RE: OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition?
No. I've covered some of the basic rules here: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/upgrading_to_ex.html Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey Posted At: 03 November 2003 03:18 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition? Subject: OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition? Can I install Exchange 2003 OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition? Ryan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay
Let me answer my own question. Those spammers were using authentication to logon to SMTP server of our Exchange. Once we saw what user account was being used and disabled it, problem went away. (Due to POP3 users, we have to allow routing thru authentication.) Jay Kulsh Please visit http://www.cancer-treatment.net - Original Message - From: Jay Kulsh To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 9:17 PM Subject: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay Hi folks, We do not have open relay on our two Exchange servers (5.5 SP4) as tested by various tools. However in the queue of IMC, there are thousand of messages that have outside domains in both source and destination addresses. The addresses of originators are obviously computer generated with words like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. We have no proof yet that any of these messages are actually delivered -- as if we were open realy -- to the destination domain but that is a possibility. Symantec techsupport stated that they are not aware of any virus or worm that can do this. If we are not allowing open-relay what is causing these messages to get to our IMC queue? Please help! Jay __ Jay Kulsh iLAN Pasadena, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay
Hi I had a similar problem as we have a lot of mobile users. Unfortunately the authentication seemed temperamental depending on which ISP you were using, so forced everybody to use the VPN and restricted routing to internal IP's only. I think that did the trick, but I wouldn't be surprised if the spammers find a way around it. Bye Ali - Original Message - From: Jay Kulsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:11 PM Subject: Re: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay Let me answer my own question. Those spammers were using authentication to logon to SMTP server of our Exchange. Once we saw what user account was being used and disabled it, problem went away. (Due to POP3 users, we have to allow routing thru authentication.) Jay Kulsh Please visit http://www.cancer-treatment.net - Original Message - From: Jay Kulsh To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 9:17 PM Subject: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay Hi folks, We do not have open relay on our two Exchange servers (5.5 SP4) as tested by various tools. However in the queue of IMC, there are thousand of messages that have outside domains in both source and destination addresses. The addresses of originators are obviously computer generated with words like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. We have no proof yet that any of these messages are actually delivered -- as if we were open realy -- to the destination domain but that is a possibility. Symantec techsupport stated that they are not aware of any virus or worm that can do this. If we are not allowing open-relay what is causing these messages to get to our IMC queue? Please help! Jay __ Jay Kulsh iLAN Pasadena, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA (E2k) issue with messages appearing to some systems as having attachments.
Ok it seems that when I reply to many messages from mailing lists via OWA the replied message seems to have an attachment (and some new postings also) . At first we noticed that all messages were using UTF-8 so found the setting to change it from that to our regional setting. That didn't solve the problem. I've tried to search the archive to no luck also searched the support.microsoft.com site. Config is W2k server with latest sp(4) and hotfixes, E2k with sp3, with post sp3 rollup and latest security patches applied. Anybody have any ideas? I have my profile set to send all my e-mails as text only which as you know OWA doesn't pay attention to. Doesn't seem to make a differance which version IE we use. tried from IE 5.0 sp4 up to latest IE 6.0 sp1 + rollup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 70-224 Exam
Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Don't be nervous From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:39:22 -0500 Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Never get a busy signal because you are always connected with high-speed Internet access. Click here to comparison-shop providers. https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Run through the test questions from http://www.transcender.com or other test sites. Gives you the enviroment to expenct and usually 40 - 50% of the questions too. Worked for me :) Ali - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Get a good nights sleep. -- From: Tony Hlabse Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, November 3, 2003 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam Don't be nervous From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:39:22 -0500 Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Never get a busy signal because you are always connected with high-speed Internet access. Click here to comparison-shop providers. https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Thanks, I'll run through those. After all the practice tests and stuff I am right at 80% which is passing. I am pressed to take the test at the end of the month and I am trying to cram as much as possible, so we'll see how it goes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AliAdmin Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam Run through the test questions from http://www.transcender.com or other test sites. Gives you the enviroment to expenct and usually 40 - 50% of the questions too. Worked for me :) Ali - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default recipient policy issue
That's what the default recipient policy does and you probably should not mess with it. Why do these SMTP and X.400 addresses bother you so much? Also if you really, really don't want you contacts to be stamped with the policy's e-mail addresses, go to each contact's properties, click on the E-mail addresses tab and then un-check the option that applies the policy settings. Now, how are you routing mail to the sister companies? Does mail from the Internet to the sister companies arrive first to your Exchange environment (i.e. do the sister companies' MX records point to your Exchange server?) If that is the case, then you want to have the e-mail addresses created by the default policy. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: default recipient policy issue Hi all, I have a container with lots of contacts from sister companies. I just noticed that they all got an additonal SMTP/X.400 address, apparently that is caused by my default policy. The filter for that policy just says (mailnickname=*) and I can't change the filter as the [Modify] button is dimmed. What can I do to prevent the policy from messing with my contacts? Thanks and regards, Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Is this the first one or the second one? The second one was a pain in the butt - very long with a lot of stuff to read through, plus it crashed on me twice :) The first one is pretty straightforward. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam
If your 80% on the tests, you'll have no probs. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:03 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam Thanks, I'll run through those. After all the practice tests and stuff I am right at 80% which is passing. I am pressed to take the test at the end of the month and I am trying to cram as much as possible, so we'll see how it goes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AliAdmin Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam Run through the test questions from http://www.transcender.com or other test sites. Gives you the enviroment to expenct and usually 40 - 50% of the questions too. Worked for me :) Ali - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good. Questions: What operating system are you running it on? Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own? If it needs another, what do you suggest? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Limits
Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay
Excuse me. Symantec said they weren't aware of any virus that can put dummy addresses in the To and From fields? I find that hard to believe since the Klez virus, among others, does this very thing and they are certainly aware of that virus. As for your original issue about the spam delete the messages that you know are spam and re-check your open relay situation. It sounds like there is a hole somewhere that you didn't plug. Check Q articles Q260973 Q265293 Q313395 Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Jay Kulsh Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2003 11:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam Clogging the IMC Queue -- Feigning Open Relay Hi folks, We do not have open relay on our two Exchange servers (5.5 SP4) as tested by various tools. However in the queue of IMC, there are thousand of messages that have outside domains in both source and destination addresses. The addresses of originators are obviously computer generated with words like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. We have no proof yet that any of these messages are actually delivered -- as if we were open realy -- to the destination domain but that is a possibility. Symantec techsupport stated that they are not aware of any virus or worm that can do this. If we are not allowing open-relay what is causing these messages to get to our IMC queue? Please help! Jay __ Jay Kulsh iLAN Pasadena, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam
This is the first one, if you mean by first the admin exam, and second the design exam. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:08 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange 70-224 Exam Subject: RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam Is this the first one or the second one? The second one was a pain in the butt - very long with a lot of stuff to read through, plus it crashed on me twice :) The first one is pretty straightforward. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding items from a Public Folder Calendar to Personal Calendar
I have been looking around SlipStick for a solution to add items from a Public Folder Calendar to a Personal Calendar automatically but couldn't find anything simple (my users are a little non-technical). I have a public folder calendar where staff post deadlines and upcoming events related to the company. Some staff who are concerned with these events would like to be able to add all these items automatically to their personal calendar. Is this possible ? I explored the possiblity of using Folder Administration to send the appointment to all users and then use Rules Wizard to automatically add the appointment to my Calendar. IS there another way to do this ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move E2K servers between AD containers?
Brent, Computers isn't a container in AD - it's a folder and therefore can't have a policy applied to it. The only policy that will apply to Computers is the default domain policy so it doesn't matter where you move your Exchange server the default domain policy will still be applied unless you block policy inheritance on the OU you put the Exchange servers into, but then you must re-apply all the required policy objects on the new OU. Yes you can move servers to any OU you like but you must make sure the right policies are being applied. Regards Brian Brian Davies - Network Operations Manager University of East London E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 0208 223 2091 Mobile: 07711 198349 -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 November 2003 04:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move E2K servers between AD containers? We've moved all ours to different OU's. No problems at all other than having to restart the services. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MS Exchange List Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 9:05 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move E2K servers between AD containers? Hello, E2K: 2 Servers, same site/group, SP3+September'03 Rollup+recent critical security patch, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP4 + all critical fixes , native The powers that be would like to move all the Servers into a new OU Servers container in AD. They're trying to deploy some policies against the default Computers container the Exchange servers currently exist in, so want the Exchange Servers out of it. It seemed to work OK in the lab after moving and rebooting. I know some of the Exchange Groups can't be moved out of the Default Users container. Any problem moving Exchange Servers between containers? They are not DCs. Thank you, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automation of Rules creation
Has anyone found any other method, other than using the Rule.dll component from the Exchange 5.5 SDK, of creating rules automatically? For instance, I want to create a rule for all my users without visiting all their mailboxes manually. K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially tested it on) uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange is on or another one ... we run it as a service ... our path looks something like this Xwall --- Exchange (Front end servers) (separate servers) If you want more detailed info, feel free to contact me directly ... Mike -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good. Questions: What operating system are you running it on? Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own? If it needs another, what do you suggest? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Thanks for the info. I'm loading up a server right now to test. Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially tested it on) uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange is on or another one ... we run it as a service ... our path looks something like this Xwall --- Exchange (Front end servers) (separate servers) If you want more detailed info, feel free to contact me directly ... Mike -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good. Questions: What operating system are you running it on? Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own? If it needs another, what do you suggest? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy issue removing last 5.5 server in the site
Hi Everyone, I have one 5.5 server, which also happens to be the first server in the site, that I would like to remove. I have two other Exchange 2000 servers in the site. I followed the instuctions and made sure there was a replica of the Free/Busy folder (among others) on one of the Exchange 2000 servers. When I shut down all of the services on the old 5.5 server for a test, I start to see errors on the server without the replica. Event ID 8207 Souce MSExchangeFBPublish. It inidicated it had a problem getting the data from the old 5.5 server. I decided to replicate the folder to that server as well (however, I think that you should only have one version of the folder in a site - is this correct?). I let it replicate over the weekend, and then this morning I tried it again. I am seeing the same error, but this time it indicates it is having a problem with the public store on itself. If I turn the services on the old server back on, the error goes away. At no point have I had any reported client issues when the error is logged. I looked at technet article 824282, but I don't think it applies, as the problem goes away when the orignal server is on. I think I have some sort of replication issue, but I am not sure what it is. Checking the public folder on the Exchange 2000 server, it says the Schedule+ Free Busy folder has replicated. Has anyone else seen this? If anyone has a pointer for me, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Virginia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
Other than 0! g -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
Ot -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
Personal or standard Day0? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Other than 0! g -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
work all night and a drinka rum! Day light come and me whanna go home -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Personal or standard Day0? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Other than 0! g -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP E2k and E2k3
Hi I have a single Exchange 2000 server that used the default SMTP VS to deliver and pick up internet mail from a smart host. Which worked fine. I wanted to upgrade to E2k3, so installed a new second server and installed E2k3 on this. Install worked fine. I moved a test user to the new server. This test user is able to send mail messages out but is unable to recieve messages from the Internet. The sender gets a NDR saying undiliverable because of a mail loop , Status: 4.4.6. I also noticed that messages between the two servers is being sent out to the smart host by the first E2k server and keeps looping. Do I have to configure the default SMTP VS on the second E2k3 server? OR do I remove the smart host settings from the 1st server and configure a SMTP Connector to send and receive Internet mail from the smart host.? Help Please. Cheers Raji Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments after sending. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help
Hey All! I am a network consultant with 4 years of network, infrastructure, desktop, exchange 55 and 2000 experience( the last 3 years in legal environment) looking for employment in the Chicago land area. Any leads or assistance will be really appreciated. Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP E2k and E2k3
Configure an SMTP Connector to use the first server's virtual server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HELP E2k and E2k3 Hi I have a single Exchange 2000 server that used the default SMTP VS to deliver and pick up internet mail from a smart host. Which worked fine. I wanted to upgrade to E2k3, so installed a new second server and installed E2k3 on this. Install worked fine. I moved a test user to the new server. This test user is able to send mail messages out but is unable to recieve messages from the Internet. The sender gets a NDR saying undiliverable because of a mail loop , Status: 4.4.6. I also noticed that messages between the two servers is being sent out to the smart host by the first E2k server and keeps looping. Do I have to configure the default SMTP VS on the second E2k3 server? OR do I remove the smart host settings from the 1st server and configure a SMTP Connector to send and receive Internet mail from the smart host.? Help Please. Cheers Raji Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments after sending. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: default recipient policy issue
Agreed. They shouldn't cause you any problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: default recipient policy issue That's what the default recipient policy does and you probably should not mess with it. Why do these SMTP and X.400 addresses bother you so much? Also if you really, really don't want you contacts to be stamped with the policy's e-mail addresses, go to each contact's properties, click on the E-mail addresses tab and then un-check the option that applies the policy settings. Now, how are you routing mail to the sister companies? Does mail from the Internet to the sister companies arrive first to your Exchange environment (i.e. do the sister companies' MX records point to your Exchange server?) If that is the case, then you want to have the e-mail addresses created by the default policy. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: default recipient policy issue Hi all, I have a container with lots of contacts from sister companies. I just noticed that they all got an additonal SMTP/X.400 address, apparently that is caused by my default policy. The filter for that policy just says (mailnickname=*) and I can't change the filter as the [Modify] button is dimmed. What can I do to prevent the policy from messing with my contacts? Thanks and regards, Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Take 284 instead. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
I can name that tune in three notes. The Banana Boat Song Harry Belafonte Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits work all night and a drinka rum! Day light come and me whanna go home -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Personal or standard Day0? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Other than 0! g -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding items from a Public Folder Calendar to Personal Calendar
Drag and drop. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Adding items from a Public Folder Calendar to Personal Calendar I have been looking around SlipStick for a solution to add items from a Public Folder Calendar to a Personal Calendar automatically but couldn't find anything simple (my users are a little non-technical). I have a public folder calendar where staff post deadlines and upcoming events related to the company. Some staff who are concerned with these events would like to be able to add all these items automatically to their personal calendar. Is this possible ? I explored the possiblity of using Folder Administration to send the appointment to all users and then use Rules Wizard to automatically add the appointment to my Calendar. IS there another way to do this ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy issue removing last 5.5 server in the site
Did you remove the replica on the 5.5 server before shutting it down? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy issue removing last 5.5 server in the site Hi Everyone, I have one 5.5 server, which also happens to be the first server in the site, that I would like to remove. I have two other Exchange 2000 servers in the site. I followed the instuctions and made sure there was a replica of the Free/Busy folder (among others) on one of the Exchange 2000 servers. When I shut down all of the services on the old 5.5 server for a test, I start to see errors on the server without the replica. Event ID 8207 Souce MSExchangeFBPublish. It inidicated it had a problem getting the data from the old 5.5 server. I decided to replicate the folder to that server as well (however, I think that you should only have one version of the folder in a site - is this correct?). I let it replicate over the weekend, and then this morning I tried it again. I am seeing the same error, but this time it indicates it is having a problem with the public store on itself. If I turn the services on the old server back on, the error goes away. At no point have I had any reported client issues when the error is logged. I looked at technet article 824282, but I don't think it applies, as the problem goes away when the orignal server is on. I think I have some sort of replication issue, but I am not sure what it is. Checking the public folder on the Exchange 2000 server, it says the Schedule+ Free Busy folder has replicated. Has anyone else seen this? If anyone has a pointer for me, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Virginia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 OWA: Setting IE to open maximized
I have an odd request from a user, unfortunately he is our CIO. He would like to see OWA open messages and replies to message in a maximized IE window. I haven't been able to find anything in the KB or via a Google search. Has anybody tried this or know how I might be able to do this? Thanks, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: HELP E2k and E2k3
I got SIX out-of-office notifications from you. You ought to extend your vacation forever and resign as an Exchange administrator. You NEVER use a reply rule as an out of office notification. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:16 PM To: Ed Crowley [MVP] Subject: Re: HELP E2k and E2k3 I will be out of the office, returning the 4th of November. Thank You Jean-Paul Natola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
There are many reasons to enforce size limits in an organization. Many reasons center around storage and backup considerations. Performance can be hampered the larger mailboxes are, too. One very important yet frequently overlooked issue is SECURITY. Without size limitations, and depending on other factors, there are certain DDoS attacks that can result in rendering a whole Exchange Information Store inaccessible. One approach you might want to consider is educating your users about the use of Personal Folders. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to present options. Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know of a package with thie capability? Thanks in advance, Kelly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: default recipient policy issue
They are not at the moment I think, but what if the smtp address it wants to create already exists in my org? regards Uso - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: RE: default recipient policy issue That's what the default recipient policy does and you probably should not mess with it. Why do these SMTP and X.400 addresses bother you so much? Also if you really, really don't want you contacts to be stamped with the policy's e-mail addresses, go to each contact's properties, click on the E-mail addresses tab and then un-check the option that applies the policy settings. Now, how are you routing mail to the sister companies? Does mail from the Internet to the sister companies arrive first to your Exchange environment (i.e. do the sister companies' MX records point to your Exchange server?) If that is the case, then you want to have the e-mail addresses created by the default policy. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: default recipient policy issue Hi all, I have a container with lots of contacts from sister companies. I just noticed that they all got an additonal SMTP/X.400 address, apparently that is caused by my default policy. The filter for that policy just says (mailnickname=*) and I can't change the filter as the [Modify] button is dimmed. What can I do to prevent the policy from messing with my contacts? Thanks and regards, Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
