Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-18 Thread charlie
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:39 am, Wolfgang Bornath had this to contribute :-
  
 My $200,000.00

 Life must be hard for people who regard their opinion not worthier than
 $0.02.

 wobo

Intriguing thought.

Charlie

-- 
Man is the only animal for whom his own existence is a problem which he has to
solve.

Erich Fromm

This email is guaranteed to be wholly Linux Mandrake 9.1, Kmail v1.5 and
OpenOffice.org1.1Beta


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 02:16, charlie wrote:
 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:39 am, Wolfgang Bornath had this to contribute :-
   
  My $200,000.00
 
  Life must be hard for people who regard their opinion not worthier than
  $0.02.
 
  wobo
 
 Intriguing thought.
 
 Charlie


Either that or they value it in 1900 US dollars (.02 would have gotten
you a meal back then) *grin*




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
Hi All,

The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
one might be really relevant, the rest personal
emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
that only includes the one entry that correctly
resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
would rather have one post --then--its solution.

Again, its just an idea Different folks, Different
Strokes 

Richard

--- Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this
 to contribute :-
   Let me know what you guys think.
  
  _Thanks
  
  Richard Mollel
  
  Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the
 think tank element of 
  everyone throwing something in that makes this
 list a valuable learning 
  experience IMHO.
  
  I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you
 mention has been running? 
  It might also be relevant to know what it is
 dealing with I suppose? I 
  certainly can't identify such an environment as
 allowing maximum discovery.
  
  Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
  
  Charlie.
 
 I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that
 borders on being
 too much too handle. You can always hit delete
 on the topics your
 not interested in.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Brian Parish
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 23:43, Tru64 User wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
 IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
 one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
 subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
 yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
 that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
 For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
 learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!
 
I think we get the idea, but you need to accept that the people here on
this list like the way it is.  I haven't read all the messages in this
thread, but those I've seen were pretty negative to the idea.

It may be tough to find relevant hits in the archives sometimes, but
it's damn easy to get help when you need it here (or at least sympathy
;-)

Gossip corner forever!

Brian


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 10:17, Brian Parish wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 23:43, Tru64 User wrote:
  Hi All,
  
  The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  
  IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
  one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
  subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
  yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
  that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
  For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
  learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!
  
 I think we get the idea, but you need to accept that the people here on
 this list like the way it is.  I haven't read all the messages in this
 thread, but those I've seen were pretty negative to the idea.
 
 It may be tough to find relevant hits in the archives sometimes, but
 it's damn easy to get help when you need it here (or at least sympathy
 ;-)
 
 Gossip corner forever!
 
 Brian
 

Heh.  ;)

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
** Tru64 User (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 15:43)

 For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
 learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

You just named one of the reasons I'm reading this list and why I'd like 
to have it like it is: Learning!

My background in Linux is only a couple of years, starting with some 
distros (DLD, Slackware, Caldera, SuSE, Red Hat) and finally settled on 
Mandrake (5.3). Since this list was brought to life I am reading it and 
I have lots of messages stored away for further reading or applying the 
contents.

While it may be nice to ask a question and receive an answer with the 
solution it's also interesting to read the in-betweens.

A to list: I have this question Q.

B to A: Answer 1
C to A: Answer 2
D to A: Answer 3

A to D: Answer 3 is good but B wrote quote
D to B: Yes, but B is wrong

A to B: D said you're wrong
B to A:  No, I'm not!

A to C: I did what you advised but my foo did not compile
C to A: Why not?
A to C: I got this error.

A to B: C advised to do  and I did it but my foo did not compile 
and I have this error
B to A: It could be this and that.

A to C: B said it could be this and that.
C to A: Oh! Then it must be the harddrive. Do a blahblah and re-login.

A to list: Referring question Q. The solution is: Do a blahblah and 
re-login.

Is that what you have in mind?

If the whole thing had been gone public it would have been faster, 
easier for A and a learning experience for some of the lurkers who 
learned that foo would not compile in this condition and  was not a 
solution as well as Answer 3 wasn't either.


 While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
 one might be really relevant, the rest personal
 emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
 that only includes the one entry that correctly
 resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
 25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
 would rather have one post --then--its solution.

OK, then go for an expert system, not a mailing list. A mailinglist - as 
far as I know them by some years - is mostly a forum for people 
interested in a topic or software or any issue. They don't want to post 
a question and get the solution and nothing else. They want to learn, 
give their opinions and even gather some self-esteem by answering other 
people's questions as soon as they have learned enough.

The magic word is: Discussion.
 
My $200,000.00

Life must be hard for people who regard their opinion not worthier than 
$0.02.

wobo
-- 
Public GnuPG key available at http://www.wolf-b.de/misc



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Hezekiah M. Carty
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 11:23, Tru64 User wrote:
 Hi  ALL,
 
 I have one suggestion to make. To minimize traffic on
 this list and make it a Read All list, i suggest the
 following rules which are being followed on a
 different list I am subscribing to to be adopted on
 this list:
 
 snip several good ideas 

I think you make some good points here, but one of the strengths of this
and other support-type mailing lists is the open discussion that goes
on.  Quite often it seems that one person's response jogs something in
another person's memory, often leading to a better resolution than one
person alone would have come up with.  We'd lose a lot of that if the
discussion switched to one-on-one for each question.  So, basically, I
like things the way they are :-)  Your ideas do sound good for perhaps a
'expert-light' list though, or something similar.

Just a thought.

Hez


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Jack Coates
Every list I've been on that implemented such a setup ended up dead
within the year. Traffic levels drop alright, spiraling down to zero. As
long as truly OT flamewars and silliness are kept down, the sort of list
non-structure that we currently enjoy allows a sense of community to
form, allows one advice-giver to amplify or correct another
advice-giver's answer, and allows serendipitous connections to be drawn.

Rather than less traffic, in my opinion we should have more traffic --
as I've said before, I would merge the newbie and expert lists into a
single users list.

I don't believe that there is a moderator since Todd left. Per Vincent's
message, it appears that Mandrake has decided to shift their attention
to web-fora as a support channel (bad mistake) and is consequently
deprioritizing all lists other than cooker. Furthermore, mailing lists
were never a support channel, support isn't really support, and black is
truly white if you just stop and think about it long enough.

Jack

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 08:23, Tru64 User wrote:
 Hi  ALL,
 
 I have one suggestion to make. To minimize traffic on
 this list and make it a Read All list, i suggest the
 following rules which are being followed on a
 different list I am subscribing to to be adopted on
 this list:
 
 After a question is posted, all replies should go
 directly ONLY to the person who posted the question. 
 After a satisfactory resolution, the original poster
 should then post a SUMMARY:, which is a description 
 to what/how the problem was solved, to the list. 
 
 If responses slow down, and problem has not been
 resolved, then the original poster can submit an
 UPDATE: to the status of his problem if not resolved. 
 
 Finally, if a problem is never resolved, send a
 SUMMARY anyway, to say that problem was not
 resolved/or no replies. U might be suprised how many
 more may reply then, since they always assumed someone
 else had : -)
 
 That way, every post will have mostly 2-3 total
 entries only. 
 
 1. Original Question 
 2. (Optional)UPDATE  
 3. SUMMARY. 
 
 Heading should be tagged as such too, to show whether
 this is an UPDATE or a SUMMARY. This makes it easier
 to filter into peoples mailboxes.
 That way, it will be very useful to all of us, and
 future users of mdk.
 
 I come across posts that should be offlinelike
 email today said I can say more offline than here
 and then, another email reply goes I tell you
 Those should not belong here in my opinion. Those two
 lines are 2/116 i received from Sat 10AM to Monday
 10AM. Automatically it forces a HighLight ALL,
 DELETE for it takes too long to read all
 emails...only to find out that a big number should not
 have been posted to the public to begin with.
 
 Let me know what you guys think. BTW, who is the list
 monitor?
 
 _Thanks
 
 Richard Mollel
 
 
 =
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
 http://sbc.yahoo.com
 
 
 __
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Tru64 User wrote:

Hi  ALL,

I have one suggestion to make. To minimize traffic on
this list and make it a Read All list, i suggest the
following rules which are being followed on a
different list I am subscribing to to be adopted on
this list:

After a question is posted, all replies should go
directly ONLY to the person who posted the question. 
After a satisfactory resolution, the original poster
should then post a SUMMARY:, which is a description 
to what/how the problem was solved, to the list. 

If responses slow down, and problem has not been
resolved, then the original poster can submit an
UPDATE: to the status of his problem if not resolved. 

Finally, if a problem is never resolved, send a
SUMMARY anyway, to say that problem was not
resolved/or no replies. U might be suprised how many
more may reply then, since they always assumed someone
else had : -)

That way, every post will have mostly 2-3 total
entries only. 

1. Original Question 
2. (Optional)UPDATE  
3. SUMMARY. 

Heading should be tagged as such too, to show whether
this is an UPDATE or a SUMMARY. This makes it easier
to filter into peoples mailboxes.
That way, it will be very useful to all of us, and
future users of mdk.

I come across posts that should be offlinelike
email today said I can say more offline than here
and then, another email reply goes I tell you
Those should not belong here in my opinion. Those two
lines are 2/116 i received from Sat 10AM to Monday
10AM. Automatically it forces a HighLight ALL,
DELETE for it takes too long to read all
emails...only to find out that a big number should not
have been posted to the public to begin with.

Let me know what you guys think. BTW, who is the list
monitor?

_Thanks

Richard Mollel


=
  

I don't think that is a very good idea.  The thinking out loud that
happens here and in the cooker list is what leads to solutions.

If after the first post all responses are off list how does anyone
profit by, or add to, the information being passed back and forth
between the original poster and the responders?  You never know when
someone might say something that will jog someone's memory or
imagination.  They can't add to the discussion in real time if they
don't know what's being said.

-- 
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident.
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 16 Jun 2003 4:47 pm, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 11:23, Tru64 User wrote:
  Hi  ALL,
 
  I have one suggestion to make. To minimize traffic on
  this list and make it a Read All list, i suggest the
  following rules which are being followed on a
  different list I am subscribing to to be adopted on
  this list:

  snip several good ideas 

 I think you make some good points here, but one of the strengths of
 this and other support-type mailing lists is the open discussion
 that goes on.  Quite often it seems that one person's response jogs
 something in another person's memory, often leading to a better
 resolution than one person alone would have come up with.  We'd
 lose a lot of that if the discussion switched to one-on-one for
 each question.  So, basically, I like things the way they are :-) 
 Your ideas do sound good for perhaps a 'expert-light' list though,
 or something similar.

I sympathise with the intention of the suggestion, but as a learning 
tool, we would also lost something, I think.  The troubleshooting 
along the way often makes me think about things relevant to my own 
system.

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 11:23, Tru64 User wrote:

 After a question is posted, all replies should go
 directly ONLY to the person who posted the question. 
 After a satisfactory resolution, the original poster
 should then post a SUMMARY:, which is a description 
 to what/how the problem was solved, to the list. 
 
 If responses slow down, and problem has not been
 resolved, then the original poster can submit an
 UPDATE: to the status of his problem if not resolved. 
 
I certainly don't agree with limiting threads to 2 or 3 posts. The 
whole spirit of the list is to allow open collaboration and the 
sharing of knowledge. Sure, there's noise but the moderators have 
responded to OT posts before. I for one will absolutely not continue 
to read or respond to any list where the posts are not publicly 
available.

 Finally, if a problem is never resolved, send a
 SUMMARY anyway, to say that problem was not
 resolved/or no replies. U might be suprised how many
 more may reply then, since they always assumed someone
 else had : -)
 

Sure, a summary post is always polite, especially in cases where the
poster gets private responses. I send quite a bit of private mail
because the original post may be OT for the list.

 That way, every post will have mostly 2-3 total
 entries only. 
 
 1. Original Question 
 2. (Optional)UPDATE  
 3. SUMMARY. 

A better idea is to read the Usenet etiquette guidelines. You don't need
to agree or follow every one of them, but some make sense. For example,
when replying to a post, quote only the relevant portions of the email.
This list has had some very long emails, quoting not only multiple
signature lines, but every response in the thread. Many times only one
or two lines were added to a hundred plus line post.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Jun 16, 2003 at 08:45:39AM -0700, Jack Coates wrote:

 I don't believe that there is a moderator since Todd left. Per Vincent's
 message, it appears that Mandrake has decided to shift their attention
 to web-fora as a support channel (bad mistake) and is consequently
 deprioritizing all lists other than cooker. Furthermore, mailing lists
 were never a support channel, support isn't really support, and black is
 truly white if you just stop and think about it long enough.

There is no moderator, and we didn't shift our attention to a website; it's
always been a website.  This has never been an official support channel.
This is an unofficial community-driven support channel, and it has always
been this way.  The official support has always been MandrakeExpert.

Cooker is a different list... it isn't a support list, it's a development
list.  Big difference.

And no, there is no moderator although if things get out of hand, I'd have
to step forward I suppose.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:12, Kwan Lowe wrote:
heavy snip
 
 A better idea is to read the Usenet etiquette guidelines. You don't need
 to agree or follow every one of them, but some make sense. For example,
 when replying to a post, quote only the relevant portions of the email.
 This list has had some very long emails, quoting not only multiple
 signature lines, but every response in the thread. Many times only one
 or two lines were added to a hundred plus line post.
 
Kwan,

   I agree with snipping and stand as guilty as anyone of being lazy. 
However I cut religiously sigs.   But as far as traffic goes this list
can't touch cooker.. Now that's volume (800 to a thousand a day during
crunch time!) I've learned way to much following threads if this list
dropped to 2 or 3 mails per thread it would become as useless a a forum
for me.  Oh yes and if the problem is a good one... Summarize in the
community twiki *grin*

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread charlie
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this to contribute :-
 Let me know what you guys think.

_Thanks

Richard Mollel

Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the think tank element of 
everyone throwing something in that makes this list a valuable learning 
experience IMHO.

I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you mention has been running? 
It might also be relevant to know what it is dealing with I suppose? I 
certainly can't identify such an environment as allowing maximum discovery.

Not quite 2 cents worth I know.

Charlie.


-- 
Man is the only animal for whom his own existence is a problem which he has to
solve.

Erich Fromm

This email is guaranteed to be wholly Linux Mandrake 9.1, Kmail v1.5 and
OpenOffice.org1.1Beta


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-16 Thread Brian V Bonini
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this to contribute :-
  Let me know what you guys think.
 
 _Thanks
 
 Richard Mollel
 
 Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the think tank element of 
 everyone throwing something in that makes this list a valuable learning 
 experience IMHO.
 
 I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you mention has been running? 
 It might also be relevant to know what it is dealing with I suppose? I 
 certainly can't identify such an environment as allowing maximum discovery.
 
 Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
 
 Charlie.

I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that borders on being
too much too handle. You can always hit delete on the topics your
not interested in.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com