Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Ok. The patch to port maven2 version of G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2 is available here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2014 It patches pom.xml's as well as java source code and the test. Thanks, 2006/5/11, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexei, Sorry but we have not looked back after the M2 conversion. Our poms have changed much since then because of transitive deps so it would take a significant effort to produce the M1 poms again. Really wish we had a tool for this. Regards, Alex Alexei Zakharov wrote: BTW, Alex, are there plans to propagate ADS jars to maven1 repo? Geronimo 1.1 currently supports maven1 only. Thanks, 2006/5/6, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alex, Oh, I've been searching in old directory and directory-network groups rather than org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core. Thank you for pointing the right group id. 2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi, I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will not work without these jars. Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation. Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine. Take a look here at the core jar for example: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/ Also MINA stuff is here: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/ HTH, Alex 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
BTW, Alex, are there plans to propagate ADS jars to maven1 repo? Geronimo 1.1 currently supports maven1 only. Thanks, 2006/5/6, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alex, Oh, I've been searching in old directory and directory-network groups rather than org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core. Thank you for pointing the right group id. 2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi, I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will not work without these jars. Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation. Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine. Take a look here at the core jar for example: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/ Also MINA stuff is here: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/ HTH, Alex 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Alexei, Sorry but we have not looked back after the M2 conversion. Our poms have changed much since then because of transitive deps so it would take a significant effort to produce the M1 poms again. Really wish we had a tool for this. Regards, Alex Alexei Zakharov wrote: BTW, Alex, are there plans to propagate ADS jars to maven1 repo? Geronimo 1.1 currently supports maven1 only. Thanks, 2006/5/6, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alex, Oh, I've been searching in old directory and directory-network groups rather than org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core. Thank you for pointing the right group id. 2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi, I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will not work without these jars. Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation. Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine. Take a look here at the core jar for example: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/ Also MINA stuff is here: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/ HTH, Alex 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Alex, Oh, I've been searching in old directory and directory-network groups rather than org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core. Thank you for pointing the right group id. 2006/5/5, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi, I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will not work without these jars. Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation. Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine. Take a look here at the core jar for example: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/ Also MINA stuff is here: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/ HTH, Alex 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Hi, I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will not work without these jars. Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation. 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi, I have created a patch to move the G directory module to ApacheDS 1.0 RC2. But I didn't find necessary 1.0 RCx jars at ibiblio neither at /maven nor at /maven2. The most recent version is 0.9.3. The same situation for MINA. So I can't post the patch right now since it will not work without these jars. Alex, I just want to let you know about this situation. Hmmm I'm seeing the RC2 jars just fine. Take a look here at the core jar for example: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/server/apacheds-core/1.0-RC2/ Also MINA stuff is here: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/directory/mina/mina-core/0.9.4/ HTH, Alex 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Hi, Just want to add that the version 0.9.2 is the reason of the org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest hang on BEA Jrockit. I've been playing with different versions of ApacheDS and Jrockit for the last couple of weeks - you may see GERONIMO-1805 and DIRSERVER-607 for details of my activity. In case big guys are currently busy with fixing other important issues I'd like to volunteer for this. I simply can continue my efforts and try to handle the porting to ApacheDS 1.0 RCx. Thanks, 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Feel free to help, it would be great. Jeff Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi, Just want to add that the version 0.9.2 is the reason of the org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest hang on BEA Jrockit. I've been playing with different versions of ApacheDS and Jrockit for the last couple of weeks - you may see GERONIMO-1805 and DIRSERVER-607 for details of my activity. In case big guys are currently busy with fixing other important issues I'd like to volunteer for this. I simply can continue my efforts and try to handle the porting to ApacheDS 1.0 RCx. Thanks, 2006/4/24, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
+1 Definitely the right direction. Aaron Mulder wrote: On 4/23/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are we including ldap in the main distro, or shipping it as a plugin? If it is the latter, we can ship it late if needed. Great point! We can even post what we've got today as the 0.92 plugin and then post a new plugin version later. (In fact the 0.92 plugin is on the plugin site already, though we'll want to rebuild it against the final 1.1 G code when that comes out.) I guess this means we need to start moving things like directory out of our main tree so they can be versioned separately. Thanks, Aaron On Apr 23, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Matt Hogstrom wrote: Depends. Since we're focusing on getting the 1.1 release out I'm not sure we'll have time. Jeff would have to comment on his availability to test, etc. Alex Karasulu wrote: You guys have time for the latest RC2 release of Directory? We could push this release for G to get a bunch of fixes and performance enhancements in there. Alex Jeff Genender wrote: Yeah, I can take a look. Jeff Aaron Mulder wrote: All, While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date (0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to). Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory- related libs and update our etc/project.properties accordingly? Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm not sure if you want to bite on this. It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory behind, but it would be nice if we could update. Thanks, Aaron
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Aaron Mulder wrote: I know 0.9.3 is there (in the /maven2 repo). Not sure about the RC's. Ya all including RC1 should be in the M2 repo if not let me know. Alex Thanks, Aaron On 4/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Can you get the jars in ibiblio and I can get the integration going? I am only seeing 0.9.2 in ibiblio at the moment. Thanks, Jeff Alex Karasulu wrote: Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Depends. Since we're focusing on getting the 1.1 release out I'm not sure we'll have time. Jeff would have to comment on his availability to test, etc. Alex Karasulu wrote: You guys have time for the latest RC2 release of Directory? We could push this release for G to get a bunch of fixes and performance enhancements in there. Alex Jeff Genender wrote: Yeah, I can take a look. Jeff Aaron Mulder wrote: All, While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date (0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to). Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory-related libs and update our etc/project.properties accordingly? Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm not sure if you want to bite on this. It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory behind, but it would be nice if we could update. Thanks, Aaron
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Matt Hogstrom wrote: Depends. Since we're focusing on getting the 1.1 release out I'm not sure we'll have time. Jeff would have to comment on his availability to test, etc. Alex Karasulu wrote: You guys have time for the latest RC2 release of Directory? We could push this release for G to get a bunch of fixes and performance enhancements in there. Alex Jeff Genender wrote: Yeah, I can take a look. Jeff Aaron Mulder wrote: All, While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date (0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to). Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory-related libs and update our etc/project.properties accordingly? Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm not sure if you want to bite on this. It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory behind, but it would be nice if we could update. Thanks, Aaron
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Jeff Genender wrote: If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the updates significant? Since 0.9.2 I'd say RC1 is a significant update. There are package name changes to comply with Directory's TLP domain name which are perhaps the most significant changes. There are changes to a couple dependencies. For the most part the code has been cleaned up and several *severe* bugs have been corrected and tested. RC1 is also an order of magnitude faster. We plan to get another 1.0 release candidate (RC2) out soon perhaps by the end of this week coming week or week there after. But looking at emails out there from Dain and Aaron it sounds to me like the update to G can take place any time after the 1.1 release. Let us know if you have any problems or need a hand while performing an upgrade either to RC1 or RC2 when it comes out. Regards, Alex
Directory Update (Jeff?)
All, While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date (0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to). Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory-related libs and update our etc/project.properties accordingly? Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm not sure if you want to bite on this. It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory behind, but it would be nice if we could update. Thanks, Aaron
Re: Directory Update (Jeff?)
Yeah, I can take a look. Jeff Aaron Mulder wrote: All, While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out of date (0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just take the latest of everything Directory-related it blows up (in particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to). Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory-related libs and update our etc/project.properties accordingly? Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm not sure if you want to bite on this. It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory behind, but it would be nice if we could update. Thanks, Aaron
