Re: [slim] Filename format question (not really that important)

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Herger

All my mp3's flacs start with a 2 digit number for example:


MP3 or flac?


03 - Band on The Run
05 - Another Day


Is this the filename or the title tag?


This is great because I can keep the album in song order and useful too
on my IHP340. I don't really like to see the number on SB2 so is it
possible to tell SB2 to ignore the number and still put and put the
files in alphabetical order for each folder?


If it's the filename and the tags are correctly set not to include the  
number it's fairly standard. But if you include the number in the title,  
then you're lost.


--

Michael

---
Help translate SlimServer by using the
StringEditor Plugin (http://www.herger.net/slim/)
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Rescan options

2005-11-05 Thread gingerneil

There are 3 options when starting a rescan from the web interface. Two
are obvious, but I have a question about "Look for new and changed
music". 
Waht exactly will be picked up by this ?? For example, if I apply
replaygain tags using foobar, should I drop and rebuild the full list,
or will a search for changed music pick out the new tags ??

As an aside, which option is envoked when using the SB2 interfcae and
the remote ?

Cheers.


-- 
gingerneil

gingerneil's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1396
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17908

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Squeezeboxes randomly rebooting

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 10:59 PM, webnom wrote:



Can someone help
Will Slim Devices replace this SB1 or am I SOL???


you would probably have to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] 6.2.0 is throwing lots of errors and 100% load upon startup

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 10:53 PM, dranch wrote:


Anyway.. so here I am upgrading from a very slow 6.2Beta [v2005-08-21]
to 6.2.0.  (Just a FYI on that "slowness": just selecting the "browse
music folder" would take the system ~30 seconds or more to show the
first A's of my ~517 artist directories.)

That slownesss of an august build should be very different now.  BMF is 
a raw file listing in 6.2+ to allow it to be faster.



Anyway.. 6.2.0 is running built from the tar.gz file but it initially
threw these errors and then 10,000s of the last line:

With all of those errors, I'd almost say you have to have a corrupt 
module in there somewhere.
However, --diag can be very hazardous for your server if you just run 
with it for no reason.  It gets VERY strict with perl; far more than 
needed for operational use.  Try taking that option out before you go 
and erase everything.  If that still gives you those syntax error 
reports, then something got mixed up.


Also, 6.2.1 has had many fixes added (will be released soon) so 
consider trying that as well.


-kdf

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Squeezeboxes randomly rebooting

2005-11-05 Thread webnom

I too was having this problem. Sometime my SB1 would reboot and then
other times it would just freeze. I would disconnect then connect power
to solve it. Then today I went to cycle the power after a freeze and
then it didn't come back up.

The display stays black, there's no audio, and I can't ping the IP
address. Tried another 5V power supply and still nothing.

Can someone help
Will Slim Devices replace this SB1 or am I SOL???


-- 
webnom

webnom's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2186
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=12778

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] 6.2.0 is throwing lots of errors and 100% load upon startup

2005-11-05 Thread dranch

Hello Everyone,

A while back I upgraded from a Slimp3 to a SB2 running a 6.2Beta with a
few bumps in the road:

http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=15672


Anyway.. so here I am upgrading from a very slow 6.2Beta [v2005-08-21]
to 6.2.0.  (Just a FYI on that "slowness": just selecting the "browse
music folder" would take the system ~30 seconds or more to show the
first A's of my ~517 artist directories.)

Anyway.. 6.2.0 is running built from the tar.gz file but it initially
threw these errors and then 10,000s of the last line:

--
/usr/local/slimserver/slimserver.pl --diag --prefsfile
/etc/slimserver.pref


2005-11-05 22:06:55.6189 Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at
/usr/local/slimserver/Slim/Web/Setup.pm line 2230.
2005-11-05 22:06:55.6303 Use of uninitialized value in anonymous hash
({}) at /usr/local/slimserver/Slim/Web/Setup.pm line 2230.
2005-11-05 22:06:58.4397 Using a hash as a reference is deprecated at
/usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/MusicMagic/Plugin.pm line 1224.
2005-11-05 22:06:58.4434 Using a hash as a reference is deprecated at
/usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/MusicMagic/Plugin.pm line 1239.
2005-11-05 22:06:59.1069 Parentheses missing around "my" list at
/usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/RPC.pm line 42.
2005-11-05 22:06:59.1147 Useless use of a variable in void context at
/usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/RPC.pm line 42.
2005-11-05 22:06:59.1160 Useless use of a variable in void context at
/usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/RPC.pm line 42.
2005-11-05 22:06:59.1203 Unquoted string "true" may clash with future
reserved word at /usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/RPC.pm line 109.
2005-11-05 22:06:59.1217 Unquoted string "false" may clash with future
reserved word at /usr/local/slimserver/Plugins/RPC.pm line 110.

2005-11-05 22:33:04.6577 Use of uninitialized value in substitution
(s///) at /usr/local/slimserver/Slim/DataStores/DBI/DBIStore.pm line
1353.

[That last line repeats forever]

At this point, the machine is at 100% CPU utilization and though
the SB2's display for the clock does update, it's only updating once
every 10 seconds.


System details:
--
This is running on an OLD server but it's all I have for now
Linux kernel: 2.2.26
glibc-2.1.3
perl, v5.8.7
All other perl modules were installed fresh via the
build-perl-modules.pl script


Any ideas on how to get this running?

--David


-- 
dranch

dranch's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1294
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17907

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread PAUL WILLIAMSON
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/05/05 11:51 PM >>>
> Perhaps you can share the names and methodologies of other 
> small, for-profit developers that do likewise such that they might 
> be used as role-models.
> 
> The magic forumla of functionality, performance, schedule, and 
> quality is very intriguing indeed.

I don't write code, but I try to do my best to download the latest 
nightly at least 2-3 times a week to go through a bunch of 
tests.  It's not exactly scientific, but there have been occasions 
where I find little bugs and try to fix them or report them.
It's not often, but I still run the nightlies anyway.

I used to be a corporate software tester.  The job of those 
schmoes is to verify the software works like intended, not 
as people would try to use it.  So, you'll always have 
things pop up in commercial software once it's released.
I would say Dan, Victor, KDF, and all the other 
software devs (working for slim or not) are a whole 
lot more talented than most of the people I worked with 
developing commercial software.  

Oh, and I've only been stranded twice running the 
nightlies with my slimp3 or sbg.  None recently, so 
much so that my wife has been hinting around at 
wanting to get a couple more.

Paul

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] ExBrowse3 updating problem

2005-11-05 Thread Jack Coates

Jacob Potter wrote:


On 11/5/05, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 


SuSE 10.0, MozillaFirefox-1.0.7-0.1, and yes, interesting stuff in
JavaScript Console:

   



Very odd... I haven't been able to reproduce that, but I'll see what I can find.

- Jacob



Works fine in Konqueror, so it's got to be Firefox-specific. That 
reference to Forecastfox is highly odd.


Okay, so while I was typing that Konqueror spat up a Javascript error... 
Transport Error: Undefined. The browser has totally crashed.


--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Nokia 770

2005-11-05 Thread GoCubs

dwc Wrote: 
> http://www.internettablettalk.com/content/view/133/2/
> Nokia USA Will Ship the Nokia 770 November 10

Oh I'm excited... oh I'm excited...  now I won't have to make a special
trip to the UK for one...

Oh I'm excited...


-- 
GoCubs

GoCubs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=312
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17837

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread Jack Coates

kdf wrote:...




In my reading on the topic, it seemed to be widely acknolwedged that 
WOL over wireless didn't work.  Annoyingly, no consistent reason was 
turning up.  In som cases its the power requirements, or the 'not 
always connected' aspect of wireless, or even the example you give. 
When a computer is powered down, it may not have the wireless section 
of the hardware powered up, thus it would have no way to receive the 
packet.


On the more positive side, I did hear of some claims that it can work, 
but only some hardware supported it.  I don't know for sure if SB2 
broadcasts the packet over wireless or not, but assuming it does, your 
router would have to support it and then forward to the wireless card, 
which would also have to have some way of supporting it (not to 
mention support from the computer hardware as well).


-k


WOL is a red-headed stephchild standard; no two vendors implement in 
exactly the same way, and no vendor ships with it activated. It's a 
"feature" in my day job's product and causes grief more than it causes 
happiness.


--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread MrC

Bonesteel Wrote: 
> A spritied defense, yet the simple fact is that until they identify 
> what platforms they test it on and what tests they perform, the unknown
> gaps in testing indeed get pushed to we consumers.

Perhaps you can share the names and methodologies of other small,
for-profit developers that do likewise such that they might be used as
role-models.

The magic forumla of functionality, performance, schedule, and quality
is very intriguing indeed.


-- 
MrC

MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Jack Coates

Bonesteel wrote:

A spritied defense, yet the simple fact is that until they identify 
what platforms they test it on and what tests they perform, the unknown

gaps in testing indeed get pushed to we consumers.  The limited
regression testing increases the number of these instances we need to
deal with.

 



I'm beginning to get that "why am I bothering" feeling here, but I'll go 
ahead one more time You are getting better support for far less 
money than you understand. Go buy some commercial enterprise software 
some time, you'll see more bugs, worse support, and a hole in your 
wallet that looks like a fleet of luxury cars.


--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Jack Coates

Michaelwagner wrote:
...


resources needed for this would be astronomical. Even the matrix I
   


showed you above, 6 server configurations, 6 client configurations,
would be a 36 test matrix. Add low memory, regular memory, fast
processor, slow processor configurations, and you're at 144
combinations (well, a few less, because there is no memory size
variation available for the NSLU2). 
 


...

I just want to point out a couple more complicating factors: plugins 
take the matrix out to 1000x1000 or so, and each test needs to run for 
at least two or three songs to make sure that transition errors are 
caught. Oh, forgot synchronization issues, make that 2000x2000.


--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread MrC

pfarrell Wrote: 
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 21:48 -0500, 
> > wrote:
> > > network. Would this cause problems or be a bad idea
> > > to have Slimserver  on one PC and the audio files i want to stream
> on a
> > > seperate PC?
> [color=blue]
> 
> A more important question is why would you want to do this?
> network file access is harder to set up and usually slower
> (often by a lot) than local access. I would not recommend it
> unless you have thought through the engineering concerns.
> But it will work.

I can see perhaps a good reason.  I don't think I would like Slim's
rescan or occasional heavy load to compete with or disturb any
scheduled video recordings.  Network file transfers are relatively fast
operations compared to, say, software MPEG2 encoding.  They are also
fairly predictable in terms of server performance hit.

Might it not make sense under certain circumstances to store your music
files on your HTPC and run the server on another PC?  Rescans might take
longer, but streaming music would not be terribly impactful.  Perhaps
some measurement of how the system behaves is in order.

Another point probably already considered is not wanting to distrub a
perfectly functional HTPC by adding additional software.


-- 
MrC

MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17905

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Jack Coates

ovonrein wrote:

stinkingpig Wrote: 
 


Use the Composer tag when you tag your files. [...] Slimserver will use
it.

   


What for?  Yes, you can dig deep into the tags on your Slim player to
find out, but that's not the point.  It is the music tree that would
require the extra level to search on.


 



I don't have enough classical in my collection to have a problem, but I 
seem to recall some discussion back in the "what should our database 
schema be" days about using Composer alongside Artist in the browse and 
search pages. So that if you had Composer=Johann Sebastian Bach and 
Artist=Lara St. John for one album, then Composer=Johann Sebastian Bach 
and Artist=Jakob Lindberg for another album, you'd get three listings in 
Browse By Artist. That would be useful, no?


--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread Mark Lanctot
No, you had better read the other responses.  I'm very
new to this and I don't know what I'm talking about.
:-(

I'd like to contribute and help but I'll stay on the
sidelines in the future.

--- windmiller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 
> Thanks for the quick reply Mark. I am going to go
> ahead and setup
> Slimserver on my HTPC and see how it goes, the HTPC
> is a 2.5 Celeron D
> w/ 1GB so it should be able to handle SlimServer and
> the occasional DVD
> at the same time.
> 
> 
> -- 
> windmiller
>

> windmiller's Profile:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2185
> View this thread:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17905
> 
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
> 







__ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:44 -0800, Michaelwagner wrote:
> dean Wrote: 
> > Nearly every ethernet card I've encountered does support WOL.

> I have some old ones that don't. Also, WOL requires at least an AT-X
> power supply and power to the lan card, so some older machines won't be
> able to support it even if the lan card does.

Pre ATX systems? drop them off the support list.
It has been a full year since Intel has been pushing BTX as
the only solution.

Sometimes you have to upgrade to something modestly modern
to get the cool new features. Its been years since I saw
a new system that had separate LAN cards, they have been
built into cheap motherboards for a long tiem.


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] thank you for 6.2

2005-11-05 Thread dlimichron

just installed SlimServer 6.2 and i'm enjoying it very much.  my thanks
go out to the folks who work on improving Squeezebox software.  i know
there will be new problems with the new version, but the tools just
keep getting better.  the Squeezebox software is truly fly.

i'm trying to find a server interface that has all controls (including
volume) and a display of where you are in the current track.  it would
be nice to be able to jump to any point in the track, ala winamp etc. 
the new ExBrowse3 looks like it wants to let you jump around, but the
horizontal bar display is non-functional.  anyone know of a server
interface that provides this function?


-- 
dlimichron

dlimichron's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1316
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17906

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Problem with SlimServMon Widget for Konfabulator

2005-11-05 Thread acebathound

Steve,

Glad to hear it's working well.  I've actually just fixed the original
author's code & made some improvements -- so as I mentioned on my site,
credits should go to him for, say 95% of it =)

I've fixed the truncating text & added slider labels as you mentioned. 
New file has been uploaded.

Regards,
Wayne


-- 
acebathound

:Techdose:
http://www.techdose.com

acebathound's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=15981

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:32 -0800, JJZolx wrote:
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > But this is an opportunity. The database can do what ID3 and
> > ogg tags can never hope to do. Its really not
> > that hard now that there is a SQL database hidden
> > behind the SlimServer

> I follow what you're saying, in that the database could be made more
> useful, but...  If the data associated with a given track (or album)
> isn't to be found in the tags (or perhaps in a CUE sheet, but let's
> ignore that for now), then where does it come from?  It either needs to
> be contained in some other form, such as separate text files, or else it
> needs to be entered manually in SlimServer.

It does need to magically come from somewhere and get entered into the
database. There are more options than just the two you mention.

Clearly a suitable GUI could let people type it in.
Or cut and paste the data from a good source, something 
like allmusic.com 

One of the problems that I have is that the current automated
sources, such as cddb or freedb, have terrible data problems.
It isn't too terrible for pop, but it is terrible for
more serious music.

A related problem is how do you tell if the tracks were ripped properly.
The idea behind http://www.accuraterip.com/ is good,
but they are uninterested in non-windows platforms or
any of the concepts of open source. So one solution could
address both issues, invent an open source equivalent to
accurate-rip that also focuses on accurate meta data.
It could provide the magic data feed and validate that
the rip was correct. I've sketched out some of the code
needed to do this.

> This is where you'd need to begin turning SlimServer into a bonafide
> music library management system. 

It is my music libary management system. Its not great at it,
but it has been the library management system for my 700+
CDs since I got my first SB1 years ago.


>  It would require a user interface,
> the ability to edit the metadata of multiple files, etc., etc. 

It has a user interface now. Maybe not suitable or optimized for
generalized management, but that is another SMOP.


> for eventually making SlimServer a music manager - in fact I think it's
> inevitable, but it's a long way off.

I don't see it as a long way off. maybe I'm a hopeless optimist.
Or maybe I've been building web front ends to RDBMS systems
since the early days of the web. A lot of this is not
rocket science.

>   Given the apparent difficulty
> right now of performing even simple tasks upon the existing data, I'd
> guess that's a very _long_ way off.

Then again, I have no problem doing fairly complex stuff with 6.2.1
I could have missed it, but I've not noticed a lot of data management
problems on the forums. Lots of installation problems, connection 
provisioning, etc. The lost genre problems appear to be fixed fairly
quickly as they are reported. The general regression testing
and reliability issues are best left in one of the existing
threads, or taken over to the dev-list.

-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

Bonesteel Wrote: 
> I see no reason why they can't identify what they test it on and how it
> compares to the last release.Nor I. Good idea, in my opinion.


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

dean Wrote: 
> Nearly every ethernet card I've encountered does support WOL.I have some old 
> ones that don't. Also, WOL requires at least an AT-X
power supply and power to the lan card, so some older machines won't be
able to support it even if the lan card does.

> http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txtCute. Since that spec was released, we have a 
> new source of packet loss
... Avian flu.


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17891

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 7:32 PM, JJZolx wrote:


 Given the apparent difficulty
right now of performing even simple tasks upon the existing data, I'd
guess that's a very _long_ way off.


I love how there is always a subtle slap in the face slipped in there :)

I'd suggest that the long term problem of the above suggestions would 
be the extreme aversion some users have to the idea that slimserver 
would be used to enter data of any kind.  a pr campaign would have to 
be in place to make sure they know it is just the db

-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread JJZolx

pfarrell Wrote: 
> But this is an opportunity. The database can do what ID3 and
> ogg tags can never hope to do. Its really not
> that hard now that there is a SQL database hidden
> behind the SlimServer
I follow what you're saying, in that the database could be made more
useful, but...  If the data associated with a given track (or album)
isn't to be found in the tags (or perhaps in a CUE sheet, but let's
ignore that for now), then where does it come from?  It either needs to
be contained in some other form, such as separate text files, or else it
needs to be entered manually in SlimServer.

This is where you'd need to begin turning SlimServer into a bonafide
music library management system.  It would require a user interface,
the ability to edit the metadata of multiple files, etc., etc.  I'm all
for eventually making SlimServer a music manager - in fact I think it's
inevitable, but it's a long way off.  Given the apparent difficulty
right now of performing even simple tasks upon the existing data, I'd
guess that's a very _long_ way off.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim

JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17877

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Killed wireless card in SB2

2005-11-05 Thread dean blackketter


On Nov 4, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Michael Amster wrote:

So, let's say one's "friend" kills one's SB2 wireless card through  
some mods. Is there a supply of wireless boards that one could buy  
from SlimDevices?  I mean in a purely hypothetical sense only.  And  
would one just contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] or is there a  
purportedly better way to do this?


I mean for a friend of mine only, of course.

Have your friend contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread dean blackketter
I've never seen a wireless card that supports WOL.  Nearly every  
ethernet card I've encountered does support WOL.  It should work fine  
if the player is connected to a wireless access point which is then  
connected to the server via ethernet.


Squeezebox doesn't know if the remote system is connected via  
wireless, wired, optical or pigeon(1), it just sends out the magic  
packets and hopes for the best.


-dean

Footnotes:
1) http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt


On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:28 PM, boybees wrote:



I'd like to be able to wake up my server (IBM thinkpad laptop)  
using the

SB2 remote. I've started and followed several threads on this issue.

Here's what I've arrived at: when I look in the properties tab of my
wired ethernet card, I see that there is a power management tab where
you can check a box that says "allow this device to bring the computer
out of standby." This is the wake-on LAN function, and it works.

When I look at properties for my wireless card, I see no such power
management tab, and no check box for the wake-on LAN function.

So I called IBM tech support (usually pretty good) and ask the rep how
to configure my wireless card so that I would have the wake-on LAN
option. He said it's not possible because "the wireless card is on all
the time and is always receiving signals from everywhere, so how would
it know which signal is yours?" This answer betrayed a level of
cluelessness that made me not trust it, but I couldn't get anything
more useful out of him.

It's hard for me to believe that Slim would build a wake-on LAN
function into their wireless squeezebox, which then wouldn't work on a
wireless network. I don't know where to turn at this point. My  
wireless

card is an Intel pro/wireless LAN 2100 #3b.

Any suggestions?


--
boybees
-- 
--
boybees's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php? 
userid=1153

View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17891

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] ReplayGain in iTunes?

2005-11-05 Thread dean blackketter
iTunes will do this for you automatically if you turn on the option  
in Preferences -> Playback -> Sound Check.  It goes off and does the  
calculation for your whole library.



On Nov 5, 2005, at 6:29 PM, eschurr wrote:



Does anyone know how to generate volume adjustments for files in
iTunes?

I understand that MP3Gain will calcualte ReplayGain tags for many  
files

at once and the SS 6.2 (with an SB gen 2 or 3) will make use of these
tags.  If your files are in iTunes, SS and SB will make use of these
tags, but iTunes (and iPods) won't because, as I understand it, iTunes
uses a different tag for volume adjustments.

However, i believe that the iTunes volume adjustments will also be
recognized by SS 6.2/SB 2.  So, if there's a way to generate the  
iTunes

tags en mass, they will be used by both iTunes and SS/SB.

Is there a program that will calcualte the adjustments and do it to
many files at once?

Thanks


--
eschurr
-- 
--
eschurr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php? 
userid=2007

View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17902

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Bonesteel

A spritied defense, yet the simple fact is that until they identify 
what platforms they test it on and what tests they perform, the unknown
gaps in testing indeed get pushed to we consumers.  The limited
regression testing increases the number of these instances we need to
deal with.

For instance - 

If I had any warning that a making the jump from my well performing
6.0.2 release to a 6.2 release with unusable performance (library scan
and UI reponse) with NO OTHER CHANGES to hardware, software, or
network, I would not have tried it.  And, if I needed a specific level
of RAM/Mhz/system software to support the upgrade it should have been
posted in the read me.  As it was, all I saw was the OS version (which
I met). 

I admitted it would be too complex a task to detail all configurations
available in my post, BUT I see no reason why they can't identify what
they test it on and how it compares to the last release.  If I can see
the deltas in their tests and on the platform they tested on it stands
to reason I should be able to estimate what would happen on my
configuration.  I'd also be able to see if they didn't test anything
near my configuration, thus leaving the guess work to me.

If I have to jump in and become my own tester, I'd like to see what my
baseline is.


-- 
Bonesteel

Bonesteel's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1438
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 6:48 PM, Mark Lanctot wrote:


I don't think that's possible, unfortunately.  The
files have to reside on the server.

actually, the files can be anywhere on the network as long as 
slimserver has appropriate permissions to access those files over the 
network.  On windows, if you install slimserver as a service, you will 
have to configure the service to run under a specific user in order to 
access files on a mapped drive.  Standard services are denied access to 
the network.  Check the FAQ at slimdevices.com (search for shared 
volume) for details.


Running linux, over nfs or samba also works.  Gigabit network should be 
good for this, though there may still be some extra time overhead when 
it comes to scanning.  I have run with files remotely at 100Mb and it 
was noticeably slower.  There are some users who also run with music on 
firewire or usb drives.


-kdf

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread windmiller

Thanks for the quick reply Mark. I am going to go ahead and setup
Slimserver on my HTPC and see how it goes, the HTPC is a 2.5 Celeron D
w/ 1GB so it should be able to handle SlimServer and the occasional DVD
at the same time.


-- 
windmiller

windmiller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2185
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17905

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread JJZolx

windmiller Wrote: 
> I am about to start using SlimServer 6.2 for the first time. I want to
> be able to stream music to my PC at work but I am curious about my home
> network setup.
> 
> I have a server that I want to run SlimServer on and my FLAC collection
> is on my HTPC in the living room connected to the server by a Gigabit
> network. Would this cause problems or be a bad idea to have Slimserver
> on one PC and the audio files i want to stream on a seperate PC?
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions!
That will work so long as you can create a network share on the HTPC. 
You can either point your Music Directory at the share, or else create
a link to the same share somewhere within the music directory tree.  I
don't think it should cause any problems, but it may depend a little on
the HTPC and how fast it is and what else it's being asked to do while
SlimServer is accessing the files stored there.  This isn't unlike my
setup, where my PC is running SlimServer and the files are stored on a
network attached storage device.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim

JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17905

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 21:48 -0500, Mark Lanctot wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > network. Would this cause problems or be a bad idea
> > to have Slimserver  on one PC and the audio files i want to stream on a
> > seperate PC?

> 
> I don't think that's possible, unfortunately.  The
> files have to reside on the server.

Of course it is possible. Files are files, they 
can be served from nearly anyway.

A more important question is why would you want to do this?
network file access is harder to set up and usually slower
(often by a lot) than local access. I would not recommend it
unless you have thought through the engineering concerns.
But it will work.

Maybe not fast enough to keep the users happy, but that
is what the engineering is for.

-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 18:44 -0800, Michaelwagner wrote:
> I think you'd have to store such things somewhere else. The Slim
> software is far too quick to clear the database. 
> It's one button push. Or one software failure. Too easy to lose.

I agree that the SlimServer process has to stop assuming that the
database is valueless. I expect a preference can fix the server
clobbering it so quickly. There are other implications
that were covered long ago, things like how you tell if a songfile
is the same or not. Cryptographic hashes handle this easily
at a cost of more CPU for each scan. So folks with underpowered
servers will not want to enable the preference.


>Perhaps a second meta file in the same directory as the song file? With
>your own tags that don't fit into the MP3 scheme (yet). Slim could be
>taught to read those as well.

No, this is a very bad idea. it is a global, serverwide collection
of metadata, not something directory specific. But details belong
over on dev-list.

I've mentioned it here because all of the hard work has been done
and many people don't seem to realize that the database is there.
The schemas are in the slimserver directory tree,
/usr/local/slimserver/SQL on my installation.

The standard sqlite front end works well on the database.

Things like proper backup, schema alterations to support
new releases, etc. all will take a small amount of
work.


-- 
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread Mark Lanctot
I don't think that's possible, unfortunately.  The
files have to reside on the server.

--- windmiller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 
> I am about to start using SlimServer 6.2 for the
> first time. I want to
> be able to stream music to my PC at work but I am
> curious about my home
> network setup.
> 
> I have a server that I want to run SlimServer on and
> my FLAC collection
> is on my HTPC in the living room connected to the
> server by a Gigabit
> network. Would this cause problems or be a bad idea
> to have Slimserver
> on one PC and the audio files i want to stream on a
> seperate PC?
> 
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions!
> 
> 
> -- 
> windmiller
>

> windmiller's Profile:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2185
> View this thread:
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17905
> 
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
> 







__ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fishbone interface in SS 6.2 has lost mouse-overs?

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 6:34 PM, eschurr wrote:



I've been using the Fishbone interface for quite a while and was
surprised to see that in the web interface in SS 6.2 it appears that
the messages that used to display when you pause your mouse over the
controls are gone.  The cursor changes when you pause on the controls,
but no messages are displayed.

they are still there for me in the 6.2.1 nightly builds.  what browser 
are you using?

-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

I think you'd have to store such things somewhere else. The Slim
software is far too quick to clear the database. 

It's one button push. Or one software failure. Too easy to lose.

Perhaps a second meta file in the same directory as the song file? With
your own tags that don't fit into the MP3 scheme (yet). Slim could be
taught to read those as well.

Works better for backing up the data too.


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17877

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Streaming files from other PCs.

2005-11-05 Thread windmiller

I am about to start using SlimServer 6.2 for the first time. I want to
be able to stream music to my PC at work but I am curious about my home
network setup.

I have a server that I want to run SlimServer on and my FLAC collection
is on my HTPC in the living room connected to the server by a Gigabit
network. Would this cause problems or be a bad idea to have Slimserver
on one PC and the audio files i want to stream on a seperate PC?


Thanks for any suggestions!


-- 
windmiller

windmiller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2185
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17905

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Fishbone interface in SS 6.2 has lost mouse-overs?

2005-11-05 Thread eschurr

I've been using the Fishbone interface for quite a while and was
surprised to see that in the web interface in SS 6.2 it appears that
the messages that used to display when you pause your mouse over the
controls are gone.  The cursor changes when you pause on the controls,
but no messages are displayed.

is this a bug or is there a setting (in SS or my browser) that I need
to set?


-- 
eschurr

eschurr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2007
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17903

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] ReplayGain in iTunes?

2005-11-05 Thread eschurr

Does anyone know how to generate volume adjustments for files in
iTunes?

I understand that MP3Gain will calcualte ReplayGain tags for many files
at once and the SS 6.2 (with an SB gen 2 or 3) will make use of these
tags.  If your files are in iTunes, SS and SB will make use of these
tags, but iTunes (and iPods) won't because, as I understand it, iTunes
uses a different tag for volume adjustments.

However, i believe that the iTunes volume adjustments will also be
recognized by SS 6.2/SB 2.  So, if there's a way to generate the iTunes
tags en mass, they will be used by both iTunes and SS/SB.

Is there a program that will calcualte the adjustments and do it to
many files at once?

Thanks


-- 
eschurr

eschurr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2007
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17902

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:57 -0800, Michaelwagner wrote:
> So, Pat, are you advocating that Slim maintain it's own file of
> extra-meta data to make up for the lack of sufficient tags in MP3 and
> OGG?

I'm advocating using the database and not being cavalier about deleting
it. The file exists and is usually called .slimserversql.db

I'm not so much pointing to lack of goodness in the existing tag
as saying that we've got a relational database, the tags can't
do what I need, so it makes sense to use the relational database.

I'm also saying that since we have a database, there is no reason
to think that the hierarchical file structure should be important
to the management of the data.

There is a lot more of the rationale for the design in the dev-list
archives from the early days when we were designing what needed
to be in 6.0.0. I posted a straw-man schema and justification for it.
Lots of it was accepted, some was not, but open source development
is collaborative, I wasn't the king.

Adding fields (attributes, columns, whatever you want to call them)
is easy. It will solve problems in many areas.

-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Swapping wireless card? (repost)

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 6:15 PM, Daryle Tilroe wrote:



I just wanted to know if there were any gotchas when swapping a
wireless card from one SB/SBG to another SB/SBG? Basically I want a
wireless SBG and I believe swaping the wireless card from a wireless SB
to a wired SBG is simpler than swapping the display from the wired SBG
to the wireless SB. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks!



the wired SBG models were built without the cardslot for the card, so 
it really is easier to swap the display.
You just have to cut 3 wires in the right place, disconnect the old 
display, connect the new one and slip a prepared wire over the remnant 
of one of the wires you cut.  this is probably easier (and certainly 
cheaper) than soldering a pccard connector onto the board.


-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] $100 promo via resellers? (repost)

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 6:12 PM, Daryle Tilroe wrote:


 Is the current USD
$100 promo available either directly through the resellers or via a
mail in rebate from SD?

it seems to be direct only, unless the resellers make some kind of 
matching deal through their own devices.

-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Swapping wireless card? (repost)

2005-11-05 Thread Daryle Tilroe

(This is a repost. After many months I just came over from the other
side/mailing list and realized I wasn't posting to the same
'discussion' group/forum I was reading.)

I just wanted to know if there were any gotchas when swapping a
wireless card from one SB/SBG to another SB/SBG? Basically I want a
wireless SBG and I believe swaping the wireless card from a wireless SB
to a wired SBG is simpler than swapping the display from the wired SBG
to the wireless SB. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks!


-- 
Daryle Tilroe

Daryle Tilroe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=434
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17900

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] $100 promo via resellers? (repost)

2005-11-05 Thread Daryle Tilroe

(This is a repost.  After many months I just came over from the other
side/mailing list and realized I wasn't posting to the same
'discussion' group/forum I was reading.)

In the past I have bought my 4 SBs through a Canadian reseller and I am
now in the market for a couple SB3s. I know this that been mentioned in
the past but I don't recall an unequivocal answer: Is the current USD
$100 promo available either directly through the resellers or via a
mail in rebate from SD?


-- 
Daryle Tilroe

Daryle Tilroe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=434
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17899

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

So, Pat, are you advocating that Slim maintain it's own file of
extra-meta data to make up for the lack of sufficient tags in MP3 and
OGG?


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17877

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

Bonesteel Wrote: 
> I'm actually surprised there isn't regression testing in place already.If you 
> go back and check, that's not what I wrote.
myself Wrote: 
> a major component of getting there would be a better scheme for
> regression checkingThere is regression checking, but it's inadequate - I 
> surmise - because
it didn't find these problems. I don't think Slim knew that 6 would be
a problem but released it anyways. There is an extensive beta test
program within the slim development group, and a regression checker. I
think, though, that beta testers, either by virtue of who they are or
by virtue of the fact that they run big machines, don't notice certain
types of problems. So I don't think relying solely on the experience of
beta testers who are all quite experienced and an old regression
checking suite is enough. Which is why I volunteered to help with a
better regression checker. 

> I was told that I would need to tinker with my system or file bug
> reports to reclaim previous levels of performance.  I do not have the
> time for this approach.  Therefore I simply returned to an earlier
> release.I sympathize with both sides of this problem. 

Clearly I am a user and sympathize with that side. Let me tell you
about the other side.

A software system like this works across a network, on at least 2
platforms (player and server). It can operate on up to 6x6 combinations
of platforms (clients: SLiMP3, Squeezebox 1, Squeezebox 2, Squeezebox 3,
Softsqueeze, Winamp. Server: Windows, Linux, Unix, Mac OSX, Linksys
NSLU2, Buffalo Linkstation, maybe more).

Diagnosing such problems is quite complex. Just showing up and saying
"It doesn't work" without telling us which IT you have and how exactly
it isn't working doesn't really get anyone anywhere. No one can help.
Imagine calling a car dealer and saying "It doesn't work". They'd say
"drive it down here and we'll look at it". Doesn't work well
trans-atlantic. 

> the final testing step has been pushed out to the consumer.I'm not a Slim 
> employee and I don't speak for them, but I don't think
that's fair. There are many different combinations of server software,
server hardware, client hardware. It's pretty hard to test them all.
Add wireless, and interference from the microwave oven in the next
apartment to yours and no one can test an environment just like yours,
because there is no environment just like yours. 

All the major configurations get a workout, but maybe not yours. 

> If Slim Devices published performance metrics for each release A good idea.

> presumably pre-release testing is done on each platform.the resources needed 
> for this would be astronomical. Even the matrix I
showed you above, 6 server configurations, 6 client configurations,
would be a 36 test matrix. Add low memory, regular memory, fast
processor, slow processor configurations, and you're at 144
combinations (well, a few less, because there is no memory size
variation available for the NSLU2). 

I agree your need needs to be addressed. I'm just not sure how, since
the requirement is more complex than you seem to envison.


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:28 -0800, Michaelwagner wrote:
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > it is important to not lose all the corrected and additional metadata
> > just because you install a new release of the SlimServer.

> Why would you lose metadata? If it's stored in tags in the file, it's
> not going anywhere.
> Or did I miss something?

You missed that the metadata is often not sufficient.
Depending on what version of which standard, you may have
what is needed or may not.

There are many advantages of having the metadata in the file,
the biggest is that once it is right, you can move the file
without worry.

But the ID3 specs, which are not well standardized and not
nearly universally implemented, were completely pop oriented. They have
slowly evolved to be less terrible for classical music, but many of the
tools haven't kept up. And ID3 isn't the solution for flac or ogg files.
Getting both the id3 and ogg tag definitions and tools to be
defined and implemented is not something that I'm willing to 
hold my breath on. 

I'm not sure that it is even possible to get reach a consensus
on what fields are important in the classical world.

But this is an opportunity. The database can do what ID3 and
ogg tags can never hope to do. Its really not
that hard now that there is a SQL database hidden
behind the SlimServer


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 5:16 PM, Pat Farrell wrote:


On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:01 -0800, Bonesteel wrote:

If Slim Devices published performance metrics for each release that we
could review it might make it easier to judge if we're willing to take
the risk of an upgrade.


I don't work for SD, I'm just a happy user, but I think
that it is prudent to approach new releases from nearly
any vendor with caution. I never install a new OS from Microsoft
until the first service pack is out. I let someone else
got the pioneer's arrows.

Just because something new is available, there is no reason
to install it unless you are unhappy with your installed version.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

As a volunteer developer, AND a user, I suffer from the same 
frustration of broken builds (sometimes after an update right before 
sleep time)
I also see the pressure to release ("why do we have to keep downloading 
nightly builds?")
There are always a number of people who try a nightly, see something 
wrong and uninstall it without saying a thing. On release, someone else 
gets burned.


That being said, at every release, I've wished that there were NO 
changes for several days on a beta release.  Let it get out to those 
who test, CLOSE bug reports on anything aside from that beta (avoid the 
clutter).  Then spend a few days taking specific reports and cleaning 
out issues.  The downside is that it requires patience from both users 
and marketing.  Not always easy to do, and this wouldn't be the first 
place I've seen these problems. There are valid reasons for some 
software providers not releasing product updates for months, if not 
years.


-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Fitting SB1 Graphical Display

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

max.spicer Wrote: 
> wives do it too and, on one memorable occasion, the catWhat happened? Did the 
> cat step on the remote?


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17862

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

pfarrell Wrote: 
> it is important to not lose all the corrected and additional metadata
> just because you install a new release of the SlimServer.Why would you lose 
> metadata? If it's stored in tags in the file, it's
not going anywhere.

Or did I miss something?


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17877

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 17:01 -0800, Bonesteel wrote:
> If Slim Devices published performance metrics for each release that we
> could review it might make it easier to judge if we're willing to take
> the risk of an upgrade.

I don't work for SD, I'm just a happy user, but I think
that it is prudent to approach new releases from nearly 
any vendor with caution. I never install a new OS from Microsoft
until the first service pack is out. I let someone else
got the pioneer's arrows.

Just because something new is available, there is no reason
to install it unless you are unhappy with your installed version.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread Bonesteel

I'm actually surprised there isn't regression testing in place already. 
It actually explains quite a bit.

I've had the same experience Michael described many times with the Slim
Server SW.  I have a stable system with excellent performance, I see
that an update is available, I install it, and the system falls down.

I posted a complaint to this effect a week or so ago and was summarily
slapped down by many here.  Essentially, I was told that I would need
to tinker with my system or file bug reports to reclaim previous levels
of performance.  I do not have the time for this approach.  Therefore I
simply returned to an earlier release.

With appropriate regression testing this would not happen, but fair
enough.  Essentially, the final testing step has been pushed out to the
consumer.

I would propose the following to help educate we "consumer users" in
this decision.

If Slim Devices published performance metrics for each release that we
could review it might make it easier to judge if we're willing to take
the risk of an upgrade.

Clearly, there are virtually unlimted server scenarios given different
OS versions, hardware configurations, and the like, but presumably
pre-release testing is done on each platform.  I propose that Slim
publish what each testing platform is, and what  tests are performed on
it with specific timing results for each, e.g. it took xxx seconds to
scan a library of 1000 MP3 songs.  Slap all of these in a speadsheet
where we can compare the metrics between releases and (more
importantly) to my configuration, then I can decide if it's worth my
time to accept the "New version of slim server" prompt.

JB


-- 
Bonesteel

Bonesteel's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1438
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread earthbased

kdf Wrote: 
> On 5-Nov-05, at 3:56 PM, earthbased wrote:
> 
> >>
> >
> > I tried loading SoftSqueeze and I get "Found unsigned entry in
> > resource:
> http://192.168.100.2:9000/html/softsqueeze/SoftSqueeze.jar";.
> > I am running 6.0.2 (trunk).  Should I upgrade SlimServer and try
> again?
> >
> were you trying the applet link or the webstart link?
> what version of sun's java do you have installed? Getting the latest 
> from sun.com may help there.
> 
> -kdf

I clicked on the link in the Slim Server web interface that says "click
to install and run Softsqueeze".  My Java build is 1.5.0_04-b05 which is
the latest.  I did get it to run by by clicking on "Softsqueeze as an
applet" clicking here link.  Then after this success the webstart
(standalone?) now works.  I think I was having wireless issues. 
Everything seems A OK now.  Thanks for the communication.  Me Clunk.


-- 
earthbased

earthbased's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=334
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17896

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] ExBrowse3 updating problem

2005-11-05 Thread Jacob Potter
On 11/5/05, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SuSE 10.0, MozillaFirefox-1.0.7-0.1, and yes, interesting stuff in
> JavaScript Console:
>

Very odd... I haven't been able to reproduce that, but I'll see what I can find.

- Jacob
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Text Entry Timing

2005-11-05 Thread dfk

Ben Sandee Wrote: 
> On 11/4/05, dfk 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does this function work on the server? It would be useful if it did.
> >
> > SlimServer Version: 6.2.1 - 5024
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> 
> What is text entry timing? Google != joy for me.
> TIA,
> Ben


Hi Ben

Found in: Server > Behaviour

Text Entry Timing

When you are entering text for a search, the player will move on to the
next letter after some amount of time. You can change the duration of
this default is 1 second.

If you read this thread it is more akin to what I was asking here:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17882


-- 
dfk

dfk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1699
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17863

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Strange search function behaviour

2005-11-05 Thread dfk

kdf Wrote: 
> On 5-Nov-05, at 4:25 PM, dfk wrote:
> 
> >
> > kdf Wrote:
> >> On 5-Nov-05, at 10:32 AM, dfk wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can't it become a choice item from within the server? :-)
> >>>
> >> type and wait, you get live results.
> >> type and press enter, you get static results.
> >>
> >> the choice is there already.
> >> -k
> >
> > Yes, but once you press enter there is no going back to live results
> > for another search until you open up another copy of the server.
> >
> browser back button seems to work fine for me
> as does going back to the home page and clicking the link
> 
> -k

You know, I should of thought of that too :-) That's grand lad works a
treat.

dfk


-- 
dfk

dfk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1699
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17882

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread dspeirs

I thought the iTunes plugin was important to be there if you use iTunes
as your library?  Is the iTunes plugin really for the iTunes updater?

Dan


-- 
dspeirs

dspeirs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=877
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Filename format question (not really that important)

2005-11-05 Thread dfk

All my mp3's flacs start with a 2 digit number for example:

03 - Band on The Run
05 - Another Day

This is great because I can keep the album in song order and useful too
on my IHP340. I don't really like to see the number on SB2 so is it
possible to tell SB2 to ignore the number and still put and put the
files in alphabetical order for each folder?

(ignored number) Another Day
(ignored number) Band on The Run

This is the format I have now: 

TITLE By (ARTIST) From (ALBUM) or TRACKNUM: TITLE By (ARTIST) From
(ALBUM) if I want to show the track number.

Maybe I am asking too much :-)


-- 
dfk

dfk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1699
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17898

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Strange search function behaviour

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 4:25 PM, dfk wrote:



kdf Wrote:

On 5-Nov-05, at 10:32 AM, dfk wrote:


Can't it become a choice item from within the server? :-)


type and wait, you get live results.
type and press enter, you get static results.

the choice is there already.
-k


Yes, but once you press enter there is no going back to live results
for another search until you open up another copy of the server.


browser back button seems to work fine for me
as does going back to the home page and clicking the link

-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Strange search function behaviour

2005-11-05 Thread dfk

kdf Wrote: 
> On 5-Nov-05, at 10:32 AM, dfk wrote:
> >
> > Can't it become a choice item from within the server? :-)
> >
> type and wait, you get live results.
> type and press enter, you get static results.
> 
> the choice is there already.
> -k

Yes, but once you press enter there is no going back to live results
for another search until you open up another copy of the server.


-- 
dfk

dfk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1699
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17882

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Any chance of a black squeezebox?

2005-11-05 Thread dfk

max.spicer Wrote: 
> I'd buy four if they were light turquoise!
> 
> Max

I'd buy a dozen if they were Blue-Green :-) :-)

Give me black anyday :-)


-- 
dfk

dfk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1699
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17878

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 3:56 PM, earthbased wrote:





I tried loading SoftSqueeze and I get "Found unsigned entry in
resource: http://192.168.100.2:9000/html/softsqueeze/SoftSqueeze.jar";.
I am running 6.0.2 (trunk).  Should I upgrade SlimServer and try again?


were you trying the applet link or the webstart link?
what version of sun's java do you have installed? Getting the latest 
from sun.com may help there.


-kdf

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Fitting SB1 Graphical Display

2005-11-05 Thread max . spicer

It's not just girlfriends - wives do it too and, on one memorable
occasion, the cat as well!

Max

kefa Wrote: 
> sounds like you might also need max's plugin :-) - g'friends can often
> 'helpfully' turn the volume down!
> 
> VolumeGuard.pm
> 
> Do you ever find you're in the middle of listening to your
> favourite track when your other half suddenly announces that the volume
> is far too loud and turns it down for you? If so, this may be the plugin
> for you! VolumeGuard detects "unauthorised" changes in volume and
> stealthily restores the original volume. Changes are made in small
> increments over a period of time, so with any luck they won't notice!
> Volume changes can be authorised by pressing 0 immediately after
> changing the volume. Please note: there is currently no way of
> authorising volume changes via the web interface — I'm open to
> suggestion as to how this could be done. I accept no responsiblity for
> any undesirable domestic situations that result due to the use of this
> plugin. :-)


-- 
max.spicer

The wild things roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible
teeth
and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws
but Max stepped into his private boat and waved good-bye

max.spicer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17862

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread earthbased

kdf Wrote: 
> On 5-Nov-05, at 2:21 PM, earthbased wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My music on the slimserver is in FLAC format for my home stereo
> systems
> > using SB2s.  I was wondering if a Windows software music player can
> > connect to hear the flac file.
> >
> connect to the url:
> http://serverIP:9000/stream.mp3
> 
> make sure "serverIP" is the address of your slimserver computer.
> you will need LAME installed because the stream to software players 
> needs to transcode to mp3 format
> 
> if you want to limit the bitrate for remote connections use:
> http://serverIP:9000/stream.mp3?bitrate=128
> 
> You can also load softsqueeze on any remote computer that supports 
> Java.  The link is available from the slimserver web interface, in the
> 
> Help section.
> -k

I tried loading SoftSqueeze and I get "Found unsigned entry in
resource: http://192.168.100.2:9000/html/softsqueeze/SoftSqueeze.jar";. 
I am running 6.0.2 (trunk).  Should I upgrade SlimServer and try again?

Earth Based


-- 
earthbased

earthbased's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=334
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17896

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Figured out my wireless - MAC address got reset

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Amster
That was it - thanks.  Man, was it tough without the SB2 for the last 
couple of weeks.  I will post my mod pics and lessons learned later. 


kdf wrote:



On 5-Nov-05, at 2:19 PM, Michael Amster wrote:

Hey, my MAC address got reset to 00:04:ff:ff:01 - I remember there 
was a sequence to set it correctly.  I have MAC filtering on, and 
would like to return the SB2 wireless card to the original MAC 
address on the box.


on power up, go into "view current settings".  when it shows the MAC 
address, press RIGHT.

you can then edit.

-kdf

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Strange search function behaviour

2005-11-05 Thread Steve Baumgarten
kdf wrote:

> in the fishbone skin, I put a form in the header that is just a direct 
> entry into the static results. Live version can't work from there.

I actually much prefer this interface and was glad to see it show up in
Fishbone. Keeps things simple. I don't see much value in the dynamic
version -- it just creates extra load on the server.

(On a related note, I think Apple just changed this behavior in
Spotlight with the most recent update of Mac OS X. It used to start
searching as soon as you typed a few letters, and it drove people crazy
because the UI suddenly became much less responsive.)

SBB

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Figured out my wireless - MAC address got reset

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 2:19 PM, Michael Amster wrote:

Hey, my MAC address got reset to 00:04:ff:ff:01 - I remember there was 
a sequence to set it correctly.  I have MAC filtering on, and would 
like to return the SB2 wireless card to the original MAC address on 
the box.


on power up, go into "view current settings".  when it shows the MAC 
address, press RIGHT.

you can then edit.

-kdf

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread Daniel Cohen

On 5/11/05 at 12:48 -0800, kdf wrote
In my reading on the topic, it seemed to be widely acknolwedged that 
WOL over wireless didn't work.  Annoyingly, no consistent reason was 
turning up.  In som cases its the power requirements, or the 'not 
always connected' aspect of wireless, or even the example you give. 
When a computer is powered down, it may not have the wireless 
section of the hardware powered up, thus it would have no way to 
receive the packet.


On the more positive side, I did hear of some claims that it can 
work, but only some hardware supported it.  I don't know for sure if 
SB2 broadcasts the packet over wireless or not, but assuming it 
does, your router would have to support it and then forward to the 
wireless card, which would also have to have some way of supporting 
it (not to mention support from the computer hardware as well).


I think your way of putting it may be a little confusing.

Wake on LAN probably does not work if the computer has a wireless card.

My own setup has my computer and my wireless gear (Airport Extreme) 
connected by Ethernet to my router, and the SB on wireless. The SB 
Wake on LAN works fine in this setup.

--
Daniel Cohen
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Problem with SlimServMon Widget for Konfabulator

2005-11-05 Thread Steve Baumgarten

My goodness, that is a nice widget! Simply gorgeous, and I love how it's
not just display only (i.e., you can pause or skip to the next track
without having to bring up a web browser or use the remote).

In fact, I have Konfabulator installed right now only because of your
widget (and OK, some of the other widgets are nice, too -- definitely
some cool software).

A couple of tiny comments: 

1. The rightmost portion of the rightmost digit in the elapsed time
display is slightly truncated; it's especially noticeable with rounded
digits like "3". Looks like if the time display were moved to the left
by a few pixels, that'd fix it. 

2. The update frequency uses a slider, but there's no indication of
whether all the way to the left is "0" or "60". 

Other than that, it's beautiful, it's functional and it's taken up
permanent residence on my desktop.

SBB


-- 
Steve Baumgarten

Steve Baumgarten's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=455
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=15981

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: is it normal to see both .flac and .cue in Squeezebox

2005-11-05 Thread JayNYC

i just checked and my cue sheets are NOT embedded in flac - they are
standalone.  in 6.2,6.2.1,and 6.5b1, for most folders i see

Browse Music-->Browse Music Folders-->Madonna-->Ray of Light-->
Madonna-Ray of Light.cue (1/2)-->song1, etc..
Madonna-Ray of Light.flac (2/2)-->Title: Ray of Light

which is the same as 6.1, HOWEVER, for some other folders i now see

Browse Music-->Browse Music Folders-->Madonna-->Ray of Light-->
Madonna-Ray of Light.cue (1/2)-->Press Right to Add to Favorites
Madonna-Ray of Light.flac (2/2)-->Title: Ray of Light

why do some cue sheets not let me "get into them" and instead tell me
to Press RIGHT to add
to favorites?


-- 
JayNYC

JayNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=121
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17817

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 2:21 PM, earthbased wrote:



Hi,

My music on the slimserver is in FLAC format for my home stereo systems
using SB2s.  I was wondering if a Windows software music player can
connect to hear the flac file.


connect to the url:
http://serverIP:9000/stream.mp3

make sure "serverIP" is the address of your slimserver computer.
you will need LAME installed because the stream to software players 
needs to transcode to mp3 format


if you want to limit the bitrate for remote connections use:
http://serverIP:9000/stream.mp3?bitrate=128

You can also load softsqueeze on any remote computer that supports 
Java.  The link is available from the slimserver web interface, in the 
Help section.

-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: This is getting frustrating - MORE problems with reading files with 6.2

2005-11-05 Thread N�stor

Cleve Wrote: 
> Ok, I *did* find a workaround for this problem.  Out of the 45 albums I
> ripped into uncompressed AIFF files, I discovered there were 5 albums
> in which the songs would not all play in Squeezbox.   
> 
> So, I did an experiment - I deleted the albums in question, and
> reimported them, but first in iTunes advanced options for importing, I
> UN-checked the option "Create Filenames with Track Number".
> 
> That worked - now all the tracks in the affected albums are available. 
> Unfortunately, the album tracks for that album are not in sequence - 
> I'm not sure how to fix THAT problem.  Sigh!


Hi, I dont use iTunes, but I guess if you dont use that option, the
file names will not start with a number, so Slimserver will not be able
to order your songs in the album order, but just in plain alphabetical
order with the _name_ of the song (I dont think you can tag AIFF files
internally either).

I would try to find a pattern for the songs/albums that dont work in
your original case: album + song name length? any special feature all
those songs share? any difference in file extension?, etc...

I dont use AIFF (just FLAC, and very ocasionally mp3) but I had never
encountered this issue with my files.

Try to get a pattern for the files, and open a bug report if its
something you think its a bug.

Regards


-- 
Néstor

Néstor's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=60
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17858

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread dropbear

if you have a windows PC, then install winamp. A very nice and stable
media player and you can get the flac decoder plugin from
www.winamp.com too.
Pete


-- 
dropbear

dropbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=176
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17896

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 14:21 -0800, earthbased wrote:
> My music on the slimserver is in FLAC format for my home stereo systems
> using SB2s.  I was wondering if a Windows software music player can
> connect to hear the flac file.

There is a plugins for flac format for Winamp,
then follow the standard instructions to point your 
copy of Winamp (or any other player that can understand flac)
to your slimserver.
Look at the Remote Streaming help on your main page

-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: One artist on Slimserver is always capitalized

2005-11-05 Thread Eserim

1st off I have no knowledge of the database behind Slim Server - However
I have been using other databases for many years and I could explain
this in other packages.

If you previously had one capitalized entry and changed it, if the
database query that looks for changed tags is NOT case sensitive it
would scan the tag of the changed, correct files and compare against
the value in the database - if it isn't case sensitive in its matching
then it will say "Nope, no change" and do nothing.

So try this - change the tags on all the tracks to something totally
different "CSNY" for example - re-scan.  See if it has changed.  If it
has then change it back to what you want, then re-scan.

Hope that helps!

Eserim


-- 
Eserim

Eserim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1932
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17880

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread Mark Lanctot
I believe if you're just listening to a stream, it 
has to be in MP3 format, but SlimServer can 
convert FLAC to high-bitrate MP3 (320 kbps) on the 
fly.

On my SlimServer (6.1.1) I don't have the option 
*not* to convert FLAC to MP3 for my software players.

Of course, there are many players that can play 
FLAC natively if you're not going through 
SlimServer.  foobar and I believe Winamp can.  If 
the files are on the same PC, easy.  If they're on 
a networked PC, just find the files over the network.

earthbased wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> My music on the slimserver is in FLAC format for my
home stereo systems
> using SB2s.  I was wondering if a Windows software
music player can
> connect to hear the flac file.
> 
> Earth Based.
> 
> 

-- 
___
 

  Mark Lanctot
___






__ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Lots of missing Genres?

2005-11-05 Thread Jim Larson

Found the Geoff B instructions for cleaning up the tags with mp3tag
(leaving just ID3v2 tags).   But that didn't work for me -- still
having the same symptoms with Browse Genres.

Sent Dan a sample track -- he already has a fix scheduled for tonight's
nightly release.  Apparently some (most?) of my tracks are not quite
following the exact tag standard.  Dan said he was able to work around
that.  I'll try it out tomorrow & report back on the results.

Jim


-- 
Jim Larson

Jim Larson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1869
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17790

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Play FLAC to Software Player?

2005-11-05 Thread earthbased

Hi,

My music on the slimserver is in FLAC format for my home stereo systems
using SB2s.  I was wondering if a Windows software music player can
connect to hear the flac file.

Earth Based.


-- 
earthbased

earthbased's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=334
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17896

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Figured out my wireless - MAC address got reset

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Amster
Hey, my MAC address got reset to 00:04:ff:ff:01 - I remember there was a 
sequence to set it correctly.  I have MAC filtering on, and would like 
to return the SB2 wireless card to the original MAC address on the box.


Please email reminders...the search functions on the forums did not 
yield that thread for me...

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] SB2 Noisy

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 1:54 PM, bjackson wrote:



I have a SB2 Wireless and I am having a problem that it is very noisy 
on

the outputs in a digital way.

i.e. whenever the wireless is in use there is a lot of noise on the
outputs. When I start playing a new song there is a definite buzz out
of it that is not a pure sine wave (it's kinda clicky, like I can hear
it switch on and off very quickly).  Also when I turn up or down the
volume control you can hear the clicks.

you should contact support. There was an early production issue, easily 
repaired if yours falls into this group.
if you are handy with a soldering iron, its fixable by yourself with 
instructions (they were posted here with pics, I believe, when the SB2 
first came out).


There is an internal antenna with the SB2, so you could try unscrewing 
the external antenna.


Some users have found that the little power supply that comes with the 
squeezebox can be noisy (usually affecting only the AM radio).  Many 
have found not so expensive replacements to avoid this.  However, I 
don't recall any mentioning issues with the RCA outputs.  do you have 
digital inputs on your amp anywhere?  That would also be an option.


Regardless, I'd certainly get in touch with [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-kdf



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] SB2 Noisy

2005-11-05 Thread bjackson

I have a SB2 Wireless and I am having a problem that it is very noisy on
the outputs in a digital way.

i.e. whenever the wireless is in use there is a lot of noise on the
outputs. When I start playing a new song there is a definite buzz out
of it that is not a pure sine wave (it's kinda clicky, like I can hear
it switch on and off very quickly).  Also when I turn up or down the
volume control you can hear the clicks.

I am running from the RCA outs to my headphone amplifier to my Shure E4
in ear monitors, which are given, very efficent and I can hear a whole
lot of things, and I don't notice this problem with my speakers and
amplifier, however, it is not my headphone amps fault because I've used
it with a variety of sources with no problem and it happens only when I
am going changing something on the SB2.


-- 
bjackson

bjackson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1315
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17894

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: SlimServer 6.2b2 problems?

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 1:31 PM, Dr.T wrote:



ceejay:

SlimServer Version: 6.2.0 - 4753 - Mac OS X 10.4.2 (8C46) - EN - utf8

I have not downloaded any nightly builds. Have they fixed the alarm
problems?

I've fixed the ones that had bugs filed for them: the on/off text issue 
and the weekday settings issue.

-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: SlimServer 6.2b2 problems?

2005-11-05 Thread Dr . T

ceejay:

SlimServer Version: 6.2.0 - 4753 - Mac OS X 10.4.2 (8C46) - EN - utf8

I have not downloaded any nightly builds. Have they fixed the alarm
problems?


-- 
Dr. T

Dr. T's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2174
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17222

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Help mounting a SB3 into a wall

2005-11-05 Thread hashref

I'll be doing the same as well.  Reference this image:
http://www.slimdevices.com/images/gallery/2.jpg
I'll probably add an extra stud to secure the sb on both sides.  Notice
how in the image the curves wrap around from the display/brushed_metal
and then meets the plastic casing?  I'm thinking about mounting the
unit so that its about 1/8" deeper than the drywall.  Then I'll use the
plaster mesh tape, and then plaster around the unit so that the plastic
casing is hidden. I'll definitely be tapeing up the front of the
display to avoid scratching the unit. 

As I've been typing this I have been thinking of other ways.  Like
framing the unit. Maybe I'll make a stainless steel frame for it. 
Stainless steel sheets are not really that expensive so I may buy a 1'
x 1' plate such as the one here. ->
https://www.metalsdepot.com/Cart3/viewCart1.phtml?LimAcc=$LimAcc&aident=

I'm just not sure how it will look since there is already brushed
stainless steel on the unit. Maybe it would be better to hide
everything but the display and then frame that.

or... heh..  what about making a frame out an 1/8" sheet of wood.  That
way you could cut and sand it to form the same curves of the squeeze box
on all four corners. Then get some of that U shaped molding to wrap
around the cutout, mount to studs, and plaster over the wood.

Man, you got me going on this. Think I'll just wait to decide until the
drywall is ready to go up.

What ever I do, I'll try to remember to post pics of the progress and
not be wired on coffee when I do.

What are your ideas?


-- 
hashref

hashref's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1976
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17829

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: SlimServer 6.2b2 problems?

2005-11-05 Thread Dr . T

ceejay:

SlimServer Version: 6.2.0 - 4753 - Mac OS X 10.4.2 (8C46) - EN - utf8

I have not downloaded any nightly builds. Have they fixed the alarm
problems?


-- 
Dr. T

Dr. T's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2174
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17222

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread kdf


On 5-Nov-05, at 12:28 PM, boybees wrote:




It's hard for me to believe that Slim would build a wake-on LAN
function into their wireless squeezebox, which then wouldn't work on a
wireless network.
Why? If WOL is a wired only feature, why should it be denied to wired 
users if wireless doesn't support it?



 I don't know where to turn at this point. My wireless
card is an Intel pro/wireless LAN 2100 #3b.

Any suggestions?

In my reading on the topic, it seemed to be widely acknolwedged that 
WOL over wireless didn't work.  Annoyingly, no consistent reason was 
turning up.  In som cases its the power requirements, or the 'not 
always connected' aspect of wireless, or even the example you give. 
When a computer is powered down, it may not have the wireless section 
of the hardware powered up, thus it would have no way to receive the 
packet.


On the more positive side, I did hear of some claims that it can work, 
but only some hardware supported it.  I don't know for sure if SB2 
broadcasts the packet over wireless or not, but assuming it does, your 
router would have to support it and then forward to the wireless card, 
which would also have to have some way of supporting it (not to mention 
support from the computer hardware as well).


-k

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Nokia 770

2005-11-05 Thread Victor

radish Wrote: 
> The Webpad skin is a little plain - how do the others look (I'm thinking
> of handheld or touchscreen)?

I'll load up the production/consumer version of the software sometime
in the next week or two and take screenshots of both of those as well.


-- 
Victor

Victor's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2181
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17837

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Wake up slimserver (Wake-on LAN) through wireless network

2005-11-05 Thread boybees

I'd like to be able to wake up my server (IBM thinkpad laptop) using the
SB2 remote. I've started and followed several threads on this issue.

Here's what I've arrived at: when I look in the properties tab of my
wired ethernet card, I see that there is a power management tab where
you can check a box that says "allow this device to bring the computer
out of standby." This is the wake-on LAN function, and it works.

When I look at properties for my wireless card, I see no such power
management tab, and no check box for the wake-on LAN function.

So I called IBM tech support (usually pretty good) and ask the rep how
to configure my wireless card so that I would have the wake-on LAN
option. He said it's not possible because "the wireless card is on all
the time and is always receiving signals from everywhere, so how would
it know which signal is yours?" This answer betrayed a level of
cluelessness that made me not trust it, but I couldn't get anything
more useful out of him.

It's hard for me to believe that Slim would build a wake-on LAN
function into their wireless squeezebox, which then wouldn't work on a
wireless network. I don't know where to turn at this point. My wireless
card is an Intel pro/wireless LAN 2100 #3b.

Any suggestions?


-- 
boybees

boybees's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1153
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17891

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 14:52 -0500, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>  Yes, or even
> Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_D_minor/Harnoncourt_(Chamber_Orchestra_of_Europe).flac
> Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_D_minor_op._125/Karajan_-_Janowitz,_Rossel-Majdan,_Kmentt,_Berry_(Berlin_Philharmonic).flac
> Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_minor/Haitink_-_Price,_Finnila,_Laubenthal,_Rintzler_(Concertgebouw).flac
> ...
> 
> when the names are entered inconsistently.

And for me, they are always entered inconsistently.
I find that CDDB/FreeDB does OK for pop, but is close to
useless with Jazz and far worse with all the kinds
of classical stuff.

Fixing all this stuff is hard, Especially knowing that
Symphony_No._9_in_D_minor_op._12 and Symphony_Number_9_in_d_minor
are the same is hard to automate, which is why
it is important to not lose all the corrected and additional
metadata just because you install a new release of the SlimServer.


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Possible DHCP issues on setting Gateway on a SB2

2005-11-05 Thread Dave Strickler




I have been having issues with my SB2 losing connection to my SS running on a dedicated box under Unix. This ran for years without  and issue, but I suspect it's a DHCP issue. While the SB2 gets a (wired) DHCP address quickly, I have noticed in the "Network Settings" section that is shows the Gateway as "0.0.0.0". Obviously this is wrong...
 
Is this a bug with SB2, or has our DHCP gone awry? I am the guy that maintains the DHCP/Network here, and I know the other devices are picking up the Gateway just fine.
 
Any clues?
 
Thanks,
 
Dave StricklerMailWise LLC617-933-5810 (direct)www.mailwise.com"Intelligent E-mail Protection"
 




   
  
  
   



This message has been certified virus-free by MailWise Filter - The real-time, intelligent, e-mail firewall used to scan inbound and outbound messages for SPAM, Viruses and Content.  For more info visit: http://www.mailwise.com 
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Wendy Seltzer
On 11/5/05, Pat Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:48 -0500, Wendy Seltzer wrote:> I also join all the movements of a piece into a single file, which has> the side benefit of making randomized play work more effectively. So> my directory for the same recording would look like
> symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Muti.flacDoes this lead tosymphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Toscanini_BBC.flacsymphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Toscanini_LaScala.flac
symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Mengelberg.flacsymphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Szell_Cleveland.flacsymphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Szell_London.flac
symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Szell_Columbia.flac
 Yes, or even
Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_D_minor/Harnoncourt_(Chamber_Orchestra_of_Europe).flac
Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_D_minor_op._125/Karajan_-_Janowitz,_Rossel-Majdan,_Kmentt,_Berry_(Berlin_Philharmonic).flac
Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_minor/Haitink_-_Price,_Finnila,_Laubenthal,_Rintzler_(Concertgebouw).flac
...

when the names are entered inconsistently.



--Wendy-- Wendy Seltzerhttp://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Help mounting a SB3 into a wall

2005-11-05 Thread Dave Strickler




I am gong to go through the same install in a few months, so if I hear of anything in the mean time, I will keep you posted.
 
Dave StricklerMailWise LLC617-933-5810 (direct)www.mailwise.com"Intelligent E-mail Protection">>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1:45:23 AM Friday, November 04, 2005 >>>We are in the mist of redoing our master bath. I want to install a SB3in the wall. The unit looks like it is slim enough to fit with a 2x4stud but I am concerned about how to finish it off. Is there a way tobuild a trim piece that would go around the bends of the sb and providea casing for sheetrock. I suspect this is done all the time for customcar installs.thanksKen-- Kenr___Discuss mailing listDiscuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss 
 




   
  
  
   



This message has been certified virus-free by MailWise Filter - The real-time, intelligent, e-mail firewall used to scan inbound and outbound messages for SPAM, Viruses and Content.  For more info visit: http://www.mailwise.com 
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Nokia 770

2005-11-05 Thread dwc

bklaas Wrote: 
> this kills me it's not available in the U.S. I've been jonesing for this
> thing as my squeezeboxen kontroller ever since I posted this thread way
> back when: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=14419
> 
> If anybody gets their hands on one of these, please post to the thread
> with impressions, both overall and slimserver-specific.
> 
> #!/ben

http://www.internettablettalk.com/content/view/133/2/
Nokia USA Will Ship the Nokia 770 November 10


-- 
dwc

dwc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1892
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17837

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:55 -0800, ovonrein wrote:
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > The key problem is that any hierarchical structure fails for
> > classical music.
> You lost me with this one.  I had thought that
> Composer/Work/Artists/Movements
> pretty much covers all bases.  I am not too bothered mixing singers and
> conductors in the Artists component.

Its all personal preference. You like Composer/Work/Artists/Movements
where I would tend to prefer: /Genre/Composer/Artist/Work/Movements

But I really don't want it to be hierarchical. Composer -> Work is fine,
we all agree on that, but even something as simple as Genre is far
too vague to be a major hierarchical divider. Some folks want
to consider "Classical" as one genre (i.e. the NullSoft folks who
brought you MP3 tags) yet anyone with a even modest sized classicial
collection would distinguish between baroque, romantic, modern and
post-modern.

Sometimes the conductor matters, sometimes not, but the big
conductors work with many of the major symphonies, you can't
assume that Riccado Muti is always with Philly.


> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > The alternative to hierarchical databases for the past 30 years has
> > been a relational database.

> Yes, and I have seen more chaos in relational databases than I ever saw
> in hierarchical structures.  Relational database design tends to require
> more discipline than the average designer cares to muster.  Hierarchical
> databases usually impose it.

Lets not go into theology here. I'll grant that the easy of use allows
people who are clueless to design terrible relational schemas.

The fact is that SlimServer starting with 6.0 has a relational database
back end. We are using it, we can use it to do more.



> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > 
> > The real solution is to use external data [...] in a relational
> > database. A database with extensions so that there are clear and easy
> > to use fields like conductor, soloists, accompanists, group, and
> > performance-location for the recording and composer, title, movement,
> > key, opus etc. for the music.
> > 
> 
> You are beginning to lose me.  I can only surmise that you are
> proposing that my search should be able to traverse an arbritrary
> number of attributes.

Since we have a database, and a front end, you can use the predefined
interface. Or, since it is all open source, we can build upon 
what is there and add a few columns.

Back to theology, there is no requirement to expose the database,
and proper code will simply ignore columns and tables that it
doesn't know about. This is something that no hierarchy can handle.


> And I am sure that you can make it work in your modern-day relational
> database.  Only SMOP.

Way smaller now that all the heavy lifting has been done for us.

We've got it, we might as well use it.

-- 
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Nokia 770

2005-11-05 Thread Dan Sully

* radish shaped the electrons to say...


The Webpad skin is a little plain - how do the others look (I'm thinking
of handheld or touchscreen)?


The Webpad skin has actually been removed from 6.2 as it was no different than 
the 'EN' skin.

-D
--
 what're the units of the coefficient of agnosticity? I don't knows per 
hour?
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Nokia 770

2005-11-05 Thread radish

The Webpad skin is a little plain - how do the others look (I'm thinking
of handheld or touchscreen)?


-- 
radish

radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17837

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Slimserver 6.2: volume issue

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

For those, like me, who didn't get the Spinal Tap reference the first
time, check out
http://spinaltapfan.com/atozed/TAP00160.HTM

The quote out of there I hope Slim didn't pay attention to:

"Early Fender Champs (a small, low-powered amp, probably intended for
practice) had no controls except for a volume control that went to 11.
And from about 5 on up, they didn’t get any louder—just more distorted.
A number of artists use them for recording and some (including Neil
Young) use them for live performances. Most of us who are lucky enough
to own one (mine was built in 1953 or 1954) turn them up to 11 cause
they sound so damn good."


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17782

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Pat Farrell
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:55 -0800, ovonrein wrote:
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > 
> > The key problem is that any hierarchical structure fails for
> > classical music.

> You lost me with this one.  I had thought that
> Composer/Work/Artists/Movements
> pretty much covers all bases.  I am not too bothered mixing singers and
> conductors in the Artists component.

Its all just personal preference. you propose
> Composer/Work/Artists/Movements

but I'd probably go with 

> 
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > 
> > Extra directories can be setup by you now. But that won't
> > do much, as it is hierarchical thinking that is the root problem.
> > 
> > The alternative to hierarchical databases for the past 30 years has
> > been a relational database.
> > 
> 
> Yes, and I have seen more chaos in relational databases than I ever saw
> in hierarchical structures.  Relational database design tends to require
> more discipline than the average designer cares to muster.  Hierarchical
> databases usually impose it.
> 
> Oh and - granted - there is the *odd* problem that could indeed not be
> elegantly represented in hierarchical form ;)
> 
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > 
> > For me, the answer to [tagging] is again, use anything that is
> > consistent within your library, but don't lose much sleep over it. The
> > [...] reality is that the limits of internal tags become painfully
> > clear with classical. So just tag the files basically and move on.
> > 
> 
> I am with you on that once since from what I can make out, the Slim
> player interface only allows me to retrieve by file tree structure. 
> Tags come in later, when it comes to building the playlist.
> 
> pfarrell Wrote: 
> > 
> > The real solution is to use external data [...] in a relational
> > database. A database with extensions so that there are clear and easy
> > to use fields like conductor, soloists, accompanists, group, and
> > performance-location for the recording and composer, title, movement,
> > key, opus etc. for the music.
> > 
> 
> You are beginning to lose me.  I can only surmise that you are
> proposing that my search should be able to traverse an arbritrary
> number of attributes.
> 
> The Slim player interface will adapt, since it will simply follow these
> branches.
> 
> This would work.
> 
> And I am sure that you can make it work in your modern-day relational
> database.  Only SMOP.  As a small aside, I had thought that you would
> have found a hierarchical database a much more natural choise - they
> adapt too, you know ... :)
> 
> 
-- 
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Archiving classics

2005-11-05 Thread Michaelwagner

ovonrein Wrote: 
> What for?  Yes, you can dig deep into the tags on your Slim player to
> find out, but that's not the point.  It is the music tree that would
> require the extra level to search on.I think something is missing here.

As of 6, what you are browsing, when you start from the home page of
the web interface to slim, is not directory based but tag based. When
you select "Browse Albums", artists, artwork, genres, years, you are
browsing by the tag content of those files.

Only when you select "Browse Music Folder" are you going into the
physical music tree.

(the other ones, below  - New Music, Favorites, Random Mix, Playlists -
are implemented in other ways)


-- 
Michaelwagner

Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17877

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: I love my Squeezebox, but it NEVER works perfectly

2005-11-05 Thread hashref

Dan,

If you're still having problems try downloading SlimCD and run you're
setup from that.  Here is a link:
http://www.herger.net/slim/detail.php?nr=763

If you continue to experience the same problems then you know it is a
hardware/network issue.  That will have at least ruled out the bloated
OS.

Next, if you're running your squeeze box using a wireless connection
bite the bullet for your next jam session and hook it up with cat5. 
Does it still have problems?

Next, choose from server settings the "Light" interface.  It looks
pretty generic, but is there still a problem?  If it is the interface
causing the problem uninstall Slimserver, download a previous version
that worked better for you and install that one.  Rename the interface
directory ( /HTML/ ) that works for you.  Upgrade to 6.2.1
and you should still see the interface from the previous version you
installed which worked for you. I use ExBrowse and because of previous
annoyances I began doing this and was able to pick and choose
interfaces from previous versions which I was already comfortable with.
I haven't noticed any problems with using older interface versions yet.

Not the interface?  Ugh...  The only time I have ran into a problem
that sounds similar to yours is when running Windows MediaPlayer as
another player elsewhere in the house.  When I connected MediaPlayer in
my office to listen to a different playlist while my SqueezeBox was
playing in the living room I started hearing 'skips' every 5 - 15
seconds. It is/was either the slow system I am running SlimServer off
of or the network. However, that was about a year ago on a much older
version of SlimServer.

I'm running fine here on a system that is VERY slow. I also rarely shut
it down. Some how its up time is comparable to my RH9/SmoothWall box:

PIII 550
768mb RAM
Windows 2000 Server
(lots of services running...poor thing)


-- 
hashref

hashref's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1976
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17864

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


  1   2   >