RE: Exchange 2010 archive question
One way to do it is to give the end user not Outlook 2010 or access to OWA. ;) You might want to look at a more compliance ready product if you have such strict requirements and there are tons of vendors (including the owners of this list) that can offer you that. Martin From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question It's not about trust. It's about compliance. -- G2 Support Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management Web: www.g2support.com Twitter: g2supporthttp://twitter.com/home?stat...@g2support Newsletter: www.g2support.com/newsletterhttp://www.g2support.com/newsletter From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 17 December 2009 13:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question You don't have to specify a date range for the retention hold; which effectively does what you are requesting. You could also set the deleted item retention for that individual user to an extremely high value. However, I would suggest that if you have an employee you trust that little - you should fire him/her. The online archive requires an Enterprise CAL, but not Enterprise Server. From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 6:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 archive question Hi all, Does anyone know, with Exchange 2010, whether it's possible to *permanently* stop a user from deleting email from their archive? I know you can put a legal hold of up to 90 days to stop them deleting emails from their mailbox and archive, but I can't see whether it's possible to simply prevent them from ever deleting an email from their archive account. Also, does anyone know, is the archiving feature still only available for Enterprise licenses or is it now available with a Standard license? (there was talk of them before it RTM'd). Olly -- G2 Support Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management [cid:image001.jpg@01CA7F7A.B39F9C40] Tel:0845 307 3443 Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.commailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.comhttp://www.g2support.com/ Twitter: g2supporthttp://twitter.com/home?stat...@g2support Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter Mail: 2nd Floor, 130a Western Rd, Brighton, Sussex, BN12LA G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341. inline: image001.jpg
RE: Exchange 2010 archive question
Then you need to be looking at a third party product. The compliance aspect of Exchange Server, even Exchange 2010, is very weak. I recently wrote an article on this topic. See: http://www.simple-talk.com/sysadmin/exchange/exchange-server-2010-compliance-capabilities/ As I wrote in the summary: So, while the work done in Exchange Server 2010 is a step in the right direction, and may be suitable for the smallest of companies; it is very likely that medium and large companies will need a more complete solution to meet their compliance requirements. From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question It's not about trust. It's about compliance. -- G2 Support Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management Web: www.g2support.com Twitter: g2supporthttp://twitter.com/home?stat...@g2support Newsletter: www.g2support.com/newsletterhttp://www.g2support.com/newsletter From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 17 December 2009 13:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question You don't have to specify a date range for the retention hold; which effectively does what you are requesting. You could also set the deleted item retention for that individual user to an extremely high value. However, I would suggest that if you have an employee you trust that little - you should fire him/her. The online archive requires an Enterprise CAL, but not Enterprise Server. From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 6:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 archive question Hi all, Does anyone know, with Exchange 2010, whether it's possible to *permanently* stop a user from deleting email from their archive? I know you can put a legal hold of up to 90 days to stop them deleting emails from their mailbox and archive, but I can't see whether it's possible to simply prevent them from ever deleting an email from their archive account. Also, does anyone know, is the archiving feature still only available for Enterprise licenses or is it now available with a Standard license? (there was talk of them before it RTM'd). Olly -- G2 Support Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management [g2supportsmall_250x58] Tel:0845 307 3443 Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.commailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.comhttp://www.g2support.com/ Twitter: g2supporthttp://twitter.com/home?stat...@g2support Newsletter: http://www.g2support.com/newsletter Mail: 2nd Floor, 130a Western Rd, Brighton, Sussex, BN12LA G2 Support LLP is registered at Mill House, 103 Holmes Avenue, HOVE BN3 7LE. Our registered company number is OC316341. inline: image001.jpg
inetinfo.exe memory keeps growing
Exch 2003 ent sp2 on server 2003 sp2 I have been having an issue with inetinfo.exe memory usage growing. I have been working with Sunbelt tech support as I run their Vipre email security. The want me to create a hang dump to analyze this which will mean letting it grow until it basically crashes. I am looking for other solutions. If I restart the smtp service and leave it alone it will grow slowly until it hangs email delivery at around 1.6 gig. This might take a week to get that high although I haven't allowed it to grow that much again. I've just been restarting it on a regular basis. I don't see very much in the outbound queues or event viewer that point to anything obvious. I've got perfmon running on the smtp service but I am not sure what I am looking for. Any ideas from anyone or am I looking at a possible PSS call to figure out what is causing this? thanks This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your system.
RE: Exchange 2010 archive question
It's not about trust. It's about compliance. If you have a SAN, there may be features available there (WORM storage) for compliance scenarios. ~JasonG
RE: inetinfo.exe memory keeps growing
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/905291
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: inetinfo.exe memory keeps growing
Exch 2003 ent sp2 on server 2003 sp2
I have been having an issue with inetinfo.exe memory usage growing. I have been
working with Sunbelt tech support as I run their Vipre email security. The want
me to create a hang dump to analyze this which will mean letting it grow until
it basically crashes. I am looking for other solutions. If I restart the smtp
service and leave it alone it will grow slowly until it hangs email delivery at
around 1.6 gig. This might take a week to get that high although I haven't
allowed it to grow that much again. I've just been restarting it on a regular
basis. I don't see very much in the outbound queues or event viewer that point
to anything obvious. I've got perfmon running on the smtp service but I am not
sure what I am looking for.
Any ideas from anyone or am I looking at a possible PSS call to figure out what
is causing this?
thanks
This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.{token}
Exchange 2007 Public Folder Calendar
I created a MASTER calendar in Public Folders section. Issue: A User creates an appointment and invites the public folder the appointment appears in both calendars. When the same user Cancels the appointment it disappears from User calendar BUT the PF calendar then will have the Original appointment and a cancelation appointment (instead of disappearing). This is also true if the user edits the appointment, the PF appointment will have the original and all individual edited versions. Is there a way to configure the calendar to show just the most updated version of an appointment? image001.jpg
RE: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Calendar
What are the user's permissions on the PF ? CFee From: ExchList [mailto:exchl...@networkblade.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 Public Folder Calendar I created a MASTER calendar in Public Folders section. Issue: A User creates an appointment and invites the public folder the appointment appears in both calendars. When the same user Cancels the appointment it disappears from User calendar BUT the PF calendar then will have the Original appointment and a cancelation appointment (instead of disappearing). This is also true if the user edits the appointment, the PF appointment will have the original and all individual edited versions. Is there a way to configure the calendar to show just the most updated version of an appointment? [cid:image001.jpg@01CA7FE9.229F8E70] inline: image001.jpg
Can't open this item. There is not enough memory available on the Microsoft Exchange Server
Have a user that is getting this error when they try to open a distribution list they created a last February which is within their contacts in their Server mailbox. Client is Outlook 2007 SP2 non-cached mode, server is Exchange 2007 SP1 RU9, all roles. Found this for Exchange 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894530 and we can open the DL in OWA. I used category view in Outlook to discover the DL is 29kb, which is almost double the size allowed. So, I'm thinking of telling this person they need to use OWA to break the list up into at least three separate groups of names. But, to prevent this from happening in the future, can I add the same reg entry that is listed in the above Exchange 2003 article to prevent the problem from re-occurring? I'm not seeing a 2007 version of this KB, so my thought is the reg entry might just need to be created? Thanks, -Bonnie
Re: Can't open this item. There is not enough memory available on the Microsoft Exchange Server
What happens if you select create a new mail message, click on To..., select the contact list containing the DL in the show names from the: box, right click the DL and select properties, can you now edit it? Can you save part of the list using save as following the instructions in the article; http://support.microsoft.com/kb/238569/en-us. If you broke this particular list into three parts, can you now edit using the regular path in Outlook? - Original Message - From: Miller Bonnie L. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:51 PM Subject: Can't open this item. There is not enough memory available on the Microsoft Exchange Server Have a user that is getting this error when they try to open a distribution list they created a last February which is within their contacts in their Server mailbox. Client is Outlook 2007 SP2 non-cached mode, server is Exchange 2007 SP1 RU9, all roles. Found this for Exchange 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894530 and we can open the DL in OWA. I used category view in Outlook to discover the DL is 29kb, which is almost double the size allowed. So, I'm thinking of telling this person they need to use OWA to break the list up into at least three separate groups of names. But, to prevent this from happening in the future, can I add the same reg entry that is listed in the above Exchange 2003 article to prevent the problem from re-occurring? I'm not seeing a 2007 version of this KB, so my thought is the reg entry might just need to be created? Thanks, -Bonnie
RE: Can't open this item. There is not enough memory available on the Microsoft Exchange Server
Interesting... I can bring up the DL in outlook and read it by doing that, but it only shows the names in a read-only style view-there are no edit options available. It looks different than if I get properties on one of her other (smaller) DLs, which open in the editor. Almost looks like when someone is opening a list from the GAL but doesn't have edit permissions. We haven't tried breaking up the list yet-I'm going to ask her to do that as I don't see another option. Looking now to see if the reg entry that 2003 can use (after the hotfix) is available to set on 2007. From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can't open this item. There is not enough memory available on the Microsoft Exchange Server What happens if you select create a new mail message, click on To..., select the contact list containing the DL in the show names from the: box, right click the DL and select properties, can you now edit it? Can you save part of the list using save as following the instructions in the article; http://support.microsoft.com/kb/238569/en-us. If you broke this particular list into three parts, can you now edit using the regular path in Outlook? - Original Message - From: Miller Bonnie L.mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu To: MS-Exchange Admin Issuesmailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:51 PM Subject: Can't open this item. There is not enough memory available on the Microsoft Exchange Server Have a user that is getting this error when they try to open a distribution list they created a last February which is within their contacts in their Server mailbox. Client is Outlook 2007 SP2 non-cached mode, server is Exchange 2007 SP1 RU9, all roles. Found this for Exchange 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894530 and we can open the DL in OWA. I used category view in Outlook to discover the DL is 29kb, which is almost double the size allowed. So, I'm thinking of telling this person they need to use OWA to break the list up into at least three separate groups of names. But, to prevent this from happening in the future, can I add the same reg entry that is listed in the above Exchange 2003 article to prevent the problem from re-occurring? I'm not seeing a 2007 version of this KB, so my thought is the reg entry might just need to be created? Thanks, -Bonnie
RE: inetinfo.exe memory keeps growing
I saw that but since I have long been on SP2 I figured it didn't apply. My version of aqueue.dll is at 6.0.3790.3959 From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: inetinfo.exe memory keeps growing http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/905291 From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: inetinfo.exe memory keeps growing Exch 2003 ent sp2 on server 2003 sp2 I have been having an issue with inetinfo.exe memory usage growing. I have been working with Sunbelt tech support as I run their Vipre email security. The want me to create a hang dump to analyze this which will mean letting it grow until it basically crashes. I am looking for other solutions. If I restart the smtp service and leave it alone it will grow slowly until it hangs email delivery at around 1.6 gig. This might take a week to get that high although I haven't allowed it to grow that much again. I've just been restarting it on a regular basis. I don't see very much in the outbound queues or event viewer that point to anything obvious. I've got perfmon running on the smtp service but I am not sure what I am looking for. Any ideas from anyone or am I looking at a possible PSS call to figure out what is causing this? thanks This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.
RE: SP2 for Exchange 2007
I'm curious about this too as we've yet to update. Specifically, I remember some chatter about it possibly affecting spam tagging. Did anyone have trouble with that? We have a Barracuda spam/mail gateway. From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SP2 for Exchange 2007 I know it became available a few months ago, did you guys upgrade? Should I? -- Stefan Jafs
Encryption for Exchange 2007
I am curious what everyone is using for corporate e-mail encryption. We have Exchange 2007 and for encryption, I only use local pgp or personal certs. I really need to get something for corporate use that is easier to send and receive encrypted mail. Jeff Johnson Systems Administrator 714-773-2600 Office 714-773-6351 Fax [cid:image001.jpg@01CA7FD9.47D395C0] inline: image001.jpg
RE: Encryption for Exchange 2007
s/mime pretty much plugs right in... From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Encryption for Exchange 2007 I am curious what everyone is using for corporate e-mail encryption. We have Exchange 2007 and for encryption, I only use local pgp or personal certs. I really need to get something for corporate use that is easier to send and receive encrypted mail. Jeff Johnson Systems Administrator 714-773-2600 Office 714-773-6351 Fax [hydraflow] inline: image001.jpg
