Re: [Emc-users] Encoders x 2
Kim, On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 17:03 -0600, Kim Kirwan wrote: Yes, this can be done and Stuart (for one) has done it. See the wiki Combining Two Feedback Devices On One Axis http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis Certainly that looks like a possibility but, I think that the state of the art approach would be a Kalman filter, that can be used to get the best from both sensors and give back a more precise feedback. In addition to this, if a decent model of the machine is available, kalman filter would use it additionally to get an even improved feedback (including velocity and acceleration if needed). Cheers, Javier Thanks, Kim On 02/16/2011 03:21 PM, Marshland Engineering wrote: I'm not sure if this can be done but I do have it on my existing mill. It has servo drives with encoders but it also has encoders on the table. This obviously gets rid of backlash. (I have to say it is very accurate mill) Has anyone done something like this ? Thanks Wallace -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Map Network drive
On 02/16/2011 05:42 PM, Doug wrote: What is the best way to have emc find files on a local network server? It seems only local folders show up in the drop down box. I have mounted on the desktop a linked drive to find but have to do that every time the machine starts. I would like not to have to do this. Doug Doug, Is this a Windows, or a Unix NFS network share? Mark -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Turning spindle off
That is the way my BP Discovery works. You press the Oh Shit button and all motion stops but the spindle keeps turning and coolant keep flowing. You press the spindle up button and the spindle moves to the clear position. Then you can press the spindle stop button and the spindle and coolant stop... Seems logical (to this hillneck) that kind of thing should be configurable by the integrator to some degree. John the top poster Farzin Kamangar wrote: Dear EMC users, I was asked to make the following change in the controller behaviour. As you know when we want to stop the running program and we push the stop program button, program stops and so does spindle from turning. Now the request is: when we stop the program by pressing the stop program button, we want the spindle to keep on turning if it was turning before pressing the stop program button. What do you think? This is because they do not want the tool in spindle to get stuck in the workpiece when we stop the program. We stop spindle by pressing spindle off button or by entering M5 in MDI later. Thanks Farzin -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Turning spindle off (or not)
Original Message Subject: [Emc-users] Turning spindle off From: Farzin Kamangar farzin.kaman...@gmail.com Date: Thu, February 17, 2011 12:05 am To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Dear EMC users, I was asked to make the following change in the controller behaviour. As you know when we want to stop the running program and we push the stop program button, program stops and so does spindle from turning. Now the request is: when we stop the program by pressing the stop program button, we want the spindle to keep on turning if it was turning before pressing the stop program button. What do you think? This is because they do not want the tool in spindle to get stuck in the workpiece when we stop the program. We stop spindle by pressing spindle off button or by entering M5 in MDI later. Thanks Farzin I have a similar issue I'd like to change. I have a sticky spindle motor on a dental mill, and sometimes it doesn't want to start. So I start it using the spindle on/off toggle, and after it's running, I start milling. But when I start milling, the spindle is commanded off, and immediately right back on. Most of the time the spindle starts running again. I'm going to see if I can change it so that the spindle is not stopped when starting a milling operation. (But that makes it real interesting when the tool-change notice box comes up and asks you to insert tool #1!) This isn't something that would be useful in the regular release, but it'll be fun seeing if I can make it work. -Alan -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Map Network drive
Sorry this is a windows server. Arch Fitters Doug McCurtain (C.Ped) President -Original Message- From: Mark Wendt [mailto:mark.we...@nrl.navy.mil] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 2:44 AM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Map Network drive On 02/16/2011 05:42 PM, Doug wrote: What is the best way to have emc find files on a local network server? It seems only local folders show up in the drop down box. I have mounted on the desktop a linked drive to find but have to do that every time the machine starts. I would like not to have to do this. Doug Doug, Is this a Windows, or a Unix NFS network share? Mark -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5882 (20110217) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Map Network drive
I have smb installed on my emc2 machines and the nc_files directory shared. This way the files reside on my machine's hard drive so the condition of the network does not affect the file information during a run. The windows machines on the network are smb connected to the directory on the machine's hard drive. They seem to maintain and reconnect on restart without any problems. The linux machines on the network also connect to the directories using smb. -- dos centavos -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Charge pump
I have a new PMDX Gecko driver board. It requires an osculating +5 to 0 to enable the outputs. I am using the step wizard and find that I only get a solid voltage out of pin 17 when I choose charge pump in the wizard. How can I fix this? PMDX manufacture does not have a sample config file. As you can tell I am using the wizard so you assume correct that I am new to EMC but learning fast. Please respond with idiot proof instructions. I need a EMC for dummies book. PS. I am looking for a EMC tech in my area. If I spent a few days with someone that has experience I could learn a lot faster. I live in Gresham Oregon. There has to be some experts in Portland area. I am will pay for there time, we are building CNC machines from the ground up. Exciting but frustrating at the same time. Doug McCurtain -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Turning spindle off
On Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:07:11 am Farzin Kamangar did opine: Dear EMC users, I was asked to make the following change in the controller behaviour. As you know when we want to stop the running program and we push the stop program button, program stops and so does spindle from turning. Now the request is: when we stop the program by pressing the stop program button, we want the spindle to keep on turning if it was turning before pressing the stop program button. What do you think? This is because they do not want the tool in spindle to get stuck in the workpiece when we stop the program. We stop spindle by pressing spindle off button or by entering M5 in MDI later. Thanks Farzin I think that will depend on how you are currently controlling the spindle. In my own case I built my interface for that using a PMDX-106, which uses a PWM signal from EMC to enable the spindle speed control in addition to a rev signal that I use to bang the DPDT relays, all of which goes to manual control at the flip of a center off switch on the PMDX-106. But there is no way to leave the spindle running except by using the manual controls on the PMDX-106 as the PWM heartbeat from EMC stops when the esc/stop button is pressed. I personally have not had the bit get stuck as it will turn and cut itself free for a turn or 2 after my steppers have frozen in place even though I do have a 'suicide' brake setup that stops the motor in 2 or 3 revolutions. Unforch, I can't say the same if the spindle is overloaded and trips its shutdown, there I have broken a 1/4 solid carbide mill once, and smaller mills are instantly shattered should they plug up while plowing in soft alu. I found that I generally make more use of the manual mode that I do of the EMC controlled mode because that lets me adjust the spindle rpms directly, for me much handier and more instinctive than the mouse based controls AXIS gives. I'm afraid that we do not have enough info to offer any meaningful advice. We would need to know what your current control method is before a suitable plan might be offered by one of the smarter people here. If indeed one, other than full manual can be suggested. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) http://tinyurl.com/ddg5bz Immortality -- a fate worse than death. -- Edgar A. Shoaff -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Charge pump
On 17 February 2011 17:26, Doug d...@archfitters.com wrote: I have a new PMDX Gecko driver board. It requires an osculating +5 to 0 to enable the outputs. I learned many years ago that osculating 5V hurts. :-) I am using the step wizard and find that I only get a solid voltage out of pin 17 when I choose charge pump in the wizard. Have a look in the HAL file to see what stepconf has created, You ought to see the charge pump be loaded (loadrt charge_pump), added to a realtime thread (addf charge-pump base-thread) and then linked to the parport pin (net pin-name charge-pump.out parport.0.pin-17-out ) It is possible that the net command might be split onto two lines in different parts of the file. -- atp Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Charge pump
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 07:26 -0800, Doug wrote: I have a new PMDX Gecko driver board. It requires an osculating +5 to 0 to enable the outputs. I am using the step wizard and find that I only get a solid voltage out of pin 17 when I choose charge pump in the wizard. How can I fix this? PMDX manufacture does not have a sample config file. There might be something useful here: http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/emcinfo.pl?About_Charge_Pumps Basically, check to see if the charge pump component is loaded with loadrt, invoked by addf, and connected with net in your .hal file. -- Kirk Wallace http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/ http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html California, USA -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Encoders with no Index
Igor Chudov wrote: Which brings up a question, can one tap with a plug tap first, on a CNC mill that is equipped for rigid tapping? The problem is how do you synchronize two taps, in different holders, so that the threads are synched? I really don't think rigid tapping with a roughing and a finish tap is practical. Probably the only way to do it would be to rigid tap with the plug tap, change to the finish tap but leave the holder loose and manually start it into the hole, and let the existing threads synch the tap. Then, tighten the tap holder while it is still in the hole. This is not what I'd call a reasonable shop operation. Jon -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Encoders with no Index
Igor Chudov wrote: Stuart, what I mean is this: 1) Drill a hole for tapping 2) Tap with a plug tap Is that possible with a CNC mill equipped for rigid tapping? (like mine)? It depends on the hole size, the thread engagement, the material, the thickness of the material, etc. I am sure you could do this in thin aluminum with an adequate hole diameter. I am sure you will have an accident attempting to do the same in thick stainless. I have a lot of experience now rigid tapping in various aluminum parts, but all with smaller taps from 2-56 up to 10-32. it was really COOL to watch it tap fairly deep holes with a 2-56 tap! All I had to do was brush the chips out of the tap's flutes every hole with a toothbrush soaked with alum-tap, and it went beautifully. But, proper tap selection really makes all the difference. Try to do too deep a hole with spiral flute taps and they choke on their own chip and break. So, I have a selection of combined drill-taps (thin material only, no more than 2X major diameter), spiral flute (maybe 3-4 X diameter) and spiral point for anything deeper. Jon -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Encoders with no Index
On 17 February 2011 19:19, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote: Probably the only way to do it would be to rigid tap with the plug tap, change to the finish tap but leave the holder loose and manually start it into the hole, and let the existing threads synch the tap. Then, tighten the tap holder while it is still in the hole. This is not what I'd call a reasonable shop operation. Once set up though, with indexed holders (such as BT, CAT, INT) it should carry on working. However, this all seems a bit of a diversion from the original question... -- atp Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Turning spindle off (or not)
kil...@bobodyne.com wrote: Dear EMC users, I was asked to make the following change in the controller behaviour. As you know when we want to stop the running program and we push the stop program button, program stops and so does spindle from turning. Now the request is: when we stop the program by pressing the stop program button, we want the spindle to keep on turning if it was turning before pressing the stop program button. What do you think? This is because they do not want the tool in spindle to get stuck in the workpiece when we stop the program. We stop spindle by pressing spindle off button or by entering M5 in MDI later. Thanks There is an option which allows you to manually start the spindle (in MDI) before switching modes to manual, so that you can have the spindle running when you run from line. I went looking for this in my configs files and can't find it. It may not be a setting in the .ini file, but something that is set when compiling EMC. Sorry my memory is so vague. I think this setting will at least partially help Farzin, too. Jon -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
[Emc-users] Joypad button to tell axis to move?
I have a Saitek P880 joypad. It works REALLY great to do the following: 1) Control X, Y and Z with joyhandles (little levers sticking out of the joypad) 2) Make some buttons like input.0.btn-pinkie to control HAL pins to give HAL pause and resume commands. The nice thing is that depending on how much I deflect joyhandles, the speed of movement is selected accordingly. Unfortunately, I used both joyhandles and have no more of them available. For two more axis, I would like to use regular joypad buttons (not joyhandles) to tell the axis to move forward or back with predetermined speed. kind of like (incorrect) net moveAAxisLeft input.0.btn-top2 = halui.move-axis-A-left In other words: when I press a certain button, I want a given axis to start moving in a given direction at a predetermined speed. When I release that button, I want movement to stop. How can I set that up. thanks -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
[Emc-users] Machine tapping was Encoders with no Index
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 19:35 +0200, andy pugh wrote: On 17 February 2011 19:19, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote: Probably the only way to do it would be to rigid tap with the plug tap, change to the finish tap but leave the holder loose and manually start it into the hole, and let the existing threads synch the tap. Then, tighten the tap holder while it is still in the hole. This is not what I'd call a reasonable shop operation. Once set up though, with indexed holders (such as BT, CAT, INT) it should carry on working. However, this all seems a bit of a diversion from the original question... Since this thread has bird-walked from spindle orient to tapping I thought I would take the liberty of renaming. In all this fuss over how to machine tap no one has mentioned thread forming. The few times I've tried it by hand it has worked well. With small holes reaming to the starting size is recommended. It works well with CD 1020 which is not completely soft. tensile of about 70K. Tapping 304 SS might be a challenge but I've not tried it. I know of an emc-er that tapped some 800+ holes in A36 with a single tap. :-) All done with a portable drill. ;-) No swarf to worry about in the final op. just drill, ream to size and tap, reverse out and be done. Yes I know that involves an extra op but you get good threads right down to as close to the bottom as your guts will let you go. Obviously, there are limits to where this is practical but the method seems to be under-utilized. Just my tuppence. Dave -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Joypad button to tell axis to move?
On 17 February 2011 21:39, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote: In other words: when I press a certain button, I want a given axis to start moving in a given direction at a predetermined speed. When I release that button, I want movement to stop. How can I set that up. Look at the mux4 component. define states 00 and 11 to be 0 output, 01 to be +speed and 10 to be -speed. Then link the buttons to the sel0 and sel1 pins: http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/html/man/man9/mux4.9.html -- atp Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Joypad button to tell axis to move?
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 13:39 -0600, Igor Chudov wrote: I would like to use regular joypad buttons I did that with my Logitech gamepad: the joysticks do gradual motion and the buttons do on-off motion. This should get you started: http://softsolder.com/2010/10/23/logitech-gamepad-as-emc2-pendant-eagle-schematics-for-the-joggy-thing/ I wrote up a somewhat more elaborate version for Digital Machinist magazine. You can fetch the files (but not the article itself) from: http://www.digitalmachinist.net/files/downloads/2010Winter/DM%205.4% 20Nisley.zip There's a bit of trickery in that version to avoid some race conditions, but the overall logic is straightforward. As soon as I got it set up, there was no going back! -- Ed http://softsolder.com -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Machine tapping was Encoders with no Index
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:43 PM, dave dengv...@charter.net wrote: In all this fuss over how to machine tap no one has mentioned thread forming. The few times I've tried it by hand it has worked well. True, but one has to be very careful with threadforming if thread strength is important: http://machinedesign.com/article/internal-thread-strip-out-tests-yield-surprising-results-0113?page=0%2C0 shows that thread strength is critically dependent on hole diameter when threadforming, much more so than for regular threading -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
