Re: [Elecraft] Best Heil Element for K3
I use a Heil Proset Elite and I have had consistently good audio reports. It has more than adequate gain for the K-3. I have also used a Heil PR 40 to very good effect. As someone mentioned, neither of those microphones require bias and so it should be turned off. Bruce – W8FU > On Mar 22, 2015, at 8:48 PM, dave via Elecraft > wrote: > > > I have a new Heil ProSet 7 with the regular HC-7 element. A friend of mine > told me that that is the wrong element and that I should have gotten the IC > electret element. > In fact, he said that Elecraft recommends the IC element for the K3. Is this > true? What has been anyone's experience with the IC element and the K3? > Thanks, Dave, N8NB > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to bmcla...@bex.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - noise blanker works fine
Not only is the noise blanker outstanding but the noise reduction also works extremely well. It can significantly reduce the noise without major alterations in the audio unlike most other such circuits I have seen in other radios which either don't do much of anything or butcher the audio to the point where it is unrecognizable and not copyable. I think Elecraft really nailed these problems with the software which is probably the major reason why both tools works so well. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chad Wasinger Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:26 PM To: Bill Clarke; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - noise blanker works fine My two cents.. I find that I run in T1-7 for a lot of the power line noise I hear on 2 meters. Absolute fantastic job at removing the noise and not degrading the weak signal that is normally received on SSB nets 300-400 miles out. Every once in a while I engage the DSP NB on the first or second setting to remove some stranger noise. I would also vote that the K3 is the best transceiver I've ever owned at removing various types of noise you find across the band. What a great tool! > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:16:49 -0400 > From: b...@w2blc.net > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - noise blanker works fine > > Just had to mention that the K3's noise blanker set at t1-1 is > excellent for taking out a distant electric fence without causing any > apparent degradation to the received signal. It was a pleasant > surprise, as most noise blankers that I have experienced cause all kinds of receive problems. > > Bill W2BLC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500,KAT500 DOES NOT RESPOND TO K3
Could you be more specific as to what is and is not working? I have a k3 and a KPA 500 but not a KAT 500. The amplifier works perfectly with my K-3, using the AUX cable. I did have a problem at first which was entirely due to my own stupidity. The amplifier was factory assembled and I did not realize that it was shipped without fuses installed. Consequently when I first attempted to use it, it was deader than a doornail! After I finally remedied that problem everything worked perfectly. I assume your amplifier turns on but does not do anything when attached to the k3 but perhaps you could be a bit more specific about the problem. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Kenneth Hale Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:18 AM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500,KAT500 DOES NOT RESPOND TO K3 Importance: High Sensitivity: Confidential Received my new KOA500 AND KAT500 but have not been able to get either one to respond to the K3. The K3 was working great as a barefoot radio. Have tried to connect the system in about 5 different configurations as shown in the manuals that came with the amp and tuner. No response from the tuner or amp. Could some menu setting in the K3 be stopping the use of the KPA 500 and KAT500? Very confused at this point. Ken Hale KE5KNF __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] new KPA 500 question
I do think there is a different set of considerations when one is talking about making contacts under competitive conditions as opposed to daily, run-of-the-mill rag chewing. When conditions are poor, certainly an amplifier can be helpful even for rag chew contacts. But frankly, if 500 Watts won't do it for a rag chew contact, it probably isn't worth it to continue. Usually reception is so poor that it isn't much fun. But I do agree that legal limit operation can be very helpful if you are after some rare DX and you have lots of company to contend with. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of hawley, charles j jr Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:16 PM To: David Gilbert Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] new KPA 500 question Ok...I was a little hasty I think. I've never been a contester and didn't consider HAVING to make the contact in adverse conditions. Sent from my iPad Chuck, KE9UW (Jack for BMW motorcycles) On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:05 PM, "David Gilbert" wrote: > > I totally agree ... there is nothing clear about that path at all. 5 db is a HUGE difference if you're anywhere near the noise level on the other end, and it is a major difference if you're competing against other weak stations for a contact. Under the right circumstances even 2 db can make a significant difference. I urge anyone who doesn't believe me to check out: > > http://www.ab7e.com/weak_signal/mdd.html > > QRP is fun and I've done a lot of it myself, but saying that 5 to 7 db is not worth having in general is just nonsense. > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > > > On 12/18/2012 3:14 PM, Scott Manthe wrote: >> I hate to be a contrarian, but the path is not quite so clear. That 5 to 7 dB can be the difference between making a contact or not making a contact, especially on the low bands. We're not always talking about the difference between S9, plus 20 or 25, but the difference between S0 or S.5, or being an S unit above the noise. >> >> I currently don't have anything bigger than my KPA500 and I'm very happy with it, but anyone who says that 600 watts is always enough power doesn't try to work tough DX on 80 or 160m. A serious 160 op will tell you that 600 watts is often about 6 dB too little, sometimes more... >> >> 73, >> Scott, N9AA >> >> >> On 12/18/12 3:31 PM, Phil Hystad wrote: >>> I agree, the path is clear -- it is obvious --- sell the Commander as 5 to 7 dB is not worth having extra stuff around to fool with. As said by a person with a growing interest and desire for QRP contacts. >>> >>> 73, phil, K7PEH >>> >>> >>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:28 PM, "hawley, charles j jr" wrote: >>> If you are 20db over S9 with the KPA500, you can be 25 to 27db over S9 with the Commander in line. The path is clear... Sent from my iPad Chuck, KE9UW (Jack for BMW motorcycles) >> > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] new KPA 500 question
It's always interesting to see the various responses that are generated when one discusses power levels. I certainly agree that the difference between 500 Watts and 1500 Watts can make a difference under challenging band conditions, particularly on the lower bands such as 160 and 80 meters. But I don't use 160 and rarely do I use 80. If I am hot on the trail of "rare" DX, the higher power does sometimes make a difference in getting through large pileups. But for day-to-day operations I honestly don't think that the relatively small db difference between the two power levels is worth worrying about. I certainly don't plan To get rid of the Commander because it has its uses. But I am looking forward to the tight integration between the k3 and the KPA 500. I can just turn it on and it should be ready to go. There is no need to wait 3+ minutes for the 3CPX800 to warm up before being able to transmit. Often the DX station has disappeared by then. But I guess time will tell. I do thank everyone for their comments. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Scott Manthe Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 5:15 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] new KPA 500 question I hate to be a contrarian, but the path is not quite so clear. That 5 to 7 dB can be the difference between making a contact or not making a contact, especially on the low bands. We're not always talking about the difference between S9, plus 20 or 25, but the difference between S0 or S.5, or being an S unit above the noise. I currently don't have anything bigger than my KPA500 and I'm very happy with it, but anyone who says that 600 watts is always enough power doesn't try to work tough DX on 80 or 160m. A serious 160 op will tell you that 600 watts is often about 6 dB too little, sometimes more... 73, Scott, N9AA On 12/18/12 3:31 PM, Phil Hystad wrote: > I agree, the path is clear -- it is obvious --- sell the Commander as 5 to 7 dB is not worth having extra stuff around to fool with. As said by a person with a growing interest and desire for QRP contacts. > > 73, phil, K7PEH > > > On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:28 PM, "hawley, charles j jr" wrote: > >> If you are 20db over S9 with the KPA500, you can be 25 to 27db over S9 with the Commander in line. The path is clear... >> >> Sent from my iPad >> Chuck, KE9UW >> (Jack for BMW motorcycles) >> >> __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] new KPA 500 question
I finally succumbed to temptation and ordered a KPA 500 which will arrive tomorrow. This may be a question that can't be answered on this reflector but I thought I would try. I have an HF 2500 Commander, the Palstar version, which I have been using with the k3 and other radios. I am not sure about how I will integrate the KPA 500 into the station. I have been switching between three different radios and the Commander amplifier using a coax switch to switch the output of the various radios to the input of the Commander. I have been thinking about pulling the output of the k3, running it through the KPA 500 and then running the output of the KPA 500 to the coax switch. With that arrangement the switching would be exactly the same as before. However, I am a little concerned about running 500 Watts into the input Of the Commander even when that amplifier is turned off. I am wondering whether that might damage the input circuits Of the Commander. Does anyone have any suggestions. I should mention That the Commander works just fine with all of the radios but I wanted to complete the K line and experience integrated, completely automatic operation. The lower power from the KPA 500 should not make any significant difference for most contacts. I would appreciate any thoughts on the subject. Bruce-W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - getting a sub receiver - filter suggestions + dvr
I have duplicated the filters installed in the main receiver for my sub receiver. There are five filters in each. I really think it comes down to what you intend to use the sub receiver for. If you use it to check out another part of the band or another band altogether while working a Qso or simply listening to one portion of the band while wanting to check another band for activity, then I think the wider filters will suffice. I also think the narrower filters are more important for CW operation than they are for sideband, although, I realize opinions on that will vary. If you want to use the sub receiver during split operation then perhaps the filter selection becomes more critical. Perhaps you should consider one wide and one narrow filter to start with and then see how you use the sub receiver and whether or not that filter lineup is adequate. If you do not plan to do diversity reception I think you will find that the use of the sub receiver is relatively limited. But again, it depends on your operating habits and interests. As far as the DVR is concerned, I do have it installed in one of my k3s and I do have another DVR but I have never installed in the second k3. I am not a contester. I think it would be of most use for calling CQ or giving canned reports during a contest. Because I do not engage in that activity, it is of lesser importance to me. I do use the CW memories however. But they come with the radio. I can't answer the question of DVR versus another filter because that depends very much on your operating interests and habits. Perhaps it would be best for you to hold off considering that and just experiment with the operation of the new sub receiver. If it is configured in a way which satisfies your use and does the job to your satisfaction, then perhaps it is time to consider a DVR. But if you are bothered by any IMD in the second receiver and that is important to your operation, perhaps acquiring a suitable additional filter would be a better choice. I think you will need some operating experience with the new set up before you can decide that. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Joseph Carter Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 12:32 PM To: Elecraft Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - getting a sub receiver - filter suggestions + dvr Greeting all. Between my birthday and Christmas my wife has OK'd the purchase of the sub-receiver for my K3 (#6623). I have read the recommendations by Wayne on the order site and originally thought I would just duplicate the filters in the main receiver (2.7, 400, 200) as I do mostly CW and Data but I do enjoy casual SSB also. I note form Frank Cady's book that the primary reason for having the filters the same is diversity reception and that do not need to be the same. Right now finances only allow 2 additional filters. So I have been giving it some thought - would it be reasonable to put say a 1,0 filter and a 2.1 filter in the sub or perhaps match the 400 and add either a 1.0 or 2.1? I realize that my operating style influences this - I am not a contester - just enjoy casual operating and some DX. The other issue would be adding the DVR - I was thinking of getting it just because it looks like it is easiest to install it at the time of the subreceiver addition though I am not sure how much I would use it and if I don't get it - I can probably add one more filter. "Found" Elecraft last Spring - now have K3 and KX3 and love them and this reflector. Thanks es 73 de Joe, W9JC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 no microphone SSB output - new build
Did you turn the bias on? Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Stan AE7UT Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:54 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 no microphone SSB output - new build Just finished a K3 100 and the mic is not working. Red led lights with PTT Full 100 watt output with CW Test is off Using an MH2 that works FB with my K2 Mic BTN is on Front panel selected Rechecked TMP cables Reloaded firmware No error messages Any help? Thanks Stan. AE7UT -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-no-microphone-SSB-output-new-build-t p7563157.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 With W2IHY Equalizer
-Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 10:14 PM To: Roy Morris Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 With W2IHY Equalizer Roy, The Elecraft MD2 microphone has an electret element. I don't know about your Unknown brand MD-2 microphone. There are no dashes in Elecraft product designations (other than the N-Gen and 2T-Gen mini modules). If you really meant the Elecraft MD2, then you have a problem with your W2IHY setup - iot apparently does no provide for bias for the electret element. Too bad because W2IHY does offer an electret element that is supposed to be better than the Heil HC4/5 elements, and those elements do need bias voltage to operate properly. 73, Don W3FPR O7/20/2012 9:31 PM, Roy Morris wrote: > I would like to know if anyone is using the W2IHY 8 band equalizer with the > K2. If so, does it improve the audio? I am using the Elecraft Heil MD-2 > mic (with with the wind blast cover). My KSB2 has the 2.6Khz bandwidth. I > don't remember if the MD-2 is a dynamic or electret mic. The W2IHY is > currently jumpered for the GM-5 mic which makes me think the MD-2 is an > electret. I am not getting any audio with the MD-2 through the equalizer to > the K2. The MD-2 works fine directly into the K2. Roy W4WFB > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] [!! SPAM] k3 with the w2ihy audio gear
I have the eight band equalizer as well as the EQ plus which I use on occasion with the k3. I mainly use that gear with other radios. There is a rotary switch on the back of the EQ plus which allows me to switch the microphone quickly between any of three radios which are hooked to the unit. That makes it very convenient and I can use my Heil PR 40 with any of them. I normally use a Heil Pro headset with the k3 but either arrangement works very well. The EQ plus offers additional processing over and above what is available with the k3. I do use a slight amount of audio compression which is very effective and does not seem to cause the audio to deteriorate in any way. I do not use the noise gate because fortunately I don't need it in the shack. I also put a very slight amount of delay in the loop. It is not enough to be noticeable as a delay but it does seem to add a bit of presence to the audio. However, if it wasn't for the ease of switching the mike from one radio to another I probably would not bother with the IHY gear with the k3 because I do think the k3 offers more than enough control for most purposes. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Scott Dunlavey Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 12:09 PM To: elecraft Subject: [!! SPAM] [Elecraft] k3 with the w2ihy audio gear hello... general question to the group... has anyone have/had experience using the w2ihy audio gear with the K3... I see that the K3 has an EQ ... is it sufficient enough or just very basic??? scott w2ntv __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
I tend to 2nd that recommendation. I have both the P3 and a 2nd receiver in my K-3. I have the same filters for the sub receiver as the main receiver, although, I have never used diversity receive. I think the P3 is particularly helpful to check on band activity before you decide whether or not to switch to that band. For that, the 2nd receiver can obviously be useful. However, as far as actual operating is concerned. If I encounter a DX station using split I find that using RIT is sometimes quicker and faster than setting up a 2nd receiver and using split. Of course, if the split being used is wider than what is available with RIT then, of course you have no choice. All of this depends upon your operating habits. But I think it is a good idea to consider a P3 1st and then the 2nd receiver if you find that could be useful. By the way, I find the P3 much more useful than LP pan. It does not tie up the computer which I can then use for other things such as logging or station co ntrol. Part of that preference was caused by the fact that I did not make the If gain modification to my K-3 and so the LP display showed very low amplitude signals which were often not very useful. That of course was my fault. I find the P3 has enough gain that the if was not required. That is not an issue with newer K-3s which already have the higher gain Incorporated on the board. Bruce-W8FU On Jul 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Keith Heimbold wrote: > I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both > useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3 more than the second > receiver. > > One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is > super awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are sporadic. I wouldn't > operate 6m without it. I use the second receiver on 6m with my new SteppIR 6m > passive and my 6m stack because I can have the antennas pointed in different > directions which is super cool. If I had to choose between one or the other I > would go with the Panadapter or P3. > > Keith > AG6AZ > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Happy But Very Sad
I am very fortunate in that I have both a K3 and an FT 5000 MP. Both radios have their strong points and some weak points. But frankly I have never had a report of either splatter or key clicks from the K3. I run it with an amplifier at which time the K3 output is around 20 to 30 W. When I use it barefoot at 100 W it also seems very clean with no adverse reports. The FT 5000 certainly has a fine main receiver but the secondary receiver is not as good since it does not use the front end roofing filters. That is in contrast to the K3 whose secondary receiver is identical in performance to the main receiver. As for as I know, that is the only radio that offers that feature. Also, the K3 weighs only about 8 pounds as contrasted with 55 pounds for the FT 5000. Obviously, I will not be doing much traveling with the FT 5000. Someone mentioned what they perceived as inferior feel to the vfo on the K3. Again I must dispute that. It feels quite adequate to me. The FT 5000 vfo is very smooth but is also much more complex in its construction. It is also much easier to change the tuning rate on the K3 as compared to the FT 5000 where one must go into the menu system to do that. The K3 requires only a push of a button or two. I really think it is pointless to endlessly argue the finer points of either radio. They will appeal to different folks for different purposes. I think we are very fortunate to have them both available. Of course, Elecraft wins hands down for customer support. No one does that better than Elecraft. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Robert Vargas Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 7:14 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Happy But Very Sad Love my K3 as I know I will love my KX3 on order and I love Elecraft customer support and the fact that the owners stand behind their products and are real gentlemen. However, if I had $5K to spend and the difference between a fully loaded K3 and the FT-5000 was around $500-$700, I would blindly go with the FT-5000. The specs are close for me and I have operated the FT-5000 and believe that it also has a great receiver. The difference I believe lies in the construction/workmanship of both radios and I'm reminded about that every time I turn the K3 VFO. I believe that the KX3 pricing is more inline with what you are getting but the K3 is IMHO slightly overpriced for a kit. But, I then have to realize that someone has to pay for the magnificent intellectual work that Wayne and Eric have done in the development of the K3's firmware, and that is worth the money. I really look forward to better construction/workmanship for the K4... Robert, KP4Y From: Scott Manthe To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 6:54 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Happy But Very Sad I said the K3's transmitter was superior to the FT-5000, not perfect. The ARRL review lists the 3rd order TX IMD numbers at -30db for the 5000 and -29 dB for the K3, but those numbers alone don't tell the whole story. Take at look at the ARRL's phase noise numbers and spectral display characteristics for the FT-5000's transmitted signal and compare them to the K3 and then get back to us. To be fair, the K3 tested does seem to have an issue with inferior 9th order IMD numbers, though. These figures were without the FT-5000's processor turned on, which of course, dirties up the 5000's signal quite a bit, unless that "feature" has been fixed. If it has, many contesters will be tearing up, because that and the key clicks help FT5000 ops get higher scores. Re: your other post, my K3 is rated at 100 watts output, so I'm sure someone running one at 120 watts will notice that the performance does degrade. I find the slightly higher PS voltage an intriguing idea. The FT-5000 is a fine rig, and is fairly clean in class A mode, with the processor turned off, but most people don't run them that way. 73, Scott, N9AA On 6/22/12 5:48 PM, Adrian wrote: > K3 a superior transmitter in imd product results? Your kidding right? > Out in the real world the K3 has a bad rep for splatter and imd3 product. > See; > > http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php/topic,75182.0.html > > Those of us with K3's running 15v PS with heavy cable inputs, driving > clean amps escape the wrath of the imd police. > The 5000 is way better esp in class A operation. > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm P
Re: [Elecraft] odd symbol
On the contrary, I am certainly glad you did. This illustrates once again the wonderful cooperation and spirit of comradeship found on this forum. I don't know of many other groups that are as carrying and responsive. I thank you very much for the response. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of dm...@nexicom.net Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:04 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] odd symbol Holy Cow! we all answered at once! sorry Bruce didn't mean to clobber you. > > --- Original message --- > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] odd symbol > From: > To: > Date: Wednesday, 06/06/2012 3:00 PM > > > > > > David Moes > VE3DVY > > Hi Bruce if you are using SSB this means that you are in Extended > single sideband, a wider bandwidth ssb mode. > > To turn it off enter config and TX ESSB and tap 1 to toggle. > > > >> >> >> >> >> Recently I noticed a new symbol has appeared on the LCD of my K-3. It >> is a plus symbol + which is at the bottom right-hand side of the LCD. >> I don't recall seeing it there before now. Does anyone know what it >> means? And how I could remove it? It does not seem to have impacted >> the operation of the K-3 but since it is not something I have seen >> before I think I would rather see it disappear. I have looked through >> the owners manual but I can't seem to find any reference to it other >> than the page which shows all of the symbols that might appear on the >> LCD and it does appear to be in the lower right-hand corner. >> Unfortunately, I can't seem to find an explanation for it >> >> Bruce - W8FU >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] odd symbol
Ah ha! Yes, I am in ESSB. I never noticed that the symbol appeared when I turned it on and since that was quite a while ago I did not associate its appearance with the ESSB mode. I thank you so much for the information. It was beginning to bug me a little. Bruce-W9FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of dm...@nexicom.net Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:01 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] odd symbol David Moes VE3DVY Hi Bruce if you are using SSB this means that you are in Extended single sideband, a wider bandwidth ssb mode. To turn it off enter config and TX ESSB and tap 1 to toggle. > > > > Recently I noticed a new symbol has appeared on the LCD of my K-3. It > is a plus symbol + which is at the bottom right-hand side of the LCD. > I don't recall seeing it there before now. Does anyone know what it > means? And how I could remove it? It does not seem to have impacted > the operation of the K-3 but since it is not something I have seen > before I think I would rather see it disappear. I have looked through > the owners manual but I can't seem to find any reference to it other > than the page which shows all of the symbols that might appear on the > LCD and it does appear to be in the lower right-hand corner. > Unfortunately, I can't seem to find an explanation for it > > Bruce - W8FU > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] odd symbol
Recently I noticed a new symbol has appeared on the LCD of my K-3. It is a plus symbol + which is at the bottom right-hand side of the LCD. I don't recall seeing it there before now. Does anyone know what it means? And how I could remove it? It does not seem to have impacted the operation of the K-3 but since it is not something I have seen before I think I would rather see it disappear. I have looked through the owners manual but I can't seem to find any reference to it other than the page which shows all of the symbols that might appear on the LCD and it does appear to be in the lower right-hand corner. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find an explanation for it Bruce - W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] (no subject)
I just discovered that my P3 QSY knob no longer appears to work with the K-3. When I turn it the cursor does not move and the K-3 does not respond when I press the button. I reloaded the latest firmware but nothing changed. Anyone have any suggestions? Bruce - W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Dayton- new hf rigs?
I think it is a very bad idea. While it is certainly common practice to require an additional payment to continue to have access to updated software, if the radio becomes inoperable because the software is not updated, I think that would be totally unacceptable. The thought of a $6700 radio becoming a paperweight is not something I would endorse. I think there needs to be further discussion of exactly what all this means. I also suspect this entire idea may go over like a lead balloon. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary Gregory Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:13 PM To: Bill Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Dayton- new hf rigs? *Bill, You think that's a bad idea? In VK look what happens! ACMA Amateur ANNUAL licence fee: $65.00 Flex annual lic fee: $200.00 Hmmm...To be a licenced Ham in VK with a Flex radio will cost you $265.00 each and every year. For everything else there's Mastercard...Chuckle Regards, Gary * On 22 May 2012 04:21, Bill wrote: > Software annual fee??? Does this mean the radio will cease to operate > unless you continue to update the software? > > Sure hope this idea will not spread! > > Bill W2BLC > -- > IN GOD I TRUST (but, NOT a single politician) > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- Gary VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile Elecraft Equipment K3 #679, KPA-500 #018 Living the dream!!! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft KPA 1500 - What is next?
I may be wrong about this, but I seem to remember seeing a message several weeks ago that it was going to be released to beta testers very soon. I don't remember whether or not a projected sales date was mentioned but I would not be surprised if it was sometime within the next two or three months. In any event, it appears that it is definitely not vaporware and actually does exist in the flesh (or metal). Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of george fritkin Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft KPA 1500 - What is next? You are right. Anyway, I hope they skip the KPA1500 and work on a KPA5000 or KPA1 for us serious operators George, W6GF Love my two K3s From: W0UCE To: Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:28 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft KPA 1500 - What is next? Before Elecraft even considers or starts working on anything else new, I for one would be most grateful if the powers that be would release the KAT-500 to market or at least provide some reliable "take it to the bank" type information. At recent hamfest Elecraft booth duty individuals are saying is obviously fictional and whatever they think a prospective buyer wants to hear and they have nothing to back up what they are saying... When can we expect to receive some factual information about the KAT500? Jack __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Another great Elecraft story!
That has come to be expected service from Elecraft. Even if the radios were not very good, which they are, they would still be worth purchasing because of their outstanding customer service and support. Many of the other radio companies, if they responded at all, would undoubtedly say that they had never heard of that problem and thereby imply that you are either imagining it or the malfunction was entirely your fault. A number of years ago I had a problem with one of my other radios and when I contacted the manufacturer's service department I was told that the failure in question was impossible because they use only the best quality components! That was a lot of help. Congratulations on the new K3. I'm sure it will give you many hours of enjoyment. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John Veach Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:22 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Another great Elecraft story! I purchased and built my K3 sn #6226 a couple of weeks ago. Since that time I have added, one at a time, two more roofing filters in addition to the 2.7khz and one more that I got with the kit. Adding those two new filters a week or so apart apparently uncovered an issue with the latest version of the K3 utility program. When I moved the 2.7khz filter, each time the software wouldn't let me select SSB TX for the filter in its new slot. The radio button for apply, never activated. I had to go to the K3 and run config and change the SSB TX to the correct filter. I wrote an email to Elecraft K3 support to describe what I thought was either a software issue or a brain dump on my part. Gary forwarded my issue to Dick who I believe wrote the software for the K3 utility. After a number of emails back and forth, Dick asked me to forward my config file to him. I did so this morning and just got an email from him that he had uncovered the problem and fixed that particular line of code. He sent a new version of the K3 utility. Do you suppose that this would have happened in a few days with any if the IKY rigs? Doubtful. Probably not with our other American companies either but with Elecraft, a few emails, and the issue was resolved in roughly 24 hours. Kudos again to a great service company, never mind their superb gear! John KE4D __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 info ?
Contact the Elecraft web site at Elecraft.com. I believe they offer secure ordering. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gordan Hribar Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 4:55 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] P3 info ? Hi all, Would like order P3 can I get any advice.. e72x __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Windows XP
I also run both Windows 7 64 bit and XP. I agree that XP is still a very good operating system. About the only difference I have noticed is that Windows 7 boots up much faster. However, it is installed on a new computer which is much more powerful and so it is hard to tell whether the improved boot time is due to the operating system or the computers. Windows 7 does appear to be very stable and well behaved. Fortunately, I have avoided Vista after reading too many horror stories about it. Bruce- W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Robertson Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 8:23 AM To: Elecraft Subject: [Elecraft] Windows XP Everyone. Someone remarked Windows XP operating system was dead. I have to disagree. Though Windows XP is old it is still one of the most successful operating system that Microsoft came out with and is still supported with up-dates. I run both windows 7-64 and XP and both operating systems perform well. 73 Dave KD1NA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] changed behavior of the K-3 when switching to the 10 meter band
With the recent band opening on 10 meters I switched to that band for almost the first time with my K-3. Instead of showing 28.0 MHz it showed 30.0 MHz, in other words, beyond the top of the band. Is there a way to get it to land on 28.0 when switched to 10 meters? I thank you in advance for any advice. Bruce-W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Switch mode PSU
I have that power supply, in fact two of them, which I use with the K-3 and a Flex 5000. If it produces any noise I have never heard it. Both units have been very reliable and seem to work very well indeed. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Ferrington, M0XDF Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 6:43 AM To: m...@justfans.co.uk Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Switch mode PSU Iain, I use a Power Mite from Walters & Stanton when not in the shack - is very quiet, both physically and RF wise 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174, P3 #108, KX3 #??? -- It came to me that reform should begin at home, and since that day I have not had time to remake the world. -Will Durant, historian (1885-1981) On 10 Sep 2011, at 22:58, Iain Haywood wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had any bad experiences using a K3 and a switch mode PSU?. > The SEC-1223 looks great aware some can cause problems.. > They say 'Totally noise free', that's some claim.. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] RIBBON MICROPHONE
As the previous response indicated, there is no fundamental reason why you cannot use this microphone with the K3. However, as also indicated there are some drawbacks. As already mentioned, it appears this particular model does not have directional controls and so it will be bidirectional and sensitive to noise from the rear. And you should be aware that ribbon microphones are very sensitive to shock and vibration and can be easily damaged. They are also very sensitive to wind blasts, which if sufficient, can break the ribbon. And finally, they usually exhibit very strong proximity effects. You should be careful not to work too closely to this microphone or the bass response will be considerably enhanced which is not particularly helpful for SSB communication. I would work no closer than a foot from the microphone to avoid not only accentuating the base but also to prevent plosives or, as sometimes called, "P pops" which result from words having a P at the beginning and sometimes other letters such as B. In other words, a ribbon microphone should sound very nice if appropriate precautions are taken in its use. Bruce -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ed Stallman Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 12:47 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] RIBBON MICROPHONE Hello , I'm A new K3 user and I would like to be sure this Microphone will work with the K3 before placing my order ... Please have a look here http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/mxl-r144-ribbon-microphone I have friends using this Mic on other radio's without audio gear and they all sound very natural , Also will I be able to use the rear Mic Jack ? I'm hoping I can to help keep clutter from up front . Thanks Ed __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 alternating blinking red LEDs
I'm sure the reference level setting is why you don't see any signals as you have already surmised. As someone else mentioned I think the red blinking LED is normal. At least my PIII has a red blinking LED or two inside which I was a bit surprised to discover. I ate concluded it was probably trying to signal that it had found some rare DX or that the Elecraft monster was attempting to escape. One can't be too careful about things like that! Bruce-W8FU On Jul 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Andrew Moore wrote: > I was more concerned about the lack of signals showing up, but come to think > of it, maybe due to panic I didn't think to adjust the reference level. > > I'll check this when I get back home today. > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Bill W4ZV wrote: > >> >> Andrew Moore-3 wrote: >>> >>> Two LEDs inside my P3 are blinking, alternating, and my P3 shows no >>> signals. >>> >>> Ideas? >>> >> >> That's normal...don't worry about it. >> >> 73, Bill >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-alternating-blinking-red-LEDs-tp6606251p6606488.html >> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] What have I gotten myself into???
Everything will go just fine. As I'm sure you know, you should take your time and work slowly but carefully. I managed to build a K2/100 with a number of accessories over an approximately 2 month period. Everything worked well when it was finished. It is a lot of fun. Best of luck and I'm sure we'll have fun working you when it is finished. Bruce-W8FU On Jul 17, 2011, at 12:09 AM, David Dietrich wrote: > Hey all! > > As I am looking at all the documentation that goes along with my K2 (10W) and > it's options, I have to ask myself this question: What have I gotten myself > into??? I am not a novice kit builder...I have built a K1-4, two other > Wilderness Radio QRP radios (Wayne's early work), and some other station > gear. However, I think the K2 is by far the most complex kit build I will > ever do. I don't think anything else comes close to it except for the > Sienna. > > > Well, I know I can do this! It is going to be a lot of fun! I will be > snapping some pics of the build and posting them to my Facebook page. Since > I cannot attach files to these E-mails, I will attach the link to the photo > album for anyone who is interested once I start working on it hopefully > starting this week. > > 73, > > David, KC9EHQ > K2 s/n 7164 > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - 5553 Is on the air..!!
Well, congratulations. If you already owned a K3 I assume the new radio provided very few surprises. I also own two K3s but I am embarrassed to admit that both were factory assembled. I don't know why since I managed to build a K2/100 with most of the accessories without any problem. I am even more embarrassed to admit that I haven't even peeked under the hood of either radio and I really should do that. I have heard a rumor that they are driven by hamsters pedaling madly on wheels but I guess I can only dispel that by looking inside. Who knows. If I do that I may find that feeding them will even increase the performance further. Perhaps we will meet one day on the air but after this message I suspect if you hear my call sign you will probably just change bands! Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of William C. Johnson Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:09 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - 5553 Is on the air..!! Preach it brother, 10 hours to rf. Super product. 5545 is on the air. To quote another owner I am also learning to drive. I loved it with the HRD interface. Bill Johnson K7BRR K3 #5545 From: W4CCS To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 4:32 PM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - 5553 Is on the air..!! K3 5553 arrived about 24 hours ago.. Five hours last night and 3 today and she is on the air..!! What a joy to assemble the K3 and other Eklecraft equipment. Not a single thing was missing (actually had extra hardware it the kit), every test was successful and all calibration went without a hitch. The is my second K3.. The first was factory assembled and I really wanted to try building one. It was GREAT.. Thanks to all the team Elecraft for a wonderful product.. de W4CCS __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] GENERAL COMMENTS FROM WB8IDY
I couldn't agree with you more strongly. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brian McInerney Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:29 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] GENERAL COMMENTS FROM WB8IDY I usually don't comment on these types of forums, and invariably someone will find fault with your comments and take you to task. However; in spite of that I feel burden to share the following perspectives with this group. I have had 69 years of experience, many levels of electronic maintenance, from vacuum type electronics, in the 1950 through large scale integration using computers and digital logic. Through this time the following has happened to me. 1. I have seen the following go out of business - Heathkit, Collins, Drake, and many others. As companies grew larger, they forgot their roots and those things which made their product so great. 2. I have IC 821 that was a great radio. Company after 6years has decided not to support the radio can't get parts. Solution: Throw it way and buy another radio. The same manufacture has decided not to sell another produce last year because they new they had a lot of field problems because of the complaints of the customer. Their solution was to not support the radio any more. I ask you is that customer service ? We all now the answer. 3. Some manufactures have proprietary hardware chips and software. When you have problems and they have chosen at the corporate level not to support or move support services overseas to off shore companies, what happens. We have all had this happen to us with some computer companies. It is ex-asperating. I could go on, on and on, so here is my point. Elecraft Company is doing it right. Bring jobs back from over seas back to USA. Designing a great product. It appears they won't leave you in the dark. Your support and further purchases depend on your satisfaction. So lets continue to help support in all ways to make this company stay in business. Brian Mc Inerney WB8IDY CF 989-859-9374 -- Brian McInerney WB8IDY __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] K-3 turning on ESSB
I have decided to try ESSB with my K-3. I found the entry TX ESSB in the config menu and I set it for 3.5. However, the word off appeared at the left of those figures and it did not change no matter what bandwidth I set. I don't know whether that is correct or whether I have managed to put the radio in ESSB mode. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. The owner's manual seems to suggest that the word off should change to on after the bandwidth is adjusted. I don't know if that is correct, and if so, how I can do that. Rotating the VFO A knob changes the bandwidth but does nothing to change off to on. Rotating the VFO B knob causes it to go to another menu entry. Thanks in advance for the help. Bruce-W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 update?
I seem to remember that Elecraft said it was currently in field tests. I also think a possible February, 2011 date was mentioned as a sales target. I'm sure that is subject to revision, depending upon the outcome of the field tests as well as the usual hassle in setting up the new production line. But I believe it is definitely going to happen and not in the very distant future but not, unfortunately, in time for this Christmas. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of don Swetzig Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 10:14 AM To: John Fritze; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 update? If a KPA500 is going to happen I would like to know before I buy something else .qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Raves about the K3
Congratulations on your purchase of the K-3. I have two of them. Both are fully outfitted as well is a K2/100 which I built several years ago. The K-3s are simply outstanding. I just acquired a P3 41 of them and that works extremely well. I also have an FTDX 5000 MP. That is an excellent radio and as you mentioned it does have its strong points. Its main receiver is extremely good. But as you noted its second receiver is not as good. It does not use the roofing filters which are available to the main receiver and, unlike the main receiver its first IF is in the VHF region so that narrow crystal roofing filters would probably not be very effective. As you know, the story is quite different with the K-3. In fact, I am not aware of any other radio offering two receivers with identical, outstanding characteristics. And of course, the company is just outstanding to deal with. Not only are their products cutting edge but they know how to treat and deal with customers. I think that will certainly ensure a long and prosperous future for Elecraft. Incidentally, I was a member of AF Mars for many years but finally resigned about three years ago because of lack of activity on 1S1. Since I was discouraged from operating on nets with other modes, I just saw no reason to continue the activity. Bruce-W8FU and ex AFA1XD ---Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ed Cienki Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 12:43 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Raves about the K3 This is my first post to this reflector and would like to share some of my observations. First. I have a 4xxx series K3, built by Elecraft that is fully outfitted and filtered running LP-Pan, an EMU-0202 and a MicroHam Station Master. Second, I have been operating an IC-7700 for the past 2 yrs. That being said I have run both rigs side-by-side into a IC-PW1 and Palstar AT-Auto. I must say that each radio has its own benefits and is outstanding to operate, but here is where the K3 shines: 1. True dual VFO/dual receive; 2. Easy MARS modification (yes, I am a licensed AF MARS Operator); 3. IF out. LP-Pan and PowerSDR are outstanding; 4. ESSB - of course with the proper filtering being installed; 5. Tx Eq and Noise Gate - No out-board W2IHY EQ is needed (sorry Julius); 6. Light weight; 7. Unbelievable receive audio with the appropriate filtering; 8. Menu flexibility;and 9. Easy updating of firmware. Candidly, I still love and use the IC-7700, but more and more I am utilizing the K3. The K3 is an outstanding value and robust transceiver. As a separate matter (a bit of a rant here), and for example having seen the ARRL and Sherwood engineering reports regarding the FTDX-5000. We as hams are always in search of "nirvana". While I have heard the issues regarding the FTDX-5000 design that have not made the mainstream press, the issue here is not to bash Yaesu, but to congratulate and thank Wayne and Eric for the OUTSTANDING job, not only with the design and operation of the K3, but their support of the user group to identify issues and improvements and their outstanding customer support when you call them for assistance. Kudos to Elecraft. Best, 73, Ed, N2EAC Sent on the SprintR Now Network from my BlackBerryR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Is the P3 Now Shipping From Stock or Backordered?
I think it is virtually from stock at the present time. A week ago Friday I finally scratched the P3 itch I had been suffering from for some time and ordered a factory assembled unit. It arrived the following Wednesday via two day air. That means they either had one in stock or assembled it either the same day or the next day after my order. That's about the best service you can expect. Incidentally, I think you'll love it. It really works very well. About the only problem I've encountered so far is my cat who sits on the operating desk and observes the signals going up and down on the P3. I managed to catch him just before he was ready to lunge at the unit. Since he is a big cat I think he would have damaged it had a smashed into it. My life has definitely been complicated when operating CW with one hand and trying to restrain the cat with my other. About the only thing that appears to be missing from the P3 is CAT control which I clearly am in need of. A perusal of the owner's manual does not mention that. I guess it is time to evict him from the premises. Have a great trip for the contest. In view of the weather outside right now I wish I could join you. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Maass Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 2:09 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Is the P3 Now Shipping From Stock or Backordered? I'm thinking about getting one before my next trip to PJ2T for CQWW 160 CW in late January. 73, Jeff K8ND __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 and Palstar AT-AUTO
I use a Palstar auto tuner with My K-3. It works very well. Although I did order it with the Kenwood cable, shortly after I received it Palstar sent me a message saying that they had a batch of Kenwood cables which were miss-wired and that I should send it back for a replacement. However, I never did because I also use the tuner with other radios and the Kenwood cable would not work with them. Furthermore, I found that it was quite easy to simply hook it up with an RF cable and led it sample the signal and tune itself. I primarily use it on 80 meters with a G5RV antenna. It also works quite well on 40 with that antenna but I have a Mosley Pro 67B which I use on that and higher bands and it does not require a tuner. Unless you plan to buy a used tuner you will find that Palstar is not currently selling any. Apparently, they are coming out with a new model after the first of the year. From what I understand they had to stop selling the current model because of a dispute with the designer of the unit who has since left the company. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tommy Alderman Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 6:02 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and Palstar AT-AUTO Anyone using a Palstar AT-AUTO tuner with their K3? I'm considering purchasing one and would appreciate comments on how it's performing for you. Plus what type interface cable are you using? Thanks, Tom - W4BQF __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Down-conversion
I suspect it is going to become the standard for many if not most of the new radios. As soon as it became apparent that effective roofing filters can really improve the close in IMD performance, it seems as if a low first IF frequency has become almost mandatory. I note that the Orion and the new Yaesu FT 5000 both use down conversion for the first IF and, therefore, have effective narrow roofing filters. I wonder when, or if, ICOM and the others will follow suit. By the way, thank you so much for the new APF feature. I think that was something which was missing from the K-3 up until now. I have always found that filter to be helpful in trying to hear very weak CW signals, especially if the band is noisy. I have had good luck with it on my FT 1000D and I missed it on my K-3s. Fortunately it is no longer missing and already I found it to be very helpful. I guess I was lucky in that I really noticed no problems with version 2.17 but I'm glad to see the update to that which I have installed on one of my K-3s and it seems to be working very well. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Wayne Burdick Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:32 PM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Down-conversion __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 Feature Request - Stopping CW Memory Playback with PTT
On my K-3 touching the dit paddle will interrupt transmission of a CW message from memory. It reminds me quite a bit of the coastal stations when they used to send CW. Stations such as WCC would be sending their ID tapes and all of a sudden you heard a single dit and the tape would stop. The operator would send that dit when he heard a ship calling. My K-3 works in much the same fashion. If I am using QSK while sending a CW message from memory if IE or anything all I need to do is touch the dit paddle and my transmission stops. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 6:41 AM To: Brett Howard; Bob Naumann Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Andy Wood' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Feature Request - Stopping CW Memory Playback with PTT > While this is true I still feel that any KEY_IN source be it PTT or VOX > or the paddles it should interrupt the memory keyer. Makes total sense to me. Any call for another transmission source, VOX, PTT, external key line input, or paddles, should halt automatic transmissions. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Odd power/ALC problem
Tom: The other day I was in contact with Don, N4ZZ, and he was complaining about a drop in power output from the K-3 of approximately 50% on occasion, particularly when he was driving his amplifier. He was using the latest software version 3.79. Although it is not exactly the problem you have described it was a power output instability problem which had not been there before. I am currently using version 3.77. Although I downloaded 3.79, I decided to hold off installing it until more is known as to whether there is a problem or not with that version. I will say I've seen nothing with version 3.77. The power output seems quite stable. I don't know whether there is or is not a problem but I have seen several references to output power instability with the latest version. There may be something to this. Perhaps you could reload version 3.77 and see whether the problem persists. Happy Easter. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:35 AM To: d...@w3fpr.com Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Odd power/ALC problem I unloaded the firmware by going back to an earlier version. After seeing it worked "OK" on USB, I deleted the new files from the K3 utility, reloaded them in a new folder, and installed from that folder. The problem repeats. The problem seems to go away if I offset the SSB TX filter by -800 Hz. - Original Message - From: "Don Wilhelm" To: "Tom W8JI" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:45 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Odd power/ALC problem > Tom, > > Did you use K3 Utility in Advanced mode and check all the > boxes and click the box to load all checked items? Any > other method will not work because the K3 is already > loaded with the same level that you are trying to re-load. > > I believe the filter offset for LSB/USB is controlled in > the DSP code, so that must be force loaded to make any > change. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > Tom W8JI wrote: >> Already deleted the firmware from my computer and >> re-downloaded the firmware from the elecraft site fresh. >> No help. >> >> - Original Message - From: "Don Wilhelm" >> >> To: "Tom W8JI" >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:43 PM >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Odd power/ALC problem >> >> >>> Tom, >>> >>> I certainly don't know what is going on with your >>> problem, but since no one else has mentioned anything >>> like that and teh current firmware has been out for a >>> while, I would guess that you have a corrupt firmware >>> download. I would get a fresh copy from the Elecraft >>> website and re-load it. >>> No promises, but it certainly is worth a try. If that >>> does not fix it, a note th K3support is in order. >>> >>> 73, >>> Don W3FPR >>> >>> Tom W8JI wrote: I have an odd power and ALC problem. When I load the latest firmware into my K3, it nearly quits working on USB. The power output is very low with occasional high peaks. LSB remains good. If I offset the filter -800 Hz, USB starts working OK. If I make no other changes and go back to the older firmware, the problem goes away. Any ideas anyone? Tom __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2777 - Release Date: 03/29/10 02:32:00 >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.791 / Virus >> Database: 271.1.1/2777 - Release Date: 03/29/10 02:32:00 >> >> __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 power output on SSB
Don: For what it may be worth, I was in contact with Don, N4ZZ, the other day and he was complaining about a momentary, periodic drop in power output from the K-3 of approximately 50% while driving his amplifier. He was using the latest firmware version 3.79. He had not had that problem before. I had downloaded version 3.79 but have held off installing it until we see whether there is in fact a problem. I am using version 3.77 and the output is quite stable as it has been all along. I think I should mention I have seen one or two other references regarding similar problems from other posting as well. Although Don's problem is not exactly the same as Tom's it does mention unstable power output on sideband. Perhaps this warrants further investigation. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:34 AM To: Juha - oh6os Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 power output on SSB Juha, Tuning within any band will not reset the power output controls, however changing bands does reset it. As Joe has mentioned, do the power calibration, it will help. The power control mechanism does use the data obtained from the TX gain calibration, so yes they are related. 73, Don W3FPR Juha - oh6os wrote: > Not so good behavior on the contest, where is alltime tuning. > > juha - oh6os > > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] W9OY on P3
RF feedback was just one of a number of problems I encountered when setting up my Flex 5000. It turned out the RF was getting from the radio into the computer by way of the FireWire cable. Someone recommended that I purchase a cable from Granite Digital which I did and it completely cured the problem. The cable is expensive but it had double insulation and gold contact pins as well as ferrite cubes on both ends. Apparently, the FireWire cable supplied by Flex does not always work very well in some installations. One of the other issues which for a while masqueraded as an RF problem turned out to be caused by the fact that I had one buffer size set in the driver and a different buffer size in Power SDR. That is a no-no. After I corrected both issues I have had absolutely no problems with RF or RF like symptoms. Bruce-W8FU On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:17 PM, O. Johns wrote: > One problem with radios like the Flex hasn't been mentioned much. It is the > RF feedback problem. I have seen demos of the Flex in action, and > practically every cable in sight had to be loaded down with chokes to keep > the RF out of the transceiver control circuits. > > On the face of it, the P3 in its small metal box adjacent to the K3 should be > better isolated against RF feedback. I sure hope Elecraft is checking this > aspect closely. There are interconnects between K3 and P3. Are they > vulnerable? > > 73, > > Oliver > W6ODJ > > > On 19 Feb 2010, at 1:46 PM, Jack Smith wrote: > >> The graphics processor makes a big difference. I have several Dell >> SX-260 computers that run SDR programs painfully slow, despite 2 GB of >> RAM and 2.5 GHz CPU. >> >> It turns out that Dell's graphic processor has no dedicated memory but >> rather shares normal RAM. That creates a huge bottleneck when running a >> graphics intensive program such as all the SDR software. Some is >> slightly worse than other but they all bog way down on the SX-260 >> compared with a machine with a separate graphics card and memory. Same >> SDR program on the SX-260 may run 70% CPU but only 10% on a computer >> with a separate graphics card and memory, with similar CPU speed and RAM. >> >> Jack K8ZOA >> >> >> On 2/19/2010 4:18 PM, ab2tc wrote: >>> I would have agreed if Windows had offered developers an easy way of >>> prioritizing threads and processes. But as far as I know it doesn't (or >>> developers don't know how to use it). In my experience the performance of a >>> PC with 90% CPU load is miserable for all processes running on it. With that >>> said, I don't see why PowerSDR should incur that kind of CPU load on a 3GHz >>> machine. I am running XP home edition on a dual core Dell at 2.9GHz and 2Gb >>> of RAM. My CPU utilization is hovering between 15 and 30% with all of the >>> following running: >>> >>> LP-Bridge >>> HRD >>> PowerSDR with EMU-0202 sound card at 192ks/s >>> VE7CC cluster client (highly recommended) >>> Iexplore composing this message >>> Thunderbird mail client >>> DX Atlas >>> >>> I can add more applications and the CPU barely nudges upwards. I think most >>> people would agree that a car that has to be driven always with the >>> accelerator nearly to the metal is underpowered and not much of a joy. I am >>> a firmware developer and we always worry whenever the CPU utilization >>> exceeds 50% even though we use OS's that allow intelligent prioritization of >>> tasks. >>> >>> AB2TC - Knut >>> >>> >>> Al Lorona wrote: >>> Just a minor point: There might be a misconception that high CPU utilization means your computer is inadequate for the task. Actually, you want the CPU to work hard for you. It isn't only CPU you should worry about, it's what is called the 'run queue'. The run queue determines how long your job has to wait until it's serviced by the computer. It's okay to have 100% CPU (and in fact you want it) if you don't have to wait at all. A person assessing the performance of a computer looks at several other things besides CPU when determining what to tune for better performance. Don Wilhelm-4 wrote: > > I am using a 3.0 GHz Pentium 4 with 1 GB of RAM, running > WinXP Pro and the CPU utilization ranges from 50% to 90%, so anyone > thinking of choosing this alternative with a lesser computer had better > think about a new computer first. > >>> >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: ht
Re: [Elecraft] K3 & Competition
" I'm curious to see what this marriage to Motorola may mean as far as the ham radio division." Hmmm . . . and I thought that marriage was with Yaesu. I bet Kenwood would be surprised to hear of this. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Y. Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 7:31 AM To: S Sacco; Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 & Competition For several reasons I hope it's true, and not just "hamfest hype". I'm not looking for a replacement for my K3 or anything, but I would like to see Kenwood get back into the HF mix. They do make some good radios when they set their minds to it (I like my TS-480 for certain situations). There has been a lot of speculation about just where Kenwood is heading (some thought they were going out the door!), and I'm curious to see what this marriage to Motorola may mean as far as the ham radio division. As for them making something that really competes with the K3--I suppose they can come close, but I find it hard to imagine that they will nurture it, improve it, and provide anywhere close to the level of customer support that Elecraft does. I also saw a post (a couple of them actually) that said Ten-Tec was coming out with some software upgrades very soon for the Orions. This was more Orlando talk from their sales people. We've heard that many times before from Ten-Tec. They seem to routinely make these kinds of statements at Dayton and other places, then they get lockjaw immediately afterwards. Maybe it's true, but they have "cried wolf" so often, I'm hesitant to believe it until I see it. I have to bypass Dayton for the first time in several years--it directly conflicts with my daughter's graduation from Gonzaga Law School--she's in her mid 30's, so we've been waiting for this for a long time, and I'm very proud of her for sticking to her goals, as it wasn't easy! Anyway, I'll be watching the chatter over the internet from Dayton in May. A lot of rumors are starting to fly, but I wouldn't bet any large sums of money on very many of them, if any. Dave W7AQK - Original Message - From: "S Sacco" To: "Elecraft Reflector" Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 12:45 PM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 & Competition > While at the Orlando Hamcation, I stopped by the Kenwood booth. > > The sales dude mentioned that Kenwood would be introducing something > in the "K3 class, as far as performance, but better". > > I thought that was wonderful compliment for Elecraft, that they > specifically singled out the K3 as the benchmark. > > Who knows if it'll be better, or not. Radios are so much about the > software anymore, that without outstanding software controlling every > aspect of the radio, the hardware, no matter how good, just won't be > able to make up the difference. Personally, I'd put my money on > Elecraft. > > He also mentioned that they'd have a "big radio" (presumably > positioned against the FT-9000 / IC-7800) "sometime" in 2011. > > Anyway I thought I'd pass that along, FYI as they say. > > 73, > Steve > NN4X > EL98jh > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] What became of the Elecraft's KPA1500 and KPA 800
I believe a firm known as Dishtronic makes the Prometheus amplifier which has most of the characteristics you mention except it does not have a built-in antenna tuner. Unfortunately, its price range is from over $10,000 to more than $13,000, depending on which power supply you select for it, either a switching or analog supply. Of course, it is hardly a mass market item. Bruce-W8FU On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Greg wrote: > As far as I know, no one makes a full 1500 watt output, continuous-duty, no > time limit, "brick on the key" amplifier that covers 160-6 meters with full > QSK and "instant on". It would be nice to have a built in precision > wattmeter, too. > > I'm sure some would also like an auto-tuner, antenna switch w/ memories, > dummy load, monitor scope...etc. It could be "optioned" just like the K3 so > cost could be adjusted to the budget of the buyer... > > 73 de Greg-N4CC > > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of westa...@comcast.net > Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 2:13 PM > To: sr...@swbell.net > Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] What became of the Elecraft's KPA1500 and KPA 800 > > > > Frankly, It seems to me that good QRO amps are a glut on the market. (see > THP, etc.) > > To be competitive in that market, any Elecraft offering would have to be > highly > > innovative and I just don't see much more that can be done. > > > > IMHO > > > > Doug, W6JD > > K2 #1626 > > K3 #23 > - Original Message - > From: sr...@swbell.net > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:08:37 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] What became of the Elecraft's KPA1500 and KPA 800 > > YES! That is exactly the question I would like to ask. I very much > looked forward to the release a couple of years ago, and now you can't even > get a comment from Elecraft about the situation. > > IMO, QRO is much more important than all these trivial little toys > they are building now. I have a much more pressing need for a KPA- than > I do a panadapter (with limited features) and a wattmeter. I have a very > nice panadapter that has rig control from the computer, and it didn't cost > 700 bucks, and I can control it with the MOUSE. > > Wayne/Eric, how about some comments on this subject. At least tell > us what the future holds for the KPAs. I'm holding off buying a new amp till > > the KPAs are released. > > Stan Rife > W5EWA > > > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of DaveVK > Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:21 AM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] What became of the Elecraft's KPA1500 and KPA 800 > > > What happened to the Elecraft Amps? Did they get beyond 'proto: gee I want > one' stage? > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/What-became-of-the-Elecraft-s-KPA1500-and-KPA-800-tp452 > > 8292p4528292.html > Sent from the [OT] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2673 - Release Date: 02/07/10 > 01:22:00 > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please
Re: [Elecraft] P3 getting closer
It sounds like a P3 may be right up your alley . . . so to speak, Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob Tellefsen Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:19 PM To: Reflector Elecraft Subject: [Elecraft] P3 getting closer On Christmas Eve morning I bowled in a tournament, and won $45. Then today I bowled in another tournament and won $55. So now I'm $100 closer to a P3. I may have it paid for by the time it's released :-) 73, Bob N6WG The Little Station with Attitude __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] RJ-11 connector on bottom of the Front Panel
I have frequently read that the jack in question is strictly for factory production testing and has no use beyond that purpose. I know that in the past folks have speculated that perhaps it could be used for an external keyboard or some other accessory. Unfortunately, the Elecraft response has always been no it can't. Beyond that, it is a mystery. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brian Moran Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 5:50 PM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] RJ-11 connector on bottom of the Front Panel What signals are available on the RJ-11 connector on the bottom of the front panel? I see some lines on the schematic that indicate the data bus is available. Can the signals on the RJ-11 be controlled via macros, or can I cause a front-panel button to put something on those control lines without otherwise performing an in-radio operation? I have an external switching matrix for listening antennas that I'd like to control via the front-panel; I theorize that I could build something that snoops the data bus via the RJ11 and then use M1-M4 to control which RX antenna I'm listening to Brian N9ADG __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 Production Firmware Release (3.63)
I had no problem. The utility found it, downloaded it and fed it to the K3. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:42 PM To: Grant Youngman Cc: Reflector Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Production Firmware Release (3.63) 3.63.zip is still in the beta folder, where we first released it, and its also in the main /firmware folder that is automatically checked and downloaded by K3 Utility. n unzipping or other manual intervention is required when K3 Utility grabs it for you. The beta folder data will be removed soon, so the normal K3 Utility method is preferred. Note that we also provide a direct link to the /firmware ftp directory at the bottom of the K3 software page. I just checked that and it also has the correct 3.63 files. It is not necessary to get it via manual ftp or via your browser. K3 Utility should be able to get it and then download it directly to your K3. I saw that Don Wilhelm had success getting it with K3 Utility. Anyone else? 73, Eric Grant Youngman wrote: > Well, there's a link on the software page at the very bottom. There you will find a folder called "beta". Download the folder, or if you don't want the release notes, just download the zip file. Expand it. Browse to it in Utility and go for broke. > > I'm not sure why 3.63 is still in the "beta" folder, but that's where t'is at the moment :-) > > Grant/NQ5T > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Mike wrote: > > >> I can do that Grant. I'm unsure which files to download however. >> >> Mike >> >> __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net query
Unfortunately, I can't make either the present time or the suggested new times because of a part-time job I have on Saturday and Sunday. I would work from 4 PM to midnight Eastern time both days. I have been able to check in when I'm on an occasional vacation, but as I recall the last time I did so propagation was pretty bad. I think it's worth experimenting, least until a few more sunspots show up. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Rock Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:31 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net query Good Morning, I would like to ask if a time change is in order. I am thinking of moving both nets earlier due to the poor propagation we are experiencing. The current times are: Monday z (Sunday 4 PM PST) 14050 kHz Monday 0200z (Sunday 6 PM PST) 7045 kHz I am thinking of moving the 20 meter net to 2300z and the 40 meter net to z. This lets me eat dinner at the same time but both nets will be done. It also may allow folks further east to check in before they need to get to bed for their Monday appointment with work or school. I would like some comments on the proposal. This would be the new schedule if there is agreement: Sunday 2300z (Sunday 3 PM PST) 14050 kHz Monday z (Sunday 5 PM PST) 7045 kHz Thank you for your continued support and thank you to the Elecraft folks for letting us have our fun. 73, Kevin. KD5ONS - __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] What happened?
Well, here I go again with a probably stupid question but that is my nature. I happened to notice that the K-3 utility has a number of features grayed out including all of the configuration menu options. I can neither see what's on there or make any adjustments. I have the latest firmware installed and this is the first time I noticed that this has apparently changed. Has anybody else experienced this situation? Bruce-W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] To those that have the K2 and K3
I have a K2/100 and 2 K3s. They each have their place. I think it's a mistake to compare the two different radios because they were obviously intended for very different purposes. If I wanted a very portable CW rig which still offers me up to 100 W when needed and which also has some SSB capability, I think the K2 is certainly the ticket. But for kind contesting or serious DX chasing the K-3 is clearly the radio to use. I wouldn't for the world think of trying to make the K2 into a K-3 equivalent. It is what it is and what it does it does very well. I think a person contemplating purchasing a radio now should decide whether they would appreciate the kit building experience. I think there is something very satisfying in assembling a working radio from a large pile of parts. Putting together a K-3 from populated circuit boards is simply not the same experience. I know I purchased my K2/100 primarily for the kit building experience. I knew going into it that it was not perhaps as full-featured as some other radios but that was not why I wanted to buy it. I think I got what I was looking for. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of NZ0T Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 5:27 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] To those that have the K2 and K3 I built a K2/100 with every option except DSP and loved it. I planned to keep next to my K3 forever but I found that I was using the K2 less and less and favoring the K3 so I finally sold it. Wasn't easy as I had put so much into building it and the K2 is a great rig but it just didn't make sense to keep it if I wasn't using it. 73 Bill nz0t Ross Primrose wrote: > > Ted Roycraft wrote: >> Gary, >> >> I have both also and pretty much agree with what has been said. The >> only thing I can add is that the K2 has been capped and you can't expect >> much if anything in the way of new features from Elecraft while the K3 >> is under active development and there seems to be something new every >> couple of days. >> > It's even more difficult to choose if you don't currently have either > one. If you want a full-featured rig, the K2 is no bargain in comparison > to the K3. To equip a K2 so it's nearly equivalent to the base K3, it > comes in at only about $140 less than the K3. Like to work 6m? That's > another $400. Oops, now your K2 is $250 more than a K3, and still > doesn't have as good a receiver, IF DSP, excellent digital mode > support... Want AM or FM support? Not there, or even available on the > K2... > > 73, Ross N4RP > > -- > FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the > minimum transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired > communications.” > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/To-those-that-have-the-K2-and-K3-tp3947624p3948743.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Some P3 Details
Once again, I think you folks have a real winner. I am definitely going to watch the reflector and when the new unit is available I will pounce. It looks like it will have all of the features I have been looking for. Do you have any estimate yet as to when it might be available? Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Wayne Burdick Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 11:47 PM To: Brett Howard Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Some P3 Details Sent from my iPhone On Aug 15, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Brett Howard wrote: > Is there an ability for the K3 to display information on the P3 > screen? > Such that it may be used as a larger output for RTTY/CW/PSK decoded > information. This way one can not only see more text but also use > decode while seeing both VFO freqs. Definitely on our list. Wayne > > ~Brett (KC7OTG) > > On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 19:23 -0700, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> In answer to some of the questions heard at the hamfest and posted >> here: >> >> - the P3 can go left or right of the K3 >> >> - the screen refresh rate will be selectable; the prototype was >> running at about six times/second, but we hope to increase that to >> 20/ >> sec >> >> - there are eight programmable switch functions that could be used as >> instant K3 band selects and/or other K3 or P3 functions >> >> - it could be used with other rigs with only firmware changes, but we >> have no immediate plans in this regard >> >> 73, >> Wayne >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 Panadapter Sneak Peek this Saturday
Gosh, I wish I lived closer to Santa Barbara but 2500 miles is a bit too far for a weekend jaunt! It certainly sounds very exciting. I am looking forward to further details and developments as they occur and am very much interested in acquiring one when it becomes available. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Wayne Burdick Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:58 PM To: Dave - AB7E Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 Panadapter Sneak Peek this Saturday Dave - AB7E wrote: > 1. Does it have any kind of point/click capability for tuning the > K3 to a signal visible on the P3? Yes. > 2. Does it provide any capability to feed I/Q signals to a computer > for use by third party software (such as CW Skimmer). Not at present, but this might be accommodated by a change to the I/O board on the rear panel. 73, Wayne N6KR > Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 Panadapter Sneak Peek this Saturday > > We'll have a P3 Panadapter (or two) with us this weekend at the Santa > Barbara hamfest - www.elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 Info!
It sounds very exciting Wayne and something I am certainly going to be looking for. Of course, the display should be as detailed as possible, i.e. better than most of the displays found on radios that feature pan adapters. I don't think I need name them. I will say the panadapter for the flex radio is very nice, but of course it does run via the computer. I don't know whether it will be possible to have one as detailed as that but if it is it surely would be most useful. It also be nice if the K-3 could be controlled through the panadapter with some sort of point and click routine. I do think having an included power supply and speaker would be very useful. It would be easier to cart the whole thing off for work in the field as there would be no need for many boxes and many connecting wires. The idea of having an organic display is interesting -- perhaps it could then grow as needs change. Of course some means would have to be provided to control its growth as it would be rather disconcerting to come into the ham shack some evening to find that the pan adapter has grown to be 10 feet tall and 5 feet wide and is growling at you! Of course, perhaps your organic stuff would not have those characteristics. All joking aside, your ideas sound very exciting and I will look forward to see how they develop and mature. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug Person Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:07 PM To: Gordan Hribar Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Info! Wayne, I would vote for an included internal speaker since this would add minimal cost and make available an optional power supply. Doug -- K0DXV Gordan Hribar wrote: > From: wayne burdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: April 28, 2007 11:25:51 AM PDT > To: Elecraft Reflector > Subject: K3 and its future external panadapter > > Sometime in the future (give us at least six months!) we'll be > offering a very high-performance panadapter for the K3. Let's call it > a "P3" for now. The P3 will work with any radio that has an I.F. tap, > but it will be styled to match the K3. We're thinking 2/3rds of the > K3's width, but the same height and depth. It may have a speaker > and/or 20 A power supply. Your input on this would be very welcome. > Early on in the K3 design process, we decided not to include an > *internal* panadapter. Here's our reasoning: > - A panadapter takes up a *lot* of front-panel real-estate. So, if > you want to >keep the radio at compact desktop size, you have to displace a lot > of controls. >The displaced controls end up buried in menus or "soft keys," > making basic >radio operation much more difficult. The K3 has a menu for things > rarely used, >but since there's no huge display, we were able to put every > often-used control >at your fingertips, optimally placed with respect to the LCD. A > good example >is our filter passband graphic, which is centered directly above > the DSP controls. > - An internal panadapter adds a lot of cost. Many customers, we felt, > would >rather have such cost be optional. If you want a panadapter, you'll > be able >get our P3 and set it beside the rig. Then, if you want to grab > your K3 and head >for the hills, you can optionally leave the panadapter on the desk > (along with >its speaker and power supply). > > - Internal panadapters often have severe performance compromises. > There's at least one >very new radio on the market with a panadapter that takes over the > rig during sweeps. >Many of them are sluggish or have user-interface issues due to lack > of panel space. >Our external panadapter will be an entirely independent unit, so it > will not interfere >with radio use at all, either operationally or due to overloading > of controls. >That said, it will be highly integrated with, and controlled by, > the K3 (or >attached computer). > > - We may use a display technology that offers faster rewrite speeds > than you can get >in an inexpensive graphic LCD such as the type most often used for > internal panadapters. >With the panadapter in a separate enclosure, we'll be able to use > very fast logic, >and possibly an exotic display such as an OLED (organic LED), > without incurring >any RFI problems. > > 73, > Wayne > > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft
Re: [Elecraft] SDR-IQ users?
Start up SDR. Then push the setup button and the cat submenu button when it comes up. You'll then see a choice of which com port you wish to use along with the other parameters that are necessary to be set up. That should do the trick. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gregory Fischer Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 6:16 PM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: [Elecraft] SDR-IQ users? Looking for some assistance in setting up SDR-IQ. I ran the setup and connected the IQ and it is receiving sigs from the K3's IF. The problem is I cannot get it to communicate with the K3 to follow frequency changes from the radioor when clicking on a signal to have it change the radios frequency. I would have thought that after the setup I would find something for the SDR-IQ in the device manager but I don't.no com port setup for it or anything. Did I miss a step somewhere? THanks Greg AB7R __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] External speakers for K3?
Gosh, I have nothing very fancy. I have been quite pleased with a speaker I bought from RadioShack for about $20. It is slightly less than 1 foot high and perhaps 8 inches wide. It carries the brand name RCA on it. It's probably made somewhere in China. However, it does sound pretty good. On CW, I tend to use earphones as I like the closer coupling you can get. I'm sure there are many more "hi-fi" options available but honestly this speaker I have appears to reproduce most of the audio spectrum coming from the K-3. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of JIM DAVIS Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 6:13 PM To: Bill Maddock; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] External speakers for K3? On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:11:06 -0500 Bill Maddock wrote: > I would like to find or build an external speaker for my K3. I want something that sounds >good,will match closely and is realitively efficent like 92 db @ 1 watt/meter! -What is everyone >using? > Thanks and 73, > > Bill N4ZI K3 #1059 & K3 #2914 > __ Dear Bill, In my own "humble-opinion" the BEST ext. spkr for the K3 is one made by "SOUNDS SWEET" (Google it!) It may be a TAD larger than some would want by their rig BUT I assure you that the resulting audio to the "Human hard-drive" will be very sweet indeed!!! As I recall the retail price is now $109USD but well worth the investment!! Though it is a tad larger than most and heavier it's resulting audio output is FANTASTIC!!! Jim/nn6ee Concord, CA (Left-Coast!) __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Tubes for sale
Oh my gosh! I wonder how he plans to keep dust off the plates. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Wiley Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 4:08 PM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Tubes for sale You _really_ can't make this stuff up: http://hardocp.com/images/news/1237476767fPYMHIsYVF_1_1_l.gif This was forwarded to me by one of my friends at the ARRL. I thought you guys might enjoy it too. I'm still laughing. - Jim, KL7CC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] What is the status of Elecraft's power amps
The fish in question may be electric eels. Perhaps Elecraft is investigating new and innovative power sources for portable operation. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Darwin, Keith Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:22 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] What is the status of Elecraft's power amps -Original Message- We ... have other fish to fry. :-) 73, Eric WA6HHQ Elecraft -- Oooo, I love fish. This sounds promising. - Keith N1AS - - K3 711 - __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Help with calibrating reference oscillator
You might try clicking the fine/course button to the right of VFO A. See if that causes some of the decimal places to disappear from the display. If it does, continue to click the button until no more decimal places disappear. Now set the VFO to the desired reading. I will qualify the foregoing by stating that I did not build the K-3 but it really does sound like it is displaying the frequency to more decimal places than you need or want for this purpose. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dale Harding K7DNH Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:43 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] [K3] Help with calibrating reference oscillator Hi everyone - need some advice please - at the K3 kit build stage of calibrating the reference oscillator ( pg 50 of manual ) - once I get to config: REF CAL - the readout on the display is like 42. 487.043 - - and the reading from the frequency counter is 59.95 I need to adjust the VFO A to match the frequency counter - however turning the VFO it appears it is going to take me three weeks of turning to get to 59.95 - as it is moving in 00.000.001 increments - is there a way to speed up this process or have I done something wrong ( probably, as I have NEVER done anything like this in my life before! ) thanks for helping a newbie out. Dale - 73, Dale K7DNH -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Help-with-calibrating-reference-oscillator-tp2538815p25 38815.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3: Low audio on 10m FM transmit...
Low received audio on FM is often a sign of too narrow deviation. Check the config menu for the FM deviation I think it is shown as FM DEV but check page 58 in the manual. It should be set to four or even five. If it is a much lower than four that could be the source of your low received audio reports. Increasing the mic gain will ensure that whatever the maximum deviation is set for is achieved but it will not increase the deviation has that set point and only cause likely audio distortion. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of James Sarte Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 4:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Low audio on 10m FM transmit... Dear group, Can't seem to figure out what's going on here. Have the stock Elecraft MH-2 mic. According to other stations and through monitoring on an HT, my audio sounds very low. Increasing mic gain does nothing to change it. I normally set mic gain to around 4, but even when pushing it to 30, audio still sounds low at the receiving station. What am I missing here? 73, James KC2UEE (soon to be K3JPS) __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra
Congratulations James on your fine accomplishment. I hope to find you on the air one of these days very soon. Enjoy your new privileges. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of James Sarte Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 1:59 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra Hello fellow Elecrafters, Sorry for the OT post here guys, but I just wanted to share with you that I passed my element 4 exam today with flying colors. Hope to have my license info updated on the ULS within a few days! 73, James KC2UEE (soon to be K3JPS) __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Heil PR-781 and K3?
I believe you should check with Heil since I believe that microphone has a balanced output, it requires a special cable. If the microphone has a three pin XLR connector on the output, it is indeed a balanced circuit and needs a special cable. I use a PR 40 with my K-3. I believe the cable I bought from Heil is the same one you need for your microphone. I'm not sure what you would use a "trigger" for, except possibly to shoot the mike if it does not work well for you. As far as I know I have no trigger and no problem. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of James Sarte Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:40 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Heil PR-781 and K3? What do I need to interface this microphone to my K3? To my understanding, the K3 uses the same pin configuration as a Kenwood, so would all I need is this mic, a trigger, and a Heil Kenwood cable?? 73, James KC2UEE __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra
I couldn't agree with you more, Dick. What really impresses me is the number of obviously new extras I hear on the air sending very slow speed CW. It almost sounds like the old novice band. Obviously, they are learning CW, much like many of us learned CW by finding the courage to practice new found skills during on the air qsos. My hat is off to those operators. They are attempting to become proficient in CW not because they were required to but because they really want to. That is real motivation and they should be congratulated for it. Come on, the CW versus no CW war is long over. Times change. Need change. It's way past time for us to also change. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dick Dievendorff Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:39 PM To: 'Dick Grolleman'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra Since the code test is no longer administered, even if one were to request it, it's a bit of a flame-bait question. What choice would he have? He's accomplished a meaningful milestone. Congratulations! Dick, K6KR -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dick Grolleman Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:51 PM To: James Sarte; 'Mike B'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra Isn't that Extra-light? with no code? 73 de Dick PA3FQA, N7QA also Extra - Original Message - From: "James Sarte" To: "'Mike B'" ; Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:38 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for your email. Good deal on the brownie points! I however, even > as > a new Extra don't impress some of my colleagues at work. One of them is > the > station master for 4UN1UN (I work at the UN), so I have a lot to live up > too! > > 73, > James KC2UEE > > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike B > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 2:31 PM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Whaddayaknow... passed the Extra > > Congratulations, James! It's a definite accomplishment, and one to be > proud > of. > Heck, I even put it on my resume! (I found out after being hired in my > current > position that my boss is a Tech-class, so having an Extra-class was a > definite > brownie point.) > > 73, > > Mike > KW1ND > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] unlinking vfos
OK. I do thank you. I never linked them before. I must have held the button too long when turning on the sub receiver/ Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: Doug Joyce [mailto:d_jo...@sympatico.ca] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 12:43 AM To: Bruce McLaughlin; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] unlinking vfos Bruce: Assuming that you have a Sub Receiver, see page 37 in the Owner's Manual - Rev D1 under the section "Dedicated Sub Receiver Controls". Holding "SUB" will link / unlink the VFOs. 73, Doug, VE3MV K3/100 #2432 - Original Message - From: "Bruce McLaughlin" To: Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 12:15 AM Subject: [Elecraft] unlinking vfos > Somehow I managed to get my vfos linked in my K-3. Can anyone tell me how > to get them unlinked so that turning vfo A does not change vfo B? I don't > know how I managed to do that but I must have pressed the wrong button at > the right time. I haven't been able to find anything about it in the > manual. > > > Bruce-W8FU > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. We are a community of 5.9 million users fighting spam. SPAMfighter has removed 1012 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len The Professional version does not have this message __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] unlinking vfos
Thanks, Joe. Apparently I held the button too long when turning on the sub receiver. I learn something new each day about the radio! Bruce-W8fu -Original Message- From: Joe Subich, W4TV [mailto:li...@subich.com] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 12:39 AM To: 'Bruce McLaughlin'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [Elecraft] unlinking vfos Hold Sub > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bruce > McLaughlin > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 12:15 AM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] unlinking vfos > > > Somehow I managed to get my vfos linked in my K-3. Can > anyone tell me how to get them unlinked so that turning vfo A > does not change vfo B? I don't know how I managed to do that > but I must have pressed the wrong button at the right time. > I haven't been able to find anything about it in the manual. > > > Bruce-W8FU > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] unlinking vfos
Somehow I managed to get my vfos linked in my K-3. Can anyone tell me how to get them unlinked so that turning vfo A does not change vfo B? I don't know how I managed to do that but I must have pressed the wrong button at the right time. I haven't been able to find anything about it in the manual. Bruce-W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Suggestion for power supply
I have had good luck with the SEC 1223 which I use for both the K2/100 and the K3. I purchased from Amateur Electronic Supply. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Yves Dussault Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 11:54 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Suggestion for power supply I now have the spring fever for building...Thinking of putting the KPA100 together for my K2. Any suggestion for a suitable (cheap!) power supply? -- Yves Dussault-VE2ATD __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 configuration finalization plus diversity receive antenna question
Okay. You plan to use it on the HF bands and not the FM broadcast band. I guess I jumped to an unwarranted conclusion about that. I'm sure you will enjoy your new radio very much. I hope to hear you on the air in their future. Bruce-W8FU From: James Sarte [mailto:kc2...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:37 PM To: 'Bruce McLaughlin' Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 configuration finalization plus diversity receive antenna question Hi Bruce, No, the 13KHz filter will be used for AM SW/MW/LW reception, not FM on the sub. The other FM filter on the main will only be used for 10m FM TX/RX. Here's an excerpt from a conversation I had with another fellow regarding the use of FM filters for AM broadcast reception: > Just to make sure I understand you, the AM filter is only required if > one desires to transmit in AM or use ESSB. > Otherwise, AM reception like SW can still be piped through the 13KHz > FM filter? Correct, I use the FM filter for listening to AM broadcast or SWL on a fairly regular basis. > How does the audio of AM SW sound going through the FM filter? > Bandwidth is obviously wider, so I'm assuming higher fidelity? Somewhat higher fidelity. The K3's DSP has a fairly sharp cutoff at 4200 Hz so you will never get more than that but the FM filter allows the full 4.5 KHz where the AM filter starts to roll off at 3 KHz but still has some audio response down the filter skirts. I hope that someday Elecraft will "open up" the audio in AM so we can hear 5.5 or 6 KHz which as good as it gets these days. Hope that helps to clarify. 73, James KC2UEE _ From: Bruce McLaughlin [mailto:bmcla...@bex.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:27 PM To: 'James Sarte' Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 configuration finalization plus diversity receive antenna question That sounds like a well-rounded package, although, I'm a bit confused by your plan to use the FM filter on the sub receiver for broadcast reception. The K-3 will not go to the FM broadcast band and I don't think you can get there using a transverter either. Also, the 13 kHz roofing filter, and the DSP are not really wide enough for broadcast FM. The 15 kHz deviation is such that I think you will have considerable distortion on a system designed for a maximum of 5 kHz deviation if it is recognizable at all. I could be mistaken about that, but you may want to check with others. I also wonder if you could save a bit of money by having only one 13 kHz filter installed on the main receiver. Assuming it will work for FM broadcast reception, unless you plan to listen to FM broadcasts for long periods of time, I would think using the main receiver for that purpose would probably be sufficient. It also could be used for FM transmission on the ham bands. As I am sure you know, you cannot transmit using the sub receiver. I have 2 K3s. The older unit has an FM filter installed in the main receiver. The newest unit has no FM receiver filter since my use of FM is likely to be very limited and certainly not at all until 10 meters begins to work again. But your plans may be different and you may have different needs. Bruce-W8FU __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Calibration of KXV3 module
If you use a dummy load, you may wish to be certain it's okay for VHF. Some dummy loads which are primarily designed for HF frequencies become rather reactive on VHF. I think the length of the internal leads in the device had some inductance and/or capacitance to the mix and, therefore, below presented to the radio is no longer a pure resistance. Bruce-W8FU From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of James Sarte Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:53 PM To: 'Stephen Prior' Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Calibration of KXV3 module Hi Stephen, Yes, I'm familiar with 50 ohm BNC network terminators. This will work without issue and get me properly calibrated? Otherwise, I can always get an SO239 to BNC adapter and run a cable into my 300w 50 ohm dummy load. 73, James KC2UEE _ From: Stephen Prior [mailto:s...@sjprior.fsnet.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:05 PM To: James Sarte Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Calibration of KXV3 module James, It will only (possibly) be 50 ohms at the frequency for which the stubby antenna is designed, which will almost certainly not be the frequency coming out of the XVTR jack, so it won't work. I expect a 47 ohm resistor would be close enough, but ideal for this purpose would be a 50 ohm BNC termination that used to be used in pc networking if you are familiar with that. Otherwise a coax cable (via adaptors if necessary) from a good dummy load to the transverter terminal would be fine. Hope that helps Stephen G4SJP On 11/02/2009 21:26, "James Sarte" wrote: Dear group, Page 50 of the user manual states that a 50 ohm resistor should be attached to the XVTR OUT jack for calibration. If I don't have a resistor, can I use a 50 ohm BNC stubby HT antenna instead since output is only 1 mW? 73, James KC2UEE _ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 sub-receiver usefulness?
I don't believe anyone has answered your filter question yet. If you plan on listening to shortwave or FM on the sub receiver you will need appropriate filters for those modes installed on the sub receiver. If you wish to listen to shortwave on the sub receiver you should also have the general coverage filter installed there. If you are trying to listen to an AM station with the sub receiver but without an AM filter on that receiver it will use the 2.7 or 2.8 roofing filter and that will severely restrict the frequency response. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Iain MacDonnell - N6ML Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 2:12 PM To: d...@w3fpr.com Cc: James Sarte; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 sub-receiver usefulness? Don Wilhelm wrote: > James, > > You might want to reconsider whether you are listening to the SW > broadcast on the main or on the sub. The low pass filter will be on the > main antenna band selection, and if the subreceiver is attempting to > receive a signal above the main receiver frequency, you will see a > message flashed in the VFO B saying USE SUB RX. That is an indication > that the main RX LPF is attenuating the sub-rx signal. Actually the message is "USE AUX", which is the solution too. Connect a separate receiving antenna to the "AUX RF" input - or perhaps split your main antenna and send it to both inputs - and set the sub-RX to to use AUX. ~Iain / N6ML > If the main RX is at a higher frequency than the sub-rx, I do not > believe that is any problem, but when the situation is reversed, the LPF > will cut the response on the sub-rx. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > James Sarte wrote: >> Hello group, >> >> Someone mentioned in one of the reflector emails that the new firmware >> under development will allow independent band switching/monitoring >> between VFO's without a sub receiver. Am I correct in my understanding >> then that without a sub receiver, this firmware will allow tuning and >> monitoring of separate bands? If that is indeed the case, can someone >> please clarify for me how that can accomplished with a single receiver? >> >> On a separate note, apart from diversity receive, I'm curious to know >> how other people are utilizing their sub receiver? The reason I ask is >> I'm finalizing my purchase of a K3, and am trying to determine whether >> it's necessary to fully load up both receivers now. At this point, I'm >> ready to purchase 2 general coverage modules plus 2 each of the >> following filters: 250KHz, 400KHz, 2.8Khz, 6KHz, 13KHz. I'd like to >> have the ability to monitor PSK31, FM or SW broadcast on the sub, >> while monitoring phone or engaging in a phone QSO on the main; both >> receivers being on separate bands. That's just one example. Another >> could be to monitor SW broadcast on the main while listening to 10m FM >> on the sub. Do I need to install the AM or FM filters in the sub to >> monitor SW or FM or can the sub's DSP take care of it? >> >> 73, >> >> James KC2UEE >> >> > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] k3 transmit problem
The K-3 requires a microphone cable configured to the Kenwood standard. I'm not sure about the Omni, but my Orion II uses a Yaesu standard cable. You may want to check. I suspect the foster connector pins are miswired for the K-3. You may also want to be sure the bias is off as I believe that is probably a dynamic microphone element rather than an electret. You may also wish to check with Heil. I believe they sell an appropriate dongle for the pro set would work with the K-3. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of bill wade Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 3:26 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] k3 transmit problem Took delivery yesterday. all seems well so far except I can't transmit using a Heil pro set plus I was using on an Omni. Need help. Bill Wade Ai4pf __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] New Eham.net K3 review by QRPNEW
We are assuming he actually owns the radio. That may be unwarranted. It's obvious from the review that he does not much like the radio. I am curious about what is really going on. I recently purchased a radio accessory which will remain unnamed. I should have read some other reviews before I purchased it. Although I tend to take such reviews with a grain of salt. When they are universally bad as those were, perhaps there is something to them. In any case my experience with the item was such that the negative reviews were quickly confirmed. The unit is really total garbage. Even so, I fail to see the benefit in wasting any more time or energy. I guess that sometime you get champagne and sometime you come up with vinegar. But even vinegar has its good points. I've discovered the cat is having a ball playing with the unit which, for a cat, has an absolutely fascinating set of cables going into and out of the box! Bruce-W8FU From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:01 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Eham.net K3 review by QRPNEW Would you write a review like that if you were going to sell the radio? I think I'd wait until after I sold it. Pure BS. John k7up ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] New Eham.net K3 review by QRPNEW
You're absolutely right. It's really odd but his criticism of the small size of the K-3 would undoubtedly be one of the easiest things to change should the spirit move the company. I also own an Orion II. Opening the case of that radio is a revelation. It has lots of empty space. It is obvious it could have been packaged in a much smaller container. However, I'm sure the objective of the designers was to have a larger radio for those who want it. I ensure Elecraft could do the same thing -- repackage the existing electronics of the K-3 into a much larger box and shazam, we would have the K-4. I am not discounting the desires of some to have a physically larger radio with the same electrical performance of the K-3. But I don't think it is wise to forget what I'm sure was an important design criteria of the team which designed the radio -- make it as complete as possible in a small, portable container so it can be used in as many circumstances as possible. I also have an FT 1000D which has many desirable qualities, considering its age. But at 50+ pounds I guarantee it will not be going on many trips with me. That is in contrast to the K-3 which would travel very well with the possible problem that I might have trouble finding it in the car when I reach my destination. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ed Muns Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:44 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Eham.net K3 review by QRPNEW > I read the review, and while "QRPNEW" took a few unwarranted > pot shots at the K3, I also thought he made some interesting > and valid points. This "review" is either a joke or the creation of someone who doesn't understand the purpose of a HF transceiver. It was clear, just partway through, that this anonymous poster had zero credibility. > The gist of his comments is that the K3 > can't quite decide whether it wants to be a small portable > transceiver, or a full-sized full-featured base station > transceiver, and in trying to be both it falls short in > several respects. This statement is completely backwards. One of the incredible achievements of the K3 is that it is the most portable of serious HF transceivers AND it outperforms other HP transceivers in all the ways that matter. Yes, there are some specific situations and specific users for which the K3 is not perfect, but the radio hits the mark for the vast majority of diverse users. Ed - W0YK ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] New Eham.net K3 review by QRPNEW
One of the more amazing aspects of that review was his claim that he did not know the size of the K-3 before he ordered it. It's size is certainly not kept a secret. Apparently, he does not bother to read the literature before he buys something. That's incredible. As far as the performance aspects he mentions, I don't know what radio he was using (if in fact he was using a radio) but it certainly does not remotely resemble either of my K-3s. His comments about a perceived need to constantly re-center the roofing filters causes me to wonder whether he has any idea of what roofing filters are supposed to do or how they work. But mainly, I truly wonder if he is ever actually operated the K-3. While he was at it, I am rather surprised he did not give it a rating of 0/5 rather than the 3/5. His remarks are so foreign to what many other owners, the ARRL and Sherwood engineering, not forgetting W8JI have all noted with respect to the radio that one has to wonder about his motives in making the comments. Certainly, he is entitled to his opinion just as we are entitled to read it and forget it. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Julian, G4ILO Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:15 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] New Eham.net K3 review by QRPNEW I see that a new review of the K3 has appeared on Eham.net which will no doubt raise the hackles of the paid-up members of the Elecraft fan club, and cause nods of agreement from many others. http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673 - Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222. http://www.g4ilo.com/ G4ILO's Shack http://www.ham-directory.com/ Ham Directoryhttp://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html KComm for Elecraft K2 and K3 -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/New-Eham.net-K3-review-by-QRPNEW-tp2218086p2218086.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] New K3
There is some interaction between the mic gain and vox settings. You should be sure you have the mic gain properly set (not too low). Then with the vox gain brought up on the menu, slowly advance the gain until the vox reliably triggers. Of course, be sure you have enabled the bias. If you haven't, neither the vox nor the mike will work, assuming you have the Pro set with the IC element. Of course voice volume varies, but for what it is worth, I get very reliable vox triggering with the vox gain at about 9 or so. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob Cunnings Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:33 AM To: elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New K3 What VOX gain settings have you tried? Bob NW8L On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Mike, W9QS wrote: > I have a new K3/10 Serial Number 2547 and I love it. First contacts were during the Fox hunt last night. I only have one problem. I ordered the Heil proset and for some reason I can't get the SSB VOX to function. I must be missing something. Any ideas? > > 73,72 > > Mike, W9QS > EX: KN6TBP (1956), K1DGQ, DL4KM, K5LJN, W9FRR, W9KVF > > K2, OHR500, Norcal 20, SP1 > > Fists #12327, FP #268, OOTC #4423, QRPARCI #9521 > > > > ___ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] Condx
I did the same thing. 599 both ways on 20 CW. But conditions vary widely from day to day. Today 20 was pretty bad here in Ohio. Bruce- W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tony Morgan Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:56 PM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Condx Worked TS7C yesterday on 20 with the K3. 559 here in NV. 73, Tony W7GO Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote: > Hm, I was just about to ask the same thing- I can't even hear the W1AW > RTTY bulletin. I did have a bad coax connector yesterday. > > 73, doug > >From: "Gary Smith" >Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:07:55 -0500 >Content-description: Mail message body > >> Are the bands really this bad or is there something wrong with my K2? >> >> John >> AB8O > >I've tried three different radios in the last week to compare this K3 >with. > >The bands $&|< right now. > >Bad... > >Gary >KA1J > ___ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - key clicks on receive
I think Dave gave a very good suggestion. I do not have a problem with key clicks from nearby stations and that is one of the great improvements over my 756 Pro which is very sensitive to things like that. Unless the key click is already in the actual pass band I don't think you should be bothered by them. Bruce W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dave G4AON Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:12 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - key clicks on receive Check that you have the menu item "AGC PLS" set to "nor" (the default), the K3 AGC overreacts to electrical pulses (such as switching on a light) if that item is set to "OFF". The same might occur with stations radiating key clicks. 73 Dave, G4AON K3/100 #80 --- Has anyone else noticed the K3 seems very susceptible to received stations with key clicks? If the station is strong, I can hear the clicks 2 khz away even with the 400 hz filter in line and DSP even narrower. No help from NR or NB. No big deal, but I've noted this several times. 73, Lee (K9CM) ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] KX1 help
If it is a BNC connector, then obviously that is the connector to use. Unfortunately, I do not have that radio. The K2 does have the PL 259 type connection and so I apparently wrongly assumed so did the smaller radio. It was certainly never my intention to suggest that one used an improper connector and then convert to what is actually needed. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of W7BRS Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 2:38 PM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX1 help > [..] Solder the other end of the coax to > a PL 259 plug and you should be done. I believe the jack on the KXV1 is a BNC connector. Right? Not sure what the PL-259 gets you. Converting from PL-259 back to BNC is just another RF-speedbump. It might not matter though. I tend to try to avoid converting coax connectors and instead put on the connector for the application. On the coax, here's what I thought, but I could be mistaken: For portability I was going to mention RG-316, it's O.D is just less than 0.100" and therefore really light in the backpack, but the matched loss is substantially higher than other selections. I haven't tried RG-303 (Belden 84303) but the O.D. is only 0.170" and the matched loss is just a bit less than half of RG-316. (1.2 db at 10Mhz per 100ft, 4.1db at 100Mhz per 100ft) compared to RG316 (2.7db at 10Mhz at 100ft and 8.3 (wow) db at 100Mhz at 100ft). Your rig is going to be operating at frequencies lower than 20m so 1.2db at 10Mhz per 100ft would be ok with me, If you use a feedline that is 40ft or so or less from the portable antenna (backpacking situation) that would be just fine. There's other narrow O.D. coax listed in table 19.1 of the ARRL handbook, RG-400 also has a narrow O.D. and decent loss values. Just depends on how much weight you want to carry with you, availability of connectors for the various coax. If weight isn't an issue, I'd go with RG8-X to get started, not the absolute best coax but cheap and fairly good dB loss figures for the bands you can work with the rig you have. -jeff ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] KX1 help
Welcome to a very fine hobby Ed. As far as a power supply is concerned you didn't exactly specify what type of AC adapter you are planning on using, but if it is a wall wart, I would advise against it. Most of them have no voltage regulation and if the voltage swings high enough above 12 V you could damage your radio. Lack of recognition is also likely to result in chirp on your signal. I think a much better choice would be a small regulated power supply. I have an inexpensive one from RadioShack which I have had for years and has successfully powered a number of small items. An antenna is a simple thing to build and put up. I would suggest using something like 14 gauge copper coated wire. It's length can be determined by the formula 468/frequency, choosing a frequency somewhere in the middle of the CW band of interest. Once you have the overall length, simply cut the wire in two. You can use an insulator for the center of the antenna. Then attach the end of each dipole wire you just cut to each end of the insulator. Then solder the center conductor of your coax to one of those wires and the shield to the other wire. Solder the other end of the coax to a PL 259 plug and you should be done. After you have upon the antenna up in the air key up the rig and check the SWR if it is too high, that is above 2.0, choose a frequency near the bottom of the band and key the rig while looking at the SWR reading. Then move to the top of the CW band and key it again noting the reading. If the SWR reading is higher at the top of the band that was at the lower end, your dipole is too long. Trim off a few inches from both ends of the dipole, keeping the amount of trim the same, and take the reading again at a frequency in the middle of the CW band. If the SWR has improved you are on the right track. If it is at least below 1.5:1 you may wish to leave it at that. Achieving a 1.0:1 exact match is not all that important. However, if the SWR is still above 2.0:1 trim off a bit more from each end and see what happens. If the SWR reading at the bottom of the band is higher than the reading at the top of the band, your dipole is too short. If you wish to lower the SWR you will have to solder some wire of equal length to each end. That is not the best idea because you must be careful when attaching the lengths of wire to make a mechanically secure connection or the antenna is likely to come apart during the first windstorm. I forgot to mention that the ends of the dipole should be attached to insulators and then to a rope which you can use to secure the antenna to a convenient tree branch or other support. I suspect the foregoing was a lot more than you really wanted to hear, but I remember my first ham experiences when every bit of information I could get was helpful. You may wish to invest in an ARRL antenna book or handbook. Both have a wealth of information for the new ham as well as more experienced hands. Best of luck. I hope to hear you on the air soon. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Edward Doyle Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 12:58 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KX1 help Howdy, I am new to amateur radio and just upgraded to General a few months ago and have some basic questions on a power supply for the KX1 and how to make a wire antenna. I am going to add the auto tuner and the optional 80 and 30 meter board later. So as far as a power supply can I use an old AC adapter as long as it is within 8 to 14 VDC and if so how should it be connected to the connector for J1. Or would a commercial type application be a better choice. As far as the antenna is concerned what type of wire should be used and how is connected to the connector. I hope that as I start building my kit that these answers will be a little more obvious but I am trying to get as much information as I can before I start building. Thanks, Ed KE7HGA ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Re: [Elecraft] E-MU 0202 connections
I use it with the LP pan unit. What use are you contemplating for it? Bruce – W8FU From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Benson Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:57 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] E-MU 0202 connections Is anyone using this sound card? It appears to have a hi-Z RCA connection in addition to a 1/8" mic plug. What is the preferred hookup to the K3? K4GST ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Re: KBT3?
And certainly the per pound cost ratio would be improved! Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of WILLIS COOKE Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:29 PM To: wayne burdick Cc: Elecraft Reflector; DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL Subject: [Elecraft] Re: KBT3? Whatever you offer Wayne, be sure that it weighs at least 50 pounds. If you have to, ballast it with a couple of cement blocks. You need to accommodate the group that really wants a work out and would like a transceiver that functions as a barbell as well as a ham radio. Willis 'Cookie' Cooke K5EWJ --- On Sat, 1/3/09, wayne burdick wrote: > From: wayne burdick > Subject: KBT3? > To: wrco...@flash.net > Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" , "DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL" > Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 10:38 AM > WILLIS COOKE wrote: > > > Wayne, for those who complain that the K3 is not heavy > enough I > > suggest that you sell a battery box to attach to the > bottom with a 100 > > amp hour gel cell. That should make it heavy enough > to give anyone a > > hernia. > > This is left as an exercise for the reader :) > > OTOH, we could offer an internal Li-ion battery for the K3 > that would > be interchangeable with the KPA3 module. We could get about > 7 AH in > there, I bet. Built-in fast charger, charge monitoring at > the front > panel, separate fuse h nice for QRP > picnic-table outings. > > A fuel cell would be even more fun. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > --- > > http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] K4: serious challenge for the $10K toys
Of course there is a fast way of developing a big radio. Just take the current electronics and put them in a bigger case. My Orion II is a good example. There is a LOT of room inside. But a bigger case does not make a better radio in my opinion. As for the idea that a higher price indicates a better radio or an "institutional" quality radio, there is the Yaesu FT 9000 example. That very expensive rig is subject to recall to replace almost all of its innards and I don't believe that has been accomplished yet. So much for design reliability. I have no doubt that Elecraft could design a radio for the institutional market if it chose to do so but I'll bet that market has its problems as well. As for the 7800 that appears to be quite capable and I'm sure there are institutional users, but for critical missions, I bet the choice is more likely the radios from Rhode & Schwartz or Harris which are way beyond the price points we are accustomed to. By the way, commercial users tend to look for the lowest priced, dependable equipment which will get the job done. Globe Wireless uses TenTEC receivers for computer controlled, unmanned remote locations. If they weren't dependable 24/7 workers, I doubt they would be used. They are far from the most expensive but they apparently meet the needs. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth. net] On Behalf Of Johnny Siu Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 1:43 AM To: Elecraft Reflector; DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K4: serious challenge for the $10K toys Hello Doug, For the market of 10k and 15k rig, it has to be supported by a large institutional market which is the most profitable. The requirements from institutonal users could be different from hams. Durability, physcial strength and easiness of operation could be another areas to look into. I fully appreciate that Elecraft is a very clever manufacturing engineer and marketing manager. When you examine both K2 and K3, for all the non-essential parts (including the fat head and pan head cabinet screws), I am rude to say that they use the cheapest materials. For the T/R switch of KPA100, they only use the cheap IN4007 diodes for the switching (but works very well!!). On the other hand, for the criticial parts such as the front end of XV144 they use an excellent MOSFET. Elecraft is very clever in a way that they can mimize the production costs against performance. K2 and K3 are excellent in specifications but I doubt whether they can really operate under full institutional usage 7/24 a week. May be there is another version of K3 for institutional users which I don't know. I am an ICOM user as well. I understand that ICOM earns huge revenue from the institutional version of their IC7800, IC7700 and ICR9500. For a purchase of 10k or over, the prospective purchaser will look into other issues. For me, I would also think of resell value of my used gears if I invest 10k or more. May be I am lucky that in Hong Kong, all the top gears (except K3) are only 80% of the US prices. Therefore, when I sell my IC7800 or IC7700 in future, the loss to me could be minimal. With the clever minds in Elecraft, I think they have the capability and talent to enter the profitable institutional market. Perhaps, they may go for IPO in due course (of course not now) for funding. cheers, Johnny Siu VR2XMC --- 2009年1月3日 星期六，DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL ��道�s > 寄件人: DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL > 主�}: [Elecraft] K4: serious challenge for the $10K toys > 收件人: "Elecraft Reflector" > 日期: 2009 1 3 星期六 上午 10:57 > Hi Joe... > > Yes, I'm sure a K4 (or how about a K88 so the SE Asia > guys would buy > in big time) could be "easily" made. In fact, > for "that" group, it > might make sense to price it even higher than > "theirs"...say $15 or > $20k. You know, when you get into the upper tiers of any > market, it's > the HIGH PRICE that convinces folks that it's good. > And if it really > is good (as I'm sure the K88 would be), then bingo. > Tons of profit > marginwith a concomitant lower volume. It all balances > out. > > However, if you look at the track record of Elecraft, they > appear to > be very good at identifying very tiny niche markets > (although the K3 > seems to have a wide appeal...wider than expected?). > Somehow, > competing "head to head" with a "big" > radio doesn't seem to fit the > "Eric/Wayne" approach. > > As I recall (it's probably on their web site > somewhere), the K3 was > targeted to be a "high performance, very portable, > light weight" > radio...with some very neat features too. They have > certainly > achieved that. If I were them (which I am not), I'd be > focusing on > refining what I have (which they are obviously doing). It > is probably > just a matter of time before the FT9009 and IC7878 come > out, using > nearly identical receiver design approaches to those used > in the K3 > (and Orion). Citing my own previous post today
RE: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU
Unfortunately, using the utility program to restore the settings did not work. It was determined that the utility saved the code that had become corrupted. So we had to do it the hard way. Even so, using the utility for restoration of settings in most cases is a very good idea. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: O. Johns [mailto:ojo...@metacosmos.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 4:36 PM To: Bruce McLaughlin Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU Dear Bruce, The K3 is, among other things, a computer. So the computer rules apply: First turn it off, unplug it, count to 20, and turn it back on. If that fails, reset it. The reset routine is on page 61 of the Owner's Manual (it's called Parameter Initialization). Before trouble occurs (i.e. NOW), be sure to back it up (another computer rule) by saving the configuration using the K3 Utility and your computer. Then after you reset it, you can restore the configuration you worked so hard to get right. --Oliver Johns, W6ODJ On 30 Dec 2008, at 6:33 AM, Bruce McLaughlin wrote: > I believe the digital gods like to toy with us. My K-3 has largely > behaved > itself but several weeks ago it suddenly stopped producing RF when > tune was > pressed. Turning it on and off, etc., did not entice it to work. It > however was working in all other respects, including producing RF > when keyed > with the paddle. I finally gave up and called Elecraft. After a > bit of > inquiry it was determined that somehow a "bit flipped in the code." > After a > reset and a manual reentry of the various menu settings everything > worked > fine and has continued to do so. As far as I know, nothing unusual > had > occurred before that situation developed. In any event, I am glad > your K-3 > is working again. > > Bruce-W8FU > > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dave Yarnes > Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 6:44 AM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU > > Hi All, > > When I went to bed last night, everything was A O K. This morning, > I turned > > on the K3, and got an error message--no ATU! Sure enough, the ATU > would not > > trigger. K3 menu is set for ATU, and cycling the power on and off a > few > times didn't seem to help. However, perserverance wins, and finally > a cycle > > of power on and off restored the ATU! Go figure! ATU now seems to be > functioning O.K. > > These microprocessors are indeed confounding devices. I don't know > if I > have something to worry about or not, but it concerns me since I've > never > received an error message like that--at least not since I got the K3 > properly up and running. I hope this radio isn't going to get cranky! > > Dave W7AQK > > > ___ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > ___ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] OT: 3L rotating 160m yagi
I can only imagine the size of the rotator needed to move that monster! I suppose it's only a matter of time before someone put something like that up in the USA. I'll bet the restrictive covenant writers blow a gasket when they hear about something like that. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Vic K2VCO Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:10 PM To: Tom Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3L rotating 160m yagi Tom wrote: > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:20:58 -0500, you wrote: > >> I bet this will add some punch to your Top Band QRP signal. >> >> http://www.ok1rr.com/news.php >> >> Scroll down a bit. It is difficult to imagine the scale, so read a >> little about it. >> >> de Doug KR2Q > [snip] > > That's insane! > > And... I'm insanely jealous! Actually, I am pleased. At last I will be able to work Europe on 160! -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Preliminary Elecraft CW Net Report for December 28th & 29th, 2008
Gosh, you certainly have been having a hard time. Several years ago we had a bad storm around here and I had no electricity for slightly less than 24 hours but that was more than enough! The temperature inside the house got down to 38° and I was seriously considering a bailout to a Red Cross shelter. I can't imagine how bad things would get without electricity for as long a time as your outage has lasted. I sure hope they get things fixed for you very shortly. As far as having the road plowed, have you considered bribery? Only joshing of course. I tried to check into both the 20 and 40 meter nets last Sunday. 20 meters was totally dead here. I managed to snag a couple of fairly weak 40 meter contacts but heard nothing else. I don't think band conditions were very good that evening, at least around here. I will have another go at it next week. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Rock Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 10:02 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Preliminary Elecraft CW Net Report for December 28th & 29th, 2008 Good Evening, I am still without power but ran both nets from my battery bank of four Trojan T-105s linked in series parallel. Luckily I had them charged the day the power went out (Wednesday) and they are still over 12 volts. According to West Oregon Electric Cooperative the repair crew is only a few miles away working on the last feeder line up to me. I know there are a few more breaks between there and me so I expect to be awakened when a few lights and the fans come on during the middle of the night. All I can say is hot running water is the most valuable luxury in the world :) Luckily power got to the lower parts of the mountain yesterday so I am able to use the telephone. I have worked through many county agencies including the sheriff and fire departments but the one I need the most is not answering. I need them to plow the current five feet of snow off the road. Then I can resupply for the next power outage. It would sure be nice to see another human being again too! I have not seen anyone since last Saturday when there was a break in the storm. I am starting to get just a little stir crazy :) But, to get back to net news, I was running my rig at 50 watts today into an artificially lowered G5RV. One of my antennas got snapped right at the feedline connection to the doublet. The other, the one I am currently using, was lowered about twenty feet by what I think is the same branch which took out the other one. However, it tunes nicely. But then so did the coax stub left from the other antenna :) I just receive and transmit so much better with the unbroken one ;) The twenty meter net went swimmingly. There were a dozen check ins. Plus, we got the very rare AC7AC. He needs to keep his K3 in one piece for longer than 30 minutes at a time. Ron, maybe we need to hide your tools and put you on emergency power. That way you would be forced to use your radio more than you tear down and rebuild it! I am glad you weathered the storms off the Pacific. Once the snow melts off up here this will only be a memory. Well, except for the folks in Vernonia. They are sweating out another flood. All of my many feet of snow melts into the Nehalem River watershed which flows right through their town. Thus, what is good for me is bad for them. Enough already and on with the lists => On 14050 kHz at 2300z: W0CZ - Ken - ND - K3 W0JFR - John - CO - K3 W1TF - Ty - GA - K3 WC7S - Dale - WY - K2 NO2D - Pete - CO - K3 - 2126 JH1VIG - Kaz - Japan (near Tokyo) K6DGW - Fred - CA - K3 AC7AC - Ron - OR - K3 VE7XF - Ralph W6ZH - Pete - CA - rig unknown :) K6PJV - Dale - CA - K3 N0AR - Scott - MN - K2 On 7045 kHz at 0200z: WC7S - Dale - WY - K2 W7SF W0JFR - John - CO - K3 Since I cannot boot the regular computer which holds the database I cannot give all of the information necessary to complete this report. When West Oregon Electric is kind enough to give me back AC power I will rewrite this report with the blanks filled in. Currenty I am running my laptop through an inverter hooked to my battery bank. I am very happy the phones are working again; it is very nice to hear people talking. I was able to check into the ECOM nets and hear about the local emergencies and could have helped if only to relay traffic. But, now the police, fire, road crews, and power company all know I work with ECOM and train people in ECOM methods. I set up the folks at West Oregon Electric with www.qrz.com and a list of call signs so they can find the local amateurs they need to assist them during power outages. They were most grateful. I need to work on my antennas though but luckily the VHF/UHF antennas have weathered the various storms much better than the HF antennas ever have. My J-pole, my
RE: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU
Ah ha, that must have been it or possibly, ET played with it when he was here! Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Harris Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:05 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU Cosmic rays. Regards, Mike VP8NO - Original Message - From: "Bruce McLaughlin" To: "'Dave Yarnes'" ; Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 11:33 AM Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU |I believe the digital gods like to toy with us. My K-3 has largely behaved | itself but several weeks ago it suddenly stopped producing RF when tune was | pressed. Turning it on and off, etc., did not entice it to work. It | however was working in all other respects, including producing RF when keyed | with the paddle. I finally gave up and called Elecraft. After a bit of | inquiry it was determined that somehow a "bit flipped in the code." After a | reset and a manual reentry of the various menu settings everything worked | fine and has continued to do so. As far as I know, nothing unusual had | occurred before that situation developed. In any event, I am glad your K-3 | is working again. | | Bruce-W8FU ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] K3 drift
I have noticed no drift with my K-3. I would think that if the ambient temperature did have any effect it would have to be a lot colder than 55. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of steven.zabarn...@notes.udayton.edu Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:16 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 drift During the past week I have noticed my K3 drifting during the first 20 seconds after power up. I hadn’t noticed this previously in my three month old K3 (SN 1672), so I’m wondering if this is normal? With winter here it is colder in my basement shack (maybe down 55 F), so perhaps that could explain the drift. I haven't measured the drift, but definitely have not noticed it in the past. Does anyone else observe this drift? Is this normal during warmup? Steve N9SZ ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU
I believe the digital gods like to toy with us. My K-3 has largely behaved itself but several weeks ago it suddenly stopped producing RF when tune was pressed. Turning it on and off, etc., did not entice it to work. It however was working in all other respects, including producing RF when keyed with the paddle. I finally gave up and called Elecraft. After a bit of inquiry it was determined that somehow a "bit flipped in the code." After a reset and a manual reentry of the various menu settings everything worked fine and has continued to do so. As far as I know, nothing unusual had occurred before that situation developed. In any event, I am glad your K-3 is working again. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dave Yarnes Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 6:44 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Woke Up With A Headache--No K3 ATU Hi All, When I went to bed last night, everything was A O K. This morning, I turned on the K3, and got an error message--no ATU! Sure enough, the ATU would not trigger. K3 menu is set for ATU, and cycling the power on and off a few times didn't seem to help. However, perserverance wins, and finally a cycle of power on and off restored the ATU! Go figure! ATU now seems to be functioning O.K. These microprocessors are indeed confounding devices. I don't know if I have something to worry about or not, but it concerns me since I've never received an error message like that--at least not since I got the K3 properly up and running. I hope this radio isn't going to get cranky! Dave W7AQK ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Re: Automatic diversity configuration
Wayne, you folks think of everything! Being able to use split in diversity mode is neat. Best wishes for the coming new year to all the folks at Elecraft. Bruce W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of wayne burdick Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 6:07 PM To: joachim.groe...@ewetel.net Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Re: Automatic diversity configuration Joachim wrote: > I've just installed MCU 2.76 and find that the diversity auto config > no longer works. Anyone else notice this? Hi Joachim, I just tested this and it appears to be working. What you may be noticing is that in diversity mode (*long* hold of SUB), VFO B is no longer linked to VFO A. In recent revisions, VFO A still controls both synthesizers, but VFO B is left independent so it can be used for SPLIT with diversity (i.e., as the transmit frequency). You'll also notice that in diversity mode, the VFO A kHz decimal point flashes as a reminder. If you link the VFOs (normal hold of SUB), the VFO B kHz decimal point flashes. In fact you can still link VFO B to VFO A if desired, even in diversity mode, but more likely you'll leave VFO B free to use for split. One other change in the most recent revision is that PRE and ATTN are independent for the main and sub receivers. Use BSET to set up the sub receiver's PRE and ATTN. 73, Wayne N6KR --- http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] TO ALL!
Welcome to the reflector Jim. There are a number of very knowledgeable (unfortunately, I am not one of them) nice folks on this reflector and they are an excellent resource, especially for a new K-3 owner. I know I have learned a lot by just watching the messages. I also own Orion II as well as a K-3. The Orion is a good radio but as you probably know, and it is way past due for a firmware upgrade. That is not the case with Elecraft. As you will surely find out if you have not already, firmware upgrades are very frequent for the K-3, either to fix problems or to add new features, many of which have been requested by owners. And unlike the TenTec reflector, the company and its owners are active participants and thereby have a very good idea of what is going on with the user population. I believe you have made an excellent choice in choosing a K-3. As you discover new features I think you'll be even more amazed by what it can do. I have no ownership interest in the company but I have been so impressed that I recently ordered a second one to keep the first one company in the shack. Hope to hear you on the air soon. Best wishes for the new year and again, welcome to the group. Bruce=W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of JIM DAVIS Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:15 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] TO ALL! Gentlemen, I just recently bought a new "K3" and all that I've got to say about it presently is that it's a FABULOUS MACHINE!!! Eventhough for over 7yrs. I'd been an owner of the "TenTec Orion" the K3 definitely has the EDGE as far as overall performance is concerned. The "learning-curve" for the K3 is substantial but the end results are well worth the effort! So if I ask any "dumb-questions out here PLEASE be patient! :-))) Regards ALL & a VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! JIM/NN6EE Concord, Ca. PS, From the time that I ordered the K3 until I received it was ONLY 2.5 WEEKS!!! ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] K3 Subreceiver ANT selection doesn't work - always uses the AUX antenna
In addition to using BSET, did you also check the configuration menu entry for KRX3 to be sure it is set to ANT=BNC? That, along with using BSET and then the ANT switch to be sure it is using antenna number one, which I assume is what you are using for your main transmit receive antenna, should do the trick. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Frank R. Oppedijk Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:19 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Subreceiver ANT selection doesn't work - always uses the AUX antenna Hi, I've just installed my KRX3. All went okay. Although I do have a KAT3 installed, I chose the subreceiver's alternative antenna to be the BNC one. If I've understood correctly, pressing BSET followed by ANT allowes me to switch the subreceiver's input between the main receiver's antenna and the BNC antenna. But, irrespective of whether I've selected MAIN or AUX, the subreceiver always uses the AUX antenna. Any clues as to what could be wrong? 73, Frank PA4N --- drs. ing. F.R. Oppedijk Avista ICT Consultancy B.V. Albert Schweitzerlaan 7 1277 BV Huizen tel: 035 - 523 09 83 fax: 035 - 523 09 84 ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] K3 Subreceiver ANT selection doesn't work - always uses the AUX antenna
I believe I was caught with this situation myself. After you have turned on the Subreceiver I believe you press BSET followed by the ANT switch until it shows ANT 1 which, I assume, is your main antenna. I believe I also set the configuration menu KRX3 to ANT = BNC followed by a power off and on cycle before I pressed BSET followed by the ANT switch. Bruce- W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:18 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Subreceiver ANT selection doesn't work - always uses the AUX antenna Frank R. Oppedijk wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just installed my KRX3. I chose the subreceiver's alternative antenna > to be the BNC one. > > If I've understood correctly, pressing BSET followed by ANT allowes > me to switch the subreceiver's input between the main receiver's > antenna and the BNC antenna. But, irrespective of whether I've > selected MAIN or AUX, the subreceiver always uses the AUX antenna. > Sorry, I missed the fact that it's the MAIN antenna that won't connect to your subreceiver. I assume you alternately see "MAIN" and "AUX" displayed when you toggle the BSET ANT switch and even when "MAIN" is displayed, you're certain that you are listening to the AUX antenna. I'm not sure what the issue is, other than a faulty relay or a mistake in the internal cabling. 73, Barry N1EU -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/K3-QRP-output-power-level-tp1745497p1764482.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] OT: new SS amps
It's funny how experiences can differ. A couple years ago I decided to refurbish my old Heathkit SB-200. Included in the project was a set of new tubes to replace the original tubes from 1972. I purchased a pair of Svetlana 572Bs from RF parts. One of them burned out its filament after it was turned on for about the fourth or fifth time. I have never had a tube do that before. RF parts exchanged them for a set of Taylor tubes which have worked fine for the past couple of years. I guess all this means is that when you are buying imported tubes the quality control may leave something to be desired. Eimac tubes may cost much more, but except for some well documented exceptions, they generally appear to be much more consistent and robust. Frankly, I would rather pay more for the amplifier up front with good Eimac tubes instead of being forced into a game of Russian roulette as to whether the tubes will still be available when replacements are needed, sometimes a lot sooner than should be the case. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of WILLIS COOKE Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 8:15 PM To: Ron D'Eau Claire; Elecraft Reflector Subject: RE: [Elecraft] OT: new SS amps Ron, there are other considerations. The tubes available today are made in China. I had very bad luck with two sets of Taylor brand 572Bs that were made in China. One set never worked at all and the other set lasted about a month. I am still using the 572Bs that I bought in 1976 used. So, if you get one of the 811A or 572B amps with Chinese tubes how long will they last? Am I extremely unlucky or did I ruin them intentionally as R. F. Parts accused? I really don't know, but it certainly will weigh heavily on my decision of what amp to buy. In fact, I just bought a used ALS-600. I will see how well that works for me. Tuning is not really a factor for me. If you buy a "No Tune" solid state amp then need an antenna tuner you have not changed things a lot. But, will you need new tubes in a month or so? How long will you be able to buy them? Willis 'Cookie' Cooke K5EWJ --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: > From: Ron D'Eau Claire > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] OT: new SS amps > To: "'Elecraft Reflector'" > Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 3:44 PM > What catches my eye is that comparing the amps on page 1 and > page 9, you > have to pay $2,000 more for an additional 1.7 dB of gain > with the amp on > page 9. > > Sure. you have to know how to adjust an amp and actually > tune the one on > page 1 whereas the one on page 9 is "no tuning" > (assuming the antenna is > tuned or you do the tuning with an external tuner). > > I guess that's significant to the hard-core contester, > but for that > convenience along with the 1.7 dB gain you must pay $2,000 > for those who > demand the ability to QSY across the band or between bands > instantly, or who > want to operate their station remotely through a computer. > > Ron AC7AC > > > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL > Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 2:30 PM > To: Elecraft Reflector > Subject: [Elecraft] OT: new SS amps > > I just ran into this by accident. > > http://www.ameritron.com/catalog/Ameritron_2009.pdf > > See page 9. > > No stated expected delivery > Not enough "specs" for my liking, but still, > rather interesting. > Is this "contest grade?" Who knows? > > de Doug KR2Q > > > ___ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] Possible utility program conflict?
After some time noticing that my K-3 was looking rather lonely sitting all by itself on the operating desk I felt that it would greatly benefit from the addition of a sibling. Hence, I ordered a second K-3 fully loaded. It then came to me that perhaps the utility program may be confused by presence of the two radios. When it comes time to update firmware will the single utility program "know" which radio it is dealing with or is necessary, and possible, to have a second copy of the utility program on the computer, one for each radio? The configuration of the two radios will be slightly different with a different lineup of roofing filters in each. Somehow, I think one copy will be sufficient but since I have yet to encounter this situation I thought it would do no harm to ask. Any information would be gratefully received. Bruce-W9FU ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] K3 Audio Upgrade Mod
Please excuse my ignorance, but I have seen various references to the AF mod and I am not sure what it is supposed to do. Also, where is it located? I have the second receiver installed and I have a bad feeling that in order to get to it I'll have to tear things apart if I decide to do it. Any info would be appreciated. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Ponomarenko Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:51 PM To: undisclosed-recipients: Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Audio Upgrade Mod GA, today I has same time for install K3-AF-mod (second part with R19 and R20). It was easy job. Yes, it's really worked! Now line-out are worked better! Here is plots "before" and "after" mod. Line-OUT before replaced R19&R20: http://forum.cqham.ru/download.php?id=33360 And AFTER: http://forum.cqham.ru/download.php?id=33361 And new R19&R20 on board :) : http://forum.cqham.ru/download.php?id=33362 Guys from Clifton-labs are clever! 73! Alex UR5LAM Dr. James C. Garland wrote: > The second part of the kit involves shunting two resistors with 51 ohm > resistors, and here also Elecraft gives two options: one is to solder > 1/8w through-hole resistors onto the IO board, and the other is to > solder two tiny SMT (surface mount ) resistors piggy-back onto existing > SMT resistors. The kit comes with both kinds of resistors. I elected to > do the SMT version of the mod, and here I’d recommend that owners opt > for the other method. I don’t see any advantage to doing the SMT > version. It takes a very steady hand, a very small-tipped soldering > iron, and very good eyesight to piggy-back the two SMT resistors into > the circuit, and I just don’t see the reason for the hassle. It would > take five minutes to install the through-hole resistors, and the result > looks quite clean and neat. I’d recommend also that Elecraft delete the > SMT option from the instructions. Took me about 30 mins to install the > SMT resistors, probably about half that time to install the through-hole > ones. > > > > 73, > > > > Jim W8ZR ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
[Elecraft] help configuring the sub receiver
A couple of days ago I received my K-3 back from Elecraft after having the sub receiver and a few other accessories installed. Unfortunately, the sub receiver does not appear to work. I'm sure it's something dumb that I am overlooking in configuring it. Basically, I hear no signals. I do hear what appears to be band noise but nothing else. This is on 40 meters during the daytime. I have the configuration set to what I believe is the atu unit. I have only one antenna which is connected to the main antenna 1 connector. The sub receiver sounds as though it has no antenna connected to it. The other choice available on the configuration menu appears to be to connect the sub receiver to the BNC connector which appears to be an auxiliary antenna input which I do not want to use since nothing is connected there. I have both the AF and RF gain controls for the sub receiver turned up full. Can anyone suggest what I may be doing wrong? I want to use the sub receiver so that is connected to the same antenna as the main receiver and transmitter, both of which run through the ATU. I tuned the sub receiver to the same frequency as the main receiver which had a very strong sideband signal and should have been clearly audible by the sub receiver but there was absolutely nothing other than some background hiss. I will appreciate any suggestions. Bruce-W8FU ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Soundcard for LP Pan
Well, I purchased a Emu 0202. I can't tell you how well it works yet because my K-3 is still with Elecraft having the sub receiver, the transverter board and a second general coverage filter installed. I also do not yet have the N8LP unit itself. I chose that soundcard because it seemed to be highly recommended and it offered the opportunity for using it not only on the desktop but also my laptop computer should I choose. I guess I will find out soon whether it was the right choice. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Connors, F5VNB Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:39 AM To: undisclosed-recipients: Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Soundcard for LP Pan Bill Maddock wrote: > I am considering getting the N8LP LP pan - My K3 already > has the transverter board - what is everyone running > for a sound card - N8LP list several - sure would like some > input! Also how long does it take to assemble the LP-Pan > kit > > Thanks and 73, > > Bill N4ZI k > K3 #1059 Bill, I am using the Infrasonic Quartet with a prebuilt 'run one' LP-PAN. I followed the setup for that card on the N8LP site and it works well with up to 192kHz in view at one time. I now need to do the IF buffer mod to reach a bit further down into the noise floor. Only possible snag: it is a PCI card so if you use a laptop you will have to try one of the other solutions. Good luck, Pete F5VNB/G4PLZ K3 #900 (with KRX3 kit sitting beside it) ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Microphone
That is the adaptor which came with my Heil Proset which I bought from Elecraft. It works fine. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Parry Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 8:34 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Microphone I have a set of Heil headphones. Although I don't work much phone I would like to check and see if it works on phone. Does the K3 connector emulate one of the other companies? (I have the adaptor for Yaesu, will that one work? Bill W5VX ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] [K3] If you are a DXer, you need the KRX3!
Congratulations on getting the VU4. The use stations are not easy from the Midwest either the polar path can be a killer! I am awaiting return of my K-3 from Elecraft after its second receiver is installed along with certain other changes and additions I ordered. I understand what you mean about the value of the second receiver. I have a second receiver in my FT 1000D and my Orion II. The second receiver in the FT 1000D is decent enough to be a considerable help while attempting to position myself at the proper place in the pileup. Although the Orion is of some help, it's second receiver is not of very high quality and difficult to use when there is a heavy pileup. Even so, any second receiver is better than nothing at all. Although some radios, such as the ICOM Pro series, allow fast switching to listen to the transmit frequency, I feel that is too little and too late for this purpose. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic K2VCO Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 1:46 PM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: [Elecraft] [K3] If you are a DXer, you need the KRX3! There is no substitute for a second receiver for getting through pileups. For years I have been switching back and forth between VFOs (on various rigs), trying to spot the guy the DX is working. This has gotten harder and harder as the liddy practice of calling continuously regardless of what the DX station is doing has become popular. Since I got the KRX3, it's become much easier. This morning I worked one of the VU4's on 40 meters through a thick and very unruly pileup -- on the first call! I think the KRX3 made this possible. VU4 is difficult from the West Coast, and it is a new one for me. My 40 meter antenna is a mere dipole at 40 feet, although I admit I was running 800 watts. It was still a thrill! -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] K3 What mics are proplr using for SSB?
I use a Heil proset with very good results. Bruce - W*FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rOn Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:56 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 What mics are proplr using for SSB? Looking to find what people are using for SSB mics. Thanks rOn ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?
I am not totally sure about your question but if you are wondering what the difference is between an antenna analyzer and an antenna tuner, basically the analyzer is an instrument to determine the characteristic impedance of the antenna at the antenna terminals or the characteristic impedance of the antenna system, including the feed line, at the end of the feed line. It can also measure a number of other electrical characteristics and is a very useful instrument but I think it is probably in excess of your needs at this stage of your hand career. And antenna tuner on the other hand is a device which will attempt to transform the impedance presented to it at the end of the feed line from the antenna so that it matches the expected load impedance of your radio which is 50 ohms. The resulting transformation or "match" performed by the antenna tuner should result in a 1:1 SWR as seen by the final of your radio. When there is a low SWR as seen by the final of your radio there should be a maximum transfer of RF power from your radio to the antenna so that it can be radiated as a signal. However, if there is an extreme impedance mismatch between the end of the feed line and the 50 ohms expected by your radio there can be problems as noted below. I think you will find that the K-3 antenna tuner is a very good one and will tune a wide range of antennas. Since you already have it, I suggest you try it first with your antenna. If for some reason it does not work you could always try a different, external tuner. But if the antenna cannot be tuned with the built-in K-3 tuner I think you would be well advised to consider a different antenna. Just because you may be able to reduce the SWR presented to the radio by using a tuner does not mean you have an efficient system or that most of your RF will actually be radiated rather than simply dissipated in the tuner. If the terminal match between the antenna and feedline is very unfavorable, while the tuner may be able to transform the resulting SWR presented to the radio enough to allow the final to run at full power you may find that much of the power is being dissipated in the antenna tuner as heat rather than being radiated by the antenna. If for example you are running 100 W from the transmitter but 80 of those watts are being dissipated in the tuner because of a very unfavorable antenna impedance, there won't be much RF power left to actually reach and be radiated by the antenna. So, I would try the K-3 antenna tuner first. Chances are it will do the job. If not you may want to consider a better antenna before you start looking for external antenna tuners. Frankly, the only time I would consider an external tuner is if I were using a balanced feed line and even then I might choose a 4 to 1 current balin at the output of the radio instead of a balanced antenna tuner. Another situation calling for an external tuner might be if you are using an amplifier following the K-3 and the impedance presented by the antenna system cannot be handled by tuning the amplifier. Good luck with your license upgrade and your new K-3. Bruce-W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Maruna Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:47 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ? I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the subject units but I don't know the difference between them, and what each one does, and which one will help me with the setup with my K3 and my antenna system ? When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an antenna tuner for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the antenna to the K3, or am I better off getting another unit like a LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200 Pro or something else like one of the MFJ units ? Where does the "baluns" come into this play with either unit ? I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class and I have not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna stuff is pretty confusing. Can anyone help please ? Thank you, Paul (73) KD8HWP ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] Re: Microphone connections for K3 #1540
You learn something new all the time on this reflector. I previously thought a "downward expander" was a recession fighting scheme employed by the Federal Reserve. I guess not Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Wiley Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 2:16 PM To: Lyle Johnson Cc: 'Elecraft Group' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: Microphone connections for K3 #1540 I give up. What is a "downward expander"? It that the same as a compressor? Or is it something that has a "crossover point" that has one action on one side of the crossover, and the opposite action on the other side? All these newfangled terms are simply amazing to us OFs. - Jim, KL7CC Lyle Johnson wrote: > > An experimental Downward Expander will be available in the K3 firmware > in the near future. It has been undergoing some limited testing already > > _ ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.14/1643 - Release Date: 8/30/2008 5:18 PM ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] KatieGram
You are in for a treat. Enjoy. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Lukaszewski Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:10 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KatieGram Received Katiegram August 27, 2008 Ordered radio May 9thnow just waiting for the brown truck Like a kid in a candy shop.. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1629 - Release Date: 8/23/2008 1:16 PM ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
RE: [Elecraft] W8JI review on eHam
I personally know Tom. He used to live within 15 miles from me before he moved to Georgia. He is an extremely knowledge person. I have NEVER known Tom to flat out rave about any radio equipment. I think his review of the K3 really means something because he always tells it like it is. The K3 is relatively small and rather innocuous looking. But in this case appearances are very deceptive. If your main interest is a large box with lots of flashing lights, maybe the K3 is not for you. I have some of those large boxes in the shack. But if you want superior performance and a company which is truly interested in making it the very best it can be, the K3 is for you. As Tom said, the K3 is amazing. If I worked for some of the other companies, I would be afraid . . . very afraid. I don't know how Elecraft can do all this with only 24 people but I suspect that may be part of the reason why it is amazing. The owners are very close to their customers. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Tippett Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 11:12 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] W8JI review on eHam http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673 Elecraft is amazing! (I almost hate to write this review. I'd like to be the only person in the world with a K3.) I like raw performance. I like working weak DX stations on low bands. I like contests. Because I have guest ops that aren't always accustomed to the radios I have, the radio has to be easy to use. With contacts coming three or four a minute for hours on end, with over a dozen antennas to pick, the radio can't be difficult to use or distracting. It also has to be top notch. This is a demanding situation with large antennas in a very quiet location. The location and large antennas demand uncompromised receiver and transmitter performance. Some top-of-the-line radios selling for three times the price of the K3 only lasted a few days here. Some have had serious design problems like so-called diversity that does not actually phase lock. Some only offer a crummy sub-receiver that isn't even worthy of being called second rate. By "sub" they must mean "sub-standard". Some have transmitter keying issues or unreasonable transmitter IM on SSB, many have receiver close-spaced strong signal handling issues. I purchased one brand new top-of-the-line high-dollar radio, assured by the sales people it was the best radio ever, and the thing was not as good as my 15 year old FT-1000D in several different ways. I thought I was destined to spend my life going back to the FT1000 and heavily modified solid state mixer and IF section diversity R4C's. Enter the K3. I measured around -35 to -38 dB SSB transmitter IM3, better than my other radios. The transmitter is flawlessly clean on CW also. The raw receiver performance on HF is second to none. It is significantly better than radios costing three times as much as a loaded K3. The K3 is an incredibly easy to use radio, and it is very simple to upgrade firmware. Just a couple mouse clicks and the new firmware is located on their website and loaded into the radio. Elecraft is also super fast in updating and improving firmware, their response to suggestions is like nothing I have ever experienced. I didn't like the way a few controls functioned in diversity mode. The knobs required a little more operator attention than I liked. Unlike other companies, when I e-mailed Elecraft they listened and agreed. Within a week a firmware upgrade corrected the difficulties. Now it is smooth as silk. Can you imagine any other radio manufacturer in the world responding like that? It's unheard of today! I'm going to make a prediction. Within a few years all the successful serious contesting stations and DX chasers will have K3's. This is the first time I've bought a radio and not been disappointed. As a matter of fact, I'm ecstatic about the K3 performance and Elecraft's service. I've waited almost 20 years for the next major improvement in radios, and this is it. Not only is the radio great, the service and support exceeds all reasonable expectations. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1629 - Release Date: 8/23/2008 1:16 PM ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http
RE: [Elecraft] VLF/LF Converters
I have worked the ham station call for the past two years during the "Night of Nights" and also monitored KPH on all marine frequencies except the 600 meter frequencies. I simply don't have an antenna for anything that low. After the second year I sent a QSL and, as you mentioned, I received a nice QSL on an RCA message form from Ms. Stoops. The volunteers there are doing a wonderful job in preserving an important part of radio history by restoring the old equipment and keeping the station available for tours, etc. I also understand they secured a new coastal station license for KSM which uses the same equipment as KPH and can accept commercial traffic when it is in operation. Monitoring KPH, KFS and WCC helped me with learning Morse back in the days when I was thinking of getting a ham license. I understand WCC was dismantled except for the receive building which they are trying to preserve as a museum but the transmitter location was dismantled and the receive location has no equipment. Fortunately, KPH has not suffered that fate. I wish I lived close enough to the station to visit during the next Night of Nights. Bruce - W8FU -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron D'Eau Claire Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 3:52 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [Elecraft] VLF/LF Converters Wow, Mike! Have you told them? They'd like to know and you'll get a nice 'QSL' from the Grand Dame of KPH, Denise Stoops (the first female operator there). She sends "QSLs" out on original RCA radiogram forms as long as the supply left over from full time station ops lasts in response to an SASE. They put in a nice signal here, but I'm only 600 miles away. On the other hand, I'm close enough that I've managed to be at the station for one of their "night of nights" activities. That's a special bit of nostalgia for me since I used to chat with them on the air from ships visiting San Francisco Bay while testing the shipboard CW gear. For those here on the reflector without MF capability, KPH also transmits CW and RTTY on various HF frequencies and is active as K6KPH on several Ham bands, usually on 7050, 14050 and 21050 kHz and occasionally on 3550 kHz. There's more info about the facilities, stations in operation and frequencies used on: http://www.radiomarine.org Ron AC7AC -Original Message- Interesting Ron.and,as a matter of interest, on the 'Night of Nights', I've copied KPH, on 426kHz, here in the far north of NZ's North Island, for several years now. 73 de Mike, zl1mh. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1629 - Release Date: 8/23/2008 1:16 PM ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
