RE: Problems with exchange

[Roger Smith]

It occurs when we try to delete the queue in the Default SMTP Virtual
Server (delete all messages (send NDF)) and delete all messages (No
NDR))

Thanks

Roger Smith  MCSE, MCP+I, MCSA, CCNA
Technical Support Manager
OfficePCs


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2003 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with exchange


Where and when does this error occur?  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Smith
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with exchange


Hi All 
I have a problem that I can not get any information about.
My exchange 2000 server SP3 has a number of queues that we can not
remove.   When we delete the queue and send NDR the following error
occurs.   I have had a look through TechNet and Google but there is no
indication of what is causing it and how to get round it.Any help
will be greatly appreciated.

Invalid Parameter error
ID no 80030057
Exchange System Manager

Thanks

Roger Smith  MCSE, MCP+I, MCSA, CCNA
Technical Support Manager
OfficePCs

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2003 design?

[Ryan Finnesey]

I am in the very early stages of doing a new Active Directory and
Exchange deployment.  I am sorry to say that I missed MEC this year and
I do not have a not of information on Windows.net or Exchange 2003. I
would like to design the deployment so it is a very easy upgrade to
Windows.net and Exchange 2003.  I know that the code is not final yet
but I would like to look to the future where is a good place for me to
look for design help?  Did anyone post the slides from MEC?   



Ryan Finnesey
CEO,CIO
Diversified Solutions Group
72 Spring Street
New York New York 10011
212-274-1465 Phone
212-274-1452 Fax
917-667-4812 Mobile


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS

[Jojo Solis]

those gateways are not use at the same time, only one gateway at a time, the problem 
is in the TCPIP the gateways is set to G1 but if i look it  using the IPCONFIG command 
it says the gateways is set on G2.

-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jojo Solis
Subject: RE: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS


Having multiple gateways always causes problems in my experience.   What
is the reason for having the multiple gateways?  Are they both in the
same subnet?

You are much better off avoiding a multiple gateway configuration if you
can.

-Kevin

> -Original Message-
> From: Jojo Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:17 AM
> Posted To: Exchange
> Conversation: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS
> Subject: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS
> 
> 
> scenario
>  
> we have two gateway for our Internet Server, G1 and G2.
> 
> before i restarted my E2K server the gateway is pointed to G1 
> (gateway 1), when I start the server the IS and the MTA 
> stacks service did not start successfully, the event log says 
> the Routing Engine hung on starting (Event 7022) and the IS 
> also not start with error message "terminated with service 
> specific error 0" (event 7024), but when i try to start those 
> services manually it starts successfully without any error. 
> the weird thing is the gateway are not correctly pointed for 
> what is supposed to be pointed which is the G1, the TCPIP 
> says it is on the G1 but if i check it using ipconfig command 
> the default gateways says its on the G2. its so weird!!! 
> 
> please help me solving this problem.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> jojo
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problems with exchange

[Tony Hlabse]

Where and when does this error occur?  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Smith
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with exchange


Hi All 
I have a problem that I can not get any information about.
My exchange 2000 server SP3 has a number of queues that we can not
remove.   When we delete the queue and send NDR the following error
occurs.   I have had a look through TechNet and Google but there is no
indication of what is causing it and how to get round it.Any help
will be greatly appreciated.

Invalid Parameter error
ID no 80030057
Exchange System Manager

Thanks

Roger Smith  MCSE, MCP+I, MCSA, CCNA
Technical Support Manager
OfficePCs

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems with exchange

[Roger Smith]

Hi All 
I have a problem that I can not get any information about.
My exchange 2000 server SP3 has a number of queues that we can not
remove.   When we delete the queue and send NDR the following error
occurs.   I have had a look through TechNet and Google but there is no
indication of what is causing it and how to get round it.Any help
will be greatly appreciated.

Invalid Parameter error
ID no 80030057
Exchange System Manager

Thanks

Roger Smith  MCSE, MCP+I, MCSA, CCNA
Technical Support Manager
OfficePCs

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Was SA still running or had it quit?

I have seen some weird situation when SA has quit and Outlook clients can't log in but 
OWA is still working.
Or another time SA and all other services were running but no one could log in, 
restarting SA and dependent services fixed it.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error


Whatever it was, restarting the SA fixed it.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
> 
> 
> usually when I see error 500 it means that the user account 
> does not have a mailbox, but in that case the whole page is 
> displaying error 500, no frames.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
> 
> 
> (Exch2k SP3 on Win2k SP3)
> 
> Hmm.  I'm getting this error: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server 
> Error, when users are logging in to OWA.  The folder list 
> appears and populates just fine, but that error appears in 
> what would be the (bigger pane) item listing.
> 
> Interestingly enough, if the user clicks "Calendar", their 
> calendar will appear in the big pane But all other 
> folders result in the error.
> 
> A google and MSKB search only mentions old browsers and 
> free-busy stuff Nothing that seems to apply to me.
> 
> Anyone seen this before?
> 
> tia
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ___
> There are 10 types of people in the world:  those who 
> understand binary, and those who do not.
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Andrey Fyodorov]

I like this idea the best. You could have an additional drive in the Exchange server 
that would hold the backup file, or you could have a little helper server that would 
hold the backup(s)

I (because I don't trust Legato alone) have a helper server with 3 drives. Drive 1 is 
for Mondays and Thursdays, Drive 2 is for Tuesdays and Fridays, Drive 3 is for 
Wednesdays and Saturdays. This way I have the last three days backed up with NTBACKUP.

P.S. Since Legato also runs at different times (and eats transaction logs) I always 
have to be aware which backup (Legato or NTBACKUP) was the most recent one and whether 
it completed successfully in case if I need to make a restore to the point of failure.

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Why not run an online backup on the local server, using Win2K Backup to
back up to disk, and then copy the online backup over the T?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Andrey,

That's true.  But you know, upon reading the archives (shoulda done that
_before_ I posted the question!!), I don't think I want to use eseutil
on a regular basis, unless it's necessary.  Do you know of any other
(3rd-party) app that would do this, or am I just barking up the wrong
tree?

Eric


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


10GB Eseutil will take a couple of hours I think.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. I
have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like to
know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Mick Putley]

I assume you can ping the exchange server but try:

net view \\exchangeservername

You might have a netbios resolution issue



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry J.
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders


This PC had a problem after a power outage. I have gotten it running fine
except for one problem. I get that error when trying to open a mailbox.
Now, I can goto another PC and open this users mailbox no problem so it is
not a problem with the info store. On this PC you can pingthe mail server,
DNS is working correctly and anything else network related is working
fine.
Now, when I go into exchange properties and reenter the users name and
tell it to check name, I get this: THe name could not be resolved. The
microsoft Exchange Address Boook was unable to log on to the Microsoft
Exchange Server computer...
AGain, the server is fine as all other users are working fine and this
user can goto another system and check mail. There is something still
wrong with this system. ITs running 2k pro and I have reinstalled outlook
2k and SP3. Nothing has changed. I have also set the logon network
security to None in hopes that I could force logon credentials to the
server but when I try to open outlook it just goes straight to the above
error again, ignoring the need for authentication.
Anyone have any ideas? This is my VP;s system and reinstall is not really
an option.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SysAdmin vocab.. t'hyuk..

[Chinnery, Paul]

Thanks, Tim.  Those were great (esp Seagull Mgr).

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SysAdmin vocab.. t'hyuk..


BLAMESTORMING: Sitting around in a group, discussing why a server went down,
and who was responsible. 
SEAGULL MANAGER: A manager who flies in, makes a lot of noise, craps on
everything, and then leaves. 
CUBE FARM: An office filled with cubicles. 
MOUSE POTATO: The on-line, wired generation's answer to the couch potato. 
STRESS PUPPY: An admin who seems to thrive on being stressed out, whiney,
and complains about stupid users all day. 
SWIPEOUT: An access card that has been rendered useless because the magnetic
strip is worn away from extensive use. 
PERCUSSIVE MAINTENANCE: The fine art of whacking the crap out of an
electronic device to get it to work again. 
404: A completely clueless end-user. 
OHNOSECOND: That fraction of time after hitting Enter, in which you realize
that you've just permanently erased a big database. 

Clipped from http://www.w2knews.com/?id=412

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Book Question

[Scoles, Damian]

Forgot the book info. Sorry.


Microsoft Operations Manager: Managing, Tuning and Securing
Author: Chris Amaris
Format: Trade Paperback
Publication Date: December 13, 2002
ISBN: 0672323761
List Price: $ 49.99




Damian Scoles
Senior Technical Analyst
MCSE+I, CCNP


-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Book Question


I just went to www.bestwebbuys.com/books/ and looked up Microsoft
Operations Manager and got these results:

BooksAMillion$33.52 
Amazon   $34.99


The link to Amazon's is
:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0672323761/ref%3Dnosim/bestbookb
uys00/002-5665487-7063245


Hope that helps.


Damian Scoles
Senior Technical Analyst
MCSE+I, CCNP


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Book Question


here is one on mom's house..
Mom's House, Dad's House: Making Two Homes for Your Child
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684830787/qid=1045085473/
sr=8 -3/ref=sr_8_3/104-2038329-1854319?v=glance&s=books&n=507846




-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Book Question


I looked on MS's site and Amazon. Could not find a book on MOM. Does
anybody

know of one?







_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Book Question

[Scoles, Damian]

I just went to www.bestwebbuys.com/books/ and looked up Microsoft
Operations Manager and got these results:

BooksAMillion$33.52 
Amazon   $34.99


The link to Amazon's is
:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0672323761/ref%3Dnosim/bestbookb
uys00/002-5665487-7063245


Hope that helps.


Damian Scoles
Senior Technical Analyst
MCSE+I, CCNP


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Book Question


here is one on mom's house..
Mom's House, Dad's House: Making Two Homes for Your Child
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684830787/qid=1045085473/
sr=8
-3/ref=sr_8_3/104-2038329-1854319?v=glance&s=books&n=507846




-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Book Question


I looked on MS's site and Amazon. Could not find a book on MOM. Does
anybody

know of one?







_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Book Question

[Hutchins, Mike]

I found this one, too!

How to Help Your Husband Make More Money So You Can Be a Stay-At-Home
Mom
by Joanne Watson

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0446690163/qid=1045086090/
sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/104-7286592-3869543?v=glance&s=books

> -Original Message-
> From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Book Question
> 
> 
> here is one on mom's house...
> Mom's House, Dad's House: Making Two Homes for Your Child 
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684830787/qid=1
> 045085473/sr=8
> -3/ref=sr_8_3/104-2038329-1854319?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT: Book Question
> 
> 
> I looked on MS's site and Amazon. Could not find a book on 
> MOM. Does anybody
> 
> know of one?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SysAdmin vocab.. t'hyuk..

[Tim Ault]

BLAMESTORMING: Sitting around in a group, discussing why a server went down,
and who was responsible. 
SEAGULL MANAGER: A manager who flies in, makes a lot of noise, craps on
everything, and then leaves. 
CUBE FARM: An office filled with cubicles. 
MOUSE POTATO: The on-line, wired generation's answer to the couch potato. 
STRESS PUPPY: An admin who seems to thrive on being stressed out, whiney,
and complains about stupid users all day. 
SWIPEOUT: An access card that has been rendered useless because the magnetic
strip is worn away from extensive use. 
PERCUSSIVE MAINTENANCE: The fine art of whacking the crap out of an
electronic device to get it to work again. 
404: A completely clueless end-user. 
OHNOSECOND: That fraction of time after hitting Enter, in which you realize
that you've just permanently erased a big database. 

Clipped from http://www.w2knews.com/?id=412

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Book Question

[Stevens, Dave]

here is one on mom's house...
Mom's House, Dad's House: Making Two Homes for Your Child
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684830787/qid=1045085473/sr=8
-3/ref=sr_8_3/104-2038329-1854319?v=glance&s=books&n=507846




-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Book Question


I looked on MS's site and Amazon. Could not find a book on MOM. Does anybody

know of one?







_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Notes client to Outlook client

[Tony Hlabse]

Have a client doing a Notes to Exchange 2000 migration. What he wants 
migrated is Calendar and Contact from the client side not the server side. 
Does anyone know of tools for that?



_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: Book Question

[Tony Hlabse]

I looked on MS's site and Amazon. Could not find a book on MOM. Does anybody 
know of one?







_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Robert Moir]

What makes sending these backups over your T1 line instead of working it all locally 
so attractive to you that you are prepared to do an offline backup just to get that?

-Original Message- 
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wed 12/02/2003 16:22 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options




We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday
Exchange Administrator
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute
McLean, VA

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


â²Úh²Ø§€P†Ûiÿü0ÂÌ"Ç(›úÞ²‹«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m˜
܆+Þ²m§ÿðÃ0Êy¢oìŠ×¬yªÜ‡ûj·!jÊS¢éì¹»®&ޙ¨¥¶‰^j÷žÅÈZž¥²Ì2žG(˜L\…©àx¸¬µ§fŠyb²Öš)ìÃ)är‰

Re: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Bob]

what fixed the problem beautifully ?



- Original Message - 
From: "Jerry J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders


> That fixed the problem beautifully. Thanks alot!
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Chris Levis]

Which solution fixed it?

> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders
> 
> 
> That fixed the problem beautifully. Thanks alot!
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?

[Smith, Ronni]

Well, that is just the thing. It is not just that one client. He is always
the pain-in-the-patootie guy so I assumed it was just his karma when I
couldn't find anything different between our machines other than I use DSL
and he uses dial-up. At that time that Q article told you to call PSS and I
wasn't willing to do that for the one guy until I knew more about what the
fix was.

But now they have released that fix and I also have another user (a much
more capable one) who is experiencing the same thing. He too is on dialup.
In both cases, they can ping by name, they can explore the domain, their
home drives get properly mapped to the server here in the office. In fact,
they can do everything except connect to the Exchange server and get data
from it. Connections do show up under netstat -a on the Exchange server if
they try but it never manages to load the data. The connections say
"waiting" and are on a couple of highish ports iirc. At least on the
Exchange server end.

All of the client machines involved are Windows 2000 Pro machines that were
joined to the domain here in the office before being taken home. The only
users successfully using the MUVPN client (software vpn) and running Outlook
to connect back to the Exchange server are those who have DSL not dial-up
connections. I know the pitp guy's virtual adapter was set up exactly
correctly because I did it myself and compared step by step with my own
machine which worked fine over my dsl line. I will check the other user's
machine when he brings it back in (it's his laptop). And I guess I will add
a modem to my machine, make sure it still works over dsl and then see if it
works over dialup. This may be instructive enough to be worth the effort and
expense.

Thanks to all who have passed on ideas. I will try adding a modem to my
machine next. Unless I can get the guy with the laptop to loan it to me.

Ronni


-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?


I would agree with Mike that it is probably and issue with that one client.
I would look carefully at the name resolution.

Can the user ping the exchange server via name resolution across the tunnel?

We ran into some recent problems when using the MUVPN from Watchguard,
especially on XP machines. Occasionally some of the MUVPN's do not setup the
Virtual Adapter and it connects using SafeNet's default mode which uses the
"Shim" (there are 3 options for this disabled, preferred, and required)
which leaves you without any name resolution that may have been supplied via
the virtual adapter. The only way around the problem with those that will
only connect with the Shim was to use an ALMOST file on there machine.
Watchguard is aware of this issue and is working with SafeNet 

-Dave Vantine



-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?



Ronni,

Given that your other VPN clients work OK except this one I think I'd be
looking at the specifics of this guys VPN and network setup and start with
the simple stuff like the Watchguard traffic monitor and logs to see if
anything's getting blocked and with the name resolution and dialup
performance at the client end, rather than diving in with a bunch of
hotfixes.

We have a very similar setup here, and these tools fix pretty much all these
issues here.

Just my approach,
Mike 

 
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 February 2003 22:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?


We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process
of moving us to a new server. New hardware, new name, following Ed's Move
Server Method which I have already done once without issue on NT4 to NT4.
This time we moved to Windows 2000 for the new server's OS. New server is
therefore Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2k SP2 + security fixes and old server was/is
Exch 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a + security fixes. I moved mailboxes over the
course of a few days and everyone was fine, running happily without issues,
except for one guy (the "n-sigma where n is a big number" guy of course)
whose home machine couldn't connect fully to the new mail server over VPN as
it had when it was on the NT4 box. It does make connections to the Exchange
Server. I can see that with netstat -a on either side but it does not appear
to transfer data. He uses a software vpn client to connect to our network.
So at first I was ready to blame the MTU issue and make the modifications
necessary to correct that. However, when I researched it, it seemed as
though I should be having the same problem with all the clients that use
vpn. Now some of my vpn clients have an appliance (Watchguard SOH

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Jerry J.]

That fixed the problem beautifully. Thanks alot!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Charles Marriott]

use the ip address

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry J.
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders


I have tried that and it tells me that it cannot resolve the name.
The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was
unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Petschow, Jeff]

Uninstall and re-install tcp/ip.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;268575


Jeff


> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders
> 
> 
> I have tried that and it tells me that it cannot resolve the name.
> The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange 
> Address Book was
> unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Jerry J.]

I have tried that and it tells me that it cannot resolve the name.
The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was
unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Candee Vaglica]

Try recreating his profile.

-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders


This PC had a problem after a power outage. I have gotten it running fine
except for one problem. I get that error when trying to open a mailbox. Now,
I can goto another PC and open this users mailbox no problem so it is not a
problem with the info store. On this PC you can pingthe mail server, DNS is
working correctly and anything else network related is working fine. Now,
when I go into exchange properties and reenter the users name and tell it to
check name, I get this: THe name could not be resolved. The microsoft
Exchange Address Boook was unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server
computer... AGain, the server is fine as all other users are working fine
and this user can goto another system and check mail. There is something
still wrong with this system. ITs running 2k pro and I have reinstalled
outlook 2k and SP3. Nothing has changed. I have also set the logon network
security to None in hopes that I could force logon credentials to the server
but when I try to open outlook it just goes straight to the above error
again, ignoring the need for authentication. Anyone have any ideas? This is
my VP;s system and reinstall is not really an option.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders

[Jerry J.]

This PC had a problem after a power outage. I have gotten it running fine
except for one problem. I get that error when trying to open a mailbox.
Now, I can goto another PC and open this users mailbox no problem so it is
not a problem with the info store. On this PC you can pingthe mail server,
DNS is working correctly and anything else network related is working
fine.
Now, when I go into exchange properties and reenter the users name and
tell it to check name, I get this: THe name could not be resolved. The
microsoft Exchange Address Boook was unable to log on to the Microsoft
Exchange Server computer...
AGain, the server is fine as all other users are working fine and this
user can goto another system and check mail. There is something still
wrong with this system. ITs running 2k pro and I have reinstalled outlook
2k and SP3. Nothing has changed. I have also set the logon network
security to None in hopes that I could force logon credentials to the
server but when I try to open outlook it just goes straight to the above
error again, ignoring the need for authentication.
Anyone have any ideas? This is my VP;s system and reinstall is not really
an option.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[East, Bill]

Actually the name "optonline.net" is misleading, the company I believe is
"Optimum Online" or some such, n'est ce pas? But the name was a point of
discussion, Jeffrey; it appears that the first thing that a spammer does
after bringing the KFC and Schlitz into his trailer is to pick a domain name
with the phrase "opt-in" in it. At the moment I am turfing email from
optinforyou, optindeals, opt-inemail, optinllc, and about 30 other domains
with the word "opt" in them.

-- 
be - MOS

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money.
-- B. Franklin

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
> 
> 
> Jim -
> 
> The customer is not on optonline.net, is not listed at 
> ordb.org, there has
> not been any spamming coming from this domain from this 
> server, and the
> problem is sporadic - so I don't think that's the issue.  
> 
> And what's you got against Optonline.net :)  Although the 
> owners won't let
> us watch the Yankees (can't get it on cable here on Long 
> Island!), they give
> kick as* Internet speeds.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Blunt, James H
> (Jim)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
> 
> 
> "...no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole."
> 
> Maybe you just answered your own question.
> 
> Have you checked the RBL's to see if your listed?  Have you 
> been spamming
> this domain to death?  With a domain name like optonline.net, 
> I'd be tempted
> to drop you in a Blackhole list, just on general principles.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Strange 550 error
> 
> 
> It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
> 
> Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
> server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is 
> fscked or one or
> more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using 
> telnet and the
> basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this 
> for yourself if
> you'd like.[1]
> 
> [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.
> 
> On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an 
> email sent from 
> inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some 
> recipients in a 
> specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a 
> strange message: 
> 
> 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway
> 
> The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), 
> but I can't 
> make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  
> 
> What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in 
> nslookup and 
> from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 
> 25.  The users 
> have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this 
> domain before or
> 
> since, except for this most important email (or course).   
> There was no NDR,
> 
> no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. 
> 
> Thanks for any assistance! 
> 
> 
> _ 
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Strange 550 error

[Chris Scharff]

Microsoft's definitions are sometimes interesting. Where the Mx records
point generally doesn't matter... 
http://mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&re
q=viewarticle&artid=2 might help you to troubleshoot.


On 2/12/03 13:39, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Chris -  Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX 
record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not 
newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid).  FYI - If you 
check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a "Generic protocol 
error (SMTP error)".  Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to 
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic?  Thanks! 

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error 


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). 

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that 
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or 
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the 
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if

you'd like.[1] 

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. 

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from 
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a 
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway 

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't 
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and 
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users 
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or


since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,


no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. 

Thanks for any assistance! 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Charles Marriott]

The present moment is all we have control of, on a good day. :-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


Charles -

I fully agree and have successfully sent email through by telnetting from
the Exchange server to that domain.  What I'm trying to figure out is how to
ensure this doesn't happen in the future as the issue is sporadic, but is
quite perturbing to the customer.

Regards,

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send
commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo.
(I am not Chris and not speaking for him)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


Chris -  Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX
record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not
newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid).  FYI - If you
check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a "Generic protocol
error (SMTP error)".  Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic?  Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message:

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.

Thanks for any assistance!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error

[Chris Levis]

Whatever it was, restarting the SA fixed it.

> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
> 
> 
> usually when I see error 500 it means that the user account 
> does not have a mailbox, but in that case the whole page is 
> displaying error 500, no frames.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
> 
> 
> (Exch2k SP3 on Win2k SP3)
> 
> Hmm.  I'm getting this error: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server 
> Error, when users are logging in to OWA.  The folder list 
> appears and populates just fine, but that error appears in 
> what would be the (bigger pane) item listing.
> 
> Interestingly enough, if the user clicks "Calendar", their 
> calendar will appear in the big pane But all other 
> folders result in the error.
> 
> A google and MSKB search only mentions old browsers and 
> free-busy stuff Nothing that seems to apply to me.
> 
> Anyone seen this before?
> 
> tia
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ___
> There are 10 types of people in the world:  those who 
> understand binary, and those who do not.
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Charles -

I fully agree and have successfully sent email through by telnetting from
the Exchange server to that domain.  What I'm trying to figure out is how to
ensure this doesn't happen in the future as the issue is sporadic, but is
quite perturbing to the customer.  

Regards,

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send
commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo.
(I am not Chris and not speaking for him)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


Chris -  Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX
record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not
newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid).  FYI - If you
check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a "Generic protocol
error (SMTP error)".  Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic?  Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message:

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.

Thanks for any assistance!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Charles Marriott]

Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send
commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo.
(I am not Chris and not speaking for him)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


Chris -  Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX
record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not
newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid).  FYI - If you
check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a "Generic protocol
error (SMTP error)".  Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic?  Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message:

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.

Thanks for any assistance!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Jim -

The customer is not on optonline.net, is not listed at ordb.org, there has
not been any spamming coming from this domain from this server, and the
problem is sporadic - so I don't think that's the issue.  

And what's you got against Optonline.net :)  Although the owners won't let
us watch the Yankees (can't get it on cable here on Long Island!), they give
kick as* Internet speeds.

Regards,

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


"...no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole."

Maybe you just answered your own question.

Have you checked the RBL's to see if your listed?  Have you been spamming
this domain to death?  With a domain name like optonline.net, I'd be tempted
to drop you in a Blackhole list, just on general principles.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from 
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a 
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't 
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and 
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users 
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. 

Thanks for any assistance! 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

recurring scheduling problems

[Mitchell Mike]

Good afternoon,

Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4

I was working with a user on an Outlook scheduling problem and after we had
completed the rescheduling process
I was curious of how other people were handling reschedules.

Here is the scenario: User needed to reschedule a recurring meeting and the
resource that the meeting was to be held
was already occupied. The user removed the resource that was in use, and
found another resource.

Meeting was scheduled and the new resource accepted.  The only problem that
remains is that the original resource
was left with a meeting but no one will be there.

How do you handle this rescheduling issue?

Thanks for your input.

Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Chris -  Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX
record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not
newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid).  FYI - If you
check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a "Generic protocol
error (SMTP error)".  Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic?  Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from 
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a 
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't 
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and 
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users 
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. 

Thanks for any assistance! 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[Candee Vaglica]

The antivirus is scanning the attachment.

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


Norton Anti Virus for MS Exchange running on Exchange server.


-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


Exchange server?
Any AV on the exchange server?

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when
I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
display the attachments. I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional
machine. I do have NAV running with File System Protection enabled. I even
tried disabling Real Time protection before opening the email but got the
same message. This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple
machines. Any ideas ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[RBHATIA]

Thanks. That's good to know.

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


I have seen this behavior with several AV software packages (Groupshield,
Grousphield 2000, NAV, and Trend.  What I have seen happen is that the AV
software takes more time depending on the size of the message.  At times I
have had to double click on an attachment multiple times before it will
open.  A lack of patience on my part is likely here.

Anyway, I don't think you are encountering anything out of the ordinary
here.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: RBHATIA
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:59
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
> 
> I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
> I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and
> when
> I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
> error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
> display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
> minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
> display the attachments.
> I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV
> running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real
> Time protection before opening the email but got the same message.
> This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines.
> Any ideas ?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[RBHATIA]

Norton Anti Virus for MS Exchange running on Exchange server.


-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


Exchange server?
Any AV on the exchange server?

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when
I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
display the attachments. I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional
machine. I do have NAV running with File System Protection enabled. I even
tried disabling Real Time protection before opening the email but got the
same message. This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple
machines. Any ideas ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[RBHATIA]

Thanks. That's a good idea

-Original Message-
From: Dolphin, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


What AV is running on the Exchange server?  I've noticed some small delays
on mail with attachments since installing ScanMail but its not too
bad...Have you considered using WinZip or something on all those files?
That might help...

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when
I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
display the attachments.
I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV
running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real
Time protection before opening the email but got the same message.
This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines.
Any ideas ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Thank you, that's a very good point.  The MX record for the customers domain
is actually mail.oldcompanyname.com, not mail.newcompanyname.com even though
the IP address is correct.  Thanks again!  Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Public Folder:
Exchange
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error



I have seen misleading 550 errors if Reverse DNS to your domain is not
correct.  If the IP address of your SMTP relay/server resolves to
mail.domain.com, but the SMTP server/relay actually claims to be a different
host name, then you can get a 550 error.

-Kevin

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:42 AM
> Posted To: Exchange
> Conversation: Strange 550 error
> Subject: Strange 550 error
> 
> 
> I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an
> email sent from
> inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some 
> recipients in a
> specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a 
> strange message: 
> 
> 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway
> 
> The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error),
> but I can't
> make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  
> 
> What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in
> nslookup and
> from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 
> 25.  The users
> have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this 
> domain before or
> since, except for this most important email (or course).   
> There was no NDR,
> no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.
> 
> Thanks for any assistance!
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Bill -

The mail was not coming from optonline.net, but from a customer site using a
different ISP to another domain.  I didn't change the error at all - it's a
copy and paste from the log.  I didn't post the domains as I'm not sure if
the customer would appreciate it in a public forum.  

As for Optonline, it is a cable modem provider (excellent speeds!), but it
does allow people inside the network to relay - send out messages with no
regard for where it is coming from or where it is going to.  If I'm NOT
inside this network though, it does not allow relaying.  

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error


As best as I can guess, the remote server is complaining that the format of
your message does not conform to the format it expects, which would be a
user at a local host in the recipient's domain. The other half of the
message is that it's not a gateway, so it will not pass on what appears to
be a non-local address. If you could give us the address to which you are
sending, even in the format @theaddress.tld, we might be able to
guess a little better. Oh, and did you munge the 550 message at all, or is
that how it appeared verbatim?

FWIW, there has been some discussion of your provider, optonline.com, on
news.admin.net-abuse.email in recent days, with the general concensus (hah!)
being that optonline is not a spammer, just a cable modem provider with a
lot of potentially abusable clients. So there is a small but existing
possiblity that you are being blocked due to your address.

-- 
be - MOS



Yow!  I just went below the poverty line!


> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Strange 550 error
> 
> 
> I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an
> email sent from
> inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some 
> recipients in a
> specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a 
> strange message: 
> 
> 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway
> 
> The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error),
> but I can't
> make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  
> 
> What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in
> nslookup and
> from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 
> 25.  The users
> have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this 
> domain before or
> since, except for this most important email (or course).   
> There was no NDR,
> no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.
> 
> Thanks for any assistance!
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

"...no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole."

Maybe you just answered your own question.

Have you checked the RBL's to see if your listed?  Have you been spamming
this domain to death?  With a domain name like optonline.net, I'd be tempted
to drop you in a Blackhole list, just on general principles.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error


It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from 
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a 
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't 
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and 
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users 
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. 

Thanks for any assistance! 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Andrey Fyodorov]

EMC's business continuance volume can stop the Exchange services for a short time and 
mirror the files, then split the mirror, then start the Exchange services again. You 
can do whatever you want with the split mirror image.

But that's like 1 million bucks.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Andrey,

That's true.  But you know, upon reading the archives (shoulda done that _before_ I 
posted the question!!), I don't think I want to use eseutil on a regular basis, unless 
it's necessary.  Do you know of any other (3rd-party) app that would do this, or am I 
just barking up the wrong tree?

Eric


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


10GB Eseutil will take a couple of hours I think.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Offline Folders

[Chris Scharff]

NoOST=3

On 2/12/03 11:46, "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Exchange 5.5.  Windows 2000, Outlook 2000. 

I have a user that keeps getting a synchronization error message.. 

7:46:32 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar' 
7:46:32 Error synchronizing message 'Network Team Staff' 
7:46:32  [80070057-501-0-322] 
7:46:32  The client operation failed. 
7:46:32  Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store 

However, Offline folders are not enabled under Tools - Services or Tools - 
Options. 
We've rebuilt her profile a couple of times, didn't help.  If Offline 
folders aren't 
enabled, why would it be trying to synchronize??? 

Thanks. 

Robert 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Holidays gone in Outlook

[Chris Scharff]

Is slipstick.com down? 

On 2/12/03 10:40, "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Ok I found that the .txt file needs updating.  How can I do this from 
Exchange 2000 to all clients? 

Jim Liddil 

-Original Message- 
From: James Liddil 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Holidays gone in Outlook 


I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In 
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Or what am I not doing? 

Jim Liddil 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error

[Andrey Fyodorov]

usually when I see error 500 it means that the user account does not have a mailbox, 
but in that case the whole page is displaying error 500, no frames.




-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error


(Exch2k SP3 on Win2k SP3)

Hmm.  I'm getting this error: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error, when
users are logging in to OWA.  The folder list appears and populates just
fine, but that error appears in what would be the (bigger pane) item
listing.

Interestingly enough, if the user clicks "Calendar", their calendar will
appear in the big pane But all other folders result in the error.

A google and MSKB search only mentions old browsers and free-busy
stuff Nothing that seems to apply to me.

Anyone seen this before?

tia


 
 
___
There are 10 types of people in the world:  those who understand binary,
and those who do not.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Chris Scharff]

Not sure who suggested that, but I'd put them on the short list for the next
layoffs.

On 2/12/03 10:22, "HOLLIDAY, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server 
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to 
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay 
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring 
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. 
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like 
to know if anyone else has any other options. 

TIA, 

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems 
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error

[Chris Levis]

(Exch2k SP3 on Win2k SP3)

Hmm.  I'm getting this error: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error, when
users are logging in to OWA.  The folder list appears and populates just
fine, but that error appears in what would be the (bigger pane) item
listing.

Interestingly enough, if the user clicks "Calendar", their calendar will
appear in the big pane But all other folders result in the error.

A google and MSKB search only mentions old browsers and free-busy
stuff Nothing that seems to apply to me.

Anyone seen this before?

tia


 
 
___
There are 10 types of people in the world:  those who understand binary,
and those who do not.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[Couch, Nate]

I have seen this behavior with several AV software packages (Groupshield,
Grousphield 2000, NAV, and Trend.  What I have seen happen is that the AV
software takes more time depending on the size of the message.  At times I
have had to double click on an attachment multiple times before it will
open.  A lack of patience on my part is likely here.

Anyway, I don't think you are encountering anything out of the ordinary
here.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: RBHATIA
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:59
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
> 
> I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
> I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and
> when
> I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
> error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
> display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
> minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
> display the attachments.
> I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV
> running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real
> Time protection before opening the email but got the same message.
> This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines.
> Any ideas ?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[Dolphin, Jeff]

What AV is running on the Exchange server?  I've noticed some small delays
on mail with attachments since installing ScanMail but its not too
bad...Have you considered using WinZip or something on all those files?
That might help...

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when
I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
display the attachments.
I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV
running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real
Time protection before opening the email but got the same message.
This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines.
Any ideas ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[Candee Vaglica]

Exchange server?
Any AV on the exchange server?

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments


I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when
I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
display the attachments. I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional
machine. I do have NAV running with File System Protection enabled. I even
tried disabling Real Time protection before opening the email but got the
same message. This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple
machines. Any ideas ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Strange behaviour with multiple attachments

[RBHATIA]

I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I sent myself an email with about 41 attachments (all Excel files) and when
I received the email and first double clicked on it to open it, Id' get an
error message saying "Unable to open one or more attachments" and would
display a blank email without the attachments. Then after a couple of
minutes when I'd try to open the same email again, it was able to open and
display the attachments.
I'm running Outlook 2000 on a Win2K Professional machine. I do have NAV
running with File System Protection enabled. I even tried disabling Real
Time protection before opening the email but got the same message.
This is not system specific as I tested it on multiple machines.
Any ideas ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?

[Lockmer, Amy]

Ronni - I had a similar VPN issue where just a few clients could ping the
Exchange server but could not connect when they were connected via VPN.  It
turned out to be the RPC binding order on the client's registry.  Have a
look at Microsoft article #163576 and article #326036.  I also found the
rpcrt4.dll would become corrupted and after I replaced that .dll and applied
the following articles everything worked.

Amy

-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?


We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process
of moving us to a new server. New hardware, new name, following Ed's Move
Server Method which I have already done once without issue on NT4 to NT4.
This time we moved to Windows 2000 for the new server's OS. New server is
therefore Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2k SP2 + security fixes and old server was/is
Exch 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a + security fixes. I moved mailboxes over the
course of a few days and everyone was fine, running happily without issues,
except for one guy (the "n-sigma where n is a big number" guy of course)
whose home machine couldn't connect fully to the new mail server over VPN as
it had when it was on the NT4 box. It does make connections to the Exchange
Server. I can see that with netstat -a on either side but it does not appear
to transfer data. He uses a software vpn client to connect to our network.
So at first I was ready to blame the MTU issue and make the modifications
necessary to correct that. However, when I researched it, it seemed as
though I should be having the same problem with all the clients that use
vpn. Now some of my vpn clients have an appliance (Watchguard SOHO at user's
home connects to our Watchguard Firebox) and some have the software client.
Those with the appliance might not see the issue but my box at home uses the
software client (SafeNet created for Watchguard) and it works fine as do all
the SOHOs. The only pertinent difference I can see between my n-sigma user's
connection and mine is that he uses dial-up and I use a dsl line. I have
also verified that this is dial-up related in that a second user also has
the issue with dial-up access.

I have googled. I have technetted. I have searched archives. I have
found/done the following:

I have read Q301337 "PMTU Detection May Not Work After You Install Windows
2000 SP2" and while it appears to be the most pertinent, I am leery of
adding a fix that until recently was not available except through PSS just
to fix 2 people's e-mail access from home. Certainly it is true that our
software vpn assigns an address on the same subnet to the client pc. But
that is true for my machine as well, so I am also not 100% convinced that
this will solve my issue. Has anyone here installed the Q301337 hotfix
Q301337_W2k_SP3_x86_en.exe on a Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange Server and found
that it caused problems? If not I am willing to try it. But I find myself a
bit nervous about that "Uninstall is not available" note at the bottom of
the download page. I do not have a server I can test with at the moment. If
I get no positive feedback on this fix I may decide to build one first.
Positive feedback about this fix would be appreciated as I am not sure where
I can find a box to build a temporary test Exchange Server out of.

Following Q159211 "Diagnoses and Treatment of Black Hole Routers" I did find
a breakdown at an MTU of about 1200 for the n-sigma user's machine over
dial-up and at 1450 for the other user's machine so I am reasonably certain
MTU is a factor.

I reviewed Q259783 "PPPoE with ICS Requires MTU Setting Below 1492 on the
ICS Client" however, neither user is running ICS, nor is either one running
PPPoE.

Q120642 "TCP/IP & NBT Configuration Parameters for Windows" seems to
indicate that I could add the MTU value for the dialup adapter to solve this
problem but that has not worked for the second user and Q3031337 seems to
indicate it might be ignored anyway due to the way the software VPN client
behaves.

Any other suggestions/pointers will be gratefully received.

Ronni

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[HOLLIDAY, Eric]

I think I'll give that a whirl.
Thanks, Drew.

Eric Holliday
Exchange Administrator
Corporate Infomation Systems
Logistics Management Institute 

-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Why not run an online backup on the local server, using Win2K Backup to
back up to disk, and then copy the online backup over the T?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Andrey,

That's true.  But you know, upon reading the archives (shoulda done that
_before_ I posted the question!!), I don't think I want to use eseutil
on a regular basis, unless it's necessary.  Do you know of any other
(3rd-party) app that would do this, or am I just barking up the wrong
tree?

Eric


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


10GB Eseutil will take a couple of hours I think.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. I
have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like to
know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline Folders

[Candee Vaglica]

Here's a Q dealing with synchronization problems:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/outlook/synchro/defa
ult.asp

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline Folders


Exchange 5.5.  Windows 2000, Outlook 2000.

I have a user that keeps getting a synchronization error message..

7:46:32 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
7:46:32 Error synchronizing message 'Network Team Staff'
7:46:32  [80070057-501-0-322]
7:46:32  The client operation failed.
7:46:32  Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store

However, Offline folders are not enabled under Tools - Services or Tools -
Options. We've rebuilt her profile a couple of times, didn't help.  If
Offline folders aren't enabled, why would it be trying to synchronize???

Thanks.

Robert


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Offline Folders

[McCready, Robert]

Exchange 5.5.  Windows 2000, Outlook 2000.

I have a user that keeps getting a synchronization error message..

7:46:32 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
7:46:32 Error synchronizing message 'Network Team Staff'
7:46:32  [80070057-501-0-322]
7:46:32  The client operation failed.
7:46:32  Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store

However, Offline folders are not enabled under Tools - Services or Tools -
Options.
We've rebuilt her profile a couple of times, didn't help.  If Offline
folders aren't
enabled, why would it be trying to synchronize???

Thanks.

Robert


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Drew Nicholson]

Why not run an online backup on the local server, using Win2K Backup to
back up to disk, and then copy the online backup over the T?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Andrey,

That's true.  But you know, upon reading the archives (shoulda done that
_before_ I posted the question!!), I don't think I want to use eseutil
on a regular basis, unless it's necessary.  Do you know of any other
(3rd-party) app that would do this, or am I just barking up the wrong
tree?

Eric


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


10GB Eseutil will take a couple of hours I think.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. I
have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like to
know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Charles Marriott]

Using whatever works, just do it at the remote site. You can run/control it
from the central office.
What is the point of having a tape from a remote server? You gonna restore
it over the T1?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Using Backup Exec, right?

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Have them do a local backup.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday
Exchange Administrator
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute
McLean, VA

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[HOLLIDAY, Eric]

Using Backup Exec, right?

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


Have them do a local backup. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Charles Marriott]

Have them do a local backup. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[HOLLIDAY, Eric]

Andrey,

That's true.  But you know, upon reading the archives (shoulda done that _before_ I 
posted the question!!), I don't think I want to use eseutil on a regular basis, unless 
it's necessary.  Do you know of any other (3rd-party) app that would do this, or am I 
just barking up the wrong tree?

Eric


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options


10GB Eseutil will take a couple of hours I think.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[Andrey Fyodorov]

10GB Eseutil will take a couple of hours I think.

-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options



We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Holidays gone in Outlook

[Bingel, Chris]

MS has an update Holiday definition file available for download from their
site.  Careful deploying it, so that you don't wind up with duplicate
entries.

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Holidays gone in Outlook

I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Or what am I not doing?

Jim Liddil


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Holidays gone in Outlook

[Candee Vaglica]

Outlook? 

www.slipstick.com

Search for add holidays.



-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Holidays gone in Outlook


I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Or what am I not doing?

Jim Liddil


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Holidays gone in Outlook

[James Liddil]

Ok I found that the .txt file needs updating.  How can I do this from
Exchange 2000 to all clients?

Jim Liddil

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Holidays gone in Outlook


I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Or what am I not doing?

Jim Liddil


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Holidays gone in Outlook

[Mellott, Bill]

there is a fix for this from MS...check technet

-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Holidays gone in Outlook


I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Or what am I not doing?

Jim Liddil


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Recall: IIScan / exmerge

[Chris Scharff]

I should hope so.

On 2/12/03 10:35, "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



James Liddil would like to recall the message, "IIScan / exmerge". 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IIScan / exmerge

[Chris Scharff]

Outlook? www.slipstick.com

On 2/12/03 10:35, "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In 
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Are what obvious thing am I not doing? 

Jim Liddil 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Offline backup of Exch2k - options

[HOLLIDAY, Eric]

We have a remote office connected via T1.  They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
10Gb.  Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay
too long.  It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring
the stores back online, & shoot the backed up files down the T1 later.
I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like
to know if anyone else has any other options.

TIA,

Eric Holliday 
Exchange Administrator 
Corporate Information Systems
Logistics Management Institute 
McLean, VA 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Holidays gone in Outlook

[James Liddil]

I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Or what am I not doing?

Jim Liddil


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall: IIScan / exmerge

[James Liddil]

James Liddil would like to recall the message, "IIScan / exmerge".

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Strange Problem with Word 2000

[SAP]

Hi All,
We have a very strange issue here, windows 2000 file and print server and 2000 Prof 
clients runnig office 2000.
when users access word docs on the local machines, everything is perfectly fine, but 
when they access the word docs on the server, it works fine to open the docs but 
to save or close it takes ages... and happens only with word docs... no other file or 
program.. excel works fine, everything works fine... no event logs on either the 
server or the client workstationsnothing at all.. I searched the support sites and 
came across suggestions of outlook 2000 and turning off the journalling option... this 
does not apply to our case.. since the outlook journal option mentioned is already 
disabled 
Can some one throw some more light on this strnage error???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IIScan / exmerge

[James Liddil]

I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In
XP things are fine.  What is broken? Are what obvious thing am I not doing?

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?

[Dave Vantine]

I would agree with Mike that it is probably and issue with that one client.
I would look carefully at the name resolution.

Can the user ping the exchange server via name resolution across the tunnel?

We ran into some recent problems when using the MUVPN from Watchguard,
especially on XP machines. Occasionally some of the MUVPN's do not setup the
Virtual Adapter and it connects using SafeNet's default mode which uses the
"Shim" (there are 3 options for this disabled, preferred, and required)
which leaves you without any name resolution that may have been supplied via
the virtual adapter. The only way around the problem with those that will
only connect with the Shim was to use an ALMOST file on there machine.
Watchguard is aware of this issue and is working with SafeNet 

-Dave Vantine



-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?



Ronni,

Given that your other VPN clients work OK except this one I think I'd be
looking at the specifics of this guys VPN and network setup and start with
the simple stuff like the Watchguard traffic monitor and logs to see if
anything's getting blocked and with the name resolution and dialup
performance at the client end, rather than diving in with a bunch of
hotfixes.

We have a very similar setup here, and these tools fix pretty much all these
issues here.

Just my approach,
Mike 

 
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 11 February 2003 22:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?


We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process
of moving us to a new server. New hardware, new name, following Ed's Move
Server Method which I have already done once without issue on NT4 to NT4.
This time we moved to Windows 2000 for the new server's OS. New server is
therefore Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2k SP2 + security fixes and old server was/is
Exch 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a + security fixes. I moved mailboxes over the
course of a few days and everyone was fine, running happily without issues,
except for one guy (the "n-sigma where n is a big number" guy of course)
whose home machine couldn't connect fully to the new mail server over VPN as
it had when it was on the NT4 box. It does make connections to the Exchange
Server. I can see that with netstat -a on either side but it does not appear
to transfer data. He uses a software vpn client to connect to our network.
So at first I was ready to blame the MTU issue and make the modifications
necessary to correct that. However, when I researched it, it seemed as
though I should be having the same problem with all the clients that use
vpn. Now some of my vpn clients have an appliance (Watchguard SOHO at user's
home connects to our Watchguard Firebox) and some have the software client.
Those with the appliance might not see the issue but my box at home uses the
software client (SafeNet created for Watchguard) and it works fine as do all
the SOHOs. The only pertinent difference I can see between my n-sigma user's
connection and mine is that he uses dial-up and I use a dsl line. I have
also verified that this is dial-up related in that a second user also has
the issue with dial-up access.

I have googled. I have technetted. I have searched archives. I have
found/done the following:

I have read Q301337 "PMTU Detection May Not Work After You Install Windows
2000 SP2" and while it appears to be the most pertinent, I am leery of
adding a fix that until recently was not available except through PSS just
to fix 2 people's e-mail access from home. Certainly it is true that our
software vpn assigns an address on the same subnet to the client pc. But
that is true for my machine as well, so I am also not 100% convinced that
this will solve my issue. Has anyone here installed the Q301337 hotfix
Q301337_W2k_SP3_x86_en.exe on a Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange Server and found
that it caused problems? If not I am willing to try it. But I find myself a
bit nervous about that "Uninstall is not available" note at the bottom of
the download page. I do not have a server I can test with at the moment. If
I get no positive feedback on this fix I may decide to build one first.
Positive feedback about this fix would be appreciated as I am not sure where
I can find a box to build a temporary test Exchange Server out of.

Following Q159211 "Diagnoses and Treatment of Black Hole Routers" I did find
a breakdown at an MTU of about 1200 for the n-sigma user's machine over
dial-up and at 1450 for the other user's machine so I am reasonably certain
MTU is a factor.

I reviewed Q259783 "PPPoE with ICS Requires MTU Setting Below 1492 on the
ICS Client" however, neither user is running ICS, nor is either one running
PPPoE.

Q120642 "TCP/IP & NBT Configuration Parameters for Windows" seems to
indicate that I co

RE: IIScan / exmerge

[Tim Ault]

Q246153: DumperAlwaysOn=1 reghack

Tim.
x3683


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IIScan / exmerge


Tools | Recover Deleted Items?

On 2/6/03 16:38, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Will either of these utilities work against a public store for a 
contact-type folder?  I have a 5.5 pub.edb but wondering whether there's 
any other way to recover a shared contacts folder from it except to 
build a 5.5 recovery server. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K

[Ken Cornetet]

Our AD domain is still mixed.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


I agree in spirit. But, don't you install it from the Exchange 5.5 CD?

Could it be related to the mode of your AD Domain/s?

If all this stuff worked perfectly it wouldn't pay nearly as well. :-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


OWA 5.5 isn't exchange, it's just a big vbscript asp program that uses
some COM objects and MAPI to access mail. It worked just fine in our
test lab. Unfortunately, our testing didn't include creating new users
after the switch to native mode, since switching to native mode was the
last thing on the test plan.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


Since Exchange 2k native means no 5.5 isn't this what one would expect?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K
mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going
native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5.

We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not
work because "legacy" attributes are not created after switching to
native mode. They could not tell us what these "legacy" attributes are
(a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious
differences in AD attributes).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

[RIM]

You've checked event logs, checked that IIS isn't pegging out and
resetting itself, checked the IIS logs?

> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 12 February 2003 15:57
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"
> 
> 
> That's my question.  I can't figure it out either.
> 
> Greg Householder
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"
> 
> If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to 
> loose the connection? It's using TCP.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Gregory Householder
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"
> 
> 
> Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to 
> happen recently. I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 
> SP3.  I have users that once in a while they lose connection 
> to their OWA.  When they try to reconnect they get a page 
> cannot be displayed.  They are accessing the OWA through 
> https and when they get that message if they change the web 
> address to http they can get back in without any problems.  
> It seems to me like the first connection gets froze up so by 
> going the non-secure way they are going through a new 
> connection.  I have 24 restaurants accessing OWA and they all 
> have had problems at one time or another and I have even 
> experienced it at home a couple of times.  IE is completed 
> updated as well as everything on the server side.  Our 
> internet connection is always solid and doesn't go down.  Has 
> anyone seen this or have any suggestions I could try to keep 
> this from happening?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Householder
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook2000

[Charles Marriott]

This list is for sharing? Whatever could it BE?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook2000


Thank everyone I found the answer

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook2000


Outlook? www.slipstick.com 

On 2/12/03 9:27, "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for 
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right 
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing 
Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I 
install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade? 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook2000

[Tony Nguyen]

Thank everyone I found the answer

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook2000


Outlook? www.slipstick.com 

On 2/12/03 9:27, "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for 
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right 
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing 
Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I 
install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade? 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook2000

[Andrey Fyodorov]

switch to corporate/workgroup mode under tools-options

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook2000


I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing
Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I
install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade?

Tony N.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

[Charles Marriott]

So, how do you know it is solid. It's the Internet, right? You don't own the
whole wire.
Check the IIS settings for things like http keepalives and connection time
out value.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"


That's my question.  I can't figure it out either.

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the
connection?
It's using TCP.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"


Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently.
I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3.  I have users that
once in a while they lose connection to their OWA.  When they try to
reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed.  They are accessing the
OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web
address to http they can get back in without any problems.  It seems to
me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure
way they are going through a new connection.  I have 24 restaurants
accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and
I have even experienced it at home a couple of times.  IE is completed
updated as well as everything on the server side.  Our internet
connection is always solid and doesn't go down.  Has anyone seen this or
have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening?

Thanks,

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

[Mellott, Bill]

Ask yourself "What else might I or Somebody else have changed"

I screwed myself one time cause of my URL filter...

bill

-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"


That's my question.  I can't figure it out either.

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the
connection?
It's using TCP.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"


Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently.
I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3.  I have users that
once in a while they lose connection to their OWA.  When they try to
reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed.  They are accessing the
OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web
address to http they can get back in without any problems.  It seems to
me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure
way they are going through a new connection.  I have 24 restaurants
accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and
I have even experienced it at home a couple of times.  IE is completed
updated as well as everything on the server side.  Our internet
connection is always solid and doesn't go down.  Has anyone seen this or
have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening?

Thanks,

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

[Gregory Householder]

That's my question.  I can't figure it out either.

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the
connection?
It's using TCP.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"


Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently.
I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3.  I have users that
once in a while they lose connection to their OWA.  When they try to
reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed.  They are accessing the
OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web
address to http they can get back in without any problems.  It seems to
me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure
way they are going through a new connection.  I have 24 restaurants
accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and
I have even experienced it at home a couple of times.  IE is completed
updated as well as everything on the server side.  Our internet
connection is always solid and doesn't go down.  Has anyone seen this or
have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening?

Thanks,

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

[Charles Marriott]

If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the
connection?
It's using TCP.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA "Page cannot be displayed"


Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently.
I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3.  I have users that
once in a while they lose connection to their OWA.  When they try to
reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed.  They are accessing the
OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web
address to http they can get back in without any problems.  It seems to
me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure
way they are going through a new connection.  I have 24 restaurants
accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and
I have even experienced it at home a couple of times.  IE is completed
updated as well as everything on the server side.  Our internet
connection is always solid and doesn't go down.  Has anyone seen this or
have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening?

Thanks,

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA "Page cannot be displayed"

[Gregory Householder]

Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently.
I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3.  I have users that
once in a while they lose connection to their OWA.  When they try to
reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed.  They are accessing the
OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web
address to http they can get back in without any problems.  It seems to
me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure
way they are going through a new connection.  I have 24 restaurants
accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and
I have even experienced it at home a couple of times.  IE is completed
updated as well as everything on the server side.  Our internet
connection is always solid and doesn't go down.  Has anyone seen this or
have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening?

Thanks,

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: eManager Rule Management

[James Liddil]

I figure a few folks here might use the Trend Micro ScanMail with the
eManager.  I have version 5.11.  I already made a feature request to Trend
but I thought maybe someone has come up with a work around.  As one develops
content filters there is no way to sort them nor is there a way to look for
duplicate entries.   Any solutions, besides buy a different product? :-)

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outlook2000

[Chris Scharff]

Outlook? www.slipstick.com 

On 2/12/03 9:27, "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for 
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right 
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing 
Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I 
install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade? 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Strange 550 error

[Chris Scharff]

It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).

Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]

[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.

On 2/12/03 7:42, "Jeffrey Dubyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from 
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a 
specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 

550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway 

The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't 
make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  

What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and 
from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25.  The users 
have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or

since, except for this most important email (or course).   There was no NDR,

no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. 

Thanks for any assistance! 


_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: insufficient space to store all of your rules

[Chris Scharff]

Archives.


On 2/11/03 20:28, "Anthony Roark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Exchange, 
  
I have many rules set in outlook.  After activating all of them I get 
the following message: "there is insufficient space to store all of 
your rules."  Once I re-open the Rules Wizard I notice some rules have 
been deactivated.  Has anyone seen this before? 
  



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook2000

[Charles Marriott]

I think you are not in mapi/workgroup mode?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook2000


I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing
Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I
install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade?

Tony N.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook2000

[Tony Nguyen]

I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing
Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I
install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade?

Tony N.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange 550 error

[Public Folder: Exchange]

I have seen misleading 550 errors if Reverse DNS to your domain is not
correct.  If the IP address of your SMTP relay/server resolves to
mail.domain.com, but the SMTP server/relay actually claims to be a
different host name, then you can get a 550 error.

-Kevin

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:42 AM
> Posted To: Exchange
> Conversation: Strange 550 error
> Subject: Strange 550 error
> 
> 
> I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an 
> email sent from
> inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some 
> recipients in a
> specific domain.  I have logging turned up, and found a 
> strange message: 
> 
> 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway
> 
> The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), 
> but I can't
> make heads or tails out of the rest of the message.  
> 
> What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in 
> nslookup and
> from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 
> 25.  The users
> have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this 
> domain before or
> since, except for this most important email (or course).   
> There was no NDR,
> no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.
> 
> Thanks for any assistance!
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS

[Public Folder: Exchange]

Having multiple gateways always causes problems in my experience.   What
is the reason for having the multiple gateways?  Are they both in the
same subnet?

You are much better off avoiding a multiple gateway configuration if you
can.

-Kevin

> -Original Message-
> From: Jojo Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:17 AM
> Posted To: Exchange
> Conversation: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS
> Subject: E2K WEIRD GATEWAY ADDRESS
> 
> 
> scenario
>  
> we have two gateway for our Internet Server, G1 and G2.
> 
> before i restarted my E2K server the gateway is pointed to G1 
> (gateway 1), when I start the server the IS and the MTA 
> stacks service did not start successfully, the event log says 
> the Routing Engine hung on starting (Event 7022) and the IS 
> also not start with error message "terminated with service 
> specific error 0" (event 7024), but when i try to start those 
> services manually it starts successfully without any error. 
> the weird thing is the gateway are not correctly pointed for 
> what is supposed to be pointed which is the G1, the TCPIP 
> says it is on the G1 but if i check it using ipconfig command 
> the default gateways says its on the G2. its so weird!!! 
> 
> please help me solving this problem.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> jojo
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K

[Erik Sojka]

Drag the contacts to a PST and then drag them back?

It's still somewhat manual but would not require the massaging that a CSV
file might.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K
> 
> 
> Good morning all.
> I was wondering if anyone knew of an easy way to import 
> Exchange contacts into Exchange 2000.
> We have a subsidiary that is running Exchange 5.5 and 
> quarterly they export their list of mailboxes to us using the 
> Directory Export tool.
> We then have to manually massage the file to get it into the 
> proper csv format for import into Ex2K. (using the csvde tool)
> 
> It's a PITA and I was wondering if anyone knew/used a 3rd 
> party product/homemade solution to accomplish this.
> I have looked around on Slipstick and could not locate an 
> obvious solution.
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> 
> 
> LEGAL NOTICE:
> Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is 
> confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the 
> addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is 
> unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or 
> copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in 
> reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you 
> are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K

[Charles Marriott]

I agree in spirit. But, don't you install it from the Exchange 5.5 CD?

Could it be related to the mode of your AD Domain/s?

If all this stuff worked perfectly it wouldn't pay nearly as well. :-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


OWA 5.5 isn't exchange, it's just a big vbscript asp program that uses
some COM objects and MAPI to access mail. It worked just fine in our
test lab. Unfortunately, our testing didn't include creating new users
after the switch to native mode, since switching to native mode was the
last thing on the test plan.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


Since Exchange 2k native means no 5.5 isn't this what one would expect?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K
mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going
native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5.

We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not
work because "legacy" attributes are not created after switching to
native mode. They could not tell us what these "legacy" attributes are
(a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious
differences in AD attributes).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K

[Ken Cornetet]

OWA 5.5 isn't exchange, it's just a big vbscript asp program that uses
some COM objects and MAPI to access mail. It worked just fine in our
test lab. Unfortunately, our testing didn't include creating new users
after the switch to native mode, since switching to native mode was the
last thing on the test plan.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


Since Exchange 2k native means no 5.5 isn't this what one would expect?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K
mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going
native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5.

We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not
work because "legacy" attributes are not created after switching to
native mode. They could not tell us what these "legacy" attributes are
(a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious
differences in AD attributes).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K

[Ken Cornetet]

If you aren't afraid to write a wee bit of code, Perl and Net::LDAP can
easily do this assuming you want their mailboxes as contacts in AD.

If you want them as contacts in a public folder, you'll have to use MAPI
or the Outlook COM object.

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Importing Contacts from 5.5 to E2K


Good morning all.
I was wondering if anyone knew of an easy way to import Exchange
contacts into Exchange 2000. We have a subsidiary that is running
Exchange 5.5 and quarterly they export their list of mailboxes to us
using the Directory Export tool. We then have to manually massage the
file to get it into the proper csv format for import into Ex2K. (using
the csvde tool)

It's a PITA and I was wondering if anyone knew/used a 3rd party
product/homemade solution to accomplish this. I have looked around on
Slipstick and could not locate an obvious solution.

Thanks
Paul


LEGAL NOTICE:
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may
be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any
disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken)
in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K

[Charles Marriott]

Since Exchange 2k native means no 5.5 isn't this what one would expect?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K
mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going
native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5.

We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not
work because "legacy" attributes are not created after switching to
native mode. They could not tell us what these "legacy" attributes are
(a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious
differences in AD attributes).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Letter to Exchange List - Using CDO for Exchange 2000

[Ken Cornetet]

On NT/2K/XP
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows
Messaging Subsystem\Profile\DefaultProfile

On 9x
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows Messaging
Subsystem\Profiles\DefaultProfile

-Original Message-
From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Letter to Exchange List - Using CDO for Exchange 2000


Hello James,

How is she connecting to the Exchange server? Code such as:

' Create Session And Logon
Set oSession = New MAPI.Session
oSession.Logon ShowDialog:=True

will cause MAPI logon dialog to appear, displaying the default Outlook
profile. Pressing OK on that window will cause the program to connect to
the user's mailbox (assuming that user has permission to access the
mailbox).

One can get the name of the default profile from the registry, but I
haven't completely worked this out yet.

Regards,

Chris

-Original Message-
From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: February 11, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Letter to Exchange List - Using CDO for Exchange 2000


I have a programmer trying to send mail using CDO on an Exchange 2000
server. It is not a production machine. She has written a delphi
application to and send mail using CDO. She is able to send email
successfully using the smtp functionality of cdo, but not using the
exchange functionality. When she uses the value "cdoSendUsingExchange"
it returns an error: "Authentication failed".

I have checked everything I can find as far as permissions and policies,
and she is using the administrator account and trying to run the script
locally to the Exchange server without success. Can anyone point me in
the direction I should look to troubleshooting? I hope this is clear, if
not, please ask for clarification and I will be happy to do so.

Thanks a bunch for any help.
J


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K

[Ken Cornetet]

Nope, LegacyDN was the first thing I thought of. I perused the AD
attributes and I didn't see anything that jumped out at me. I assume the
attributes in question must be mailbox attributes in the store, not user
attributes in AD.

They didn't seem interested in going further since using 5.5 OWA with
E2K mailboxes isn't supported. We did not push the matter, though. 

We'll probably just escalate getting rid of the reasons to keep 5.5 OWA
so that we can switch to OWA 2000, which, IMHO, is one of the best parts
of E2K anyway.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: WARNING! OWA 5.5 & E2K


It's not the MS Exchange legacy DN? Call PSS back and tell them to find
the
attribute(s) in question, they can and if they won't ask them who they'd
like to escalate the call to. You'll likely be able to set those
attributes programmatically.

On 2/11/03 16:02, "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K 
mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going 
native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5. 

We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not 
work because "legacy" attributes are not created after switching to 
native mode. They could not tell us what these "legacy" attributes are 
(a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious 
differences in AD attributes). 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]