Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

++1

> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On  6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
> 
> I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
> soak for a while.
> 
>>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On  6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
 
 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
 
   Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
 
 So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull 
 request is borked.
 
 Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
>>> 
>>> I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
>>> pre-update version of the patch.  I regenerated nss.patch, so these
>>> issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On  6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9

I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
soak for a while.

>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>> 
>> On  6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>>> 
>>> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>>> 
>>>Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>>> 
>>> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull 
>>> request is borked.
>>> 
>>> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
>> 
>> I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
>> pre-update version of the patch.  I regenerated nss.patch, so these
>> issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9

> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On  6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>> 
>> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>> 
>>Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>> 
>> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull 
>> request is borked.
>> 
>> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
> 
> I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
> pre-update version of the patch.  I regenerated nss.patch, so these
> issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On  6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
> 
> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
> 
> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
> 
> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull 
> request is borked.
> 
> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'

I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
pre-update version of the patch.  I regenerated nss.patch, so these
issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.

2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:

Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej

So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request 
is borked.

Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'

> On Oct 6, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will 
> update to head and pull in nss
> 
>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis > > wrote:
>> 
>> Any progress on nss?
>> 
>> On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it 
>>> until Monday.
>>> 
 On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
 
 On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
 Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
 to 2.7.18.
>>> Merged now...
>>> 
>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>> fix.
> 
> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
 
 nss is somewhat risky.  We've had problems with upgrading it in the
 past, primarily with MacOS.  It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
 I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss.  I just
 submitted a pull request.
 
 Serf should be fairly quick.  It's just a couple of patches
 cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
 
 There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
 library.  They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
 
> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Matthias
> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
  
 > 
  
 >>
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
  
 > 
 >>
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will update 
to head and pull in nss

> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> Any progress on nss?
> 
> On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it 
>> until Monday.
>> 
>>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Hi Don,
 
 Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>> to 2.7.18.
>> Merged now...
>> 
>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
> fix.
 
 OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>>> 
>>> nss is somewhat risky.  We've had problems with upgrading it in the
>>> past, primarily with MacOS.  It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
>>> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss.  I just
>>> submitted a pull request.
>>> 
>>> Serf should be fairly quick.  It's just a couple of patches
>>> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>>> 
>>> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
>>> library.  They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>>> 
 Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
 
 Regards,
 
   Matthias
 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

Any progress on nss?

On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it 
> until Monday.
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>> 
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
 On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>> to 2.7.18.
> Merged now...
> 
> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
 I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
 fix.
>>> 
>>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>> 
>> nss is somewhat risky.  We've had problems with upgrading it in the
>> past, primarily with MacOS.  It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
>> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss.  I just
>> submitted a pull request.
>> 
>> Serf should be fairly quick.  It's just a couple of patches
>> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>> 
>> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
>> library.  They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>> 
>>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>Matthias
>>> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

I've got everything on my list for AOO418 in the queue:

  * Fix for old java detection when building with new java
Set java compilation target to version 1.5 #101
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/101

  * Bug fixes from upstream for bundled libxml2 and serf modules
Libxml+serf 418 #102
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/102

  * Upgrade to a newer bundled nss
Nssupgrade - Upgrade bundled nss to nss-3.39-with-nspr-4.20 #100
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/100

The first two have been committed to trunk and AOO42X.  The AOO418
changes have been lightly tested on Debian 9, Windows 7, and CentOS 5.

The last pull request has not yet been merged to trunk.  The changes
have been tested on Debian 9, Windows 7, and CentOS 7.  Upgrades to NSS
have been problematic in the past, especially on MacOS.  This module is
used for document signing and signature checking.


 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it 
until Monday.

> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>> 
>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
> to 2.7.18.
 Merged now...
 
 Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
 we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>>> fix.
>> 
>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
> 
> nss is somewhat risky.  We've had problems with upgrading it in the
> past, primarily with MacOS.  It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss.  I just
> submitted a pull request.
> 
> Serf should be fairly quick.  It's just a couple of patches
> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
> 
> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
> library.  They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
> 
>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
 Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
 to 2.7.18.
>>> Merged now...
>>>
>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>> fix.
> 
> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?

nss is somewhat risky.  We've had problems with upgrading it in the
past, primarily with MacOS.  It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss.  I just
submitted a pull request.

Serf should be fairly quick.  It's just a couple of patches
cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.

There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
library.  They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.

> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>> to 2.7.18.
>> Merged now...
>>
>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
> fix.

OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?

Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>> to 2.7.18.
> 
> Merged now...
> 
> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
> we are pretty close to a release candidate?

I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
fix.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

+1

> On Sep 26, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>> to 2.7.18.
> 
> Merged now...
> 
> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
 On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:
 
 Great!
 
 We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
 
 And update LICENSE:
 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
 
 Regards,
 
   Matthias
 
 
 Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in 
> AOO42X... rebuilding
> 
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with 
>> the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>> 
>> ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>> ... removing directory 
>> /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
>>  ...
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have 
>>> macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>> 
 On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel 
  wrote:
 
 Hi Don, Jim,
 
 Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so 
>> far...
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
> changes from AOO42X.
 If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
 would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
 
 Opinions?
 
 Regards,
 
 Matthias
 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi all,

Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
> to 2.7.18.

Merged now...

Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
we are pretty close to a release candidate?

Regards,

   Matthias

>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>>>
>>> And update LICENSE:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... 
 rebuilding

> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with 
> the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>
> ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory 
> /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
>  ...
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have 
>> macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
 On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so 
> far...
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
 changes from AOO42X.
>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
to 2.7.18.
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Great!
>>
>> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>>
>> And update LICENSE:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... 
>>> rebuilding
>>>
 On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

 Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with 
 the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:

 ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
 ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
 ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
 ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
 ... cleaning the output tree ...
 ... removing directory 
 /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
  ...


> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS 
> building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>
>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>> changes from AOO42X.
>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)

> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Great!
> 
> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
> 
> And update LICENSE:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> 
> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... 
>> rebuilding
>> 
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the 
>>> new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>> 
>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>> ... removing directory 
>>> /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
>>>  ...
>>> 
>>> 
 On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS 
 building further along than before... fingers crossed.
 
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Don, Jim,
> 
> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>> changes from AOO42X.
> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Matthias
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 24 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Great!
> 
> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
> 
> And update LICENSE:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e

Now that the big merge is out of the way, I've started working on
testing this for a pull request.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Great!

We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7

And update LICENSE:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... 
> rebuilding
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the 
>> new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>
>> ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>> ... removing directory 
>> /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
>>  ...
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS 
>>> building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>>
 On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 Hi Don, Jim,

 Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
> changes from AOO42X.
 If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
 would prefer to shift them to AOO419.

 Opinions?

 Regards,

  Matthias

>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 24 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the 
> new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
> 
> ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory 
> /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718

I don't think there were any changes to serf.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... 
rebuilding

> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the 
> new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
> 
> ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory 
> /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
>  ...
> 
> 
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS 
>> building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>> 
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
 On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
 changes from AOO42X.
>>> 
>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>> 
>>> Opinions?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>  Matthias
>>> 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new 
apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:

ERROR: The following files could not be found: 
ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
... cleaning the output tree ...
... removing directory 
/var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 
...


> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS 
> building further along than before... fingers crossed.
> 
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Don, Jim,
>> 
>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>> changes from AOO42X.
>> 
>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>> 
>> Opinions?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>   Matthias
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS 
building further along than before... fingers crossed.

> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Don, Jim,
> 
> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>> changes from AOO42X.
> 
> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don, Jim,

Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
> changes from AOO42X.

If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
would prefer to shift them to AOO419.

Opinions?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
changes from AOO42X.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...

> On Sep 19, 2020, at 5:43 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 15.09.20 um 13:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and 
>> AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull 
>> those Issues into AOO418.
> It got reverted here (and in some other commits):
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/63fbc773865edd81abc91dd88f871bf29ce0a1f1
>  
> 
> 
> This may also be needed for Don's Pull Request:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
>>> I think so:
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
>>> 
>>> Especially this one from you ;-)
>>> 
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. 
>> Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. 
>> IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
> wanted you to have a look.
> 
> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Matthias
> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>> We should try
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>> 
>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Matthias
>>> 
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
 I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into 
 AOO418.
 There are two categories:
 * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the 
 trunk
 and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
 port of 4.1.7.
 
 * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
 updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
 AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of 
 these.
 
 I'd like to revisit:
 
 commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
 Author: Matthias Seidel 
 Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
 
  Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
 
  git-svn-id: 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571
  13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
 
 I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a 
 build
 with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how 
 it
 would break the build since the changes are just to structured 
 comments
 that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When 
 this was
 backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer 
 version
 of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of 
 the JDK.
 So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, 
 which
 have the changes.
>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>> 
>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so 
>>> that
>>> all objects get visited
>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>> 
>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>> 
>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 
>> to
>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>> 
>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding M

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 15.09.20 um 13:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and 
> AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull 
> those Issues into AOO418.
It got reverted here (and in some other commits):

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/63fbc773865edd81abc91dd88f871bf29ce0a1f1

This may also be needed for Don's Pull Request:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
>> I think so:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
>>
>> Especially this one from you ;-)
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
 On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 Hi Jim,

 Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. 
> Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, 
> we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
 That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
 wanted you to have a look.

 Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?

 Regards,

   Matthias

>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>
>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>> We should try
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>
>> again for 4.1.8.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>  Matthias
>>
 On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:

 On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into 
>>> AOO418.
>>> There are two categories:
>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>
>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>
>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>
>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>> Author: Matthias Seidel 
>>> Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>>>
>>>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>
>>>   git-svn-id: 
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571
>>>  13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>
>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how 
>>> it
>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured 
>>> comments
>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When 
>>> this was
>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer 
>>> version
>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the 
>>> JDK.
>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>> have the changes.
>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>
>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>> all objects get visited
>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>
>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>
> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>
> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
 I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
 be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
 included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
 MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.

> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
 Since 127876 only 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and 
AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull 
those Issues into AOO418.

> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
> 
> I think so:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
> 
> Especially this one from you ;-)
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing 
 supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull 
 the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
>>> wanted you to have a look.
>>> 
>>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim, Don,
> 
> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
> We should try
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
> 
> again for 4.1.8.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Matthias
> 
>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into 
>> AOO418.
>> There are two categories:
>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>> port of 4.1.7.
>> 
>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>> 
>> I'd like to revisit:
>> 
>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>> Author: Matthias Seidel 
>> Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>> 
>>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>> 
>>   git-svn-id: 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>> 
>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured 
>> comments
>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this 
>> was
>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer 
>> version
>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the 
>> JDK.
>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>> have the changes.
> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
> 
> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
> all objects get visited
> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
> 
> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
> 
 Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
 
 So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
 We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
>>> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>> 
 Regards,
 
 Matthias
 
> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>> build with Java 8?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional comman

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?

I think so:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0

Especially this one from you ;-)

https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing 
>>> supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull 
>>> the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
>> wanted you to have a look.
>>
>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
 On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 Hi Jim, Don,

 Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Let's commit and work after pushed.
 We should try

 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887

 again for 4.1.8.

 Regards,

   Matthias

>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Hi Don,

 Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into 
> AOO418.
> There are two categories:
> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>  and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>  port of 4.1.7.
>
> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>  updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>  AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>
> I'd like to revisit:
>
> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
> Author: Matthias Seidel 
> Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>
>Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>
>git-svn-id: 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>
> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
> would break the build since the changes are just to structured 
> comments
> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this 
> was
> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer 
> version
> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the 
> JDK.
> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
> have the changes.
 If I remember it right the Rollback included:

 - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
 - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
 all objects get visited
 - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
 Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API

 We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.

>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>
>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
>> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>  Matthias
>>>
 "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
 checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>> build with Java 8?
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 



smime.p7s

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?

> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing 
>> supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the 
>> rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
> 
> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
> wanted you to have a look.
> 
> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>> We should try
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>> 
>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
 I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into 
 AOO418.
 There are two categories:
 * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
  and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
  port of 4.1.7.
 
 * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
  updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
  AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
 
 I'd like to revisit:
 
 commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
 Author: Matthias Seidel 
 Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
 
Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
 
git-svn-id: 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
 
 I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
 with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
 would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
 that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this 
 was
 backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
 of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the 
 JDK.
 So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
 have the changes.
>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>> 
>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>> all objects get visited
>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>> 
>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>> 
>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>> 
>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>  Matthias
>> 
>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
> build with Java 8?
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing 
> supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the 
> rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.

That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
wanted you to have a look.

Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>
>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>> We should try
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>
>> again for 4.1.8.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
 On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:

 On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>> There are two categories:
>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>   and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>   port of 4.1.7.
>>>
>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>>>   updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>   AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>
>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>
>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>> Author: Matthias Seidel 
>>> Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>>>
>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>
>>> git-svn-id: 
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>
>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>> have the changes.
>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>
>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>> all objects get visited
>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>
>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>
> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>
> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
 I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
 be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
 included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
 MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.

> Regards,
>
>   Matthias
>
>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
 Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
 affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
 build with Java 8?


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing 
supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the 
rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.

> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim, Don,
> 
> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
> 
> We should try
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
> 
> again for 4.1.8.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>> There are two categories:
>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>   and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>   port of 4.1.7.
>> 
>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>>   updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>   AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>> 
>> I'd like to revisit:
>> 
>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>> Author: Matthias Seidel 
>> Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>> 
>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>> 
>> git-svn-id: 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>> 
>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>> have the changes.
> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
> 
> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
> all objects get visited
> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
> 
> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
> 
 Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
 
 So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
 We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
>>> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>> 
 Regards,
 
   Matthias
 
> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>> build with Java 8?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 04.09.20 um 18:45 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On  4 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>
>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>> We should try
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>
>> again for 4.1.8.
> I've included it in a large bundle of cherry-picks that I've been
> testing.
Thanks!
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On  4 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Jim, Don,
> 
> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
> 
> We should try
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
> 
> again for 4.1.8.

I've included it in a large bundle of cherry-picks that I've been
testing.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim, Don,

Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Let's commit and work after pushed.

We should try

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887

again for 4.1.8.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Hi Don,

 Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
> There are two categories:
>  * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>port of 4.1.7.
>
>  * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>
> I'd like to revisit:
>
>  commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>  Author: Matthias Seidel 
>  Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>
>  Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>
>  git-svn-id: 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>
> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
> have the changes.
 If I remember it right the Rollback included:

  - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
  - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
 all objects get visited
  - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
 Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API

 We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.

>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>
>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
>> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>Matthias
>>>
 "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
 checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>> build with Java 8?
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Let's commit and work after pushed.

> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> 
>>> Hi Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
 I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
 There are two categories:
  * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
port of 4.1.7.
 
  * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
 
 I'd like to revisit:
 
  commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
  Author: Matthias Seidel 
  Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
 
  Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
 
  git-svn-id: 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
 
 I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
 with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
 would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
 that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
 backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
 of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
 So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
 have the changes.
>>> 
>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>> 
>>>  - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>  - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>> all objects get visited
>>>  - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>> 
>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>> 
>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>> 
>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
> 
> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
> 
> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
> build with Java 8?
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 27.08.20 um 20:02 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
 I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
 There are two categories:
   * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
 and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
 port of 4.1.7.

   * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
 updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
 AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.

 I'd like to revisit:

   commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
   Author: Matthias Seidel 
   Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
   
   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
   
   git-svn-id: 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

 I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
 with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
 would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
 that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
 backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
 of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
 So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
 have the changes.
>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>
>>>  - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>  - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>> all objects get visited
>>>  - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>
>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>
>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>
>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
> build with Java 8?

The last time I built 4.1.x with Java 8 the installed Java 7 JDK wasn't
detected (on Windows).
That was without the patch.

I can test it again with a current revision but not before next week.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>> There are two categories:
>>>   * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>
>>>   * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>
>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>
>>>   commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>   Author: Matthias Seidel 
>>>   Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>>>   
>>>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>   
>>>   git-svn-id: 
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>
>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>> have the changes.
>>
>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>
>>  - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>  - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>> all objects get visited
>>  - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>
>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>
> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
> 
> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.

I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.

> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.

Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
build with Java 8?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>> There are two categories:
>>   * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>> port of 4.1.7.
>>
>>   * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>
>> I'd like to revisit:
>>
>>   commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>   Author: Matthias Seidel 
>>   Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>>   
>>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>   
>>   git-svn-id: 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>
>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>> have the changes.
>
> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>
>  - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>  - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
> all objects get visited
>  - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>
> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>
Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
4.1.6 after the Rollback.

So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.

Regards,

   Matthias

> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias
>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
> There are two categories:
>   * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
> port of 4.1.7.
>
>   * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>
> I'd like to revisit:
>
>   commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>   Author: Matthias Seidel 
>   Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>   
>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>   
>   git-svn-id: 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>
> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
> have the changes.

If I remember it right the Rollback included:

 - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
 - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
all objects get visited
 - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API

We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.

"Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double checked
because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
> There are two categories:
>   * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
> port of 4.1.7.
>
>   * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>
> I'd like to revisit:
>
>   commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>   Author: Matthias Seidel 
>   Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>   
>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>   
>   git-svn-id: 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>
> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
> have the changes.

No, it was backed out because it broke the build.
But I am not sure if it was the patch itself or the way it was
committed. I think there were several fixes committed at once...

However, at that time a build that was compiled with Java 8 could not
see an installed Java 7 (at least on Windows).
Meanwhile Damjan has changed the Java detection (for AdpoptOpenJDK) so
we might try it again.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
> 
> I'm still trying to compile 418 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64
> I updated the 418 code but I get stuck at module graphite with the following 
> error (log file at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/config.log)
> 
> Any ideas?

The error is happening during the configure step for graphite.  The
config.log mentioned is this one:

main/graphite/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine/config.log

I don't believe I've run across any problems here.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Don, all

I'm still trying to compile 418 on Ubuntu 18.04 x64
I updated the 418 code but I get stuck at module graphite with the following 
error (log file at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/config.log)

Any ideas?

Thanks!

configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
dmake:  Error code 77, while making 
'./unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/so_configured_so_graphite'

1 module(s): 
graphite
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /source/openoffice/main/graphite

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
running:

build --from graphite

> On 08/24/2020 3:04 AM Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
>  
> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
> There are two categories:
>   * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
> port of 4.1.7.
> 
>   * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
> AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
> 
> I'd like to revisit:
> 
>   commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>   Author: Matthias Seidel 
>   Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
>   
>   Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>   
>   git-svn-id: 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
> 
> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
> have the changes.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

AOO418 cherry picks

[Don Lewis]

I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
There are two categories:
  * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
port of 4.1.7.

  * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.

I'd like to revisit:

  commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
  Author: Matthias Seidel 
  Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
  
  Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
  
  git-svn-id: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
have the changes.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org