RE: Autoarchive and oooops

[Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)]

Auto Archived mail is pulled from the server and deposited into the
ARCHIVE.PST. At the point it goes into the PST file it is no longer on
the server.  Not sure if it will be available in the dumpster if you
have the dumpster reg hack in place.

 

John H. Matteson, Jr.

Systems Administrator/ITT Systems

Forward Operating Base Orgun-E

Afghanistan

DSN - 318 431 8001

VoSIP - (308) 431 - 

Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823

Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832

 

"So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for
people to work." -- Peter Drucker

 

From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Autoarchive and ps

 

We have an end user who, believe it or not, auto archived their outlook
email a few days back. Then this morning, they saw the archive.pst file,
and deleted it using ctl or shift and delete, by-passing their deleted
items. Amazing. 

 

Is there any way to retrieve email cleared out by an autoarchive? Should
it be stored in the recoverable deleted items window ?

 

Olly

 

--

G2 Support

Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management

 

www.g2support.com

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry

[Boggis, Josh]

This stuff works!  I poured it all over OWA, and now I have OWA light!

From: Francisca Fitzgerald 
[mailto:supplicatingnf...@approvedfinancialservices.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry

Acai diet plan will enable you to

Enter at the moment




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry

[Sherry Abercrombie]

LOL

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Boggis, Josh  wrote:

>  This stuff works!  I poured it all over OWA, and now I have OWA light!
>
>
>
> *From:* Francisca Fitzgerald [mailto:
> supplicatingnf...@approvedfinancialservices.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry
>
>
>
> Acai diet plan will enable you to
>
>
>
> Enter at the moment 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Autoarchive and oooops

[Dahl, Peter]

Yes, if DIR is setup to retain deleted items the messages would be in the 
dumpster of the folder that the item was moved from.

From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) 
[mailto:john.matte...@afghan.swa.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Autoarchive and ps

Auto Archived mail is pulled from the server and deposited into the 
ARCHIVE.PST. At the point it goes into the PST file it is no longer on the 
server.  Not sure if it will be available in the dumpster if you have the 
dumpster reg hack in place.

John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
Forward Operating Base Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823
Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832

"So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for people 
to work." -- Peter Drucker

From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Autoarchive and ps

We have an end user who, believe it or not, auto archived their outlook email a 
few days back. Then this morning, they saw the archive.pst file, and deleted it 
using ctl or shift and delete, by-passing their deleted items. Amazing.

Is there any way to retrieve email cleared out by an autoarchive? Should it be 
stored in the recoverable deleted items window ?

Olly

--
G2 Support
Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management

www.g2support.com










This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

LOL

I like Acai Berry OWA, but my favorite is Lemon-Lime.

--
ME2


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Boggis, Josh  wrote:

>  This stuff works!  I poured it all over OWA, and now I have OWA light!
>
>
>
> *From:* Francisca Fitzgerald [mailto:
> supplicatingnf...@approvedfinancialservices.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry
>
>
>
> Acai diet plan will enable you to
>
>
>
> Enter at the moment 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Patching Exchange 2007 Sp1

[McCready, Robert]

Is there any harm in patching most of our Exchange Servers with Rollup 7 (our 
two Edge Transport Servers, the two Hub Transport Servers and the Passive 
Mailbox Server) with Exchange Roll Up 7, and then patching the Active Mailbox 
Cluster server a few days later?  The Active Mailbox Cluster server will 
require a brief outage, so we need to schedule that.  Meanwhile, I was thinking 
of going ahead and patching the other servers one at a time, but I wasn't sure 
if any complications could arise from several servers being on Roll Up 7 with 
one server on Roll Up 5?

Thanks.




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Autoarchive and oooops

[Don Andrews]

So, the problem is that the system did EXACTLY what the user wanted? -
got it!

 



From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:john.matte...@afghan.swa.army.mil] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Autoarchive and ps

 

Auto Archived mail is pulled from the server and deposited into the
ARCHIVE.PST. At the point it goes into the PST file it is no longer on
the server.  Not sure if it will be available in the dumpster if you
have the dumpster reg hack in place.

 

John H. Matteson, Jr.

Systems Administrator/ITT Systems

Forward Operating Base Orgun-E

Afghanistan

DSN - 318 431 8001

VoSIP - (308) 431 - 

Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823

Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832

 

"So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for
people to work." -- Peter Drucker

 

From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Autoarchive and ps

 

We have an end user who, believe it or not, auto archived their outlook
email a few days back. Then this morning, they saw the archive.pst file,
and deleted it using ctl or shift and delete, by-passing their deleted
items. Amazing. 

 

Is there any way to retrieve email cleared out by an autoarchive? Should
it be stored in the recoverable deleted items window ?

 

Olly

 

--

G2 Support

Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management

 

www.g2support.com

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Autoarchive and oooops

[Ben Scott]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Don Andrews  wrote:
> So, the problem is that the system did EXACTLY what the user wanted?

  It did exactly what the user *told* it to do.  Not always the same
thing, sadly.

  "It's just what we asked for -- but not what we want!" -- From "The
Night Before Implementation"

http://www.daclarke.org/Humour/sware-engr.html

-- Ben

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Autoarchive and oooops

[Don Andrews]

Yeah, I know, but it sure reduces the urgency - IMHO.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Autoarchive and ps

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Don Andrews 
wrote:
> So, the problem is that the system did EXACTLY what the user wanted?

  It did exactly what the user *told* it to do.  Not always the same
thing, sadly.

  "It's just what we asked for -- but not what we want!" -- From "The
Night Before Implementation"

http://www.daclarke.org/Humour/sware-engr.html

-- Ben

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Defrag old 2003 Stores

[Stefan Jafs]

I have move all 225 users to my new E2K7 server, I still have my E2K3 server 
and want to keep it running for a few more months.
My 2 stores have 40Gigs and 30 Gigs of white space, what's the proper command 
and procedure to defrag the 2 stores?

Thanks

__
Stefan Jafs


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Defrag old 2003 Stores

[Steve Ens]

Google is your friend...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328804


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Stefan Jafs  wrote:

>  I have move all 225 users to my new E2K7 server, I still have my E2K3
> server and want to keep it running for a few more months.
>
> My 2 stores have 40Gigs and 30 Gigs of white space, what’s the proper
> command and procedure to defrag the 2 stores?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *__*
> *Stefan Jafs*
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

[Cardwell, Dick (IT Solutions UK)]

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=192185



From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] 
Sent: 26 March 2009 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag old 2003 Stores



I have move all 225 users to my new E2K7 server, I still have my E2K3
server and want to keep it running for a few more months.

My 2 stores have 40Gigs and 30 Gigs of white space, what's the proper
command and procedure to defrag the 2 stores?

 

Thanks 

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Paul]

I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a DST 
issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it is 
correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful are 
coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person sending the 
requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from the same 
people so I had the person send a request to an account on the clients server 
and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that request was incorrect 
for the client, but correct on the separate server.  I'm stumped.  How can they 
be seeing the correct time for 90% of their meeting invites and incorrectly for 
the remaining 10% yet also be able to send a meeting request to the same people 
who are sending the bad ones and those people see it correctly?
The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 server.  
Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type of 
inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for recurring 
meetings.

Thanks
Paul
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Campbell, Rob]

Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?

-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a DST 
issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it is 
correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful are 
coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person sending the 
requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from the same 
people so I had the person send a request to an account on the clients server 
and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that request was incorrect 
for the client, but correct on the separate server.  I'm stumped.  How can they 
be seeing the correct time for 90% of their meeting invites and incorrectly for 
the remaining 10% yet also be able to send a meeting request to the same people 
who are sending the bad ones and those people see it correctly?
The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 server.  
Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type of 
inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for recurring 
meetings.

Thanks
Paul
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Kennedy, Jim]

10% of the time they are using OWA and its daylight savings time is set wrong 
on the options page? Or the sender is?




> -Original Message-
> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:31 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
> 
> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting
> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is
> a DST issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting
> request it is correct and most of the ones they receive are correct
> however a handful are coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought
> it was the person sending the requests since the ones they receive
> incorrectly are always from the same people so I had the person send a
> request to an account on the clients server and to an account on a
> separate Exchange server and that request was incorrect for the client,
> but correct on the separate server.  I'm stumped.  How can they be
> seeing the correct time for 90% of their meeting invites and
> incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to send a meeting
> request to the same people who are sending the bad ones and those
> people see it correctly?
> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003
> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this
> type of inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not
> for recurring meetings.
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Paul]

No the ones that are off are all being accepted through Outlook and not a PDA 
or OWA.

Thanks
Paul
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Autoarchive and oooops

[Ben Scott]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Don Andrews  wrote:
>>  It did exactly what the user *told* it to do.  Not always the same
>> thing, sadly.
>
> Yeah, I know, but it sure reduces the urgency - IMHO.

  Oh, I'm with you.

  Of course, it's often the higher-ups with power who are the ones who
generate these situations *sigh*

-- Ben

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Pages

[McCready, Robert]

Anybody know what might cause Distribution Groups for pagers 
(555-555-1...@pager.com, 555-555-5...@pager.com ) to stop working, but still 
allow INDIVIDUAL pages to a specific contact to work via Outlook (page-Johnny 
Smith only)?

When we page a distribution group today via Outlook 2003 (through Exchange 
2007), the pages do not arrive.  However, if I pick a specific contact, the 
page appears immediately.

Confusion.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

[Stefan Jafs]

Thanks,

___
Stefan Jafs

From: Cardwell, Dick (IT Solutions UK) [mailto:dick.cardw...@siemens.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=192185

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: 26 March 2009 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag old 2003 Stores
I have move all 225 users to my new E2K7 server, I still have my E2K3 server 
and want to keep it running for a few more months.
My 2 stores have 40Gigs and 30 Gigs of white space, what's the proper command 
and procedure to defrag the 2 stores?

Thanks

__
Stefan Jafs








~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Pages

[Mayo, Bill]

I can tell you that we have a similar issue with cell phones (text
messaging device).  What we have determined on our end is that there is
something that the cell provider doesn't like about having multiple
recipients on one message.  The cell provider, of course, insists that
is not the case and can provide no further information.  The logs don't
lie, though.  I doubt this helps, but wanted to share JIC.

Bill Mayo 

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Pages

Anybody know what might cause Distribution Groups for pagers
(555-555-1...@pager.com, 555-555-5...@pager.com ) to stop working, but
still allow INDIVIDUAL pages to a specific contact to work via Outlook
(page-Johnny Smith only)?

When we page a distribution group today via Outlook 2003 (through
Exchange 2007), the pages do not arrive.  However, if I pick a specific
contact, the page appears immediately.

Confusion.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Strange occurrence on calendars outlook 2007

[David.Ricci]

I have a user that works from a reception computer as well as her own
which she is the exec admin for several people.  She has her calendar
open most of the day and it shows all those exec she manages.  When she
works on the receptionist computer and logs in as herself the calendars
do not match.  She has local admin rights to both computers.  She has
outlook 2007 on both and both are cached.  Any suggestions on what to
look for she is missing appointments for her exec.

 

Thanks for any help 

 

 

David 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Eric Woodford]

DST patch is on some PCs and not others. Remember DST consisted of both a
server patch and office patch.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Paul  wrote:

> No the ones that are off are all being accepted through Outlook and not a
> PDA or OWA.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Kurt Buff]

We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of
them are using Blackberries - but not all of them.

Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs
are the Exec assistants, IIRC.

Got a line on something?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob
 wrote:
> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>
> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a DST 
> issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it is 
> correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful are 
> coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person sending 
> the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from the same 
> people so I had the person send a request to an account on the clients server 
> and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that request was 
> incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server.  I'm stumped.  
> How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their meeting invites and 
> incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to send a meeting request 
> to the same people who are sending the bad ones and those people see it 
> correctly?
> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 
> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type of 
> inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for recurring 
> meetings.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>
> **
> Note:
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
> and
> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> **
>
>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Paul]

Except that the client sees most meeting requests correctly.  Only a few have 
the incorrect time and the ones that have the incorrect time are correct when 
sent to a computer outside of this particular exchange group.  If it was a DST 
patch wouldn't the client see all meeting requests as wrong?
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[John Cook]

Was the BES server patched?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Kurt Buff 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:31:07 2009
Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of
them are using Blackberries - but not all of them.

Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs
are the Exec assistants, IIRC.

Got a line on something?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob
 wrote:
> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>
> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a DST 
> issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it is 
> correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful are 
> coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person sending 
> the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from the same 
> people so I had the person send a request to an account on the clients server 
> and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that request was 
> incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server.  I'm stumped.  
> How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their meeting invites and 
> incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to send a meeting request 
> to the same people who are sending the bad ones and those people see it 
> correctly?
> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 
> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type of 
> inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for recurring 
> meetings.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> **
> Note:
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
> and
> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> **
>
>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Paul]

No PDAS or smart phones of any kind in this organization...everything is going 
directly through Outlook 2007.  I'm totally stumped.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Kurt Buff]

I'll ask - what patches might apply? I don't administer that box.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:31, John Cook  wrote:
> Was the BES server patched?
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership For Strong Families
>  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kurt Buff 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:31:07 2009
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>
> We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of
> them are using Blackberries - but not all of them.
>
> Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs
> are the Exec assistants, IIRC.
>
> Got a line on something?
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob
>  wrote:
>> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>>
>> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
>> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a 
>> DST issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it 
>> is correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful 
>> are coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person 
>> sending the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from 
>> the same people so I had the person send a request to an account on the 
>> clients server and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that 
>> request was incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server.  
>> I'm stumped.  How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their 
>> meeting invites and incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to 
>> send a meeting request to the same people who are sending the bad ones and 
>> those people see it correctly?
>> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 
>> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type 
>> of inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for 
>> recurring meetings.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Paul
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>>
>> **
>> Note:
>> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
>> and
>> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>>
>>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
> attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
> which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
> dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
> the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information 
> may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
> of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized 
> use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal 
> penalties.
>  Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
> need to.
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[John Cook]

I can't remember that far back but iirc upgrading to 4.1 might have handled 
this.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Kurt Buff 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:42:12 2009
Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

I'll ask - what patches might apply? I don't administer that box.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:31, John Cook  wrote:
> Was the BES server patched?
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership For Strong Families
>  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kurt Buff 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:31:07 2009
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>
> We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of
> them are using Blackberries - but not all of them.
>
> Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs
> are the Exec assistants, IIRC.
>
> Got a line on something?
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob
>  wrote:
>> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>>
>> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
>> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a 
>> DST issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it 
>> is correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful 
>> are coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person 
>> sending the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from 
>> the same people so I had the person send a request to an account on the 
>> clients server and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that 
>> request was incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server.  
>> I'm stumped.  How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their 
>> meeting invites and incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to 
>> send a meeting request to the same people who are sending the bad ones and 
>> those people see it correctly?
>> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 
>> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type 
>> of inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for 
>> recurring meetings.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Paul
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>
>> **
>> Note:
>> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
>> and
>> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>
>>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
> attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
> which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
> dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
> the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information 
> may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
> of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized 
> use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal 
> penalties.
>  Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
> need to.
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

CO

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[Kurt Buff]

Thanks.

I'll check.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:44, John Cook  wrote:
> I can't remember that far back but iirc upgrading to 4.1 might have handled 
> this.
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership For Strong Families
>  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kurt Buff 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:42:12 2009
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>
> I'll ask - what patches might apply? I don't administer that box.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:31, John Cook  wrote:
>> Was the BES server patched?
>> John W. Cook
>> Systems Administrator
>> Partnership For Strong Families
>>  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Kurt Buff 
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:31:07 2009
>> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>>
>> We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of
>> them are using Blackberries - but not all of them.
>>
>> Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs
>> are the Exec assistants, IIRC.
>>
>> Got a line on something?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob
>>  wrote:
>>> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
>>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>>>
>>> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
>>> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a 
>>> DST issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it 
>>> is correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful 
>>> are coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person 
>>> sending the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always 
>>> from the same people so I had the person send a request to an account on 
>>> the clients server and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that 
>>> request was incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server.  
>>> I'm stumped.  How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their 
>>> meeting invites and incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to 
>>> send a meeting request to the same people who are sending the bad ones and 
>>> those people see it correctly?
>>> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 
>>> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type 
>>> of inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for 
>>> recurring meetings.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Paul
>>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>>> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>>>
>>> **
>>> Note:
>>> The information contained in this message may be privileged and 
>>> confidential and
>>> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the 
>>> intended
>>> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message 
>>> to
>>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>>> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
>> attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
>> which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
>> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
>> dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
>> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
>> the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information 
>> may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
>> of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or 
>> unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil 
>> and/or criminal penalties.
>>  Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
>> need to.
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~      

Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

[John Cook]

Additionally if it is only affecting specific users the existence (or lack 
thereof) can be checked from the BES console. There's a tool that can check 
them all I think. Devices with the 4.2.2 or higher OS are exempt.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Kurt Buff 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Thu Mar 26 19:14:10 2009
Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?

Thanks.

I'll check.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:44, John Cook  wrote:
> I can't remember that far back but iirc upgrading to 4.1 might have handled 
> this.
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership For Strong Families
>  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kurt Buff 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:42:12 2009
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>
> I'll ask - what patches might apply? I don't administer that box.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:31, John Cook  wrote:
>> Was the BES server patched?
>> John W. Cook
>> Systems Administrator
>> Partnership For Strong Families
>>  Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Kurt Buff 
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:31:07 2009
>> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>>
>> We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of
>> them are using Blackberries - but not all of them.
>>
>> Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs
>> are the Exec assistants, IIRC.
>>
>> Got a line on something?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob
>>  wrote:
>>> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA?
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM
>>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour?
>>>
>>> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting 
>>> invitations they receive being off by one hour.  I would assume this is a 
>>> DST issue, but it isn't consistent.  If they send out a meeting request it 
>>> is correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful 
>>> are coming in with the time one hour late.  I thought it was the person 
>>> sending the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always 
>>> from the same people so I had the person send a request to an account on 
>>> the clients server and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that 
>>> request was incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server.  
>>> I'm stumped.  How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their 
>>> meeting invites and incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to 
>>> send a meeting request to the same people who are sending the bad ones and 
>>> those people see it correctly?
>>> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 
>>> server.  Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type 
>>> of inconsistent behavior?  Also the meeting invitations are not for 
>>> recurring meetings.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Paul
>>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>>
>>> **
>>> Note:
>>> The information contained in this message may be privileged and 
>>> confidential and
>>> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the 
>>> intended
>>> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message 
>>> to
>>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
>> attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
>> which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
>> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
>> dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
>> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
>> the expre

RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

[Murray Wall]

I have another suggestion that I feel works better as we have moved lots of 
users and used it after a large migration.  After your Store retention time has 
elapsed, and the stores are empty, simply dialtone the old exchange stores.  
You can dialtone the stores by dismounting all the stores in the applicable 
Storage groups, removing all the store files and log files and then mounting 
the store again.  White space all gone, a new store is there and no work!  
Dialtoning is a Microsoft Supported procedure, check it out on google!

Murray

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

Thanks,

___
Stefan Jafs

From: Cardwell, Dick (IT Solutions UK) [mailto:dick.cardw...@siemens.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=192185

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: 26 March 2009 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag old 2003 Stores
I have move all 225 users to my new E2K7 server, I still have my E2K3 server 
and want to keep it running for a few more months.
My 2 stores have 40Gigs and 30 Gigs of white space, what's the proper command 
and procedure to defrag the 2 stores?

Thanks

__
Stefan Jafs











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

[Stefan Jafs]

Wow, that was news to me, anyhow I did the eseutil /d and my 2 stores went from 
a backup of 140Gigs to 16gigs. I'm now planning to do a PTV and keep it Virtual 
for a while.

__
Stefan Jafs

From: Murray Wall [mailto:w...@murmans.com]
Sent: March-26-09 7:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

I have another suggestion that I feel works better as we have moved lots of 
users and used it after a large migration.  After your Store retention time has 
elapsed, and the stores are empty, simply dialtone the old exchange stores.  
You can dialtone the stores by dismounting all the stores in the applicable 
Storage groups, removing all the store files and log files and then mounting 
the store again.  White space all gone, a new store is there and no work!  
Dialtoning is a Microsoft Supported procedure, check it out on google!

Murray

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

Thanks,

___
Stefan Jafs

From: Cardwell, Dick (IT Solutions UK) [mailto:dick.cardw...@siemens.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag old 2003 Stores

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=192185

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: 26 March 2009 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag old 2003 Stores
I have move all 225 users to my new E2K7 server, I still have my E2K3 server 
and want to keep it running for a few more months.
My 2 stores have 40Gigs and 30 Gigs of white space, what's the proper command 
and procedure to defrag the 2 stores?

Thanks

__
Stefan Jafs














~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Unable to recover Deleted Items in Exch2k7

[Robert Smith]

Hello,

Using OWA 2007, we are unable to recover deleted items, how can this option
be enabled on the Exchange 2k7 server?

http://i682.photobucket.com/albums/vv186/drakul663/recoverdelitems.jpg


Thanks,
Bob

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange occurrence on calendars outlook 2007

[Carl Houseman]

1. Verify the calendar entries are correct in OWA.
 
2. Delete the OST file(s) where the calendar doesn't match OWA.  After a new
is created is should show the right stuff.
 
Carl
 
  _  

From: David.Ricci [mailto:david.ri...@hwinstitute.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange occurrence on calendars outlook 2007



I have a user that works from a reception computer as well as her own which
she is the exec admin for several people.  She has her calendar open most of
the day and it shows all those exec she manages.  When she works on the
receptionist computer and logs in as herself the calendars do not match.
She has local admin rights to both computers.  She has outlook 2007 on both
and both are cached.  Any suggestions on what to look for she is missing
appointments for her exec.

 

Thanks for any help 

 

 

David 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange occurrence on calendars outlook 2007

[Steve Szabo]

I have noticed differences when working with more than one Outlook in cached
mode attached to the same server. Turning off the cache on all but one seems
to resolve the issues of missing messages, appointments, etc.

 

\\Steve// 

 

From: David.Ricci [mailto:david.ri...@hwinstitute.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange occurrence on calendars outlook 2007

 

I have a user that works from a reception computer as well as her own which
she is the exec admin for several people.  She has her calendar open most of
the day and it shows all those exec she manages.  When she works on the
receptionist computer and logs in as herself the calendars do not match.
She has local admin rights to both computers.  She has outlook 2007 on both
and both are cached.  Any suggestions on what to look for she is missing
appointments for her exec.

 

Thanks for any help 

 

 

David 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Offline Defrag of 2007 message store

[Cesare' A. Ramos]

Hellos all.

Anyone have a thought or opinion as to if an offline defrag in 2007 runs any 
faster than it did on 2003?  Planning to one run but trying to get some 
baselines as I have never run on 2007.

Thanks.

CAR


This e-Mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this e-Mail in error please notify the sender via returned 
e-Mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-Mail are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
company. Although IDF operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept 
responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.

** Think before you print this message. **

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~