RE: dcpromo on existing server

2002-01-14 Thread Paul Love

anyone know of a simila NT list, i used to belong to one on sunbelt i
think.?

Regards

Paul

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: 10 January 2002 20:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: dcpromo on existing server


Yep.


> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Sachs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: dcpromo on existing server
>
>
> Is it possible to upgrade an existing Exchange 2000 (Win2k
> Server sp2, exchange2k std sp2) to a domain controller for
> the Active Directory? Its a lab environment, not production...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Inherited Permissions

2002-01-14 Thread Aarts, Jan

You should remove it from the configuration object of that Site

That should work

Jan

-Original Message-
From: Pat Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Inherited Permissions




On Exchange 5.5, user properties, the permissions tab displays a list of
Windows NT Accounts with inherited permissions. How can I remove a Service
Account Administrator who is no longer needed?

Thank you in advance.


PM

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Colin J Revell

Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I thought that it may 
be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield installed. I rebuilt the server - 
Exchange SP2 all updates etc including Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The 
IS has just stopped again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the 
time being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Paul Bouzan

What does the event log say? - It may also be prudent to turn logging up to
maximum for the time being as well.

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 14 January 2002 10:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I thought
that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield installed. I
rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including Groupshield and
did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped again. I have set the
automatic recovery to restart it for the time being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Colin J Revell

The event log for the IS stop:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   Service Control Manager
Event Category: None
Event ID:   7031
Date:   14/01/2002
Time:   08:27:34
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service terminated unexpectedly.  It has done 
this 1 time(s).  The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds: No 
action. 



-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 10:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


What does the event log say? - It may also be prudent to turn logging up to
maximum for the time being as well.

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 14 January 2002 10:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I thought
that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield installed. I
rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including Groupshield and
did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped again. I have set the
automatic recovery to restart it for the time being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson

It's not so much a question of whether NetShield was on the server, but
more a question of which directories NetShield was scanning.  The
general recommendation is not to run file-level scanning on the
\exchsrvr\*data directories, e.g. mdbdata, mtadata, etc.

It's possible that you *may* have introduced corruption into the
database.  You may therefore like to run the database utilities to see
if this is the case, ensuring of course that you get PSS involved if
you're not comfortable when you do this.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 10:28
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



IMAP client causes 13000 event log entry

2002-01-14 Thread Phillips, Alan

All of a sudden, we are seeing quite a few occurences of download failure
involving IMAP 4 clients (servers are all Ex5.5SP4 on NT4SP6a, running Norton
AV 2.17)

The MSExchange IMAP4 Interface logs an error with ID 13000 and text:

   An error (0x7da) occurred while rendering a message for download on mailbox


EventID.net has nothing on ID 13000; nothing in the group messages we have
stored; archives not working.

TechNet has a few KB articles on similar messages, but none with this specific
error code and all allegedly fixed well before SP4.

Anyone able to suggest what we might look for in this specific case or what
"0x7da" indicates (it certainly doesn't make sense as a Win32 error code...)?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US

One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the other
is listed as *:.  One of our admins from our NJ site stated that we need to
add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead.  I tend to disagree though.  I tend
to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:.  Everything I have
researched has stated that it should be *;.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a six
pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.

What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow for
IMS traffic?

> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
> 
> 
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem 
> is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see 
> why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review 
> the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read 
> through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new 
> site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone 
> out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I 
> am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw 
> a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> LaCretia Sandoval

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT help...

2002-01-14 Thread Chinnery Paul

And moving it may not help at all.  I've got it on a separate machine and
have experienced similar problems.  Trend's tech support's only suggestion
was to remove and reinstall the client program on the client machine.
I use their Scanmail av and love it but their Officescan product is not up
to the same level of quality.  Their gui also leaves a lot to be desired.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


Moving it to another machine after you have your clients installed is a
MAJOR PITA. Be sure to talk to tech support first. They have some
documentation to follow.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


I have only just installed it
I will put it on a dedicated machine, see what it does...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 January, 2002 8:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


Is this all the time, or just this new update?
Have you checked on how to manually do it? There is a doc on their tech
support that tells how to do it.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


NT4 network, OfficeScan HTML interface, setup done completely by the book,
only thing I think might be a problem is that I have installed it on an
Exchange server? 
It recognises the clients being installed but when I want to push out the
initial update it doesn't recognise any of the domains...

Kim

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 January, 2002 7:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


Well, from the amount of detail you provided about your environment etc. I
would guess that you are having a problem with something :-)

More detail?

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 13, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT help...


I can't get Trend Office scan updates pushed out...
It recognises the clients but doesn't give a list to push the updates to...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson

Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than
just *.  But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the
other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from our NJ site stated that
we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead.  I tend to disagree
though.  I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:.
Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a
six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.

What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow
for IMS traffic?

> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
> 
> 
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem
> is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see 
> why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review 
> the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read 
> through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new 
> site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone 
> out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I 
> am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw 
> a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> LaCretia Sandoval

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT help...

2002-01-14 Thread Kim Schotanus

I can't uninstall the clients as it doesn't recognise them in the list,
but when I want to add them it says theu're already there...
Does this mean I have to uninstall manually on each client?

Kim

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


And moving it may not help at all.  I've got it on a separate machine
and
have experienced similar problems.  Trend's tech support's only
suggestion
was to remove and reinstall the client program on the client machine.
I use their Scanmail av and love it but their Officescan product is not
up
to the same level of quality.  Their gui also leaves a lot to be
desired.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


Moving it to another machine after you have your clients installed is a
MAJOR PITA. Be sure to talk to tech support first. They have some
documentation to follow.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


I have only just installed it
I will put it on a dedicated machine, see what it does...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 January, 2002 8:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


Is this all the time, or just this new update?
Have you checked on how to manually do it? There is a doc on their tech
support that tells how to do it.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


NT4 network, OfficeScan HTML interface, setup done completely by the
book,
only thing I think might be a problem is that I have installed it on an
Exchange server? 
It recognises the clients being installed but when I want to push out
the
initial update it doesn't recognise any of the domains...

Kim

-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 January, 2002 7:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT help...


Well, from the amount of detail you provided about your environment etc.
I
would guess that you are having a problem with something :-)

More detail?

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 13, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT help...


I can't get Trend Office scan updates pushed out...
It recognises the clients but doesn't give a list to push the updates
to...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mai

Re: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread missy koslosky

Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: GWART


Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than
just *.  But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the
other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from our NJ site stated that
we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead.  I tend to disagree
though.  I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:.
Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GWART

I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a
six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.

What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow
for IMS traffic?

> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
> 
> 
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem
> is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see 
> why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review 
> the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read 
> through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new 
> site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone 
> out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I 
> am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw 
> a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> LaCretia Sandoval

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson

In that case my mind ain't working like it used to... :-)

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: Re: GWART


Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: GWART


Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than
just *.  But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the
other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from our NJ site stated that
we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead.  I tend to disagree
though.  I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:.
Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GWART

I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a
six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.

What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow
for IMS traffic?

> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
> 
> 
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, 
> internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. 
> I decided to look into the routing table to see why this is. However, 
> I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the 
> GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered that there is

> no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. 
> Does anyone out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file?

> I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw
> a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> LaCretia Sandoval

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson

Actually, what I meant to say is that, although I'd agree that * is the
usual way to go, doesn't the presence of a *@* in the GWART appear as a
better route than * ?

That being said, I'd just change both to * and raise the cost of the
route I didn't want stuff to go down.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: Re: GWART


Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: GWART


Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than
just *.  But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the
other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from our NJ site stated that
we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead.  I tend to disagree
though.  I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:.
Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GWART

I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a
six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.

What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow
for IMS traffic?

> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
> 
> 
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, 
> internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. 
> I decided to look into the routing table to see why this is. However, 
> I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the 
> GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered that there is

> no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. 
> Does anyone out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file?

> I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw
> a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> LaCretia Sandoval

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately by telephone on 0120

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US

I had tried just raising the cost here and leaving it as is however, mail
still flows into one bridgehead and out the other.  I would like to do a
drawing of our GWART on a diagram to make sure it's optimally configured.  I
have been having trouble though since it appears the GWART is sectioned and
it does not tell where one section starts and one begins.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 7:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

Actually, what I meant to say is that, although I'd agree that * is the
usual way to go, doesn't the presence of a *@* in the GWART appear as a
better route than * ?

That being said, I'd just change both to * and raise the cost of the
route I didn't want stuff to go down.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: Re: GWART


Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: GWART


Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than
just *.  But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the
other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from our NJ site stated that
we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead.  I tend to disagree
though.  I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:.
Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;.

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GWART

I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a
six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.

What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow
for IMS traffic?

> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: GWART
> 
> 
> I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, 
> internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. 
> I decided to look into the routing table to see why this is. However, 
> I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the 
> GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered that there is

> no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. 
> Does anyone out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file?

> I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw
> a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> LaCretia Sandoval

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.

RE: What would you buy?

2002-01-14 Thread Roger Seielstad

With a 20%+ growth rate, I'd buy 2 slightly smaller boxen rather than 1
beast. Lots of memory, dual procs, and a FAST disk system.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What would you buy?
> 
> 
> Yes, and yes
> 
> And actually I'm serious.  I need to budget for a new server, 
> the current ones just arent cutting it.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What would you buy?
> 
> 
> Do you even read this list?  Or are you just a sadist?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: Friday, January 11, 2002 04:11 PM
> > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> > Conversation: What would you buy?
> > Subject: What would you buy?
> > 
> > 
> > Not nessicarily brand, cause I'm stuck with IBM.
> > 
> > Exchange 2000 server for roughly 1000 users, mailbox storage/OWA/KM 
> > not smtp, limits around 100mb to 200mb( negotiable ) per mailbox,
> > some public
> > folder usage under 5gig db.  Enviroment will have a projected 
> > growth of
> > 20-27% anually.
> > 
> > Based on the previous IBM5000 w/2 p2-450's and the current 
> IBM5100 w/2
> > p3-800 I was thinking of a quad xeon 900 with an oodle of 
> drives and 
> > maybe agrigated fiber cards.
> > 
> > What would you recommend for such a senario?
> > 
> > e-
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMAP client causes 13000 event log entry

2002-01-14 Thread Tom Meunier

Go look at the profile for the client [mailboxname].  See what's funny -
ie. They're hitting the mailbox using MAPI and IMAP within the same
profile, with both trying to deliver to PST...  Don't just fix it -
delete it and build it properly from scratch using only the services you
need.


-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:15 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: IMAP client causes 13000 event log entry
Subject: IMAP client causes 13000 event log entry


All of a sudden, we are seeing quite a few occurences of download
failure involving IMAP 4 clients (servers are all Ex5.5SP4 on NT4SP6a,
running Norton AV 2.17)

The MSExchange IMAP4 Interface logs an error with ID 13000 and text:

   An error (0x7da) occurred while rendering a message for download on
mailbox 

EventID.net has nothing on ID 13000; nothing in the group messages we
have stored; archives not working.

TechNet has a few KB articles on similar messages, but none with this
specific error code and all allegedly fixed well before SP4.

Anyone able to suggest what we might look for in this specific case or
what "0x7da" indicates (it certainly doesn't make sense as a Win32 error
code...)?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Roger Seielstad

Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target address,
so the connector with which that is associated will be chosen every time.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: GWART
> 
> 
> Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
> 
> Missy
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better 
> match than just *.  But you still haven't stated what your 
> desired flow is
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
> Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
> Conversation: GWART
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as 
> *(A)* and the other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from 
> our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other 
> bridgehead.  I tend to disagree though.  I tend to think that 
> the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have 
> researched has stated that it should be *;.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LaCretia Sandoval
> Dallas LAN Administrator
> Triaton, NA, Inc.
> 972-443-4027
> ___
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, 
> not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.
> 
> What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the 
> desired flow for IMS traffic?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, 
> > internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> bridgehead. 
> > I decided to look into the routing table to see why this 
> is. However, 
> > I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the 
> > GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered 
> that there is 
> > no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new 
> bridgehead. 
> > Does anyone out there have any experience reading the 
> GWART0.MTA file? 
> > I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw
> > a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> > help would be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > LaCretia Sandoval
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it 
> is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those 
> of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
> subsidiary companies.
> If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
> Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/s

RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Eric Sedore

There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000
stopping the store.  We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if
you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has
seemed to resolve the problem.

-Eric



-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US

So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic for each site
should flow through the bridgehead for that site right?  Also, I had a
question about the administrative management domain name.  What is this used
for?  I read that if you set this up for each site then the traffic will be
more controlled.  Currently all sites in the entire org are set to the
default "None".

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target address,
so the connector with which that is associated will be chosen every time.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: GWART
> 
> 
> Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
> 
> Missy
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better 
> match than just *.  But you still haven't stated what your 
> desired flow is
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
> Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
> Conversation: GWART
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as 
> *(A)* and the other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from 
> our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other 
> bridgehead.  I tend to disagree though.  I tend to think that 
> the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have 
> researched has stated that it should be *;.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LaCretia Sandoval
> Dallas LAN Administrator
> Triaton, NA, Inc.
> 972-443-4027
> ___
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, 
> not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.
> 
> What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the 
> desired flow for IMS traffic?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, 
> > internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> bridgehead. 
> > I decided to look into the routing table to see why this 
> is. However, 
> > I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the 
> > GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered 
> that there is 
> > no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new 
> bridgehead. 
> > Does anyone out there have any experience reading the 
> GWART0.MTA file? 
> > I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw
> > a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> > help would be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > LaCretia Sandoval
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it 
> is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those 
> of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
> subsidiary companies.
> If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
> Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/re

RE: Backup

2002-01-14 Thread East, Bill

Don't worry Ed, you'll get your cut. I don't need another round of your
thugs pouring lime Jello in my fishtank.

-- 
be - MOS

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Backup
> 
> 
> Pretty cheap.  That's what, about US$27.50?
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:49 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Backup
> 
> 
> As others have pointed out, you don't need a server-class 
> machine for a
> recovery server.
> 
> For that matter, I have never needed to use a recovery server. Why? I
> use the Ed Crowley(tm) Never Restore(c) Method(sm)!
> 
> For full details on this method, send 150 Euros and an unused thong to
> the address at the bottom of your screen. Or read the FAQ. Or just
> Google for it.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> be - MOS
> 
> 
> 
> Houston, Tranquillity Base here.  The Eagle has landed.  --Neil
> Armstrong
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steck, Steffen M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:55 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: WG: Backup
> > 
> > 
> > You are right friends, I am doing a brick level backup. I
> > also backup DS and
> > IS. The key in here is that I have *not* an adequate test 
> machine for
> > recovering single mailboxes. So, correct me if I'm wrong or 
> > if I oversee
> > something relevant, brick level backup is the only way for 
> > me, isn't it?!
> > And, no unfortunately I won't get the bucks for a similar 
> > test machine ;-(((
> > Greetings
> > Steffen
> > 
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Steck, Steffen M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2002 08:24
> > An: Exchange Discussions
> > Betreff: Backup
> > 
> > 
> > Hi there,
> > I am having probs with the backup of my XCNG 5.5 Sp4 on 
> > NT4Sp6. I have a
> > priv.edb of approximately 23 GB size. Besides is only the OS 
> > and little more
> > (antivirus etc) on the machine. The machine itself is a P3 
> > Xeon with 500 Mhz
> > and 512 MB RAM. It has an DLT 80 and uses backup software 
> > Veritas Backup
> > Exec Multiserver 7.3.
> > The problem: The backup of the Exchange Mailboxes lasts 12 
> > hours, the whole
> > filesystem (27 GB) is being taped in half an hour. Why does 
> > take so long to
> > read out the mailboxes of the information store?
> > Anybody seen this or any idea?
> > Thx in advance
> > Steffen
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson

If you set both to * and there's some form of site connector between the
two, then yes, all mail will flow through the bridgehead for that site
(since the other IMS will have a higher cost via the site connector).

But watch out if you implement identical size restrictions on both IMS
connectors - you can get a situation where oversize messages bounce
between the two IMS connectors 512 times before they finally NDR.  The
way round this is to restrict the IMS address spaces to the site rather
than the organisation.

As for the administrative management domain name, I assume you're
talking about the admd field.  This is usually set to a single space
character, and I'd leave this alone in a native Exchange environment.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:55
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic for each
site should flow through the bridgehead for that site right?  Also, I
had a question about the administrative management domain name.  What is
this used for?  I read that if you set this up for each site then the
traffic will be more controlled.  Currently all sites in the entire org
are set to the default "None".

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target
address, so the connector with which that is associated will be chosen
every time.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: GWART
> 
> 
> Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
> 
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better
> match than just *.  But you still haven't stated what your 
> desired flow is
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
> Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
> Conversation: GWART
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as
> *(A)* and the other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from 
> our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other 
> bridgehead.  I tend to disagree though.  I tend to think that 
> the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have 
> researched has stated that it should be *;.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LaCretia Sandoval
> Dallas LAN Administrator
> Triaton, NA, Inc.
> 972-443-4027
> ___
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um,
> not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.
> 
> What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the
> desired flow for IMS traffic?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is,
> > internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> bridgehead.
> > I decided to look into the routing table to see why this
> is. However,
> > I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the
> > GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered 
> that there is
> > no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new
> bridgehead.
> > Does anyone out there have any experience reading the
> GWART0.MTA file?
> > I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw a 
> > picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any help would 
> > be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > LaCretia Sandoval
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/r

RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Colin J Revell

We had heard about this, but we were already loaded the 4.1.60 engine. I have since 
this morning compacted the databases and reduced them by about 5 Gb. I have also run 
the isinteg with the -fix option and fixed all but 58 warnings.

but

The IS has just stopped again

Help!


PS. I love computers

-Original Message-
From: Eric Sedore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000
stopping the store.  We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if
you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has
seemed to resolve the problem.

-Eric



-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Joyce, Louis

Are you sure the event log isnt full, causing the IS to shutdown? Have you
re-installed service packs?

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 14:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


We had heard about this, but we were already loaded the 4.1.60 engine. I
have since this morning compacted the databases and reduced them by about 5
Gb. I have also run the isinteg with the -fix option and fixed all but 58
warnings.

but

The IS has just stopped again

Help!


PS. I love computers

-Original Message-
From: Eric Sedore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000
stopping the store.  We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if
you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has
seemed to resolve the problem.

-Eric



-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Kevin Miller

Get rid of GroupsSheild all together. Until you have the problems all
fixed up. What kind of Disk System are you using? DO you have a Drive
that is dieing? What else is in the event log?

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colin J Revell
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


We had heard about this, but we were already loaded the 4.1.60 engine. I
have since this morning compacted the databases and reduced them by
about 5 Gb. I have also run the isinteg with the -fix option and fixed
all but 58 warnings.

but

The IS has just stopped again

Help!


PS. I love computers

-Original Message-
From: Eric Sedore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000
stopping the store.  We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if
you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has
seemed to resolve the problem.

-Eric



-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Roger Seielstad

Change it to * on all your connectors and it will select the best route
based on cost values.

ADMD is only relevant for foreign (ie outside your Exchange org) systems.
Your current settings are fine.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic 
> for each site should flow through the bridgehead for that 
> site right?  Also, I had a question about the administrative 
> management domain name.  What is this used for?  I read that 
> if you set this up for each site then the traffic will be 
> more controlled.  Currently all sites in the entire org are 
> set to the default "None".
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LaCretia Sandoval
> Dallas LAN Administrator
> Triaton, NA, Inc.
> 972-443-4027
> ___
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: GWART
> 
> Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the 
> target address, so the connector with which that is 
> associated will be chosen every time.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> http://www.peregrine.com
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
> > 
> > Missy
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
> > Subject: RE: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better
> > match than just *.  But you still haven't stated what your 
> > desired flow is
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37
> > Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
> > Conversation: GWART
> > Subject: RE: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as
> > *(A)* and the other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from 
> > our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other 
> > bridgehead.  I tend to disagree though.  I tend to think that 
> > the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have 
> > researched has stated that it should be *;.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > LaCretia Sandoval
> > Dallas LAN Administrator
> > Triaton, NA, Inc.
> > 972-443-4027
> > ___
> > 
> >  -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: GWART
> > 
> > I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um,
> > not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.
> > 
> > What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the
> > desired flow for IMS traffic?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: GWART
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is,
> > > internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other 
> > bridgehead.
> > > I decided to look into the routing table to see why this
> > is. However,
> > > I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the
> > > GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered 
> > that there is
> > > no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new
> > bridgehead.
> > > Does anyone out there have any experience reading the
> > GWART0.MTA file?
> > > I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw a 
> > > picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any 
> help would 
> > > be greatly appreciated.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > LaCretia Sandoval
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubsc

RE: GWART

2002-01-14 Thread Neil Hobson

I see.  You don't mean the admd field...Q234639 will help you.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 14 January 2002 14:24
To: Neil Hobson
Subject: RE: GWART


Thanks for the information, its very helpful.  I got confused here
though... the admd field for our site is left blank.  What I was
referring to is the Server Location field on the server properties page.
See below:

 <<...OLE_Obj...>> 

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

If you set both to * and there's some form of site connector between the
two, then yes, all mail will flow through the bridgehead for that site
(since the other IMS will have a higher cost via the site connector).

But watch out if you implement identical size restrictions on both IMS
connectors - you can get a situation where oversize messages bounce
between the two IMS connectors 512 times before they finally NDR.  The
way round this is to restrict the IMS address spaces to the site rather
than the organisation.

As for the administrative management domain name, I assume you're
talking about the admd field.  This is usually set to a single space
character, and I'd leave this alone in a native Exchange environment.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:55
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: GWART
Subject: RE: GWART


So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic for each
site should flow through the bridgehead for that site right?  Also, I
had a question about the administrative management domain name.  What is
this used for?  I read that if you set this up for each site then the
traffic will be more controlled.  Currently all sites in the entire org
are set to the default "None".

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: GWART

Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target
address, so the connector with which that is associated will be chosen
every time.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com


> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: GWART
> 
> 
> Nope.  LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space.
> 
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than 
> just *.  But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
> Conversation: GWART
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> 
> One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as
> *(A)* and the other is listed as *:.  One of our admins from
> our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other 
> bridgehead.  I tend to disagree though.  I tend to think that 
> the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have 
> researched has stated that it should be *;.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LaCretia Sandoval
> Dallas LAN Administrator
> Triaton, NA, Inc.
> 972-443-4027
> ___
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: GWART
> 
> I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without

> a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon.
> 
> What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow

> for IMS traffic?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: GWART
> > 
> > 
> > I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, 
> > internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other
> bridgehead.
> > I decided to look into the routing table to see why this
> is. However,
> > I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the 
> > GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered
> that there is
> > no entry for the new

RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Colin J Revell

The event logs are set to overwrite as needed and we are running al the latest SP's 
and security fixes. I don't believe that there is a HD fault, and as I was 
contemplating removing GroupShield, I received a copy of the W32/Magistr.b@MM virus in 
a gif file.




-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


Are you sure the event log isnt full, causing the IS to shutdown? Have you
re-installed service packs?

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 14:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


We had heard about this, but we were already loaded the 4.1.60 engine. I
have since this morning compacted the databases and reduced them by about 5
Gb. I have also run the isinteg with the -fix option and fixed all but 58
warnings.

but

The IS has just stopped again

Help!


PS. I love computers

-Original Message-
From: Eric Sedore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000
stopping the store.  We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if
you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has
seemed to resolve the problem.

-Eric



-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gi g ger. A@mm Virus)

2002-01-14 Thread John Matteson

If the genders had been reversed, there would have been no trial. They'd
have found the teacher out in the woods somewhere strung up by tender parts.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 6:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the
S.Gig ger. A@mm Virus)


Sober note: if the genders were reversed would you (or anyone) be cracking
jokes? Think about it.

- Original Message -
From: "Bob Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig
ger. A@mm Virus)


> Now now, let's give Mary Kay a break!  After all, it's just simple
> math:  seventeen goes into forty more times than forty goes into
seventeen. ;-p
>
> At 04:46 PM 1/11/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >Mary Kay Letourneau says hi and wants to know how old you are.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:29 PM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: Re: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the
S.Gig
> >ger. A@mm Virus)
> >
> >
> >Sounds like a captive audience. Do they qualify as lusers?
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:46 PM
> >Subject: RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the
S.Gig
> >ger. A@mm Virus)
> >
> >
> > > Washington State Corrections Center for Women
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:22 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the
S.Gigger.
> > > A@mm Virus)
> > >
> > >
> > > Bellevue.
> > >
> > > Jesse Wendel
> > > Sr. Messaging Analyst
> > > Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
> > > www.pse.com
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:10 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
> > >
> > >
> > > SW Washington.
> > >
> > > Ken Powell
> > > Systems Administrator
> > > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
> > > Vancouver, Washington
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> > > Fax: (360) 759-6001
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:32 PM
> > > To: Powell, Ken
> > > Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
> > >
> > > Sounds like a lot of fun and I would really like to meet the group of
> >gurus
> > > you associate with in Seattle!!  Unfortunately for me, I already
agreed to
> > > take off work early and take a non-techie friend of mine to see the
Lord
> >of
> > > the Rings.
> > >
> > > Maybe next time?  Dang...would have been nice to meet Don before he
left
> > > though.  Guess I'll have a chance to meet him at MEC this year though.
> > >
> > > Who else is in the Washington State/Idaho/Oregon/Lower Cananda area?
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
> > >
> > >
> > > A bunch of us are headed out tonight to Pacific Crest Brew Pub, to say
> >good
> > > Bye to Don Ely. He is leavening the PNW for the other coast next week.
> > >
> > > Come on up. You have about 4 hours to make it. Right at the North end
of
> > > Boeing field.
> > >
> > > Milton R Dogg
> > > Of The Dogg Foundation..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James
H
> > > (Jim)
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
> > >
> > >
> > > Dr. Dogg!
> > >
> > > Yer in Seattle?  Cool!  If you ever need someone to go to a
> > > Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in
the
> > > Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific.  ;0)
> > >
> > > Jim Blunt
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the 

RE: Slightly OT: PST policies

2002-01-14 Thread Atkinson, Daniel

thanks for your comment ed.

i like the idea of offline folders, but surely these would just be mirrors
of the users mailbox, or a subset thereof. That's not what's needed
here...the users need to archive data so they stay under the store limit and
can send mail. I don't see how an offline folder could be used in this
manner. 

am i missing something about offline folders?

dan.

> I'm not going to argue with you on your point, but I suggest that
> offline folders might be more appropriate.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
> Daniel
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> 
> 
> ok, check this pst scenario:
> 
> exchange site in uk, 450 users, 400mb mailbox limit, 30gb store.
> 
> servers are located in london, remote sites in northern cities connect
> via 2mbps links.
> 
> users often hit the mailbox limit and have to archive to pst. 
> in london,
> they just move items to a pst on their local disk, and we 
> make sure that
> they understand their data is no longer available via OWA or backed up
> nightly.
> 
> in the northern cities, the techs have put the PST's onto network
> drives. i immediately yelled "pst on net drives = bad" but their
> philosophy is that they have plentiful disk space on their 
> file servers
> and a fast network, so they do this to gain the advantage of 
> backing up
> the pst's.
> 
> i can't think of any good reason to persuade them to store 
> the pst's on
> local hard drives, and i think that's because there isn't one. 
> 
> dan.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 11 January 2002 06:11
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:  RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > 
> > 
> > That's fine [1] but keep them off file servers.
> > 
> > [1] not really
> > 
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> > Tech Consultant
> > Compaq Computer
> > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> > problems."
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Cook, David A.
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:34 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > 
> > 
> > I have read all those things about PST=BAD and I have used
> > all of those.
> > I gave my suggestion of do not allow any PSTs and I was told that we
> > have to allow PSTs. The reasons is the best part of the whole thing,
> > "they have always been able to use PSTs so we can't take that 
> > away from
> > them". Politics is the problem. 
> > 
> > The more I'm thinking about this the madder it makes me. I've
> > given this
> > recommendation before and then this time I was asked to give the
> > recommendation again so it could be taking to the powers that 
> > be. I give
> > my recommendation and I'm told it is not acceptable. I'm pretty much
> > being given the recommandation and being told that it is my
> > recommendation now justify it. I can't justify the wrong decision.
> > 
> > So that was my rant that you all could care less about but 
> thank you 
> > everyone for the input.
> > 
> > 
> > Dave Cook
> > Exchange Administrator
> > Kutak Rock, LLP
> > 402-231-8352
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Internal MAPI error

2002-01-14 Thread V.S. Lout

Receive error:
Internal MAPI error:  The properties of Microsoft Exchange Server could
not be saved into the profile.  Contact your administrator.

Setting up profile using Outlook 2000 on a Windows 2000 server (this is
not an exchange server) and lashing up to Exchange 5.5 SP 3 on NT 4 SP 6a.
 Have a different profile successfully setup on the 2000 machine aimed at
the same Exchange server.  Can absolutely verify the mailbox setup is
correct on Exchange since I can connect to the mailbox (the one that
throws the MAPI error on the 2k box) from another machine using OL2000.

The A(Q165414) article seemed dated.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Receiving email that isn't decoded (via smtp)

2002-01-14 Thread Tom.Gray

Exchange 5.5 sp4
NT 4.0 sp6a

System has been running for 2 years without this problem.  

99.9% of users can receive email attachments with no problem.  Word 
documents, Excel Spreadsheets, Zip Files, etc.

However, mail sent from one specific outside address arrives with
an attachment, attachment has name  "minutes.doc"  but it 
is not a word document.   It is all text, looks like a mime or
uuencoded document.   Here are the first few lines:

0M8R4KGxGuEAPgADAP7/CQAGAAABLgAA
EAAAMAEAAAD+AC0AAAD/






///s
pcEAayAJBAAA8BK/EAAABAAADxEAAA4AYmpiah+uH64A


If that same outside user send the same file to my America Online address
it works just fine.

Outside user claims they are using Outlook.  Header from AOL says:
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.


Any ideas?



Tom Gray, Network Engineer
All Kinds of Minds & The Center for Development and Learning
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AT&T Net: (919)960-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: User is unable to open add'l mailbox

2002-01-14 Thread Hong Bui

What do you mean by grant visible rights on the username level? By going
to ADUC, select the Exchange Advanced tab, enter the sec'y in the mailbox
rights and give her the rights to read and change?  Please be more
specific.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slightly OT: PST policies

2002-01-14 Thread Joe Pochedley

Dan,

You're right, offline folders wouldn't help alleviate the mailbox size
restriction problem..

There's still the question:  Is storage space on your file server less
expensive than on your Exchange server?  If there's a good reason that some
users need more than 400 Mb worth of storage space, why make them split
things into PST's?

PST's on file servers aren't "bad" per-say, just a waste of time and
resources and a potential headache for the admin...

Joe Pochedley
"I like deadlines," 
cartoonist Scott Adams once said. 
"I especially like the whooshing 
sound they make as they fly by."




-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies


thanks for your comment ed.

i like the idea of offline folders, but surely these would just be mirrors
of the users mailbox, or a subset thereof. That's not what's needed
here...the users need to archive data so they stay under the store limit and
can send mail. I don't see how an offline folder could be used in this
manner. 

am i missing something about offline folders?

dan.

> I'm not going to argue with you on your point, but I suggest that 
> offline folders might be more appropriate.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson, 
> Daniel
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> 
> 
> ok, check this pst scenario:
> 
> exchange site in uk, 450 users, 400mb mailbox limit, 30gb store.
> 
> servers are located in london, remote sites in northern cities connect 
> via 2mbps links.
> 
> users often hit the mailbox limit and have to archive to pst.
> in london,
> they just move items to a pst on their local disk, and we 
> make sure that
> they understand their data is no longer available via OWA or backed up
> nightly.
> 
> in the northern cities, the techs have put the PST's onto network 
> drives. i immediately yelled "pst on net drives = bad" but their 
> philosophy is that they have plentiful disk space on their file 
> servers and a fast network, so they do this to gain the advantage of
> backing up
> the pst's.
> 
> i can't think of any good reason to persuade them to store
> the pst's on
> local hard drives, and i think that's because there isn't one. 
> 
> dan.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 11 January 2002 06:11
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:  RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > 
> > 
> > That's fine [1] but keep them off file servers.
> > 
> > [1] not really
> > 
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> > Tech Consultant
> > Compaq Computer
> > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
> > problems."
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Cook, David A.
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:34 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > 
> > 
> > I have read all those things about PST=BAD and I have used all of 
> > those. I gave my suggestion of do not allow any PSTs and I was told 
> > that we have to allow PSTs. The reasons is the best part of the 
> > whole thing, "they have always been able to use PSTs so we can't 
> > take that away from
> > them". Politics is the problem. 
> > 
> > The more I'm thinking about this the madder it makes me. I've given 
> > this recommendation before and then this time I was asked to give 
> > the recommendation again so it could be taking to the powers that
> > be. I give
> > my recommendation and I'm told it is not acceptable. I'm pretty much
> > being given the recommandation and being told that it is my
> > recommendation now justify it. I can't justify the wrong decision.
> > 
> > So that was my rant that you all could care less about but
> thank you
> > everyone for the input.
> > 
> > 
> > Dave Cook
> > Exchange Administrator
> > Kutak Rock, LLP
> > 402-231-8352
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://w

Trend and Yahoo

2002-01-14 Thread PRamatowski



Just curious if anyone else has seen this:

We all of a sudden stopped getting mail from personal Yahoo accounts, saw
this string in an antispam rule.  Not sure when it updated but the first we
heard of a problem was January 10th.  We're using E-Manager V3.5.0 build
1346.

http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

This text seems to be in any mail sent from a Yahoo personal account,
removed the text from Spam rule and we are back in business.. 

Paul

 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slightly OT: PST policies

2002-01-14 Thread Atkinson, Daniel

Yes, storage space is more expensive on the exchange server because it's on
a SAN, but that's not the point. We have a 400mb mailbox limit for good
reasons. We don't want the information store to grow too large, otherwise
restore times get too long and you can't quickly take a copy of the store to
another drive to try some eseutil or similar when there are problems. I
firmly believe in keeping the store at a manageable, copyable and quickly
restorable size. 

I've recently faced an exchange restore situation with an 80gb information
store from an online backup, and we had to wait several hours before we
could even begin to work with the inconsistent databases. Not good.

So, 'power users' who want 400mb+ have to archive somewhere. OST's don't
perform this function according to my understanding, so it has to be PST's.
As i said, here in London our guys just leave the PST's on the local hard
drive, but our friends in the north choose to keep them on file servers
where there's a nightly backup. 

So, it seems they've shown me a use of PST's on net drives where no viable
alternative exists to achieve the same result, namely, to maintain mailbox
limits and thus a manageable store while allowing users to archive their
data where it will get backed up.

is there a better way?

dan.

> Dan,
> 
> You're right, offline folders wouldn't help alleviate the mailbox size
> restriction problem..
> 
> There's still the question:  Is storage space on your file server less
> expensive than on your Exchange server?  If there's a good 
> reason that some
> users need more than 400 Mb worth of storage space, why make 
> them split
> things into PST's?
> 
> PST's on file servers aren't "bad" per-say, just a waste of time and
> resources and a potential headache for the admin...
> 
> Joe Pochedley
> "I like deadlines," 
> cartoonist Scott Adams once said. 
> "I especially like the whooshing 
> sound they make as they fly by."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> 
> 
> thanks for your comment ed.
> 
> i like the idea of offline folders, but surely these would 
> just be mirrors
> of the users mailbox, or a subset thereof. That's not what's needed
> here...the users need to archive data so they stay under the 
> store limit and
> can send mail. I don't see how an offline folder could be used in this
> manner. 
> 
> am i missing something about offline folders?
> 
> dan.
> 
> > I'm not going to argue with you on your point, but I suggest that 
> > offline folders might be more appropriate.
> > 
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > Tech Consultant
> > Compaq Computer Corporation
> > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson, 
> > Daniel
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:52 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > 
> > 
> > ok, check this pst scenario:
> > 
> > exchange site in uk, 450 users, 400mb mailbox limit, 30gb store.
> > 
> > servers are located in london, remote sites in northern 
> cities connect 
> > via 2mbps links.
> > 
> > users often hit the mailbox limit and have to archive to pst.
> > in london,
> > they just move items to a pst on their local disk, and we 
> > make sure that
> > they understand their data is no longer available via OWA 
> or backed up
> > nightly.
> > 
> > in the northern cities, the techs have put the PST's onto network 
> > drives. i immediately yelled "pst on net drives = bad" but their 
> > philosophy is that they have plentiful disk space on their file 
> > servers and a fast network, so they do this to gain the advantage of
> > backing up
> > the pst's.
> > 
> > i can't think of any good reason to persuade them to store
> > the pst's on
> > local hard drives, and i think that's because there isn't one. 
> > 
> > dan.
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 11 January 2002 06:11
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject:  RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > > 
> > > 
> > > That's fine [1] but keep them off file servers.
> > > 
> > > [1] not really
> > > 
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > Compaq Computer
> > > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
> > > problems."
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Cook, David A.
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:34 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have read all those things about PST=BAD and I have used all of 
> > > those. I gave my suggestion of do not allow any PSTs and 
> I was told 
> > > that we have to allow PSTs. The reasons is the 

RE: OWA Login?

2002-01-14 Thread Dupler, Craig

Restore connections

-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Login?


Morning, 

I have an interesting dilemma.  Running E2k.  One of my employees recently
redid her home computer.  Now when she goes to check her email from home
using OWA, she is not prompted for username / password - it takes her
straight to her inbox.  She has DSL/Cable.  

I thought perhaps she had 'saved' her username and password, but on my home
computer, the login box still appears - just filled out.  

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.  If you checks her email at a
different machine - she is prompted.


Tony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted itemsfolder in MS Outlook

2002-01-14 Thread Soysal, Serdar

Well, you do have an agents tab on the Deleted Items folder, so technically
it is possible to do this.  It's probably the cheapest way to do it as well,
assuming Sachin has the know-how to write the code.  Hell, you can even get
creative and create a contact for each email address that you retrieve from
the Deleted Items and fill up the PHB's contact list.  

But..why?

S.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items folder in
MS Outlook


Just curious, what does he hope to gain by having a list of email addresses
for messages that he has negligently deleted. Seems like a behavioral
problem to me.

Not sure about this (because I've never had to script actions on the deleted
items folder), but you could probably write an event script to write the
email address of every message that hits his deleted items folder to a text
file. Give him a link to the location of the text file. Yet another exercise
in stupidity issued by a PHB.

I think a better solution would be to correct the behavior, or this will be
the first in a long list of stupid scripting exercises for the Great Stupid
One.

My $.02. YMMV.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Sachin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items folder in MS
Outlook

I have a problem here my boss recieves hundreds of emails every day so
he keeps on deleting many of them without giving a serious look at the
contents and adresses. Now he wants that even if the mail gets deleted and
gets stored in the deleted items folder, he should run a utility and be able
to get the email ids of senders of all such messages in the deleted item
folder by running the utility at the end of each day.

Can any body guide me how to go about writing such a utility or get it
somewhere for outlook. The mail server used is MS Exchange 5.5

thanks 
Sachin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted itemsfolder in MS Outlook

2002-01-14 Thread Thomas Di Nardo

:)

My point exactly - WHY?

T.

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted itemsfolder
in MS Outlook


Well, you do have an agents tab on the Deleted Items folder, so
technically it is possible to do this.  It's probably the cheapest way
to do it as well, assuming Sachin has the know-how to write the code.
Hell, you can even get creative and create a contact for each email
address that you retrieve from the Deleted Items and fill up the PHB's
contact list.  

But..why?

S.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items
folder in MS Outlook


Just curious, what does he hope to gain by having a list of email
addresses for messages that he has negligently deleted. Seems like a
behavioral problem to me.

Not sure about this (because I've never had to script actions on the
deleted items folder), but you could probably write an event script to
write the email address of every message that hits his deleted items
folder to a text file. Give him a link to the location of the text file.
Yet another exercise in stupidity issued by a PHB.

I think a better solution would be to correct the behavior, or this will
be the first in a long list of stupid scripting exercises for the Great
Stupid One.

My $.02. YMMV.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Sachin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items folder in
MS Outlook

I have a problem here my boss recieves hundreds of emails every day
so he keeps on deleting many of them without giving a serious look at
the contents and adresses. Now he wants that even if the mail gets
deleted and gets stored in the deleted items folder, he should run a
utility and be able to get the email ids of senders of all such messages
in the deleted item folder by running the utility at the end of each
day.

Can any body guide me how to go about writing such a utility or get it
somewhere for outlook. The mail server used is MS Exchange 5.5

thanks 
Sachin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a
real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no
"Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Andy David

Which is better than:
"Why u no close me earlier?" 



-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no
"Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another
annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file
once every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is
no "Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Andy David

Ok, Who let the Dogg out?


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another
annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file
once every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is
no "Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread William Smith

>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Envelope Recipients is zero...

2002-01-14 Thread Cook, David A.

Thanks for the input and I'm moving toward installing SP2 but I don't
think that will do anything for me. I do not believe it is simply the
count being off because the recipient address is also blank and these
emails never send they just remain in a retry state and eventually fail.
I can delete them and delete (send NDR) but the sender never receives an
NDR.

Dave Cook
Exchange Administrator
Kutak Rock, LLP
402-231-8352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David Lemson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 12:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Envelope Recipients is zero...


Try Exchange 2000 SP2.  (on the server, not the machine running the ESM
console)
I'm not positive that it will fix the situation you are hitting, but
several issues related to counts being off were fixed in SP2.

David

-Original Message-
From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Envelope Recipients is zero...


Hoping someone can help me with my issue. I seem to recall reading
something about this once before and I thought it releted to sending
delivery/read reciepts. I can't find anything on it in the archive or on
Microsoft though. I may be searching for the wrong thing though.

Running E2K SP1 on W2K SP2. Client are all W2K SP2 and Outlook 2K.

My issue is that periodically a message gets caught in my SMTP queue in
a retry state. If I open up the properties of the message as it sits in
the SMTP queue there are no recipients listed and the number of envelope
recipients is zero. Has anyone seen this before or have any idea what to
look at? I checked the users sent item around the time that the message
was sent to the queue and there is nothing sent at that time. If this is
a delivery/read reciept how can I find out why it's getting stuck in the
queue.


Dave Cook
Exchange Administrator
Kutak Rock, LLP
402-231-8352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

##
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
(including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its
authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally 
privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for
delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended 
recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are 
hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying,
printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in
it.  In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone 
(402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any
attachments) without reading or saving in any manner.  

Thank you.
##

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
(including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its
authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally 
privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible
for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended 
recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are 
hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying,
printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained
in it.  In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone 
(402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any
attachments) without reading or saving in any manner.  

Thank you.
##

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Information Store Stopping...

2002-01-14 Thread Jennifer Baker

If the event log is full in exchange 2000, the store stops unexpectedly?
Just say no.

-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


Are you sure the event log isnt full, causing the IS to shutdown? Have you
re-installed service packs?

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 14:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


We had heard about this, but we were already loaded the 4.1.60 engine. I
have since this morning compacted the databases and reduced them by about 5
Gb. I have also run the isinteg with the -fix option and fixed all but 58
warnings.

but

The IS has just stopped again

Help!


PS. I love computers

-Original Message-
From: Eric Sedore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping...


There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000
stopping the store.  We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if
you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has
seemed to resolve the problem.

-Eric



-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Stopping...


Hi all,

My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I
thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield
installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including
Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped
again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time
being.

Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield
Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping

Thanks in anticipation,


Colin J Revell MCSE
IS Manager Oakham School

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Andy David

I think there was sarcasm there.


-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in
the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours
search. 

I think I am offended. =] but thatÂ’s ok, I would have said the same
thing you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre 
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at
times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is
the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a
real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread William Smith

My apologies then.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I think there was sarcasm there.


-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre 
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

I forgot the bloody tag. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I think there was sarcasm there.


-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre 
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at
times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is
the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a
real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread William Smith

Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

That rules thing is a PITA too. You should talk to your network/email
administrator and see if he can help

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file once
every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no
"Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

;)

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my
work day. As well as a great resource.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in
the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours
search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same
thing you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre 
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at
times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is
the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a
real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




__

RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your
own.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my
work day. As well as a great resource.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearc

RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

You have problems?

W

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your
own.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my
work day. As well as a great resource.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

I am the Admin you Bloody Voodoo doll clone. Any how, you are using a
PST when you get this aren't you?? I know William is not. 

This means I have to downgrade my server back to win2k so I can install
exchange on it again. Or get Sp3 beta?? M sounds like I have a
mission for the day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


That rules thing is a PITA too. You should talk to your network/email
administrator and see if he can help

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another
annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file
once every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is
no "Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted itemsfolder i n MS Outlook

2002-01-14 Thread Smith, Ronni

Here's a guess: The boss wants to check the senders to make sure he isn't
tossing mail from anyone he knows before he empties his deleted items folder
(if he ever does - he may not realize he can/should etc) and no one has
shown him how to set the view to "by sender" in deleted items.

Ronni

*
Reality is an obstacle to hallucination.
-


> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:54 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted 
> itemsfolder
> in MS Outlook
> 
> 
> :)
> 
> My point exactly - WHY?
> 
> T.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted 
> itemsfolder
> in MS Outlook
> 
> 
> Well, you do have an agents tab on the Deleted Items folder, so
> technically it is possible to do this.  It's probably the cheapest way
> to do it as well, assuming Sachin has the know-how to write the code.
> Hell, you can even get creative and create a contact for each email
> address that you retrieve from the Deleted Items and fill up the PHB's
> contact list.  
> 
> But..why?
> 
> S.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items
> folder in MS Outlook
> 
> 
> Just curious, what does he hope to gain by having a list of email
> addresses for messages that he has negligently deleted. Seems like a
> behavioral problem to me.
> 
> Not sure about this (because I've never had to script actions on the
> deleted items folder), but you could probably write an event script to
> write the email address of every message that hits his deleted items
> folder to a text file. Give him a link to the location of the 
> text file.
> Yet another exercise in stupidity issued by a PHB.
> 
> I think a better solution would be to correct the behavior, 
> or this will
> be the first in a long list of stupid scripting exercises for 
> the Great
> Stupid One.
> 
> My $.02. YMMV.
> 
> Tom.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sachin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted 
> items folder in
> MS Outlook
> 
> I have a problem here my boss recieves hundreds of emails 
> every day
> so he keeps on deleting many of them without giving a serious look at
> the contents and adresses. Now he wants that even if the mail gets
> deleted and gets stored in the deleted items folder, he should run a
> utility and be able to get the email ids of senders of all 
> such messages
> in the deleted item folder by running the utility at the end of each
> day.
> 
> Can any body guide me how to go about writing such a utility or get it
> somewhere for outlook. The mail server used is MS Exchange 5.5
> 
> thanks 
> Sachin
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

No I am not! You know I finally got an Exchange server.
I do however Dean excessively.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I am the Admin you Bloody Voodoo doll clone. Any how, you are using a PST
when you get this aren't you?? I know William is not. 

This means I have to downgrade my server back to win2k so I can install
exchange on it again. Or get Sp3 beta?? M sounds like I have a mission
for the day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


That rules thing is a PITA too. You should talk to your network/email
administrator and see if he can help

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file once
every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no
"Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

Mr Dogg.

Is Nate your son?
http://www.dogg-foundation.fr.st/


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another
annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file
once every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is
no "Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I
sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy!

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You have problems?

W

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your
own.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my
work day. As well as a great resource.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre 
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..





_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address

RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

 You still look just like the doll. Have you had
this problem since you got the exchange server?

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


No I am not! You know I finally got an Exchange server.
I do however Dean excessively.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I am the Admin you Bloody Voodoo doll clone. Any how, you are using a
PST when you get this aren't you?? I know William is not. 

This means I have to downgrade my server back to win2k so I can install
exchange on it again. Or get Sp3 beta?? M sounds like I have a
mission for the day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


That rules thing is a PITA too. You should talk to your network/email
administrator and see if he can help

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another
annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file
once every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is
no "Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

I don't see how being hung is a problem.



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I
sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy!

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You have problems?

W

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your
own.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my
work day. As well as a great resource.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre 
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Milton R Dogg

No coke this morning you missed with that one... 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Mr Dogg.

Is Nate your son?
http://www.dogg-foundation.fr.st/


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process
against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another
annoyance.

You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another
Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file
once every 3 days. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have not had this eXPerience.

The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs.  

I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is
no "Are you sure?" question.

William

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on
one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my
exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to
restart outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional

2002-01-14 Thread Jean-Francois Bourdeau

A customer is asking me if IIS of W2K pro can handle OWA ???

JF



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

Absolutely.

William 


-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional


A customer is asking me if IIS of W2K pro can handle OWA ???

JF


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange WebMonitor

2002-01-14 Thread Cook, David A.

Just catching up on this list so sorry for the late reply.

The account the WebMonitor is using must have access on the Exchange
servers to read the information it is wanting from WMI. In my experience
you get what you pay for with this tool. Some things get miss reported a
lot such as memory and CPU usage on the server. Using it to monitor
queues though is useful and it is a decent tool if budget prohibits you
from purchasing something.



Dave Cook
Exchange Administrator
Kutak Rock, LLP
402-231-8352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange WebMonitor


Exchange 2000 resource kit comes with a webmonitor?  Has anyone gotten
this to work?  I followed the instructions and I am getting an error?

Here is the error Im getting;

The page cannot be displayed 
There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot
be
displayed.





Please try the following:

Click the Refresh button, or try again later.

Open the xx.xx.xx.xx home page, and then look for links to the
information
you want.
HTTP 500.100 - Internal Server Error - ASP error
Internet Information Services





Technical Information (for support personnel)

Error Type:
(0x80041003)
/Monitor/servers_and_connectors.asp, line 30


Browser Type:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) 

Page:
GET /Monitor/servers_and_connectors.asp 

Time:
Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 2:29:57 PM 


More information:
Microsoft Support 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
(including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its
authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally 
privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible
for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended 
recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are 
hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying,
printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained
in it.  In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone 
(402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any
attachments) without reading or saving in any manner.  

Thank you.
##

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: highlight

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

It isn't unless you are a server or a female

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I don't see how being hung is a problem.



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I
sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy!

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You have problems?

W

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your
own.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my
work day. As well as a great resource.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously.

W

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles
memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the
TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. 

I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing
you had said on a different day.

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


>>Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre
>>setup

Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times.
Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type
of help I'd give you after a response like yours.

W

Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you.


-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real
problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: highlight


I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it.

-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: highlight


This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing
folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one
folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange
folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart
outlook to fix this problem.

Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? 

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted itemsfolderi n MS Outlook

2002-01-14 Thread Soysal, Serdar


Replace the boss' computer with an etch-a-sketch.  Don't forget to show him
how to reboot his "new laptop" if the view gets too cluttered.

-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted itemsfolder i n
MS Outlook


Here's a guess: The boss wants to check the senders to make sure he isn't
tossing mail from anyone he knows before he empties his deleted items folder
(if he ever does - he may not realize he can/should etc) and no one has
shown him how to set the view to "by sender" in deleted items.

Ronni

*
Reality is an obstacle to hallucination.
-


> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:54 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted
> itemsfolder
> in MS Outlook
> 
> 
> :)
> 
> My point exactly - WHY?
> 
> T.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted 
> itemsfolder
> in MS Outlook
> 
> 
> Well, you do have an agents tab on the Deleted Items folder, so 
> technically it is possible to do this.  It's probably the cheapest way 
> to do it as well, assuming Sachin has the know-how to write the code. 
> Hell, you can even get creative and create a contact for each email 
> address that you retrieve from the Deleted Items and fill up the PHB's 
> contact list.
> 
> But..why?
> 
> S.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items
> folder in MS Outlook
> 
> 
> Just curious, what does he hope to gain by having a list of email 
> addresses for messages that he has negligently deleted. Seems like a 
> behavioral problem to me.
> 
> Not sure about this (because I've never had to script actions on the 
> deleted items folder), but you could probably write an event script to 
> write the email address of every message that hits his deleted items 
> folder to a text file. Give him a link to the location of the text 
> file. Yet another exercise in stupidity issued by a PHB.
> 
> I think a better solution would be to correct the behavior,
> or this will
> be the first in a long list of stupid scripting exercises for 
> the Great
> Stupid One.
> 
> My $.02. YMMV.
> 
> Tom.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sachin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted 
> items folder in
> MS Outlook
> 
> I have a problem here my boss recieves hundreds of emails
> every day
> so he keeps on deleting many of them without giving a serious look at
> the contents and adresses. Now he wants that even if the mail gets
> deleted and gets stored in the deleted items folder, he should run a
> utility and be able to get the email ids of senders of all 
> such messages
> in the deleted item folder by running the utility at the end of each
> day.
> 
> Can any body guide me how to go about writing such a utility or get it 
> somewhere for outlook. The mail server used is MS Exchange 5.5
> 
> thanks
> Sachin
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Jonathan Beeler

Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?

Personally, I don't care if user's receive it.  It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.

Any suggestions would be of help.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

Definitely. I would say the only restriction would be the W2K Pro IIS 10
concurrent user rule. Other than that, it should run just fine.

-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Ex 5.5 with IIS of W2K Professional


A customer is asking me if IIS of W2K pro can handle OWA ???

JF



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

What are you using for AV?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anti-Spam software


Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?

Personally, I don't care if user's receive it.  It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.

Any suggestions would be of help.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Address Book Lists

2002-01-14 Thread Jonathan Beeler

Currently, we have Address Book Lists configured to work within our
Exchange 5.5 organization.  We intend to bring this same concept over to
2000.  Does anyone know of any articles that explain how to perform this?

I've been looking in Technet and on their Premiere site, but can't find
anything.
Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread msharik

(which may sound like an irrelevant answer, but it's not.  answer the
question)

-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl
Immigration site:  
The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while:

Tiggercam:  
-
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but if we
have nothing to fear but fear itself, why does Elanore Roosevelt wear that
spooky mask?" 
-


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


What are you using for AV?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anti-Spam software


Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?

Personally, I don't care if user's receive it.  It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.

Any suggestions would be of help.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Andy David

Some 13 year old geek in 8th grade. 
He knows everything about projectors.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


What are you using for AV?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anti-Spam software


Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?

Personally, I don't care if user's receive it.  It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.

Any suggestions would be of help.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Denis Baldwin

hah :)

It took me twice to realize I wasn't dreaming. Then I blew milk out of my
nose.

Thanks guys, that ruled.

Denis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


Some 13 year old geek in 8th grade. 
He knows everything about projectors.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


What are you using for AV?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anti-Spam software


Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?

Personally, I don't care if user's receive it.  It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.

Any suggestions would be of help.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Jennifer Baker

Dr. Pepper hurts.

-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


hah :)

It took me twice to realize I wasn't dreaming. Then I blew milk out of my
nose.

Thanks guys, that ruled.

Denis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


Some 13 year old geek in 8th grade. 
He knows everything about projectors.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


What are you using for AV?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anti-Spam software


Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with
Exchange 5.5?

Personally, I don't care if user's receive it.  It's their own fault for
putting their email address all over the web, but since people have
requested that I look into it, I will do so.

Any suggestions would be of help.

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Distribution List question

2002-01-14 Thread Jeremy Pinquist

Hi all,
I'm working with E2k sp1 on Win2k, and I'd like to let a user manage a
DL that is made up of users from a subdomain of the domain in which the
user and the exchange server reside. I've made the user the "manager" of
the DL, and added the user to the security tab for that list with full
control. The user is on Outlook 2000 and when she attempts to add a user
she gets the 
"Changes to the distribution list membership could not be saved. You do
not have sufficient permission to perform this operation on this object"
error. 

 Checking the MS KB, there is a Q (Q262199) that claims it is not
possible to modify DL's when there are "multiple global catalogs across
different domains."  As far as I know, the Global Catalog is across
domains by default, yes/no? Which means to me I have only one global
catalog.  If I don't, does anyone have any workarounds for this
situation? As an Admin, I can edit the lists from my outlook client, but
I'd rather not give this user elevated permissions beyond whats needed
for that list itself if it is at all possible.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Receiving email that isn't decoded (via smtp)

2002-01-14 Thread Daniel Chenault

Too much has been snipped. Include all the X- headers up to and including
the first MIME reference.

- Original Message -
From: "Tom.Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Receiving email that isn't decoded (via smtp)


> Exchange 5.5 sp4
> NT 4.0 sp6a
>
> System has been running for 2 years without this problem.
>
> 99.9% of users can receive email attachments with no problem.  Word
> documents, Excel Spreadsheets, Zip Files, etc.
>
> However, mail sent from one specific outside address arrives with
> an attachment, attachment has name  "minutes.doc"  but it
> is not a word document.   It is all text, looks like a mime or
> uuencoded document.   Here are the first few lines:
>
>
0M8R4KGxGuEAPgADAP7/CQAGAAABLgAA
>
EAAAMAEAAAD+AC0AAAD/
>

>

>

>

>

>

>
///s
>
pcEAayAJBAAA8BK/EAAABAAADxEAAA4AYmpiah+uH64A
>
>
> If that same outside user send the same file to my America Online address
> it works just fine.
>
> Outside user claims they are using Outlook.  Header from AOL says:
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> Importance: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> Tom Gray, Network Engineer
> All Kinds of Minds & The Center for Development and Learning
> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AT&T Net: (919)960-
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Distribution List question

2002-01-14 Thread Scott Hendry

Can't you create a Snap-in that allows that user to edit only the things
that you want and give it to them in user mode without author
privileges? ? ? 


-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Distribution List question

Hi all,
I'm working with E2k sp1 on Win2k, and I'd like to let a user manage a
DL that is made up of users from a subdomain of the domain in which the
user and the exchange server reside. I've made the user the "manager" of
the DL, and added the user to the security tab for that list with full
control. The user is on Outlook 2000 and when she attempts to add a user
she gets the 
"Changes to the distribution list membership could not be saved. You do
not have sufficient permission to perform this operation on this object"
error. 

 Checking the MS KB, there is a Q (Q262199) that claims it is not
possible to modify DL's when there are "multiple global catalogs across
different domains."  As far as I know, the Global Catalog is across
domains by default, yes/no? Which means to me I have only one global
catalog.  If I don't, does anyone have any workarounds for this
situation? As an Admin, I can edit the lists from my outlook client, but
I'd rather not give this user elevated permissions beyond whats needed
for that list itself if it is at all possible.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Distribution List question

2002-01-14 Thread Jeremy Pinquist

I wanted them to use outlook and not the admin MMC, but if that's the
only way...
jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Scott Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Distribution List question


Can't you create a Snap-in that allows that user to edit only the things
that you want and give it to them in user mode without author
privileges? ? ? 


-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Distribution List question

Hi all,
I'm working with E2k sp1 on Win2k, and I'd like to let a user manage a
DL that is made up of users from a subdomain of the domain in which the
user and the exchange server reside. I've made the user the "manager" of
the DL, and added the user to the security tab for that list with full
control. The user is on Outlook 2000 and when she attempts to add a user
she gets the 
"Changes to the distribution list membership could not be saved. You do
not have sufficient permission to perform this operation on this object"
error. 

 Checking the MS KB, there is a Q (Q262199) that claims it is not
possible to modify DL's when there are "multiple global catalogs across
different domains."  As far as I know, the Global Catalog is across
domains by default, yes/no? Which means to me I have only one global
catalog.  If I don't, does anyone have any workarounds for this
situation? As an Admin, I can edit the lists from my outlook client, but
I'd rather not give this user elevated permissions beyond whats needed
for that list itself if it is at all possible.

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Book Purchase - Tony Redmond

2002-01-14 Thread Garrish, Robert B.

Dear DL Members,

All I need is a "part number" and I am getting the book.
What is the part number for Tony's book (see history below)?

Publisher / ISBN

Thanks.


Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


>  -Original Message-
> From: Bommelyn, Jeff R.  
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 02:04 PM
> To:   Garrish, Robert B.
> Subject:  RE: Request - Book Purchase
> 
> do you have a number of any kind part ref what ever...
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Garrish, Robert B.  
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:15 PM
> To:   Bommelyn, Jeff R.
> Subject:  Request - Book Purchase
> 
> Dear Jeff,
> 
>   I would like to order the following resource.  It is a book.
>   Let me know if you need any further information.
>   Thanks.
> 
> 
>   "Microsoft Exchange Server for Windows 2000"
>   by Tony Redmond
> 
> 
> Rob Garrish
> Exchange Administrator
> Wawa Inc.
> 610-558-8371
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond

2002-01-14 Thread Tom Meunier

www.amazon.com
www.bn.com
www.fatbrain.com



-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:13 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond
Subject: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond


Dear DL Members,

All I need is a "part number" and I am getting the book.
What is the part number for Tony's book (see history below)?

Publisher / ISBN

Thanks.


Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


>  -Original Message-
> From: Bommelyn, Jeff R.  
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 02:04 PM
> To:   Garrish, Robert B.
> Subject:  RE: Request - Book Purchase
> 
> do you have a number of any kind part ref what ever...
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Garrish, Robert B.  
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:15 PM
> To:   Bommelyn, Jeff R.
> Subject:  Request - Book Purchase
> 
> Dear Jeff,
> 
>   I would like to order the following resource.  It is a book.
>   Let me know if you need any further information.
>   Thanks.
> 
> 
>   "Microsoft Exchange Server for Windows 2000"
>   by Tony Redmond
> 
> 
> Rob Garrish
> Exchange Administrator
> Wawa Inc.
> 610-558-8371
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

Digital Press.

ISBN # 1-8-224-9


William


-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Book Purchase - Tony Redmond


Dear DL Members,

All I need is a "part number" and I am getting the book.
What is the part number for Tony's book (see history below)?

Publisher / ISBN

Thanks.


Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Jonathan Beeler

Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as
you know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Blackstone

The next version of Antigen will have content filtering in it. You may want
to just wait and spend money on the UG (if it isn't free)

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as you
know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William

If you purchase the two year license of Antigen, you get all the upgrades in
that period.  

Now, I get a couple of filter replies to posts (probably from not removing
Andy David's comments from the thread first) each day it seems.  I am now
setting up an Antigen and Scanmail rule to toast these.  They are worse than
SPAM!

William 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


The next version of Antigen will have content filtering in it. You may want
to just wait and spend money on the UG (if it isn't free)

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as you
know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Kelly_Borndale


You can try contacting your sales rep, and see if they will let you into
the beta program for content filtering...
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor"


|+--->
||  "Jonathan Beeler"|
||  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
||  Sent by: |
||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
||  .swynk.com   |
||   |
||   |
||  01/14/2002 02:33 PM  |
||  Please respond to|
||  "Exchange Discussions"   |
||   |
|+--->
  
>-|
  |
 |
  |  To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
  |  cc:   
 |
  |  Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software   
 |
  
>-|




Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as
you know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread blambert

Can't wait till that comes to market.  If it's like Antigen, it will be
excellent.

Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software



You can try contacting your sales rep, and see if they will let you into the
beta program for content filtering...
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor"


|+--->
||  "Jonathan Beeler"|
||  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
||  Sent by: |
||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
||  .swynk.com   |
||   |
||   |
||  01/14/2002 02:33 PM  |
||  Please respond to|
||  "Exchange Discussions"   |
||   |
|+--->
 
>---
--|
  |
|
  |  To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
  |  cc:
|
  |  Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software
|
 
>---
--|




Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as you
know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Andy David

My name alone is banned on three continents.


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


If you purchase the two year license of Antigen, you get all the upgrades in
that period.  

Now, I get a couple of filter replies to posts (probably from not removing
Andy David's comments from the thread first) each day it seems.  I am now
setting up an Antigen and Scanmail rule to toast these.  They are worse than
SPAM!

William 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


The next version of Antigen will have content filtering in it. You may want
to just wait and spend money on the UG (if it isn't free)

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as you
know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anti-Spam software

2002-01-14 Thread Boehm, Diane M.

Is anyone using the MessageLabs Anti-spam service or looked into them?

Diane

Diane Boehm
SC Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


My name alone is banned on three continents.


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


If you purchase the two year license of Antigen, you get all the upgrades in
that period.  

Now, I get a couple of filter replies to posts (probably from not removing
Andy David's comments from the thread first) each day it seems.  I am now
setting up an Antigen and Scanmail rule to toast these.  They are worse than
SPAM!

William 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


The next version of Antigen will have content filtering in it. You may want
to just wait and spend money on the UG (if it isn't free)

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software


Aside from the 13 year old geek, we're using Antigen for virus protection.

I currently add domains to the message filtering area on the IMC, but as you
know, it's pretty inefficient.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: saving a copy of all attachments'

2002-01-14 Thread srnews

Take a look at a product called Attachment Executive from
MadSolutions-www.madsolutions.com.  It sound like they've got what you
may need.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: saving a copy of all attachments'


I would like to save a copy of all messages that only include file
attachments to a destination such as a public folder. These would be
messages that pass through my 5.5 server going both internally and
externally.

CAn this be done without any 3rd party solutions.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



PLEASE HELP!!!

2002-01-14 Thread Tim McGrath

I'm new to the exchange world and I'm having some issues. I have a small
business server at a client site running exchange. When user try and send
internet mail to them they receive a Delivery Status Notification. "This is
an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED]" It also
contains a .DAT file which contains the following:

Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi
Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi
Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500

Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6

If anyone has any thoughts on this please help. I've been in the field about
4 years and have recently got to play with exchange, Could use any help I
can get!!! thanks

Tim McGrath
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Help on getting user's .pst files into the Exchange Server

2002-01-14 Thread Michael Anderson

Hello,

I searched Technet quite extensively, and I am swimming in the
ocean of information that came up.  Everything I find, seems just
short of what I need.  I even searched the archives with no avail.

Up to this point, our POP3 clients have been retrieving their mail
from the server, and storing everything in their personal .pst
file on their workstations.

My goal is to move / import all of their .pst files, into the
message store on the Exchange 2000 Server.  We are under the gun
to centrally store everyone's mail, in order to get the collaboration
stuff working.

Is there a built-in utility (either GUI based or command line) that
I can use to accomplish this?

Thank you in advance for any information offered.

Mike

P.S.  If this post appears twice, I am sorry - I didn't see my own
  post last night - so I am resending it this morning.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



CDO Logon Problem

2002-01-14 Thread Richard

I am trying to send email using CDO (not CDONTS) using asp. 
Currently I have the web site set to Basic and can successfully send mail
as a user who has access to the mailbox.
What I would like is to have anyone logon to the web site and then have
the asp page connect to exchange as a different user to send the email.

Is this possible?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Importing Users .pst files into the Server Store

2002-01-14 Thread Michael Anderson

Hello,

I searched Technet pretty extensively, and I am swimming in the
ocean of information that came up.  Everything I find, seems just
short of what I need.

Up to this point, our POP3 clients have been retrieving their mail
from the server, and storing everything in their personal .pst
file on their workstations.

My goal is to move / import all of their .pst files, onto the
message store on the Exchange 2000 Server.  We are under the gun
to centrally store everyone's mail, in order to get the collaboration
stuff working.

Is there a built-in utility (either GUI based or command line) that
I can use to accomplish this?

Thank you in advance for any information offered.

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Locking down default location for saving attachment in mail

2002-01-14 Thread Khoi Nguyen

Hi all,

I have a quick question.  Is there a way (if possible) to lock down the default 
location for saving attachment in mail (like in home-directory in w2k environment) 
beside my document??.  I have a user who ask this a while back, and I have looked at 
MS site, Exchange list FAQ and could not find a solution.  

TIA

-- Khoi


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   >