GSM Modem
Hi We are looking for a high-end GSM modem (not simple mobile phone!!) which can talk to SUN Solaris m/c over serial port and send/receive short messages in UK. The modem should have built in power supply. We are keen on modem with reference history (used and working with no hitches). Any info/links will be highly appreciated. Regards, PS: I apologize if it was already discussed ( I am in crises !). **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.
Re: GSM modem
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 06:51:33PM +0200, Fernando Primo wrote: > I try to probe kannel 1.0.3 to send SMS mainly, but i don´t sure about > the kind of GSM modem that i have to use. In the user manual, i have > read that you used three GSM modem: WAVECOM, SIEMEMS and Ericsson. Are > there any specific model?. I have been able to find one, concretely > the WAVECOM WMOD2B , Can I use this modem to do the tests with Kannel > 1.0.3? (I am working with Linux 2.4.7) I know for sure that the Wavecome WMOD2 works. I believe that the WMOD2B is just a more recent version, but I have cc'ed the Kannel developers list who will know for sure. > Thank you Fernando Primo del Val netZima S.L e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > P.D: I am sorry, but my english is not enough good to explain it > better, I hope that had been enough to understand my problem Your English is better than my Spanish! Dave -- David Holland =*= Systems Manager =*= tel: +44 01223 478900 http://www.3glab.com/ =*= 3G Lab, UK =*= fax: +44 01223 478901
Re: GSM modem
Use current cvs and at2 It works. If you want to use with 1.03. you need to modify some rows of smsc_at.c (pdu encode) Andrea - Original Message - From: "David Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fernando Primo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:46 AM Subject: Re: GSM modem > On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 06:51:33PM +0200, Fernando Primo wrote: > > I try to probe kannel 1.0.3 to send SMS mainly, but i don´t sure about > > the kind of GSM modem that i have to use. In the user manual, i have > > read that you used three GSM modem: WAVECOM, SIEMEMS and Ericsson. Are > > there any specific model?. I have been able to find one, concretely > > the WAVECOM WMOD2B , Can I use this modem to do the tests with Kannel > > 1.0.3? (I am working with Linux 2.4.7) > > I know for sure that the Wavecome WMOD2 works. I believe that the WMOD2B > is just a more recent version, but I have cc'ed the Kannel developers > list who will know for sure. > > > Thank you Fernando Primo del Val netZima S.L e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > P.D: I am sorry, but my english is not enough good to explain it > > better, I hope that had been enough to understand my problem > > Your English is better than my Spanish! > > Dave > -- > David Holland =*= Systems Manager =*= tel: +44 01223 478900 > http://www.3glab.com/ =*= 3G Lab, UK =*= fax: +44 01223 478901 >
Re: GSM modem
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:26:47PM +0100, Fernando Primo wrote:
> Finaly I bought the GSM modem and I have got to send/recive menssage, but
> now I have a little problem, and I don´t know if you will be able to solve
> it. When I send special character, like "ñ, ú, ó, á, é, í, ü" , I don´t get
> to recive them correctly. Is a configuration problem of GSM modem? or Is a
> kannel problem?
> I have seen a file "alt_charsets.h" in source files, but I don´t know if i
> have to modify this file to solve this problem and how to do it. ???
Sorry, no idea. ("I am not a programmer", etc.) I've cc'ed the devel
list; someone there should know.
Dave
--
David Holland =*= Systems Manager =*= tel: +44 01223 478900
http://www.3glab.com/ =*= 3G Lab, UK =*= fax: +44 01223 478901
AW: GSM Modem
I think a mobile phone fits your requirements quite nicely (except for the fact that it is a mobile phone). There are billions of them in daily use and they come with a builtin battery that provides UPS for a day or so. The chips and the software in mobile phones is in no way different from so called GSM modems. It's just a different packaging. A mobile phone might look a little bit unprofessional, but you could wrap it in a more serious looking case. Regards Jörg > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Saurabh Bhardwaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 11:46 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: GSM Modem > > Hi > > We are looking for a high-end GSM modem (not simple mobile > phone!!) which can talk to SUN Solaris m/c over > serial port and > send/receive short messages in UK. The modem should have > built in power > supply. > We are keen on modem with reference history (used and working with no > hitches). > > Any info/links will be highly appreciated. > > Regards, > > PS: I apologize if it was already discussed ( I am in crises > !). > > > >
RE: GSM Modem
In my company we use Wavecom modems (specificly WM02B model), and its working perfectly for our needs (very high loads for both sending and receiving). it does not have a builtin power supply, but use an external adapter, but in addition to the external power adapter it comes with a connector and wires that allow you to connect the modem directly to any 12v DC power output, so you could have (for example) a single power source with battery backup power your entire modem rack. -- Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] For every credibility gap, there is a gullibility fill. -- R. Clopton > -Original Message- > From: Saurabh Bhardwaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: GSM Modem > > > Hi > > We are looking for a high-end GSM modem (not simple mobile > phone!!) which can talk to SUN Solaris m/c over > serial port and > send/receive short messages in UK. The modem should have > built in power > supply. > We are keen on modem with reference history (used and working with no > hitches). > > Any info/links will be highly appreciated. > > Regards, > > PS: I apologize if it was already discussed ( I am in crises > !). > > > >
Re: GSM Modem
The Siemens Cellular Engine's MC ## work fine - but really they are just normal phones. Their serial port is a bit faster - it is a bit easier to mount in a 1U rack box with all the extra bits - but you are limited by the air speed anyway. The only real reason to use those is that they are much easier to mount securely - i.e. lock them down against vibrations, theft, have the case opened by laymen with no issues, etc. Dw. On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Saurabh Bhardwaj wrote: > Hi > > We are looking for a high-end GSM modem (not simple mobile > phone!!) which can talk to SUN Solaris m/c over serial port and > send/receive short messages in UK. The modem should have built in power > supply. > We are keen on modem with reference history (used and working with no > hitches). > > Any info/links will be highly appreciated. > > Regards, > > PS: I apologize if it was already discussed ( I am in crises !). > > > >
RE: GSM Modem
Title: Message First thing I would like to dissuade you from using the M20 terminal - from my experience it has many flaws and its behavior is undefined in some common situations. second thing - why not use Kannel to communicate with the modem ? if you don't want to use Kannel, you can just take the source of one of the AT modules (my recommendation will be AT2) as a reference implementation (porting it to Java should be hard). --Oded Arbelm-Wise Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED] "My life needs a rewind/erase button." -- Calvin and Hobbes -Original Message-From: Saurabh Bhardwaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: GSM Modem HiLet me first thank all who provided me with their valuable insights (Andreas Fink, Oded Arbel, Jörg, Dave Wilson, Dw.). After a brief research, I decided on following alternatives ( I have to finally zero on one of them)Wavecom WM02Siemens M20 TerminalSiemens TC35 TerminalNokia 20Price of these units are varying around £300 and accessories another £80. Has anybody already done a research and can help me decide which would be best (requirement mentioned in attached mail- in particular working with Sun Solaris m/c) with its approx price in £ ? I also need help implementing AT command set in java (as my SMS application is built on java and we need to add an additional module to communicate to GSM world using GSM modem). If anybody has already implemented and can share reference implementation, it will be highly appreciated. regards, -Saurabh -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saurabh BhardwajSent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:16 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: GSM ModemHiWe are looking for a high-end GSM modem (not simple mobilephone!!) which can talk to SUN Solaris m/c over serial port and send/receive short messages in UK. We are keen on modem with reference history (used and working with no hitches).Any info/links will be highly appreciated.Regards,PS: I apologize if it was already discussed ( I am in crises !).
RE: GSM Modem
Title: Message HiLet me first thank all who provided me with their valuable insights (Andreas Fink, Oded Arbel, Jörg, Dave Wilson, Dw.). After a brief research, I decided on following alternatives ( I have to finally zero on one of them)Wavecom WM02Siemens M20 TerminalSiemens TC35 TerminalNokia 20Price of these units are varying around £300 and accessories another £80. Has anybody already done a research and can help me decide which would be best (requirement mentioned in attached mail- in particular working with Sun Solaris m/c) with its approx price in £ ? I also need help implementing AT command set in java (as my SMS application is built on java and we need to add an additional module to communicate to GSM world using GSM modem). If anybody has already implemented and can share reference implementation, it will be highly appreciated. regards, -Saurabh -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saurabh BhardwajSent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:16 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: GSM ModemHiWe are looking for a high-end GSM modem (not simple mobilephone!!) which can talk to SUN Solaris m/c over serial port and send/receive short messages in UK. We are keen on modem with reference history (used and working with no hitches).Any info/links will be highly appreciated.Regards,PS: I apologize if it was already discussed ( I am in crises !). **Disclaimer Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.
GSM Modem Support
Hi Could anyone please tell me whether kannel version 1.1.6 was tested with the following GSM modems 1. Siemens MC35 GPRS Terminal 2. Nokia 30 GSM Connectivity Terminal Rgds Rajesh OpenMobile AP Pte Ltd
UDH over GSM modem
Hi, I have for a time now tried to send UDH over a GSM modem. After a while and reading the news in this list, I changed the DCS from 04 to F4 in the code and tried. What I am trying to send is a OTA configuration, which is over one SMS long. Now I can send the OTA to a Ericsson e380, but the Nokia see the OTA as malformed !?!?! I can send the same OTA via a EMI connection and it works. Under here is the bearerbox output from the emi and gsm modem. And kannel sends the OTA (send command status: 0). I use linux RedHat 7.0 and 7.1 and the newest CVS version. Can anybody see what is wrong? Best Regards Steffen Lindemann 2001-06-27 15:36:47 [6] DEBUG: smscconn_sender (EMIIP:194.182.xxx.xxx:n/a): sending message 2001-06-27 15:36:47 [6] DEBUG: emi 2 message 01/00359/O/51/40253981/24237623/01004/1024/01062C1F2A6170706 C69636174696F6E2F782D7761702D70726F762E62726F777365722D73657474696E67730081E A01016A0045C6060187124501871311033139342E3138322E3235312E3135000187146001872 111032B34353430333930393039000187287301872270018723110374646B000187241103776 17074646B001//01 0C 0B0504C34FC0020003000201///F0 2001-06-27 15:36:48 [6] DEBUG: smscconn_sender (EMIIP:194.182.xxx.xxx:n/a): sending message 2001-06-27 15:36:48 [6] DEBUG: emi 3 message 02/00211/O/51/40253981/24237623/01004/0432/01877E11035669630 0010186071103687474703A2F2F7761702E74646B6D6F62696C2E646B2F0001C608018715110 3566963000101011//01 0C 0B0504C34FC0020003000202///56 2001-06-27 13:38:46 [6] DEBUG: AT: Command: AT+CMGS=153 2001-06-27 13:38:46 [6] DEBUG: AT: Command: 0051000A91540452931800F4 A78C 0B0504C34FC0020003060201 01062C1F2A6170706C69636174696F6E2F782D7761702D70726F762E62726F777365722D7365 7474696E67730081EA01016A0045C6060187124501871311033139342E3138322E3235312E31 35000187146001872111032B3435343033393039303900018728730187227001872311037464 6B00018724110377617074646B00 2001-06-27 13:38:51 [6] DEBUG: AT: Command: AT+CMGS=79 2001-06-27 13:38:51 [6] DEBUG: AT: Command: 0051000A91540452931800F4 A742 0B0504C34FC0020003060202 01877E110356696300010186071103687474703A2F2F7761702E74646B6D6F62696C2E646B2F 0001C608018715110356696300010101
Falcom GSM MODEM Support
Hi. I have a Falcom Modem A2D but I can not send an sms message since when the ^Z character is inserted after a PDU submit, the modem replies with >ERROR. Is there any workaround? Has anyone on the list used successfully a Falcom Modem? Regards, Tim __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
WAP kannel + GSM Modem
Hi all, I am trying to use Kannel as WAP&SMS Gateway. Initially i started with SMS Gateway, using a GSM phone as modem and (after some trials) everything was ok. Now i am testing kannel as WAP gateway. The idea is to establish a PPP connection (dial-in) between a WAP phone and the GSM phone (connected to kannel) used as modem. But i had many problems I followed the instructions on the Kannel User Guide (about "Setting up a dial-up line") but after i added the line "S0:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS0 -x 6 -D /dev/ttyS0" to the file "/etc/inittab" (and the others explained on the guide) the GSM modem (Ericsson T39) doesn't answer automatically to the call of WAP phone (Nokia 9210) Probably i have a problem with mgetty. Below you can find the mgetty log file: 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.26-Apr16 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 mgetty.c compiled at Jul 24 2001, 18:57:33 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 user id: 0, parent pid: 1 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 reading configuration data for port 'ttyS0' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 reading /etc/mgetty+sendfax/mgetty.config... 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'debug 9' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'speed 19200' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'port ttyS0' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 section: port ttyS0, **found** 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'debug 9' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'data-only y' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'speed', type=0, flags=3, data=19200 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'switchbd', type=0, flags=1, data=0 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'direct', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'blocking', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'port-owner', type=1, flags=1, data=uucp 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'port-group', type=1, flags=1, data=uucp 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'port-mode', type=0, flags=1, data=432 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'toggle-dtr', type=3, flags=1, data=TRUE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'toggle-dtr-waittime', type=0, flags=1, data=500 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'need-dsr', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'data-only', type=3, flags=2, data=TRUE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-only', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'modem-type', type=1, flags=1, data=auto 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'modem-quirks', type=0, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'init-chat', type=2, flags=1, data= \dATQ0V1H0 OK ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1 OK 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'force-init-chat', type=2, flags=1, data= \d\d\d\d+++\d\d\d \dATQ0V1H0 OK 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'post-init-chat', type=2, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'data-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=1 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-send-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=7 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-rec-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=7 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'modem-check-time', type=0, flags=1, data=3600 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'rings', type=0, flags=1, data=1 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'msn-list', type=2, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'get-cnd-chat', type=2, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'cnd-program', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'answer-chat', type=2, flags=1, data= ATA CONNECT \c 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'answer-chat-timeout', type=0, flags=1, data=80 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'autobauding', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'ringback', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'ringback-time', type=0, flags=1, data=30 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'ignore-carrier', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'issue-file', type=1, flags=1, data=/etc/issue 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'prompt-waittime', type=0, flags=1, data=500 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'login-prompt', type=1, flags=1, data=@ login: 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'login-time', type=0, flags=1, data=240 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fido-send-emsi', type=3, flags=1, data=TRUE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'login-conf-file', type=1, flags=1, data=login.config 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-id', type=1, flags=1, data=49 115 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-min-speed', type=0, flags=1, data=0 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-max-speed', type=0, flags=1, data=14400 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-server-file', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'diskspace', type=0, flags=1, data=1024 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'notify', type=1, flags=1, data=faxadmin 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-owner'
WAP kannel & GSM Modem
Hi all, I am trying to use Kannel as WAP&SMS Gateway. Initially i started with SMS Gateway, using a GSM phone as modem and (after some trials) everything was ok. Now i am testing kannel as WAP gateway. The idea is to establish a PPP connection (dial-in) between a WAP phone and the GSM phone (connected to kannel) used as modem. But i had many problems I followed the instructions on the Kannel User Guide (about "Setting up a dial-up line") but after i added the line "S0:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS0 -x 6 -D /dev/ttyS0" to the file "/etc/inittab" (and the others explained on the guide) the GSM modem (Ericsson T39) doesn't answer automatically to the call of WAP phone (Nokia 9210) Probably i have a problem with mgetty. Below you can find the mgetty log file: 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.26-Apr16 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 mgetty.c compiled at Jul 24 2001, 18:57:33 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 user id: 0, parent pid: 1 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 reading configuration data for port 'ttyS0' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 reading /etc/mgetty+sendfax/mgetty.config... 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'debug 9' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'speed 19200' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'port ttyS0' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 section: port ttyS0, **found** 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'debug 9' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 conf lib: read: 'data-only y' 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'speed', type=0, flags=3, data=19200 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'switchbd', type=0, flags=1, data=0 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'direct', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'blocking', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'port-owner', type=1, flags=1, data=uucp 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'port-group', type=1, flags=1, data=uucp 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'port-mode', type=0, flags=1, data=432 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'toggle-dtr', type=3, flags=1, data=TRUE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'toggle-dtr-waittime', type=0, flags=1, data=500 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'need-dsr', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'data-only', type=3, flags=2, data=TRUE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-only', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'modem-type', type=1, flags=1, data=auto 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'modem-quirks', type=0, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'init-chat', type=2, flags=1, data= \dATQ0V1H0 OK ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1 OK 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'force-init-chat', type=2, flags=1, data= \d\d\d\d+++\d\d\d \dATQ0V1H0 OK 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'post-init-chat', type=2, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'data-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=1 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-send-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=7 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-rec-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=7 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'modem-check-time', type=0, flags=1, data=3600 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'rings', type=0, flags=1, data=1 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'msn-list', type=2, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'get-cnd-chat', type=2, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'cnd-program', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'answer-chat', type=2, flags=1, data= ATA CONNECT \c 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'answer-chat-timeout', type=0, flags=1, data=80 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'autobauding', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'ringback', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'ringback-time', type=0, flags=1, data=30 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'ignore-carrier', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'issue-file', type=1, flags=1, data=/etc/issue 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'prompt-waittime', type=0, flags=1, data=500 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'login-prompt', type=1, flags=1, data=@ login: 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'login-time', type=0, flags=1, data=240 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fido-send-emsi', type=3, flags=1, data=TRUE 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'login-conf-file', type=1, flags=1, data=login.config 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-id', type=1, flags=1, data=49 115 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-min-speed', type=0, flags=1, data=0 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-max-speed', type=0, flags=1, data=14400 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-server-file', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'diskspace', type=0, flags=1, data=1024 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'notify', type=1, flags=1, data=faxadmin 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-owner', type=1, flags=1, data=uucp 10/17 01:11:36 yS0 key: 'fax-group', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 10/
GSM Modem and dial in
Hi Do you know how to set up a dial in server using GSM Modem (phone ?). Which modem works with linux ? Regards, Hubert Kubik Ps. I'm using this list because users-kannel looks dead...
PDU mode and GSM modem
I'm trying to send an SMS in PDU mode using kannel gatewy 1.0.3 and a GSM Modem. I can not get it to work, the modem returns OK after the send command is issued but nothing never comes to the mobile phone. I know many messages have been exchanged previously about this topic.. pdu_encode in smsc_at.c is probably not correct, but I could not find in the archives a clear solution of my problem... Here are the commands I'm sending : First Command: AT+CMGS=54 Second Command: 004100099160714598F700042A093346050415813344024A3A51D195CDD004001B205505 9061056055855054854082084990 using the URL : http://131.107.0.15:12345/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=user&password=pass&to=061 754897&udh=3D%06%05%04%15%81%00%00&text=3D%02%4A%3A%51%D1%95%CD%D0%04%00%1B% 20%55%05%90%61%05%60%55%85%50%54%85%40%82%08%49%90%00%00
RE: Falcom GSM MODEM Support
It could be a modem problem or a sim problem - but I think its the later. have you tried sending a message with this sim using a phone ? have you tried to send a simple 7bit text message through the modem ? -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014 ::.. Rules for Academic Deans: (1) HIDE (2) If they find you, LIE -- Father Damian C. Fandal > -Original Message- > From: Ion Amigdalou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Falcom GSM MODEM Support > > > Hi. > I have a Falcom Modem A2D but I can not send an sms > message since when the ^Z character is inserted after > a PDU submit, the modem replies with >ERROR. > Is there any workaround? Has anyone on the list used > successfully a Falcom Modem? > > Regards, > Tim > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > >
AW: GSM Modem and dial in
We have done this using a Nokia Cardphone. There is nothing special to this. Regards Jorg > -UrsprØngliche Nachricht- > Von: Hubert Kubik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 20. Juli 2001 11:31 > An: Devel - Kannel > Betreff: GSM Modem and dial in > > Hi > > Do you know how to set up a dial in server using GSM Modem (phone ?). > Which modem works with linux ? > > Regards, > Hubert Kubik > > Ps. I'm using this list because users-kannel looks dead... >
REF:- Nokia 8890 as GSM modem
Sorry to be a pain guys, I can access the modem AT commands through IR but through the data cable I cannot gain access. I was hoping this phone would work with Kannel as the same commands as in sms_at2.c work through IR. Unfortunately IR is not stable enough to leave running - line of sight and all that. Is there a special unlock or anything like that? Any help appreciated else its of to Car Phone warehouse for me. Many thanks Steve Stephen RothwellTechnical ConsultantConsult HyperionTel: +44 1483 301793Fax: +44 1483 561657www.consult.hyperion.co.uk -where people, networks and money come together...Consult Hyperion-
connection of bearerbox with GSM modem
Hello, I work with the cygwin installation of kannel on a win2k machine. I have a peculiar problem with the bearerbox. When I start bearerbox utility and try and connect to the modem, the speed in the conf file does not seem to match and the connection fails. But if I try to connect to the modem thru the HyperTerminal (developed by Hilgraeve for microsoft) to the modem with the same speed, the connection comes through correctly. Consequently if I try the bearerbox connection with the same conf file, the bearerbox is up and running fine. Any idea why this would happen? Best Regards Anu
Re: REF:- Nokia 8890 as GSM modem
Title: Re: REF:- Nokia 8890 as GSM modem Sorry to be a pain guys, I can access the modem AT commands through IR but through the data cable I cannot gain access. I was hoping this phone would work with Kannel as the same commands as in sms_at2.c work through IR. Unfortunately IR is not stable enough to leave running - line of sight and all that. Is there a special unlock or anything like that? Any help appreciated else its of to Car Phone warehouse for me. the phone doesnt do standard AT commands on the serial cable but runs some infrared type encapsulation over it. Its not worth using it with Kannel. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting -- Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com -- Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
Re: connection of bearerbox with GSM modem
Anupama R wrote: > > Hello, > I work with the cygwin installation of kannel on a win2k machine. > I have a peculiar problem with the bearerbox. > When I start bearerbox utility and try and connect to the modem, the speed > in the conf file does not seem to match and the connection fails. > > But if I try to connect to the modem thru the HyperTerminal (developed by > Hilgraeve for microsoft) > to the modem with the same speed, the connection comes through correctly. > > Consequently if I try the bearerbox connection with the same conf file, the > bearerbox is up > and running fine. > > Any idea why this would happen? so do you get a valid connection to the device or not? I didn't get the point, sorry. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
RE: connection of bearerbox with GSM modem
Hello Stipe, I'll put it down in points, yes I get the connection, but I'll explain where the problem is. 1) connect the gsm modem to usb port 2) start bearerbox to connect to modem at 115200 (speed set in conf file) 3) bearerbox fails to connect, because after opening port at that speed, at command fails 4) connect the modem through hyperterminal (Hilgraeve product, comes with win 2k) at 115200 5) disconnect the modem from hyperterminal 6) reconnect with the same configuration file from bearerbox, this time connection will succeed. This is not sporadic behaviour. I run through this process everytime I connect the gsm modem. I wanted to know if there are any workarounds for this. Best Regards Anu > -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:33 AM > To: Anupama R > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: connection of bearerbox with GSM modem > > > Anupama R wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I work with the cygwin installation of kannel on a win2k machine. > > I have a peculiar problem with the bearerbox. > > When I start bearerbox utility and try and connect to the > modem, the speed > > in the conf file does not seem to match and the connection fails. > > > > But if I try to connect to the modem thru the HyperTerminal > (developed by > > Hilgraeve for microsoft) > > to the modem with the same speed, the connection comes > through correctly. > > > > Consequently if I try the bearerbox connection with the > same conf file, the > > bearerbox is up > > and running fine. > > > > Any idea why this would happen? > > so do you get a valid connection to the device or not? I didn't get > the point, sorry. > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > --- > wapme.net - wherever you are >
Re: connection of bearerbox with GSM modem
Anupama R wrote: > > 1) connect the gsm modem to usb port > 2) start bearerbox to connect to modem at 115200 (speed set in conf file) > 3) bearerbox fails to connect, because after opening port at that speed, at > command fails > 4) connect the modem through hyperterminal (Hilgraeve product, comes with > win 2k) at 115200 > 5) disconnect the modem from hyperterminal > 6) reconnect with the same configuration file from bearerbox, this time > connection will succeed. > > This is not sporadic behaviour. I run through this process everytime I > connect the gsm modem. > I wanted to know if there are any workarounds for this. I guest this is more of a Cygwin and USB port issue then kannel. Maybe you should post a USB related question to the cygwin mailing list. Sorry, but it's definetly out of scope for this mailing list. (Which doesn't mean someone who knows what this effect is shouldn't head up now and explain :)) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect
Guys, I am looking at the code here in smsc_at.c and cannot seem to see where the manufacturer string and issue are generated ready to be match to the detect-string variables as outlined in the user guide. Is this stuff fully implemented? or am I looking in the wrong place. If it is not done yet I can add the code to do the auto detect but am currently not fully confident of the whole architecture so someone may have to point me in the direction for implementing the hand down of the modem group stuff from the config files. Steve Stephen RothwellTechnical ConsultantConsult HyperionTel: +44 1483 301793Fax: +44 1483 561657www.consult.hyperion.co.uk -where people, networks and money come together...Consult Hyperion-
gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Hi. I'm running 'latest kannel cvs' (sep28) with a Falcom A2D1 modem, and the at smsc interface (*) It seems the modem/kannel is not acknowledging the incoming SMSs the way the telco SMSC (some kind of EMI2, I assume) wants it. Whenever I send an SMS from a regular mobile, two things happen: 1) it arrives alright within kannel. 2) the telco thinks it didn't, and sends the regular mobile a message saying 'Mobile text to 1234whatever sent 02.10.01 15.03.05 cannot be delivered because of error in the mobilephone (116)' (the text is really in danish, and I guess the 116 is a number of characters, not a return code, but I'm not sure). This behaviour must be partly dependent on the telco - some telcos don't send such a DLR back. But whatever, this is no good, since the user shouldn't I'm guessing it must somehow be related to the AT+CNMI command, that allows one to set how messages are received (and confirmed ?). Do anyone have suggestions for, what I should be looking at to get more understanding of how CNMI is/can be used ? The kannel I'm using says AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,0 (*) I am not using AT2 yet (though I want to), since my attempts to use it rather effectively screwed up the gsm modem :-(
Re: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect
Look in smsc_at2.c , and use smsc=at2. Andrea - Original Message - From: Stephen Rothwell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect Guys, I am looking at the code here in smsc_at.c and cannot seem to see where the manufacturer string and issue are generated ready to be match to the detect-string variables as outlined in the user guide. Is this stuff fully implemented? or am I looking in the wrong place. If it is not done yet I can add the code to do the auto detect but am currently not fully confident of the whole architecture so someone may have to point me in the direction for implementing the hand down of the modem group stuff from the config files. Steve Stephen RothwellTechnical ConsultantConsult HyperionTel: +44 1483 301793Fax: +44 1483 561657www.consult.hyperion.co.uk -where people, networks and money come together...Consult Hyperion-
Re: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect
Sorry my earlier email was in error and I am looking smsc_at2.c and I do have smsc=at2. I am expecting to see a command like AT+GMM / AT+GMI but cannot see them. Maybe I have an old version - 1.1.6?? Steve - Original Message - From: Andrea Viscovich To: Stephen Rothwell ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:29 AM Subject: Re: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect Look in smsc_at2.c , and use smsc=at2. Andrea - Original Message - From: Stephen Rothwell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect Guys, I am looking at the code here in smsc_at.c and cannot seem to see where the manufacturer string and issue are generated ready to be match to the detect-string variables as outlined in the user guide. Is this stuff fully implemented? or am I looking in the wrong place. If it is not done yet I can add the code to do the auto detect but am currently not fully confident of the whole architecture so someone may have to point me in the direction for implementing the hand down of the modem group stuff from the config files. Steve Stephen RothwellTechnical ConsultantConsult HyperionTel: +44 1483 301793Fax: +44 1483 561657www.consult.hyperion.co.uk -where people, networks and money come together...Consult Hyperion-
Re: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 11:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Sorry my earlier email was in error and I am looking smsc_at2.c and I do have >smsc=at2. > > I am expecting to see a command like AT+GMM / AT+GMI but cannot see them. Maybe I >have an old version - 1.1.6?? ATI, line 1876
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Hi. This actually works, thank you ! (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of 'problem with receiving device' message). They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed because of a problem with falcom, or is it temporary because something else needs to be fixed ? I don't see a performance problem in polling a gsm_modem (it doesn't get messages that quick anyway), but I wish the kannel.log didn't grow when there is no traffic... Also, I'm still curious about the return codes...
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
On 3 October 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi. This actually works, thank you ! If you are talking about my patches I sent the list, then a] This work around is for all modems. It uses modem memory for reception of SMSs and uses direct SMS sending to send SMSs. It tends to be more reliable. b] Andreas Fink has written the AT2 driver which uses SMS version two and has a few advantages because of that. I suggest he re-writes the list on how to set up that driver so we can all help debug it with him. c] I will have new patches as of tomorrow which fix a few more bugs and yeild the original AT driver even better then my last patches. The only way to loose SMSs is by sending and failing to send 4 times, as per the RETRIES variable, set in the smsc_at.c file. d] I require a nominee before I can patch the CVS tree ... would you / someone mind nominating me ? e] The new patches will stop the kannel log from growing when there are no incvoming / outgoing SMSs ... this was originally for debugging. > (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of > 'problem with receiving device' message). > > They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. > > But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed > because of a problem with falcom, or is it temporary because > something else needs to be fixed ? >I don't see a performance problem in polling a gsm_modem > (it doesn't get messages that quick anyway), but > I wish the kannel.log didn't grow when there is no traffic... > > Also, I'm still curious about the return codes... > -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Matt, I would like you to patch the at code and let at2 code from Andreas Fink. By the way maybe someone won't agree with this, but having an at3 is not so good. Anybody using at currently has any comments? Andrea
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Why is it that bad to have at3 ? Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. Thanks.
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
Ok then Matt, at3 seems the best solution. Andrea - Original Message - From: "Alexei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:40 AM Subject: Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC? > Why is it that bad to have at3 ? > Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my > Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. > I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. > I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. > Thanks. > > >
Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote: > Why is it that bad to have at3 ? > Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my > Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. > I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. > I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. > Thanks. Quite frankly, the current AT module is so buggy it is not even worth thinking about using. I believe that if people want an AT module which works in a similar way to the original but works, then they should switch to the AT2 module it was alot more reliable then the original AT module and that was weeks ago - by now it must be even better ! Tomorrow I am going to send out my latest patches which will alter the smsc_at.c and smsc_p.h files. -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte
RE: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
I'm still using the AT module (with a nokiaphone) because I have the following problem when I want to send an operator logo with the AT2 module : My logo is divided into 2 sms. The first one is sent correctly but the second always fails (status FAILED in the logs). With the AT module, it's working fine... I have no idea where it could come fom. Eric Guivarch -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Matt Flax Envoye : mercredi 3 octobre 2001 14:47 A : Alexei Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC? On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote: > Why is it that bad to have at3 ? > Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my > Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it. > I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea. > I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim card. > Thanks. Quite frankly, the current AT module is so buggy it is not even worth thinking about using. I believe that if people want an AT module which works in a similar way to the original but works, then they should switch to the AT2 module it was alot more reliable then the original AT module and that was weeks ago - by now it must be even better ! Tomorrow I am going to send out my latest patches which will alter the smsc_at.c and smsc_p.h files. -- Matt Common computer data descriptions bitlicknibble byte
[RFC] AT (Was: Re: REF:- SMSC - GSM Modem - Modem Type Auto Detect)
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 11:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Guys, > > I am looking at the code here in smsc_at.c Could we drop AT module on release 1.2 ? Is it there something still lacking in AT2 ?
