Weird event error
Anyone seen this before? I can't find it on the web or on the support site. I am getting a ton of NDR's because of this. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Transport Delivering Event ID: 2091 Date: 2/6/2003 Time: 4:37:29 PM User: N/A Computer: Servername Description: A message deliver to public folder store First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (Servername) with message class REPORT.IPM.NOTE.NDR is being dropped. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. The NDRs are showing this: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Sent: 2/4/2003 4:44 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Public Folder Store (Servername) on 2/6/2003 3:01 AM A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two recipients. Contact your administrator. server.domain.com #4.4.6 If someone can point me in the direction to trouble shoot this, I would really appreciate it. thanks Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
So far it's been three days. I was waiting an hour before I forced replication. Wilson -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL How long are you waiting between the time you create the new mail account and the time you hit the panic button? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:02 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: New accounts not showing up in GAL Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
Yeah those won't be affected. But I have a lot of addresses where the user account is Thomas Smith, but the SMTP was changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also distribution lists and public folders that have SMTP addresses that are different then the display name. Won't these get changed? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I don't know the answer to this, but I do know that the extra address that I have added for my admin account (postmaster@, abuse@, etc) are unaffected by the rebuild. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Importance: High Thanks. I tried the update now but that didn't work. As for rebuild.. I'm a little concerned. Does this stamp all the user accounts with new SMTP addresses because we have made some custom entries and modified a couple to have slightly different smtp addresses then what was the default stamp. Would all these get undone? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I have the same problem ocassionally, and the only way I have found around it is to force the Recipient Update Service to Update Now or Rebuild. If you find a better solution, please let me know. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Yes. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Did you try forcing replication to see if they then show up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL They are. Actually I can get to one of the accounts using OWA even. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL The object has to be mail- or mailbox-enabled. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
Hehe.. Why am I scared all of a sudden? -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I just changed the primary SMTP email address of one of my users, waited until it showed up as changed in ADUC and then ran the Recipient Update Service rebuild. The address I changed was not affected, was not changed to a secondary and a new default address was not created for them. I cannot speak to what may happen in your environment, but in mine, running the rebuild option didn't screw anything up. Note: I did not try changing a public folders' address, but I doubt it would be any different from a user object. I'd say back that baby up and give it a try :-) Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Yeah those won't be affected. But I have a lot of addresses where the user account is Thomas Smith, but the SMTP was changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also distribution lists and public folders that have SMTP addresses that are different then the display name. Won't these get changed? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I don't know the answer to this, but I do know that the extra address that I have added for my admin account (postmaster@, abuse@, etc) are unaffected by the rebuild. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Importance: High Thanks. I tried the update now but that didn't work. As for rebuild.. I'm a little concerned. Does this stamp all the user accounts with new SMTP addresses because we have made some custom entries and modified a couple to have slightly different smtp addresses then what was the default stamp. Would all these get undone? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I have the same problem ocassionally, and the only way I have found around it is to force the Recipient Update Service to Update Now or Rebuild. If you find a better solution, please let me know. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Yes. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Did you try forcing replication to see if they then show up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL They are. Actually I can get to one of the accounts using OWA even. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL The object has to be mail- or mailbox-enabled. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
This quote from MS Q319065 is what scares me. If you perform a rebuild operation, all proxy e-mail addresses are recalculated and all address list memberships are verified. Perform a rebuild operation if you make a change to organizational policy on SMTP addressing (for example, if you change from a .com to a .net location or if you change the DNS domain name). A rebuild operation may take several hours; Microsoft recommends that you perform this operation only when the network is quiet -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Hehe.. Why am I scared all of a sudden? -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I just changed the primary SMTP email address of one of my users, waited until it showed up as changed in ADUC and then ran the Recipient Update Service rebuild. The address I changed was not affected, was not changed to a secondary and a new default address was not created for them. I cannot speak to what may happen in your environment, but in mine, running the rebuild option didn't screw anything up. Note: I did not try changing a public folders' address, but I doubt it would be any different from a user object. I'd say back that baby up and give it a try :-) Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Yeah those won't be affected. But I have a lot of addresses where the user account is Thomas Smith, but the SMTP was changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also distribution lists and public folders that have SMTP addresses that are different then the display name. Won't these get changed? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I don't know the answer to this, but I do know that the extra address that I have added for my admin account (postmaster@, abuse@, etc) are unaffected by the rebuild. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Importance: High Thanks. I tried the update now but that didn't work. As for rebuild.. I'm a little concerned. Does this stamp all the user accounts with new SMTP addresses because we have made some custom entries and modified a couple to have slightly different smtp addresses then what was the default stamp. Would all these get undone? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I have the same problem ocassionally, and the only way I have found around it is to force the Recipient Update Service to Update Now or Rebuild. If you find a better solution, please let me know. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Yes. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Did you try forcing replication to see if they then show up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL They are. Actually I can get to one of the accounts using OWA even. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL The object has to be mail- or mailbox-enabled. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
New accounts not showing up in GAL
Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
They are. Actually I can get to one of the accounts using OWA even. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL The object has to be mail- or mailbox-enabled. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
Yes. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Did you try forcing replication to see if they then show up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL They are. Actually I can get to one of the accounts using OWA even. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL The object has to be mail- or mailbox-enabled. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL
Thanks. I tried the update now but that didn't work. As for rebuild.. I'm a little concerned. Does this stamp all the user accounts with new SMTP addresses because we have made some custom entries and modified a couple to have slightly different smtp addresses then what was the default stamp. Would all these get undone? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL I have the same problem ocassionally, and the only way I have found around it is to force the Recipient Update Service to Update Now or Rebuild. If you find a better solution, please let me know. Greg -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Yes. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL Did you try forcing replication to see if they then show up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL They are. Actually I can get to one of the accounts using OWA even. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New accounts not showing up in GAL The object has to be mail- or mailbox-enabled. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New accounts not showing up in GAL Anyone know of a document, website, or article that shows how a new account is added to the GAL? I'm trying to track down why we are not seeing accounts in the GAL. I can't see any event errors on the exchange server or DCs pointing to replication issues. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 2000 monitoring doesn't send email notifications.
I followed the direction on MS site to setup of monitoring of queue growth and CPU
usage on the Exchange 2k server. But I'm not getting any email.
When I checked the wbemess.log file, I saw the following:
Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : Unable to send message: 0x
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : Failed the first attempt to deliver an event to event
consumer
SMTPEventConsumer.ExchangeConsumerSF1-ITS-EXC-002Email-{01C2BE2D-C987-4EAB-A069-0B975F7DBACA}
with error code 80041001.
WMI will reload and retry.
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : Consumer provider SMTPEventConsumer does not support
IWbemUnboundObjectSink: error code 80004002
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : SMTP command HELO ðø@
returned 501
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : SMTP command MAIL FROM: WinMgmt@SF1-ITS-EXC-002
returned 503
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : Unable to send message: 0x
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : Failed the second attempt to deliver an event to event
consumer
SMTPEventConsumer.ExchangeConsumerSF1-ITS-EXC-002Email-{01C2BE2D-C987-4EAB-A069-0B975F7DBACA}
with error code 80041001.
This event is dropped for this consumer.
(Sun Jan 26 16:51:56 2003) : Dropping event destined for event consumer
SMTPEventConsumer.ExchangeConsumerSF1-ITS-EXC-002Email-{01C2BE2D-C987-4EAB-A069-0B975F7DBACA}
in namespace root\cimv2\Applications\Exchange
(Sun Jan 26 16:52:06 2003) : Unloading event consumer sink
SMTPEventConsumer.ExchangeConsumerSF1-ITS-EXC-002Email-{01C2BE2D-C987-4EAB-A069-0B975F7DBACA}
Can anyone shine some light on why the emails aren't being sent? I made sure the
server could relay itself, and allowed anonymous user access.
Thanks in advance.
Wilson
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5
try Q259321 -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 I had a similar problem with my home machine, even after disabling the pop-up stopper. My problem was with Zone Labs software firewall, I had the privacy settings too high. If you don't have anything like this running, then try going through your Internet Explorer options and resetting your security and privacy settings to default. Steve -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Presumably you are going through a firewall when you access OWA from home, and directly when you tried the laptop at work? What happens if you take the laptop home? Perhaps the firewall is using some sort of filter that isn't accepting your reply request? Mark -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2002 21:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Hi there IE 6 - there's no anti popup software on this computer. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Forget the OWA part, my bad. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 What version of OWA and IE? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Hi all I have an unusual problem. When I access Outlook Web Access from my home machine, I can see all my emails. I can open my emails. However, if I try to reply to my emails, I hit the reply button and the window that normally allows me to reply never appears. I can type a new email, I just can't respond to an existing email. This doesn't happen on any other machine (I tried it at work with one of the laptops), just my home machine. I can't seem to find anything on Microsoft or Slipstick. Can anyone point me in the direction of a Q article that might be able to help me?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
Unable to reply or forward to email in OWA, Exchange 2000
Exchange 2000 in a native mode child domain. OWA server setup as front end server in DMZ. 5 exchange 2000 servers scattered across the world, one in each remote office. For one office, they can't forward or reply to emails in OWA. All other remote offices are fine. I've tried logging in as one of the users from my machine and I can't respond or forward emails either. But I can from my own mailbox. looks like this is happening to everyone in that particular office. The users have the same rights and everyone else. Anyone have any ideas on what I should check? Thanks in advance, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
have you gotten this to work? I don't even see the file smtpreg.vbs in the SDK folder.. I tracked one down off the web but that errors out. Wilson -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3. Hi All, My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP transport event sink failed. Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any suggestions? Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indexing on Exch2k Sp2
I swear I get the weirdest errors.. Anyone have an issue with indexing all of a sudden stop working? All of a sudden the last 4 days are not being indexed. I checked to see if it was paused but it wasn't. It's scheduled to run all the time and it used to display new messages within a few minutes of receiving them. But the last message I can pull up with a search is from the 22nd of this month. Search on support site with indexing pulled up 56 articles but none seem to be what I'm looking for. What's the normal procedure for something like this? Do you just delete the index and recreate? Only change I've made is adding more Exchange servers to the environment. But these servers are at different locations around the world and currently they do not have any users on it. Christ, things like this are so frustrating... If anyone can point me to someplace that might have some information that would be great. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Issue installing Exch2k SP2
We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site. Currently we have two remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new server will be in a remote office. After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up properly. But once I install SP2 on it, the IS and SA service will not start. I get event 5000 and 1121. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 1121 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Error 0x8004010f connecting to the Microsoft Active Directory. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 5000 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. Error 0x8004010f. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I've already checked KB 305392, and kb 329599 and they are not the cause. Anyone have any information that could help? Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2
Correction on first email.. it wasn't the SA, it was the MTA. Reinstalled the server again and this time I tried SP1 first and everything worked fine. Installed SP2 and MTA and IS would not come up. Same event errors except now I see a an event 8213. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 11/19/2002 Time: 6:01:05 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine SB1-ITS-EXC-001. The error number is 0x80005000. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Issue installing Exch2k SP2 We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site. Currently we have two remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new server will be in a remote office. After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up properly. But once I install SP2 on it, the IS and SA service will not start. I get event 5000 and 1121. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 1121 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Error 0x8004010f connecting to the Microsoft Active Directory. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 5000 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. Error 0x8004010f. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I've already checked KB 305392, and kb 329599 and they are not the cause. Anyone have any information that could help? Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mssdmn.exe using high cpu
So you think this is caused by public folder indexing and not mailboxs? Wilson -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 7:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: mssdmn.exe using high cpu Have you configured indexing? If you're using that, you should have your public folders on a dedicated server if you're seeing high CPU load. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mssdmn.exe using high cpu Exchange 2k, sp2, 2gigs ram, 1cpu. (in a native mode child domain) Mssdmn.exe is using high CPU, and when I terminal serviced into the server to see why mail was running so slow, I saw two instances of mssdmn.exe. This has happened before and it goes away after an hour but during that hour, client access to mail and searches are extremely slow. I checked Google and support.Microsoft.com but only hits were for SQL Server indexing issue. Anyone know of any issues with indexing on an exchange 2k server? Any hints would be helpful before I end up calling PSS. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mssdmn.exe using high cpu
Exchange 2k, sp2, 2gigs ram, 1cpu. (in a native mode child domain) Mssdmn.exe is using high CPU, and when I terminal serviced into the server to see why mail was running so slow, I saw two instances of mssdmn.exe. This has happened before and it goes away after an hour but during that hour, client access to mail and searches are extremely slow. I checked Google and support.Microsoft.com but only hits were for SQL Server indexing issue. Anyone know of any issues with indexing on an exchange 2k server? Any hints would be helpful before I end up calling PSS. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP connector and smart hosts
Is there a way to put multiple smart hosts in the General Tab on the SMTP connectors? I have two bridgehead servers I want to use to send messages to. One in CA, one in Indiana. Can I put both IP numbers in there enclosed in []? If so, what's the separator? Comma, semicolon, or space? Also would this work in a fail over situation? If this, can't be done.. How can I create something that would do this? Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
need help with setting up a recipient policy
Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com from our org through a VPN connection. We just migrated about 20 users from one remote office onto our exchange server. (dumped their emails into a PST and imported them into a new account at xxx.com) We put [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their primary SMTP address, but added [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can still receive emails to the old address for a while. Well now people that send them emails are getting a bounce message with the following.. X-Display-Name: lastname, firstname - MOVED. I tried to create a new recipient policy but I don't know if I'm doing it right. Anyone have a step by step on how to do this by chance? I'm going through the help files now but thought I would ask the experts here. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy
Yyy.com. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy When getting the bounce message which email address is the sender using? yyy.com or xxx.com -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy Hello Everyone, There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000 (xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com). We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000 domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com from our org through a VPN connection. We just migrated about 20 users from one remote office onto our exchange server. (dumped their emails into a PST and imported them into a new account at xxx.com) We put [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their primary SMTP address, but added [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can still receive emails to the old address for a while. Well now people that send them emails are getting a bounce message with the following.. X-Display-Name: lastname, firstname - MOVED. I tried to create a new recipient policy but I don't know if I'm doing it right. Anyone have a step by step on how to do this by chance? I'm going through the help files now but thought I would ask the experts here. Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Yeah we looked into the cache and it is enabled with size of 32k.. good point though. I've so far checked all the SAN settings and it seems fine. Ugh.. I guess I'll move the public folder to a different store on a different mirror set. See if that helps.. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Slow performance
Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
1.5 gigs or ram. Wilson -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRS
Can the Site Replication Service be removed once the last Exchange 5.5 server is decommissioned? Is it used for anything else? Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36
Finally got this resolved with MS PSS help. Apparently IIS didn't install properly. Had to go to a command prompt in winnt\system32\inetsrv and type rundll32 wamreg.dll, CreateIISPackage This registered the DLL and everything worked. wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:28 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 I'm getting this error but it's not from logoff.asp. MS PSS had me uninstall, reinstall IIS, SP2, Exchange 2k, E2k SP3 in that order on our Exchange server. Now I get these errors every few minutes. Also people with mailboxes on that server can not access it with OWA. Wilson -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Oops. logoff.asp (https://owaserver/exchweb/bin/usa/logoff.asp) -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user clicks the logout button in OWA, I get the following event in my syslog: Event Type: Warning Event Source: W3SVC Event Category: None Event ID: 36 Date: 8/28/2002 Time: 10:06:12 AM User: N/A Computer: BEAUTY1 Description: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/root'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. W2K AS SP2 Cluster; E2K SP2. Exchange running in Mixed mode. OWA and stores all on one cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Protect on an Exchange Server
Actually this is right. I had Norton virus scanner and the Exchange version running on an old Exchange 5.5 Server and when we got hit by a virus, it ended up quarantining the log (or was it the DB, can't remember) file and killing the exchange server.. So if you do scan with a file level virus scanner, exclude the Exchange, DB, and log directory. wilson -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server Protect on an Exchange Server I was having a discussion with someone on a Security List the other day who said it was nonsense to NOT run AV on an Exchange Server. Just exclude the DB's and all is well. I have heard also 2 sides: this is true and NEVER run file-level AV on an Exchange server. What's the group consensus? And if it is aye! He's right! Is excluding all *.edb enough? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: server access
To quote Microsoft, This is by design. They will need to dial in or use OWA. -Original Message- From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: server access newbie question... we have a user that wants to install outlook 2000 on their home machine access our exchange server using his road runner connection instead of the dial-up into the network. It fails, can't find the server. He can telnet to port 25, however. So, it appears you have to be connected to the LAN to be able to find the server through outlook. OWA works fine. is this normal? necessary operation of exchange server? network configuration? his machine? All I have access to is my exchange server, so, I just need some direction on where the problem might be, if it even is a problem...my exchange server, the network, or the guy's computer. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36
I'm getting this error but it's not from logoff.asp. MS PSS had me uninstall, reinstall IIS, SP2, Exchange 2k, E2k SP3 in that order on our Exchange server. Now I get these errors every few minutes. Also people with mailboxes on that server can not access it with OWA. Wilson -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Oops. logoff.asp (https://owaserver/exchweb/bin/usa/logoff.asp) -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user clicks the logout button in OWA, I get the following event in my syslog: Event Type: Warning Event Source: W3SVC Event Category: None Event ID: 36 Date: 8/28/2002 Time: 10:06:12 AM User: N/A Computer: BEAUTY1 Description: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/root'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. W2K AS SP2 Cluster; E2K SP2. Exchange running in Mixed mode. OWA and stores all on one cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
w3svc causes error 36
I was asked by MS PSS to : 1. Uninstall IIS 2. Reinstall IIS 3. Reinstall Win2k SP2 4. reinstall Exchange 2000 5. reinstall Exchange 2000 sp3 This was to resolve this damn bug with mail just sitting in the outbox for 30 minutes at a time. Well now I'm getting this error on that server. Event ID 36. The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. And people with mailboxes on that server can't access it with OWA, they get the error 500 - internal server error. I've been reading through the support site and so far nothing matches this error and the fixes I have tried doesn't seem to solve it. Anyone have any ideas? I'm still waiting for the PSS person to call back but thought I would ask the brains in here first :) Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SP3
We are running: Two GC/DC in our SF office for the root domain, and one child domain with a GC/DC also. Exchange 2000 is on a win2k sp2 server in the child domain. We have three exchange server, all win2k sp2, with exchange 2000 sp3. One is our primary server in SF, one is an OWA server in the DMZ (front end server) and one in our Walnut Creek office (this server has zero mailboxes so far) Outlook client is, Outlook 2000. I'm not sure where the message gets stuck at, or if it's one particular message that blocks the whole queue and prevents the rest from being picked up. If you can give me some pointers on how to check if the message is in IS or categorizer queue, that would be helpful. But we do know that if we restart the IS, everything works fine for a couple of hours and the process starts all over again. MS is having us dump everything and send them the log files and they are forwarding it to their debug team. Let's hope this gets resolved fast because I got some pissed off users and managers. Wilson -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 I'm sure that's an important issue for several of the list members. So can you expand a bit more on your environment and infrastructure? Do you run Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP3? How many DC/GCs are in place? Is the Exchange 2000 machine also DC/GC? I'm running SP3 now for a bunch of days on the test/development server and production server and my mail is still getting delivered (as you see right now). Is it MAPI Outlook which causes the mail to not get picked up? Which version of Outlook? What happens to the mail? Does it get stuck in the Outbox or hide completely? Can you track down where the message got stuck via Perfmon? Is it somewhere in an IS queue or Categorizer queue? Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SP3 I wouldn't recommend installing this currently if you have plans to. There is a serious bug that is causing none of the mail to be picked up from your outlook clients until you restart the IS. This happens every few hours now when it was just twice a day last week. We are all scratching our heads on this since there are no bad event errors even with logging set. We have had this issue open with MS since last week and they first blamed it on the virus scanner but that's not the case. The Tech at MS did confirm that a few other customers were having the same problem so it's not isolated to just us. But as always YMMV, so good luck if you install it.. Just a heads up.. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server?
Looks like the bug with SP3 not picking up email is going to the debugging group and the only thing I can do is rebuild my exchange environment. What I want to do is, create a new server and join it to the current site. (MS has confirmed we can add an SP2 machine to an SP3 site) then move the mailboxes over. (40 gigs of it will take all weekend at least) But once it's done, I want to rename the new server with the old exchange servers name so the outlook clients can still connect. Is this possible? Anyone changed a server name before and if so, what issued have you come across? Please any info can be helpful. This is kind of an emergency.. Thanks in advance, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server?
Thanks Kanee, My reasoning for removing the original server right away was because of the damn bug. I am still a little concerned that the mailflow might still stop with this bugged server still active in the site. I could change the DNS entry and make it point the old name to the new server... One dumb thing is, we have developers that run scripts on databases that send email. The server name is hard coded into the scripts so they all must be changed also. Christ, 14 gigs of public folders need to be rehomed and 40+ gigs of user mail needs to be moved in less then 2 days... And I was told I had good karma :P I've read Ed's move server method, technet and support sites.. but nowhere does it say I can rename a exchange 2000 server.. did find one on Ex5.5 though. (Wish I knew that last year :) Thanks again.. Wilson -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server? Varghese, For right now you can leave the first server up and running, once you move the mailboxes over to the new server. You don't have to change the server name in the clients outlook configuaration. After moving the mailboxes over to the new server just connect a clients outlook without making any changes, the mta from your old server will automatically redirect your clients to the new server as long as both the old server and the new server are in the same site. thx -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server? Importance: High Looks like the bug with SP3 not picking up email is going to the debugging group and the only thing I can do is rebuild my exchange environment. What I want to do is, create a new server and join it to the current site. (MS has confirmed we can add an SP2 machine to an SP3 site) then move the mailboxes over. (40 gigs of it will take all weekend at least) But once it's done, I want to rename the new server with the old exchange servers name so the outlook clients can still connect. Is this possible? Anyone changed a server name before and if so, what issued have you come across? Please any info can be helpful. This is kind of an emergency.. Thanks in advance, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server?
Thanks. One good thing is that the MX records won't need to be changed since it points to our firewall and not directly to an Exchange server. But I think you are right, I will leave it up for a day just so I don't have to deal with all the users calling about not being able to connect. Thanks again, Wilson -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server? Right now renaming a e2k server is hard. Since it uses AD renaming the netbios name is not a good idea unless you are very familiar with ADSI edit utility. IT seems simple enough to change the netbios name but I am not sure that all instances of that name will get changed in the AD structure, its just like renaming a domain, right now you can rename a child domain but you have ti do a lot of stuff thru adsi edit to make it work because not all instances of the domain name get changed in the AD structure, not to mention the changes in the registry. That's why they have made it easier to rename the child domains in .NET. But I moved a exchange server from ny to ma, changed ips put it into a completely different ip scheme and it worked like a charm, given that changing an IP is much easier than renaming, but I think you should be ok to rename as long as you make sure the new name has an account in the domain, all your wins records are updated and your dns records are updated. But if you are so concerned about the bug on the old server, once you move all the mailboxes to the new server, why don't you just remove the old server from the site, that way the old server is totally out of the picture. JUST MAKE SURE YOUR MX RECORDS ARE POINTED TO THE RIGHT SERVER, ALSO IF YOU DO THIS AND REMOVE THE OLD SERVER OUT OF THE SITE THEN YOU MIGHT HAVE TO MANUALLY EDIT ALL THE OUTLOOK PROFILES. SO I SUGGEST MOVING ALL MAILBOXES OVER TO NEW SERVER, MAKE THE MX RECORD POINT TO NEW SERVER THEN MAKE SURE YOU HAVE MAIL FLOW FOR A DAY, IN ONE DAY MAKE SURE ALL YOUR CLIENTS CONNECT TO EXCHANGE SERVER, THIS WAY ALL THEIR OUTLOOKS ARE UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY WITH THE NEW SERVER NAME AND THEN REMOVE THE OLD SERVER OUT OF THE SITE. HOPE THIS HELPS...GOOD LUCK :-) -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server? Importance: High Thanks Kanee, My reasoning for removing the original server right away was because of the damn bug. I am still a little concerned that the mailflow might still stop with this bugged server still active in the site. I could change the DNS entry and make it point the old name to the new server... One dumb thing is, we have developers that run scripts on databases that send email. The server name is hard coded into the scripts so they all must be changed also. Christ, 14 gigs of public folders need to be rehomed and 40+ gigs of user mail needs to be moved in less then 2 days... And I was told I had good karma :P I've read Ed's move server method, technet and support sites.. but nowhere does it say I can rename a exchange 2000 server.. did find one on Ex5.5 though. (Wish I knew that last year :) Thanks again.. Wilson -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server? Varghese, For right now you can leave the first server up and running, once you move the mailboxes over to the new server. You don't have to change the server name in the clients outlook configuaration. After moving the mailboxes over to the new server just connect a clients outlook without making any changes, the mta from your old server will automatically redirect your clients to the new server as long as both the old server and the new server are in the same site. thx -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HELP, can I change the name of the exchange server? Importance: High Looks like the bug with SP3 not picking up email is going to the debugging group and the only thing I can do is rebuild my exchange environment. What I want to do is, create a new server and join it to the current site. (MS has confirmed we can add an SP2 machine to an SP3 site) then move the mailboxes over. (40 gigs of it will take all weekend at least) But once it's done, I want to rename the new server with the old exchange servers name so the outlook clients can still connect. Is this possible? Anyone changed a server name before and if so, what issued have you come across? Please any info can be helpful. This is kind of an emergency.. Thanks in advance, Wilson
Exchange 2000 SP3
I wouldn't recommend installing this currently if you have plans to. There is a serious bug that is causing none of the mail to be picked up from your outlook clients until you restart the IS. This happens every few hours now when it was just twice a day last week. We are all scratching our heads on this since there are no bad event errors even with logging set. We have had this issue open with MS since last week and they first blamed it on the virus scanner but that's not the case. The Tech at MS did confirm that a few other customers were having the same problem so it's not isolated to just us. But as always YMMV, so good luck if you install it.. Just a heads up.. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone know what this error is?
I checked MS website but there's nothing on this particular error. This is going to a subsidiary company that is running Exch 5.5. We are running Exch 2k and Win2k with SP2. This is a new one for me. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Read: Standards Sent: 7/29/2002 7:47 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Smith, John on 7/29/2002 7:47 AM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message Thanks in advance Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone know what this error is?
Ahh thanks. I tried to call the user but apparently she is on vacation.. So couldn't check that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone know what this error is? That recipient is over their mailbox limit. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone know what this error is? I checked MS website but there's nothing on this particular error. This is going to a subsidiary company that is running Exch 5.5. We are running Exch 2k and Win2k with SP2. This is a new one for me. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Read: Standards Sent: 7/29/2002 7:47 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Smith, John on 7/29/2002 7:47 AM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message Thanks in advance Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone know what this error is?
Haha.. Trust me, over here everything is my problem :) Our IT director makes sure of that.. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone know what this error is? On a posative note...it is not your problem...dont worry. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone know what this error is? Recipient over mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone know what this error is? I checked MS website but there's nothing on this particular error. This is going to a subsidiary company that is running Exch 5.5. We are running Exch 2k and Win2k with SP2. This is a new one for me. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:Read: Standards Sent: 7/29/2002 7:47 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Smith, John on 7/29/2002 7:47 AM The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message Thanks in advance Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA File Attachments
Ellis, We have the same issue here. Almost exact setup as you. Whenever the file is over 1.5mb, the browser just hangs. If you kill the process and try again, it usually works. I tried to send a 4mb file from my DSL connection at home and first time it hung for 15 minutes before I gave up. I tried it again a few seconds later and it worked fine. No idea what's causing this, if you find a solution please let me know also. For some reason it just fails the first time. Wilson -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA File Attachments The size of the pipe has nothing to do with the available bandwidth on same. You've demonstrated that file uploading works from the internet, so sounds like the user was killing the process too soon based on the information provided. -Original Message- From: Ellis Hillinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA File Attachments While I am old enough to remember 1200 baud too, this user isn't, and is not willing to wait that long. I conducted a test from home using a larger file (almost 2x) and slower link (DSL) going to the same Exchange server. It took 6.25 minutes to attach the file. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing past appointments
We have the same issue here with one of our employee. Sometimes calendar items vanish right after they are due. They don't have any archiving setup, we double-checked this. So far it's been an open ticket with Microsoft for several months. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments No -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Are you cleaning mailboxes with something like Mailbox Manager? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Dates are not bold, Appts disappeared too. Auto archive feature is disabled due to an issue with Imanage(Document management software. Raj -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing past appointments Disappeared or the dates don't appear as bold? Did she autoarchive them? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing past appointments We are in a mixed mode environment( Exchange 5.5 sp4 and 2000 ,sp2). Some of the user mailboxes are still resident in Ex55 and they are having issues with their Calendar. One person has complained that all her appts from May and back have disappeared. Any Clues where to start looking. I have backups on tape as a last resort, did some research on the MS knowldgebase without success. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Yes Exchange 2000. I think I didn't explain this too well. I WANT to disable an account because the user left the firm. I DON'T want to delete the account and mailbox for 30 to 60 days just in case someone needs to access it. But once I disable the account, the damn errors pop up constantly. How do I tell the system, hey, this user is no longer with the firm so I'm going to disable his account. But don't delete the account and quit sending me dumb errors? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Exchange 2000? Associate an active account with the mailbox. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:11 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL? Thank in advance. Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Really annoying when you disable an account. How come when you disable an account for a user that has left the company, you get a billion event 9548s? This is so damn annoying, is there a way to turn it off? Besides, I just disabled the account, I didn't remove it's master account SID so what's the problem? Is there a way to stop this event error from popping up all the time? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Well that kind of sucks. That's what I was hoping you weren't saying :P Crud... what's the point of disabling an account if you have to create a temp account to associate with the old mailbox? Since you can only have one account associated with a mailbox, I will have to create a lot of accounts to do this. Wow, how lame. Thanks a lot for the help though. wilson -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. You explained it perfectly. I responded with what I thought was a perfectly clear solution, which is also explained in the text of the event log error message. Go create another, active account named Zaphod Beeblebrox and associate that mailbox with it. Note that it doesn't have to be named Zaphod Beeblebrox, it could also be named Peter Tosh. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Really annoying when you disable an account. Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Yes Exchange 2000. I think I didn't explain this too well. I WANT to disable an account because the user left the firm. I DON'T want to delete the account and mailbox for 30 to 60 days just in case someone needs to access it. But once I disable the account, the damn errors pop up constantly. How do I tell the system, hey, this user is no longer with the firm so I'm going to disable his account. But don't delete the account and quit sending me dumb errors? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Exchange 2000? Associate an active account with the mailbox. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:11 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL? Thank in advance. Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really annoying when you disable an account. How come when you disable an account for a user that has left the company, you get a billion event 9548s? This is so damn annoying, is there a way to turn it off? Besides, I just disabled the account, I didn't remove it's master account SID so what's the problem? Is there a way to stop this event error from popping up all the time? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL? Thank in advance. Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Really annoying when you disable an account. How come when you disable an account for a user that has left the company, you get a billion event 9548s? This is so damn annoying, is there a way to turn it off? Besides, I just disabled the account, I didn't remove it's master account SID so what's the problem? Is there a way to stop this event error from popping up all the time? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NDRs on disabled accounts
How do I turn off the NDRs that keep coming for user accounts in AD that were disabled? I don't want to delete the mailbox just yet, want to keep it around for a few months, but the NDRs keep popping up. If the only way is to remove them manually from all the groups, then I can do that but was wondering if there was a check box I'm overlooking. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP.. I need to import 1000 contacts
In exchange 5.5 this was easy, but how do I do it in Exchange 2000? I tried to create a different OU in AD but there are no options to import. There isn't anything I can see in Exchange System Manager either. If you can point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thanks Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
status of emails in a dismounted Information store
Anyone know what happens to emails that are being sent to an account that is in a dismounted store? I tested this out, but the emails just vanished. I created a test store, and moved a test mailbox to it. I then sent test emails which delivered fine. I then dismounted the store, and sent more test emails. I didn't get any NDRs so I assumed it's being queued someplace? Well I brought the store back up, but the emails are not in there and after an hour, it's still not in there. No NDRs still either. So what happened to these emails? Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
I think I found what might be wrong. I checked the differences between a working public folder and a non working one using ADSI Edit. It seems the working one has the HomeMDB set and the others didn't. With Microsoft's help I am rebuilding my RUS and let's hope this takes care of it.. Thanks everyone for your help. Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Well they all seem to have the right permissions... I did discover something though. Only people that are having problems are the Exchange 2000 users. Exchange 5.5 users can send emails to public folders with no problem. Then 15 minutes later you see it replicated into the Exchange 2000 server. So this is where we are: 1. Exchange 5.5 users have no problem. (interesting though that since the folder is homed on the 2k server, it still goes to the 5.5 server then gets replicated to 2k. 2. Exchange 2k users can't send to public folders 3. Both 5.5 and 2k users can send to any new folders we create. Does this info help a bit? Thanks in advance Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Great thanks, Walt. I will check into this on my site and let everyone know if this worked. Wilson -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Wilson is alleged to have written: What I want to know is why the internal users are getting NDRs when the external clients can send to it fine. Please any info you have would be great. I have checked technet and support and can't find this error referenced anywhere. Thank you, Wilson Walt Replies: We had the exact same issue with Exchange 2000. External mail to PF was good. Internal = NDR, but only for SOME users. With us it turned out to be an over zealous Domain Admin that had broken inheritance in many places in Active Directory, and removed the Enterprise Exchange ACE. The Enterprise Exchange security group did not have permissions to all objects. Specifically: Every SG that a user is a member of, MUST have the Enterprise Exchange group ACE on that object. If not, all members of that group are affected. Walt Brannon University of New Orleans [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
Great thanks, Walt. I will check into this on my site and let everyone know if this worked. Wilson -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Wilson is alleged to have written: What I want to know is why the internal users are getting NDRs when the external clients can send to it fine. Please any info you have would be great. I have checked technet and support and can't find this error referenced anywhere. Thank you, Wilson Walt Replies: We had the exact same issue with Exchange 2000. External mail to PF was good. Internal = NDR, but only for SOME users. With us it turned out to be an over zealous Domain Admin that had broken inheritance in many places in Active Directory, and removed the Enterprise Exchange ACE. The Enterprise Exchange security group did not have permissions to all objects. Specifically: Every SG that a user is a member of, MUST have the Enterprise Exchange group ACE on that object. If not, all members of that group are affected. Walt Brannon University of New Orleans [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
Well they all seem to have the right permissions... I did discover something though. Only people that are having problems are the Exchange 2000 users. Exchange 5.5 users can send emails to public folders with no problem. Then 15 minutes later you see it replicated into the Exchange 2000 server. So this is where we are: 1. Exchange 5.5 users have no problem. (interesting though that since the folder is homed on the 2k server, it still goes to the 5.5 server then gets replicated to 2k. 2. Exchange 2k users can't send to public folders 3. Both 5.5 and 2k users can send to any new folders we create. Does this info help a bit? Thanks in advance Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Great thanks, Walt. I will check into this on my site and let everyone know if this worked. Wilson -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Wilson is alleged to have written: What I want to know is why the internal users are getting NDRs when the external clients can send to it fine. Please any info you have would be great. I have checked technet and support and can't find this error referenced anywhere. Thank you, Wilson Walt Replies: We had the exact same issue with Exchange 2000. External mail to PF was good. Internal = NDR, but only for SOME users. With us it turned out to be an over zealous Domain Admin that had broken inheritance in many places in Active Directory, and removed the Enterprise Exchange ACE. The Enterprise Exchange security group did not have permissions to all objects. Specifically: Every SG that a user is a member of, MUST have the Enterprise Exchange group ACE on that object. If not, all members of that group are affected. Walt Brannon University of New Orleans [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with mail enabled Public folder
Hello everyone, Current setup.. One site, with Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 server. Public folders are replicated across both servers but all are homed on Exchange 2000 server. Exchange 2000 is in a child domain that is native for DL reasons. We have a public folder called [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with an email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so when you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , it get put in the public folder. This has been working fine for over 4 years, but lately after the Exchange 2000 addition, we are having issues from internal users that send email to this. They get the following NDR. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 2/18/2002 12:47 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2/18/2002 12:47 PM The message was undeliverable because the recipient specified has changed address permanently and forwarding was not applicable sf1-its-exc-001.Exchange.kmv.com #5.1.6 Emails from a test yahoo account went to the folder fine after about 15 minutes so I am assuming that it's being sent to one of the servers then being replicated to the other. (our replication is set to 15 minutes) What I want to know is why the internal users are getting NDRs when the external clients can send to it fine. Please any info you have would be great. I have checked technet and support and can't find this error referenced anywhere. Thank you, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
Sorry, but internal I mean our normal outlook users in the domain that connect to the Exchange servers. All the other email works, I can send to other users fine. I didn't do any MX record changes since the site was still the same, we still have the 5.5 server as our primary until all the users are migrated over. Hope that helps? Wilson -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder When you say internal users what do you mean? The way you laid out the problem, it rather sounds like these users are not using Exchange, but some other SMTP mailer and then relying on your internal DNS to point it toward Exchange - yes? If this be the case, did your true DNS domain names and/ or MX records change during your upgrade? I think you have an address resolution issue at the DNS level. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help with mail enabled Public folder Importance: High Hello everyone, Current setup.. One site, with Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 server. Public folders are replicated across both servers but all are homed on Exchange 2000 server. Exchange 2000 is in a child domain that is native for DL reasons. We have a public folder called [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with an email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so when you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , it get put in the public folder. This has been working fine for over 4 years, but lately after the Exchange 2000 addition, we are having issues from internal users that send email to this. They get the following NDR. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 2/18/2002 12:47 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2/18/2002 12:47 PM The message was undeliverable because the recipient specified has changed address permanently and forwarding was not applicable sf1-its-exc-001.Exchange.kmv.com #5.1.6 Emails from a test yahoo account went to the folder fine after about 15 minutes so I am assuming that it's being sent to one of the servers then being replicated to the other. (our replication is set to 15 minutes) What I want to know is why the internal users are getting NDRs when the external clients can send to it fine. Please any info you have would be great. I have checked technet and support and can't find this error referenced anywhere. Thank you, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
Hmm.. users do type in [EMAIL PROTECTED] which resolves to same name. So it might be going out and trying to come back in. Our MX record at the ISP points to our firewall which forwards emails to our Exchange 5.5 server. Is there a setting where I can tell it that all internal emails to xxx.com shouldn't go outside? But I'm still don't understanding why it wouldn't just deliver like it was doing for the last 4 years since the only change was that the public folder was rehomed to the new Exchange 2k server. There shouldn't have been any address change since no one is allowed to modify it. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Perhaps. Are you then also saying that your Outlook users are using the external form of address ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and thus forcing it out through you SMTP gateway for routing by your relay host, and then back in again? You see, I am convinced that if they were mailing to the folder as an AD addressable object from within, then an delivery failure should not be possible. Another possibility comes to mind. Cached but obsolete addresses gathered in the Outlook Contacts list. In either case, or perhaps another which has not yet suggested itself, an addressing change has occurred. There are but two general possibilities: either the address being used is truly valid and the resolution of it is failing, or the address is not valid. Is Sir John around here someplace? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Sorry, but internal I mean our normal outlook users in the domain that connect to the Exchange servers. All the other email works, I can send to other users fine. I didn't do any MX record changes since the site was still the same, we still have the 5.5 server as our primary until all the users are migrated over. Hope that helps? Wilson -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder When you say internal users what do you mean? The way you laid out the problem, it rather sounds like these users are not using Exchange, but some other SMTP mailer and then relying on your internal DNS to point it toward Exchange - yes? If this be the case, did your true DNS domain names and/ or MX records change during your upgrade? I think you have an address resolution issue at the DNS level. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help with mail enabled Public folder Importance: High Hello everyone, Current setup.. One site, with Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 server. Public folders are replicated across both servers but all are homed on Exchange 2000 server. Exchange 2000 is in a child domain that is native for DL reasons. We have a public folder called [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with an email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so when you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , it get put in the public folder. This has been working fine for over 4 years, but lately after the Exchange 2000 addition, we are having issues from internal users that send email to this. They get the following NDR. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 2/18/2002 12:47 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2/18/2002 12:47 PM The message was undeliverable because the recipient specified has changed address permanently and forwarding was not applicable sf1-its-exc-001.Exchange.kmv.com #5.1.6 Emails from a test yahoo account went to the folder fine after about 15 minutes so I am assuming that it's being sent to one of the servers then being replicated to the other. (our replication is set to 15 minutes) What I want to know is why the internal users are getting NDRs when the external clients can send to it fine. Please any info you have would be great. I have checked technet and support and can't find this error referenced anywhere. Thank you, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
Thanks Craig. I need to sit down with those guys and go through this also. Just wish they weren't so damn defensive whenever you ask them a question.. Just an FYI, when you type in the address and do a ctrl+K in your outlook (internal users) you get the public folder icon next to the name in the search window. (the little yellow folder with an envelop on it). So you know you are sending it to a public folder. Wilson -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Remember, all (well most) SMTP addresses are relative. It's not that there is no such thing as a FQN or FQA, it's just that the combination of MX records and relay host pointers can move mail with identical addresses via numerous routes. There is a difference between saying that a specific address is no longer valid, and the process by which an address gets resolved and the message delivered has changed. One of the tools that you need, is a happy chart. Working with your network engineer, lay out exactly how name resolution and delivery works. Do not combine any steps. Your flow should read something like . . . Client Path . . . 1. Message picked up by MAPI services from Outlook. 2. Message received by Exchange Server MTA. - if address is in AD format, MTA attempts internal delivery - if address is not in AD format, it is handed to a gateway assigned to that format. Exchange Path . . . 1. blah blah 2. blah blah X.400 Path . . . 1. blah blah 2. blah blah Digital fax path . . . 1. blah blah 2. blah blah SMTP Path . . . 1. gateway receives message from MTA 2. Gateway looks up name of its relay host. It is (write it down here!) 3. Gateway calls its DNS server (write it down the name here!*) for the IP address of its relay host 4. Gateway opens port (probably 80) on its realy server 5. blah blah * note that if the IP stack on your gateway server uses a static address, then the DNS server's numeric IP address is likely specified in your network stack's property sheets. If however you are using DHCP resolution, your gateway server gets the address of its DNS server updated each time it is booted, so you should lay out the details of exactly what your DHCP server does, and so on. The idea is to make sure that every last minute detail of houw your system works is in a map in your hands. You have to have that map. It is extremely important. Your job depends on it. Once you have a detailed map of how your system works, then tracing the problem will be straight forward. You simply follow the dots until you find one that isn't connected. It is asking too much to simply know every last detail without having ever mapped it out. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Hmm.. users do type in [EMAIL PROTECTED] which resolves to same name. So it might be going out and trying to come back in. Our MX record at the ISP points to our firewall which forwards emails to our Exchange 5.5 server. Is there a setting where I can tell it that all internal emails to xxx.com shouldn't go outside? But I'm still don't understanding why it wouldn't just deliver like it was doing for the last 4 years since the only change was that the public folder was rehomed to the new Exchange 2k server. There shouldn't have been any address change since no one is allowed to modify it. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Perhaps. Are you then also saying that your Outlook users are using the external form of address ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and thus forcing it out through you SMTP gateway for routing by your relay host, and then back in again? You see, I am convinced that if they were mailing to the folder as an AD addressable object from within, then an delivery failure should not be possible. Another possibility comes to mind. Cached but obsolete addresses gathered in the Outlook Contacts list. In either case, or perhaps another which has not yet suggested itself, an addressing change has occurred. There are but two general possibilities: either the address being used is truly valid and the resolution of it is failing, or the address is not valid. Is Sir John around here someplace? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder Sorry, but internal I mean our normal outlook users
OWA and large attachments.
I was wondering if anyone else have issues sending large attachments with OWA (on Exchange 2000)? I can send a 1mb attachment via hotmail or yahoo in about 15 seconds, but when I try the same thing with OWA, it just hangs there for several minutes. Let it sit for over 30 minutes and still nothing. This is at the point where you click on the file and say attach. Not in the send phase. Anyone else having issues with this or know of a fix? I can't find any Q articles on this, and so far nothing on their websites either. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and large attachments.
I thought about that and checked. Since our Exchange 2k environment is so new, we haven't even put in any limitations on attachment size yet. It doesn't do it with Outlook, just OWA. That's the weird part. Wilson -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OWA and large attachments. Message size limits on your SMTP connector? Does this with Outlook? Yahoo/Hotmail not subject to message store size limits (although I thought they have their own 1MB limit). Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and large attachments. I was wondering if anyone else have issues sending large attachments with OWA (on Exchange 2000)? I can send a 1mb attachment via hotmail or yahoo in about 15 seconds, but when I try the same thing with OWA, it just hangs there for several minutes. Let it sit for over 30 minutes and still nothing. This is at the point where you click on the file and say attach. Not in the send phase. Anyone else having issues with this or know of a fix? I can't find any Q articles on this, and so far nothing on their websites either. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and large attachments.
Ok, I logged on locally to the OWA Server and I could attach files fine, even big ones. One major difference seems to be the server is using IE 5.0 SP2, and the laptops are using 5.5 sp2. I will check and see if 5.0 on the desktop will work, to see if this is just a 5.5 issue. Anyone else with 5.5 sp2 that can test this? Just want to see if this is with all IE 5.5 or just our setup of it. Thanks, Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OWA and large attachments. You could try attaching another file local to the OWA server, maybe use another account. Otherwise, shouldn't take longer than few seconds to attach a 1mb file. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and large attachments. I thought about that and checked. Since our Exchange 2k environment is so new, we haven't even put in any limitations on attachment size yet. It doesn't do it with Outlook, just OWA. That's the weird part. Wilson -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OWA and large attachments. Message size limits on your SMTP connector? Does this with Outlook? Yahoo/Hotmail not subject to message store size limits (although I thought they have their own 1MB limit). Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and large attachments. I was wondering if anyone else have issues sending large attachments with OWA (on Exchange 2000)? I can send a 1mb attachment via hotmail or yahoo in about 15 seconds, but when I try the same thing with OWA, it just hangs there for several minutes. Let it sit for over 30 minutes and still nothing. This is at the point where you click on the file and say attach. Not in the send phase. Anyone else having issues with this or know of a fix? I can't find any Q articles on this, and so far nothing on their websites either. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Yeah, if anyone decides to write this program, call me too.. I'll pay for it :) Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST No. This is a significant and long standing deficiency in OWA, and probably an entrepreneurial opportunity similar to the one that ASL (now a part of Extended Systems) worked on. One could do it two ways - stupidly or neatly. The stupid way would be to pull the data from the OWA U/I. The neat way would be to build an extension to the OWA server that made the synch data available to a browser plug-in, which in turn would update any of several local stores. A good implementation would support the following stores at a minimum: .OST Pocket PC and Pocket PC 2002 Palm/Handspring I doubt that it is worth doing a .PST synchronizer. If you stop and think about it, it is really lame that a PDA can't call Exchange, look at the store contents in a browser, and then synch anything that is worth the bandwidth cost (time and money). This is especially true if you consider something like a Stinger phone. If someone out there decides to build this, call me. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Anyone know of a utility that you can install on the OWA server or client that will download emails from the Exchange server and place them in your OST or PST? And then upload changes to the Exchange Server? I'm looking for a way to bypass the synchronization required for people that work offline. If you could point me to a website that would be great.. I've been searching all morning and came up with a few calendar sync programs.. but nothing that does actual emails. Thanks in advance. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Anyone know of a utility that you can install on the OWA server or client that will download emails from the Exchange server and place them in your OST or PST? And then upload changes to the Exchange Server? I'm looking for a way to bypass the synchronization required for people that work offline. If you could point me to a website that would be great.. I've been searching all morning and came up with a few calendar sync programs.. but nothing that does actual emails. Thanks in advance. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2k OWA in a DMZ
Here is the deal: We have a exchange 2000 front end and back end server. The front end server was working great as an OWA server when we did the setup and initial testing. (inside our network). Soon as I moved it to the DMZ, Exchange services wouldn't start on this server. We even went to the hassle of putting an any rule on the firewall so nothing was blocked from the Front end server (DMZ) to the internal network, and from the internal network to the front end server. Been working on this for over 2 days now and can't seem to figure out why Exchange can't access AD to start. LDAP communication is happening both ways, I can log in to the server, etc.. Another kicker is, when I tried to uninstall exchange 2k on the front end server, it says it can't connect to AD or doesn't know what site it's in... WTF.. Anyone have any ideas? Please? Thanks in advance... Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Connector
Thanks Mark. Wilson -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: ADC Connector Easier to rehome them than to recreate. If you bring up your second ADC whilst the first is still running then on the General Tab of each agreement you can change the server that that CA runs on. You will be prompted to retype in the connection username/password. If you are really concerned set the deletion options to catch any deletions in a csv/ldf file and then monitor those files. Having said that I have recreated them without any issues. Just check Technet first as there are some articles on this very subject. Hint - Search on Active Directory Connector in quotes. Regards Mark -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 December 2001 23:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Connector Is there an issue with recreating the ADC's after your environment is up? The DC that is hosting the ADC needs to be rebuilt but I'm wondering if this will cause issues if I recreate them on another server? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC Connector
Is there an issue with recreating the ADC's after your environment is up? The DC that is hosting the ADC needs to be rebuilt but I'm wondering if this will cause issues if I recreate them on another server? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
If you moved mailboxes from your 5.5 to 2000, then you probably lost your single instance of all the attachments.. that could be a reason for your increase in DB size. Also during mailbox moves, a lot of log files are created, I turned on circular logging during the mailbox move process so it wouldn't create so many log files. Then turned circular logging off after I was done. As for not being able to mount your store.. There can be 100 reasons, check all the event errors and see if any of them point you in the right direction. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rob Yeldon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files, our Exchaneg server was playing up. We moved the log files to another location and things went back to normal. The same thing repeated itself 1 week later. Moved the log files again and since then all the services start up without a problem, however the mail stores will not mount. Public mail store is abnormally large - 6GB - was 50MB under Exchange 5.5. Thanks for any assistance. Regards Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forest and domain prep
Does anyone know if there is a formula to calculate the amount of time it will take to do a forest prep and domain prep for a Exchange 2000 migration? Or can someone give me some numbers on how long it took you to do it when you did the migration? I am just trying to see what kind of an outage window I should prepare for, but don't see any documentation on this. Thanks for any info you can provide. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forest and domain prep
Thanks Kim, We created a test lab environment to try out many different scenarios. One thing we really couldn't judge was how long forest prep would take because during some of our tests, the time ranged from 30 minutes to 2 hours for no apparent reason. So I was afraid that it could take all weekend on the production servers. Also if anyone knows... I am going to create a native mode child domain so the delegations, distribution lists, etc will come across properly during the in place upgrade. Does this sound like a valid method? We tested out so many different ways to minimize the impact on the end user and we finally had to break down and do the following method: 1. Offline backup of current Exchange 5.5 (currently it's a NT4 BDC Cluster) 2. Dump Public Folder permission dump with PFADMIN. 3. Shut down current Exchange 5.5 (fall back if everything fails) 4. Restore database onto a new Win2k (non DC), Exch 5.5 staging server and bring it up 5. Create Native Mode child domain (so DL's and delegations can have a place to be stored. TechNet says that these will be lost if there isn't a native mode domain available) 6. Do an in place upgrade of 5.5 to Exch 2000 (this is what everyone is nervous about) 7. Cross our fingers and toes and bring up the server 8. If everything works, we will build a Win2k, Exch 2k cluster server on the SAN and join it to the current Exchange Site. 9. Migrate users to the new Cluster server and shut down the staging server. 10. Move Public Folders and import the PFADMIN dump of permissions. 11. If things fail during any of these steps, we will just plug the old NT4 Cluster back in and users will get their email access back. Since the site will remain the same, we won't have to visit the users desktops, which is a big advantage. Anyone have any recommendations on this plan? Maybe something I'm missing or some steps I can skip? Thanks a lot for your help and hope everyone is having a good Friday. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Forest and domain prep Wilson, as i recall, we first did the schema modifications by running setup.exe with the /schemaonly switch. this stretched the schema and lessened the work to be done by forestprep. it took about a half-hour in our forest. forestprep also took about a half hour from the time we completed the wizard. domainprep took even less time. i do recommend that you try all of these in a test lab - even a single DC off your network somewhere. there are a number of places where you can run into issues - primarily permissions problems - that could cost you hours to figure out. you probably don't want that to happen during a scheduled outage window on your production domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forest and domain prep Does anyone know if there is a formula to calculate the amount of time it will take to do a forest prep and domain prep for a Exchange 2000 migration? Or can someone give me some numbers on how long it took you to do it when you did the migration? I am just trying to see what kind of an outage window I should prepare for, but don't see any documentation on this. Thanks for any info you can provide. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forest and domain prep
So it's not like other databases where you don't want people logged in during schema updates? I was just covering my behind in making sure that users accessing resources in AD wouldn't cause issues. When we did our first forest prep in our test lab, it failed. But when we ran it again, it worked. Only difference was, the first time, we were goofing around with AD (checking permissions, creating new users, etc) I guess I'm just a tad bit nervous. This has to work on the first try or we will have some pretty ticked off directors. Thanks, Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Forest and domain prep Forestprep and domainprep don't cause outages, so I might ask you to rephrase the question? Replication of the changes could take weeks depending on the environment. It took about 60 minutes for me to install and configure E2K including forestprep and domainprep in my lab last night. Course I've done it once or twice before... Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forest and domain prep Does anyone know if there is a formula to calculate the amount of time it will take to do a forest prep and domain prep for a Exchange 2000 migration? Or can someone give me some numbers on how long it took you to do it when you did the migration? I am just trying to see what kind of an outage window I should prepare for, but don't see any documentation on this. Thanks for any info you can provide. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forest and domain prep
Actually I got the whole weekend scheduled for this Starting 6pm Friday and ends at noon on Sunday Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Forest and domain prep Well, it causes an entire replication of the GC schema and I suppose I wouldn't want to be mucking about in it too much... How's 0300 GMT on Saturday work for ya? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and domain prep So it's not like other databases where you don't want people logged in during schema updates? I was just covering my behind in making sure that users accessing resources in AD wouldn't cause issues. When we did our first forest prep in our test lab, it failed. But when we ran it again, it worked. Only difference was, the first time, we were goofing around with AD (checking permissions, creating new users, etc) I guess I'm just a tad bit nervous. This has to work on the first try or we will have some pretty ticked off directors. Thanks, Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and domain prep Forestprep and domainprep don't cause outages, so I might ask you to rephrase the question? Replication of the changes could take weeks depending on the environment. It took about 60 minutes for me to install and configure E2K including forestprep and domainprep in my lab last night. Course I've done it once or twice before... Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forest and domain prep Does anyone know if there is a formula to calculate the amount of time it will take to do a forest prep and domain prep for a Exchange 2000 migration? Or can someone give me some numbers on how long it took you to do it when you did the migration? I am just trying to see what kind of an outage window I should prepare for, but don't see any documentation on this. Thanks for any info you can provide. Wilson Varghese NT Systems Manager KMV, LLC Office: (415)229-0726 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
