RE: MDBDATA Log Files
That doesn't stop me from wondering. I think my server would pass out from exhaustion. (Your post is another keeper, I'd say) William -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MDBDATA Log Files The issue is not compressing; it is assumed this would be a lengthy job and would be done off-hours. The problem is with manipulating the compressed file. When a request to open a file is passed to NTFS and the file system finds that the file is compressed it will decompress as much of that file as possible into memory. This is all well and good if you're working on a Word document that will get some changes (usually to the end of the file) and be saved back to looked at another time for a total size of maybe a few megs. But for a 12G database that is constantly being read and written to at many different locations, and constantly, this unraveling of the compressed file will kill performance as the CPU gets maxed out uncompressing multiple locations of this file into memory(1). The disks get thrashed as well while the system asks for more and more free physical memory forcing page faults(2)(3). Overall, compressing a database file being accessed hundreds, of not thousands, of times a minute with a file size well beyond physical memory (if you're uncompressing the file into VM you're losing even more time) is just not a good idea. The log files, on the other hand, are a different story. Each one exists in memory being written to an address with a pre-allocated size of 5M(4). As that memory allocation is used up, the entire chunk is written to a file and the file handle is closed(5). Exchange will not read this file again except in certain circumstances(6) so once closed the file will stay closed. Thus one would think that compressing the log files would be a good move to save disk space. Or would it? Most organizations I know who do backups(7) do them nightly. Since this wipes the logs off the drive we need only look at some numbers for a single day's worth of transactions. Assume an organization that moves, say, ten thousand messages a day through a given server. Each message has an average size of 50K. Allowing 5% for overhead (which is a number I picked just to keep the numbers even) this yields an average of 1,075,253,760 or just a bit over 1gig. The NTFS encryption algorithm is relatively efficient(8) and will largely depend on the data being compressed (9) A file of nothing but 01010101 repeating over and over will compress wonderfully (10) but although it is possible for there to be blocks of such patterns overall the file's data structure will be complex and somewhat random. At best I'd say expect 30% compression. Even giving it the benefit of the doubt and saying 40% yields a diskspace savings of about 400M. And brother, if you're sweating 400M on your server, you need to add another drive to the array or increase your budget. (1) unless you have a server with 12G, that is (2) writing pages of memory to the swapfile (3) disk access is high overhead, reading the file into memory such that more disk access is forced doubles the overhead resulting in a noticeably performance hit (4) I don't know why 5M was chosen; I guess it was just as good as 4 or 6 megs (5) for the purists: the current edb.log file is renamed to edbthe next sequential hex number and the new log file is named edb.log (6) all of them having to do with disaster recovery and, at that point, diskspaceis the least of your worries (7) ahem (8) it's a trade-off between efficiency and performance (9) if you are curious you may wish to run your own tests since each installation and deployment will have its own traffic flow characteristics (10) like PKZip the algorithm largely depends on repeating pattern substitution(11) (11) meaning the software attempts to find repeating pattersn of multiple subpatterns (12) and replace it with a single pattern (12) such as the word the which can be replaced with one character resulting in savings of 66.6%(13) (13) this is a purposely simple example to illustrate the mechanism(14) (14) Hi Sherry! - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:31 PM Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wonder how long it would take to compress say a 12GB priv.edb? William -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MDBDATA Log Files compress log files, yes. compress databases, no. Just clarifying - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:00 PM Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files You could, in an emergency, compress some of the log files with NTFS compression. They
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
-Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 17:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup norton wins? are they mad? Of course the reporters are not mad! Norton/Symantec have a very large advertising and journalist schmoozing budget. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
-Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 19:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. I checked my dictionary and I didn't find takes backups before screwing with system under paranoid. I did find it under clueful admin though. I can't help feeling that at least 40% of support calls/discussions on places like this would go away if more people did that. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message disappeared during link outage
Thanks, I will look into these items, not sure about the relevance of the rather attractive looking hat though ! Nik -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 23:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message disappeared during link outage Did you track the message or look in the tracking.logs? Use article Q173364 to decipher the event numbers. Regarding connectivity try Q220976. And you'll need this to: http://www.millerhats.com/899.jpg I always where mine in situations such as this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message disappeared during link outage Dear All, We have 5 offices connected via VPN provided by Sonicwall ADSL routers. Each office has an Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 on NT Server 4 SP6a, with 1 of them having an IMC. There is one Organisation/Site with multiple servers to represent the different offices, and all staff at each office have their mailboxes on their local servers. It was reported to me that a Director (isnt it always?) sent an email to the Managing Director (arrrgh!) within the same organisation, but whose mailbox was located on another server, seperated by the ADSL VPN link. The mail never arrived, and no error was received by sender or recipient. Upon closer inspection, the following event is noted in the senders local NT server event log at the same time that they sent the message. Event ID - 9316 Source - MSExchangeMTA An RPC communications error occurred. No data was sent over the RPC connection. Locality table (LTAB) index: 238. Windows NT error: 9317. The MTA will attempt to recover the RPC connection. (BASE IL INCOMING RPC 40 522) (12) There were no errors immediately before or after this event (closest 5 hours) and I assume there was some problem with the ADSL link at that time, not uncommon, and also suggested by some errors on the main server (the 'hub' of the VPN). What I need to know is a) why wasn't the mail delivered when the link was restored and b) why was no non delivery error returned. Mail normally flows fine between all servers. I have followed the instructions in technet doc - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247782 but the concurrent xapi sessions was already at 50. Its not so important to ensure mail delivery, as it is to make sure we know when a message has not been delivered. Thanks in advance for any help Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Troublesome IMS
No, we don't have a Cisco Pix. Could it be a setting on the Cisco 2600 router? This is the only Cisco kit we have. Thanks, Dan. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:54 Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS No SMTP fixup for you! Check the archives, tons of info there on this issue :) -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS is this essential? i just checked our pix and smtp fixup is enabled - i'm not aware of any problems though... -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS Cisco PIX? No SMTP fixup -Original Message- From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troublesome IMS Hello all, Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets delivered, but the mail sticks in the IMS's 'Outbound mail awaiting delivery' queue with '(host unreachable)' next to it. This results in the IMS retrying to redeliver the mail at the set intervals and the somewhat annoyed recipient receiving multiple copies of the mail until it expires. This only happens occasionally - most mail goes out fine. I have noticed that is does happen to one email that gets sent regularly from one of our users to an external mailbox. I have tried using nslookup from the server and can telnet in to port 25 of the other servers without a problem. Our box is set up as follows: NT4, Sp6a, PIII, 3 processors, 1gb mem. Exchange 5.5 sp4 (configured as per Q181420 - 'How to Configure Exchange or other SMTP with Proxy Server') Network Associates GroupShield (Antivirus Server Extension: 4.5.572.171 Server Admin Extension: 4.5.572.128) Network Associates Netshield 4.5.0 (with the recommended Exchange directories excluded from scanning). I also had the Network Associates Message Body Scanning tool installed but thought this might have been contributing to the problem so I removed it a few months ago, but the problem sill continues. Any ideas? Many thanks, Daniel. This e-mail may contain proprietary and confidential information, and is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not one of the named recipients, then disclosure, distribution, copying or printing of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted. Additionally you should notify the sender of the distribution error. Heal's will not accept any liability or responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of its contents and attachments. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == This e-mail may contain proprietary and confidential information, and is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not one of the named recipients, then disclosure, distribution, copying or printing of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted. Additionally you should notify the sender of the distribution error. Heal's will not accept any liability or responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of its contents and attachments.
RE: Message disappeared during link outage
Yes, individual sites connected to internet with ADSL and public addresses, then the sonicwalls create the VPN using the addresses at each site I may have to revise my setup, but I assumed even if it wasn't ideal, error messages would be generated for failed deliveries Thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 03:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message disappeared during link outage If by VPN you mean over the Internet, that topology probably calls for separate sites connected by X.400 connectors. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message disappeared during link outage Dear All, We have 5 offices connected via VPN provided by Sonicwall ADSL routers. Each office has an Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 on NT Server 4 SP6a, with 1 of them having an IMC. There is one Organisation/Site with multiple servers to represent the different offices, and all staff at each office have their mailboxes on their local servers. It was reported to me that a Director (isnt it always?) sent an email to the Managing Director (arrrgh!) within the same organisation, but whose mailbox was located on another server, seperated by the ADSL VPN link. The mail never arrived, and no error was received by sender or recipient. Upon closer inspection, the following event is noted in the senders local NT server event log at the same time that they sent the message. Event ID - 9316 Source - MSExchangeMTA An RPC communications error occurred. No data was sent over the RPC connection. Locality table (LTAB) index: 238. Windows NT error: 9317. The MTA will attempt to recover the RPC connection. (BASE IL INCOMING RPC 40 522) (12) There were no errors immediately before or after this event (closest 5 hours) and I assume there was some problem with the ADSL link at that time, not uncommon, and also suggested by some errors on the main server (the 'hub' of the VPN). What I need to know is a) why wasn't the mail delivered when the link was restored and b) why was no non delivery error returned. Mail normally flows fine between all servers. I have followed the instructions in technet doc - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247782 but the concurrent xapi sessions was already at 50. Its not so important to ensure mail delivery, as it is to make sure we know when a message has not been delivered. Thanks in advance for any help Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message disappeared during link outage
I have tracked messages after similar complaints considering the sender and intended recipient are you sure that. 1. The message was actually sent to the correct address 2. There isn't a rule that has moved the message to a different folder 3. Its not in the inbox with a few thousand other emails but hidden due to a strange view Regrds Stewart Jump -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message disappeared during link outage Dear All, We have 5 offices connected via VPN provided by Sonicwall ADSL routers. Each office has an Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 on NT Server 4 SP6a, with 1 of them having an IMC. There is one Organisation/Site with multiple servers to represent the different offices, and all staff at each office have their mailboxes on their local servers. It was reported to me that a Director (isnt it always?) sent an email to the Managing Director (arrrgh!) within the same organisation, but whose mailbox was located on another server, seperated by the ADSL VPN link. The mail never arrived, and no error was received by sender or recipient. Upon closer inspection, the following event is noted in the senders local NT server event log at the same time that they sent the message. Event ID - 9316 Source - MSExchangeMTA An RPC communications error occurred. No data was sent over the RPC connection. Locality table (LTAB) index: 238. Windows NT error: 9317. The MTA will attempt to recover the RPC connection. (BASE IL INCOMING RPC 40 522) (12) There were no errors immediately before or after this event (closest 5 hours) and I assume there was some problem with the ADSL link at that time, not uncommon, and also suggested by some errors on the main server (the 'hub' of the VPN). What I need to know is a) why wasn't the mail delivered when the link was restored and b) why was no non delivery error returned. Mail normally flows fine between all servers. I have followed the instructions in technet doc - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247782 but the concurrent xapi sessions was already at 50. Its not so important to ensure mail delivery, as it is to make sure we know when a message has not been delivered. Thanks in advance for any help Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Messages
Tris How surprising they have reappeared now - and the user swears blind they did not do it! No Comment. Guess I should not have been so quick to look for a link between system and user errors. Peter -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 14:54 Subject: RE: Disappearing Messages May be worth running the /cleanviews switch and/or having a look at the mailboxes in question using the Exchange 5 client. -Original Message- From: Harrison, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Messages Exchange 5.5/SP4 Win2K/SP2 and OL2000 At the begging of the week we merged to previously independent exchange organisations into the same site using move server wizard to join one to the other. On the whole it seems to have gone OK but ... a few users have reported that when they move files between folders in their exchange mailbox using OL2000 the file disappears from the source but does not appear in the target. We seem to have fixed one by emptying the folder completely, restarting and now it is OK. A similar thing is happening to a couple of people with deleted items. They delete a file and it does not appear in deleted items (Yes I have checked and they have not set delete immediately). I have seen a mailbox that has a deleted file in the bin, then a gap where we cannot find the deleted item, then another file saved in the bin. Using recover deleted items cannot find them either. These users are in the correct organisation on the pre-existing server not the imported users/server. Has anyone got any ideas; are we looking at an exchange glitch or an outlook problem? Peter -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: RAM
Hi I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAM
BAA RAM EWE BAA RAM EWE -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: RAM Hi I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAM
Check this site out for deciphering the RAM markings... http://www.arstechnica.com/paedia/r/ram_id-1.html Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: RAM Hi I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPAM Deletion
We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
Why do you say this? Do you think it will continue to happen over and over again? I keep telling this to my manager but I have nothing to support the statement. I have been asking the question over and over again what causes this. I know logging into the mailbox with different clients will have negative effects and could be the cause. I'm wondering though if it could be the environment itself since the environment is running 2000 and the delegate is running 98. Any thoughts on that? One other thing... all the conf rm's displays their free busy time inconsistently. Is there any way to fix this? LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question That might work. I hope you don't mind doing it every couple of months or so! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed
RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Paul, Thanks for this; I avoided O2K as it needs the admin kit (is that the name) to install on TS but Outlook98 installs apparently OK. The symptoms you describe are very similar. When you say 'transformed', what are you referring to? Cheers, Roger -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS? We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is happening slowly). Anyway back to the point. Fire up Access in a TS session and all is well and good. Fire up Access as an App on the server and it runs like a two-legged hamster. O2K had to be transformed to work with TS - I not know if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your predicament Roger? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW just did, less than 10 ms. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Dumb question, but have you tried pinging your server and checking the response time? -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAM
Stick 'em in a spare PC and see what the BIOS reports...? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAM Check this site out for deciphering the RAM markings... http://www.arstechnica.com/paedia/r/ram_id-1.html Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: RAM Hi I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
Thanks for your answer. Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the MTA, open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string? Harold -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Roger, I haven't had the pleasure of installing any version of office previous to 2K on a TS so I wouldn't know if anything had to be done via an admin kit or transform file (quite likely the same), sorry. Hopefully someone else on the list might be able to shed some light on the matter. If previous versions have to be transformed to work with TS then we might have some more luck... I would look into Dominic's suggestion of the profiles possibly having an effect as this may help. Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Paul, Thanks for this; I avoided O2K as it needs the admin kit (is that the name) to install on TS but Outlook98 installs apparently OK. The symptoms you describe are very similar. When you say 'transformed', what are you referring to? Cheers, Roger -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS? We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is happening slowly). Anyway back to the point. Fire up Access in a TS session and all is well and good. Fire up Access as an App on the server and it runs like a two-legged hamster. O2K had to be transformed to work with TS - I not know if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your predicament Roger? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW just did, less than 10 ms. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Dumb question, but have you tried pinging your server and checking the response time? -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Calendar Problems
I have a user who shares her calendar with the General Managers Direct Reports. Each user can view the calendar for meetings and such. But now sometimes meetings just disappear off the calendar. Can someone help me as to what would be causing this? Thanks Libi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar Problems
Maybe somebody is marking some meetings 'Private'. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar Problems I have a user who shares her calendar with the General Managers Direct Reports. Each user can view the calendar for meetings and such. But now sometimes meetings just disappear off the calendar. Can someone help me as to what would be causing this? Thanks Libi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar Problems
These are recurring meeting occurrences. The assistant prints off a copy the night before And then the next morning the meeting is gone. Libi Maniace Database Administrator BEI Precision Sensors Space Div 1100 Murphy Drive Maumelle, AR 72113 (501) 851-4000 -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 07:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook Calendar Problems Maybe somebody is marking some meetings 'Private'. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar Problems I have a user who shares her calendar with the General Managers Direct Reports. Each user can view the calendar for meetings and such. But now sometimes meetings just disappear off the calendar. Can someone help me as to what would be causing this? Thanks Libi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: changing Outlook client mail profile
Her response may have been sarcastic, but it was hardly useless. It was the correct answer to the question as asked. After moving the mailboxes, we need to point mail profiles to the new server, what is the best way to go about doing this? Now, had you phrased a proper technical question[1], Mrs. Hunter's response would have been different (and possibly even less sarcastic). Looking ant the quality, depth and breadth of Mrs. Hunter's answers to this list over the last several years I certainly hope she doesn't find something better to do with her time. If the ECMSM did not apply to all clients using the Exchange Server service there would likely be a caveat in the method, especially since OL97 was the predominant client in use at the time it was codified into a FAQ appendix. [1] One which even vaguely described the actual question you were trying to ascertain the answer to. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile For your information I have been a member of this list for long enough to have read the FAQs. If a colleague of mine has suggested that Outlook 97 clients do not reconnect automatically to the new server, what harm is there in sending a message to this list to check up? That's what it's here for! If you cannot respond to such questions without being useless and sarcastic, don't respond at all, I would hope you might have something better to do with your time. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile You don't do a thing except go read Ed's Move Server Method, which you clearly did not yet read, or you would have brilliantly awed us with your knowledge that you do not need to do a thing on the client. FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changing Outlook client mail profile Hi folks, We are installing an Exchange 5.5 server in an organisation with one other Exchange 5.5 server and are going to move everything from the old server to the new server. There are about 150 clients running Outlook version 5.0.2653.22 or less (which I understand implies they are all on Outlook97?). After moving the mailboxes, we need to point mail profiles to the new server, what is the best way to go about doing this? We were thinking of enforcing a registry change on each Windows client using the logon script (obviously this won't work for the Macs, but that's ok). I've discovered utilities like NEWPROF ... but I wonder if anyone can confirm this is the best way? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Long shot here, but have you checked the location and accessibility of the address lists that the client uses for 'auto' name resolution? Nick -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
OK thanks. Simple is good. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion In essence yes. It may be basic but it works! PBB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Thanks for your answer. Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the MTA, open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string? Harold -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
;-} -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion OK thanks. Simple is good. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion In essence yes. It may be basic but it works! PBB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Thanks for your answer. Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the MTA, open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string? Harold -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
clustering wireless
Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Mscs??? The only good cluster in exchange is a single node cluster. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Kevin do you know any good documentation for beginners to set up two exchange servers for clustering -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Mscs??? The only good cluster in exchange is a single node cluster. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Sounds like a cluster fsck -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Beginners shouldn't be setting up clustering. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Kevin do you know any good documentation for beginners to set up two exchange servers for clustering -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Mscs??? The only good cluster in exchange is a single node cluster. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Best documentation. Dont do it. What do you plan on gaining? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Kevin do you know any good documentation for beginners to set up two exchange servers for clustering -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Mscs??? The only good cluster in exchange is a single node cluster. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows NT sp6 BDC ---- migrate W2k Server DC?
Mr. Crowley, Thank you for the response. I didn't want to get too technical in my initial question. Sometimes that leads to confusion. Here is the scenario: Multiple remote physical sites over WAN links all consisting of the following: (1) NT 4.0 SP6 BDC running Exchange 5.5 SP4, DNS, DHCP. [SQL 6.5 or SQL 7.0 and SMS (both SQL SMS to go away during upgrade)] Call this Sever DOM01 (1) NT 4.0 SP6 member server running the file and print services. Call this Server FPS01 (x) NT 4.0 clients to be all replaced with Windows 2000 Pro clients within a week. When I said migrate here is what I mean. Step 1 Backup both boxes on own tape. Step 2 Clean both servers of all non-essential services, Mcafee, Backup Exec, VNC, Compaq agents, etc., all that stuff. With the exception of Exchange and Groupshield. Step 3 Upgrade the DOM01 to Windows 2000 SP2 and install AD. Will Exchange 5.5 still work with an upgrade to the server? (booting to NT inserting the 2000 CD and upgrading in that fashion) Step 4 Upgrade the FPS01, should be simple, print queues should carry over. User Data should also. The questions surround the Q article 275127. The last paragraph as follows: NOTE : Exchange Server 5.5 is supported on a domain controller or global catalog only when there is a single Exchange server in the Site and only one Site exists in the Exchange Organization. Exchange Server 5.5 is supported on a domain controller or global catalog only when there are no other domain controllers in the domain and there is only one domain in the forest. No further Domain controllers can be installed into the environment. There is no supported migration path to Exchange 2000 while the Exchange 5.5 installation exists on a global catalog server. If you plan to install another Microsoft Windows 2000-based computer into the domain or forest, then the preceding steps are not supported. With the above in mind, the million dollar question is this. Should I put the AD on the file and print server, leaving Exchange to reside on the upgraded DOM01 as a member server now? Therefore pulling the DC/Exchange issue out of the question? Thanks, David Semler I want to tell you, Yes it will work. But I can't say that because all the detail you've provided about your strategy is the word migrate. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows NT sp6 BDC migrate W2k Server DC? I'm finding the typical conflicts in the Microsoft documentation. My question is this? Will Exchange 5.5 migrate and function when I migrate an NT 4.0 sp6 BDC to a Windows 2000 SP2 domain controller in a multiple Exchange 5.5 server environment with multiple Windows 2000 SP2 domain controllers? I understand the LDAP problem, does this mean I have to change the listener ports on all my exchange servers if I migrate one exchange server to W2k runnin AD? There are 7 Exchange servers all running 5.5 on NT 4.0 servers and 1 running 5.5 on W2k w/out AD installed (member) My AD is running just fine and so is Exchange. I guess all I'm looking for is a better explaination for Q275127. Thanks in advance for any input, Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
no im not trying to set it up i want to get a solution on how we are going to connect the two buildings wireless with failover -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Sounds like a cluster fsck -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Is anyone seeing this message when posting to the board Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Tener, Richard Subject = RE: clustering wireless Delivery Time = January 17, 2002 (Thursday) 08:46:23 Policy = Anti-Spam Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
That is what happens when you use the words cluster and exchange in the same post. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Is anyone seeing this message when posting to the board Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Tener, Richard Subject = RE: clustering wireless Delivery Time = January 17, 2002 (Thursday) 08:46:23 Policy = Anti-Spam Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Do you have content filtering on at your site there Richard? If so, most likely the trigger was when the replier to your message said It sounds like a cluster Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Is anyone seeing this message when posting to the board Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Tener, Richard Subject = RE: clustering wireless Delivery Time = January 17, 2002 (Thursday) 08:46:23 Policy = Anti-Spam Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Fiber would be the way to go. It is secure, not suseptable to Electromagnetic interferance, and with ethernet protocols you will more than likely meet any speed and distance requirements. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
I would go with the fiber. I'm guessing you could use a good bowl of oatmeal. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
nice and crunchy with a good shine too it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless I would go with the fiber. I'm guessing you could use a good bowl of oatmeal. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Remember, with MS clustering, you will need a shared storage array. That most likely means you would need fiber between the buildings. There are also 3rd party packages that claim to do clustering over a WAN without a shared array. Maybe you should take a step back and really decide if you need true failover. I think most people on this list will tell you that clusters aren't worth the effort - there are better ways to ensure availability. Remember also with a cluster, if you corrupt the database, you corrupt the database :-) Having a cluster doesn't protect you against the corruption. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless no im not trying to set it up i want to get a solution on how we are going to connect the two buildings wireless with failover -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Sounds like a cluster fsck -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Trust us on this one, clustering won't buy you a thing. I inherited a clustered exchange server here at work and Kevin is right, when the Db is corrupt, you're toast. Simple as that. Stick with Raid level redundancy, backups, and a recovery server. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Help
No. However, I am home now and I can log on through the OWA with the same machine that I kept getting asked for my credentials while on the LAN at work. It did take a few tried to log in. First try the OWA frames never loadedIt said that the pages could not be displayed (IIS Default page not found), I hit refresh and the NAV bar loaded. Hit refresh a third time and my inbox showed up. Any other thoughts? Oh, did I mention that it has always worked from a MAC. Even when no other client (Windows based) could connect to the OWA. Steve -Original Message- From: Stidley, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help Do you have a proxy server or firewall between you and the OWA box? If so what? Joel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
So the best bet would get another server in the other building with a new site to cut down on the existing server load. And of course move over some one companys mailboxes because there is two companys on one server right now. And get a phat tape drive to backup up my DB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Trust us on this one, clustering won't buy you a thing. I inherited a clustered exchange server here at work and Kevin is right, when the Db is corrupt, you're toast. Simple as that. Stick with Raid level redundancy, backups, and a recovery server. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Help
are you using netsecure to access the owa? Rachel -- From: Steve Iadarola[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 17 January 2002 15:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help No. However, I am home now and I can log on through the OWA with the same machine that I kept getting asked for my credentials while on the LAN at work. It did take a few tried to log in. First try the OWA frames never loadedIt said that the pages could not be displayed (IIS Default page not found), I hit refresh and the NAV bar loaded. Hit refresh a third time and my inbox showed up. Any other thoughts? Oh, did I mention that it has always worked from a MAC. Even when no other client (Windows based) could connect to the OWA. Steve -Original Message- From: Stidley, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help Do you have a proxy server or firewall between you and the OWA box? If so what? Joel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox moves across site
Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Sites with buildings as a boundary? Generally, no that wouldn't be a best bet. Unless the building happen to be on separate continents. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless So the best bet would get another server in the other building with a new site to cut down on the existing server load. And of course move over some one companys mailboxes because there is two companys on one server right now. And get a phat tape drive to backup up my DB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Trust us on this one, clustering won't buy you a thing. I inherited a clustered exchange server here at work and Kevin is right, when the Db is corrupt, you're toast. Simple as that. Stick with Raid level redundancy, backups, and a recovery server. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
clustering wireless
Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
All part of disaster recovery. Have you read the Disaster Recovery White Paper? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
no, a little -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Richard, I detect a trend in your posts...have you read the Disaster Recovery White Paper by MS? Reading it would give you a good understanding of the issues that your questions indicate you have... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
exchange + mscs = sleep deprivation look forward to cluster services failing for no apparent reason, exchange services not responding properly to actions in cluster administrator, dubious failover etc etc in 4 months with the cluster we had plenty of downtime during working hours, terrible. Since trashing the cluster and using the two servers as seperate exchange servers in the same site, we've had no downtime, and both servers are busy delivering mail instead of one just sitting there waiting to not work when called upon. while i'm on the subject, does anyone know the correct way to get exchange databases (particularly the directory i think) to forget that they are part of a clustered exchange server? . The problem is that the IMS won't install on a clean, non-clustered exchange server with restored databases from a clustered exchange server. It throws an error saying the cluster services aren't installed, so there must be something in the databases that tells exchange it should be on a cluster. i couldn't figure it out, so ended up migrating users to another server using ed's server move method. dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Isn't this a new topic (hence worthy of a new subject line)? There are a number of high availability solutions, some of them are even listed in the weblinks section of www.mail-resources.com, but there's still no substitute for planning, testing and documenting disaster recovery procedures. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders and OST
Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
The Server not actually coming here and the link is only 256k so we're not going to use the move server wizard. I click on the e-mail addresses tab and click New - Other, and then type in the syntax I gave earlier and labe it as X500 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Read these.. Then let us know what you think about that question. 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless no, a little -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
You could get some of the way in E2k, providing you were running E2k Enterprise on both servers and the mailbox stores on each server had different names. If one mailbox store died (or the server died) you could re-create that mailbox store on the remaining server and restore (then reconnect the mailboxes, etc). At least, in some initial testing I did on this, it seemed to work. But I wouldn't recommend it. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 17 January 2002 15:41 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: clustering wireless Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
Yes. Just discussed a few days ago. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
yeah put the pf in the favorites folder -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
No, there's always the potential for 2 way replication based on permissions to the folder. Synchronization is achieved by adding the said PF to the PF 'favorites' and then marking the folders as available for offline use. HTH, Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
So I do not dupplicate the effort do you remember the subject of that thread? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST Yes. Just discussed a few days ago. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
I believe the proper label is x500. IIRC it's case sensitive. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site The Server not actually coming here and the link is only 256k so we're not going to use the move server wizard. I click on the e-mail addresses tab and click New - Other, and then type in the syntax I gave earlier and labe it as X500 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
Ok cool I'll give it a try Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST No, there's always the potential for 2 way replication based on permissions to the folder. Synchronization is achieved by adding the said PF to the PF 'favorites' and then marking the folders as available for offline use. HTH, Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
or competence. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Isn't this a new topic (hence worthy of a new subject line)? There are a number of high availability solutions, some of them are even listed in the weblinks section of www.mail-resources.com, but there's still no substitute for planning, testing and documenting disaster recovery procedures. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
and then? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST yeah put the pf in the favorites folder -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
and then set up your ost to sychronize under favorites -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST and then? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST yeah put the pf in the favorites folder -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the proper label is x500. IIRC it's case sensitive. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site The Server not actually coming here and the link is only 256k so we're not going to use the move server wizard. I click on the e-mail addresses tab and click New - Other, and then type in the syntax I gave earlier and labe it as X500 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deleting Calendar Folder in OWA
I had a user delete the default calendar folder in OWA. We are running E2K. Now you can not do that in the Outlook client but OWA allows that? Dammm. So now I created a new calendar folder in the fat client hoping everything would be okay but Outlook 2000 doesn't see it as the default calendar folder for sending appointment requests or meeting requests. Anybody see this before? _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
SO iset for Offline use in the OST Stuff ( where I would set other Custom made folders) ? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST No, there's always the potential for 2 way replication based on permissions to the folder. Synchronization is achieved by adding the said PF to the PF 'favorites' and then marking the folders as available for offline use. HTH, Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
right click the folder under your favourites, bring up properties, go to synchronization tab, configure... -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST SO iset for Offline use in the OST Stuff ( where I would set other Custom made folders) ? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST No, there's always the potential for 2 way replication based on permissions to the folder. Synchronization is achieved by adding the said PF to the PF 'favorites' and then marking the folders as available for offline use. HTH, Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Authentication (WAS: OWA Help)
OK, So in trying to figure out what the heck is going on with this OWA I have found the following things. 1) When I access OWA from inside my network using the FQDN or the Server Name I sometimes get in and sometimes get asked to pass my credentials as each item on the page loads. 2) When I access OWA via the servers internal IP address I have no problem logging in. 3) When I access OWA via external IP address I have no problem. 4) When I access OWA via external FQDN I have no problem. 5) All my internal and external DNS A records and PTR Records are correct and working fine. So here is my question...Is there an issues that I am unaware of that prevents OWA to use Integrated Windows Authentication? I set the OWA to use Basic Authentication and it is now working fine. By the way SSL is running on the exchange box. TIA, Steve I PS - To answer Rachel's question, No. -Original Message- From: Chetwood, Rachel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help are you using netsecure to access the owa? Rachel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
Hopefully last question: What if the Public folder has subfolders? 1. How do you get them in the favorites? 2. do you have to set offline for each subfolder? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST right click the folder under your favourites, bring up properties, go to synchronization tab, configure... -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST SO iset for Offline use in the OST Stuff ( where I would set other Custom made folders) ? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST No, there's always the potential for 2 way replication based on permissions to the folder. Synchronization is achieved by adding the said PF to the PF 'favorites' and then marking the folders as available for offline use. HTH, Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders and OST
like a few things in exchange/outlook, you have to do it one at a time (yaaawn zz) -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST Hopefully last question: What if the Public folder has subfolders? 1. How do you get them in the favorites? 2. do you have to set offline for each subfolder? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST right click the folder under your favourites, bring up properties, go to synchronization tab, configure... -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST SO iset for Offline use in the OST Stuff ( where I would set other Custom made folders) ? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST No, there's always the potential for 2 way replication based on permissions to the folder. Synchronization is achieved by adding the said PF to the PF 'favorites' and then marking the folders as available for offline use. HTH, Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders and OST Can 'Public Folders' be allowed to sync to an offline copy ? This would always be one way: down to a laptop Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
Was that it? It's early and I may be a tad over medicated. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the proper label is x500. IIRC it's case sensitive. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site The Server not actually coming here and the link is only 256k so we're not going to use the move server wizard. I click on the e-mail addresses tab and click New - Other, and then type in the syntax I gave earlier and labe it as X500 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
Actually, when making the X lower case defaults back to uppercase after hitting apply. The lower case only holds when you make a secondary x500 address. I'm mainly concerned if my syntax is correct. Does it look close? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site Was that it? It's early and I may be a tad over medicated. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the proper label is x500. IIRC it's case sensitive. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site The Server not actually coming here and the link is only 256k so we're not going to use the move server wizard. I click on the e-mail addresses tab and click New - Other, and then type in the syntax I gave earlier and labe it as X500 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possible problem...
Greetings folks, Here's one for you to try. Two Servers: Windows 2K, SP1 w/ Exchange 5.5 SP4 Clients: Outlook 2K Outlook 2002 Situation: A client has an inbox view set for his/her inbox to Group by From using the Group by.. From field in the client views. (not simply sort by..) If you move the mailbox to the other Win2K /Exch 5.5 server - all is well and the inbox view works as you would expect. BUT, if you move the mailbox back to the original WIN2K/EX5.5 server the inbox view shows the last Group by.. view you had while your inbox was on that server... in other words, the inbox view is frozen and will not update the view when you read a message or receive a message. Observations: changing the view back to the standard Messages works just fine (in fact all other views work fine) and you see what you would expect but if you attempt to use the Group by... on that server - you always see the frozen unchanged view - even when new mail arrives - it doesn't show in the view - although the inbox folder increments. The only way to fix the issue is to run ISINTEG -fix on the priv... Try it! Anyone else see this? Art _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves across site
I believe that's correct. (/o=org/ou=old-site/cn=container/cn=rdn) -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site Actually, when making the X lower case defaults back to uppercase after hitting apply. The lower case only holds when you make a secondary x500 address. I'm mainly concerned if my syntax is correct. Does it look close? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site Was that it? It's early and I may be a tad over medicated. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the proper label is x500. IIRC it's case sensitive. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site The Server not actually coming here and the link is only 256k so we're not going to use the move server wizard. I click on the e-mail addresses tab and click New - Other, and then type in the syntax I gave earlier and labe it as X500 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site I believe the Move Server Wizard will add an appropriate x.500 address to the mailbox. When you are adding the e-mail address to the mailbox, what exactly are you doing (step by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses tab of the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox moves across site Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I don't think I'm using the correct syntax. I'm using /O=Orgname./OU=Previous Sitename/CN=Previous container/CN=Previous directoryname...Is this correct or should it be different? Or is there a different method all together? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with OWA
Hello All, On my main machine, when I use Internet Explorer to get into my mailbox, whenever I reply to people's messages, it doesn't include their original message text - which should appear in the bottom of my reply, indented. Now when I move to a different machine, and check my mail the same way using Internet Explorer, whenever I reply to a person's message, it DOES include their original message text in the bottom of my reply. I looked under options, for that setting, and it's nowhere to be found. Does anybody know where this setting is located? And why it would work on one machine and not another (since the browser is such a generic way if getting in)? Thanks for any info, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with OWA
Exchange Version and SP Level? IE version? -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with OWA Hello All, On my main machine, when I use Internet Explorer to get into my mailbox, whenever I reply to people's messages, it doesn't include their original message text - which should appear in the bottom of my reply, indented. Now when I move to a different machine, and check my mail the same way using Internet Explorer, whenever I reply to a person's message, it DOES include their original message text in the bottom of my reply. I looked under options, for that setting, and it's nowhere to be found. Does anybody know where this setting is located? And why it would work on one machine and not another (since the browser is such a generic way if getting in)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with OWA
OOPS! - Sorry about that. On the machine that does NOT work - Win2K, MSIE 6.0 On the machine that DOES work - Win2K, MSIE 5.5 (sp2) Server version is Exchange 2000 SP2. Is it possibly the browser version difference? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with OWA Exchange Version and SP Level? IE version? -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with OWA Hello All, On my main machine, when I use Internet Explorer to get into my mailbox, whenever I reply to people's messages, it doesn't include their original message text - which should appear in the bottom of my reply, indented. Now when I move to a different machine, and check my mail the same way using Internet Explorer, whenever I reply to a person's message, it DOES include their original message text in the bottom of my reply. I looked under options, for that setting, and it's nowhere to be found. Does anybody know where this setting is located? And why it would work on one machine and not another (since the browser is such a generic way if getting in)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deleting Calendar Folder in OWA
Okay if you run the outlook.exe /resetfolders routine you get the calendar folder back. But it still is bad that users can delete default folders like calendar in OWA2000. This is a bug MS should address. I had a user delete the default calendar folder in OWA. We are running E2K. Now you can not do that in the Outlook client but OWA allows that? Dammm. So now I created a new calendar folder in the fat client hoping everything would be okay but Outlook 2000 doesn't see it as the default calendar folder for sending appointment requests or meeting requests. Anybody see this before? _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding exchange
Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
With a fox? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
no with another server -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
It's bol-ox :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 17 January 2002 17:07 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: adding exchange Subject: RE: adding exchange With a fox? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
if you mean, 'add an additional exchange server to an existing exchange site', just run the installer on your new hardware and follow the wizard. it takes about five minutes. Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
When you run setup on the new box, AND the first exchange server is available, you have the options of: -creating a new org and site -joining an org in a new site -joining an org and site. Follow the steps. William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange no with another server -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange On the same box? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
cool will try it. Lets take a vote yes i will do it right no i will fail -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange if you mean, 'add an additional exchange server to an existing exchange site', just run the installer on your new hardware and follow the wizard. it takes about five minutes. Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
I have since retired from MS and any usage of MS-Bob (SPX) will be prosecuted! Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
What Sifler??? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
And you will have to come out from under the troll bridge to do this as it has no network. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
Keep a look out for the goats.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange And you will have to come out from under the troll bridge to do this as it has no network. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
Ah, leave the poor guy alone. This is a radical idea that's never been tried before, otherwise he could do his own reading and research. Right? JDE -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: adding exchange And you will have to come out from under the troll bridge to do this as it has no network. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration tools across Forest
Can you use MS migration to move mailboxes from one forest to another or must you use .PST move method? This will save me the trouble of just trying it! In a test environment of course. -John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
