[digitalradio] mftty

2008-12-11 Thread dg9bfc
download of mftty works again
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
greetz



[digitalradio] mftty

2008-12-11 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear groupmembers
the download of mftty works again
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
try it out
it is also useful for echolink or controlling repeaters by dtmf commands
greets dg9bfc

[digitalradio] MFTTY

2009-01-20 Thread Russell Blair
New version 3.0.148  up dates.

Russell

   = 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)  Skype-Russell.Blair  Hell Field #300  DRCC #55  30m 
Dig-group #693


  


[digitalradio] MFTTY

2009-01-26 Thread David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
Where has all the activity gone ?

david/wd4kpd



Re: [digitalradio] mftty

2008-12-11 Thread W6IDS
Hello,

Do we know if the application will run on a VISTA 64 OS?

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: "dg9bfc" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] mftty


> download of mftty works again
> http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
> greetz



Re: [digitalradio] mftty

2008-12-12 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear howard
try it out ... it should work
if you got it working just tell the other in the group how you did it
i have an old win98se pc ... there it works fine
could´t tell you if it will work on vista but should be interresting for others
ps: norbert works on a "second edition" and said it will also be free
best73´s de dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: W6IDS 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:17 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] mftty


  Hello,

  Do we know if the application will run on a VISTA 64 OS?

  Howard W6IDS
  Richmond, IN

  - Original Message - 
  From: "dg9bfc" 
  To: 
  Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:56 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] mftty

  > download of mftty works again
  > http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
  > greetz



   

Re: [digitalradio] mftty

2008-12-13 Thread Andy obrien
So, in what  ways are people using this on the air ?

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Siegfried Jackstien
 wrote:
> dear howard
> try it out ... it should work
> if you got it working just tell the other in the group how you did it
> i have an old win98se pc ... there it works fine
> could´t tell you if it will work on vista but should be interresting for
> others
> ps: norbert works on a "second edition" and said it will also be free
> best73´s de dg9bfc
>
> - Original Message -
> From: W6IDS
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] mftty
>
> Hello,
>
> Do we know if the application will run on a VISTA 64 OS?
>
> Howard W6IDS
> Richmond, IN
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "dg9bfc" 
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:56 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] mftty
>
>> download of mftty works again
>> http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
>> greetz
>
> 


Re: [digitalradio] mftty

2008-12-13 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
you can just send text like in any other mode or you can control a local 
repeater via dtmf or you can use it for echolink  so many possibilities for 
use of that software
greetz
dg9bfc

  - Original Message - 
  From: Andy obrien 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 4:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] mftty


  So, in what ways are people using this on the air ?

  On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Siegfried Jackstien
   wrote:
  > dear howard
  > try it out ... it should work
  > if you got it working just tell the other in the group how you did it
  > i have an old win98se pc ... there it works fine
  > could´t tell you if it will work on vista but should be interresting for
  > others
  > ps: norbert works on a "second edition" and said it will also be free
  > best73´s de dg9bfc
  >
  > - Original Message -
  > From: W6IDS
  > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:17 AM
  > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] mftty
  >
  > Hello,
  >
  > Do we know if the application will run on a VISTA 64 OS?
  >
  > Howard W6IDS
  > Richmond, IN
  >
  > - Original Message -
  > From: "dg9bfc" 
  > To: 
  > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:56 PM
  > Subject: [digitalradio] mftty
  >
  >> download of mftty works again
  >> http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
  >> greetz
  >
  > 


   

[digitalradio] MFTTY Download

2008-12-14 Thread n4hra
Were do I fine the MFTTY site to download 

Lew




[digitalradio] MFTTY FREQ.

2009-01-08 Thread wd4kpd
LOOKING FORWARD TO FIRST QSOAM WATCHING THE FREQS MENTIONED IN 
EARLIER MESSAGESHPE C UALL TONIGHT.

DAVID/WD4KPD




[digitalradio] MFTTY 20m

2009-01-11 Thread Tommi Holopainen
I will CQ 14068 MFTTY
Version 3.0.141 is OUT

-Tommi OH7JJT-


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY

2009-01-26 Thread F.R. Ashley
What activity?   I have yet to hear a MFTTY signal on any band.  I've called 
CQ for hours but no response, mainly on 20 and 80 meters.

73 Buddy WB4M

- Original Message - 
From: "David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD" 
To: "DIGITALRADIO" 
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 3:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY


> Where has all the activity gone ?
>
> david/wd4kpd
>
>
> 
>
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY

2009-01-26 Thread kh6ty
Buddy, suggest a frequency and time here: http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/


73, Skip KH6TY





> What activity?   I have yet to hear a MFTTY signal on any band.  I've 
> called
> CQ for hours but no response, mainly on 20 and 80 meters.
>
> 73 Buddy WB4M



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY

2009-01-26 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
don´t know
just as an info:version3.149 is out
dg9bfc
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD 
  To: DIGITALRADIO 
  Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:45 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY


  Where has all the activity gone ?

  david/wd4kpd



   

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY

2009-01-26 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
or go via that page to the page "digitalmodes" ... there you will find others 
with mftty 
  - Original Message - 
  From: kh6ty 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:15 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY


  Buddy, suggest a frequency and time here: http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/

  73, Skip KH6TY

  > What activity? I have yet to hear a MFTTY signal on any band. I've 
  > called
  > CQ for hours but no response, mainly on 20 and 80 meters.
  >
  > 73 Buddy WB4M



   

[digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-13 Thread Andy obrien
I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5 USB.  It seems to do fairly
well with moderate signals.

CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk

£´k3uk hi there de nc5o
nc50 hi
nc50 hi  from Andy in NY

 log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state over...

e prograVVsowork oFrus to useare he in texatday d

Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to figure this out ...BTU de K3UK

hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou now V6Vó¦

73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk



Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download

2008-12-14 Thread Toby Burnett
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/

That is where I got it from. 

Good luck
 
---Original Message---
 
From: n4hra
Date: 14/12/2008 12:43:48
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download
 
Were do I fine the MFTTY site to download 

Lew


 
 <><<5453.gif>>

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download

2008-12-14 Thread Lew Cason
Thank you for the information

I installed it on a Panasonic laptop with Win 98 and received a error 
"RUN-TIME ERROR 429 ACTIVEX COMPOMENT CAN'T CREAT OBLECT"


Lew
N4HRA
  - Original Message - 
  From: Toby Burnett 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 9:39 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download



   
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/

That is where I got it from. 

Good luck

---Original Message---

From: n4hra
Date: 14/12/2008 12:43:48
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download

Were do I fine the MFTTY site to download 

Lew



   
   
   


   <<5453.gif>>

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download

2008-12-14 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
look here
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
greetz
dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: n4hra 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 1:43 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY Download


  Were do I fine the MFTTY site to download 

  Lew



   

[digitalradio] MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread rich3x
Will qsx & send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.

Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

de Rich/N2JR




[digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-07 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi all,

I am monitoring dial 3588 USB (1000Hz) now .

I am not able to QSO right now, but the
radio will be on the frequency for some hours .

I will post the monitoring result here.


73 LA5VNA Steinar




Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY FREQ.

2009-01-08 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Also keep en eye on http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

Very useful..



At 02:01 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
>LOOKING FORWARD TO FIRST QSOAM WATCHING THE FREQS MENTIONED IN 
>EARLIER MESSAGESHPE C UALL TONIGHT.
>
>DAVID/WD4KPD














Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY FREQ.

2009-01-08 Thread F.R. Ashley
I heard some MFTTY signals but they would not decode.. no RX print at all.. 

73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message - 
From: "wd4kpd" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY FREQ.


> LOOKING FORWARD TO FIRST QSOAM WATCHING THE FREQS MENTIONED IN 
> EARLIER MESSAGESHPE C UALL TONIGHT.
> 
> DAVID/WD4KPD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 


[digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Tommi Holopainen
QRV MF teletype 3591 nw

-Tommi OH7JJT



[digitalradio] MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Norbert Pieper
There is an update of MFTTY Help file available now.
In the chapter "General" i have added a page named 
"Tuning into MFTTY Station"
Feel free to download and study
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/MFTTHelp.chm

Problems with opening the Help file?
Then read this Instructions from Microsoft
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/HelpInstructions.html

73
55
de
Norbert



[digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons

2009-01-15 Thread Tony
All, 

It's good to see the enthusiasm about MFTTY. It has a nifty GUI and its easy to 
use. A few have mentioned a lack of lack of sensitivity and that does seem to 
be the case. But I think it's safe to say that we don't always need to bring an 
elephant gun to a turkey shoot ;  ). 

For what it's worth, and with all due respect to the author, I've tested MFTTY 
with an HF path simulator and it is less sensitive and less robust than say 
PSK31. On air tests seem to show that the mode performs well with low power 
under quiet conditions. 

Many thanks to Norbert and those like him who give us the opportunity to 
experiment and play with new modes. If it wasn't for them, we'd still be 
lugging those heavy RTTY machines into the shack ;  ). 

Tony -K2MO


[digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'

2009-01-16 Thread Russell Blair
I updated to the newer version 3.0.146, and I am getting a (run-time error'380' 
Invalid property value), this error didn't show up in any of the older version, 
I have to delete the program and reload it to get to run. After that it work 
fine. Has something changed in between versions. That would cause this to 
happen?

Russell 

   = 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)  Skype-Russell.Blair  Hell Field #300  DRCC #55  30m 
Dig-group #693


  


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-13 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
I could also hear you in there, Andy, but much too close to try for 
a QSO on 30M! Had a good copy on Russell, but the tuning has me a bit 
baffled.

With my rig tuned so that I was decoding Russell and Ron, my tones 
sounded like they were much lower than the other two stations.

How can you tell when you are right on frequency?

73
Dave
KB3MOW


Andy obrien wrote:
> I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5 USB.  It seems to do fairly
> well with moderate signals.
>
> CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
> CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk
>
> £´k3uk hi there de nc5o
> nc50 hi
> nc50 hi  from Andy in NY
>
>  log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
> Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state over...
>
> e prograVVsowork oFrus to useare he in texatday d
>
> Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to figure this out ...BTU de K3UK
>
> hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou now V6Vó¦
>
> 73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk
>
> 
>
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>   



Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-13 Thread Toby Burnett
Hi all, 

Just downloaded the MFTT software, 
I'm on the Isle of Lewis, NW Scotland. 
Listening 10.135,5 
What speed etc should I be set too and I will listen. 

Toby  
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Dave 'Doc' Corio
Date: 13/12/2008 19:04:38
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
 
I could also hear you in there, Andy, but much too close to try for
a QSO on 30M! Had a good copy on Russell, but the tuning has me a bit
baffled.
 
With my rig tuned so that I was decoding Russell and Ron, my tones
sounded like they were much lower than the other two stations.
 
How can you tell when you are right on frequency?
 
73
Dave
KB3MOW
 
 
Andy obrien wrote:
> I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5 USB.  It seems to do fairly
> well with moderate signals.
>
> CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
> CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk
>
> £´k3uk hi there de nc5o
> nc50 hi
> nc50 hi  from Andy in NY
>
>  log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
> Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state over...
>
> e prograVVsowork oFrus to useare he in texatday d
>
> Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to figure this out ...BTU de
K3UK
>
> hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou now V6Vó¦
>
> 73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk
>
> 
>
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
 

 
Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
 
 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
<><<5453.gif>>

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-13 Thread Russell Blair
Toby, set it to 1/2 speed and see if I can copy you hr in Texas 
 
Russell
 
= IN GOD WE TRUST ! = Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Toby Burnett  wrote:
From: Toby Burnett Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It worksTo: digitalradio@yahoogroups.comDate: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 1:13 PM











 


Hi all, 
 
Just downloaded the MFTT software, 
I'm on the Isle of Lewis, NW Scotland. 
Listening 10.135,5 
What speed etc should I be set too and I will listen. 
 
Toby  
 
---Original Message- --
 

From: Dave 'Doc' Corio
Date: 13/12/2008 19:04:38
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
 
I could also hear you in there, Andy, but much too close to try for
a QSO on 30M! Had a good copy on Russell, but the tuning has me a bit
baffled.
 
With my rig tuned so that I was decoding Russell and Ron, my tones
sounded like they were much lower than the other two stations.
 
How can you tell when you are right on frequency?
 
73
Dave
KB3MOW
 
 
Andy obrien wrote:
> I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5 USB.  It seems to do fairly
> well with moderate signals.
>
> CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
> CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk
>
> £´k3uk hi there de nc5o
> nc50 hi
> nc50 hi  from Andy in NY
>
>  log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
> Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state over...
>
> e prograVVso work oFrus to useare he in texatday d
>
> Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to figure this out ...BTU de K3UK
>
> hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou now V6Vó¦
>
> 73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk
>
>  - - --
>
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
 
 - - --
 
Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked
 
 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links
 
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/digitalrad io/
 
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
 
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/digitalrad io/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
 
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:digitalradio -dig...@yahoogro ups.com
mailto:digitalradio -fullfeatured@ yahoogroups. com
 
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio- unsubscribe@ yahoogroups. com
 
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs. yahoo.com/ info/terms/
 









  

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-13 Thread w4lde
Russell,

Thanks for the #1 MFTTY QSO on 30 meters.  I would suggest that since 
the stated Bandwidth for 1/2 speed is 468Hz that probably that keeps us 
inside the 500Hz allowed bandwidth for most of the digital frequencies.  
What I see interesting is the RX bandwidth at hald speed which is 15Hz.  
That helps explain why so many are having trouble syncing in on a 
station.  I think that the mode needs lots of work before it can be used 
by all.  I can't get the help file to open.  O'well back to the standards

73 de
Ron W4LDE


Russell Blair wrote:
> Toby, set it to 1/2 speed and see if I can copy you hr in Texas
>  
> Russell
>
>  
> =
> *IN GOD WE TRUST !*
> =
> Russell Blair (NC5O)
> Skype-Russell.Blair
> Hell Field #300
> DRCC #55
> 30m Dig-group #693
>
>
> --- On *Sat, 12/13/08, Toby Burnett //* wrote:
>
> From: Toby Burnett 
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 1:13 PM
>
>  
>
> Hi all,
>  
> Just downloaded the MFTT software,
> I'm on the Isle of Lewis, NW Scotland.
> Listening 10.135,5
> What speed etc should I be set too and I will listen.
>  
> Toby  
>  
> /---Original Message- --/
>  
> /*From:*/ Dave 'Doc' Corio <mailto:dco...@zitomedia.net>
> /*Date:*/ 13/12/2008 19:04:38
> /*To:*/ digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
> <mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
> /*Subject:*/ Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
>  
> I could also hear you in there, Andy, but much too close to
> try for
> a QSO on 30M! Had a good copy on Russell, but the tuning has me a bit
> baffled.
>  
> With my rig tuned so that I was decoding Russell and Ron, my tones
> sounded like they were much lower than the other two stations.
>  
> How can you tell when you are right on frequency?
>  
> 73
> Dave
> KB3MOW
>  
>  
> Andy obrien wrote:
> > I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5 USB.  It seems to do
> fairly
> > well with moderate signals.
> >
> > CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
> > CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk
> >
> > £´k3uk hi there de nc5o
> > nc50 hi
> > nc50 hi  from Andy in NY
> >
> >  log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
> > Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state over...
> >
> > e prograVVso work oFrus to useare he in texatday d
> >
> > Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to figure this out
> ...BTU de K3UK
> >
> > hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou now V6Vó¦
> >
> > 73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk
> >
> >  - - --
> >
> > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> > http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked <http://www.obriensweb.com/sked>
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  
>  - - --
>  
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked <http://www.obriensweb.com/sked>
>  
>  
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>  
>  
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>  
> mailto:digitalradio -fullfeatured@ yahoogroups. com
> <mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com>
>  
>  
>  
>
>   
>   
>
>



Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-13 Thread Rick W
Ron,

Although I am not strongly supportive of wide bandwidth modes in what 
has historically been the narrower portions of the HF bands, I will use 
1000 or even 2000 Hz modes under conditions where a given band is almost 
devoid of signals, or under severe conditions. This is not a criticism, 
but where do you find any reference to an "allowed bandwidth?"

There are no specific HF digital frequencies that I am aware of here in 
the U.S.It is true that on the HF bands we have  RTTY/Data portions and 
phone/image portions. Digital modes can be used throughout the bands 
based upon the type of information to be transmitted. (The third symbol 
in the ITU Classifications of Emissions).

The one change in the past few years was allowing image (fax), whether 
digital or analog, in the RTTY/Data portions of the HF bands, providing 
the emission is 500 Hz or narrower. But non-phone emissions have no 
specific bandwidth limit except that they may not "exceed the bandwidth 
of a communications quality phone emission of the same modulation type."

There is a special restriction for stations in automatic operation where 
there can be a 500 Hz limitation. But there is no such limitation with 
operators communicating from their control points.

Finally, there are band plans from various groups, particularly the IARU 
and while they appear at times to not properly reflect current actual 
operating practices, they can be used as a guide.


73,

Rick, KV9U


w4lde wrote:
> Russell,
>
> Thanks for the #1 MFTTY QSO on 30 meters.  I would suggest that since 
> the stated Bandwidth for 1/2 speed is 468Hz that probably that keeps us 
> inside the 500Hz allowed bandwidth for most of the digital frequencies.  
>
>
>   



[digitalradio] MFTTy Help file Download

2008-12-14 Thread Norbert Pieper
For those who have problems opening the MFTTy helpfile here the 
solution from Microsoft homepage:

Resolution for end users
Warning If you are prompted to open or to save a .chm file from a 
Web site, you should do so only if you need the file and if you 
trust the Web site that is providing the file. 

In the File Download dialog box, click Save, and then choose where 
you want to save the .chm file. Then, use one of the following 
methods:
Method 1
Double-click the .chm file.
In the Open File-Security Warning dialog box, click to clear the 
Always ask before opening this file check box.
Click Open.
Method 2
Right-click the CHM file, and then click Properties.
Click Unblock.
Double-click the .chm file to open the file.
Back to the top

BR
Norbert



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works

2008-12-14 Thread w4lde
Rick,

You are correct regarding bandwidth, there was several discussions 
awhile back regarding the 30 meter band where some argued that we were 
restricted to 500Hz, I didn't subscribe to this and I thought 1Khz was 
acceptable.  Anyway my thoughts are based on what space is available so 
as not to cause  QRM  to other users on the band, what I see from the 
MFTTY widths when selecting a mode is anywhere from narrow (29Hz)  to 
(986Hz) plus a S/N ratio of -27 to 8db.  The normal mode (speed) 
provides 75wpm at 936Hz (bw) and a 0db SNR were as the 1/2 speed 
provides a 38wpm at 468Hz (bw) and a -3db SNR.  Frankly I believe that 
Olivia and Thor will accomplish the needs of digital operators better.  
Thanks for your input I learn something every day.

Happy Holidays and a safe and wonderful 2009 to you and the family

73 de
Ron W4LDE



Rick W wrote:
>
> Ron,
>
> Although I am not strongly supportive of wide bandwidth modes in what
> has historically been the narrower portions of the HF bands, I will use
> 1000 or even 2000 Hz modes under conditions where a given band is almost
> devoid of signals, or under severe conditions. This is not a criticism,
> but where do you find any reference to an "allowed bandwidth?"
>
> There are no specific HF digital frequencies that I am aware of here in
> the U.S.It is true that on the HF bands we have RTTY/Data portions and
> phone/image portions. Digital modes can be used throughout the bands
> based upon the type of information to be transmitted. (The third symbol
> in the ITU Classifications of Emissions).
>
> The one change in the past few years was allowing image (fax), whether
> digital or analog, in the RTTY/Data portions of the HF bands, providing
> the emission is 500 Hz or narrower. But non-phone emissions have no
> specific bandwidth limit except that they may not "exceed the bandwidth
> of a communications quality phone emission of the same modulation type."
>
> There is a special restriction for stations in automatic operation where
> there can be a 500 Hz limitation. But there is no such limitation with
> operators communicating from their control points.
>
> Finally, there are band plans from various groups, particularly the IARU
> and while they appear at times to not properly reflect current actual
> operating practices, they can be used as a guide.
>
> 73,
>
> Rick, KV9U
>
> w4lde wrote:
> > Russell,
> >
> > Thanks for the #1 MFTTY QSO on 30 meters. I would suggest that since
> > the stated Bandwidth for 1/2 speed is 468Hz that probably that keeps us
> > inside the 500Hz allowed bandwidth for most of the digital frequencies.
> >
> >
> >
>
>  


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 40m

2009-01-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
hummm , it is possible to try a freq around 7035 ? There is there is
heavy ssb qrm on

7068 in Europa 

73 de LA5VNA Steinar






rich3x wrote:
> Will qsx & send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.
>
> Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?
>
> de Rich/N2JR
>
>
>
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 
> 07:56
>
>   



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-08 Thread W6IDS

Hey, Steinar!

Tried to bring up MFTTY but encountered a problem.

I get this flag:

Run Time Error '429':

ActiveX component can't create object.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: "Steinar Aanesland" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:35 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m


> Hi all,
> 
> I am monitoring dial 3588 USB (1000Hz) now 


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-08 Thread W6IDS
Forgot to mention, if it matters, that I'm running VISTA.

Howard W6IDS

- Original Message - 
From: "W6IDS" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m


> 
> Hey, Steinar!
> 
> Tried to bring up MFTTY but encountered a problem.
> 
> I get this flag:
> 
> Run Time Error '429':
> 
> ActiveX component can't create object.
> 
> Howard W6IDS
> Richmond, IN
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Steinar Aanesland" 
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:35 AM
> Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m
> 
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I am monitoring dial 3588 USB (1000Hz) now 
> 
> 
> 
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Tapani Juhola
Hi, Tommi.

I will try to be there after downloading the .139 or so.

cu de Tapani/OH2LU


On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:31:46 +0200, Tommi Holopainen wrote:

>QRV MF teletype 3591 nw
>
>-Tommi OH7JJT
>
>



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Capture @ 3591 right now

CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ deOH7TE  CQ de OH7TE 
CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  k

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Tapani Juhola wrote:
> Hi, Tommi.
>
> I will try to be there after downloading the .139 or so.
>
> cu de Tapani/OH2LU
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:31:46 +0200, Tommi Holopainen wrote:
>
>   
>> QRV MF teletype 3591 nw
>>
>> -Tommi OH7JJT
>>
>>
>> 
>
>
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1885 - Release Date: 09.01.2009 
> 19:59
>
>   



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Tapani Juhola

Any capture on me? de OH2LU


On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:00:40 +0100, Steinar Aanesland wrote:

>
>Capture @ 3591 right now
>
>CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ deOH7TE  CQ de OH7TE 
>CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  k
>
>73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>
>
>
>
>Tapani Juhola wrote:
>> Hi, Tommi.
>>
>> I will try to be there after downloading the .139 or so.
>>
>> cu de Tapani/OH2LU
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:31:46 +0200, Tommi Holopainen wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> QRV MF teletype 3591 nw
>>>
>>> -Tommi OH7JJT
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>
>>
>>   
>> 
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1885 - Release Date: 09.01.2009 
>> 19:59
>>
>>   
>
>



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Tapani Juhola

Hei, Tommi.

Nyt näin ensi kertaa selkeän CQ-kutsun sinulta! 
1815 UTC! Ja nyt toinen kerta.

de Tapani

On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:31:46 +0200, Tommi Holopainen wrote:

>QRV MF teletype 3591 nw
>
>-Tommi OH7JJT
>
>



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread F.R. Ashley
qrv on 14.075 USB now. (1825z ). mftty

wb4m


- Original Message - 
From: "Tapani Juhola" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m



Hei, Tommi.

Nyt näin ensi kertaa selkeän CQ-kutsun sinulta!
1815 UTC! Ja nyt toinen kerta.

de Tapani

On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:31:46 +0200, Tommi Holopainen wrote:

>QRV MF teletype 3591 nw
>
>-Tommi OH7JJT
>
>




Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Tapani Juhola

Made my first QSO on MFTT with Tommi, OH7JJT on 3590!
de OH2LU




[digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.140 is out

2009-01-10 Thread Steinar Aanesland
MFTT 3.0.140

Download it from :
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Yes :)

OH7TE OH7TE DE OH2LU KYLLÄ SINÄ TN HYVI5I OK??BK

la5vna Steinar


Tapani Juhola wrote:
> Any capture on me? de OH2LU
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:00:40 +0100, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
>
>> Capture @ 3591 right now
>>
>> CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ deOH7TE  CQ de OH7TE
>> CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  k
>>
>> 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>>
>>



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Tapani Juhola

Thanks, Steiner! Good copy on our contact. We had an hour-long 
roundtable including OH7TE, OH7JJT, OH2BRN and myself on 3590. 

Finally learned how to tune up on the right frequency, hi!

To-morrow perhaps on 14075 for a longer-haul contact.

73 & GN de Tapani/OH2LU


On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:49:17 +0100, Steinar Aanesland wrote:

>Yes :)
>
>OH7TE OH7TE DE OH2LU KYLLÄ SINÄ TN HYVI5I OK??BK
>
>la5vna Steinar
>
>
>Tapani Juhola wrote:
>> Any capture on me? de OH2LU
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:00:40 +0100, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
>>
>>> Capture @ 3591 right now
>>>
>>> CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ deOH7TE  CQ de OH7TE
>>> CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  CQ de OH7TE  k
>>>
>>> 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>>>
>>>
>
>



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Rick W
What do you find are the main benefits of this mode compared with other 
modes?

73,

Rick, KV9U


Tapani Juhola wrote:
> Thanks, Steiner! Good copy on our contact. We had an hour-long 
> roundtable including OH7TE, OH7JJT, OH2BRN and myself on 3590. 
>
> Finally learned how to tune up on the right frequency, hi!
>
> To-morrow perhaps on 14075 for a longer-haul contact.
>
> 73 & GN de Tapani/OH2LU
>
>   



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
witch mode  speed did you use??
dg9bfc
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: Tapani Juhola 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 7:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m



  Made my first QSO on MFTT with Tommi, OH7JJT on 3590!
  de OH2LU



   

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m

2009-01-10 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear rick
when conditions are good it is very easy to send in higher mode (speed)
i think that its the most benefit
it is just a new mode so try it out
how good it is with weak signal and lower speed has to be proofed on the air
greetz
dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick W 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 9:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m


  What do you find are the main benefits of this mode compared with other 
  modes?

  73,

  Rick, KV9U

  Tapani Juhola wrote:
  > Thanks, Steiner! Good copy on our contact. We had an hour-long 
  > roundtable including OH7TE, OH7JJT, OH2BRN and myself on 3590. 
  >
  > Finally learned how to tune up on the right frequency, hi!
  >
  > To-morrow perhaps on 14075 for a longer-haul contact.
  >
  > 73 & GN de Tapani/OH2LU
  >
  > 



   

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Norbert

Thanks for giving us this very interesting and easy to use software.  I
have question; what about
using 1500Hz as a default infrequency  in instead of 1000Hz ? All my
transceivers (icom's) have their
"sweet point's " at 1500Hz. i USB/LSB

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Norbert Pieper wrote:
> There is an update of MFTTY Help file available now.
> In the chapter "General" i have added a page named 
> "Tuning into MFTTY Station"
> Feel free to download and study
> http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/MFTTHelp.chm
>
> Problems with opening the Help file?
> Then read this Instructions from Microsoft
> http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/HelpInstructions.html
>
> 73
> 55
> de
> Norbert
>
>
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1886 - Release Date: 10.01.2009 
> 18:01
>
>   



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Tuning information

2009-01-11 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear steinar
you can switch it on your own to 1500
but you have to dial your trx 500 hz lower to be on the same frequency when 
somebody in the group
sends a mail like :qrv in mftty on 14.075 or something like this
the best way is when somebody wants to make a sked
he should ad af frequency in the announcement like
qrv in mftty on 14.075 + 1500hz mode 1/4speed
so others will find the station easier
good luck with this new mode
best 73´s de dg9bfc
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: Steinar Aanesland 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 12:34 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Tuning information


  Hi Norbert

  Thanks for giving us this very interesting and easy to use software. I
  have question; what about
  using 1500Hz as a default infrequency in instead of 1000Hz ? All my
  transceivers (icom's) have their
  "sweet point's " at 1500Hz. i USB/LSB

  73 de LA5VNA Steinar

  Norbert Pieper wrote:
  > There is an update of MFTTY Help file available now.
  > In the chapter "General" i have added a page named 
  > "Tuning into MFTTY Station"
  > Feel free to download and study
  > http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/MFTTHelp.chm
  >
  > Problems with opening the Help file?
  > Then read this Instructions from Microsoft
  > http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/HelpInstructions.html
  >
  > 73
  > 55
  > de
  > Norbert
  >
  >
  > 
  > --
  >
  >
  > No virus found in this incoming message.
  > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
  > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1886 - Release Date: 10.01.2009 
18:01
  >
  > 



   

[digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-12 Thread Steinar Aanesland
MFTT 3.0.143


# Pilot Tone will be inserted automatically after a transmission pause
of equivalent 4 words time
# Thin grey line added to spectrum display, indicating the center
frequency of Rx-Band-Pass-Filter
# Double click on "Rx . Hz" will copy the Tx freq.
# Double click on "Tx . Hz" will copy the Rx freq.
# Tool Tip Text added to UI elements


Download it from :
http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html

73 de LA5VNA Steinar



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons

2009-01-16 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
dear tony
what speed did you use for the path simulation?
when you take a slower mode the s7n will be higher cause the filter are narrower
that´s why i asked about used speed for the test
greetz
dg9bfc
sigi
  - Original Message - 
  From: Tony 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:49 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons



  All, 

  It's good to see the enthusiasm about MFTTY. It has a nifty GUI and its easy 
to use. A few have mentioned a lack of lack of sensitivity and that does seem 
to be the case. But I think it's safe to say that we don't always need to bring 
an elephant gun to a turkey shoot ;  ). 

  For what it's worth, and with all due respect to the author, I've tested 
MFTTY with an HF path simulator and it is less sensitive and less robust than 
say PSK31. On air tests seem to show that the mode performs well with low power 
under quiet conditions. 

  Many thanks to Norbert and those like him who give us the opportunity to 
experiment and play with new modes. If it wasn't for them, we'd still be 
lugging those heavy RTTY machines into the shack ;  ). 

  Tony -K2MO


   

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'

2009-01-16 Thread kh6ty
The reason for a version change IS because something has changed. There are 
many reasons under Visual Basic for getting a run-time error message, and 
perhaps your reload then overwrote the older values the program was still 
using, and that is why it is working now.

Just my guess, not knowing the details of Norbert's code.

It is usually best when upgrading to delete all previous code, such as a 
.ini file, etc, but I do not know what or where MFTTY is writing to the hard 
disk, so deleting all the previous files before upgrading is not possible, 
and we are left with having the program just overwrite them.

73, Skip KH6TY



- Original Message - 
From: "Russell Blair" 
To: "Digital Radio" 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:43 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'


I updated to the newer version 3.0.146, and I am getting a (run-time 
error'380' Invalid property value), this error didn't show up in any of the 
older version, I have to delete the program and reload it to get to run. 
After that it work fine. Has something changed in between versions. That 
would cause this to happen?

Russell

  =
IN GOD WE TRUST !
=
Russell Blair (NC5O)  Skype-Russell.Blair  Hell Field #300  DRCC #55  30m 
Dig-group #693





Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1785 - Release Date: 11/13/2008 
9:12 AM




Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'

2009-01-16 Thread Russell Blair
Yes I have been deleteing the program before I install the new one. Maybe 
Norbert can put some light on this,
 I need to get the Com-port1 to work, I have to use VOX, in the program it 
access the com port-1, because if I try to start MMTTY it sayes it cant star 
com port 1. MFTTY is just not keying the radio. The radio works with MMTTY, 
HRD, and Commander with MultiPSK on keying the radio all works fine.
 
Russell 


 
= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Fri, 1/16/09, kh6ty  wrote:

From: kh6ty 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 8:00 AM






The reason for a version change IS because something has changed. There are 
many reasons under Visual Basic for getting a run-time error message, and 
perhaps your reload then overwrote the older values the program was still 
using, and that is why it is working now.

Just my guess, not knowing the details of Norbert's code.

It is usually best when upgrading to delete all previous code, such as a 
.ini file, etc, but I do not know what or where MFTTY is writing to the hard 
disk, so deleting all the previous files before upgrading is not possible, 
and we are left with having the program just overwrite them.

73, Skip KH6TY

- Original Message - 
From: "Russell Blair" 
To: "Digital Radio" 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:43 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'

I updated to the newer version 3.0.146, and I am getting a (run-time 
error'380' Invalid property value), this error didn't show up in any of the 
older version, I have to delete the program and reload it to get to run. 
After that it work fine. Has something changed in between versions. That 
would cause this to happen?

Russell

 =
IN GOD WE TRUST !
 =
Russell Blair (NC5O) Skype-Russell. Blair Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 30m 
Dig-group #693

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1785 - Release Date: 11/13/2008 
9:12 AM

 














  

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'

2009-01-16 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
i don´t know where the error message is coming from
i never deinstalled the soft
just overwritten the previus version with the new one
but you have to "unclick" make shortcuts to programm folder and "uncklick" make 
shortcut to desktop
i worked fine for me but the cleanest way is everytime you install a new soft
you should deinstall the older one first
hope that helps a bit
greetz
dg9bfc
  - Original Message - 
  From: kh6ty 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'


  The reason for a version change IS because something has changed. There are 
  many reasons under Visual Basic for getting a run-time error message, and 
  perhaps your reload then overwrote the older values the program was still 
  using, and that is why it is working now.

  Just my guess, not knowing the details of Norbert's code.

  It is usually best when upgrading to delete all previous code, such as a 
  .ini file, etc, but I do not know what or where MFTTY is writing to the hard 
  disk, so deleting all the previous files before upgrading is not possible, 
  and we are left with having the program just overwrite them.

  73, Skip KH6TY

  - Original Message - 
  From: "Russell Blair" 
  To: "Digital Radio" 
  Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:43 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY error '380'

  I updated to the newer version 3.0.146, and I am getting a (run-time 
  error'380' Invalid property value), this error didn't show up in any of the 
  older version, I have to delete the program and reload it to get to run. 
  After that it work fine. Has something changed in between versions. That 
  would cause this to happen?

  Russell

  =
  IN GOD WE TRUST !
  =
  Russell Blair (NC5O) Skype-Russell.Blair Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 30m 
  Dig-group #693

  Internal Virus Database is out of date.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
  Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1785 - Release Date: 11/13/2008 
  9:12 AM



   

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons

2009-01-16 Thread Tony
Sigi,

> what speed did you use for the path simulation?

I used half-speed. I'll test the mode at different speeds and will post the 
results.

Tony -K2MO



[digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations

2009-01-17 Thread Tony
All, 

I was able to take some time to test MFTTY with the HF path simulator this 
evening. I added a few commonly use modes for comparison. As expected, the 
slower / narrow MFTTY modes seemed to have a definite weak signal advantage 
over the faster ones.  

The minimum SNR test showed a wide 12db gap in sensitivity between 1/8 speed 
and double speed modes. This should show when testing the different MFTTY modes 
on the air.  

In the HF simulator tests, each mode was subjected to same HF path distortion. 
The less tolerable a mode is to this distortion, the greater the throughput 
errors.

It would seem that MFTTY would compare well with other more robust modes if the 
character speed is kept down using the half and quarter speed modes. At least 
that's what the HF simulator seemed to indicate. 

I'd appreciate hearing about on-air tests from you all so I can compare some 
real data to the simulators. 

Thanks, 

Tony -K2MO


Minimum SNR

MFTTY
Double Speed -5db 
Normal Speed -7db
1/2 Speed-9db
1/4 Speed  -13db
1/8 Speed  -17db


MFSK16 -14db
Olivia 500/16  -13db
PSK31-10db
RTTY -dab



Path Simulations

Path Simulation: 
Mid Latitude Disturbed
SNR -8db

Mode  Throughput

Double Speed <10% 
Normal Speed10%
1/2 Speed25%
1/4 Speed50% 
1/8 Speed85%

MFSK16 100%
Olivia 500/16  100%
PSK31  70%
RTTY 4520%

___

Selective Fading
SNR -8db

Double Speed  10%
Normal Speed  30%
Half Speed45%
Quarter Speed  60%
Eighth Speed70%

MFSK1690%
Olivia 500/15   100%
PSK31   65%
RTTY 45 25%



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons

2009-02-02 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Tony

Have you done a path simulations test of the FEC version of
the MFTTY mode?

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


Tony wrote:
>
> All,
>  
> It's good to see the enthusiasm about MFTTY. It has a nifty GUI and
> its easy to use. A few have mentioned a lack of lack of sensitivity
> and that does seem to be the case. But I think it's safe to say that
> we don't always need to bring an elephant gun to a turkey shoot ;  ).
>  
> For what it's worth, and with all due respect to the author, I've
> tested MFTTY with an HF path simulator and it is less sensitive and
> less robust than say PSK31. On air tests seem to show that the mode
> performs well with low power under quiet conditions.
>  
> Many thanks to Norbert and those like him who give us the opportunity
> to experiment and play with new modes. If it wasn't for them, we'd
> still be lugging those heavy RTTY machines into the shack ;  ).
>  
> Tony -K2MO
>  
> _



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons

2009-02-03 Thread Tony
Steinar, 

I did test the FEC mode at half speed using the "canned" simulations from Moe 
Wheatley's PathSim and there doesn't appear to be any difference in 
performance.  

The half-speed mode seems to be quite a bit less sensitive than other keyboard 
modes and I would imagine throughput would suffer when signals are weak. The 
1/4 and 1/8 speed modes have better sensitivity, but they are slow. 

It does appear to have better stability than say PSK31 when signals are 
severely distorted; at least that seems to be the case with polar path 
simulations (see below). 

Tony - K2MO




Minimum Sensitivity

MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. -6db
MFSK16...-14db
Olivia 16/500-13db
PSK31..-10db

Simulation: High Latitude Disturbed

Path delay: 7ms

Frequency spread: 30Hz 

SNR: -3db (weak signal)

Mode  Throughput

MFTTY (1/2 Speed). <10%
MFSK16...75%
Olivia 16/500..100%
PSK31.no copy


SNR: +10db (moderate signal)

Mode  Throughput

MFTTY (1/2 Speed). <10%
PSK31.no copy




Simulation: Mid-Latitude Disturbed

Path delay: 2ms

Frequency spread: 1Hz



SNR: -8db SNR (weak signal)

Mode  Throughput

MFTTY (1/2 Speed). <25%
MFSK16.100%
Olivia 16/500..100%
PSK31...70%


SNR: +10db SNR (moderate signal)

Mode  Throughput

MFTTY (1/2 Speed)... 80%
MFSK16.100%
Olivia 16/500..100%
PSK31..90%


Simulation: Low-Latitude Disturbed 

Path Delay: 6ms 

Frequency Spread: 10Hz


SNR: -8db SNR (weak signal)

Mode  Throughput

MFTTY (1/2 Speed)... 25%
MFSK16.100%
Olivia 16/500..100%
PSK31.no copy

SNR: +10db SNR (moderate signal)

Mode Throughput

MFTTY (1/2 Speed)... 80%
MFSK16.100%
Olivia 16/500..100%
PSK31.no copy



> Have you done a path simulations test of the FEC version of the MFTTY mode? 
> 73 de 
> LA5VNA Steinar


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY Path Simulaitons

2009-02-03 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Great!
Thanks Tony
73 de la5vna Steinar






Tony wrote:
>
> Steinar,
>  
> I did test the FEC mode at half speed using the "canned" simulations
> from Moe Wheatley's PathSim and there doesn't appear to be any
> difference in performance. 
>  
> The half-speed mode s eems to be quite a bit less sensitive than other
> keyboard modes and I would  imagine throughput would suffer when
> signals are weak. The 1/4 and 1/8 speed modes have better sensitivity,
> but they are slow.
>  
> It does appear to  have  better stability than say PSK31 when signals
> are severely distorted; at least that seems to be the case with polar
> path simulations (see below).
>  
> Tony - K2MO
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Minimum Sensitivity
>  
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . ... -6db
> MFSK16.. . . . ..-14db
> Olivia 16/500.. . . -13db
> PSK31... . . . -10db
>  
>
> Simulation: High Latitude Disturbed
>
> Path delay: 7ms
>
> Frequency spread: 30Hz
>
> *SNR: -3db (weak signal)*
>
> Mode  Throughput
>
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . . . <10%
> MFSK16.. . . . . .75%
> Olivia 16/500.. . . . .100%
> PSK31... . . . . ..no copy
>  
>  
>
> *SNR: +10db (moderate signal)*
>
> Mode  Throughput
>
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . . . <10%
> PSK31... . . . . ..no copy
>  
>  
>
>  
>
> Simulation: Mid-Latitude Disturbed
>
> Path delay: 2ms
>
> Frequency spread: 1Hz
>
> *SNR: -8db SNR (weak signal)*
>
> Mode  Throughput
>
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . . . <25%
> MFSK16.. . . . . ...100%
> Olivia 16/500.. . . . .100%
> PSK31... . . . . 70%
>  
>  
>
> *SNR: +10db SNR (moderate signal)*
>
> Mode  Throughput
>
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . . ... 80%
> MFSK16.. . . . . ...100%
> Olivia 16/500.. . . . .100%
> PSK31... . . . . ...90%
>  
>  
>
> Simulation: Low-Latitude Disturbed
>
> Path Delay: 6ms
>
> Frequency Spread: 10Hz
>
> *SNR: -8db SNR (weak signal)*
>
> Mode  Throughput
>
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . . ... 25%
> MFSK16.. . . . . ...100%
> Olivia 16/500.. . . . .100%
> PSK31... . . . . ..no copy
>  
>
> * SNR: +10db SNR (moderate signal) *
>
> Mode Throughput
>
> MFTTY (1/2 Speed).. . . ... 80%
> MFSK16.. . . . . ...100%
> Olivia 16/500.. . . . .100%
> PSK31... . . . . ..no copy
>  
>  



[digitalradio] MFTTY On Air Sensitivity

2009-02-05 Thread Tony
All,

Had another opportunity to test MFTTY on air today. As expected, sensitivity 
goes hand-in-hand with character speed and the slower 1/8 mode is probably 
close to what you might expect from say PSK31.

Path simulations seem to indicate that the mode is probably more stable than 
PSK31 when HF path distortion becomes an issue.

I'd appreciate any thoughts / experiences with MFTTY performance; slow vs. 
fast mode etc.

Tony - K2MO 



[digitalradio] MFTTY: Run-time Error 429

2008-12-15 Thread rich3x
"ActiveX component can't create object"

program won't load/run -- vb6 installed -- solution?

de Rich/N2JR





Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.140 is out

2009-01-10 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Hi

Info:

There seems to be some compatibilities problems between the versions.

I was not able to decode signals from 3.0.140 with 3.0.139 .

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Steinar Aanesland wrote:
> MFTT 3.0.140
>
> Download it from :
> http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
>
> 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>
>
>
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1885 - Release Date: 09.01.2009 
> 19:59
>
>   



[digitalradio] MFTTY Update 142 is out

2009-01-11 Thread Norbert Pieper
Error in manual tuning of pilot tone corrected 
(measured rx frequency was not implemented)



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-12 Thread W6IDS
Hey, Steiner

I have it installed.  Before I did anything else, I modified the Pilot CQ to 
add my callsign
and Grid Locator (EM79).  When I selected the Pilot CQ (I'm using the "SEND" 
button
now) I found four tone "beeps"  transmissions being transmitted.  When I 
pressed the
"SEND" button, I transmitted the CQ sequence but with no PILOT Tones.

My Pilot CQ is:

CQ CQ CQ DE W6IDS W6IDS EM79
CQ CQ ..etc etc etc

HmmmI'm not totally clear on what's happening or if I accidentally
did something wrong in modifying the Pilot CQ.  Can you clarify your
sentence abut the Pilot Tone below also?

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN


- Original Message - 
From: "Steinar Aanesland" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:08 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out


> MFTT 3.0.143

> # Pilot Tone will be inserted automatically after a transmission pause
> of equivalent 4 words time
> # Thin grey line added to spectrum display, indicating the center
> frequency of Rx-Band-Pass-Filter
> # Double click on "Rx . Hz" will copy the Tx freq.
> # Double click on "Tx . Hz" will copy the Rx freq.
> # Tool Tip Text added to UI elements

   



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-12 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Hi Richmond 

I have not tested this last version yet.
I will give it a try when I am back from work.

73


W6IDS wrote:
> Hey, Steiner
>
> I have it installed.  Before I did anything else, I modified the Pilot CQ to 
> add my callsign
> and Grid Locator (EM79).  When I selected the Pilot CQ (I'm using the "SEND" 
> button
> now) I found four tone "beeps"  transmissions being transmitted.  When I 
> pressed the
> "SEND" button, I transmitted the CQ sequence but with no PILOT Tones.
>
> My Pilot CQ is:
>
> CQ CQ CQ DE W6IDS W6IDS EM79
> CQ CQ ..etc etc etc
>
> HmmmI'm not totally clear on what's happening or if I accidentally
> did something wrong in modifying the Pilot CQ.  Can you clarify your
> sentence abut the Pilot Tone below also?
>
> Howard W6IDS
> Richmond, IN
>
>
>   



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-12 Thread W6IDS

No problem, Steinar.

I'm just working my way along my learning curve here.

I just noticed that I get the Pilot tones when I have the 
"Send Immediately" box checked.  Then, when I select the
Pilot CQ, the tones are sent at the beginning of each line as
typed in the box.  If i select "Send By Enter Key" or if I
UNCHECK BOTH selections, the "SEND" button appears
and in any case, NO Pilot tones are sent.  They're sent ONLY
when the "Send Immediately" box is checked.

I should think that the tones should be sent anytime the CQ
is sent or perhaps when text otherwise is being sent and I
insert  somewhere inside any typed text.  However,
that isn't the case.  The only time the  tone is sent is
at the beginning of a line where I place .  It cannot be
inserted anywhere else, so that seems to make it difficult to
increase the number of Pilot tones as recommended in the
information I read.

Unless, of course, the Pilot tones are only used during a CQ
sequence, then all of this is moot.  The only issue then is
being able to transmit  tones in instances involving
using "SEND" button or "Send By Enter Key" which doesn't
happen now.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: "Steinar Aanesland" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out


> 
> Hi Richmond 
> 
> I have not tested this last version yet.
> I will give it a try when I am back from work.

  


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread Noel Keen
Yyuyyq
-Original Message-
Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:27:17 am
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
From: "Steinar Aanesland" 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out


Hi Richmond 

I have not tested this last version yet.
I will give it a try when I am back from work.

73


W6IDS wrote:
> Hey, Steiner
>
> I have it installed.  Before I did anything else, I modified the Pilot CQ to 
> add my callsign
> and Grid Locator (EM79).  When I selected the Pilot CQ (I'm using the "SEND" 
> button
> now) I found four tone "beeps"  transmissions being transmitted.  When I 
> pressed the
> "SEND" button, I transmitted the CQ sequence but with no PILOT Tones.
>
> My Pilot CQ is:
>
> CQ CQ CQ DE W6IDS W6IDS EM79
> CQ CQ ..etc etc etc
>
> HmmmI'm not totally clear on what's happening or if I accidentally
> did something wrong in modifying the Pilot CQ.  Can you clarify your
> sentence abut the Pilot Tone below also?
>
> Howard W6IDS
> Richmond, IN
>
>
>   





Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread 7L4IOU
Hi Steinar

very interesting mode
I will QRV 7.039 around 21:00z

73 Hisami 7L4IOU


>MFTT 3.0.143
>
>
># Pilot Tone will be inserted automatically after a transmission pause
>of equivalent 4 words time
># Thin grey line added to spectrum display, indicating the center
>frequency of Rx-Band-Pass-Filter
># Double click on "Rx . Hz" will copy the Tx freq.
># Double click on "Tx . Hz" will copy the Rx freq.
># Tool Tip Text added to UI elements
>
>
>Download it from :
>http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
>
>73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>
>


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY 3.0.143 is out

2009-01-13 Thread 7L4IOU
Hi Steinar

very interesting mode
I will QRV 7.039 around 21:00z

73 Hisami 7L4IOU


>MFTT 3.0.143
>
>
># Pilot Tone will be inserted automatically after a transmission pause
>of equivalent 4 words time
># Thin grey line added to spectrum display, indicating the center
>frequency of Rx-Band-Pass-Filter
># Double click on "Rx . Hz" will copy the Tx freq.
># Double click on "Tx . Hz" will copy the Rx freq.
># Tool Tip Text added to UI elements
>
>
>Download it from :
>http://www.polar-electric.com/MFTT/index.html
>
>73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>
>


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations

2009-01-17 Thread kh6ty
Thanks for the tests, Tony. The numbers confirm what NC5O and I found 
yesterday with our on-the-air comparisons between MFTTY, PSK31, PSK63, 
PSK125, and MFSK16 over a period of four hours and changing band conditions. 
We could communicate on PSK31 long after MFTTY had quit decoding, and solid 
copy using MFSK16 (but with a wider bandwidth, of course) when PSK31 started 
producing errors.

73, Skip KH6TY



- Original Message - 
From: "Tony" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 3:59 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations


> All,
>
> I was able to take some time to test MFTTY with the HF path simulator this 
> evening. I added a few commonly use modes for comparison. As expected, the 
> slower / narrow MFTTY modes seemed to have a definite weak signal 
> advantage over the faster ones.
>
> The minimum SNR test showed a wide 12db gap in sensitivity between 1/8 
> speed and double speed modes. This should show when testing the different 
> MFTTY modes on the air.
>
> In the HF simulator tests, each mode was subjected to same HF path 
> distortion. The less tolerable a mode is to this distortion, the greater 
> the throughput errors.
>
> It would seem that MFTTY would compare well with other more robust modes 
> if the character speed is kept down using the half and quarter speed 
> modes. At least that's what the HF simulator seemed to indicate.
>
> I'd appreciate hearing about on-air tests from you all so I can compare 
> some real data to the simulators.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
> Minimum SNR
>
> MFTTY
> Double Speed -5db
> Normal Speed -7db
> 1/2 Speed-9db
> 1/4 Speed  -13db
> 1/8 Speed  -17db
>
>
> MFSK16 -14db
> Olivia 500/16  -13db
> PSK31-10db
> RTTY -dab
>
>
>
> Path Simulations
>
> Path Simulation:
> Mid Latitude Disturbed
> SNR -8db
>
> Mode  Throughput
>
> Double Speed <10%
> Normal Speed10%
> 1/2 Speed25%
> 1/4 Speed50%
> 1/8 Speed85%
>
> MFSK16 100%
> Olivia 500/16  100%
> PSK31  70%
> RTTY 4520%
>
> ___
>
> Selective Fading
> SNR -8db
>
> Double Speed  10%
> Normal Speed  30%
> Half Speed45%
> Quarter Speed  60%
> Eighth Speed70%
>
> MFSK1690%
> Olivia 500/15   100%
> PSK31   65%
> RTTY 45 25%
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.10.8/1898 - Release Date: 1/16/2009 
> 3:09 PM
>
> 



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations

2009-01-17 Thread kh6ty
Selective Fading
SNR -8db

>> MFSK1690%
>> Olivia 500/15   100%
>> PSK31   65%
>> RTTY 45 25%

Although MFSK16 produced 10% errors when Olivia produced no errors, Olivia 
16-500 (20 wpm) takes twice as long to send the same information as MFSK16 
(42 wpm), so it is exposed to QRM and QSB over a much longer time. If you 
are only interested in exchanging name, qth, and signal report, Olivia will 
usually do that better than MFSK16, but for ragchewing, over a longer time 
period, using IMHO MFSK16 will probably be as good as Olivia without having 
to wait as long for the text to appear.

73, Skip KH6TY



Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations

2009-01-17 Thread Tony
Skip,

Glad to hear that the path simulations coincide with your on-air tests. I agree 
with your take on Olivia 500/16 and MFSK16. There are times when I'd rather 
sacrifice some throughput and go twice as fast. 

The throughput gap between the two does increase under severe ionospheric 
distortion as you can see in the high latitude tests below. We'll have to wait 
for another ionospheric storm and work over the pole to confirm what the 
simulator indicates. 

Thanks Skip...

Tony -K2MO




Simulation: High Latitude DisturbedPath delay: 7msFrequency spread: 30Hz SNR: 
-3db (weak signal)Mode  ThroughputContestia 
500/16.100% CW 20 WPM100%Olivia 
1000/32...100% Olivia 500/16100% Olivia 
500/8.100% Olivia 500/4..95% 
RTTYM**...95%Voice (Multipsk)..95% 
MFSK31... 90% MFSK1675% 
RTTY..40%Chip-64...10% 
Chip-128**no copyDominoEX-4no copy 
FEC-31no copyJason Turbo (Fa...no 
copyMT631Kno copyPSK10.no copy 
PSKAM10...no copyPSK31.no copy 
PSK63.no copyThor-11...no copy 
ThrobX-4..no copy Feld HellReadable 









- Original Message - 
From: "kh6ty" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 5:21 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations


> Thanks for the tests, Tony. The numbers confirm what NC5O and I found 
> yesterday with our on-the-air comparisons between MFTTY, PSK31, PSK63, 
> PSK125, and MFSK16 over a period of four hours and changing band conditions. 
> We could communicate on PSK31 long after MFTTY had quit decoding, and solid 
> copy using MFSK16 (but with a wider bandwidth, of course) when PSK31 started 
> producing errors.
> 
> 73, Skip KH6TY
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Tony" 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 3:59 AM
> Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY - HF Path Simulations
> 
> 
>> All,
>>
>> I was able to take some time to test MFTTY with the HF path simulator this 
>> evening. I added a few commonly use modes for comparison. As expected, the 
>> slower / narrow MFTTY modes seemed to have a definite weak signal 
>> advantage over the faster ones.
>>
>> The minimum SNR test showed a wide 12db gap in sensitivity between 1/8 
>> speed and double speed modes. This should show when testing the different 
>> MFTTY modes on the air.
>>
>> In the HF simulator tests, each mode was subjected to same HF path 
>> distortion. The less tolerable a mode is to this distortion, the greater 
>> the throughput errors.
>>
>> It would seem that MFTTY would compare well with other more robust modes 
>> if the character speed is kept down using the half and quarter speed 
>> modes. At least that's what the HF simulator seemed to indicate.
>>
>> I'd appreciate hearing about on-air tests from you all so I can compare 
>> some real data to the simulators.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>> Minimum SNR
>>
>> MFTTY
>> Double Speed -5db
>> Normal Speed -7db
>> 1/2 Speed-9db
>> 1/4 Speed  -13db
>> 1/8 Speed  -17db
>>
>>
>> MFSK16 -14db
>> Olivia 500/16  -13db
>> PSK31-10db
>> RTTY -dab
>>
>>
>>
>> Path Simulations
>>
>> Path Simulation:
>> Mid Latitude Disturbed
>> SNR -8db
>>
>> Mode  Throughput
>>
>> Double Speed <10%
>> Normal Speed10%
>> 1/2 Speed25%
>> 1/4 Speed50%
>> 1/8 Speed85%
>>
>> MFSK16 100%
>> Olivia 500/16  100%
>> PSK31  70%
>> RTTY 4520%
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Selective Fading
>> SNR -8db
>>
>> Double Speed  10%
>> Normal Speed  30%
>> Half Speed45%
>> Quarter Speed  60%
>> Eighth Speed70%
>>
>> MFSK1690%
>> Olivia 500/15   100%
>> PSK31   65%
>> RTTY 45 25%
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.10.8/1898 - Release Date: 1/16/2009 
>> 3:09 PM
>>
>> 
> 
>

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works Help file (Ron)

2008-12-13 Thread Russell Blair
Ron, I download the help files to, but mine works in the program on top (?) and 
it pulled the help in HTML format. Yes the program needs some more work for me 
to be a on going user. Tnx for the qso CUL 73 

Russell

   = 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)  Skype-Russell.Blair  Hell Field #300  DRCC #55  30m 
Dig-group #693


--- On Sat, 12/13/08, w4lde  wrote:

> From: w4lde 
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 2:26 PM
> Russell,
> 
> Thanks for the #1 MFTTY QSO on 30 meters.  I would suggest
> that since 
> the stated Bandwidth for 1/2 speed is 468Hz that probably
> that keeps us 
> inside the 500Hz allowed bandwidth for most of the digital
> frequencies.  
> What I see interesting is the RX bandwidth at hald speed
> which is 15Hz.  
> That helps explain why so many are having trouble syncing
> in on a 
> station.  I think that the mode needs lots of work before
> it can be used 
> by all.  I can't get the help file to open.  O'well
> back to the standards
> 
> 73 de
> Ron W4LDE
> 
> 
> Russell Blair wrote:
> > Toby, set it to 1/2 speed and see if I can copy you hr
> in Texas
> >  
> > Russell
> >
> >  
> > =
> > *IN GOD WE TRUST !*
> > =
> > Russell Blair (NC5O)
> > Skype-Russell.Blair
> > Hell Field #300
> > DRCC #55
> > 30m Dig-group #693
> >
> >
> > --- On *Sat, 12/13/08, Toby Burnett
> //* wrote:
> >
> > From: Toby Burnett 
> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 1:13 PM
> >
> >  
> >
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > Just downloaded the MFTT software,
> > I'm on the Isle of Lewis, NW Scotland.
> > Listening 10.135,5
> > What speed etc should I be set too and I will
> listen.
> >  
> > Toby  
> >  
> > /---Original Message- --/
> >  
> > /*From:*/ Dave 'Doc' Corio
> <mailto:dco...@zitomedia.net>
> > /*Date:*/ 13/12/2008 19:04:38
> > /*To:*/ digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
> > <mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
> > /*Subject:*/ Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
> >  
> > I could also hear you in there, Andy, but much
> too close to
> > try for
> > a QSO on 30M! Had a good copy on Russell, but the
> tuning has me a bit
> > baffled.
> >  
> > With my rig tuned so that I was decoding
> Russell and Ron, my tones
> > sounded like they were much lower than the other
> two stations.
> >  
> > How can you tell when you are right on frequency?
> >  
> > 73
> > Dave
> > KB3MOW
> >  
> >  
> > Andy obrien wrote:
> > > I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5
> USB.  It seems to do
> > fairly
> > > well with moderate signals.
> > >
> > > CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
> > > CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk
> > >
> > > £´k3uk hi there de nc5o
> > > nc50 hi
> > > nc50 hi  from Andy in NY
> > >
> > >  log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
> > > Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state
> over...
> > >
> > > e prograVVso work oFrus to useare he in
> texatday d
> > >
> > > Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to
> figure this out
> > ...BTU de K3UK
> > >
> > > hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou
> now V6Vó¦
> > >
> > > 73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk
> > >
> > >  - - --
> > >
> > > Announce your digital presence via our
> Interactive Sked Page at
> > > http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked
> <http://www.obriensweb.com/sked>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >  
> >  - - --
> >  
> > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive
> Sked Page at
> > http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked
> <http://www.obriensweb.com/sked>
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >  
> >  
> > (Yahoo! ID required)
> >  
> > mailto:digitalradio -fullfeatured@
> yahoogroups. com
> >
> <mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com>
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked
> Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

  


Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 40m or 30m or 20m ?

2009-01-06 Thread Russell Blair
I been on 7068 usb all day and no signal there and the other stations in EU 40m 
and 80m not good for me at this time of the day.
anyone want to try 30m or even 20m ?
 
Russell

 
= 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Russell Blair  wrote:

From: Russell Blair 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 40m
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:25 AM











Rich, I will be looking for you there.
 
Russell 


 
 = 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
 = 
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell. Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693

--- On Tue, 1/6/09, rich3x  wrote:

From: rich3x 
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 40m
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 10:43 AM




Will qsx & send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day 6 Jan.

Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention?

de Rich/N2JR


 














  

Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works Tnx to all for QSO

2008-12-13 Thread Russell Blair
Andy tnx for thw qso, I had a nice qso with Ron W4LDE in Ga, we went in speed 
and was able to still work, Then the band went south on us and it dead now, the 
program need some more work on it. But yes it does work even at mornal speed, 
we didnt try to top speed the bans was gone.

Russell

   = 
IN GOD WE TRUST ! 
= 
Russell Blair (NC5O)  Skype-Russell.Blair  Hell Field #300  DRCC #55  30m 
Dig-group #693


--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Andy obrien  wrote:

> From: Andy obrien 
> Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY: It works
> To: "digitalradio" 
> Date: Saturday, December 13, 2008, 1:01 PM
> I had a QSO with NC5O in texas on 10135.5 USB.  It seems to
> do fairly
> well with moderate signals.
> 
> CQ CQ tesde k3uk k3uk K3uk
> CQ CQ CQ test de k3uk k3uk K3uk
> 
> £´k3uk hi there de nc5o
> nc50 hi
> nc50 hi  from Andy in NY
> 
>  log o with w4nice to c u hr nc5o
> Nc5O de k3uk  good signal here in NY state over...
> 
> e prograVVsowork oFrus to useare he in texatday d
> 
> Glad I am making it to texas, still trying to figure this
> out ...BTU de K3UK
> 
> hy holiday to uand tnx‡Vqso I am loseinyou now V6Vó¦
> 
> 73 and happy holidays to u nc5o de k3uk sk
> 
> 
> 
> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked
> Page at
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>