Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-27 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 5/24/06 9:38:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 The next logical step in terms of performance is a 
 contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major 
 problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just 
 don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with 
 that kind of performance. 

I see your point, but consider this:

When the K2 came out, one of the comments I heard many times was that there 
weren't many hams who would spend close to $600 for a kit QRP CW rig they had 
to build themselves. Almost 6000 K2s later, that's turned out to be a bit 
inaccurate

Another comment I recall went along the lines that the complexity of modern 
radio technology was such that any modern, high performance ham rig would have 
to use surface mount technology and would be close to impossible to put in a 
kit

You can see where this is going.

I don't know if big gun contesters would buy/build a K3, or if SO2R in one 
rig is even a practical option. I do know that some serious contest folks are 
running K2/100s, even in SO2R. I also know that the K2 has shown there to be a 
market for rigs that don't fit the Ikensu mold.

73 de Jim, N2EY

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-26 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 5/25/06 10:19:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Until the Orion came out, 99% of modern transceivers were up 
 conversion radios. (K2 the exception)  Rob Sherwood
 
 http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/Dayton_2004-Sherwood.pdf
 

A bit of hyperbole, that.

The Ten Tec Omni series, from the A to the VI+, are/were not upconverting - 
their first IF is/was 9 MHz. Same for the original Argosy and the Corsair I and 
II. The Delta used a 6.3 MHz first IF. In fact, upconversion to VHF is rarely 
used in TT rigs (the Paragon is one exception).

73 de Jim, N2EY
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-25 Thread Bill Coleman


On May 24, 2006, at 11:39 AM, N2TK, Tony wrote:


- Fast, quiet QSK
- Dual receive - The ability to listen in stereo so when running  
split you
can listen in one ear on the transmit freq and at the same time  
listen in

the other ear to the receive frequency.


I want more. I want SO2R in a box -- I want to be able to receive  
with one receiver when I'm transmitting (so long as it isn't on the  
same band).



- 6-160M - maybe even 2M?
- Push button clear switch for RIT and XIT.


Lack of this feature automatically DQs the K2 from some very serious  
contesters.



- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.


For the price, the K2 has one of the best dynamic range figures, even  
close in.



- Switchable front end filters


Huh? The K2 is single-conversion. It isn't an up-conversion rig like  
the Orion or the IC-7800, etc. There's no need for a front-end  
roofing filter because the main filter IS the front-end roofing filter.



Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASELMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quote: Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-25 Thread Bill Tippett


N2TK:
- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.

AA4LR:
For the price, the K2 has one of the best dynamic range figures, even close in.

K2's IMD degrades 24 dB from 5 kHz to 1 kHz,
primarily due to phase noise.

IMD @ 5 kHz 91 dB (ARRL)
IMD @ 2 kHz 80 dB* (Sherwood)
IMD @ 1 kHz 67 dB* (ARRL)

* = phase noise limited

Sources:
http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/lab/k2.pdfhttp://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/lab/k2.pdf 
(graph page 20)

http://www.sherweng.com/table.htmlhttp://www.sherweng.com/table.html



N2TK:
- Switchable front end filters

AA4LR:
Huh? The K2 is single-conversion. It isn't an up-conversion rig like 
the Orion or the IC-7800, etc. There's no need for a front-end 
roofing filter because the main filter IS the front-end roofing filter.


But Orion is not an up-conversion rig.  Its
First IF is 9 MHz vs the K2's ~5 MHz.  Up conversion
rigs typically have First IF at VHF (70 or 40 MHz).

Until the Orion came out, 99% of modern transceivers were up 
conversion radios. (K2 the exception)  Rob Sherwood


http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/Dayton_2004-Sherwood.pdf

73,  Bill  W4ZV


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Jack Brindle
Why would you lose out on the wattmeter? The power (forward and  
reflected) is derived from an on-board coupler and calculations are  
done in the KAT's MCU. VRFdet doesn't have anything to do with that.


On May 24, 2006, at 10:15 AM, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:

I wish it were possible to use the KAT100 wattmeter with an  
amplifier other than the KPA100 but it isn't.  I have an HFPacker  
amp, and if you bring VRFdet into the K2, it applies the K2 ALC to  
the output of the amplifier, and the RF gain knob won't go past  
15W.  The solution from Gary was to use the internal VRFdet, but  
that means I lose out on the wattmeter.


Maybe I could make a PIC-based display or even a simple vu-style  
comparator that reads the external VRFdet!


Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Wed, 24 May 2006 7:07 am, Don Wilhelm wrote:

JT,

The Elecraft KAT2, KAT1, KXAT1, KAT100 and KAT100 already contain
wattmeters, so if you have one of these in your station, you do  
have a
wattmeter buit in - no need to carry a separate wattmeter,  
particularly for
the trail.  Of course, if you are using a non-Elecraft QRP rig,  
then the

need is obvious, and the T1 can serve the purpose there.

73,
Don W3FPR

-Original Message-

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt
meter is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive
side IMO.  I think a watt meter of this type could probably be  
offered

in the $50 - $75 range, especially in kit form.

72 de JT, W6FO

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.0/346 - Release Date:  
5/23/2006


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


- Jack Brindle, W6FB
 
-



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Tom Althoff
As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some other 
way of determining the size/dimentions.


If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I would love 
to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.


Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd rcvr, 
6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.


Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include 
decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an 
optional flat panel display.


Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in quiet 
switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have a built-in 
50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking out loud here.


And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting the 
sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that operators can HEAR 
the difference between when they are transmitting split and when they are 
not.   A visual indication such as having all the frequency readouts turn 
red in transmit during split operation and some other color when operating 
simplex.   An operator would KNOW from the first dit if he was intending to 
work a DXpedition split and started to call simplex on the DX stations 
frequency.   (Maybe a mild shock to the keyer paddle is needed?)


A low end version would be a 20W 160-10M CW only rig (although I suspect SSB 
would not add that much cost).


A high end version would run 200W with an internal AC supply and cover 
160-microwave all modes including general coverage on 2 receivers and 
auto-tuning on all bands below 144Mhz.


I think a K3 like that would be at least as expensive as adding up the price 
of a 100W K2 with all accessories, options and converters and doubling or 
tripling the total price.


Tom K2TA

- Original Message - 
From: Craig D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:06 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


I'm not interested in the amps, although they look great and hope that 
they
are a big success.  I really enjoy the test equipment kits such as the 
XG-2

and noise source.  Hopefully more specialized small test equipment such as
this can be done w/o a really large RD commitment.

Of the big projects being discussed, the K3 is the only one that 
captures
my interest and enthusiasm.  I love my K2 - best rig I've ever had - but 
it

sits in my shack on its small footprint as I twiddle the small knobs and
drill down thru menus (if I can remember how) to operate it.  My ideal K3
would NOT need to be contest grade with 2 receivers, etc.  But I would
like a larger self contained unit with less menus and more knobs and a
larger (color??) display.  12 V power, 100 W out, built in tuner, CW  
SSB,

IF DSP, spectrum display, and if possible 6 and 2 w/o external adapters.
Tall order I know, but what fun it would be to build and operate!!

 73
... Craig  AC0DS



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread JT Croteau

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt
meter is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive
side IMO.  I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered
in the $50 - $75 range, especially in kit form.

72 de JT, W6FO
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Larry Phipps


Just my $0.02, but I think there is a problem looming for Elecraft as it 
concerns a new radio. The next logical step in terms of performance is a 
contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major 
problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just 
don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with 
that kind of performance. It would have to be a kit in the same context 
as the new amps... in other words, not really a kit. Of course, there is 
no rule that says that all future Elecrafts have to be kits.


I think there is a KIT market for a new radio, with bigger form factor, 
more knobs, fewer menus, but not all the bells and whistles of a contest 
grade rig.  Maybe there is a modular approach that could be offered, 
with a motherboard and plug-in options... more like the venerable Drake 
TR-7 in terms of physical layout of the boards... with a loaded price 
tag of maybe $2,000.


Larry N8LP



Tom Althoff wrote:
As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some 
other way of determining the size/dimentions.


If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I 
would love to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.


Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd 
rcvr, 6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.


Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include 
decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an 
optional flat panel display.


Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in 
quiet switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have 
a built-in 50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking 
out loud here.


And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting 
the sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that 
operators can HEAR the difference between when they are transmitting 
split and when they are not.   A visual indication such as having all 
the frequency readouts turn red in transmit during split operation and 
some other color when operating simplex.   An operator would KNOW from 
the first dit if he was intending to work a DXpedition split and 
started to call simplex on the DX stations frequency.   (Maybe a mild 
shock to the keyer paddle is needed?)


A low end version would be a 20W 160-10M CW only rig (although I 
suspect SSB would not add that much cost).


A high end version would run 200W with an internal AC supply and cover 
160-microwave all modes including general coverage on 2 receivers and 
auto-tuning on all bands below 144Mhz.


I think a K3 like that would be at least as expensive as adding up the 
price of a 100W K2 with all accessories, options and converters and 
doubling or tripling the total price.


Tom K2TA

- Original Message - From: Craig D. Smith 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:06 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


I'm not interested in the amps, although they look great and hope 
that they
are a big success.  I really enjoy the test equipment kits such as 
the XG-2
and noise source.  Hopefully more specialized small test equipment 
such as

this can be done w/o a really large RD commitment.

Of the big projects being discussed, the K3 is the only one that 
captures
my interest and enthusiasm.  I love my K2 - best rig I've ever had - 
but it

sits in my shack on its small footprint as I twiddle the small knobs and
drill down thru menus (if I can remember how) to operate it.  My 
ideal K3

would NOT need to be contest grade with 2 receivers, etc.  But I would
like a larger self contained unit with less menus and more knobs and a
larger (color??) display.  12 V power, 100 W out, built in tuner, CW 
 SSB,

IF DSP, spectrum display, and if possible 6 and 2 w/o external adapters.
Tall order I know, but what fun it would be to build and operate!!

 73
... Craig  AC0DS



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):

Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Larry Phipps


Check out my LP-300 digital handheld wattmeter kit at 
www.telepostinc.com. Also, for base station use, my LP-100 digital 
vector wattmeter kit was a huge success at Dayton. The LP-300 is 
accurate for power and SWR from 10 mW to 120W. The LP-100 is good from 
50 mW to the legal limit.


73,
Larry N8LP



JT Croteau wrote:

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt
meter is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive
side IMO.  I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered
in the $50 - $75 range, especially in kit form.

72 de JT, W6FO
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Darwin, Keith
Yes, a watt meter that is the right level for the K2 for less than $100
would be great!

I'm currently using my Palstar meter which I have wired backwards.  The
reflected scale then gives me QRP resolution for measuring forward
power.  Of course my ability to measure SWR is gone but at 5 or 10 watts
that meter doesn't really support SWR measurement anyway.

One of the things I really like about my Palstar is that it is active
and really measures and reports peak power.  I'll get 100 watts key down
with my ic-735.  Go to a string of dits and it still reads 100 watts.
Call CQ on SSB and it shows 100 watts.  Nice.  Of course, an active
meter may not be so conducive to portable operation.

- Keith KD1E -
- K2 5411 -
 

-Original Message-
From: JT Croteau

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt meter
is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive side IMO.
I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered in the $50 -
$75 range, especially in kit form.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Don Wilhelm
JT,

The Elecraft KAT2, KAT1, KXAT1, KAT100 and KAT100 already contain
wattmeters, so if you have one of these in your station, you do have a
wattmeter buit in - no need to carry a separate wattmeter, particularly for
the trail.  Of course, if you are using a non-Elecraft QRP rig, then the
need is obvious, and the T1 can serve the purpose there.

73,
Don W3FPR

-Original Message-

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt
meter is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive
side IMO.  I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered
in the $50 - $75 range, especially in kit form.

72 de JT, W6FO

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.0/346 - Release Date: 5/23/2006

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Larry Phipps


My LP-300 has a peak power mode with a peak-hold display on the 
numerical readout. It also has fast analog bargraphs for power and SWR 
that can follow voice peaks. It shows accurate SWR down to about 10 mW 
forward power. It runs on a 9V Duracell or Lithium battery, or external 12v.


Larry N8LP



Darwin, Keith wrote:

Yes, a watt meter that is the right level for the K2 for less than $100
would be great!

I'm currently using my Palstar meter which I have wired backwards.  The
reflected scale then gives me QRP resolution for measuring forward
power.  Of course my ability to measure SWR is gone but at 5 or 10 watts
that meter doesn't really support SWR measurement anyway.

One of the things I really like about my Palstar is that it is active
and really measures and reports peak power.  I'll get 100 watts key down
with my ic-735.  Go to a string of dits and it still reads 100 watts.
Call CQ on SSB and it shows 100 watts.  Nice.  Of course, an active
meter may not be so conducive to portable operation.

- Keith KD1E -
- K2 5411 -
 


-Original Message-
From: JT Croteau

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt meter
is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive side IMO.
I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered in the $50 -
$75 range, especially in kit form.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Bill NY9H

wayne said; all functional modules simply plug in

So I would expect that the PA modules that are in the KPA800/1500 
could have been engineered to be put in other things:  a smaller amp 
??? a transceiver ??

a mobile amp ??  utilizing the motherboard concept...

Maybe the K4 will have a spot on the mother board for spectrum board ...(opt5)
a spot for the second full receiver .( optional would keep the 
entry price down)

the super duper noise blanker board, if you need it like I do .(opt2)

maybe even a slot for daughter board in-box computer...( not for me )

BUT PLEASE don't make it like the form factor of the
TITANTIC Y brand product line.

and if they do add the SO2R feature set ,
I can pull out all my Top Ten devices surrounding my HercII !!

phew,,, now back to reality,,,and the nice stuff I'm lucky to have already.

bill  ny9h 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Toby Deinhardt

But Bill...


BUT PLEASE don't make it like the form factor of the
TITANTIC Y brand product line.


...don't you know,m that real radios have to weigh at least twice as 
much as the OP... hi hi



vy 73 de toby 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread N2TK, Tony
Hi Larry,

Maybe they will need to do something like they are doing with the new amps -
kit or assembled? And critical boards already stuffed and checked out.

I built a K2 because that is the only way it comes. I bought it for the
performance and the size. I enjoy putting kits together and I feel I do a
good job at it. But I would rather be operating than soldering, especially
if the price differential isn't great - an example is the KPA1500. For an
additional 7% I get an amp assembled and checked out.

I agree that some contesters and Dxers would rather buy it assembled and
tested. And some will continue to like to build it. To me both are good
choices to have for all of us.

And while I am at it, here is my list of things I would like to see in a new
rig. These are the minimum things I would want over a K2 in a K3:
- Fast, quiet QSK
- Dual receive - The ability to listen in stereo so when running split you
can listen in one ear on the transmit freq and at the same time listen in
the other ear to the receive frequency.
- 6-160M - maybe even 2M?
- Push button clear switch for RIT and XIT.
- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.
- Switchable front end filters

73,
N2TK, Tony
#3481


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Tom Althoff
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


Just my $0.02, but I think there is a problem looming for Elecraft as it
concerns a new radio. The next logical step in terms of performance is a
contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major
problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just
don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with
that kind of performance. It would have to be a kit in the same context
as the new amps... in other words, not really a kit. Of course, there is
no rule that says that all future Elecrafts have to be kits.

I think there is a KIT market for a new radio, with bigger form factor,
more knobs, fewer menus, but not all the bells and whistles of a contest
grade rig.  Maybe there is a modular approach that could be offered,
with a motherboard and plug-in options... more like the venerable Drake
TR-7 in terms of physical layout of the boards... with a loaded price
tag of maybe $2,000.

Larry N8LP



Tom Althoff wrote:
 As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some
 other way of determining the size/dimentions.

 If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I
 would love to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.

 Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd
 rcvr, 6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.

 Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include
 decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an
 optional flat panel display.

 Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

 Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in
 quiet switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have
 a built-in 50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking
 out loud here.

 And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting
 the sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that
 operators can HEAR the difference between when they are transmitting
 split and when they are not.   A visual indication such as having all
 the frequency readouts turn red in transmit during split operation and
 some other color when operating simplex.   An operator would KNOW from
 the first dit if he was intending to work a DXpedition split and
 started to call simplex on the DX stations frequency.   (Maybe a mild
 shock to the keyer paddle is needed?)

 A low end version would be a 20W 160-10M CW only rig (although I
 suspect SSB would not add that much cost).

 A high end version would run 200W with an internal AC supply and cover
 160-microwave all modes including general coverage on 2 receivers and
 auto-tuning on all bands below 144Mhz.

 I think a K3 like that would be at least as expensive as adding up the
 price of a 100W K2 with all accessories, options and converters and
 doubling or tripling the total price.

 Tom K2TA

 - Original Message - From: Craig D. Smith
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:06 AM
 Subject: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


 I'm not interested in the amps, although they look great and hope
 that they
 are a big success.  I really enjoy the test equipment kits such as
 the XG-2
 and noise source.  Hopefully more specialized small test equipment
 such as
 this can be done w/o a really large RD commitment.

 Of the big projects being discussed, the K3 is the only one that
 captures
 my interest and enthusiasm.  I love my K2 - best rig I've ever had -
 but it
 sits in my shack on its small footprint as I

RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread James C. Hall, MD
These have been great posts. As I convalesce from back surgery, my dreams of
Elecraft kits have become much more vivid. I ran across Larry N8LP's kits,
that may be what you are thinking of, JT.  Check out
http://www.telepostinc.com/n8lp.html .

73, Jamie
WB4YDL

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JT Croteau
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:29 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt
meter is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive
side IMO.  I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered
in the $50 - $75 range, especially in kit form.

72 de JT, W6FO
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Thom R LaCosta

On Wed, 24 May 2006, Toby Deinhardt wrote:


But Bill...


BUT PLEASE don't make it like the form factor of the
TITANTIC Y brand product line.


...don't you know,m that real radios have to weigh at least twice as much as 
the OP... hi hi


And at the very least require that they be mounted in a 3 foot relay rack with
super-sized casters.

My present to myself when I passed my general a 1000 years ago was a tranmitter 
that had an 813 final and plate modulationit was in one of those racks.


Brought it homeunloaded it from the truck and my father made me go buy two 
of the adjustable foundation jacks and a steel beam before he would let me put

in in the house.

73,Thom-k3hrn
www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page,Drake Web Ring,
QRP IRC channel, Drake IRC Channel, Elecraft Owners Database
www.tlchost.net/hosting/  ***  Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Mike Scott
Now that the K3 has dual receivers (grin) and stereo audio it needs to be
able to slave the two receivers to provide binaural I-Q receive.

Mike Scott
AE6WA
Tarzana, CA (near LA)
Elecraft KX1 4-Watts

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of N2TK, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:40 AM
To: 'Larry Phipps'; 'Tom Althoff'
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

Hi Larry,

Maybe they will need to do something like they are doing with the new amps -
kit or assembled? And critical boards already stuffed and checked out.

I built a K2 because that is the only way it comes. I bought it for the
performance and the size. I enjoy putting kits together and I feel I do a
good job at it. But I would rather be operating than soldering, especially
if the price differential isn't great - an example is the KPA1500. For an
additional 7% I get an amp assembled and checked out.

I agree that some contesters and Dxers would rather buy it assembled and
tested. And some will continue to like to build it. To me both are good
choices to have for all of us.

And while I am at it, here is my list of things I would like to see in a new
rig. These are the minimum things I would want over a K2 in a K3:
- Fast, quiet QSK
- Dual receive - The ability to listen in stereo so when running split you
can listen in one ear on the transmit freq and at the same time listen in
the other ear to the receive frequency.
- 6-160M - maybe even 2M?
- Push button clear switch for RIT and XIT.
- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.
- Switchable front end filters

73,
N2TK, Tony
#3481


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Tom Althoff
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


Just my $0.02, but I think there is a problem looming for Elecraft as it
concerns a new radio. The next logical step in terms of performance is a
contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major
problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just
don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with
that kind of performance. It would have to be a kit in the same context
as the new amps... in other words, not really a kit. Of course, there is
no rule that says that all future Elecrafts have to be kits.

I think there is a KIT market for a new radio, with bigger form factor,
more knobs, fewer menus, but not all the bells and whistles of a contest
grade rig.  Maybe there is a modular approach that could be offered,
with a motherboard and plug-in options... more like the venerable Drake
TR-7 in terms of physical layout of the boards... with a loaded price
tag of maybe $2,000.

Larry N8LP



Tom Althoff wrote:
 As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some
 other way of determining the size/dimentions.

 If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I
 would love to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.

 Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd
 rcvr, 6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.

 Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include
 decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an
 optional flat panel display.

 Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

 Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in
 quiet switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have
 a built-in 50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking
 out loud here.

 And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting
 the sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that
 operators can HEAR the difference between when they are transmitting
 split and when they are not.   A visual indication such as having all
 the frequency readouts turn red in transmit during split operation and
 some other color when operating simplex.   An operator would KNOW from
 the first dit if he was intending to work a DXpedition split and
 started to call simplex on the DX stations frequency.   (Maybe a mild
 shock to the keyer paddle is needed?)

 A low end version would be a 20W 160-10M CW only rig (although I
 suspect SSB would not add that much cost).

 A high end version would run 200W with an internal AC supply and cover
 160-microwave all modes including general coverage on 2 receivers and
 auto-tuning on all bands below 144Mhz.

 I think a K3 like that would be at least as expensive as adding up the
 price of a 100W K2 with all accessories, options and converters and
 doubling or tripling the total price.

 Tom K2TA

 - Original Message - From: Craig D. Smith
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:06 AM
 Subject: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


 I'm not interested in the amps, although

RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread N2TK, Tony
Gee, maybe we are up to the K5 with this feature?
N2TK, Tony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Scott
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

Now that the K3 has dual receivers (grin) and stereo audio it needs to be
able to slave the two receivers to provide binaural I-Q receive.

Mike Scott
AE6WA
Tarzana, CA (near LA)
Elecraft KX1 4-Watts

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of N2TK, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:40 AM
To: 'Larry Phipps'; 'Tom Althoff'
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

Hi Larry,

Maybe they will need to do something like they are doing with the new amps -
kit or assembled? And critical boards already stuffed and checked out.

I built a K2 because that is the only way it comes. I bought it for the
performance and the size. I enjoy putting kits together and I feel I do a
good job at it. But I would rather be operating than soldering, especially
if the price differential isn't great - an example is the KPA1500. For an
additional 7% I get an amp assembled and checked out.

I agree that some contesters and Dxers would rather buy it assembled and
tested. And some will continue to like to build it. To me both are good
choices to have for all of us.

And while I am at it, here is my list of things I would like to see in a new
rig. These are the minimum things I would want over a K2 in a K3:
- Fast, quiet QSK
- Dual receive - The ability to listen in stereo so when running split you
can listen in one ear on the transmit freq and at the same time listen in
the other ear to the receive frequency.
- 6-160M - maybe even 2M?
- Push button clear switch for RIT and XIT.
- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.
- Switchable front end filters

73,
N2TK, Tony
#3481


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Tom Althoff
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


Just my $0.02, but I think there is a problem looming for Elecraft as it
concerns a new radio. The next logical step in terms of performance is a
contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major
problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just
don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with
that kind of performance. It would have to be a kit in the same context
as the new amps... in other words, not really a kit. Of course, there is
no rule that says that all future Elecrafts have to be kits.

I think there is a KIT market for a new radio, with bigger form factor,
more knobs, fewer menus, but not all the bells and whistles of a contest
grade rig.  Maybe there is a modular approach that could be offered,
with a motherboard and plug-in options... more like the venerable Drake
TR-7 in terms of physical layout of the boards... with a loaded price
tag of maybe $2,000.

Larry N8LP



Tom Althoff wrote:
 As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some
 other way of determining the size/dimentions.

 If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I
 would love to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.

 Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd
 rcvr, 6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.

 Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include
 decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an
 optional flat panel display.

 Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

 Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in
 quiet switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have
 a built-in 50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking
 out loud here.

 And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting
 the sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that
 operators can HEAR the difference between when they are transmitting
 split and when they are not.   A visual indication such as having all
 the frequency readouts turn red in transmit during split operation and
 some other color when operating simplex.   An operator would KNOW from
 the first dit if he was intending to work a DXpedition split and
 started to call simplex on the DX stations frequency.   (Maybe a mild
 shock to the keyer paddle is needed?)

 A low end version would be a 20W 160-10M CW only rig (although I
 suspect SSB would not add that much cost).

 A high end version would run 200W with an internal AC supply and cover
 160-microwave all modes including general coverage on 2 receivers and
 auto-tuning on all bands below 144Mhz.

 I think a K3 like that would be at least as expensive as adding up the
 price of a 100W K2 with all accessories, options and converters

Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I wish it were possible to use the KAT100 wattmeter with an amplifier 
other than the KPA100 but it isn't.  I have an HFPacker amp, and if you 
bring VRFdet into the K2, it applies the K2 ALC to the output of the 
amplifier, and the RF gain knob won't go past 15W.  The solution from 
Gary was to use the internal VRFdet, but that means I lose out on the 
wattmeter.


Maybe I could make a PIC-based display or even a simple vu-style 
comparator that reads the external VRFdet!


Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Wed, 24 May 2006 7:07 am, Don Wilhelm wrote:

JT,

The Elecraft KAT2, KAT1, KXAT1, KAT100 and KAT100 already contain
wattmeters, so if you have one of these in your station, you do have a
wattmeter buit in - no need to carry a separate wattmeter, particularly 
for
the trail.  Of course, if you are using a non-Elecraft QRP rig, then 
the

need is obvious, and the T1 can serve the purpose there.

73,
Don W3FPR

-Original Message-

Speaking of test equipment, I'd like to see Elecraft come out with a
real QRP watt meter at a decent price.  Something small that can be
taken to the field and can read 1 mW up to 20W.  The OHR QRP watt
meter is nice but too big for the trail and a bit on the expensive
side IMO.  I think a watt meter of this type could probably be offered
in the $50 - $75 range, especially in kit form.

72 de JT, W6FO

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.0/346 - Release Date: 
5/23/2006


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread william parker
From: Mike Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed May 24 11:54:12 CDT 2006
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

K3-K5? Too many features can cause a drop in the need for operating skills. I 
think Elecraft builders and CW Ops can be held in a high regard for thier 
operating skills as well as thier knowledge of electronics. With the 
deregulations of the ham ticket, No Code, I am happy with the Elecraft K2/100, 
and if a K3 never comes along I will not be dissapointed, As everyone has 
different requirements or needs, I think the module idea is great so add ons 
can be made. 

Bill KA3IXF






Now that the K3 has dual receivers (grin) and stereo audio it needs to be
able to slave the two receivers to provide binaural I-Q receive.

Mike Scott
AE6WA
Tarzana, CA (near LA)
Elecraft KX1 4-Watts

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of N2TK, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:40 AM
To: 'Larry Phipps'; 'Tom Althoff'
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

Hi Larry,

Maybe they will need to do something like they are doing with the new amps -
kit or assembled? And critical boards already stuffed and checked out.

I built a K2 because that is the only way it comes. I bought it for the
performance and the size. I enjoy putting kits together and I feel I do a
good job at it. But I would rather be operating than soldering, especially
if the price differential isn't great - an example is the KPA1500. For an
additional 7% I get an amp assembled and checked out.

I agree that some contesters and Dxers would rather buy it assembled and
tested. And some will continue to like to build it. To me both are good
choices to have for all of us.

And while I am at it, here is my list of things I would like to see in a new
rig. These are the minimum things I would want over a K2 in a K3:
- Fast, quiet QSK
- Dual receive - The ability to listen in stereo so when running split you
can listen in one ear on the transmit freq and at the same time listen in
the other ear to the receive frequency.
- 6-160M - maybe even 2M?
- Push button clear switch for RIT and XIT.
- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.
- Switchable front end filters

73,
N2TK, Tony
#3481


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Tom Althoff
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


Just my $0.02, but I think there is a problem looming for Elecraft as it
concerns a new radio. The next logical step in terms of performance is a
contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major
problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just
don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with
that kind of performance. It would have to be a kit in the same context
as the new amps... in other words, not really a kit. Of course, there is
no rule that says that all future Elecrafts have to be kits.

I think there is a KIT market for a new radio, with bigger form factor,
more knobs, fewer menus, but not all the bells and whistles of a contest
grade rig.  Maybe there is a modular approach that could be offered,
with a motherboard and plug-in options... more like the venerable Drake
TR-7 in terms of physical layout of the boards... with a loaded price
tag of maybe $2,000.

Larry N8LP



Tom Althoff wrote:
 As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some
 other way of determining the size/dimentions.

 If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I
 would love to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.

 Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd
 rcvr, 6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.

 Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include
 decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an
 optional flat panel display.

 Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

 Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in
 quiet switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have
 a built-in 50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking
 out loud here.

 And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting
 the sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that
 operators can HEAR the difference between when they are transmitting
 split and when they are not.   A visual indication such as having all
 the frequency readouts turn red in transmit during split operation and
 some other color when operating simplex.   An operator would KNOW from
 the first dit if he was intending to work a DXpedition split and
 started to call simplex on the DX stations frequency.   (Maybe a mild
 shock to the keyer paddle is needed?)

 A low end version would be a 20W 160-10M CW only rig (although I
 suspect

Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Joseph Reed
Somehow, I don't see Elecraft coming out with a new transceiver in the near 
future.  Their accomplishments in developing new products and innovations is 
pretty amazing.  Tasking Wayne with the design of a new radio would be way too 
much overload.
 
But if we were to do so, I second all the features that have been mentioned,  
but I would also include on the design list variable passband tuning, and a 
good notch filter.
 
And K3 as a name?  No way!  There is no K3, there was but it is now known as 
Broad Peak.  (Located about 5 miles away from K2 in the Karakoram range.)  I 
think the radio Wayne is ultimately destined to design should be named McKinley.
 
Joe N9JR

- Original Message 
From: Mike Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:54:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


Now that the K3 has dual receivers (grin) and stereo audio it needs to be
able to slave the two receivers to provide binaural I-Q receive.

Mike Scott
AE6WA
Tarzana, CA (near LA)
Elecraft KX1 4-Watts

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of N2TK, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:40 AM
To: 'Larry Phipps'; 'Tom Althoff'
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

Hi Larry,

Maybe they will need to do something like they are doing with the new amps -
kit or assembled? And critical boards already stuffed and checked out.

I built a K2 because that is the only way it comes. I bought it for the
performance and the size. I enjoy putting kits together and I feel I do a
good job at it. But I would rather be operating than soldering, especially
if the price differential isn't great - an example is the KPA1500. For an
additional 7% I get an amp assembled and checked out.

I agree that some contesters and Dxers would rather buy it assembled and
tested. And some will continue to like to build it. To me both are good
choices to have for all of us.

And while I am at it, here is my list of things I would like to see in a new
rig. These are the minimum things I would want over a K2 in a K3:
- Fast, quiet QSK
- Dual receive - The ability to listen in stereo so when running split you
can listen in one ear on the transmit freq and at the same time listen in
the other ear to the receive frequency.
- 6-160M - maybe even 2M?
- Push button clear switch for RIT and XIT.
- Better close in (2KHZ) dynamic range performance.
- Switchable front end filters

73,
N2TK, Tony
#3481


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Tom Althoff
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products


Just my $0.02, but I think there is a problem looming for Elecraft as it
concerns a new radio. The next logical step in terms of performance is a
contest grade K3 with SO2R capability to match the new amps. The major
problem with this is that is not compatible with a kit... IMHO. I just
don't see the big gun contesters spending months building a radio with
that kind of performance. It would have to be a kit in the same context
as the new amps... in other words, not really a kit. Of course, there is
no rule that says that all future Elecrafts have to be kits.

I think there is a KIT market for a new radio, with bigger form factor,
more knobs, fewer menus, but not all the bells and whistles of a contest
grade rig.  Maybe there is a modular approach that could be offered,
with a motherboard and plug-in options... more like the venerable Drake
TR-7 in terms of physical layout of the boards... with a loaded price
tag of maybe $2,000.

Larry N8LP



Tom Althoff wrote:
 As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some
 other way of determining the size/dimentions.

 If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I
 would love to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.

 Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd
 rcvr, 6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.

 Include FM, SSTV etc as an Optional Mode Module.   Perhaps include
 decoding of SSTV and text from other digital modes for display on an
 optional flat panel display.

 Make the PA upgradable with choice of 20W or 200W output.

 Make it a 12V for mobile/battery operation but include a built-in
 quiet switching supply.  Maybe have the 20W be 12VDC and the 200W have
 a built-in 50V switching supply for running on 120VAC.   Just thinking
 out loud here.

 And make some provision for split operation indicators such as putting
 the sidetone into only one side of a stereo headphone so that
 operators can HEAR the difference between when they are transmitting
 split and when they are not.   A visual indication such as having all
 the frequency readouts turn red in transmit during split operation and
 some other color when operating simplex.   An operator would KNOW from
 the first dit if he

Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Vic K2VCO

Mike Scott wrote:

Now that the K3 has dual receivers (grin) and stereo audio it needs to be
able to slave the two receivers to provide binaural I-Q receive.


What would this sound like?  I've always wanted to try some kind of 
crossover device that would distribute the signal between the two 
earphones according to frequency.  Then as I tune through a CW signal, 
it would seem to move.  Is this the same idea?

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy

Vic Rosenthal wrote:

What would this sound like?  I've always wanted to try some kind of 
crossover device that would distribute the signal between the two 
earphones according to frequency.  Then as I tune through a CW signal, it 
would seem to move.  Is this the same idea?


--

Several ways to skin this cat Vic, but yes the signal seems to move. Bit 
like being in a room at a party with people, or you, moving around as you 
tune. When you stop tuning everybody stops moving, some on one side of you 
others on the other side. It is possible to sort out those in front and 
those behind - the almost zero beat guys- but this is best done in other 
circuitry. Combine this with the brain's ability to zero in on a particular 
conversation (The 'cocktail party effect') and life will never be the same.


73,
Geoff
GM4ESD

PS Strong receiver design information is almost ready for you. 




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] New Elecraft Products

2006-05-24 Thread VR2BrettGraham

Sometime last night K2TA posted what I was thinking:


As long as we are dreaming...I wish the KPA800 photo had a K2 or some other
way of determining the size/dimentions.

If the KPA800/1500 is not much larger than a Ten-Tec Orion then I would love
to see a K3 that matched the amp in size.

Make it modular and expandable.  Have slots on the motherboard for 2nd rcvr,
6M/2M/220/440 transverter modules etc.


I don't think doing an internalized set of XVs makes sense,
but the basic approach is neat (though as K2VCO pointed
out, perhaps a bit on the large side).

Hopefully more of a kit than the new KPAs, it might be
reasonable to expect doing one or two significant
additional features to the basic radio in a post-K2 product.

Take general coverage.  BPFs as a module gives choice of
not having to pay for cost of feature one might not need, or
change to something even more robust for more demanding
ham-band-only use.  Enough room in that cabinet to
transplant some of those FT9k preselectors?  ;^)

A sub-RX isn't entirely a rabid contester feature - I use it
more DXing  realize if we had it in the past, it would have
been handy when NCSing 7RN.  Perfect thing to make into
a module.

All sorts of interesting possibilities.  Hopefully starting with a
good, solid radio.  Keeping kit  serviceability in mind, maybe
unlikely to have things like IF DSP.  More remote
controllability please, though remember every knob on an
encoder is significantly more expensive.

Something more like as N8LP described.  Some of the
features mentioned here are probably not practical.  I see
some of it driven by Brand-K/I/Y domestic market, something
Elecraft probably now has the momentum to go against.

An SO2R-ready-out-of-the-box K3 is the last thing this
contester would like to see a modernized TR7 as Larry
mentioned or something starting from like an OMNI6-as-
a-kit - that would go down well with a far wider market, too.

N2TK - I'm thinking all solid-state TS820/830-like performance
in a kit, maybe even use an IF so that filters can be recycled
from other rigs.  Are you with me? Divide-from-VHF PLL is start
towards Tony's  W4ZV's previous mention of close-in
performance - GM4ESD, got any other ideas?  Then add some
first-string big-box features based on modules  there's
something for everybody.

Nice to dream, isn't it?  ;^)

73, VR2BrettGraham

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com