Mail

[Bill Beckett]

Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so, what are
your thoughts?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Tom Lee]

Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

[Whitson, Garry]

In August my organization completed our migration from Exchange 2003
to Exchange 2007.  Unfortunately we have been plagued by problems with
new, non-dynamic mail distribution and mail enabled security groups.
Mail sent to these groups via Outlook are not delivered and no non-
delivery notice is received by the sender.
If a user attempts to address a message to the group using OWA, there
is a prompt that there is more than one address (though OWA only shows
a single address).
None of the distribution groups have a legacyExchangeDN.  I am aware
that RUS would have handled assigning this attribute were we still
running Exchange 2003 but this is no longer the case.
Obviously something is broken but we cannot determine what it is.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?


[cid:image001.jpg@01C97F9E.F8A987B0]<http://help.llcc.edu/>
Do you need to request assistance or check on an existing call?
Click on the LLCC Help Desk logo to log into KBOX.

Garry Whitson
System Administrator
Information & Telecommunication System
Lincoln Land Community College


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

internet mail

[Gary Gregg]

Hi all ive a problem when i try too add the IMS on exchange 5.5 the server
says add dns records mx and a to your dns server. This is done but yet i
still get the maessage .Can anyone suggest any reason why.

Thanks Gary

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)

I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
originating host/-email address/domain?
We're running Exchange2k and the solution should not be clientside but
serverside instead.
Adding a firewallrule is no option either.

Thanks in advance!

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten

-- 
"Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Routing Mail

[Friese, Casey]

I just installed Exchange 2000 into my server invironment which is all
native Win2k.  This is the only mail server currently in the domain.  My
domain name is test.com (example)  Yesterday my T1 was installed and I had
an MX record created for testing purposes, the MX record is mail1.test.net.
I'm using test.net because everyone in the office is still receiving mail
via pop3 from an external provider.  Anytime someone on the internet sends a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the message gets sent to our external provider
and we receive the message through pop3.

Now, since my domain name is test.com and I try to send a message from the
e2k server to test.com, the messages sits in the outbound queue and goes
nowhere.  I don't have mailboxes created for my internal users as of yet but
I assumed that when I send a message from test.net to test.com that the
message would be routed through the internet to our pop3 provider.

Where in E2k can I tell messages that I send to test.com to go to our
external provider instead of try to deliver them on the inside?

Thanks
Casey


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

mail forward

[Luis Esteves]

Hi everybody. I'm in the final stages of seting up an Exchange2000 server
and I'm kinda' stumped with something I hope is pretty basic.

We have 4 employees here that have e-mail pagers. I want all incoming e-mail
to be delivered to their exchange mailbox and be automatically forwarded to
their Blackberry account. I suspect that this is handled in the 'recipient
policies' but

TIA,
-
Luis Esteves
Digital Connexxions Corp.
Network Administrator
Tel:  (905) 338-8355
Cell: (905) 334-7448
http://www.dconx.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Essentials

[Tim Gilroy]

Hi.

I tried to install Mail Essentials on a system that had Exchange 5.5 (SP4)
on it.  I have done the backup routine etc.  Installed Mail Essentials
changed ports and services file etc. I then had issues with intialisation
of object in the MMC.  Due to the fact that this was a remote site and
time constraints etc I have reconfigured everything back to the way it was
and allseemed to be fine.  But alas, it will download mail from the ISP
via smtp (Fine) but it will not upload files.  It complains that it can
not resolve hosts.  (Host unreachable) in the queues dialogue box.  This
is a server that is forwarding all mail to the ISP mail gateway.  I am
struggling abit for the quick fix and would appreciate thoughts.

Thanks in advance.

Tim Gilroy

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Merge

[List]

Hi 
All,
 
Does anyone know how 
to mail merge html document using outlook.
 
thanks for your 
help.
 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Relay

[Irfan GM]

Title: Mail Relay








How do i stop mail relaying in exchange 2000 sp2


irfan



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Spooler

[Martin Henriksen]

Hello 
All.
 
Can anyone recommend 
a good mail spooler? I want to place the mail spooler on a different 
server, have this server recive mail and forward it to the exchageserver, so i 
dont have direct connection between the i-net and my 
mailserver.
 
Any suggestions are 
much appreciated
 
Regards, 

Martin Henriksen, 
MCPSystems Engineer
Consensus it a/s Carl Jacobsens 
Vej 20, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark Phone    : +45 3613 
Fax    : +45 3613 2223 
Mobile    : +45 4016 2266E-mail    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Gateway

[Jonathan K]

Sorry for the off topic but is anyone using the Mail Gateway product.  I
am looking at it as a solution.  Any thought and ideas would be
appreciated.
 
Thanks,
 
Jonathan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

pop mail

[Gary Gregg]

  Hi all does anyone know
any pop 3 collectors for exchange ive tried popcon but is there any others??

 

Thanks Gary Gregg







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

snail mail

[Irfan GM]

Title: snail mail








Hi guys  I have two exchange 2000 sp1 servers in the same organization ,

 the problem i'am facing is mail's are all stuck in the smtp queue's , and mail delivery

 is slow between thease two server's , how can i resolve this problem

 please help

 

Thanks

 Irfan




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Problem...

[Paul Love]

Ok just a quickie, my CEO uses Outlook express 5 for his eprsonal mail,
where does the os store the mail and what format is it in ? Any ideas ? Os
is 95 !... The machine Is well unstable, and I need to back it up.. Help

TIA


Paul

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

mail connectivity

[Todd White]

OK here is the 
scenario.
 
Windows 2000 
advanced server running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 in USA
Windows NT Server 
4.0 SP6a running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 in Israel
using a VPN 
connection, (checkpoint firewall), 
this is in a test 
environment so no rush.
 
what is 
happening
can't send mail to 
each other from either side, which will not allow me to do directory 
replication.  I have verified that I can ping the server name by IP address 
and by name from both sides, which shows that there should be nothing wrong with 
the rules on the firewall.  Now with that said before I had this going 
across the VPN connection I had this on our FRAME connection which was 
working.
 
ANY 
IDEAS?
Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
The contents of this e-mail and any 
attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and 
are intended to be private and confidential.  This material is intended 
solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  The material is 
protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade 
secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express 
permission of LaserComm Inc.  If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the 
correspondence.
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

POP mail

[Steve Ens]

Greetings

I have just rolled out our Exchange 5.5 sp4 server on
Windows 2000 (member server). 
Everything is running fine. 
The two things I cannot find any info on are:

    1)When retrieving mail remotely using POP mail, the users
can only use Outlook Express.  Outlook
does not work using the exact settings (including SPA).  Is there a setting on the Exchange
server I need to change?  

    2)When I get mail in to people who are no longer working
here (no mailbox), is there a way I can have a message sent back or
refused?  Some people sign up for so
many lists, etc and get so much spam that I want to
filter that out.  

Thanks

Steve

 

Steve
Ens 

Information
Technolgist

APTN

(204)
947 9331 ext.238

 




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

outgoing mail

[aci]

I currently have a problem with outgoing mail.  Nothing is going through. 
I have incoming mail being sent to the users.  but their out going mail is
being queued at the internet mail service.  It states that the message
will continue to be retried until the configured maximum timeout period.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail problems

[Tom Delong]

I am recieving this in my application logs on my exchange server. I am
running win2k, exchange 2000 on a DC.
Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
Event Category: Access Control 
Event ID:   1029
Date:   2/1/2002
Time:   2:11:54 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   DOTTIE
Description:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the
following access rights:

'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item'
'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read
Security Descriptor' 'Contact'

The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=xxx/OU=FIRST
ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=xxx. The folder ID is in the data
section of this event.

Any help or advice would be great.
TIA

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Relaying

[Ed Santiago]

We have a stand alone exchange 5.5 sp4 which we need to run pop3 on and have
applied the fixes mentioned in the article.

http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
but for some reason we can still relay...

I ran  the test on telnet relay-test.mail-abuse.org
And we pass all of the tests except for this one 

:Relay test: #Test 17
 >>> mail from: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>> rcpt to: 
<<< 250 OK - Recipient 
>>> QUIT
<<< 221 closing connection

Does anyone have an idea why this is occurring or how we can prevent these
type of addresses from being sent out from our boxes. Any suggestions would
be appreciated. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

redirecting mail

[Mal Sasalu]

Hello All,

We have an employee who will work as a consultant from home. I need to redirect
all his mail to his AOL account. I need to keep his account and he shouldn't be
able to login into the mailbox. I don't want to keep his mails on his mailbox
either. His name should be visible on our address list, so that internally
people are able to send him mail. What is the easiest way to achieve this. By
the way we use NT 4.0, exchange5.5 and OL2000.

TIA
Mal
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Marshall

[Karen Palmer]

Can 
anyone provide the link for this software or the company name?  My search 
engines did not turn it up.
 
Thanks,
 
Karen 
Palmer
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Expire Mail

[Roan, Wayne]

Group,

Is there a way to have mail automatically deleted from a public
folder based on date?  I have several folders that are part of mailing lists
and I want mail that is older than a week to be deleted automatically.

Thanks,

Wayne Roan
Information Technology
Capitol Broadcasting Company



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Junk Mail ?

[David.Ricci]

Where is the best place to turn off the junk mail filter on outlook
2007?  I have Exchange 2003 sp2.

 

Is it in exchange or is it best on a GPO.  Whichever one is best pls let
me know how.  

 

Thank You,

 

 


 
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in reliance on the 
information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please immediately notify our e-mail administrator at 
mailto:supp...@hwinstitute.com.
.

Mail alert?

[Evan Brastow]

Hi guys,

 

You know the little desktop alert thingy that pops up on the bottom
right of the screen when new mail arrives in the Inbox? Is there any
Outlook (2003) add-on that can pop up an alert when an email arrives in
an Inbox of another user, whose mailbox you have open within Outlook?

 

I haven't found any that can actually do it.

 

I'm using Exchange 2003.

 

Thanks,

 

Evan


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Outgoing Mail

[dave mcnulty]

Are there any good (maybe documented) reasons 
why I should limit mail messages to a certain size other than if a virus was 
designed to take advantage of no mail limits for a DoS and bandwidth 
issues?
I need to prove to management that this should 
be planned and implemented for an E2K rollout.
TIA
Dave McNulty
 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_

  *** PLEASE BE ADVISED *** This email contains confidential information
that may also be legally privileged and which is intended only for the use
of the above-named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please
be advised that any copy, dissemination or use of the information contained
on this email is strictly prohibited. If this email has been received in
error, please contact us immediately. Thank you.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Kevin Miller]

What do you want it to do?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail


Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so, what
are your thoughts?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Abercrombie, Sherry]

Title: RE: Mail





We've tested it using the 30 day demo.  Weren't overly impressed with what it did versus the cost of the software.


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail



Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so, what are your thoughts?


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Bill Beckett]

Monitor Spam, inappropriate emails.


-Original Message-
From:   Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Mail

What do you want it to do?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail


Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so,
what
are your thoughts?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Kevin Miller]

There is nothing out there that will effectively do anything with Spam.
Best you can do it slow it down or cut off some off it. But for Content
filtering, which is what you want here, this will do a good job. Mail
Marshal or Mail essentials from GFI. Both do a good job.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail


Monitor Spam, inappropriate emails.


-Original Message-
From:   Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Mail

What do you want it to do?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail


Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so,
what
are your thoughts?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Kurt]

I'm working on learning a lot more about the Open Source OSes.

One really good reason is the anti-spam software here:

http://software.libertine.org/tmda/

Looks really dang cool!

| -Original Message-
| From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:27
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: RE: Mail
| 
| 
| There is nothing out there that will effectively do anything 
| with Spam.
| Best you can do it slow it down or cut off some off it. But 
| for Content
| filtering, which is what you want here, this will do a good job. Mail
| Marshal or Mail essentials from GFI. Both do a good job.
| 
| --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
| http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
| 
| 
| -Original Message-
| From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
| Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:15 AM
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: RE: Mail
| 
| 
| Monitor Spam, inappropriate emails.
| 
| 
|   -Original Message-
|   From:   Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|   Sent:   Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:15 PM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject:    RE: Mail
| 
|   What do you want it to do?
| 
|   --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
|   http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
| 
| 
|   -Original Message-
|   From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
|   Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:07 AM
|   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
|   Subject: Mail
| 
| 
|   Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so,
| what
|   are your thoughts?
| 
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
| 
| 
| 
|   List Charter and FAQ at:
|   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
| 
| List Charter and FAQ at:
| http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
| 
| 
| 
| List Charter and FAQ at:
| http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
| 
| 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Brian Politis]

If you decide to download the demo of Mail Marshal, make sure to
download the updated Spam rules seperately.  These get updated often and
aren't bundled into the install, because the are customizable, and the
install could theoretically overwrite someone's customized rules. The
standard rules with the install don't catch all that much.

I also have some separate info and reccomendations I can email you that
aren't posted publicly on MM's website yet, for configuring Spam
Filtration.  At at site with about 250 users, I see about 60 - 120 spams
a day caught(most addressed to multiple personnel), and few complaints
from users on stuff getting through... Or block inappropiately.

This is without MAPS or RBL lists in use.  If you really are trying to
kill spam, subscribing to a MAPS or RBL list will catch even more.

The customer's I have implemented it for, purchased it for other
reasons, but spam catching is a nice advantage.  


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail


Monitor Spam, inappropriate emails.


-Original Message-
From:   Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
    Subject:RE: Mail

What do you want it to do?

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail


Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so,
what
are your thoughts?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail

[Benjamin Zachary]

I like the Gfi product line. Mail essentials works great on spam and
content filtering, has a few addons including web based responding,
which I don't know if the others have. When an email gets quarantined
for rule violation I can click on a link in the email to approve/deny it
so I don't have to radmin into the server. Stuff like that .. They have
a free trial as well .

-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail


Other than Brian answering, does anyone use Mail Marshal? If so, what
are your thoughts?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail Relaying

[Eric]

I have a customer looking at an Exchange hosted environment.  During the
transition, they'd like to be able transition users over time to the hosted
system.  I am looking for a solution where I can have one of the sytems
accept email for the domain, but if the mailbox is not located on the
system, then forward it to the other system..  Is that possible with
Exchange 2003?

Thanks,
Eric

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[William Lefkovics]

Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Brent Hudson]

The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in your org, 
problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2 exchange server and a 
smart host, even if you check "send direct before using smart host".. this will not 
however help you with which mail goes where.. I would personally adjust the names to 
something like public.abc.com and office.abc.com, alterativly you could change 
addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED] being the company and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. 
recip that points back to the linux box

Brent

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

AW: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Rickenbacher Beat]

If the Exchange2000 servers are first hit:
It shouldn't be a problem to forward all unresolved mails to another email
server. Just disable that the Organization is responsible for the whole
email address in the recipient policy (smtp).
There are also Qs available addressing these problems. (Sorry, I don't have
em handy right now!)

If the Exchange2000 servers are the end point:
Then it's standard procedure like they are the only servers in domain.

Ricki

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. April 2002 08:23
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in
your org, problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2
exchange server and a smart host, even if you check "send direct before
using smart host".. this will not however help you with which mail goes
where.. I would personally adjust the names to something like public.abc.com
and office.abc.com, alterativly you could change addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
being the company and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. recip that points
back to the linux box

Brent

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Marty Richards]

If the mail flows to the linux server first, you can control delivery by
recipient using the virtual usertable in sendmail. Something like

[EMAIL PROTECTED]   user@[my.exchange.servers.ip]

You would need to add a secondary email address to the exchange server users
- user@[my.exchange.servers.ip]

Any user not defined in the virtusertable file would be delivered locally to
the linux box as per current arrangements.

Cheers,
Marty

> -Original Message-
> From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:23 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
> 
> 
> The smart host option will only work if it is the only 
> Exchange server in your org, problems start creeping in if 
> there has to be mail between 2 exchange server and a smart 
> host, even if you check "send direct before using smart 
> host".. this will not however help you with which mail goes 
> where.. I would personally adjust the names to something like 
> public.abc.com and office.abc.com, alterativly you could 
> change addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED] being the company and 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. recip that points back to 
> the linux box
> 
> Brent
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
> 
> 
> Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is 
> running on Linux?
> The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
> Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to 
> a specific
> host upon failure?  
> 
> Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an 
> SMTP connector
> that may assist.
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.
> 
> Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public 
> group users and
> private group users.
> 
> Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server 
> to locate at
> Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve 
> Private users
> ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.
> 
> So, what can i do to make this two server using the same 
> domain (abc.com),
> different email server, to serve different group??
> 
> Can some one help me?   
> Thank you
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> FYI:
> ===
> 
> Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
> Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
> Linux Mail server
> Domain : abc.com
> User Group : Group Public
> 
> Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
> Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
> Exchange Mail Server
> Domain : abc.com
> User Group : Group Private
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[William Lefkovics]

You control the routing on your messaging servers, not the other way around.
I can have 5 Exchange servers with one pointing to a SendMail smarthost.
What problmes have you experienced in this situation?

The subdomain is reasonable.  The Linux box relaying unresolved recipients
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Each user would have to have both:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the former being the reply-to (Set as Primary) address.

Additional admin to that, but an alternative.

William


-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in
your org, problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2
exchange server and a smart host, even if you check "send direct before
using smart host".. this will not however help you with which mail goes
where.. I would personally adjust the names to something like public.abc.com
and office.abc.com, alterativly you could change addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
being the company and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. recip that points
back to the linux box

Brent

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Brent Hudson]

I have 2 (2000 sp2) and battled for 5 hours with this so any tips would be great!
Setup:
2 exchange servers in different routing groups (across a WAN link)
1 Linux box as a SOA DNS server, SMTP (sendmail) incoming (and outgoing), and Firewall.

What happened:
Setup SMTP to send via Smart host.. worked fine, however it insisted on sending mail 
to the second server via the smart host as well... mail bounced from the linux box!

What I tried:
Setting (below the smarthost) to first try and send directly
created a seperate smtp vs and configured costing..
tried different setting in the routing groups connector


Eventually gave up and punched a hole in the firewall for smtp out and dns query the 
linux dns on its internal nic

Later
B




-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 09:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


You control the routing on your messaging servers, not the other way around.
I can have 5 Exchange servers with one pointing to a SendMail smarthost.
What problmes have you experienced in this situation?

The subdomain is reasonable.  The Linux box relaying unresolved recipients
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Each user would have to have both:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the former being the reply-to (Set as Primary) address.

Additional admin to that, but an alternative.

William


-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in
your org, problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2
exchange server and a smart host, even if you check "send direct before
using smart host".. this will not however help you with which mail goes
where.. I would personally adjust the names to something like public.abc.com
and office.abc.com, alterativly you could change addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
being the company and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. recip that points
back to the linux box

Brent

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[William Lefkovics]

I typically use an SMTP connector for the smart host versus the virtual
server.

The routing groups does add to the mix.  Good resolution, though.


-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


I have 2 (2000 sp2) and battled for 5 hours with this so any tips would be
great!
Setup:
2 exchange servers in different routing groups (across a WAN link)
1 Linux box as a SOA DNS server, SMTP (sendmail) incoming (and outgoing),
and Firewall.

What happened:
Setup SMTP to send via Smart host.. worked fine, however it insisted on
sending mail to the second server via the smart host as well... mail bounced
from the linux box!

What I tried:
Setting (below the smarthost) to first try and send directly
created a seperate smtp vs and configured costing..
tried different setting in the routing groups connector


Eventually gave up and punched a hole in the firewall for smtp out and dns
query the linux dns on its internal nic

Later
B




-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 09:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


You control the routing on your messaging servers, not the other way around.
I can have 5 Exchange servers with one pointing to a SendMail smarthost.
What problmes have you experienced in this situation?

The subdomain is reasonable.  The Linux box relaying unresolved recipients
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Each user would have to have both:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the former being the reply-to (Set as Primary) address.

Additional admin to that, but an alternative.

William


-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in
your org, problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2
exchange server and a smart host, even if you check "send direct before
using smart host".. this will not however help you with which mail goes
where.. I would personally adjust the names to something like public.abc.com
and office.abc.com, alterativly you could change addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
being the company and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. recip that points
back to the linux box

Brent

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Brent Hudson]

When I have the time I'm gonna fix this.. it has become a personal issue.. I'll let 
ya'll know what it was..

later
B

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


I typically use an SMTP connector for the smart host versus the virtual
server.

The routing groups does add to the mix.  Good resolution, though.


-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


I have 2 (2000 sp2) and battled for 5 hours with this so any tips would be
great!
Setup:
2 exchange servers in different routing groups (across a WAN link)
1 Linux box as a SOA DNS server, SMTP (sendmail) incoming (and outgoing),
and Firewall.

What happened:
Setup SMTP to send via Smart host.. worked fine, however it insisted on
sending mail to the second server via the smart host as well... mail bounced
from the linux box!

What I tried:
Setting (below the smarthost) to first try and send directly
created a seperate smtp vs and configured costing..
tried different setting in the routing groups connector


Eventually gave up and punched a hole in the firewall for smtp out and dns
query the linux dns on its internal nic

Later
B




-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 09:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


You control the routing on your messaging servers, not the other way around.
I can have 5 Exchange servers with one pointing to a SendMail smarthost.
What problmes have you experienced in this situation?

The subdomain is reasonable.  The Linux box relaying unresolved recipients
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Each user would have to have both:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the former being the reply-to (Set as Primary) address.

Additional admin to that, but an alternative.

William


-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


The smart host option will only work if it is the only Exchange server in
your org, problems start creeping in if there has to be mail between 2
exchange server and a smart host, even if you check "send direct before
using smart host".. this will not however help you with which mail goes
where.. I would personally adjust the names to something like public.abc.com
and office.abc.com, alterativly you could change addresses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
being the company and [EMAIL PROTECTED] could be a cust. recip that points
back to the linux box

Brent

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Which server would the email hit first?  What email app is running on Linux?
The native SMTP services?  Or something like SendMail?  
Is there not an alias file you can query and forward email to a specific
host upon failure?  

Alternatively, Exchange2000 has a smart host option in an SMTP connector
that may assist.

William

-Original Message-
From: Tom Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server


Hi All,

I have problem with this situation. And need your advise.

Site A is an old email server, previously it serve Public group users and
private group users.

Now, the company has decided get a Exchange 2000 mail server to locate at
Site B, and they prefer this exchange 2000 mail server serve Private users
ONLY. and let the old Linux server serve the Public group users.

So, what can i do to make this two server using the same domain (abc.com),
different email server, to serve different group??

Can some one help me?   
Thank you

Tom


FYI:
===

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ):
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only )
Linux Mail server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Public

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ):
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only )
Exchange Mail Server
Domain : abc.com
User Group : Group Private

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List

RE: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

[Michael B. Smith]

If you look at these in the exchange management console, do you see two
distribution groups? One marked legacy, and one not?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Whitson, Garry [mailto:garry.whit...@llcc.edu] 
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

 

In August my organization completed our migration from Exchange 2003 
to Exchange 2007.  Unfortunately we have been plagued by problems with 
new, non-dynamic mail distribution and mail enabled security groups. 

Mail sent to these groups via Outlook are not delivered and no non- 
delivery notice is received by the sender. 

If a user attempts to address a message to the group using OWA, there 
is a prompt that there is more than one address (though OWA only shows 
a single address). 

None of the distribution groups have a legacyExchangeDN.  I am aware 
that RUS would have handled assigning this attribute were we still 
running Exchange 2003 but this is no longer the case. 

Obviously something is broken but we cannot determine what it is. 

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

 

 

 <http://help.llcc.edu/> LLCC Helpdesk

Do you need to request assistance or check on an existing call?  

Click on the LLCC Help Desk logo to log into KBOX.

 

Garry Whitson

System Administrator

Information & Telecommunication System

Lincoln Land Community College

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

RE: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

[Whitson, Garry]

No

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

If you look at these in the exchange management console, do you see two 
distribution groups? One marked legacy, and one not?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

From: Whitson, Garry [mailto:garry.whit...@llcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

In August my organization completed our migration from Exchange 2003
to Exchange 2007.  Unfortunately we have been plagued by problems with
new, non-dynamic mail distribution and mail enabled security groups.
Mail sent to these groups via Outlook are not delivered and no non-
delivery notice is received by the sender.
If a user attempts to address a message to the group using OWA, there
is a prompt that there is more than one address (though OWA only shows
a single address).
None of the distribution groups have a legacyExchangeDN.  I am aware
that RUS would have handled assigning this attribute were we still
running Exchange 2003 but this is no longer the case.
Obviously something is broken but we cannot determine what it is.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?


[cid:image001.jpg@01C97FA4.E0035A50]<http://help.llcc.edu/>
Do you need to request assistance or check on an existing call?
Click on the LLCC Help Desk logo to log into KBOX.

Garry Whitson
System Administrator
Information & Telecommunication System
Lincoln Land Community College








~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

Re: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem

[Eric Woodford]

Check to see if two objects have the same SMTP email address. I've seen two
issues lately.

1. Multiple Primary smtp addresses on the same object.
2. Multiple objects with the same SMTP address.

I believe it's the web management tool we use, but can't verify.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Whitson, Garry wrote:

>  No
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 26, 2009 10:48 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem
>
>
>
> If you look at these in the exchange management console, do you see two
> distribution groups? One marked legacy, and one not?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> My blog: 
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael<http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael>
>
> I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
>
>
>
> *From:* Whitson, Garry [mailto:garry.whit...@llcc.edu]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 26, 2009 11:15 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* non-dynamic mail distribution and mail problem
>
>
>
> In August my organization completed our migration from Exchange 2003
> to Exchange 2007.  Unfortunately we have been plagued by problems with
> new, non-dynamic mail distribution and mail enabled security groups.
>
> Mail sent to these groups via Outlook are not delivered and no non-
> delivery notice is received by the sender.
>
> If a user attempts to address a message to the group using OWA, there
> is a prompt that there is more than one address (though OWA only shows
> a single address).
>
> None of the distribution groups have a legacyExchangeDN.  I am aware
> that RUS would have handled assigning this attribute were we still
> running Exchange 2003 but this is no longer the case.
>
> Obviously something is broken but we cannot determine what it is.
>
> Can anyone point me in the right direction?
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: LLCC Helpdesk] <http://help.llcc.edu/>
>
> *Do you need to request assistance or check on an existing call?  *
>
> *Click on the LLCC Help Desk logo to log into KBOX.*
>
>
>
> Garry Whitson
>
> System Administrator
>
> Information & Telecommunication System
>
> Lincoln Land Community College
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

Re: AW: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Tom Lee]

Thanks for all quick respond.

to: Brent Hudson
==
- The company doesn't want the subdomain ( public.abc.com or
office.abc.com )


to:Rickenbacher Beat

ok, let's say exchange 2000 is the first hit, ( mean change the DNS server
record, abc.com point to IP address 202.162.2.1)

I only create the users a,b,c,d,for Private users.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / d@abc,com

if the somebody send the email to Exchange2000 server, - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
of course, the email server can't locate the user in Exchange 2000 user
list. ( means this is unresolved mails )

So, where should exchange 2000 forward the email to?? to Linux server? 
is the linux server use the same domain? 
of course the Private users point their SMTP and POP3 to the Exchange 2000
email server, BUT how about Public users? their POP3 server point to
Exchage 2000 or Linux?
If point to Exchange 2000 email server, user ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) not found.!
If point to Linux mail server, then should the linux use the same domain
(abc.com )?

to: Marty Richards
===
So, means that the Linux server must run as secondary domain
(public.abc.com ), if not, then no way to solve this problem??

Thank you



Tom




FYI: 
=== 

Site A OLD ( located at ISP ): 
Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only ) 
Linux Mail server 
Domain : abc.com 
User Group : Group Public 

Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ): 
Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only ) 
Exchange Mail Server 
Domain : abc.com 
User Group : Group Private 




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AW: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Marty Richards]

> So, means that the Linux server must run as secondary domain
> (public.abc.com ), if not, then no way to solve this problem??
> 
> FYI: 
> === 
> 
> Site A OLD ( located at ISP ): 
> Public IP : 202.188.1.1 ( example only ) 
> Linux Mail server 
> Domain : abc.com 
> User Group : Group Public 
> 
> Site B New ( located at HQ Office, leased line to Internet ): 
> Public IP : 202.162.2.1 ( example only ) 
> Exchange Mail Server 
> Domain : abc.com 
> User Group : Group Private 
> 


No.
 
if the mx record points to the linux box, then all abc.com mail will arrive
there.
 
The linux box then consults its virtual user table file. An entry in this
file might be:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]john@[202.162.2.1]

An email for john would then be redirected to the exchange server. If john's
account on the exchange server has a second email address of
john@[202.162.2.1] then it will be delivered. John's primary address on the
exchange server is still [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If a mail went to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] was NOT in the virtual user
table, it would be delivered to user a on the linux server.
 
No secondary domains are required.

Cheers,
Marty

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AW: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Tom Lee]

to Marty Richards :


ok, i got what you mean. so, the problem solve 

Outsider send email to John([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
when outsider people send the email to john([EMAIL PROTECTED] ), the email will
arrive at Linux server, then according to the virtual user table, forward
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( so in exchnage server i must create the user named
John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ??)

John send email out

john point the SMTP server to Linux(abc.com ) will do..:)

John Receive email
---
So John, this public user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - When he wants to receive email,
what is his POP3 server address?
IF point Linux (abc.com) the result will be user not found.
IF point to Exchange 2000 (202.162.2.1), then i think this is the right
one?

By the way,can u provide more info in this Linux server, virtual user
table, how to setup? how to configure? ( I think i am beginner in Linux )

Thank you very much

( please correct me for all above mentioned if wrong)

Tom 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: AW: Exchange 2000 mail server + Linux mail server

[Marty Richards]

Comments in line. Its starting to get a bit linuxy and might be OT for most
readers.

Cheers,
Marty

> ok, i got what you mean. so, the problem solve 
> 
> Outsider send email to John([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> --
> when outsider people send the email to john([EMAIL PROTECTED] ), 
> the email will
> arrive at Linux server, then according to the virtual user 
> table, forward
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( so in exchnage server i must create the 
> user named
> John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ??)

Close. Create John on the exchange server as usual ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), but add a
second email address for john@[202.162.2.1]. Leave the primary SMTP address
as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> 
> John send email out
> 
> john point the SMTP server to Linux(abc.com ) will do..:)

Yes, you could do that, but its easier to leave John sending out through the
exchange server in the normal manner.

> John Receive email
> ---
> So John, this public user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - When he wants to 
> receive email,
> what is his POP3 server address?
> IF point Linux (abc.com) the result will be user not found.
> IF point to Exchange 2000 (202.162.2.1), then i think this is 
> the right
> one?

I thought John was an internal, not public user? The internal users would
probably use the Exchange server client, not POP/SMTP. You could set up the
internal users to use POP/SMTP via Exchange if you really want to.
 
The public users on the linux box wouldn't change from their current setup
(which could well be POP/SMTP to the linux box).

> By the way,can u provide more info in this Linux server, virtual user
> table, how to setup? how to configure? ( I think i am 
> beginner in Linux )

Hmm, you might want to get some help or do some web research for this.

The short version is to enable 

FEATURE(`virtusertable', `hash /etc/mail/virtusertable')dnl  

in the mc file, run m4 to convert the mc file into sendmail.cf, copy
sendmail.cf into the /etc or /etc/mail directory and restart sendmail. Then,
edit the /etc/mail/virtusertable file to contain the user redirection lines
discussed previously:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]john@[202.162.2.1]

and finally, compile the virtusertable file with

makemap hash virtusertable < virtusertable   (do this in the /etc/mail
directory).

and thats it. Remember to re-run the makemap command above when you update
the virtusertable text file.

Cheers,
Marty

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

e-mail problem

[avinash]

hi guys,

I have following problem when connecting to my mail server can some one
help me its urgent

Avinash

Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=gdii;l=GDIMSX0111030544WFDCJ6AF
MSEXCH:IMS:gdii:india:GDIMSX 3902 (000B099C) Host Unknown

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

e-mail problem

[avinash]

hi guys,

I have following problem when connecting to my mail server can some one
help me its urgent do send me updates to my e-mail account i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Avinash

Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=gdii;l=GDIMSX0111030544WFDCJ6AF
MSEXCH:IMS:gdii:india:GDIMSX 3902 (000B099C) Host Unknown

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: internet mail

[Don Ely]

The only time I see that error is when there are no DNS Servers to the
outside world specified in the TCP/IP properties.  I'd start there...

-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: internet mail


Hi all ive a problem when i try too add the IMS on exchange 5.5 the server
says add dns records mx and a to your dns server. This is done but yet i
still get the maessage .Can anyone suggest any reason why.

Thanks Gary

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: internet mail

[Steve Johnston]

It's just a warning anyway.  If you're sure you have your DNS set up correctly, ignore 
it.

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/12/01 09:46AM >>>
The only time I see that error is when there are no DNS Servers to the
outside world specified in the TCP/IP properties.  I'd start there...

-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: internet mail


Hi all ive a problem when i try too add the IMS on exchange 5.5 the server
says add dns records mx and a to your dns server. This is done but yet i
still get the maessage .Can anyone suggest any reason why.

Thanks Gary

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: internet mail

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: internet mail





I believe it says that each and every time you try to install the Internet Mail Service.  It is just a "don't forget to do this" type message.

 -Original Message-
From:   Gary Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, November 12, 2001 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:    internet mail


Hi all ive a problem when i try too add the IMS on exchange 5.5 the server
says add dns records mx and a to your dns server. This is done but yet i
still get the maessage .Can anyone suggest any reason why.


Thanks Gary


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

remote mail transport

[Kim Schotanus]

One of the users has suddenly this pop up box appearing that connects to
the remote exchange transport
WHy?
How?


Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[mark verschaeve]

Blocking a domain for all users is possible in Exchange 5.5
Perhaps for one user in Exchange 2K??

A good solution is Mails Essentials for such stuff.
Is not so expensive and a trial versiopn exists (90days)

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 22 november 2001 9:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking mail


Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)

I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd party
software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to block
someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain originating
host/-email address/domain? We're running Exchange2k and the solution should
not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a firewallrule is no option
either.

Thanks in advance!

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten

--
"Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Wayne Hanks]

I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way to do this.  In
the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.  Simply
create a custom recipient for the mail address you want to block and place
this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm assuming here that
it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.  Microsoft wouldn't decrease
functionality in a new version, would they ;-)
 

cheers 

Wayne Hanks 
Systems Administrator 
Paterson Ord Minnett 
Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
"Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking mail


Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)

I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
originating host/-email address/domain?
We're running Exchange2k and the solution should not be clientside but
serverside instead.
Adding a firewallrule is no option either.

Thanks in advance!

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten

-- 
"Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Thanks for your reply Mark,

Though I have Mail Essentials, i'm not sure if i should install it, i
don't know how far it will modify original settings and files from
Exchange2k server. Will it be embedded inside Exchgange2k and/or win2k
server and annoying to remove when we decide not to purchase it?
More info and personal experiences regarding Mail Essentials will be
greataly appreciated!


Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: mark verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 09:49
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Blocking a domain for all users is possible in Exchange 5.5
> Perhaps for one user in Exchange 2K??
> 
> A good solution is Mails Essentials for such stuff.
> Is not so expensive and a trial versiopn exists (90days)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: donderdag 22 november 2001 9:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> 
> I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably 
> without 3rd party
> software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to block
> someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain 
> originating
> host/-email address/domain? We're running Exchange2k and the 
> solution should
> not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a 
> firewallrule is no option
> either.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> -- 
> "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Neil Hobson]

The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Blocking mail
Subject: RE: Blocking mail



I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way to do this.
In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you want to block
and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, would they
;-)
 

cheers 

Wayne Hanks 
Systems Administrator 
Paterson Ord Minnett 
Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
"Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking mail


Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)

I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
originating host/-email address/domain? We're running Exchange2k and the
solution should not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a
firewallrule is no option either.

Thanks in advance!

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten

-- 
"Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Wayne thanks for your reply,

Yes I know about this option in EX 5.5, but i could not find such a
thing in 2k unfortunatly. Actually the options on setting rights and
other things on mailboxes in Exchange Manager is incredibly slim, can't
do sh*t :(


Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 09:56
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> 
> I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way 
> to do this.  In
> the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions 
> tab.  Simply
> create a custom recipient for the mail address you want to 
> block and place
> this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm 
> assuming here that
> it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.  Microsoft 
> wouldn't decrease
> functionality in a new version, would they ;-)
>  
> 
> cheers 
> 
> Wayne Hanks 
> Systems Administrator 
> Paterson Ord Minnett 
> Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> 
> I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
> party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
> block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> originating host/-email address/domain?
> We're running Exchange2k and the solution should not be clientside but
> serverside instead.
> Adding a firewallrule is no option either.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> -- 
> "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Neil,

It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i
seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; but what does
ADUC stand for?
And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions in exchange2k?

Thanks,

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking mail
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> 
> I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way 
> to do this.
> In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
> Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you 
> want to block
> and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, would they
> ;-)
>  
> 
> cheers 
> 
> Wayne Hanks 
> Systems Administrator 
> Paterson Ord Minnett 
> Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> 
> I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
> party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
> block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> originating host/-email address/domain? We're running 
> Exchange2k and the
> solution should not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a
> firewallrule is no option either.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> -- 
> "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> **
> This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
> or any of its subsidiary companies.
> If you have received this eMail in error please contact the 
> Support Desk
> Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Neil Hobson]

It's the Active Directory Users & Computers snap-in, and it's much
easier to type ADUC!

Make sure you run the ADUC from your Exchange 2000 server, or a Windows
2000 server with the admin tools and Exchange System Manager installed,
as the ADUC snap-in is upgraded.  For each mailbox-enabled Windows 2000
user, you'll find a delivery restrictions button on the Exchange General
tab (I think).

Don't forget that with Exchange 2000, a lot of the admin is performed in
ADUC and not necessarily the Exchange System Manager.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 22 November 2001 09:10
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Blocking mail
Subject: RE: Blocking mail



Neil,

It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i
seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; but what does
ADUC stand for? And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions in
exchange2k?

Thanks,

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking mail
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> 
> I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way
> to do this.
> In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
> Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you 
> want to block
> and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, would they
> ;-)
>  
> 
> cheers
> 
> Wayne Hanks
> Systems Administrator 
> Paterson Ord Minnett 
> Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> 
> I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd 
> party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to

> block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain 
> originating host/-email address/domain? We're running Exchange2k and 
> the solution should not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a
> firewallrule is no option either.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> --
> "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> **
> This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.

> Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its 
> subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please 
> contact the Support Desk
> Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[WEAVER, Simon]

Active Directory Users and Computers!
This is found in the Administrative Tools once Active Directory has been
configured and implemented :)
Click on VIEW and Advanced to see more tabs!

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2001 09:10:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking mail


Neil,

It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i
seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; but what does
ADUC stand for?
And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions in exchange2k?

Thanks,

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
>
>
> The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
>
> Neil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking mail
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
>
>
>
> I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way
> to do this.
> In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
> Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you
> want to block
> and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, would they
> ;-)
>  
>
> cheers
>
> Wayne Hanks
> Systems Administrator
> Paterson Ord Minnett
> Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086
> "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy"
>
>  
>
> 
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking mail
>
>
> Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
>
> I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
> party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
> block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> originating host/-email address/domain? We're running
> Exchange2k and the
> solution should not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a
> firewallrule is no option either.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
>
> --
> "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
> **
> This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
> or any of its subsidiary companies.
> If you have received this eMail in error please contact the
> Support Desk
> Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
...
This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.  Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.
Astrium Limited
Gunnels Wood Road
Stevenage
Hertfordshire
SG1 2AS

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Oh yes ofcourse hehe, i feel so dumb ;) ADUC rules!!!

I never thought of creating a new custom recipient to add in that
delivery restrictions tab, i always did find it very annoying i could
only add recipients from an AL and not just enter any e-mail address ;)

Thanks, i'm sure this will help.

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:13
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> It's the Active Directory Users & Computers snap-in, and it's much
> easier to type ADUC!
> 
> Make sure you run the ADUC from your Exchange 2000 server, or 
> a Windows
> 2000 server with the admin tools and Exchange System Manager 
> installed,
> as the ADUC snap-in is upgraded.  For each mailbox-enabled 
> Windows 2000
> user, you'll find a delivery restrictions button on the 
> Exchange General
> tab (I think).
> 
> Don't forget that with Exchange 2000, a lot of the admin is 
> performed in
> ADUC and not necessarily the Exchange System Manager.
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 22 November 2001 09:10
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking mail
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> 
> Neil,
> 
> It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i
> seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; 
> but what does
> ADUC stand for? And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions in
> exchange2k?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> > Conversation: Blocking mail
> > Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way
> > to do this.
> > In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
> > Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you 
> > want to block
> > and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> > assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> > Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, 
> would they
> > ;-)
> >  
> > 
> > cheers
> > 
> > Wayne Hanks
> > Systems Administrator 
> > Paterson Ord Minnett 
> > Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> > "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> > 
> > I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably 
> without 3rd 
> > party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all 
> possible to
> 
> > block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain 
> > originating host/-email address/domain? We're running 
> Exchange2k and 
> > the solution should not be clientside but serverside 
> instead. Adding a
> > firewallrule is no option either.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > Bob ten Berge
> > deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> > 
> > --
> > "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at: 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> **
> > This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
> addressed.
> 
> > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the 
> author and do 
> > not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its 

RE: Blocking mail

[Neil Hobson]

Custom recipient?  You've still got your Exchange 5.5 head on - it's now
referred to as a contact!

Looks like you're the semi-pro now...  ;-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 22 November 2001 09:19
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Blocking mail
Subject: RE: Blocking mail


Oh yes ofcourse hehe, i feel so dumb ;) ADUC rules!!!

I never thought of creating a new custom recipient to add in that
delivery restrictions tab, i always did find it very annoying i could
only add recipients from an AL and not just enter any e-mail address ;)

Thanks, i'm sure this will help.

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:13
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> It's the Active Directory Users & Computers snap-in, and it's much 
> easier to type ADUC!
> 
> Make sure you run the ADUC from your Exchange 2000 server, or
> a Windows
> 2000 server with the admin tools and Exchange System Manager 
> installed,
> as the ADUC snap-in is upgraded.  For each mailbox-enabled 
> Windows 2000
> user, you'll find a delivery restrictions button on the 
> Exchange General
> tab (I think).
> 
> Don't forget that with Exchange 2000, a lot of the admin is
> performed in
> ADUC and not necessarily the Exchange System Manager.
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 22 November 2001 09:10
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking mail
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> 
> Neil,
> 
> It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i 
> seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; but what 
> does ADUC stand for? And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions 
> in exchange2k?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> 
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> > Conversation: Blocking mail
> > Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way to do 
> > this. In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions

> > tab. Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you
> > want to block
> > and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> > assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> > Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, 
> would they
> > ;-)
> >  
> > 
> > cheers
> > 
> > Wayne Hanks
> > Systems Administrator
> > Paterson Ord Minnett 
> > Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> > "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> > 
> > I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably
> without 3rd
> > party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all
> possible to
> 
> > block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> > originating host/-email address/domain? We're running 
> Exchange2k and
> > the solution should not be clientside but serverside
> instead. Adding a
> > firewallrule is no option either.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > Bob ten Berge
> > deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> > 
> > --
> > "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> ***

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Damn, you got me, guess that last vacation 7 years ago didn't help ;)

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


-- 
"Do I sense another presence in this room? or is it just me"


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:21
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Custom recipient?  You've still got your Exchange 5.5 head on 
> - it's now
> referred to as a contact!
> 
> Looks like you're the semi-pro now...  ;-)
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 22 November 2001 09:19
> Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking mail
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Oh yes ofcourse hehe, i feel so dumb ;) ADUC rules!!!
> 
> I never thought of creating a new custom recipient to add in that
> delivery restrictions tab, i always did find it very annoying i could
> only add recipients from an AL and not just enter any e-mail 
> address ;)
> 
> Thanks, i'm sure this will help.
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> 
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:13
> > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > It's the Active Directory Users & Computers snap-in, and it's much 
> > easier to type ADUC!
> > 
> > Make sure you run the ADUC from your Exchange 2000 server, or
> > a Windows
> > 2000 server with the admin tools and Exchange System Manager 
> > installed,
> > as the ADUC snap-in is upgraded.  For each mailbox-enabled 
> > Windows 2000
> > user, you'll find a delivery restrictions button on the 
> > Exchange General
> > tab (I think).
> > 
> > Don't forget that with Exchange 2000, a lot of the admin is
> > performed in
> > ADUC and not necessarily the Exchange System Manager.
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: 22 November 2001 09:10
> > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> > Conversation: Blocking mail
> > Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Neil,
> > 
> > It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm 
> stupid and i 
> > seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; but what 
> > does ADUC stand for? And where do you see a tab delivery 
> restrictions 
> > in exchange2k?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Bob ten Berge
> > deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> > 
> > 
> > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > > Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> > > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> > > 
> > > Neil
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> > > Conversation: Blocking mail
> > > Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way to do 
> > > this. In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery 
> restrictions
> 
> > > tab. Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you
> > > want to block
> > > and place this in the "reject messages from" table under 
> list.  I'm
> > > assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> > > Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, 
> > would they
> > > ;-)
> > >  
> > > 
> > > cheers
> > > 
> > > Wayne Hanks
> > > Systems Administrator
> > > Paterson Ord Minnett 
> > > Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> > > "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Thanks for explaining the abbreviation, I just didn't think of AD Users
and Computers because i had Exchange2k in my head too much ;)
I did know about that tab being there in ADUC user's properties tho!

Sometimes it's so easy to focus on one thing and completely forget the
obvious ;)

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:14
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Active Directory Users and Computers!
> This is found in the Administrative Tools once Active 
> Directory has been
> configured and implemented :)
> Click on VIEW and Advanced to see more tabs!
> 
> Simon Weaver
> NT Domain Administrator
> Ext. 5544
> Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 November 2001 09:10:AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Neil,
> 
> It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i
> seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks; 
> but what does
> ADUC stand for?
> And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions in exchange2k?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> 
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> >
> >
> > The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> > Conversation: Blocking mail
> > Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way
> > to do this.
> > In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
> > Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you
> > want to block
> > and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> > assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> > Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version, 
> would they
> > ;-)
> >  
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Wayne Hanks
> > Systems Administrator
> > Paterson Ord Minnett
> > Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086
> > "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy"
> >
> >  
> >
> > 
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Blocking mail
> >
> >
> > Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> >
> > I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
> > party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all 
> possible to
> > block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> > originating host/-email address/domain? We're running
> > Exchange2k and the
> > solution should not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a
> > firewallrule is no option either.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Bob ten Berge
> > deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> >
> > --
> > "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> > 
> **
> > This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
> addressed.
> > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
> > the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
> > or any of its subsidiary companies.
> > If you have received this eMail in error please contact the
> > Support Desk
> > Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> **
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> ...
> This email is for the intended addressee only.
> If you have received it in error then you must not use, 
> retain, disseminate
> or otherwise deal with it.  Please notify the sender by return email.
> The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the 
> views of Astrium Limited.
> Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any 
> contract or obligation.
> Astrium Limited
> Gunnels Wood Road
> Stevenage
> Hertfordshire
> SG1 2AS
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking mail

[WEAVER, Simon]

No probs Bob.
I am learning new stuff about Exchange 2000 all the time, and I have found
this list to have some uses, as well as various Exchange 2000 books, and the
online help files, plus Technet White papers, plus
www.microsoft.com/exchange 

Phew! :)

Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2001 09:22:AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking mail


Thanks for explaining the abbreviation, I just didn't think of AD Users
and Computers because i had Exchange2k in my head too much ;)
I did know about that tab being there in ADUC user's properties tho!

Sometimes it's so easy to focus on one thing and completely forget the
obvious ;)

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:14
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
>
>
> Active Directory Users and Computers!
> This is found in the Administrative Tools once Active
> Directory has been
> configured and implemented :)
> Click on VIEW and Advanced to see more tabs!
>
> Simon Weaver
> NT Domain Administrator
> Ext. 5544
> Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 November 2001 09:10:AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Blocking mail
>
>
> Neil,
>
> It's probably pretty obvious to everybody else, but i'm stupid and i
> seem to be losing my mind slowly the last couple of weeks;
> but what does
> ADUC stand for?
> And where do you see a tab delivery restrictions in exchange2k?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
>
>
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 10:02
> > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> >
> >
> > The tab still exists in ADUC, so fear not.   :-)
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Posted At: 22 November 2001 08:56
> > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
> > Conversation: Blocking mail
> > Subject: RE: Blocking mail
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way
> > to do this.
> > In the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions tab.
> > Simply create a custom recipient for the mail address you
> > want to block
> > and place this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm
> > assuming here that it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.
> > Microsoft wouldn't decrease functionality in a new version,
> would they
> > ;-)
> > 
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Wayne Hanks
> > Systems Administrator
> > Paterson Ord Minnett
> > Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086
> > "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy"
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Blocking mail
> >
> >
> > Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> >
> > I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
> > party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all
> possible to
> > block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> > originating host/-email address/domain? We're running
> > Exchange2k and the
> > solution should not be clientside but serverside instead. Adding a
> > firewallrule is no option either.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Bob ten Berge
> > deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> >
> > --
> > "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> **
> > This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed.
> > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of

RE: Blocking mail

[Bob t. Berge]

Well, that didn't work :(

I created this test contact with my hotmail address as e-mail.
I then added this contact to "Accept messages from everyone except:"
from my co-worker's account in ADUC. When I sent him an e-mail from that
hotmail account it still arrived in his mailbox!
When I added my testuser I noticed that I could only add users from
Entire Directory OR dv02.net (which is, ofcourse, our mailserver
domain), not a choice from any address book at all.

Did I do something wrong here? Am I forgetting something?

Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2001 09:56
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> 
> I don't know about ex2k but I know in Ex5.5 there was a way 
> to do this.  In
> the client mailbox config, there is a delivery restrictions 
> tab.  Simply
> create a custom recipient for the mail address you want to 
> block and place
> this in the "reject messages from" table under list.  I'm 
> assuming here that
> it is possible to do a similar thing in  e2k.  Microsoft 
> wouldn't decrease
> functionality in a new version, would they ;-)
>  
> 
> cheers 
> 
> Wayne Hanks 
> Systems Administrator 
> Paterson Ord Minnett 
> Ph 08 9263 1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
> "Don't Panic" -Douglas Adams "The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 16:44
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking mail
> 
> 
> Hello admins and semi-pro's ;)
> 
> I have a question; does anyone know of a way, preferably without 3rd
> party software (but if all else fails...), if it is at all possible to
> block someone inside our domain from receiving mail from a certain
> originating host/-email address/domain?
> We're running Exchange2k and the solution should not be clientside but
> serverside instead.
> Adding a firewallrule is no option either.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> -- 
> "Did anyone see my turkey? I seem to have lost my turkey"
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Backup mail server...

[Steve Casas]

I'm looking for a ISP/ASP that we can use to queue mail and as a backup mail
server/mail relay in the event our primary SMTP server goes down. Our
existing ISP, Qwest, does not provide this service. Can anyone recommend a
provider that can perform these functions?

Thanks,



Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Routing Mail

[Bob t. Berge]

I think you should create an SMTP connector that forwards all mail to
the smarthost you provide (probably your ISP's SMTP server).
I could be wrong tho, but I don't think I am ;)


Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 27 november 2001 15:54
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: Routing Mail
> 
> 
> I just installed Exchange 2000 into my server invironment which is all
> native Win2k.  This is the only mail server currently in the 
> domain.  My
> domain name is test.com (example)  Yesterday my T1 was 
> installed and I had
> an MX record created for testing purposes, the MX record is 
> mail1.test.net.
> I'm using test.net because everyone in the office is still 
> receiving mail
> via pop3 from an external provider.  Anytime someone on the 
> internet sends a
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the message gets sent to our 
> external provider
> and we receive the message through pop3.
> 
> Now, since my domain name is test.com and I try to send a 
> message from the
> e2k server to test.com, the messages sits in the outbound 
> queue and goes
> nowhere.  I don't have mailboxes created for my internal 
> users as of yet but
> I assumed that when I send a message from test.net to 
> test.com that the
> message would be routed through the internet to our pop3 provider.
> 
> Where in E2k can I tell messages that I send to test.com to go to our
> external provider instead of try to deliver them on the inside?
> 
> Thanks
> Casey
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Routing Mail

[Barry McConnell]

This would be bypass the problem but would work. Personally I
would create another MX record with a smaller value and point that to
your ISP for testing once testing is finalized and u create mailbox's
for your users and delete your ISP MX record. 

Barry McConnell
Corel Corporation
Security Officer/Email Admin
Phone# 613-728-8200 Ext 1148
Cell# 613-299-2881
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Routing Mail


I think you should create an SMTP connector that forwards all mail to
the smarthost you provide (probably your ISP's SMTP server). I could be
wrong tho, but I don't think I am ;)


Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 27 november 2001 15:54
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: Routing Mail
> 
> 
> I just installed Exchange 2000 into my server invironment which is all

> native Win2k.  This is the only mail server currently in the domain.  
> My domain name is test.com (example)  Yesterday my T1 was
> installed and I had
> an MX record created for testing purposes, the MX record is 
> mail1.test.net.
> I'm using test.net because everyone in the office is still 
> receiving mail
> via pop3 from an external provider.  Anytime someone on the 
> internet sends a
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the message gets sent to our 
> external provider
> and we receive the message through pop3.
> 
> Now, since my domain name is test.com and I try to send a
> message from the
> e2k server to test.com, the messages sits in the outbound 
> queue and goes
> nowhere.  I don't have mailboxes created for my internal 
> users as of yet but
> I assumed that when I send a message from test.net to 
> test.com that the
> message would be routed through the internet to our pop3 provider.
> 
> Where in E2k can I tell messages that I send to test.com to go to our 
> external provider instead of try to deliver them on the inside?
> 
> Thanks
> Casey
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: mail forward

[Zangara, Jim]

Title: RE: mail forward





Use the server redirector.  Works like a champ and doesn't require CR's.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




> -Original Message-
> From: Luis Esteves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:54 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: mail forward
> 
> 
> Hi everybody. I'm in the final stages of seting up an 
> Exchange2000 server and I'm kinda' stumped with something I 
> hope is pretty basic.
> 
> We have 4 employees here that have e-mail pagers. I want all 
> incoming e-mail to be delivered to their exchange mailbox and 
> be automatically forwarded to their Blackberry account. I 
> suspect that this is handled in the 'recipient policies' but
> 
> TIA,
> -
> Luis Esteves
> Digital Connexxions Corp.
> Network Administrator
> Tel:  (905) 338-8355
> Cell: (905) 334-7448
> http://www.dconx.com
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-> software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: mail forward

[MBrownell]

Even better use the Blackberry Enterprise Server. Synchs inbox and calendar
wirelessly in both directions. When you send or respond or forward it is
addressed from your exchange address, not the Blackberry email address.

***
Michael K. Brownell
Senior Network Administrator
Express Messenger Systems/California Overnight

Support Desk:  888.594.6306
Office  :  602.333.4401
Cell :  602.315.5668

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


-Original Message-
From: Luis Esteves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mail forward


Hi everybody. I'm in the final stages of seting up an Exchange2000 server
and I'm kinda' stumped with something I hope is pretty basic.

We have 4 employees here that have e-mail pagers. I want all incoming e-mail
to be delivered to their exchange mailbox and be automatically forwarded to
their Blackberry account. I suspect that this is handled in the 'recipient
policies' but

TIA,
-
Luis Esteves
Digital Connexxions Corp.
Network Administrator
Tel:  (905) 338-8355
Cell: (905) 334-7448
http://www.dconx.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

mail automatically duplicated

[Bao, Gang]

We have a Exchange5.5 user whose mails automatically duplicated since last
Saturday, Any idea of this? He uses outlook2000.

Thanks.

Bao

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SP


http://www.tntsoftware.com



> -Original Message-
> From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:42 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Exchange 2k SP
> 
> Company URL, please  :)
> And don't tell me its msn.com
> 
> --- Scott Schnoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have a set of tools we've developed internally
> > that we use to stress our
> > product running on systems.  We'll do things like
> > hammer the heck out of the
> > event logs, collect performance data intensely, send
> > email notifications (a
> > lot!), etc.
> >
> > My company's flagship product does real-time
> > monitoring of servers,
> > workstations, etc. and needs to perform well,
> > especially under periods of
> > heavy stress.  So before it goes out to customers,
> > we stress it to the
> > extreme.  It's actually a lot of work, but a lot of
> > fun, too!
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "David N Precht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: Exchange 2k SP
> >
> >
> > > What kind of stress tools ya got  ;) ?
> > >
> > > --- Scott Schnoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ditto here.  Running in production without even
> > a
> > > > hint of any problems.
> > > >
> > > > Also running it on a test/development cluster
> > that
> > > > gets stressed pretty hard
> > > > and all is well there, too.
> > > >
> > > > SP2 gets a big thumbs up from me!
> > > >
> > > > -Scott
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Bob t. Berge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:14 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Same here, installed it overnight and all seems
> > to
> > > > work fine indeed.
> > > > It's a BIG SP, almost 190MB, and the patching
> > takes
> > > > quite some time, but it
> > > > all went good and no strange eventlog entries
> > were
> > > > added after the reboot.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > > > > Van: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Verzonden: maandag 10 december 2001 16:22
> > > > > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Exchange 2k SP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I installed the E2k SP2 this morning, so far,
> > > > everything looks ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mensaje original-
> > > > > De: David N. Precht
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Diciembre de 2001
> > 12:12
> > > > a.m.
> > > > > Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Asunto: Exchange 2k SP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/ESSp1_en.asp
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess MS decided to put it back up !?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> _
> > > > >
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > >
> > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> > > http://greetings.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > >
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Essentials

[Rick Ward - HQ]

Title: RE: Mail Essentials





Sounds like DNS not resolving.. Did the name change on the server? Is DNS updated to reflect that?
Do/Did you have LMHOST or HOSTS file?


-Rick


-Original Message-
From: Tim Gilroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Essentials



Hi.


I tried to install Mail Essentials on a system that had Exchange 5.5 (SP4) on it.  I have done the backup routine etc.  Installed Mail Essentials changed ports and services file etc. I then had issues with intialisation of object in the MMC.  Due to the fact that this was a remote site and time constraints etc I have reconfigured everything back to the way it was and allseemed to be fine.  But alas, it will download mail from the ISP via smtp (Fine) but it will not upload files.  It complains that it can not resolve hosts.  (Host unreachable) in the queues dialogue box.  This is a server that is forwarding all mail to the ISP mail gateway.  I am struggling abit for the quick fix and would appreciate thoughts.

Thanks in advance.


Tim Gilroy


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Essentials

[Benjamin Zachary]

On the outbound connectivity you should have mail forwarded to smart
host and that IP should be the mail essentials machine. Make sure the
MES machine is resolving correctly as well as is listening on port 25
from internal and external.

-Original Message-
From: Tim Gilroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Essentials


Hi.

I tried to install Mail Essentials on a system that had Exchange 5.5
(SP4) on it.  I have done the backup routine etc.  Installed Mail
Essentials changed ports and services file etc. I then had issues with
intialisation of object in the MMC.  Due to the fact that this was a
remote site and time constraints etc I have reconfigured everything back
to the way it was and allseemed to be fine.  But alas, it will download
mail from the ISP via smtp (Fine) but it will not upload files.  It
complains that it can not resolve hosts.  (Host unreachable) in the
queues dialogue box.  This is a server that is forwarding all mail to
the ISP mail gateway.  I am struggling abit for the quick fix and would
appreciate thoughts.

Thanks in advance.

Tim Gilroy

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Relay

[Benjamin Winzenz]

Title: Mail Relay









Exchange
2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box.  So unless you changed
something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be
relaying.



Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Irfan GM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January
 07, 2002 3:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Relay

 

 

How
do i stop mail relaying in exchange 2000 sp2 

irfan


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Relay

[Benjamin Zachary]

Title: Message



Yah 
but you are unable to send from outside the domain as well. Not a very nice 
tradeoff. All my outside users now either have to use OWA or I have to open up 
the anonymous on the smtp so they can continue to function.

  
  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 
  8:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mail 
  Relay
  
  Exchange 
  2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box.  So unless you 
  changed something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be 
  relaying.
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE 
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator 
  Peregrine 
  Systems 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 
  2002 3:52 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mail Relay
   
   
  How do i stop mail relaying in 
  exchange 2000 sp2 
  irfan 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Relay

[Irfan GM]

Title: Mail Relay



Thanks 
Benjamin , I have fixed this problem . I had to delete the SMTP mail 
connector.
 
Thanks
Irfan

  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 
  6:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mail 
  Relay
  
  Exchange 
  2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box.  So unless you 
  changed something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be 
  relaying.
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE 
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator 
  Peregrine 
  Systems 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 
  2002 3:52 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mail Relay
   
   
  How do i stop mail relaying in 
  exchange 2000 sp2 
  irfan 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Relay

[Benjamin Winzenz]

Title: Message









Or you can implement a VPN solution...



Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
8:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Relay

 



Yah but you are unable to send from
outside the domain as well. Not a very nice tradeoff. All my outside users now
either have to use OWA or I have to open up the anonymous on the smtp so they
can continue to function.





-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
8:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Relay

Exchange
2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box.  So unless you changed
something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be
relaying.



Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Irfan GM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
3:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Relay

 

 

How
do i stop mail relaying in exchange 2000 sp2 

irfan


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Relay

[Benjamin Winzenz]

Title: Mail Relay









I suppose that would certainly do it.  The
SMTP connector, IIRC, overrides the settings on the Default SMTP Virtual Server.



Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Irfan GM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
10:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Relay

 



Thanks Benjamin , I have fixed this
problem . I had to delete the SMTP mail connector.





 





Thanks





Irfan





-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
6:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Relay

Exchange
2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box.  So unless you changed
something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be
relaying.



Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Irfan GM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
3:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Relay

 

 

How
do i stop mail relaying in exchange 2000 sp2 

irfan


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Relay

[Eugene Pesochin]

Title: Message









You will need to allow authenticated users
to relay. And users will have to check in the properties of outgoing mail that
they must authenticate.

 

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
8:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Relay

 



Yah but you are unable to
send from outside the domain as well. Not a very nice tradeoff. All my outside
users now either have to use OWA or I have to open up the anonymous on the smtp
so they can continue to function.





-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
8:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Relay

Exchange
2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box.  So unless you changed
something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be
relaying.



Ben Winzenz,
MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Irfan GM
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
3:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Relay

 

 

How do i stop mail relaying in exchange 2000 sp2


irfan 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

no outgoing mail

[John John]

I have an exchange 5.5 sp4 machine that has suddenly stopped sending 
outgoing mail. Outside mail is being routed internally, and internal mail is 
routed fineit's just mail destined for outside.

The exchange box uses a different dns server than it did previously, but 
this was done weeks ago. Messages stopped going out after a reboot 
yesterday. I've tried switching back to the old dns server, to no avail.

The Exchange box is behind a proxy 2.0.

Any ideas would be helpful. I can't find anything on TechNet.

John.

_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Internet mail question

[Charles Whitby]

I currently have to active connections to the 'net: one through provider A
(whom we've had for some time but are phasing out) and one through provider
B (whom we're phasing in).  Both have active connections tot he network
segment where the unprotected interface of my firewall lives.

E-mail comes and goes just fine through Provider A when I set its router as
the default gateway on my firewall.

When I set up provider B's router as my default gateway I can send e-mails
fine, but can't receive them.

I know that the required DNS changes showing my new addresses haven't
filtered through yet.  My question is, when I'm using my new provider as my
default route to the 'net and some one sends an e-mail to me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], shouldn't it still be able to come in via my old (and
still activeand connected) internet connection and be delivered to my
exchange server?

Configuration:

Exposed firewalla.b.c.180
/29 network
Old connection (A)  a.b.c.179  /29
network
New connection  (B) a.b.c.177 /29
network

I'm probably missing something totally obvious here, but hey, a chance to
learn is a chance to learn.

Thanks.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Routing E-Mail

[Friese, Casey]

All Exchange 2000 environment with latest updates applied, Native Windows 2k
domain with latest updates as well.

My domain name is penncolor.com so Exchange is installed as penncolor.com
Currently we use an external ISP to handle mail for our domain so our mx
record for penncolor.com points to our ISP.  

When internal users with local exchange accounts send messages to internal
users without exchange accounts to the penncolor.com address, the messages
sit in the queue and eventually are bounced because they try to remain
internal.

Any idea how I can get this to stop until I get everyone cut over from the
ISP to Exchange locally?

Thank You,
Casey Friese
NT Admin / Exchange Admin
Omnicare Clinical Research
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p) 484.679.2784
c) 610.812.2180

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail forwarding software

[Jay Ploughe]

Title: Message



I am 
looking for an email forwarding/aliasing solution similar to the service 
provided by bigfoot.com in which a "permanent" email address can be setup for a 
user which is automatically forwarded to the user's real/current email 
address.
The 
solution would need to be manageable by the user from the web. 

 
Is 
there a software package out there that does this or is it all custom web 
programming?  NT/Exchange based preferred but a Linux based solution would 
be considered.
 
TIA
 
 
Jay Ploughe Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer Network Administrator Kiwanis 
International 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mail size limits

[Gabe Austin]

Where do you set the 
mail size limit?
 
Exch 
5.5
 
 
Gabe Austin 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

GFI Mail Essentials

[Eric Munson - Future Technologies]

We recently installed GFI Mail Essentials on our Exchange Server and now
external email is taking up to 2hours to deliver and eating up 50% of CPU.
Has anyone else had this problem and if so do you have a resolution.

Machine specs:
NT40sp6a
Exchange 5.5 sp4
GFI Mail Essentials 5
GFI Faxmaker

Dual 333, 1gb ram RAID5 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Spooler

[Simon Curtiss]

Mail 
Marshal will do this, but that's not it's primary function which is content 
filtering, virus-checking & traffic analysis. I do heartily recommend it 
however.
 
www.marshalsoftware.com
 
cheers
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Martin Henriksen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 
  7:57 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mail 
  Spooler
  Hello 
  All.
   
  Can anyone 
  recommend a good mail spooler? I want to place the mail spooler on a 
  different server, have this server recive mail and forward it to the 
  exchageserver, so i dont have direct connection between the i-net and my 
  mailserver.
   
  Any suggestions 
  are much appreciated
   
  Regards, 
  
  Martin Henriksen, 
  MCPSystems Engineer
  Consensus it a/s Carl 
  Jacobsens Vej 20, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark Phone    : +45 
  3613 Fax    : +45 
  3613 2223 Mobile    : +45 4016 
  2266E-mail    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

External E-mail

[McCready, Robert]

What's the easiest way to prevent a user from sending/receiving mail outside
the company.
I tried removing his SMTP address, didn't help.  We want to restrict the
user to local mail
only.

NT 4.0  SP6
Exchange 5.5 SP4

Thanks.

Robert


*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message 
contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney 
client privileged or constitute inside information.  It is intended only for the use 
of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s).  If you are not one of the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed 
information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this electronic mail message 
in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then 
remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power & Light Company. ***

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exch2000 mail usage

[PTipirneni]

Title: Exch2000 mail usage





Hi All,



Question: Can we use IE5.5  for many people to look at their mail without logging to computer [one of the user will logon to the computer]

If the answer is yes , is there any configurations we need to make on IE or on AD


Thanks for your support


Regards


Prasad Tipirneni
http:\\www.snowyhydro.com.au




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

SMTP Mail Logging

[Jeramy Eling]

There is probably a really simple answer to this problem. When we used
to run Exchange 5.5 we could log when an SMTP mail was sent and received
in the event log.

Is this function in Exchange 2000 and if so where do I turn it on?

Cheers

Jez.
Network Administrator
Britax PMG Ltd.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

SMTP Mail Archive

[Jeramy Eling]

Can anyone tell me if Exchange 2000 keeps an Archive of all SMTP mail in
and out of the server. If it does where does it reside on the server?

Thanks

Jez

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Gateway

[Martin Blackstone]

You mean there is only one now?? Damn CA must have sucked em up.

Seriously, there are a number of products that do that. Which one are
you looking at?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Gateway


Sorry for the off topic but is anyone using the Mail Gateway product.  I
am looking at it as a solution.  Any thought and ideas would be
appreciated.
 
Thanks,
 
Jonathan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Gateway

[Jonathan K]

I am looking at the borderware product.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail Gateway


You mean there is only one now?? Damn CA must have sucked em up.

Seriously, there are a number of products that do that. Which one are
you looking at?

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Gateway


Sorry for the off topic but is anyone using the Mail Gateway product.  I
am looking at it as a solution.  Any thought and ideas would be
appreciated.
 
Thanks,
 
Jonathan

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Notification Inbound Mail

[Sethi, Ali]

Hello,

We have deleted approximately 100 mailboxes that belonged to former
employees.  Our "administrator" mailbox usually received all Inbound mail
failures.  Many of these email failures are due to users subscribing to
various email services like horoscopes, daily sports news, marketing news,
job news etc.  Is there a way to block these emails from evening entering
our Exchange server?  We get a ton of Inbound Failure messages everyday and
99percent of them are just useless listings that former employees had
subscribed to.  What is the best way to prevent these Inbound Mail Failure
messages?  Do you recommend putting all of these email address in Message
Filtering?  Is there a better option?

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Exchange 5.5 sp4 on windows 2k sp1

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Not receiving mail

[Todd White]

I am testing 2 
exchange servers for directory replication but my problem is that when I send a 
email to the server in Israel they don't receive the email going down the 
VPN.  If this is on our frame it works.  I added a new zone with A 
record and MX record for the server in Israel.  I can ping by name and IP 
address so I don't think it is WINS or DNS...what should I check 
next?
Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
The contents of this e-mail and any 
attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors and 
are intended to be private and confidential.  This material is intended 
solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  The material is 
protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade 
secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express 
permission of LaserComm Inc.  If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the 
correspondence.
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: pop mail

[Clark, Steve]

POP3Gateway from JAK (www.jak.com).
 
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax
 
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pop mail
 
  Hi all does anyone know any pop 3 collectors for exchange ive tried popcon
but is there any others??
 
Thanks Gary Gregg
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: pop mail

[Greg Hamner]

I use Exchange pop3 by Kinesphere.  (www.exchangepop3.com 
).  It'e 
excellent and has lots of features.

Greg Hamner
IT/Network Administrator
ESI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm