Re: Resource Mailbox Calendar viewing
I think there is an additional issue as well - with resource mailboxes (Exchange 2007), there is a setting that automatically replaces the meeting subject with the name of the organizer. From my experience, the only way to get to this setting is to open the mailbox in OWA and navigate to the resource settings. Unless there is a way to get to this setting in powershell . . . there is no setting in Outlook I am aware of that allows you to change this. From: Brown, Larry Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource Mailbox Calendar viewing Well.you could create a Mail profile for the Resource Mailbox.open it.and change the Free/Busy settings on the Permissions tab of Properties. BUT.giving everyone full access to this information can backfire. Some meetings are meant to be private (anyone downsizing? Anyone having disciplinary meetings? Etc.) Make sure everyone knows of the potential consequences. Larry From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 3:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Resource Mailbox Calendar viewing I have a conference room set up as a Resource Mailbox. Users can schedule meetings and they can see when the conference room is busy with meetings scheduled by others. They want to have the ability to see who has scheduled the meetings. When I hover over the calendar entry it tells me, but I suspect that that is because I have full access to the mailbox. How do enable users to see the details of previously scheduled meetings without giving them full access to the mailbox? E2007 SP2, Outlook 2002 and 2003. Steve
Re: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI
FYI, I talked with one of our iPhone 4G users here in our IT department, and he installed the patch - it was basically just an updated cert that changes the timeout period to 240 seconds. From: Carol Fee Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI No, it was the Store Drive Avr. Disk Queue length .. thread CFee From: Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI I think it was related to the iPad, not the iPhone. On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote: Didn't someone post an issue earlier this week with this exact problem ? CFee -Original Message- From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: FW: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI FYI: I have not seen or heard of this affecting anyone at our company but just in case any of you have been impacted check out the Apple article and fix mentioned in the original message. -Original Message- From: Susan Bradley Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:32 PM To: Patch Management Mailing List Subject: iPhone4 and Exchange problem FYI Forwarded courtesy of Bob Groger Got this email from Intermedia, whose products I resell. Bob G. Apple recently released the iPhone4. It uses a new iPhone operating system ? iOS4 ? that is also available for download on older iPhone devices. The new iPhone operating system is adversely impacting Intermedia customers as well as customers of other email providers. The following notification summarizes these issues and the critical actions we ask that your iPhone4 and iOS4 users immediately take in response. The actions are in support of our commitment to providing the highest service quality for your organization and all Intermedia customers. We will continue to post updates as the situation evolves and Apple provides further details. Summary of Issues Exchange users who use an iPhone4 or upgraded an older iPhone to iOS4 are experiencing difficulties syncing their contacts, mail, and calendar via ActiveSync. Additionally, iOS4 is creating significant artificial load on Exchange servers, resulting in performance slowdowns for users on other devices and mail clients. An Internet search for ?iOS4 Exchange? will provide further information related to these issues, which are affecting all email providers that use the ActiveSync protocol with iPhones. Steps Your Organization Must Take iPhone users who use the iPhone4 or upgraded to iOS4 must install a related Apple configuration patch on their iPhone. The patch, along with installation directions, can be found here: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3398. Failure to install this patch will result in incomplete sync of user items and may cause performance issues. If your users run an iPhone4 or other iOS4 device without the configuration patch, Intermedia may disable ActiveSync on their device to protect your organization?s overall service quality. Further Technical Details on the Issue and Our Response The iOS4 issues are driving random application pool instability on Exchange 2007 CAS servers. Microsoft confirmed this instability is caused by iOS4 and classified this as a client side issue related to the Apple iOS4 update. Microsoft is not planning to release a patch or update. The instability will manifest itself as connection failures or slow performance when using Outlook and other clients. Outlook Web App (OWA) is not impacted and continues to function normally. If you are having connectivity issues we recommend using OWA to retrieve your mail. Intermedia's engineering and operations teams are mitigating the impact to our customers via close monitoring and automated restarts of the impacted application pools. Thank you for hosting with us, Intermedia This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.
RE: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name
Nope, deleting a calendar from People's Calendars will not delete the actual calendar itself. I have done it many times. It just removes it from the list of shared calendars you have open. Thanks, James Winzenz Subject: RE: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:32:15 -0500 From: tom.alver...@ngc.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com I wasn’t worried about deleting the whole mailbox, I was just worried that instead of just deleting the “shortcut” to that resource calendar, that it might delete the folder itself of the contents of the folder (since I have full permissions to that folder). From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name You cannot delete a mailbox just by deleting the calendar in Outlook, that is only removing it from their Outlook. To delete a calendar/mailbox you must use ADUC and ESM. If you still don't believe us, then you can go the manual route in Outlook. Go to Tools/Account Settings, Double click on Microsoft Exchange Server, then select the More Settings button at the bottom right, then click on the Advanced tab, and remove it from the Mailboxes section. On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron) tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote: James: By “removing” from “People’s Calendars” do you mean right click and choose “DELETE”. I am a little nervous about trying this since that command in the “my calendars” right above there actually deletes the folder containing the calendar. Tom From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 6:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name I'll bite. This is the same behavior you see if you rename a user in AD/Exchange - Outlook does not reflect the new name unless you update their profile, even though the address book shows the correct entry. Removing and re-adding the shared calendar in their list of People's Calendars should allow them to re-add it with the new name - it will not delete the actual calendar. Thanks, James Winzenz Subject: RE: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:15:05 -0500 From: tom.alver...@ngc.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com cricket noise ……. cricket noise Bueller? Anybody? From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 4:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name I have a few conference rooms that have mailboxes on an Exchange 2003 server for resource (calendar) scheduling. Some of the rooms have moved so I needed to change the names of the accounts a little. Despite changing the display name in AD, the displayed name on Outlook 2007 is still the old name. If a user who had never opened the calendar opens it now they will get the new name. Any user who had previously opened the calendar still gets the old name, even if they log into a brand new computer with Outlook 2007 (so the setting is not in a user profile, or an exchange profile on the local computer it must be stored on the server somehow). The old name is still shown in the “People’s Calendars” on the left and also on the tab above the calendar itself. I was tempted to “delete” the calendar from the list of “People’s Calendars” on the left side of Outlook but it looks like that might actually delete the whole calendar. I can right click on that list and choose “rename” and put any name in there I want (Including the new name). Is there some good way to fix this problem short of exporting all the calendar data and creating a whole new mailbox with the new name? Tom Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. See how. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke _ The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccountocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
RE: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name
I'll bite. This is the same behavior you see if you rename a user in AD/Exchange - Outlook does not reflect the new name unless you update their profile, even though the address book shows the correct entry. Removing and re-adding the shared calendar in their list of People's Calendars should allow them to re-add it with the new name - it will not delete the actual calendar. Thanks, James Winzenz Subject: RE: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:15:05 -0500 From: tom.alver...@ngc.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com cricket noise ……. cricket noise Bueller? Anybody? From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 4:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Renamed conference room (resource calendar) still shows old name I have a few conference rooms that have mailboxes on an Exchange 2003 server for resource (calendar) scheduling. Some of the rooms have moved so I needed to change the names of the accounts a little. Despite changing the display name in AD, the displayed name on Outlook 2007 is still the old name. If a user who had never opened the calendar opens it now they will get the new name. Any user who had previously opened the calendar still gets the old name, even if they log into a brand new computer with Outlook 2007 (so the setting is not in a user profile, or an exchange profile on the local computer it must be stored on the server somehow). The old name is still shown in the “People’s Calendars” on the left and also on the tab above the calendar itself. I was tempted to “delete” the calendar from the list of “People’s Calendars” on the left side of Outlook but it looks like that might actually delete the whole calendar. I can right click on that list and choose “rename” and put any name in there I want (Including the new name). Is there some good way to fix this problem short of exporting all the calendar data and creating a whole new mailbox with the new name? Tom _ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
RE: email encryption
Zix is an appliance based product. Can't speak to IronPort, although I believe it is similar. Zix does allow you to create policies and rules in terms of encryption, routing, exceptions, etc. Thanks, James Winzenz Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:46:41 -0400 Subject: Re: email encryption From: sms...@gmail.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Are these products all mailboxes or are you able to select a certain subset of mail accounts? Thx On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Theochares, George gtheocha...@campbell-trial-lawyers.com wrote: We use Ironport but PGP is very similar. From: paul d [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email encryption I have been tasked to present an email encryption solution. What with HITech and HIPAA, we will probably be sending PHI related emails in the near future. I have been looking at a few products. One that caught my eye was Ironport. Is anybody using it and if so, how is it? Thanks. Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more. -- smsadm _ The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccountocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message
Finally got a chance to do this this morning - get the exact same error message as with the console about not finding the organizational unit. For testing purposes, I can try to increase her authority to see what happens. Thanks, James Winzenz From: mich...@smithcons.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:03:13 + No….as long as there are no higher order explicit denies, then this should work; as long as there are corresponding “change” permissions. Can you copy-n-paste the command and see if it will execute from a EMS? (Where I’m leading here is to get tracing that defines exactly which operation failed). Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Too much to list everything here . . . but here are the permissions for Account Operators: Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for inetOrgPerson CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for computer CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for group CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for user CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD If you want the rights for our Exchange Recipient Administrators group, I can do that too. I want to emphasize that this happens for multiple OU's, not just one. Thanks, James Winzenz From: mich...@smithcons.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:29:00 + Can you give us a dsacls on the OU? That may answer the question directly instead of through guessing. Obfuscate as appropriate. ;-) Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Even though she can create a user account? She is a member (indirectly) of Account Operators, which I verified has create/delete user objects to the OU. Thanks, James Winzenz From: mich...@smithcons.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:20:42 + This appears that she has modify permissions in the OU but not create permissions. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 funky error message I had to resubmit this because Lyris didn't like the fact that I had the words new mailbox in the subject line. See below. I have a weird error being experienced by an individual when trying to create a mailbox. Exchange 2007 SP1, AD 2003 functional level, user has exchange recipient administrator rights and has the appropriate rights in AD (verified she is able to create a new AD user account). When she tries to create a new mailbox for a new user, she gets all the way to the very end of the New-Mailbox wizard, and when it tries to run the command, she gets the following error message: Organizational unit was not found. Please make sure you have typed it correctly. She is selecting the OU from the drop-down list that appears. Google-fu is failing me today - I have been unable to come up with anything so far. Any ideas? I also verified that she is able to create a new mailbox for an existing AD user, so it does not appear to be permissions-related. Thanks, James Winzenz Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. _ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/
Exchange 2007 funky error message
I had to resubmit this because Lyris didn't like the fact that I had the words new mailbox in the subject line. See below. I have a weird error being experienced by an individual when trying to create a mailbox. Exchange 2007 SP1, AD 2003 functional level, user has exchange recipient administrator rights and has the appropriate rights in AD (verified she is able to create a new AD user account). When she tries to create a new mailbox for a new user, she gets all the way to the very end of the New-Mailbox wizard, and when it tries to run the command, she gets the following error message: Organizational unit was not found. Please make sure you have typed it correctly. She is selecting the OU from the drop-down list that appears. Google-fu is failing me today - I have been unable to come up with anything so far. Any ideas? I also verified that she is able to create a new mailbox for an existing AD user, so it does not appear to be permissions-related. Thanks, James Winzenz _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message
Even though she can create a user account? She is a member (indirectly) of Account Operators, which I verified has create/delete user objects to the OU. Thanks, James Winzenz From: mich...@smithcons.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:20:42 + This appears that she has modify permissions in the OU but not create permissions. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 funky error message I had to resubmit this because Lyris didn't like the fact that I had the words new mailbox in the subject line. See below. I have a weird error being experienced by an individual when trying to create a mailbox. Exchange 2007 SP1, AD 2003 functional level, user has exchange recipient administrator rights and has the appropriate rights in AD (verified she is able to create a new AD user account). When she tries to create a new mailbox for a new user, she gets all the way to the very end of the New-Mailbox wizard, and when it tries to run the command, she gets the following error message: Organizational unit was not found. Please make sure you have typed it correctly. She is selecting the OU from the drop-down list that appears. Google-fu is failing me today - I have been unable to come up with anything so far. Any ideas? I also verified that she is able to create a new mailbox for an existing AD user, so it does not appear to be permissions-related. Thanks, James Winzenz Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message
Too much to list everything here . . . but here are the permissions for Account Operators: Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for inetOrgPerson CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for computer CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for group CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD Allow BUILTIN\Account Operators SPECIAL ACCESS for user CREATE CHILD DELETE CHILD If you want the rights for our Exchange Recipient Administrators group, I can do that too. I want to emphasize that this happens for multiple OU's, not just one. Thanks, James Winzenz From: mich...@smithcons.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:29:00 + Can you give us a dsacls on the OU? That may answer the question directly instead of through guessing. Obfuscate as appropriate. ;-) Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Even though she can create a user account? She is a member (indirectly) of Account Operators, which I verified has create/delete user objects to the OU. Thanks, James Winzenz From: mich...@smithcons.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 funky error message Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:20:42 + This appears that she has modify permissions in the OU but not create permissions. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 funky error message I had to resubmit this because Lyris didn't like the fact that I had the words new mailbox in the subject line. See below. I have a weird error being experienced by an individual when trying to create a mailbox. Exchange 2007 SP1, AD 2003 functional level, user has exchange recipient administrator rights and has the appropriate rights in AD (verified she is able to create a new AD user account). When she tries to create a new mailbox for a new user, she gets all the way to the very end of the New-Mailbox wizard, and when it tries to run the command, she gets the following error message: Organizational unit was not found. Please make sure you have typed it correctly. She is selecting the OU from the drop-down list that appears. Google-fu is failing me today - I have been unable to come up with anything so far. Any ideas? I also verified that she is able to create a new mailbox for an existing AD user, so it does not appear to be permissions-related. Thanks, James Winzenz Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. _ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
RE: ExMerge ?
1. Yes 2. Check the mailbox size in Exchange to determine whether you may need to split up the pst or not. If the mailbox is close to 2GB or is larger, then see 3. Of course, if you run ExMerge and the pst ends up being larger than 2 GB, you can always run it again using the options below. When ExMerge gives you an estimate of how much space is needed, it is roughly 2X the size of the mailbox(es), but I have never yet seen a pst that was twice the size of the mailbox - usually about the same size. 3. You can tell ExMerge to only export certain messages based on date or you can only process certain folders. If we have to exmerge a large mailbox, we typically use the date option rather than split it out by folder. Keep in mind that you would then have to run ExMerge twice against that mailbox, once for the first set of messages, and a second time for the rest of them. Also keep in mind that if you don't move or rename the first pst file and rerun ExMerge, it will overwrite the first pst. Thanks, James Winzenz Subject: ExMerge ? Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:50:08 -0500 From: david.ri...@hwinstitute.com To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com I have Exchange 2003 sp2. I have to ExMerge out the email to a pst for the Mimecast project. This is in order to get my history up to them and then stubbing can take place. 1)Can the end user be in the email when I run the tool? 2)Is there a way to make sure that the pst’s I get are 2gb or less since it seems that any higher may cause corruption. 3)Any other tips to get all the pst’s out and at a 2gb limit would be great. Thank you, David This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in reliance on the information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify our e-mail administrator at supp...@hwinstitute.com. _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/
RE: Exchange 2k7, Recover Deleted Items
The Export-Mailbox cmdlet will let you export Dumpster items but only from the Deleted Items folder. I have tested this, and this is not true. The Export-Mailbox command exports the entire dumpster, no matter what. The problem is that, unlike ExMerge, you cannot specify *only* the dumpster to be exported, *and* Export-Mailbox also converts the dumpster items to regular mail items and puts them in the folder(s) they were deleted from. This is this case both with exporting to another mailbox and exporting to .pst (again, from personal test results). ExMerge is your best bet for this, since you can get only the dumpster. And, although technically unsupported, it works just fine (as MBS had already indicated to me in a different question). Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2k7, Recover Deleted Items The Export-Mailbox cmdlet will let you export Dumpster items but only from the Deleted Items folder. This is of limited use but perhaps worth Robert pursuing: If you export data to another mailbox by using the TargetMailbox parameter, the Export-Mailbox cmdlet also exports messages from the dumpster of Deleted Items. The messages from the dumpster are converted to regular messages when they are exported. From: bounce-8520117-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8520117-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: 07 May 2009 17:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2k7, Recover Deleted Items Exmerge can do this (plus any number of 3rd party tools) - export the dumpster to another PST for offline review. If the user has Outlook 2007, you can look at their deleted items from anywhere - just set up a new profile on their mailbox (of course, you have to grant that right). From: Robert Smith [exch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2k7, Recover Deleted Items Thanks for the reply Michael, Is there any way this can be done without physically being at the users workstation? We ideally would like to restore any deleted items and export them to a different mailbox for mgmt to review Thanks, Bob On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: No. That's client-based functionality, not server based functionality. From: Robert Smith [exch...@gmail.commailto:exch...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2k7, Recover Deleted Items Hello, Is it possible to restore a users hard deleted items via powershell? Thanks, Bob CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007?
Scenario: Exchange 2007 SP1 I need to find out if there is a way to export the entire dumpster (not just the deleted items dumpster) to another mailbox (using export-mailbox or another cmdlet), without using keywords, and if I can *only* export the dumpster and not the regular folders. I can do this with ExMerge by deselecting User Messages and Folders, and only selecting Items from Dumpster, but I do not see a way to do this using the exchange management shell. We will be performing a separate export of mailboxes directly to .pst, which will not export the dumpster, and need to do a second export that does include the dumpster. I would prefer to only export the dumpster if that is possible to avoid duplication of messages in the two exports, as well as to avoid confusion. This is for legal purposes, so I did not make the requirements, I just have to find a way to fulfill them. I would prefer not to use ExMerge, even though the information I have read so far says it *does* still work, because it is unsupported. Any ideas? Please let me know if additional information is needed. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services Telefax: (602) 797-5823 [cid:image001.jpg@01C9B2D5.7B5A1850] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007?
The problem is that with ExMerge technically being unsupported, we may not be able to offer this as a solution for our legal department (guess it depends on what they say). Can you confirm that if I export the user's mailbox to a separate mailbox, it exports the entire dumpster (and converts the dumpster items to regular mail items), or does it just export the deleted items dumpster? That is, if a user performs a hard delete from their inbox, would my export get that as well? I have seen conflicting information on this. From two separate technet articles: The Export-Mailbox cmdlet also exports messages from the dumpster. (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb266964.aspx) If you export data to another mailbox by using the TargetMailbox parameter, the Export-Mailbox cmdlet also exports messages from the dumpster of Deleted Items. (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998579.aspx) I suppose I can (and probably will) test this with a test account, but if anyone has direct experience with this, I would love to hear about it. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007? Exmerge works just fine. Use it. I'm not aware of any use case where it fails on 2007 and works on 2003 (that is, there are bugs; but they exist regardless of what version of Exchange you use). There is no way to do what you want with native E12 tools. Either use Exmerge or write a custom MAPI application. Excellent problem description, by the way. From: James Winzenz [james.winz...@pulte.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007? Scenario: Exchange 2007 SP1 I need to find out if there is a way to export the entire dumpster (not just the deleted items dumpster) to another mailbox (using export-mailbox or another cmdlet), without using keywords, and if I can *only* export the dumpster and not the regular folders. I can do this with ExMerge by deselecting User Messages and Folders, and only selecting Items from Dumpster, but I do not see a way to do this using the exchange management shell. We will be performing a separate export of mailboxes directly to .pst, which will not export the dumpster, and need to do a second export that does include the dumpster. I would prefer to only export the dumpster if that is possible to avoid duplication of messages in the two exports, as well as to avoid confusion. This is for legal purposes, so I did not make the requirements, I just have to find a way to fulfill them. I would prefer not to use ExMerge, even though the information I have read so far says it *does* still work, because it is unsupported. Any ideas? Please let me know if additional information is needed. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services Telefax: (602) 797-5823 [cid:image001.jpg@01C9B2DA.FC6C4B20] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007?
Update - just did a test, and the export-mailbox command when using the -targetmailbox switch does indeed export the entire dumpster, not just the deleted items dumpster. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007? Exmerge works just fine. Use it. I'm not aware of any use case where it fails on 2007 and works on 2003 (that is, there are bugs; but they exist regardless of what version of Exchange you use). There is no way to do what you want with native E12 tools. Either use Exmerge or write a custom MAPI application. Excellent problem description, by the way. From: James Winzenz [james.winz...@pulte.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007? Scenario: Exchange 2007 SP1 I need to find out if there is a way to export the entire dumpster (not just the deleted items dumpster) to another mailbox (using export-mailbox or another cmdlet), without using keywords, and if I can *only* export the dumpster and not the regular folders. I can do this with ExMerge by deselecting User Messages and Folders, and only selecting Items from Dumpster, but I do not see a way to do this using the exchange management shell. We will be performing a separate export of mailboxes directly to .pst, which will not export the dumpster, and need to do a second export that does include the dumpster. I would prefer to only export the dumpster if that is possible to avoid duplication of messages in the two exports, as well as to avoid confusion. This is for legal purposes, so I did not make the requirements, I just have to find a way to fulfill them. I would prefer not to use ExMerge, even though the information I have read so far says it *does* still work, because it is unsupported. Any ideas? Please let me know if additional information is needed. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services Telefax: (602) 797-5823 [cid:image001.jpg@01C9B2DE.7CFFEA00] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007?
Update 2 - exporting directly to .pst *also* includes the dumpster. This is way uncool. And what's worse is there seems to be no way around it, based on the following article: http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.exchange.admin/browse_thread/thread/4f70d7e446290064/5b9cba80c84c8ae7?lnk=gstq=dumpster#5b9cba80c84c8ae7 Boo on Microsoft for doing this :( Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007? Exmerge works just fine. Use it. I'm not aware of any use case where it fails on 2007 and works on 2003 (that is, there are bugs; but they exist regardless of what version of Exchange you use). There is no way to do what you want with native E12 tools. Either use Exmerge or write a custom MAPI application. Excellent problem description, by the way. From: James Winzenz [james.winz...@pulte.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is there a way to export only dumpster in Exchange 2007? Scenario: Exchange 2007 SP1 I need to find out if there is a way to export the entire dumpster (not just the deleted items dumpster) to another mailbox (using export-mailbox or another cmdlet), without using keywords, and if I can *only* export the dumpster and not the regular folders. I can do this with ExMerge by deselecting User Messages and Folders, and only selecting Items from Dumpster, but I do not see a way to do this using the exchange management shell. We will be performing a separate export of mailboxes directly to .pst, which will not export the dumpster, and need to do a second export that does include the dumpster. I would prefer to only export the dumpster if that is possible to avoid duplication of messages in the two exports, as well as to avoid confusion. This is for legal purposes, so I did not make the requirements, I just have to find a way to fulfill them. I would prefer not to use ExMerge, even though the information I have read so far says it *does* still work, because it is unsupported. Any ideas? Please let me know if additional information is needed. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services Telefax: (602) 797-5823 [cid:image001.jpg@01C9B2E2.9E2ECCB0] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list?
My solution to avoid the list receiving OOF's from me is to simply set my list preferences to nomail for the period which I will be out of the office. Quite easy to do via the forums, and I can set all my lists at the same time . . . Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? D'oh! -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? Out Of Facilities John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? My last - how the heck did Out Of Office get abbreviated as OOF? (Out Of Foffice?) -Original Message- From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I think I'll add a rule sending any further messages on this topic to the bit-bucket... -Original Message- From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? In outlook, I used to have a rule. When receive message from [whatever list] move to folder and Stop Processing more rules. This seemed to have prevented me from sending out corporate required OOOs. Steven On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:47 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote: Don't think it works on 2007. If it's 2003 here's a nice little add-on that helps http://www.ivasoft.biz/selectiveoof.shtml John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fa (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt) Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=825370 That works with 2003, nfi if it works with 2007 S -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I don't know who's defining this particular best practice, but I can tell you that the overwhelming majority of companies I do business with do it the way I do it. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? The blame falls on you, for not following best business practices. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 09:01, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: I don't want a second mailbox, but OOOs need to go to people who send me messages regardless of whether they're in my contact list. I know this issue has come up before... Where exactly does the fault lie with this issue? Is Exchange doing things wrong? Or is Lyris? Or is this just how SMTP is designed, and there really is no blame? -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? Second mailbox for yourself, subscribe to lists with that. Or Outlook 2007 and have the out of organization messages sent only to those in your contact list if that works for you..it is in the OOO setup area of Outlook 2007. -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? But I don't want to do that; external users need to know when I'm out of the office. -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? Exchange 2007 with Outlook 2007 makes it very easy. There are separate Out Of Office settings for internal
RE: question about modifying allowed senders to a distribution list
Just verified we do not have object access auditing enabled in the domain controller policy, although it is enabled on the default computer policy. This issue is compounded by the fact that the user in question exists in a different domain that is managed by a different IS group - and I can't get to their tracking logs. We are both in child domains of a root domain. I can ask their guys to verify, but I think you provided me with the information I needed to know - sounds like in order to track those types of changes, we would have to enable object access auditing. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: question about modifying allowed senders to a distribution list It's far too late. You would have to have object auditing enabled in your AD. Even though the attribute is an exchange-related attribute, it is stored in AD and obeys AD auditing principles. That being said, do your message tracking logs agree with the user that she was able to send to the list as of last Thursday? That would be where I would start my investigation. From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winz...@pulte.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: question about modifying allowed senders to a distribution list Good afternoon all, We recently had an issue where a user was removed from being able to send TO a distribution list that has been configured to only accept messages from certain indivduals on the Exchange General tab. Environment is Exchange 2003 SP2. In ADUC, the object tab in the properties of the distribution list shows that it was last modified on 2/2. Yet the individual in question indicated he was able to send to the distribution list as recently as last Thursday (2/19). There do not appear to be any security logs pertaining to this change generated by any of our DC's (which I didn't really expect, since this was an exchange property that was modified). My question is this - is this something that would be logged somewhere within Exchange? If so, would I need to have logging levels turned way up to find it (if so, too late)? Sorry, I always have the weird questions - please let me know if more details are needed. I have checked google, my googlefu is weak today . . . Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services Telefax: (602) 797-5823 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
question about modifying allowed senders to a distribution list
Good afternoon all, We recently had an issue where a user was removed from being able to send TO a distribution list that has been configured to only accept messages from certain indivduals on the Exchange General tab. Environment is Exchange 2003 SP2. In ADUC, the object tab in the properties of the distribution list shows that it was last modified on 2/2. Yet the individual in question indicated he was able to send to the distribution list as recently as last Thursday (2/19). There do not appear to be any security logs pertaining to this change generated by any of our DC's (which I didn't really expect, since this was an exchange property that was modified). My question is this - is this something that would be logged somewhere within Exchange? If so, would I need to have logging levels turned way up to find it (if so, too late)? Sorry, I always have the weird questions - please let me know if more details are needed. I have checked google, my googlefu is weak today . . . Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services Telefax: (602) 797-5823 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Send on behalf of
I would consider this a handy setting to use only for generic or dummy accounts, not for actual employees . . . keep in mind, with send as rights, the person sending the email could potentially do so without the knowledge of the employee he/she has been granted send as rights to. Is the employee who you are giving someone else send as rights OK with this? Does he/she understand the implications? We don't even allow people full mailbox access to existing employees, let alone send as rights. If they want access, we tell them to talk to the employee in question, and they can grant them delegate rights, including send on behalf of rights. Anything else has to go through our corporate legal and HR departments. This is just my take - I may be a bit paranoid on the issue, but you could be drumming up a potential legal issue with this sort of access. James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Send on behalf of Ah ah with you now. Found it! Cheers People. It could be a handy setting to use. John From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 October 2008 15:34 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Send on behalf of It's in the Security Tab about half way down in the list. From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Send on behalf of Maybe Im being a bit blind here, but ive been to the mailbox rights tab and cant see Send As. We dont have Blackberries, so we are OK on that score. I can see Delete Mailbox Storage Read Permissions Change Permissions Take Ownership Full Mailbox access Associated External account We do have an Advanced tab... Thanks John From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 October 2008 14:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Send on behalf of Exchange 2003. You're not changing this permission in Outlook or ESM, this is on the actual account properties in ADUC on the Exchange Advanced tab then click on the Mailbox Rights button and you will see all kinds of permissions. This is also where you have to make sure you BES account has Send As and Receive as permissions for a Blackberry user. On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Ellis, John P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this an Exchange 2003 or 2007 feature? If 2003 where does the option hide? We have a user who has SoBo permissions but would like to do SA permissions John From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 October 2008 14:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Send on behalf of This is a permission that is set on the account properties of the mailbox account in question, not a setting done in Outlook. ADUC. On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the permission you want is Send As rather than Send on Behalf of. - Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld - Original Message - From: Kevan Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thu Oct 23 06:29:48 2008 Subject: Send on behalf of Hi We have a user A that has send on Behalf of permissions on a mailbox belonging to User B. They also have full access to the mailbox. When they send an outbound email and change the From to the user B they have permission to send on behalf of the email says From User A sent on behalf of User B. WE would like the email to look as if it has just come from User B. It used to say this until a recent migration of both mailboxes to a new exchange server. Can anyone please point me in the right direction. Regards Kevan Dickinson Network Manager NSF-CMI 23 Lodge Road Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough, Oxford, OX29 8SJ, UK T:+44 01993 885661 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.nsf-cmi.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com
RE: Dummy Email Account
send on behalf of is different than send as. Send as allows you to type the name of the account in the from field, and the email is sent from that account, not from you on behalf of the account. The send as permissions are found in the Security tab of the account. As for a dummy account that can send but no one can send to, in the Exchange General tab, configure the Delivery Restrictions so that it can only receive mail from itself. No one else will be able to send to it. We do something similar to this for the generic accounts we use for sending out notifications to users. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services -Original Message- From: Margo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Dummy Email Account Unfortunately I can't do a dist list. The sender (the Pres) doesn't want the sent on behalf to be in the From line - only his name. Margo ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: DL management by group...
Just grant the group the Write Members permission in the Advanced security settings for the DL in AD. This is what that manager can update membership option in Outlook does anyways for the individuals - at least when I look at one of our DL's that we allow a certain individual to update, that is what shows up in the security settings, and we did exactly what you were trying to do, just with one person instead of a group. James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: DL management by group... E2k3 on Win2k3. I'm trying to delegate the DLs that mirror our org chart to HR, and have a group that contains the relevant staff. I added that group (usExDL-HumanResources) to the Managed By tab, and selected Manager can update membership list, but members of the managing DL, which is a universal distribution group, cannot add nor remove members of the DLs. What am I missing? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: DL management by group...
Concur - whether global or universal, in order to use the group to assign permissions, it must be a security group. Interesting that it doesn't even give you the option to choose the group - we have had cases before where public folder permissions have been applied using DL's, and it automatically switches the scope of the group from distribution to security. Does not affect the ability of the group to still receive email. James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 11:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DL management by group... CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: DL management by group...
Yup, and certainly easy enough for you to copy the current members to a new security group to use when applying permissions . . . I will say that we try our hardest to keep our security groups separated from our DL's as well. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 12:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DL management by group... Cool. I could convert it, but I think I'd like to keep my security groups separate from my DLs - there may be no technical reason to do so, but it makes more sense to me. Seem reasonable? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Concur - whether global or universal, in order to use the group to assign permissions, it must be a security group. Interesting that it doesn't even give you the option to choose the group - we have had cases before where public folder permissions have been applied using DL's, and it automatically switches the scope of the group from distribution to security. Does not affect the ability of the group to still receive email. James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 11:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DL management by group... CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Mailbox rights question
Yes, it is in the Security tab - scroll about halfway down the list and you will see it right after receive as. In fact, unless you are allowing this dummy account to also receive email so that they would need to monitor the mailbox, they probably don't need full mailbox access. For most of our dummy accounts, we prevent them from receiving emails so people don't try to send to them. Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox rights question Security tab in AD? Can you be more specific, please? Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox rights question Full mailbox rights doesn't grant 'Send As' permissions. That's a separate permission that has to be assigned via the Security tab in AD. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 5:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox rights question Exchange 2k3, all SPs and hotfixes installed Outlook 2k3 Server 2k3 We have a dummy account, newsletter, that we use to mass-mail our press releases, etc. In the past, one of our IT guys has been the one to send these mailings, simply by putting the newsletter address in the From: field. He then puts the newsletter in the To: address, and BCCs the actual recipients. This has worked. However, now, we're trying to transfer responsibility for this task to our Marketing unit. I have gone into the Exchange Advanced options under the newsletter account, and added the Marketing unit with Full Mailbox rights. When someone from that unit tries to send a press release, etc the same way the IT guy did it, they get the following error: You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. Have I missed the Golden button here in setting up the permissions? What have I missed in order to allow the Marketing unit to do this task? Thanks, Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook PST was corrupt
I have had luck using AOR (Advanced Outlook Repair) when scanpst and pst2gb would not repair the file. It can both repair a Unicode pst (OL2003 and up) as well as take an older pst (OL97-2003 format) and either split it into smaller Unicode pst's or simply convert it to Unicode. You could even split the older pst into smaller old pst files. However, the price tag ($250) could be a bit hefty for personal use. Could be a useful tool to have lying around if you can get the company to pay for it . . . HTH, Janfrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Nirav Doshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 5:16 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Outlook PST was corrupt Subject: Outlook PST was corrupt Dear All I upgraded my Desktop from office 2003 to office 2007, Now I am not able to see any single mail in my inbox folder. Rest of the folder shown mail. Necessary Step taken 1: Scanpst. 2: 2GB PST Repair tool. Is there any other way to repair it? Thanks Regards Nirav Doshi System Administrator Bitscape IT Solutions. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Adding new email address to 200 users
What is your update interval in RUS set to? We found that if the update interval was set to always run, it would not update existing accounts. However, if the update interval was set to 15 minutes, it would update existing accounts. James Winzenz Infrastructure Engineer - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:56 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Adding new email address to 200 users Subject: RE: Adding new email address to 200 users It actually will modify existing users, but it's not instantaneous. Make sure your filters are correct and try this doc: http://www.msexchange.org/articles/Troubleshooting-Exchange-Recipient-Up date-Service-RUS.html Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980 You rely on Exchange. We keep it running. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding new email address to 200 users Kevan, I think the recipient policy will apply to new users but will not modify existing users. Lynne From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 May 2008 12:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding new email address to 200 users Hi Thank you for your replies. I have looked up Recipient Policies and read all about them and tried to apply a new policy to a couple of test users in a test OU. I found the users via the LDAP query tool and correctly identified them. In the policy I left the original address unchanged and added the new one as an SMTP address so I have 2 SMTP addresses in this policy. However I am still not seeing the new address being added to these users when I view them in Active Directory Users and computers. At the moment under Recipient policies I am seeing 3 policies. 2 of them are the same apart from the LDAP Query. They are Default with the priority at lowest and Checkmate with priority highest which both seem to have been created when exchange was first installed and my new policy that has a priority of 1. Any ideas why my addresses might not be updating? Regards Kevan From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 May 2008 18:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Adding new email address to 200 users Kevan, Lookup Recipient Policies in Exchange 2003. What you're looking to do can be accomplished in there. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/249299 _ John Bowles - Original Message From: Kevan Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:01:38 PM Subject: Adding new email address to 200 users Hi We have recently merged with another company and are being requested to accept email at the new company name. What is the easiest way to alias the the new address to our current mailboxes? We are using exchange 2003 SP2 and windows Server 2003. Regards. Kevan Dickinson Network Manager CMi plc 23 Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough, Oxfordshire. OX29 8SG. Direct Tel: +(44)1993 885661 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cmi-plc.com http://www.cmi-plc.com/ ***Disclaimer*** The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, CMi plc and its subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of our own computer systems. This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by MailMarshal for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run anti-virus software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any Email or attachment you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability for any damage you suffer as a consequence of receiving any virus. Checkmate International plc (CMi) Registered in England No: 1899857 Registered Office 4th Floor, 35 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6BW ** Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62 sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20 ***Disclaimer*** The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying
RE: Outlook Calendar
Microsoft has a DST update for windows mobile smartphones and pda's running windows mobile 5 or 6. I just downloaded and installed it - no issues. Two different options: 1. copy to device and install update from device (watch wrappage): http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0d6fc192-3142-4 473-b435-b514e4b360a5DisplayLang=en 2. Desktop install via activesync: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3bd7c55c-8ac1-4 821-81fe-3f4ada831fe0DisplayLang=en I did the first option, no problems. After the update installed, it rebooted my phone. Appointments were fixed. James Winzenz Infrastructure Engineer - Security Pulte Homes Information Services -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:43 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Outlook Calendar Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar I've just noticed that on my phone (active sync / Treo 700w) that my scheduled appointments are an hour off. My Outlook calendar is correct. Anthony Shields Systems Administrator The Epstein School 404-250-5659 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The Epstein School is a proud beneficiary of the Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Conference room calendar auto accept agent?
With the auto-accept agent, yes. As Durf said, no need to set the calendar permissions to allow others author permissions. Just leave it alone, or if you are changing an existing calendar resource, remove the default permissions that get set when you use the direct booking feature. The calendar permissions should be exactly the same as a regular user. They can still view the availability of the conference room from the scheduling tab. If you want them to be able to view the actual calendar, you can give them reviewer permissions. James Winzenz Infrastructure Engineer - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, February 22, 2008 11:03 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Conference room calendar auto accept agent? Subject: RE: Conference room calendar auto accept agent? You don't' need to grant permissions... So CAN you prevent users from opening the resource calendar and directly entering meetings? Thanks, Dave From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Conference room calendar auto accept agent? You don't need to grant Calendar permissions to use the AutoAccept agent, that's the whole point - it's accepting the meeting, not directly writing requests to the calendar as with Resource Booking. -- Durf CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Windows Vista
Short answer: yes. See link: http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/Windows/en-US/Help/3af7e05f-4d2a-4af7-a 168-9242f9093bb81033.mspx#EEDAC You can either purchase an upgrade disk or a full version disk and choose the option to upgrade, or you can use the Windows Anytime Upgrade to upgrade online. James Winzenz Infrastructure Engineer - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Victor Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:09 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Windows Vista Subject: Windows Vista Does anyone know if you can upgrade from Vista home basic to any other version of vista Victor Rodriguez Inter America Data Florida LLC 1987 NW 88 Court Suite 201 Doral, Fl 33172 Office # (305)443-0331 x1201 Cell # (786)282-4838 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all
Or blood sausage? Or head cheese? Are we sparking an international culinary debate now? :-) Thanks, James Winzenz Infrastructure Engineer - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:00 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all And spotted dick isn't oddball? From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all ahhh right. Just checking. This list is great. All these odd ball foods y'all eat! From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 February 2008 16:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all Porridge is made from Oats not Corn. We call it Outmeal here in the states. - Original Message - From: Ellis, John P. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:45 AM Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all you mean porridge? Im glad you told me what Hominy is From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 February 2008 16:43 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all It's ground up hominy, which you then boil to cook them. Should never be runny, as has been mentioned already. Hominy comes from corn by the way. Joe Heaton From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all Grits? John, UK. From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 February 2008 16:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all I grew up in Northern Florida, and loved grape jelly on my grits... my father ate them with butter and pepper, which is how I eat them now. Joe Heaton From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all I'm going to take issue with your response to #16. I'm originally from the mountains of North Carolina (fairly close to the Tennessee border) and I grew up eating grits with butter and sugar. Andy From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all 11.) A true Southerner knows that fixin' can be used as a noun, a verb, or an adverb. I'm fixin' to forward this to some of my friends! Or fiddenta, as we say around here. 13.) Only true Southerners make friends while standing in lines. We don't do queues, we do lines, and when we're in line, we talk to everybody! I was so confused when, as a child, I moved from the deep south to New York and heard people talking about waiting on line. I kept looking at the floor trying to find the line they were standing on. Thankfully, a year later we left NY and headed south again! 15.) True Southerners never refer to one person as y'all. A pet peeve of mine. When Hollywood tries to imitate southerners, it has actors saying y'all to just one person. Drives me nuts. 16.) True Southerners know grits come from corn and how to eat them. With salt, and sometimes cheese. Never with sugar. 19.) Only true Southerners say sweet tea and sweet milk. Sweet tea indicates the need for sugar and lots of it - we do not like our tea unsweetened. Sweet milk means you don't want buttermilk. Actually, in a good southern restaurant you don't have to say sweet. If you order tea, it will be sweet-because why on earth would anyone want tea that WASN'T sweet?! 20.) And a true Southerner knows you don't scream obscenities at little old ladies who drive 30 MPH on the freeway. You just say, Bless her heart and go your own way. In the south, you can utter all sorts of insults without being considered rude if you follow them up with a bless his/her heart. For example, That Jane just isn't very bright
RE: VIRUS HELL!!!! ...help?
As this was cross-posted on the sysadmin list, here's my response from that list - only thing I could find on technet - http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q195712 On an interesting side note, I also found this little tidbit regarding vbscripts with the preview pane . . . http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q241205 James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VIRUS HELL ...help? Unfortunately, as soon as you click on the inbox, you get a Dr. Watson error and then Outlook closes! How about de-selecting Preview Pane in the View Menu? -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: VIRUS HELL ...help? TIA--- I am looking for a bit of help on the antivirus problems I am having today. Today there seems to be heavy virus activity regarding email with an attachment decrypt-password.exe These files are being blocked at the exchange gateway. Only the alert.txt message comes through with the original email. However, there must be some form of embedded VB script = in the body of the message. As the message hits the inbox, it somehow = enables the Preview pane on the inbox, makes this message always be the first message and runs the script. What I am looking for is some way to = disable the preview pane (before opening outlook) so that I can click on the = inbox and delete the message. I do not want to add the security patch to outlook, as this is not an option currently. Does anyone know of a reg-hack where I can disable the preview pane for Outlook??? Please let me know any and all ideas. \ BIG THANKS! aci List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Event viewer error
Title: Message http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q266383 and http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q257348 James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message-From: DENNIS ROGOV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Event viewer error Guys i need some real fast response I have an exchange 5.5 server sp3 The following is popping up in the event viewer any suggestions??? Event ID 2026: Type: Warning An internal MTA error occurred. Contact Microsoft Product Support Services. Unable to write to the message tracking log, error code (BASE XFER-IN 20 89) (16) . Dennis Rogov System support specialist Huntleigh Healthcare 1800-223-1218 ext.142 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening other user's inbox
Permissions. If a user is logging into another user's mailbox, he/she has permissions to do so. Check the permissions for the mailboxes being accessed. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening other user's inbox Hello everyone, How do I prevent users from using the option to open other user's Inbox (FILE, OPEN, OTHER USER'S FOLDER...)? Is this a default setting? The application section of the Event Viewer is reports that several individuals were logging on to other employee's mailbox when they were not the primary NT account users. Thanks in advance, Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Opening other user's inbox
Check the permissions in exchange admin to the mailboxes in question. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Opening other user's inbox It is Exchange 5.5! Nelson -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Opening other user's inbox Have the people who's mailboxes are being opened delegated this to the people who are opening them? Is this Exchange 5.5? By default no one should be able to access other users stuff, so check to see if folks have delegated, otherwise, in the Exchange Management, you can edit the properties of the mailboxes to deny access. -Original Message- From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 3, 2002 1:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Opening other user's inbox Hello everyone, How do I prevent users from using the option to open other user's Inbox (FILE, OPEN, OTHER USER'S FOLDER...)? Is this a default setting? The application section of the Event Viewer is reports that several individuals were logging on to other employee's mailbox when they were not the primary NT account users. Thanks in advance, Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Trancenders Exchange 2000
Ya, I just got a call from Beachfront software for one of their pieces - they offered it to me at a really good price, too. Much better than the couple thousand bucks for the transcenders. And they don't seem to be too bad. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Trancenders Exchange 2000 I think Beach Front Quizzer will have a new Exchange2000 product soon to compete with those, too. William -Original Message- From: Roland van Hierden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Trancenders Exchange 2000 Can anybody help me with getting some Exchange 2000 transcenders? Thanks in advantage, Roland. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Download IE6 for redistribution
Title: RE: Download IE6 for redistribution Thats correct. When you install IE6 on a win2k or XP machine, you cannot change the install options. Heck, even when you download IE6 from a 98 box and run the setup on a 2k or XP box, you still cant modify the options. It shows up as a 2000/XP install, and it is NOT a full install. There are several components that are not installed. Just an FYI. If you want to download IE6 to be installed on any other machines, you have to download it from an OS other than 2k. I dont remember about NT myself I think that when I downloaded it, I also used a 98 box, and chose the download only option. Then I downloaded everything. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Siatkowski, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Download IE6 for redistribution Well, it seems when I run the ie6setup.exe from a win2K machine, it just automatically defaults to a full install with no options. There may be command line switches that I'm unaware of. When I run the setup on a Win98 machine, it allows me to download the files for other OS's. I'm not sure about NT, but it may also give those options. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Download IE6 for redistribution Why a Win98 machine? William -Original Message- From: Siatkowski, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Download IE6 for redistribution Easiest way is to download it from a Win98 machine, select advanced options and tell it that you want to download only, and also check off the applicable OS's from the list. Then burn the entire Windows Update Setup Files to the cd, and you can use it for all your OS's. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Download IE6 for redistribution I've seen this site before, but can't remember where it is What is Microsofts web address for downloading IE so I can throw it onto a CD and load it onto another machine. I don't need the 468kb file that then downloads the real IE. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech, Inc. Real-Time Information Protection 2800 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 http://www.riptech.com w: (703) 373-5158 c: (703) 786-9158 f: (703) 373-6158 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: RE: Wondering
Title: Message Or try this: forward any message to this email address. [EMAIL PROTECTED]. No need to be rude. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Bob Beatty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE: Wondering Unsubscribe me - shit, fuck, damn you, kiss my ass, go fuck yourself, whatever it takes, please unsubscribe me. Thanks The hardest thing in life is to know which bridge to cross and which to burn. -David Russell Good quote... -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE: Wondering Maybe three of them. Sounds like we've been tasked with the judging. ;o) The hardest thing in life is to know which bridge to cross and which to burn. -David Russell -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: RE: Wondering I think we need a panel of judges really. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 4, 2001 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: RE: Wondering To stop this thread may I make a suggestion. Everyone on the list sends akeg of their favourite beer to me. I will access each one, and sometime in 2003, when I sober up I will post my assessments. Kevin the judge's vote is final Snook List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: looking for hardware
I agree too. We are 90% Dell in our office and 10% Compaq. They are both great servers. We have had no problems whatsoever with our Dell servers. Even had a hard drive go down on one of them, and plugged a new one in, and the RAID controller automatically scrubbed it and restored the RAID without us having to do anything! Have not had any experience with any IBM servers, though. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: looking for hardware I like Dell! Certainly never had a problem with them! Same as Compaq - no problem running them either! I do like their Smart Start stuff! Simon Weaver NT Domain Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 03:10:PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable. -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart start disks -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: looking for hardware I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000. Any best bets? Kim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ... This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited Gunnels Wood Road Stevenage Hertfordshire SG1 2AS List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
FW: Recovering data in .ost file
Title: RE: Recovering data in .ost file Heres one of the previous replies, amazingly enough dated only about 3 weeks ago. grin James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovering data in .ost file or if you are in a real panic you can use ost2pst, it costs 80 dollars last time I checked but it works. Converts ost files to pst files, as the name suggests ;) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 05:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recovering data in .ost file .ost files are tied to the mailbox and not the correct method for transferring mailbox contents. The mailbox should have been exported to a .pst file. Some have produced a utility that might be successful: http://www.officerecovery.com/exchange/ William -Original Message- From: Debbie BAnik To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 10/17/01 8:45 PM Subject: Recovering data in .ost file Help please! Here's the scoop. New CEO who was working with offline folders from the exchange server from his previous company. We needed to get the data onto our Exchange server. First, copied .ost file into another directory to keep a copy. Second, set up personal folders, third copied data from offline folders to personal folders. Got errors on some of the subfolders for tasks. Fourth, big mistake. Instead of creating another profile, I changed his current profile to point to our exchange server. We got all his calendar, contacts, notes, and synched some of his tasks from his palm to laptop. But subfolder tasks don't synch to palm. So now he needs to get some of those subfolder tasks that are part of the .ost file. His mailbox on his old company is gone, so we can't reconnect with that. Of course, since the new server wasn't the original mailbox, I can't see those offline folders. Does anyone have any idea how I can get to the data in that offline file? Not a good impression to make to the new CEO!!! Thanks so much! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this E-mail from your system. Thank you. It is possible for data transmitted by email to be deliberately or accidentally corrupted or intercepted. For this reason, where the communication is by email, the Bank of Ireland Group does not accept any responsibility for any breach of confidence which may arise through the use of this medium. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of known computer viruses. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
Title: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network? This is done on the client side . . . check the users outlook - tools services and check in the Delivery tab. Most likely, he/she has this set to deliver to his/her personal folders. You can very simply change it to the correct mailbox on the exchange server from the drop-down menu. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network? sorry meant PST OST is for offline storage only Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence. -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network? IS it possible that this client has a rule setup to deliver, copy, or move mail to the OST file? Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and are intended to be private and confidential. This material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. The material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the correspondence. -Original Message- From: Paul Rothschild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: delivery to .ost even when connected to network? Outlook2k is delivering new mail to the .ost eben when connected to network. Delivery options are correctly configured, i can't seem to figure this one out List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
weird exchange/outlook problem
Hopefully someone out there has some ideas about this. Here's the scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a Server w/Exchange 5.5 SP3 User with 9x (still, I know, but soon to be win2k) and outlook 2000 - the user is actually our site manager and VP. About 6 months ago, his previous administrative assistant left the company. She had been set up with permissions to access his mailbox, and also had send on behalf of permissions. Her user account and mailbox have been long since deleted. Here comes the weird part. Ever since she left, whenever a meeting request or appointment is sent to this site manager, a delivery failure notification is sent back saying that the mail could not be delivered to the following recipient: name of terminated assistant. We have searched and have not been able to find anything we could do short of moving his emails to a .pst, deleting the mailbox and recreating and reimporting his emails. If anyone has other ideas, that would be extremely helpful. If more information is needed, I will strive to provide it. Thanks, James R. Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems 39555 Orchard Hill Place Suite 250 Novi, MI 48375 Phone: (248) 675-2801 Fax: (248) 675-2801 www.peregrine.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: weird exchange/outlook problem
I will have to check this again, but I don't think he had any delegates set up. In addition, her account was deleted, so I don't know how it could still be in there if she was set up as a delegate. But I will definitely check. Thanks, James R. Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems 39555 Orchard Hill Place Suite 250 Novi, MI 48375 Phone: (248) 675-2801 Fax: (248) 675-2801 www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: weird exchange/outlook problem Check his client to see if the admin's account is setup as a delegate to his account. You can have all meeting requests forwarded automatically to your delegate so that is probably what is happening. Tools -- Options -- Delegates tab. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: weird exchange/outlook problem Hopefully someone out there has some ideas about this. Here's the scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a Server w/Exchange 5.5 SP3 User with 9x (still, I know, but soon to be win2k) and outlook 2000 - the user is actually our site manager and VP. About 6 months ago, his previous administrative assistant left the company. She had been set up with permissions to access his mailbox, and also had send on behalf of permissions. Her user account and mailbox have been long since deleted. Here comes the weird part. Ever since she left, whenever a meeting request or appointment is sent to this site manager, a delivery failure notification is sent back saying that the mail could not be delivered to the following recipient: name of terminated assistant. We have searched and have not been able to find anything we could do short of moving his emails to a .pst, deleting the mailbox and recreating and reimporting his emails. If anyone has other ideas, that would be extremely helpful. If more information is needed, I will strive to provide it. Thanks, James R. Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems 39555 Orchard Hill Place Suite 250 Novi, MI 48375 Phone: (248) 675-2801 Fax: (248) 675-2801 www.peregrine.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
