RE: Administration, Anti-Virus, Content Filtering,etc. *I need control!*

[Ed Crowley]

Correction:  This is discussed ad nauseum in the archives.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Administration, Anti-Virus, Content Filtering, etc. *I need
control!*


To the group...

We are going to rebuild our exchange environment (current one sucks and I
haven't a clue why it still works) and we wish to attach some administrative
tools to the project.  As shown in the subject I've been reviewing tools
that my department can use to streamline anything and everything with our
new/current exchange server.

Now I'm looking for real world experience, policies, ideas, pros and cons
etc.  This is what I have in my plan so far for exchange Config...

Gateway -Win2000
Firewall -PIX 515
Bridge
Dir. services -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4
Bridge
Information store -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4

3rd party -This is where I'm looking for suggestions


1. Mail Essentials
 -Content filter
 -AV with VSAPI (mapi=bad in my world {I hate bricks but have no choice
*really, not kidding*})
 -Spam filter
 -Disclaimer
 -Installed on the gateway

2. Bind View BV-Control
 -Query base administrator
 -Policy enforcement
 -Jr. Admin permission control
 -Security scan and enforcement
 -Performance tuning

Is there a better set of tools out there?  What pro/con you all had with
these tools?

This is where you all pull out your big sticks and tell me to read the
archive or the FAQ (Not done with it but reading) use send mail, blah blah
blah.

David Gibbons
Sr. Network Engineer
Caliber Collision Center
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: address generators

[Ed Crowley]

Friggin' remove the cc:Mail connector component everywhere.

(The friggin' is for Lyris!)

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Klosa, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


I did what he said  but I want to know how to delete it from the menu path I
listed.

-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


William is suggesting Configuration -> Site Addressing -> Site Addressing,
not what you have selected.

-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 9:47 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated.
I am trying to delete from the admin:

Configuration-->Addressing-->E-Mail Address Generators

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


Exchange Admin
Configuration-->SiteAddressing-->SiteAddressing

Deselect cc: mail

William


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators


How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa
S&C Electric Company
Chicago,IL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Clustering Exchange

[Exchange]

Hmmm...So everyone likes to cut down clustering. I don't fully agree.

I have worked with it tons, both on the 5.5 and 2000 platforms. It is
more complex, more things can go wrong, many times 'the clustering part
of it' lags behind the other parts of the program, third party products
aren't always cluster aware and therefore can cause problems, human
error is much more common because people aren't sufficiently trained on
it, etc.

But, if you educate yourself on the technology, work with 3rd parties
that do consider clustering, etc. it is possible to, first and foremost,
have less planned downtime. That really is one of clustering's major
benefits. You can deploy service packs, etc. on the passive nodes while
the active one is still running, and effectively cut a 1/2 hour downtime
situation to 2 minutes (if everything goes well ;-) ).

Also, if the hardware, OS, or a service, goes South on a system,
failovers happen quite gracefully (given you're up to date on service
packs) and you will have the service back up faster than if you weren't
clustered. I've had systems with 5,000 users on them failover with
minimal reports to the customers help desk...it does work.

If you're in an environment that has people who know what they're doing,
and the decision makers above are willing to spend the money for adding
possibly another 9, clustering can help. If you are new to the
technology, let others do it - your stand alone server will run just
fine and will be easier for you to maintain.

If you do go with clustering: Don't do active/active clusters, and don't
forget that the single point of failure is your SAN/external disks -
clustering won't save you from database corruption or external disk
failure.

In your situation it certainly sounds like not clustering is the right
thing to do. I just wanted to defend the technology a bit, because I
feel given the right circumstances, it performs as advertised.

'Hope it helps,

Per Farny
Senior Network Architect
Goliath Networks Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:34 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Clustering Exchange
Subject: Clustering Exchange

My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do,
and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Clustering Exchange

[Ed Crowley]

My theory is that, at least at the current stage of the technology,
clustering could actually decrease your reliability.

Chris, ask you boss what specific benefits he is expecting to get from
clustering.  Then we can go from there.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange


You should benchmark your reliability.  Work with your vendors to determine
exactly what your current configuration will deliver in terms of:

- mean time between data loss events
Your first supporting table for this statistic should look like a seismic
event map so you can project not just the frequency of an event, but the
frequency of events of various magnitude.  You need a second supporting
table for this statistic should list all of the probable causes of data loss
events, and their relative probability.

- mean time between single server outages
You need the same accompanying table showing the projected recovery times,
assuming that you project that some outages will be more severe than others.
You need the same second supporting table listing causes in order of
probability.

- mean time between total system outages
You need the same accompanying table showing the projected recovery times,
assuming that you project that some outages will be more severe than others.
You need the same second supporting table listing causes in order of
probability.

Once you have all of this data in hand, and NOT BEFORE, then you have the
data that you need to propose various procedural changes and technical
upgrades, and you can project with a high degree of accuracy exactly how
much additional reliability you will get for a given investment.  After
that, it is a simple business decision.

Any other approach is simply playing with toys and making wild unsupported
guesses.  But hey, playing with clustering technology can be fun, even if it
does drive down your reliability due to guaranteeing an increase in both
system outages and data loss events, both deriving largely from sys admin
error rates increasing due to the added complexity.



-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering Exchange


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Is this really the case? Mixed mode requires much hardware?

[Ed Crowley]

That makes no sense at all to me.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morrison, Gordon
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this really the case? Mixed mode requires much hardware?


I have a mixed mode org consisting of 5.5/2000 servers.

 If I want to add an e2k server into its own administrative group into my
environment, do I have to build a corresponding 5.5 server if I want my 5.5
users to be able to email anyone on that server???
Likewise, do I have to wait to remove any 5.5 server until I have converted
every single user to e2k (presuming that I would actually want my 5.5 users
to continue to be able to communicate with my e2k users)?


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: clustering wireless

[Ed Crowley]

You're an "idea guy", aren't you, Richard?

I think I've met you before.  You go to MCP classes and sit in the front row
and constantly ask the teacher about things that aren't remotely related to
the course subject, causing lengthy hours-long digressions.  You ask
questions like, "What happens if I try to run my Exchange server on a
MacIntosh?" or "What would happen if I moved my information store to
DECTape?"

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: clustering wireless


Hello,

Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless
bridge.  I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers
over a Cisco Aironet 340.

Thanks
Richard

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows NT sp6 BDC ---- migrate W2k Server DC?

[Ed Crowley]

My advice to you would be to find some additional equipment and use the
"leapfrog" method of upgrading.  The Exchange part is explained in the FAQ
Appendix A.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows NT sp6 BDC  migrate W2k Server DC?



Mr. Crowley,
Thank you for the response. I didn't want to get too
technical in my initial question. Sometimes that leads to confusion.

Here is the scenario:

Multiple remote physical sites over WAN links all consisting of the
following:

(1) NT 4.0 SP6 BDC running Exchange 5.5 SP4, DNS, DHCP. [SQL 6.5 or SQL
7.0 and SMS (both SQL & SMS to go away during upgrade)] Call this Sever
DOM01

(1) NT 4.0 SP6 member server running the file and print services. Call
this Server FPS01
(x) NT 4.0 clients to be all replaced with Windows 2000 Pro clients within
a week.

When I said migrate here is what I mean.

Step 1  Backup both boxes on own tape.

Step 2  Clean both servers of all non-essential services, Mcafee, Backup
Exec, VNC, Compaq agents, etc., all that stuff. With the exception of
Exchange and Groupshield.

Step 3  Upgrade the DOM01 to Windows 2000 SP2 and install AD. Will
Exchange 5.5 still work with an upgrade to the server? (booting to NT
inserting the 2000 CD and upgrading in that fashion)

Step 4  Upgrade the FPS01, should be simple, print queues should carry
over. User Data should also.

The questions surround the Q article 275127. The last paragraph as
follows:





NOTE : Exchange Server 5.5 is supported on a domain controller or global
catalog only when there is a single Exchange server in the Site and only
one Site exists in the Exchange Organization.

Exchange Server 5.5 is supported on a domain controller or global catalog
only when there are no other domain controllers in the domain and there is
only one domain in the forest. No further Domain controllers can be
installed into the environment.

There is no supported migration path to Exchange 2000 while the Exchange
5.5 installation exists on a global catalog server.

If you plan to install another Microsoft Windows 2000-based computer into
the domain or forest, then the preceding steps are not supported.





With the above in mind, the million dollar question is this. Should I put
the AD on the file and print server, leaving Exchange to reside on the
upgraded DOM01 as a member server now? Therefore pulling the DC/Exchange
issue out of the question?

Thanks,
David Semler




I want to tell you, "Yes it will work."  But I can't say that because all
the detail you've provided about your strategy is the word "migrate".

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows NT sp6 BDC  migrate W2k Server DC?



I'm finding the typical conflicts in the Microsoft documentation. My
question is this?

Will Exchange 5.5 migrate and function when I migrate an NT 4.0 sp6 BDC to
a Windows 2000 SP2 domain controller in a multiple Exchange 5.5 server
environment with multiple Windows 2000 SP2 domain controllers?

I understand the LDAP problem, does this mean I have to change the
listener ports on all my exchange servers if I migrate one exchange server
to W2k runnin AD?

There are 7 Exchange servers all running 5.5 on NT 4.0 servers and 1
running 5.5 on W2k w/out AD installed (member)

My AD is running just fine and so is Exchange.

I guess all I'm looking for is a better explaination for Q275127.

Thanks in advance for any input,
Dave






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Error Message in Exchange 2000

[Ed Crowley]

Include the entire NDR.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Saul
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error Message in Exchange 2000


I have seen this several times when messages are undeliverable;

Your mail system could not find a way to successfully communicate with the
destination system

Does anybody have any ideas?

Thanks
Saul

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backing up the Information Store

[Ed Crowley]

Back up the Information Store.  There should be a checkbox for that.  Do not
back up the \exchsrvr\*data directories because they'll be of no use if you
need to restore.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard S Kahan
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing up the Information Store


Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite
ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files
folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files
(and a number of other .log files) are skipped as they are unable to be
opened. Consequently there are no entries to be found in the Information
store.
I am using Administrator priviledges. I am probably doing something
stupidly wrong, what is it?

Many thanks,

Richard S Kahan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Deleting Calendar Folder in OWA

[Ed Crowley]

Then call PSS and report it.  There's supposed to be no charge for bug
reports.  Or mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Deleting Calendar Folder in OWA





Okay if you run the outlook.exe /resetfolders routine you get the calendar
folder back. But it still is bad that users can delete default folders like
calendar in OWA2000. This is a bug MS should address.


>
>I had a user delete the default calendar folder in OWA. We are running E2K.
>Now you can not do that in the Outlook client but OWA allows that? Dammm.
>So
>now I created a new calendar folder in the fat client hoping everything
>would be okay but Outlook 2000 doesn't see it as  the default calendar
>folder for sending appointment requests or meeting requests. Anybody see
>this before?
>
>_
>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
>http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Inherited Perms within MultiSite Orgs - 5.5

[Ed Crowley]

No permissions cross sites.  That is, the permissions at the organization
level on one site can be completely different than on the other site.  Just
because it says "Organization" doesn't mean that it applies to the entire
organization.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Inherited Perms within MultiSite Orgs - 5.5


I'm confounded.

Scenario:
- Remote Site B introduced into Org; lists along with Site A after
connectors are configured, blah, blah..
- Site A & B both coexist within same NT4 domain--no Trusts necessary.
- Installed Site B using svc acct common to the Domain


Discovery:
After cursory run thru all containers on Site B to set config to match that
of Site A, it is discovered Site B does not display same accts with perms at
Org and Site levels as Site A.

Is something fundamentally wrong in my understanding of basic management of
a multi-Site Exchange Orgs?

Tim.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup

[Ed Crowley]

The magazines know what side their bread is buttered on.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup



> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 January 2002 17:02
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
>
>
> norton wins? are they mad?

Of course the reporters are not mad! Norton/Symantec have a very large
"advertising" and journalist schmoozing budget.


--
This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information
that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or
unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited.

The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or
policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Orphan Site probem - need HELP!!!

[Ed Crowley]

If I were in your shoes, I'd call PSS.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kastner, Bill
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Orphan Site probem - need HELP!!!


Hi everyone,

I have a real problem that I am hoping someone in this group can help with.

We currently run an Exchange 5.5 organization with about 30 sites spanning 3
NT 4.0 domains, with a few Exchange 2000 servers from the Win2000 forest we
are migrating too. I was trying to consolidate two of the 5.5 sites using
the move server wizard, however the move failed about 90% of the way thru,
and it was unable to move the server back into the original site (where it
had been the only server).

Now in my GAL I have an orphan site, with an empty configuration container.
I can't delete it, and it is preventing the KCC from completely successfully
because several sites seem to think they have info on this (ie. The
tombstone was never replicated). We also can't install any new Exchange 2000
servers into the Org, likely again because the KCC isn't happy.

I've tried installing a new server into a new site with the same name (can't
join as no server is in site), however I can't setup the replication
connectors because our Corporate site thinks it has a connection to that
site already, so removing it has no effect on the GAL. I've also tried
installing a server into a new site, and using move server wizard to try and
move into the orphan site, but it fails as well.

I am at a loss as to what else to try. Microsoft's support site and various
other resources have been useless in this situation, and you all are my last
hope before paying out to PSS.

Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated. I am wondering whether I
can manually set a tombstone thru the raw admin utility, but have no idea
what actually needs to be set.

Thanks in advance.

Bill Kastner
Network Administrator
RAND Worldwide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Server Upgrade

[Ed Crowley]

Please share with me what the many many different reasons are that the
system must have the same system name.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Exchange-List
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server Upgrade


I am upgrading our current e-mail system hardware, for many many different
reasons the new system has to have the same system name as the old system.
This is usually not a problem, I just do it as a Disaster Recovery and
restore exchange to the new H/W, however I am trying to through my own
wrench into the equation this time.
Current Config is:
NT 4.0 w/sp6a
Exch 5.5 w/sp4

Purposed new configuration:
Win 2000svr (member) w/sp2
Exch 5.5 w/sp4

I have not been able to find any documentation on this, and didn't know if
any of you had tried this.  I am doing this getting ready for our AD
conversion and would like all my member servers to be 2000 as prior to going
to AD.  I can't upgrade the current server to 2000 as it is a BDC (I
know...not my choice).  I know I could always do the new one as a NT4.0
member then do a OS upgrade, however I am very wary of doing OS upgrades, I
prefer to have them done as fresh installs.
TIA
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RAM

[Ed Crowley]

Keep a fire extinguisher handy!

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RAM


Stick 'em in a spare PC and see what the BIOS reports...?

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RAM


Check this site out for deciphering the RAM markings...

http://www.arstechnica.com/paedia/r/ram_id-1.html


Larry Josefowski
Network Operations Analyst
Conectiv, Inc.




-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: RAM


Hi

I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There
are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one...

Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Administration, Anti-Virus, Content Filtering,etc. *I need control!*

[Ed Crowley]

This is discussed ad nauseum in the FAQ.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Administration, Anti-Virus, Content Filtering, etc. *I need
control!*


To the group...

We are going to rebuild our exchange environment (current one sucks and I
haven't a clue why it still works) and we wish to attach some administrative
tools to the project.  As shown in the subject I've been reviewing tools
that my department can use to streamline anything and everything with our
new/current exchange server.

Now I'm looking for real world experience, policies, ideas, pros and cons
etc.  This is what I have in my plan so far for exchange Config...

Gateway -Win2000
Firewall -PIX 515
Bridge
Dir. services -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4
Bridge
Information store -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4

3rd party -This is where I'm looking for suggestions


1. Mail Essentials
 -Content filter
 -AV with VSAPI (mapi=bad in my world {I hate bricks but have no choice
*really, not kidding*})
 -Spam filter
 -Disclaimer
 -Installed on the gateway

2. Bind View BV-Control
 -Query base administrator
 -Policy enforcement
 -Jr. Admin permission control
 -Security scan and enforcement
 -Performance tuning

Is there a better set of tools out there?  What pro/con you all had with
these tools?

This is where you all pull out your big sticks and tell me to read the
archive or the FAQ (Not done with it but reading) use send mail, blah blah
blah.

David Gibbons
Sr. Network Engineer
Caliber Collision Center
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL

[Ed Crowley]

You have posted this to the wrong list.  This belongs on the Dilbert
newsgroup.

Ask your boss whether he knows the meaning of catch-22.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL


OK. It's a stupid question, but I can't seem to find an answer. I've been
asked to create about 200 new mailboxes that will begin with a number. The
boss INSISTS on this naming scheme. When I pointed out to him that these
200 mailboxes would appear first in the Global Address Book, he was
equally insistent that they appear last.

So there it is. Is there any way to configure things so that the numbered
mailboxes will appear at the end of the Global Address List instead of the
top? I've looked in all the obvious places - at least the ones I can think
of.

I'm on Exchange 5.5 and users are on Outlook 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook BUG question

[Ed Crowley]

If it happens once, you can bet it'll happen again.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval,
LaCretia, Triaton/US
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question


Why do you say this?  Do you think it will continue to happen over and over
again?  I keep telling this to my manager but I have nothing to support the
statement.  I have been asking the question over and over again what causes
this.  I know logging into the mailbox with different clients will have
negative effects and could be the cause.  I'm wondering though if it could
be the environment itself since the environment is running 2000 and the
delegate is running 98.  Any thoughts on that?
One other thing... all the conf rm's displays their free busy time
inconsistently.  Is there any way to fix this?
LaCretia Sandoval

 -Original Message-
From:   Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question

That might work.  I hope you don't mind doing it every couple of months or
so!

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval,
LaCretia, Triaton/US
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question


Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice
reply's.  He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm.
Export the data from the old one.  Delete the old one.  Have a secretary
input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I
think this will raise some hairs with the users).  He said if we re-do it
and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are
broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved.  Can you say BIG WASTE of
time and MONEY?

Regards,

LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___

 -Original Message-
From:   Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question

Bad, very bad

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question


And then I saw her face,
and now I'm a Script Believer...


-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question


LaCretia, why is it not acceptable?  Perhaps we can give you good arguments
that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them
all.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question


Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the
company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with
it as will you.
Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless
thousands who LOVE it.

-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook BUG question


I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in
how the delegate is configured for conference rooms.  Our company, had us
configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer
to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double
bookings.  When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the
resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the
delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead.  I found out that
once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to
be a minimal of author permissions for the default user.  If you try to set
the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have
enough permission.  This was a problem because our company has users that
constantly double book and then get into it over it.  I tried to revert the
conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back.  I
tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the
calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over.  The company is now
making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then 

RE: Performance migrating mailboxes

[Ed Crowley]

It depends on a lot of factors, such as available network bandwidth, choice
of migration method or tool, speed of servers, speed of disk subsystems,
architecture of disk subsystems, etc.  Your best bet would try a dry run.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez
Gonzalez, Jose J
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Performance migrating mailboxes


Hi all,

Anyone know what's the performance in Gb/hr when migrating mailboxes from
Exch.5.5 to Exch.2000 using either "Sp1/Sp2 Exchange Migration
Tool-Migration Wizard" method or the "Active Directory Connector + Migration
Wizard" method, if exists any difference between them.

Thanks in advance
~~~
 J. Javier Gonzalez, mcse 2000/nt4 mcp+i
 Consultor Tecnológico
 UNISYS
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~
El contenido de esta comunicación debe considerarse privado y confidencial.
Si Vd. no es el destinatario y la hubiere recibido por error, se le informa
que cualquier divulgación, distribución o copia de esta comunicación está
estrictamente prohibida; por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente
y elimine este mensaje.

This Email is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not use the contents nor disclose
them to any other person and you should immediately notify the sender and
delete the Email.
~~~



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: clustering wireless

[Guy]

Along those lines, anyone know where I can find docs on wireless security on
a Windows LAN? Things like setting up certs, WEP encryption info, what the
dif is between 40-bit and 128-bit, how a Win2k Cert server can help, etc...

- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Bourdeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: clustering wireless


> Read a little bit more
>
> Wireless for now can be easily hacked.
>
> It's a gift for hacker.
>
> IF you use wireless, use stgrong encryption within it.
>
> IPSEC, PPTP or (TSL, please correct me if I'M wrong, TLS is one of the
> encryption to use to link 2 exchange ? )
>
> SO if you go wireless, use encryption and WireLess device that change the
> WEP encryption key dynamically
>
> JF
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:49 AM
> Subject: RE: clustering wireless
>
>
> > no im not trying to set it up i want to get a solution on how we are
going
> > to connect the two buildings wireless with failover
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: clustering wireless
> >
> >
> > Sounds like a cluster fsck
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: clustering wireless
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless
> > bridge.  I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange
servers
> > over a Cisco Aironet 340.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Richard
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> --
> --
> > --
> > The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> > entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
> > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
> > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> >
> >
>

> > ==
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Jennifer Baker]

http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=5041

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


Sorry if i confuse u. What I expect is after I send the message to the
Public Folder, Microsoft Exchange Server will automatically route the item
to recipients for approval.

thanks.

Poh Ling 

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


You've lost me.  You say you can see the message that you sent in the Public
Folder.  If the message appears on the folder, what's not working the way
you expect it to?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


How to check whether the folder is set up to accept messages or not? I can
see the message that i send in that public folder.

I select the folder from the Global Address list.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


Is the folder set up to accept messages?  If you set it as a calendar or
contacts folder that could be an issue.

How did you address the message?  Did you select the folder from the Global
address list or enter the SMTP address manually?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.

The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site
or from an external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default
permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Lee, Poh Ling]

Sorry if i confuse u. What I expect is after I send the message to the
Public Folder, Microsoft Exchange Server will automatically route the item
to recipients for approval.

thanks.

Poh Ling 

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


You've lost me.  You say you can see the message that you sent in the Public
Folder.  If the message appears on the folder, what's not working the way
you expect it to?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


How to check whether the folder is set up to accept messages or not? I can
see the message that i send in that public folder.

I select the folder from the Global Address list.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


Is the folder set up to accept messages?  If you set it as a calendar or
contacts folder that could be an issue.

How did you address the message?  Did you select the folder from the Global
address list or enter the SMTP address manually?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.

The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site
or from an external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default
permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: clustering wireless

[Jean-Francois Bourdeau]

Read a little bit more

Wireless for now can be easily hacked.

It's a gift for hacker.

IF you use wireless, use stgrong encryption within it.

IPSEC, PPTP or (TSL, please correct me if I'M wrong, TLS is one of the
encryption to use to link 2 exchange ? )

SO if you go wireless, use encryption and WireLess device that change the
WEP encryption key dynamically

JF

- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: clustering wireless


> no im not trying to set it up i want to get a solution on how we are going
> to connect the two buildings wireless with failover
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: clustering wireless
>
>
> Sounds like a cluster fsck
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: clustering wireless
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless
> bridge.  I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers
> over a Cisco Aironet 340.
>
> Thanks
> Richard
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
--
> --
> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>

> ==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder, http://server/public/files)

[Jean-Francois Bourdeau]

does anyone use EX 2k as a file server to have one central location for
accessing files on the road  or from the office ?

I tried to create a network shortcut in w2k Pro and XP Pro, connecting to
http://server/public/files

It was prompting very often for authentification.
I could drag files to that folder but was having error when saving file from
Word or Excel... But could drag those .doc or .xls file to the folder
manually

>From what I understand, I heard that sharing a Folder from the M drive could
be dangerous (corruption of the exchange database)

We must create webFolder if we want to hare ordinary folder within our w2k
server.  but for exchange public Folder I was expecting that it would work
smoothly...

Any comment is appreciated...

JF



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Darcy Adams]

You've lost me.  You say you can see the message that you sent in the Public Folder.  
If the message appears on the folder, what's not working the way you expect it to?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


How to check whether the folder is set up to accept messages or not? I can
see the message that i send in that public folder.

I select the folder from the Global Address list.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


Is the folder set up to accept messages?  If you set it as a calendar or
contacts folder that could be an issue.

How did you address the message?  Did you select the folder from the Global
address list or enter the SMTP address manually?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.

The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site
or from an external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default
permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Thomas Di Nardo]

I have that one on Laserdisc. One of the best.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption

Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill
.htm
l

Amateur.

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


http://www.lilbill.net/index.html

William 


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma
g01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge
with
RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or
not,
and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
> is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Lee, Poh Ling]

How to check whether the folder is set up to accept messages or not? I can
see the message that i send in that public folder.

I select the folder from the Global Address list.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


Is the folder set up to accept messages?  If you set it as a calendar or
contacts folder that could be an issue.

How did you address the message?  Did you select the folder from the Global
address list or enter the SMTP address manually?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.

The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site
or from an external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default
permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Kevin Miller]

That’s the one I was thinking about.. Thanks Jennifer..

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill
.htm
l

Amateur.

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


http://www.lilbill.net/index.html

William 


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma
g01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge
with RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or
not, and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are 
> using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen talks about the need 
> to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the 
> client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Darcy Adams]

Is the folder set up to accept messages?  If you set it as a calendar or contacts 
folder that could be an issue.

How did you address the message?  Did you select the folder from the Global address 
list or enter the SMTP address manually?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.

The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site
or from an external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default
permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Jennifer Baker]

Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill.htm
l

Amateur.

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


http://www.lilbill.net/index.html

William 


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or not,
and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
> is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Lee, Poh Ling]

I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that
Public Folder.

The default permission on the Public Folder is Author.

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4.
thanks.

Poh Ling

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site
or from an external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default
permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Darcy Adams]

We need more details - how did you send the message?  From inside your site or from an 
external address?

What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default permission)?

What version of Exchange server are you using?

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard


I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard

[Lee, Poh Ling]

hi, 

I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route
like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder.

anybody can help me?
thank you.

Poh Ling

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Groups within Address Lists

[Chris Scharff]

Been a while since I wrote LDAP queries and I'm over medicated at the
moment, but doesn't the query below say give me objects which are both users
and groups whose UPN and display name is *@company.com? If so, I think the
problem might be that you want to ask for users OR groups. It seems you are
searching for objects which are both, and they are mutually exclusive.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Groups within Address Lists
> 
> 
> 
> Win2k SP2 Native Mode
> Ex2k SP2 Native Mode
> 
> I am creating Address Lists in ESM. Using 'Filter Rules' I 
> can add groups to a list, users to a list, but not both to 
> the same list. I have tried every combination under the 
> menus. I have tried adding custom code such as
> 
> 
> 
>  (|(&(objectCategory=user)(userPrincipalName=*@SmallCompany.com))(& 
>  _(objectCategory=group)(displayName=*@SmallCompany.com)))  
> 
>  I have tried using Global and Universal groups. The fact that I
>  can add groups to a list on their own indicates it is not a
>  permissions issue. I have checked fields with ADSI Edit to ensure  
>  the names and values are correct.  
> 
>  She no go no way.  
>  Any ideas appreciated. 
> 
> 
> 
> Danny Mills
> Messaging Consultant
> KAZ Computer Services
> Melbourne, Australia
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Groups within Address Lists

[danny_mills]

Win2k SP2 Native Mode
Ex2k SP2 Native Mode

I am creating Address Lists in ESM. Using 'Filter Rules' I can add groups
to a list, users to a list, but not both to the same list. I have tried
every combination under the menus. I have tried adding custom code such as



 (|(&(objectCategory=user)(userPrincipalName=*@SmallCompany.com))(& 
 _(objectCategory=group)(displayName=*@SmallCompany.com)))  

 I have tried using Global and Universal groups. The fact that I
 can add groups to a list on their own indicates it is not a
 permissions issue. I have checked fields with ADSI Edit to ensure  
 the names and values are correct.  

 She no go no way.  
 Any ideas appreciated. 



Danny Mills
Messaging Consultant
KAZ Computer Services
Melbourne, Australia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Clustering Exchange

[Dupler, Craig]

You should benchmark your reliability.  Work with your vendors to determine
exactly what your current configuration will deliver in terms of:

- mean time between data loss events
Your first supporting table for this statistic should look like a seismic
event map so you can project not just the frequency of an event, but the
frequency of events of various magnitude.  You need a second supporting
table for this statistic should list all of the probable causes of data loss
events, and their relative probability.

- mean time between single server outages
You need the same accompanying table showing the projected recovery times,
assuming that you project that some outages will be more severe than others.
You need the same second supporting table listing causes in order of
probability.

- mean time between total system outages
You need the same accompanying table showing the projected recovery times,
assuming that you project that some outages will be more severe than others.
You need the same second supporting table listing causes in order of
probability.

Once you have all of this data in hand, and NOT BEFORE, then you have the
data that you need to propose various procedural changes and technical
upgrades, and you can project with a high degree of accuracy exactly how
much additional reliability you will get for a given investment.  After
that, it is a simple business decision.

Any other approach is simply playing with toys and making wild unsupported
guesses.  But hey, playing with clustering technology can be fun, even if it
does drive down your reliability due to guaranteeing an increase in both
system outages and data loss events, both deriving largely from sys admin
error rates increasing due to the added complexity.



-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering Exchange


My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange
Servers that we should have them clustered.  Now I have never clustered
servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get
everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with.  How hard is it to do, and
how is it to maintain.  What are the pro's and con's.  Any help would be
appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Lefkovics, William]

http://www.lilbill.net/index.html

William 


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or not,
and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
> is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Legal Question.......

[Ben Schorr]

As was pointed out elsewhere you really need to check with an attorney in
the applicable state (sounds like Maryland in this case).  

Generally speaking I believe the key phrase is "expectation of privacy."
Merely saying that the e-mail is for business use only is probably not going
to be sufficient unless it also says that the company reserves the right to
review it at any time.

The company might argue "it's our property; enforcement of policy, etc." but
if the court decides that the employee had a reasonable expectation of
privacy the company will probably lose.

The company should clearly state in their employment manual that the e-mail
may be subject to review AND have each employee initial that specific page
(if not that passage) indicating that they have read and understand it.
Ideally, anyhow.

Since you were just curious for opinions and not actually planning to offer
them legal advice...

Speaking of which, here's the disclaimer: I am not an attorney and this is
not legal advice; just my educated opinion. No attorney-client relationship
has been established between anybody and Damon Key by means of this
conversation; it's just a bunch of geeks (or nerds, if you prefer) trading
opinions.

I only work for attorneys, don't hold that against me.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Legal Question...
> 
> 
> All, 
> 
> I have pretty much been lurking on this list for awhile now.
> I really respect the Technical opinions that most have 
> offered, Not to mention, the biting sarcasm keeps me in fits 
> of laughter.
> 
> That Said, I have a client that has asked me a question that 
> I don't Have the legal expertise to answer, and was curious if 
> 
> 1. Any of you have dealt with a similar experience and 
> 2. Could point me to a specific, reference in writing.
> 
> I was recently approached by my client to get access to one 
> of their employees email. I told them to hold off, I would 
> have to check if I was legally able to do that for them. The 
> equipment is owned by my client. There is Policy in the 
> employee handbook states that Email is for business use only. 
> My client has reason to believe an employee is sending 
> corporate information, (vendor lists and pricing) Offsite to 
> someone outside their company. My client and I both reside in 
> the U.S., in the state of Maryland. Does anyone know what the 
> legal ramifications of viewing/reviewing an employees email are?  
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive Mails

[Ben Schorr]

It would help if you were a little more specific.

Are some messages being archived and others not or does it just fail to
archive entirely?  Are you getting error messages?  Does it only happen on
some folders and not others...

Chances are the problem is that some messages aren't archiving while others
are; and the reason for it is because AutoArchive works off the modified
date of the item and not the received or created date.  If you move an item
to another folder the modified date is updated - so it won't archive until
the specified interval after the modified date -- even though the received
date makes the item look much older.

If that's not itwe'll need more information.

Aloha,

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Archive Mails
> 
> 
> does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes? 
> my server exchange 2000 w/sp2.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive Mails

[Ben Schorr]

Well, it's as accurate an answer as he could offer, under the circumstances.
:)

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:06 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Archive Mails
> 
> 
> There goes that New Year's Resolution!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:54 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Archive Mails
> 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:19 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Archive Mails
> > 
> > 
> > does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes?
> > my server exchange 2000 w/sp2.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --
> 
> The information contained in this email message is privileged 
> and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
> message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
> email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler 
> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
> email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> 
> ==
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RAM

[Doug Eubank]

That'll do pig. That'll do.


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RAM


BAA RAM EWE
BAA RAM EWE


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: RAM


Hi

I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what?
There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a
single one...

Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Error Message in Exchange 2000

[Saul]

I have seen this several times when messages are undeliverable;

Your mail system could not find a way to successfully communicate with the
destination system

Does anybody have any ideas?

Thanks
Saul

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Chris Scharff]

To be clear, by "I can write", I mean I could design the spec on a napkin
and pass it off to one of a dozen friends who could whip up the code in
under a day. I personally couldn't write the code, even if I wanted to.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> What robust authentication policy would that be? Exchange and 
> Outlook use NTLM authentication, I'm not aware of an optional 
> authentication policy available for Outlook which is more 
> robust than that Unless there's a 3rd party product out 
> there I don't know about. 
> 
> I can write a trojan which accesses your inbox without you 
> even having Outlook installed on the machine, all you need to 
> do is be logged in as you. I guess if you want to be really 
> secure, you could VNC into one box and then inside of that 
> session open a terminal services session to another box and 
> then from within that window open Outlook.
> 
> Chris
> -- 
> Chris Scharff
> Senior Sales Engineer
> MessageOne
> If you can't measure, you can't manage! 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:51 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
> > 
> > 
> > Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of
> > vulnerability, I could think of leaving my restricted mail 
> > and stuff at the Exchange Server, considering the use of a 
> > robust authentication policy to access it.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Orphan Site probem - need HELP!!!

[Kastner, Bill]

Hi everyone,

I have a real problem that I am hoping someone in this group can help with.

We currently run an Exchange 5.5 organization with about 30 sites spanning 3
NT 4.0 domains, with a few Exchange 2000 servers from the Win2000 forest we
are migrating too. I was trying to consolidate two of the 5.5 sites using
the move server wizard, however the move failed about 90% of the way thru,
and it was unable to move the server back into the original site (where it
had been the only server).

Now in my GAL I have an orphan site, with an empty configuration container.
I can't delete it, and it is preventing the KCC from completely successfully
because several sites seem to think they have info on this (ie. The
tombstone was never replicated). We also can't install any new Exchange 2000
servers into the Org, likely again because the KCC isn't happy.

I've tried installing a new server into a new site with the same name (can't
join as no server is in site), however I can't setup the replication
connectors because our Corporate site thinks it has a connection to that
site already, so removing it has no effect on the GAL. I've also tried
installing a server into a new site, and using move server wizard to try and
move into the orphan site, but it fails as well.

I am at a loss as to what else to try. Microsoft's support site and various
other resources have been useless in this situation, and you all are my last
hope before paying out to PSS.

Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated. I am wondering whether I
can manually set a tombstone thru the raw admin utility, but have no idea
what actually needs to be set.

Thanks in advance.

Bill Kastner
Network Administrator
RAND Worldwide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Chris Scharff]

What robust authentication policy would that be? Exchange and Outlook use
NTLM authentication, I'm not aware of an optional authentication policy
available for Outlook which is more robust than that Unless there's a
3rd party product out there I don't know about. 

I can write a trojan which accesses your inbox without you even having
Outlook installed on the machine, all you need to do is be logged in as you.
I guess if you want to be really secure, you could VNC into one box and then
inside of that session open a terminal services session to another box and
then from within that window open Outlook.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -Original Message-
> From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of 
> vulnerability, I could think of leaving my restricted mail 
> and stuff at the Exchange Server, considering the use of a 
> robust authentication policy to access it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Rogerio,

If you've got users that are able to open e-mails containing trojans,
transported by various attachment types, then you have a bigger problem.
You either have:

1.  No firewall/AV software or
2.  Bad firewall/AV software or
3.  Poorly configured firewall/AV software.

Plug your security holes from this end first, and you won't have to worry
about the multiple connections "issue."

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable


In your scenario there is certainly a security issue, but I don't see that
issue as Outlook. Not that there aren't a number of security issues with
Outlook, the scenario as described simply does not seem to be one of them.

A trojan has access to the contents of my inbox. So what? It could also have
access to the contents of my hard drive and any file shares to which I might
have permissions. What is the Outlook specific security issue?


> -Original Message-
> From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed
> and running at a particular machine, can use an active 
> connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to 
> have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of 
> strong authentication that could be used to enforce the 
> security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because 
> an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used 
> by whatever process running on that machine.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[William Rettig]

Y'all are brutal.  Get me out of here... 
 
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Oh, let's hope not.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Sitting on the steps of capital hill?

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma
g01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge
with RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or
not, and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are 
> using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen talks about the need 
> to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the 
> client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Mood, Steve]

Oh, let's hope not.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Sitting on the steps of capital hill?

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma
g01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge
with RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or
not, and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are 
> using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen talks about the need 
> to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the 
> client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Kevin Miller]

Sitting on the steps of capital hill?

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma
g01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge
with RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or
not, and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are 
> using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen talks about the need 
> to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the 
> client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Andy David]

I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...


-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or not,
and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
> is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[William Rettig]

Bill,

Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption


Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or not,
and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
> is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[East, Bill]

Bill, 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp

(link may wrap)

makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.

-- 
be - MOS



I remember a bigger, older guy we called "Dad." We'd eat some stuff, or not,
and 
then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you.


> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
> is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: address generators

[Klosa, Bill]

I did what he said  but I want to know how to delete it from the menu path I
listed.

-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


William is suggesting Configuration -> Site Addressing -> Site Addressing,
not what you have selected.

-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 9:47 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated.
I am trying to delete from the admin:

Configuration-->Addressing-->E-Mail Address Generators

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


Exchange Admin
Configuration-->SiteAddressing-->SiteAddressing

Deselect cc: mail

William 


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators


How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa 
S&C Electric Company 
Chicago,IL. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Inherited Perms within MultiSite Orgs - 5.5

[Tim Ault]

I'm confounded.

Scenario:
- Remote Site B introduced into Org; lists along with Site A after
connectors are configured, blah, blah..
- Site A & B both coexist within same NT4 domain--no Trusts necessary.
- Installed Site B using svc acct common to the Domain


Discovery:
After cursory run thru all containers on Site B to set config to match that
of Site A, it is discovered Site B does not display same accts with perms at
Org and Site levels as Site A. 

Is something fundamentally wrong in my understanding of basic management of
a multi-Site Exchange Orgs?

Tim.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: address generators

[Leeann McCallum]

William is suggesting Configuration -> Site Addressing -> Site Addressing,
not what you have selected.

-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 9:47 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated.
I am trying to delete from the admin:

Configuration-->Addressing-->E-Mail Address Generators

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


Exchange Admin
Configuration-->SiteAddressing-->SiteAddressing

Deselect cc: mail

William 


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators


How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa 
S&C Electric Company 
Chicago,IL. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: address generators

[Benjamin Winzenz]

Probably because you did a standard install, which includes the MSMail and
Lotus Notes Connectors.  You need to uninstall those, otherwise CCMail
addresses get generated automatically.  I believe it does this even if you
remove the CC Mail connector.  Just re-run the Exchange setup, and choose to
add/remove components.  Deselect the Lotus notes connector and that is it.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators

I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated.
I am trying to delete from the admin:

Configuration-->Addressing-->E-Mail Address Generators

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


Exchange Admin
Configuration-->SiteAddressing-->SiteAddressing

Deselect cc: mail

William 


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators


How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa 
S&C Electric Company 
Chicago,IL. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is this really the case? Mixed mode requires much hardware?

[Morrison, Gordon]

I have a mixed mode org consisting of 5.5/2000 servers. 

 If I want to add an e2k server into its own administrative group into my
environment, do I have to build a corresponding 5.5 server if I want my 5.5
users to be able to email anyone on that server???
Likewise, do I have to wait to remove any 5.5 server until I have converted
every single user to e2k (presuming that I would actually want my 5.5 users
to continue to be able to communicate with my e2k users)?


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Rogerio Silva]

Having in mind that my terminal has a reasonable degree of vulnerability,
I could think of leaving my restricted mail and stuff at the Exchange
Server, considering the use of a robust authentication policy to access
it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: address generators

[Klosa, Bill]

I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated.
I am trying to delete from the admin:

Configuration-->Addressing-->E-Mail Address Generators

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: address generators


Exchange Admin
Configuration-->SiteAddressing-->SiteAddressing

Deselect cc: mail

William 


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators


How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa 
S&C Electric Company 
Chicago,IL. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: address generators

[Lefkovics, William]

Exchange Admin
Configuration-->SiteAddressing-->SiteAddressing

Deselect cc: mail

William 


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: address generators


How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa 
S&C Electric Company 
Chicago,IL. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Rogerio Silva]

The obvious difference is that I'm talking about the access to
my own mail stuff, not the spreading of new messages from my
place. But, as I understood, the answer is to be smart enough
to avoid Britney Spears pictures ...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

address generators

[Klosa, Bill]

How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5?

Bill Klosa 
S&C Electric Company 
Chicago,IL. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Chris Scharff]

In your scenario there is certainly a security issue, but I don't see that
issue as Outlook. Not that there aren't a number of security issues with
Outlook, the scenario as described simply does not seem to be one of them.

A trojan has access to the contents of my inbox. So what? It could also have
access to the contents of my hard drive and any file shares to which I might
have permissions. What is the Outlook specific security issue?


> -Original Message-
> From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed 
> and running at a particular machine, can use an active 
> connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to 
> have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of 
> strong authentication that could be used to enforce the 
> security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because 
> an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used 
> by whatever process running on that machine.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Legal Question.......

[Jim Brady]

Could check out ...

E-Policy : How to Develop Computer, E-Policy, and Internet Guidelines to
Protect Your Company and Its Assets
by Michael R. Overly

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814479960/qid=1011294873/sr=8-1/
ref=sr_8_3_1/103-8981035-4241454 

Maybe he's got new material.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Legal Question...


I don't think there are many subscribers to this list who are licensed
to
practice law.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Legal Question...


All,

I have pretty much been lurking on this list for awhile now.
I really respect the Technical opinions that most have offered,
Not to mention, the biting sarcasm keeps me in fits of laughter.

That Said, I have a client that has asked me a question that I don't
Have the legal expertise to answer, and was curious if

1. Any of you have dealt with a similar experience and
2. Could point me to a specific, reference in writing.

I was recently approached by my client to get access to one of their
employees email. I told them to hold off, I would have to check if I was
legally able to do that for them. The equipment is owned by my client.
There
is Policy in the employee handbook states that Email is for business use
only. My client has reason to believe an employee is sending corporate
information, (vendor lists and pricing) Offsite to someone outside their
company. My client and I both reside in the U.S., in the state of
Maryland.
Does anyone know what the legal ramifications of viewing/reviewing an
employees email are?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Administration, Anti-Virus, Content Filtering, etc. *I need control!*

[David Gibbons]

To the group...

We are going to rebuild our exchange environment (current one sucks and I haven't a 
clue why it still works) and we wish to attach some administrative tools to the 
project.  As shown in the subject I've been reviewing tools that my department can use 
to streamline anything and everything with our new/current exchange server.

Now I'm looking for real world experience, policies, ideas, pros and cons etc.  This 
is what I have in my plan so far for exchange Config...

Gateway -Win2000
Firewall -PIX 515
Bridge
Dir. services -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4
Bridge 
Information store -Win2000 Exch5.5sp4

3rd party -This is where I'm looking for suggestions


1. Mail Essentials
 -Content filter
 -AV with VSAPI (mapi=bad in my world {I hate bricks but have no choice *really, not 
kidding*})
 -Spam filter
 -Disclaimer
 -Installed on the gateway

2. Bind View BV-Control
 -Query base administrator
 -Policy enforcement
 -Jr. Admin permission control
 -Security scan and enforcement
 -Performance tuning

Is there a better set of tools out there?  What pro/con you all had with these tools? 

This is where you all pull out your big sticks and tell me to read the archive or the 
FAQ (Not done with it but reading) use send mail, blah blah blah.

David Gibbons
Sr. Network Engineer
Caliber Collision Center
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Robert Moir]

> -Original Message-
> From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 17 January 2002 20:22
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed 
> and running at a particular machine, can use an active 
> connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to 
> have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of 
> strong authentication that could be used to enforce the 
> security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because 
> an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used 
> by whatever process running on that machine.

Ok. I'm logged on at my machine and I'm stupid enough to run "click here to
see britney spears naked, really, not a virus
honest.exe.jpg.pif.htm.bat.com"

It uses your elite security hole to send lots of emails via notepad.
It sends email via the VBA scripting interface
It installs it's own SMTP engine (like Happy99/SKA did) and sends  it's damn
email it's damn self.

What's the difference? What's the point?

-- 
This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information
that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or
unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited.

The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or
policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Server Upgrade

[Garrish, Robert B.]

Dear Jeff,

I think that the "jump" in your plan is too much in one step.
When we swapped out our hardware for bigger and better, we stopped
the Exchange Services and disabled them, rebooted, then performed a special
tape backup.  Took the (old) Exchange Server off of the network.  Performed
a tape restore onto a generic NT 4.0 build.  Then, rebooted the (new)
Exchange Server and performed an NT 4.0 install upon boot up.  This way, we
used all of the old files (even the operating system) and installed the
different drivers as appropriate.


Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 01:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server Upgrade


I am upgrading our current e-mail system hardware, for many many different
reasons the new system has to have the same system name as the old system.
This is usually not a problem, I just do it as a Disaster Recovery and
restore exchange to the new H/W, however I am trying to through my own
wrench into the equation this time.
Current Config is:
NT 4.0 w/sp6a
Exch 5.5 w/sp4

Purposed new configuration:
Win 2000svr (member) w/sp2
Exch 5.5 w/sp4

I have not been able to find any documentation on this, and didn't know if
any of you had tried this.  I am doing this getting ready for our AD
conversion and would like all my member servers to be 2000 as prior to going
to AD.  I can't upgrade the current server to 2000 as it is a BDC (I
know...not my choice).  I know I could always do the new one as a NT4.0
member then do a OS upgrade, however I am very wary of doing OS upgrades, I
prefer to have them done as fresh installs.
TIA
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Rogerio Silva]

It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed 
and running at a particular machine, can use an active connection
from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to have free access
to the user's mailbox. So, any form of strong authentication that
could be used to enforce the security of access to the Exchange Server
is useless, because an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be
largely used by whatever process running on that machine.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Error open pub folders with OWA

[Chris Levis]

Got it... Thx  =)

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error open pub folders with OWA


Q168661



-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error open pub folders with OWA


Ex 5.5 SP3, IIS 5.

When using Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to render folder.  There are no
published folders."

What did I forget to do?

TIA


 __
   Chris Levis 
   Applied Geographics, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   617-292-7125 x112
   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL

[Brian Ko]

If you put 123 or &*$#, those mailboxes will show at the top.  If you
start display name with ZZ , those will show at the end.

Or you could implment Address Book Views to be more flexible.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL


OK. It's a stupid question, but I can't seem to find an answer. I've
been asked to create about 200 new mailboxes that will begin with a
number. The boss INSISTS on this naming scheme. When I pointed out to
him that these 200 mailboxes would appear first in the Global Address
Book, he was equally insistent that they appear last.

So there it is. Is there any way to configure things so that the
numbered mailboxes will appear at the end of the Global Address List
instead of the top? I've looked in all the obvious places - at least the
ones I can think of.

I'm on Exchange 5.5 and users are on Outlook 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA

[Chris Scharff]

Well, there we are then.


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA
> 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA
> 
> 
> To publish folders?
> 
> Chris
> -- 
> Chris Scharff
> Senior Sales Engineer
> MessageOne
> If you can't measure, you can't manage! 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA
> > 
> > 
> > When use Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read
> > rights for Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to 
> > render folder.  There are no published folders."
> > 
> > What did I forget to do?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA

[Chris Levis]

Yes.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA


To publish folders?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA
> 
> 
> When use Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read 
> rights for Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to 
> render folder.  There are no published folders."
> 
> What did I forget to do?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL

[Chris Scharff]

Change the display name of all other mailboxes to " Username" or
have him write an RFC proposal to change the order of asciibetical?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL
> 
> 
> OK. It's a stupid question, but I can't seem to find an 
> answer. I've been asked to create about 200 new mailboxes 
> that will begin with a number. The boss INSISTS on this 
> naming scheme. When I pointed out to him that these 200 
> mailboxes would appear first in the Global Address Book, he 
> was equally insistent that they appear last.
> 
> So there it is. Is there any way to configure things so that 
> the numbered mailboxes will appear at the end of the Global 
> Address List instead of the top? I've looked in all the 
> obvious places - at least the ones I can think of.
> 
> I'm on Exchange 5.5 and users are on Outlook 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Andy David]

Cuz you can share holes silly!


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable


How is this a critical hole from a security point of view exactly?

> -Original Message-
> From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> An Outlook session to the Exchange Server is normally 
> shareable, so any other program can use it, having an open 
> access to the user's mailbox. Since this is a critical hole 
> from a security point of view, is there any way to disable 
> this "feature" ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA

[Chris Scharff]

To publish folders?

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA
> 
> 
> When use Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read 
> rights for Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to 
> render folder.  There are no published folders."
> 
> What did I forget to do?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Error open pub folders with OWA

[Andy David]

Q168661



-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error open pub folders with OWA


Ex 5.5 SP3, IIS 5.

When using Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to render folder.  There are no
published folders."

What did I forget to do?

TIA


 __
   Chris Levis 
   Applied Geographics, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   617-292-7125 x112
   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive Mails

[Andy David]

There goes that New Year's Resolution!


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive Mails


Yes.

> -Original Message-
> From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Archive Mails
> 
> 
> does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes? 
> my server exchange 2000 w/sp2.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook session sharing disable

[Chris Scharff]

How is this a critical hole from a security point of view exactly?

> -Original Message-
> From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook session sharing disable
> 
> 
> An Outlook session to the Exchange Server is normally 
> shareable, so any other program can use it, having an open 
> access to the user's mailbox. Since this is a critical hole 
> from a security point of view, is there any way to disable 
> this "feature" ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backing up the Information Store

[Leeann McCallum]

You need an exchange aware backup solution.  Plenty around.


-Original Message-
From: Richard S Kahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing up the Information Store


Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite
ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files
folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files
(and a number of other .log files) are skipped as they are unable to be
opened. Consequently there are no entries to be found in the Information
store. I am using Administrator priviledges. I am probably doing something
stupidly wrong, what is it?

Many thanks,

Richard S Kahan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA

[Drewski]

you forgot to tell us what version of the OS, Exchange, IIS, and OWA you're
running, for a start...

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
"Perhaps the greatest social service that can be rendered by anybody to the
country and to mankind is to bring up a family." - George Bernard Shaw

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Levis
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Unable to Render Folder" in OWA


When use Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to render folder.  There are no
published folders."

What did I forget to do?

TIA


__
   Chris Levis
   Applied Geographics, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   617-292-7125 x112


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backing up the Information Store

[Drewski]

You need to be running an Online, Exchange Aware backup.  NTBackup on the
exchange box will be able to do this for you.  Read the Disaster Recovery White
papers, and the FAQ.  Read it.  Love it.  Live it.

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
"I got a simple rule about everybody. If you don't treat me right, shame on
you." - Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard S Kahan
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing up the Information Store


Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite
ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files
folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files
(and a number of other .log files) are skipped as they are unable to be
opened. Consequently there are no entries to be found in the Information
store.
I am using Administrator priviledges. I am probably doing something
stupidly wrong, what is it?

Many thanks,

Richard S Kahan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive Mails

[Chris Scharff]

Yes.

> -Original Message-
> From: JR Velasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Archive Mails
> 
> 
> does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes? 
> my server exchange 2000 w/sp2.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backing up the Information Store

[Andy David]

Quit doing a flat file backup.


-Original Message-
From: Richard S Kahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing up the Information Store


Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite
ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files
folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files
(and a number of other .log files) are skipped as they are unable to be
opened. Consequently there are no entries to be found in the Information
store.
I am using Administrator priviledges. I am probably doing something
stupidly wrong, what is it?

Many thanks,

Richard S Kahan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - Encryption

[Chris Scharff]

Explanation: RPC is cool.

> -Original Message-
> From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
> 
> 
> I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. 
> We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
> talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if 
> encryption is desired between the client and server.
> 
> Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
> form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
> inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
> within the packets on the LAN.
> 
> Can someone please explain.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Bill 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Numbered Mailboxes in the GAL

[exchangeuser]

OK. It's a stupid question, but I can't seem to find an answer. I've been
asked to create about 200 new mailboxes that will begin with a number. The
boss INSISTS on this naming scheme. When I pointed out to him that these
200 mailboxes would appear first in the Global Address Book, he was
equally insistent that they appear last.

So there it is. Is there any way to configure things so that the numbered
mailboxes will appear at the end of the Global Address List instead of the
top? I've looked in all the obvious places - at least the ones I can think
of.

I'm on Exchange 5.5 and users are on Outlook 2000.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Error open pub folders with OWA

[Chris Levis]

Ex 5.5 SP3, IIS 5.

When using Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to render folder.  There are no
published folders."

What did I forget to do?

TIA


 __
   Chris Levis 
   Applied Geographics, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   617-292-7125 x112
   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems with Web-Based Conference Scheduler

[Burhan]

Hi. I have Exchange 2000 SP2 running with the Conferencing Server add-on
(SP2).

My clients cannot schedule meetings with the web-based scheduler because
they cannot drop-down a list of conferencing resources (Virtual Rooms
List).

Also, when they attempt to cancel or delete a conference from the listing
using the X button, they receive another error stating that the SMTP
e-mail address of a resource cannot be found.

Everything else seems to work OK from inside Outlook 2000 - including
scheduling, joining and deleteing conferences.

We currently use data only conferences in a site of 10,000 users with only
about ten users testing the Conferencing feature.

This is a site migrated from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 - anyone with
any queries about a migration can ask - I might be able to help, as we had
our own problem that dragged on with Microsoft Product support for over a
month!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RV: Performance migrating mailboxes

[Gonzalez Gonzalez, Jose J]

Hi all,
 
Anyone know what is the performance in Gb/hr when migrating mailboxes from
Exch.5.5 to Exch.2000 using either "Sp1/Sp2 Exchange Migration
Tool-Migration Wizard" method or the "Active Directory Connector + Migration
Wizard" method, if exists any difference between them.
 
Thanks in advance
 ~~~
  J. Javier Gonzalez, mcse 2000/nt4 mcp+i
  Consultor Tecnológico
  UNISYS 
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ~~~
 El contenido de esta comunicación debe considerarse privado y confidencial.
Si Vd. no es el destinatario y la hubiere recibido por error, se le informa
que cualquier divulgación, distribución o copia de esta comunicación está
estrictamente prohibida; por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente
y elimine este mensaje.
 
 This Email is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not use the contents nor disclose
them to any other person and you should immediately notify the sender and
delete the Email.
 ~~~ 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Performance migrating mailboxes

[Gonzalez Gonzalez, Jose J]

Hi all,

Anyone know what's the performance in Gb/hr when migrating mailboxes from
Exch.5.5 to Exch.2000 using either "Sp1/Sp2 Exchange Migration
Tool-Migration Wizard" method or the "Active Directory Connector + Migration
Wizard" method, if exists any difference between them.

Thanks in advance
~~~
 J. Javier Gonzalez, mcse 2000/nt4 mcp+i
 Consultor Tecnológico
 UNISYS 
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~
El contenido de esta comunicación debe considerarse privado y confidencial.
Si Vd. no es el destinatario y la hubiere recibido por error, se le informa
que cualquier divulgación, distribución o copia de esta comunicación está
estrictamente prohibida; por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente
y elimine este mensaje.

This Email is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should not use the contents nor disclose
them to any other person and you should immediately notify the sender and
delete the Email.
~~~ 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Unable to Render Folder" in OWA

[Chris Levis]

When use Public Access in OWA to view public folders (Read rights for
Everyone on those), I get an error:  "Unable to render folder.  There are no
published folders."

What did I forget to do?

TIA


__
   Chris Levis 
   Applied Geographics, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   617-292-7125 x112
   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook session sharing disable

[Rogerio Silva]

An Outlook session to the Exchange Server is normally shareable,
so any other program can use it, having an open access to the user's
mailbox. Since this is a critical hole from a security point of view,
is there any way to disable this "feature" ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Archive Mails

[JR Velasco]

does anyone knows why archives email does not work sometimes? my server
exchange 2000 w/sp2.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Backing up the Information Store

[Richard S Kahan]

Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.
I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite
ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files
folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files
(and a number of other .log files) are skipped as they are unable to be
opened. Consequently there are no entries to be found in the Information
store.
I am using Administrator priviledges. I am probably doing something
stupidly wrong, what is it?

Many thanks,

Richard S Kahan

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Off Topic - Encryption

[William Rettig]

I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
We are using Exchange 5.5.  Any documentation I've seen 
talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption
is desired between the client and server.

Here is what puzzles us.  We have not selected any 
form of encryption. However, when we read email from the
inbox we notice that there is no human readable text
within the packets on the LAN.

Can someone please explain.

Thank you,

Bill 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Host Unreachable and Network Error During Host Resolution

[Tony Hlabse]

These are valid error messages. I would also indicate the email address to 
your help desk so they can determine if the domain name of the email is 
valid. You get them every fours hours because that is how often Exchange 
trys to resend the msgs by default for a 48 hour period.



>
>Dear DL Members,
>
>   On any given business day, we have e-mail messages queued at the
>Internet Mail Service (Outbound messages awaiting delivery).
>   Normally, there is one of two "error categories" associated with
>these queued up e-mail messages.
>
>01.  Host Unreachable
>02.  Network Error During Host Resolution
>
>   The following is a document that I would like to give to Wawa's Help
>Desk, to help them with handling these sorts of calls (our End Users 
>receive
>notification messages once every 4 hours, up till 48 hours).
>   I am not sure that I fully understand these two error categories.
>   Let me know what you think about the document below.
>
>
>=
>
>E-mail messages queued at the Internet Mail Service.
>
>   This document has been created to assist the PC Hotline with
>resolving issues when an e-mail message is queued at the Internet Mail
>Service on an Exchange Server.
>
>01.  Open a call in the Applix Database.
>
>02.  Ask the Outlook User to forward the "Notification" message to the PC
>Hotline.
>
>03.  Forward the "Notification" message to the NT Team.
>   Include the Call Number in the subject line.
>
>04.  The NT Team needs to check the Outbound Queues and find the "error
>category".
>   Host Unreachable
>   MX Record is known by Wawa's ISP (Verio).
>   Fire Wall (of Intended Recipient) may be down.
>   IMC Service (of Intended Recipient) may be stopped (due to
>virus, etc.).
>   Intended Recipient's Personal ISP may be experiencing
>problems.
>
>   Network Error During Host Resolution
>   MX Record is unknown by Wawa's ISP (Verio).
>   Intended Recipient's Start of Authority (SOA) is not
>reaching Wawa's ISP (Verio).
>
>05.  The NT Team needs to report back to the PC Hotline.
>
>06.  The PC Hotline contacts the Outlook User, providing the appropriate
>information.
>
>
>Test One
>
>Ask the Intended Recipient to send a test e-mail message to the Original
>Sender, and see if the Original Sender can successfully reply to the
>message, without the reply getting queued up.
>
>If the test fails, have the Original Sender contact the Intended Recipient
>with the following information, based on the appropriate error category.
>
>
>Host Unreachable
>
>A.  The Intended Recipient should contact his or her "Help Desk" and ask
>them to bring the following information to the attention of the System
>Administrator.
>
>B.  Inquire about any problems related to their e-mail servers or Fire 
>Wall.
>
>
>Network Error During Host Resolution
>
>A.  The Intended Recipient should contact his or her "Help Desk" and ask
>them to bring the following information to the attention of the System
>Administrator.
>
>B.  Wawa's ISP, Verio, does not have an MX Record for the Intended
>Recipient's e-mail domain in their DNS tables.
>
>C.  Please check with your Start of Authority (SOA) to make sure that they
>are properly replicating your MX Record across the Internet.
>
>=
>
>
>Rob Garrish
>Exchange Administrator
>Wawa Inc.
>610-558-8371
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Host Unreachable and Network Error During Host Resolution

[Garrish, Robert B.]

Dear DL Members,

On any given business day, we have e-mail messages queued at the
Internet Mail Service (Outbound messages awaiting delivery).
Normally, there is one of two "error categories" associated with
these queued up e-mail messages.

01.  Host Unreachable
02.  Network Error During Host Resolution

The following is a document that I would like to give to Wawa's Help
Desk, to help them with handling these sorts of calls (our End Users receive
notification messages once every 4 hours, up till 48 hours).
I am not sure that I fully understand these two error categories.
Let me know what you think about the document below.


=

E-mail messages queued at the Internet Mail Service.

This document has been created to assist the PC Hotline with
resolving issues when an e-mail message is queued at the Internet Mail
Service on an Exchange Server.

01.  Open a call in the Applix Database.

02.  Ask the Outlook User to forward the "Notification" message to the PC
Hotline.

03.  Forward the "Notification" message to the NT Team.
Include the Call Number in the subject line.

04.  The NT Team needs to check the Outbound Queues and find the "error
category".
Host Unreachable
MX Record is known by Wawa's ISP (Verio).
Fire Wall (of Intended Recipient) may be down.
IMC Service (of Intended Recipient) may be stopped (due to
virus, etc.).
Intended Recipient's Personal ISP may be experiencing
problems.

Network Error During Host Resolution
MX Record is unknown by Wawa's ISP (Verio).
Intended Recipient's Start of Authority (SOA) is not
reaching Wawa's ISP (Verio).

05.  The NT Team needs to report back to the PC Hotline.

06.  The PC Hotline contacts the Outlook User, providing the appropriate
information.


Test One

Ask the Intended Recipient to send a test e-mail message to the Original
Sender, and see if the Original Sender can successfully reply to the
message, without the reply getting queued up.

If the test fails, have the Original Sender contact the Intended Recipient
with the following information, based on the appropriate error category.


Host Unreachable

A.  The Intended Recipient should contact his or her "Help Desk" and ask
them to bring the following information to the attention of the System
Administrator.

B.  Inquire about any problems related to their e-mail servers or Fire Wall.


Network Error During Host Resolution

A.  The Intended Recipient should contact his or her "Help Desk" and ask
them to bring the following information to the attention of the System
Administrator. 

B.  Wawa's ISP, Verio, does not have an MX Record for the Intended
Recipient's e-mail domain in their DNS tables.

C.  Please check with your Start of Authority (SOA) to make sure that they
are properly replicating your MX Record across the Internet.

=


Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM Deletion

[Leeann McCallum]

But with Q224493, it suggests you run ISSCAN to scan for text/attachments
that are already in the IS.  If you've been spammed and have messages from
xxx to breakfast in your MTA that suggests that they haven't yet reached
your IS, so wouldn't it be more appropriate to try and remove them before
they hit they do? 

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 8:06 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Isn't Q224493 simpler? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: SPAM Deletion
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


OK thanks.  Simple is good.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


In essence yes.  It may be basic but it works!

PBB


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Thanks for your answer.  Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the MTA,
open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find
File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string?

Harold

-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Ouch!

Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item
count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account.

Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the
spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue.

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4

-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM Deletion


We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely,
that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue.  There are approximately
25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages.  Are there
any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon
author or subject to delete them from the queues.  Otherwise, it will be a
pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to
stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway.

Thanks,

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook Calendar Problems

[Bowles, John L.]

First things first.  What version is your Outlook client?  I'm not talking
about Outlook 2K.  I'm talking the exact version number?

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar Problems


Perhaps try running outlook with /cleanfreebusy switch.
Also, is the user running an OST?

-Original Message-
From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 3:01 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar Problems


These are recurring meeting occurrences. The assistant prints off a copy the
night before And then the next morning the meeting is gone.

Libi Maniace
Database Administrator
BEI Precision  Sensors & Space Div
1100 Murphy Drive
Maumelle, AR  72113
(501) 851-4000

 -Original Message-
From:   Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, January 17, 2002 07:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook Calendar Problems

Maybe somebody is marking some meetings 'Private'. 

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions




-Original Message-
From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Calendar Problems



I have a user who shares her calendar with the General Managers Direct
Reports. Each user can view the calendar for meetings and such. But now 
sometimes meetings just disappear off the calendar. Can someone help me as
to what would be causing this? 

Thanks

Libi


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Server Upgrade

[Exchange-List]

I am upgrading our current e-mail system hardware, for many many different
reasons the new system has to have the same system name as the old system.
This is usually not a problem, I just do it as a Disaster Recovery and
restore exchange to the new H/W, however I am trying to through my own
wrench into the equation this time.
Current Config is:
NT 4.0 w/sp6a
Exch 5.5 w/sp4

Purposed new configuration:
Win 2000svr (member) w/sp2
Exch 5.5 w/sp4

I have not been able to find any documentation on this, and didn't know if
any of you had tried this.  I am doing this getting ready for our AD
conversion and would like all my member servers to be 2000 as prior to going
to AD.  I can't upgrade the current server to 2000 as it is a BDC (I
know...not my choice).  I know I could always do the new one as a NT4.0
member then do a OS upgrade, however I am very wary of doing OS upgrades, I
prefer to have them done as fresh installs.
TIA
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM Deletion

[Tom Meunier]

Isn't Q224493 simpler? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: SPAM Deletion
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


OK thanks.  Simple is good.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


In essence yes.  It may be basic but it works!

PBB


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Thanks for your answer.  Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the
MTA, open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then
run Find File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against
that string?

Harold

-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Ouch!

Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item
count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account.

Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in
the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue.

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion


Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4

-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM Deletion


We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or
purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue.  There are
approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate
messages.  Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go
after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the
queues.  Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up.
In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our
TrendMicro gateway.

Thanks,

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]