date:20130724

2013/7/24 Rob Weir 

> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Ricardo Berlasso 
> wrote:
> > 2013/7/24 Marcus (OOo) 
> >
> >> Am 07/24/2013 12:47 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> >>
> >>  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Marcus (OOo)
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>
>  Am 07/23/2013 11:49 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> 
>   Am 07/23/2013 11:40 PM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
> >
> >>
> >> 2013/7/23 Marcus (OOo)
> >>
> >>  Am 07/23/2013 11:39 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> >>>
> >>> French -- http://www.openoffice.org/fr/
> >>>
> 
> 
>  It looks like it has its own copy of the download scripts. This
> logic
>  needs to be updated.
> 
>  Announcement header as well.
> 
> 
> >>> Fixed in the meantime.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> German -- http://www.openoffice.org/de/
> >>>
> 
> 
>  Announcement header is stuck on 3.4, and is in English
> 
> 
> >>> Simple link to the main download webpage. Nothing to do.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Italian -- http://www.openoffice.org/it/
> >>>
> 
> 
>  download logic is still pointing to 3.4.1
> 
>  There may be others as well, but I noticed these three.
> 
> 
> >>> IT:
> >>> I've fixed the errors, except the sentence "A release for language
> >>> (language) is not available." which need attention.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apac**he.org/it/index.html<
> http://apache.org/it/index.html>
> >>>  http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/it/index.html>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apac**he.org/it/download/index.html<
> http://apache.org/it/download/index.**html>
> >>>  http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/it/download/index.html>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ES:
> >>> Hm, I've checked-out a fresh copy but I cannot find any download
> >>> webpages
> >>> or directory.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It is here:
> >>
> >> http://www.openoffice.org/es/**descargar/<
> http://www.openoffice.org/es/descargar/>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ups, sorry. ;-) I'll try again.
> >
> 
> 
>  OK, now the webpage should work again. I've tried to transfer the
>  translated
>  strings but please check yourself if it's also OK.
> 
> 
> >>> You da man, Marcus!  Thanks!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot! :-)
> >>
> >> Today ast, de, es, fr, it, ja were updated.
> >>
> >> Please don't forget to do a last publish when the reviews and last fixes
> >> were done.
> >>
> >> More languages if needed tomorrow.
> >>
> >> So, good night for today.
> >
> >
> >
> > Good night for today!
> >
> > For tomorrow, I have a quick question :)
> >
> > The ES site still shows the old logo. I don't know how to find the
> template
> > or even how to fix it. Tomorrow I'll review the links under "información
> > adicional", several seems outdated.
> >
>
> This is the file that needs to be updated:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/es/brand.mdtext
>
>
Thanks! Checked in. I revised that file on CMS but it seemed empty: I was
fooled by the fact that there is no scroll bar on that page, so I did not
see the relevant parts. I needed to zoom out the page to gain access to the
lower part!

Regards
Ricardo



> It generates the recurring parts of the branding, including the logo
> and the announcement string and link, and a few other similar items.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>
> > Regards
> > Ricardo
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Marcus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> --**--**-
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<
> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Blog, forums and extension sites down

Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the blog in
red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:

General Error
SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]

Too many connections [1040]

An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
administrator if this problem persists.


The extension site gives

Error
The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
Error message
PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded the
'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
/home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).


Regards
Ricardo

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

http://www.datamation.com/applications/apache-releases-open-source-openoffice-4.html

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ricardo Berlasso  wrote:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQxODQ
>
>
> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>
>> http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-is-here/
>>
>> http://www.zdnet.com/openoffice-4-0-arrives-718456/
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >
>> http://office.about.com/b/2013/07/23/the-new-openoffice-available-today-new-side-bar-and-more.htm
>> >
>> >
>> http://amanz.my/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-dilancarkan-untuk-pengguna-windows-mac-dan-linux/
>> >
>> >
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/23/1643204/apache-openoffice-40-released-with-major-new-features
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >> This is a nice one:
>> >> http://betanews.com/2013/07/23/apache-releases-openoffice-4/
>> >>
>> >> -Rob
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >>>
>> http://www.chip.de/news/OpenOffice-4.0-Gross-Update-mit-neuen-Funktionen_63245985.html
>> >>>
>> >>> (They have a nice gallery of screen shots as well:
>> >>>
>> http://www.chip.de/bildergalerie/Alle-Neuheiten-von-Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-Galerie_63246075.html
>> )
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>  http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
>>  they got paid by the word?)
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.dobreprogramy.pl/Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-z-nowym-interfejsem,Aktualnosc,42866.html
>> 
>>  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> > So far, so good.
>> >
>> > http://tweakers.net/meuktracker/31036/apache-openoffice-400.html
>> >
>> >
>> www.ghacks.net/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-released-find-out-what-is-new
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Ricardo Berlasso <
>> rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>> >>
>> >>> http://www.itmagazine.ch/Artikel/53584/Openoffice_4.0_ist_da.html
>> >>>
>> >>> http://denis-sylvain.be/2013/07/apache-openoffice-4-0-est-sorti/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://blog.open-office.es/index.php/inicio/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-0-ya-disponible-para-su-descarga
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20046/apache-openoffice-40-erschienen.html
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://tic-et-net.org/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-fr-est-enfin-disponible-en-version-dfinitive/
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://www.lbenitez.com/2013/07/openoffice-40-is-available-now-go-and.html
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://www.golem.de/news/apache-openoffice-4-0-erscheint-mit-symphony-funktionen-1307-100567.html
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>>  Respond in this thread to share news articles, etc., related
>> to 4.0
>> >>> release.
>> >>> 
>> >>>  So far I've seen, in the first 30 minutes:
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/23/561727/10041350/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Announces-Apache-tm-OpenOffice-tm-4-0.html
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2045000/apache-openoffice-now-comes-with-a-handy-sidebar.html
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apache-OpenOffice-4-0-Becomes-a-Serious-Player-with-Major-Overhaul-and-New-Features-370284.shtml
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/meldung/OpenOffice-4-0-mit-neuer-Seitenleiste-1921880.html
>> >>> 
>> >>>  https://www.facebook.com/ApacheOO/posts/559747687417446
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> http://sourceforge.net/blog/apache-openoffice-extensions-new-site/
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/a_short_celebration_and_then
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Not sure if it counts, but from my own hand
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://elpinguinotolkiano.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/disponible-apache-openofficetm-4-0/
>> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115087708337528473904/posts/7vaRzTgYBRG
>> >> http://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=8749
>> >> http://www.forosuse.org/forosuse/showthread.php?t=30195
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Ricardo
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> -
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>> --

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

2013-07-24 Thread Anton Meixome

Something goes wrong on official blog

https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_announces47

Returns:


«Bad Gateway

The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.


Apache/2.0.63 Server at blogs.apache.org Port 443»



2013/7/24 Rob Weir :
> http://www.datamation.com/applications/apache-releases-open-source-openoffice-4.html
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ricardo Berlasso  wrote:
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQxODQ
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>>
>>> http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-is-here/
>>>
>>> http://www.zdnet.com/openoffice-4-0-arrives-718456/
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> >
>>> http://office.about.com/b/2013/07/23/the-new-openoffice-available-today-new-side-bar-and-more.htm
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://amanz.my/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-dilancarkan-untuk-pengguna-windows-mac-dan-linux/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/23/1643204/apache-openoffice-40-released-with-major-new-features
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> >> This is a nice one:
>>> >> http://betanews.com/2013/07/23/apache-releases-openoffice-4/
>>> >>
>>> >> -Rob
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.chip.de/news/OpenOffice-4.0-Gross-Update-mit-neuen-Funktionen_63245985.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> (They have a nice gallery of screen shots as well:
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.chip.de/bildergalerie/Alle-Neuheiten-von-Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-Galerie_63246075.html
>>> )
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>>  http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
>>>  they got paid by the word?)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://www.dobreprogramy.pl/Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-z-nowym-interfejsem,Aktualnosc,42866.html
>>> 
>>>  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> > So far, so good.
>>> >
>>> > http://tweakers.net/meuktracker/31036/apache-openoffice-400.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> www.ghacks.net/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-released-find-out-what-is-new
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Ricardo Berlasso <
>>> rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>>> >>
>>> >>> http://www.itmagazine.ch/Artikel/53584/Openoffice_4.0_ist_da.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://denis-sylvain.be/2013/07/apache-openoffice-4-0-est-sorti/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> http://blog.open-office.es/index.php/inicio/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-0-ya-disponible-para-su-descarga
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20046/apache-openoffice-40-erschienen.html
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> http://tic-et-net.org/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-fr-est-enfin-disponible-en-version-dfinitive/
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.lbenitez.com/2013/07/openoffice-40-is-available-now-go-and.html
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.golem.de/news/apache-openoffice-4-0-erscheint-mit-symphony-funktionen-1307-100567.html
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>  Respond in this thread to share news articles, etc., related
>>> to 4.0
>>> >>> release.
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>  So far I've seen, in the first 30 minutes:
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/23/561727/10041350/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Announces-Apache-tm-OpenOffice-tm-4-0.html
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2045000/apache-openoffice-now-comes-with-a-handy-sidebar.html
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apache-OpenOffice-4-0-Becomes-a-Serious-Player-with-Major-Overhaul-and-New-Features-370284.shtml
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/meldung/OpenOffice-4-0-mit-neuer-Seitenleiste-1921880.html
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>  https://www.facebook.com/ApacheOO/posts/559747687417446
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> http://sourceforge.net/blog/apache-openoffice-extensions-new-site/
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/a_short_celebration_and_then
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Not sure if it counts, but from my own hand
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://elpinguinotolkiano.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/disponible-apache-openofficetm-4-0/
>>> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115087708337528473904/posts/7vaRzTgYBRG
>>> >> http://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=8

Portable version (X-ApacheOpenOffice by winPenPack) updated

2013-07-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti

The winPenPack volunteers already updated their portable version, 
X-ApacheOpenOffice, to version 4:

http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1341

The link is the same as the one they were using for version 3.4.1, so no 
updates are needed on the website pages.


A big "thank you" to the winPenPack guys for being so fast...

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[Website]

2013-07-24 Thread Bob Hayward

The templates and extensions sections of your site are not working.

Thanks and keep up the great work!
Bob

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

Important Japanese website:

http://www.forest.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20130724_608941.html

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> http://www.datamation.com/applications/apache-releases-open-source-openoffice-4.html
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ricardo Berlasso  wrote:
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQxODQ
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>>
>>> http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-is-here/
>>>
>>> http://www.zdnet.com/openoffice-4-0-arrives-718456/
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> >
>>> http://office.about.com/b/2013/07/23/the-new-openoffice-available-today-new-side-bar-and-more.htm
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://amanz.my/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-dilancarkan-untuk-pengguna-windows-mac-dan-linux/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/23/1643204/apache-openoffice-40-released-with-major-new-features
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> >> This is a nice one:
>>> >> http://betanews.com/2013/07/23/apache-releases-openoffice-4/
>>> >>
>>> >> -Rob
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.chip.de/news/OpenOffice-4.0-Gross-Update-mit-neuen-Funktionen_63245985.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> (They have a nice gallery of screen shots as well:
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.chip.de/bildergalerie/Alle-Neuheiten-von-Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-Galerie_63246075.html
>>> )
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>>  http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
>>>  they got paid by the word?)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://www.dobreprogramy.pl/Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-z-nowym-interfejsem,Aktualnosc,42866.html
>>> 
>>>  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> > So far, so good.
>>> >
>>> > http://tweakers.net/meuktracker/31036/apache-openoffice-400.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> www.ghacks.net/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-released-find-out-what-is-new
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Ricardo Berlasso <
>>> rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>>> >>
>>> >>> http://www.itmagazine.ch/Artikel/53584/Openoffice_4.0_ist_da.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://denis-sylvain.be/2013/07/apache-openoffice-4-0-est-sorti/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> http://blog.open-office.es/index.php/inicio/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-0-ya-disponible-para-su-descarga
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20046/apache-openoffice-40-erschienen.html
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> http://tic-et-net.org/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-fr-est-enfin-disponible-en-version-dfinitive/
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.lbenitez.com/2013/07/openoffice-40-is-available-now-go-and.html
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.golem.de/news/apache-openoffice-4-0-erscheint-mit-symphony-funktionen-1307-100567.html
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Rob Weir 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>  Respond in this thread to share news articles, etc., related
>>> to 4.0
>>> >>> release.
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>  So far I've seen, in the first 30 minutes:
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/23/561727/10041350/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Announces-Apache-tm-OpenOffice-tm-4-0.html
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2045000/apache-openoffice-now-comes-with-a-handy-sidebar.html
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apache-OpenOffice-4-0-Becomes-a-Serious-Player-with-Major-Overhaul-and-New-Features-370284.shtml
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>
>>> http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/meldung/OpenOffice-4-0-mit-neuer-Seitenleiste-1921880.html
>>> >>> 
>>> >>>  https://www.facebook.com/ApacheOO/posts/559747687417446
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> http://sourceforge.net/blog/apache-openoffice-extensions-new-site/
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> 
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/a_short_celebration_and_then
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Not sure if it counts, but from my own hand
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://elpinguinotolkiano.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/disponible-apache-openofficetm-4-0/
>>> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115087708337528473904/posts/7vaRzTgYBRG
>>> >> http://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=8749
>>> >> http://www.forosuse.org/forosuse/showthread.php?t=30195
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Ricardo
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

2013-07-24 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come to try 
> to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects OpenOffice in the 
> distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear choice, not a 
> default substitution.

The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.

Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin

Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
Arch, Slackware and other distros.


Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

2013-07-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado

I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
OSX.

This would be helpful to the community I think.


On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
>> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come to
>> try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects OpenOffice
>> in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
>> choice, not a default substitution.
>
> The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
>
> Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
>
> Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> Arch, Slackware and other distros.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

2013/7/24 Alexandro Colorado 

> I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
> installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
> OSX.
>
> This would be helpful to the community I think.
>

Blog posts are forgotten in a matter of days, so unless there are clear
links elsewhere pointing to it a blog post will not help. But there is no
need for a blog post either: there is an official installation guide linked
directly from the download page, and on the forums there are several
install guides.

Perhaps we can think about ways to make the information more visible, but
it is already there.

Regards
Ricardo



>
>
> On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> > Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> >> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come to
> >> try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> OpenOffice
> >> in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> >> choice, not a default substitution.
> >
> > The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> > package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
> >
> > Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
> >
> > Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> > Arch, Slackware and other distros.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> http://www.openoffice.org
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

http://www.muylinux.com/2013/07/24/apache-openoffice-4/

(Interesting choice of a logo, one of the other nice ones from the contest)

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> Important Japanese website:
>
> http://www.forest.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20130724_608941.html
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> http://www.datamation.com/applications/apache-releases-open-source-openoffice-4.html
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ricardo Berlasso  wrote:
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQxODQ
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>>>
 http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-is-here/

 http://www.zdnet.com/openoffice-4-0-arrives-718456/

 On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
 >
 http://office.about.com/b/2013/07/23/the-new-openoffice-available-today-new-side-bar-and-more.htm
 >
 >
 http://amanz.my/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-dilancarkan-untuk-pengguna-windows-mac-dan-linux/
 >
 >
 http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/23/1643204/apache-openoffice-40-released-with-major-new-features
 >
 > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
 >> This is a nice one:
 >> http://betanews.com/2013/07/23/apache-releases-openoffice-4/
 >>
 >> -Rob
 >>
 >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
 >>>
 http://www.chip.de/news/OpenOffice-4.0-Gross-Update-mit-neuen-Funktionen_63245985.html
 >>>
 >>> (They have a nice gallery of screen shots as well:
 >>>
 http://www.chip.de/bildergalerie/Alle-Neuheiten-von-Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-Galerie_63246075.html
 )
 >>>
 >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
  http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
  they got paid by the word?)
 
 
 http://www.dobreprogramy.pl/Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-z-nowym-interfejsem,Aktualnosc,42866.html
 
  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir 
 wrote:
 > So far, so good.
 >
 > http://tweakers.net/meuktracker/31036/apache-openoffice-400.html
 >
 >
 www.ghacks.net/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-released-find-out-what-is-new
 >
 > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Ricardo Berlasso <
 rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
 >> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
 >>
 >>> http://www.itmagazine.ch/Artikel/53584/Openoffice_4.0_ist_da.html
 >>>
 >>> http://denis-sylvain.be/2013/07/apache-openoffice-4-0-est-sorti/
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rob Weir 
 wrote:
 >>> >
 >>>
 http://blog.open-office.es/index.php/inicio/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-0-ya-disponible-para-su-descarga
 >>> >
 >>> >
 >>>
 http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20046/apache-openoffice-40-erschienen.html
 >>> >
 >>> >
 >>>
 http://tic-et-net.org/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-fr-est-enfin-disponible-en-version-dfinitive/
 >>> >
 >>> >
 >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir 
 wrote:
 >>> >>
 >>>
 http://www.lbenitez.com/2013/07/openoffice-40-is-available-now-go-and.html
 >>> >>
 >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rob Weir 
 wrote:
 >>> >>>
 >>>
 http://www.golem.de/news/apache-openoffice-4-0-erscheint-mit-symphony-funktionen-1307-100567.html
 >>> >>>
 >>> >>>
 >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Rob Weir 
 wrote:
 >>>  Respond in this thread to share news articles, etc., related
 to 4.0
 >>> release.
 >>> 
 >>>  So far I've seen, in the first 30 minutes:
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>
 http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/23/561727/10041350/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Announces-Apache-tm-OpenOffice-tm-4-0.html
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>
 http://www.pcworld.com/article/2045000/apache-openoffice-now-comes-with-a-handy-sidebar.html
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>
 http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apache-OpenOffice-4-0-Becomes-a-Serious-Player-with-Major-Overhaul-and-New-Features-370284.shtml
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>>
 http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/meldung/OpenOffice-4-0-mit-neuer-Seitenleiste-1921880.html
 >>> 
 >>>  https://www.facebook.com/ApacheOO/posts/559747687417446
 >>> 
 >>> 
 http://sourceforge.net/blog/apache-openoffice-extensions-new-site/
 >>> 
 >>> 
 https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/a_short_celebration_and_then
 >>>
 >>
 >> Not sure if it counts, but from my own hand
 >>
 >>
 http://elpinguinotolkiano.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/disponible-apache-openofficetm-4-0/
 >> https

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013-07-24 Thread Roberto Galoppini

2013/7/24 Ricardo Berlasso 

> Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the blog
> in
> red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:
>
> General Error
> SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
>
> Too many connections [1040]
>
> An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
> administrator if this problem persists.
>
>
> The extension site gives
>
> Error
> The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
> Error message
> PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded the
> 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
> lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
> /home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).
>

Our MySQL server was unable to serve additional requests, and we restarted
the server and cleaned the cache table. While our caching system is
rebuilding it might be slow.

We are now investigating the root cause, that seems to be related to an
application issue. We'll keep monitoring the system while working on fixing
such issue.

Roberto



>
>
> Regards
> Ricardo
>

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013/7/24 Roberto Galoppini 

> 2013/7/24 Ricardo Berlasso 
>
> > Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the blog
> > in
> > red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:
> >
> > General Error
> > SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
> >
> > Too many connections [1040]
> >
> > An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
> > administrator if this problem persists.
> >
> >
> > The extension site gives
> >
> > Error
> > The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
> > Error message
> > PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded the
> > 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
> > lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
> > /home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).
> >
>
> Our MySQL server was unable to serve additional requests, and we restarted
> the server and cleaned the cache table. While our caching system is
> rebuilding it might be slow.
>
> We are now investigating the root cause, that seems to be related to an
> application issue. We'll keep monitoring the system while working on fixing
> such issue.
>
> Roberto
>

Thanks, Roberto!

Blog seems to work now, but the forum is unstable. Sometimes it is possible
to connect, but one second later fails again. The status page I linked
above continuously change between red and green for ooo-forums.apache.org,
but the truth is that forums are not usable.

Regards
Ricardo


>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Ricardo
> >
>

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013-07-24 Thread janI

On 24 July 2013 16:40, Ricardo Berlasso  wrote:

> 2013/7/24 Roberto Galoppini 
>
> > 2013/7/24 Ricardo Berlasso 
> >
> > > Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the
> blog
> > > in
> > > red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:
> > >
> > > General Error
> > > SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
> > >
> > > Too many connections [1040]
> > >
> > > An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
> > > administrator if this problem persists.
> > >
> > >
> > > The extension site gives
> > >
> > > Error
> > > The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
> > > Error message
> > > PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded
> the
> > > 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
> > > lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
> > > /home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).
> > >
> >
> > Our MySQL server was unable to serve additional requests, and we
> restarted
> > the server and cleaned the cache table. While our caching system is
> > rebuilding it might be slow.
> >
> > We are now investigating the root cause, that seems to be related to an
> > application issue. We'll keep monitoring the system while working on
> fixing
> > such issue.
> >
> > Roberto
> >
>
> Thanks, Roberto!
>
> Blog seems to work now, but the forum is unstable. Sometimes it is possible
> to connect, but one second later fails again. The status page I linked
> above continuously change between red and green for ooo-forums.apache.org,
> but the truth is that forums are not usable.
>

In general it is a mysql overload problem, this problem then have a number
of sideeffects.

I hope our forum admin, will have a look at in some hours.

rgds
jan I.


>
> Regards
> Ricardo
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ricardo
> > >
> >
>

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-overhauls-user-interface-boosts-microsoft-compatibility/

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> http://www.muylinux.com/2013/07/24/apache-openoffice-4/
>
> (Interesting choice of a logo, one of the other nice ones from the contest)
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> Important Japanese website:
>>
>> http://www.forest.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20130724_608941.html
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> http://www.datamation.com/applications/apache-releases-open-source-openoffice-4.html
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ricardo Berlasso  
>>> wrote:
 http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQxODQ


 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 

> http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-is-here/
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/openoffice-4-0-arrives-718456/
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> >
> http://office.about.com/b/2013/07/23/the-new-openoffice-available-today-new-side-bar-and-more.htm
> >
> >
> http://amanz.my/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-dilancarkan-untuk-pengguna-windows-mac-dan-linux/
> >
> >
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/23/1643204/apache-openoffice-40-released-with-major-new-features
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> >> This is a nice one:
> >> http://betanews.com/2013/07/23/apache-releases-openoffice-4/
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> >>>
> http://www.chip.de/news/OpenOffice-4.0-Gross-Update-mit-neuen-Funktionen_63245985.html
> >>>
> >>> (They have a nice gallery of screen shots as well:
> >>>
> http://www.chip.de/bildergalerie/Alle-Neuheiten-von-Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-Galerie_63246075.html
> )
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>  http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
>  they got paid by the word?)
> 
> 
> http://www.dobreprogramy.pl/Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-z-nowym-interfejsem,Aktualnosc,42866.html
> 
>  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir 
> wrote:
> > So far, so good.
> >
> > http://tweakers.net/meuktracker/31036/apache-openoffice-400.html
> >
> >
> www.ghacks.net/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-released-find-out-what-is-new
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Ricardo Berlasso <
> rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
> >>
> >>> http://www.itmagazine.ch/Artikel/53584/Openoffice_4.0_ist_da.html
> >>>
> >>> http://denis-sylvain.be/2013/07/apache-openoffice-4-0-est-sorti/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rob Weir 
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://blog.open-office.es/index.php/inicio/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-0-ya-disponible-para-su-descarga
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20046/apache-openoffice-40-erschienen.html
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://tic-et-net.org/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-fr-est-enfin-disponible-en-version-dfinitive/
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir 
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://www.lbenitez.com/2013/07/openoffice-40-is-available-now-go-and.html
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rob Weir 
> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.golem.de/news/apache-openoffice-4-0-erscheint-mit-symphony-funktionen-1307-100567.html
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Rob Weir 
> wrote:
> >>>  Respond in this thread to share news articles, etc., related
> to 4.0
> >>> release.
> >>> 
> >>>  So far I've seen, in the first 30 minutes:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/23/561727/10041350/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Announces-Apache-tm-OpenOffice-tm-4-0.html
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2045000/apache-openoffice-now-comes-with-a-handy-sidebar.html
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apache-OpenOffice-4-0-Becomes-a-Serious-Player-with-Major-Overhaul-and-New-Features-370284.shtml
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/meldung/OpenOffice-4-0-mit-neuer-Seitenleiste-1921880.html
> >>> 
> >>>  https://www.facebook.com/ApacheOO/posts/559747687417446
> >>> 
> >>> 
> http://sourceforge.net/blog/apache-openoffice-extensions-new-site/
>

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

2013-07-24 Thread Jonathan Corbet

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:19:07 +0200
"Marcus (OOo)"  wrote:

> Am 07/23/2013 05:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
> > they got paid by the word?)  
> 
> And the first comment is about the trademark? Ridiculous.

So, given all the whining, should I take it you'd prefer that LWN ignore
your releases in the future?

jon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jonathan Corbet  wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:19:07 +0200
> "Marcus (OOo)"  wrote:
>
>> Am 07/23/2013 05:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> > http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
>> > they got paid by the word?)
>>
>> And the first comment is about the trademark? Ridiculous.
>
> So, given all the whining, should I take it you'd prefer that LWN ignore
> your releases in the future?
>

All the whining?  Marcus made a single remark about a comment, not the
article itself.  The whining only seems excessive because it was
longer than the article itself ;-)

-Rob


> jon
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013-07-24 Thread Rory O'Farrell

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:33:13 +0200
Roberto Galoppini  wrote:

> 2013/7/24 Ricardo Berlasso 
> 
> > Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the blog
> > in
> > red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:
> >
> > General Error
> > SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
> >
> > Too many connections [1040]
> >
> > An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
> > administrator if this problem persists.
> >
> >
> > The extension site gives
> >
> > Error
> > The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
> > Error message
> > PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded the
> > 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
> > lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
> > /home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).
> >
> 
> Our MySQL server was unable to serve additional requests, and we restarted
> the server and cleaned the cache table. While our caching system is
> rebuilding it might be slow.
> 
> We are now investigating the root cause, that seems to be related to an
> application issue. We'll keep monitoring the system while working on fixing
> such issue.
> 
> Roberto
> 

It would be of interest (but irrelevant to the immediate problem) to know if 
the server failure was due to a peak or overload possibly arising from the 
AOO4.0 release.

-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:

> I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
> installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
> OSX.
>
> This would be helpful to the community I think.
>

The Install Guide covers installation on Linux -- but not from a distro
specific perspective. These instructions work very well for some distros
and not well for others.  I can't elaborate much more on that statement.

http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html

When we released 3.4., we found some additional installation instructions
which are included in the wiki version of the Linux install page (which now
also needs some slight updating):

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation/How_do_I_install_OpenOffice.org_on_Linux%3F#Where_can_I_find_more_information_on_installing_OpenOffice_on_Linux.3F

I would suggest if you find tutorials, or create tutorials yourself, for
any Linux distros, that you put links to them on the above wiki page.


>
> On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> > Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> >> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come to
> >> try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> OpenOffice
> >> in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> >> choice, not a default substitution.
> >
> > The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> > package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
> >
> > Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
> >
> > Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> > Arch, Slackware and other distros.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> http://www.openoffice.org
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-
MzK

Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
 -- Jon Bon Jovi

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013-07-24 Thread Roberto Galoppini

2013/7/24 Rory O'Farrell 

> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:33:13 +0200
> Roberto Galoppini  wrote:
>
> > 2013/7/24 Ricardo Berlasso 
> >
> > > Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the
> blog
> > > in
> > > red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:
> > >
> > > General Error
> > > SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
> > >
> > > Too many connections [1040]
> > >
> > > An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
> > > administrator if this problem persists.
> > >
> > >
> > > The extension site gives
> > >
> > > Error
> > > The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
> > > Error message
> > > PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded
> the
> > > 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
> > > lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
> > > /home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).
> > >
> >
> > Our MySQL server was unable to serve additional requests, and we
> restarted
> > the server and cleaned the cache table. While our caching system is
> > rebuilding it might be slow.
> >
> > We are now investigating the root cause, that seems to be related to an
> > application issue. We'll keep monitoring the system while working on
> fixing
> > such issue.
> >
> > Roberto
> >
>
> It would be of interest (but irrelevant to the immediate problem) to know
> if the server failure was due to a peak or overload possibly arising from
> the AOO4.0 release.
>

We found and fixed the problem that was causing AOOE and then AOOT to stop
working. Actually the extra traffic makes it happen faster, but it wasn't
the root cause.

Roberto



>
> --
> Rory O'Farrell 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

[DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread janI

Hi.

I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.

I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
could avoided with a simple measure.

I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest that
these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
product wide.

thoughts ?

rgds
jan I.

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI  wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
> wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.
>
> I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
> cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
> could avoided with a simple measure.
>

It might be useful to think of this in terms of Review-Then-Commit
(RTC) versus Commit-Then-Review (CTR) rules.  Once we clarify these
and when they apply, then we can discuss whether additional
technological means are needed to enforce this.

For the wiki the general rules is CTR for all users with an account.
No additional karma is needed.

The for resources in Subversion the general rule is CTR for all
commiters.  Additionally, the public can submit patches, to the list,
attached to BZ issues, or using the CMS anonymous submission tool.
This then is effectively RTC since a committer must first reviews the
patch.

Those are the default postures, but there are exceptions.  For
example, as we approach a Release Candidate we switch into RTC for the
trunk code.  We only make changes after a bug has been proposed and
approved as a "release blocker" on the dev list.

So we could simply adopt a RTC for certain resources at certain times.
 For example, Release Notes once a release occurs, are RTC.  The
project logos, once approved and published, are RTC.   If we agree to
such things there are lightweight ways of reminding ourselves.  For
example, we could have a README file in directories that are RTC that
explain this.  That should be enough for conscientious,
well-intentioned volunteers,

> I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest that
> these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
> restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
> anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
> product wide.
>

Personally I think this is a RTC versus CTR question.  This
distinction is a tool that we don't invoke as often as we could.
Maybe that would be sufficient, at least in SVN.

Also, I think even a PMC member should be following CTR rules when it
is in effect.  I don't think of a PMC member as a higher class of
committer in terms of what they have access to.

Regards,

-Rob

> thoughts ?
>
> rgds
> jan I.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/apache-bolts-sidebar-onto-new-openoffice-1168196

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-overhauls-user-interface-boosts-microsoft-compatibility/
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> http://www.muylinux.com/2013/07/24/apache-openoffice-4/
>>
>> (Interesting choice of a logo, one of the other nice ones from the contest)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> Important Japanese website:
>>>
>>> http://www.forest.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20130724_608941.html
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
 http://www.datamation.com/applications/apache-releases-open-source-openoffice-4.html

 On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ricardo Berlasso  
 wrote:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQxODQ
>
>
> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>
>> http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-is-here/
>>
>> http://www.zdnet.com/openoffice-4-0-arrives-718456/
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >
>> http://office.about.com/b/2013/07/23/the-new-openoffice-available-today-new-side-bar-and-more.htm
>> >
>> >
>> http://amanz.my/2013/07/openoffice-4-0-dilancarkan-untuk-pengguna-windows-mac-dan-linux/
>> >
>> >
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/23/1643204/apache-openoffice-40-released-with-major-new-features
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >> This is a nice one:
>> >> http://betanews.com/2013/07/23/apache-releases-openoffice-4/
>> >>
>> >> -Rob
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>> >>>
>> http://www.chip.de/news/OpenOffice-4.0-Gross-Update-mit-neuen-Funktionen_63245985.html
>> >>>
>> >>> (They have a nice gallery of screen shots as well:
>> >>>
>> http://www.chip.de/bildergalerie/Alle-Neuheiten-von-Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-Galerie_63246075.html
>> )
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Rob Weir  
>> >>> wrote:
>>  http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
>>  they got paid by the word?)
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.dobreprogramy.pl/Apache-OpenOffice-4.0-z-nowym-interfejsem,Aktualnosc,42866.html
>> 
>>  On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> > So far, so good.
>> >
>> > http://tweakers.net/meuktracker/31036/apache-openoffice-400.html
>> >
>> >
>> www.ghacks.net/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-released-find-out-what-is-new
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Ricardo Berlasso <
>> rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 2013/7/23 Rob Weir 
>> >>
>> >>> http://www.itmagazine.ch/Artikel/53584/Openoffice_4.0_ist_da.html
>> >>>
>> >>> http://denis-sylvain.be/2013/07/apache-openoffice-4-0-est-sorti/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://blog.open-office.es/index.php/inicio/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-0-ya-disponible-para-su-descarga
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/20046/apache-openoffice-40-erschienen.html
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://tic-et-net.org/2013/07/23/apache-openoffice-4-fr-est-enfin-disponible-en-version-dfinitive/
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://www.lbenitez.com/2013/07/openoffice-40-is-available-now-go-and.html
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rob Weir 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://www.golem.de/news/apache-openoffice-4-0-erscheint-mit-symphony-funktionen-1307-100567.html
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Rob Weir 
>> >>> >>> 
>> wrote:
>> >>>  Respond in this thread to share news articles, etc., related
>> to 4.0
>> >>> release.
>> >>> 
>> >>>  So far I've seen, in the first 30 minutes:
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/07/23/561727/10041350/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Announces-Apache-tm-OpenOffice-tm-4-0.html
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2045000/apache-openoffice-now-comes-with-a-handy-sidebar.html
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Apache-OpenOffice-4-0-Becomes-a-Serious-Player-with-Major-Overhaul-and-New-Features-370284.shtml
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread janI

On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir  wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI  wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
> > wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.
> >
> > I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
> > cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
> > could avoided with a simple measure.
> >
>
> It might be useful to think of this in terms of Review-Then-Commit
> (RTC) versus Commit-Then-Review (CTR) rules.  Once we clarify these
> and when they apply, then we can discuss whether additional
> technological means are needed to enforce this.
>
> For the wiki the general rules is CTR for all users with an account.
> No additional karma is needed.
>
> The for resources in Subversion the general rule is CTR for all
> commiters.  Additionally, the public can submit patches, to the list,
> attached to BZ issues, or using the CMS anonymous submission tool.
> This then is effectively RTC since a committer must first reviews the
> patch.
>
> Those are the default postures, but there are exceptions.  For
> example, as we approach a Release Candidate we switch into RTC for the
> trunk code.  We only make changes after a bug has been proposed and
> approved as a "release blocker" on the dev list.
>
> So we could simply adopt a RTC for certain resources at certain times.
>  For example, Release Notes once a release occurs, are RTC.  The
> project logos, once approved and published, are RTC.   If we agree to
> such things there are lightweight ways of reminding ourselves.  For
> example, we could have a README file in directories that are RTC that
> explain this.  That should be enough for conscientious,
> well-intentioned volunteers,
>
>
> > I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest
> that
> > these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
> > restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
> > anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
> > product wide.
> >
>
> Personally I think this is a RTC versus CTR question.  This
> distinction is a tool that we don't invoke as often as we could.
> Maybe that would be sufficient, at least in SVN.
>
> Also, I think even a PMC member should be following CTR rules when it
> is in effect.  I don't think of a PMC member as a higher class of
> committer in terms of what they have access to.
>

I think you misunderstood me.  I agree with the RTC/CTR discussion, but
that does not prevent the accidential commit, I think it has happened to
most of us, that we commit our changes, and we overlook that another file
is also committed.

rgds
jan I.


>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>
> > thoughts ?
> >
> > rgds
> > jan I.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI  wrote:
> On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI  wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
>> > wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.
>> >
>> > I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
>> > cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
>> > could avoided with a simple measure.
>> >
>>
>> It might be useful to think of this in terms of Review-Then-Commit
>> (RTC) versus Commit-Then-Review (CTR) rules.  Once we clarify these
>> and when they apply, then we can discuss whether additional
>> technological means are needed to enforce this.
>>
>> For the wiki the general rules is CTR for all users with an account.
>> No additional karma is needed.
>>
>> The for resources in Subversion the general rule is CTR for all
>> commiters.  Additionally, the public can submit patches, to the list,
>> attached to BZ issues, or using the CMS anonymous submission tool.
>> This then is effectively RTC since a committer must first reviews the
>> patch.
>>
>> Those are the default postures, but there are exceptions.  For
>> example, as we approach a Release Candidate we switch into RTC for the
>> trunk code.  We only make changes after a bug has been proposed and
>> approved as a "release blocker" on the dev list.
>>
>> So we could simply adopt a RTC for certain resources at certain times.
>>  For example, Release Notes once a release occurs, are RTC.  The
>> project logos, once approved and published, are RTC.   If we agree to
>> such things there are lightweight ways of reminding ourselves.  For
>> example, we could have a README file in directories that are RTC that
>> explain this.  That should be enough for conscientious,
>> well-intentioned volunteers,
>>
>>
>> > I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest
>> that
>> > these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
>> > restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
>> > anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
>> > product wide.
>> >
>>
>> Personally I think this is a RTC versus CTR question.  This
>> distinction is a tool that we don't invoke as often as we could.
>> Maybe that would be sufficient, at least in SVN.
>>
>> Also, I think even a PMC member should be following CTR rules when it
>> is in effect.  I don't think of a PMC member as a higher class of
>> committer in terms of what they have access to.
>>
>
> I think you misunderstood me.  I agree with the RTC/CTR discussion, but
> that does not prevent the accidential commit, I think it has happened to
> most of us, that we commit our changes, and we overlook that another file
> is also committed.
>

I disagree that we have a a problem with accidental overwrites in SVN
in cases where it is clear that RTC is in effect.  I think the problem
is that it is not clear when CTR is in effect.

Also, I don't see how your solution helps with truly accidental
commits.  Surely PMC members make errors as well?

-Rob


> rgds
> jan I.
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>> > thoughts ?
>> >
>> > rgds
>> > jan I.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: release media files

2013-07-24 Thread Drew Jensen

Thanks for the comments.

I'm sorry I was so tardy in offering it, I didn't really expect y'all would
be able to make use of it with such a suddenness.

(first time I played with macro settings on the video camera, so that was
fun).

I've got a good bit of raw stuff together for the followup piece, but my
time on the net is done for this week (almost) - I'll send that along next
time.

//drew


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Drew Jensen  >wrote:
>
> > The SVG files for the logo certainly make a trick ;_)
> >
> > You'll see I've made a few other changes and I kind of like where this is
> > at.
> >
> > One item to note, I did, even with the admonition attached to the logo
> > images, stick with the AOO_w_4 logo in the opening frames. That just
> makes
> > sense to me specific to the purpose here - I did however switch to the
> > numberless logo for the closing frames.
> >
> > OK - so, I pulled down the file from the other day and put up the results
> > of the changes here:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bx7ZNEXlmR0ITkdtcnQwOEp3cm8/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> >
> > Second note - the license CC-BY-NC-SA - that's just because of the
> little 7
> > second blurb of music, I must use the NC license for that, if that is a
> > problem with anyone I don't mind avoiding that.
> >
> > Otherwise, I'll follow up with mail about a second video (with features
> > highlights) in a separate mail thread.
> >
> > As I said earlier, I'm not connected to the internet regularly, so I've
> not
> > (and wouldn't able to again before Wed.) posted to any media sites, if
> this
> > looks acceptable and you folks can make use of it, in any way, please do.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > //drew
> >
>
> nice! I really like the way you did the fade-in...
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Dave Fisher 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Drew,
> > >
> > > This looks really great, but as a note I had to run the mp4 through a
> > > convertor program to play it on my MacOSX 10.6.8.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > On Jul 20, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for links - I grabbed all the files.
> > > >
> > > > So - I'll give another throw and post what happens tomorrow..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Andrea Pescetti <
> pesce...@apache.org
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Drew Jensen wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I took the liberty of spinning up a very brief such item, which you
> > can
> > > >>> find here:
> > > >>> https://docs.google.com/file/**d/**0Bx7ZNEXlmR0IUTY1YzFhR1VLQU0/**
> > > >>> edit?usp=sharing<
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bx7ZNEXlmR0IUTY1YzFhR1VLQU0/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >
> > > >>> [unzip the a4.mp4 video file from the uploaded zip container]
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Nice! (and welcome back Drew, by the way). The new logo colors
> appear
> > a
> > > >> bit too bright at the end, but see below for vector sources, that
> may
> > > help
> > > >> with this.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> was not able to quickly find a vector graphic of what I take if the
> > new
> > > >>> logo, only - I did what I could using the PNG image I found on the
> > > wiki,
> > > >>> but I'm sure there is a better image available.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> You can find all versions, including PDF and SVG, at
> > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/**
> > > >> content/marketing/art/**galleries/logos/aoo-working/<
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/marketing/art/galleries/logos/aoo-working/
> > > >
> > > >> (warning: this is meant to be a temporary location)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I would also like to offer, and have started, a second video.
> Longer,
> > > 45 -
> > > >>> 90 sec. range, with a quick summary of new features. A little
> > different
> > > >>> audiance from the shorty here, I suppose. To start that I've
> > downloaded
> > > >>> all
> > > >>> the information from the release notes page on the wiki, have used
> > > this to
> > > >>> generate some raw screen video catpure for the GUI changes and will
> > > use,
> > > >>> with your permission If I may, the graphics from the wiki for some
> of
> > > the
> > > >>> file fidelity enhancements.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> This would be very good to have. I don't know of anyone else working
> > on
> > > >> this, and obviously you can feel free to use images from the Release
> > > Notes
> > > >> page.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>  Andrea.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> --**--**-
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<
> > > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread Keith N. McKenna

Rob Weir wrote:

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote:

Hi.

I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.

I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
could avoided with a simple measure.

It might be useful to think of this in terms of Review-Then-Commit
(RTC) versus Commit-Then-Review (CTR) rules. Once we clarify these
and when they apply, then we can discuss whether additional
technological means are needed to enforce this.

For the wiki the general rules is CTR for all users with an account.
No additional karma is needed.

The for resources in Subversion the general rule is CTR for all
commiters. Additionally, the public can submit patches, to the list,
attached to BZ issues, or using the CMS anonymous submission tool.
This then is effectively RTC since a committer must first reviews the
patch.

Those are the default postures, but there are exceptions. For
example, as we approach a Release Candidate we switch into RTC for the
trunk code. We only make changes after a bug has been proposed and
approved as a "release blocker" on the dev list.

So we could simply adopt a RTC for certain resources at certain times.
For example, Release Notes once a release occurs, are RTC. The
project logos, once approved and published, are RTC. If we agree to
such things there are lightweight ways of reminding ourselves. For
example, we could have a README file in directories that are RTC that
explain this. That should be enough for conscientious,
well-intentioned volunteers,

For the Release Notes I believe that this would make sense. Restricting
access while the notes are being drafted would deprive individuals who
may not be technically oriented to contribute in a meaningful way to the
project. However once a Release occurs they should be frozen except for
things lake a re-spin for new languages, new issues for which a work
around exists that needs to be communicated, etc.

There was an extensive discussion of this in an earlier
thread;http://markmail.org/message/zub3ovqoi3zvoxst?q=Where+to+keep+release+notes%3F&page=3.
One of the suggestions floated was to move the Release notes to the
developer cwiki that is write restricted to committers, but can be read
by anyone. This would appear to be a viable alternative at least for
items lke Release Notes that need to be tied to a particular release,
but also have the potential to change without a new release.

Another possibility that could be used is the setting of restrictions on
pages of the cwiki. A quick review of the help show that a Space
Admnistrator can define set up a structure for a limited number of
people to be able to set view or edit restrictions on a page that will
be inherited by all child pages as well. This scenario would work well
for the Release Notes. Once the release occurs the Notes are edit
restricted to a defined group that can edit them if necessary.

Regards
Keith

I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest that
these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
product wide.

Personally I think this is a RTC versus CTR question. This
distinction is a tool that we don't invoke as often as we could.
Maybe that would be sufficient, at least in SVN.

Also, I think even a PMC member should be following CTR rules when it
is in effect. I don't think of a PMC member as a higher class of
committer in terms of what they have access to.

Regards,

-Rob

thoughts ?

rgds
jan I.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Report Builder, bug

2013-07-24 Thread Josef Latt


Hi,

there seems to be a problem with the version of Report Builder in the 
extension site. See below.


Regards
Josef


---
 Original-Nachricht 
Betreff: Re: Report Builder
Datum: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:04:12 -0300
Von: Ariel Constenla-Haile 
An: Josef Latt 

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:25:50PM +0200, Josef Latt wrote:

Hi,

AOO 4.0.0 wants to upgrade the Report Builder to version 1.2.1-rev2.
After installing from the AOO extension site version is still 1.2.1.

Therefore I downloaded it from your site
(http://people.apache.org/~arielch/extensions/reportbuilder/)
meaning that this should be the 1.2.1-rev2.
But the extension manager still offers the upgrade.

In the file 'description.xml' you find 

If I change this to 

1.2.1-rev2 is not a valid version number... anyway, it seems to be this
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/projectrelease/oracle-report-builder-121-rev2
but the version value inside the extension is still 1.2.1

This looks like a bug caused with extension's site update, feel free to
report it on dev@openoffice.apache.org


Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
---



Nachrichtenteil als Anhang
Description: PGP signature

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Starting Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice Module

2013-07-24 Thread Scott Robert

I am Robert Scott
I was an IT Project manager for the US Department of Justice and now retired.

I enjoy writing technical documentation and would like to volunteer for this 
task.

Re: Coverage of 4.0 Release


Am 07/24/2013 05:07 PM, schrieb Jonathan Corbet:

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:19:07 +0200
"Marcus (OOo)"  wrote:


Am 07/23/2013 05:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:

http://lwn.net/Articles/560203/  (All of three sentences.  I thought
they got paid by the word?)


And the first comment is about the trademark? Ridiculous.


So, given all the whining, should I take it you'd prefer that LWN ignore
your releases in the future?


Complete wrong question. But I don't have expected something different.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.


Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI  wrote:

On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir  wrote:


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI  wrote:

Hi.

I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.

I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
could avoided with a simple measure.



It might be useful to think of this in terms of Review-Then-Commit
(RTC) versus Commit-Then-Review (CTR) rules.  Once we clarify these
and when they apply, then we can discuss whether additional
technological means are needed to enforce this.

For the wiki the general rules is CTR for all users with an account.
No additional karma is needed.

The for resources in Subversion the general rule is CTR for all
commiters.  Additionally, the public can submit patches, to the list,
attached to BZ issues, or using the CMS anonymous submission tool.
This then is effectively RTC since a committer must first reviews the
patch.

Those are the default postures, but there are exceptions.  For
example, as we approach a Release Candidate we switch into RTC for the
trunk code.  We only make changes after a bug has been proposed and
approved as a "release blocker" on the dev list.

So we could simply adopt a RTC for certain resources at certain times.
  For example, Release Notes once a release occurs, are RTC.  The
project logos, once approved and published, are RTC.   If we agree to
such things there are lightweight ways of reminding ourselves.  For
example, we could have a README file in directories that are RTC that
explain this.  That should be enough for conscientious,
well-intentioned volunteers,



I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest

that

these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
product wide.



Personally I think this is a RTC versus CTR question.  This
distinction is a tool that we don't invoke as often as we could.
Maybe that would be sufficient, at least in SVN.

Also, I think even a PMC member should be following CTR rules when it
is in effect.  I don't think of a PMC member as a higher class of
committer in terms of what they have access to.



I think you misunderstood me.  I agree with the RTC/CTR discussion, but
that does not prevent the accidential commit, I think it has happened to
most of us, that we commit our changes, and we overlook that another file
is also committed.



I disagree that we have a a problem with accidental overwrites in SVN
in cases where it is clear that RTC is in effect.  I think the problem
is that it is not clear when CTR is in effect.


I don't think that it will help to prevent every error of this kind.


Also, I don't see how your solution helps with truly accidental
commits.  Surely PMC members make errors as well?


Of course, as they are humans, too. ;-)

But you don't become a PMC member by default. You need to show some 
things that you have understand how the page is turning. And then I 
doubt that such error would happen.


So, I also think that we should do more than just turn the CTR into RTC 
and expect that no mistakes will happen after that.


My 2 ct.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

New Developer - Introduction

Hello everyone,




My name is Balaji Arun and just joined the Apache OpenOffice Developer Group. I 
am a junior Computer Engineering student at Virginia Tech,  USA. I am excited 
to be involved in this huge community driven project. I have been using 
OpenOffice on my Ubuntu system, and I really like its flexibility. I am quite 
knowledgeable in C++ and I will for most part try to raise issues and fix bugs. 
I excited to work with you all.


Thanks


Balaji Arun

Completed How the Apache OpenOffice Project Works

Hello everyone


I have completed reading How the Apache OpenOfice Project Works Page.


Balaji Arun






Sent from Windows Mail

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

> Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI  wrote:
>>> On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>> 
 On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI  wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not
> wanted changed in our important artifacts happen.
> 
> I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc.
> cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that
> could avoided with a simple measure.
> 

 It might be useful to think of this in terms of Review-Then-Commit
 (RTC) versus Commit-Then-Review (CTR) rules.  Once we clarify these
 and when they apply, then we can discuss whether additional
 technological means are needed to enforce this.

 For the wiki the general rules is CTR for all users with an account.
 No additional karma is needed.

 The for resources in Subversion the general rule is CTR for all
 commiters.  Additionally, the public can submit patches, to the list,
 attached to BZ issues, or using the CMS anonymous submission tool.
 This then is effectively RTC since a committer must first reviews the
 patch.

 Those are the default postures, but there are exceptions.  For
 example, as we approach a Release Candidate we switch into RTC for the
 trunk code.  We only make changes after a bug has been proposed and
 approved as a "release blocker" on the dev list.

 So we could simply adopt a RTC for certain resources at certain times.
  For example, Release Notes once a release occurs, are RTC.  The
 project logos, once approved and published, are RTC.   If we agree to
 such things there are lightweight ways of reminding ourselves.  For
 example, we could have a README file in directories that are RTC that
 explain this.  That should be enough for conscientious,
 well-intentioned volunteers,

> I am normally strong against limitations, but I would like to suggest
 that
> these items are moved to one (or more) subdirs, where the commit right is
> restricted e.x. to PMC members or even less. Doing so will not prohibit
> anybody from making their changes but simply avoid that the changes are
> product wide.
> 

 Personally I think this is a RTC versus CTR question.  This
 distinction is a tool that we don't invoke as often as we could.
 Maybe that would be sufficient, at least in SVN.

 Also, I think even a PMC member should be following CTR rules when it
 is in effect.  I don't think of a PMC member as a higher class of
 committer in terms of what they have access to.

>>> 
>>> I think you misunderstood me.  I agree with the RTC/CTR discussion, but
>>> that does not prevent the accidential commit, I think it has happened to
>>> most of us, that we commit our changes, and we overlook that another file
>>> is also committed.
>>> 
>> 
>> I disagree that we have a a problem with accidental overwrites in SVN
>> in cases where it is clear that RTC is in effect.  I think the problem
>> is that it is not clear when CTR is in effect.
> 
> I don't think that it will help to prevent every error of this kind.
> 
>> Also, I don't see how your solution helps with truly accidental
>> commits.  Surely PMC members make errors as well?
> 
> Of course, as they are humans, too. ;-)
> 
> But you don't become a PMC member by default. You need to show some things 
> that you have understand how the page is turning. And then I doubt that such 
> error would happen.
> 
> So, I also think that we should do more than just turn the CTR into RTC and 
> expect that no mistakes will happen after that.
> 
> My 2 ct.

I think that there are a few things to think about.

We can all understand when RTC and CTR are in effect. These are different in 
different systems.

We are talking about a situation where a commit was made that was not 
acceptable. Since it was in svn we can always revert. In other systems we have 
other means of restoration.

I don't think we need extra security. We may need a review of our systems to 
know what is in effect. WIth that in hand we can discuss what policy changes to 
make.

Whatever changes might be made they should be the smallest possible and kept 
simple.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

New Developer - Introduction

Hello everyone,

 

My name is Balaji Arun and just joined the Apache OpenOffice Developer Group. I 
am a junior Computer Engineering student at Virginia Tech,  USA. I am excited 
to be involved in this huge community driven project. I have been using 
OpenOffice on my Ubuntu system, and I really like its flexibility. I am quite 
knowledgeable in C++ and I will for most part try to raise issues and fix bugs. 
I excited to work with you all.

 

Thanks

 

Balaji Arun

Re: Starting Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice Module

2013-07-24 Thread Keith N. McKenna


Scott Robert wrote:

I am Robert Scott
I was an IT Project manager for the US Department of Justice and now retired.

I enjoy writing technical documentation and would like to volunteer for this 
task.

Hello Robert and welcome to the Apache OpenOffice community. We are 
currently preparing the User Guides for AOO v4.0.0 on our MediaWiki 
(mwiki) site (http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide) 
and all help in this large effort is appreciated.


As your main interest appears to be in technical writing you would be 
best to subscribe to the documentation mailing list at 
mailto:doc-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org. Follow the instructions in 
the reply e-mail that you receive and you will be subscribed to the 
list. All discussions around documentation take place on this list. 
Introduce yourself there and let us know a little about your background.


If you are new to Open Source and the Apache Software Foundation I 
strongly suggest that you continue though the first two levels of the 
Orientation Modules as well as the level 3 module 
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-doc.html.


I look forward to seeing you at the douc mailing list and to working 
with you.


Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[WEBSITE][BUG] Download script

2013-07-24 Thread Michal Hriň


Hi,

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".

Regards,
Michal Hriň

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Starting Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice Module

2013-07-24 Thread Regina Henschel


Hi Prince Soni,

you are welcome.

Prince Soni schrieb:

Hi, my name is Prince Soni, 3rd Year CSE from India.

I know J2se and J2EE. I want to strong my grip in both these fields.



Since this one would be my 1st open source project I have no Idea how
to take part or contribute in open source.



I am looking for a simple and popular project in these two field for
now. Once I became comfortable I may take difficult one



The source itself is mostly written in C++. But AOO has an API, which 
can be used with Java. Indeed most examples of the developer guide [1] 
are written in Java. Using it would mean, that you write an extension 
for AOO. Such can be a small task, adding a features not yet available, 
but also complex, large things are possible. What is your interest 
besides programming? Anyway, in this case you should subscribe to our 
API mailing list:  api-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org


Quality assurance is another part of our project, which works with Java. 
But I'm not familiar with that part and you should subscribe to our QA 
Mailing list and ask there: qa-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org


[1] see left side in 
http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html


Kind regards
Regina


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Some NL homepages that need updating for 4.0


Am 07/24/2013 01:42 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

Am 07/24/2013 12:47 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:

Am 07/23/2013 11:49 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


Am 07/23/2013 11:40 PM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:


2013/7/23 Marcus (OOo)


Am 07/23/2013 11:39 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:

French -- http://www.openoffice.org/fr/



It looks like it has its own copy of the download scripts. This
logic
needs to be updated.

Announcement header as well.



Fixed in the meantime.


German -- http://www.openoffice.org/de/



Announcement header is stuck on 3.4, and is in English



Simple link to the main download webpage. Nothing to do.


Italian -- http://www.openoffice.org/it/



download logic is still pointing to 3.4.1

There may be others as well, but I noticed these three.



IT:
I've fixed the errors, except the sentence "A release for language
(language) is not available." which need attention.


http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/it/index.html



http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/it/download/index.**html



ES:
Hm, I've checked-out a fresh copy but I cannot find any download
webpages
or directory.



It is here:

http://www.openoffice.org/es/descargar/



ups, sorry. ;-) I'll try again.



OK, now the webpage should work again. I've tried to transfer the
translated
strings but please check yourself if it's also OK.



You da man, Marcus! Thanks!


Thanks a lot! :-)

Today ast, de, es, fr, it, ja were updated.


I've updated the download links also for:

gd, nl

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/gd/
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/nl/

Marcus




Please don't forget to do a last publish when the reviews and last fixes
were done.

More languages if needed tomorrow.

So, good night for today.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".


Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013-07-24 Thread Hagar Delest


For the record, forums still down (9 hrs now).
This and the signature with the new string 4.0.0 (and 4* to cover future 
releases) need a quick fix.

Hagar


Le 24/07/2013 17:39, Roberto Galoppini a écrit :


2013/7/24 Rory O'Farrell 


On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:33:13 +0200
Roberto Galoppini  wrote:


2013/7/24 Ricardo Berlasso 


Checking on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ I can only see the

blog

in
red, but the forums, which are in green there, do not work:

General Error
SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]

Too many connections [1040]

An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an
administrator if this problem persists.


The extension site gives

Error
The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
Error message
PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000] [1226] User 'a689097admin' has exceeded

the

'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 100) in
lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of
/home/project-web/aoo-extensions/htdocs/includes/lock.inc).



Our MySQL server was unable to serve additional requests, and we

restarted

the server and cleaned the cache table. While our caching system is
rebuilding it might be slow.

We are now investigating the root cause, that seems to be related to an
application issue. We'll keep monitoring the system while working on

fixing

such issue.

Roberto



It would be of interest (but irrelevant to the immediate problem) to know
if the server failure was due to a peak or overload possibly arising from
the AOO4.0 release.



We found and fixed the problem that was causing AOOE and then AOOT to stop
working. Actually the extra traffic makes it happen faster, but it wasn't
the root cause.

Roberto





--
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Portable version (X-ApacheOpenOffice by winPenPack) updated

2013-07-24 Thread Hagar Delest


Huge thanks for such reactivity indeed.
Not installed yet but will do tomorrow.

Hagar


Le 24/07/2013 13:53, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :


The winPenPack volunteers already updated their portable version, 
X-ApacheOpenOffice, to version 4:
http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1341

The link is the same as the one they were using for version 3.4.1, so no 
updates are needed on the website pages.

A big "thank you" to the winPenPack guys for being so fast...

Regards,
   Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: New Developer - Introduction

2013-07-24 Thread Regina Henschel


Hi Balaji Arun,

welcome to the Apache OpenOffice community.

Balaji Arun schrieb:

Hello everyone,



My name is Balaji Arun and just joined the Apache OpenOffice
Developer Group. I am a junior Computer Engineering student at
Virginia Tech,  USA. I am excited to be involved in this huge
community driven project. I have been using OpenOffice on my Ubuntu
system, and I really like its flexibility. I am quite knowledgeable
in C++ and I will for most part try to raise issues and fix bugs. I
excited to work with you all.


There are so many bugs to fix. We will really appreciate your help.

You first need to get a little bit familiar with the way we work under 
Apache, and then you need to get your own build of AOO.


So please start with http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/index.html

In addition you should tell us in which part of AOO you are most 
interested. Then we can easier suggest starting tasks.


Kind regards
Regina



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script

2013-07-24 Thread Michal Hri

Browser variables  Values 
navigator.appCodeName  Mozilla 
navigator.appName  Microsoft Internet Explorer 
navigator.appVersion  5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; 
Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; 
Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C) 
navigator.platform  Win32 
navigator.oscpu  undefined 
navigator.product  undefined 
navigator.productSub  undefined 
navigator.vendor  undefined 
navigator.vendorSub  undefined 
navigator.language  undefined 
navigator.browserLanguage  cs-CZ 
navigator.userLanguage  sk-SK 
navigator.systemLanguage  sk-SK 
navigator.userAgent  Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; 
Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; 
Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C) 
JavaScript functions/variables Values 
Language name  Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina) 
Language ISO code  sk 
Language array data  sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk 
(slovenčina),y,http://www.openoffice.org/sk/ 
Platform name  Windows mobile device 
Mirror platform name   
File name  undefined 
File extension   
Checksum file (here for MD5)  undefined 
hasMirrorLink()  true 
getLink()  http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html 



 From: Marcus (OOo) 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org 
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script
 

Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:
> Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
> script as "Windows mobile device".

Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

2013-07-24 Thread Juergen Schmidt

Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013 um 17:25 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:
>  
> > I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
> > installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
> > OSX.
> >  
> > This would be helpful to the community I think.
>  
> The Install Guide covers installation on Linux -- but not from a distro
> specific perspective. These instructions work very well for some distros
> and not well for others. I can't elaborate much more on that statement.
>  
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html
>  
> When we released 3.4., we found some additional installation instructions
> which are included in the wiki version of the Linux install page (which now
> also needs some slight updating):
>  
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation/How_do_I_install_OpenOffice.org_on_Linux%3F#Where_can_I_find_more_information_on_installing_OpenOffice_on_Linux.3F
>  
> I would suggest if you find tutorials, or create tutorials yourself, for
> any Linux distros, that you put links to them on the above wiki page.
>  
>  

if a distro installs LibreOffice when the user select OpenOffice it's a 
trademark violation and it is time to stop this...

Just my opinion, they can do whatever they want but we should stop them to use 
our brand.

Juergen  
>  
>  
> >  
> > On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> > > Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> > > > Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come to
> > > > try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> > > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> >  
> > OpenOffice
> > > > in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> > > > choice, not a default substitution.
> > > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > > The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> > > package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
> > >  
> > > Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> > > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
> > >  
> > > Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> > > Arch, Slackware and other distros.
> > >  
> > >  
> > > Best regards,
> > > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> > >  
> > >  
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > --
> > Alexandro Colorado
> > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> > http://www.openoffice.org
> >  
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >  
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> -
> MzK
>  
> Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
> -- Jon Bon Jovi
>  
>

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script

2013-07-24 Thread Michal Hriň

Dňa Wed, 24 Jul 2013 22:50:30 +0200 Michal Hri   
napísal:



Browser variables  Values
navigator.appCodeName  Mozilla
navigator.appName  Microsoft Internet Explorer
navigator.appVersion  5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;  
Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR  
3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)

navigator.platform  Win32
navigator.oscpu  undefined
navigator.product  undefined
navigator.productSub  undefined
navigator.vendor  undefined
navigator.vendorSub  undefined
navigator.language  undefined
navigator.browserLanguage  cs-CZ
navigator.userLanguage  sk-SK
navigator.systemLanguage  sk-SK
navigator.userAgent  Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1;  
WOW64; Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET  
CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)

JavaScript functions/variables Values
Language name  Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina)
Language ISO code  sk
Language array data  sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk  
(slovenčina),y,http://www.openoffice.org/sk/

Platform name  Windows mobile device
Mirror platform name
File name  undefined
File extension
Checksum file (here for MD5)  undefined
hasMirrorLink()  true
getLink()  http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html




And Marcus, when you will lookin' at it , please,
repair "Language name " to only "slovenčina" ..
Thanks.




 From: Marcus (OOo) 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script

Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".


Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



--
Táto správa bola vytvorená poštovým klientom v prehliadači Opera:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/24/2013 11:02 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Dňa Wed, 24 Jul 2013 22:50:30 +0200 Michal Hri 
napísal:


Browser variables Values
navigator.appCodeName Mozilla
navigator.appName Microsoft Internet Explorer
navigator.appVersion 5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1;
WOW64; Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729;
.NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)
navigator.platform Win32
navigator.oscpu undefined
navigator.product undefined
navigator.productSub undefined
navigator.vendor undefined
navigator.vendorSub undefined
navigator.language undefined
navigator.browserLanguage cs-CZ
navigator.userLanguage sk-SK
navigator.systemLanguage sk-SK
navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT
6.1; WOW64; Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)
JavaScript functions/variables Values
Language name Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina)
Language ISO code sk
Language array data sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk
(slovenčina),y,http://www.openoffice.org/sk/
Platform name Windows mobile device
Mirror platform name
File name undefined
File extension
Checksum file (here for MD5) undefined
hasMirrorLink() true
getLink() http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html




And Marcus, when you will lookin' at it , please,
repair "Language name " to only "slovenčina" ..
Thanks.


You mean on the "other.html"?

Marcus





From: Marcus (OOo) 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script

Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".


Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

2013-07-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:
>
> > I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
> > installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
> > OSX.
> >
> > This would be helpful to the community I think.
> >
>
> The Install Guide covers installation on Linux -- but not from a distro
> specific perspective. These instructions work very well for some distros
> and not well for others.  I can't elaborate much more on that statement.
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html
>
> When we released 3.4., we found some additional installation instructions
> which are included in the wiki version of the Linux install page (which now
> also needs some slight updating):
>
>
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation/How_do_I_install_OpenOffice.org_on_Linux%3F#Where_can_I_find_more_information_on_installing_OpenOffice_on_Linux.3F
>
> I would suggest if you find tutorials, or create tutorials yourself, for
> any Linux distros, that you put links to them on the above wiki page.
>

Correct however in the mind of many people they would like to see a 4.0
instructions. Even if 99.9% de same. Should we just change it to the 4.0
release? Even then, the blog will highlight these links.

I remember OSDir - OpenShot used to do this, screenshot guides of
installation of major distros and apps like OpenOffice, however there is
some questions on trying OpenOffice 4.0 while keeping LibO without risk.



>
>
> >
> > On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> > > Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> > >> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come
> to
> > >> try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> > OpenOffice
> > >> in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> > >> choice, not a default substitution.
> > >
> > > The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> > > package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
> > >
> > > Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> > > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
> > >
> > > Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> > > Arch, Slackware and other distros.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexandro Colorado
> > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> > http://www.openoffice.org
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> -
> MzK
>
> Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
>  -- Jon Bon Jovi
>



-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote:

> Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013 um 17:25 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
> > > installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
> > > OSX.
> > >
> > > This would be helpful to the community I think.
> >
> > The Install Guide covers installation on Linux -- but not from a distro
> > specific perspective. These instructions work very well for some distros
> > and not well for others. I can't elaborate much more on that statement.
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html
> >
> > When we released 3.4., we found some additional installation instructions
> > which are included in the wiki version of the Linux install page (which
> now
> > also needs some slight updating):
> >
> >
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation/How_do_I_install_OpenOffice.org_on_Linux%3F#Where_can_I_find_more_information_on_installing_OpenOffice_on_Linux.3F
> >
> > I would suggest if you find tutorials, or create tutorials yourself, for
> > any Linux distros, that you put links to them on the above wiki page.
> >
> >
>
> if a distro installs LibreOffice when the user select OpenOffice it's a
> trademark violation and it is time to stop this...
>
> Just my opinion, they can do whatever they want but we should stop them to
> use our brand.
>
> Juergen
>

I remember you brought this up before. What I had found in my case, was not
the situation you're talking about, but the relinking of the base program,
"soffice". OK, time to start looking for the other matter.


>
> >
> > >
> > > On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> > > > Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> > > > > Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has
> come to
> > > > > try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > OpenOffice
> > > > > in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> > > > > choice, not a default substitution.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> > > > package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
> > > >
> > > > Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> > > > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
> > > >
> > > > Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> > > > Arch, Slackware and other distros.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexandro Colorado
> > > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> > > http://www.openoffice.org
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> -
> > MzK
> >
> > Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
> > -- Jon Bon Jovi
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
-
MzK

Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
 -- Jon Bon Jovi

Re: release media files

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:

> Thanks for the comments.
>
> I'm sorry I was so tardy in offering it, I didn't really expect y'all would
> be able to make use of it with such a suddenness.
>
> (first time I played with macro settings on the video camera, so that was
> fun).
>
> I've got a good bit of raw stuff together for the followup piece, but my
> time on the net is done for this week (almost) - I'll send that along next
> time.
>
> //drew
>

Thanks again. Looking forward to the followup.


>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Drew Jensen  > >wrote:
> >
> > > The SVG files for the logo certainly make a trick ;_)
> > >
> > > You'll see I've made a few other changes and I kind of like where this
> is
> > > at.
> > >
> > > One item to note, I did, even with the admonition attached to the logo
> > > images, stick with the AOO_w_4 logo in the opening frames. That just
> > makes
> > > sense to me specific to the purpose here - I did however switch to the
> > > numberless logo for the closing frames.
> > >
> > > OK - so, I pulled down the file from the other day and put up the
> results
> > > of the changes here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bx7ZNEXlmR0ITkdtcnQwOEp3cm8/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> > >
> > > Second note - the license CC-BY-NC-SA - that's just because of the
> > little 7
> > > second blurb of music, I must use the NC license for that, if that is a
> > > problem with anyone I don't mind avoiding that.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, I'll follow up with mail about a second video (with features
> > > highlights) in a separate mail thread.
> > >
> > > As I said earlier, I'm not connected to the internet regularly, so I've
> > not
> > > (and wouldn't able to again before Wed.) posted to any media sites, if
> > this
> > > looks acceptable and you folks can make use of it, in any way, please
> do.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > //drew
> > >
> >
> > nice! I really like the way you did the fade-in...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Dave Fisher 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Drew,
> > > >
> > > > This looks really great, but as a note I had to run the mp4 through a
> > > > convertor program to play it on my MacOSX 10.6.8.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 20, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for links - I grabbed all the files.
> > > > >
> > > > > So - I'll give another throw and post what happens tomorrow..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Andrea Pescetti <
> > pesce...@apache.org
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Drew Jensen wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I took the liberty of spinning up a very brief such item, which
> you
> > > can
> > > > >>> find here:
> > > > >>>
> https://docs.google.com/file/**d/**0Bx7ZNEXlmR0IUTY1YzFhR1VLQU0/**
> > > > >>> edit?usp=sharing<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bx7ZNEXlmR0IUTY1YzFhR1VLQU0/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > >
> > > > >>> [unzip the a4.mp4 video file from the uploaded zip container]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Nice! (and welcome back Drew, by the way). The new logo colors
> > appear
> > > a
> > > > >> bit too bright at the end, but see below for vector sources, that
> > may
> > > > help
> > > > >> with this.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> was not able to quickly find a vector graphic of what I take if
> the
> > > new
> > > > >>> logo, only - I did what I could using the PNG image I found on
> the
> > > > wiki,
> > > > >>> but I'm sure there is a better image available.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You can find all versions, including PDF and SVG, at
> > > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/**
> > > > >> content/marketing/art/**galleries/logos/aoo-working/<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/marketing/art/galleries/logos/aoo-working/
> > > > >
> > > > >> (warning: this is meant to be a temporary location)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I would also like to offer, and have started, a second video.
> > Longer,
> > > > 45 -
> > > > >>> 90 sec. range, with a quick summary of new features. A little
> > > different
> > > > >>> audiance from the shorty here, I suppose. To start that I've
> > > downloaded
> > > > >>> all
> > > > >>> the information from the release notes page on the wiki, have
> used
> > > > this to
> > > > >>> generate some raw screen video catpure for the GUI changes and
> will
> > > > use,
> > > > >>> with your permission If I may, the graphics from the wiki for
> some
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > >>> file fidelity enhancements.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This would be very good to have. I don't know of anyone else
> working
> > > on
> > > > >> this, and obviously you can feel free to use images from the
> Release
> > > > Notes
> > > > >> page.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >>  Andrea.
> > > > >>
> > > >

Re: Blog, forums and extension sites down

2013-07-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti


Hagar Delest wrote:

For the record, forums still down (9 hrs now).


I see everything OK now (blogs, extensions, forums).

Forums have indeed been down until about one hour ago, then Infra 
restarted the machine, then the machine was up but with extremely high 
load (I have access to it, but not full privileges) and now load is much 
lower and the forums are working normally for me.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros


On Jul 24, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote:

> Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013 um 17:25 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:
>> 
>>> I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
>>> installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
>>> OSX.
>>> 
>>> This would be helpful to the community I think.
>> 
>> The Install Guide covers installation on Linux -- but not from a distro
>> specific perspective. These instructions work very well for some distros
>> and not well for others. I can't elaborate much more on that statement.
>> 
>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html
>> 
>> When we released 3.4., we found some additional installation instructions
>> which are included in the wiki version of the Linux install page (which now
>> also needs some slight updating):
>> 
>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation/How_do_I_install_OpenOffice.org_on_Linux%3F#Where_can_I_find_more_information_on_installing_OpenOffice_on_Linux.3F
>> 
>> I would suggest if you find tutorials, or create tutorials yourself, for
>> any Linux distros, that you put links to them on the above wiki page.
>> 
>> 
> 
> if a distro installs LibreOffice when the user select OpenOffice it's a 
> trademark violation and it is time to stop this...
> 
> Just my opinion, they can do whatever they want but we should stop them to 
> use our brand.

If the PMC wants to do this then we should discuss this with Shane on the 
trademarks@ list.

We probably want to see if the distributors are willing to cooperate first.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Juergen  
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
 Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come to
> try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> 
 
 
>>> 
>>> OpenOffice
> in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> choice, not a default substitution.
> 
 
 
 The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
 package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
 
 Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
 http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
 
 Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
 Arch, Slackware and other distros.
 
 
 Best regards,
 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Alexandro Colorado
>>> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
>>> http://www.openoffice.org
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --  
>> -
>> MzK
>> 
>> Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
>> -- Jon Bon Jovi
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/24/2013 10:50 PM, schrieb Michal Hri:

Browser variables  Values
navigator.appCodeName  Mozilla
navigator.appName  Microsoft Internet Explorer
navigator.appVersion  5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; 
Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; 
Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)
navigator.platform  Win32
navigator.oscpu  undefined
navigator.product  undefined
navigator.productSub  undefined
navigator.vendor  undefined
navigator.vendorSub  undefined
navigator.language  undefined
navigator.browserLanguage  cs-CZ
navigator.userLanguage  sk-SK
navigator.systemLanguage  sk-SK
navigator.userAgent  Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; 
Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; 
Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)


"Center" is the problem:

First it will be tested if "windows" or win" is contained in 
"navigator.platform". If yes, the "navigator.userAgent" will be checked 
if "phone" or "moble" or "ce" is included.


(all converted into lower case)

And "ce" is included in "center". ;-)

I've deleted the query for "ce". Please test if this solves the problem.

Thanks



JavaScript functions/variables Values
Language name  Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina)
Language ISO code  sk
Language array data  sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk 
(slovenčina),y,http://www.openoffice.org/sk/
Platform name  Windows mobile device
Mirror platform name
File name  undefined
File extension
Checksum file (here for MD5)  undefined
hasMirrorLink()  true
getLink()  http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html



  From: Marcus (OOo)
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".


Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/24/2013 11:17 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

Am 07/24/2013 11:02 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Dňa Wed, 24 Jul 2013 22:50:30 +0200 Michal Hri 
napísal:

And Marcus, when you will lookin' at it , please,
repair "Language name " to only "slovenčina" ..
Thanks.


You mean on the "other.html"?


OK, forget it. Found it. ;-)

But I remember our discussion from the past OOo project about a) correct 
writing of sk + sl and b) how to differenciate between both writings as 
they are very similar in their native languages. So, you suggested the 
additional text to make it clear.


Do you want this to be changed now?

Marcus





From: Marcus (OOo) 
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script

Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".


Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/25/2013 12:10 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

Am 07/24/2013 10:50 PM, schrieb Michal Hri:

Browser variables Values
navigator.appCodeName Mozilla
navigator.appName Microsoft Internet Explorer
navigator.appVersion 5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1;
WOW64; Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729;
.NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)
navigator.platform Win32
navigator.oscpu undefined
navigator.product undefined
navigator.productSub undefined
navigator.vendor undefined
navigator.vendorSub undefined
navigator.language undefined
navigator.browserLanguage cs-CZ
navigator.userLanguage sk-SK
navigator.systemLanguage sk-SK
navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT
6.1; WOW64; Trident/6.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)


"Center" is the problem:

First it will be tested if "windows" or win" is contained in
"navigator.platform". If yes, the "navigator.userAgent" will be checked
if "phone" or "moble" or "ce" is included.

(all converted into lower case)

And "ce" is included in "center". ;-)

I've deleted the query for "ce". Please test if this solves the problem.


I don't know if this is already published when you test, so please use 
this URL:


http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/

Marcus




JavaScript functions/variables Values
Language name Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina)
Language ISO code sk
Language array data sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk
(slovenčina),y,http://www.openoffice.org/sk/
Platform name Windows mobile device
Mirror platform name
File name undefined
File extension
Checksum file (here for MD5) undefined
hasMirrorLink() true
getLink() http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html



From: Marcus (OOo)
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE][BUG] Download script


Am 07/24/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:

Internet Explorer 10 and Windows 7 64bit is recognized by download
script as "Windows mobile device".


Please post the output of the analysis webpage:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html

Then I will have a look.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links


Hi all,

I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a 
release version:


http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html

Advantages:
- created automatically, depending on the respective available
  languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
  file
--> no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release

- contains links to all checksum files
--> no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary

- all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
  place

Please test and tell me your feedback.

@Andrea:
I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.

Thanks

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

2013/7/25 Marcus (OOo) 

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
> release version:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**other_tables.html
>
> Advantages:
> - created automatically, depending on the respective available
>   languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
>   file
> --> no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release
>
> - contains links to all checksum files
> --> no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary
>
> - all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
>   place
>
> Please test and tell me your feedback.
>

Downloading the main package works for all platforms but ASC, md5 and
sha256 files are only available for win and mac: for Linux, all those files
gives a "not found" error. Beside that, the new page looks really good! +1
from my side.

Regards
Ricardo



>
> @Andrea:
> I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.
>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links


Am 07/25/2013 12:29 AM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:

2013/7/25 Marcus (OOo)


Hi all,

I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
release version:

http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**other_tables.html

Advantages:
- created automatically, depending on the respective available
   languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
   file
-->  no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release

- contains links to all checksum files
-->  no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary

- all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
   place

Please test and tell me your feedback.



Downloading the main package works for all platforms but ASC, md5 and
sha256 files are only available for win and mac: for Linux, all those files
gives a "not found" error. Beside that, the new page looks really good! +1


Please can you give me all *.asc links for all OS and one language? Then 
I'll investigate the difference(s).



from my side.


Thanks :-)

Marcus




@Andrea:
I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.

Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

Hi Marcus,

Very cool! I have some minor points

> Important Notes:
> 
>   • A language pack is not a release for its own and has to be installed 
> over a stable release with the same version number and platform. It contains 
> resource files for a specific language and platform to show, e.g., menus, 
> dialogs, error messages in your language. It may contain translated Help 
> content. Language packs are created if at least 80% of the user interface 
> (UI) is translated. In case it is not fully localized, some elements of the 
> UI or help topics will display in English as default language.

(1) The first bullet needs editing as 80% is not the policy, the policy is 100%.

(2) Add a bullet:

* If your language is not listed here, please http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html >

> 
>   • If your operating system is not listed here, or you need a special 
> version of Apache OpenOffice, please see our list of third-party ports and 
> distributions.

(3) Similarly the further notes needs both an Apache OpenOffice and 4.0 update.

>   • Please read here further important notes

(4) Shouldn't we order the columns by popularity? Windows, MacOSX, Linux (don't 
know the popular order..)

Regards,
Dave

On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a release 
> version:
> 
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html
> 
> Advantages:
> - created automatically, depending on the respective available
>  languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
>  file
> --> no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release
> 
> - contains links to all checksum files
> --> no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary
> 
> - all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
>  place
> 
> Please test and tell me your feedback.
> 
> @Andrea:
> I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Marcus
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

2013/7/25 Marcus (OOo) 

> Am 07/25/2013 12:29 AM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
>
>> 2013/7/25 Marcus (OOo)
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
>>> release version:
>>>
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apac**he.org/download/test/**other_**
>>> tables.html <
>>> http://ooo-site.**staging.apache.org/download/**test/other_tables.html
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> Advantages:
>>> - created automatically, depending on the respective available
>>>languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
>>>file
>>> -->  no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release
>>>
>>> - contains links to all checksum files
>>> -->  no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary
>>>
>>> - all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
>>>place
>>>
>>> Please test and tell me your feedback.
>>>
>>>
>> Downloading the main package works for all platforms but ASC, md5 and
>> sha256 files are only available for win and mac: for Linux, all those
>> files
>> gives a "not found" error. Beside that, the new page looks really good! +1
>>
>
> Please can you give me all *.asc links for all OS and one language? Then
> I'll investigate the difference(s).
>

For Spanish, all ASC, md5 and sha256 files are here:

http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/es/

For example, the table for x86_64 rpm points to

http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install_es.tar.gz.asc

while the right address is

http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_es.tar.gz.asc

so on the table is missing the package format (rpm or deb)

Regards
Ricardo




>
>  from my side.
>>
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>
>  @Andrea:
>>> I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum
>>> links.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

RE: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

Hi Marcus

For the title of the page "Apache OpenOffice - Download all builds", I think
there can be better way to put it. It is like asking user to download every
build. Please consider "Apache OpenOffice Downloads - All Builds" or any
other apt title.

The UI looks simple and neat.

Balaji Arun

-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:19 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

Hi all,

I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
release version:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html

Advantages:
- created automatically, depending on the respective available
   languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
   file
--> no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release

- contains links to all checksum files
--> no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary

- all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
   place

Please test and tell me your feedback.

@Andrea:
I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.

Thanks

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links


Am 07/25/2013 12:44 AM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:

2013/7/25 Marcus (OOo)


Am 07/25/2013 12:29 AM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:


2013/7/25 Marcus (OOo)

  Hi all,


I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
release version:

http://ooo-site.staging.**apac**he.org/download/test/**other_**
tables.html<
http://ooo-site.**staging.apache.org/download/**test/other_tables.html





Advantages:
- created automatically, depending on the respective available
languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
file
-->   no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release

- contains links to all checksum files
-->   no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary

- all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
place

Please test and tell me your feedback.



Downloading the main package works for all platforms but ASC, md5 and
sha256 files are only available for win and mac: for Linux, all those
files
gives a "not found" error. Beside that, the new page looks really good! +1



Please can you give me all *.asc links for all OS and one language? Then
I'll investigate the difference(s).



For Spanish, all ASC, md5 and sha256 files are here:

http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/es/

For example, the table for x86_64 rpm points to

http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install_es.tar.gz.asc

while the right address is

http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.0/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_es.tar.gz.asc

so on the table is missing the package format (rpm or deb)


right, and some errors for the SDK and source files as well.

I've fixed it.

Marcus




  @Andrea:

I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum
links.

Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO in the Linux distros

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexandro Colorado 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to see a blog entry tutorial demonstrating the
> > > installation of OpenOffice on the 4 major distros and also Win and
> > > OSX.
> > >
> > > This would be helpful to the community I think.
> > >
> >
> > The Install Guide covers installation on Linux -- but not from a distro
> > specific perspective. These instructions work very well for some distros
> > and not well for others.  I can't elaborate much more on that statement.
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html
> >
> > When we released 3.4., we found some additional installation instructions
> > which are included in the wiki version of the Linux install page (which
> now
> > also needs some slight updating):
> >
> >
> >
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation/How_do_I_install_OpenOffice.org_on_Linux%3F#Where_can_I_find_more_information_on_installing_OpenOffice_on_Linux.3F
> >
> > I would suggest if you find tutorials, or create tutorials yourself, for
> > any Linux distros, that you put links to them on the above wiki page.
> >
>
> Correct however in the mind of many people they would like to see a 4.0
> instructions. Even if 99.9% de same. Should we just change it to the 4.0
> release? Even then, the blog will highlight these links.
>

The Install link above the wiki link specifically addresses 4.0.

The wiki page can be changed by anyone with a wiki account to reflect 4.0.
Or a new 4.0 page added with whatever changes anyone feels are needed.



>
> I remember OSDir - OpenShot used to do this, screenshot guides of
> installation of major distros and apps like OpenOffice, however there is
> some questions on trying OpenOffice 4.0 while keeping LibO without risk.
>

There's no reason why we can't do this. It just takes someone to make it
happen. That's what the wiki is for.


>
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On 7/24/13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn  wrote:
> > > > Rory O'Farrell schrieb:
> > > >> Now that AOO 4.0 is successfully launched, perhaps the time has come
> > to
> > > >> try to get it into the Linux distros.At present if one selects
> > > OpenOffice
> > > >> in the distros I know, one gets LibreOffice. One should get a clear
> > > >> choice, not a default substitution.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is mostly the lack of volunteers which are willing to
> > > > package and maintain AOO among these distros' developers.
> > > >
> > > > Gentoo has a precompiled version of AOO packaged:
> > > > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-office/openoffice-bin
> > > >
> > > > Besides that, there exist some user maintained packages for Ubuntu,
> > > > Arch, Slackware and other distros.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexandro Colorado
> > > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> > > http://www.openoffice.org
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> -
> > MzK
> >
> > Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
> >  -- Jon Bon Jovi
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> http://www.openoffice.org
>



-- 
-
MzK

Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."
 -- Jon Bon Jovi

Re: problem with new logo

2013-07-24 Thread Donald Whytock

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:

> The problem is simple the Sans Pro font doesnt display properly when
> rendered by other engines.
> font-family="Source Sans Pro Light"
>
> I recomend a simple edit, to change from Fonts to Paths, that way the
> nodes and form is statically set, the render would be numerical and
> will be more accurate.
>
> I generate one here:
> http://imagebin.org/265395

I tried downloading and working with the image at that link but ran into
problems.  Chrome didn't want to open it at all until I replaced the TM
character with the string "TM" and shrank the font size to fit.  After
that, the logo was still messed up in Draw in the same way.

Don

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

Am 07/25/2013 12:39 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:

Hi Marcus,

Very cool! I have some minor points

Important Notes:

• A language pack is not a release for its own and has to be installed
over a stable release with the same version number and platform. It contains
resource files for a specific language and platform to show, e.g., menus,
dialogs, error messages in your language. It may contain translated Help
content. Language packs are created if at least 80% of the user interface (UI)
is translated. In case it is not fully localized, some elements of the UI or
help topics will display in English as default language.

(1) The first bullet needs editing as 80% is not the policy, the policy is 100%.

right, I've copied it from the normal "other.html".

(2) Add a bullet:

* If your language is not listed here, pleasehttp://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html>

• If your operating system is not listed here, or you need a special
version of Apache OpenOffice, please see our list of third-party ports and
distributions.

I've added some text and mentioned here the 100% rule.

(3) Similarly the further notes needs both an Apache OpenOffice and 4.0 update.

• Please read here further important notes

Also right. I will do this as a separate task.

(4) Shouldn't we order the columns by popularity? Windows, MacOSX, Linux (don't
know the popular order..)

Ask 5 people an you will get 6 opinions. ;-)

I can sort it via alphabetically order. But then Windows is at the end
which is somehow also not the best solution. Hm.

Marcus

On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a release
version:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html

Advantages:
- created automatically, depending on the respective available
languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
file
--> no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release

- contains links to all checksum files
--> no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary

- all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
place

Please test and tell me your feedback.

@Andrea:
I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.

Thanks

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links


Am 07/25/2013 12:48 AM, schrieb Balaji Arun:

Hi Marcus

For the title of the page "Apache OpenOffice - Download all builds", I think
there can be better way to put it. It is like asking user to download every
build. Please consider "Apache OpenOffice Downloads - All Builds" or any
other apt title.


Good idea. To align it with the "index.html" I've adjusted the text for 
webpage title and H1 tag.



The UI looks simple and neat.


Thanks

Marcus




-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:19 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

Hi all,

I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
release version:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html

Advantages:
- created automatically, depending on the respective available
languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
file
-->  no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release

- contains links to all checksum files
-->  no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary

- all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
place

Please test and tell me your feedback.

@Andrea:
I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.

Thanks

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





--

Ciao

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Missing dictionaries on Extension website [Was Re: New version of Spanish dictionaries]

2013/7/17 Ricardo Berlasso 

> 2013/7/17 Regina Henschel 
>
>> Hi Ricardo,
>>
>> Ricardo Berlasso schrieb:
>>
>>> 2013/7/17 Regina Henschel 
>>>
>>>  Hi Ricardo,

 Ricardo Berlasso schrieb:

  There is a rather serious problem: Almost all the Spanish dictionaries
> are
>
> missing from the extension repository. The links on this list
>
> http://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5709#**
> **p5709
> 
> >
>
>
> that used to be a reference for the localized dictionaries gives "page
> not
> found".
>
> On the extensions site there are only three custom dictionaries listed
> under "Spanish" and other two under "Español", all of them really old
> and
> unmaintained. What happened with the 21 localized dictionaries? It
> seems
> that all the extensions from "Recursos lingüísticos abiertos"
> disappeared!
>
>
 http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/search
 >

 And then in the list "Filter by tags" the item "diccionario".

 Is it that, what you are looking for?

 Kind regards
 Regina


>>> No. I know that path, but all Spanish dictionaries that used to be on the
>>> extensions repository just disappeared. Just click on the links here:
>>>
>>> http://forum.openoffice.org/**es/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5709#**p5709
>>>
>>> Up to a couple of months ago when I last checked, all of them worked. All
>>> those 21 dictionaries are now missing, including the dictionary we are
>>> shipping by default on our releases
>>>
>>> http://extensions.openoffice.**org/project/es_ES-dicts
>>>
>>> gives "Page not found".
>>>
>>>
>> I do not understand what is wrong with e.g.
>> http://extensions.openoffice.**org/en/project/diccionario-de-**
>> correcci%C3%B3n-ortogr%C3%**A1fica-separaci%C3%B3n-sil%C3%**
>> A1bica-y-sin%C3%B3nimos-en-**espa%C3%B1ol-argentina
>>
>
> Nothing wrong with the dictionary, of course, that's one of the "missing"
> ones. But compare the link you provided with the original one for the same
> dictionary before the site migration:
>
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/project/es_AR-dicts
>
> It seems *all* the addresses changed on the site upgrade and now it's a
> small challenge to find them again. In fact, I started this thread after
> someone from the "Recursos Lingüísticos" project said on l10n list he
> cannot find their own extensions to update to the last dictionary version!
>
> It seems the identifier for the extension is now the extension title
> instead of the original label.
>

The old dictionaries addresses are back! Now both, the long and the short
address are working, offering the same extension.

Regards
Ricardo




>
> Regards
> Ricardo
>
>
>
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Regina
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --**--**-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: Some NL homepages that need updating for 4.0

2013-07-24 Thread Xuacu

Hi Marcus, all

I've trying to find how I can translate that pages (and, perhaps,
create new ones) with no luck so far. I guess I need an account
"somewhere" and an access point to the CMS, but I've been unable to
find it.

I suppose it must have been explained 100 times, but I missed it
all... could someone explain it one more time?

Thanks in advance, and my apologies for the inconveniences.

Regards
--
Xuacu

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:
> Am 07/23/2013 01:20 PM, schrieb Xuacu:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>>
>> [...]

 The problem is that these pages use
 http://www.openoffice.org/download/globalvars_improved.js
 which still has 3.4.1, but since it's global configuration I didn't
 change
 it. The current download page uses
 http://www.openoffice.org/download/globalvars.js
 that has the correct numbers but does not work as a
 globalvars_improved.js
 replacement in the IT site.

>>>
>>> Maybe Marcus can help describe what needs to be done here.  I bet
>>> their are HTML changes needed as well as pointing to the new
>>> javascript.
>>> [...]
>>
>>
>> Download page for Asturian is really outdated, and mostly points to
>> our NL team page which is outdated too. I will now fix our NL pages,
>> but it would be great if, as you say, someone describes what (and
>> where) is needed to fix AOO download page to keep as much as possible
>> within AOO site.
>
>
> I've created a ".../ast/download/index.html" directory + webpage.
>
> BTW:
> In the "index.html" I've set the variable NL_LANGUAGE to "ast". That means
> that only Asturian files can be downloaded.
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ast/download/index.html
>
> Happy testing and translating. :-)
>
> And don't forget to change the link for download on
> "http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ast/index.html";
>
> Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Some NL homepages that need updating for 4.0

2013/7/25 Xuacu 

> Hi Marcus, all
>
> I've trying to find how I can translate that pages (and, perhaps,
> create new ones) with no luck so far. I guess I need an account
> "somewhere" and an access point to the CMS, but I've been unable to
> find it.
>

Try this page: http://openoffice.apache.org/website-local.html

specially the part for the "bookmarklet".

Regards
Ricardo



>
> I suppose it must have been explained 100 times, but I missed it
> all... could someone explain it one more time?
>
> Thanks in advance, and my apologies for the inconveniences.
>
> Regards
> --
> Xuacu
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Marcus (OOo) 
> wrote:
> > Am 07/23/2013 01:20 PM, schrieb Xuacu:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> 
> 
>  The problem is that these pages use
>  http://www.openoffice.org/download/globalvars_improved.js
>  which still has 3.4.1, but since it's global configuration I didn't
>  change
>  it. The current download page uses
>  http://www.openoffice.org/download/globalvars.js
>  that has the correct numbers but does not work as a
>  globalvars_improved.js
>  replacement in the IT site.
> 
> >>>
> >>> Maybe Marcus can help describe what needs to be done here.  I bet
> >>> their are HTML changes needed as well as pointing to the new
> >>> javascript.
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >>
> >> Download page for Asturian is really outdated, and mostly points to
> >> our NL team page which is outdated too. I will now fix our NL pages,
> >> but it would be great if, as you say, someone describes what (and
> >> where) is needed to fix AOO download page to keep as much as possible
> >> within AOO site.
> >
> >
> > I've created a ".../ast/download/index.html" directory + webpage.
> >
> > BTW:
> > In the "index.html" I've set the variable NL_LANGUAGE to "ast". That
> means
> > that only Asturian files can be downloaded.
> >
> > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ast/download/index.html
> >
> > Happy testing and translating. :-)
> >
> > And don't forget to change the link for download on
> > "http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ast/index.html";
> >
> > Marcus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links

+100.

Your great work continues!

Regards,
Dave
 
On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

> Am 07/25/2013 12:48 AM, schrieb Balaji Arun:
>> Hi Marcus
>> 
>> For the title of the page "Apache OpenOffice - Download all builds", I think
>> there can be better way to put it. It is like asking user to download every
>> build. Please consider "Apache OpenOffice Downloads - All Builds" or any
>> other apt title.
> 
> Good idea. To align it with the "index.html" I've adjusted the text for 
> webpage title and H1 tag.
> 
>> The UI looks simple and neat.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:19 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: [PROPOSAL] New "other.html" for all possible download links
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a
>> release version:
>> 
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html
>> 
>> Advantages:
>> - created automatically, depending on the respective available
>>languages for the release version, controlled via the "globalvars.js"
>>file
>> -->  no manual changes in the "other.html" for every new release
>> 
>> - contains links to all checksum files
>> -->  no separate webpage just for checksum files necessary
>> 
>> - all possible downloads for a respective language and OS in a single
>>place
>> 
>> Please test and tell me your feedback.
>> 
>> @Andrea:
>> I've already considered your smaller font size wish for the checksum links.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Marcus
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Ciao
> 
> Marcus
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Some NL homepages that need updating for 4.0