Re: [Evolution] Spell checking broke after evolution 1.2 upgrade
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 15:42, Mark Gordon wrote: OK, I've looked into this, and I suspect that you somehow got an aspell package that was intended for a distribution other than Red Hat 7.1. What's in your /etc/redhat-release file? It did say something like Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (forgot the name) (see below) Did this aspell package get installed with rpm -Uvh --nodeps? No. The solution may be to remove aspell* and reinstall the aspell packages built for Red Hat 7.1. Thanks for replying. I did all the installs and upgrades with redcarpet. I did try to uninstall and reinstall with RC all the *spell* packages. I got an off list reply from someone with the same setup who said they also got the same aspell/library error but spell checking was working for them. I did try a fresh test account and spell checking was also broken. I copied libltdl.so.3 from a RH8.0 machine to my RH7.1 and that fixed the aspell error, but still no spell checking in Evolution. It seems my problem was unique in some way. All upgrades and installs since the RH7.1 to Ximian desktop install have been with RC. At this point, my problem is resolved in the sense that I've upgraded (actually a fresh install) to RH8.0. I was waiting for something to give me that last little push to upgrade. RH7.1 was getting a little close to the edge of obsolescence (I needed the spell check for that!). I plan to run the stock RH version until I get a feel for the system and then I'll probably Ximianize again once RH8.0 desktop is supported or I miss RC or the latest Evolution too much. So I'm back to Evolution 1.0.8, spell checking is working, but I already miss the improvements in Evolution 1.2. Thanks, John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.2 - spell checker missing English
Hi, Since my spell problem with evo 1.2, I've upgraded my system to RH8.0, but I went through my system backup from my RH7.1 and I did have a ~/.gconfd/lock/ior but no ~/.gconf/%gconf-xml-backend.lock/ior. I don't know how to tell if they were stale or not, but maybe this was the cause of my no languages available problem. I did have the menu entry in the composer window edit-spell check document available (not grayed out), but it never found any mispellings. John On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:24, Etienne Tourigny wrote: The bug I had (number 1 in this mail) which was that certain languages were not available even though they were installed, has been resolved. I had some stale gconf lock files : ~/.gconfd/lock/ior and ~/.gconf/%gconf-xml-backend.lock/ior. I simply removed them then re-logged and the languages are now available. This gconf bug has to do with NFS and/or system crashes. If you ever get weird configuration issues like this you can safely delete the lock files after closing all your applications, then re-login. Cheers! Etienne On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 14:36, Etienne Tourigny wrote: Gretings, A few issues related to spell checking: 1) I have installed evo-1.2.0 with all the required updates. I cannot seem to add English(American or Canadian) to the list of spell checker languages. In the Settings under Composer Preferences-Spell Checking the only available languages are French(France) and French(Swiss). Here are the spell checking rpms installed (found with rpm -qa | grep spell): aspell-fr-0.1-1 aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-9 pspell-0.12.2-ximian.7 gnome-spell-0.5-1.ximian.3 aspell-en-ca-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-0.33.7.1-9 pspell-devel-0.12.2-ximian.7 Curiously, I tried setting up a new account with another user (first use of Evolution) and the following languages are available without any intervention: English(American), English(Canadian), French(France), French(Swiss). 2) Furthermore under the gnomecc I cannot configure spell checking, when I click on Configure spell checking in the HTML Viewer Editor: Cannot execute GNOME Spell control applet. Try to install GNOME spell if you don't have it installed. But I do have gnome-spell installed(0.5.1)! I noticed other gnome-spell packages that include /usr/bin/gnome-spell-properties-capplet but the one supplied by Ximian does not. 3) How does one add a language to the list of available languages? As I understand gnome-spell uses pspell and the language dictionaries are in the aspell-* RPMS (e.g. aspell-fr). How about if I have a aspell dictionnary that doesn't have a corresponding RPM? Which files are needed and where do they go? Thanks for your help, Etienne ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] More spell-check problems: wrong dictionaryselected for suggestions
Hi, A difference I'm seeing between my system (RH7.1, spelling broken) and what's posted here and another thread is that I have aspell-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 and the ones that work have aspell-0.33.7.1-9. Maybe the ximian version is broken? I'm running the full Ximian desktop. HvR: Which one do you have? John On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 09:35, Mertens Bram wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 17:02, HvR wrote: so how come i dont see ANY choices for languages in my spell checker option setting box? why did it work for the old version why not with the new version? i downloaded the complete update of the evolution channel with red-carpet. I also installed some new packages from the Ximian-desktop channel, perhaps one of those is missing from your system? I'm running RH7.3. (just in case somebody missed my sig) These are the 'spell'-packages installed on my system: [M8ram@localhost M8ram]$ rpm -qa | grep spell aspell-es-0.2-8 aspell-en-ca-0.33.7.1-9 gnome-spell-0.5-1.ximian.3 aspell-pt_BR-2.4-7 aspell-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-it-0.1-11 pspell-0.12.2-ximian.7 aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-ca-0.1-13 aspell-nl-0.1-12 aspell-sv-1.3.6-2 aspell-de-0.1.1-12 pspell-devel-0.12.2-ximian.7 aspell-da-1.4.22-2 aspell-no-0.3-1 aspell-pt-0.1-6 aspell-fr-0.1-1 aspell-en-gb-0.33.7.1-9 I have the following options for my spell-checker: Catalan, Danish, German (Germany/Swiss), English (American/British/Canadian), Spanish, French (France/Swiss), Italian, Dutch, Norwegian, Portuguese (Portugal/Brazilian), Swedish And these are the Evolution packages on my system: [M8ram@localhost M8ram]$ rpm -qa | grep evolution evolution-pilot-1.2.0-1.ximian.1 evolution-devel-1.2.0-1.ximian.1 evolution-1.2.0-1.ximian.1 Perhaps one of the Ximian-developers can help you if you let us know what system you're running? Regards, -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] More spell-check problems: wrong dictionaryselected for suggestions
Hi, It was in the Ximian Desktop channel (RH7.1). Your doing better without the ximian version. I have no languages. John On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 15:25, Etienne Tourigny wrote: Hi, I have aspell-0.33.7.1-9 and not all the installed languages are available in evolution. Besides,where did you (John) get the aspell-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 package? It is not in ximian-gnome nor ximian-evolution channels. On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 12:18, John Weber wrote: Hi, A difference I'm seeing between my system (RH7.1, spelling broken) and what's posted here and another thread is that I have aspell-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 and the ones that work have aspell-0.33.7.1-9. Maybe the ximian version is broken? I'm running the full Ximian desktop. HvR: Which one do you have? John On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 09:35, Mertens Bram wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 17:02, HvR wrote: so how come i dont see ANY choices for languages in my spell checker option setting box? why did it work for the old version why not with the new version? i downloaded the complete update of the evolution channel with red-carpet. I also installed some new packages from the Ximian-desktop channel, perhaps one of those is missing from your system? I'm running RH7.3. (just in case somebody missed my sig) These are the 'spell'-packages installed on my system: [M8ram@localhost M8ram]$ rpm -qa | grep spell aspell-es-0.2-8 aspell-en-ca-0.33.7.1-9 gnome-spell-0.5-1.ximian.3 aspell-pt_BR-2.4-7 aspell-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-it-0.1-11 pspell-0.12.2-ximian.7 aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-9 aspell-ca-0.1-13 aspell-nl-0.1-12 aspell-sv-1.3.6-2 aspell-de-0.1.1-12 pspell-devel-0.12.2-ximian.7 aspell-da-1.4.22-2 aspell-no-0.3-1 aspell-pt-0.1-6 aspell-fr-0.1-1 aspell-en-gb-0.33.7.1-9 I have the following options for my spell-checker: Catalan, Danish, German (Germany/Swiss), English (American/British/Canadian), Spanish, French (France/Swiss), Italian, Dutch, Norwegian, Portuguese (Portugal/Brazilian), Swedish And these are the Evolution packages on my system: [M8ram@localhost M8ram]$ rpm -qa | grep evolution evolution-pilot-1.2.0-1.ximian.1 evolution-devel-1.2.0-1.ximian.1 evolution-1.2.0-1.ximian.1 Perhaps one of the Ximian-developers can help you if you let us know what system you're running? Regards, -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Spell checking broke after evolution 1.2 upgrade
Hi, I just did all the upgrades in the Ximian desktop channel for my RH7.1 system. Spell checking no longer works in evolution. If I go to tools-settings-composer preferences, there are no languages listed in the spell checer tab. I have [jweber@ceora jweber]$ rpm -qa | grep spell aspell-en-gb-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 aspell-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 pspell-0.12.2-ximian.7 applix-bin-spell-base-5.00-1315 aspell-en-ca-0.33.7.1-ximian.2 gnome-spell-0.5-1.ximian.3 From the knowlege base, it says I should have aspell-en, but I don't see it in the Ximian desktop channel. I just want american english, but I tried adding the aspell-en-gb and aspell-en-ca to see if anything would work. I also get a mail component crash frequently when I try to change fonts in evolution tools-settings-font preferences. The place where I used to change fonts in gnomecc seems to have disappeared. After a number of crashes, I did get the fonts changed OK. Soory if anything is mispelled in this message Thanks, John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Anyway to preview when I attach pictures?
Hi, I use nautilus to select my attachments. You can drag and drop from nautilus to the compose window. Nautilus has thumbnail picture previews and you can DD multiple files. John On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 22:38, Tianran Chen wrote: How can I preview the pictures (or other files) in the Attach a file dialog? Thank you for any help. BTW: Where are the codes that control the behavior of the Attach a file dialog? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Anyway to preview when I attach pictures?
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:48, Tony Earnshaw wrote: man, 2002-10-28 kl. 15:10 skrev John Weber: I use nautilus to select my attachments. You can drag and drop from nautilus to the compose window. Nautilus has thumbnail picture previews and you can DD multiple files. Oh no, I can't. Gnome 1.4, Evo 1.0.0, Nautilus 1.0.4, resolution 1024 x 768. Best, Tony I'm sorry you can't. I've got RH7.1 fully Ximian'd and up-to-date, Gnome 1.4, Nautilus 1.0.6, Evo 1.0.8, resolution 1600x1200, and I can. It seems I've been able to for quite some time (i.e. many versions of upgrades). John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Problem with reply and other stuff (OT)
Hi, I've always liked top posting for summary replies. It's like geology...if you want to know the past, then you dig down. Also, the mail headers themselves are a series of top posts by the mail software. Makes it all kind of harmonious. :) This is only my preference. I've seen too many flame wars about this on newsgroups that don't end up serving any purpose. Signatures, I trim if I remember, but it seems less an issue if one top posts because then you won't need to scroll through them unless you forget the thread and need to reference down. If I point-by-point reply, then I'm more likely to remember to trim unnecessary material from the message body. I'd prefer the software to not strip the signatures. John On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 13:53, Jason Tackaberry wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 20:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: For more details, see: http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-bambenek-posting-guidelines-00.html That's pretty interesting. I didn't know such a document existed. :) I hardly ever post in summary reply form as the IETF draft suggests. My habit, developed from my BBS days, is to always quote inline (aka point-by-point reply) even if (such as in this case) I'm only quoting one thing. The reason is to immediately establish context. I don't think, as the IETF doc suggests, this detracts from the emphasis of my reply. What are other people's feelings on this? As for removing the signature from the QRT, I have sent a couple emails where it was relevant to quote the person's signature. Every other time I remove it manually, though. I guess it'd be more convenient to have Evo strip the signature from the QRT, but I have mixed feelings that it may be doing the wrong thing. Jason. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Problem with reply and other stuff (OT)
Hi, I've always liked top posting for summary replies. It's like geology...if you want to know the past, then you dig down. Also, the mail headers themselves are a series of top posts by the mail software. Makes it all kind of harmonious. :) This is only my preference. I've seen too many flame wars about this on newsgroups that don't end up serving any purpose. Signatures, I trim if I remember, but it seems less an issue if one top posts because then you won't need to scroll through them unless you forget the thread and need to reference down. If I point-by-point reply, then I'm more likely to remember to trim unnecessary material from the message body. I'd prefer the software to not strip the signatures. John On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 13:53, Jason Tackaberry wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 20:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: For more details, see: http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-bambenek-posting-guidelines-00.html That's pretty interesting. I didn't know such a document existed. :) I hardly ever post in summary reply form as the IETF draft suggests. My habit, developed from my BBS days, is to always quote inline (aka point-by-point reply) even if (such as in this case) I'm only quoting one thing. The reason is to immediately establish context. I don't think, as the IETF doc suggests, this detracts from the emphasis of my reply. What are other people's feelings on this? As for removing the signature from the QRT, I have sent a couple emails where it was relevant to quote the person's signature. Every other time I remove it manually, though. I guess it'd be more convenient to have Evo strip the signature from the QRT, but I have mixed feelings that it may be doing the wrong thing. Jason. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Deleting all messages
This happens to me occasionally (hardly ever), too. It seems I have to go to a different folder and back again before I can delete the left over message. I suppose it could be a new mail comes in during the expunge process. John On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 11:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Maybe you got new mail as you were expunging the folder? Jeff On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 10:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote: Hi When I try to delete all messages by pressing ctrl-a, ctrl-d and ctrl-e it always seems to leave one message in the folder. Not exactly a serious problem, but I thought I would mention it. I am using Evolution 1.0.5 (which seems to have fixed most, if not all, of the crashing problems I was having with 1.0.3 - well done). -- | Andrew Stubbs, | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | SuperH, Inc., | or [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | 2430 Aztec West, || | Almondsbury, | Tel:+44 (0)1454 462325| | Bristol, BS32 4AQ, U.K.| Fax:+44 (0)1454 462701| ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Evolution mail component keeps dying - but fixed
Hi, evolution 1.0.3. Mail component dies every time it tries to send/receive. Uses all CPU for about 5 seconds and then notifies that mail component has died. Is this the thing I saw earlier today on the list about someone posting an attachment that crashes the mail component? If so, someone don't do that! I think I fixed it now after rebuilding my evolution directory bit by bit and narrowed it down to one of the meta folders in the ~/evolution/local/Inbox directory. I deleted everything in there except mbox and the problem seems fixed. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] This message crashes Evo (attached)
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 17:22, Austin Gonyou wrote: Also, something interesting here is that my system swaps itself to death, that is of course until sigabrt is reached. I consider this a serious security bug. Me too. I hope this becomes a top priority item, although this list (and other Ximian lists) is probably the biggest target of evolution users. I haven't actually seen the offending message. Is there a way to protect myself in case it gets posted again? Filters? I have my evolution list mail filtered anyway and it seemed to get hung in the Inbox directory, probably in the movemail_blah.blah file (mentioned at the top of this thread), which is one of the files I deleted to get my evo working again so I'm doubtful about a filter. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Evolution mail component keeps dying - but fixed
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 21:09, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 19:48, John Weber wrote:
I think I fixed it now after rebuilding my evolution directory bit by
bit and narrowed it down to one of the meta folders in the
~/evolution/local/Inbox directory. I deleted everything in there except
mbox and the problem seems fixed.
Hmmm. And you still have an Inbox in your folder tree? That shouldn't
happen. :-)
I guess what you did was just removing the .ibex and .ev-summary files
and keeping the mbox and {folder,local}-metadata.xml files?
No, I removed everything except mbox. On the next evo start up it popped
up a dialog that said some files were missing for this version and
should it create them. I said yes and now it all seems OK.
[jweber@ceora Inbox]$ pwd
/home/jweber/evolution/local/Inbox
[jweber@ceora Inbox]$ ls
folder-metadata.xml local-metadata.xml mbox mbox.ev-summary mbox.ibex
[jweber@ceora Inbox]$
--
John S. Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] poll: patch to optionally disable HTML mail?
Hi, I like this. I get HTML mail that has attached GIFs that obscure the text I need to see (HTML rendering problem?). If I open these mails in pine, I can see the text (which has the real information in the first place) fine. I would like the option of seeing the text version (if it exits) of an email as the default with the HTML version as an attachment to be opened as I choose. It's still a matter of dealing with people who want to make a simple 3 line message pretty. In the worst case they'll make it a 1MB powerpoint slide to express less than 1 KB of info. I get HTML mail that is not spam, but in most cases there's a text equivalent with the email, but evolution won't let me choose which I want to see by default. If the HTML part was an attachment, I could open it if I wanted, but the message body would show the plain text part. John On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 16:43, Colin Walters wrote: Hello, Have you ever been annoyed by HTML email? Do you want to have the option not to see 66 pt. bold red headers that someone decided to write? Is the only HTML email you get spam, and you'd like to have the option to turn it into an attachment? Do you know anyone else who would like this option? I have written a patch which implements this (http://people.debian.org/~walters/debian/render-html.patch). Some of the Evolution developers aren't convinced that many people would use it. So, we decided to have a poll. If you would like to see this patch in Evolution, please send a message in support to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Some attachments don't show up in evolution.
My original post to this thread referenced the example on the Ximian users list. I didn't want to forward a virus to this list. I think the answer I'm getting is that there are changes being made to evolution that may fix this in a future version (?) Thanks, John On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 23:49, Not Zed wrote: It could be related though. a multipart/related base part that doesn't reference the parts that follow. Without seeing the mail I cant' really say though. The 'attachment' icon is determined pretty simply too, based on the type of parts in a multipart, it ins't always accurate. That multipart/related fix didn't make it into stable afaik either. On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 00:15, Dan Winship wrote: On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 10:23, John Weber wrote: Hi, I curious as to why some attachments (seems to be the virus ones on the Ximian users list) don't show up in evolution (1.0.3) Several of the recent Outlook viruses have mangled MIME syntax to trigger various Outlook bugs. Evolution is doing its best to display the message according to the inconsistent description it's given. There was a problem that messages composed in rich text mode in Outlook and then auto-converted to HTML by Exchange would show up without the attachments in Evolution (because Evolution was displaying what the message *said* to display instead of what it *meant* to be displayed). That's definitely fixed in Evolution 1.2 (and hacked around in Connector 1.0), but I don't remember if the fix made it into Evolution 1.0. But this is probably not what you're seeing if you're talking about virus mails. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Some attachments don't show up in evolution.
Well, I guess 0x0 IS hard to see :) I'm trying to understand why pine can see these attachments OK. Not that it matters much, but I get curious. FYI pine list these attachments as (possibly from a different virus email than the one I mentioned)... 1 ~4 lines Text/HTML 2 98 KB Audio/X-WAV 3 0 lines Text/PLAIN 48.8 KB Application/OCTET-STREAM (Name: WATERMRK.JPG) While evolution tells me nothing (unless I read the source). Thanks for the info and I'm not too worried about it. Is there a stand alone utility to decode/save these if I were to save the attachment segments from the message source? John On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 10:14, Larry Ewing wrote: In the example you gave the only thing that is supposed to be showing up is a 0x0 inline frame (an iframe). Trust me it is showing up. The part that claims it is wave file is referenced by the iframe so evolution doesn't show a save widget for that part, this is same way it treats inline images. This is a very reasonable way to interpret this intentionally broken message. One way I can think of that might improve the situation is to check the mime type of the part and compare it to the mime type that gtkhtml requests on that stream, see the difference and add the the save part widget since it doesn't match. On the other hand I'm not sure if it is really worth the effort. --Larry -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Some attachments don't show up in evolution.
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 14:57, John Weber wrote: Is there a stand alone utility to decode/save these if I were to save the attachment segments from the message source? To answer my own question...mimencode -u seems to work if I cut the different segments out of the message source. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Some attachments don't show up in evolution.
Hi, I curious as to why some attachments (seems to be the virus ones on the Ximian users list) don't show up in evolution (1.0.3). e.g., on the Ximian users list dated Yesterday 10:15 PM from [EMAIL PROTECTED], subject Re:eager to see you. The message list shows a paper clip indicating an attachment, but the message view shows nothing in the message body (normal display). In view source mode there's clearly at least one encoded attachment. Also, pine and kmail show these attachments and allow me to save them to disk. Mozilla mail (Mozilla 0.9.9 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020326) also seems to have problems showing these attachments. It makes me wonder what other attachments may fail to show up, maybe important ones I need to see or save. Thanks, John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] spell check broken
Hi, I've done all the upgrades on RH7.1 using red-carpet on the RH7.1 and Ximian desktop channels and I noticed that spell check isn't working in evolution anymore. It seems to work OK in abiword. Do evo and abiword both use the same spell check back end? Anybody else notice this? I no longer get the instant spell check and the Edit-Spell Check Document is grayed out. Thanks, John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] retrieve mail times
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 21:28, John Weber wrote: On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 20:43, Ian Goldberg wrote: Hi, RH7.1, evolution versions since the middle of last year. I use fetchmail to get my mail from various servers and spool it on my local machine. I use pop to get it into evolution from my local machine. What I've noticed is that mail which has an applicable filter to put it in another folder (besides inbox) is processed almost immediately, while mail that is destined for inbox (no filter applies) takes roughly 30 seconds. Anybody know why or how to fix this? Is your inbox huge? That could slow down additions to it. - Ian No, this happens with even just one small test message in my spool and nothing in inbox. I also tried it with local delivery instead of pop. There's a big file called mbox.ibex. What is that? I tried renaming it to xxx.mbox.ibex.xxx but it didn't help, and the timestamp on it still gets updated after mail retrieval even with it's new name. Should I delete it? Also the CPU goes to 90+ % during the retrieval time. [jweber@ceora Inbox]$ pwd /home/jweber/evolution/local/Inbox [jweber@ceora Inbox]$ ls -l total 20868 -rw-r--r--1 jweber jweber103 Jul 24 2001 folder-metadata.xml -rw-rw-r--1 jweber jweber 95 Jan 29 13:19 local-metadata.xml -rw---1 jweber jweber 0 Jan 29 21:15 mbox -rw---1 jweber jweber 43885 Jan 29 21:15 mbox.ev-summary -rw---1 jweber jweber 21286144 Jan 29 21:15 mbox.ibex [jweber@ceora Inbox]$ OK. I went ahead and got rid of the mbox.ibex file and the problem is fixed. What is this file for? Everything works after deleting it. It did get recreated, but much smaller. It's mostly filled with zeros. Does this file continually grow and need periodic pruning? -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: Can't view .jpg
Hi, I'm posting this again, since I haven't heard anything... It doesn't detect. I can save the file to disk and it's definitely a jpg. Nautilus and gmc both recognize the file as jpg. This has been happening so much that I've added xv to the list of applications to use for unknown type in the File Types and Programs in GCC so evo will have it on it's list of available applications for unknown type attachment. What do you suggest? Is there some other config in evo I need to look at? I don't think I noticed this until about version 1.0 of Evo, prior to that I'd been using latest snapshots. John On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 14:56, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: It should still detect it as an image/jpeg. If the Content-Type is application/octet-stream or some unknown type, we (Evolution) feed it to gnome-vfs's mime type sniffers which should detect image/jpeg. If it doesn't, then maybe it's not really a jpeg file. Jeff On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 10:55, John Weber wrote: I get unknown attachment. Evo 1.0.1. The headers on the attachment are --=_NextPart_000_0013_01C1A5E1.6A333510 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=NoMarkers.jpg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=NoMarkers.jpg I've seen that it won't recognize a jpg unless the Content-Type: field says it's a jpg which this one doesn't (it's application/octet-stream not image/jpeg). John On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 18:46, Seth wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is the original message just simply forwarded. Using outlook 2002, and evo can't determine, what type it is. Seth - -Original Message- From: Tanya Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:17 PM To: gerri haumschild; SETH; janice griffith Subject: Fw: No Markers - - Original Message - From: Kim Hoile [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tanya Hollen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joyce (Work) Spinks [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barbara Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:15 AM Subject: FW: No Markers -Original Message- From: Timothy Hoile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:00 AM To: Kim (Work) Hoile Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: BTMCase [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jordan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kim and TJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Skip Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jimmy/Angela Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Clark and Connie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: gordon hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bob amandanate king [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BillTurah [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cheryl stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BobJosie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:14 AM Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: mkndy68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Theresa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Terry Colleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stacy Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sally [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rod Missy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mom Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lori B [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kevin Les [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Jo Ann [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jill [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Heidi [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Heather [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Grandma Grandpa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; George Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Doug Bettye [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cindy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 2E Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:53 PM Subject: Fw: No Markers -Original Message- From: Russ Karen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tammy Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laura Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dennie Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kathy Asmann (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pat Adams (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vicky Cook (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:43 PM Subject: FW: No Markers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No Markers This is why you don't give Markers to kids... NoMarkers.jpg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPFIKg0u+O1SmNwFOEQLoOQCg4q3LgfQA4IRAXO110n0/ejZy3xMAn29z A/6p1QSg6Rvx5/d4JiVLKasa
Re: [Evolution] Re: Can't view .jpg
OK. I fixed it. I went into GCC (1.5.9) and went to Advanced-File Types and Programs. I found the image/jpeg entry and changed the default action from Use Viewer to Open With Application. I restarted evolution and it works. I tried to break it again by setting it back to Use Viewer, but it won't break. (?) These long lists of mime types could really use a search engine! Something like the search in redcarpet. John On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 14:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: I have no idea... all I can say is works for me. I don't think upgrading gdk-pixbuf would help, but maybe it would? I dunno. Jeff On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 16:04, John Weber wrote: Hi, I'm posting this again, since I haven't heard anything... It doesn't detect. I can save the file to disk and it's definitely a jpg. Nautilus and gmc both recognize the file as jpg. This has been happening so much that I've added xv to the list of applications to use for unknown type in the File Types and Programs in GCC so evo will have it on it's list of available applications for unknown type attachment. What do you suggest? Is there some other config in evo I need to look at? I don't think I noticed this until about version 1.0 of Evo, prior to that I'd been using latest snapshots. John On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 14:56, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: It should still detect it as an image/jpeg. If the Content-Type is application/octet-stream or some unknown type, we (Evolution) feed it to gnome-vfs's mime type sniffers which should detect image/jpeg. If it doesn't, then maybe it's not really a jpeg file. Jeff On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 10:55, John Weber wrote: I get unknown attachment. Evo 1.0.1. The headers on the attachment are --=_NextPart_000_0013_01C1A5E1.6A333510 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=NoMarkers.jpg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=NoMarkers.jpg I've seen that it won't recognize a jpg unless the Content-Type: field says it's a jpg which this one doesn't (it's application/octet-stream not image/jpeg). John On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 18:46, Seth wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is the original message just simply forwarded. Using outlook 2002, and evo can't determine, what type it is. Seth - -Original Message- From: Tanya Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:17 PM To: gerri haumschild; SETH; janice griffith Subject: Fw: No Markers - - Original Message - From: Kim Hoile [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tanya Hollen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joyce (Work) Spinks [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barbara Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:15 AM Subject: FW: No Markers -Original Message- From: Timothy Hoile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:00 AM To: Kim (Work) Hoile Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: BTMCase [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jordan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kim and TJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Skip Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jimmy/Angela Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Clark and Connie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: gordon hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bob amandanate king [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BillTurah [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cheryl stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BobJosie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:14 AM Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: mkndy68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Theresa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Terry Colleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stacy Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sally [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rod Missy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mom Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lori B [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kevin Les [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Jo Ann [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jill [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Heidi [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Heather [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Grandma Grandpa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; George Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Doug Bettye [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cindy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 2E Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:53 PM Subject: Fw: No Markers -Original Message- From: Russ Karen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tammy Kennedy [EMAIL
[Evolution] Apply filters expunges?
Is it correct that ctrl-a, ctrl-y (select all, apply filters) also expunges deleted messages? evo 1.0.2, RH7.1. That's what it does for me, at least on inbox. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] retrieve mail times
Hi, RH7.1, evolution versions since the middle of last year. I use fetchmail to get my mail from various servers and spool it on my local machine. I use pop to get it into evolution from my local machine. What I've noticed is that mail which has an applicable filter to put it in another folder (besides inbox) is processed almost immediately, while mail that is destined for inbox (no filter applies) takes roughly 30 seconds. Anybody know why or how to fix this? Thanks -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] retrieve mail times
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 20:43, Ian Goldberg wrote: Hi, RH7.1, evolution versions since the middle of last year. I use fetchmail to get my mail from various servers and spool it on my local machine. I use pop to get it into evolution from my local machine. What I've noticed is that mail which has an applicable filter to put it in another folder (besides inbox) is processed almost immediately, while mail that is destined for inbox (no filter applies) takes roughly 30 seconds. Anybody know why or how to fix this? Is your inbox huge? That could slow down additions to it. - Ian No, this happens with even just one small test message in my spool and nothing in inbox. I also tried it with local delivery instead of pop. There's a big file called mbox.ibex. What is that? I tried renaming it to xxx.mbox.ibex.xxx but it didn't help, and the timestamp on it still gets updated after mail retrieval even with it's new name. Should I delete it? Also the CPU goes to 90+ % during the retrieval time. [jweber@ceora Inbox]$ pwd /home/jweber/evolution/local/Inbox [jweber@ceora Inbox]$ ls -l total 20868 -rw-r--r--1 jweber jweber103 Jul 24 2001 folder-metadata.xml -rw-rw-r--1 jweber jweber 95 Jan 29 13:19 local-metadata.xml -rw---1 jweber jweber 0 Jan 29 21:15 mbox -rw---1 jweber jweber 43885 Jan 29 21:15 mbox.ev-summary -rw---1 jweber jweber 21286144 Jan 29 21:15 mbox.ibex [jweber@ceora Inbox]$ -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: Can't view .jpg
It doesn't detect. I can save the file to disk and it's definitely a jpg. This has been happening so much that I've added xv to the list of applications to use for unknown type in the File Types and Programs in GCC. What do you suggest? I don't think I noticed this until about version 1.0 of Evo, prior to that I'd been using latest snapshots. John On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 14:56, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: It should still detect it as an image/jpeg. If the Content-Type is application/octet-stream or some unknown type, we (Evolution) feed it to gnome-vfs's mime type sniffers which should detect image/jpeg. If it doesn't, then maybe it's not really a jpeg file. Jeff On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 10:55, John Weber wrote: I get unknown attachment. Evo 1.0.1. The headers on the attachment are --=_NextPart_000_0013_01C1A5E1.6A333510 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=NoMarkers.jpg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=NoMarkers.jpg I've seen that it won't recognize a jpg unless the Content-Type: field says it's a jpg which this one doesn't (it's application/octet-stream not image/jpeg). John On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 18:46, Seth wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is the original message just simply forwarded. Using outlook 2002, and evo can't determine, what type it is. Seth - -Original Message- From: Tanya Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:17 PM To: gerri haumschild; SETH; janice griffith Subject: Fw: No Markers - - Original Message - From: Kim Hoile [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tanya Hollen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joyce (Work) Spinks [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barbara Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:15 AM Subject: FW: No Markers -Original Message- From: Timothy Hoile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:00 AM To: Kim (Work) Hoile Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: BTMCase [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jordan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kim and TJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Skip Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jimmy/Angela Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Clark and Connie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: gordon hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bob amandanate king [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BillTurah [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cheryl stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]; BobJosie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:14 AM Subject: Fw: No Markers - Original Message - From: mkndy68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Theresa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Terry Colleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stacy Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sally [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rod Missy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mom Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lori B [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kevin Les [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Jo Ann [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jill [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Heidi [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Heather [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Grandma Grandpa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; George Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Doug Bettye [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cindy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 2E Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:53 PM Subject: Fw: No Markers -Original Message- From: Russ Karen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tammy Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laura Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dennie Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kathy Asmann (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pat Adams (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vicky Cook (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:43 PM Subject: FW: No Markers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No Markers This is why you don't give Markers to kids... NoMarkers.jpg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPFIKg0u+O1SmNwFOEQLoOQCg4q3LgfQA4IRAXO110n0/ejZy3xMAn29z A/6p1QSg6Rvx5/d4JiVLKasa =C0jC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns/ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman
Re: [Evolution] running Evolution from Opera
From an earlier posting that worked for me... create a script e.g. evomail #! /bin/bsh /usr/bin/evolution --no-splash mailto:$1; Call this script from File - Preferences - Applications - E-mail client. John On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 10:30, Rodolfo Pilas wrote: Can you tell me how to run evolution from Opera web browser? I need to know how to include evolution into opera option: File - Preferences - Applications - E-mail client Thank you -- Rodolfo PilasQuien los puso a estos tipos donde estan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quien los deja seguir en su lugar, http://rodolfo.pilas.net Quien los baja ahora de su altar, ICQ #17461636Quien les paga para que hagan lo que haran http://xtralinux.org -=# Apocalipsis Now % Cuarteto de Nos #=- Public GnuPG key: http://www.keyserver.net 1024D/57153363 2001-06-02 key fingerprint = DAAE 3246 3F7D A420 B7A0 48A5 D120 C773 5715 3363 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns/ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] steaming hot software, fresh from the Ximian(tm)Software Bakery
Hi, I filed a bug a while back regarding non-alphabetic characters in a search string. This got marked as a repeat of 16227 Body contains seems to want a regexp It still seems broken. I did a Body or subject contains search for 16627 in the folder containing this message and got no matches. Also e.g. a dash or underscore in a string will return no matches. I'm running 1.0.0.99 on RH7.1. John On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 09:15, Luis Villa wrote: New snapshots for your breaking pleasure. Note that these are from the 1.0.x tree, not from the uber-cool 1.2 development tree that we haven't done much with yet :) So, they should be very stable. We'd definitely appreciate any reports from them. A list of fixes since 1.0 (generated from bugzilla, so possibly not 100% accurate): We'd appreciate it if you check these, and if they don't appear to be fixed, please reopen them. Luis 2233 Don't show RTF attachments inline 6893 doesn't refresh unmatched after receiving mail 6896 message_list_select with wraparound won't select very first message 7641 Crash in EMap widget when used in Evolution 7707 New category not updated in category is list 7708 New category not sorted in category is list 7827 Switching desktops leaves the folderbar popped up 10114 No icon for Delete in New Contact List Editor 10910 Save in list editor vs. Save and Close in contact editor 11647 Body contains and Body does not contain searches are matching strings in the message header. 11776 email addresses are case sensitive 12062 Can't use 'n' to skip to next unread if multiple messages are selected 12150 startup wizard pops up an importing your netscape data window when it shouldn't 13751 AddressBook Address Entry Form Usability problem 13843 Deleting tasks causes crash 13898 Crash: Cannot create emails in evolution 13952 Notifier repeatedly gives alarm after appointment ended. 13977 Selection color when no focus should be lighter 13980 After pasting URL, first word of text is blue 14002 select names dialog stays up past the composer then addressbook crashes 14074 Editing fields under the Colaboration LDAP contact 14087 Daily repeat event with end-date misses one day 14127 Wrong error message 14149 'Copy' doesn't work in mail view 14196 Quited line disappears 14347 Generic Evo Desktop Icon? 14348 Some things that need open messages... 14452 Converting names wrong from palm pilot 14489 UI Bug - Calendar - Caendar Settings - General 14517 Clear needed twice for non-body+subject searches 14662 gpg signature showing as attachment 14715 wombat gets locked up when LDAP server is down 14734 evolution-mail crashes while accessing imap servers 14848 forwarding wrong email due to next/prev 14965 Message copy fails with space in folder names 14976 CRASH -- Opening a message residing on an IMAP server. 15264 Crash: evolution-mail seg fault on exit 15359 multiple message editor search and replace problems 15372 [Alt]-[Enter] in mail edit window 15374 ___ in autogenerated name of vfolder created by sender of message 15379 Printing anything from addressbook is totally broken 15401 Replace gnome-print calls for the UTF8-aware ones 15415 Virtual Folders Editor: display of non-ascii symbols is broken 15417 The users guide is out of date with the AUTHORS file in CVS 15435 Rename folder dialog: non-ascii folder names are displayed incorrectly in prompt 15449 n wraps p doesn't 15451 Crash when pressing stop during going offline 15456 typo in translatable string 15489 Evolution crashed while deleting my IMAP mail account 15491 evolution crashes/becomes unusable if ppp connection is lost 15498 Crash: Faulty vFolder editor 15512 Hangs while scanning for changed messages on SIMAP+Exchange 15608 RCPT TO: response error: Success 15623 Find/Replace does not replace all, and also crashes 15647 Composer send button has wrong tooltip when offline 15657 empty receipients 15693 Crash: Loading message contents from IMAP and close application 15728 Crashed when selecting message 15745 Search edit window widgets disabled. / Mail component crash. 15749 Empty end time in all-day-event crashes calendar. 15774 Selecting decline in schedule meeting request makes evo crash 15843 Attachments inside attachments 15922 EAddress conduit crash / weirdness with entry duplicates 15941 Location missing for the calendar. 16156 Save As, Send As, and Send To not available in List Editor 16174 Redraws entire window with every selection change. 16176 tab_order starts wrong 16224 remove unsupported columns from Tasks view 16227 Body contains seems to want a regexp 16232 e-itip-control.c - init() doing odd stuff 16416 X-Mailer says Preview Release 16507 right click-View does nothing 16510 Small contact editor fixes. 16577 e_tree_selection_model_change_cursor doesn't unset selection-old_selection 16254 Add Sender to Addressbook missing from
Re: [Evolution] steaming hot software, fresh from the Ximian(tm)Software Bakery
I notice that your picture shows ...Ximian Evolution 1.0.0.99 in the window title, but no CVS info. I neglected to provide that in my original post. Mine is CVS 2001.12.06.08.57 John On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 12:36, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: works for me http://primates.ximian.com/~fejj/body-or-subject-contains-2233.png (note the purple 2233) Jeff On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 14:02, John Weber wrote: Hi, I filed a bug a while back regarding non-alphabetic characters in a search string. This got marked as a repeat of 16227 Body contains seems to want a regexp It still seems broken. I did a Body or subject contains search for 16627 in the folder containing this message and got no matches. Also e.g. a dash or underscore in a string will return no matches. I'm running 1.0.0.99 on RH7.1. John On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 09:15, Luis Villa wrote: New snapshots for your breaking pleasure. Note that these are from the 1.0.x tree, not from the uber-cool 1.2 development tree that we haven't done much with yet :) So, they should be very stable. We'd definitely appreciate any reports from them. A list of fixes since 1.0 (generated from bugzilla, so possibly not 100% accurate): We'd appreciate it if you check these, and if they don't appear to be fixed, please reopen them. Luis 2233 Don't show RTF attachments inline 6893 doesn't refresh unmatched after receiving mail 6896 message_list_select with wraparound won't select very first message 7641 Crash in EMap widget when used in Evolution 7707 New category not updated in category is list 7708 New category not sorted in category is list 7827 Switching desktops leaves the folderbar popped up 10114 No icon for Delete in New Contact List Editor 10910 Save in list editor vs. Save and Close in contact editor 11647 Body contains and Body does not contain searches are matching strings in the message header. 11776 email addresses are case sensitive 12062 Can't use 'n' to skip to next unread if multiple messages are selected 12150 startup wizard pops up an importing your netscape data window when it shouldn't 13751 AddressBook Address Entry Form Usability problem 13843 Deleting tasks causes crash 13898 Crash: Cannot create emails in evolution 13952 Notifier repeatedly gives alarm after appointment ended. 13977 Selection color when no focus should be lighter 13980 After pasting URL, first word of text is blue 14002 select names dialog stays up past the composer then addressbook crashes 14074 Editing fields under the Colaboration LDAP contact 14087 Daily repeat event with end-date misses one day 14127 Wrong error message 14149 'Copy' doesn't work in mail view 14196 Quited line disappears 14347 Generic Evo Desktop Icon? 14348 Some things that need open messages... 14452 Converting names wrong from palm pilot 14489 UI Bug - Calendar - Caendar Settings - General 14517 Clear needed twice for non-body+subject searches 14662 gpg signature showing as attachment 14715 wombat gets locked up when LDAP server is down 14734 evolution-mail crashes while accessing imap servers 14848 forwarding wrong email due to next/prev 14965 Message copy fails with space in folder names 14976 CRASH -- Opening a message residing on an IMAP server. 15264 Crash: evolution-mail seg fault on exit 15359 multiple message editor search and replace problems 15372 [Alt]-[Enter] in mail edit window 15374 ___ in autogenerated name of vfolder created by sender of message 15379 Printing anything from addressbook is totally broken 15401 Replace gnome-print calls for the UTF8-aware ones 15415 Virtual Folders Editor: display of non-ascii symbols is broken 15417 The users guide is out of date with the AUTHORS file in CVS 15435 Rename folder dialog: non-ascii folder names are displayed incorrectly in prompt 15449 n wraps p doesn't 15451 Crash when pressing stop during going offline 15456 typo in translatable string 15489 Evolution crashed while deleting my IMAP mail account 15491 evolution crashes/becomes unusable if ppp connection is lost 15498 Crash: Faulty vFolder editor 15512 Hangs while scanning for changed messages on SIMAP+Exchange 15608 RCPT TO: response error: Success 15623 Find/Replace does not replace all, and also crashes 15647 Composer send button has wrong tooltip when offline 15657 empty receipients 15693 Crash: Loading message contents from IMAP and close application 15728 Crashed when selecting message 15745 Search edit window widgets disabled. / Mail component crash. 15749 Empty end time in all-day-event crashes calendar. 15774 Selecting decline in schedule meeting request makes evo crash 15843 Attachments inside attachments 15922 EAddress conduit crash / weirdness with entry
Re: [Evolution] Where to send general Ximian issues?
I had trouble finding this on the Ximian list of mailing lists, too. there's a list called [EMAIL PROTECTED] that I didn't see on that list. I found it somewhere else on the Ximian site, I think. John On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 15:43, Janne Morén wrote: I helped a friend of mine install redhat 7.2 and Ximian Gnome today, and found a lot of issues that I (having used Linux for a long time) have never noticed before. Where can one send feedback about such things? -- Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend. Mr. Jan Morén Dept. of Cognitive Science Tel. +46-046 222 8588 Kungshuset, Lund Fax. +46-046 222 9758 S-222 22 Lund, Sweden ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] command line or mailto: support
Hi, Either I've never gotten this to work or I don't understand how it's supposed to work. My understanding is that if this is working and I click on a link of the form Mailto:somebody@somwhere; in mozilla, I should get an evolution compose window with the To: already filled out with somebody@somewhere and not get the mozilla mail compose window, correct? I always get the mozilla window and I've tried the suggestions from this thread and a previous one on this list. I'm using RH7.1 with the latest ximian gnome, gnomecc 1.5.9, almost the latest evo snaps. Thanks, John On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 21:51, Benjamin Sherman wrote: Hi, I know this has been covered a long while back on the mailing list, but i want to set evolution to be my mail handler in Gnome. Specifically... to handle mailto:; links from web pages. In the URL Handlers control-applet, I added the mailto protocol and the command: evolution %s this works, however, it opens a second Evolution shell even if it's already running? any ideas? thanks. -- Benjamin Sherman ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] search for numeric string in message body
This may be related to bug 11647. If I search for a numeric string in either Body or subject contains or Body contains for a string that is or contains numeric characters, the search fails. It will return matches for the subject in the Body or subject contains case. I noticed this in my redhat folder where I keep all the RHBAs and RHSAs and did a search for 7.2. I went to a message that had 7.2 in it and entered (cut and paste) the 7.2 from the body into the search and did searches on both subject and body and then body only. The first case returned 1 message with 7.2 in the subject. The message that I did the cut and paste from briefly showed the 7.2 string highlighted as a seach match does, but then the message disappeared. Similarly, a search for i386 returns no matched. I have RH7.1. I noticed this also in 200110291518 and I'm now seeing this also on 200111021518. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] search for numeric string in message body
Or bug 11640. Besides what I mentioned below, searching seems pretty goofy in general. Seems like this is already known. John On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:14, John Weber wrote: This may be related to bug 11647. If I search for a numeric string in either Body or subject contains or Body contains for a string that is or contains numeric characters, the search fails. It will return matches for the subject in the Body or subject contains case. I noticed this in my redhat folder where I keep all the RHBAs and RHSAs and did a search for 7.2. I went to a message that had 7.2 in it and entered (cut and paste) the 7.2 from the body into the search and did searches on both subject and body and then body only. The first case returned 1 message with 7.2 in the subject. The message that I did the cut and paste from briefly showed the 7.2 string highlighted as a seach match does, but then the message disappeared. Similarly, a search for i386 returns no matched. I have RH7.1. I noticed this also in 200110291518 and I'm now seeing this also on 200111021518. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] search for numeric string in message body
OK. I filed it. John. On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:25, Luis Villa wrote: Weird. Probably related to but I'd say distinct from 11647. If you could file a separate bug for this, John, I'd appreciate it. Luis On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 14:14, John Weber wrote: This may be related to bug 11647. If I search for a numeric string in either Body or subject contains or Body contains for a string that is or contains numeric characters, the search fails. It will return matches for the subject in the Body or subject contains case. I noticed this in my redhat folder where I keep all the RHBAs and RHSAs and did a search for 7.2. I went to a message that had 7.2 in it and entered (cut and paste) the 7.2 from the body into the search and did searches on both subject and body and then body only. The first case returned 1 message with 7.2 in the subject. The message that I did the cut and paste from briefly showed the 7.2 string highlighted as a seach match does, but then the message disappeared. Similarly, a search for i386 returns no matched. I have RH7.1. I noticed this also in 200110291518 and I'm now seeing this also on 200111021518. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Luis Villa Ximian Bugmaster Quality is an amazing bridge because it is universal in its language. Thomas Corcoran ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Receiving options in Account editor question
Hi, 1. In the Receiving options tab for editing an account, what's the difference between Standard Unix mbox spools and Local Delivery? 2. What is Mail-dir format mail directories ? Thanks, John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Saving a message to finish later (Draft?)
Hi, When I'm composing a message and need to stash it away to finish later, what's the way to do this? I tried file-Save draft and it put the message into the draft folder, but I can't figure out how to reopen it for editing. I can move it to the sent folder and then I can edit-Edit as New message..., but this seems the long way around. It gives me an error if I try the edit-Edit as New message... directly from the draft folder. You may only resend messages in the Sent folder Also the message gets HTMLized when I put it in the draft folder. I have all my settings set for plain text and that's the way it's been sending my mail. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Receiving options in Account editor question
Thanks for the explanation. It helps a lot. I've been using mailx and pine and a little netscape (only lately) until evolution. Evolution is a vast universe of email goodies! John On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 12:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 12:42, John Weber wrote: Hi, 1. In the Receiving options tab for editing an account, what's the difference between Standard Unix mbox spools and Local Delivery? - Standard Unix mbox spools will create a a subtree of folder(s) in the folder-tree view and leave messages there. This is for people who want to share mbox folders between mail clients. So for example you could tell evolution to read an mbox spool such as /home/user/Mail/inbox that might actually be part of Balsa, KMail, mutt, pine, etc - Local Delivery is if you want Evolution to download mail from say /var/spool/mail/user and filter it into your various other folders (assuming you have filters setup, otherwise it delivers them to Inbox). 2. What is Mail-dir format mail directories ? If you don't know, you probably don't have it :-) Maildir is the mail format that QMail uses, I think mutt also has support for it. Jeff Thanks, John -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- If they want the monkey love, they've gotta love the monkey. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Text overflows page while printing...
What's the bug number for this? I searched bugzilla for what I thought were good keywords. Thanks, John On Thu, 2001-10-04 at 08:30, Dan Winship wrote: On Thu, 2001-10-04 at 12:44, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote: Hi, I am using CVS snapshot from 10/04. When I print, sometimes the text does not get wrapped properly. Yes, this is a known bug. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Printing calendar
I'm seeing some things when printing (and previewing) calendar views. 1. Text overflows boundaries in any view. I suspect this may be related to some of the gtkHTML bugs already reported. Those have been for printing mail, but I see essentially the same thing in calendar printing. 2. When printing (or preview) Selected Week, it mangles what I see on screen for Week View (not work week). The week View shows 2 columns of days and I have it set so Sat Sun share the upper left box split horizontally. Then Mon Tues are the 2nd and 3rd boxes down in the 1st column and Wed-Fri are the second column. In print (and preview), the upper left half box formerly Sat, is blank, Sun Mon are the 2nd 3rd boxes down. Fri has come up from the bottom box 2nd col and Tues from bottom box 1st col to overwrite each other in top box 2nd col. Wed Thur are now the 2nd and 3rd boxes, 2nd col. RH7.1, evolution snap 200110251553. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Lost Contacts
Rh7.1 I had similar experience. Went back to the evolution on the gnome desktop channel (seems like a lot of broken stuff in the last few snaps) and contacts was blank. A sub-folder of contacts did show OK but the main contacts folder was blank. I went back to snap 200110181519 ( a version I particularly enjoyed) and contacts is OK. John On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 11:02, Mark Lussier wrote: I did up update to the 10.23 snapshot and evo seg faults on startup (Debian Potato, 2.4.5). So I jump backed down to Beta 6, and all is well.. except my contacts is blank. The db _is_ in evolution/local/Contacts and it has the content in there, it just wont show. If _did_ previously show under B6 before I got the snapshot that segfaults. Ideas on how to get it back M ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] button bar goes blank and no menus in folder bar
snap 200110240757 RH7.1 The horizontal button bar goes blank after changing mail folders. It shows up at first, but blanks and stays blank after the first folder change. I also get no menus when right clicking on a folder in the folder bar. I downgraded to 200110231929 and these problems went away. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Per-folder feature idea (that would just happen tofit me perfectly :-)
Yeah. This would take care of the ambiguities I was mentioning in the thread From field with replies from last Friday. John (I almost sent this one with the wrong From:) On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 19:07, Adam Warner wrote: Hi all, The need is easy to explain: My mailing lists email address is different from my personal email address. Whenever I am posting/replying to a mailing list I have to remember to select the right From address. If I forget the mail can bounce (or I've just increased the spam that goes to my personal email address). The solution is elegant: PER-FOLDER DEFAULT EMAIL ADDRESSES. For example if I am in the folder evolution and either post or reply to a new message my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address could be set as the default. A good place for the selection item could be a right mouse click on a particular folder called Default Account... For those of us that sort their mail using folders and use more than one email address I think this could be a killer feature. What do you all think? Regards, Adam ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] From field with replies
OK. This info helps me narrow down the behavior I think is strange. If I reply to a message where the To: field is one of my identities in the mail settings, then the From: will match that. What I notice is that if I'm replying and the To: is not one of my identities (e.g. the To: field is this mailing list), then it's not using my default ID but a different one that happens to be first in the list of 4 accounts, default is last. This account is also disabled. So it seems to me to make more sense to use the default ID in this case instead of another one on the list. If it does use the first on the list, there should be an easy way of reordering them. Does this mean that default account only applies to new messages? What other attributes (if any) does the 'default' account have except for the From: on new messages? Next question. Does the status 'enabled' or 'disabled' just turn on or off receiving mail or does it affect other things? Thanks, John On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 12:19, Jon Trowbridge wrote: On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 12:07, Rebecca J. Walter wrote: On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 17:20, John Weber wrote: What determines which identity gets put in the From: field when replying to a message? I notice that sometimes it's not my default account id. What I have noticed is that is appears based on the address the message was sent to. Yes, this is correct. If someone sends mail to your [EMAIL PROTECTED] address, your reply will have that in the From:, even if your default account is [EMAIL PROTECTED] New messages always use your default identity, unless otherwise specified. -JT ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Summary - Mail Summary count not working
RH7.1 +cvs200109250808 (red carpet snap) New messages count shows 0 when there are new messages in a folder. The folder status bar count is working when a folder is selected. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] mail recipients in compose suggestion
Hi, When composing a new email, I have the recipient fields To:, Cc:, and Bcc:. Each of these buttons brings up the same addressbook menu which lets me choose any of these fields again. Instead have a separate addressbook button and use these buttons to change the category (To:, Cc, Bcc:) with a drop down menu. Like Mozilla. Thanks, John ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] libgtkhtml
I had this error in red carpet when trying to do all the upgrades today. I had apparent success by installing the evolution snaps and then individually selecting all the desktop upgrades. Red carpet didn't complain about that. John On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 03:26, Xavier Bestel wrote: Hi ! there's a problem with Evo packages for RH6.2: libgtkhtml15 contains gtkhtml0.16, but the latest desktop upgrade needs 0.15 ... You've probably already noticed it anyway. have a nice day, Xav ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Slow and where's documentation
Hi, I recently started using the evolution daily snapshots and now I can't find a user manual. It seems it was accessible in the help menu on the main release. Is there a user manual available somewhere? I looked around on Ximian web site but found none. I'm also curious as to why evolution takes a long time to start up. About 10 secs for each component to highlight in the startup window, and after that the different components take a similar amount of time to open on first use. The New Messages window always takes a long time to open. I never see any disk or CPU usage during the wait, so what is it doing? -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] themes
Will evolution support themes? I've been using mozilla mail and I like the skypilot theme because it has darker shades, especially the backgrounds. Is there a way to set the background color in evolution? White backgrounds are so bright. -- John S. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.qwest.net/~weberjohns ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Slow and where's documentation
Mike Leone wrote: I'm also curious as to why evolution takes a long time to start up. About 10 secs for each component to highlight in the startup window, and after that the different components take a similar amount of time to open on first use. The New Messages window always takes a long time to open. I never see any disk or CPU usage during the wait, so what is it doing? ORBIT problems, probably. I notice that, when Evolution gets that slow, if I do (as root): (close Evo) killev oaf-slay rm -rf /tmp/orbit-(my-user-name) Then Evo speeds up TREMENDOUSLY. Both start up, and widow openings - new message, reply, etc. I know that if I *don't* periodically do this, Evo gets very slow. Especially if I leave X, and then come back into X. Thanks, This worked to speed things up again. I've crashed evolution several times since, but no slow down yet. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
