RE: Stupid disclaimers

[B. van Ouwerkerk]

Just found out.. they don't like love

Now.. who wants to work for a company where love is a forbidden word.

To prevent others from reading their policy they didn't put it on the place 
where they say it is.. smart move if you want to do business..

B.

At 08:08 22-03-2003 +0100, you wrote:
Not only stupid disclaimers, but also stupid filters.

I wonder what triggered the filter


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Stupid disclaimers

[B. van Ouwerkerk]

Not only stupid disclaimers, but also stupid filters.

I wonder what triggered the filter, love or mushrooms :)



B.

At 22:57 21-03-2003 -0800, you wrote:
Guess they don't like the shitake mushrooms.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: WC System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:39 PM
To: 'Ed Crowley'
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
taken.
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Ed Crowley
Subject = RE: Stupid disclaimers
Delivery Time = March 21, 2003 (Friday) 22:38:41
Policy = Dirty Words
Action on this mail = Quarantine message
Warning message from administrator:
The content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.  Please see
http://policiesweb.baf.com/Misc/ElectronicCommunication.doc for further
details. If this is a business critical email, you can contact the
Helpdesk at x4357 in Walnut Creek.

__
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
prohibited.
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Stupid disclaimers

[Ed Crowley]

Guess they don't like the shitake mushrooms.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: WC System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:39 PM
To: 'Ed Crowley'
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
taken.


Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Ed Crowley
Subject = RE: Stupid disclaimers
Delivery Time = March 21, 2003 (Friday) 22:38:41
Policy = Dirty Words
Action on this mail = Quarantine message

Warning message from administrator:
The content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.  Please see
http://policiesweb.baf.com/Misc/ElectronicCommunication.doc for further
details. If this is a business critical email, you can contact the
Helpdesk at x4357 in Walnut Creek.

__ 

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential 
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is 
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should 
delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution 
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly 
prohibited.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Stupid disclaimers

[Ed Crowley]

Love those shitake mushrooms!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers


Now now, remember, my City is filtering on only two words, F*** and
S***.  Why we don't filter on other, much more obscene words then that
is beyond me :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stupid disclaimers


Wow, if my content filters would have flagged this message for
administrative review, I would have been in violation of federal
criminal law... In the country of Bullshitia I guess.

On 3/19/03 9:43, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
> print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this

> in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the
> message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of 
> federal criminal law.
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 setup problems

[Ed Crowley]

Try rerunning ForestPrep and DomainPrep from the SP3 CD.

Run:

update /ForestPrep
And update /DomainPrep

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robyn
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 setup problems


Dear all,

I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if
anyone can help??.

Let me set the scene.

I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been
dcpromo-ed.  One of my servers is the Global Catalog for the domain
whilst my other server is a domain controller which has been ticked in
the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog server.  It is this server that is
the Exchange 2000 server.  The domain is currently running in mixed
mode. I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install
exchange 2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have Service pack 1
installed.

I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes
well with no reported errors.  Once replication has taken place, I then
run the domainprep switch.  Once replication has taken place, I then
install Exchange 2000.  All seems to go ok and once installed I can
connect to the exchange server via an outlook client, and send emails
internally and add stuff to the public folders.

The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for
Exchange 2000 (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1 SP2 and SP3)

The Problem:-

When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the
following
message:-

'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration
Services
failed: The component "Microsoft Exchange
Messaging and Collaboration Services" cannot be assigned the action
"Update" because:
 - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date.  You must run setup
with the "/ForestPrep" switch. If you have already done this with the
current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to
complete. Consult your documentation for details.
 - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date.  You must run setup
with the "/DomainPrep" switch within this domain. If you have already
done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for
replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. 



Any ideas???

Thanks

Robyn.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SBS and Pop3 Connector

[Ed Crowley]

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_smtp_diatribe.htm
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_dq.htm
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_smtp.htm

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 6:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SBS and Pop3 Connector


I was under the impression that the Pop3Connector would let me send
through it to my Provider that my E-mail Addresses look like they are
coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] vs. [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
If I understand you correctly I use Exchanges SMTP to just relay off my
provider? Or I set up my SMTP connector to send my mail and make my
default reply address my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.

Thanks, I'll also check Yahoo.


Joshua







Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector


This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail
from 
the internet right?
So it has to do with the SMTP sending part.

Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's 
SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too?

Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require
you 
to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam.

Use message tracking to find out where it goes.

There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k 
where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field.



B.

At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange,

>yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but
>unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never 
>delivered to their recipients.
>
>Here is the set up
>Microsoft Small Business Server 2000
>Windows 2000 SP3
>Exchange 2000 SP3
>Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15
>minutes
>
>He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to)
>and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses.
>
>I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know
>where to begin to troubleshoot.
>
>Any Help would be appreciated.
>
>Joshua


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.

[Missy Koslosky]

Use cleansweep from the Back Office Resource Kit (I forget which one...)
- Original Message -
From: "Miller, LT Johnny -wcso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.


Now I get this error since I changed to the inbox assistant.

"Changes to the rule could not be saved.  There is not enough memory or the
rules are to complex.  Try deleting some rules."

I have only one test rule set up.  All this rule does id move an e-mail to a
folder.

Any thoughts or ideas.


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP connector issue

[Missy Koslosky]

What's the encoding look like on the client?

That's a WAG, BTW.
- Original Message - 
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: SMTP connector issue


Exchange 2k SP3

Finally, I got an event on this.  Every now and then one of our users
(Random) sends an outbound email with an attachment that gets stuck on
our SMTP connector that connects to our mail gateway.  Below are the
events it triggered in order.  Its not a certain attachment and its not
a certain client.  Its all random.  Clients are sending HTML, RTF, and
plain text.   It happens to all of them.  I'm stuck on this.  It has
been happening for a while so I am kind of frustrated.  I guess it might
lead to PSS.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

1.
Event ID: 327
Source: MSExchangeTransport
Category: Exchange Store Driver


The following call : EcGetMime to the store failed. Error code :
-2147024809. MDB : 2126f66d-a776-4b44-9790-bc6902e8aed1. FID : 1-2E. MID
: 1-2E2AC8B. File : . 




2.
Event ID: 4000

Message delivery to the remote domain '[mail gateway ip]' failed for the
following reason: Unable to open the message for delivery.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PF post feature (was Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item)

[Tener, Richard]

sorry about the subject, yeah we purchased a utility called PostToNote but the problem 
is they dont let you download it after purchase you have to wait for it in the mail 
12-24 hours, pretty messed up. The funny thing is that you can download a evaluation 
version.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PF post feature (was Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display
cannot display item)


This is by product design. If you don't want to use a 3rd party event sink,
you can write your own or rehome the public folders in question to a 5.5
server.

-- 
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne

Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp



On 3/21/03 21:15, "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to
> exchange 2000 box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as
> message formats. Does anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using
> third party programs.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item

[Missy Koslosky]

This is by design.  LOL.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:15 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item


We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to
exchange 2000 box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as
message formats. Does anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using
third party programs.

rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PF post feature (was Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item)

[Chris Scharff]

This is by product design. If you don't want to use a 3rd party event sink,
you can write your own or rehome the public folders in question to a 5.5
server.

-- 
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne

Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp



On 3/21/03 21:15, "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to
> exchange 2000 box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as
> message formats. Does anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using
> third party programs.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item

[Tener, Richard]

We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to exchange 2000 
box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as message formats. Does 
anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using third party programs.

rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item

[Chris Scharff]

Does this occur on all installed instances of the Admin program?

On 3/21/03 20:33, "sukei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
>  I have encountered a problem of exchange 5.5 administrator, when I open
> the exchange administrator and select the left side of the "connection"
> item tab, it should be some connection show up at the right side. Such as
> Internet mail connector, CC mail connector etc.
> 
>  In my server, the display is blank, but I can still point to the
> corresponding blank area, then select file -> properties to view it. All
> other things display are normal, such as receiptent, mailbox display...
> 
>  How can I fix this problem ?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item

[sukei]

Dear all,
  
   I have encountered a problem of exchange 5.5 administrator, when I open
the exchange administrator and select the left side of the "connection"
item tab, it should be some connection show up at the right side. Such as
Internet mail connector, CC mail connector etc.

   In my server, the display is blank, but I can still point to the
corresponding blank area, then select file -> properties to view it. All
other things display are normal, such as receiptent, mailbox display...

   How can I fix this problem ?

Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Jeffrey Dubyn]

Ronald -

Addusers from the resource kit will work.  For more info and other ideas you
can check out this link from Andrew S. Baker's website: 
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=/usermgr.txt

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B.
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system.


I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can
import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD users &
computer select export list.  I only need to get the users account info, not
the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this.

Ron Pennell

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SEC mail retention rule

[Tony Hlabse]

Well there you go. I haven't worked in a financial firm in a while. Seems 
everything had to be on a list of some sort of products allowed to be used.





From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:30:48 -0600
Our Local SEC (Fort Worth, TX) is accepting it.  But I cannot say wether or
not it is certified.  Have the even come out with requirements to be
certified?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule
So then journaling is certified to be compliant with SEC rule 17a-4?





From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:23:47 -0600
We have the same issue here.  I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I
have the advantage of a SAN to store it on.  I have everything going to a
single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I
can still search it and access it no problem.  Becarefull with Indexing
though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only.  We
looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling
(The poor mans solution) is good enough for now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SEC mail retention rule
I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.
Thanks in advance,

David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
  "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which
my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp
everything."
   - Sir William Blagg.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SEC mail retention rule

[Clemens, Rick]

Our Local SEC (Fort Worth, TX) is accepting it.  But I cannot say wether or
not it is certified.  Have the even come out with requirements to be
certified?

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule


So then journaling is certified to be compliant with SEC rule 17a-4?





From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:23:47 -0600

We have the same issue here.  I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I
have the advantage of a SAN to store it on.  I have everything going to a
single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I
can still search it and access it no problem.  Becarefull with Indexing
though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only.  We
looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling
(The poor mans solution) is good enough for now.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SEC mail retention rule


I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.

Thanks in advance,


David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
  "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which
my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp
everything."
   - Sir William Blagg.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SEC mail retention rule

[Tony Hlabse]

So then journaling is certified to be compliant with SEC rule 17a-4?





From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:23:47 -0600
We have the same issue here.  I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I
have the advantage of a SAN to store it on.  I have everything going to a
single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I
can still search it and access it no problem.  Becarefull with Indexing
though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only.  We
looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling
(The poor mans solution) is good enough for now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SEC mail retention rule
I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.
Thanks in advance,

David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
 "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which
my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp
everything."
  - Sir William Blagg.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SEC mail retention rule

[Clemens, Rick]

We have the same issue here.  I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I
have the advantage of a SAN to store it on.  I have everything going to a
single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I
can still search it and access it no problem.  Becarefull with Indexing
though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only.  We
looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling
(The poor mans solution) is good enough for now.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SEC mail retention rule


I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.

Thanks in advance,


David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
 "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which 
my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp
everything."
  - Sir William Blagg.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: "Reply to" not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5

[John Strongosky]

I bought it and they don't have a fix for it so I'm stuck trying to fix OWA
and I know there has to someone else on this list who has run into this
problem.
   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_// 
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, 
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
we are all Downwinder's...


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: "Reply to" not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5


Ask the person who bought it for you to fix it.






From: John Strongosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "Reply to" not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:55:47 -0800

We are currently testing a antispam software from Active State called Pure
Message, (when I say testing we have bought it and we are implementing it)
but now we find out that the "Reply To" of the email header does not work on
OWA 5.5 which will stop our users from getting any messages that have been
quarantined. Has anyone have a fix for this. I've looked at Tech Net and
what I come up with is KB article 181408 "Set Up Reply to Alternate
Recipient" which will require adding some code but being not a programmer,
is there another way.

___
\\  - -  //
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away,
|while written word's stay on"

+--Oooo--+
   oooO (   )
  (   )  ) /
   \ (  (_/
\_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
we are all Downwinder's...


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system.


I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I
can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in to
performing this.

Ron Pennell

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SMTP connector issue

[Woodruff, Michael]

Exchange 2k SP3

Finally, I got an event on this.  Every now and then one of our users
(Random) sends an outbound email with an attachment that gets stuck on
our SMTP connector that connects to our mail gateway.  Below are the
events it triggered in order.  Its not a certain attachment and its not
a certain client.  Its all random.  Clients are sending HTML, RTF, and
plain text.   It happens to all of them.  I'm stuck on this.  It has
been happening for a while so I am kind of frustrated.  I guess it might
lead to PSS.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

1.
Event ID: 327
Source: MSExchangeTransport
Category: Exchange Store Driver


The following call : EcGetMime to the store failed. Error code :
-2147024809. MDB : 2126f66d-a776-4b44-9790-bc6902e8aed1. FID : 1-2E. MID
: 1-2E2AC8B. File : . 




2.
Event ID: 4000

Message delivery to the remote domain '[mail gateway ip]' failed for the
following reason: Unable to open the message for delivery.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.

[Miller, LT Johnny -wcso]

Now I get this error since I changed to the inbox assistant.

"Changes to the rule could not be saved.  There is not enough memory or the
rules are to complex.  Try deleting some rules."

I have only one test rule set up.  All this rule does id move an e-mail to a
folder.

Any thoughts or ideas.


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Replication

[Gagrani, Kishore]

I am able to move all my users to this new server. The only thing doesn't 
move/replicate are Public Folders (System e.g. Free Busy, Off Line Address Book as 
well User Public Folders)  

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication

So by "site", you meant server? Your other folders have replicated
successfully and you've consolidated the user onto this new server?

On 3/21/03 11:30, "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote site for Exchange server and didn't
> realize I wasn't terming the things right, sorry about that. So, essentially
> it's a simple one site network having three exchange servers , I want to bring
> down two of them and consolidate all exchange stuff on the last one (the
> newest I added recently) , to do that I was trying to replicate all the PF
> related stuff on to the this new server from the first exchange server and
> that's where I got stuck as it won't replicate . If I tried to look in First
> Exchange server's one of the PF's  properties under replication tab -->details
> it says "In Sync" with this First Exchange Server however it says "Local
> Modified" for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange
> server).
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
>
> Then by site you meant what?
>
> On 3/21/03 11:08, "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same
>> subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed
>> Windows-2k domain environment.
>> Thanks for any help.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>>
>> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
>> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
>> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
>> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
>> subnet that is included in a site definition)
>>
>> John
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>>
>> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
>> 2000.
>>
>> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
>> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
>> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
>> Kishore
>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Public Folder Replication
>>
>>
>> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
>> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
>> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
>> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
>>
>> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
>> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
>> there is something in particular I should be looking for.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SEC mail retention rule

[Dflorea]

Negative, this is just an archiving solution in an 'unalterable format',
and apparently must include a 'searchable index.'
They also mandate archival of IM, but I assume that's only if you use an
in-house IM server...

David

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SEC mail retention rule


KVS and Assentor come to mind. Also if your doing archiving of all mail
are 
you also required to restrict delivery based on content.







From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SEC mail retention rule
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:29:38 -0800

I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.

Thanks in advance,


David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
  "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two,
one can grasp everything."
   - Sir William Blagg.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Roger Seielstad]

I completely agree. But enough "material non-public" information graces most
companies' email to make me really get the willies thinking about someone
else having a copy of all of ti,

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: postini spam control
> 
> 
> Yet all that data is traveling in the clear over the wire? Is 
> the threat of federal prosecution by the government of 
> Bushittia, of those who might dare to intercept the data 
> without authorization what helps you sleep at night then? 
> 
> Not that this isn't a legitimate issue, or that there aren't 
> other legitimate issues which ought to be evaluated as well 
> before making such a decision... But it the same issues 
> should likely spark a number of other policy discussions and 
> initiatives as well.
> 
> On 3/21/03 10:40, "Roger Seielstad" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much 
> marginally 
> > confidential information crossing email these days to make that a 
> > practical solution for all byt the smallest shops.
> > 
> > --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis Inc.
> > 
> > 
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
> >> To: Exchange Discussions
> >> Subject: postini spam control
> >> 
> >> 
> >> anybody have any information or tried Postini for their 
> spam control. 
> >> we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about 
> >> surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good 
> pitch.  I 
> >> guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure 
> I like, and 
> >> then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked 
> >> through the archives and didn't find any info, which is 
> probably all 
> >> I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if 
> >> anyone has any comments.
> >> 
> >> thanks
> >> Josh
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: "Reply to" not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5

[Tony Hlabse]

Ask the person who bought it for you to fix it.





From: John Strongosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "Reply to" not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:55:47 -0800
We are currently testing a antispam software from Active State called Pure
Message, (when I say testing we have bought it and we are implementing it)
but now we find out that the "Reply To" of the email header does not work on
OWA 5.5 which will stop our users from getting any messages that have been
quarantined. Has anyone have a fix for this. I've looked at Tech Net and
what I come up with is KB article 181408 "Set Up Reply to Alternate
Recipient" which will require adding some code but being not a programmer,
is there another way.
   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away,
|while written word's stay on"
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
we are all Downwinder's...
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I
can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in to
performing this.
Ron Pennell

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Reply to" not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5

[John Strongosky]

We are currently testing a antispam software from Active State called Pure
Message, (when I say testing we have bought it and we are implementing it)
but now we find out that the "Reply To" of the email header does not work on
OWA 5.5 which will stop our users from getting any messages that have been
quarantined. Has anyone have a fix for this. I've looked at Tech Net and
what I come up with is KB article 181408 "Set Up Reply to Alternate
Recipient" which will require adding some code but being not a programmer,
is there another way.

   ___
   \\  - -  //
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_// 
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community College
|District Email Administrator
|Phone: 619.388.6725
|"8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, 
|while written word's stay on"
   
+--Oooo--+
  oooO (   )
 (   )  ) /
  \ (  (_/
   \_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
we are all Downwinder's...


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system.


I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I
can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in to
performing this.

Ron Pennell

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Chris Scharff]

So ADMT does too much for you? How bout ldif?

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/activedirectory/bulks
teps.asp

On 3/21/03 13:47, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No just want to grab the users from my current AD (minus the exchange
> info) and import them into this new 2000 servers AD.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
> 
> Just because? Are you doing a migration of some kind? Or? The reason I
> am
> asking is because there may be tools to do what you are asking,
> depending on
> what it is you are actually asking.. Like ADMT or the InterOrg tool for
> example.
> 
> On 3/21/03 13:35, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users
> on
>> as needed for access to the other domain.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
>> 
>> What's the design goal?
>> 
>> On 3/21/03 13:18, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory
> so
>> I
>>> can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the
> AD
>>> users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
>>> account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in
>> to
>>> performing this.
>>> 
>>> Ron Pennell
>> 
>>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Pennell, Ronald B.]

No just want to grab the users from my current AD (minus the exchange
info) and import them into this new 2000 servers AD.  

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

Just because? Are you doing a migration of some kind? Or? The reason I
am
asking is because there may be tools to do what you are asking,
depending on
what it is you are actually asking.. Like ADMT or the InterOrg tool for
example.

On 3/21/03 13:35, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users
on
> as needed for access to the other domain.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
> 
> What's the design goal?
> 
> On 3/21/03 13:18, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory
so
> I
>> can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the
AD
>> users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
>> account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in
> to
>> performing this.
>> 
>> Ron Pennell
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Chris Scharff]

Just because? Are you doing a migration of some kind? Or? The reason I am
asking is because there may be tools to do what you are asking, depending on
what it is you are actually asking.. Like ADMT or the InterOrg tool for
example.

On 3/21/03 13:35, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users on
> as needed for access to the other domain.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
> 
> What's the design goal?
> 
> On 3/21/03 13:18, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so
> I
>> can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
>> users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
>> account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in
> to
>> performing this.
>> 
>> Ron Pennell
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Erik Sojka]

It's not easy to specify where the rules get run;  

Start here:
http://www.slipstick.com/rules/serverbased.htm

(I found that by googling for the terms [client server rules Outlook]

> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> I'm playing with the client side now.  Can you give me some 
> tips on setting
> them up here?
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:40 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> Client-side, you are pretty much unlimited in number/total 
> size of rules.  
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:32 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > 
> > Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or 
> > would that make
> > any difference?
> > 
> > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > Management Information Division
> > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > 550 Justice Dr.
> > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > 513-695-1416 Office
> > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of 
> > space that they
> > take up on the server (for server-side rules).  The max 
> > amount is 32k of
> > storage space.  
> > 
> > I don't know of a way to see how much space your current 
> > rules take, other
> > than adding rules until you can't add no mo.  As Candee [1] 
> said, try
> > consolidating them to conserve space.
> > 
> > [1]  I like Candee!
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?
> > > 
> > > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > > Management Information Division
> > > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > > 550 Justice Dr.
> > > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > > 513-695-1416 Office
> > > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > > 
> > > +
> > > 
> > > This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If 
> > > you are  not
> > > the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
> > >  print, copy
> > > or disseminate this information. If you have received this in 
> > > error, please
> > > reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. 
> > > Unauthorized
> > > interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal 
> criminal law.
> > > 
> > > ++
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > > 
> > > Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get 
> > > the following
> > > msg.
> > >  
> > > "One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server 
> > > and have been
> > > deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters 
> > > are not supported
> > > or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > > Management Information Division
> > > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > > 550 Justice Dr.
> > > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > > 513-695-1416 Office
> > > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List po

RE: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Pennell, Ronald B.]

Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users on
as needed for access to the other domain.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

What's the design goal?

On 3/21/03 13:18, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so
I
> can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
> users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
> account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in
to
> performing this.
> 
> Ron Pennell


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Chris Scharff]

What's the design goal?

On 3/21/03 13:18, "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I
> can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
> users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
> account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in to
> performing this.
> 
> Ron Pennell


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exporting copy of AD to new system.

[Pennell, Ronald B.]

I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I
can import them into another domain.  At the current time, I go the AD
users & computer select export list.  I only need to get the users
account info, not the exchange info.  Anyone have any quick steps in to
performing this.

Ron Pennell

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folder Replication

[Chris Scharff]

So by "site", you meant server? Your other folders have replicated
successfully and you've consolidated the user onto this new server?

On 3/21/03 11:30, "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote site for Exchange server and didn't
> realize I wasn't terming the things right, sorry about that. So, essentially
> it's a simple one site network having three exchange servers , I want to bring
> down two of them and consolidate all exchange stuff on the last one (the
> newest I added recently) , to do that I was trying to replicate all the PF
> related stuff on to the this new server from the first exchange server and
> that's where I got stuck as it won't replicate . If I tried to look in First
> Exchange server's one of the PF's  properties under replication tab -->details
> it says "In Sync" with this First Exchange Server however it says "Local
> Modified" for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange
> server).
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
> 
> Then by site you meant what?
> 
> On 3/21/03 11:08, "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same
>> subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed
>> Windows-2k domain environment.
>> Thanks for any help.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>> 
>> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
>> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
>> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
>> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
>> subnet that is included in a site definition)
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>> 
>> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
>> 2000.
>> 
>> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
>> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
>> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
>> Kishore
>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Public Folder Replication
>> 
>> 
>> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
>> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
>> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
>> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
>> 
>> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
>> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
>> there is something in particular I should be looking for.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SEC mail retention rule

[Tony Hlabse]

KVS and Assentor come to mind. Also if your doing archiving of all mail are 
you also required to restrict delivery based on content.







From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SEC mail retention rule
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:29:38 -0800
I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.
Thanks in advance,

David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
 "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which
my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp
everything."
  - Sir William Blagg.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SEC mail retention rule

[Dflorea]

I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule
17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail & IM traffic.  Anyone on the
list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be
willing to share?  I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K
journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs.

Thanks in advance,


David A. Florea, Sys Admin
Private Consulting Group Inc.
503-972-1500 x310
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
 "Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as
that in which 
my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp
everything."
  - Sir William Blagg.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can this happen with Spam ?

[Pat Richard]

But I believe that just turns it off. It doesn't disable it (I could be
wrong, but that's how I believe it to be). A user could just turn it back
on.

BTW - That's called 'web beaconing' (when images are use for tracking). It's
a very effective method for determining if email addresses are valid, and
has been used by a LOT of spammers. We've even seen HTML emails that don't
have any visible images use this by setting the width & height to 0 so the
image doesn't appear, but it still gets accessed.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:34 AM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Can this happen with Spam ?


Outlook has a /nopreview switch which alows you to turn off the preview pane
for your users. When you deploy Outlook you could deploy it with this
switch.

I'd love to see a lawsuit raised against spammers. Something along the lines
of emotional damages for receiving pornographic e-mail. Hit them in the
wallet - it's the only language they understand!

> > Is this possible in Outlook ? The article said something
> about with the
> > Preview pane being turned on in Outlook, this was more
> likely to happen or
> > just opening an email with this sort of an image in it
> could also trigger
> > the code. How can this happen ? This means Outlook is
> allowing some code to
> > get executed that passes information back to the source.
> Isn't there a
> > security patch to prevent this from happening ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Miller, LT Johnny -wcso]

I'm playing with the client side now.  Can you give me some tips on setting
them up here?

Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

Client-side, you are pretty much unlimited in number/total size of rules.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or 
> would that make
> any difference?
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of 
> space that they
> take up on the server (for server-side rules).  The max 
> amount is 32k of
> storage space.  
> 
> I don't know of a way to see how much space your current 
> rules take, other
> than adding rules until you can't add no mo.  As Candee [1] said, try
> consolidating them to conserve space.
> 
> [1]  I like Candee!
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > 
> > Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?
> > 
> > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > Management Information Division
> > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > 550 Justice Dr.
> > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > 513-695-1416 Office
> > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > 
> > +
> > 
> > This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If 
> > you are  not
> > the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
> >  print, copy
> > or disseminate this information. If you have received this in 
> > error, please
> > reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. 
> > Unauthorized
> > interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
> > 
> > ++
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > 
> > When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get 
> > the following
> > msg.
> >  
> > "One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server 
> > and have been
> > deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters 
> > are not supported
> > or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."
> > 
> > 
> > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > Management Information Division
> > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > 550 Justice Dr.
> > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > 513-695-1416 Office
> > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archi

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Erik Sojka]

Client-side, you are pretty much unlimited in number/total size of rules.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or 
> would that make
> any difference?
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of 
> space that they
> take up on the server (for server-side rules).  The max 
> amount is 32k of
> storage space.  
> 
> I don't know of a way to see how much space your current 
> rules take, other
> than adding rules until you can't add no mo.  As Candee [1] said, try
> consolidating them to conserve space.
> 
> [1]  I like Candee!
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > 
> > Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?
> > 
> > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > Management Information Division
> > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > 550 Justice Dr.
> > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > 513-695-1416 Office
> > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > 
> > +
> > 
> > This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If 
> > you are  not
> > the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
> >  print, copy
> > or disseminate this information. If you have received this in 
> > error, please
> > reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. 
> > Unauthorized
> > interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
> > 
> > ++
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> > 
> > 
> > When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get 
> > the following
> > msg.
> >  
> > "One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server 
> > and have been
> > deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters 
> > are not supported
> > or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."
> > 
> > 
> > Lt. Johnny Miller
> > Management Information Division
> > Warren County Sheriff's Office
> > 550 Justice Dr.
> > Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> > 513-695-1416 Office
> > 513-695-1286 FAX
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

___

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Miller, LT Johnny -wcso]

Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or would that make
any difference?

Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they
take up on the server (for server-side rules).  The max amount is 32k of
storage space.  

I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other
than adding rules until you can't add no mo.  As Candee [1] said, try
consolidating them to conserve space.

[1]  I like Candee!

> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> +
> 
> This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If 
> you are  not
> the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
>  print, copy
> or disseminate this information. If you have received this in 
> error, please
> reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. 
> Unauthorized
> interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
> 
> ++
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get 
> the following
> msg.
>  
> "One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server 
> and have been
> deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters 
> are not supported
> or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."
> 
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Candee Vaglica]

Of course you do!
=)

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?


Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they
take up on the server (for server-side rules).  The max amount is 32k of
storage space.  

I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other
than adding rules until you can't add no mo.  As Candee [1] said, try
consolidating them to conserve space.

[1]  I like Candee!

> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> +
> 
> This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If
> you are  not
> the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
>  print, copy
> or disseminate this information. If you have received this in 
> error, please
> reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. 
> Unauthorized
> interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
> 
> ++
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get
> the following
> msg.
>  
> "One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server
> and have been
> deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters 
> are not supported
> or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."
> 
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 2019 Error

[Candee Vaglica]

Any time.
;)



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 2019 Error


Thanks, David!!

> -Original Message-
> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: 2019 Error
> 
> 
> Try searching event ID:
> www.eventid.net
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: 2019 Error
> 
> 
> When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server.
> 
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
> 
> > --
> > From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reply To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:   Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:2019 Error
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > I am getting 2019 error on Exchange  and it is getting hanged. Any
> > solutions
> > 
> > Event details are as follows:
> > 
> > "Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system
> > nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. "
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Replication

[Gagrani, Kishore]

Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote site for Exchange server and didn't realize I 
wasn't terming the things right, sorry about that. So, essentially it's a simple one 
site network having three exchange servers , I want to bring down two of them and 
consolidate all exchange stuff on the last one (the newest I added recently) , to do 
that I was trying to replicate all the PF related stuff on to the this new server from 
the first exchange server and that's where I got stuck as it won't replicate . If I 
tried to look in First Exchange server's one of the PF's  properties under replication 
tab -->details it says "In Sync" with this First Exchange Server however it says 
"Local Modified" for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange server).

  

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication

Then by site you meant what?

On 3/21/03 11:08, "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same
> subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed
> Windows-2k domain environment.
> Thanks for any help.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>
> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
> subnet that is included in a site definition)
>
> John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>
> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
> 2000.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
> Kishore
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder Replication
>
>
> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
>
> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
> there is something in particular I should be looking for.
>
> Thank you,
> Kishore
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[William Lefkovics]

The total amount of server-side rules must fall under 32k to fit in an RPC
packet. 

Consolidate.
Be selective with which rules need to run server-side (you can still add
client-side rules)

William


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, LT Johnny
-wcso
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?

Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Candee Vaglica]

No, it's actually a size limit, they're limited to 32k; which is what can
fit in a single data packet.

-Original Message-
From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?


Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?

Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org

+

This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are  not
the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose,  print, copy
or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please
reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.

++

-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.

-Original Message-
From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?


When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following
msg.
 
"One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been
deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters are not supported
or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Erik Sojka]

Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they
take up on the server (for server-side rules).  The max amount is 32k of
storage space.  

I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other
than adding rules until you can't add no mo.  As Candee [1] said, try
consolidating them to conserve space.

[1]  I like Candee!

> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> +
> 
> This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If 
> you are  not
> the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
>  print, copy
> or disseminate this information. If you have received this in 
> error, please
> reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. 
> Unauthorized
> interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
> 
> ++
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
> 
> 
> When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get 
> the following
> msg.
>  
> "One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server 
> and have been
> deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters 
> are not supported
> or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."
> 
> 
> Lt. Johnny Miller
> Management Information Division
> Warren County Sheriff's Office
> 550 Justice Dr.
> Lebanon, Ohio 45036
> 513-695-1416 Office
> 513-695-1286 FAX
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 2019 Error

[Erik Sojka]

Thanks, David!!

> -Original Message-
> From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: 2019 Error
> 
> 
> Try searching event ID:
> www.eventid.net
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: 2019 Error
> 
> 
> When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server.
> 
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
> 
> > --
> > From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reply To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:   Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:2019 Error
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > I am getting 2019 error on Exchange  and it is getting hanged. Any 
> > solutions
> > 
> > Event details are as follows:
> > 
> > "Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system 
> > nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. "
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Miller, LT Johnny -wcso]

Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place?

Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org

+

This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are  not
the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose,  print, copy
or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please
reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.

++

-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.

-Original Message-
From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?


When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following
msg.
 
"One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been
deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters are not supported
or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 2019 Error

[Candee Vaglica]

Try searching event ID:
www.eventid.net

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 2019 Error


When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  2019 Error
> 
> Hi
> 
> I am getting 2019 error on Exchange  and it is getting hanged. Any 
> solutions
> 
> Event details are as follows:
> 
> "Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system 
> nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. "
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 2019 Error

[Couch, Nate]

When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  2019 Error
> 
> Hi
> 
> I am getting 2019 error on Exchange  and it is getting hanged. Any
> solutions
> 
> Event details are as follows:
> 
> "Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged
> pool because the pool was empty. "
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folder Replication

[Chris Scharff]

Then by site you meant what?

On 3/21/03 11:08, "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same
> subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed
> Windows-2k domain environment.
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
> 
> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
> subnet that is included in a site definition)
> 
> John
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
> 
> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
> 2000.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
> Kishore
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder Replication
> 
> 
> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
> 
> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
> there is something in particular I should be looking for.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kishore
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folder Replication

[Chris Scharff]

Ok, perhaps I was a bit too general in my comment. Yes, a bungled Active
Directory can effect Exchange routing, however what gets routed where and
how often (which is the root issue surrounding PF replication) is based on
Exchange specific topology information.

On 3/21/03 10:42, "John Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> When setting up sites for our organization, a network segment that one
> of our Exchange servers was on was initially not included in the
> definition for the site and this did cause significant Exchange
> problems.  I can't remember details now, but adding the segment to the
> site did fix our problem with Exchange.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication
> 
> However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication
> topologies... Which is why I think Ed might have asked for
> clarification.
> 
> On 3/21/03 7:02, "John Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
>> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
>> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
>> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
>> subnet that is included in a site definition)
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
>> 
>> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
>> 2000.
>> 
>> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
>> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
>> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
>> Kishore
>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Public Folder Replication
>> 
>> 
>> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line
> Address
>> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
>> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
>> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
>> 
>> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
>> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help
> if
>> there is something in particular I should be looking for.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Kishore 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Candee Vaglica]

Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them.

-Original Message-
From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it?


When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following
msg.
 
"One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been
deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters are not supported
or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: postini spam control

[Chris Scharff]

Yet all that data is traveling in the clear over the wire? Is the threat of
federal prosecution by the government of Bushittia, of those who might dare
to intercept the data without authorization what helps you sleep at night
then? 

Not that this isn't a legitimate issue, or that there aren't other
legitimate issues which ought to be evaluated as well before making such a
decision... But it the same issues should likely spark a number of other
policy discussions and initiatives as well.

On 3/21/03 10:40, "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally
> confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical
> solution for all byt the smallest shops.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: postini spam control
>> 
>> 
>> anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam
>> control. we have looked at all the major players and we are
>> thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and
>> gave a good pitch.  I guess we point our mx records to them,
>> which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and
>> forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and
>> didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know,
>> but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has
>> any comments.
>> 
>> thanks
>> Josh


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2019 Error

[hairamky]

Hi

I am getting 2019 error on Exchange  and it is getting hanged. Any
solutions

Event details are as follows:

"Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged
pool because the pool was empty. "


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

What does this mean and how can I fix it?

[Miller, LT Johnny -wcso]

When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following
msg.
 
"One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been
deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters are not supported
or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules."


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Replication

[Gagrani, Kishore]

Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same subnet. So, 
we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed Windows-2k domain 
environment.
Thanks for any help. 

-Original Message-
From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication

"Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
subnet that is included in a site definition)

John

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication

And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
2000.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
Kishore
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Replication


I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.

I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
there is something in particular I should be looking for.

Thank you,
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Mellott, Bill]

The one strong point I always thought was good for the outsourcing part was
that
that much less stuff came over my link to the internet..thus idealy helping
to manage bandwidth.

Now on the other hand I could never find an out sourcer who could give me
the granularity I needed/wanted

2 cents
bill

-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: postini spam control


At 08:38 21-03-2003 -0600, you wrote:
>anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we
>have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol
>but these people called us up and gave a good pitch.  I guess we point our
>mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for
>spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't
>find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would
>present it again to see if anyone has any comments.

This week we talked about putting a Linux box with Sendmail between you and 
the internet. You can use spamassasin and have everything in house. One of 
the advantages is that you do have full control about what gets caught and 
you can always access the "probably spam" mailbox to see if spamassasin was 
a bit 'trigger happy'.

I did hear (on the SBS2K list) about gfi mailessentials which seem to have 
a pretty good anti spam util too.. it runs on Windows.


B.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: postini spam control

[B. van Ouwerkerk]

At 08:38 21-03-2003 -0600, you wrote:
anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we
have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol
but these people called us up and gave a good pitch.  I guess we point our
mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for
spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't
find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would
present it again to see if anyone has any comments.
This week we talked about putting a Linux box with Sendmail between you and 
the internet. You can use spamassasin and have everything in house. One of 
the advantages is that you do have full control about what gets caught and 
you can always access the "probably spam" mailbox to see if spamassasin was 
a bit 'trigger happy'.

I did hear (on the SBS2K list) about gfi mailessentials which seem to have 
a pretty good anti spam util too.. it runs on Windows.

B.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Douglas, Josh D.]

that was my argument to the higher ups

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: postini spam control


No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally
confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical
solution for all byt the smallest shops.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: postini spam control
> 
> 
> anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam 
> control. we have looked at all the major players and we are 
> thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and 
> gave a good pitch.  I guess we point our mx records to them, 
> which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and 
> forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and 
> didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, 
> but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has 
> any comments.
> 
> thanks
> Josh
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Replication

[John Sutton]

When setting up sites for our organization, a network segment that one
of our Exchange servers was on was initially not included in the
definition for the site and this did cause significant Exchange
problems.  I can't remember details now, but adding the segment to the
site did fix our problem with Exchange.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication

However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication
topologies... Which is why I think Ed might have asked for
clarification.

On 3/21/03 7:02, "John Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
> subnet that is included in a site definition)
> 
> John
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
> 
> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
> 2000.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
> Kishore
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder Replication
> 
> 
> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line
Address
> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
> 
> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help
if
> there is something in particular I should be looking for.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kishore 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Roger Seielstad]

No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally
confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical
solution for all byt the smallest shops.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: postini spam control
> 
> 
> anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam 
> control. we have looked at all the major players and we are 
> thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and 
> gave a good pitch.  I guess we point our mx records to them, 
> which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and 
> forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and 
> didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, 
> but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has 
> any comments.
> 
> thanks
> Josh
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.

[Depp, Dennis M.]

Robert,
 
Our Exchange 2000 servers are connected to an EMC CX600 on a SAN.  We are using Legato 
for our backup.  The Legato server is a Sun e450.
 
Denny

-Original Message- 
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Fri 3/21/2003 10:47 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.




Greetings all.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0.  However, we will be
upgrading to
Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year.  We are considering attaching the
Exchange
2000 Server to a SAN.  The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback
as the
backup software.  I have two question.

1.  Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN?

2.  Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server?

Comments on one or both?

Thanks.

Robert

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,Ã)är‰¿²+^±æ«rìyª܅«)N‹§²æìr¸›zf¢–Ú%y«Þ{!jx–Ë0Êy¢a1r§ââ²֝š)åŠËZvh§³§‘Ê&

RE: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes

[Neil Hobson]

Contact me offlist, as I've a MS utility to do this for you.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 19 March 2003 15:43
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes
Subject: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes


We are doing a migration from Lotus Notes 5.x to Exchange 2k (finally!).
The migration wizard does not bring across contacts.  Does anyone know
any free utilities to grab contacts from Notes and import to Exchange?

Thanks!

Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE
Technical Analyst
(905) 319-8378 Ext. 240
FAX (905) 319-8397

Just Released: Nexterna Real-Time Service Tool Kit
Get the information you need to jump-start preparations for Real-Time
service at your organization. www.nexterna.com/toolkit

NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print,
copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in
error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message.
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal
criminal law.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.

[Peter Orlowski]

We have a Compaq SAN and use BackupExec.

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.


We have it on a EMC 4700 and also use Backup Exec.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.


Yes and No.  We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec.

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.



Greetings all. 

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0.  However, we will be
upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year.  We are
considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN.  The SAN has a
Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software.  I have
two question.

1.  Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 

2.  Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server?

Comments on one or both?

Thanks.

Robert

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Woodruff, Michael]

I don't' think MailFrontier has any AV capabilities does it?  That's if
you need it.

-Original Message-
From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: postini spam control


thanks, I appreciate the comments.  I'll get right on that MailFrontier.
:)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: postini spam control


:) 

FWIW, Postini was initially marketed as an ISP solution.. I know several
in town how use it. Not one I've tested, so I can't offer an opinion. A
friend of mine works for MailFrontier.. I was planning to take a look at
their stuff, maybe you could do it for me and let me know what you
think? 

On 3/21/03 9:44, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute.
> 
> John
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Re: postini spam control
>> 
>> 
>> I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to 
>> outsource. There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions 
>> where the administrator can log in and access mail which had been
>> quarantined. That
>> mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By
>> outsourcing the
>> filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail
>> incoming... Which
>> makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the
>> maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a
>> group which does
>> nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of
>> outsourcing e-mail services in general.
>> 
>> Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every 
>> organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which

>> insist on doing everything in house, when all signs point to
>> outsourcing being a
>> better solution for them.
>> 
>> On 3/21/03 9:33, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and
>> needs it STAT,
>>> and you need to go to a third party to get it
>> back.always bad news to
>>> take something as essential as email and put it in someone
>> else's control.
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Douglas, Josh D.]

thanks, I appreciate the comments.  I'll get right on that MailFrontier.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: postini spam control


:) 

FWIW, Postini was initially marketed as an ISP solution.. I know several in
town how use it. Not one I've tested, so I can't offer an opinion. A friend
of mine works for MailFrontier.. I was planning to take a look at their
stuff, maybe you could do it for me and let me know what you think? 

On 3/21/03 9:44, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute.
> 
> John
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Re: postini spam control
>> 
>> 
>> I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to
>> outsource.
>> There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the
>> administrator can log in and access mail which had been
>> quarantined. That
>> mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By
>> outsourcing the
>> filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail
>> incoming... Which
>> makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the
>> maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a
>> group which does
>> nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of
>> outsourcing e-mail services in general.
>> 
>> Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every
>> organization, but by the same token there more than a few
>> shops which insist
>> on doing everything in house, when all signs point to
>> outsourcing being a
>> better solution for them.
>> 
>> On 3/21/03 9:33, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and
>> needs it STAT,
>>> and you need to go to a third party to get it
>> back.always bad news to
>>> take something as essential as email and put it in someone
>> else's control. 
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.

[Chinnery, Paul]

We have it on a EMC 4700 and also use Backup Exec.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.


Yes and No.  We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec.

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.



Greetings all. 

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0.  However, we will be
upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year.  We are
considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN.  The SAN has a
Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software.  I have
two question.

1.  Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 

2.  Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server?

Comments on one or both?

Thanks.

Robert

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: postini spam control

[Chris Scharff]

:) 

FWIW, Postini was initially marketed as an ISP solution.. I know several in
town how use it. Not one I've tested, so I can't offer an opinion. A friend
of mine works for MailFrontier.. I was planning to take a look at their
stuff, maybe you could do it for me and let me know what you think? 

On 3/21/03 9:44, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute.
> 
> John
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Re: postini spam control
>> 
>> 
>> I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to
>> outsource.
>> There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the
>> administrator can log in and access mail which had been
>> quarantined. That
>> mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By
>> outsourcing the
>> filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail
>> incoming... Which
>> makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the
>> maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a
>> group which does
>> nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of
>> outsourcing e-mail services in general.
>> 
>> Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every
>> organization, but by the same token there more than a few
>> shops which insist
>> on doing everything in house, when all signs point to
>> outsourcing being a
>> better solution for them.
>> 
>> On 3/21/03 9:33, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and
>> needs it STAT,
>>> and you need to go to a third party to get it
>> back.always bad news to
>>> take something as essential as email and put it in someone
>> else's control. 
>> 
>> 
>> _
>> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yes and No.  We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec.

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.



Greetings all. 

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0.  However, we will be
upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year.  We are
considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN.  The SAN has a
Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software.  I have
two question.

1.  Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 

2.  Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server?

Comments on one or both?

Thanks.

Robert

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.

[McCready, Robert]

Greetings all. 

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0.  However, we will be
upgrading to
Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year.  We are considering attaching the
Exchange
2000 Server to a SAN.  The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback
as the
backup software.  I have two question.

1.  Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 

2.  Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server?

Comments on one or both?

Thanks.

Robert

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[John Steniger]

Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute.  

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: postini spam control
> 
> 
> I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to 
> outsource.
> There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the
> administrator can log in and access mail which had been 
> quarantined. That
> mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By 
> outsourcing the
> filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail 
> incoming... Which
> makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the
> maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a 
> group which does
> nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of
> outsourcing e-mail services in general.
> 
> Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every
> organization, but by the same token there more than a few 
> shops which insist
> on doing everything in house, when all signs point to 
> outsourcing being a
> better solution for them.
> 
> On 3/21/03 9:33, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and 
> needs it STAT,
> > and you need to go to a third party to get it 
> back.always bad news to
> > take something as essential as email and put it in someone 
> else's control.  
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: postini spam control

[Chris Scharff]

I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource.
There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the
administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That
mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the
filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which
makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the
maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does
nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of
outsourcing e-mail services in general.

Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every
organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist
on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a
better solution for them.

On 3/21/03 9:33, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT,
> and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to
> take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control.  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[John Steniger]

Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT,
and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to
take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control.  

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: postini spam control
> 
> 
> anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam 
> control. we
> have looked at all the major players and we are thinking 
> about surfcontrol
> but these people called us up and gave a good pitch.  I guess 
> we point our
> mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they 
> scan it for
> spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the 
> archives and didn't
> find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I 
> thought I would
> present it again to see if anyone has any comments.
> 
> thanks
> Josh
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folder Replication

[Chris Scharff]

However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication
topologies... Which is why I think Ed might have asked for clarification.

On 3/21/03 7:02, "John Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
> sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
> Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
> correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
> subnet that is included in a site definition)
> 
> John
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
> 
> And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
> 2000.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
> Kishore
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder Replication
> 
> 
> I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
> Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
> SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
> sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed.
> 
> I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
> Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
> there is something in particular I should be looking for.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kishore 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Douglas, Josh D.]

the deafening silence was leading me to this conclusion.

thanks

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: postini spam control


Yuck...

-Original Message-
From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: postini spam control


anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we
have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about
surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch.  I
guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and
then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through
the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to
know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any
comments.

thanks
Josh

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Woodruff, Michael]

Yuck...

-Original Message-
From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: postini spam control


anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we
have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about
surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch.  I
guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and
then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through
the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to
know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any
comments.

thanks
Josh

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 5.5 Directory Error (1171)

[Chris Scharff]

Per Rich's advice 2 days ago, call Microsoft.
-- 
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne

Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp



On 3/20/03 8:20, "Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> Anybody knows what are the parameters -1601 & 16054 in a Internal
> Processing
> error means ?
> The problem occur when you double-click on a Distribution List (DL) and
> since its corrupted you get a DS_E_DIT_ERROR.
> 
> The Event viewer record this a maximum logging.
> 
> Event Type: Error
> Event Source: MSExchangeDS
> Event Category: Internal Processing
> Event ID: 1171
> Description: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and
> 16054
> (internal ID 208017d). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance.
> 
> I tried deleting the object, even in RAW mode and repairing the DIR.EDB
> with
> eseutil /p... doesnt work.
> Support.microsoft.com doesn't have the exact error, and the only reference
> to -1601 is (JET_errRecordNotFound). But nothing on 16054.
> 
> So anybody has any idea, short of calling directly microsoft, or restoring
> from backups ?
> 
> thx
> Patrick
> 
> BTW: There are only 3 recipients in that DL :)
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000

[Chris Scharff]

Try reapplying W2K SP1 or better.. Applying SP3.

On 3/20/03 8:35, "Robyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dear fellow IT professionals,
> 
> I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if
> anyone can help??.
> 
> Let me set the scene for you all.
> 
> I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been
> dcpromo-ed.  One of my servers is the Global Catalog
> for the domain whilst my other server is a domain controller which has
> been ticked in the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog
> server.  It is this server that is the Exchange 2000 server.  The domain
> is currently running in mixed mode.
> I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install exchange
> 2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have
> Service pack 1 installed.
> 
> I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes well
> with no reported errors.  Once replication has
> taken place, I then run the domainprep switch.  Once replication has taken
> place, I then install Exchange 2000.  All seems
> to go ok and once installed I can conect to the exchange server via an
> outlook client, and send emails internally and
> add stuff to the public folders.
> 
> The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for
> Exchange (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1
> SP2 and SP3)
> 
> The Problem:-
> 
> When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the following
> message:-
> 
> 'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services
> failed: The component "Microsoft Exchange
> Messaging and Collaboration Services" cannot be assigned the action
> "Update" because:
> - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date.  You must run setup with
> the "/ForestPrep" switch.
> If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you
> must wait for replication to complete.
> Consult your documentation for details.
> - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date.  You must run setup
> with the "/DomainPrep" switch within this domain.
> If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you
> must wait for replication to complete.
> Consult your documentation for details.
> 
> 
> 
> Any ideas???
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821

[Chris Scharff]

Messages coming _from_ your Exchange server destined for an external
recipient make you vulnerable to a buffer overrun how?

On 3/17/03 17:59, "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5
> SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified
> maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000.
> Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us
> vulnerable to buffer overruns and such.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the
> issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would
> greatly be appreciated.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Stupid disclaimers

[Bob Sadler]

Now now, remember, my City is filtering on only two words, F*** and
S***.  Why we don't filter on other, much more obscene words then that
is beyond me :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stupid disclaimers


Wow, if my content filters would have flagged this message for
administrative review, I would have been in violation of federal
criminal law... In the country of Bullshitia I guess.

On 3/19/03 9:43, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are 
> not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, 
> print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this

> in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the 
> message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of 
> federal criminal law.
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly

[Joshua R. Morgan]

Ok I have made some headway,   
I did some snooping and noticed the Reverse Lookup Zones were built
incorrectly so I fixed them and rebooted Servers SES and TES.   Now the
users on SES and TES are able to send email to each other with no
issues.
I have since removed the test2 Routing group and associated connector
and placed both SES and TES in the Same Routing Group (Test), which has
a single Routing Group Connector in it. Last night I Rebooted FES with
hopes it would start acting correctly, well it did not. For further
testing I moved TES into the First Routing Group with FES and this
completely broke all my e-mail transmissions between servers. So I moved
TES back into the Test Routing Group with SES and all is fine with those
2 servers again .

So to some up:
1. Users on FES are able to receive emails from SES and TES
however they can not send mail to SES and TES
2. Users on TES and FES are able to send and receive mail
between both Servers.


Again all help is appreciated,

Joshua






Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


Would not having the reverse lookup Zones built correctly possibly cause
this problem?







Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan 
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


I will do it tonight but I did it this weekend and Still no luck.

I'm pretty sure I do not have resolution problems, I have not had any
other issues. I would think I would at least see some other issues
right?



Joshua







Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


After you're absolutely sure you don't have any name resolution or
network problems, try rebooting the ones with problems when you have the
opportunity.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


Sorry I'm sick today 

The event logs do not show any errors  









Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


"know errors"

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


Looking for Microsoft tools, but in the meantime the NetIQ Tool shows
know errors on any of my DC's or in DNS

Also there are no errors in the Eventlog.










Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
correctly


Any DNS errors in the event viewer? There's a free tool called ADCheck
from NetIQ you may want to run http://www.netiq.com/adcheck/default.asp.
I think Microsoft has some free utilities to troubleshoot that as well.

On 3/19/03 9:41, "Joshua R. Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ok I can accept that, but I have gone into DNS and all machines are
> registered and I have gone to each machine and I'm able to ping all 
> the others with NetBIOS name and with FQDN
> 
> 
> Where else can I look>?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Joshua Morgan
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating
> correctly
> 
> 
> DNS name resolution issues almost certainly.
> 
> On 3/19/03 9:21, "Joshua R. Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
>> I posted this problem about a week or so ago and I got a few
>> responses, well I've gotten a lot more information and hopefully 
>> someone can help
>> 
>> Ok
>> 
>> Environment:
>> Windows 2000 SP3
>> Exchange 2000 SP3
>> 1 Domain
>> All machines are  in the same site and same subnet
>> First Exchange Server is installed on a Domain Controller  (Will b

Stupid disclaimers

[Chris Scharff]

Wow, if my content filters would have flagged this message for
administrative review, I would have been in violation of federal criminal
law... In the country of Bullshitia I guess.

On 3/19/03 9:43, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy
> or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please
> reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
> interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

postini spam control

[Douglas, Josh D.]

anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we
have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol
but these people called us up and gave a good pitch.  I guess we point our
mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for
spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't
find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would
present it again to see if anyone has any comments.

thanks
Josh

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: JScript

[Hanna, Keith]

Flaming? Where? 
I musta missed it when we were talking about the weather

-Original Message-
From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 March 2003 21:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: JScript


Thank you all.
Thanks to all of you for the time you spent flaming me on the JScript 
thread!



>From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: JScript
>Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:00:01 -0500
>
>Ah, not too far then...  :o)
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:11 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>
>SC
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Joshua Morgan
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:08 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: JScript
>
>
>You in NC?
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:22 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>
>
>Lots of rain!!!   Flash Flooding
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Joshua Morgan
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:06 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: JScript
>
>
>Severe thunderstorms here...
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:18 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>
>warm with cold spells.
>Possible rain.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 20 March 2003 15:11
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: JScript
>
>
>
>
>   Outlook?
>
>Lum, David wrote:
> > I want... a shrubbery. One that looks nice. And not too expensive.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 15:28 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: JScript
> >
> >
> >
> >   Would someone please recomend a nice brand of casual shoe? Something
>
> > nicer that running shoes, but comfortable to walk extended distance
> > in. Size 9 1/2 men's medium
> >
>
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821

[Hanna, Keith]

Linkco

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2003 14:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821


Ciscsys? 


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

You mean Cisco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> 
> 
> Linksys? 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform 
> to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it?
> 
> Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is 
> no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having 
> the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer 
> overflows, either.
> 
> I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy 
> one.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> > 
> > 
> > Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from
> our Exchange
> > 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the 
> > specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the 
> > message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the 
> > Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such.
> > 
> > Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able
> to solve the
> > issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this
> issue it would
> > greatly be appreciated.
> > 
> > Thank you
> > Jason
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821

[Ely, Don]

Ciscsys? 


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

You mean Cisco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> 
> 
> Linksys? 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform 
> to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it?
> 
> Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is 
> no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having 
> the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer 
> overflows, either.
> 
> I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy 
> one.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> > 
> > 
> > Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from
> our Exchange
> > 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the 
> > specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the 
> > message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the 
> > Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such.
> > 
> > Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able
> to solve the
> > issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this
> issue it would
> > greatly be appreciated.
> > 
> > Thank you
> > Jason
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821

[Erik Sojka]

You mean Cisco.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> 
> 
> Linksys? 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to 
> conform to the
> RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it?
> 
> Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, 
> there is no
> reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that 
> having the
> firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to 
> buffer overflows,
> either.
> 
> I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to 
> never buy one.
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> > 
> > 
> > Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from 
> our Exchange 
> > 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the 
> > specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the 
> > message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the 
> > Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such.
> > 
> > Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able 
> to solve the 
> > issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this 
> issue it would 
> > greatly be appreciated.
> > 
> > Thank you
> > Jason
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: JScript

[Les Bessant]

Flaming? You were gently teased

And given some answers, too

-Original Message-
From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 March 2003 21:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: JScript


Thank you all.
Thanks to all of you for the time you spent flaming me on the JScript 
thread!



>From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: JScript
>Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:00:01 -0500
>
>Ah, not too far then...  :o)
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:11 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>
>SC
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Joshua Morgan
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:08 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: JScript
>
>
>You in NC?
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:22 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>
>
>Lots of rain!!!   Flash Flooding
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Joshua Morgan
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:06 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: JScript
>
>
>Severe thunderstorms here...
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:18 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>
>warm with cold spells.
>Possible rain.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 20 March 2003 15:11
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: JScript
>
>
>
>
>   Outlook?
>
>Lum, David wrote:
> > I want... a shrubbery. One that looks nice. And not too expensive.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 15:28 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: JScript
> >
> >
> >
> >   Would someone please recomend a nice brand of casual shoe? Something
>
> > nicer that running shoes, but comfortable to walk extended distance
> > in. Size 9 1/2 men's medium
> >
>
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.


The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential
and may be legally privileged. It i

RE: SBS and Pop3 Connector

[B. van Ouwerkerk]

POP3 provides a way to retrieve mail from POP3 boxes.

You still need to install/configure the SMTP connector. AFAIK this is 
documented, you will find information on the MS website.

Have a look at www.sbsfaq.com too, you will find valuable SBS related 
information there too.

B.

At 09:01 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote:
I was under the impression that the Pop3Connector would let me send
through it to my Provider that my E-mail Addresses look like they are
coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] vs. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I understand you correctly I use Exchanges SMTP to just relay off my
provider?
Or I set up my SMTP connector to send my mail and make my default reply
address my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
Thanks, I'll also check Yahoo.

Joshua







Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector
This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail
from
the internet right?
So it has to do with the SMTP sending part.
Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's
SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too?
Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require
you
to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam.
Use message tracking to find out where it goes.

There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k
where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field.


B.

At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange,
>yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but
>unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never
>delivered to their recipients.
>
>Here is the set up
>Microsoft Small Business Server 2000
>Windows 2000 SP3
>Exchange 2000 SP3
>Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15
>minutes
>
>He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to)
>and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses.
>
>I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know
>where to begin to troubleshoot.
>
>Any Help would be appreciated.
>
>Joshua
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SBS and Pop3 Connector

[Joshua R. Morgan]

I was under the impression that the Pop3Connector would let me send
through it to my Provider that my E-mail Addresses look like they are
coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] vs. [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
If I understand you correctly I use Exchanges SMTP to just relay off my
provider?
Or I set up my SMTP connector to send my mail and make my default reply
address my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.

Thanks, I'll also check Yahoo.


Joshua







Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector


This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail
from 
the internet right?
So it has to do with the SMTP sending part.

Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's 
SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too?

Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require
you 
to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam.

Use message tracking to find out where it goes.

There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k 
where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field.



B.

At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange,

>yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but 
>unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never 
>delivered to their recipients.
>
>Here is the set up
>Microsoft Small Business Server 2000
>Windows 2000 SP3
>Exchange 2000 SP3
>Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15 
>minutes
>
>He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to) 
>and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses.
>
>I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know 
>where to begin to troubleshoot.
>
>Any Help would be appreciated.
>
>Joshua


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector

[B. van Ouwerkerk]

This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail from 
the internet right?
So it has to do with the SMTP sending part.

Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's 
SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too?

Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require you 
to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam.

Use message tracking to find out where it goes.

There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k 
where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field.



B.

At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote:
I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange,
yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but unable
to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never delivered to
their recipients.
Here is the set up
Microsoft Small Business Server 2000
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP3
Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15
minutes
He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to)
and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses.
I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know
where to begin to troubleshoot.
Any Help would be appreciated.

Joshua


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821

[Ely, Don]

Linksys? 


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the
RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it?

Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no
reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the
firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows,
either.

I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> 
> 
> Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 
> 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the 
> specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the 
> message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the 
> Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the 
> issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would 
> greatly be appreciated.
> 
> Thank you
> Jason
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SBS and Pop3 Connector

[Joshua R. Morgan]

I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange,
yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but unable
to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never delivered to
their recipients.

Here is the set up 
Microsoft Small Business Server 2000
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP3
Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15
minutes

He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to)
and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses.

I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know
where to begin to troubleshoot.

Any Help would be appreciated.

Joshua







Joshua Morgan
Method IQ
Senior Network Engineer
Main: (864) 272-1145
Mobile: (864) 449-9912
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404

[Erik Sojka]

I'll look at ours and get back to yours;  

Be aware that if you are 100% patched and up to date on your IIS code, you
may be able to completely remove some of the entries that are intended to
protect against exploits that are already protected by a patch.  We
compromised and removed some redundant entries (removed ".." but kept ".\" to
protect against the CMD.EXE exploit).  

> -Original Message-
> From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404
> 
> 
> Hey erik-
> 
> Yeah, traced it to urlscan and have been tweaking it.  Can 
> someone send
> me an ini file that's known to work well for user community over some
> time  Providing a solid level of security w/o sacrificing
> functionality with/in exch 2000 owa? I'd like to compare/benchmark.  
> 
> Thx again-byron 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404
> 
> 
> URLScan?  Check the name of the mail message in which the 
> attachment is
> located.  If the title of the message contains any string of an
> otherwise bogus URL request (e.g. ".." which is part of the 
> request for
> Code Red and
> Nimda) then it will be denied with a 404.  
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:58 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404
> > 
> > 
> > More info:
> > 
> > * OWA 2000 server is a front-end setup
> > * OWA 2000 server using latest iis lockdown and url scan w/
> > standard owa
> > template.
> > 
> > Appreciate any pointers.
> > 
> > byron
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Byron Kennedy
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:30 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404
> > 
> > 
> > Am seeing this error occasionally on a new exchange 2000 owa
> > server (All
> > 2000 mailbox  and owa 2000 servers are sp3). One example was a
> > relatively small zip file, another an .htm file. Doesn't 
> happen on all
> > attachments, but is consistent with the message, that is it 
> > never works
> > when accessing w/ 2000 owa, but funny thing is it will access 
> > fine from
> > our legacy 5.5 sp4 owa server.  Both using ssl.
> > 
> > Seems like an encoding or formatting issue that owa 2000 
> experiences 
> > when accessing the 2000 mailbox file system.  The 5.5 owa ASP code 
> > doesn't get the 404 error.
> > 
> > Any thoughts?
> > 
> > Byron D. Kennedy
> > 
> http://www.markettools.com
> 
> MarketTools(r)
> Real Market Research Insights.  In Real Time.  At Real Savings.
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Error message: "553 sorry, your envelope sender has been deni ed ( #5.7.1)"

[Roger Seielstad]

Means you're being rejected most likely because of either a realtime
blackhole list or you are explicitly blacklisted there.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:54 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Error message: "553 sorry, your envelope sender has 
> been denied ( #5.7.1)"
> 
> 
> This is a new one for us! Can someone tell me what this error 
> message means? All email from us to a certain location is 
> being blocked!  Why?
> 
>   The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 3/20/2003 4:06 PM
>   The recipient name is not recognized
>   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=One 
> Call Medical;l=MAIL2-030320210532Z-5753 MSEXCH:IMS:One Call 
> Medical, Inc.:OCM Headquarters:MAIL2 3553 (000B09AA) 553 
> sorry, your envelope sender has been denied (#5.7.1) 
> ~~~ Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6
> 
> 
> TIA
> -Jim
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821

[Roger Seielstad]

So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the
RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it?

Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no
reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the
firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows,
either.

I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
> 
> 
> Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our 
> Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater 
> than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is 
> truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not 
> an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to 
> buffer overruns and such.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to 
> solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve 
> this issue it would greatly be appreciated.
> 
> Thank you
> Jason
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000

[John Sutton]

Were you schema admin when you did the forestprep?

John

-Original Message-
From: Robyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000

Dear fellow IT professionals,

I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if
anyone can help??.

Let me set the scene for you all.

I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been
dcpromo-ed.  One of my servers is the Global Catalog
for the domain whilst my other server is a domain controller which has
been ticked in the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog
server.  It is this server that is the Exchange 2000 server.  The domain
is currently running in mixed mode.
I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install
exchange
2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have
Service pack 1 installed.

I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes
well
with no reported errors.  Once replication has
taken place, I then run the domainprep switch.  Once replication has
taken
place, I then install Exchange 2000.  All seems
to go ok and once installed I can conect to the exchange server via an
outlook client, and send emails internally and
add stuff to the public folders.

The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for
Exchange (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1
SP2 and SP3)

The Problem:-

When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the
following
message:-

'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration
Services
failed: The component "Microsoft Exchange
Messaging and Collaboration Services" cannot be assigned the action
"Update" because:
 - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date.  You must run setup
with
the "/ForestPrep" switch.
If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then
you
must wait for replication to complete.
Consult your documentation for details.
 - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date.  You must run setup
with the "/DomainPrep" switch within this domain.
If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then
you
must wait for replication to complete.
Consult your documentation for details. 



Any ideas???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Replication

[John Sutton]

"Sites" is a Windows 2000 term.  You organize servers in a domain into
sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things.
Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that
correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a
subnet that is included in a site definition)

John

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication

And by "sites" you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange
2000.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani,
Kishore
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Replication


I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address
Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000
SP3) . Under the details it always says "Local Modified" for the other
sites whereas "In Sync" for the site on which they are homed. 

I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy ,
Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if
there is something in particular I should be looking for.

Thank you,
Kishore 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]