Multiple updaters for a DL
In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with "User" privileges, to the "Permissions" page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself reasonably intelligent. I really do want to understand this stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
You do mean SR1... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Levis Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited MS Office SP2 requires SP1... > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) > > > -Original Message- > From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > My thoughts exactly. > > Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? > > But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my > knowledge - cumulative. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > So you think the release notes are lying? > > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: sp3 revisited > > > ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can > someone help > me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative > so I can hop > from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms > state that > they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' > thanks Rob > > Support Analyst > T.K.C. Sales Ltd. > 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate > Keynsham > Bristol > BS31 1TZ > UK > Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 > > > > intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > -- > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual > or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > == > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Meeting requests between two Exchange 5.5 Organizations
Be sure the sender has the recipient's entry in Contacts or the address book set to use rich text. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hein, Arlyn Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Meeting requests between two Exchange 5.5 Organizations Whan a user in Exchange Organization A send a meeting request to users in her Exchange Organization and Exchange Organization B, the users in her Exchange Organization receive the meeting request without any problem, but the users in Exchange Organization B receive it as a regular email message with "MIME garbage" contained in the message - see a snip of it below. Not certain if this is true every time, but the instances I've seen are when she sends on behalf of the Executuves she supports. Any ideas? Example of "MIME garbage --_=_NextPart_000_01C25905.AB4CA270 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+Ig8UAQaQCAAEAAABAAEAAQeQBgAI5AQAAADoAAEIgAcAHgAA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatically archiving ALL sent messages
Search for TechNet for "Exchange 2000 message journaling". It keeps all messages both sent and received. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatically archiving ALL sent messages I have a customer using X2K, who wants to keep a copy of all sent messages from each user. Is there a way to send ALL sent messages automatically to a central mailbox? The idea is not to use a Client side rule so the users have no way NOT to archive the email. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy
Post the full NDR. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com from our org through a VPN connection. We just migrated about 20 users from one remote office onto our exchange server. (dumped their emails into a PST and imported them into a new account at xxx.com) We put [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their primary SMTP address, but added [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can still receive emails to the old address for a while. Well now people that send them emails are getting a bounce message with the following.. X-Display-Name: lastname, firstname - MOVED. I tried to create a new recipient policy but I don't know if I'm doing it right. Anyone have a step by step on how to do this by chance? I'm going through the help files now but thought I would ask the experts here. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange aware ADUC without ESM?
The supported way is to install the system tools. If you want to experiment with which files you don't really need, then be my guest. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange aware ADUC without ESM? Is there is a way to install the Exchange aware version of ADUC, but not the rest of the Win2k adminpak or Exchange System Manager? We are going to install ADUC on our help desk staff's computers, but we'd prefer not to "pollute" their PCs with stuff they don't need. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 HA
More importantly, it's very hard to determine if it does work. You have to fail it over to tell, and do it enough times to be sure that it'll really work when you do need it. That is, it might work five times you test it, and then when the real event occurs, the database is corrupt. In addition, it's hard to test because putting together a test infrastructure is itself very costly. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karen McLaughlin Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View is confirmed replication between sites. The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. Cheers, Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with > its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing > this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is > unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no > product out there today that can make this work consistently - they > may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this > type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go. > > Make sense? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it > does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > - Karen > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't > > do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management is > > concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out > > there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is not good > > enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > TIA, > > Karen > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Features
Not granular enough for you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Features you cannot even set it on an administrative group basis. OOF and autoreply capability is set at the Org level. yeah, it's stoopid. -Original Message- From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Forum Conversation: Exchange 2000 Features Subject: Exchange 2000 Features Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on a "per mailbox" basis? I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it mentioned. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: display names during conversion
No way. First, moving the mailbox doesn't affect the display name. That would be established when you ran the connection agreement. Second, ADC doesn't talk to the NT SAM. My guess is that the display name got populated the way you see it from when you ran the ADMT, and your connection agreement hasn't written over it. Are you sure your recipient connection agreement is working properly? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Beeler Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: display names during conversion So we've finally started our migration to 2000. The environment: w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode. a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k. After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox from 5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes. Instead of taking the 5.5 display name, it is taking the NT4.0 User Manager Full Name field and using that for the display name. I have been referencing q269843 and using ADSI edit to try and solve the problem. It tells you to modify the "selected CA", however, I'm not sure if there are additional ones that I need to. There is the one that I created, and modified, but there are also two others, namely the CN=Default ADC Policy and the CN=Config CA_NYC_NYEXCH03 (the CA created during install). Does anyone know which CA or CA's I need to modify via ADSI Edit, or does someone have another solution to this? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
So how much time did you spend looking up that useless bit of trivia?! I would have told you the correct answer had you asked. In fact, I think I posted it recently. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Just looked it up. SP3. You're right. I was thinking SP2 as well, but it was cumulative. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: sp3 revisited Just one. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesear
RE: Any experiences with Allocity Live!Ex?
Saw the sales presentation. Seems the company was started by a professor I had at Berkeley. At the time I saw the presentation, however, it wasn't in a form that would work for my customer's needs yet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Swynk Exchange Support List Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any experiences with Allocity Live!Ex? Boss got a flyer in the mail. Is talking to sales rep. Wants me to produce an opinion from experienced E2K Admin(s). Anyone? www.allocity.com __ Paul E. Pelfrey, MCSE, MCP, A+ Messaging Engineer, Cardinal Health, Inc. 7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, OH 43017 :614.757.3777Cell: 614.374.4088 :[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatically archiving ALL sent messages
Yes you can do this on the server. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatically archiving ALL sent messages I have a customer using X2K, who wants to keep a copy of all sent messages from each user. Is there a way to send ALL sent messages automatically to a central mailbox? The idea is not to use a Client side rule so the users have no way NOT to archive the email. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automatically archiving ALL sent messages
I have a customer using X2K, who wants to keep a copy of all sent messages from each user. Is there a way to send ALL sent messages automatically to a central mailbox? The idea is not to use a Client side rule so the users have no way NOT to archive the email. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Tell him there won't be any redundency when he takes the HD. Before fire/flood can happen, you'll probably lose your RAID 5. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
I figured that was the reason. Free is good! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Well, for one, you're not paying for any version of Windows... -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only runs on a Linux box. Or is this an inexpensive way to run the software. Will have to look at it I guess. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Put a Linux box in front of your mail server and use this: http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/more_information.plex http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/PerlMx_v2.1.pdf Optional Mail Filters Mail Statistics PerlMx::MailStats gathers statistics about processed messages, including sender, recipient, mail frequency, etc. PerlMx includes a utility to produce summary data in a portable format. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
Well, for one, you're not paying for any version of Windows... -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only runs on a Linux box. Or is this an inexpensive way to run the software. Will have to look at it I guess. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Put a Linux box in front of your mail server and use this: http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/more_information.plex http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/PerlMx_v2.1.pdf Optional Mail Filters Mail Statistics PerlMx::MailStats gathers statistics about processed messages, including sender, recipient, mail frequency, etc. PerlMx includes a utility to produce summary data in a portable format. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Hell just burn the business down after you upped the insurance to 5 million dollars and retire. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Do it for free. Throw 'em in your bank's night drop. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 05:55 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Backup Hardware > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > Ah we're a small business. Not cost effective. I looked into > it once and it would eat the majority of my budget > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > > Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure. > > For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and > someone else picks it up? > > For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to > pay for proper offsite storage services. It's their data, so > they should want to be protecting it as best they can. > > MP > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of > the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. > > I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their > offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a > long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with > them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work > does he put it back in or does he take one out and put > another in. This is too funny. > > Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can > someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" > > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup Hardware > > > My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their > servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config > home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to > back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive > solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the > worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and > temperature changes that the hard drives would have to > withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why > this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from > other admins to help convince him. > > Thanks > Chris Hummert > > > Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance > Webmaster for Noghri.net > http://www.noghri.net > MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 > > Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life > exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried > to contacts us." > > - from Calvin and Hobbes > > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only runs on a Linux box. Or is this an inexpensive way to run the software. Will have to look at it I guess. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring Put a Linux box in front of your mail server and use this: http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/more_information.plex http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/PerlMx_v2.1.pdf Optional Mail Filters Mail Statistics PerlMx::MailStats gathers statistics about processed messages, including sender, recipient, mail frequency, etc. PerlMx includes a utility to produce summary data in a portable format. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Ok any other reason I can throw in there besides the Vibration/Temperature RAID box dying? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Now taking tapes home is normal. Depending on your backup schedule most companies do this on a weekly bases. Bye the way taking one drive home does no good at all. Think of it this way. Lets say the RAID box catches fire/blows up. Do you really think one drive will allow a full rebuild. I don't think so. Tell your Boss that his friend is an idiot. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
What I meant to say taking tapes offsite is normal. Companies that have one employee take them home. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Now taking tapes home is normal. Depending on your backup schedule most companies do this on a weekly bases. Bye the way taking one drive home does no good at all. Think of it this way. Lets say the RAID box catches fire/blows up. Do you really think one drive will allow a full rebuild. I don't think so. Tell your Boss that his friend is an idiot. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Do it for free. Throw 'em in your bank's night drop. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 05:55 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Backup Hardware > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > Ah we're a small business. Not cost effective. I looked into > it once and it would eat the majority of my budget > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > > Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure. > > For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and > someone else picks it up? > > For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to > pay for proper offsite storage services. It's their data, so > they should want to be protecting it as best they can. > > MP > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of > the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. > > I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their > offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Hardware > > > What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a > long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with > them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work > does he put it back in or does he take one out and put > another in. This is too funny. > > Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can > someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" > > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup Hardware > > > My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their > servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config > home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to > back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive > solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the > worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and > temperature changes that the hard drives would have to > withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why > this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from > other admins to help convince him. > > Thanks > Chris Hummert > > > Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance > Webmaster for Noghri.net > http://www.noghri.net > MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 > > Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life > exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried > to contacts us." > > - from Calvin and Hobbes > > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Ah we're a small business. Not cost effective. I looked into it once and it would eat the majority of my budget -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure. For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and someone else picks it up? For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to pay for proper offsite storage services. It's their data, so they should want to be protecting it as best they can. MP -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Backup Hardware
Now taking tapes home is normal. Depending on your backup schedule most companies do this on a weekly bases. Bye the way taking one drive home does no good at all. Think of it this way. Lets say the RAID box catches fire/blows up. Do you really think one drive will allow a full rebuild. I don't think so. Tell your Boss that his friend is an idiot. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure. For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and someone else picks it up? For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to pay for proper offsite storage services. It's their data, so they should want to be protecting it as best they can. MP -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Not to mention, how many backups can you get on one drive? A couple, maybe 3? That's not a lot of old backups to have around. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is pretty short from all that rebuilding. I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case of a fire. Any problem with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and put another in. This is too funny. Almost as good as " Hey my System Idle process is at 99% can someone tell how to make it stop taking up all the CPU cycles?" -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
Put a Linux box in front of your mail server and use this: http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/more_information.plex http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/PerlMx_v2.1.pdf Optional Mail Filters Mail Statistics PerlMx::MailStats gathers statistics about processed messages, including sender, recipient, mail frequency, etc. PerlMx includes a utility to produce summary data in a portable format. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Too many negative points to mention them all really... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup Hardware
My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us." - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy
Yyy.com. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy When getting the bounce message which email address is the sender using? yyy.com or xxx.com -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com from our org through a VPN connection. We just migrated about 20 users from one remote office onto our exchange server. (dumped their emails into a PST and imported them into a new account at xxx.com) We put [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their primary SMTP address, but added [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can still receive emails to the old address for a while. Well now people that send them emails are getting a bounce message with the following.. X-Display-Name: lastname, firstname - MOVED. I tried to create a new recipient policy but I don't know if I'm doing it right. Anyone have a step by step on how to do this by chance? I'm going through the help files now but thought I would ask the experts here. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
tracking.zip at http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm Not nearly as swell as Promodag, but it's free ;-) Hunter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange aware ADUC without ESM?
Is there is a way to install the Exchange aware version of ADUC, but not the rest of the Win2k adminpak or Exchange System Manager? We are going to install ADUC on our help desk staff's computers, but we'd prefer not to "pollute" their PCs with stuff they don't need. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
Actually Double Take works for replication, however it is not High Availability Solution as the developer NSI or Sunbelt promote it on their site. But if you just want the data replicated then if you tweek it (and not according to their support way's soultion) , it does the job. Their other solution Geo Cluster is so damn expensive that we decided it is not worth it. - Original Message - From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:28 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that > it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > - Karen > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it > > nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management > > is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software > > is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > > not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > TIA, > > Karen > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 HA
bad experiences then? -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA um. No. - Original Message - From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:34 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any good experience with it? They have been around for a long time too. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit. My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution which used snapshot (Exchange aware) backups and replicated diffs, would probably be ideal in terms of bandwidth optimization... Recovery from failover would be my biggest concern. How do the changes get replicated back quickly in order to bring the production server back online and how automated will the process be. Another issue which weighs on my mind somewhat is testing... How easy is it to test failover, and how much expertise is required to make sure it goes smoothly when the %^&# hits the fan. There are also some issues around message routing in the event of a partial failover: updating of DNS and IP routing, client configuration and the like. Short answer: I don't think any full WAN replication solutions are as straightforward or easy to implement as the vendors might like you to think. Not that they aren't an appropriate solution for some companies, but sunglasses are required during evaluation in order to not be blinded by the sunshine and light the vendors espouse. And like Missy, I like the Marathon Technologies solutions if for no reason other than they've been at this game a lot longer than the other players and have earned a good reputation during that time. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. > The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC > SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based > on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" > process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View > is confirmed replication between sites. > > The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then > it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. > > Cheers, > Karen > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange > works with > > its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing > > this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is > > unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no > > product out there today that can make this work consistently - they > > may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this > > type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go. > > > > Make sense? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it > > does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > > > - Karen > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as > Exchange doesn't > > > do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > > > Missy > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. > Management is > > > concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out > > > there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > not good > > > enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > > > TIA, > > > Karen > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.co
RE: recommendation please
Praetor TumbleWeed GFI Mail Essentials you can find info on them on google. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Features
you cannot even set it on an administrative group basis. OOF and autoreply capability is set at the Org level. yeah, it's stoopid. -Original Message- From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Forum Conversation: Exchange 2000 Features Subject: Exchange 2000 Features Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on a "per mailbox" basis? I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it mentioned. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: recommendation please
Good point. - Original Message - From: "EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: recommendation please Or read the book Mien Kompf -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: recommendation please Google. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation please Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recommendation please We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recommendation please
Or read the book Mien Kompf -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: recommendation please Google. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation please Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recommendation please We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
um. No. - Original Message - From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:34 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any good experience with it? They have been around for a long time too. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit. My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution which used snapshot (Exchange aware) backups and replicated diffs, would probably be ideal in terms of bandwidth optimization... Recovery from failover would be my biggest concern. How do the changes get replicated back quickly in order to bring the production server back online and how automated will the process be. Another issue which weighs on my mind somewhat is testing... How easy is it to test failover, and how much expertise is required to make sure it goes smoothly when the %^&# hits the fan. There are also some issues around message routing in the event of a partial failover: updating of DNS and IP routing, client configuration and the like. Short answer: I don't think any full WAN replication solutions are as straightforward or easy to implement as the vendors might like you to think. Not that they aren't an appropriate solution for some companies, but sunglasses are required during evaluation in order to not be blinded by the sunshine and light the vendors espouse. And like Missy, I like the Marathon Technologies solutions if for no reason other than they've been at this game a lot longer than the other players and have earned a good reputation during that time. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. > The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC > SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based > on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" > process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View > is confirmed replication between sites. > > The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then > it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. > > Cheers, > Karen > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange > works with > > its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing > > this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is > > unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no > > product out there today that can make this work consistently - they > > may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this > > type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go. > > > > Make sense? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it > > does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > > > - Karen > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as > Exchange doesn't > > > do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > > > Missy > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. > Management is > > > concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out > > > there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > not good > > > enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > > > TIA, > > > Karen > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > ___
Re: recommendation please
Google. - Original Message - From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation please Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recommendation please We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recommendation please
Minesweeper: Start > Programs > Accessories > Games > Minesweeper and hit F1. Mimesweeper: http://www.mimesweeper.com might have something. > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 02:27 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: recommendation please > Subject: RE: recommendation please > > > Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. > > -Original Message- > From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: recommendation please > > > We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: recommendation please > > > Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter > the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are > use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for > viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the > soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and are intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are > NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for > delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised > that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, > dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this > e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct book ing in Outlook 2k+
I did not have to do that. But as someone suggested on this list I made sure that Exchange Event service would use a service account (which has Exchange full admin rights) instead of System. -Original Message- From: DWYER Brian (Powerlink) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct book ing in Outlook 2k+ Had a lot of problems getting AutoAccept from ExchangeCode.com to work with E2K and found the problem (with some help from this list) was with permissions. Had to give the eventconfig send as and receive as permissions on the resource mailboxes to make it work. -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 20 June 2002 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+ Importance: High Here's the story - Running Exchange 5.5 and users booking appointments using the AutoAccept script from ExchangeCode.com - and my life is great (except for those darn reoccurring meetings from time to time). Now we make the big move to E2K and since the autoaccecpt script "doesn't" (some reports say it does, some it doesn't - my testing says it doesn't) work on E2K... so I need to come up with a new method. The two methods are using the really old method of leaving an Outlook97 machine logged in with all the resource accounts setup to delegate their appointments to the one dedicated Outlook97 account -or- use the new fangled Outlook 2000/2002 direct booking feature (Direct Booking of Resource Without a Delegate Acct. [Q196534]) where in the client directly books their own meetings using Outlook. Ok, I test it (the new direct book method) and all seems ok. But... when I roll it out into production I have random users (dozens out of 4,000 users) that can not book onto a room because Outlook first declines the meeting because it says it is "busy" and then follows that up with an error of "Unable to save Free/Busy". So, in trouble shooting I have narrowed it down to the client by: * Happens even if the user logs into another machine with their account (without roaming profiles) * Deleting the free/busy file of the calendar (using the GW-Client) and then re-setting it up fixes it from time to time * Granting Owner rights also "sometimes" fixes the problem but not always Is there anyone out there that is using the new OL2000+ direct booking method and has it working correctly? Is there some way to get the exchangecode.com script working on E2K? david moore Chevron Phillips Chemical Messaging Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Important Message: [This transmission or any part of it is intended solely for the named addressee. It is confidential. The copying or distribution of this transmission or any information it contains, by anyone other than the addressee, is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please let us know by telephone 61 7 3860 2111 or by reply email to the sender. If you are not the named addressee, you must destroy the original transmission and its contents. You may not rely on electronically transmitted material unless the transmission is subsequently confirmed by fax or letter. Material transmitted to you should also be checked by reference to a hard copy of that material printed directly from our word processing system.] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 HA
hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any good experience with it? They have been around for a long time too. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit. My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution which used snapshot (Exchange aware) backups and replicated diffs, would probably be ideal in terms of bandwidth optimization... Recovery from failover would be my biggest concern. How do the changes get replicated back quickly in order to bring the production server back online and how automated will the process be. Another issue which weighs on my mind somewhat is testing... How easy is it to test failover, and how much expertise is required to make sure it goes smoothly when the %^&# hits the fan. There are also some issues around message routing in the event of a partial failover: updating of DNS and IP routing, client configuration and the like. Short answer: I don't think any full WAN replication solutions are as straightforward or easy to implement as the vendors might like you to think. Not that they aren't an appropriate solution for some companies, but sunglasses are required during evaluation in order to not be blinded by the sunshine and light the vendors espouse. And like Missy, I like the Marathon Technologies solutions if for no reason other than they've been at this game a lot longer than the other players and have earned a good reputation during that time. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. > The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC > SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based > on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" > process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View > is confirmed replication between sites. > > The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then > it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. > > Cheers, > Karen > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange > works with > > its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing > > this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is > > unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no > > product out there today that can make this work consistently - they > > may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this > > type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go. > > > > Make sense? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it > > does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > > > - Karen > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as > Exchange doesn't > > > do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > > > Missy > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. > Management is > > > concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out > > > there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > not good > > > enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > > > TIA, > > > Karen > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.a
RE: recommendation please
Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: recommendation please We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
I had copied my scheduled reports off the server and then onto a new server... the .pro extensions...worked like a champ. Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring yes we have upgraded and it is much better with a bunch of more options for reports. However, it removed all of my scheduled reports which was a huge hassle to recreate. But it's done now, and before I do another upgrade, I'll ask first what and how I need to back this stuff up. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also > evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide > the report format that management wanted. dave > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mailbox monitoring > > > Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all > service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there > 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a > count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that > more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. > > TIA. > > > > > Bill Lambert > Endoxy Healthcare > 847-941-9206 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
yes we have upgraded and it is much better with a bunch of more options for reports. However, it removed all of my scheduled reports which was a huge hassle to recreate. But it's done now, and before I do another upgrade, I'll ask first what and how I need to back this stuff up. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also > evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the > report format that management wanted. > dave > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mailbox monitoring > > > Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all > service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd > party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of > emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information > than simply a count would be a bonus to them. > > TIA. > > > > > Bill Lambert > Endoxy Healthcare > 847-941-9206 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
display names during conversion
So we've finally started our migration to 2000. The environment: w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode. a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k. After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox from 5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes. Instead of taking the 5.5 display name, it is taking the NT4.0 User Manager Full Name field and using that for the display name. I have been referencing q269843 and using ADSI edit to try and solve the problem. It tells you to modify the "selected CA", however, I'm not sure if there are additional ones that I need to. There is the one that I created, and modified, but there are also two others, namely the CN=Default ADC Policy and the CN=Config CA_NYC_NYEXCH03 (the CA created during install). Does anyone know which CA or CA's I need to modify via ADSI Edit, or does someone have another solution to this? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Except in Microsoft's Office Suites. Don't know about the new ones, but the old ones you could not jump to SP3 from SP1 without applying SP2. I remember doing this some years ago. Maybe 3 years. So maybe it was Office98??? IDR. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch
Did you re-apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation as what is on the Exchange Server? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch How about http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q322051? Was posted as a possible answer by an MS guy in the newsgroups to a similar sounding issue. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch > > > Hi there. > > I applied the January Windows 2000 security rollup package to > my laptop (W2K SP2) after which I could no longer connect to > the 5.5 SP4 Server using the Admin app. I uninstalled the > patch and Admin finds the server again. This happened on a > desktop I tried also. Obviously I want my laptop secured. I'm > presuming that W2K SP3 will produce the same results what > with it being a cumulative SP. The error is as follows: > > Microsoft Exchange Directory > ID no: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM > > I checked microsoft's site and found nothing. Any help would > be much appreciated. > > Pete. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMAP Contacts
There is if you use Ximian Evolution. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: IMAP Contacts > > > Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server > for a user through IMAP? I tried adding the contacts folder > as a subscribed IMAP folder but that just displayed it as an > email folder. > > Thanks, > Mike > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 HA
Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit. My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution which used snapshot (Exchange aware) backups and replicated diffs, would probably be ideal in terms of bandwidth optimization... Recovery from failover would be my biggest concern. How do the changes get replicated back quickly in order to bring the production server back online and how automated will the process be. Another issue which weighs on my mind somewhat is testing... How easy is it to test failover, and how much expertise is required to make sure it goes smoothly when the %^&# hits the fan. There are also some issues around message routing in the event of a partial failover: updating of DNS and IP routing, client configuration and the like. Short answer: I don't think any full WAN replication solutions are as straightforward or easy to implement as the vendors might like you to think. Not that they aren't an appropriate solution for some companies, but sunglasses are required during evaluation in order to not be blinded by the sunshine and light the vendors espouse. And like Missy, I like the Marathon Technologies solutions if for no reason other than they've been at this game a lot longer than the other players and have earned a good reputation during that time. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. > The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC > SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based > on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" > process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View > is confirmed replication between sites. > > The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then > it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. > > Cheers, > Karen > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange > works with > > its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing > > this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is > > unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no > > product out there today that can make this work consistently - they > > may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this > > type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go. > > > > Make sense? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it > > does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > > > - Karen > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as > Exchange doesn't > > > do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > > > Missy > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. > Management is > > > concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out > > > there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > not good > > > enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > > > TIA, > > > Karen > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesear
IMAP Contacts
Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server for a user through IMAP? I tried adding the contacts folder as a subscribed IMAP folder but that just displayed it as an email folder. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct book ing in Outlook 2k+
David, there is a fine article at www.exchangeadmin.com by Joseph Neubauer in this months issue (oct2002) entitled Using and Configuring Outlook Direct Booking, article number is 26184. john -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+ Follow up answer to this problem: It turns out to be a "bug" in the Outlook client. If you give additional rights beyond "Editor" to any DL or Default then the Outlook client will produce the below listed errors. So, you should only grant Editor and Author rights when using the direct booking methods. david -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 June, 2002 2:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+ Are all the clients running the same version of Outlook? SP1a I think fixed some Free/Busy issues. Try www.slipstick.com for more info. - Original Message - From: "Moore, David K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+ Here's the story - Running Exchange 5.5 and users booking appointments using the AutoAccept script from ExchangeCode.com - and my life is great (except for those darn reoccurring meetings from time to time). Now we make the big move to E2K and since the autoaccecpt script "doesn't" (some reports say it does, some it doesn't - my testing says it doesn't) work on E2K... so I need to come up with a new method. The two methods are using the really old method of leaving an Outlook97 machine logged in with all the resource accounts setup to delegate their appointments to the one dedicated Outlook97 account -or- use the new fangled Outlook 2000/2002 direct booking feature (Direct Booking of Resource Without a Delegate Acct. [Q196534]) where in the client directly books their own meetings using Outlook. Ok, I test it (the new direct book method) and all seems ok. But... when I roll it out into production I have random users (dozens out of 4,000 users) that can not book onto a room because Outlook first declines the meeting because it says it is "busy" and then follows that up with an error of "Unable to save Free/Busy". So, in trouble shooting I have narrowed it down to the client by: * Happens even if the user logs into another machine with their account (without roaming profiles) * Deleting the free/busy file of the calendar (using the GW-Client) and then re-setting it up fixes it from time to time * Granting Owner rights also "sometimes" fixes the problem but not always Is there anyone out there that is using the new OL2000+ direct booking method and has it working correctly? Is there some way to get the exchangecode.com script working on E2K? david moore Chevron Phillips Chemical Messaging Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
have you upgraded your Promodag to the newest version, 5? It is much faster spitting out reports than the previous. Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also > evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide > the report format that management wanted. dave > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mailbox monitoring > > > Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all > service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there > 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a > count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that > more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. > > TIA. > > > > > Bill Lambert > Endoxy Healthcare > 847-941-9206 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extracting permissions of all folder in EX5.5
Hello. I need to list all permissions applied to all folders in all mailboxes on Exchange 5.5 server. Can any one recommand on a tool or product to do it? Thanks, Mark. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either. There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also > evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the > report format that management wanted. > dave > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mailbox monitoring > > > Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all > service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd > party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of > emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information > than simply a count would be a bonus to them. > > TIA. > > > > > Bill Lambert > Endoxy Healthcare > 847-941-9206 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+
Follow up answer to this problem: It turns out to be a "bug" in the Outlook client. If you give additional rights beyond "Editor" to any DL or Default then the Outlook client will produce the below listed errors. So, you should only grant Editor and Author rights when using the direct booking methods. david -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 June, 2002 2:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+ Are all the clients running the same version of Outlook? SP1a I think fixed some Free/Busy issues. Try www.slipstick.com for more info. - Original Message - From: "Moore, David K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: From nirvana to hell in one upgrade - the tail of direct booking in Outlook 2k+ Here's the story - Running Exchange 5.5 and users booking appointments using the AutoAccept script from ExchangeCode.com - and my life is great (except for those darn reoccurring meetings from time to time). Now we make the big move to E2K and since the autoaccecpt script "doesn't" (some reports say it does, some it doesn't - my testing says it doesn't) work on E2K... so I need to come up with a new method. The two methods are using the really old method of leaving an Outlook97 machine logged in with all the resource accounts setup to delegate their appointments to the one dedicated Outlook97 account -or- use the new fangled Outlook 2000/2002 direct booking feature (Direct Booking of Resource Without a Delegate Acct. [Q196534]) where in the client directly books their own meetings using Outlook. Ok, I test it (the new direct book method) and all seems ok. But... when I roll it out into production I have random users (dozens out of 4,000 users) that can not book onto a room because Outlook first declines the meeting because it says it is "busy" and then follows that up with an error of "Unable to save Free/Busy". So, in trouble shooting I have narrowed it down to the client by: * Happens even if the user logs into another machine with their account (without roaming profiles) * Deleting the free/busy file of the calendar (using the GW-Client) and then re-setting it up fixes it from time to time * Granting Owner rights also "sometimes" fixes the problem but not always Is there anyone out there that is using the new OL2000+ direct booking method and has it working correctly? Is there some way to get the exchangecode.com script working on E2K? david moore Chevron Phillips Chemical Messaging Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
It's not worth the huge chunk of money they're asking, or tons of organizations would be happy with the solution. I've tested most of these solutions in the past, and the only one that made me even think about deployment was the solution from Marathon Technologies. Missy - Original Message - From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View is confirmed replication between sites. The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. Cheers, Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its > transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this > simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is > simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no product out there today > that can make this work consistently - they may work for a while, but I > would not want to tell anyone that this type of solution (geo-clustering) is > a great way to go. > > Make sense? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that > it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > - Karen > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it > > nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management > > is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software > > is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > > not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > TIA, > > Karen > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself. The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" process and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mirror View is confirmed replication between sites. The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it. Cheers, Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its > transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this > simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is > simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no product out there today > that can make this work consistently - they may work for a while, but I > would not want to tell anyone that this type of solution (geo-clustering) is > a great way to go. > > Make sense? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA > > > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that > it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? > > - Karen > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it > > nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management > > is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software > > is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > > not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > > > Any pointers appreciated. > > > > TIA, > > Karen > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Just looked it up. SP3. You're right. I was thinking SP2 as well, but it was cumulative. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: sp3 revisited Just one. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or cop
RE: sp3 revisited
>>So you think the release notes are lying? er no, but ms have been know to get things wrong ;-0) >>Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? no, not really (cue flames...) but I'm not going to discuss this any further! Anyway, thanks for confirming. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sp3 revisited
Just one. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no product out there today that can make this work consistently - they may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go. Make sense? Missy - Original Message - From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? - Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it > nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management > is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software > is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > Any pointers appreciated. > > TIA, > Karen > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Service packs are most always cumulative, most, if not all of the time. That is except during leap years. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Office XP, that is. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > MS Office SP2 requires SP1... > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that > were not. :) > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > My thoughts exactly. > > > > Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? > > > > But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my > > knowledge - cumulative. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > So you think the release notes are lying? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: sp3 revisited > > > > > > ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can > > someone help > > me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative > > so I can hop > > from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms > > state that > > they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the > horse's mouth' > > thanks Rob > > > > Support Analyst > > T.K.C. Sales Ltd. > > 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate > > Keynsham > > Bristol > > BS31 1TZ > > UK > > Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 > > > > > > > > intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > -- > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the > > individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this > message is not > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > > (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > == > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe:
RE: Mailbox monitoring
There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the report format that management wanted. dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox monitoring Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Are any of the Office SRs cumulative? -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Office XP, that is. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > MS Office SP2 requires SP1... > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that > were not. :) > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > My thoughts exactly. > > > > Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? > > > > But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my > > knowledge - cumulative. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > So you think the release notes are lying? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: sp3 revisited > > > > > > ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can > > someone help > > me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative > > so I can hop > > from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms > > state that > > they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the > horse's mouth' > > thanks Rob > > > > Support Analyst > > T.K.C. Sales Ltd. > > 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate > > Keynsham > > Bristol > > BS31 1TZ > > UK > > Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 > > > > > > > > intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > -- > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the > > individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this > message is not > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > > (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > == > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAI
RE: sp3 revisited
Office XP, that is. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > MS Office SP2 requires SP1... > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that > were not. :) > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > My thoughts exactly. > > > > Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? > > > > But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my > > knowledge - cumulative. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > > > > So you think the release notes are lying? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: sp3 revisited > > > > > > ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can > > someone help > > me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative > > so I can hop > > from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms > > state that > > they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the > horse's mouth' > > thanks Rob > > > > Support Analyst > > T.K.C. Sales Ltd. > > 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate > > Keynsham > > Bristol > > BS31 1TZ > > UK > > Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 > > > > > > > > intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > -- > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the > > individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this > message is not > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > > (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > == > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesear
RE: sp3 revisited
MS Office SP2 requires SP1... > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) > > > -Original Message- > From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > My thoughts exactly. > > Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? > > But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my > knowledge - cumulative. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: sp3 revisited > > > So you think the release notes are lying? > > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: sp3 revisited > > > ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can > someone help > me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative > so I can hop > from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms > state that > they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' > thanks Rob > > Support Analyst > T.K.C. Sales Ltd. > 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate > Keynsham > Bristol > BS31 1TZ > UK > Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 > > > > intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > -- > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > == > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? - Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it > nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management > is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software > is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is > not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. > > Any pointers appreciated. > > TIA, > Karen > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? Missy - Original Message - From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 HA I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. Any pointers appreciated. TIA, Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
I will give it another whirl tonite before heading out the door. The one thing I did not do was restart the SMTP service from services. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. The SMTP service needs to be restarted. Does it work? Yes, to the extent that the code is developed. It won't add disclaimers to MSTNEF messages though unless the samples have been changed (haven't checked). > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the > server need to be rebooted for it to take effect, although > the q article does not say so? TIA. > > Raj > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a > one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 09:31 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. > Hi All, > My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the > SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all > directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really > work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? > > Thanks > > Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy
When getting the bounce message which email address is the sender using? yyy.com or xxx.com -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com from our org through a VPN connection. We just migrated about 20 users from one remote office onto our exchange server. (dumped their emails into a PST and imported them into a new account at xxx.com) We put [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their primary SMTP address, but added [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can still receive emails to the old address for a while. Well now people that send them emails are getting a bounce message with the following.. X-Display-Name: lastname, firstname - MOVED. I tried to create a new recipient policy but I don't know if I'm doing it right. Anyone have a step by step on how to do this by chance? I'm going through the help files now but thought I would ask the experts here. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sp3 revisited
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox monitoring
Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information than simply a count would be a bonus to them. TIA. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recommendation please
We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recommendation please
try www.mail-resources.com -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recommendation please Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 HA
There are a number of high availability solutions listed at www.mail-resources.com in the weblinks section including EMS. What are the actual requirements and how does DoubleTake not meet those? -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:02 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA > > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. > Management is concerned over how to do backups and what kind > of software is out there that can provide this functionality. > DoubleTake is not good enough, and that's the only product I > am familiar with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
The SMTP service needs to be restarted. Does it work? Yes, to the extent that the code is developed. It won't add disclaimers to MSTNEF messages though unless the samples have been changed (haven't checked). > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the > server need to be rebooted for it to take effect, although > the q article does not say so? TIA. > > Raj > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a > one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 09:31 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. > Hi All, > My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the > SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all > directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really > work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? > > Thanks > > Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 HA
I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. Any pointers appreciated. TIA, Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
As as 10 seconds from now, I have. > -Original Message- > From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification > > > There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good > request, though. > Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM > Subject: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification > > > Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. > > When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up > that new-mail > notification icon. > > However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- > are delivered to > a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. > > Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way > to change the > behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification? > > Thanks! > > > > > Chris Levis > Applied Geographics, Inc. > Boston, MA > > Don't go where the path leads you. > Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations
I promise that posting the same question using two different accounts will not make the answer to your question show up twice as fast. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:02 AM Subject: Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations A user sends a meeting request to several different individuals. Some are in the same Exchange Organization, some are in another Exchange Organization. The recipientes in the same Exchange Organization receive the requests without any problems. Those recipients in the "Other" Exchange Organization do not recieve it as a meeting request, and when they open it, it contains "MIME garbage" - see sample below. Any thoughts as to what the solution is? --_=_NextPart_000_01C25905.AB4CA270 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+Ig8UAQaQCAAEAAABAAEAAQeQBgAI5AQAAADoAAEIgAcAHgAAAElQTS5NaWN --- much more deleted - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good request, though. Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Missy - Original Message - From: "Chris Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail notification icon. However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way to change the behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification? Thanks! Chris Levis Applied Geographics, Inc. Boston, MA Don't go where the path leads you. Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the server need to be rebooted for it to take effect, although the q article does not say so? TIA. Raj -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 09:31 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. > Hi All, > My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the > SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all > directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really > work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? > > Thanks > > Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations
A user sends a meeting request to several different individuals. Some are in the same Exchange Organization, some are in another Exchange Organization. The recipientes in the same Exchange Organization receive the requests without any problems. Those recipients in the "Other" Exchange Organization do not recieve it as a meeting request, and when they open it, it contains "MIME garbage" - see sample below. Any thoughts as to what the solution is? --_=_NextPart_000_01C25905.AB4CA270 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+Ig8UAQaQCAAEAAABAAEAAQeQBgAI5AQAAADoAAEIgAcAHgAAAElQTS5NaWN --- much more deleted - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meeting requests between two Exchange 5.5 Organizations
Whan a user in Exchange Organization A send a meeting request to users in her Exchange Organization and Exchange Organization B, the users in her Exchange Organization receive the meeting request without any problem, but the users in Exchange Organization B receive it as a regular email message with "MIME garbage" contained in the message - see a snip of it below. Not certain if this is true every time, but the instances I've seen are when she sends on behalf of the Executuves she supports. Any ideas? Example of "MIME garbage --_=_NextPart_000_01C25905.AB4CA270 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+Ig8UAQaQCAAEAAABAAEAAQeQBgAI5AQAAADoAAEIgAcAHgAA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
Mail server down is not. UTP cable unplugged it is. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... You must give in to the Exchange side, or become overrun with people asking you if the mail server's down when it's not. (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail notification icon. However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way to change the behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification? Thanks! Chris Levis Applied Geographics, Inc. Boston, MA Don't go where the path leads you. Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 Features
You cannot. - Original Message - From: "CHRIS H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 Features Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on a "per mailbox" basis? I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it mentioned. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
need help with setting up a recipient policy
Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com from our org through a VPN connection. We just migrated about 20 users from one remote office onto our exchange server. (dumped their emails into a PST and imported them into a new account at xxx.com) We put [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their primary SMTP address, but added [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can still receive emails to the old address for a while. Well now people that send them emails are getting a bounce message with the following.. X-Display-Name: lastname, firstname - MOVED. I tried to create a new recipient policy but I don't know if I'm doing it right. Anyone have a step by step on how to do this by chance? I'm going through the help files now but thought I would ask the experts here. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
recommendation please
Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch
How about http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q322051? Was posted as a possible answer by an MS guy in the newsgroups to a similar sounding issue. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch > > > Hi there. > > I applied the January Windows 2000 security rollup package to > my laptop (W2K SP2) after which I could no longer connect to > the 5.5 SP4 Server using the Admin app. I uninstalled the > patch and Admin finds the server again. This happened on a > desktop I tried also. Obviously I want my laptop secured. I'm > presuming that W2K SP3 will produce the same results what > with it being a cumulative SP. The error is as follows: > > Microsoft Exchange Directory > ID no: DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM > > I checked microsoft's site and found nothing. Any help would > be much appreciated. > > Pete. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time deal and you don't have the in-house expertise. http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm http://www.exclaimer.co.uk > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 09:31 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. > > > Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. > Hi All, > My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the > SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all > directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really > work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? > > Thanks > > Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Features
Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on a "per mailbox" basis? I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it mentioned. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Chaos
Excellent idea. Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:32 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > You might also want to set folder visible tick box off under contributor > (if > the emails are confidential). > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everyone wants one but not yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 September 2002 19:54 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > > You have to set default as contributor... > > -Original Message- > From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Public Folder Chaos > > > Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. > > OK. I have several Public Folders setup which people are having a problem > sending E-mail to. > Here is the error message I am receiving. > > The message could not be delivered because you do not have create > permissions on this folder > or it is only available to folder owners at this time > The default permissions on this Public Folder are set to NONE. Now, if I > change those > permissions to AUTHOR, the Public Folder accepts E-mails without any > problems. > However, the issue is, that some of these folders have sensitive data, and > I > don't want > the entire organizaion having accessing to them. Is there any way to > allow > the mail > to be delivered to the Public Folder and still restrict who has access to > it? > > Thanks in advance! > > Robert > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible > for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you > have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, > forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ** > * > The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be > confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). > Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use > of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express > permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of > the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated > companies. Sony email is for business use only. > > This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom > Limited. > (04) > ** > * > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Chaos
OK. Anonymous = yes with 2000, not needed with Exchange 5.5. Thanks! Robert > -Original Message- > From: Kim Cameron [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > in e2k, you *do* have to set anonymous to contributor in order to get > external messages. Just another one of the Plethora of Sinister Surprises > that abound in e2k. > > > -Original Message- > From: Reiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:04 PM > Posted To: MS Exchange Forum > Conversation: Public Folder Chaos > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > > No, you don't need to give permissions to "Anonymous". I also had this > impression initially based on reading a Q article, but I think it had > "anonymous" confused with "default" (it was definitely inconsistent). > > Peter > > -Original Message- > From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > > Somebody else said I should change Anonymous to Contributor to, > in order to accept messages from the Internet. But my test message > worked OK with anonymous still set to NONE. Is that how it should > work? Do I need to touch anonymous? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
