[Elecraft] [K3] KRX3 L-mix-R problem

2013-10-10 Thread Brian Machesney
Suddenly, I can't hear the sub-receiver in the right headphone unless I use
the Ab-b option on the L-MIX-R menu item. (FYI, the b-Ab option also
does not work.) I used the A-b option for years. Any clues as to what I
may have inadvertently changed to cause this?

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] KX3: I/Q out on TRANSMIT?

2013-06-08 Thread Brian Machesney
I would like access to the I/Q signals produced by the DSP modulator on
transmit. Are these signals available on the rig's I/Q outputs?

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] FS: K2/100 plus options

2013-05-25 Thread Brian Machesney
I am the builder and non-smoking sole owner of K2 s/n 3070 (rev B) with
these options: KPA100 (also provides RS-232 computer interface), KSB2,
KNB2, K160RX, KAT100 external autotuner with crossover cable and Yaesu
MD-100A8X desk mic.

This rig has provided years of faithful service without a hiccough in pileups,
contests and daily contacts. You add antenna and mic / key / PC to be on
the air with a competition-grade radio.

Sale includes: all manuals; 12-Vpower cables; coax jumper from rig to
autotuner; N7HKW padded carrying bag, probes, alignment tool, allen
wrenches.

$1250 shipped CONUS.

Let me know if you'd like to make a sked and hear this rig in action.

73 -- Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] W1: adapting for high power use

2013-04-20 Thread Brian Machesney
I need an internal wattmeter for a homebrew, legal limit, solid-state amp.
Except for the fact that the W1 only takes up to 140W without modification,
it looks like a great solution. I'm thinking about using a surplus bridge
from an industrial ISM generator and padding the DC output by 12-dB
before feeding (via miniature coax) to the junctions at D1/R3 and D2/R4.

Can anyone think of a reason that this would NOT work?

Also, if I simply change the voltage at TP1 by adjusting R17, does the
entire power range follow, or does the accuracy suffer at one end of the
range or the other?

Thanks,

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: output power low only on 17m SSB!!

2011-12-09 Thread Brian Machesney
I'm hoping someone else has experienced this, because it's too weird for me
to figure out.

When I QSY to 17m phone and begin to speak into the mic, I get very low
output power. The only way I can get to full output is to switch to CW and
begin transmitting, during which I see the output power rise to the
expected 100W. This is the only band on which this problem occurs.

Using the latest firmware.

Any clues?

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: A cure for RF feedback with electret mic

2011-03-29 Thread Brian Machesney
I'm posting this only to add to the reflector's knowledge base of solutions
to mic problems. I do not claim that this problem occurs with all electret
mics. This information will come as no surprise to Jim, Tom and other
frequent contributors. While the solution falls into the realm of good
engineering practice, I operate from a variety of locations, the
engineering of which is generally outside of my direct control. I've
identified a solution that I can apply to the stations I visit - and leave
behind, at no great expense.

It's worth noting that my problem was *not* solved by shorting the mic
ground to the shield as recommended in the Elecraft app note on this
subject. The problem behavior does not depend on whether the front- or
rear-panel mic jack is used.

I use a ClarityAloft headset, which employs an electret element. (To the
peanut gallery: yes, there are far cheaper headsets that may work just as
well, but I've never found a match for the long-wearing comfort of these
units.) The headphones and mic are split at an unshielded box into separate
headphone and mic cables. I've been plagued with RF feedback which varies in
severity from installation to installation. The feedback is band-dependent,
can occur at a power output as low as 10-watts or less and is evidenced by
artifacts ranging from distorted audio in the headphone monitor to
uncontrollable, full-power output. Interestingly, I don't have this problem
with a dynamic mic. Until now, I've never expended the energy necessary to
identify the root cause and solve the problem, I've only applied enough of
the right kinds of band-aids to bring the transmitted audio from my home
shack into the acceptable range.

For these tests, the only connections to the K3 were coax to the ANT 1 jack,
headset connection to the rear-panel mic and headphone jacks and power from
a well-known 25-A switching supply. Since the feedback did not occur when
the feedline was terminated in a proper dummy load, my solution started by
applying a ferrite choke at the load end of the feedline to ensure that RF
is not flowing back to the rig on the outside of the antenna coax shield
from a real world load. Choking the load end eliminates the uncontrollable
output and brings the audio into the very acceptable range, but I could
still detect distortion on some bands and at higher output power levels.
Applying the same choke to only the K3 end of the feedline was not nearly as
effective, though it did reduce the severity of the feedback. Choking both
ends of the feedline eliminated the problem as evidenced by no change in
headphone-monitored audio quality from zero watts to full 100-watts output.

Choking the load end of the feedline and the mic cable going into the K3
also eliminated the problem. Choking only the mic cable, or the mic cable
and the K3 end of the feedline, was not sufficient to eliminate the
feedback.

Using an AIM4170 to measure choking impedances, I learned quite a bit about
ferrite chokes in the process of solving this problem. Suffice it to say
that all ferrites are not alike (plug: see
www.audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf ). The chokes used in these tests
consisted of five turns of the subject cable - whether mic or LMR200
feedline - through a Fair-Rite 2631102002 type 31 core.

Please contact me off-list if you have questions.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: APF... wow!

2011-02-01 Thread Brian Machesney
The K3's APF feature formalizes behavior that I used to implement by mixing
the audio from the main and second RX with the two receivers set to
different IF and DSP bandwidths. The first few times I tried the APF, I was
not impressed; I thought (mistakenly) that it was not meant to work with
the 8-pole 400Hz IF filters in my K3.

Boy, was I ever wrong! I followed the suggestions that Eric posted last week
- especially using 1Hz FINE tuning - and APF has, indeed, allowed me to hear
signals that were inaudible before. In particular, it has allowed me to work
VP8ORK from 160m down to 10m, raising copy from ESP to workable in many
cases.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: APF... wow!

2011-02-01 Thread Brian Machesney
My mistake: Eric is a great guy, but credit for this post goes to Wayne,
N6KR:

See: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Tips-for-using-APF-td5964773.html

My apologies to Wayne!
-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:43 PM, K3RWN rwnewbo...@comcast.net wrote:

 Can you help me with finding the posting by Eric that you mentioned?

 I am not finding it in the archive search or my search topics are off.

 Rich

 -Original Message-
 From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brian Machesney
 Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:23 PM
 To: Elecraft Reflector
 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: APF... wow!

 The K3's APF feature formalizes behavior that I used to implement by mixing
 the audio from the main and second RX with the two receivers set to
 different IF and DSP bandwidths. The first few times I tried the APF, I was
 not impressed; I thought (mistakenly) that it was not meant to work with
 the 8-pole 400Hz IF filters in my K3.

 Boy, was I ever wrong! I followed the suggestions that Eric posted last
 week
 - especially using 1Hz FINE tuning - and APF has, indeed, allowed me to
 hear
 signals that were inaudible before. In particular, it has allowed me to
 work
 VP8ORK from 160m down to 10m, raising copy from ESP to workable in many
 cases.

 --
 73 -- Brian -- K1LI
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Informative read: ADC specs for SDR

2010-09-22 Thread Brian Machesney
http://i.cmpnet.com/rfdesignline/2010/09/807_ENOBS_pt1.pdf

Part 2 still to come.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: FD 2010

2010-06-29 Thread Brian Machesney
If others had the same Field Day experience we had, then Elecraft should
prepare for an orders onslaught.

We used three K3s and three tribanders (plus an 80m dipole and 40m beam) at
W1MOO. In years past, we had terrible inter-station QRM with *other* radios,
despite bandpass filters at all stations. This year, we were able to operate
stations on phone and CW *** on the same band *** at the same time. Sure, we
had a couple of instances where we would run across an artifact of the other
station's signal ( we * did not * employ all the band filtering of years
past because we didn't feel we needed it), but there was not the usual sound
of Charlie Brown's teacher in the headphones at the CW station, nor the
modulation of the noise level in the cans at the phone station.

There was significant resistance to using tribanders placed in a line 150 ft
and 75 ft apart, because the former monoband antennas themselves were
supposed to provide significant isolation, but even the skeptics were
convinced. Comments like, Wow, that's really a great rig and Gee, I
really like that radio, were commonplace. First-time users were able to
quickly pick up the use of the radio's controls. Folks were equally
impressed by the fact that they can buy only the features they need and add
the features they want later.

Another frequent remark, and an effect that I was able to witness for
myself, was on the difference between 5-pole and 8-pole filters. The 8-pole
filters were preferred, hands-down, over the 5-pole filters. When I used a
radio with 5-pole filters, it felt as though the filters weren't even
engaged, because so many undesired signals that were inaudible using the
8-pole filters were allowed through - albeit much attenuated - by the 5-pole
filters.

Hope you all had a fun and safe Field Day 2010.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: all RX muted on transmit?

2010-05-18 Thread Brian Machesney
Are both the primary and secondary RX muted when in transmit mode, even if
the KRX3 gets its RF from the AUX input? Can this be disabled so that the
KRX3 can listen on a separate antenna during transmit on ANT1 or ANT2?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] [K3] Ferrite beads on TMP cables

2010-04-05 Thread Brian Machesney
I want to do some experiments placing ferrite beads on the TMP cables that
carry so many signals around the inside of the K3. I can't find the
dimensions of the SP060022 connectors on the cables and I don't have a set
of calipers to make an accurate measurement. Does anyone know the location
of an engineering drawing of this connector? Nothing shown on the web site
of Circuit Design, Inc.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Ferrite beads on TMP cables

2010-04-05 Thread Brian Machesney
Thanks to those who sent me a link to the drawing.

In response to several queries I received, I agree that there *should not
be* any currents flowing on the outsides of the coax cables. As far as I
know, that doesn't mean that there *are* no currents on the outsides of the
cables. I think that putting ferrites on the some of the cables is a good
way to see if there are currents or not. Now that I have a possible source
for the connectors, I may make up my own cables and give them a try. That's
one of the reasons I love having a radio I built - or, in this case,
assembled - myself. It's a great learning vehicle.

In response to other queries as to what might go wrong, I can't imagine why
putting ferrites on the outside of the coax would affect the signals
traveling on the inside of the coax. If someone can illuminate me, I'm all
ears.

Brian K1LI


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Brian Machesney nekvts...@gmail.com wrote:
 I want to do some experiments placing ferrite beads on the TMP cables that
 carry so many signals around the inside of the K3. I can't find the
 dimensions of the SP060022 connectors on the cables and I don't have a set
 of calipers to make an accurate measurement. Does anyone know the location
 of an engineering drawing of this connector? Nothing shown on the web site
 of Circuit Design, Inc.

 --
 73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: plug for DVR

2010-03-20 Thread Brian Machesney
I used my K3 as J7Y in the recent ARRL DX SSB contest. Since I've seen some
discussion of the merits of the DVR in the age of PC-recorded audio, I
wanted to drop a line here about my experience. I use an extremely
comfortable headset with an electret mic that needs bias from the K3, so I
can't run the mic directly through the PC without outboard circuitry. Your
configuration may dictate different preferences.

As a DX station, the most obvious instance to prefer the DVR over
PC-generated audio is on 40m, where one picks a CQ frequency below the US
phone band allocation and listens up. The need to frequently change
listening frequency and (less often) CQ frequency was easily accommodated
with the DVR. I would have to have recorded new messages on the PC to
achieve the same function, which was not possible with my configuration. I
used the same F-keys and macro calls at all times. I followed the same
practice, but to a much more limited extent, on 80m - where I was
requested mid-contest to listen in the General-class portion of the band.
Note that some W/VE stations were transmitting high in the 80- and
40-meter phone bands and listening down, so this practice is not restricted
to DX stations.

Since I was running the K3 barefoot, I found myself also changing the
outgoing CQ message to adapt to changing band conditions, particularly on
the low bands. Slower and slightly longer CQs were used when propagation was
weaker and the rate was lower. I would also repeat my recorded exchange
information during these times to cut down on the receiving stations' needs
for  fills. Completely the opposite during high-rate periods on 20, 15 and
(incredibly) 10 meters.

Again, this is just one ham's experience. There may be a host of different
ways to accomplish the same thing, but I found the DVR to be a very useful
addition to the contesting arsenal.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: plug for DVR

2010-03-20 Thread Brian Machesney
Tony,

I second your desire to have separate monitor levels for the DVR and the mic
and for exactly the same reason. Perhaps the Elecraft gang will put it on
our wish list.

Brian K1LI

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, N2TK, Tony tony@verizon.net wrote:

 If there was one wish it would be that the monitor level adjust was
 independent between the playback on the DVR from the mike. I tent to run
 the
 monitor a little high when using the mike. This helps to keep me from
 yelling into the mike. If I could adjust the DVR monitor separately I could
 run it at a lower level to give my ears a break.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - 'High Isolation Headphones'

2010-02-08 Thread Brian Machesney
I received a Clarity Aloft headset as a gift. I am very impressed with the
quality of RX and TX sound and they are very comfortable to wear. The
headset and boom comprise a continuous wire frame that gently but firmly
grasps the head, while the earbud material and transducers are derived
from hearing aids, which are obviously designed for long-wearing comfort.

The earpieces provide excellent isolation from nearby sounds. The noise from
my amplifier blowers -- directly to my left at the operating position --
used to drive me crazy, but no more. I have tried several times to get up
and walk away from the radio with the headset on because I forgot I was
wearing it.

The RX and TX transducers are both of the wide range variety. The first TX
audio reports I received said that the audio was very bassy,  so the ESSB
community should *really* love them. The RX and TX equalizers on the K3
have become very valuable for tailoring the response to communications
standards for both day-to-day and contest use.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 SSB, Hi Cur message on PTT

2010-02-08 Thread Brian Machesney
Doug,

I have owned and used my K2/100 on SSB and CW for almost 10 years, but it
has been relegated to second radio duty since getting my K3 a year ago.

I've been getting the K2 ready for a DXpedition for the last few days and I
have noticed a similar symptom to what you describe, as part of a
more-general syndrome that I can't explain and that is very unnerving.

The primary problem is that I frequently turn on the K2 in USB mode but I
can't get any output. Speaking into the mic simply doesn't produce any
output, doesn't move the ALC meter and doesn't produce anything I can hear
on the K3. Even though it all worked together fine the previous day.

As part of the diagnosis procedure, I removed the mic plug from the front
panel and shorted the PTT pin to the adjacent GND pin - I was going to see
if touching the MIC pin in this configuration would create output and
indicate a faulty line from the mic itself. Lo and behold, shorting the PTT
and GND pins produced a *strong* carrier, whose output I could vary with the
POWER control.

Since this didn't produce the expected result (to say the least!), I
remembered that the dot side of the paddle would act as PTT, so I plugged
in a paddle and got the same behavior.

Just for grins, I switched to CW and everything worked as expected.

Switching back to USB, it too now works as expected.

At some point in this procedure, I saw both the Hi Cur and the PA Hot
warnings, but both are gone now.

Don - any thoughts on what's going on here? Do I have to do a reboot of
the radio?

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - sub balance and LOUD audio crashes

2010-02-03 Thread Brian Machesney
Stewart,

I had this problem a while ago and thought it had been cleared up, but it's
ba-ack, perhaps because I started using Ab-Ab with Sub and split again
recently. Doesn't matter if I use CW or SSB.

I'm running the latest beta FW.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 in CQ 160 CW Contest

2010-02-02 Thread Brian Machesney
Bill,

I more than doubled last year's score without doubling QSOs, which means
that I had a greater percentage of non-US QSOs. I originally attributed this
to improved conditions and was surprised to hear from other nearby
stations that conditions for them were not as good as last year.

I had completely forgotten that this was my first CQ WW 160 with the K3, but
I do remember marvelling during the contest at my ability to hear and work
EU and near-AS stations that were calling underneath US/VE stations.

This is even more amazing since I use the same, omnidirectional antenna for
both TX and RX.
-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Bill W4ZV btipp...@alum.mit.edu wrote:


 If you want some interesting reading, go to the link below and use Edit 
 Find space K3 space in your web browser.  You can then scroll through the
 3830 Soapbox summary comments by participants in what is arguably the
 world's most extreme test of RX capability (i.e. extremely weak signals in
 the presence of wall-to-wall extremely strong signals).

 http://www.eskimo.com/~mwdink/3830/CQ160%20CW%20Soapbox%2002-01-2010.txt

 73,  Bill  W4ZV
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Attenuator and RF Gain Settings

2010-02-02 Thread Brian Machesney
Wow, Don, the effect of setting the AGC THR is dramatic!

I live in a very rural location that seems relatively free of man-made
noise. With antenna connected, the K3 S-meter shows about S-5 background
noise. (S-0 with no antenna!)

Surprising to me, turning *down* the AGC THR to 002 (was set to 008) really
quieted things down and made signals pop out of the noise the way you
describe. (Note: NF and NB are OFF) I could hear the background noise level
rise monotonically as I increased the THR setting and fall as I decreased
it.

With seven AGC variables to adjust -- DCY, HLD, PLS, SLP, THR, -F and -S  --
setting AGC up for a given operating scenario in a given location seems like
a very complex topic. Is there any way this could be reduced to a tutorial
for the K3 Wiki (like K3NA's entry at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/K3_Receiver_Gain_Configurations,
which addresses the no AGC case)?

This might create a run on N-GENs...

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 I just thought of something that might help those confused by the AGC
 Threshold setting. One other way to look at the required AGC Threshold level
 is to think of it as an S-meter level If your noise is S-1 or lower (on the
 K3's S-meter), you can set the Threshold to 002 or higher and all may be
 well OTOH, if you have an S-7 noise level indicated, the AGC Threshold
 should be set to 008 or higher.

 This is not an exact science number - the AGC Threshold menu parameter
 values are not tied to the S-meter, but hopefully the relative scale can
 give you an indication of which way to move the setting to avoid activating
 the AGC on the ambient noise coming in on your feedline.

 As I have said before I believe the default setting of 005 is even too low
 - mine normally is set at 008 even though I have a relatively quiet
 location.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Beat the drum a little

2010-01-31 Thread Brian Machesney
Merv,

I noticed some of the raspy or buzzy quality you heard, but for me it
was not on all signals. I have also noted that quality on signals for the
past week or so; perhaps it is atmospheric.

For the first time, I turned on the K3's ATT and found that I was even
better able to separate callers, particularly when trying to pick out
relatively weaker EU signals from stronger NA signals responding to my CQ.
This, of course, was all going on in the midst of many strong signals spaced
very close together.

Brian K1LI

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Merv Schweigert k...@flex.com wrote:


 One question I have,  when the band is wall to wall with strong signals
 the CW note seems to have a raspy quality on receive,  not a real
 pure DC note,  is this some side effect of DSP or what?  Maybe its
 just my ears.   Tuned 20 meters this morning and all sounds fine,
 its just when there are many many strong signals on the band, I hear
 this,  have heard it before but figured it is my ears.  This is
 slight and most may not even hear it.
 No blanker on, no NR on,  just standard settings.
 73 Merv KH7C
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Use of KUSB cable with the K2

2010-01-29 Thread Brian Machesney
Ron,

This topic has been discussed over just the past few days here on the
reflector.

Apparently, people are having different experiences. My K2 works by plugging
the K2's   ** serial cable **   into the end of the KUSB cable and setting
up the application software to run at 4800 / N / 8 / 1.

It seems that ONE SHOULD NOT PLUG THE KUSB INTO THE K2'S AUXIO JACK for risk
of damage to the K2.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:20 AM, KM4VX ronce...@earthlink.net wrote:


 I realize this topic is not new, but it is confusing to review the archives
 when searching this question. The KUSB is sold to support the K3. It is not
 advertised to support the K2. Can it be used out of the box to support the
 K2? Can I plug it into the serial port of the K2 (okay not a real serial
 port  but looks like it) and then connect it to a USB port on my laptop
 without damaging the K2? I thought there might be a good  reason why
 ELECRAFT does not list it for use with the K2 as well as the K3. I seem to
 recall a warning about damaging the K2 when using the wrong interface, but
 can't find it in the K2 manual or module building instructions. Any help
 would be appreciated. Many thanks, and this reflector is addictive! Ron
 --

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2: connecting a condenser mic

2010-01-29 Thread Brian Machesney
I have a condenser mic that is not on the list of known mics in the docs
or on the Elecraft web site. I'm trying to decide whether to simply short
the +5V to the AF when connecting my condenser mic to the KSB2, or to place
a resistor in between. I am more concerned about potential long-term adverse
effects on the mic element by operating it out-of-spec than I am concerned
with damaging the K2.

A DMM shows the DC resistance of the element to be 400 Kohms! Not really
surprising, I guess, since a condenser mic is electrically similar to a
capacitor.

The manufacturer specs the mic element at 4.5Kohms and 1.5V to 9.0V bias.
Applying the KSB2's +5V directly to the mic element's 4.5K ohms should
produce 1mA drain, no sweat for the KSB2, and right in the middle of the
manufacturer's applied DC voltage spec.

The manufacturer's tech sent me a wiring diagram that shows a +12V supply
with a series resistor between 470 and 2.2K ohms to the mic. The 470 ohm
resistor would apply nearly 11V to the mic, if the mic element and the
series act as a pure voltage divider. The 2.2K ohm resistor would produce 8V
at the mic.

The KSB2 schematic shows a 2.2uF electrolytic cap between the MIC AF and the
rest of the KSB2, so I wouldn't think there's any risk of a short.

Help from those in the know, please?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2: connecting a condenser mic

2010-01-29 Thread Brian Machesney
Thanks, Don.

Not knowing any better, I simply shorted the AF and MICBIAS when I connected
the mic to the K3. From what I can see in the K3 schematics, the only
bypassing on the MICBIAS line is 1uF (rev B, sheet 5 of 7, Front Panel -
Miscellaneous). Can I build the same resistor into the mic plug and use it
that way for both the K2 and K3?

Brian K1LI

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Brian,

 Is that a 3 terminal mic element?  If so, then you can follow the
 manufacturer's instructions and apply the 5 volts to the voltage terminal on
 the element.
 OTOH, most of these elements are 2 terminal, and the voltage should be
 applied to the AF pin through a resistor - try 5.6k like the Elecraft MH2
 uses as a first trial, it will likely work because the resistance is not
 critical.
 If you try to connect the 5 volts directly to the AF terminal, you will
 effectively bypass all the audio to ground.  For AC signals, a power rail is
 jst the same as ground because there are large bypass capacitors on the
 voltage rail.

 73,
 Don W3FPR


 Brian Machesney wrote:

 I have a condenser mic that is not on the list of known mics in the docs
 or on the Elecraft web site. I'm trying to decide whether to simply short
 the +5V to the AF when connecting my condenser mic to the KSB2, or to
 place
 a resistor in between. I am more concerned about potential long-term
 adverse
 effects on the mic element by operating it out-of-spec than I am concerned
 with damaging the K2.

 A DMM shows the DC resistance of the element to be 400 Kohms! Not really
 surprising, I guess, since a condenser mic is electrically similar to a
 capacitor.

 The manufacturer specs the mic element at 4.5Kohms and 1.5V to 9.0V bias.
 Applying the KSB2's +5V directly to the mic element's 4.5K ohms should
 produce 1mA drain, no sweat for the KSB2, and right in the middle of the
 manufacturer's applied DC voltage spec.

 The manufacturer's tech sent me a wiring diagram that shows a +12V supply
 with a series resistor between 470 and 2.2K ohms to the mic. The 470 ohm
 resistor would apply nearly 11V to the mic, if the mic element and the
 series act as a pure voltage divider. The 2.2K ohm resistor would produce
 8V
 at the mic.

 The KSB2 schematic shows a 2.2uF electrolytic cap between the MIC AF and
 the
 rest of the KSB2, so I wouldn't think there's any risk of a short.

 Help from those in the know, please?


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 KUSB PROBLEM

2010-01-28 Thread Brian Machesney
Eric,

I am using the KUSB with my K2 and N1MM Logger. I plugged the K2's serial
cable into the end of the the KUSB adapter. I am running at 4800 bps, no
parity, 8 data bits and no stop bits.
-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Eric,

 You have run into a situation where the USB/serial adapter does not like
 to work at lower baud rates.  I know it is counter-intuitive, but it
 seems to be true.  Use your Keyspan adapter with the K2 because you have
 found it to work.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 Eric wrote:
  I thought I was clear but perhaps not--the KUSB does not work with the
 proper cable I built as per Elecraft instructions but the Keyspan adapter
 does.  I am not trying to connect my K2 to my XP laptop using an RS-232
 cable. Has anyone been successful connecting a K2 using a KUSB?
 
  73 Eric WD6DBM

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Why can't I use my 1.8kHz filter for SSB TX?

2010-01-24 Thread Brian Machesney
Yes, I did search the archives to find out why you can transmit through
some filters and not through others before posting this question to the
reflector. The only authoritative information I found information was this
from July 2008:

Until further information to the contrary is available from Elecraft, you
must select the 2.7 or 2.8 filter for SSB, Data and CW transmit. The AM
transmit filter must be 6 kHz and the FM transmit filter must be 13 kHz. Any
other settings will result in failure and a ERR TXF (Error TX Filter)
message.

See the Errata sheet that shipped with your K3.

73,
Don W3FPR 
To the best of my ability to discern, this does not indicate the reason for
the limitation. In fact, the phrase until further information and the fact
that ESSB uses a different filter than traditional SSB indicates to me at
least the possibility that there may be firmware reasons for this
limitation (like BFO alignment on TX and RX), not that there aren't also
possibly hardware reasons (like carrier rejection, etc.). If someone knows
the theory of the radio's operation well enough to help me understand the
limitation, I would like to be enlightened.

So yes, I did look for the answer in the reflector archives and no, this is
not a request for Elecraft to take valuable time out from their other
activities to react to my personal wish list.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.comwrote:

 On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:01:05 +, rfenab...@gmail.com wrote:

 Have you searched the reflector or the website for past communications on
 the topics that interest you? There are engineering reasons why you can
 transmit through some filters and not others. These are not firmware issues,
 they are RF design issues. Elecraft has very good engineers, and they tend
 to make good decisions.

 Jim Brown K9YC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: transmitted RF feedback with condenser mics?

2010-01-24 Thread Brian Machesney
I am getting transmitted RF feedback into the K3 when running high power
with a headset that uses a condenser element. With an otherwise identical
setup, I don't have any problems with either of my two headsets that have
dynamic mic elements, using either the front- or the rear-panel mic jacks.

I hear the distortion in the K3's own monitor, but I have confirmed the
distortion using my K2 as a second receiver (1 wire in the ANT jack, RF
gain near zero, ATT on to prevent front-end overload) and with on-the-air
tests with stations hundreds to thousands of miles away.

The problem headset is designed for aviation use and, as far as I can tell,
uses a shielded mic cable.

Has anyone else had and resolved this problem?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: Why can't I use my 1.8kHz filter for SSB TX?

2010-01-23 Thread Brian Machesney
I've searched the archives and found that use of a filter other than 2.7kHz
for SSB TX seems to be forbidden. One selects a non-standard filter for
ESSB; why can' t this filter be the 2.1kHz or 1.8kHz filter?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Alpha 91b

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Machesney
Mike,

I have used my K3 and A91b successfully on all bands from 160 through 10
meters for over a year. No problems with SSB on any bands. I have run full
output on 160 and 80/75, both SSB and CW. Net: I can't think why you're
having trouble.

I do have one problem on the low bands that I do not associate with the K3
but might be playing into your situation somehow. I believe my house wiring
is picking up RF, which kills my DSL connection whenever I run high power on
160 and sometimes when I only run 100W barefoot from the K3.

Have you run the setup into a dummy load?

Brian K1LI

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:59 PM, n...@aol.com wrote:

 I have an Alpha 91b hooked to the K3 (SN 8376) and I'm having an Odd
 problem ... on 75/80 meter SSB, if I run the amp at 45 watts, which is what
 works on CW without issue, I encounter significant nuisance tripping of the
 Amplifier to the fault condition.  The amp also exhibits a power spike into
 the 2KW range often times when it faults.  If I reduce the  power to 30
 watts on the K3, the amp runs 1500 watts OK without tripping.   Please 
 resist the temptation to say Run at 30 watts then.  All  other bands ...
 except 6 meters which I didn't check, do not exhibit this  issue.  Power
 out from
 the K3 is 45 watts and the amp runs  1500 watts  out with NO nuisance
 tripping.  I've talked to the tech's at Alpha and at  least one other K3
 owner
 has had this same problem.  He asked me to check  the amp with another
 radio
 so, using my spare radio, Yaesu FT-450, to drive  the amp I have no
 nuisance
 tripping on any band while running 45-50 watts into  the amp.  Neither
 radio
 has ALC hooked up, only the TR relay.  Both  radios and amp are grounded to
 the same ground buss.  RF calibration was  done when the radio was
 assembled and I have not re-done that process.

 Any ideas as to why the radio would exhibit a tendency to over drive the
 amp just on 75/80 meters?

 Mike N9QR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2: An old filter question - - the underwater noise

2010-01-19 Thread Brian Machesney
http://www.rt66.com/~hypoxic/K2stuff/ultreject.html

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy 
gm4...@btinternet.com wrote:

 Duane,

 Can you remember the web-site of this K2 owner?

 73,
 Geoff.
 GM4ESD
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 how often do you use it?

2010-01-09 Thread Brian Machesney
I sold a big rig in deference to the K3. Many of the big screen features
of the big rigs - and more, I'll wager - will be provided by the P3 at a
price which will *begin* to put the K3+P3 combo in the same league as the
big rigs but still with the performance advantages that many Elecraft
owners value.

For me, this highlights the SUPERIORITY of Elecraft's marketing - you can
pay for only the features you need: output power, 2nd receiver, portability,
screen size, etc. I'd like to have this kind of unbundled value from my
satellite TV provider!

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Noisy DSP radios theory

2010-01-07 Thread Brian Machesney
Keith,

I wonder why you believe that all DSPs would amplify harmonics. When
properly designed, a DSP behaves in a linear fashion - i.e., it does not
produce the harmonic distortion you describe. The criteria for proper DSP
design include limiting the bandwidth of the input signal to prevent
aliasing (the Nyquist criterion), limiting the amplitude of the signal to
avoid saturating the A/D converter and scaling the DSP operations to avoid
numerical overflows.

I agree with your assertion that harmonic distortion could produce a noisy
sounding receiver, but I can't think of any reason why well-designed
radios... before DSP necessarily had any more or less tendency to behave
in a linear fashion; being square-law devices, tube-type and MOSFET-based
amplifiers produce more even-order harmonic distortion which some judge as
less objectionable (purportedly because mechanical sound generators, like
musical instruments, produce even-order harmonics) than bipolar-junction
transistors.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Keith Hamilton tu...@zoominternet.netwrote:

 I believe it is a fault of all DSP radios that they amplify the HARMONICS
 of a sound too much. In our earlier days before DSP, radio amplifiers tended
 to amplify only the fundamental of a sound and not the partials (harmonics
 2,3,4,5,6 etc.) ... But if the sound and ALL of its nearby harmonics are all
 amplified equally, or the harmonics are not down in amplitude far enough
 from the fundamental, you might get a busy, or noisy receiver. This could
 equate to amplifying the harmonics too much in a final PA and having a
 'noisy or as we call it, a dirty transmitter.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Remote Matching Thought

2010-01-05 Thread Brian Machesney
This seems like a potential application for the KRC2. Could it not be
co-located with a relay-controlled array of matching components? I know that
one of the big concerns is the length of the AUXBUS cable; perhaps BCD
control via something akin to rotor cable would be more appropriate.

Yes, the per-band-segment selection of control relay values would have to be
determined a priori, but once identified should be repeatably selectable
with the KRC2's 36 output drivers.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: will the P3 require the KXV3 option?

2009-12-28 Thread Brian Machesney
To get the IF Out signal?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 needs survey -- firmware and application software

2009-12-24 Thread Brian Machesney
I would like to be able to lock the V-M front panel key.

In what must surely be the latest evidence of my brain's declining function,
I constantly confound the V-M and M-V buttons, inadvertently writing
over the memory contents. Pressing the V-M button while it is locked
would produce an audible beep and the text message unlock V-M

Along the same lines, I find that pressing M-V does not load both saved
frequencies into the main and sub receivers if the main and sub are set to
different bands when the key is pressed. I would like to have a way to make
this the default behavior when pressing the M-V key.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Key Out line

2009-12-23 Thread Brian Machesney
Phil,

You can see the T-R switching circuitry in the schematics available on the
Elecraft web site. Just search for t-r and you'll find the circuitry for
both the 10W and 100W PAs.
-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI


On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Phil Hystad k7...@comcast.net wrote:

 I noticed from the documentation that the K3 Key out line can handle up to
 200 VDC and 5 amps.  I assume this means that when the key out is closed
 that it can handle 5 amps of current.

 So, I am curious, what kind of switch mechanism is used for TR switching.
  Is this an actual relay or is it some kind of transistor switch.  I am
 guessing transistor based switch but this is where I started wondering about
 the 200 VDC and 5 amp capability thing.

 Or, am I totally off base.  I am willing to be off base without shame
 because I really do not know a lot of details of how these things are
 actually done.

 Oh, two more minor decisions on configuration to make and then I order my
 K3, probably just after Christmas sometime.

 phil, K7PEH

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] kit building or buy ready for use

2009-12-20 Thread Brian Machesney
I second Don's comment, re: If you build the K3, fears about adding
options, doing upgrades or performing any maintenance later on will be
minimized because you know how it 'goes together'.

The ability to add features as requirements change and money becomes
available is a major feature of Elecraft products and the K3 is no
exception. I had to remove the KRX3 and the front panel assembly to add the
DVR and a filter unit. I was nervous because it had been nearly since I
built the kit, but the process went very, very smoothly. I would have felt a
much higher barrier to taking advantage of the K3's field upgrade-ability
if I had not put it together myself.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: Noisy Receiver? - not here!

2009-12-17 Thread Brian Machesney
Gents,

On the flip side, I - and, apparently, many other operators from whom
we've heard on this and other reflectors - have run the K3 for 30+ hours out
of a 48-hour contest and not experienced the fatigue you describe. Such
fatigue would make any rig an intolerable chore to use and would detract
substantially from the rave reviews the K3 has received in contesting
circles.

I agree with other post-ers to this reflector that I frequently find myself
reaching to turn DOWN the RF gain control (I operate with
factory-supplied AGC defaults). In this respect, I don't find anything WRONG
with the K3, but I do find it to be DIFFERENT and I have had to modify my
listening habits to accomodate that difference, just as I have had to do
when changing radios in the past.

We all appreciate that igs from different manufacturers have different
sounds; I would describe the K3 as less soft than the TS850, more
precise than the FT1KMP and similar to the Omni VII (I lack experience
with Icom beyond using the 706MkIIG mobile). Now that I think of it, this
appears to track the evolution of DSP from none to very low IF to
higher IF.
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:26 AM, James Sarte k2qi@gmail.com wrote:


 I've worked long pileups [with] the FT-1000, and I don't recall ever
 having as much noise-related fatigue as I get when I use the K3... It just
 seems the K3's noise characteristics seem stronger and perhaps a tad harsher
 than what comes out of the Yaesu.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT: antenna farm

2009-12-14 Thread Brian Machesney
Clint,

I don't know all your constraints, but since you are considering putting up
multiple individual antennas to work in opposite directions, you may want to
consider reversible wire beams or reversible Moxon rectangles. There is a
wealth of information at www.cebik.com (free to create a userid) and at the
Moxon Antenna Project (see, e.g.,
http://www.moxonantennaproject.com/w8egb/w8egb_reverse.htm )

Good luck!

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Online K3 Demo

2009-12-14 Thread Brian Machesney
Dave,

I think that's a good idea, particularly since I've heard some hams comment
that they bought one rig and not another because of the ability to operate
it remotely (couldn't transmit, of course - no control op). This demo could
tip the balance for that segment of the market.
Brian K1LI
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:45 PM, David Gilbert xda...@cis-broadband.comwrote:

 And although users wouldn't be able to directly check the ergonomics of
 the K3, they might be able to do so indirectly.  As many K3 owners have
 already pointed out, once you have the K3 set up the way you want it
 there isn't a lot of need to change anything while operating it ...
 particularly during a contest.  Even remote operation of the rig would
 help confirm that.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] 150 watt boots for 160m

2009-12-11 Thread Brian Machesney
Julius,

Do you want to amplify 10 watts to 150 watts, or 100 watts to 150 watts? The
former is nearly 12dB- about 2 S-units - while the latter is less than 2dB -
about 1/3 of an S-unit, a difference which would be very difficult to
discern on the air.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Julius Fazekas n2wn
phriend...@yahoo.comwrote:


 Wondering if anyone has a suggestion of a solid state amp or pushing the
 K3
 PA to obtain 150 watts out on 160m?

 A kit or HB would be fine...

 73,
 Julius
 n2wn

 -
 Julius Fazekas
 N2WN

 Tennessee Contest Group
 http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html

 Tennessee QSO Party
 http://www.tnqp.org/

 Elecraft K2/100 #4455
 Elecraft K3/100 #366
 Elecraft K3#1875
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://n2.nabble.com/150-watt-boots-for-160m-tp4151943p4151943.html
 Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: DRM listening?

2009-12-11 Thread Brian Machesney
Now that I'm enjoying SWLing again, I'd like to try to decode Digital
Radio Mondiale. Has anyone succeeded in doing this without buying a
purpose-built DRM receiver?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: band switch question

2009-12-10 Thread Brian Machesney
Wayne,

You wrote, What I do is set up the per-band quick memories for different
modes
and starting points on each band. In the case of 80 m, tapping MV /
M1 gets me to CW mode at 3540, M2 is LSB at 3900, M3 is AM-SYNC at
3870, and M4 is PSK31 at 3580.

Does one have to already be somewhere in the 80m band for this approach to
work?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: CW feature request

2009-12-02 Thread Brian Machesney
N1MM Logger and DX Lab Suite both give you the option. On N1MM Logger, open
the Configuration panel, choose the Other tab and check the Use Reverse CW
box in the lower right-hand corner.
-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Ralph Parker ve...@dccnet.com wrote:

 I've tried really hard to adjust to CW on LSB, but it just doesn't work for
 me.
 To make matters worse, much software (eg. N1MM) insists on re-setting the
 CW mode to 'normal' (after I've set it to 'REV') at the most inopportune
 moments.

 I plead for a CONFIG option to set CW 'normal' to USB.
 I'd even pay money for this!

 VE7XF

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: killing RX key clicks

2009-12-01 Thread Brian Machesney
Stewart,

I'm starting a new thread on this subject because your post reminded me to
write in on the subject.

Since a key click is an impulse of signal to the RX, perhaps they could be
reduced by a noise blanker type of function. That will make it even more
impossible to know that you're close to an offending station! Now, if we
could just cancel the offending station's signal all together, there will be
no more QRM!

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:41 AM, GW0ETF gw0...@btinternet.com wrote:


 Ref key clicks. adjust the onboard system which emits anti-phase sound
 to cancel the engine noise and so make them silent to other vessels nearby.

 So I wonder if it might be feasible to develop a system on the K3 to use
 the 2nd rx to listen to the offending signal and the software produce an
 anti-phase 'key click' in the main receiving bandwidth to cancel the
 clicks...?

 73,

 Stewart Rolfe, GW0ETF (GW6W in cqww..)



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 static electricity

2009-12-01 Thread Brian Machesney
Steve,

In addition to being bad for your radio, the dry air that's allowing the
static charges to build up on your skin aren't good for the rest of your
body (sinuses, skin, etc.). We use a whole house humidifier that sits on
the floor near the wood stove (Vermont crude is a lot cheaper than the
slick stuff, even though it's more work...). No problems with static,
snoring, etc.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: no audio out with AGC off in FW 3.63

2009-11-24 Thread Brian Machesney
Pretty self-explanatory from the subject line. Seems that AGC must be
enabled to get audio out. Doesn't seem right and not the same behavior as
before, unless someone can tell me what I've inadvertently set incorrectly.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: no audio out with AGC off in FW 3.63

2009-11-24 Thread Brian Machesney
Anyone ever listen to Cheech and Chong's Big Bambu album back in the 70s?
I feel like Sister Mary Elephant responding to Lyle's correct answer: Thank
you.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI


On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Lyle Johnson k...@wavecable.com wrote:

 ...unless someone can tell me what I've inadvertently set incorrectly.


 Check CONFIG:AF LIM

 73,

 Lyle KK7P


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Production Firmware Release (3.63) and audio blast

2009-11-23 Thread Brian Machesney
I was among those who experienced audio blast with a previous release when
operating QSK and subRX together. I've been working DXpeditions split for
the past few hours and don't hear anything untoward with this release.

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dennis Watkins androm...@wildblue.netwrote:

 Have you fixed the audio blast issue??

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 WSPR

2009-11-20 Thread Brian Machesney
Eric,

 force the PA on even at low power to keep things cool

I don't know about that, but you can force the PA fans on by:

- Press the POWER button to turn the K3 on
- Hold CONFIG to select the Configuration menu, then turn VFO B to KPA3
- Turn the VFO A knob to PAIO ON... further to PAIO TST... past TST to FN1,
then FN2, FN3 and FN4
- The fans should start turning at FN1 and increase speed as you continue to
FN4

If you press CONFIG again, the fans will be left running at the FNx speed
you chose.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: BAND up/down problem with FW 3.56 and later

2009-11-15 Thread Brian Machesney
Since installing v3.56 and continuing with v3.57, the front panel BAND
control always takes me to 5.975 MHz in AM-S when I try to QSY to 40m. I can
get to 7.xxx MHz frequencies via keypad and logging programs, but not via
BAND control.

Any ideas on what's going on?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: BAND up/down problem with FW 3.56 and later

2009-11-15 Thread Brian Machesney
Steve,

Thanks for your suggestion - BND MAP was, indeed, the culprit. I had
disabled 60m, but it somehow got re-enabled.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Steve Ellington n...@carolina.rr.comwrote:

 Go to config/BND MAP. Scroll through the bands and make sure 7.0 is IN.
 Maybe somehow it got changed to OUT.



 Steve
 N4LQ

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: new feature idea / question

2009-11-09 Thread Brian Machesney
I was just reading about the differing levels of success that people have
with active noise cancelling units. It occurred to me that one should be
able to achieve the same kinds of results using the second RX and separate
antenna in the K3 - with the addition of control over the phase (delay) of
the arriving signal. On its face, it would seem that one could achieve
destructive interference between the noise only coming from a sense
antenna and the noise + signal coming from a better receive antenna.

Thoughts?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: 160m SWR issue

2009-11-04 Thread Brian Machesney
The issue(s) that I'm facing are being dealt with fully in the other
thread re: K3 SWR accuracy. I would like to abandon this thread.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: 160m SWR issue

2009-11-03 Thread Brian Machesney
Good question, Rudolf, but no the ATU is not engaged.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:56 PM, hb9ari hb9...@bluewin.ch wrote:

 Hi Brian,

 Just an idiot question: are you using the K3 ATU?

 73, Rudolf HB9ARI

 Don Wilhelm wrote:
  Brian,
 
  Is the higher reflected power indicated on the K3 or is it the reading
  on a meter in the line between the amp and the antenna?
 
  If it is read on an external meter --
  Is there any possibility that something is arcing over at high power -
  check your antenna system for that condition.
 
  If the indication is on the K3, then the problem is in the input circuit
  for the amp (giving a non-50 ohm resistive load to the K3).
 
  73,
  Don W3FPR
 
  Brian Machesney wrote:
 
  I'm feeding a double L antenna on 160m (visualize a vertical dipole
 with
  the top and bottom legs bent to form something like a capital C and
 fed in
  the middle of the vertical leg). The SWR bridge on the K3 shows 1:1 SWR,
 but
  when I fire up my Alpha 91B, I see significant reflected power.
 
  I recently saw a post on the topband reflector from another K3 owner
 whose
  160m output power is being reduced from 100W to 50W by the K3 even
 though
  the SWR reads 1:1 on the K3's internal SWR bridge.
 
  Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation for it?
 
 
 
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: 160m SWR issue

2009-11-03 Thread Brian Machesney
I'm feeding a double L antenna on 160m (visualize a vertical dipole with
the top and bottom legs bent to form something like a capital C and fed in
the middle of the vertical leg). The SWR bridge on the K3 shows 1:1 SWR, but
when I fire up my Alpha 91B, I see significant reflected power.

I recently saw a post on the topband reflector from another K3 owner whose
160m output power is being reduced from 100W to 50W by the K3 even though
the SWR reads 1:1 on the K3's internal SWR bridge.

Has anyone else seen this or have an explanation for it?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 + RX antenna

2009-10-23 Thread Brian Machesney
It may seem obvious, but be sure that you also routed one of the TMP cables
to the AUX connector!

K1LI

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Arie Kleingeld PA3A p...@xs4all.nlwrote:

 Don't forget to hold the sub button so that the diversity mode  kicks in.

 73 Arie PA3A

 -Oorspronkelijk bericht-

 If I want to listen to both the 80m vertical and the RX loop at the same
 time, is this all I need to do:
 - set both receivers to the same frequency
 - connect RX antenna to AUX RF BNC
 - set KRX3 to Ant = BNC in the config menu

 Is that all there is to it?
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] KRC2: VFO aware?

2009-10-22 Thread Brian Machesney
I'm considering a KRC2 purchase. Can the KRC2 control outputs based on the
TX VFO?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: Mixing sub-RX audio in stereo headphones

2009-10-20 Thread Brian Machesney
I have the 8-pole 1.8-kHz filter for phone contesting, but it's on the
border of intelligibility for my ears. I want to overcome this by mixing in
a small amount of wider-bandwidth audio from the linked sub-RX with a wider
filter. While I can set SPKRS to 1 to accomplish this, it seems that with
stereo *headphones* I am forced to have the main and sub in left and right
ears rather than mixed together into both ears.

Any hints on how I can do this? Have I missed something in the manual? Do I
have to plug my stereo headphones into the speaker jack?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: SO2R-in-a-box

2009-10-16 Thread Brian Machesney
Call me stubborn, but I believe that it should be possible to *make* the K3
and a logging program work together as SO2R-in-a-box. This probably
involves external, switched bandpass filters, might involve an external
antenna switch and/or applying a context swtich via the logging program,
but it seems that it must be possible - and a good idea.

Has anyone made this work? Is anyone working on it? Is anyone interested in
starting up a new group (off this reflector) to work up ideas?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Morse Trainer

2009-10-15 Thread Brian Machesney
Ed,

Getting frustrated is no fun! In addition to just getting on the air, you
might want to try one of the Morse training programs listed here:

http://www.ac6v.com/morseprograms.htm#CWT

Does anyone on the reflector have experience with a Morse trainer that they
can recommend to Ed?

73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:51 AM, EMD edwarddo...@mac.com wrote:



 So I hope to get finished and on the air soon, so I can frustrate everyone
 with my poor morse.  Another learning process.

 73,  Ed  KE7HGA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Fwd: Topband: Fw: 3d2kj

2009-10-12 Thread Brian Machesney
Can anyone help the team on Fiji?

Rys - I will follow up with a response from the reflector if I see it.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI

-- Forwarded message --
From: Ryszard Tymkiewicz r...@ippt.gov.pl
Date: Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:04 AM
Subject: Topband: Fw: 3d2kj
To: topb...@contesting.com


I'm sorry I attache longer text here but our friends on Fiji have serious
problems.
Below text were sent to Elecraft too but because of holidays I'm not sure if
they will be able to read it now.
Maybe someone will be able to help them?

   73 Rys
 SP5EWY

=

Dear Sir,
My callsign is 3D2KJ (SP5DRH at home), We are on a dx-pedition on Fiji
with the main
interest to activate 160m. We have here two rigs: K2 and K3 in use. The
last night we have encountered a serious trouble with our K3 (S/N 1739)
Since that time, we are observing short (a few seconds) lost of power on
160m, while CW is used. This behavior concerns ONLY 160m! That happens
with a small power level being set at 6W, as we are using this rig to
drive an external PA. Then, the output returns to the previous level,
with a short view of a full bar on the LCD display. We tried to find if
it occurs on TUNE position as well, but it looks that it happens very
rarely there. The rate of this behavior seems to be unpredictable but it
is sometimes a few times within a minute! On other bands everything is
OK. It looks, moreover, that the
rig produces sometimes some spurious signals on 160m resulting an odd
behavior of our home made PA, while using a K2 instead of K3 solves the
problem.
This makes us unhappy since this failure might jeopardize our program.
Since one of us
(3d2mj #8211; home sp5eaq) is an engineer in electronics, we have
performed several tests and we are now convinced that the nature of the
problem is of K3. We re-initialized the rig and nothing changed.
The transceiver is loaded with the low SWR input of the PA but the same
problem happens if it is loaded just with an antenna. Any local external
support is impossible, we have basic tools (including soldering iron),
some spare parts (but not K3 origin) and an AC/DC meter. There is a
possibility that the problem began during a crash of PA during
transmition without load (failure of antenna). The
PA has been then repaired, but soon we found the K3 problem. It might be
just a coincidence since before we had used 15W of drive.
73 de 3d2kj3d2mj
==
___
Topband mailing list
topb...@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 hum problem - not the usual? [Try CONFIG:AFSK TX = FIL ON]

2009-09-29 Thread Brian Machesney
Wayne,

Thanks for that suggestion - it worked!! One starts to wonder if there is
any thing that this radio can't do!

73 -- Brian -- K1LI

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Wayne Burdick n...@elecraft.com wrote:

 The K3 has a CONFIG menu entry called AFSK TX. If you set it to FIL
 ON, a 400-Hz transmit-mode audio filter is inserted, centered around
 the mark/space tones. This is only available when the rig is set for
 AFSK A mode. It should be effective against low-frequency hum coming
 in through the mic or LINE IN connectors.

 73,
 Wayne
 N6KR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 hum problem - not the usual?

2009-09-28 Thread Brian Machesney
After enjoying my K3 for about nine months, I was recently alerted to
audible 60-Hz hum on my transmitted audio signal. After reading the many
hum related posts on the reflector, I began investigating. Step 1 was to
remove all connections to the rig except the DC power and the coax to the
external PA (I placed a direct short on the keying line input at the PA).
Without a mic connected, the indication of the problem is that the PA
registers output power with no audio input. The problem only occurs in an
SSB mode when the nearby PA is both on and enabled (i.e., not on standby)
and when the K3 is both within about 8-in of the PA and parallel or at right
angles to it; rotating the rig about 15 degrees around the z-axis eliminated
the hum. All in the usual vein, so far.

There are several aspects of this problem that I find hard to understand:

- With all conditions apparently constant, the problem is at least somewhat
intermittent and will build up to full output over about a 3 second period
when it does occur
- When hum is being produced, the K3 output power meter reads zero while
the external PA is putting out something near full power! (Ordinarily, it
takes 20 watts of output power from the K3 to drive the external to this
power level)
- Lowering the output power setting on the K3 reduces the amount of hum
power registering on the PA output power meter; there is a marked reduction
in hum power when I pass the K3's internal PA power threshold and the hum
power goes to zero when the K3 power output is set to zero
- There is hysteresis in the output power registered by the external PA vs.
the output power setting on the K3; i.e., starting with K3 output power set
to zero, the K3 output power setting which produces the onset of hum power
as shown by the external PA is a larger value than the K3 output power
setting at which the external PA hum power decreases / disappears.

I am space challenged inasmuch as I have an SO2R setup, so moving the K3
will be difficult. Any thoughts on what's going on?

-- 
73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 USB CAT Interface

2009-05-26 Thread Brian Machesney
Fred,

I use KUSB with K3 and have no trouble sending CW from N1MM using RTS and
DTR from a WinXP laptop. Just letting you know that it *can* work.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI

Snip:

 I was surprised the KUSB from Elecraft doesn't work for the logger-rig
 interface.  I guess all USB-Serial adapters are not created equal.  If
 one doesn't work, try a different one.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Key out (was CW sideband)

2009-04-23 Thread Brian Machesney
If you don't want power output when you hit the key, turn off the VOX while
in CW mode - the rig responds with PTT in the message area. To get power
out with VOX off, you must press the XMIT button or active the PTT (with a
footswitch, for example) while keying the paddles.

Depending on what you mean, this is also the answer to the full QSK
statement. VOX on means that pressing the key activates the transmitter.
QSK on means the RX is active between code elements. Here is the truth
table for VOX and QSK:

VOX QSK
Off (message = PTT) Off (message = SEMI)  XMIT button or PTT to
transmit
Off   On (message = FULL)  Same as Off - Off
On (message = VOX)Off  Key = transmit;
no RX between elements
On   On  Key =
transmit; RX between elements

73 -- Brian -- K1LI
K1 270 -- K2 2070 -- K3 2465

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Carl Clawson carlclaw...@verizon.netwrote:

  ps: the first thing that drives me crazy about the K3?
  The fact that the radio (and the amp) key when I'm playing
  with my paddles and just wanna hear my own CW.

 Me too.

 I guess it must be done this way for people who send the key first to
 their amp or antenna switch, and then get their PTT back to the radio
 from it? Like from an extra contact pair on a relay that bypasses a
 mast-mount preamp. People hate smoking those.

 I also would like to be able to turn it off, so that Key Out occurs
 only when VOX or PTT is already asserted. Yet another menu option for
 the bottom of the software wish list!

 Also, I'm away from my K3 now but I could swear that it works at full
 QSK even if you don't have QSK enabled. That's pretty odd.

 73 and thanks for listening,
 Carl WS7L
 K3 #486, 1 year old and owner is still smiling.

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] No/low RF power out on 17m

2009-04-03 Thread Brian Machesney
I have a problem which, as far as I can tell, is unique to 17m operation.
Regardless of what I do with the PWR control, I can't get more than a few
watts out in either SSB mode (i.e., USB or LSB). I can get full power out by
switching to CW mode, transmitting a few characters, and returning to SSB
mode. The problem is NOT fixed if I simply switch to CW and back to SSB.

I am running firmware version 3.06.

73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 FW 3.03+ : scan item

2009-03-26 Thread Brian Machesney
I have run into an item - I won't call it a problem or bug because I
don't know that the function is not intended.

With the bands the way they are, I scan a lot. Of course, you have to load
the min and max scan frequencies by a M-V operation. But this doesn't work
unless VFO A and VFO B are already on the same band. Feature or issue?

Brian K1LI

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, wayne burdick n...@elecraft.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 The major features introduced in K3 beta revision 3.03 (DSP 2.10) have
 now had quite a bit of on-air time. Thanks to feedback from early
 adopters, we've just improved them further with the release of 3.04
 (DSP 2.11).

 These features are excellent additions to the K3 that you really should
 try:

 - Band independence for the sub receiver (CONFIG:VFO IND)
 - New AGC features, especially for use in pileups (CONFIG:AGC DCY, AGC
 HLD)
 - Fast-tuning spurious receive signal removal (CONFIG:SIG RMV)
 - Multiple ATU settings per band; per-band/per-antenna auto/bypass
 selection
 - Improved behavior of PTT and the TX LED
 - Extended transverter frequency coverage when used with a 10-m I.F.

 It's pretty easy to do a beta installation; see instructions at

  http://www.elecraft.com/K3/k3_software.htm

 Please let us know how the new features are working. Meanwhile, Lyle
 (KK7P) and I are working on the next round

 73,
 Wayne
 N6KR

 ---

 http://www.elecraft.com

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 digital mode audio input via LINE IN

2009-03-24 Thread Brian Machesney
I can't get the K3 to transmit using audio supplied to the LINE IN jack. I'm
working in DATA A mode. I CAN transmit with audio supplied to both the
front- and rear-panel MIC jacks. I have tried selecting the main MENU MIC
SEL = LINE IN as well as the MIC+LIN = ON setting, but no go. Any
suggestions as to what I've forgotten to set up?

73 -- Brian -- K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] How long to complete K3 master reset?

2009-03-23 Thread Brian Machesney
I pressed and held the K3 power switch until the MCU LD message appeared -
that was over a half-hour ago. How long should this take to complete?

Trying to solve the low sub RX audio problem.

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Low SubRX audio below 20m

2009-03-23 Thread Brian Machesney
Bob,

That fixed the problem. Thanks for the suggestion - the master reset is
always the last resort!

73 - Brian - K1LI

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Robert Ansell robert-ans...@msn.comwrote:

  Hi Brian, yes I've experienced this and for me the fix was to do a hard
 reset but do not under any circumstances upload your config settings. Mine
 were for some reason corrupted. I did this and balance returned to center!
 Make sure you copy down on paper all your settings and put them back by
 hand. I wrote them all down rebooted then got them all back with a recal on
 the rig and mine was fixed. Talked to Elecraft on this one so the info comes
 from them. don't forget to save everything when you are done. Just for
 giggles I assume that you did a double strike on transfering all from vfo a
 to vfo b RIGHT?

 Bob Ansell
 K1WGM

 - Original Message -
 *From:* nekvts...@gmail.com
 *To:* Elecraft reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:01 PM
 *Subject:* [Elecraft] Low SubRX audio below 20m

 On 30m and below, the sub RX audio is much lower in level than the main
 RX.
 I am set up to use the SUB audio control as the balance control
 between
 the main and SubRX audio levels (SPKRS: 2, SPKR+PH: no, SUB AF: balance).
 Both receivers get their RF from the main antenna. On 20m and above, this
 works fine - adjusting the control to the 12 o'clock position centers
 the
 stereo audio image between the two speakers. On 30m and below, however,
 the
 sub RX audio is much lower - the balance control is at about 3 o'clock
 (ie, injecting a much smaller amount of main RX audio) to center the
 stereo image. Thus, I have to ride this control when changing bands.

 I am using the latest public firmware revision, but I believe I have had

 this problem for some time. I did purchase matched filters for the main
 and sub RX's, and I have re-checked to ensure that they are set up with
 the
 same parameters. The state of the AFX control has no perceptible effect
 and
 I see that AF GAIN and AF LIM cannot be set differently for main and sub
 RX.

 Any thoughts on what is causing this? I don't see any previous mention in
 the reflector archives.

 Brian K1LI K3 #2435 -- K2 #2070 -- K1 #270
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 RTTY MODE

2009-03-23 Thread Brian Machesney
Don,

I am a digital mode neophyte. Is it possible - or, is it considered to be
too much of a kludge - to receive a digital mode (be it PSK or RTTY) via PC
soundcard and send CW to the K3 for translation into the digital mode? It
seems that this would avoid some of the pitfalls associated with using a PC
to generate radio quality audio. Do you know if any of the popular
programs does this?

Thanks,

Brian K1LI

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Dick,

 Rather than using SSB mode for data, use the DATA modes, it is less
 troublesome and compression is set to zero automatically..
 Use DATA A mode for soundcard digital modes, or AFSK A for soundcard
 RTTY.  See page 31 of the K3 manual.  With good carrier balance, an AFSK
 signal is equal to an FSK signal.  The K3 AFSK A data mode sets the mark
 frequency in the VFO (rather than the carrier frequency), and allows use
 of the dual passband filter which is designed for RTTY use.
 The narrow roofing filters and the full range of DSP filters can be used
 for DATA modes if you configure the narrow filters for receive in that
 mode.  Transmit must always use the 2.7 or 2.8 kHz filters, but the K3
 figures out the arithmetic involved.

 If you wish to use the FSK input to the K3, you will have to provide a
 level translation and drive the FSK input on the ACC connector.  MMTTY
 has methods of activating the FSK input.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 Richard W. Solomon wrote:
  Does anyone have any idea when they will upgrade to Keyboard operation
  for RTTY ? Now, I mean using real FSK, not this sound card AFSK stuff.
 
  In some radios, AFSK requires you to use the SSB mode, which does not
  allow filter selection. The Yaesu does.
 
  73, Dick, W1KSZ
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] So, anyone going to get more CW filtering?

2009-02-23 Thread Brian Machesney
I echo Dave's remarks, though I have the 8-pole 400Hz filter.

Being in VT made me the focus of several spot pileups, but I
experienced none of the desense issues that someone reported on the
reflector. There were numerous wide stations, which caused me to
tailor the RX EQ settings in an effort to further reduce the
audibility of their key clicks.

All in all I can say that the K3 (built in January) performed
flawlessly. The only item on my wish list is an outboard tuning device
to sit on the desk to the left of the keyboard (like my former Omni
VII). 48 hours is a long time to reach up to the rig (on a shelf at
eye level above the laptop screen) and the keyboard up/down arrow
facility isn't flexible enough (station spacing on the band is fairly
even, so you want to zip up the the next station and then slowly
tune it in). I can see that I'm going to wear out the paint above the
bezel where the fingers of my right hand rest while my thumb rotates
the dial.

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 sub-receiver usefulness?

2009-02-10 Thread Brian Machesney
Johnny,

The beautiful thing about Elecraft products is that you don't have to make
the final decision now. You can purchase the rig without the second receiver
and buy it when you figure what you need it for.

That said, I think the question you want to ask yourself is, What could I
do if I had *two* K3s?

I can scarcely think of a day that passes that I *don't* use the second
receiver. For example, at sunrise and sunset, I scan the 160m band with one
receiver and listen with the other receiver to see who comes back to the big
guns who are calling CQ. It's a great way to see where the band might be
open to and sometimes I can call the same stations a kc or two up and get a
reply. With the forthcoming band independence between the main and sub
receivers, I plan to enjoy a shortwave station on one receiver while I troll
a dead band for signs of life. Come on, sunspots!!

Perhaps the most common practice is listening to both a DX station and the
pileup at the same time. I became accustomed to this with my FT1KMP, but
lost the ability when I switched to my K2 for its more bullet proof receiver
and also missed it with my Ten Tec Omni VII. Since having it again in the
K3, I spend *a lot* less time trying to bust a pileup simply because I have
a lot better chance of putting my signal in a quieter spot where the DX will
hear it. Sure, you *can* sort of do this without the second receiver, but in
my experience not nearly as effectively. I plan to take this to the next
level and use the radio as a single-box SO2R in future contests - that
should be interesting!!
Like most engineering questions, the answer is, It depends. It depends on
what you want to do and what you're comfortable doing. I admit that after 40
years in the hobby, it has taken a little practice to integrate two K3s
into my operating style. Now I definitely would not want to do without it.

73,

Brian K1LI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3: USB Adapter cooked

2009-01-26 Thread Brian Machesney
Lee,

I usually have trouble with my DSL connection when I operate high power on
160 and 80, even though the antenna is 200 feet from the shack. I have been
attributing it to RF pickup by the long-ish phone lines and AC wiring in the
house.

This weekend, I had trouble with my amp, so I moved it onto the bench a few
feet away from the main operating position where I could observe it in
action. Surprisingly, the DSL connection worked flawlessly!! The only thing
that changed was the positioning of the cables from the rig to the amp and
from the amp to the window sash through which the cables exit.

The lesson I take from this is that there must be enough RF current on the
coax shields that they radiate enough to disrupt sensitive electronics.
Perhaps ferrites over the coax would prevent this happening to you again.

Brian K1LI

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Lee Buller k...@swbell.net wrote:


 Now, I know that there are some issues in my shack concerning my Inverted-L
 feed.  The feed point is less that 15 feet from the shack/rig/tuner/amp.
 All were grounded to a single point.  Still, the USB adapter cooked and I
 attribute this to high amounts of RF in the shack.  And, since I am not
 going have any more children...it seems that I just lost the USB adapter.

 This only happened on 160 meters.

 Any comments?

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Elecraft] ANT2 routing to KRX3 via KAT3

2009-01-20 Thread Brian Machesney
Pardon my density, but I can't figure out how to realize the function
depicted in figure 3 of the K3 Owner's Manual: routing a signal from the
ANT2 connector to the KRX3 through the KAT3. I don't see anything in the
FAQ. Can someone, please, tell me how to configure the rig so that K1 and K3
are properly actuated.

Thanks,

Brian K1LI
K1 # 270, K2 # 3070, K3 # 2465
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Elecraft] KRX3: configuration for second antenna routing

2009-01-20 Thread Brian Machesney
Pardon my density, but I can't figure out how to realize the function
depicted in figure 3 of the K3 Owner's Manual: routing a signal from the
ANT2 connector to the KRX3 through the KAT3. I don't see anything in the
FAQ. Can someone, please, tell me how to configure the rig so that K1 and K3
are properly actuated.

Thanks,

Brian K1LI
K1 # 270, K2 # 3070, K3 # 2465
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Re: [Elecraft] KRX3: configuration for second antenna routing

2009-01-20 Thread Brian Machesney
Don,

Thanks for the help, but I'm still not with you. I want to operate in SO2V
mode with the main and sub receivers on different bands using different
antennas connected to the ANT1 and ANT2 connectors.

I have the TMP cable connected between the KAT3 and the KRX3 input. The TMP
cable from the Aux RF BNC connector is present but insulated, per the manual
instructions, so it is inactive.

I want the input to the KRX3 to come from the ANT2 connector. What I need to
know is how to set the configuration options to make this happen. Obviously,
the KAT3 and KRX3 CONFIG menu options are set to something other than
notInst. The only options for the KRX3 are Ant-Atu and Ant=bnc. So, if
I have the KRX3 set to Ant=bnc and the KRX3 input coming from the KAT3, I
would expect the KRX3 input to come from the ANT2 connector - but it
doesn't; it still comes from the ANT1 connector.

What am I missing?

Brian K1LI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Re: [Elecraft] KRX3: configuration for second antenna routing

2009-01-20 Thread Brian Machesney
FOUND IT

In order for the KRX3 to get its input from the ANT2 connector, the KRX3
input must come from the KAT3 **AND** one must set the KRX3 to ANT2 using
the B_SET button.

Whew!!!

Brian K1LI

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Brian Machesney nekvts...@gmail.comwrote:

 Don,

 Thanks for the help, but I'm still not with you. I want to operate in SO2V
 mode with the main and sub receivers on different bands using different
 antennas connected to the ANT1 and ANT2 connectors.

 I have the TMP cable connected between the KAT3 and the KRX3 input. The TMP
 cable from the Aux RF BNC connector is present but insulated, per the manual
 instructions, so it is inactive.

 I want the input to the KRX3 to come from the ANT2 connector. What I need
 to know is how to set the configuration options to make this happen.
 Obviously, the KAT3 and KRX3 CONFIG menu options are set to something other
 than notInst. The only options for the KRX3 are Ant-Atu and Ant=bnc.
 So, if I have the KRX3 set to Ant=bnc and the KRX3 input coming from the
 KAT3, I would expect the KRX3 input to come from the ANT2 connector - but it
 doesn't; it still comes from the ANT1 connector.

 What am I missing?

 Brian K1LI

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Elecraft] KNB3 problems after KRX3 installation

2009-01-04 Thread Brian Machesney
After installing the KRX3 module, I get an ERR IF1 message when I
power the radio on (this is the only error message); the manual
indicates a problem with KNB3. Further, holding LEVEL produces IF
N/A in the VFO B area of the display (the DSP NB function appears
to operate correctly based on audible observations). The ERR IF1
message does not appear if the KNB3 is disabled via the CONFIG menu.

I took the following dianostic steps:

- Removed the KRX3 and set the KRX3 CONFIG value to not Inst, with no effect
- Removed and reseated the KNB3 on the RF board, with no effect
- Swapped the main KNB3 with the sub KNB3, with no effect

There does not appear to be any way to independently set the action of
the main and sub KNB3, so I can't use the sub for differential
diagnosis.

Any suggestions from the esteemed list?

I have K3 s/n 2435 with microcode version 2.67 firmware rev 5
installed today (4 Jan 09).

Regards,

Brian K1LI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com