[Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Johnsen
I needed a windows ISO burner and went to the LinuxCNC site because I had
gotten one there before.  I found infraRecorder on LinucCNC.org here:

http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

When I downloaded, it linked me to downloads.sourceforge...  and once it
started downloading, Google Chrome put up a RED screen and halted the
download.

Are there any issues w/ Sourceforge and google?   I ended up downloading
anyway and I didn't get extorted yet...

Lastly, there are some dead links on the linuxCNC Download page:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/download

I looked briefly to see if I could edit and didn't find a way.  The problem
is that the links point to EMC and not CNC in the getting _LinuxCNC:
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

Regards,
Mark
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Johnsen
I got a hum dinger...

I was using pnnconf to setup my 5i25-7i77 and I couldn't reach the entire
pnnconf window on my system using a 17 lenovo monitor.  I dragged the
window 'up' to click the buttons on the bottom, but the next window I
couldn't reach the top and seemed to be stuck.  I tried reducing the size
of the window by grabbing the sides, but that just moved the window around
and sometimes not in the direction I wanted.

I got the bright idea to increase the screen resolution and found the
Display utility from the wheezy menus.  I changed the resolution fine.

After that bright idea, I got stupid real fast.  I noticed two monitors
listed, the lenovo and a generic.  Also, there was a check box that said
something like, Don't use this display.  I figured it might turn off the
lenovo and default to the generic monitor listed.  I'm a curious sort and
thought it would be worth trying.  Why I checked that box I have no idea,
but after checking it, my monitor went blank and the green on/off LED
turned Yellow...

I have rebooted and I can login and as the window environment opens, but my
monitor goes blank and the LED changes from green to yellow.

I tried another monitor from Dell, and the same thing happens.  I noticed
that you can login to a xsession of xfce session, neither made a
difference.

Any idea on how to get my display back?   I should be laughing at this, not
really so much.

Thinking out-loud, I don't have anything on that system, so a re-install is
probably easiest?  Especially for a linux-handicapper like me.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 24.03.15 22:51, Mark Johnsen wrote:
 I got a hum dinger...

You sure have found a way in deep. Back on older distros, I'd have a go
at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but wheezy doesn't seem to have anything in /etc,
just what look like examples in /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d, so it's all
changed yet again.

Ah, /var/log/Xorg.0.log says:

[25.537] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d
[25.582] (==) No Layout section.  Using the first Screen section.
[25.582] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
[25.582] (**) |--Screen Default Screen Section (0) 
[25.582] (**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
[25.583] (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen
Section.
   Using a default monitor configuration.

So, if there's a file in the directory with a Screen section, you
could try deleting that section. OR Better Still, if you can get a
command line, e.g. remotely via ssh, you could try:

$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

I'm newly on Debian 7.8.0, and still installing all the dozens of bits
and pieces missing after a new install, so a bit reluctant to futz with
the display here to see if it still does what it used to. It should -
there's a pile of xserver-xorg packages for it to play havoc with.

Last time I did that, it backed up what was there, in case I might want
it again. That doesn't seem to be your case. :-)

...

OR it should alternatively be possible to run, as root:

# sudo Xorg -configdir directory

where directory is a clean set of config files borrowed from an
uncorrupted wheezy box. That would be safer than immediately overwriting
what you have ... in case that just digs a deeper hole.

OR it could be interesting to first see if just:

# Xorg -configure

will regenerate a clean config. (Depends on what it detects, AIUI.)

 I should be laughing at this, not really so much.

No, it takes time to be able to laugh about a hole in one's foot.

 Thinking out-loud, I don't have anything on that system, so a re-install is
 probably easiest?  Especially for a linux-handicapper like me.

Well, even if there were a lot on the system, it is doubtless all backed
up, so nothing can be lost, can it? ;-)

A re-install might be the easiest way out if you can't ssh in.

Erik

-- 
Sometimes you have to outsmart this stuff, it works for Murphy you know.
- Gene Heskett, on emc-users ML.

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Andreas Pettersson
Easiest way is to create a new user and startx on that user so you drop 
all previous configs.
then just copy you home folder setting files to your old user again..

// A

Erik Christiansen skrev den 2015-03-25 08:36:
 On 24.03.15 22:51, Mark Johnsen wrote:
 I got a hum dinger...
 You sure have found a way in deep. Back on older distros, I'd have a go
 at /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but wheezy doesn't seem to have anything in /etc,
 just what look like examples in /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d, so it's all
 changed yet again.

 Ah, /var/log/Xorg.0.log says:

 [25.537] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d
 [25.582] (==) No Layout section.  Using the first Screen section.
 [25.582] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
 [25.582] (**) |--Screen Default Screen Section (0)
 [25.582] (**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
 [25.583] (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen
 Section.
 Using a default monitor configuration.

 So, if there's a file in the directory with a Screen section, you
 could try deleting that section. OR Better Still, if you can get a
 command line, e.g. remotely via ssh, you could try:

 $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

 I'm newly on Debian 7.8.0, and still installing all the dozens of bits
 and pieces missing after a new install, so a bit reluctant to futz with
 the display here to see if it still does what it used to. It should -
 there's a pile of xserver-xorg packages for it to play havoc with.

 Last time I did that, it backed up what was there, in case I might want
 it again. That doesn't seem to be your case. :-)

 ...

 OR it should alternatively be possible to run, as root:

 # sudo Xorg -configdir directory

 where directory is a clean set of config files borrowed from an
 uncorrupted wheezy box. That would be safer than immediately overwriting
 what you have ... in case that just digs a deeper hole.

 OR it could be interesting to first see if just:

 # Xorg -configure

 will regenerate a clean config. (Depends on what it detects, AIUI.)

 I should be laughing at this, not really so much.
 No, it takes time to be able to laugh about a hole in one's foot.

 Thinking out-loud, I don't have anything on that system, so a re-install is
 probably easiest?  Especially for a linux-handicapper like me.
 Well, even if there were a lot on the system, it is doubtless all backed
 up, so nothing can be lost, can it? ;-)

 A re-install might be the easiest way out if you can't ssh in.

 Erik



--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 25.03.15 08:48, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
 Easiest way is to create a new user and startx on that user so you drop 
 all previous configs.
 then just copy you home folder setting files to your old user again..

If it is an xorg.conf in $HOME which is causing the problem, then there
is no need for a new user. It is sufficent to delete (or rename) that file.

I have never encountered a linux box with a per-user xorg.conf, and I
expect that Mark would be back on the air on falling back to a default
system config.

Erik

-- 
The meta-problem here is that the configuration wizard does all the approved
rituals (GUI with standardized clicky buttons, help popping up in a browser,
etc. etc.) but doesn't have the central attribute these are supposed to achieve:
discoverability. That is, the quality that every point in the interface has
prompts and actions attached to it from which you can learn what to do next.
   - Eric Raymond, in The Luxury of Ignorance.

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Kyle Kerr
This doesn't answer your question about security certificates. You could
try imgburn. http://www.imgburn.com/
On Mar 25, 2015 2:13 AM, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:

 I needed a windows ISO burner and went to the LinuxCNC site because I had
 gotten one there before.  I found infraRecorder on LinucCNC.org here:

 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

 When I downloaded, it linked me to downloads.sourceforge...  and once it
 started downloading, Google Chrome put up a RED screen and halted the
 download.

 Are there any issues w/ Sourceforge and google?   I ended up downloading
 anyway and I didn't get extorted yet...

 Lastly, there are some dead links on the linuxCNC Download page:
 http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/download

 I looked briefly to see if I could edit and didn't find a way.  The problem
 is that the links point to EMC and not CNC in the getting _LinuxCNC:
 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

 Regards,
 Mark

 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
 all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
 to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Johnsen
Andy - thanks for the reply.  I thought it was a little strange to get the
red screen and wanted to make sure the community was aware of what's going
on there.  I hadn't seen that before from that site.

I agree w/ the shady download adverts, they're prevalent at source.forge
and cnet's download.com, but I hadn't had chrome stop that before.

Once you're past the adverts, then you have to watch about the rogue ad-in
installs like ask.com, etc.  Those are on the same level of evil...


Message: 7
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:47:45 +
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
CAN1+YZXHBhFnHECRCMHU4MTuQKH9HgTr7H=9ye8awcekbgj...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 25 March 2015 at 06:02, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:

 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

 When I downloaded, it linked me to downloads.sourceforge...  and once it
 started downloading, Google Chrome put up a RED screen and halted the
 download.

When I go to Infracorder,org I see two _adverts_ which look like
download links but are not, as far as I can tell, actually the
download links for infracorder.

I wasn't brave enough to see what they were download links for.

This is a common problem on Sourceforge too, the adverts on the
download page are spoofed to look like download links for the software
you just asked for.

This is just evil, and there should be a way to complain such
misleading adverts.

--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 07:47:45 andy pugh wrote:
 On 25 March 2015 at 06:02, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:
  http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_
 the_cd
 
  When I downloaded, it linked me to downloads.sourceforge...  and
  once it started downloading, Google Chrome put up a RED screen and
  halted the download.

 When I go to Infracorder,org I see two _adverts_ which look like
 download links but are not, as far as I can tell, actually the
 download links for infracorder.

 I wasn't brave enough to see what they were download links for.

 This is a common problem on Sourceforge too, the adverts on the
 download page are spoofed to look like download links for the software
 you just asked for.

 This is just evil, and there should be a way to complain such
 misleading adverts.

I've not found such a link, complaints to abuse seem to go to a black 
hole, and the spammy crap from them (they hit me 2 to 4x a day) has 
caused me to setup a filter recipe that sends them to a spam folder, 
to be inspected as sa-learn -spam runs in the middle of the night and 
deletes them when it has learned about them.  All the fake training 
resources  so-called seminars they offer, are related to stuff that 
will change with the next exploit that breaks, and likely would be a 
total waste for any IP departments money that was worth keeping on the 
payroll.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Wendt
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:



 I've not found such a link, complaints to abuse seem to go to a black
 hole, and the spammy crap from them (they hit me 2 to 4x a day) has
 caused me to setup a filter recipe that sends them to a spam folder,
 to be inspected as sa-learn -spam runs in the middle of the night and
 deletes them when it has learned about them.  All the fake training
 resources  so-called seminars they offer, are related to stuff that
 will change with the next exploit that breaks, and likely would be a
 total waste for any IP departments money that was worth keeping on the
 payroll.

 Cheers, Gene Heskett



Hey Gene,

Good to hear from you.  We were wondering if everything is ok, since you
normally post here just about every day, and we hadn't heard from you in a
while.

Hope everything is going well.

Mark
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] [Was] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett


On Wednesday 25 March 2015 08:28:21 Mark Wendt wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com 
wrote:
  I've not found such a link, complaints to abuse seem to go to a
  black hole, and the spammy crap from them (they hit me 2 to 4x a
  day) has caused me to setup a filter recipe that sends them to a
  spam folder, to be inspected as sa-learn -spam runs in the middle
  of the night and deletes them when it has learned about them.  All
  the fake training resources  so-called seminars they offer, are
  related to stuff that will change with the next exploit that breaks,
  and likely would be a total waste for any IP departments money that
  was worth keeping on the payroll.
 
  Cheers, Gene Heskett

 Hey Gene,

 Good to hear from you.  We were wondering if everything is ok, since
 you normally post here just about every day, and we hadn't heard from
 you in a while.

 Hope everything is going well.

 Mark

Well is a state of mind. :)  To summerize, a typu in the emc filters has 
been marking posts as read for the last couple weeks,  and it was 
bothering me that the list seemed to have died.  Fixed for about a day 
now.

However its been entirely too damned real around here. A bug in the bill 
pay software at my bank caused by medicare sup policy to go unpaid for 
long enough it was canceled, and they (Mutual of Omaha) will not 
reinstate coverage based on my past claims. So now the only way is to 
become an ARRP member and buy it thru them because ARRP says they can't 
refuse.  Work in progress. I am not crazy about ARRP.  But when in 
Rome...

Then a bit over 24 hours ago, a patient at Sharpe Hospital climbed the 
fence and walked into the woods, so everyone has a piece in their pocket 
in case he shows up, including me.  He was there for mental evaluation 
to determine if he could stand trial for murder one.

Then I ordered the 11 amp electric demolition hammer from Harbor Fraud 2 
weeks ago last saturday, intending to sink a 20 some gallon platic sump 
into the basement floor because 3 dehumidifiers can't keep up with the 
spring rains, expecting the usual UPS lag of 5 business days.  The 
illiterate knuckle dragger in the warehouse stuck the shipping label on 
a transmission jack, which I rejected when they brought it the first 
time, so they brought it back again DBY, box now all beat to hell  
leaking parts, and without even punching the door bell. I burned up the 
line  to HF (again), they supposedly have now shipped the correct item, 
but I've no clue what the name of the donkey pulling the cart is.

Fedex of course won't send it back unless HF issues a shipping return.  
So unless they do that in another week or so, I figure I'll own a 450lb 
rated transmission jack, free.  Not at all sure what I'll use it for 
though, barter material maybe.  No clue what its worth, but it can't 
possibly be worth more than a 100 dollar bill if that much.  Its a 
stamped metal scissors jack.

Stress, created by not strangling someone desperately in need of it..

And how was your last 2 weeks?

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] [Was] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Wendt
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:



 On Wednesday 25 March 2015 08:28:21 Mark Wendt wrote:
  On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
 wrote:
   I've not found such a link, complaints to abuse seem to go to a
   black hole, and the spammy crap from them (they hit me 2 to 4x a
   day) has caused me to setup a filter recipe that sends them to a
   spam folder, to be inspected as sa-learn -spam runs in the middle
   of the night and deletes them when it has learned about them.  All
   the fake training resources  so-called seminars they offer, are
   related to stuff that will change with the next exploit that breaks,
   and likely would be a total waste for any IP departments money that
   was worth keeping on the payroll.
  
   Cheers, Gene Heskett
 
  Hey Gene,
 
  Good to hear from you.  We were wondering if everything is ok, since
  you normally post here just about every day, and we hadn't heard from
  you in a while.
 
  Hope everything is going well.
 
  Mark

 Well is a state of mind. :)  To summerize, a typu in the emc filters has
 been marking posts as read for the last couple weeks,  and it was
 bothering me that the list seemed to have died.  Fixed for about a day
 now.

 However its been entirely too damned real around here. A bug in the bill
 pay software at my bank caused by medicare sup policy to go unpaid for
 long enough it was canceled, and they (Mutual of Omaha) will not
 reinstate coverage based on my past claims. So now the only way is to
 become an ARRP member and buy it thru them because ARRP says they can't
 refuse.  Work in progress. I am not crazy about ARRP.  But when in
 Rome...

 Then a bit over 24 hours ago, a patient at Sharpe Hospital climbed the
 fence and walked into the woods, so everyone has a piece in their pocket
 in case he shows up, including me.  He was there for mental evaluation
 to determine if he could stand trial for murder one.

 Then I ordered the 11 amp electric demolition hammer from Harbor Fraud 2
 weeks ago last saturday, intending to sink a 20 some gallon platic sump
 into the basement floor because 3 dehumidifiers can't keep up with the
 spring rains, expecting the usual UPS lag of 5 business days.  The
 illiterate knuckle dragger in the warehouse stuck the shipping label on
 a transmission jack, which I rejected when they brought it the first
 time, so they brought it back again DBY, box now all beat to hell 
 leaking parts, and without even punching the door bell. I burned up the
 line  to HF (again), they supposedly have now shipped the correct item,
 but I've no clue what the name of the donkey pulling the cart is.

 Fedex of course won't send it back unless HF issues a shipping return.
 So unless they do that in another week or so, I figure I'll own a 450lb
 rated transmission jack, free.  Not at all sure what I'll use it for
 though, barter material maybe.  No clue what its worth, but it can't
 possibly be worth more than a 100 dollar bill if that much.  Its a
 stamped metal scissors jack.

 Stress, created by not strangling someone desperately in need of it..

 And how was your last 2 weeks?

 Cheers, Gene Heskett



State of mind indeed...  ;-)  If nothing else, hope your health is holding
out.

Mark
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 03/25/2015 12:02 AM, Mark Johnsen wrote:
 Lastly, there are some dead links on the linuxCNC Download page:
 http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/download
 
 I looked briefly to see if I could edit and didn't find a way.  The problem
 is that the links point to EMC and not CNC in the getting _LinuxCNC:
 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

Thanks for the bug report, i fixed the broken links on the Download page.

The main, non-wiki part of our docs is protected by a password and only
editable by a few people (using a wonky old web interface), so
unfortunately those docs don't get much love.


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Johnsen
Thanks for the replies.  I'll go try the easy stuff (new user,
ctrl+buttons) here in a little bit after finishing some 'real' work...

I do think I'd like to SSH into the system, but I'm not entirely sure how
to do that?  SSH was on my 'mental' list once I got my machine running.
From what I can tell, it's not too hard.  It's one of those things where I
don't think I 'need' to do it, but it would be cool.  Although saying that,
I'd probably work on my CAD and CAM in the house and then walk it out w/ a
USB stick.  If I could SSH in, I could just send it that way...  There was
a recent post about a gentleman connecting ssh to his machine - totally
thought it was cool...

I have another debian wheezy computer I can use and can hook them up on the
house network (wired). So theoretically, I should be able to connect...

Thanks for the replies,
Mark

PS - I'm a laughing a little more now that I slept on it.  This is
hilarious...  Although, if I find the guy that put that checkbox in wheezy
I'll have a few choice words for him.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 10:40:46 Mark Johnsen wrote:
 Thanks for the replies.  I'll go try the easy stuff (new user,
 ctrl+buttons) here in a little bit after finishing some 'real' work...

 I do think I'd like to SSH into the system, but I'm not entirely sure
 how to do that?  SSH was on my 'mental' list once I got my machine
 running. From what I can tell, it's not too hard.  It's one of those
 things where I don't think I 'need' to do it, but it would be cool. 

ssh -Y FQDN, forwards the x stuff too.  You can even run LCNC from your 
armchair that way if motor power is off.  Sorta, depends on homing 
config etc if you can cut warm air with the motor power off, which I 
have always setup as a separate switch.  So I can on the 4 axis mill, 
but not of the lathe as it has real home switches.

 Although saying that, I'd probably work on my CAD and CAM in the house
 and then walk it out w/ a USB stick.

Seriously that is what the ssh -Y session is for, and also what NFS is 
for.  Surprisingly easy to setup and it Just Works(TM)

HOWEVER, I also have a decent router, reflashed with dd-wrt, between my 
local network and the cable modem.  No one has gotten past it in the 5 
or 6 years I've had it in service.

 If I could SSH in, I could just 
 send it that way...  There was a recent post about a gentleman
 connecting ssh to his machine - totally thought it was cool...

 I have another debian wheezy computer I can use and can hook them up
 on the house network (wired). So theoretically, I should be able to
 connect...

All my machines are net connected, it greatly simplifies the upgrade and 
patch process.  Well worth the cat5 to do it.  I have 2 strands of cat5 
running across the back yard, one of which was 6 years old in 2010 when 
a 112 mph direcho came by and knocked down most of the bigger trees, all 
my privacy fence, + took some of my roof and generally made a heck of a 
mess of the whole neighborhood.

That now faded blue cable is still there, swinging in the breeze and 
working perfectly on a 100 mbit circuit.  I haved no clue how a 
neighbors yard building, which went by 6 or 7 feet up in the air, took 
some guttering off the house and smashed into a pine tree just downwind 
of the house  12 feet up, leaving damages that can still be seen, 
managed to miss taking out that cable. Did Murphy have the day off?

 Thanks for the replies,
 Mark

 PS - I'm a laughing a little more now that I slept on it.  This is
 hilarious...  Although, if I find the guy that put that checkbox in
 wheezy I'll have a few choice words for him.

Which checkbox is that?

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Ladder logic documentation [Was: Simple, adjustable timer]

2015-03-25 Thread richshoop
As an older, not that aware, blonde, Polish, left handed, engineeer. I 
can't keep track of more than one thing at a time. Out of self defense working 
on PLC's and yes discrete hard wire ladder logic in machine tools, (since about 
1965), I only use normally open switches with PLC's. It reduces the task to 
something that I can understand. The exception to this rule is the safety loop, 
which should consist of nothing but normally closed switches, which is never 
tied into the PLC anyway, or it shouldn't be, my apologies to Pilz and a few 
others that make intrinsically safer PLC's. 
Invert the signals in one logic level only! When you are working to a deadline 
to get a piece of equipment running again, there are enough 
stress/distractions, don't make the task more difficult. A further concern that 
comes to mind is whether another person can follow you and do the repair? And 
if the repair/upgrade happened more than two weeks ago, that person is you! and 
you won't remember what you did, so you will have to relearn the logic 
More self defense I only use power on timers in PLCs, if I need something 
else, I build it in the PLC logic, it does no one any service to combine timer 
types in a single PLC program to save a few lines of programming. 
- Original Message -

From: emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net 
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:10:26 PM 
Subject: Emc-users Digest, Vol 107, Issue 58 

Send Emc-users mailing list submissions to 
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users 
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net 

You can reach the person managing the list at 
emc-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
than Re: Contents of Emc-users digest... 


Today's Topics: 

1. Re: gcmc - 1.5.3 (TonyZPP) 
2. Re: gcmc - 1.5.3 (Bertho Stultiens) 
3. Re: Ladder logic documentation [Was: Simple, adjustable 
timer] (Gregg Eshelman) 
4. Anyone remember the Purdue CAD-LAB? (Gregg Eshelman) 
5. Re: Anyone remember the Purdue CAD-LAB? (andy pugh) 
6. Re: Anyone remember the Purdue CAD-LAB? (Gregg Eshelman) 
7. InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning? (Mark Johnsen) 


-- 

Message: 1 
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:25:55 -0400 
From: TonyZPP tony_zamp...@cox.net 
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] gcmc - 1.5.3 
To: Enhanced Machine Controller \(EMC\) 
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
Message-ID: 7E1B5A6DE4FE4DE08EC2D8BBBF51BBC4@E5530Laptop 
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; 
reply-type=original 

Bertho, 

Thank you for continuing to support your program, GCMC, and for keeping 
it current. I use it often. It has served me well. 

Tony 


-Original Message- 
From: Bertho Stultiens 
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 6:42 AM 
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
Subject: [Emc-users] gcmc - 1.5.3 

Hi All, 

A new version 1.5.3 of gcmc has been released. 

This release is a bugfix release and fixes relative movement. The 
movement would be calculated twice if the destination was within 1e-12 
(epsilon) of zero, resulting in the wrong path. 

You can get the new version from the homepage: 
http://www.vagrearg.org/content/gcmc 

As usual, let me know if you encounter bugs or have any questions or wishes. 

-- 
Greetings Bertho 

(disclaimers are disclaimed) 

-- 
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, 
sponsored 
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for 
all 
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs 
to 
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ 
___ 
Emc-users mailing list 
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users 




-- 

Message: 2 
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:16:40 +0100 
From: Bertho Stultiens ber...@vagrearg.org 
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] gcmc - 1.5.3 
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
Message-ID: 55106698.4050...@vagrearg.org 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 

On 03/23/2015 05:25 PM, TonyZPP wrote: 
 Thank you for continuing to support your program, GCMC, and for keeping 
 it current. I use it often. It has served me well. 

You are welcome. I love to fix gcmc's bugs(*) and implement useful 
features. The more users, the better it gets ;-) 



(*) That is, fix it when I do not have to hide in shame for some bad 
code I produced when my mind took off on a tangent. Luckily, that does 
not happen too often. 

-- 

Re: [Emc-users] [Was] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 10:31:42 Mark Wendt wrote:

  Stress, created by not strangling someone desperately in need of
  it..
 
  And how was your last 2 weeks?
 
  Cheers, Gene Heskett

 State of mind indeed...  ;-)  If nothing else, hope your health is
 holding out.

 Mark

Fair to middlin.  Due for some more cortisone shots in my back, but not 
till the insurance is good again.  I hope I can get away with running 
that demo hammer when it finally does get here.

I did get mostly finished with the first of what might be 4 of those 
blanket chests featured in the Dec 2014 Fine Woodworking, doing all the 
joinery on my mill of course, Some of you helped with that code, thank 
you, but I'm still wiping on another coat of Minwax's fast drying wipe 
on poly varnish from time to time.  I sent one of my boys a pix, he took 
it to work, and everybody that saw it proclaimed is was wood porn :) 
Too many people buy their furniture at Big Lots or Ikea I guess. 

I did go the magazine version one better though, my version has a lining 
of eastern aromatic red cedar.  Costs me about $600 in Mahogany, cedar 
and ebony plus some very expensive ($35/copy) hinges from Rockler to 
make it.  Fun project but almost too big for my shop area.  Currently 
weighing down my table saw and fully occupying the top.  I'd post a pix, 
but its probably bigger than the server will pass at nearly 300kb.

At some point when I can get some decent pix by backing away so my zoom 
lens doesn't warp it near as badly, I'll put some pix on my web page.

Keeps me out of the bars dontcha know.  :)

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread andy pugh
On 25 March 2015 at 14:40, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:
 There was
 a recent post about a gentleman connecting ssh to his machine - totally
 thought it was cool...

I have my lathe and mill set up with ssh and also have wake-on-lan
configured, so I can boot the machines from the Mac in the living
room.

I can then ssh -Y to put the LinuxCNC gui on the Mac monitor, and (in
theory) run the machines.

A much more typical use is to wake-on-lan the machines so they are
booted when I get to the workshop, set up and start the job, then
close the workshop and turn the lights out, and go back to the Mac and

ssh -Y andypugh@mill.local
halcmd -kf
loadusr -s pin motion.program-line

Which pops up a little window on the Mac screen which shows me the
progress of the job, and which (usefully) shows 0 when paused
waiting for a tool change or manual unclamp of the rotary.

-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
Hello to all!

I just managed to turn the second motor of my machine (another AC motor
with a Powerflex 40 drive) and works just fine for positioning the part.
Tomorrow I'll be uploading some videos.

Although I need to do some fine tuning on both the rotary and the linear
axis I was thinking about a concept to improve the accuracy of the servo
loops.

As I have seen on many machines including the Mazak that we have here, the
servo systems close the velocity loop within the servo drive, and then the
CNC applies a voltage to control the velocity of the motor based on the PID
of the position loop.

So as I see it, it's like there is one pid nested inside the other, or sort
of. Now the VFDs that I'm using can close the velocity loop but I would
have to use a special module for that.

My question is, based on your experience. Could this improve the accuracy
of the joints? I guess this could be done within LinuxCNC without closing
the loop on the VFDs.

Thanks as always for your help!!

-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread alex chiosso
Hi Leonardo.
If you want to perform a closed loop position system as you said you need
the inner speed closed loop.
I do believe that can be quite difficult to perform both closed loops
within LCNC with the expected accuracy.
The VFD that you are using is a sensor less vector control type (that is
why you have to close the speed loop outside the VFD).
This kind of VFD are not the right product to run a servo system (as you
already know) also because you should drive an asynchronous induction motor
that is not usually suited for that porpouse.
I'm not a LCNC guru  but at least I've always used a vector VFD with
encoder feedback tied from the motor to the VFD with the encoder simulation
feedback connected to the axis module .

Alex


On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia 
leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello to all!

 I just managed to turn the second motor of my machine (another AC motor
 with a Powerflex 40 drive) and works just fine for positioning the part.
 Tomorrow I'll be uploading some videos.

 Although I need to do some fine tuning on both the rotary and the linear
 axis I was thinking about a concept to improve the accuracy of the servo
 loops.

 As I have seen on many machines including the Mazak that we have here, the
 servo systems close the velocity loop within the servo drive, and then the
 CNC applies a voltage to control the velocity of the motor based on the PID
 of the position loop.

 So as I see it, it's like there is one pid nested inside the other, or sort
 of. Now the VFDs that I'm using can close the velocity loop but I would
 have to use a special module for that.

 My question is, based on your experience. Could this improve the accuracy
 of the joints? I guess this could be done within LinuxCNC without closing
 the loop on the VFDs.

 Thanks as always for your help!!

 --
 *Leonardo Marsaglia*.

 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
 all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
 to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread alex chiosso
How are you managing the positioning right now?
Are you using limit switches or incremental encoder or something else?
Il giorno 25/mar/2015 19:45, Leonardo Marsaglia 
leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com ha scritto:

 2015-03-25 15:07 GMT-03:00 alex chiosso achio...@gmail.com:

  Hi Leonardo.
  If you want to perform a closed loop position system as you said you need
  the inner speed closed loop.
  I do believe that can be quite difficult to perform both closed loops
  within LCNC with the expected accuracy.
  The VFD that you are using is a sensor less vector control type (that is
  why you have to close the speed loop outside the VFD).
  This kind of VFD are not the right product to run a servo system (as
 you
  already know) also because you should drive an asynchronous induction
 motor
  that is not usually suited for that porpouse.
  I'm not a LCNC guru  but at least I've always used a vector VFD with
  encoder feedback tied from the motor to the VFD with the encoder
 simulation
  feedback connected to the axis module .
 

 Hello Alex and thanks for the answer.

 Well, I know this is not the best solution to drive a servo system, but
 since this is not a really accurate machine, because I only need to
 position a coil for induction heating, I can live with that. Also now It's
 working pretty well considering these limitations.

 Anyway I was investigating this because If I can manage to get better
 results with this system I would love to achieve them.






 --
 *Leonardo Marsaglia*.

 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
 all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
 to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
2015-03-25 16:46 GMT-03:00 alex chiosso achio...@gmail.com:

 How are you managing the positioning right now?
 Are you using limit switches or incremental encoder or something else?


Now I'm using incremental encoders on both axis and I'm finishing the setup
with LinuxCNC. For the linear axis the maximum error is like 0.1 mm wich is
really good considering the setup and also considering the accuracy that I
need.

The other one I'm going to make some tuning tomorrow and I'll be telling
you. Also tomorrow I'll be uploading some videos of the machine running.


-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
2015-03-25 15:07 GMT-03:00 alex chiosso achio...@gmail.com:

 Hi Leonardo.
 If you want to perform a closed loop position system as you said you need
 the inner speed closed loop.
 I do believe that can be quite difficult to perform both closed loops
 within LCNC with the expected accuracy.
 The VFD that you are using is a sensor less vector control type (that is
 why you have to close the speed loop outside the VFD).
 This kind of VFD are not the right product to run a servo system (as you
 already know) also because you should drive an asynchronous induction motor
 that is not usually suited for that porpouse.
 I'm not a LCNC guru  but at least I've always used a vector VFD with
 encoder feedback tied from the motor to the VFD with the encoder simulation
 feedback connected to the axis module .


Hello Alex and thanks for the answer.

Well, I know this is not the best solution to drive a servo system, but
since this is not a really accurate machine, because I only need to
position a coil for induction heating, I can live with that. Also now It's
working pretty well considering these limitations.

Anyway I was investigating this because If I can manage to get better
results with this system I would love to achieve them.






-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Johnsen
I made some progress, but still struggling.

The Ctrl-Alt-F1 opened a terminal, but maybe not the right kind?

Whenever I issued the xrandr command (other than man xrandr), I got Can't
Open Display

Found two outputs VGA1 and LVDS1 in this file /var/log/Xorg.0.log and this
coincides with what I saw in the monitor window.  These are the 'output'
types and if the xrandr command worked I'd issue something like:
xrandr --ouptut LVDS1 --auto

Someone mentioned xorg.conf, but I could not find any xorg.conf files in
the etc/X11 file.  In some of the info I found, the xorg.conf was replaced
in this or a recent version of Debian by something else and confuses me.

One person had the same issue and he got to this directory:
 $HOME/.e/e/config/standard and found files such as:
 e_randr.cfg plus e_randr.1.cfg thru e_randr.9.cfg

Here's the page for that guy:
https://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=16531.0

He kept saying, I can login as root.  I'm having issues login as root and
not I got that right.  I issued:
sudo su
cd root

But,
ls root  --  there are no files or folders.

I tried:
cd .e
cd e

But, no surprise that folder is not there.

I guess my question is, did I get to root, and if so, how can I get to .e
folder?   I did see the # sign appear like other info I read on the web.
But, no files are there.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread alex chiosso
Looks really good.
I've understood that you're running the axis with position open loop
control.
Am I wrong?
Il giorno 25/mar/2015 20:52, Leonardo Marsaglia 
leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com ha scritto:

 2015-03-25 16:46 GMT-03:00 alex chiosso achio...@gmail.com:

  How are you managing the positioning right now?
  Are you using limit switches or incremental encoder or something else?
 

 Now I'm using incremental encoders on both axis and I'm finishing the setup
 with LinuxCNC. For the linear axis the maximum error is like 0.1 mm wich is
 really good considering the setup and also considering the accuracy that I
 need.

 The other one I'm going to make some tuning tomorrow and I'll be telling
 you. Also tomorrow I'll be uploading some videos of the machine running.


 --
 *Leonardo Marsaglia*.

 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
 all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
 to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] New TP

2015-03-25 Thread Belli Button
I saw a page today regarding the new TP where the formulas were given for
calculating the desired freq, look ahead and so forth settings, now I cannot
for the life of me find it!  I think Sam wrote it but it might have RE.

Someone have a link?

Running the LCNC splash screen doesn't seem to run any different regardless
of what I make the P and Q settings, is this unique to the splash screen?



--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] New TP

2015-03-25 Thread sam sokolik
is this wat you are looking for?

http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/html/config/ini_config.html#sub:TRAJ-section

are you running the splash screen at a high feed?  you won't notice any
speed increase at its default speed...  It helps keep the feed up when
doing high speed machining..

sam

On 03/25/2015 03:25 PM, Belli Button wrote:
 I saw a page today regarding the new TP where the formulas were given for
 calculating the desired freq, look ahead and so forth settings, now I cannot
 for the life of me find it!  I think Sam wrote it but it might have RE.

 Someone have a link?

 Running the LCNC splash screen doesn't seem to run any different regardless
 of what I make the P and Q settings, is this unique to the splash screen?



 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] New TP

2015-03-25 Thread Belli Button
Running at default speed, 400 and upped it 200% but the tool staggers around
the curves, almost as if it wasn't blending at all, tried G64, G64 P.1Q.1
G64 P3 Q3 and looking at the trace on the screen, they were all exactly the
same.
It's a new set up and I am still getting started, didn't have any other
G-code handy.

That's not the page I saw but I think the same content, might have been same
info, different site.  I'll start reading in the morning.

Thanks,

-Original Message-
From: sam sokolik [mailto:sa...@empirescreen.com] 
Sent: 25 March 2015 22:58
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] New TP

is this wat you are looking for?

http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/html/config/ini_config.html#sub:TRAJ-section

are you running the splash screen at a high feed?  you won't notice any
speed increase at its default speed...  It helps keep the feed up when doing
high speed machining..

sam

On 03/25/2015 03:25 PM, Belli Button wrote:
 I saw a page today regarding the new TP where the formulas were given 
 for calculating the desired freq, look ahead and so forth settings, 
 now I cannot for the life of me find it!  I think Sam wrote it but it
might have RE.

 Someone have a link?

 Running the LCNC splash screen doesn't seem to run any different 
 regardless of what I make the P and Q settings, is this unique to the
splash screen?



 --
  Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel 
 Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot 
 Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from 
 weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, 
 tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. 
 http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Karlsson Wang
To get higher accuracy you need more accurate measurement, some extra 
resolution above the accuracy is also useful.

For better dynamic perfomance it may make sense to close the inner loop if the 
inner loop is faster than the outer loop. If the electic response is much 
faster than the mechanical response then there is rather little to gain from 
faster control loop. If motor inductance is around 1mH, applied voltage is 48 
volt and current is 10A then U=L*di/dt = dt = L*di/U = 1mH*10A/48V = 0.2ms = 
200µs is the time to change motor torque from zero to maximum which put an 
upper limit on dynamic response, there is also a rotational speed dependent 
back emf reducing available voltage.

If you do not like the math. Change servo loop peridicity adjust control loop 
and see if it make any real difference.


Nicklas Karlsson





On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:45:42 -0300
Leonardo Marsaglia leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello to all!
 
 I just managed to turn the second motor of my machine (another AC motor
 with a Powerflex 40 drive) and works just fine for positioning the part.
 Tomorrow I'll be uploading some videos.
 
 Although I need to do some fine tuning on both the rotary and the linear
 axis I was thinking about a concept to improve the accuracy of the servo
 loops.
 
 As I have seen on many machines including the Mazak that we have here, the
 servo systems close the velocity loop within the servo drive, and then the
 CNC applies a voltage to control the velocity of the motor based on the PID
 of the position loop.
 
 So as I see it, it's like there is one pid nested inside the other, or sort
 of. Now the VFDs that I'm using can close the velocity loop but I would
 have to use a special module for that.
 
 My question is, based on your experience. Could this improve the accuracy
 of the joints? I guess this could be done within LinuxCNC without closing
 the loop on the VFDs.
 
 Thanks as always for your help!!
 
 -- 
 *Leonardo Marsaglia*.
 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 19:02:16 Karlsson  Wang wrote:
 To get higher accuracy you need more accurate measurement, some extra
 resolution above the accuracy is also useful.

 For better dynamic perfomance it may make sense to close the inner
 loop if the inner loop is faster than the outer loop. If the electic
 response is much faster than the mechanical response then there is
 rather little to gain from faster control loop. If motor inductance is
 around 1mH, applied voltage is 48 volt and current is 10A then
 U=L*di/dt = dt = L*di/U = 1mH*10A/48V = 0.2ms = 200µs is the time to
 change motor torque from zero to maximum which put an upper limit on
 dynamic response, there is also a rotational speed dependent back emf
 reducing available voltage.

 If you do not like the math. Change servo loop peridicity adjust
 control loop and see if it make any real difference.


 Nicklas Karlsson

If I can butt in here Leonardo, when I was setting up the spindle speed 
servo in my toy lathe after switching from a non-linear and failure 
prone driver to drive the 1hp treadmill motor my 7x12 now sports, to a 
slightly modified version of the Pico Systems servo driver, and keeping 
in mind I am using one of Peters 5i25 interfaces, which means I no 
longer needed a base thread in the setup.  But the speed servo was 
hunting badly enough to keep the back gears in the headstock rattling 
pretty good when the servo thread was running at nominally 1 kilohertz.

I had to reduce the P in the pid to the point it was essentially 
worthless at sub 300 rev speeds.  So for SG, thinking the control was 
too slow, I did a rockhopper diagram and re-arranged the hal file so 
that I was doing a straight fall thru of the control path so it was not 
wasting a period or more because it was out of order when the modules 
were in the wrong order.  That helped but the amount of P seemed to be 
limited yet, so the only other way to get a faster control loop was to 
raise the servo thread speed. Nominally 2 kilohertz made an obvious 
difference, and at 4 kilohertz, it was lots quieter.  So that is where 
it has been running at for several months now.  P in the speed PID is 
now high enough that I can peel off a pretty good sized string of blued 
steel at 150 revs, or even a dimly glowing string at 500 revs, which 
gives a more better finish.

My $0.02.  Works well here, might not be worth the electron wiggle to 
send it to someone else.  The phrase YMMV applies here.




 On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:45:42 -0300

 Leonardo Marsaglia leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello to all!
 
  I just managed to turn the second motor of my machine (another AC
  motor with a Powerflex 40 drive) and works just fine for positioning
  the part. Tomorrow I'll be uploading some videos.
 
  Although I need to do some fine tuning on both the rotary and the
  linear axis I was thinking about a concept to improve the accuracy
  of the servo loops.
 
  As I have seen on many machines including the Mazak that we have
  here, the servo systems close the velocity loop within the servo
  drive, and then the CNC applies a voltage to control the velocity of
  the motor based on the PID of the position loop.
 
  So as I see it, it's like there is one pid nested inside the other,
  or sort of. Now the VFDs that I'm using can close the velocity loop
  but I would have to use a special module for that.
 
  My question is, based on your experience. Could this improve the
  accuracy of the joints? I guess this could be done within LinuxCNC
  without closing the loop on the VFDs.
 
  Thanks as always for your help!!
 
  --
  *Leonardo Marsaglia*.
  
 -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go
  Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership
  with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software
  development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos,
  case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
  conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
  ___
  Emc-users mailing list
  Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
 Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot
 Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from
 weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies,
 tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now.
 http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in 

Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Kyle Kerr
I warned you. I know enough to be dangerous. :D See if
https://pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org/howto/use-xrandr.html has any useful
info for you.
On Mar 25, 2015 2:52 PM, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:

 I made some progress, but still struggling.

 The Ctrl-Alt-F1 opened a terminal, but maybe not the right kind?

 Whenever I issued the xrandr command (other than man xrandr), I got Can't
 Open Display

 Found two outputs VGA1 and LVDS1 in this file /var/log/Xorg.0.log and this
 coincides with what I saw in the monitor window.  These are the 'output'
 types and if the xrandr command worked I'd issue something like:
 xrandr --ouptut LVDS1 --auto

 Someone mentioned xorg.conf, but I could not find any xorg.conf files in
 the etc/X11 file.  In some of the info I found, the xorg.conf was replaced
 in this or a recent version of Debian by something else and confuses me.

 One person had the same issue and he got to this directory:
  $HOME/.e/e/config/standard and found files such as:
  e_randr.cfg plus e_randr.1.cfg thru e_randr.9.cfg

 Here's the page for that guy:
 https://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=16531.0

 He kept saying, I can login as root.  I'm having issues login as root and
 not I got that right.  I issued:
 sudo su
 cd root

 But,
 ls root  --  there are no files or folders.

 I tried:
 cd .e
 cd e

 But, no surprise that folder is not there.

 I guess my question is, did I get to root, and if so, how can I get to .e
 folder?   I did see the # sign appear like other info I read on the web.
 But, no files are there.

 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
 all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
 to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread Gregg Eshelman
On 3/25/2015 8:29 AM, Mark Johnsen wrote:
 Andy - thanks for the reply.  I thought it was a little strange to get the
 red screen and wanted to make sure the community was aware of what's going
 on there.  I hadn't seen that before from that site.

 I agree w/ the shady download adverts, they're prevalent at source.forge
 and cnet's download.com, but I hadn't had chrome stop that before.

 Once you're past the adverts, then you have to watch about the rogue ad-in
 installs like ask.com, etc.  Those are on the same level of evil...

I have to deal with that a lot. I show people what to make sure they 
un-check when they download and install software, but some people just 
cannot or refuse to learn.

ALWAYS select custom install if available and carefully examine each 
step during an install instead of just clicking Next.

So they regularly pay me to come and clean up all the junk (they won't 
learn how to uninstall anything) and scan/clean their computer for BHO's 
(Browser Helper Objects), PUP's (Possibly Unpopular Programs) and malware.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com


--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Jon Elson
On 03/25/2015 12:45 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
 As I have seen on many machines including the Mazak that we have here, the
 servo systems close the velocity loop within the servo drive, and then the
 CNC applies a voltage to control the velocity of the motor based on the PID
 of the position loop.


You should check this out :
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis

There used to be a web page that described dual feedback on 
one of the big machines at Stuart Stevenson's MPM shop and 
had a bit of history of how they arranged to do that, but I 
can not find it now. They used a linear encoder for position 
feedback and a shaft encoder on the motor for velocity feedback.

(Anybody know where the descriptive page with photos, etc. 
on that has gone to?)

Jon

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
2015-03-25 16:56 GMT-03:00 alex chiosso achio...@gmail.com:

 Looks really good.
 I've understood that you're running the axis with position open loop
 control.
 Am I wrong?


No open but closed loop on LinuxCNC. The only thing I'm looking after is to
closed both velocity and position loop like a real servo would do.


-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett


On Wednesday 25 March 2015 20:22:14 andy pugh wrote:
 On 26 March 2015 at 00:12, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
  I had to reduce the P in the pid to the point it was essentially
  worthless at sub 300 rev speeds.

 I am not sure that P is appropriate for a speed controller.
 The point is that P = 0 when the speed is correct. But you don't want
 0 PID output when the speed is correct, or the speed will stop being
 correct.
 So, a speed loop might want to be mainly FF0 and I.

You AIR, said that when I was doing the setup, but the regulation was 
very poor. Let me go see what its actually using now.

#
# Spindle
#
[SPINDLE_9]
P = 75.000
I = 1.000
D = 0.000
FF0 = 86.00
FF1 = 2.000
FF2 = 0.000
BIAS = 0.
FBIAS = 38
RBIAS = -38
ACCEL   = 5.7
LIMIT3_ACCEL= 1600.0
LOWGEAR = 2.125
DEADBAND = 0.000
# diff between s_max_outut and s_scale sets max pwm duty, make max_out 
98% of s_scale
LIMIT3_S_MAX_OUTPUT =   2048
# But it needs clipped in both directions, so...
LIMIT3_S_MIN_OUTPUT =   -2048
ENCODER_SCALE   =   200.0
PWMGEN_S_SCALE  =   2100
PWMGEN_S_FREQ   =   25000
# near_tol is now in %, 12.5 IOW
NEAR_TOL=   0.5
NEAR_SCALE  =   1.075
ENCODER_SAMPLE  =   50

And its running decently.  The weight of the chuck makes a pretty good 
low pass filter.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread andy pugh
On 25 March 2015 at 18:50, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:
 Someone mentioned xorg.conf, but I could not find any xorg.conf files in
 the etc/X11 file.

You can create an xorg.conf, either automatically or by hand. This
_might_ fix the problem if the auto-generator has useful defaults.

http://askubuntu.com/questions/217758/how-to-make-an-xorg-conf-file




-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
2015-03-25 20:02 GMT-03:00 Karlsson  Wang nicklas.karls...@karlssonwang.se
:

 To get higher accuracy you need more accurate measurement, some extra
 resolution above the accuracy is also useful.

 For better dynamic perfomance it may make sense to close the inner loop if
 the inner loop is faster than the outer loop. If the electic response is
 much faster than the mechanical response then there is rather little to
 gain from faster control loop. If motor inductance is around 1mH, applied
 voltage is 48 volt and current is 10A then U=L*di/dt = dt = L*di/U =
 1mH*10A/48V = 0.2ms = 200µs is the time to change motor torque from zero to
 maximum which put an upper limit on dynamic response, there is also a
 rotational speed dependent back emf reducing available voltage.

 If you do not like the math. Change servo loop peridicity adjust control
 loop and see if it make any real difference.


Thanks for the data, and I really like the math, it's just that in cases
like these you always want to put the machine to work as accurate as it
coul be to make the job and then understand all the theory involved in the
process (wich I really like  to dig in a lot).

Playing with the control loop it has been the best option because with that
I achieved a 0.1 mm following error on the linear axis. I'm still managing
to tune up the loop for the rotary axis (now I have 1.5 degrees of error
more or less) but it's working ok for the job so far.


-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread andy pugh
On 26 March 2015 at 00:12, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
 I had to reduce the P in the pid to the point it was essentially
 worthless at sub 300 rev speeds.

I am not sure that P is appropriate for a speed controller.
The point is that P = 0 when the speed is correct. But you don't want
0 PID output when the speed is correct, or the speed will stop being
correct.
So, a speed loop might want to be mainly FF0 and I.


-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Converting straight lines to arcs?

2015-03-25 Thread Gregg Eshelman
Anyone know of CAD software that can convert a selected set of faces on 
a 3D model into an arc?

I have a plain shape with two parallel faces, connected with many 
narrow, vertical faces approximating various arcs. I'd like to be able 
to select 2 or more of those faces that are next to each other and 
replace them with an arc.

Would make the cut faster and smoother instead of doing a lot of very 
short straight cuts.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com


--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Converting straight lines to arcs?

2015-03-25 Thread andy pugh
On 26 March 2015 at 00:33, Gregg Eshelman g_ala...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Would make the cut faster and smoother instead of doing a lot of very
 short straight cuts.

Possibly not, as the trajectory planner already does that (to within
the limits of the blending tolerance).

However, I think I have heard of software that can do the same thing.

You can draw an arc through any three points, but there is no
guarantee that successive arcs generated the same way will be
tangential to each other, so there needs to be some clever
manipulation to make the arcs as big as possible to see the potential
advantage.

-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] InfraRecorder google Chrome download warning?

2015-03-25 Thread andy pugh
On 25 March 2015 at 06:02, Mark Johnsen m...@ijohnsen.com wrote:

 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/common/Getting_LinuxCNC.html#_burning_the_cd

 When I downloaded, it linked me to downloads.sourceforge...  and once it
 started downloading, Google Chrome put up a RED screen and halted the
 download.

When I go to Infracorder,org I see two _adverts_ which look like
download links but are not, as far as I can tell, actually the
download links for infracorder.

I wasn't brave enough to see what they were download links for.

This is a common problem on Sourceforge too, the adverts on the
download page are spoofed to look like download links for the software
you just asked for.

This is just evil, and there should be a way to complain such
misleading adverts.

-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] New TP

2015-03-25 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Belli Button wrote:

 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:20:14 +0200
 From: Belli Button be...@iafrica.com
 Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
 emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)' emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [Emc-users] New TP
 
 Running at default speed, 400 and upped it 200% but the tool staggers around
 the curves, almost as if it wasn't blending at all, tried G64, G64 P.1Q.1
 G64 P3 Q3 and looking at the trace on the screen, they were all exactly the
 same.
 It's a new set up and I am still getting started, didn't have any other
 G-code handy.

 That's not the page I saw but I think the same content, might have been same
 info, different site.  I'll start reading in the morning.

 Thanks,

Note, There was a interval a couple weeks ago where blending in the new TP was 
broken so if you built from source, you may want to re-fetch and re-build



 -Original Message-
 From: sam sokolik [mailto:sa...@empirescreen.com]
 Sent: 25 March 2015 22:58
 To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
 Subject: Re: [Emc-users] New TP

 is this wat you are looking for?

 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/html/config/ini_config.html#sub:TRAJ-section

 are you running the splash screen at a high feed?  you won't notice any
 speed increase at its default speed...  It helps keep the feed up when doing
 high speed machining..

 sam

 On 03/25/2015 03:25 PM, Belli Button wrote:
 I saw a page today regarding the new TP where the formulas were given
 for calculating the desired freq, look ahead and so forth settings,
 now I cannot for the life of me find it!  I think Sam wrote it but it
 might have RE.

 Someone have a link?

 Running the LCNC splash screen doesn't seem to run any different
 regardless of what I make the P and Q settings, is this unique to the
 splash screen?



 --
  Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
 Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot
 Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from
 weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies,
 tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now.
 http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



 
 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
 hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
 leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
 look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
()_() signature to help him gain world domination.


--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Debian Wheezy Monitor Blank

2015-03-25 Thread Kyle Kerr
I only know enough to be terribly dangerous. Ctrl+Alt+F1 might give access
to a terminal and then maybe xrandr with the proper arguments to re-enable
the GUI?
On Mar 25, 2015 4:42 AM, Erik Christiansen dva...@internode.on.net
wrote:

 On 25.03.15 08:48, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
  Easiest way is to create a new user and startx on that user so you drop
  all previous configs.
  then just copy you home folder setting files to your old user again..

 If it is an xorg.conf in $HOME which is causing the problem, then there
 is no need for a new user. It is sufficent to delete (or rename) that file.

 I have never encountered a linux box with a per-user xorg.conf, and I
 expect that Mark would be back on the air on falling back to a default
 system config.

 Erik

 --
 The meta-problem here is that the configuration wizard does all the
 approved
 rituals (GUI with standardized clicky buttons, help popping up in a
 browser,
 etc. etc.) but doesn't have the central attribute these are supposed to
 achieve:
 discoverability. That is, the quality that every point in the interface has
 prompts and actions attached to it from which you can learn what to do
 next.
- Eric Raymond, in The Luxury of
 Ignorance.


 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
 sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
 all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
 to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
2015-03-25 23:17 GMT-03:00 Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com:

 You should check this out :

 http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis

 There used to be a web page that described dual feedback on
 one of the big machines at Stuart Stevenson's MPM shop and
 had a bit of history of how they arranged to do that, but I
 can not find it now. They used a linear encoder for position
 feedback and a shaft encoder on the motor for velocity feedback.

 (Anybody know where the descriptive page with photos, etc.
 on that has gone to?)


Hello Jon and thanks for the link I didn't remember about it.

I guess my approach of using the same encoder mounted on the shaft of the
motor isn't the best solution for speed and position feedback right?.

As I told gene I was planning on using the same encoder for velocity and
then position feedback but I don't know if this is a good option.


-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
Same thinking on the bottom of the link you sended to me jon haha :).

It seems redundant to measure the same axis twice, with two encoders. But
often that gives significantly better results than using a single encoder.
Whether it is two different kinds of sensor -- gyro, accelerometer, GPS [1]
http://quadcopter.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/taking-a-break/. Or two
identical sensors in two different locations, one with accuracy but bad
latency, the other with good (low) latency but bad accuracy: Bob Pease,
What's All This P-I-D Stuff, Anyhow?[2]
http://electronicdesign.com/content.aspx?topic=what-s-all-this-p-i-d-stuff-anyhow-6131

2015-03-25 23:59 GMT-03:00 Leonardo Marsaglia leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com
:


 2015-03-25 23:17 GMT-03:00 Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com:

 You should check this out :

 http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis

 There used to be a web page that described dual feedback on
 one of the big machines at Stuart Stevenson's MPM shop and
 had a bit of history of how they arranged to do that, but I
 can not find it now. They used a linear encoder for position
 feedback and a shaft encoder on the motor for velocity feedback.

 (Anybody know where the descriptive page with photos, etc.
 on that has gone to?)


 Hello Jon and thanks for the link I didn't remember about it.

 I guess my approach of using the same encoder mounted on the shaft of the
 motor isn't the best solution for speed and position feedback right?.

 As I told gene I was planning on using the same encoder for velocity and
 then position feedback but I don't know if this is a good option.


 --
 *Leonardo Marsaglia*.




-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Jon Elson
On 03/25/2015 09:59 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
 2015-03-25 23:17 GMT-03:00 Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com:

 You should check this out :

 http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis

 There used to be a web page that described dual feedback on
 one of the big machines at Stuart Stevenson's MPM shop and
 had a bit of history of how they arranged to do that, but I
 can not find it now. They used a linear encoder for position
 feedback and a shaft encoder on the motor for velocity feedback.

 (Anybody know where the descriptive page with photos, etc.
 on that has gone to?)

 Hello Jon and thanks for the link I didn't remember about it.

 I guess my approach of using the same encoder mounted on the shaft of the
 motor isn't the best solution for speed and position feedback right?.
No, nothing wrong with it, if you have sufficient encoder 
counters.
 As I told gene I was planning on using the same encoder for velocity and
 then position feedback but I don't know if this is a good option.
Do you mean to extract velocity from the encoder and then 
feed it out a DAC channel to
a velocity servo amp?  This is what almost all FANUC 
controls do, and a few people are
doing this with LinuxCNC.  I think Chris Radek is doing this 
on his machine, and John Kasunich and Chris
Kelley at Tx/Rx Labs in Texas got this working on their 
PowerHawk mill.

Jon


--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
2015-03-25 21:12 GMT-03:00 Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com:

 If I can butt in here Leonardo, when I was setting up the spindle speed
 servo in my toy lathe after switching from a non-linear and failure
 prone driver to drive the 1hp treadmill motor my 7x12 now sports, to a
 slightly modified version of the Pico Systems servo driver, and keeping
 in mind I am using one of Peters 5i25 interfaces, which means I no
 longer needed a base thread in the setup.  But the speed servo was
 hunting badly enough to keep the back gears in the headstock rattling
 pretty good when the servo thread was running at nominally 1 kilohertz.

 I had to reduce the P in the pid to the point it was essentially
 worthless at sub 300 rev speeds.  So for SG, thinking the control was
 too slow, I did a rockhopper diagram and re-arranged the hal file so
 that I was doing a straight fall thru of the control path so it was not
 wasting a period or more because it was out of order when the modules
 were in the wrong order.  That helped but the amount of P seemed to be
 limited yet, so the only other way to get a faster control loop was to
 raise the servo thread speed. Nominally 2 kilohertz made an obvious
 difference, and at 4 kilohertz, it was lots quieter.  So that is where
 it has been running at for several months now.  P in the speed PID is
 now high enough that I can peel off a pretty good sized string of blued
 steel at 150 revs, or even a dimly glowing string at 500 revs, which
 gives a more better finish.


Hello Gene!

I always like to here from your experiences.

From what I've been doing I got really good results but I don't recall
trying to raise the speed of the servo thread to make any difference so
I'll be trying tomorrow.

The idea that was spinning in my head is if it will make any difference (if
possible) first to close a speed loop and then feed with that the position
loop all using the same encoders for the two feedbacks.

Here's an example picture:

http://s23.postimg.org/6xyj2q0zf/reductor.jpg

That's the rotary axis, the picture is before I mounted the encoder but you
can see how it works. I know It would be the best to have another encoder
on the main shaft to really know the exact position but, since this is not
thar critical and the worm and gear have almost none backlash we decided
this setup would be ok.

What I'm doing here is to sense directly on the shaft of the motor (this
would give me a really accurate reading of the speed). But It would be
great if this same encoder could feed also the position loop in LinuxCNC.






-- 
*Leonardo Marsaglia*.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Velocity closed loop + Position losed loop on an axis

2015-03-25 Thread dave
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis

On 03/25/2015 08:01 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
 Same thinking on the bottom of the link you sended to me jon haha :).

 It seems redundant to measure the same axis twice, with two encoders. But
 often that gives significantly better results than using a single encoder.
 Whether it is two different kinds of sensor -- gyro, accelerometer, GPS [1]
 http://quadcopter.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/taking-a-break/. Or two
 identical sensors in two different locations, one with accuracy but bad
 latency, the other with good (low) latency but bad accuracy: Bob Pease,
 What's All This P-I-D Stuff, Anyhow?[2]
 http://electronicdesign.com/content.aspx?topic=what-s-all-this-p-i-d-stuff-anyhow-6131

 2015-03-25 23:59 GMT-03:00 Leonardo Marsaglia leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com
 :
 2015-03-25 23:17 GMT-03:00 Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com:

 You should check this out :

 http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Combining_Two_Feedback_Devices_On_One_Axis

 There used to be a web page that described dual feedback on
 one of the big machines at Stuart Stevenson's MPM shop and
 had a bit of history of how they arranged to do that, but I
 can not find it now. They used a linear encoder for position
 feedback and a shaft encoder on the motor for velocity feedback.

 (Anybody know where the descriptive page with photos, etc.
 on that has gone to?)

 Hello Jon and thanks for the link I didn't remember about it.

 I guess my approach of using the same encoder mounted on the shaft of the
 motor isn't the best solution for speed and position feedback right?.

 As I told gene I was planning on using the same encoder for velocity and
 then position feedback but I don't know if this is a good option.


 --
 *Leonardo Marsaglia*.





--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users