date:20020614



So your E2k server still sees an IMS that doesn't exist.  I seem to
remember doing something similar in a test lab, but fortunately I did a
simple reinstall.  I'm not sure of the ramifications of deleting the
connector using, say, ADSIEdit, so maybe a call to PSS is in order here
to get the official word.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 June 2002 17:25
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Deleting Legacy Connection / Event ID 929
Subject: RE: Deleting Legacy Connection / Event ID 929


Your assessment matches mine. During the migration Internet mail went to
the IMS on the 5.5 server until most to the users were on the E2K
server. We then changed the E2K virtual SMTP connector (to point
outwards) and changed the firewall to direct incoming mail to the E2K
server.

The 5.5 server was re-installed from scratch - not an in-place upgrade.

So the question remains - how do I remove references to a server and
connector that no longer exist (without wrecking the working system)

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 


After a brief look, it looks like the E2k server is trying to reference
an IMS on the 5.5 server, which leads me to the quesiton of how did you
handle the Internet email during your migration?  How did you reinstall
the 5.5 server with E2k?  Was it an upgrade?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 

Environment: Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP2 and Exchange 2000
Enterprise Server SP2

I have an Exchange system that was migrated from Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000. The upgrade method was as follows

1. Upgrade NT4 domain to W2K AD
2. Install a temporary E2K server
3. Setup an Active Direcorty Connector (ADC)
4. Move the 5.5 mailboxes to the E2K server
5. Re-install the 5.5 server with E2K (keeping the same name) 6. Move
the mailboxes back from the temporary E2K server to the new server. 7.
Move all first server roles from the temporary server to the new server
8. Wait a week 9. Re-check first server roles then remove the temporary
server.

The server has settled in but fills the application event log with the
following message.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeTransport
Event Category: Routing Engine/Service 
Event ID:   929
Date:   22/05/2002
Time:   07:50:14
User:   N/A
Computer:   RIDDLER
Description:
Failed in reading Connector's DS Info Process Id: 1224 Process location:
x:\x\inetsrv\inetinfo.exe ConnectorDN: CN=Internet Mail Service
(PENGUIN),CN=Connections,CN=BELFRY,CN=Routing
Groups,CN=BELFRY,CN=Administrative Groups,CN=BATT,CN=Microsoft
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=company,DC=com Hr:80040920
Attribute:[]



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Customizing NDRs


Hi all,

I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible to customize 
the test in NDRs?

Exchange 2000 SP2

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: vpn and exchange

2002-06-14 Thread Chris Hampton


pptp to a watchguard firebox. With exchange in the
trusted
--- Garland Mac Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
> 
> What kind of VPN are you using?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: vpn and exchange
> 
> 
> I would follow this route - 
> 
> Ping the exchange server from the client by the IP
> address
> Ping the exchange by name.
> In the exchange server properties on outlook change
> the sever name to FQDN
> (As
> steven stated).
> You can also add an entry in the host file for the
> exchange server.
> Then try having the client run the command net use
> \\Domainname\servername\IPC$
> /user:domainname\username
> Also check weather the client can map any other
> drive on other servers.
> 
> Just my thoughts!
> 
> Mal
> 
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:54 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: vpn and exchange
> 
> Attaching To An Exchange Server Through Windows XP
> 
> Submitted By: BrienPosey, 
> Posted On: 6/4/2002 7:09:27 AM
> 
> Description: This week, someone posted a question in
> the discussion forum
> stating that they had recently added two Windows XP
> machines to their
> network,
> and that the users were unable to access their
> Exchange mail through Outlook
> on
> these machines. He went on to say that the problem
> wasn't related to
> insufficient permissions because the same users were
> able to login and check
> E-mail on other machines. 
> 
> I've actually heard about quite a few people having
> this and similar
> problems
> with Windows XP. The good news is that the problem
> isn't linked to any type
> of
> known bug. I've been all over the Internet and have
> been unable to locate
> anything related to a Windows XP / Outlook /
> Exchange bug. Instead, the
> problem
> is usually related to either a permissions problem
> or a configuration
> problem. 
> 
> The real trick to making Windows XP be able to
> access Exchange successfully
> is
> to verify that the network settings are configured
> correctly. If you're
> having
> trouble connecting to an Exchange server on a
> machine that you believe to be
> working correctly, then you should begin the
> troubleshooting process by
> opening
> a Command Prompt window and using the PING command
> to verify that TCP/IP is
> working correctly. Begin by pinging your own IP
> address and the IP address
> of
> the Exchange server. If you receive a Destination
> Path Unreachable message,
> then
> it means that TCP/IP is configured incorrectly.
> Often it means that the
> machine
> hasn't acquired an IP address from a DHCP server. If
> the ping times out,
> then
> there is no valid network path between the machine
> and the Exchange server.
> Perhaps the network cable is loose. 
> 
> If you can successfully ping the Exchange server by
> IP address, try pinging
> it
> by host name. If this ping fails, then the
> workstation in question is
> unaware of
> the server's host name. You can correct this problem
> by verifying that the
> machine is configured to use the same DNS server (or
> WINS server) as the
> Exchange server is. 
> 
> If you're still having trouble communicating with
> the Exchange server and
> the
> tests have all been successful up to this point,
> then its possible that the
> Windows XP machine may not be a part of the correct
> domain. Unless the
> Windows
> XP machine is a part of a domain that has
> permissions to the Exchange
> Server,
> then the machine will be unable to access the
> Exchange Server. You can
> verify
> domain membership by opening the Control Panel and
> selecting the Performance
> and
> Maintenance link, followed by the System link.When
> you do, Windows will open
> the
> System Properties sheet. Select the Computer Name
> tab to view the system's
> computer name and domain membership. If the computer
> isn't a domain member
> or if
> it's part of an incorrect domain, you can use the
> Change button to change
> the
> system's domain membership. Keep in mind that
> Windows XP is a little bit
> different than Windows 9x. Windows 9x had minimal
> security, and it was
> possible
> to simply tell Windows to use a specific domain.
> Windows XP, on the other
> hand,
> requires you to create a computer account within the
> domain before the
> machine
> can participate in the domain. Creating a computer
> account is no big deal,
> and
> the wizard that walks you through the domain
> changing process will help you
> to
> set up the computer account. The only catch is that
> you must have
> administrative
> privileges within the domain before you can create a
> computer account. After
> joining a domain, you should be able to access your
> Exchange Server.
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:45 PM
>

Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540

2002-06-14 Thread Joe Friess


I am trying to use the above utilities to fix the problem described in Q192540.

I was able to download profinst from MS, but can't find the gwclient at MS or on the 
Exchange CD.

Does anyone know where I can get gwclient or another approach to fix the same problem?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0

Title: Message



How is this High Importance 
?
How 
is this related to MS Exchange Issues ?

  
  -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel 
  E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 
  15:07To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Hiding Start 
  Bar in Windows NT 4.0Importance: High
  Hi Folks, 
  Could u please help me out. 
  How can I hide the Start bar from my Desktop?. 
  regards 
  Emmanuel 
  
  
  __
  Disclaimer and 
  confidentiality note 
  Everything in this 
  e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank 
  Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally 
  privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse any 
  other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly 
  stated as being that of Standard Bank. 
  The person 
  addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the 
  sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, 
  disclose or use the content in any way.
  Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has 
  been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or 
  interference.
   ___List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Unable to bind to the destination server in DNS

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q279616
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q290290

-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 18:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to bind to the destination server in DNS

Hi,

In Exchange 2000 SP2/Windows 2000 SP2 I get the following with some messages
that are sitting in the Queues of my default virtual SMTP server.

Unable to bind to the destination server in DNS.

I see this when I look at the properties of some connections that are in a
retry state in the bottom text box.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Darrin Carter

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customizing NDRs

Yes and no.
You probably could with a HEFTY bill from Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 06:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs

Hi all,

I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible to
customize the test in NDRs?

Exchange 2000 SP2

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customizing NDRs


that would be a no then, hefty bills aren't too popular here and it's really not that 
important an issue

Thanks

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 13:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs


Yes and no.
You probably could with a HEFTY bill from Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 06:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs


Hi all,

I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible to
customize the test in NDRs?

Exchange 2000 SP2

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest


WTF? Nice post


-Original Message-
From: Rene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 00:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540



I can remember PSS sending this to me once, so you might like to try
them.  I'm sure it would be free.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
Subject: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540


I am trying to use the above utilities to fix the problem described in
Q192540.

I was able to download profinst from MS, but can't find the gwclient at
MS or on the Exchange CD.

Does anyone know where I can get gwclient or another approach to fix the
same problem?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest

2002-06-14 Thread Andy David


Made more sense than half the ones you post.


-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest


WTF? Nice post


-Original Message-
From: Rene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 00:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customizing NDRs



By the way, one would think that with the number of times this is
requested (here and other groups/lists) that Microsoft would come up
with the goods.  Perhaps you should email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
request too (the more the merrier)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:39
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Customizing NDRs
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs


that would be a no then, hefty bills aren't too popular here and it's
really not that important an issue

Thanks

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 13:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs


Yes and no.
You probably could with a HEFTY bill from Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 06:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs


Hi all,

I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible
to customize the test in NDRs?

Exchange 2000 SP2

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customizing NDRs

2002-06-14 Thread Andy David

I dont know Neil, I have the feeling that if easy customization was allowed,
we would have to wade through thousands of paragraph-long NDRs with
disclaimers and such.. :)

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs

By the way, one would think that with the number of times this is
requested (here and other groups/lists) that Microsoft would come up
with the goods.  Perhaps you should email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
request too (the more the merrier)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:39
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Customizing NDRs
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs

that would be a no then, hefty bills aren't too popular here and it's
really not that important an issue

Thanks

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 13:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs

Yes and no.
You probably could with a HEFTY bill from Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 06:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs

Hi all,

I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible
to customize the test in NDRs?

Exchange 2000 SP2

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customizing NDRs


That's a fair comment.  Maybe if they restricted it to a 64 character
field or something.  But one thing they should allow to be customisable
is the annoying storage warning limit advising users to use PSTs.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:49
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Customizing NDRs
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs


I dont know Neil, I have the feeling that if easy customization was
allowed, we would have to wade through thousands of paragraph-long NDRs
with disclaimers and such.. :)


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs



By the way, one would think that with the number of times this is
requested (here and other groups/lists) that Microsoft would come up
with the goods.  Perhaps you should email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
request too (the more the merrier)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:39
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Customizing NDRs
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs


that would be a no then, hefty bills aren't too popular here and it's
really not that important an issue

Thanks

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 13:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs


Yes and no.
You probably could with a HEFTY bill from Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 06:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs


Hi all,

I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible
to customize the test in NDRs?

Exchange 2000 SP2

Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540

2002-06-14 Thread Joe Friess

Who is PSS?

 -Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540

I can remember PSS sending this to me once, so you might like to try
them.  I'm sure it would be free.

Neil

 -Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
Subject: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540

I am trying to use the above utilities to fix the problem described in
Q192540.

I was able to download profinst from MS, but can't find the gwclient at
MS or on the Exchange CD.

Does anyone know where I can get gwclient or another approach to fix the
same problem?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view
or opinions presented are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies.

If you have received this email in error, please
contact our Support Desk immediately on
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540


Microsoft's Product Support Services

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:57
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
Subject: RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540


Who is PSS?

 -Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540



I can remember PSS sending this to me once, so you might like to try
them.  I'm sure it would be free.

Neil

 -Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
Subject: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540


I am trying to use the above utilities to fix the problem described in
Q192540.

I was able to download profinst from MS, but can't find the gwclient at
MS or on the Exchange CD.

Does anyone know where I can get gwclient or another approach to fix the
same problem?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view
or opinions presented are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies.

If you have received this email in error, please
contact our Support Desk immediately on
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0

2002-06-14 Thread Mark Kelsay

Title: Message



He 
must want to do this on his Exchange server.  Just a 
guess.

  -Original Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:32 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding Start 
  Bar in Windows NT 4.0
  How is this High Importance 
  ?
  How is this related to MS Exchange Issues 
  ?
  

-Original Message-From: Martey, 
Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 
13, 2002 15:07To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0Importance: 
High
Hi Folks, 
Could u please help me out. 
How can I hide the Start bar from my Desktop?. 
regards 
Emmanuel 


__
Disclaimer and 
confidentiality note 
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating 
to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to 
the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. 
Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions 
are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Standard 
Bank. 
The person 
addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the 
sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, 
disclose or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has 
been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or 
interference.
 ___List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How to remove permanent mailbox

2002-06-14 Thread Wilson, Stephen -CONT

Title: Message



I have 
very similar problem. If I run Consistency adjuster the mailbox is restored 
after being deleted.

  -Original Message-From: Le Hong Phong 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:54 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: How to remove 
  permanent mailbox
  I'm using NAV and it notice that can't protect 
  mailbox "Aaron"
  I checked that there aren't user use this 
  mailbox.
  I used ESEUTIL /g then /p and it show that 
  mailbox "Aaron" error and try to repair but I run ESEUTIL several times 
  and this error is still exits.
  I try to create a new user with name "Aaron" but 
  I can login to this mailbox (use Outlook98 on desktop).
  Now I have to create a user "Aaron" so I have to 
  delete old mailbox permanent
   
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
William Lefkovics 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:18 
AM
Subject: RE: How to remove permanent 
mailbox

>>When I use ESEUTIL 
to check the database
 
Check the database for what?
 
>>I use ESEUTIL to fix it but it not 
done.
 
What makes you think it is 
broken?
 
Delete the mailbox.  Delete the 
user.   Done.  There are objects assicated with that user 
that are still associated with other users that still exist.  

 

  
  -Original Message-From: Le Hong 
  Phong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 
  2002 7:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: How 
  to remove permanent mailbox
  
  Hello
  I'm using WinNT4SP6.0a and Ex5.5 
  SP4.
  I deleted an user "Aaron" on Exchange 
  and it really deleted in Recipients and mailbox.
  When I use ESEUTIL to check the database of 
  Priv.edb it show that the mailbox "Aaron" is exits but it error. I use 
  ESEUTIL to fix it but it not done.
  How can I remove permanent this user? Pls 
  help me.
  Thanks
   
  Le Hong PhongIT ManagerTransViet 
  Promotion114A Nguyen Hue, Dist 1, Ho Chi Minh Citywww.transvietgroup.com
   List Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0

Title: Message



Maybe.
-Original Message-From: Mark 
Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 
09:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding Start 
Bar in Windows NT 4.0

  He 
  must want to do this on his Exchange server.  Just a 
  guess.
  
-Original Message-From: Precht, David 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 
8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding 
Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0
How is this High Importance 
?
How is this related to MS Exchange Issues 
?

  
  -Original Message-From: Martey, 
  Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 
  13, 2002 15:07To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0Importance: 
  High
  Hi Folks, 
  Could u please help me out. 
  How can I hide the Start bar from my Desktop?. 
  regards 
  Emmanuel 
  
  
  __
  Disclaimer and 
  confidentiality note 
  Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating 
  to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to 
  the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. 
  Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and 
  opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of 
  Standard Bank. 
  The person 
  addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify 
  the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not 
  read, disclose or use the content in any way.
  Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication 
  has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or 
  interference.
   ___List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0

2002-06-14 Thread Wilson, Stephen -CONT

Title: Message



Change 
the shell 
 
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows 
NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon
shell = 

  -Original Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:57 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding Start 
  Bar in Windows NT 4.0
  Maybe.
  -Original Message-From: Mark 
  Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 
  09:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding 
  Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0
  
He 
must want to do this on his Exchange server.  Just a 
guess.

  -Original Message-From: Precht, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 
  8:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 4.0
  How is this High Importance 
  ?
  How is this related to MS Exchange Issues 
  ?
  

-Original Message-From: Martey, 
Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
June 13, 2002 15:07To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Hiding Start Bar in Windows NT 
4.0Importance: High
Hi Folks, 
Could u please help me out. 
How can I hide the Start bar from my Desktop?. 

regards 
Emmanuel 


__
Disclaimer and 
confidentiality note 
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments 
relating to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is 
proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and 
protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other 
content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly 
stated as being that of Standard Bank. 
The 
person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please 
notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and 
do not read, disclose or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication 
has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception 
or interference.
 ___List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clustering

2002-06-14 Thread TWU-Durham, Ryan


Here is an article that about software that replicates from one server
to the other for exchange. So that would take care of the store problem.

http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=24890

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering

Oh yes  Beat that puppy to virtual death in a past life.

-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering


You forgot another single point of failure - there is one quorum drive.

-- 
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
 When cryptography is outlawed,
 bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.

 -Original Message-
From:   William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Clustering

As Kevin mentioned, there is still a single point of failure - there is
only one information store.  No matter how many cluster nodes,
corruption in the store is not fault tolerant. 

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering


Exchange fault tolerance basically


-Original Message-
From:   Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Clustering

We would not recommend it. More issues and you still have a
single point
of failure. 

What are you wanting to achieve?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Clustering


Would the list recommend clustering of exchange servers or too
many
issues with this? Too difficult to setup?


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187

Title: Message



I'm getting 
the following events in the event log of a customer's Exchange 2000 server. I 
have done as the event test suggested and removed and then re-added the Exchange 
server to the "Exchange Domain Servers" group. The event log continues to show 
these events.
 
I don't know 
how long this has been going on but I noticed it when trying to diagnose another 
problem: New users added via AD Users and Computers are unable to receive email 
from the Internet. Internal delivery via corp workgroup (Outlook2K) mode or SMTP 
(Outlook Express) works fine. Email sent to the same user's SMTP address results 
in the following error. Anyone have any thoughts on this? The server in question 
is a Windows2000 member server running Exchange2000 w/ SP2 applied. Just to 
reiterate...existing old users are able to receive mail from the Internet just 
fine. I'm not sure if these event ID's are related to the delivery problem but I 
thought I'd include them for the sake of completeness. There are no other 
apparent error events in the event log.
 





Your message did not reach some or all of the 
intended recipients.
Subject: test
Sent: 6/13/2002 4:28 
PM
The following recipient(s) could not be 
reached:
'testuser@thedomainname.com' on 6/14/2002 9:40 
AM
The recipient name is not recognized
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= 
;p=Comp 
Name;l=MAILSRV-020614133923Z-1762
MSEXCH:IMS:Company 
Inc.:CAI-RI:MAILSRV 3550 (000B099C) 550 User 
unknown
 
-
 
Event Type: WarningEvent Source: MSExchangeSAEvent 
Category: General Event 
ID: 9186Date:  6/14/2002Time:  9:54:01 
AMUser:  N/AComputer: NEWMANDescription:Microsoft 
Exchange System Attendant has detected that the local computer is not a member 
of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=thedomainname,dc=com'. System Attendant is going 
to add the local computer into the group. 
 
The current members of the group are ''. 

 
For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

 
 
---
 
Event 
Type: ErrorEvent Source: MSExchangeSAEvent 
Category: General Event 
ID: 9187Date:  6/14/2002Time:  9:54:01 
AMUser:  N/AComputer: NEWMANDescription:Microsoft 
Exchange System Attendant failed to add the local computer as a member of the DS 
group object 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=thedomainname,dc=com'. 

 
Please stop all the 
Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group manually and 
restart all the services. 
 
For more 
information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 



 
Jason Loven, MCSE, CCA
Senior Network Specialist
Network Services Group
Computer Associates, Inc.
Voice: (401)232-2600 x3021
Fax: (401)232-7778
http://www.cainetserv.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540

2002-06-14 Thread Patrick Smallwood



Not sure if the List would recomend that you have PSS on the phone when
using this for the first time, but I seem to remember having to get it from
here before (I think a Google search will also show a few possible places
to get it) if you happen for some odd reason to save these old CD's (check
under coffee cups or in old CD servers)  : )



  RESOLUTION


  To resolve this problem, delete the message stuck in the server free and  
  busy information by using the GWClient utility. (The GWClient utility is  
  in the BackOffice Resource Kit, Second Edition on the TechNet September   
  1999 CD-ROM)  





Thank you,
Patrick





|-+>
| |   "Joe Friess" |
| ||
| ||
| |   06/14/2002 05:57 |
| |   AM   |
| |   Please respond to|
| |   "MS-Exchange |
| |   Admin Issues"|
| ||
|-+>
  
>|
  |
|
  |   To:   "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   |
  |   cc:  
|
  |   Subject:  RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540   
|
  |
|
  |
|
  
>|



Who is PSS?

 -Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540



I can remember PSS sending this to me once, so you might like to try
them.  I'm sure it would be free.

Neil

 -Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
Subject: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540


I am trying to use the above utilities to fix the problem described in
Q192540.

I was able to download profinst from MS, but can't find the gwclient at
MS or on the Exchange CD.

Does anyone know where I can get gwclient or another approach to fix the
same problem?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view
or opinions presented are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies.

If you have received this email in error, please
contact our Support Desk immediately on
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187

Title: Message

First question, not necessarily addressing the 9186 problem, is whether
the new users are getting their addresses stamped by the RUS. Have you
checked this?
Neil

-Original Message-From: Jason Loven
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 June 2002
15:05Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation:
Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187Subject: Exchange2000 Event ID
9186 and 9187
I'm getting
the following events in the event log of a customer's Exchange 2000 server. I
have done as the event test suggested and removed and then re-added the
Exchange server to the "Exchange Domain Servers" group. The event log
continues to show these events.
I don't know
how long this has been going on but I noticed it when trying to diagnose
another problem: New users added via AD Users and Computers are unable to
receive email from the Internet. Internal delivery via corp workgroup
(Outlook2K) mode or SMTP (Outlook Express) works fine. Email sent to the same
user's SMTP address results in the following error. Anyone have any thoughts
on this? The server in question is a Windows2000 member server running
Exchange2000 w/ SP2 applied. Just to reiterate...existing old users are able
to receive mail from the Internet just fine. I'm not sure if these event ID's
are related to the delivery problem but I thought I'd include them for the
sake of completeness. There are no other apparent error events in the event
log.

Your message did not reach some or all of the
intended recipients.
Subject: test
Sent: 6/13/2002 4:28
PM
The following recipient(s) could not be
reached:
'testuser@thedomainname.com' on 6/14/2002 9:40
AM
The recipient name is not recognized
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=Comp
Name;l=MAILSRV-020614133923Z-1762
MSEXCH:IMS:Company
Inc.:CAI-RI:MAILSRV 3550 (000B099C) 550 User
unknown
-
Event Type: WarningEvent
Source: MSExchangeSAEvent Category: General Event
ID: 9186Date: 6/14/2002Time: 9:54:01
AMUser: N/AComputer: NEWMANDescription:Microsoft
Exchange System Attendant has detected that the local computer is not a member
of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=thedomainname,dc=com'. System Attendant is
going to add the local computer into the group.
The current members of the group are ''.

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.

---
Event
Type: ErrorEvent Source: MSExchangeSAEvent
Category: General Event
ID: 9187Date: 6/14/2002Time: 9:54:01
AMUser: N/AComputer: NEWMANDescription:Microsoft
Exchange System Attendant failed to add the local computer as a member of the
DS group object 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=thedomainname,dc=com'.

Please stop all
the Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group
manually and restart all the services.
For more
information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.

Jason Loven, MCSE, CCA
Senior Network Specialist
Network Services Group
Computer Associates, Inc.
Voice: (401)232-2600
x3021
Fax: (401)232-7778
http://www.cainetserv.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view
or opinions presented are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies.

If you have received this email in error, please
contact our Support Desk immediately on
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

RE: Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187

Title: Message



Pardon 
my ignorance. RUS?

  
  -Original Message-From: Neil Hobson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 
  10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187
  First question, not necessarily addressing the 9186 problem, is whether 
  the new users are getting their addresses stamped by the RUS.  Have you 
  checked this?
   
  Neil
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187

Title: Message



Recipient Update Service, the process that stamps your user accounts with 
their email addresses.
 
Neil

  
  -Original Message-From: Jason Loven 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 June 2002 
  15:11Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: 
  Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187Subject: RE: Exchange2000 Event 
  ID 9186 and 9187
  Pardon my ignorance. RUS?
  

-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 
2002 10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187
First question, not necessarily addressing the 9186 problem, is 
whether the new users are getting their addresses stamped by the RUS.  
Have you checked this?
 
NeilList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest

2002-06-14 Thread Garland Mac Neill

They charge for me for telling me to there is a problem and they can't
figure it out and to  reinstall Exchange over itself, I am going to sue. 

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest

The day after Bill gives you your money back.

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
"Who's watching your network?" 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 7:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest

4 Microsoft Techs Down...

When do they punt and give you a devolper?

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed (Part Duex)

I've covered that ground a few times. The DHCP was new. 

The information store started fine and the mailbox store mounted fine. That
is the baffling part. 

-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed (Part Duex)

9167 : Q264413
 < font> 

1008 : http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1008
 &source= 

9175 : Q264413
  , Q288598

-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Move Mailbox is hosed (Part Duex)

What am I missing here? The information store starts ok and the mailbox
storage mounts fine, which is what Technet suggests. I also get Event ID
9167 and 1008 with the same error. Replication seems to be fine. I've
removed the AV s/w. IS this installation hosed? 

Thanks in advance,

Garland

Event Type:  Error

Event Source:   MSExchangeAdmin

Event Category:MAPI Session 

Event ID:  9175

Date:6/11/2002

Time:10:04:11 AM

User:N/A

Computer:SAKIC

Description:

The MAPI call 'OpenMsgStore' failed with the following error: 

The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed.

The MAPI provider failed.

Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store

ID no: 8004011d-0512- 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187

Title: Message



Within 
a few moments of creating the users their email addresses appear in AD U&C. 
Both a SMTP and X.400 address in the addresses tab and a smtp-style address in 
the general user properties.

  
  -Original Message-From: Neil Hobson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 
  10:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187
  Recipient Update Service, the process that stamps your user accounts 
  with their email addresses.
   
  Neil
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Double Take

2002-06-14 Thread Bill Beckett


Any feedback on this product? Anyone using it?


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

One of those little things users complain about.


We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and a second mailbox.

The users get the little envelope in the system tray when mail arrives in their 
mailbox but when mail arrives into the second mailbox.

Is there anyway to show the lil evelope when mail arrives into either mailbox?

Exchange 2000 SP2/Outlook 2000
Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: One of those little things users complain about.

2002-06-14 Thread Clark, Steve


You might find something over at Slipstick.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax

The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: One of those little things users complain about.

We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and a second mailbox.

The users get the little envelope in the system tray when mail arrives in
their mailbox but when mail arrives into the second mailbox.

Is there anyway to show the lil evelope when mail arrives into either
mailbox?

Exchange 2000 SP2/Outlook 2000
Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: One of those little things users complain about.

2002-06-14 Thread Kahn, Stuart

Are the users set as Author on the second mailbox?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: One of those little things users complain about.

We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and a second mailbox.

The users get the little envelope in the system tray when mail arrives in
their mailbox but when mail arrives into the second mailbox.

Is there anyway to show the lil evelope when mail arrives into either
mailbox?

Exchange 2000 SP2/Outlook 2000
Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
The information in this email and any attachment or any reproduction of this
email is confidential and for the use of the addressee(s) only. 
If received in error please advise the sender and delete all records of it
from your system. 

Racing Champions International Limited 
Hembury House, Pynes Hill, Rydon Lane, Exeter, EX2 5AZ 
Tel: +44 (0)1392 281 900 Fax: +44 (0)1392 213 125 

Registered in England No. 1634124 
A List of Directors may be inspected at the Registered office as above 
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: One of those little things users complain about.

They have full rights over the mailbox

-Original Message-
From: Kahn, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 16:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: One of those little things users complain about.

Are the users set as Author on the second mailbox?

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: One of those little things users complain about.

We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and a second mailbox.

The users get the little envelope in the system tray when mail arrives in
their mailbox but when mail arrives into the second mailbox.

Is there anyway to show the lil evelope when mail arrives into either
mailbox?

Exchange 2000 SP2/Outlook 2000
Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
The information in this email and any attachment or any reproduction of this
email is confidential and for the use of the addressee(s) only. 
If received in error please advise the sender and delete all records of it
from your system. 

Racing Champions International Limited 
Hembury House, Pynes Hill, Rydon Lane, Exeter, EX2 5AZ 
Tel: +44 (0)1392 281 900 Fax: +44 (0)1392 213 125 

Registered in England No. 1634124 
A List of Directors may be inspected at the Registered office as above 
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Force Logoff of OWA

2002-06-14 Thread Steve Ens

How about Ronaldo...or Beckham (the guy who married one of the Spice girls)
or Maradonna? I'm a hockey fan through and through and I've heard of those
guys...and then there is that goalie from the US who wears his hair in
dreadsdunno his name though.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

I don't know any soccer stars other than Pele. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

I couldn't really tell you the name of any American
baseball/'football'/basketball star other than the obvious one like Michael
Jordan or that fat fscker The Washing Machine (or Fridge, or Dishwasher, or
whatever his name was).

-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 June 2002 16:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Force Logoff of OWA
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Are you serious Ray?  Football (soccer) stars make gazillions in Europe!!!
And they are bigger stars worldwide than the North American
baseball/football/basketball stars.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Soccer may be the most played youth sport in the US.  I know one of the
local "travelling teams" (13-yr olds) went to Holland to play some youth
teams there. Not sure of the results. 

Anyway, you're starting to see the results, and hopefully it'll continue.
Unfortunately, our very best athletes still turn to the "money sports" -
football, basketball, maybe baseball. 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Disagree, I've seen the NHL - those guys know the difference between an
elbow and a foot!

BTW I was told the North Americans believe "soccer" is a game for women and
kids. The Argentinians would agree!

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 09:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Siegfried was being considerate of us North Americans who don't know our
feet from our elbows.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Soccer?? You mean football, the game played with the foot?  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 June 2002 00:18
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Force Logoff of OWA
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Soccer? I don't like it as much as I don't like German beer. Can you say I
am not a typical German? Everybody who knows me closer is telling me that
over and over again...

> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:14 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> 
> WWII all over again...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> 
> 
>  Germany advancing? Go Poland? What did I miss 
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:08 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> >
> > It's the same with .Net build 3590.
> >
> > Thank you, sir.  And congrats to Germany for advancing.
> >
> > Go Poland!
> >
> > William
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:53 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> >
> >
> > Interesting. Just tested it on Windows.NET Server build 3604 and
> you're
> > right! IE6 on Win.NET doesn't seem to cache the session if using 
> > basic/clear text authentication.
> >
> > As for your kiosk question: some do a reboot after you logoff, some
> not.
> > I've seen one where after I quit the whole machine got imaged back
at
> > the restarted. But you can't count on this.
> >
> > The solution is, as I mentioned, either buy that product from the 
> > MessageWare guys or roll your own component. I wrote an ActiveX
> control
> > based solution which destroys the browser session. I am aware that
> some
> > kiosks even disallow ActiveX but in this case IE5/6 and OWA 2000
will
> > also not work ;-)
> >
> > Contact me offlist if you want to test it with a test account.
> >
> > 
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>

RE: Force Logoff of OWA

2002-06-14 Thread Ray Zorz

The names ring a bell once you name them, but I'd be hardpressed to name
them on my own. 

-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

How about Ronaldo...or Beckham (the guy who married one of the Spice
girls) or Maradonna? I'm a hockey fan through and through and I've heard
of those guys...and then there is that goalie from the US who wears his
hair in dreadsdunno his name though.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

I don't know any soccer stars other than Pele. 

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

I couldn't really tell you the name of any American
baseball/'football'/basketball star other than the obvious one like
Michael Jordan or that fat fscker The Washing Machine (or Fridge, or
Dishwasher, or whatever his name was).

-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 June 2002 16:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Force Logoff of OWA
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Are you serious Ray?  Football (soccer) stars make gazillions in
Europe!!! And they are bigger stars worldwide than the North American
baseball/football/basketball stars.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Soccer may be the most played youth sport in the US.  I know one of the
local "travelling teams" (13-yr olds) went to Holland to play some youth
teams there. Not sure of the results. 

Anyway, you're starting to see the results, and hopefully it'll
continue. Unfortunately, our very best athletes still turn to the "money
sports" - football, basketball, maybe baseball. 

-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 2:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Disagree, I've seen the NHL - those guys know the difference between an
elbow and a foot!

BTW I was told the North Americans believe "soccer" is a game for women
and kids. The Argentinians would agree!

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 09:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Siegfried was being considerate of us North Americans who don't know our
feet from our elbows.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Soccer?? You mean football, the game played with the foot?  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 June 2002 00:18
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Force Logoff of OWA
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA

Soccer? I don't like it as much as I don't like German beer. Can you say
I am not a typical German? Everybody who knows me closer is telling me
that over and over again...

> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:14 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> 
> WWII all over again...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> 
> 
>  Germany advancing? Go Poland? What did I miss 
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:08 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> >
> > It's the same with .Net build 3590.
> >
> > Thank you, sir.  And congrats to Germany for advancing.
> >
> > Go Poland!
> >
> > William
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:53 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
> >
> >
> > Interesting. Just tested it on Windows.NET Server build 3604 and
> you're
> > right! IE6 on Win.NET doesn't seem to cache the session if using
> > basic/clear text authentication.
> >
> > As for your kiosk question: some do a reboot after you logoff, some
> not.
> > I've seen one where after I quit the whole machine got imaged back
at
> > the restarted. But you can't count on this.
> >
> > The solution is, as I mentioned, either buy that product from the
> > MessageWare guys or roll your own component. I wrote an ActiveX
> control
> > based solution which destroys the browser session. I am aware that
> some
> > kiosks e

removing first exchange 5.5 server

2002-06-14 Thread Anwar Qureshi

Title: Message



I have 
two exchange 5.5 servers in a site. I want to remove the first server. The 
following are the steps I am planning to take. .
 
1. 
Move all the mailboxes to second server
2. 
Follow steps in KB Q152959 (how to remove first exchange server in 
site)
3. 
Move OWA web site
4. Put 
the first server offline
5. 
Change the MX record value for the first server to 20
6. 
Change the MX record value for the second server to 10
 
Pls 
let me know if there is any step I am missing or if there are any 
suggestions
 
Anwar
 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: removing first exchange 5.5 server

2002-06-14 Thread Jim Holmgren

Title: Message

Supplement your list with this:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
and
you should be ok.
-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive
communication. Advertising.com --
Superior Technology. Superior Performance.

-Original Message-From: Anwar Qureshi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:38
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: removing first
exchange 5.5 server
I
have two exchange 5.5 servers in a site. I want to remove the first server.
The following are the steps I am planning to take. .
1.
Move all the mailboxes to second server
2.
Follow steps in KB Q152959 (how to remove first exchange server in
site)
3.
Move OWA web site
4.
Put the first server offline
5.
Change the MX record value for the first server to 20
6.
Change the MX record value for the second server to 10
Pls
let me know if there is any step I am missing or if there are any
suggestions
Anwar
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
***The information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking ofany action in reliance upon, this information by persons orentities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.If you received this email in error, please contact thesender and permanently delete the email from any computer.

RE: One of those little things users complain about.

2002-06-14 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)


You'll have to write a COM Add-in or a macro to do this. If you can't find
anything at www.slipstick.com, I'm sure I could write one for you quite
quickly.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: One of those little things users complain about.


We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and a second mailbox.

The users get the little envelope in the system tray when mail arrives in
their mailbox but when mail arrives into the second mailbox.

Is there anyway to show the lil evelope when mail arrives into either
mailbox?

Exchange 2000 SP2/Outlook 2000
Thanks

Stu

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How to remove permanent mailbox

2002-06-14 Thread Dopps, Mike

Title: Message



First 
about ESEUTIL
You 
only need to run ESEUTIL /p just once in in repair mode in order to get final 
results, running it more than once does nothing and here is 
why.
 
Eseutil scans the database looking at the data sections.  Exchange 
databases are totally blocked and divided into 4Kb pages of all its data.  
Each 4K page has a checksum, meaning there are a certain number of zeros 
and ones that belong to that record that should exist according to the 
checksum.  Eseutil checks all 4K pages to match the listed checksum for 
that page.  If any one 4k page does not match the checksum it 
deletes the entire 4K page regardless if the record is related to a single 
email, or multiple emails that contain data inside that 4k page.  Think 
about what its doing, its randomly blowing away data and doesn't care what the 
data was used for.  For this reason unless you know exactly what you need 
eseutil for, DO NOT RUN IT!  try the soft repair /r or run isinteg 
first.
 
Ok so 
how do you get ride of incomplete data inside a database like an 
entire mailbox?
Once 
eseutil is ran you must repair the broken links to the data that no longer 
exsits or now only partially exists.  For exmaple if a 4k page is removed 
from a 1mb email, even though the remainder of that email still 
exists, that email is gone forever.  You must run a different utility 
to tell the database that part of that email has been removed and to go ahead 
and remove the rest of that email so that user's mailbox functions 
correctly.  This is what isinteg does.  It re-establishes pointers and 
corrects incomplete email chunks that ESEUTIL /P causes.  So 
if there is something corrupted about a mailbox eseutil will remove the 
corruption and ISINTEG will fix the mailbox so that it is accessible 
again.  Then you can safely deleted it normally.  If you cannot there 
may be a problem with the header of the database that eseutil broke.  Once 
this happens the only thing you can do is use exmerge to copy out all of the 
data from the database, create a new database file name after renaming the old 
in case something goes wrong, mount the new and use exmerge to put the 
data back.
 
Isinteg must be ran as many times as it takes such that no more errors 
exitsts.  Isinteg is the real repair tool here and is the only thing that 
can correct broken mailboxes and invalid pointers to records like emails and the 
location of a mailbox and why or why not it should be deleted from the 
database.
 
My 
suggestion is run ISINTEG with the alltests switch on the database and keep 
running it if it reports errors until they are all gone.  Then you should 
be able to remove that mailbox normally.

  
  -Original Message-From: Wilson, Stephen 
  -CONT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 
  2002 8:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: How 
  to remove permanent mailbox
  I 
  have very similar problem. If I run Consistency adjuster the mailbox is 
  restored after being deleted.
  
-Original Message-From: Le Hong Phong 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:54 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: How to 
remove permanent mailbox
I'm using NAV and it notice that can't protect 
mailbox "Aaron"
I checked that there aren't user use this 
mailbox.
I used ESEUTIL /g then /p and it show that 
mailbox "Aaron" error and try to repair but I run ESEUTIL several times 
and this error is still exits.
I try to create a new user with name "Aaron" 
but I can login to this mailbox (use Outlook98 on desktop).
Now I have to create a user "Aaron" so I have 
to delete old mailbox permanent
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  William Lefkovics 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:18 
  AM
  Subject: RE: How to remove permanent 
  mailbox
  
  >>When I use 
  ESEUTIL to check the database
   
  Check the database for what?
   
  >>I use ESEUTIL to fix it but it not 
  done.
   
  What makes you think it is 
  broken?
   
  Delete the mailbox.  Delete the 
  user.   Done.  There are objects assicated with that user 
  that are still associated with other users that still exist.  
  
   
  

-Original Message-From: Le Hong 
Phong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 
2002 7:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
How to remove permanent mailbox

Hello
I'm using WinNT4SP6.0a and Ex5.5 
SP4.
I deleted an user "Aaron" on Exchange 
and it really deleted in Recipients and mailbox.
When I use ESEUTIL to check the database of 
Priv.edb it show that the mailbox "Aaron" is exits but it error. I use 
ESEUTIL to fix it but it not done.
How can I remove permanent th

RE: Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187

2002-06-14 Thread Preston Jeffares

Title: Message



What 
Service Pack level are you at on Exchange and Win2k?

  -Original Message-From: Jason Loven 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:24 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange2000 
  Event ID 9186 and 9187
  Within a few moments of creating the users their email addresses appear 
  in AD U&C. Both a SMTP and X.400 address in the addresses tab and a 
  smtp-style address in the general user properties.
  

-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 
2002 10:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187
Recipient Update Service, the process that stamps your user accounts 
with their email addresses.
 
NeilList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187