RE: Can this happen with Spam ?
Outlook has a /nopreview switch which alows you to turn off the preview pane for your users. When you deploy Outlook you could deploy it with this switch. I'd love to see a lawsuit raised against spammers. Something along the lines of emotional damages for receiving pornographic e-mail. Hit them in the wallet - it's the only language they understand! Is this possible in Outlook ? The article said something about with the Preview pane being turned on in Outlook, this was more likely to happen or just opening an email with this sort of an image in it could also trigger the code. How can this happen ? This means Outlook is allowing some code to get executed that passes information back to the source. Isn't there a security patch to prevent this from happening ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intra Site rep problem in same routing group
Hi all, Well I've beaten myself up over this one and still can't solve it so I'll throw it open to the experts: Scenario: Single domain forest in mixed mode. Exisiting single Win2k DC also running Ex2k. (Inbound mail is pulled by POP3 connector - popconn) Additional Win2k server installed, DCPromoed and then Ex2k installed. Both machines global cats in default-first-site site. AD integrated DNS - both machines Static IP No errors in logs other than usual (starting virtual servers etc after reboot) Replmon indicates no replication errors nltest, netdiag etc and replmon indicate no problems in name/single master resolution smtp responding on both machines on 25 Both servers are in a single routing group and are in mixed mode The only thing that I can see is not strictly correct is that the original Ex2k server has a disallowed _ in its name (server_01) All seems fine however the two Exchange servers do not seem to be able to communicate I first noticed this when setting up some public folder replication as a queue to server2.domain.com was filing up with messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This messages would go to retry immediately. If a mailbox is moved to the new machine then when the client logs on the public folder hierachy is not sync'd and any PF's set for replication do not appear. The client is also unable to send mail to a mailbox on the other server with 'unable to carry out this request'. Another strange fact is that for some reason the mails in the queue to the other server eventually appear at the Internet smtp host and are collected by the pop3 connector and bought back in again - checked the smtp VS config and all seems fine. Any help on this one would be most gratefully received. - Notice: This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of Swift Horsman Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately and delete this message. It is the responsibility of the recipient to virus scan this email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes
We are doing a migration from Lotus Notes 5.x to Exchange 2k (finally!). The migration wizard does not bring across contacts. Does anyone know any free utilities to grab contacts from Notes and import to Exchange? Thanks! Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE Technical Analyst (905) 319-8378 Ext. 240 FAX (905) 319-8397 Just Released: Nexterna Real-Time Service Tool Kit Get the information you need to jump-start preparations for Real-Time service at your organization. www.nexterna.com/toolkit NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000
Dear fellow IT professionals, I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if anyone can help??. Let me set the scene for you all. I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been dcpromo-ed. One of my servers is the Global Catalog for the domain whilst my other server is a domain controller which has been ticked in the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog server. It is this server that is the Exchange 2000 server. The domain is currently running in mixed mode. I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install exchange 2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have Service pack 1 installed. I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes well with no reported errors. Once replication has taken place, I then run the domainprep switch. Once replication has taken place, I then install Exchange 2000. All seems to go ok and once installed I can conect to the exchange server via an outlook client, and send emails internally and add stuff to the public folders. The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for Exchange (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1 SP2 and SP3) The Problem:- When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the following message:- 'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /ForestPrep switch. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /DomainPrep switch within this domain. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. Any ideas??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Server to server coms prob
Hi all, Well I've beaten myself up over this one and still can't solve it so I'll throw it open to the experts: Scenario: Single domain forest in mixed mode. Existing single Win2k DC also running Ex2k. (Inbound mail is pulled by POP3 connector - popconn) Additional Win2k server installed, DCPromoed and then Ex2k installed. Both machines global cats in default-first-site site. AD integrated DNS - both machines Static IP No errors in logs other than usual (starting virtual servers etc after reboot) Replmon indicates no replication errors nltest, netdiag etc and replmon indicate no problems in name/single master resolution smtp responding on both machines on 25 Both servers are in a single routing group and are in mixed mode The only thing that I can see is not strictly correct is that the original Ex2k server has a disallowed _ in its name (server_01) All seems fine however the two Exchange servers do not seem to be able to communicate I first noticed this when setting up some public folder replication as a queue to server2.domain.com was filing up with messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This messages would go to retry immediately. If a mailbox is moved to the new machine then when the client logs on the public folder hierachy is not sync'd and any PF's set for replication do not appear. The client is also unable to send mail to a mailbox on the other server with 'unable to carry out this request'. Another strange fact is that for some reason the mails in the queue to the other server eventually appear at the Internet smtp host and are collected by the pop3 connector and bought back in again - checked the smtp VS config and all seems fine. Any help on this one would be most gratefully received. Regards, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 Directory Error (1171)
Hi, Anybody knows what are the parameters -1601 16054 in a Internal Processing error means ? The problem occur when you double-click on a Distribution List (DL) and since its corrupted you get a DS_E_DIT_ERROR. The Event viewer record this a maximum logging. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 1171 Description: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 16054 (internal ID 208017d). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. I tried deleting the object, even in RAW mode and repairing the DIR.EDB with eseutil /p... doesnt work. Support.microsoft.com doesn't have the exact error, and the only reference to -1601 is (JET_errRecordNotFound). But nothing on 16054. So anybody has any idea, short of calling directly microsoft, or restoring from backups ? thx Patrick BTW: There are only 3 recipients in that DL :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error message: 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied ( #5.7.1)
This is a new one for us! Can someone tell me what this error message means? All email from us to a certain location is being blocked! Why? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 3/20/2003 4:06 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=One Call Medical;l=MAIL2-030320210532Z-5753 MSEXCH:IMS:One Call Medical, Inc.:OCM Headquarters:MAIL2 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied (#5.7.1) ~~~ Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6 TIA -Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes
NABs From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 09:43:00 -0600 We are doing a migration from Lotus Notes 5.x to Exchange 2k (finally!). The migration wizard does not bring across contacts. Does anyone know any free utilities to grab contacts from Notes and import to Exchange? Thanks! Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE Technical Analyst (905) 319-8378 Ext. 240 FAX (905) 319-8397 Just Released: Nexterna Real-Time Service Tool Kit Get the information you need to jump-start preparations for Real-Time service at your organization. www.nexterna.com/toolkit NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Notes To Exchange Migration Question
We are doing a migration from Lotus Notes 5.x to Exchange 2k (finally!). The migration wizard does not bring across contacts. Does anyone know any free utilities to grab contacts from Notes and import to Exchange? Thanks! Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE Technical Analyst (905) 319-8378 Ext. 240 FAX (905) 319-8397 Just Released: Nexterna Real-Time Service Tool Kit Get the information you need to jump-start preparations for Real-Time service at your organization. www.nexterna.com/toolkit NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing group comms problems
Hi all, Well I've beaten myself up over this one and still can't solve it so I'll throw it open to the experts: Scenario: Single domain forest in mixed mode. Exisiting single Win2k DC also running Ex2k. (Inbound mail is pulled by POP3 connector - popconn) Additional Win2k server installed, DCPromoed and then Ex2k installed. Both machines global cats in default-first-site site. AD integrated DNS - both machines Static IP No errors in logs other than usual (starting virtual servers etc after reboot) Replmon indicates no replication errors nltest, netdiag etc and replmon indicate no problems in name/single master resolution smtp responding on both machines on 25 Both servers are in a single routing group and are in mixed mode The only thing that I can see is not strictly correct is that the original Ex2k server has a disallowed _ in its name (server_01) All seems fine however the two Exchange servers do not seem to be able to communicate I first noticed this when setting up some public folder replication as a queue to server2.domain.com was filing up with messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This messages would go to retry immediately. If a mailbox is moved to the new machine then when the client logs on the public folder hierachy is not sync'd and any PF's set for replication do not appear. The client is also unable to send mail to a mailbox on the other server with 'unable to carry out this request'. Another strange fact is that for some reason the mails in the queue to the other server eventually appear at the Internet smtp host and are collected by the pop3 connector and bought back in again - checked the smtp VS config and all seems fine. Any help on this one would be most gratefully received. Regards, - Simon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error message: 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied ( #5.7.1)
This is a new one for us! Can someone tell me what this error message means? All email from us to a certain location is being blocked! Why? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 3/20/2003 4:06 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=One Call Medical;l=MAIL2-030320210532Z-5753 MSEXCH:IMS:One Call Medical, Inc.:OCM Headquarters:MAIL2 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied (#5.7.1) ~~~ Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6 TIA -Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTPEventSink Adding a Disclaimer to outgoing emails
Hello, I am trying to add a disclaimer to all outgoing SMTP mail from my exchange server. I have followed Q articles 317327 and 288756. However, when I go to register the sink on the interface as described in 317327 I get an error. The smtpreg.vbs comes back with Active X object can't be created. I have tried this several times, rebuilt the dll in VB several times but still no luck. Any ideas? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time and help Dave Kuehling Genoa Savings and Loan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTPEventSink Adding a Disclaimer to outgoing mail
Hello, I am trying to add a disclaimer to all outgoing SMTP mail from my exchange server. I have followed Q articles 317327 and 288756. However, when I go to register the sink on the interface as described in 317327 I get an error. The smtpreg.vbs comes back with Active X object can't be created. I have tried this several times, rebuilt the dll in VB several times but still no luck. Any ideas? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time and help Dave Kuehling Genoa Savings and Loan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 setup problems
Dear all, I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if anyone can help??. Let me set the scene. I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been dcpromo-ed. One of my servers is the Global Catalog for the domain whilst my other server is a domain controller which has been ticked in the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog server. It is this server that is the Exchange 2000 server. The domain is currently running in mixed mode. I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install exchange 2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have Service pack 1 installed. I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes well with no reported errors. Once replication has taken place, I then run the domainprep switch. Once replication has taken place, I then install Exchange 2000. All seems to go ok and once installed I can connect to the exchange server via an outlook client, and send emails internally and add stuff to the public folders. The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for Exchange 2000 (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1 SP2 and SP3) The Problem:- When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the following message:- 'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /ForestPrep switch. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /DomainPrep switch within this domain. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. Any ideas??? Thanks Robyn. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication
Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000
Were you schema admin when you did the forestprep? John -Original Message- From: Robyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Dear fellow IT professionals, I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if anyone can help??. Let me set the scene for you all. I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been dcpromo-ed. One of my servers is the Global Catalog for the domain whilst my other server is a domain controller which has been ticked in the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog server. It is this server that is the Exchange 2000 server. The domain is currently running in mixed mode. I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install exchange 2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have Service pack 1 installed. I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes well with no reported errors. Once replication has taken place, I then run the domainprep switch. Once replication has taken place, I then install Exchange 2000. All seems to go ok and once installed I can conect to the exchange server via an outlook client, and send emails internally and add stuff to the public folders. The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for Exchange (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1 SP2 and SP3) The Problem:- When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the following message:- 'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /ForestPrep switch. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /DomainPrep switch within this domain. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. Any ideas??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it? Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows, either. I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error message: 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been deni ed ( #5.7.1)
Means you're being rejected most likely because of either a realtime blackhole list or you are explicitly blacklisted there. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error message: 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied ( #5.7.1) This is a new one for us! Can someone tell me what this error message means? All email from us to a certain location is being blocked! Why? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 3/20/2003 4:06 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=One Call Medical;l=MAIL2-030320210532Z-5753 MSEXCH:IMS:One Call Medical, Inc.:OCM Headquarters:MAIL2 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender has been denied (#5.7.1) ~~~ Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6 TIA -Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404
I'll look at ours and get back to yours; Be aware that if you are 100% patched and up to date on your IIS code, you may be able to completely remove some of the entries that are intended to protect against exploits that are already protected by a patch. We compromised and removed some redundant entries (removed .. but kept .\ to protect against the CMD.EXE exploit). -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404 Hey erik- Yeah, traced it to urlscan and have been tweaking it. Can someone send me an ini file that's known to work well for user community over some time Providing a solid level of security w/o sacrificing functionality with/in exch 2000 owa? I'd like to compare/benchmark. Thx again-byron -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404 URLScan? Check the name of the mail message in which the attachment is located. If the title of the message contains any string of an otherwise bogus URL request (e.g. .. which is part of the request for Code Red and Nimda) then it will be denied with a 404. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404 More info: * OWA 2000 server is a front-end setup * OWA 2000 server using latest iis lockdown and url scan w/ standard owa template. Appreciate any pointers. byron -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Double-clicking attachments in OWA 2000 gives 404 Am seeing this error occasionally on a new exchange 2000 owa server (All 2000 mailbox and owa 2000 servers are sp3). One example was a relatively small zip file, another an .htm file. Doesn't happen on all attachments, but is consistent with the message, that is it never works when accessing w/ 2000 owa, but funny thing is it will access fine from our legacy 5.5 sp4 owa server. Both using ssl. Seems like an encoding or formatting issue that owa 2000 experiences when accessing the 2000 mailbox file system. The 5.5 owa ASP code doesn't get the 404 error. Any thoughts? Byron D. Kennedy http://www.markettools.com MarketTools(r) Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SBS and Pop3 Connector
I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange, yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never delivered to their recipients. Here is the set up Microsoft Small Business Server 2000 Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15 minutes He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to) and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses. I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know where to begin to troubleshoot. Any Help would be appreciated. Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Main: (864) 272-1145 Mobile: (864) 449-9912 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
Linksys? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it? Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows, either. I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector
This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail from the internet right? So it has to do with the SMTP sending part. Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too? Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require you to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam. Use message tracking to find out where it goes. There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field. B. At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote: I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange, yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never delivered to their recipients. Here is the set up Microsoft Small Business Server 2000 Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15 minutes He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to) and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses. I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know where to begin to troubleshoot. Any Help would be appreciated. Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SBS and Pop3 Connector
I was under the impression that the Pop3Connector would let me send through it to my Provider that my E-mail Addresses look like they are coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] vs. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I understand you correctly I use Exchanges SMTP to just relay off my provider? Or I set up my SMTP connector to send my mail and make my default reply address my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. Thanks, I'll also check Yahoo. Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail from the internet right? So it has to do with the SMTP sending part. Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too? Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require you to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam. Use message tracking to find out where it goes. There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field. B. At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote: I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange, yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never delivered to their recipients. Here is the set up Microsoft Small Business Server 2000 Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15 minutes He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to) and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses. I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know where to begin to troubleshoot. Any Help would be appreciated. Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SBS and Pop3 Connector
POP3 provides a way to retrieve mail from POP3 boxes. You still need to install/configure the SMTP connector. AFAIK this is documented, you will find information on the MS website. Have a look at www.sbsfaq.com too, you will find valuable SBS related information there too. B. At 09:01 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote: I was under the impression that the Pop3Connector would let me send through it to my Provider that my E-mail Addresses look like they are coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] vs. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I understand you correctly I use Exchanges SMTP to just relay off my provider? Or I set up my SMTP connector to send my mail and make my default reply address my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. Thanks, I'll also check Yahoo. Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SBS and Pop3 Connector This has nothing to do with the POP3 connector, you are receiving mail from the internet right? So it has to do with the SMTP sending part. Are you using SMTP(DNS) to deliver directly or are you using your ISP's SMTP server. Did you setup the SMTP connector too? Check the ISP to find out if they block direct delivery, some require you to send via their SMTP servers. They do this to stop spam. Use message tracking to find out where it goes. There is a yahoogroup dedicated to SBS: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbs2k where you will find ppl with much experience in the SBS field. B. At 08:34 21-03-2003 -0500, you wrote: I have a customer who wants to use the SBS Pop3 connector for Exchange, yesterday we configured it and he is able to receive messages but unable to send them. The messages leave his outbox but are never delivered to their recipients. Here is the set up Microsoft Small Business Server 2000 Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 Pop3 Connector for exchange set to connect to his provider every 15 minutes He has both his internal SMTP address (Which is his default reply to) and his provider email address listed under e-mail addresses. I have never used the SBS Pop3 Connector before so I do not even know where to begin to troubleshoot. Any Help would be appreciated. Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JScript
Flaming? You were gently teased And given some answers, too -Original Message- From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2003 21:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Thank you all. Thanks to all of you for the time you spent flaming me on the JScript thread! From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: JScript Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:00:01 -0500 Ah, not too far then... :o) -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions SC Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript You in NC? -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Lots of rain!!! Flash Flooding Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Severe thunderstorms here... -Original Message- From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions warm with cold spells. Possible rain. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Outlook? Lum, David wrote: I want... a shrubbery. One that looks nice. And not too expensive. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 15:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Would someone please recomend a nice brand of casual shoe? Something nicer that running shoes, but comfortable to walk extended distance in. Size 9 1/2 men's medium _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly
RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
You mean Cisco. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Linksys? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it? Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows, either. I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
Ciscsys? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions You mean Cisco. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Linksys? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it? Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows, either. I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
Linkco -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2003 14:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Ciscsys? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions You mean Cisco. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Linksys? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions So, let me get this straight. You don't want your firewall to conform to the RFC's, yet you complain when Exchange doesn't like it? Unless you have a very, and I mean VERY, brain dead firewall, there is no reason that it can't enforce text wrapping. I don't buy that having the firewall enforcing the wrapping limits will open you to buffer overflows, either. I'm interested in what kind of firewall it is, so I know to never buy one. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821 Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. Thank you Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JScript
Flaming? Where? I musta missed it when we were talking about the weather -Original Message- From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2003 21:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Thank you all. Thanks to all of you for the time you spent flaming me on the JScript thread! From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: JScript Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:00:01 -0500 Ah, not too far then... :o) -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions SC Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript You in NC? -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Lots of rain!!! Flash Flooding Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Severe thunderstorms here... -Original Message- From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions warm with cold spells. Possible rain. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Outlook? Lum, David wrote: I want... a shrubbery. One that looks nice. And not too expensive. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 15:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript Would someone please recomend a nice brand of casual shoe? Something nicer that running shoes, but comfortable to walk extended distance in. Size 9 1/2 men's medium _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
postini spam control
anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid disclaimers
Wow, if my content filters would have flagged this message for administrative review, I would have been in violation of federal criminal law... In the country of Bullshitia I guess. On 3/19/03 9:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly
Ok I have made some headway, I did some snooping and noticed the Reverse Lookup Zones were built incorrectly so I fixed them and rebooted Servers SES and TES. Now the users on SES and TES are able to send email to each other with no issues. I have since removed the test2 Routing group and associated connector and placed both SES and TES in the Same Routing Group (Test), which has a single Routing Group Connector in it. Last night I Rebooted FES with hopes it would start acting correctly, well it did not. For further testing I moved TES into the First Routing Group with FES and this completely broke all my e-mail transmissions between servers. So I moved TES back into the Test Routing Group with SES and all is fine with those 2 servers again . So to some up: 1. Users on FES are able to receive emails from SES and TES however they can not send mail to SES and TES 2. Users on TES and FES are able to send and receive mail between both Servers. Again all help is appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly Would not having the reverse lookup Zones built correctly possibly cause this problem? Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly I will do it tonight but I did it this weekend and Still no luck. I'm pretty sure I do not have resolution problems, I have not had any other issues. I would think I would at least see some other issues right? Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly After you're absolutely sure you don't have any name resolution or network problems, try rebooting the ones with problems when you have the opportunity. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly Sorry I'm sick today The event logs do not show any errors Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly know errors Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly Looking for Microsoft tools, but in the meantime the NetIQ Tool shows know errors on any of my DC's or in DNS Also there are no errors in the Eventlog. Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly Any DNS errors in the event viewer? There's a free tool called ADCheck from NetIQ you may want to run http://www.netiq.com/adcheck/default.asp. I think Microsoft has some free utilities to troubleshoot that as well. On 3/19/03 9:41, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I can accept that, but I have gone into DNS and all machines are registered and I have gone to each machine and I'm able to ping all the others with NetBIOS name and with FQDN Where else can I look? Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple Servers in the Same Site not communicating correctly DNS name resolution issues almost certainly. On 3/19/03 9:21, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posted this problem about a week or so ago and I got a few responses, well I've gotten a lot more information and hopefully someone can help Ok Environment: Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 2000 SP3 1 Domain All machines are in the same site and same subnet First Exchange Server is installed on a Domain Controller (Will be called FES) Second Exchange Server is installed on a member
RE: Stupid disclaimers
Now now, remember, my City is filtering on only two words, F*** and S***. Why we don't filter on other, much more obscene words then that is beyond me :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid disclaimers Wow, if my content filters would have flagged this message for administrative review, I would have been in violation of federal criminal law... In the country of Bullshitia I guess. On 3/19/03 9:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Text Body Line to Long RFC 2821
Messages coming _from_ your Exchange server destined for an external recipient make you vulnerable to a buffer overrun how? On 3/17/03 17:59, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our proxy based firewall is seeing messages comming from our Exchange 5.5 SP4 mail system with text lines that are greater than the specified maximum of 1000 bytes in rfc2821, and is truncating the message past 1000. Increasing the size is not an option on the Firewall as it would make us vulnerable to buffer overruns and such. Has anyone else seen this before, and if so were you able to solve the issue? If someone could point me to a fix to solve this issue it would greatly be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000
Try reapplying W2K SP1 or better.. Applying SP3. On 3/20/03 8:35, Robyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear fellow IT professionals, I am having problems with Exchange 2000 configuration, and I wonder if anyone can help??. Let me set the scene for you all. I have two windows 2000 advanced servers in an domain which have been dcpromo-ed. One of my servers is the Global Catalog for the domain whilst my other server is a domain controller which has been ticked in the NTDS settings as a Global Catalog server. It is this server that is the Exchange 2000 server. The domain is currently running in mixed mode. I have been following the Microsoft white paper on how to install exchange 2000, and thus both my Windows 2000 servers have Service pack 1 installed. I install exchange by firstly running the Forestprep switch, all goes well with no reported errors. Once replication has taken place, I then run the domainprep switch. Once replication has taken place, I then install Exchange 2000. All seems to go ok and once installed I can conect to the exchange server via an outlook client, and send emails internally and add stuff to the public folders. The problems start to happen when I try and install a service pack for Exchange (the problem happens for both Exchange SP1 SP2 and SP3) The Problem:- When I run the update for the exchange service packs, I get the following message:- 'Prerequisites for Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services failed: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Update because: - The Active Directory schema is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /ForestPrep switch. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. - The local domain configuration is not up-to-date. You must run setup with the /DomainPrep switch within this domain. If you have already done this with the current version of Setup, then you must wait for replication to complete. Consult your documentation for details. Any ideas??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 Directory Error (1171)
Per Rich's advice 2 days ago, call Microsoft. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 3/20/03 8:20, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Anybody knows what are the parameters -1601 16054 in a Internal Processing error means ? The problem occur when you double-click on a Distribution List (DL) and since its corrupted you get a DS_E_DIT_ERROR. The Event viewer record this a maximum logging. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeDS Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 1171 Description: Exception e0010004 has occurred with parameters -1601 and 16054 (internal ID 208017d). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. I tried deleting the object, even in RAW mode and repairing the DIR.EDB with eseutil /p... doesnt work. Support.microsoft.com doesn't have the exact error, and the only reference to -1601 is (JET_errRecordNotFound). But nothing on 16054. So anybody has any idea, short of calling directly microsoft, or restoring from backups ? thx Patrick BTW: There are only 3 recipients in that DL :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
Yuck... -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
the deafening silence was leading me to this conclusion. thanks -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: postini spam control Yuck... -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Replication
However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication topologies... Which is why I think Ed might have asked for clarification. On 3/21/03 7:02, John Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT, and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control. John -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postini spam control
I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource. There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of outsourcing e-mail services in general. Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a better solution for them. On 3/21/03 9:33, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT, and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute. John -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource. There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of outsourcing e-mail services in general. Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a better solution for them. On 3/21/03 9:33, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT, and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
Greetings all. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0. However, we will be upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year. We are considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN. The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software. I have two question. 1. Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 2. Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server? Comments on one or both? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
Yes and No. We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Greetings all. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0. However, we will be upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year. We are considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN. The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software. I have two question. 1. Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 2. Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server? Comments on one or both? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postini spam control
:) FWIW, Postini was initially marketed as an ISP solution.. I know several in town how use it. Not one I've tested, so I can't offer an opinion. A friend of mine works for MailFrontier.. I was planning to take a look at their stuff, maybe you could do it for me and let me know what you think? g On 3/21/03 9:44, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute. John -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource. There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of outsourcing e-mail services in general. Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a better solution for them. On 3/21/03 9:33, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT, and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
We have it on a EMC 4700 and also use Backup Exec. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Yes and No. We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Greetings all. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0. However, we will be upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year. We are considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN. The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software. I have two question. 1. Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 2. Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server? Comments on one or both? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
thanks, I appreciate the comments. I'll get right on that MailFrontier. :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control :) FWIW, Postini was initially marketed as an ISP solution.. I know several in town how use it. Not one I've tested, so I can't offer an opinion. A friend of mine works for MailFrontier.. I was planning to take a look at their stuff, maybe you could do it for me and let me know what you think? g On 3/21/03 9:44, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute. John -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource. There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of outsourcing e-mail services in general. Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a better solution for them. On 3/21/03 9:33, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT, and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
I don't' think MailFrontier has any AV capabilities does it? That's if you need it. -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: postini spam control thanks, I appreciate the comments. I'll get right on that MailFrontier. :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control :) FWIW, Postini was initially marketed as an ISP solution.. I know several in town how use it. Not one I've tested, so I can't offer an opinion. A friend of mine works for MailFrontier.. I was planning to take a look at their stuff, maybe you could do it for me and let me know what you think? g On 3/21/03 9:44, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed - I shouldn't have made the assertation absolute. John -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource. There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of outsourcing e-mail services in general. Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a better solution for them. On 3/21/03 9:33, John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT, and you need to go to a third party to get it back.always bad news to take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
We have a Compaq SAN and use BackupExec. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. We have it on a EMC 4700 and also use Backup Exec. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Yes and No. We use a couple XIOTECH boxes and Backup Exec. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback. Greetings all. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0. However, we will be upgrading to Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year. We are considering attaching the Exchange 2000 Server to a SAN. The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback as the backup software. I have two question. 1. Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN? 2. Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server? Comments on one or both? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes
Contact me offlist, as I've a MS utility to do this for you. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 19 March 2003 15:43 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes Subject: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes We are doing a migration from Lotus Notes 5.x to Exchange 2k (finally!). The migration wizard does not bring across contacts. Does anyone know any free utilities to grab contacts from Notes and import to Exchange? Thanks! Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE Technical Analyst (905) 319-8378 Ext. 240 FAX (905) 319-8397 Just Released: Nexterna Real-Time Service Tool Kit Get the information you need to jump-start preparations for Real-Time service at your organization. www.nexterna.com/toolkit NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
Robert,
Our Exchange 2000 servers are connected to an EMC CX600 on a SAN. We are using Legato
for our backup. The Legato server is a Sun e450.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 3/21/2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Exchange backups with a SAN / Ominback.
Greetings all.
We are currently running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0. However, we will be
upgrading to
Exchange/Windows 2000 later in the year. We are considering attaching the
Exchange
2000 Server to a SAN. The SAN has a Unix server attached using HP Omniback
as the
backup software. I have two question.
1. Does anybody else have their Exchange server attached to a SAN?
2. Anybody using Omniback software to backup the Exchange server?
Comments on one or both?
Thanks.
Robert
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyª«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: postini spam control
No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical solution for all byt the smallest shops. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication
When setting up sites for our organization, a network segment that one of our Exchange servers was on was initially not included in the definition for the site and this did cause significant Exchange problems. I can't remember details now, but adding the segment to the site did fix our problem with Exchange. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication topologies... Which is why I think Ed might have asked for clarification. On 3/21/03 7:02, John Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
that was my argument to the higher ups -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: postini spam control No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical solution for all byt the smallest shops. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postini spam control
At 08:38 21-03-2003 -0600, you wrote: anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. This week we talked about putting a Linux box with Sendmail between you and the internet. You can use spamassasin and have everything in house. One of the advantages is that you do have full control about what gets caught and you can always access the probably spam mailbox to see if spamassasin was a bit 'trigger happy'. I did hear (on the SBS2K list) about gfi mailessentials which seem to have a pretty good anti spam util too.. it runs on Windows. B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
The one strong point I always thought was good for the outsourcing part was that that much less stuff came over my link to the internet..thus idealy helping to manage bandwidth. Now on the other hand I could never find an out sourcer who could give me the granularity I needed/wanted 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control At 08:38 21-03-2003 -0600, you wrote: anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. This week we talked about putting a Linux box with Sendmail between you and the internet. You can use spamassasin and have everything in house. One of the advantages is that you do have full control about what gets caught and you can always access the probably spam mailbox to see if spamassasin was a bit 'trigger happy'. I did hear (on the SBS2K list) about gfi mailessentials which seem to have a pretty good anti spam util too.. it runs on Windows. B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication
Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed Windows-2k domain environment. Thanks for any help. -Original Message- From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2019 Error
Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does this mean and how can I fix it?
When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: postini spam control
Yet all that data is traveling in the clear over the wire? Is the threat of federal prosecution by the government of Bushittia, of those who might dare to intercept the data without authorization what helps you sleep at night then? g Not that this isn't a legitimate issue, or that there aren't other legitimate issues which ought to be evaluated as well before making such a decision... But it the same issues should likely spark a number of other policy discussions and initiatives as well. On 3/21/03 10:40, Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical solution for all byt the smallest shops. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Replication
Ok, perhaps I was a bit too general in my comment. Yes, a bungled Active Directory can effect Exchange routing, however what gets routed where and how often (which is the root issue surrounding PF replication) is based on Exchange specific topology information. On 3/21/03 10:42, John Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When setting up sites for our organization, a network segment that one of our Exchange servers was on was initially not included in the definition for the site and this did cause significant Exchange problems. I can't remember details now, but adding the segment to the site did fix our problem with Exchange. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication However, Windows 2000 sites have no impact on Exchange 2000 replication topologies... Which is why I think Ed might have asked for clarification. On 3/21/03 7:02, John Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Replication
Then by site you meant what? On 3/21/03 11:08, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed Windows-2k domain environment. Thanks for any help. -Original Message- From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2019 Error
When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2019 Error Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2019 Error
Try searching event ID: www.eventid.net -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2019 Error Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2019 Error
Thanks, David!! -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error Try searching event ID: www.eventid.net -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:2019 Error Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
No, it's actually a size limit, they're limited to 32k; which is what can fit in a single data packet. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
The total amount of server-side rules must fall under 32k to fit in an RPC packet. Consolidate. Be selective with which rules need to run server-side (you can still add client-side rules) William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, LT Johnny -wcso Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication
Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote site for Exchange server and didn't realize I wasn't terming the things right, sorry about that. So, essentially it's a simple one site network having three exchange servers , I want to bring down two of them and consolidate all exchange stuff on the last one (the newest I added recently) , to do that I was trying to replicate all the PF related stuff on to the this new server from the first exchange server and that's where I got stuck as it won't replicate . If I tried to look in First Exchange server's one of the PF's properties under replication tab --details it says In Sync with this First Exchange Server however it says Local Modified for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange server). -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication Then by site you meant what? On 3/21/03 11:08, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed Windows-2k domain environment. Thanks for any help. -Original Message- From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. Thank you, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2019 Error
Any time. ;) -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error Thanks, David!! -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error Try searching event ID: www.eventid.net -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2019 Error When I have seen this error I typically have to reboot the server. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:2019 Error Hi I am getting 2019 error on Exchange and it is getting hanged. Any solutions Event details are as follows: Event 2019: The server was unable to allocate from the system nonpaged pool because the pool was empty. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Of course you do! =) -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or would that make any difference? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Client-side, you are pretty much unlimited in number/total size of rules. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or would that make any difference? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
I'm playing with the client side now. Can you give me some tips on setting them up here? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Client-side, you are pretty much unlimited in number/total size of rules. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or would that make any difference? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can this happen with Spam ?
But I believe that just turns it off. It doesn't disable it (I could be wrong, but that's how I believe it to be). A user could just turn it back on. BTW - That's called 'web beaconing' (when images are use for tracking). It's a very effective method for determining if email addresses are valid, and has been used by a LOT of spammers. We've even seen HTML emails that don't have any visible images use this by setting the width height to 0 so the image doesn't appear, but it still gets accessed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:34 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Can this happen with Spam ? Outlook has a /nopreview switch which alows you to turn off the preview pane for your users. When you deploy Outlook you could deploy it with this switch. I'd love to see a lawsuit raised against spammers. Something along the lines of emotional damages for receiving pornographic e-mail. Hit them in the wallet - it's the only language they understand! Is this possible in Outlook ? The article said something about with the Preview pane being turned on in Outlook, this was more likely to happen or just opening an email with this sort of an image in it could also trigger the code. How can this happen ? This means Outlook is allowing some code to get executed that passes information back to the source. Isn't there a security patch to prevent this from happening ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SEC mail retention rule
I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SEC mail retention rule
KVS and Assentor come to mind. Also if your doing archiving of all mail are you also required to restrict delivery based on content. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SEC mail retention rule Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:29:38 -0800 I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Replication
So by site, you meant server? Your other folders have replicated successfully and you've consolidated the user onto this new server? On 3/21/03 11:30, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote site for Exchange server and didn't realize I wasn't terming the things right, sorry about that. So, essentially it's a simple one site network having three exchange servers , I want to bring down two of them and consolidate all exchange stuff on the last one (the newest I added recently) , to do that I was trying to replicate all the PF related stuff on to the this new server from the first exchange server and that's where I got stuck as it won't replicate . If I tried to look in First Exchange server's one of the PF's properties under replication tab --details it says In Sync with this First Exchange Server however it says Local Modified for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange server). -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication Then by site you meant what? On 3/21/03 11:08, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed Windows-2k domain environment. Thanks for any help. -Original Message- From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exporting copy of AD to new system.
I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
What's the design goal? On 3/21/03 13:18, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users on as needed for access to the other domain. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system. What's the design goal? On 3/21/03 13:18, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
It's not easy to specify where the rules get run; Start here: http://www.slipstick.com/rules/serverbased.htm (I found that by googling for the terms [client server rules Outlook] -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? I'm playing with the client side now. Can you give me some tips on setting them up here? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Client-side, you are pretty much unlimited in number/total size of rules. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Do you know if this could be set on the client side only or would that make any difference? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Not necessarily the number of rules, but the total amount of space that they take up on the server (for server-side rules). The max amount is 32k of storage space. I don't know of a way to see how much space your current rules take, other than adding rules until you can't add no mo. As Candee [1] said, try consolidating them to conserve space. [1] I like Candee! -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org + This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. ++ -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it? Most probably you have too many rules; try consolidating them. -Original Message- From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What does this mean and how can I fix it? When ever I try to set up a new e-mail filtering rule I get the following msg. One or more rules could not be uploaded to exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
Just because? Are you doing a migration of some kind? Or? The reason I am asking is because there may be tools to do what you are asking, depending on what it is you are actually asking.. Like ADMT or the InterOrg tool for example. On 3/21/03 13:35, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users on as needed for access to the other domain. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system. What's the design goal? On 3/21/03 13:18, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
No just want to grab the users from my current AD (minus the exchange info) and import them into this new 2000 servers AD. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system. Just because? Are you doing a migration of some kind? Or? The reason I am asking is because there may be tools to do what you are asking, depending on what it is you are actually asking.. Like ADMT or the InterOrg tool for example. On 3/21/03 13:35, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users on as needed for access to the other domain. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system. What's the design goal? On 3/21/03 13:18, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system.
So ADMT does too much for you? How bout ldif? http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/activedirectory/bulks teps.asp On 3/21/03 13:47, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No just want to grab the users from my current AD (minus the exchange info) and import them into this new 2000 servers AD. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system. Just because? Are you doing a migration of some kind? Or? The reason I am asking is because there may be tools to do what you are asking, depending on what it is you are actually asking.. Like ADMT or the InterOrg tool for example. On 3/21/03 13:35, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to populate the AD with a set of my current users and turn users on as needed for access to the other domain. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exporting copy of AD to new system. What's the design goal? On 3/21/03 13:18, Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply to not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5
We are currently testing a antispam software from Active State called Pure Message, (when I say testing we have bought it and we are implementing it) but now we find out that the Reply To of the email header does not work on OWA 5.5 which will stop our users from getting any messages that have been quarantined. Has anyone have a fix for this. I've looked at Tech Net and what I come up with is KB article 181408 Set Up Reply to Alternate Recipient which will require adding some code but being not a programmer, is there another way. ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system. I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reply to not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5
Ask the person who bought it for you to fix it. From: John Strongosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reply to not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:55:47 -0800 We are currently testing a antispam software from Active State called Pure Message, (when I say testing we have bought it and we are implementing it) but now we find out that the Reply To of the email header does not work on OWA 5.5 which will stop our users from getting any messages that have been quarantined. Has anyone have a fix for this. I've looked at Tech Net and what I come up with is KB article 181408 Set Up Reply to Alternate Recipient which will require adding some code but being not a programmer, is there another way. ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system. I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
I completely agree. But enough material non-public information graces most companies' email to make me really get the willies thinking about someone else having a copy of all of ti, -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control Yet all that data is traveling in the clear over the wire? Is the threat of federal prosecution by the government of Bushittia, of those who might dare to intercept the data without authorization what helps you sleep at night then? g Not that this isn't a legitimate issue, or that there aren't other legitimate issues which ought to be evaluated as well before making such a decision... But it the same issues should likely spark a number of other policy discussions and initiatives as well. On 3/21/03 10:40, Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much marginally confidential information crossing email these days to make that a practical solution for all byt the smallest shops. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: postini spam control anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. thanks Josh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEC mail retention rule
Negative, this is just an archiving solution in an 'unalterable format', and apparently must include a 'searchable index.' They also mandate archival of IM, but I assume that's only if you use an in-house IM server... David -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SEC mail retention rule KVS and Assentor come to mind. Also if your doing archiving of all mail are you also required to restrict delivery based on content. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SEC mail retention rule Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:29:38 -0800 I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication
I am able to move all my users to this new server. The only thing doesn't move/replicate are Public Folders (System e.g. Free Busy, Off Line Address Book as well User Public Folders) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication So by site, you meant server? Your other folders have replicated successfully and you've consolidated the user onto this new server? On 3/21/03 11:30, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coming from 5.5 environment I wrote site for Exchange server and didn't realize I wasn't terming the things right, sorry about that. So, essentially it's a simple one site network having three exchange servers , I want to bring down two of them and consolidate all exchange stuff on the last one (the newest I added recently) , to do that I was trying to replicate all the PF related stuff on to the this new server from the first exchange server and that's where I got stuck as it won't replicate . If I tried to look in First Exchange server's one of the PF's properties under replication tab --details it says In Sync with this First Exchange Server however it says Local Modified for the newly added Replication Server (i.e. the new exchange server). -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Replication Then by site you meant what? On 3/21/03 11:08, Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks John, yes the exchange server is on the same site and on the same subnet. So, we have three exchange server all in the same subnet in Mixed Windows-2k domain environment. Thanks for any help. -Original Message- From: John Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Sites is a Windows 2000 term. You organize servers in a domain into sites for a better handle on replication traffic, among other things. Make sure that the Exchange application servers are on subnets that correspond to defined sites in your organization (eg Exchange is on a subnet that is included in a site definition) John -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication And by sites you mean what, since there's no such term in Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I can not seem to replicate my Public Folder Contents / Off Line Address Book /Free-Busy Data across the different sites (all on Exchange 2000 SP3) . Under the details it always says Local Modified for the other sites whereas In Sync for the site on which they are homed. I tried all the Microsoft's KB articles on Receipent's Policy , Recepient's Update Service but nothing seems to be wrong. Please help if there is something in particular I should be looking for. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.
Now I get this error since I changed to the inbox assistant. Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are to complex. Try deleting some rules. I have only one test rule set up. All this rule does id move an e-mail to a folder. Any thoughts or ideas. Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP connector issue
Exchange 2k SP3 Finally, I got an event on this. Every now and then one of our users (Random) sends an outbound email with an attachment that gets stuck on our SMTP connector that connects to our mail gateway. Below are the events it triggered in order. Its not a certain attachment and its not a certain client. Its all random. Clients are sending HTML, RTF, and plain text. It happens to all of them. I'm stuck on this. It has been happening for a while so I am kind of frustrated. I guess it might lead to PSS. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. 1. Event ID: 327 Source: MSExchangeTransport Category: Exchange Store Driver The following call : EcGetMime to the store failed. Error code : -2147024809. MDB : 2126f66d-a776-4b44-9790-bc6902e8aed1. FID : 1-2E. MID : 1-2E2AC8B. File : . 2. Event ID: 4000 Message delivery to the remote domain '[mail gateway ip]' failed for the following reason: Unable to open the message for delivery. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5
I bought it and they don't have a fix for it so I'm stuck trying to fix OWA and I know there has to someone else on this list who has run into this problem. ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reply to not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5 Ask the person who bought it for you to fix it. From: John Strongosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reply to not working in OWA for Exchange 5.5 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:55:47 -0800 We are currently testing a antispam software from Active State called Pure Message, (when I say testing we have bought it and we are implementing it) but now we find out that the Reply To of the email header does not work on OWA 5.5 which will stop our users from getting any messages that have been quarantined. Has anyone have a fix for this. I've looked at Tech Net and what I come up with is KB article 181408 Set Up Reply to Alternate Recipient which will require adding some code but being not a programmer, is there another way. ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exporting copy of AD to new system. I'm trying to get a good export of my users in the Active Directory so I can import them into another domain. At the current time, I go the AD users computer select export list. I only need to get the users account info, not the exchange info. Anyone have any quick steps in to performing this. Ron Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEC mail retention rule
We have the same issue here. I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I have the advantage of a SAN to store it on. I have everything going to a single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I can still search it and access it no problem. Becarefull with Indexing though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only. We looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling (The poor mans solution) is good enough for now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEC mail retention rule I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEC mail retention rule
So then journaling is certified to be compliant with SEC rule 17a-4? From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:23:47 -0600 We have the same issue here. I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I have the advantage of a SAN to store it on. I have everything going to a single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I can still search it and access it no problem. Becarefull with Indexing though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only. We looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling (The poor mans solution) is good enough for now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEC mail retention rule I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEC mail retention rule
Our Local SEC (Fort Worth, TX) is accepting it. But I cannot say wether or not it is certified. Have the even come out with requirements to be certified? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule So then journaling is certified to be compliant with SEC rule 17a-4? From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:23:47 -0600 We have the same issue here. I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I have the advantage of a SAN to store it on. I have everything going to a single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I can still search it and access it no problem. Becarefull with Indexing though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only. We looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling (The poor mans solution) is good enough for now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEC mail retention rule I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SEC mail retention rule
Well there you go. I haven't worked in a financial firm in a while. Seems everything had to be on a list of some sort of products allowed to be used. From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:30:48 -0600 Our Local SEC (Fort Worth, TX) is accepting it. But I cannot say wether or not it is certified. Have the even come out with requirements to be certified? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule So then journaling is certified to be compliant with SEC rule 17a-4? From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SEC mail retention rule Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:23:47 -0600 We have the same issue here. I am using Exchange 2000 and Journaling but I have the advantage of a SAN to store it on. I have everything going to a single mailbox and its roughly at 60GB with about 2.5million messages and I can still search it and access it no problem. Becarefull with Indexing though...It will suck up those resourcesI index at night only. We looked at KVS and others and they wanted way to much money.Journaling (The poor mans solution) is good enough for now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SEC mail retention rule I've just been advised our company must begin complying with SEC rule 17a-4 regarding the retention of all e-mail IM traffic. Anyone on the list have experience with that, and have some resource links they'd be willing to share? I'm hoping I can get the job done with E2K journalling and writing to optical storage, without large costs. Thanks in advance, David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Religion and science are opposed, but only in the same sense as that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Blagg. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
