[FairfieldLife] Melbourne Maharishi School

2008-01-28 Thread bob_brigante
http://tinyurl.com/28fc77



[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity 
  ruthsimplicity@ wrote:
  
   
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1706768,00.html?
   cnn=yes
  
  *
  
  Alcohol is a poison and every drop you drink weakens the heart 
  muscle...
 

 That's probably what killed that lush Jesus.

***

Water was always unhealthy to drink back then, so people drank wine, 
kind of like how people today drink Coke in India to avoid the nasty 
water -- doesn't mean alcohol is a good thing. 










[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 sandiego108@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 
sandiego108@
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
 Something in me just snapped, but very quietly. I
 walked over to the red-faced, near-apoplectic ass-
 hole and took him by the perfectly-pressed collar
 of his perfectly-pressed shirt (mussing his perfect
 tie), and dragged him over to the edge of the trail
 that we were walking along and leaned him out over
 the edge. He looked down...WAY down, several hundred
 meters, to where he might easily wind up if he didn't
 pay attention. He paid attention.
 
I don't believe you-- this sounds like a made up 
fantasy of yours, child.
   
   You mean like your enlightenment?  :-)
  
  To you, precisely like enlightenment, simply because you don't 
know 
  how to tell the difference...twit. (hook, line, and sinker...). :-
)
 
 Jim,
 
 Do you actually believe that you are impressing
 people by pursuing this grudge against me?
 
 And by acting out with the intelligence level
 of a twelve-year-old?
 
 I mean, you could stand to learn a little some-
 thing from the events of the last couple of days.
 People here on this forum like Nablus, ferchissakes,
 preferred believing that sandiego108 wasn't you 
 to believing that you -- Jim Flanegin -- had sunk
 so low in both your language and your thinking.
 
 Ask for a show of hands, Jim. 
 
 After this latest meltdown, ask whether there is 
 even ONE person on this forum who believes your
 claims of being enlightened.

I do. Why does enlightenment has to mean kindness to everybody, in 
all directions ? Why indeed is kindness so important, all of the 
time ? 
Didn't Nityananda just sit there not saying a word, and then 
suddendly start hitting some fellow vigorously with a stick 
apparently for no reason ?
Get over it, enlightenment is not for fainthearted amateurs.




[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity 
 ruthsimplicity@ wrote:
 
  http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1706768,00.html?
  cnn=yes
 
 *
 
 Alcohol is a poison and every drop you drink weakens the heart 
 muscle...

That's probably what killed that lush Jesus.





[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 sandiego108@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
   Something in me just snapped, but very quietly. I
   walked over to the red-faced, near-apoplectic ass-
   hole and took him by the perfectly-pressed collar
   of his perfectly-pressed shirt (mussing his perfect
   tie), and dragged him over to the edge of the trail
   that we were walking along and leaned him out over
   the edge. He looked down...WAY down, several hundred
   meters, to where he might easily wind up if he didn't
   pay attention. He paid attention.
   
  I don't believe you-- this sounds like a made up fantasy of 
yours, 
  child.
 
 Of course I didn't really DO what I said I did.
 
 --Barry Wright, 1/23/08

Spot on Judy !  :-)




[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity 
   ruthsimplicity@ wrote:
   

 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1706768,00.html?
cnn=yes
   
   *
   
   Alcohol is a poison and every drop you drink weakens the heart 
   muscle...
  
 
  That's probably what killed that lush Jesus.
 
 ***
 
 Water was always unhealthy to drink back then, so people drank wine, 
 kind of like how people today drink Coke in India to avoid the nasty 
 water -- doesn't mean alcohol is a good thing. 

And you believing that alcohol is a bad thing 
doesn't make alcohol a bad thing.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] The score is 1 believer in Jim's enlightenment but it's Nabby, so that's minus 1

2008-01-28 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 sandiego108@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 
 sandiego108@
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
   wrote:
  Something in me just snapped, but very quietly. I
  walked over to the red-faced, near-apoplectic ass-
  hole and took him by the perfectly-pressed collar
  of his perfectly-pressed shirt (mussing his perfect
  tie), and dragged him over to the edge of the trail
  that we were walking along and leaned him out over
  the edge. He looked down...WAY down, several hundred
  meters, to where he might easily wind up if he didn't
  pay attention. He paid attention.
  
 I don't believe you-- this sounds like a made up 
 fantasy of yours, child.

You mean like your enlightenment?  :-)
   
   To you, precisely like enlightenment, simply because you don't 
 know 
   how to tell the difference...twit. (hook, line, and sinker...). :-
 )
  
  Jim,
  
  Do you actually believe that you are impressing
  people by pursuing this grudge against me?
  
  And by acting out with the intelligence level
  of a twelve-year-old?
  
  I mean, you could stand to learn a little some-
  thing from the events of the last couple of days.
  People here on this forum like Nablus, ferchissakes,
  preferred believing that sandiego108 wasn't you 
  to believing that you -- Jim Flanegin -- had sunk
  so low in both your language and your thinking.
  
  Ask for a show of hands, Jim. 
  
  After this latest meltdown, ask whether there is 
  even ONE person on this forum who believes your
  claims of being enlightened.
 
 I do. Why does enlightenment has to mean kindness to everybody, in 
 all directions ? Why indeed is kindness so important, all of the 
 time ? 
 Didn't Nityananda just sit there not saying a word, and then 
 suddendly start hitting some fellow vigorously with a stick 
 apparently for no reason ?
 Get over it, enlightenment is not for fainthearted amateurs.

Congratulations, Jim!

One person on this forum DOES believe your
claim about being enlightened. Of course, it's 
the same person who believes that Christ is 
alive and well and speaking through Benjamin 
Creme, but at least it's one person.

Then again, only a day ago he claimed that the
person who was writing the stuff that you were
posting here under the ID sandiego108 couldn't 
*possibly* be Jim Flanegin, so maybe Nabby has 
you mixed up *with* Benjamin Creme or Christ. 
It's kinda hard to tell with Nabby.

Just as a recap, here are a few of the writings
of this enlightened being -- Jim Flanegin/sandiego108:

Now we know why your dog is bowlegged, you drunken old fart.

I think you meant this to go to Turdquoise, he's the one who wants to
fuck your asshole, asshole.

Hey, whaddya call a Buddhist who is full of shit?
Turdquoise B!

speak up please Turdquoise...all I hear is mffmmffmm...
cuz your mouth is so full of shit. Just what we need on here for our
continuing spiritual education-- an impotent animal lover-- how's
FiFi?

spew on Turdquoise- you're as easy to bait as that limp fish you
call your dick. Oh, and feel free to wave your wee-pain around in
my absence- we're impressed! PS How's Fido?

What does the B in Turdquoise B stand for, anyway? Bitch? Cuz
that's all I hear from your direction- a little whiny bitch. Oh,
right, because of your dog... hey bitch did I forget to act
enlightened? Or should I get in touch with my inner asshole? or do
we just do that when we're drinking? Damn, clue me in Turdquoise, I'm
gettin' lost out here in Reality...bitch.


H...sounds a lot like Nabby himself. Maybe 
*Nablus* is pretending to be Jim Flanegin, who
is pretending to be Christ who is pretending to
be Maitreya, all of whom are pretending to be
enlightened. Whatever...  :-)






[FairfieldLife] 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread Robert
Questions for the Clintons
  By BOB HERBERT
  Published: January 26, 2008
Charleston, S.C.
 Joseph P. Riley Jr. has been mayor of this historic and often tense city 
since the mid-1970s. He’s a Democrat, highly respected and has worked 
diligently to heal racial wounds that have festered in some cases for hundreds 
of years.

  He has endorsed Barack Obama in today’s Democratic primary. But what struck 
me during an interview in his quiet office in an exquisitely restored City Hall 
was not the fact of the endorsement, but the manner in which the mayor 
expressed it.
  He went out of his way to praise the Democratic field, including some of the 
candidates who have dropped out, like Senators Joseph Biden and Chris Dodd. He 
talked about his fondness for Bill and Hillary Clinton and said: “It’s tough 
when you have to choose between friends.”
  The mayor’s thoughtful, respectful, generous assessment of the field echoed 
the tone that had prevailed until recently in the Democratic primary campaign. 
That welcome tone has been lost, undermined by a deliberate injection of 
ugliness, and it would be very difficult to make the case that the Clintons 
have not been primarily to blame.
  Bill Clinton, in his over-the-top advocacy of his wife’s candidacy, has at 
times sounded like a man who’s gone off his medication. And some of the Clinton 
surrogates have been flat-out reprehensible.
  Andrew Young, for instance.
  This week, while making the remarkable accusation that the Obama camp was 
responsible for raising the race issue, Mr. Clinton mentioned Andrew Young as 
someone who would bear that out. It was an extremely unfortunate reference.
  Here’s what Mr. Young, who is black and a former ambassador to the United 
Nations, had to say last month in an interview posted online: “Bill is every 
bit as black as Barack. He’s probably gone with more black women than Barack.”
  He then went on to make disgusting comments about the way that Bill and 
Hillary Clinton defended themselves years ago against the fallout from the 
former president’s womanizing. That’s coming from the Clinton camp!
  And then there was Bob Kerrey, the former senator and another Clinton 
supporter, who slimed up the campaign with the following comments:
  “It’s probably not something that appeals to him, but I like the fact that 
his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was a Muslim and that his 
paternal grandmother is a Muslim. There’s a billion people on the planet that 
are Muslims, and I think that experience is a big deal.”
  Pressing the point, Mr. Kerrey told CNN’s John King: “I’ve watched the blogs 
try to say that you can’t trust him because he spent a little bit of time in a 
secular madrassa. I feel quite the opposite.”
  Get it?
  Let’s start with the fact that Mr. Obama never attended a madrassa, and that 
there is no such thing as a secular madrassa. A madrassa is a religious school. 
Beyond that, the idea is to not-so-slyly feed the current frenzy, on the 
Internet and elsewhere, that Senator Obama is a Muslim, and thus potentially 
(in the eyes of many voters) an enemy of the United States.
  Mr. Obama is not a Muslim. He’s a Christian. And if he were a Muslim, it 
would not be a legitimate reason for attacking his candidacy.
  The Clinton camp knows what it’s doing, and its slimy maneuvers have been 
working. Bob Kerrey apologized and Andrew Young said at the time of his comment 
that he was just fooling around. But the damage to Senator Obama has been real, 
and so have the benefits to Senator Clinton of these and other lowlife tactics.
  Consider, for example, the following Web posting (misspellings and all) from 
a mainstream news blog on Jan. 13:
  “omg people get a grip. Can you imagine calling our president barak hussien 
obama ... I cant, I pray no one would be disrespectful enough to put this man 
in our whitehouse.”
  Mr. Obama’s campaign was always going to be difficult, and the climb is even 
steeper now. There is no reason to feel sorry for him. He’s a politician out of 
Chicago who must have known that campaigns often degenerate into demolition 
derbies.
  Still, it’s legitimate to ask, given the destructive developments of the last 
few weeks, whether the Clintons are capable of being anything but divisive. The 
electorate seems more polarized now than it was just a few weeks ago, and the 
Clintons have seemed positively gleeful in that atmosphere.
  It makes one wonder whether they have any understanding or regard for the 
corrosive long-term effects — on their party and the nation — of pitting people 
bitterly and unnecessarily against one another. 
  What kind of people are the Clintons? What role will Bill Clinton play in a 
new Clinton White House? Can they look beyond winning to a wounded nation’s 
need for healing and unifying?
  These are questions that need to be answered. Stay tuned. 
   


   
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find 

Re: [FairfieldLife] 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
Not to worry! The Kennedy's have endorsed Barack Hussein Obama, or is that  a 
kiss of *death*, politically speaking?



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread Vaj


On Jan 28, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Peter wrote:



--- sandiego108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  What do you think of the idea of the Bindu, what
 MMY refers to as
 a
  point of consciousness originating from Fullness,
 a seed
 containing in
  a potential state all the forces, dimensions,
 time, suns, solar
  systems, galaxies, galaxy clusters and universe
 required for the
  creation of a single universe. This point of
 consciousness could
 be the
  origin of the big bang and in this case refers to
 the origin of a
  single soul, creating its' universe and then
 incarnating into it,
 each
  soul creating its' own universe from this seed of
 consciousness.
 At the
  end of a souls lifetime, its' created universe
 then reverts back
 into
  the Bindu and then back into Fullness.
 
 I think what Maharishi says about the Bindu is that
 it contains all
 that there is, within all that there is. So there is
 not a Bindu of
 singularity inside of that which is not of the same
 essential nature
 as the Bindu. Rather, from any point in all that
 there is, that
 chosen point can be isolated, the Bindu point, which
 then is found
 to also contain all that there is; a point of
 Infinity, within
 Infinity. There is nothing which is not Bindu.

I've experienced two types, gold and blue. They open
into universes. I wouldn't call them a point of
consciousness, but I know why you say that. A point of
consciousness is consciousness as emptiness. A true
point is dimensionless as pure consciousness is
appreciated to be in CC. Bindus are points in a
relative sense because they are perceived through the
senses (subtle). So they initially appear as a point
of light in awareness and if you hold the attention on
them they might open into a universe in your
awareness. Just a really trippy object of
perception.


That would be a relative bindu or the aspect of the energetic  
dimension consisting of prana (or vayu), nadi and bindu. There is a  
more absolute level to bindu (the maha-bindu), but that's different  
than what's being described here and taught in inner practices of  
both the Buddhist and Hindu tantras.


As one 'gets used to' the view of Unity, then one can integrate  
further aspects of individual and collective energy to the point  
where bindus self-perfect into mandalas or dimensions of deities.  
Eventually, as this stabilizes, this is carried into waking state as  
well.


This shouldn't be confused with the idea of the 4 transformations of  
the point used in Advaita vedanta and Nyaya metaphysics which MMY  
talks about.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread Peter

--- sandiego108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  What do you think of the idea of the Bindu, what
 MMY refers to as 
 a 
  point of consciousness originating from Fullness,
 a seed 
 containing in 
  a potential state all the forces, dimensions,
 time, suns, solar 
  systems, galaxies, galaxy clusters and universe
 required for the 
  creation of a single universe. This point of
 consciousness could 
 be the 
  origin of the big bang and in this case refers to
 the origin of a 
  single soul, creating its' universe and then
 incarnating into it, 
 each 
  soul creating its' own universe from this seed of
 consciousness. 
 At the 
  end of a souls lifetime, its' created universe
 then reverts back 
 into 
  the Bindu and then back into Fullness.
 
 I think what Maharishi says about the Bindu is that
 it contains all 
 that there is, within all that there is. So there is
 not a Bindu of 
 singularity inside of that which is not of the same
 essential nature 
 as the Bindu. Rather, from any point in all that
 there is, that 
 chosen point can be isolated, the Bindu point, which
 then is found 
 to also contain all that there is; a point of
 Infinity, within 
 Infinity. There is nothing which is not Bindu.

I've experienced two types, gold and blue. They open
into universes. I wouldn't call them a point of
consciousness, but I know why you say that. A point of
consciousness is consciousness as emptiness. A true
point is dimensionless as pure consciousness is
appreciated to be in CC. Bindus are points in a
relative sense because they are perceived through the
senses (subtle). So they initially appear as a point
of light in awareness and if you hold the attention on
them they might open into a universe in your
awareness. Just a really trippy object of
perception.





 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping


[FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 --- sandiego108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie
  msilver1951@ 
  wrote:
  
   What do you think of the idea of the Bindu, what
  MMY refers to as 
  a 
   point of consciousness originating from Fullness,
  a seed 
  containing in 
   a potential state all the forces, dimensions,
  time, suns, solar 
   systems, galaxies, galaxy clusters and universe
  required for the 
   creation of a single universe. This point of
  consciousness could 
  be the 
   origin of the big bang and in this case refers to
  the origin of a 
   single soul, creating its' universe and then
  incarnating into it, 
  each 
   soul creating its' own universe from this seed of
  consciousness. 
  At the 
   end of a souls lifetime, its' created universe
  then reverts back 
  into 
   the Bindu and then back into Fullness.
  
  I think what Maharishi says about the Bindu is that
  it contains all 
  that there is, within all that there is. So there is
  not a Bindu of 
  singularity inside of that which is not of the same
  essential nature 
  as the Bindu. Rather, from any point in all that
  there is, that 
  chosen point can be isolated, the Bindu point, which
  then is found 
  to also contain all that there is; a point of
  Infinity, within 
  Infinity. There is nothing which is not Bindu.
 
 I've experienced two types, gold and blue. They open
 into universes. I wouldn't call them a point of
 consciousness, but I know why you say that. A point of
 consciousness is consciousness as emptiness. A true
 point is dimensionless as pure consciousness is
 appreciated to be in CC. Bindus are points in a
 relative sense because they are perceived through the
 senses (subtle). So they initially appear as a point
 of light in awareness and if you hold the attention on
 them they might open into a universe in your
 awareness. Just a really trippy object of
 perception.

Very nice peter. 
I'm sorry I thought you were a mental case, a blind leading other 
blinds and taking their cash simultaneously. 
I do apologize.



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:07 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

 

--- In HYPERLINK
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nab,
 Americans seem to occupy a special place in your heart. 
 Similar, I'm sure, to the place you occupy in our own.

I do not dislike them, in fact I have several americans friends from my 
travels there. Very nice people.
But since the CIA are (mostly) americans it is natural to be sceptical. 
It's not only that president of yours that makes the americans look 
like fools the world over, CIA is very busy doing the same thing. And, 
like their president, they are in the business of creating havoc around 
the world.

Hey Nabby, there’s a point that you and I agree on.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 1/27/2008
6:39 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: The score is 1 believer in Jim's enlightenment but it's Nabby, so that's minus 1

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 H...sounds a lot like Nabby himself. Maybe 
 *Nablus* is pretending to be Jim Flanegin, who
 is pretending to be Christ who is pretending to
 be Maitreya, all of whom are pretending to be
 enlightened. Whatever...  :-)

And you believing that alcohol is a bad thing
doesn't make alcohol a bad thing.  :-) 
- Turq

Haha, you have just had too much of that cheap 0.6 euros pr bottle 
Spain is so full of. ;-)




[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nab,
Americans seem to occupy a special place in your heart. 
 Similar, I'm sure, to the place you occupy in our own.

I do not dislike them, in fact I have several americans friends from my 
travels there. Very nice people.
But since the CIA are (mostly) americans it is natural to be sceptical. 
It's not only that president of yours that makes the americans look 
like fools the world over, CIA is very busy doing the same thing. And, 
like their president, they are in the business of creating havoc around 
the world.



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Questions for the Clintons
   By BOB HERBERT
   Published: January 26, 2008
snip
   Bill Clinton, in his over-the-top advocacy of his wife's 
candidacy, has at times sounded like a man who's gone off his 
medication. And some of the Clinton surrogates have been flat-out 
reprehensible.
snip
   And then there was Bob Kerrey, the former senator and another 
Clinton supporter, who slimed up the campaign with the following 
comments:
   It's probably not something that appeals to him, but I like the 
fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was a 
Muslim and that his paternal grandmother is a Muslim. There's a 
billion people on the planet that are Muslims, and I think that 
experience is a big deal.
   Pressing the point, Mr. Kerrey told CNN's John King: I've 
watched the blogs try to say that you can't trust him because he 
spent a little bit of time in a secular madrassa. I feel quite the 
opposite.
   Get it?

Yes. Sounds to me like Kerrey is trying to counter
the false rumor that Obama is a Muslim. How that
could be considered a slime is rather strange;
to call it a slime appears to be an attempt to
slime the Clinton campaign.

   Let's start with the fact that Mr. Obama never attended a 
madrassa, and that there is no such thing as a secular madrassa. A 
madrassa is a religious school.

Madrassa is the Arabic word for school--any
kind of school, secular or religious. So we're
not starting with a fact at all.

snip
   The Clinton camp knows what it's doing, and its slimy maneuvers 
have been working. Bob Kerrey apologized and Andrew Young said at the 
time of his comment that he was just fooling around. But the damage 
to Senator Obama has been real, and so have the benefits to Senator 
Clinton of these and other lowlife tactics.
   Consider, for example, the following Web posting (misspellings 
and all) from a mainstream news blog on Jan. 13:
   omg people get a grip. Can you imagine calling our president 
barak hussien obama ... I cant, I pray no one would be disrespectful 
enough to put this man in our whitehouse.

Cherry-picking one nasty *comment* (not a posting)
on a blog as if it were somehow representative of
the purported damage the Clinton campaign is doing
to Obama is really beneath contempt. Herbert knows
better, but he knows many of his readers will not.

snip
   Still, it's legitimate to ask, given the destructive developments 
of the last few weeks, whether the Clintons are capable of being 
anything but divisive. The electorate seems more polarized now than 
it was just a few weeks ago, and the Clintons have seemed positively 
gleeful in that atmosphere.

I see no glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
What I do see is a relentless attempt by the media
and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons as
divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
reasonable remarks by the campaign misleadingly out
of context.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread feste37
Those of us who live in Iowa have plenty of practice at living in ice! 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
 
  Yes, but what's the point?
 
 He can live in places no-one else wants to live in, but he have some 
 trouble with gobal warming.
 
 OffWorld
 
 
 
  
  
  Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC
  
  Sun Jan 27, 2:03 PM ET
  
  NEW YORK - A man who calls himself a tantric master broke his own
  world record by standing engulfed in ice for 72 minutes.
  
  Wim Hof, 48, stood on a Manhattan street in a clear container filled
  with ice for an hour and 12 minutes Saturday.
  
  Hof said he survives by controlling his body temperature through
  tantric meditation. Tantra is an Eastern tradition of ritual and
  meditation said to bring followers closer to their chosen deities.
  
  Hof set the world record for full body ice contact endurance in 
 2004,
  when he immersed himself in ice for an hour and eight minutes.
  
  Hof's feat kicked off BRAINWAVE, a five-month series of events in 
 New
  York exploring how art, music, and meditation affect the brain.
 





RE: [FairfieldLife] Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
Wow! What a mature kid. 

--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Rick Archer
 Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:34 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fred and Debby Poneman's
 son
 
  
 
 HYPERLINK

http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1
 
 
 Fred and Debby are in this too in a couple of
 places.
 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 -
 Release Date: 1/27/2008
 6:39 PM
  
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
 
In a message dated 1/28/08 9:11:41 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Not  to worry! The Kennedy's have endorsed Barack Hussein Obama,
 or is that  a kiss of *death*, politically speaking?

Hardly. Only those who would  never vote for a
Democrat in the first place would even think of
posing  such a question.

(And for the record, some of the Kennedy's  [sic]
have endorsed Clinton.)



Not necessarily true Judy. Ted Kennedy is a very big turn off to a lot of  
independents and the more conservative element of the Democrats. It will be  
interesting to see if any other Kennedy's come out for Hillary or see if they  
speak with one voice. 



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread Angela Mailander
It may be that this guy is doing it for the benefit of his ego.  The fact that 
the report made it sound that way doesn't necessarily mean that this is really 
his interest.  In any case, it is a good thing to publicize things like this 
for the benefit of those who doubt that yogic expertise really has something 
going for it.  Selling a meditation technique for money is also rather 
incongruous, but until it was done, not enough people could take advantage of 
it and learn.  

- Original Message 
From: feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:04:44 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC









  



I got the impression from the report that this guy is doing it as an

ego thing -- he wants to break a world record and do it in public. I

don't think he's the slightest bit interested in scientific research

for the benefit of humanity. He just wants to show off, and the idea

of a spiritual master, Tantric  or otherwise, performing in a stunt

like this seems rather incongruous to me. 



--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Angela Mailander

mailander111@ ... wrote:



 I don't understand the what's the point question.  Of course there

is no immediate usefulness I can think of, but the FACT of controlling

what we ordinarily think of as beyond our control is not only

interesting but important to explore for humankind.

 

 - Original Message 

 From: feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com

 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:24:16 AM

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Those of us who live in Iowa have plenty of practice at

living in ice! 

 

 

 

 --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, off_world_beings no_reply@ .

 

 wrote:

 

 

 

  --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:

 

  

 

   Yes, but what's the point?

 

  

 

  He can live in places no-one else wants to live in, but he have some 

 

  trouble with gobal warming.

 

  

 

  OffWorld

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

 

   

 

   Sun Jan 27, 2:03 PM ET

 

   

 

   NEW YORK - A man who calls himself a tantric master broke his own

 

   world record by standing engulfed in ice for 72 minutes.

 

   

 

   Wim Hof, 48, stood on a Manhattan street in a clear container filled

 

   with ice for an hour and 12 minutes Saturday.

 

   

 

   Hof said he survives by controlling his body temperature through

 

   tantric meditation. Tantra is an Eastern tradition of ritual and

 

   meditation said to bring followers closer to their chosen deities.

 

   

 

   Hof set the world record for full body ice contact endurance in 

 

  2004,

 

   when he immersed himself in ice for an hour and eight minutes.

 

   

 

   Hof's feat kicked off BRAINWAVE, a five-month series of events in 

 

  New

 

   York exploring how art, music, and meditation affect the brain.

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 !--

 

 #ygrp-mkp{

 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font- family:Arial; margin:14px

0px;padding: 0px 14px;}

 #ygrp-mkp hr{

 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}

 #ygrp-mkp #hd{



color:#628c2a; font-size: 85%;font- weight:bold; line-height: 122%;margin: 10px

0px;}

 #ygrp-mkp #ads{

 margin-bottom: 10px;}

 #ygrp-mkp .ad{

 padding:0 0;}

 #ygrp-mkp .ad a{

 color:#ff; text-decoration: none;}

 --

 

 

 

 !--

 

 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{

 font-family: Arial;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{

 margin:10px 0px;font-weight: bold;font- size:78%; line-height: 122%;}

 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{

 margin-bottom: 10px;padding: 0 0;}

 --

 

 

 

 !--

 

 #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean,

sans-serif;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit; font:100% ;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica,

clean, sans-serif;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}

 #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height: 1.22em;}

 #ygrp-text{

 font-family: Georgia;

 }

 #ygrp-text p{

 margin:0 0 1em 0;}

 #ygrp-tpmsgs{

 font-family: Arial;

 clear:both;}

 #ygrp-vitnav{

 padding-top: 10px;font- family:Verdana; font-size: 77%;margin: 0;}

 #ygrp-vitnav a{

 padding:0 1px;}

 #ygrp-actbar{

 clear:both;margin: 25px

0;white-space: nowrap;color: #666;text- align:right; }

 #ygrp-actbar .left{

 float:left;white- space:nowrap; }

 .bld{font-weight: bold;}

 #ygrp-grft{

 font-family: Verdana;font- size:77%; padding:15px 0;}

 #ygrp-ft{

 font-family: verdana;font- size:77%; border-top: 1px solid #666;

 padding:5px 0;

 }

 #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{

 padding-bottom: 10px;}

 

 #ygrp-vital{

 background-color: #e0ecee;margin- bottom:20px; padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}

 #ygrp-vital #vithd{



font-size:77% ;font-family: Verdana;font- weight:bold; color:#333; 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread Vaj


On Jan 28, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Angela Mailander wrote:

I don't understand the what's the point question.  Of course  
there is no immediate usefulness I can think of, but the FACT of  
controlling what we ordinarily think of as beyond our control is  
not only interesting but important to explore for humankind.



True. One of the interesting ramifications of yogis being able to  
actually consciously control their metabolic rate is for space travel  
or to create suspended animation pending surgery. Raising body temp  
could also help science understand phenomenon like spontaneous tumor  
necrosis, where a patient will often get a bad fever and then find  
out later all their cancer has been eradicated.

[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
  Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:07 AM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise
  
   
  
  --- In HYPERLINK
  mailto:FairfieldLife%
 40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  mainstream20016 
  mainstream20016@ wrote:
  
   Nab,
   Americans seem to occupy a special place in your heart. 
   Similar, I'm sure, to the place you occupy in our own.
  
  I do not dislike them, in fact I have several americans friends 
 from my 
  travels there. Very nice people.
  But since the CIA are (mostly) americans it is natural to be 
 sceptical. 
  It's not only that president of yours that makes the americans 
look 
  like fools the world over, CIA is very busy doing the same thing. 
 And, 
  like their president, they are in the business of creating havoc 
 around 
  the world.
  
  Hey Nabby, there's a point that you and I agree on.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ...and do the both of you also believe that the CIA infiltrated the 
 TMO?

The crew-cut american caught on the bridge between Kulm and 
Sonnenberg with a 9mm was not from the Salvation Army.



[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  And you believing that alcohol is a bad thing 
  doesn't make alcohol a bad thing.  :-)
 
 A balanced life is a good thing.  Be active, drink a little, 
 eat a moderate amount. Meditate. Don't work too hard.  Do 
 good.  Be kind.

See the difference between this prescription
and Bob's absolute condemnation of alcohol?
One is balanced; the other is not. *Especially*
when the unbalanced one was in response to an 
article about the proven beneficial effects of 
moderate wine intake on health.

It's starting to look as if there is a perfect 
inverse relationship between how *sure* certain 
posters on FFL are about what they believe to 
be true, and the likelihood that those things 
actually *are* true.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread Vaj


On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:10 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:


 Hey Nabby, there's a point that you and I agree on.

...and do the both of you also believe that the CIA infiltrated the
TMO?



Well you saw the video with the KGB agent, right? After that, the CIA  
is less of a surprise.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread curtisdeltablues
That was one of the most inspiring things I have seen all year.  It
doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have such natural self
confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to Success?  This kid was
brought up by parents who know how to think!  Thanks for posting this.
 I was taking notes from this kid on how to bring my own dreams to the
next level!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Wow! What a mature kid. 
 
 --- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   
  
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Rick Archer
  Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:34 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fred and Debby Poneman's
  son
  
   
  
  HYPERLINK
 
 http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1
  
  
  Fred and Debby are in this too in a couple of
  places.
  
  
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 -
  Release Date: 1/27/2008
  6:39 PM
   
  
 
 
 
  

 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs





[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And you believing that alcohol is a bad thing 
 doesn't make alcohol a bad thing.  :-)



A balanced life is a good thing.  Be active, drink a little, eat a
moderate amount. Meditate. Don't work too hard.  Do good.  Be kind.  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
 
In a message dated 1/28/08 10:05:46 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I see no  glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
What I do see is a relentless  attempt by the media
and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons  as
divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
reasonable remarks  by the campaign misleadingly out
of context.



Oh Judy, please. You are truly a loyal dyed in the wool Clintonista. And  
you'll defend anything they say or do. Just this past week Bill compared Obama  
to Jesse Jackson by saying Jesse had won the SC primary twice. You take that as 
 something innocent but everybody else knows that is code to scare more white 
 voters to Hillary  . And that is not just my perception but of most blacks  
and Democrats. Nothing coming out of the mouths of the Clinton's is innocent,  
it's very calculated and subtle. And whenever they or their surrogates are  
called on the carpet to explain what they said, they are prepared with  an 
innocent explanation from how something was originally taken. Case in  point, 
Bob 
Kerry,a Hillary supporter, talking about Barack Hussein Obama's  Muslim roots 
at a time when the Internet was full of rumors about him really  being a 
radical Muslim. There was no other reason for him to bring that up than  to 
feed 
into that rumor and when called on that, he says he just thought it was  a 
great 
asset and was meant as a complement. Please give me a  break!



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
I really don't know Fred either, but I always liked
Debbie. Saw her about ten years ago at a SSRS event
and  she was just the same as ever. With all the
bashing (myself included) of the many idiots, morons
and ethically challenged people in the TMO, we should
shift gears at times and make a list of the amazing
cool, together,just-down-right-good people that have
been part of the TMO. In fact, I know many more of
these type of people than the other type from the TMO.

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred
 and
  Debbie's parenting skills. What easy
 self-confidence.
  I think all of us could learn something by
 watching
  this kid!
 
 I didn't know Fred but I knew Debby when we were
 students.  She is an
 exceptional human.
 
 So I've been deconstructing Dan's rejection strategy
 as he pitches his
 site, which would help me in pitching my shows.  I
 think part of the
 key is that he goes in with nothing to lose.  Just
 last week I had
 braces on so I don't expect them to talk with me. 
 He doesn't take
 himself too seriously. (a tad bit easier at 16 then
 50!)  But it
 allows him tremendous freedom to ask for what he
 wants from anybody. 
 By coming in with no ego to protect, he doesn't have
 to be defensive
 about people taking him seriously.  He takes himself
 seriously in a
 healthy way, but it is totally unconnected from
 people's reactions to
 him.  I'm idealizing a bit here but this POV is so
 useful for my own
 work.  The kid's got it going on and big high five
 for great
 parenting.  (I raised two well behaved cats and that
 was my parenting
 skills limit!)  
 
 
 
 
   
  --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
   That was one of the most inspiring things I have
   seen all year.  It
   doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have
 such
   natural self
   confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
   Success?  This kid was
   brought up by parents who know how to think! 
 Thanks
   for posting this.
I was taking notes from this kid on how to
 bring my
   own dreams to the
   next level!
   
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
   drpetersutphen@ wrote:
   
Wow! What a mature kid. 

--- Rick Archer rick@ wrote:

  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Rick Archer
 Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:34 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fred and Debby
   Poneman's
 son
 
  
 
 HYPERLINK

   
  
 

http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1
 
 
 Fred and Debby are in this too in a couple
 of
 places.
 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database:
   269.19.13/1246 -
 Release Date: 1/27/2008
 6:39 PM
  
 



 
  
 


Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home
 page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
   
   
   
   
   
   To subscribe, send a message to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Or go to: 
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
   and click 'Join This Group!' 
   Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
  
  
  
   


  Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
 snip
   I see no glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
   What I do see is a relentless attempt by the media
   and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons as
   divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
   reasonable remarks by the campaign misleadingly out
   of context.
  
  I can't believe you feel that way about the now infamous Ronald 
  Reagan remarks about Obama by Bill Clinton, Judy.
  
  Do you really feel that that was a perfectly reasonable remark 
by 
  the campaign misleadingly out of context?
 
 Have you stopped beating your wife, Shemp?


See if you can just answer the fucking question, Judy.

Or are you doing the same thing you always do when someone points out 
a consistency on your part, which is to NOT address the matter at 
hand?




[FairfieldLife] Re: Rodrigo Y Gabriela

2008-01-28 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think you music lovers will like these folks: HYPERLINK
 http://www.rodgab.com/watch.htmhttp://www.rodgab.com/watch.htm 


Delicioso! Muchas gracias, Rick!



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
  I see no glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
  What I do see is a relentless attempt by the media
  and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons as
  divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
  reasonable remarks by the campaign misleadingly out
  of context.
 
 I can't believe you feel that way about the now infamous Ronald 
 Reagan remarks about Obama by Bill Clinton, Judy.
 
 Do you really feel that that was a perfectly reasonable remark by 
 the campaign misleadingly out of context?

Have you stopped beating your wife, Shemp?




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
 
In a message dated 1/28/08 11:16:34 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

A  balanced life is a good thing. Be active, drink a little, 
 eat a  moderate amount. Meditate. Don't work too hard. Do 
 good. Be  kind.

See the difference between this prescription
and Bob's  absolute condemnation of alcohol?
One is balanced; the other is not.  *Especially*
when the unbalanced one was in response to an 
article  about the proven beneficial effects of 
moderate wine intake on  health.

It's starting to look as if there is a perfect 
inverse  relationship between how *sure* certain 
posters on FFL are about what they  believe to 
be true, and the likelihood that those things 
actually  *are* true.



I think Krishna says someplace in the Gita that moderation is the key to a  
long healthy life.



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 1/28/08 9:11:41 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Not  to worry! The Kennedy's have endorsed Barack Hussein Obama,
  or is that  a kiss of *death*, politically speaking?
 
 Hardly. Only those who would  never vote for a
 Democrat in the first place would even think of
 posing  such a question.
 
 (And for the record, some of the Kennedy's  [sic]
 have endorsed Clinton.)
 
 Not necessarily true Judy. Ted Kennedy is a very big turn
 off to a lot of independents and the more conservative
 element of the Democrats.

Who wouldn't vote for Obama in the first place.

 It will be  
 interesting to see if any other Kennedy's come out for Hillary or 
 see if they speak with one voice.

They have, and they don't, as I just noted.




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 1/28/08 10:05:46 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 I see no  glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
 What I do see is a relentless  attempt by the media
 and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons  as
 divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
 reasonable remarks  by the campaign misleadingly out
 of context.
 
 Oh Judy, please. You are truly a loyal dyed in the wool
 Clintonista. And you'll defend anything they say or do.
 Just this past week Bill compared Obama to Jesse Jackson
 by saying Jesse had won the SC primary twice. You take that
 as something innocent

You're a terrible mind-reader. No, that wasn't
innocent. On the other hand, Obama's no
innocent either. The notion that he's not running
as an African American, and that therefore any
acknowledgment of his race is playing the race
card, is ludicrous. He wants to have it both ways.

 but everybody else knows that is code to scare more white 
  voters to Hillary. And that is not just my perception but
 of most blacks and Democrats.

 Nothing coming out of the mouths of the Clinton's is innocent,  
 it's very calculated and subtle.

At least, Obama's campaign, the media, and
Clinton-hating right-wingers will do their
damndest to portray it that way--the latter
because they think Obama will be easier to
beat (and they're probably right).

 And whenever they or their surrogates are  
 called on the carpet to explain what they said, they are prepared
 with an innocent explanation from how something was originally 
 taken.

Again, I'm not saying the Clintons are cleaner
than whistles. I'm saying they're not anywhere
*near* as dirty as they're portrayed.

 Case in  point, Bob 
 Kerry,a Hillary supporter, talking about Barack Hussein Obama's 
 Muslim roots at a time when the Internet was full of rumors about 
 him really  being a radical Muslim. There was no other reason for 
 him to bring that up than  to feed into that rumor and when called 
 on that, he says he just thought it was  a great asset and was 
 meant as a complement. Please give me a  break!

Seems to me that's exactly what it was. But Kerrey
should have known better than to try to say something
positive about Obama in this poisonous anti-Clinton
atmosphere.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread feste37
I got the impression from the report that this guy is doing it as an
ego thing -- he wants to break a world record and do it in public. I
don't think he's the slightest bit interested in scientific research
for the benefit of humanity. He just wants to show off, and the idea
of a spiritual master, Tantric  or otherwise, performing in a stunt
like this seems rather incongruous to me. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't understand the what's the point question.  Of course there
is no immediate usefulness I can think of, but the FACT of controlling
what we ordinarily think of as beyond our control is not only
interesting but important to explore for humankind.
 
 - Original Message 
 From: feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:24:16 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Those of us who live in Iowa have plenty of practice at
living in ice! 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, off_world_beings no_reply@ .
 
 wrote:
 
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
 
  
 
   Yes, but what's the point?
 
  
 
  He can live in places no-one else wants to live in, but he have some 
 
  trouble with gobal warming.
 
  
 
  OffWorld
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
   
 
   Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC
 
   
 
   Sun Jan 27, 2:03 PM ET
 
   
 
   NEW YORK - A man who calls himself a tantric master broke his own
 
   world record by standing engulfed in ice for 72 minutes.
 
   
 
   Wim Hof, 48, stood on a Manhattan street in a clear container filled
 
   with ice for an hour and 12 minutes Saturday.
 
   
 
   Hof said he survives by controlling his body temperature through
 
   tantric meditation. Tantra is an Eastern tradition of ritual and
 
   meditation said to bring followers closer to their chosen deities.
 
   
 
   Hof set the world record for full body ice contact endurance in 
 
  2004,
 
   when he immersed himself in ice for an hour and eight minutes.
 
   
 
   Hof's feat kicked off BRAINWAVE, a five-month series of events in 
 
  New
 
   York exploring how art, music, and meditation affect the brain.
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 !--
 
 #ygrp-mkp{
 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px
0px;padding:0px 14px;}
 #ygrp-mkp hr{
 border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
 #ygrp-mkp #hd{

color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0px;}
 #ygrp-mkp #ads{
 margin-bottom:10px;}
 #ygrp-mkp .ad{
 padding:0 0;}
 #ygrp-mkp .ad a{
 color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
 --
 
 
 
 !--
 
 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
 font-family:Arial;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
 margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
 margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
 --
 
 
 
 !--
 
 #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean,
sans-serif;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica,
clean, sans-serif;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
 #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
 #ygrp-text{
 font-family:Georgia;
 }
 #ygrp-text p{
 margin:0 0 1em 0;}
 #ygrp-tpmsgs{
 font-family:Arial;
 clear:both;}
 #ygrp-vitnav{
 padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
 #ygrp-vitnav a{
 padding:0 1px;}
 #ygrp-actbar{
 clear:both;margin:25px
0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
 #ygrp-actbar .left{
 float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
 .bld{font-weight:bold;}
 #ygrp-grft{
 font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
 #ygrp-ft{
 font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
 padding:5px 0;
 }
 #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
 padding-bottom:10px;}
 
 #ygrp-vital{
 background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
 #ygrp-vital #vithd{

font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
 #ygrp-vital ul{
 padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
 #ygrp-vital ul li{
 list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
 }
 #ygrp-vital ul li .ct{

font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
 #ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
 font-weight:bold;}
 #ygrp-vital a{
 text-decoration:none;}
 
 #ygrp-vital a:hover{
 text-decoration:underline;}
 
 #ygrp-sponsor #hd{
 color:#999;font-size:77%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov{
 padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
 padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
 list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
 text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor #nc{
 background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad{
 padding:8px 0;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{

font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
 #ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:07 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise
 
  
 
 --- In HYPERLINK
 mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 mainstream20016 
 mainstream20016@ wrote:
 
  Nab,
  Americans seem to occupy a special place in your heart. 
  Similar, I'm sure, to the place you occupy in our own.
 
 I do not dislike them, in fact I have several americans friends 
from my 
 travels there. Very nice people.
 But since the CIA are (mostly) americans it is natural to be 
sceptical. 
 It's not only that president of yours that makes the americans look 
 like fools the world over, CIA is very busy doing the same thing. 
And, 
 like their president, they are in the business of creating havoc 
around 
 the world.
 
 Hey Nabby, there's a point that you and I agree on.

Glad to hear that. :-)
 
It would also be good to keep that in mind when you hear and evaluate 
the truth of rumours.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread Angela Mailander
I think that for any knowledge to be possible, there has to be that bindu point 
that includes all knowledge and this point is omnipresent.  Based on what I am 
learning in the chat group of physicists and mathematicians that I belong to, 
the big bang is definitely bindu.  It is the first distinction from 
undifferentiated being.

- Original Message 
From: tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:35:55 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness









  



sandiego108 writes snipped:

I think what Maharishi says about the Bindu is that it contains all 

that there is, within all that there is. So there is not a Bindu of 

singularity inside of that which is not of the same essential nature 

as the Bindu. Rather, from any point in all that there is, that 

chosen point can be isolated, the Bindu point, which then is found 

to also contain all that there is; a point of Infinity, within 

Infinity. There is nothing which is not Bindu.



Tom T:

When the Knowing is Known by the ultimate Knower there is no where

left to go. This is the one and only Knower knowing its creation

through its own Self. From the totality of creation to point value it

is all Knower and Knower can know through the totality and the point

value simultaneously. All the ocean in a drop. Same. 



TomT






  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
--



!--

#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
font-family:Arial;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
--



!--

#ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
#ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, 
sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
#ygrp-text{
font-family:Georgia;
}
#ygrp-text p{
margin:0 0 1em 0;}
#ygrp-tpmsgs{
font-family:Arial;
clear:both;}
#ygrp-vitnav{
padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a{
padding:0 1px;}
#ygrp-actbar{
clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
#ygrp-actbar .left{
float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
.bld{font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-grft{
font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
#ygrp-ft{
font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
padding:5px 0;
}
#ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
padding-bottom:10px;}

#ygrp-vital{
background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
#ygrp-vital #vithd{
font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
#ygrp-vital ul{
padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
#ygrp-vital ul li{
list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
}
#ygrp-vital ul li .ct{
font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
#ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-vital a{
text-decoration:none;}

#ygrp-vital a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}

#ygrp-sponsor #hd{
color:#999;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov{
padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #nc{
background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad{
padding:8px 0;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{
font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
text-decoration:none;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad p{
margin:0;}
o{font-size:0;}
.MsoNormal{
margin:0 0 0 0;}
#ygrp-text tt{
font-size:120%;}
blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;}
.replbq{margin:4;}
--







Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
   
  Nothing coming out of the mouths of the Clinton's is
  innocent, it's very calculated and subtle. And whenever
  they or their surrogates are called on the carpet to
  explain what they said, they are prepared with  an 
  innocent explanation from how something was originally taken. 
 
 So, every politician is expected to speak carefully and never
 make a statement that could be interpreted as racist, sexist,
 or any other ist.

Which means, effectively, that whichever
candidate the media most dislikes literally
can't say *anything* that cannot interpreted
as some kind of ist.

Regarding Obama's appalling comments about
Reagan, I wrote my sister that Hillary should
forget the truce and string him up for them.

Ten minutes after sending the email, I realized
that if I'd been speaking to the media, I'd have
been immediately branded as a racist.

In an email to a blogger, I referred to Obama's
noble pose. Then I realized I couldn't say that
either, because it could be interpreted as a
reference to the noble savage stereotype.

Another anti-Clinton blogger actually accused
Bill Clinton of racism for saying Obama had put
out a hit job on him--because the hit job
metaphor had connotations of violence.

snip
 As someone who spends her time with politicians, I know that the
 press plays a large part in setting the divisive tone.  Everything 
 is the horse race.  Everything you say will get repeated, context 
 be damned.

Absolutely. And worse, it's a horse race in which
the media pick favorites and do whatever they can
to help them win.

Bob Somerby's blog dailyhowler.com does a terrific
job of chronicling this sort of thing almost every
day, if anyone is interested in seeing examples.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  ...and maybe it's because I spent time in the TMO and all seems 
  quite normal to me, but I really don't see much harm in the Tom 
  Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:
  
  http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6
  
  
  Everyone seems to think it is some sort of terrible propagandist, 
  brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see it.
  
  What do you think?
 
 I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY one who can really help
 at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has been drinking the
 coolaid a bit too much.
 
 I find his claim that Scientologists are the experts on the human mind
 to be delusional. 
 
 His claim about how SP's can't come around him was specifically
 refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed his wacky perspective
 on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement terms, he didn't
 avert the danger before it arose by his magical state of mind.
 
 He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking himself waay too
 seriously.  His delight in everything he says, and his inappropriate
 projectile laughter, make him one of the most entertaining weirdos to
 come along in a long time.  I could watch that tape every day and not
 tire of it. 


Then you'll probably also really enjoy this one: 

Tom Cruise Scientology-Constipation Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9jqD_8IQpMfeature=related











[FairfieldLife] Everything old is new again ('What Kind of People are the Clintons?')

2008-01-28 Thread Duveyoung
I just now heard Ted Kennedy's speech announcing his backing of Obama
-- missed Caroline and Patrick's speeches, but the whole history and
might and power of the Kennedys is now Obama's.  Very very rousing
speech -- tears came to my eyes as he recalled Jack and Bobby.

Camelot came back to life today.

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
   
  In a message dated 1/28/08 9:11:41 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
  jstein@ writes:
  
   Not  to worry! The Kennedy's have endorsed Barack Hussein Obama,
   or is that  a kiss of *death*, politically speaking?
  
  Hardly. Only those who would  never vote for a
  Democrat in the first place would even think of
  posing  such a question.
  
  (And for the record, some of the Kennedy's  [sic]
  have endorsed Clinton.)
  
  Not necessarily true Judy. Ted Kennedy is a very big turn
  off to a lot of independents and the more conservative
  element of the Democrats.
 
 Who wouldn't vote for Obama in the first place.
 
  It will be  
  interesting to see if any other Kennedy's come out for Hillary or 
  see if they speak with one voice.
 
 They have, and they don't, as I just noted.





RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread Peter

--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:11 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard /
 Vedic exercise
 
  
 
 ...and do the both of you also believe that the CIA
 infiltrated the 
 TMO?
 
 Probably not to the extent MMY carried on about, but
 they definitely had
 their eye on it, especially after Jonestown. I
 worked in the DC center after
 Jonestown and I’m sure our phones were tapped.

I think the CIA saw pretty quickly that the TMO was
the gang that couldn't shoot straight and just left us
to self-destruct on our own!




 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 -
 Release Date: 1/27/2008
 6:39 PM
  
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread Angela Mailander
Yes, he may be a wannabe, but his feat seems real enough.  In any case, my 
point was that we just don't know enough about him to judge.  When I was in 
China, I became very close friends with an allegedly Buddhist monk who was into 
trantric stuff.  (He told me, We're all pretty much Taoists in here--here 
being his monastery on an island rock in the middle of the Yang Tse River near 
where it flows into the East China Sea. We spent two years together, so I'm not 
entirely  ignorant about  these things. It is possible that he was chosen and 
sent by his superiors (in the monastic sense) to do just what he's doing.

- Original Message 
From: Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:55:12 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC









  



He may be just another wannabe tantric.  Though there are many 
tantric 

siddhis but tantrics aren't supposed to show off any of them.  They 

are to be left for practical applications as they arise and mostly for 

healing.



Angela Mailander wrote:

 It may be that this guy is doing it for the benefit of his ego.  The fact 
 that the report made it sound that way doesn't necessarily mean that this is 
 really his interest.  In any case, it is a good thing to publicize things 
 like this for the benefit of those who doubt that yogic expertise really has 
 something going for it.  Selling a meditation technique for money is also 
 rather incongruous, but until it was done, not enough people could take 
 advantage of it and learn.  

   






  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
--



!--

#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
font-family:Arial;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
--



!--

#ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
#ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, 
sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
#ygrp-text{
font-family:Georgia;
}
#ygrp-text p{
margin:0 0 1em 0;}
#ygrp-tpmsgs{
font-family:Arial;
clear:both;}
#ygrp-vitnav{
padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a{
padding:0 1px;}
#ygrp-actbar{
clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
#ygrp-actbar .left{
float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
.bld{font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-grft{
font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
#ygrp-ft{
font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
padding:5px 0;
}
#ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
padding-bottom:10px;}

#ygrp-vital{
background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
#ygrp-vital #vithd{
font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
#ygrp-vital ul{
padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
#ygrp-vital ul li{
list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
}
#ygrp-vital ul li .ct{
font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
#ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-vital a{
text-decoration:none;}

#ygrp-vital a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}

#ygrp-sponsor #hd{
color:#999;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov{
padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #nc{
background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad{
padding:8px 0;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{
font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
text-decoration:none;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad p{
margin:0;}
o{font-size:0;}
.MsoNormal{
margin:0 0 0 0;}
#ygrp-text tt{
font-size:120%;}
blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;}
.replbq{margin:4;}
--







Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[FairfieldLife] Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread shempmcgurk
...and maybe it's because I spent time in the TMO and all seems 
quite normal to me, but I really don't see much harm in the Tom 
Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:

http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6


Everyone seems to think it is some sort of terrible propagandist, 
brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see it.

What do you think?



[FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie msilver1951@ 
 wrote:
 
  What do you think of the idea of the Bindu, what MMY refers to as 
 a 
  point of consciousness originating from Fullness, a seed 
 containing in 
  a potential state all the forces, dimensions, time, suns, solar 
  systems, galaxies, galaxy clusters and universe required for the 
  creation of a single universe. This point of consciousness could 
 be the 
  origin of the big bang and in this case refers to the origin of a 
  single soul, creating its' universe and then incarnating into it, 
 each 
  soul creating its' own universe from this seed of consciousness. 
 At the 
  end of a souls lifetime, its' created universe then reverts back 
 into 
  the Bindu and then back into Fullness.
 
 I think what Maharishi says about the Bindu is that it contains all 
 that there is, within all that there is. So there is not a Bindu of 
 singularity inside of that which is not of the same essential nature 
 as the Bindu. Rather, from any point in all that there is, that 
 chosen point can be isolated, the Bindu point, which then is found 
 to also contain all that there is; a point of Infinity, within 
 Infinity. There is nothing which is not Bindu.


...or banana.









[FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Alex Stanley
That kid is definitely going places. But, as the owner of a face with
five prominent, but fairly well-placed moles, my advice for young
Daniel is to get that one humongous mole on his face removed. I think
the large size and poor placement of that mole detracts from his
appearance. I was distracted by it during the entire video.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred and
 Debbie's parenting skills. What easy self-confidence.
 I think all of us could learn something by watching
 this kid!
  
 --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  That was one of the most inspiring things I have
  seen all year.  It
  doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have such
  natural self
  confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
  Success?  This kid was
  brought up by parents who know how to think!  Thanks
  for posting this.
   I was taking notes from this kid on how to bring my
  own dreams to the
  next level!




[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard

2008-01-28 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 sandiego108@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sandiego108 sandiego108@
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
 Something in me just snapped, but very quietly. I
 walked over to the red-faced, near-apoplectic ass-
 hole and took him by the perfectly-pressed collar
 of his perfectly-pressed shirt (mussing his perfect
 tie), and dragged him over to the edge of the trail
 that we were walking along and leaned him out over
 the edge. He looked down...WAY down, several hundred
 meters, to where he might easily wind up if he didn't
 pay attention. He paid attention.
 
I don't believe you-- this sounds like a made up 
fantasy of yours, child.
   
   You mean like your enlightenment?  :-)
  
  To you, precisely like enlightenment, simply because you don't know 
  how to tell the difference...twit. (hook, line, and sinker...). :-)
 
 Jim,
 
 Do you actually believe that you are impressing
 people by pursuing this grudge against me?
 
 And by acting out with the intelligence level
 of a twelve-year-old?
 
 I mean, you could stand to learn a little some-
 thing from the events of the last couple of days.
 People here on this forum like Nablus, ferchissakes,
 preferred believing that sandiego108 wasn't you 
 to believing that you -- Jim Flanegin -- had sunk
 so low in both your language and your thinking.
 
 Ask for a show of hands, Jim. 
 
 After this latest meltdown, ask whether there is 
 even ONE person on this forum who believes your
 claims of being enlightened.


At this point I think Jim's a troll, Barry.








[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:11 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise
 
  
 
 ...and do the both of you also believe that the CIA infiltrated the 
 TMO?
 
 Probably not to the extent MMY carried on about, but they 
definitely had
 their eye on it, especially after Jonestown. I worked in the DC 
center after
 Jonestown and I'm sure our phones were tapped.


Are you aware that unlawful wire-tapping is/was against the law?

As such, why didn't you alert the authorities?

Or the media?






 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 
1/27/2008
 6:39 PM





Re: [FairfieldLife] Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
What I struggle with in Scientology is the bizarre
narrative regarding thetans, space-ships that look
like 747's and so forth. It makes a great science
fiction story, but it is rather strange that it is
taken as fact by apparently intelligent people without
a lick of evidence.


--- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ...and maybe it's because I spent time in the TMO
 and all seems 
 quite normal to me, but I really don't see much
 harm in the Tom 
 Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6
 
 
 Everyone seems to think it is some sort of terrible
 propagandist, 
 brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see it.
 
 What do you think?
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


[FairfieldLife] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation empire

2008-01-28 Thread Vaj

http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-31636820080128

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation empire
By Emma Thomasson

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, who became a guru to the  
Beatles, stepped down this month as the head of the organisation that  
brought transcendental meditation to the West, an aide said on Monday.


His work is done and now he'll be concentrating on the field of  
silence and dedicating himself more to pure knowledge rather than  
administrative matters, Benjamin Feldman, finance minister for the  
Global Country of World Peace, told Reuters.


(...)

Reported to be 91, the Maharishi is fairly well, Feldman said and  
plans to stay in the Netherlands for the time being. Maharaja Nader  
Raam, a Lebanese doctor who has studied with the Maharishi for 25  
years, will take over the organisation.


Feldman said the Maharishi's work would live on because he has  
trained tens of thousands of teachers over the years (!).

[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
  snip
I see no glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
What I do see is a relentless attempt by the media
and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons as
divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
reasonable remarks by the campaign misleadingly out
of context.
   
   I can't believe you feel that way about the now 
   infamous Ronald Reagan remarks about Obama by
   Bill Clinton, Judy.
   
   Do you really feel that that was a perfectly reasonable
   remark by the campaign misleadingly out of context?
  
  Have you stopped beating your wife, Shemp?
 
 See if you can just answer the fucking question, Judy.

I can't answer your question any more than you
can answer mine, and for the same reason.

Read what I wrote again, please.

 Or are you doing the same thing you always do when someone
 points out a consistency on your part, which is to NOT
 address the matter at hand?

Have you stopped beating your wife?

Hint: I'm schooling you in how to ask a fair
question that reflects what the person you're
asking actually said.




[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread suziezuzie
I always considered alcohol as an apathetic, which when absorbed into 
the spunge like material of the brain, anesthetizes or numbs the brain 
cells. The brain has been described as the most complex creation in the 
universe so does anesthetizing it make sense?. It's true that brain 
cells well 'wake up' eventually after being anesthetized but over time, 
they simply die. My brother drank wine with his meals after believing 
in the horse shit about how good it is for the heart and then quit this 
ridiculous habit. He told me after being off wine for sometime, that 
his mind was so clear, he didn't know what to do with himself. The 
definition of an alcoholic is one who likes to feel dullness at least 
once a day. My daughter who attends university told me that when her 
friends come up to her drunk or high, she tells them, you're high or 
stoned, don't waste my time, get yourself in order and then come back 
and we'll talk. 



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 12:04 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

 

Are you aware that unlawful wire-tapping is/was against the law?

I don’t think that ever concerned the CIA.

As such, why didn't you alert the authorities?

Or the media?

I wouldn’t have been able to prove it.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 1/27/2008
6:39 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread suziezuzie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think that for any knowledge to be possible, there has to be that 
bindu point that includes all knowledge and this point is 
omnipresent.  Based on what I am learning in the chat group of 
physicists and mathematicians that I belong to, the big bang is 
definitely bindu.  It is the first distinction from undifferentiated 
being.
 

I love this idea that that the big bang is definitely bindu, in this 
case the bindu point being defined to contain a potential universe. 
The question then arises, where is this bindu located? Scientists 
haven't located exactly where the origin of the big bang is. My 
daughter took an astronomy class. She described to me how Hubble, 
after observing the motion of large numbers of galaxies, determined 
that they were all moving away from an original point of reference 
and therefore, the big bang theory was created. Thinking about this, 
I believed that no matter where a person existed in a universe, their 
perception of galaxies would be the same, all moving away from a 
common reference point. I then felt that this subjective observation 
really indicated that the perception of big bang or origins of the 
universe began with the point of consciousness or what I understand 
as the bindu of consciousness or spiritual essence. The concept that 
we each create one universe is an extension of this idea, our 
creation and therefore perception of everything stems from the 
existence of the bindu. 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Peter

--- John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Not so fast there, Bub.
  
  I think in Hindu scriptures they have a complete
 science about what
  marks on the body mean.  Don't know for sure, but
 seems that cutting
  one off might be, er, cutting one's self off from
 a cosmic channel 
 of
  certain vibrations.
  
  I'm just sayin'
  
  Moles are like opinions too, so I'm guessing that
 everyone reading 
 the
  below said, Wait a damned second.  You talking to
 me?  You don't 
 like
  my beauty mark?
  
  Edg
 
 In jyotish, a mole in the face means that there is a
 benefic planet 
 in the person's second house, the field of family,
 speech and money.  
 So, the indication is that this person will be rich
 some day.
 
 The person involved appears to be focused and
 driven.  So, there is 
 something else that is driving his interests.  The
 indications show  
 that he probably has a very strong 10th house, the
 field of career, 
 or the lord of the 10th house is strong and placed
 in benefic houses.
 
 I don't think one should take away something that is
 a sign of good 
 luck for cosmetic reasons.  For example, there is
 the son of a 
 Spanish singer, Julio Iglesias, who became popular a
 few years ago 
 for his singing ability and relationship with
 Kurnokova, the female 
 tennis player.  He mentioned at that time that he
 had removed a 
 prominent mole on his face for cosmetic reason.  As
 of today, I don't 
 see that he has maintained his popularity as before.
 As a matter of 
 fact, I can't even remember his first name now...lol
 
 John R.

Yes, and the above anecdotal story indicates the power
of jyotish...please! How in the world does the removal
of a facial mark have any influence on your life at
all? This is such a primitive way of thinking. The
Western world has struggled for hundreds of years to
climb above this type of superstitious thinking,
please don't relapse into pre-scientific thought.




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex
 Stanley
  j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
  
   That kid is definitely going places. But, as the
 owner of a face 
 with
   five prominent, but fairly well-placed moles, my
 advice for young
   Daniel is to get that one humongous mole on his
 face removed. I 
 think
   the large size and poor placement of that mole
 detracts from his
   appearance. I was distracted by it during the
 entire video.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 drpetersutphen@ 
 wrote:
   
Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to
 Fred and
Debbie's parenting skills. What easy
 self-confidence.
I think all of us could learn something by
 watching
this kid!
 
--- curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
wrote:

 That was one of the most inspiring things I
 have
 seen all year.  It
 doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would
 have such
 natural self
 confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes!
 to
 Success?  This kid was
 brought up by parents who know how to think!
  Thanks
 for posting this.
  I was taking notes from this kid on how to
 bring my
 own dreams to the
 next level!
  
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I always considered alcohol as an apathetic, which when absorbed 
 into the spunge like material of the brain, anesthetizes or numbs 
 the brain cells. The brain has been described as the most complex 
 creation in the universe so does anesthetizing it make sense?. It's 
 true that brain cells well 'wake up' eventually after being 
 anesthetized but over time, they simply die. My brother drank wine 
 with his meals after believing in the horse shit about how good it 
 is for the heart and then quit this ridiculous habit. He told me 
 after being off wine for sometime, that his mind was so clear, he 
 didn't know what to do with himself. The definition of an alcoholic 
 is one who likes to feel dullness at least once a day. 

I'm sorry that your body is so out of balance that 
it can't handle a glass of wine without becoming dull. 
But to believe that this disability makes you better 
than those who do not have such a limitation? 

Get a life.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re:99

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
dude, where's your post in all that? ;-)

--- nadarrombus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, The Secret
 L.Shaddai@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 curtisdeltablues 
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:

 I think we can all safely just toss the
 Collected Papers now,
   don't  ya
 think?  No more need to pretend...
 
 The religion of Guru Devism is born.




It's only 11 days since Maharishi gave up
 control of and 
  management 
of the TMO and the clowns -- I mean the Rajas
 -- that have taken 
  over 
have, as Curtis has indicated, already gone
 the extra mile to 
solidify the religious nature of the
 Movement.

This supports the theory that I have presented
 on this forum from 
time to time: that Maharishi abandoned the TM
 is not a religion 
  or 
philosophy tenet of the TM Program because he
 was badgered to do 
  so 
by the sycophants that have surrounded him for
 the past 35 years. 
  And 
now those very sychophants have become the
 gate-keepers. 

They wore the poor man down by continually
 demanding that he give 
them the real knowledge despite his
 continual admonitions that 
  the 
TM technique was the full and complete
 program. Well, Maharishi 
  may 
be enlightened but he is only human.  And at
 some point he threw 
  his 
hands up and said: Okay, if you want 'the
 real knowledge' I 
  guess 
that's what I have to GIVE you. So now we've
 got THIS 
  catastrophy on 
our hands: Rajas, tinfoil hats, Vedic peanut
 butter, etc.

Well, the inmates have got the reigns of the
 ship now and, 
  presto!, 
we're prostrating once a day for the next
 month.

Abraham?  Can you please bring Isaac over to
 the alter?  Yeah, 
  and 
bring some of those briquettes, too, while
 you're at it...

   
   Man,  I'm in a mood to laugh, laugh, laugh. 
 Thank you.  I haven't 
  had
   such belly laughs in years.
   
   But let me try to understand your arguments. 
 You're saying that
   Maharishi did not have a hidden agenda of using
 the West to awaken 
  the
   East, of spreading Maharishi brand Hinduism
 throughout the world?
  
  
  
  
  Yes, he had an agenda but, no, it wasn't hidden. 
 He told us quite 
  explicitly what he was doing by packaging TM as a
 non-denominational, 
  non-belief, non-religious program.
  
  And, no, I truly believe it wasn't a case of him
 thinking: TM is part 
  of the Hindu religion and, therefore, I have to
 disguise it in order 
  for the suckers of the West to buy into it.  To
 him, TM was very much 
  a universal thing that was separate and apart from
 his own personal 
  Hinduism and could, on its own, stand apart from
 the trappings of 
  religion.  And it was with that very worldview
 that he packaged TM 
  and, successfully, brought it into the world.
  
  And that's how things were progressing until about
 1977-9 when things 
  started falling apart, largely from his own doing.
  And I refer to an 
  abandonment of the above described universal
 non-religious approach.
  
  
  
  
   
   This of course runs counter to the way it was
 explained to us wide
   eyed  children:  that Maharishi was giving us
 what we needed at the
   time and or that our raising the world's
 consciousness allowed the
   Maha Rishi to cognize more and more of the Vedic
 truth, or as I 
  always
   believed, to pull all of this shit out of his
 ass.
  
  
  
  
  I don't know who was explaining all this to you or
 whether it was 
  done in some official capacity.  But I can tell
 you what I was taught 
  as both a meditator who learned TM from the 7-step
 program and as a 
  teacher in Teacher Training and that was that the
 TM Program was (1) 
  not a religion; (2) not a philosophy or belief;
 and (3) the 
  organisation taking on the responsibility of
 disseminating this 
  knowledge would itself embody those very
 principles (because to do 
  otherwise would be to stop being universal and
 therefore alienate 
  some potential practitioners of TM).
  
  
  
  
  
Dr. BM doesn't
   just have those funny initials for nothing.  Of
 course we've read
   which group of great seers and Shankaracharias
 granted him the title
   he scribbled on that stationary in London.  Let
 me speak a bit more
   sweetly and say that he pulled that one out of
 the air as well.
   
   I don't quite get your problem with this
 becoming a religion.
  
  
  
  As religions go, I would probably be the first in
 line to sign up.
  
  But once it is a religion, you lose the potential
 to get 99% of the 
  people on the planet to sign up.  That's not being
 universal.
  
  Hey, I'd love to have a guru and sit cross-legged
 on the Ganges at 
  the feet of a master and get darshan and 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re:99% of tmo people are off the program!!!!

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
Sucking on Krishna's toes? Oh man, do tell!

--- nadarrombus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  you are right about this. on the ia course when
 maharishi was looking
 for experiences i think he just wanted the group to
 affirm that
 nothing was needed but self refferal. he said he was
 looking for the
 nothing experience. instead people gave him weird
 stuff like sucking
 krishnas toe or bubbles of veda. god the ladies
 would go on about
 their feelings like crazy and he would just say
 continue with the
 rounding. we need to reject the chance that this
 thing will turn into
 buddhism or worse. the buddhas last words were dont
 worship me, dont
 follow me, dont make statues of me... look what
 happened to it.  
   --- In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, The Secret
 L.Shaddai@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 curtisdeltablues 
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:

 I think we can all safely just toss the
 Collected Papers now,
   don't  ya
 think?  No more need to pretend...
 
 The religion of Guru Devism is born.




It's only 11 days since Maharishi gave up
 control of and 
  management 
of the TMO and the clowns -- I mean the Rajas
 -- that have taken 
  over 
have, as Curtis has indicated, already gone
 the extra mile to 
solidify the religious nature of the
 Movement.

This supports the theory that I have presented
 on this forum from 
time to time: that Maharishi abandoned the TM
 is not a religion 
  or 
philosophy tenet of the TM Program because he
 was badgered to do 
  so 
by the sycophants that have surrounded him for
 the past 35 years. 
  And 
now those very sychophants have become the
 gate-keepers. 

They wore the poor man down by continually
 demanding that he give 
them the real knowledge despite his
 continual admonitions that 
  the 
TM technique was the full and complete
 program. Well, Maharishi 
  may 
be enlightened but he is only human.  And at
 some point he threw 
  his 
hands up and said: Okay, if you want 'the
 real knowledge' I 
  guess 
that's what I have to GIVE you. So now we've
 got THIS 
  catastrophy on 
our hands: Rajas, tinfoil hats, Vedic peanut
 butter, etc.

Well, the inmates have got the reigns of the
 ship now and, 
  presto!, 
we're prostrating once a day for the next
 month.

Abraham?  Can you please bring Isaac over to
 the alter?  Yeah, 
  and 
bring some of those briquettes, too, while
 you're at it...

   
   Man,  I'm in a mood to laugh, laugh, laugh. 
 Thank you.  I haven't 
  had
   such belly laughs in years.
   
   But let me try to understand your arguments. 
 You're saying that
   Maharishi did not have a hidden agenda of using
 the West to awaken 
  the
   East, of spreading Maharishi brand Hinduism
 throughout the world?
  
  
  
  
  Yes, he had an agenda but, no, it wasn't hidden. 
 He told us quite 
  explicitly what he was doing by packaging TM as a
 non-denominational, 
  non-belief, non-religious program.
  
  And, no, I truly believe it wasn't a case of him
 thinking: TM is part 
  of the Hindu religion and, therefore, I have to
 disguise it in order 
  for the suckers of the West to buy into it.  To
 him, TM was very much 
  a universal thing that was separate and apart from
 his own personal 
  Hinduism and could, on its own, stand apart from
 the trappings of 
  religion.  And it was with that very worldview
 that he packaged TM 
  and, successfully, brought it into the world.
  
  And that's how things were progressing until about
 1977-9 when things 
  started falling apart, largely from his own doing.
  And I refer to an 
  abandonment of the above described universal
 non-religious approach.
  
  
  
  
   
   This of course runs counter to the way it was
 explained to us wide
   eyed  children:  that Maharishi was giving us
 what we needed at the
   time and or that our raising the world's
 consciousness allowed the
   Maha Rishi to cognize more and more of the Vedic
 truth, or as I 
  always
   believed, to pull all of this shit out of his
 ass.
  
  
  
  
  I don't know who was explaining all this to you or
 whether it was 
  done in some official capacity.  But I can tell
 you what I was taught 
  as both a meditator who learned TM from the 7-step
 program and as a 
  teacher in Teacher Training and that was that the
 TM Program was (1) 
  not a religion; (2) not a philosophy or belief;
 and (3) the 
  organisation taking on the responsibility of
 disseminating this 
  knowledge would itself embody those very
 principles (because to do 
  otherwise would be to stop being universal and
 therefore alienate 
  some potential practitioners of TM).
  
  
  
  
  
Dr. BM doesn't
   just have those funny initials 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
He nailed it! Poor Tom!

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 http://youtube.com/watch?v=fYBTlI1-fHg
 
 This is my favorite goofing on Tom video.  Craig
 Ferguson really nails it!
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
   wrote:
   
...and maybe it's because I spent time in the
 TMO and all seems 
quite normal to me, but I really don't see
 much harm in the Tom 
Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:

http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6


Everyone seems to think it is some sort of
 terrible propagandist, 
brainwashing type of thing but I just don't
 see it.

What do you think?
   
   I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY
 one who can really help
   at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has
 been drinking the
   coolaid a bit too much.
   
   I find his claim that Scientologists are the
 experts on the human mind
   to be delusional. 
   
   His claim about how SP's can't come around him
 was specifically
   refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed
 his wacky perspective
   on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement
 terms, he didn't
   avert the danger before it arose by his magical
 state of mind.
   
   He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking
 himself waay too
   seriously.  His delight in everything he says,
 and his inappropriate
   projectile laughter, make him one of the most
 entertaining weirdos to
   come along in a long time.  I could watch that
 tape every day and not
   tire of it. 
  
  
  Then you'll probably also really enjoy this one: 
  
  Tom Cruise Scientology-Constipation Video
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9jqD_8IQpMfeature=related
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
Alex, give me a call, we can work through your mole
issues in a safe, supportive environment. ;-)

--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 That kid is definitely going places. But, as the
 owner of a face with
 five prominent, but fairly well-placed moles, my
 advice for young
 Daniel is to get that one humongous mole on his face
 removed. I think
 the large size and poor placement of that mole
 detracts from his
 appearance. I was distracted by it during the entire
 video.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred
 and
  Debbie's parenting skills. What easy
 self-confidence.
  I think all of us could learn something by
 watching
  this kid!
   
  --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
   That was one of the most inspiring things I have
   seen all year.  It
   doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have
 such
   natural self
   confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
   Success?  This kid was
   brought up by parents who know how to think! 
 Thanks
   for posting this.
I was taking notes from this kid on how to
 bring my
   own dreams to the
   next level!
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


[FairfieldLife] Re: Request to change RIP Scott Girard thread title

2008-01-28 Thread matrixmonitor
---Thanks, I always pray for the dead.  I have visitations now and 
then from my deceased relatives in the dream state.  As Adi Da says, 
while physically alive, you make mind, but after departing from the 
physical world, mind makes you.  In other words, the various mental 
constructions that people set into motion along with the emotional 
charge of engrams tends to create a type of mental prison after 
death. Techniques along the line of the Tibetan Book of the Dead are 
designed to blast through the mental encrustations and assist the 
person into the higher realms, possibly right into the Pure Light of 
the Void. 


 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mr. Archer et al,
 
 I tried to post to this thread last night but cannot find it. I may
 have done something wrong.  
 
 Rather than attempt to re-write my memories of my friend Scott 
Girard
 from high school and college, I would like to simply repeat my 
request
 that, as there appears to be no adult supervision on this discussion
 group, perhaps all of you might take your little arguments about
 exercise and your vicious threats against each other to a different
 subject line in order to stop the disrespect you are bringing to the
 name of a good and gentle man.
 
 This is precisely the kind of childishness that would have upset 
Scott
 the most. Were he to have learned that so many people have time to
 criticize each other behind anonymous pen-names, he would have been
 saddened indeed. I am certain he would ask all of you to rise above
 it, to seek to spend your limited time here on more significant
 matters. And, above all, he would ask you to stop with the childish
 name-calling and meaningless physical threats.
 
 So, please, start a thread called To exercise or not or something
 like that and let poor Scott and his memory actually begin to rest 
in
 peace.
 
 Tim Rowan
 Colorado Springs
  
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 
1/27/2008
 6:39 PM





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 ...and maybe it's because I spent time in the TMO and all seems 
 quite normal to me, but I really don't see much harm in the Tom 
 Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6
 
 
 Everyone seems to think it is some sort of terrible propagandist, 
 brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see it.
 
 What do you think?

I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY one who can really help
at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has been drinking the
coolaid a bit too much.

I find his claim that Scientologists are the experts on the human mind
to be delusional. 

His claim about how SP's can't come around him was specifically
refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed his wacky perspective
on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement terms, he didn't
avert the danger before it arose by his magical state of mind.

He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking himself waay too
seriously.  His delight in everything he says, and his inappropriate
projectile laughter, make him one of the most entertaining weirdos to
come along in a long time.  I could watch that tape every day and not
tire of it. 










[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
 snip
   I see no glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
   What I do see is a relentless attempt by the media
   and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons as
   divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
   reasonable remarks by the campaign misleadingly out
   of context.
  
  I can't believe you feel that way about the now infamous Ronald 
  Reagan remarks about Obama by Bill Clinton, Judy.
  
  Do you really feel that that was a perfectly reasonable remark 
by 
  the campaign misleadingly out of context?
 
 Have you stopped beating your wife, Shemp?


Come again?




[FairfieldLife] Re: Live - Lightning Crashes [death, rebirth and an angel too]

2008-01-28 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Nice song. I like the guy's voice.
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsOculxtdX8


This version is even better by the guy. His voice penetrates.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--QBj4OyAaMNR=1



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii_99@ wrote:
 
  Questions for the Clintons
By BOB HERBERT
Published: January 26, 2008
 snip
Bill Clinton, in his over-the-top advocacy of his wife's 
 candidacy, has at times sounded like a man who's gone off his 
 medication. And some of the Clinton surrogates have been flat-out 
 reprehensible.
 snip
And then there was Bob Kerrey, the former senator and another 
 Clinton supporter, who slimed up the campaign with the following 
 comments:
It's probably not something that appeals to him, but I like 
the 
 fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was 
a 
 Muslim and that his paternal grandmother is a Muslim. There's a 
 billion people on the planet that are Muslims, and I think that 
 experience is a big deal.
Pressing the point, Mr. Kerrey told CNN's John King: I've 
 watched the blogs try to say that you can't trust him because he 
 spent a little bit of time in a secular madrassa. I feel quite the 
 opposite.
Get it?
 
 Yes. Sounds to me like Kerrey is trying to counter
 the false rumor that Obama is a Muslim. How that
 could be considered a slime is rather strange;
 to call it a slime appears to be an attempt to
 slime the Clinton campaign.
 
Let's start with the fact that Mr. Obama never attended a 
 madrassa, and that there is no such thing as a secular madrassa. A 
 madrassa is a religious school.
 
 Madrassa is the Arabic word for school--any
 kind of school, secular or religious. So we're
 not starting with a fact at all.
 
 snip
The Clinton camp knows what it's doing, and its slimy maneuvers 
 have been working. Bob Kerrey apologized and Andrew Young said at 
the 
 time of his comment that he was just fooling around. But the damage 
 to Senator Obama has been real, and so have the benefits to Senator 
 Clinton of these and other lowlife tactics.
Consider, for example, the following Web posting (misspellings 
 and all) from a mainstream news blog on Jan. 13:
omg people get a grip. Can you imagine calling our president 
 barak hussien obama ... I cant, I pray no one would be 
disrespectful 
 enough to put this man in our whitehouse.
 
 Cherry-picking one nasty *comment* (not a posting)
 on a blog as if it were somehow representative of
 the purported damage the Clinton campaign is doing
 to Obama is really beneath contempt. Herbert knows
 better, but he knows many of his readers will not.
 
 snip
Still, it's legitimate to ask, given the destructive 
developments 
 of the last few weeks, whether the Clintons are capable of being 
 anything but divisive. The electorate seems more polarized now than 
 it was just a few weeks ago, and the Clintons have seemed 
positively 
 gleeful in that atmosphere.
 
 I see no glee coming out of the Clinton campaign.
 What I do see is a relentless attempt by the media
 and the Obama campaign to paint the Clintons as
 divisive, including deliberately quoting perfectly
 reasonable remarks by the campaign misleadingly out
 of context.


I can't believe you feel that way about the now infamous Ronald 
Reagan remarks about Obama by Bill Clinton, Judy.

Do you really feel that that was a perfectly reasonable remark by 
the campaign misleadingly out of context?




[FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred and
 Debbie's parenting skills. What easy self-confidence.
 I think all of us could learn something by watching
 this kid!

I didn't know Fred but I knew Debby when we were students.  She is an
exceptional human.

So I've been deconstructing Dan's rejection strategy as he pitches his
site, which would help me in pitching my shows.  I think part of the
key is that he goes in with nothing to lose.  Just last week I had
braces on so I don't expect them to talk with me.  He doesn't take
himself too seriously. (a tad bit easier at 16 then 50!)  But it
allows him tremendous freedom to ask for what he wants from anybody. 
By coming in with no ego to protect, he doesn't have to be defensive
about people taking him seriously.  He takes himself seriously in a
healthy way, but it is totally unconnected from people's reactions to
him.  I'm idealizing a bit here but this POV is so useful for my own
work.  The kid's got it going on and big high five for great
parenting.  (I raised two well behaved cats and that was my parenting
skills limit!)  




  
 --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  That was one of the most inspiring things I have
  seen all year.  It
  doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have such
  natural self
  confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
  Success?  This kid was
  brought up by parents who know how to think!  Thanks
  for posting this.
   I was taking notes from this kid on how to bring my
  own dreams to the
  next level!
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  drpetersutphen@ wrote:
  
   Wow! What a mature kid. 
   
   --- Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
   
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick Archer
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:34 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fred and Debby
  Poneman's
son

 

HYPERLINK
   
  
 
 http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1


Fred and Debby are in this too in a couple of
places.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database:
  269.19.13/1246 -
Release Date: 1/27/2008
6:39 PM
 

   
   
   

 


   Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
   http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
  
  
  
  
  
  To subscribe, send a message to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Or go to: 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
  and click 'Join This Group!' 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
 
 
 
  

 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread Bhairitu
He may be just another wannabe tantric.  Though there are many tantric 
siddhis but tantrics aren't supposed to show off any of them.  They 
are to be left for practical applications as they arise and mostly for 
healing.

Angela Mailander wrote:
 It may be that this guy is doing it for the benefit of his ego.  The fact 
 that the report made it sound that way doesn't necessarily mean that this is 
 really his interest.  In any case, it is a good thing to publicize things 
 like this for the benefit of those who doubt that yogic expertise really has 
 something going for it.  Selling a meditation technique for money is also 
 rather incongruous, but until it was done, not enough people could take 
 advantage of it and learn.  
   



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread curtisdeltablues
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fYBTlI1-fHg

This is my favorite goofing on Tom video.  Craig Ferguson really nails it!


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   ...and maybe it's because I spent time in the TMO and all seems 
   quite normal to me, but I really don't see much harm in the Tom 
   Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:
   
   http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6
   
   
   Everyone seems to think it is some sort of terrible propagandist, 
   brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see it.
   
   What do you think?
  
  I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY one who can really help
  at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has been drinking the
  coolaid a bit too much.
  
  I find his claim that Scientologists are the experts on the human mind
  to be delusional. 
  
  His claim about how SP's can't come around him was specifically
  refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed his wacky perspective
  on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement terms, he didn't
  avert the danger before it arose by his magical state of mind.
  
  He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking himself waay too
  seriously.  His delight in everything he says, and his inappropriate
  projectile laughter, make him one of the most entertaining weirdos to
  come along in a long time.  I could watch that tape every day and not
  tire of it. 
 
 
 Then you'll probably also really enjoy this one: 
 
 Tom Cruise Scientology-Constipation Video
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9jqD_8IQpMfeature=related





[FairfieldLife] Re:99% of tmo people are off the program!!!!

2008-01-28 Thread nadarrombus
 you are right about this. on the ia course when maharishi was looking
for experiences i think he just wanted the group to affirm that
nothing was needed but self refferal. he said he was looking for the
nothing experience. instead people gave him weird stuff like sucking
krishnas toe or bubbles of veda. god the ladies would go on about
their feelings like crazy and he would just say continue with the
rounding. we need to reject the chance that this thing will turn into
buddhism or worse. the buddhas last words were dont worship me, dont
follow me, dont make statues of me... look what happened to it.  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, The Secret L.Shaddai@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
I think we can all safely just toss the Collected Papers now,
  don't  ya
think?  No more need to pretend...

The religion of Guru Devism is born.
   
   
   
   
   It's only 11 days since Maharishi gave up control of and 
 management 
   of the TMO and the clowns -- I mean the Rajas -- that have taken 
 over 
   have, as Curtis has indicated, already gone the extra mile to 
   solidify the religious nature of the Movement.
   
   This supports the theory that I have presented on this forum from 
   time to time: that Maharishi abandoned the TM is not a religion 
 or 
   philosophy tenet of the TM Program because he was badgered to do 
 so 
   by the sycophants that have surrounded him for the past 35 years. 
 And 
   now those very sychophants have become the gate-keepers. 
   
   They wore the poor man down by continually demanding that he give 
   them the real knowledge despite his continual admonitions that 
 the 
   TM technique was the full and complete program. Well, Maharishi 
 may 
   be enlightened but he is only human.  And at some point he threw 
 his 
   hands up and said: Okay, if you want 'the real knowledge' I 
 guess 
   that's what I have to GIVE you. So now we've got THIS 
 catastrophy on 
   our hands: Rajas, tinfoil hats, Vedic peanut butter, etc.
   
   Well, the inmates have got the reigns of the ship now and, 
 presto!, 
   we're prostrating once a day for the next month.
   
   Abraham?  Can you please bring Isaac over to the alter?  Yeah, 
 and 
   bring some of those briquettes, too, while you're at it...
   
  
  Man,  I'm in a mood to laugh, laugh, laugh.  Thank you.  I haven't 
 had
  such belly laughs in years.
  
  But let me try to understand your arguments.  You're saying that
  Maharishi did not have a hidden agenda of using the West to awaken 
 the
  East, of spreading Maharishi brand Hinduism throughout the world?
 
 
 
 
 Yes, he had an agenda but, no, it wasn't hidden.  He told us quite 
 explicitly what he was doing by packaging TM as a non-denominational, 
 non-belief, non-religious program.
 
 And, no, I truly believe it wasn't a case of him thinking: TM is part 
 of the Hindu religion and, therefore, I have to disguise it in order 
 for the suckers of the West to buy into it.  To him, TM was very much 
 a universal thing that was separate and apart from his own personal 
 Hinduism and could, on its own, stand apart from the trappings of 
 religion.  And it was with that very worldview that he packaged TM 
 and, successfully, brought it into the world.
 
 And that's how things were progressing until about 1977-9 when things 
 started falling apart, largely from his own doing.  And I refer to an 
 abandonment of the above described universal non-religious approach.
 
 
 
 
  
  This of course runs counter to the way it was explained to us wide
  eyed  children:  that Maharishi was giving us what we needed at the
  time and or that our raising the world's consciousness allowed the
  Maha Rishi to cognize more and more of the Vedic truth, or as I 
 always
  believed, to pull all of this shit out of his ass.
 
 
 
 
 I don't know who was explaining all this to you or whether it was 
 done in some official capacity.  But I can tell you what I was taught 
 as both a meditator who learned TM from the 7-step program and as a 
 teacher in Teacher Training and that was that the TM Program was (1) 
 not a religion; (2) not a philosophy or belief; and (3) the 
 organisation taking on the responsibility of disseminating this 
 knowledge would itself embody those very principles (because to do 
 otherwise would be to stop being universal and therefore alienate 
 some potential practitioners of TM).
 
 
 
 
 
   Dr. BM doesn't
  just have those funny initials for nothing.  Of course we've read
  which group of great seers and Shankaracharias granted him the title
  he scribbled on that stationary in London.  Let me speak a bit more
  sweetly and say that he pulled that one out of the air as well.
  
  I don't quite get your problem 

[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:07 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise
 
  
 
 --- In HYPERLINK
 mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 mainstream20016 
 mainstream20016@ wrote:
 
  Nab,
  Americans seem to occupy a special place in your heart. 
  Similar, I'm sure, to the place you occupy in our own.
 
 I do not dislike them, in fact I have several americans friends 
from my 
 travels there. Very nice people.
 But since the CIA are (mostly) americans it is natural to be 
sceptical. 
 It's not only that president of yours that makes the americans look 
 like fools the world over, CIA is very busy doing the same thing. 
And, 
 like their president, they are in the business of creating havoc 
around 
 the world.
 
 Hey Nabby, there's a point that you and I agree on.







...and do the both of you also believe that the CIA infiltrated the 
TMO?






 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 
1/27/2008
 6:39 PM





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread Peter

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  ...and maybe it's because I spent time in the TMO
 and all seems 
  quite normal to me, but I really don't see much
 harm in the Tom 
  Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:
  
  http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6
  
  
  Everyone seems to think it is some sort of
 terrible propagandist, 
  brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see
 it.
  
  What do you think?
 
 I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY one
 who can really help
 at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has been
 drinking the
 coolaid a bit too much.
 
 I find his claim that Scientologists are the experts
 on the human mind
 to be delusional. 
 
 His claim about how SP's can't come around him was
 specifically
 refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed his
 wacky perspective
 on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement
 terms, he didn't
 avert the danger before it arose by his magical
 state of mind.
 
 He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking
 himself waay too
 seriously.  His delight in everything he says, and
 his inappropriate
 projectile laughter, make him one of the most
 entertaining weirdos to
 come along in a long time.  I could watch that tape
 every day and not
 tire of it.

I think Tom's problem is that he suffers from such
early success that nobody around him told him when he
acted like an asshole. He's been surrounded by
synchophants and toadies his whole life and he has a
very warped view of his fascinating self. Although I
was very impressed to hear that he went over to Brook
Shields house and apologized to her in person for his
profoundly misinformed views on Post Partum Depression
and glib comments regarding her appropriate treatment.



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 




  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard

2008-01-28 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Exercise may not be a critical factor in preventing heart disease, 
 which is probably due to diet factors:
 
 http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/140/12/1007
 
 Conclusions: Aerobic physical exercise did not attenuate progression 
 of atherosclerosis, except in a subgroup of men not taking statins.

Except in a subgroup of men *not* taking statins? So, aerobic physical
exercise is ineffective for men who do take statins and effective for
men who don't? Then, Duh!, do aerobic physical exercise and don't take
statins! 

Statin drugs are a huge scam. Big Pharma is raking in billions of
dollars on drugs that, for the vast majority of users, provide no
benefit in terms of decreased all-cause mortality. The only statin
users who do benefit from them are men under the age of 65 with a
history of a heart attack, and the benefit isn't all that great. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 Nothing coming out of the mouths of the Clinton's is innocent,  
 it's very calculated and subtle. And whenever they or their
surrogates are  
 called on the carpet to explain what they said, they are prepared
with  an 
 innocent explanation from how something was originally taken. 

So, every politician is expected to speak carefully and never make a
statement that could be interpreted as racist, sexist, or any other
ist.  But when they attempt to speak carefully, they are called
calculating.  Or if they didn't speak carefully, the mistake was
calculating. Everything gets interpreted by the listener in a way that
reinforces their own positions.  

As someone who spends her time with politicians, I know that the press
plays a large part in setting the divisive tone.  Everything is the
horse race.  Everything you say will get repeated, context be damned.
Because Clnton, Obama, and Edwards are not very far apart on the
issues, I think this can lead to manufactured disputes, whether
manufactured by the press or or the candidates.  I hope they do not go
too far as they need to all come together in the end.  Charisma plays
a huge role in this country.  Reagan had it.  Bill Clinton had it. 
Even Bush had a fair amount of it.  Remember people saying how they
liked the guy, but not his policies?  Of the democratic candidates,
Obama seems to have the most charismatic appeal. 

 





[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread Duveyoung
suziezuzie My daughter who attends university told me that when her
  friends come up to her drunk or high, she tells them, you're high
or stoned, don't waste my time, get yourself in order and then come
back  and we'll talk.

Edg:

Would your daughter also say that to someone who's tamping down their
emotions with Xanax or other medical chemicals?  

A lot of folks use alcohol for medicine that's cheap and works.  Gotta
have some compassion for those who are driven into corners they simply
cannot imagine escaping.  

This isn't Sat Yuga where a sniff a cork would lower one's ability to,
well, smell God.  This is Kali, they say, and I believe it.  With
murderers in high office, with war and the down-trodden on every
continent, nay, in every single country, a brewski after a day fending
off the wild dogs of the mercantile might just be a better thing to
do than spending the time investing in egoic angst.  What's better a
numb mind or a roiling mind?  A very hard call for those who do pop a
top.  And the euphoria of alcohol is, if anything, as deep a metaphor
for bliss as life ever will offer to most folks on Earthsurely,
spiritually, we aim at just such a background feeling of well being,
 and this, however mis-used according to dogma, can be a spiritual
lesson symbolically.  Like tasting honey and thinking that one could
be this pleased in the afterlife not just on the tongue but by every
sense imaginable, just so getting high can serve.  Robert DeRopp wrote
a book called The Master Game in which he said that LSD etc.
experiences could reveal a target that the sober brain could strive for.

Who here does not have MANY tales of those in their families who
struggle with some form of chemical use?  Those who eat nothing but
industrial pastes, goos, and rainbow colors, could equally be said to
be addicted users whose brains are saturated with the toxins allowed
in foods today -- anyone here willing to drink a glass of water with a
teaspoon of MSG dissolved in it?  What does one think when one sees a
55 gallon drum of it in a food factory?  Consult the GRAS list for
where each of us is compromising one's chemical virginity.

Thank your stars if you do not have life knocking on your door with
the fever of a SWAT team.  In a foxhole, everyone believes in God and
a good stiff drink!  One of my elementary school teachers confessed to
my class, I smoked while being a soldier in WWII, but everyone did.

Mr. Sendrak, thanks -- that was what I needed then, and just now I got
a chance to use your wisdom.

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I always considered alcohol as an apathetic, which when absorbed into 
 the spunge like material of the brain, anesthetizes or numbs the brain 
 cells. The brain has been described as the most complex creation in the 
 universe so does anesthetizing it make sense?. It's true that brain 
 cells well 'wake up' eventually after being anesthetized but over time, 
 they simply die. My brother drank wine with his meals after believing 
 in the horse shit about how good it is for the heart and then quit this 
 ridiculous habit. He told me after being off wine for sometime, that 
 his mind was so clear, he didn't know what to do with himself. The 
 definition of an alcoholic is one who likes to feel dullness at least 
 once a day. My daughter who attends university told me that when her 
 friends come up to her drunk or high, she tells them, you're high or 
 stoned, don't waste my time, get yourself in order and then come back 
 and we'll talk.





RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

2008-01-28 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:11 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard / Vedic exercise

 

...and do the both of you also believe that the CIA infiltrated the 
TMO?

Probably not to the extent MMY carried on about, but they definitely had
their eye on it, especially after Jonestown. I worked in the DC center after
Jonestown and I’m sure our phones were tapped.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 1/27/2008
6:39 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Point of Consciousness

2008-01-28 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
sandiego108 writes snipped:
I think what Maharishi says about the Bindu is that it contains all 
that there is, within all that there is. So there is not a Bindu of 
singularity inside of that which is not of the same essential nature 
as the Bindu. Rather, from any point in all that there is, that 
chosen point can be isolated, the Bindu point, which then is found 
to also contain all that there is; a point of Infinity, within 
Infinity. There is nothing which is not Bindu.

Tom T:
When the Knowing is Known by the ultimate Knower there is no where
left to go. This is the one and only Knower knowing its creation
through its own Self. From the totality of creation to point value it
is all Knower and Knower can know through the totality and the point
value simultaneously. All the ocean in a drop. Same. 

TomT




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread Roberto
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Not to worry! The Kennedy's have endorsed Barack Hussein Obama, or is 
that  a 
 kiss of *death*, politically speaking?
  
Well, I'm not sure...
Barack's middle name could be a problem for some people, although it's 
really not his fault, right?
But some people will use this to push people's buttons- quite common in 
some decietful political circles.
Could be Kennedy's endorsement will be the 'kiss of death' for the 
Clinton campaign, which had been begging for his endorsement;
All I know is: the Clintons have definitely been knocked down a few 
pegs, and some light has been shed on the way they operate, pitting one 
against the other.



[FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Not to worry! The Kennedy's have endorsed Barack Hussein Obama,
 or is that a kiss of *death*, politically speaking?

Hardly. Only those who would never vote for a
Democrat in the first place would even think of
posing such a question.

(And for the record, some of the Kennedy's [sic]
have endorsed Clinton.)




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
Very funny. I just watched the original TC video all
over again and it really is so disturbing in its
narcissism. Kind of reminds me of myself talking about
the perfection of TM 30 years ago!

--- do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 curtisdeltablues
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   ...and maybe it's because I spent time in the
 TMO and all seems 
   quite normal to me, but I really don't see
 much harm in the Tom 
   Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:
   
   http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6
   
   
   Everyone seems to think it is some sort of
 terrible propagandist, 
   brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see
 it.
   
   What do you think?
  
  I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY one
 who can really help
  at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has
 been drinking the
  coolaid a bit too much.
  
  I find his claim that Scientologists are the
 experts on the human mind
  to be delusional. 
  
  His claim about how SP's can't come around him was
 specifically
  refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed
 his wacky perspective
  on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement
 terms, he didn't
  avert the danger before it arose by his magical
 state of mind.
  
  He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking
 himself waay too
  seriously.  His delight in everything he says, and
 his inappropriate
  projectile laughter, make him one of the most
 entertaining weirdos to
  come along in a long time.  I could watch that
 tape every day and not
  tire of it. 
 
 
 Then you'll probably also really enjoy this one: 
 
 Tom Cruise Scientology-Constipation Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9jqD_8IQpMfeature=related
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard

2008-01-28 Thread Richard J. Williams
nab wrote:
 Getting rid of freaking violent types like 
 you feels good too. :-)
 
TurquoiseB wrote:
 If you EVER speak to me again on this course, 
 that is where I will throw you.

Isn't this just like a TBer? Goes bananas and 
threatens to kill the meditation camp manager. 
Can't even keep his dirty mouth shut for a walk 
in nature without spouting some obscene reference 
to his backside. Then, when told to shut the phuck 
up, he retaliates by causing a scene. Can't even 
take a walk and enjoy the silence of nature without 
the hearing some over-the-top TMer blabbing and 
making wise-acre jokes. I'm surprised the other
TBers didn't gang up on the blabber and kick him 
out on the spot.

 I still remember the one that pushed me -- and, as
 it turns out, almost him -- over the edge. I was
 having some fun talking with my buddy about some-
 thing more interesting than cows and green-flowing-
 fucking-soma and we laughed out loud and he came 
 running over and actually *yelled* at us and screamed, 
 YOU! YOU are the reason Maharishi hasn't visited our 
 course! You shame his teachings by laughing like this 
 when you should be in silence!
 
 Something in me just snapped, but very quietly. I
 walked over to the red-faced, near-apoplectic ass-
 hole and took him by the perfectly-pressed collar
 of his perfectly-pressed shirt (mussing his perfect
 tie), and dragged him over to the edge of the trail
 that we were walking along and leaned him out over
 the edge. He looked down...WAY down, several hundred
 meters, to where he might easily wind up if he didn't
 pay attention. He paid attention.
 
 I said, quietly, I have taken just about all of your
 bullshit I can. Go away and bother me no more. Look 
 down. If you EVER speak to me again on this course, 
 that is where I will throw you. Do you understand?
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What I struggle with in Scientology is the bizarre
 narrative regarding thetans, space-ships that look
 like 747's and so forth. It makes a great science
 fiction story, but it is rather strange that it is
 taken as fact by apparently intelligent people without
 a lick of evidence.
 

Especially weird, given that the creator of the religion was a science
fiction writer and the religion reads like a nove.  



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What I struggle with in Scientology is the bizarre
 narrative regarding thetans, space-ships that look
 like 747's and so forth. It makes a great science
 fiction story, but it is rather strange that it is
 taken as fact by apparently intelligent people without
 a lick of evidence.


Especially weird, given that the creator of the religion was a science
fiction writer and the religion reads like a novel.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Request to change RIP Scott Girard thread title

2008-01-28 Thread Duveyoung
Thanks for the chiding.

I have gotten slack in renaming my titles.  I should set a better example.

That said, I think this phenomenon is typical of most largely
unmonitored boards -- the threads almost universally devolve into a
flurry of other topics.  Often immediately.

Your heads-up comes precisely on a thread that certainly shows the
downside of such posting immorality.  I felt it, and even though I
continued to post under the thread, there was a queasy discomfort
knocking at my knows-better door for me to do so, since it was
Scott's last time in the spotlight, and I ascribe to speaking well of
the dead.

My bad.

That said, how to fix this?  I have utterly no hope of getting many
posters here to follow this simple rule.  The traditional trolls
certainly will not care, and even the well-meaning-ers can find it
hard to resist doing a quick posting back at someone who is being off
topic, and there's the additional and significant possibility that
another topic title (which may or may not signal to the
off-topic-poster that a reply is there under a differing title) will
not be read.  That's where I get hard up -- deciding whether the
off-topic-ness is so onerous that a new title is needed that my
urgency to communicate and reply must take second place.

I pledge to try to rename my titles.  Thanks again for the tender
feeling level lesson.  Jai Guru Dev!

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mr. Archer et al,
 
 I tried to post to this thread last night but cannot find it. I may
 have done something wrong.  
 
 Rather than attempt to re-write my memories of my friend Scott Girard
 from high school and college, I would like to simply repeat my request
 that, as there appears to be no adult supervision on this discussion
 group, perhaps all of you might take your little arguments about
 exercise and your vicious threats against each other to a different
 subject line in order to stop the disrespect you are bringing to the
 name of a good and gentle man.
 
 This is precisely the kind of childishness that would have upset Scott
 the most. Were he to have learned that so many people have time to
 criticize each other behind anonymous pen-names, he would have been
 saddened indeed. I am certain he would ask all of you to rise above
 it, to seek to spend your limited time here on more significant
 matters. And, above all, he would ask you to stop with the childish
 name-calling and meaningless physical threats.
 
 So, please, start a thread called To exercise or not or something
 like that and let poor Scott and his memory actually begin to rest in
 peace.
 
 Tim Rowan
 Colorado Springs
  
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date:
1/27/2008
 6:39 PM





[FairfieldLife] Re: recipe for good health

2008-01-28 Thread Marek Reavis
Amen, Ruth.  It doesn't have to one thing or the other; we're all just 
looking for the line that defines our life and then follow it with the 
least amount of hullabaloo.

**

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  And you believing that alcohol is a bad thing 
  doesn't make alcohol a bad thing.  :-)
 
 
 
 A balanced life is a good thing.  Be active, drink a little, eat a
 moderate amount. Meditate. Don't work too hard.  Do good.  Be kind.





[FairfieldLife] Live - Lightning Crashes [death, rebirth and an angel too]

2008-01-28 Thread do.rflex


Nice song. I like the guy's voice.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsOculxtdX8



[FairfieldLife] Re:99

2008-01-28 Thread nadarrombus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, The Secret L.Shaddai@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
I think we can all safely just toss the Collected Papers now,
  don't  ya
think?  No more need to pretend...

The religion of Guru Devism is born.
   
   
   
   
   It's only 11 days since Maharishi gave up control of and 
 management 
   of the TMO and the clowns -- I mean the Rajas -- that have taken 
 over 
   have, as Curtis has indicated, already gone the extra mile to 
   solidify the religious nature of the Movement.
   
   This supports the theory that I have presented on this forum from 
   time to time: that Maharishi abandoned the TM is not a religion 
 or 
   philosophy tenet of the TM Program because he was badgered to do 
 so 
   by the sycophants that have surrounded him for the past 35 years. 
 And 
   now those very sychophants have become the gate-keepers. 
   
   They wore the poor man down by continually demanding that he give 
   them the real knowledge despite his continual admonitions that 
 the 
   TM technique was the full and complete program. Well, Maharishi 
 may 
   be enlightened but he is only human.  And at some point he threw 
 his 
   hands up and said: Okay, if you want 'the real knowledge' I 
 guess 
   that's what I have to GIVE you. So now we've got THIS 
 catastrophy on 
   our hands: Rajas, tinfoil hats, Vedic peanut butter, etc.
   
   Well, the inmates have got the reigns of the ship now and, 
 presto!, 
   we're prostrating once a day for the next month.
   
   Abraham?  Can you please bring Isaac over to the alter?  Yeah, 
 and 
   bring some of those briquettes, too, while you're at it...
   
  
  Man,  I'm in a mood to laugh, laugh, laugh.  Thank you.  I haven't 
 had
  such belly laughs in years.
  
  But let me try to understand your arguments.  You're saying that
  Maharishi did not have a hidden agenda of using the West to awaken 
 the
  East, of spreading Maharishi brand Hinduism throughout the world?
 
 
 
 
 Yes, he had an agenda but, no, it wasn't hidden.  He told us quite 
 explicitly what he was doing by packaging TM as a non-denominational, 
 non-belief, non-religious program.
 
 And, no, I truly believe it wasn't a case of him thinking: TM is part 
 of the Hindu religion and, therefore, I have to disguise it in order 
 for the suckers of the West to buy into it.  To him, TM was very much 
 a universal thing that was separate and apart from his own personal 
 Hinduism and could, on its own, stand apart from the trappings of 
 religion.  And it was with that very worldview that he packaged TM 
 and, successfully, brought it into the world.
 
 And that's how things were progressing until about 1977-9 when things 
 started falling apart, largely from his own doing.  And I refer to an 
 abandonment of the above described universal non-religious approach.
 
 
 
 
  
  This of course runs counter to the way it was explained to us wide
  eyed  children:  that Maharishi was giving us what we needed at the
  time and or that our raising the world's consciousness allowed the
  Maha Rishi to cognize more and more of the Vedic truth, or as I 
 always
  believed, to pull all of this shit out of his ass.
 
 
 
 
 I don't know who was explaining all this to you or whether it was 
 done in some official capacity.  But I can tell you what I was taught 
 as both a meditator who learned TM from the 7-step program and as a 
 teacher in Teacher Training and that was that the TM Program was (1) 
 not a religion; (2) not a philosophy or belief; and (3) the 
 organisation taking on the responsibility of disseminating this 
 knowledge would itself embody those very principles (because to do 
 otherwise would be to stop being universal and therefore alienate 
 some potential practitioners of TM).
 
 
 
 
 
   Dr. BM doesn't
  just have those funny initials for nothing.  Of course we've read
  which group of great seers and Shankaracharias granted him the title
  he scribbled on that stationary in London.  Let me speak a bit more
  sweetly and say that he pulled that one out of the air as well.
  
  I don't quite get your problem with this becoming a religion.
 
 
 
 As religions go, I would probably be the first in line to sign up.
 
 But once it is a religion, you lose the potential to get 99% of the 
 people on the planet to sign up.  That's not being universal.
 
 Hey, I'd love to have a guru and sit cross-legged on the Ganges at 
 the feet of a master and get darshan and all that.  Must be a 
 wonderful path!
 
 But that's not the path I chose for myself; I actually bought into 
 the whole TM 20 minutes twice a day and then go into activity and, 
 according to one's own religion and values and traditions and common 
 sense, perform action.  I 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

2008-01-28 Thread Angela Mailander
I don't understand the what's the point question.  Of course there is no 
immediate usefulness I can think of, but the FACT of controlling what we 
ordinarily think of as beyond our control is not only interesting but important 
to explore for humankind.

- Original Message 
From: feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:24:16 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC









  



Those of us who live in Iowa have plenty of practice at living in 
ice! 



--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

wrote:



 --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:

 

  Yes, but what's the point?

 

 He can live in places no-one else wants to live in, but he have some 

 trouble with gobal warming.

 

 OffWorld

 

 

 

  

  

  Tantric master breaks ice record in NYC

  

  Sun Jan 27, 2:03 PM ET

  

  NEW YORK - A man who calls himself a tantric master broke his own

  world record by standing engulfed in ice for 72 minutes.

  

  Wim Hof, 48, stood on a Manhattan street in a clear container filled

  with ice for an hour and 12 minutes Saturday.

  

  Hof said he survives by controlling his body temperature through

  tantric meditation. Tantra is an Eastern tradition of ritual and

  meditation said to bring followers closer to their chosen deities.

  

  Hof set the world record for full body ice contact endurance in 

 2004,

  when he immersed himself in ice for an hour and eight minutes.

  

  Hof's feat kicked off BRAINWAVE, a five-month series of events in 

 New

  York exploring how art, music, and meditation affect the brain.

 








  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
--



!--

#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
font-family:Arial;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
--



!--

#ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
#ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, 
sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
#ygrp-text{
font-family:Georgia;
}
#ygrp-text p{
margin:0 0 1em 0;}
#ygrp-tpmsgs{
font-family:Arial;
clear:both;}
#ygrp-vitnav{
padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a{
padding:0 1px;}
#ygrp-actbar{
clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
#ygrp-actbar .left{
float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
.bld{font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-grft{
font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
#ygrp-ft{
font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
padding:5px 0;
}
#ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
padding-bottom:10px;}

#ygrp-vital{
background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
#ygrp-vital #vithd{
font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
#ygrp-vital ul{
padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
#ygrp-vital ul li{
list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
}
#ygrp-vital ul li .ct{
font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
#ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-vital a{
text-decoration:none;}

#ygrp-vital a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}

#ygrp-sponsor #hd{
color:#999;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov{
padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{
text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #nc{
background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad{
padding:8px 0;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{
font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a{
text-decoration:none;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}
#ygrp-sponsor .ad p{
margin:0;}
o{font-size:0;}
.MsoNormal{
margin:0 0 0 0;}
#ygrp-text tt{
font-size:120%;}
blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;}
.replbq{margin:4;}
--







Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[FairfieldLife] Re: RIP Scott Girard

2008-01-28 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Statin drugs are a huge scam. Big Pharma is raking in billions of
 dollars on drugs that, for the vast majority of users, provide no
 benefit in terms of decreased all-cause mortality. The only statin
 users who do benefit from them are men under the age of 65 with a
 history of a heart attack, and the benefit isn't all that great.

Part of the problem in evaluating the evidence is the risk is
cummulative over your life.  So, you might only have a 1% chance in a
year of having a heart attack, but a 10% chance within 10 years. 
Statins are probably not a miracle drug, but don't let the pendulum
swing too far the other way.  





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:49 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


Very funny. I just watched the original TC video all
over again and it really is so disturbing in its
narcissism. Kind of reminds me of myself talking about
the perfection of TM 30 years ago!


You put your finger on what repulses me about it...I recognize my own
past!


You were a much better actor than Tom is, Curtis. :)

Sal




[FairfieldLife] Distinctive voices of singers (Live - Lightning Crashes)

2008-01-28 Thread Duveyoung
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZOU8GIRUd_g
Rick Astley

http://youtube.com/watch?v=EwTZ2xpQwpA
Tay Zonday

The above two vids are of guys who on their very first note got my
attention -- extremely distinctive voices right out of the chute. 
That plus being introduced to the world with a catchy tune really
grabs the attention.

There's been a lot of folks who have an ear for pitch who have a
special voice that have made it big.  Notably I think most female
country singers have that special croak rasp in their voices, and
the males have that throat tightened twangy thingy.  

Celine has that kind of special voice too, but her singing talent is
just as special -- though her song choices are not my cup of tea. 
Barbara Streisand? Tony Bennett? Mel Torme? Brenda Lee? Jackson Brown?
 Freddy Mercury?  Roy Orbison? Sting? Even Elvis?  So many have taken
a voice and worked it deeply for its best presentation -- like
trying to find music that is perfect for, say, the cello.  Gotta love
it when it all comes together in a nice package of on-key, unique
voice, cool song, and market timing -- even if it's not the music one
listens to regularly.  

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Nice song. I like the guy's voice.
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsOculxtdX8





[FairfieldLife] Request to change RIP Scott Girard thread title

2008-01-28 Thread Rick Archer
Mr. Archer et al,

I tried to post to this thread last night but cannot find it. I may
have done something wrong.  

Rather than attempt to re-write my memories of my friend Scott Girard
from high school and college, I would like to simply repeat my request
that, as there appears to be no adult supervision on this discussion
group, perhaps all of you might take your little arguments about
exercise and your vicious threats against each other to a different
subject line in order to stop the disrespect you are bringing to the
name of a good and gentle man.

This is precisely the kind of childishness that would have upset Scott
the most. Were he to have learned that so many people have time to
criticize each other behind anonymous pen-names, he would have been
saddened indeed. I am certain he would ask all of you to rise above
it, to seek to spend your limited time here on more significant
matters. And, above all, he would ask you to stop with the childish
name-calling and meaningless physical threats.

So, please, start a thread called To exercise or not or something
like that and let poor Scott and his memory actually begin to rest in
peace.

Tim Rowan
Colorado Springs
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date: 1/27/2008
6:39 PM
 



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread John
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Not so fast there, Bub.
 
 I think in Hindu scriptures they have a complete science about what
 marks on the body mean.  Don't know for sure, but seems that cutting
 one off might be, er, cutting one's self off from a cosmic channel 
of
 certain vibrations.
 
 I'm just sayin'
 
 Moles are like opinions too, so I'm guessing that everyone reading 
the
 below said, Wait a damned second.  You talking to me?  You don't 
like
 my beauty mark?
 
 Edg

In jyotish, a mole in the face means that there is a benefic planet 
in the person's second house, the field of family, speech and money.  
So, the indication is that this person will be rich some day.

The person involved appears to be focused and driven.  So, there is 
something else that is driving his interests.  The indications show  
that he probably has a very strong 10th house, the field of career, 
or the lord of the 10th house is strong and placed in benefic houses.

I don't think one should take away something that is a sign of good 
luck for cosmetic reasons.  For example, there is the son of a 
Spanish singer, Julio Iglesias, who became popular a few years ago 
for his singing ability and relationship with Kurnokova, the female 
tennis player.  He mentioned at that time that he had removed a 
prominent mole on his face for cosmetic reason.  As of today, I don't 
see that he has maintained his popularity as before. As a matter of 
fact, I can't even remember his first name now...lol

John R.












 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
 j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
 
  That kid is definitely going places. But, as the owner of a face 
with
  five prominent, but fairly well-placed moles, my advice for young
  Daniel is to get that one humongous mole on his face removed. I 
think
  the large size and poor placement of that mole detracts from his
  appearance. I was distracted by it during the entire video.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ 
wrote:
  
   Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred and
   Debbie's parenting skills. What easy self-confidence.
   I think all of us could learn something by watching
   this kid!

   --- curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
   wrote:
   
That was one of the most inspiring things I have
seen all year.  It
doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have such
natural self
confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
Success?  This kid was
brought up by parents who know how to think!  Thanks
for posting this.
 I was taking notes from this kid on how to bring my
own dreams to the
next level!
 





[FairfieldLife] Dalai Lama on emptiness

2008-01-28 Thread quantum packet


Note: forwarded message attached.
   
-
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.---BeginMessage---
Title: Snow Lion Publications Newsletter




	
		
		
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
	
	

		



	
		

	



	
		
		
 Dalai Lama Quote of the Week 
		Question: If a person views the self and other phenomena as being empty of any inherent existence, is it then, in that state, possible for them to take any animate or inanimate phenomenon as their object, and through the power of imputation or words, enable that object to actually take on a manifesting role with the qualities which we view objects to have?

His Holiness: This is an instance of not properly understanding the meaning of "lack of inherent existence." If we think that "emptiness" means things cannot function, then, with an improper understanding of the view of emptiness, one will have fallen into nihilism. So, because one has failed to reconcile emptiness and the fact that things work, this view is incorrect. That is why it is said that the meaning of emptiness is to be understood in terms of dependent arising.

Now, since the meaning of emptiness is to be explained in terms of dependent arising, we can only explain something as arising dependently if there is a basis, that is, some thing that is dependent. Hence, such a basis must exist. We see then that when we speak of dependent arising, we are indicating that things work. Dependent arising proves that things have no inherent existence, through the fact that things work in dependence on each other. The fact that things work and the fact that they do so in dependence, one on the other, eliminates the possibility of their being independent. This in turn precludes the possibility of inherent existence, since, to inherently exist means to be independent. Hence, the understanding of emptiness, of the the emptiness of a kind of inherent existence that is independent, boils down to understanding dependent arising.

--from Answers: Discussions with Western Buddhists by the Dalai Lama, edited by Jose Ignacio Cabezon, published by Snow Lion Publications









  
  
	
	SNOW LION PUBLICATIONS is dedicated 
  to the preservation of Tibetan Buddhism and culture by 
  publishing books about this great tradition. Tibetan culture is seriously endangered in its homeland and is striving to continue outside of Tibet. To support this effort, in addition to publishing and distributing books, Snow Lion offers a wide range of dharma items, purchased primarily from Tibetans in exile. These include visual art and ritual objects, 
  statues and thangkas, videos, traditional music, and many gift 
  items offered through our webstore and "Snow Lion Buddhist News  Catalog" (Newsletter)--over 2000 
  items--the largest selection anywhere. To browse the complete 
  list go towww.snowlionpub.comand select any of the 
  categories in left-hand margin.
  When you choose to purchase from Snow Lion you 
  are directly supporting the large effort to publish more 
  Buddhist texts and help the Tibetan people.THANK YOU FOR YOUR 
  SUPPORT.
  

	

   
		
	You are receiving this announcement from Snow Lion Publications because you have previously subscribed on our website. To continue receiving messages, we recommend that you add [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to your address book. If you'd like to change or cancel your subscription, please visit our subscription pages at www.snowlionpub.com/pages/lists.php, www.snowlionpub.com/pages/unsubscribe.php,or email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Please note that these announcements are also available in plain text, if you are having trouble receiving them.	


			

	

	
  
	
		
ANSWERS:Discussions with Western Buddhists by the Dalai Lamaedited by Jos Ignacio Cabeznmore...


			


	
	Contact Us:

  
  N. America:(800) 950-0313
  
  Worldwide:(607) 273-8519 
  
  By Mail: PO Box 6483, Ithaca, NY  14851 USA
  
	  By Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
	 
	   
	  On the Web:www.snowlionpub.com
	 
	  
	
	   
The New Rigpa Calendar Is In!

	

New Items Available 
Online:

  
  
New Books
  
  New Dharma Items
	  
	   
  
On Sale!
	   
  
Gifts
	   
  
Calendars

 General Catalog: www.snowlionpub.com
	  
	
	  

	Sign Up:
	Receive Snow 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation em...

2008-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
 
In a message dated 1/28/08 1:05:52 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Feldman said the Maharishi's  work would live on because he has trained tens 
of thousands of teachers over  the years (!).


And only re-certified how many?



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'What Kind of People are the Clintons?'

2008-01-28 Thread MDixon6569
 
In a message dated 1/28/08 12:56:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

snip
 As someone who spends her time with politicians, I  know that the
 press plays a large part in setting the divisive tone.  Everything 
 is the horse race. Everything you say will get repeated,  context 
 be damned.

Absolutely. And worse, it's a horse race in  which
the media pick favorites and do whatever they can
to help them  win.



Hey, I've said for years that the media loves to build somebody up so they  
can tear them down when they feel like it.



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi steps down as head of meditation em...

2008-01-28 Thread Vaj


On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 1/28/08 1:05:52 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 writes:
Feldman said the Maharishi's work would live on because he has  
trained tens of thousands of teachers over the years (!).


And only re-certified how many?


Dunno. Maybe everyone will get reprieves from the maharaja? ;-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Peter
Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred and
Debbie's parenting skills. What easy self-confidence.
I think all of us could learn something by watching
this kid!
 
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 That was one of the most inspiring things I have
 seen all year.  It
 doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have such
 natural self
 confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
 Success?  This kid was
 brought up by parents who know how to think!  Thanks
 for posting this.
  I was taking notes from this kid on how to bring my
 own dreams to the
 next level!
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Wow! What a mature kid. 
  
  --- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

   
   From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   On Behalf Of Rick Archer
   Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:34 PM
   To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] Fred and Debby
 Poneman's
   son
   

   
   HYPERLINK
  
 

http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1http://www.youtube.com/user/danpon1
   
   
   Fred and Debby are in this too in a couple of
   places.
   
   
   No virus found in this outgoing message.
   Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
   Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database:
 269.19.13/1246 -
   Release Date: 1/27/2008
   6:39 PM

   
  
  
  
   


  Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


[FairfieldLife] Top Ten Rejected Titles For The George W. Bush Movie

2008-01-28 Thread bob_brigante
David Letterman:

10. Jackass 3
9. The Lyin' King
8. The Departed As Of January 20th, 2009
7. Stop Or My Vice President Will Shoot
6. Dial M For Moron 
5. Das Boob
4. When Sally Met Cheney's Daughter
3. White Men Can't Govern
2. The Nightmare Before Hillary
1. Raging Bull





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maybe it's me...

2008-01-28 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Very funny. I just watched the original TC video all
 over again and it really is so disturbing in its
 narcissism. Kind of reminds me of myself talking about
 the perfection of TM 30 years ago!

You put your finger on what repulses me about it...I recognize my own
past!



 
 --- do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
  shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
   wrote:
   
...and maybe it's because I spent time in the
  TMO and all seems 
quite normal to me, but I really don't see
  much harm in the Tom 
Cruise Scientology video making the rounds:

http://tinyurl.com/yre7c6


Everyone seems to think it is some sort of
  terrible propagandist, 
brainwashing type of thing but I just don't see
  it.

What do you think?
   
   I think that anyone who claims to be the ONLY one
  who can really help
   at an accident scene, and who isn't an EMT, has
  been drinking the
   coolaid a bit too much.
   
   I find his claim that Scientologists are the
  experts on the human mind
   to be delusional. 
   
   His claim about how SP's can't come around him was
  specifically
   refuted by Matt Lauer's interview which exposed
  his wacky perspective
   on psychiatry. Contrary to his claim in movement
  terms, he didn't
   avert the danger before it arose by his magical
  state of mind.
   
   He drips with the unpleasant quality of taking
  himself waay too
   seriously.  His delight in everything he says, and
  his inappropriate
   projectile laughter, make him one of the most
  entertaining weirdos to
   come along in a long time.  I could watch that
  tape every day and not
   tire of it. 
  
  
  Then you'll probably also really enjoy this one: 
  
  Tom Cruise Scientology-Constipation Video
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9jqD_8IQpMfeature=related
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  To subscribe, send a message to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Or go to: 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
  and click 'Join This Group!' 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
 
 
 
  

 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs





[FairfieldLife] Re: Fred and Debby Poneman's son

2008-01-28 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Alex, give me a call, we can work through your mole
 issues in a safe, supportive environment. ;-)

Thanks, Dr. Pete, but I really think your struggle with Scientology
should be a higher priority than my melanocytic naevus nervosa.
 
 --- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  That kid is definitely going places. But, as the
  owner of a face with
  five prominent, but fairly well-placed moles, my
  advice for young
  Daniel is to get that one humongous mole on his face
  removed. I think
  the large size and poor placement of that mole
  detracts from his
  appearance. I was distracted by it during the entire
  video.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  drpetersutphen@ wrote:
  
   Wasn't that great? That kid is a testament to Fred
  and
   Debbie's parenting skills. What easy
  self-confidence.
   I think all of us could learn something by
  watching
   this kid!

   --- curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
   wrote:
   
That was one of the most inspiring things I have
seen all year.  It
doesn't surprise me that Debby's son would have
  such
natural self
confidence and focused goals.  Remember Yes! to
Success?  This kid was
brought up by parents who know how to think! 
  Thanks
for posting this.
 I was taking notes from this kid on how to
  bring my
own dreams to the
next level!
  




[FairfieldLife] Re: Request to change RIP Scott Girard thread title

2008-01-28 Thread Richard J. Williams
Ed wrotewrote:
 Thanks for the chiding.
 
 I have gotten slack in renaming my titles.  
 I should set a better example.
 
Yeah, stop hijacking topics and renaming them - 
start your own thread when you want to change 
the subject being discussed. Thanks.



  1   2   >