Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
+1 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Manfred Geilermanfred.gei...@gmail.com wrote: +1 thanks leonardo --Manfred On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:24, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous emails the suggested layout is this: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/1.1.x /branches/1.2.x If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with that). regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com +1 On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
+1 thanks leonardo --Manfred On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:24, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous emails the suggested layout is this: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/1.1.x /branches/1.2.x If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with that). regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com +1 On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
Hi Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous emails the suggested layout is this: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/1.1.x /branches/1.2.x If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with that). regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com +1 On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote: sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
that would be great ! Thx Leo! -Matthias On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Leonardo Uribelu4...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous emails the suggested layout is this: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/1.1.x /branches/1.2.x If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with that). regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com +1 On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
+1 On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote: sure! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
+1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
+1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
+1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary steps for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is possible to delay this change after the release. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com +1 for sure On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.comwrote: +1 sounds good to me 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become trunk ? -Matthias On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
Ah. Good point! Sent from my iPod. On 22.05.2009, at 21:10, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote: Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
[VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on the above svn layout -Matthias On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...)
from Bernd, on a different thread: Hello, I would suggest following layout 1.1.x branch/1.1.x 1.2.x branch/1.2.x 2.0.x trunk because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches are only in bugfix state. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
[MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...)
Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x -Matthias -Matthias I think core is find for now and later we can add tomahawk and orchestra etc... have in mind that git basically mirrors all revisions and you cannot checkout subprojects like in svn, so having a split is preferrable. Werner -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...)
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, ... Ok, I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ... (since we already work on 2.0.x) what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk And the following efforts are on a branch: -2.0.x -1.1.x +1
