[Elecraft] lets not drag apostrophes into this

2016-10-17 Thread Charles Yahrling
"Due to the odd way Elecraft chose to label the new K3s, I would request
that
when referring to multiple radios, use the terms K3's or K3s' rather than
simply K3s which implies a single radio."

Please. let us not fall into the improper use of the apostrophe
that is so common these days. One example above is correct for he
possessive, as in
 " the K3's output on 10M is"   For plural, "we both brought our K3s to
Field Day."

The term K3s' (or K3S') has no valid meaning, grammatically speaking.
You'd need to write "the K3S's output on 10M is" for the possessive.
And probably " we both brought our new K3Ses to Field Day"

One we get that fixed, we can work on eliminating "Comprised of"

;^}
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] (K3) APF and selected bandwidth

2016-10-17 Thread Bill W4ZV
(BTW I wrote the following ~3 years ago before APF was changed from HOLD to
TAP on DUAL PB):

##
I use APF virtually all the time and never use RIT, SHIFT, etc.  Just HOLD
DUAL PB to actuate APF and use the VFO to zero beat.  COARSE (10 Hz) VFO
steps is usually close enough but you can switch to FINE (1 Hz) if necessary
for ultra weak signals.  I also strongly endorse N6KR's suggestion below: 

"I suggest setting the passband width to about 250-300 Hz when using APF." 

This is extremely important since bandwidths too narrow will introduce
additional ringing to the APF which already borders on ringing.  I actually
use a 200 Hz XFIL but set to actuate at DSP 400 Hz.  With WIDTH set to 400
Hz, the signal first goes through the relatively broad (4.0 shape factor)
200 Hz XFIL, then a 400 Hz DSP and finally the narrow APF.  This makes the
cascaded XFIL/DSP seem more like 250 Hz, reduces ringing, still allows you
to hear off-frequency callers (although attenuated) and helps your ears
discriminate weak signals from noise by providing a wider background sample
of noise.
###

The last phrase "helps your ears discriminate weak signals from noise by
providing a wider background sample of noise" is key.  Narrower bandwidths
are not best for the human ear/brain...no matter what theory says about
narrower bandwidths having better S/N.

73,  Bill  W4ZV



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-APF-and-selected-bandwidth-tp7623407p7623455.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] [K3] WTB:KAT500

2016-10-17 Thread Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS
Hi,

I am looking for used Elecraft KAT500 in 100% conditions to complete my K3
line and use the KPA500 safely. Many thanks for kind offers or tips.

73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com 
 



-
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-WTB-KAT500-tp7623456.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] let's not drag apostrophes into this

2016-10-17 Thread Charlie T, K3ICH
I want to formally apologize for bringing up this thread which appears to be
going on forever.
Due to an oversight on my part, it was completely unnecessary anyway.
If you want to comment further send your "slings & arrows" directly to me
and stop subjecting everyone to a truly "OT" thread.

Thanks, Charlie k3ICH



-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Charles Yahrling
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 6:04 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] lets not drag apostrophes into this

"Due to the odd way Elecraft chose to label the new K3s, I would request
that when referring to multiple radios, use the terms K3's or K3s' rather
than simply K3s which implies a single radio."

Please. let us not fall into the improper use of the apostrophe that is so
common these days. One example above is correct for he possessive, as in
 " the K3's output on 10M is"   For plural, "we both brought our K3s to
Field Day."

The term K3s' (or K3S') has no valid meaning, grammatically speaking.
You'd need to write "the K3S's output on 10M is" for the possessive.
And probably " we both brought our new K3Ses to Field Day"

One we get that fixed, we can work on eliminating "Comprised of"

;^}
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to pin...@erols.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Finan
Has the mechanism for the K3S returns been set up yet?

I suppose turn-around time also needs clarification too. 

Not many manufacturers would do this sort of upgrade, let alone for 'free'.

Thanks!

73,

Jim

Jim Finan
AB4AC ‎
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message  
From: Wayne Burdick
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 8:26 PM
To: ab2tc
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

Knut,

The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 
12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right 
around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way 
to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no 
charge.

73,
Wayne
N6KR




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to jimfi...@att.net
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3S PA Upgrade

2016-10-17 Thread Don Wilhelm

Jim,

Contact support to get all the latest information on the upgrade and 
start the process for sending it in.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 10/17/2016 8:50 AM, Jim Finan wrote:

Has the mechanism for the K3S returns been set up yet?

I suppose turn-around time also needs clarification too.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] CW message record in KX3

2016-10-17 Thread Ignacy
I am trying to record a CW message in KX3. I push REC, then number, use KXPD3
and than tap MSG to finish. This works well when I program a callsign (e.g.,
NO9E). When I program a message (e.g., CQ CQ de NO9E NO9E), it seems that
the message is recorded but it does not play. Pushing few buttons bring a
"chain" message. What am I doing wrong?

Programming messages from a computer works well. 

Ignacy, NO9E  



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/CW-message-record-in-KX3-tp7623461.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread j...@kk9a.com
How about a user adjustable amplifier on set point?  In my case there is a
2 watt jump when going from 12 to 13 watts and if a person wanted a
smoother output in that range for an amp or whatever it would be possible.

John KK9A

from: Wayne Burdick n6kr

Wes,

This would be a simple firmware change, and it might be worth considering.
But typically we see -30 dBc or better at 12 W in production with the
latest revisions.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Oct 15, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Wes Stewart  wrote:

> ….I would recommend that Elecraft change firmware to set the max power
out at 10W (LP) and switch in the KPA100 above 10W, not 12.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] FOR SALE

2016-10-17 Thread William Hartman via Elecraft
K3 -100  in mint condition with included power supply, mike, outboard  speaker, 
Bencher paddle  and keyboard capability with outboard Hamgadgets Master Keyer 
and blue tooth connected keyboard.  E mail for more details and pix.

Bill Hartman
n...@aol.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Brown
Your logic is good, as usual. But let's look at the physics of 
loudspeakers, which I tried to do on an earlier post. A SMALL diaphragm 
has better dispersion of high frequencies, while it doesn't produce loud 
bass. We don't need loud bass, so a GOOD small diaphragm loudspeaker is 
what we need. And that is EXACTLY what Elecraft uses in the K2 and both 
versions of the K3.


The late Dick Heyser famously said that "trying to describe an audio 
device or system using only frequency response is like trying to write 
Shakespeare with only one word in your vocabulary. In addition, to have 
any meaning, a frequency response spec must include +/- dB limits and it 
must include angular dispersion. VERY few consumer loudspeakers do that 
-- they simply quote upper and lower limits.  Many cheap loudspeakers 
(and headphones) have very bumpy frequency response, and those bumps 
create phase distortion that degrades speech intelligibility.


So, to repeat my earlier advice, the best loudspeaker for ham radio is 
one that has smooth response from about 300 Hz to about 3 kHz and has 
wide, uniform dispersion within those limits. In other words, it sounds 
the same both on and off axis. Loudspeakers that cover a wider frequency 
range are FINE, but don't pay extra to get one. A loudspeaker with wider 
response would reproduce lower lows and higher highs, but our ham rigs 
(at least the good ones when well adjusted) limit audio to a range of 
about 300 - 3,000 Hz in the IF.


There is no good reason to buy a speaker rated for 300 - 3,000 Hz. What 
we want is one with good performance within that range, and most that do 
will have at least another octave or two above and below those limits. 
(An octave is 2:1 frequency)


BTW -- I purposely set my RXEQ flat because I primarily work CW, and I 
want to hear the off-frequency signals that may be very low or very high 
in frequency, and I limit frequency response on SSB with the settings of 
my IF filters.


73, Jim K9YC

On Sun,10/16/2016 10:44 PM, Dave Cole wrote:

So, as I said in my original post, it is the most efficient use of the
hardware is to use a limited response speaker.  No need for high end
stereo speakers on a K3...  That said, I may put on some better speakers
on my K3 because in the long run it is a bit less stressful on my
ears...:)



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Rogers
I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be 
somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem.


Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with 
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the 
burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and 
guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance.


I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, 
modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to 
you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the 
defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort 
of disassembly and re-assembly.


Jim, W4ATK

K-line, K2



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Charlie T, K3ICH
Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that
this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people.

VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec.

However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications
for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the
market.

THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER
than the typical radio for this parameter.
AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping.

Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A"
model and leave it at that.

And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much
gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a
retraction.
I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion.

73, Charlie k3ICH



-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Rogers
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat
similar to the VW diesel problem.

Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of
time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in
compliance, into compliance.

I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards,
modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you
the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective
boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of
disassembly and re-assembly.

Jim, W4ATK

K-line, K2



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to pin...@erols.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Chortek Bob via Elecraft
 blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px 
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white 
!important; }  Hear, Hear!
Bob/AA6VB 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Monday, October 17, 2016, 4:03 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH  wrote:

Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that
this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people.

VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec.

However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications
for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the
market.

THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER
than the typical radio for this parameter.
AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping.

Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A"
model and leave it at that.

And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much
gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a
retraction.
I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion.

73, Charlie k3ICH



-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Rogers
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat
similar to the VW diesel problem.

Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of
time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in
compliance, into compliance.

I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards,
modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you
the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective
boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of
disassembly and re-assembly.

Jim, W4ATK

K-line, K2



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to pin...@erols.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to bobchor...@yahoo.com

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Don Wilhelm

Jim,

Elecraft sold you a K3S that *was* in compliance and will still be if 
you do nothing.  See Wayne's post yesterday.  They improved the Transmit 
IMD for the current K3S and are offering to make that change to older K3S.


They are going out of their way to add the change to your K3S free of 
labor charge - all you have to pay for is the shipping.


I think that is above and beyond the call of duty.  I have not heard of 
another ham manufacturer that would do anything like that.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 10/17/2016 4:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote:


Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the
burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and
guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread K9ZTV
Jim,

Your new rig had nothing "defective."  It was "in compliance" when you bought 
it.  Subsequent to your buying it, that particular in-compliance specification 
has been improved.  There is nothing for Elecraft to fix because there is 
nothing broken.  No warranty extends to future improvements.  Be thankful 
Elecraft is offering that improvement at no charge. 

73,

Kent  K9ZTV

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers  wrote:
> 
> I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat 
> similar to the VW diesel problem.
> 
> Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with 
> specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of 
> time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in 
> compliance, into compliance.
> 
> I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, 
> modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you 
> the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective 
> boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly 
> and re-assembly.
> 
> Jim, W4ATK
> 
> K-line, K2
> 
> 
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to k9...@socket.net
> 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] SVGA/P3 Question -Waterfall Height Problem

2016-10-17 Thread Irwin Darack
I have a P3 with the SVGA board installed + an external monitor.

SVGA Monitor Height = Main
P3 = 30

When ever I turn on the P3 (and monitor), I need to reset the Waterfall
Height.  The Height is fine on the P3, but takes up 3/4 of the screen on
the external monitor. The P3 remembers the original Height setting. To
reset the Waterfall Height on the external monitor, I need to go to the P3
Waterfall Height, make any change in the Height value, and then the
Waterfall Height on the external monitor corrects itself. Not sure why the
External Monitor requires this and if it has something to do with the
P3 SVGA board or a monitor setting?

Thanks, Irwin KD3TB




-- 
Irwin KD3TB
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread MaverickNH
Seems I can't go wrong with Elecraft, Phonema or Palstar speakers, assuming
the wallet factor is a near-draw at too expensive :-)



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Speakers-Optimal-Frequency-Range-tp7623428p7623471.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Mark E. Musick
Charlie,
You hit the nail on the head.

Mark Musick, WB9CIF

-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Charlie T, K3ICH
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:04 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that
this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people.

VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec.

However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications
for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the
market.

THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER
than the typical radio for this parameter.
AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping.

Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A"
model and leave it at that.

And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much
gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a
retraction.
I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion.

73, Charlie k3ICH



-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Rogers
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat
similar to the VW diesel problem.

Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of
time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in
compliance, into compliance.

I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards,
modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you
the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective
boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of
disassembly and re-assembly.

Jim, W4ATK

K-line, K2



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to pin...@erols.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to markmus...@sbcglobal.net

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Phil Townsend Lontz
I have spent may years in “hi end” audio… some building some selling some just 
fooling around. Does wire matter? is there a difference between tubes and soild 
state? Can I hear 20K? does it matter if I can’t hear 20K? Why build a wide 
band amp if you can hear it?

All these questions really don't matter one bit.

The ONLY question the listener need ask…

Do I LIKE how it sounds?

That's it folks, no more no less.

Simplistic… yep sure is. 

A few years back I was attending an audio show in Denver with a few “audio” 
friends. We would typically visit different rooms together and give a listen to 
the various systems in each room. 
To my surprise, we all had different ideas about what system sounded good.
I like room 990 but Glen said it sucked.
He liked the system in 512 but to me it nearly drove me to drinking.
Chris loved 234 but the rest of us were sure he was ready for the funny farm.

We all “hear” differently…
I love how my K3 sounds with high end speakers left and right side... and a 
fine digital amp that drives the speakers.
I eq the crap out of the K3 after 8K and set the tone of my CW note to 440… 
Near a natural “C”.
to me that sounds easy and warm.

But to my old ears the best tone in the world was and is a fine old Drake or a 
Collins pure analog signal run thru a nice 8" alnico speaker in an open baffle.

That, to me, is simply the best.

Phil 
K5SSR
Santa Fe
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Kevin
Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the 
FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with.


The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because 
everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do 
better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the 
desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the 
K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their 
K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day?


Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My 
TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know 
where I can rent a mule?



On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote:
I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be 
somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem.


Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with 
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the 
burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and 
guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance.


I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, 
modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to 
you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the 
defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and 
effort of disassembly and re-assembly.


Jim, W4ATK

K-line, K2



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net



--
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
ARRL
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Cox
Well one of the main reasons I love my K3S is because of weight (or lack of 
it).  Due to back problems, I cant move that 40-50 pound rig to the bench to 
do any adjustments, repair, etc.
I can take my K3S to the beach house with ease and have a nice 100 watt 
radio.
Each of us has their own needs and wants in a radio and a 60 pound monster 
with 200 watts and built in power supply for 48 -60 volts, may not be one of 
them.  Jim K4JAF


-Original Message- 
From: Kevin

Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 6:47 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the
FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with.

The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because
everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do
better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the
desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the
K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their
K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day?

Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My
TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know
where I can rent a mule?


On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote:
I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be 
somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem.


Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with 
specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden 
of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be 
in compliance, into compliance.


I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, 
modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you 
the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the 
defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort 
of disassembly and re-assembly.


Jim, W4ATK

K-line, K2



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net



--
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
ARRL
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to jcox...@bellsouth.net 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin  wrote:

> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because
> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do
> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the
> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s)
> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in
> the sticks...ever...save Field Day?
>

Oh yeah.

"Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat
dissipation even fit in the same space?  OK. Everybody ready to go out and
buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies
is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M  35A@28VDC is 380
dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case?

And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything
else from the 28V?

Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee
change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping.

What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out
all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan.
It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts."

73, Guy K2AV
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] SVGA/P3 Question -Waterfall Height Problem

2016-10-17 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
I do not have this problem, and I have P3/SVGA. Do you have all the latest
production firmware? Or have you installed a beta?

73, Guy K2AV

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Irwin Darack  wrote:

> I have a P3 with the SVGA board installed + an external monitor.
>
> SVGA Monitor Height = Main
> P3 = 30
>
> When ever I turn on the P3 (and monitor), I need to reset the Waterfall
> Height.  The Height is fine on the P3, but takes up 3/4 of the screen on
> the external monitor. The P3 remembers the original Height setting. To
> reset the Waterfall Height on the external monitor, I need to go to the P3
> Waterfall Height, make any change in the Height value, and then the
> Waterfall Height on the external monitor corrects itself. Not sure why the
> External Monitor requires this and if it has something to do with the
> P3 SVGA board or a monitor setting?
>
> Thanks, Irwin KD3TB
>
>
>
>
> --
> Irwin KD3TB
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to k2av@gmail.com
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Doug Person
Wow Phil, right on.  My first career was a buyer for an audio chain.  I 
listened to everything they brought in.  My assistant and my secretary 
and I NEVER agreed on what system sounded best. I would think a speaker 
that is reasonably flat from 200 hz to maybe 5khz with low mechanical 
distortion and good power handling would provide a decent baseline.  
After that - your warm tones are my screeching trebles; your full bass 
is my headache- inducing low range.


I use a quality, small bookshelf speaker and then use the K3's equalizer 
to make the sound fill into the peaks and valleys of my ear's response 
curve.


$50 would probably net you a pair of small Sony, Polk, KLH, JBL or even 
Pyle. New or used - you can't beat a nice rigid box with a woofer and a 
tweeter.


Other interesting options are line-out to a Bluetooth audio source and 
then to one of the many Bluetooth wireless speaker systems.  Or to a 
small stereo hifi amplifier. The K3 has stereo line output - a nice pair 
of bookshelf speakers left and right would definitely give you the best 
sound the K3/K3s is capable of producing (especially the K3s or an 
upgraded K3).


A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly 
adjusted radio with a good microphone.  There is a very broad range in 
the quality of signals on HF SSB.  From dreadful to beautiful.  I 
recommend setting up your station for the very best receive quality your 
radio can produce - which in the case of the K3, is substantial.


Doug -- K0DXV

On 10/17/2016 4:20 PM, Phil Townsend Lontz wrote:

I have spent may years in “hi end” audio… some building some selling some just 
fooling around. Does wire matter? is there a difference between tubes and soild 
state? Can I hear 20K? does it matter if I can’t hear 20K? Why build a wide 
band amp if you can hear it?

All these questions really don't matter one bit.

The ONLY question the listener need ask…

Do I LIKE how it sounds?

That's it folks, no more no less.

Simplistic… yep sure is.

A few years back I was attending an audio show in Denver with a few “audio” 
friends. We would typically visit different rooms together and give a listen to 
the various systems in each room.
To my surprise, we all had different ideas about what system sounded good.
I like room 990 but Glen said it sucked.
He liked the system in 512 but to me it nearly drove me to drinking.
Chris loved 234 but the rest of us were sure he was ready for the funny farm.

We all “hear” differently…
I love how my K3 sounds with high end speakers left and right side... and a 
fine digital amp that drives the speakers.
I eq the crap out of the K3 after 8K and set the tone of my CW note to 440… 
Near a natural “C”.
to me that sounds easy and warm.

But to my old ears the best tone in the world was and is a fine old Drake or a 
Collins pure analog signal run thru a nice 8" alnico speaker in an open baffle.

That, to me, is simply the best.

Phil
K5SSR
Santa Fe
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. 

I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! 

73 Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug 
Person
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 7:27 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

Wow Phil, right on.  My first career was a buyer for an audio chain.  I 
listened to everything they brought in.  My assistant and my secretary and I 
NEVER agreed on what system sounded best. I would think a speaker that is 
reasonably flat from 200 hz to maybe 5khz with low mechanical distortion and 
good power handling would provide a decent baseline.  
After that - your warm tones are my screeching trebles; your full bass is my 
headache- inducing low range.

I use a quality, small bookshelf speaker and then use the K3's equalizer to 
make the sound fill into the peaks and valleys of my ear's response curve.

$50 would probably net you a pair of small Sony, Polk, KLH, JBL or even Pyle. 
New or used - you can't beat a nice rigid box with a woofer and a tweeter.

Other interesting options are line-out to a Bluetooth audio source and then to 
one of the many Bluetooth wireless speaker systems.  Or to a small stereo hifi 
amplifier. The K3 has stereo line output - a nice pair of bookshelf speakers 
left and right would definitely give you the best sound the K3/K3s is capable 
of producing (especially the K3s or an upgraded K3).

A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted 
radio with a good microphone.  There is a very broad range in the quality of 
signals on HF SSB.  From dreadful to beautiful.  I recommend setting up your 
station for the very best receive quality your radio can produce - which in the 
case of the K3, is substantial.

Doug -- K0DXV

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Jan Erik Holm

Wayne,

Is there a way to do this " at home" ? Since I´m in Sweden
it might not be practical to send the radio all the way to
California for this.

73 Jim SM2EKM
--
On 2016-10-17 02:25, Wayne Burdick wrote:

Knut,

The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 
12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right 
around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way 
to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no 
charge.

73,
Wayne
N6KR



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Brown

On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too.


When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near 
field. That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from 
the loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so 
close to the loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most 
recording studios have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on 
top of the console for exactly that purpose. They also have a larger 
pair that DOES excite the room.



I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks!


Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening 
environments.


On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote:
A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly 
adjusted radio with a good microphone. 


All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of 
headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are 
excellent choices. There are other good choices, but these are well 
established, widely available, and not expensive. All are VERY 
comfortable for LOOONG contest weekends (although comfort in the ER4 
depends on matching the ear piece to your ear).


73, Jim K9YC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Walter Underwood
I worked with someone who had two sound-absorbing pillars in the corners of his 
office. Of course, he’d just recorded his 8th or 11th album, depending on how 
you count, and he’d produced the latest one. Mitch Easter was busy this time.

I’m not nearly that picky and have some hearing loss by now, but I still miss 
my baby Magnaplanars (SMGa).

Need to write up my cheap-ham amp & speaker setup after I have a few more miles 
on it.

wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 8:15 PM, Jim Brown  wrote:
> 
> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
>> Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too.
> 
> When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near field. 
> That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the 
> loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the 
> loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios 
> have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for 
> exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room.
> 
>> I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks!
> 
> Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening 
> environments.
> 
> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote:
>> A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted 
>> radio with a good microphone. 
> 
> All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of 
> headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent 
> choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, widely 
> available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG contest 
> weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear piece to 
> your ear).
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Phillip Lontz
Love the the Ety's in the ear with the custom ear molds.  They are very 
comfortable too.
And block out  EVERY THING!
What me worry?

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:15 PM, Jim Brown  wrote:
> 
>> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
>> Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too.
> 
> When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near field. 
> That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the 
> loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the 
> loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios 
> have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for 
> exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room.
> 
>> I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks!
> 
> Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening 
> environments.
> 
>> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote:
>> A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted 
>> radio with a good microphone. 
> 
> All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of 
> headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent 
> choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, widely 
> available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG contest 
> weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear piece to 
> your ear).
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to phi...@mac.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Wayne Burdick
Our entire product line emphasizes portability, so we'll just have to continue 
the never-ending search for 12 volt mojo. (Note: the new Upgrade is a case of 
this; IMD is improved when running from lower voltages.)

Stick with Elecraft and minimize your carbon footprint!

73,
Wayne
N6KR



On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV  wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin  wrote:
> 
>> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because
>> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do
>> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the
>> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s)
>> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in
>> the sticks...ever...save Field Day?
>> 
> 
> Oh yeah.
> 
> "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat
> dissipation even fit in the same space?  OK. Everybody ready to go out and
> buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies
> is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M  35A@28VDC is 380
> dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case?
> 
> And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything
> else from the 28V?
> 
> Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee
> change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping.
> 
> What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out
> all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan.
> It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts."
> 
> 73, Guy K2AV




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article

2016-10-17 Thread Matt Murphy
Thanks, Wayne. This thread has been very interesting!

73
Matt NQ6N/9

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Wayne Burdick  wrote:

> Our entire product line emphasizes portability, so we'll just have to
> continue the never-ending search for 12 volt mojo. (Note: the new Upgrade
> is a case of this; IMD is improved when running from lower voltages.)
>
> Stick with Elecraft and minimize your carbon footprint!
>
> 73,
> Wayne
> N6KR
>
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV  wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin  wrote:
> >
> >> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because
> >> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do
> >> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the
> >> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the
> K3(s)
> >> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s)
> out in
> >> the sticks...ever...save Field Day?
> >>
> >
> > Oh yeah.
> >
> > "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat
> > dissipation even fit in the same space?  OK. Everybody ready to go out
> and
> > buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies
> > is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M  35A@28VDC is 380
> > dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case?
> >
> > And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything
> > else from the 28V?
> >
> > Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee
> > change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping.
> >
> > What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay
> out
> > all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item
> plan.
> > It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts."
> >
> > 73, Guy K2AV
>
>
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to m...@nq6n.com
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Doug Person
I definitely agree with using good quality headphones for optimal 
listening.  But, headphones are a different psycho-acoustical experience 
than a speaker system. Personally, I prefer to listen to a speaker 
system.  Headphones VS: Speaker system will be different for everyone. 
But, if you prefer speakers, i recommend decent quality components to 
give you the best your "K" brand transceiver can deliver.


Doug -- K0DXV


On 10/17/16 9:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too.


When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near 
field. That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from 
the loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so 
close to the loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most 
recording studios have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on 
top of the console for exactly that purpose. They also have a larger 
pair that DOES excite the room.



I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks!


Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening 
environments.


On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote:
A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly 
adjusted radio with a good microphone. 


All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of 
headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are 
excellent choices. There are other good choices, but these are well 
established, widely available, and not expensive. All are VERY 
comfortable for LOOONG contest weekends (although comfort in the ER4 
depends on matching the ear piece to your ear).


73, Jim K9YC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Walter Underwood
OK, I know this thread is getting too long, but…

When my beloved Grado SR-60 headphones died, I used my Yamaha CM-500 phones for 
music. They were terrible. Not even good enough. So I ordered Grado SR-225e 
phones. And the cord for the SR-60 phones is part of my PTT hand switch. The 
CM-500 phones are back with the ham rig.

In general, good hi-fi reproducers should be good communications reproducers.

wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Doug Person  wrote:
> 
> I definitely agree with using good quality headphones for optimal listening.  
> But, headphones are a different psycho-acoustical experience than a speaker 
> system. Personally, I prefer to listen to a speaker system.  Headphones VS: 
> Speaker system will be different for everyone. But, if you prefer speakers, i 
> recommend decent quality components to give you the best your "K" brand 
> transceiver can deliver.
> 
> Doug -- K0DXV
> 
> 
> On 10/17/16 9:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
>>> Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too.
>> 
>> When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near 
>> field. That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the 
>> loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the 
>> loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios 
>> have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for 
>> exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room.
>> 
>>> I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks!
>> 
>> Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening 
>> environments.
>> 
>> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote:
>>> A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly 
>>> adjusted radio with a good microphone. 
>> 
>> All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of 
>> headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent 
>> choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, 
>> widely available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG 
>> contest weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear 
>> piece to your ear).
>> 
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> 
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?

2016-10-17 Thread Augie "Gus" Hansen



On 10/17/2016 5:20 PM, Phil Townsend Lontz wrote:

...
I eq the crap out of the K3 after 8K and set the tone of my CW note to 440… 
Near a natural “C”.
to me that sounds easy and warm.


When did this musical standard get changed? I've always tuned to A440. 
Guess I'll need to tune all my guitars differently from now on... ;>)


Cheers,
Gus
KB0YH

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com