Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
pretty cool! On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Awesome! Thanks Gurkan! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 3:14 PM The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Not anymore ! It has done :) I will start to release process in this week. --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 11:58:15 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month now). But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine though). I'd rather like to kick out a M4 now and ship a M5 later this month. There are also a few very important conferences this month (including JSFDays together with the Spring people) and it would be really cool if people can go out and use OWB without having to compile it theirselfs! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month now). But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine though). I'd rather like to kick out a M4 now and ship a M5 later this month. There are also a few very important conferences this month (including JSFDays together with the Spring people) and it would be really cool if people can go out and use OWB without having to compile it theirselfs! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month now). yes, that is my feeling too. But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine though). I'd rather like to kick out a M4 now and ship a M5 later this month. There are also a few very important conferences this month (including JSFDays together with the Spring people) and it would be really cool if people can go out and use OWB without having to compile it theirselfs! :-) +1 on that! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Not anymore ! It has done :) I will start to release process in this week. --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 11:58:15 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month now). But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine though). I'd rather like to kick out a M4 now and ship a M5 later this month. There are also a few very important conferences this month (including JSFDays together with the Spring people) and it would be really cool if people can go out and use OWB without having to compile it theirselfs! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
Awesome! Thanks Gurkan! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 3:14 PM The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Not anymore ! It has done :) I will start to release process in this week. --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 11:58:15 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month now). But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine though). I'd rather like to kick out a M4 now and ship a M5 later this month. There are also a few very important conferences this month (including JSFDays together with the Spring people) and it would be really cool if people can go out and use OWB without having to compile it theirselfs! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? Once the official 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. I agree :-) -Matthias --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
I'm not sure if we need a M5. Current code quality is already pretty fine and 1.0.0 from my understanding would mean being feature complete and (almost) passing the TCK. I would then go on and quarterly release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions. So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? Once the official 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. I agree :-) -Matthias --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move them to 1.0.0 release. But as a common pattern with old releases, I want to releas e artifacts as 1.0.0-M5 instead of 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT. There is no road map other than one in OWB JIRA.( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel ) I will go ahead and remove M5 release this evening if no other objection. Thanks; --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 12:46 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? Once the official 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. I agree :-) -Matthias --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
As I and Matthias said, there will be no M5. After releasing (1.0.0-M4), the next release will be 1.0.0. Matthias, I think it is reasonable to remove M5 from release. Just stick with M4 and after that we can go ahead and release 1.0.0. Therefore, next release will be 1.0.0-M4 and then final release will be 1.0.0. After M4 release, we continue to work on 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. WDYT? --Gurkan 2010/1/21 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de I'm not sure if we need a M5. Current code quality is already pretty fine and 1.0.0 from my understanding would mean being feature complete and (almost) passing the TCK. I would then go on and quarterly release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions. So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? Once the official 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. I agree :-) -Matthias --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move them to 1.0.0 release. nice, sounds good. But as a common pattern with old releases, I want to releas e artifacts as 1.0.0-M5 instead of 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT. Sure. Release like: 1.0.0-M3 1.0.0-M4 ... but current code (unreleased) in trunk, something like 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT would make it nicer to understand, IMO. There is no road map other than one in OWB JIRA.( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel ) Ok, perhaps we should write something down, on the website. Perhaps I can get to it soon (or in the wiki) I will go ahead and remove M5 release this evening if no other objection. that is fine with me. However, if the OWB project releases a 1.0.0 release, it has to pass TCK by 100% -Matthias Thanks; --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 12:46 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? Once the official 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. I agree :-) -Matthias --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: As I and Matthias said, there will be no M5. After releasing (1.0.0-M4), the next release will be 1.0.0. +1 TCK work is looking very good, so 1.0.0 is a reasonable target for the release after M4. Matthias, I think it is reasonable to remove M5 from release. Just stick with M4 and after that we can go ahead and release 1.0.0. see my other mail. but basically yes. Therefore, next release will be 1.0.0-M4 and then final release will be 1.0.0. After M4 release, we continue to work on 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT (after the 1.0.0 is out) ;-) WDYT? sounds good to me -Matthias --Gurkan 2010/1/21 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de I'm not sure if we need a M5. Current code quality is already pretty fine and 1.0.0 from my understanding would mean being feature complete and (almost) passing the TCK. I would then go on and quarterly release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions. So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com: I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. Any other ideas? what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current direction is, IMO Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? Once the official 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. I agree :-) -Matthias --Gurkan 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org yazdı: I agree with you. +1 on a new release. Minor things: -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number Do you agree ? -Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
[DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
