Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Mika Tuupola]

On Dec 5, 2006, at 6:10, bmsterling wrote:

> A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
> looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.

In addition to all suggested there is also eZ Publish.

http://ez.no/

-- 
Mika Tuupola
http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/



___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Felix Geisendörfer]

CakePHP is what I'd recommend you. Besides being a part-time jQuery 
evangelist I truly belong to the church of CakePHP as well. Other then 
the Zend framework it is not only a loose collection of useful code, it 
is actually a very elegant organizational structure to put your code in. 
It was originally inspired by Ruby on Rails and has many of it's 
features (ActiveRecord Models, Controllers, Views, Helpers,etc.) but has 
taken it's own path and introduced a lot of own features.


It has an an excellent Manual , a great 
community , quick support 
via IRC  (all of the core devs hang out there), 
people actively blogging about it (CakeBaker 
, Jonathan Snook 
, Me , 
and some others ) and a dedicated Bakery 
. With the latest release 
 it also just recieved a 
significant performance boost.


Code igniter is nice, but I don't think it's educational effect is as 
big as CakePHP's. It let's you get away with a low skill level / bad 
practices more easily (afaik). Symfonie is pretty nice and stable, 
however I really don't like how you have to configure *everything* in 
thousands of YAML files. CakePHP takes an approach of conventions over 
configuration, leaving all freedom you need, but not annoying you with 
details when not required. The only thing you have to setup to get it 
running is the database connection (assuming you want to use one, 
otherwise skip that as well).


I'd be happy to see you becoming a baker soon!

-- Felix Geisendörfer aka the_undefined
--
http://www.thinkingphp.org
http://www.fg-webdesign.de


Clodelio Delfino wrote:

For me, i'd recommend CodeIgniter... http://www.codeigniter.com, this
framework works in PHP4 and PHP5 and follows MVC pattern.It has an easy
to follow Documentation, examples and responsive community. CI +
JQuery... no more, no less... c",)

Cheers
cdelfino

Aaron Heimlich wrote:
  

On 12/4/06, bmsterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hey all,
A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.
  

The  Zend Framework[1] is still being developed (0.6 is due sometime
later
this month), but IMO it looks very promising, especially with all of
the new
MVC stuff. A roadmap can be found at
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Project+Management+Team .
IIRC
it has actually been used in production environments with a good
amount of
success (for a framework still in heavy development).

If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?

As I said, the Zend Framework looks really good. I've also heard good

things
about CakePHP[2].

[1]http://framework.zend.com
[2]http://www.cakephp.org/



___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
  





___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

  
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

[jQuery] Departure

[Glen Lipka]

Unfortunately, I am leaving Intuit. (Friday is my last day)
In the past 6 months, I have tried to spread the gospel of jQuery at
Intuit.  Unfortunately, where I am going, YUI is already being used.

I really enjoyed using jQuery and think that it is something special.  I
haven't been this excited about a technology since CSS.

Some sites launching or launched:

http://www.turbotax.com is moving towards using jQuery extensively this tax
season on their public website.
http://www.intuit.com uses it all over and once the test is done will use it
even more.
Shared account management experiences
Shared checkout experiences.
Error checking
http://www.payroll.com
Global Header - TBD launch, depends on political issues

I will organize the examples on my site before I go.  Thanks for everything!

*Very jQuery!*

Best regards,

Glen
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Larry Garfield]

I actually have to look into several frameworks at work very soon, so I'm 
interested in this subject as well. :-)

Depending on what you're building, a CMS/framework hybrid like Drupal[1] could 
be useful.  It's widely used, very flexible, and version 5 (now in beta 2 
release) has adopted jQuery as its Javascript library of choice. :-)

[1] http://drupal.org/

On Monday 04 December 2006 22:10, bmsterling wrote:
> Hey all,
> A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
> looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.
>
> If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben

-- 
Larry Garfield  AIM: LOLG42
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ: 6817012

"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of 
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, 
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to 
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession 
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it."  -- Thomas 
Jefferson

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Will Jessup]

I use symfony-project for www.kevo.com. lots of documentation, solid 
support, new development etc. highly recommended next to rails.

Will
> On 12/4/06, *bmsterling* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
>
> Hey all,
> A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
> looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.
>
>
> The  Zend Framework[1] is still being developed (0.6 is due sometime 
> later this month), but IMO it looks very promising, especially with 
> all of the new MVC stuff. A roadmap can be found at 
> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Project+Management+Team 
>  
> . IIRC it has actually been used in production environments with a 
> good amount of success (for a framework still in heavy development).
>
> If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?
>
>
> As I said, the Zend Framework looks really good. I've also heard good 
> things about CakePHP[2].
>
> [1]http://framework.zend.com
> [2]http://www.cakephp.org/
>
> -- 
> Aaron Heimlich
> Web Developer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://aheimlich.freepgs.com 
> 
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>   


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Jon Baer]

http://www.cakephp.org

If you have used Rails or worship the MVC model, you can't go wrong.   
There is a Cajax plugin (to do RJS/Ajax stuff), its really solid and  
easy to get up and running and the IRC room is always filled to  
answer questions.

- Jon

On Dec 4, 2006, at 11:10 PM, bmsterling wrote:

>
> Hey all,
> A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
> looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.
>
> If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/php-frameworks- 
> tf2759163.html#a7692970
> Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] NEWS: jQuery-powered Osxcode.com in Ajax Magazine

[Jon Baer]

Very nice site, congrats ...

On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:38 PM, Rey Bango wrote:

> Fredi announced his new jQuery-powered feed aggregator osxcode.com  
> just
> yesterday and I'm pleased to say that Ajax Magazine just picked up on
> his site and gave him some press. You can check it out here:
>
> http://ajax.phpmagazine.net/2006/12/ 
> jme_feed_aggregator_10_beta_re.html
>
> Congrats Fredi!
>
> Rey...
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Clodelio Delfino]

For me, i'd recommend CodeIgniter... http://www.codeigniter.com, this
framework works in PHP4 and PHP5 and follows MVC pattern.It has an easy
to follow Documentation, examples and responsive community. CI +
JQuery... no more, no less... c",)

Cheers
cdelfino

Aaron Heimlich wrote:
> On 12/4/06, bmsterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>> A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
>> looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.
>
>
> The  Zend Framework[1] is still being developed (0.6 is due sometime
> later
> this month), but IMO it looks very promising, especially with all of
> the new
> MVC stuff. A roadmap can be found at
> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Project+Management+Team .
> IIRC
> it has actually been used in production environments with a good
> amount of
> success (for a framework still in heavy development).
>
> If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?
>>
>
> As I said, the Zend Framework looks really good. I've also heard good
> things
> about CakePHP[2].
>
> [1]http://framework.zend.com
> [2]http://www.cakephp.org/
>
> 
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>   



___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Brice Burgess]

Aaron Heimlich wrote:
> On 12/4/06, *bmsterling* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
>
> Hey all,
> A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
> looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.
>
>
> The  Zend Framework[1] is still being developed (0.6 is due sometime 
> later this month), but IMO it looks very promising, especially with 
> all of the new MVC stuff. A roadmap can be found at 
> http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Project+Management+Team 
>  
> . IIRC it has actually been used in production environments with a 
> good amount of success (for a framework still in heavy development).
>
> If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?
>
>
> As I said, the Zend Framework looks really good. I've also heard good 
> things about CakePHP[2].
>
> [1]http://framework.zend.com
> [2]http://www.cakephp.org/
>
Don't forget everyone ELSE's favorite; Symfony.  
http://www.symfony-project.com/

Between these three -- I'd choose whichever one is most congruent with 
your "logic" (naming conventions, methods, etc.)

~ Brice.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php frameworks

[Aaron Heimlich]

On 12/4/06, bmsterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hey all,
A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.



The  Zend Framework[1] is still being developed (0.6 is due sometime later
this month), but IMO it looks very promising, especially with all of the new
MVC stuff. A roadmap can be found at
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Project+Management+Team . IIRC
it has actually been used in production environments with a good amount of
success (for a framework still in heavy development).

If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?




As I said, the Zend Framework looks really good. I've also heard good things
about CakePHP[2].

[1]http://framework.zend.com
[2]http://www.cakephp.org/

--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

[jQuery] php frameworks

[bmsterling]

Hey all,
A partially non-jquery question, anyone use any php frameworks?  I was
looking at the zend framework, but not sure if it is any good.

If you use a php frame work can you post a url and why you like it?

Thanks,
Ben
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/php-frameworks-tf2759163.html#a7692970
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] NEWS: jQuery-powered Osxcode.com in Ajax Magazine

[Benjamin Sterling]

The is awesome, Congrats Fredi!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 10:38 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] NEWS: jQuery-powered Osxcode.com in Ajax Magazine

Fredi announced his new jQuery-powered feed aggregator osxcode.com just 
yesterday and I'm pleased to say that Ajax Magazine just picked up on 
his site and gave him some press. You can check it out here:

http://ajax.phpmagazine.net/2006/12/jme_feed_aggregator_10_beta_re.html

Congrats Fredi!

Rey...

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Sam Sherlock]

I have submitted details to the google discussion group.

Or there a bug system like mantis somewhere also? something like this might
get lost in the swamp of discussion over there. I will wait and see what
response come through the google group and also play about with it some
more  seems to be openning it before loading the site, possibly having no
other tabs open

On the upside I did manage to have a play with firebug in one session and
click freely around the various features without  issue .  Though I cant
think what it was about this session that permitted it to work without
issue.  That was straight after I disabled a load of add ons; that I thought
might conflict with firebug or  I use seldom (though I had disabled every
add on except firebug)

Looks absolutely amazing though such a range info information; beautifully
presented - pristine work

- S

On 05/12/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Did you submit a bug report to Joe Hewitt?

Rey...

Sam Sherlock wrote:
> The issue continues.  Though it appears I was misled and it appears to
> not be about the xhtml bug.
> Guess I just recalled that comment.  It just crashed over at
> www.456bereastreet.com  and it crashed
> there, thats strict html4 so the problem got more wide spread.  I have
> gone through a cycle of opening firefox and loading the first page then
> opening firebug and it either crashed there or crashed when I clicked on
> html or inspect.
>
> Having said that I have just opened  a new firefox window  and
> firebugged a whole load of sites includng those I previously listed.
>
> Perhaps the issue is now resolved somehow, fingers crossed - what I have
> seen looks really amazing.
> Hope the crashing remains resolved! So I can get neck deep in jQuery and
> firebug
>
> -S
> On 05/12/06, *Mike Alsup* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> wrote:
>
>  > www.linkdup.com  - works fine
>  > www.getk2.com  - crashes when firebug is
> enabled
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I didn't have any trouble with either of those sites.  K2 throws a
js
> exception but Firebug handles it just fine.
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com 
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
>
> 
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

[jQuery] NEWS: jQuery-powered Osxcode.com in Ajax Magazine

[Rey Bango]

Fredi announced his new jQuery-powered feed aggregator osxcode.com just 
yesterday and I'm pleased to say that Ajax Magazine just picked up on 
his site and gave him some press. You can check it out here:

http://ajax.phpmagazine.net/2006/12/jme_feed_aggregator_10_beta_re.html

Congrats Fredi!

Rey...

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Rey Bango]

Did you submit a bug report to Joe Hewitt?

Rey...

Sam Sherlock wrote:
> The issue continues.  Though it appears I was misled and it appears to 
> not be about the xhtml bug.
> Guess I just recalled that comment.  It just crashed over at 
> www.456bereastreet.com  and it crashed 
> there, thats strict html4 so the problem got more wide spread.  I have 
> gone through a cycle of opening firefox and loading the first page then 
> opening firebug and it either crashed there or crashed when I clicked on 
> html or inspect.
> 
> Having said that I have just opened  a new firefox window  and 
> firebugged a whole load of sites includng those I previously listed.
> 
> Perhaps the issue is now resolved somehow, fingers crossed - what I have 
> seen looks really amazing.
> Hope the crashing remains resolved! So I can get neck deep in jQuery and 
> firebug
> 
> -S
> On 05/12/06, *Mike Alsup* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 
> wrote:
> 
>  > www.linkdup.com  - works fine
>  > www.getk2.com  - crashes when firebug is
> enabled
> 
> Hi Sam,
> 
> I didn't have any trouble with either of those sites.  K2 throws a js
> exception but Firebug handles it just fine.
> 
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com 
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Sam Sherlock]

The issue continues.  Though it appears I was misled and it appears to not
be about the xhtml bug.
Guess I just recalled that comment.  It just crashed over at
www.456bereastreet.com and it crashed there, thats strict html4 so the
problem got more wide spread.  I have gone through a cycle of opening
firefox and loading the first page then opening firebug and it either
crashed there or crashed when I clicked on html or inspect.

Having said that I have just opened  a new firefox window  and firebugged a
whole load of sites includng those I previously listed.

Perhaps the issue is now resolved somehow, fingers crossed - what I have
seen looks really amazing.
Hope the crashing remains resolved! So I can get neck deep in jQuery and
firebug

-S
On 05/12/06, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> www.linkdup.com - works fine
> www.getk2.com - crashes when firebug is enabled

Hi Sam,

I didn't have any trouble with either of those sites.  K2 throws a js
exception but Firebug handles it just fine.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Guntur N. Sarwohadi]

both sites work fine.. no errors nor exceptions whatsoever.. using FB2.0

btw.. this tool is. BADA$$!.. very very very nice tool.. can't work
without it.. ever! :D

cheers
Guntur N. Sarwohadi

On 12/5/06, Matt Stith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


getk2 works fine for me too. Same thing as mike, exception is thrown, and
cought by FB.

On 12/4/06, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> > www.linkdup.com - works fine
> > www.getk2.com - crashes when firebug is enabled
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I didn't have any trouble with either of those sites.  K2 throws a js
> exception but Firebug handles it just fine.
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/



___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Matt Stith]

getk2 works fine for me too. Same thing as mike, exception is thrown, and
cought by FB.

On 12/4/06, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> www.linkdup.com - works fine
> www.getk2.com - crashes when firebug is enabled

Hi Sam,

I didn't have any trouble with either of those sites.  K2 throws a js
exception but Firebug handles it just fine.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Mike Alsup]

> www.linkdup.com - works fine
> www.getk2.com - crashes when firebug is enabled

Hi Sam,

I didn't have any trouble with either of those sites.  K2 throws a js
exception but Firebug handles it just fine.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Small optimizations: IE XMLHttpRequest

[Mike Alsup]

> does work for both IE 5.x and 6. With that in mind, we can remove both
> the Msxml2 stuff and the check for the useragent. Agreed?

Just for kicks I took a look at what the other guys are doing:

// dojo
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP'
'Microsoft.XMLHTTP'
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP.4.0'

// yui
'MSXML2.XMLHTTP.3.0',
'MSXML2.XMLHTTP',
'Microsoft.XMLHTTP'

// atlas
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP'
'Microsoft.XMLHTTP'

// tibco
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP.3.0'
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP.4.0'

// mochikit
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP'
'Microsoft.XMLHTTP'
'Msxml2.XMLHTTP.4.0'

// moo
'Microsoft.XMLHTTP'

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

[jQuery] InterfaceElements/Sortables - Help with mousedown bindings

[Anthony Rasmussen]

jQuery 1.0.2 / Interface Elements as of approx Nov 25th
Firefox 2.0 / IE6 
-

I have a Sortable , and it works great, except for the issue below..

I'm trying to have an element
within a sortable  to not trigger the draggable mousedown.

For example:
All triggers the draggable except for: this text

The two ways I know how to remove the draggable mousedown are 1) 
.DraggableDestroy(), and 2) .unbind('mousedown').  

Unfortunately, both methods will remove the mousedown and I cannot seem to bind 
it afterwards.  

The only way I know how to re-bind the mousedown is:
.SortableAddItem().  While this function works for new elements, I
cannot get it to work for existing elements that just need a
re-binding.

I appreciate any insights or help you can offer!!  Thanks all!

-Tony
_
Use Messenger to talk to your IM friends, even those on Yahoo!
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=7adb59de-a857-45ba-81cc-685ee3e858fe___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Sam Sherlock]

Basically when I installed firebug 1, I felt like a kid on Christmas
morning.  However when I enabled it firefox crashed on a wordpress site on
my localhost.  I restarted firefox again and enabled it again.

It did not crash when I enabled it on a html4 site  eg

  - www.linkdup.com - works fine
  - www.getk2.com - crashes when firebug is enabled


I have found the comment on Joe's Blog to which I was referring here is:

JohnH


BTW, I noted that you rather cavalielry[sp?] (from my POV) state that it
doesn't work with synchronous calls or XHTML. If it's free I'm prepared to
work around that by temporarily disabling both. However that's kind of a big
glaring hole in my mind and would defenitely stop me shelling out a required
$25.



I thought of the comment (above) made by JohnH, and thought that to be the
reason.  getk2 is served as text/html


perhaps I am missing something, if so I would love to know what.

any ideas??

-S





On 04/12/06, Felix Geisendörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 Huh?  I only write xhtml and I've been using Firebug since it was
first available.  I've not had any problems.

 Just a guess: But he is probably talking about XHTML served with the
correct mime type. What you are doing probably ends up beeing HTML 4.01tag soup 
that happens to look like XHTML ; ). I don't have a link right now,
but there is plenty of information about this topic out there. The basic
message is that an XHTML doctype does not cause (any) browser to render the
contents of a page as XHTML. Only sending the correct mime type (via php or
some other server side technology) does that. The reason very few people are
doing this is that IE 6 (not sure about 7) does not support XHTML at all.

-- Felix
--
http://www.thinkingphp.org
http://www.fg-webdesign.de


Mike Alsup wrote:

 I am happy to donate but will only really use it if it works with xhtml
which currently causes it to crash firefox

 Huh?  I only write xhtml and I've been using Firebug since it was
first available.  I've not had any problems.

___
jQuery mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]://jquery.com/discuss/


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/



___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php , ruby & jQuery devs

[Brice Burgess]

Brice Burgess wrote:
> Will Jessup wrote:
>   
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Probably not the place to post this but its very hard to find good 
>> people to work with and I know the people working with jQuery are above 
>> the average. Anyhow, I'm looking for a couple back-end (rails , PHP & 
>> db) and front-end guys to work with. I'm located in LA and work on sites 
>> like www.kevo.com & talentboom.com and other stuff like Nike digital.
>>
>> Anyway, sorry if you think this is spam - just tired of finding a load 
>> of crappy people on job sites.
>>
>> Will
>>   
>> 
> Will,
>
>   I'm in the same boat, and have been planning on job seeking for a 
> small (yet successful) web firm after the holidays. Currently I'm an 
> independent contractor, but would prefer a full time job working with 
> people that I can collaborate with -- and that understand (and like to 
> talk about) the kind of work we do :)
>
>   I am in Richmond VA for a stint, but am open to relocation. If you're 
> interested I can send my resume (which is actually tailored to Linux 
> system administration). Let me know.
>
>   Thanks!
>
> ~ Brice
Apologies for the spam! Once again, the reply-to: header blues.

~ Brice

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Aaron Heimlich]

On 12/4/06, Felix Geisendörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Just a guess: But he is probably talking about XHTML served with the
correct mime type. What you are doing probably ends up beeing HTML 4.01tag soup 
that happens to look like XHTML ; ). I don't have a link right now,
but there is plenty of information about this topic out there.



Here's some links to get you started:

No to XHTML - Spartanicus' Web tips[1]
SitePoint Forums - XHTML vs HTML FAQ[2]
Sufin' Safari -- Understanding HTML, XML and XHTML[3]
SitePoint Forums - Frequently Asked Questions about HTML[4]

[1]http://www.spartanicus.utvinternet.ie/no-xhtml.htm
[2]http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393445
[3]http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68
[4]http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=428205
--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] php , ruby & jQuery devs

[Brice Burgess]

Will Jessup wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Probably not the place to post this but its very hard to find good 
> people to work with and I know the people working with jQuery are above 
> the average. Anyhow, I'm looking for a couple back-end (rails , PHP & 
> db) and front-end guys to work with. I'm located in LA and work on sites 
> like www.kevo.com & talentboom.com and other stuff like Nike digital.
>
> Anyway, sorry if you think this is spam - just tired of finding a load 
> of crappy people on job sites.
>
> Will
>   
Will,

  I'm in the same boat, and have been planning on job seeking for a 
small (yet successful) web firm after the holidays. Currently I'm an 
independent contractor, but would prefer a full time job working with 
people that I can collaborate with -- and that understand (and like to 
talk about) the kind of work we do :)

  I am in Richmond VA for a stint, but am open to relocation. If you're 
interested I can send my resume (which is actually tailored to Linux 
system administration). Let me know.

  Thanks!

~ Brice


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ]

Safari:
jQuery Test Suite - Core
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9.1 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Safari/419.3
core module: Basic requirements (0, 7, 7)
core module: length (0, 1, 1)
core module: size() (0, 1, 1)
core module: get() (0, 1, 1)
core module: get(Number) (0, 1, 1)
core module: each(Function) (0, 1, 1)
core module: index(Object) (0, 8, 8)
core module: attr(String) (0, 12, 12)
core module: attr(Hash) (0, 1, 1)
core module: attr(String, Object) (0, 6, 6)
core module: attr(String, Object)x (0, 2, 2)
core module: css(String|Hash) (3, 2, 5)
core module: css(String, Object) (3, 1, 4)
core module: text() (0, 1, 1)
core module: wrap(String|Element) (0, 4, 4)
core module: append(String|Element|Array) (0, 4, 4)
core module: prepend(String|Element|Array) (0, 4, 4)
core module: before(String|Element|Array) (0, 3, 3)
core module: after(String|Element|Array) (0, 3, 3)
core module: end() (0, 2, 2)
core module: find(String) (0, 1, 1)
core module: clone() (0, 3, 3)
core module: filter() (0, 2, 2)
core module: not(String) (1, 1, 2)
core module: is(String) (0, 22, 22)
core module: $.extend(Object, Object) (0, 2, 2)
core module: $.extend(Object, Object, Object, Object) (0, 4, 4)
core module: expressions - element (0, 5, 5)
core module: expressions - id (0, 5, 5)
core module: expressions - class (0, 4, 4)
core module: expressions - multiple (0, 4, 4)
core module: expressions - child and adjacent (0, 14, 14)
core module: expressions - attributes (0, 16, 16)
core module: expressions - pseudo (:) selctors (3, 27, 30)
core module: expressions - basic xpath (0, 14, 14)
core module: val() (0, 2, 2)
core module: val(String) (0, 2, 2)
core module: html(String) (0, 1, 1)
core module: id() (0, 3, 3)
core module: title() (0, 2, 2)
core module: name() (0, 3, 3)
core module: siblings([String]) (0, 3, 3)
core module: children([String]) (0, 2, 2)
core module: show() (0, 1, 1)
core module: addClass(String) (0, 1, 1)
core module: removeClass(String) - simple (0, 1, 1)
core module: removeClass(String) - add three classes and remove again (0, 1,
1)
core module: removeAttr(String (0, 1, 1)
event module: toggle(Function, Function) - add toggle event and fake a few
clicks (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: serialize() (1, 0, 1)
ajax module: param (0, 4, 4)
ajax module: load(String, Object, Function) - simple: inject text into DOM
(1, 1, 2)
ajax module: load(String, Object, Function) - inject without callback (1, 2,
3)
ajax module: load(String, Object, Function) - check scripts (1, 6, 7)
ajax module: test global handlers - success (0, 6, 6)
ajax module: test global handlers - failure (0, 6, 6)
ajax module: $.get(String, Hash, Function) - parse xml and use text() on
nodes (0, 2, 2)
ajax module: $.getIfModified(String, Hash, Function) (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: $.getScript(String, Function) - with callback (0, 2, 2)
ajax module: $.getScript(String, Function) - no callback (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: $.getJSON(String, Hash, Function) - JSON array (0, 4, 4)
ajax module: $.getJSON(String, Hash, Function) - JSON object (0, 2, 2)
ajax module: $.post(String, Hash, Function) - simple with xml (0, 2, 2)
ajax module: $.ajaxTimeout(Number) - with global timeout (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: $.ajaxTimeout(Number) with localtimeout (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: $.ajax - simple get (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: $.ajax - simple post (0, 1, 1)
ajax module: $.ajax - dataType html (2, 3, 5)
ajax module: $.ajax - xml: non-namespace elements inside namespaced elements
(1, 1, 2)
ajax module: $.ajax - preprocess (1, 3, 4)
fx module: animate(Hash, Object, Function) - assert that animate doesn't
modify its arguments (3, 0, 3)
Tests completed in 16028 milliseconds.
21 tests of 284 failed.


On 12/4/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Corey Jewett schrieb:
> Do you have an isolated test case proving IE is ignoring
> setRequestHeader?
>
It's part of the testsuite, available in SVN. It's a bit complicate to
isolate the problem: I'm not sure what is happening on the serverside
and I can't debug it. I can't even see what is actually send in IE (no
Firebug...).

I uploaded the "compiled" testsuite here:
http://fuzz.bassistance.de/ie-requestheader/test/index.html

Would be nice to see if this works in Safari...

--
Jörn Zaefferer

http://bassistance.de


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/





--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב   ʝǡǩȩ   ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

[jQuery] ie6 flicker issue

[bmsterling]

Hey, 
Figured I'd share this; this is a fix to the ie6 flicker issue on the
fadeIn/fadeOut.


//Stop IE flicker
if ($.browser.msie == true) {
document.execCommand('BackgroundImageCache', false, true);
}

org:
http://medienfreunde.com/deutsch/weblog/index.html?nid=87&action=showcom
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/ie6-flicker-issue-tf2756724.html#a7686901
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Jörn Zaefferer]

Corey Jewett schrieb:
> Do you have an isolated test case proving IE is ignoring  
> setRequestHeader?
>   
It's part of the testsuite, available in SVN. It's a bit complicate to 
isolate the problem: I'm not sure what is happening on the serverside 
and I can't debug it. I can't even see what is actually send in IE (no 
Firebug...).

I uploaded the "compiled" testsuite here: 
http://fuzz.bassistance.de/ie-requestheader/test/index.html

Would be nice to see if this works in Safari...

-- 
Jörn Zaefferer

http://bassistance.de


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Ignoring tags already affected by .addClass()

[digital spaghetti]

Easy enough.  My module uses a hook into drupals views, when a node is
about to be rendered to the screen, I have a function that generates a
hash based on the url of the node id.

Then using drupal_add_js, I write out the jQuery function and drop in
the vars from the module's php code (naybe not standard but very easy
to do using this function).

Since the hash code is generated from the node's url' I know the id of
the node and where I now want to put it.

Really I should have thought of it before, but today was a rather
testing day for other reasons, with far too many coffee and cigs and
not enough work.

On 12/4/06, Erik Beeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you're talking about trying to do with .addClass doesn't make sense. It
> sounds like you want something like what Alex described. How do you expect
> to map from node number to class name?
>
> --Erik
>
> On 12/4/06, digital spaghetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To be honest, I don't know how to currently with drupal, I've looked
> > through the docs but currently haven't found anything to allow me to
> > affect the node's class tag.
> >
> > This way seemed like a quick workaround way to do it, and as far as I
> > could see drupal_add_js was designed to be able to do stuff like this
> > (mix JS and PHP, maybe I'm wrong).
> >
> > I do want to look for a more perminant way of doing this, as I have
> > thought that a microid spider might ignore JS which would render this
> > module's current implementation useless.
> > But at the moment this is more of a proof-of-concept rather than
> > something fully useable (there are not many services that support
> > microid).
> >
> > Tane
> >
> > On 12/4/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > digital spaghetti schrieb:
> > > > Since drupal_add_js allows me to mix PHP variables with jQuery code I
> > > > could change the I'd selector to be specific to the node I'd (I.e
> > > > id="node-14", id="node-15", etc) as drupal always automatically
> > > > generates this.  If anyone can think of anything else, it will be
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > It sounds like you should try to add that ID without JS at all. I think
> > > mixing of javascript with any serverside code should be avoided as much
> > > as possible, it always gets ugly. Use metadata added via serverside code
> > > within your js code, but don't generate js.
> > >
> > > I'm interested to hear why you need js to do that stuff.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jörn Zaefferer
> > >
> > > http://bassistance.de
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > jQuery mailing list
> > > discuss@jquery.com
> > > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> > >
> > ___
> > jQuery mailing list
> > discuss@jquery.com
> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >
>
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

[jQuery] php , ruby & jQuery devs

[Will Jessup]

Hey guys,

Probably not the place to post this but its very hard to find good 
people to work with and I know the people working with jQuery are above 
the average. Anyhow, I'm looking for a couple back-end (rails , PHP & 
db) and front-end guys to work with. I'm located in LA and work on sites 
like www.kevo.com & talentboom.com and other stuff like Nike digital.

Anyway, sorry if you think this is spam - just tired of finding a load 
of crappy people on job sites.

Will

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Ignoring tags already affected by .addClass()

[Erik Beeson]

What you're talking about trying to do with .addClass doesn't make sense. It
sounds like you want something like what Alex described. How do you expect
to map from node number to class name?

--Erik

On 12/4/06, digital spaghetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


To be honest, I don't know how to currently with drupal, I've looked
through the docs but currently haven't found anything to allow me to
affect the node's class tag.

This way seemed like a quick workaround way to do it, and as far as I
could see drupal_add_js was designed to be able to do stuff like this
(mix JS and PHP, maybe I'm wrong).

I do want to look for a more perminant way of doing this, as I have
thought that a microid spider might ignore JS which would render this
module's current implementation useless.
But at the moment this is more of a proof-of-concept rather than
something fully useable (there are not many services that support
microid).

Tane

On 12/4/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> digital spaghetti schrieb:
> > Since drupal_add_js allows me to mix PHP variables with jQuery code I
> > could change the I'd selector to be specific to the node I'd (I.e
> > id="node-14", id="node-15", etc) as drupal always automatically
> > generates this.  If anyone can think of anything else, it will be
> > appreciated.
> >
> It sounds like you should try to add that ID without JS at all. I think
> mixing of javascript with any serverside code should be avoided as much
> as possible, it always gets ugly. Use metadata added via serverside code
> within your js code, but don't generate js.
>
> I'm interested to hear why you need js to do that stuff.
>
> --
> Jörn Zaefferer
>
> http://bassistance.de
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] accordian help

[bmsterling]

Jörn,
Thanks for the quick response, here is the things I need the accordian todo:

 1.  I need it so that if i click on any of the, we'll use "titles,"
titles that it will open to the right content, but if you click on it again,
the content will close the the default title/content will become active.

 2.  I need to have a background image for each title, on and off as it
were. <-- which is working for the most part, but if this can be cleaned up
from what I did that great.  Minor twist for my needs is that the bottom
title when not active, will have a rounded corner, so it will be different
then the other title backgrounds and therefor will be a different class. 
Thats why there is all that extra code in there.  Could not figure that out
real well, but do have it working, but i am sure if could be done better.

 3.  When the content opens, the text needs to fade in and when it
closed it needs to fade out.

Thanks again.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/accordian-help-tf2733195.html#a7686549
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Corey Jewett]

Do you have an isolated test case proving IE is ignoring  
setRequestHeader?

Corey


On Dec 4, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:

> Mike Alsup schrieb:
>> preprocess: function(xml) {
>>
>>
>> The form plugin uses 'before' for the preprocess hook.  For
>> consistency, maybe using that name would be a good idea.
>>
> Done.
>
> Still, setting custom request headers in IE(5 - 7) fails, anyone  
> got any
> clue?
>
> http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/384/
>
> -- 
> Jörn Zaefferer
>
> http://bassistance.de
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Ignoring tags already affected by .addClass()

[digital spaghetti]

To be honest, I don't know how to currently with drupal, I've looked
through the docs but currently haven't found anything to allow me to
affect the node's class tag.

This way seemed like a quick workaround way to do it, and as far as I
could see drupal_add_js was designed to be able to do stuff like this
(mix JS and PHP, maybe I'm wrong).

I do want to look for a more perminant way of doing this, as I have
thought that a microid spider might ignore JS which would render this
module's current implementation useless.
But at the moment this is more of a proof-of-concept rather than
something fully useable (there are not many services that support
microid).

Tane

On 12/4/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> digital spaghetti schrieb:
> > Since drupal_add_js allows me to mix PHP variables with jQuery code I
> > could change the I'd selector to be specific to the node I'd (I.e
> > id="node-14", id="node-15", etc) as drupal always automatically
> > generates this.  If anyone can think of anything else, it will be
> > appreciated.
> >
> It sounds like you should try to add that ID without JS at all. I think
> mixing of javascript with any serverside code should be avoided as much
> as possible, it always gets ugly. Use metadata added via serverside code
> within your js code, but don't generate js.
>
> I'm interested to hear why you need js to do that stuff.
>
> --
> Jörn Zaefferer
>
> http://bassistance.de
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Mike Alsup]

> The form plugin's call point is earlier and lets you modify the form before
> it's serialized and passed on to ajax(), which would now have a "before"
> handler. If there's some way to resolve the call arguments and "this" usage
> I think it would be great to extend "before", but it seems tricky.

Good point, Dave.  The form plugin passes it's options argument to the
ajax method.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] accordian help

[Jörn Zaefferer]

bmsterling schrieb:
> Jörn,
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.  I implemented your code and
> made some modifications (tips on the modifications are welcomed) and for
> most part things are working great.
>
> url in question: http://ierev.informationexperts.com/test.htm
>   
Could you please start with the standard accordion plugin and tell me 
what you miss in there? I can then tell you how to achieve that with the 
code as it is or with modifications, or even add those modifications to 
the release.

You modifed it that much that I can't see what went wrong without hours 
of debugging.

The plugin was already defined to be quite flexible, therefore I'm sure 
we can find a solution for your requirements without the available 
options, without heavy modifications.

-- 
Jörn Zaefferer

http://bassistance.de


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Dave Methvin]

>> $.ajax({
>> ...
>> preprocess: function(xml) { 
>>xml.setRequestHeader(...);
>>xml.otherStuff();
>> }
>> });
>
>  Exactly my thought! but preprocess is too many bytes! (ha ha )
 
Let's use "b4" then. :-)  Just kidding!

> The form plugin uses 'before' for the preprocess hook.
> For consistency, maybe using that name would be a good idea.

The form plugin's call point is earlier and lets you modify the form before
it's serialized and passed on to ajax(), which would now have a "before"
handler. If there's some way to resolve the call arguments and "this" usage
I think it would be great to extend "before", but it seems tricky.



___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Ignoring tags already affected by .addClass()

[Jörn Zaefferer]

digital spaghetti schrieb:
> Since drupal_add_js allows me to mix PHP variables with jQuery code I
> could change the I'd selector to be specific to the node I'd (I.e
> id="node-14", id="node-15", etc) as drupal always automatically
> generates this.  If anyone can think of anything else, it will be
> appreciated.
>   
It sounds like you should try to add that ID without JS at all. I think 
mixing of javascript with any serverside code should be avoided as much 
as possible, it always gets ugly. Use metadata added via serverside code 
within your js code, but don't generate js.

I'm interested to hear why you need js to do that stuff.

-- 
Jörn Zaefferer

http://bassistance.de


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Jörn Zaefferer]

Mike Alsup schrieb:
> preprocess: function(xml) {
>   
>
> The form plugin uses 'before' for the preprocess hook.  For
> consistency, maybe using that name would be a good idea.
>   
Done.

Still, setting custom request headers in IE(5 - 7) fails, anyone got any 
clue?

http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/384/

-- 
Jörn Zaefferer

http://bassistance.de


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Felix Geisendörfer]

Huh?  I only write xhtml and I've been using Firebug since it was
first available.  I've not had any problems.
Just a guess: But he is probably talking about XHTML served with the 
correct mime type. What you are doing probably ends up beeing HTML 4.01 
tag soup that happens to look like XHTML ; ). I don't have a link right 
now, but there is plenty of information about this topic out there. The 
basic message is that an XHTML doctype does not cause (any) browser to 
render the contents of a page as XHTML. Only sending the correct mime 
type (via php or some other server side technology) does that. The 
reason very few people are doing this is that IE 6 (not sure about 7) 
does not support XHTML at all.


-- Felix
--
http://www.thinkingphp.org
http://www.fg-webdesign.de


Mike Alsup wrote:

I am happy to donate but will only really use it if it works with xhtml
which currently causes it to crash firefox



Huh?  I only write xhtml and I've been using Firebug since it was
first available.  I've not had any problems.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

  
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Mike Alsup]

> Hey Mike, as long as you don't serve XHTML as XML it's just HTML with
> some weird slashes where they don't belong to.

Yep, I thought that's what Sam was talking about.  But maybe he was
referring to XML.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Get the Firebug 1.0 Beta!

[Klaus Hartl]

Mike Alsup schrieb:
>> I am happy to donate but will only really use it if it works with xhtml
>> which currently causes it to crash firefox
> 
> Huh?  I only write xhtml and I've been using Firebug since it was
> first available.  I've not had any problems.


Hey Mike, as long as you don't serve XHTML as XML it's just HTML with 
some weird slashes where they don't belong to.


-- Klaus

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ]

I was thinking prep, but if the ideas are similar to before in forms,,, I'm
all for it!

On 12/4/06, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> >> > preprocess: function(xml) {

The form plugin uses 'before' for the preprocess hook.  For
consistency, maybe using that name would be a good idea.

Mike

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/





--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב   ʝǡǩȩ   ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] accordian help

[bmsterling]

Jörn,
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.  I implemented your code and
made some modifications (tips on the modifications are welcomed) and for
most part things are working great.

Few issues the I have in order of importance:
 1. If I click on, we'll say, "on our minds," the content shows, but for
some reason the content is clickable and in turn messes everything up if
that happens.  Not sure why it is becoming clickable and there for can fix
it.

 2. In IE6, the "headers" flicker even if the images are loaded.

 3. If you click on another tab before the animation is done that messes
everything up, is there a way to prevent this.

url in question: http://ierev.informationexperts.com/test.htm

thanks in advance.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/accordian-help-tf2733195.html#a7685218
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Mike Alsup]

> >> > preprocess: function(xml) {

The form plugin uses 'before' for the preprocess hook.  For
consistency, maybe using that name would be a good idea.

Mike

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Custom headers to ajax calls

[Mike Alsup]

>> > preprocess: function(xml) {

> It'd work for me (and Kevin, i suppose) too. +1 for taking that route.

I like that too.

___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] Ignoring tags already affected by .addClass()

[digital spaghetti]

Hi alex and eric,

Sorry, my email was written during a fit of frustration.

Basicly what I mean is as each node is generated on the page there is
some PHP that generates the hash Id, then using the drupal_add_js I
add the .addClass() function to the head with the class name I want to
add, but it seems that jQuery is adding sll the .addClass() to each
node.  This actually makes sense to me with how jQuery works.

So what I need to happen is for each jQuery function that is generated
for each .addClass to have a condition that excludes previous nodes
that have already been affected.  I'm hoping that it runs in order too
(I.e. The correct .addClass() affects the correct node).  As I typed
out this email I had the same idea as Alex (but my blackberry kicked
me out of gmail before I could send it) I will try tommorow.

Since drupal_add_js allows me to mix PHP variables with jQuery code I
could change the I'd selector to be specific to the node I'd (I.e
id="node-14", id="node-15", etc) as drupal always automatically
generates this.  If anyone can think of anything else, it will be
appreciated.


Tane
http://digitalspaghetti.me.uk

On 12/4/06, Alex Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you know the node that is generating the original  call, then
> why can't you write the id value into the jQuery call?
>
> Drupal spits out this:
>
>