[FairfieldLife] Re: Spotify's list of 10 misquoted songs

[doctordumbass]

Spotify pays artists 8/1000th's of a cent(!), as a royalty per song sale. That 
compares to iTunes, which pays about 70 cents per song. Cheap bastards 
masquerading as hipsters.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>
> How many of these did you misquote?  In some cases the bands I was in 
> liked to misquote and often with even worse misquotes. :-D
> 
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2013/07/11/spotify-wrong-song-lyrics/2506899/
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[card]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > >
> > > In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides 
> > > with the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is 
> > > transitioning into.  In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now 
> > > in the ascending mode of the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according 
> > > to Shri Yukteswar.  It means that the USA will benefit in the development 
> > > of higher consciousness throughout the world.  It also suggests that the 
> > > USA will be positioned to participate in the next evolution or revolution 
> > > towards sophisticated high technology in science and space exploration.
> > > 
> > > In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> > > economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> > > transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process. 
> > >  Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> > > eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> > > 
> > > The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as 
> > > long as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be 
> > > economically healthy to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.
> > >
> > 
> > Here's a brief lecture of Shri Yukteswar's Yuga Cycle.
> > 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0xBUIJtfFE&list=PLr4btvSEPHazqNnOLIiTWseVUMPA2rZ1Y
> >
> 
> Sadhguru explains his version of the Tide of Time.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAgd5KS-ULc
>

He seems to be from Karnataka, and thus, Dravidian??

 My impression is that the people of the Southern, Dravidian parts of India 
tend to be way "cooler", than the Northern Indo-Europeans, most
of whom might be descendants of Siberian shamanic tribes??

I'm "afraid" the value of nimesha (16/75th of a second) is defined
afterwards to get the correct speed of light, LoL. Go figure.

nimeSa  m. shutting the eye , twinkling , winking TS. Mn. Ya1jn5. MBh. &c. 
(also as a measure of time i.e. a moment ; %{-SAd@iva} , in a mñmoment MBh. R. 
&c. ; %{-SaM@nimeSam} , every mñmoment S3Br. ; as a disease Sus3r.)

[FairfieldLife] Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

Very spiritual, did you see this?
Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/13fcddc595106c66

[FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

>
> Very spiritual, did you see this?
> Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> 
> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/13fcddc595106c66
>

Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
meditation movement for spiritual freedom too.   
-Buck

[FairfieldLife] Has Snowden gone Caracas?

[salyavin808]

Amid all the spying revelations about PRISM and the NSA released by
Edward Snowden, the mainstream press seems to have missed this:


Venezuelan Asylum Achieved, Snowden reveals UFO DocumentsBY KILGOAR
 , ON JULY 5TH, 2013 [Mantle Convection
300x157 Venezuelan Asylum Achieved, Snowden reveals UFO Documents ] 

According to bombshell documents leaked by Snowden, the government has
long known UFOs to be a species more advanced than mankind.

CARACAS, Venezuela  – Edward Snowden, the leaker of NSA surveillance
documents, was granted asylum in Venezuela on Friday. With safe harbors
in sight, Snowden was willing to share shocking and world-shattering
exclusive secret government documents with The Internet Chronicle.

Snowden's testimony was as follows:
"The highest levels of government don't know what to do about
UFOs, and the official story that they are all merely weather balloons
or natural phenomena has been clearly dismissed. If anything, these
documents speak about UFOs as if they are surely guided by an
intelligence beyond our own. As it turns out, the most credible and
inexplicable sightings are of vehicles that have been spotted leaving
the sea floor at hydrothermal vents and directly entering solar orbit .
. .

"Because ballistic missile tracking systems and deep-sea sonar are
kept as state secrets, scientists don't have access to data about
these objects. However, most of the contractors at DARPA are sure that
there is a species more intelligent than homo sapiens living in the
mantle of the Earth. It makes sense, if you think about it, because that
is the only place where conditions have been more or less stable for
billions of years. Extremophiles may live at different temperatures than
us, but they have been able to thrive and develop intelligence at a
seemingly accelerated rate. That's not true, because they've
simply evolved at the same rate, but without many of the vicissitudes
which set back surface life . . .

"The president receives daily briefings about their activities.
Analysts believe their technology to be so far advanced that we stand
little chance of survival in any potential war. The general sentiment is
that we are but ants from their perspective, so there is little chance
they would empathize or attempt to communicate with us, and the current
contingency plan is to detonate nuclear weapons in deep caverns to
`sting' the foe we have no hope of destroying in hopes it would
discourage further attacks."

Critics may allege that what the 30-year-old former NSA and CIA
contractor can state with authority about our ultraterrestrial neighbors
is already well-known. But the Ground-Penetrating Radar, or GPR, scans,
which The Internet Chronicle has shared and confirmed with sources
within intelligence community, will only serve to underscore popular
bitterness over strategically timed earthquakes and tsunamis.

Just as PRISM shined a new light on goings-on in NSA's ECHELON
computer systems, revealed in the 1990s, the vast complexes of
underground cities  – laser-etched from pure diamond – apparent
in the GPR scans will transform public debate about the balance between
liberty and security.




http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-reveals-ufo-documents-after-receivi\
ng-asylum-in-venezuela/

[FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

> 
> >
> > Very spiritual, did you see this?
> > Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> > 
> > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/13fcddc595106c66
> >
> 
> Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
> meditation movement for spiritual freedom too.   
> -Buck
>

Yes, 20 minutes twice a day minimum gets you in on spiritual revolution.  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

> 
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > Very spiritual, did you see this?
> > > Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> > > 
> > > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/13fcddc595106c66
> > >
> > 
> > Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
> > meditation movement for [complete] spiritual freedom too.   
> > -Buck
> >
> 
> Yes, 20 minutes twice a day minimum gets you in on spiritual revolution.
>

Yup, where two or more are gathered in transcendental deep meditation comes 
revolutionary change.  Join a meditation cell near you and be part of the 
ongoing spiritual Revival Movement for revolutionary change.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > Very spiritual, did you see this?
> > > > Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> > > > 
> > > > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/13fcddc595106c66
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
> > > meditation movement for [complete] spiritual freedom too.   
> > > -Buck
> > >
> > 
> > Yes, 20 minutes twice a day minimum gets you in on spiritual revolution.
> >
> 
> Yup, where two or more are gathered in transcendental deep meditation comes 
> revolutionary change.  Join a meditation cell near you and be part of the 
> ongoing spiritual Revival Movement for revolutionary change.
>

Yes, be a soldier in the world-wide Spiritual Regeneration Movement and come to 
meditation now.
Yours in the Meissner,
-Buck in the Dome

[FairfieldLife] Re: Global Warming

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer"  wrote:
>
> In case there are some climate change deniers here who think that the
> slowing in the rise of atmospheric temperatures means the planet is not
> warming.
> 
>  
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/jun
> /24/global-warming-pause-button
>

Actually that explains the ongoing moisture laden rain events of the last 
several years.  It used to be that a one inch rain was considered a ten year 
rain here.  We commonly get 10 year rains now.  

Notice just recently this week that the air-flow streaming at about 3 to 9 
thousand feet has shifted this week to mid-summer drought pattern like the last 
few years shutting off the flow of ocean evaporated air off of the gulf of Baja 
and Gulf of Mexico coming up to the mid-west.  Weather follows the sun by one 
month, Git ready for mid-summer hot and dry coming to the grain belt...
-Buck  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share

[Share Long]

Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have been validated by 
objective people like Xeno and Susan. Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks 
ago, on June 17, he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't think it 
is appropriate for you to comment on these matters. Nor do I think you have the 
moral authority or mental good health to do so. As to the former, I've seen how 
you distort what I say. As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance 
with regards to Robin. 





 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
 


  
349555

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
(snip)
> OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> apologizing.

Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
people like you.

> Robin didn't accept my apologies
> before and I've had no indication from him that
> he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> many times so I agree with you that some posters
> are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> needs to apologize to whom and for what.

This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
somewhere deep in your stunted heart and atrophied
conscience, you know it.

> There was plenty of hurtful words on both sides.

There did not have to be *any* hurtful words on
either side had you, Share, simply accepted Robin's
initial explanation of what he had said to you that
you had so absurdly misunderstood.

Instead, you mulishly resisted that explanation--as
well as his gracious (and entirely undeserved) *apology*
to you for having written something quite simple and
straightforward that you somehow managed to get
thoroughly garbled in your own mind. It was so
ridiculously, hideously garbled that Robin didn't even
understand what you were objecting to at first.

Robin was blameless in all this. What you call "hurtful
words" on his side were no more than his trying to get
you to deal with reality. This terrified you so badly
that you made your inexcusable and utterly unjustified
accusation that he had "psychologically raped" you--
referring back to your *original* misunderstanding. I've
documented how mild your initial complaint was and how
you went on to inflate and embroider it, contradicting
yourself time and again and refusing to address the
contradictions when they were pointed out to you.

There is no way anybody but you needs to apologize. And
your apology needs to be made in the same place as you
made your false accusation, right here on FFL, in public
where everyone can see it. That has not happened yet. Not
only have you not apologized "many times," you have
*never* apologized for that.

There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
target does not have to give you any "indications" that
an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
making that apology. You owe it unconditionally.

Your refusal to apologize for what you know was a false
accusation is the elephant in the room of your claims
to be all about seeking healing and making amends for
your bad behavior. You will never be successful at either
until you confront the reality of that false accusation
and apologize for it.

349462

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> turq has gone after me before and I've survived.

But you would much rather he didn't do it again.
That's understandable. *Pandering* to him in order
to get on his good side is contemptible.

> One of the qualities of Libra ascendent which I
> am, is that they like to balance discussions and
> situations. So when many are opposing someone
> here, I tend to take the opposite view.

Said with a completely straight face, not even
a whiff of irony. Unbelievable.

> OTOH I don't like it when turq says what are IMO
> really mean things to or about someone. But I
> don't like it when anyone, including myself, does
> that. It seems that we're all on a learning curve
> about that.

It seems you need to speak for yourself, Share.

349579

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> You funny, Ann! turq and I are what I call
> frenemies. We know what we like and what we
> don't like about each other and we've expressed
> that here. I like that kind of balance in a 
> frenemyship (-:

Do you seriously think Barry has paid one nanosecond's
attention to what you've said you don't like about him?
(Or what you've said you do like, for that matter?)

Seriously?

How do you manage to tie your shoes in the morning?

P.S.: "frenemy": one who pretends to be a friend but is
actually an enemy

"The enemy of my enemy is my frenemy."

34955

Re: [FairfieldLife] Equal Rights for All

[Share Long]

Welcome back, Buck. Hey I don't want to open a gmail account. Can you send 
another way? Thanks





 From: Buck 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 6:12 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Equal Rights for All
 


  
Very spiritual, did you see this?
Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/13fcddc595106c66


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

[Michael Jackson]

No lies here Ravi - there are plenty of us from the South who don't care for 
country - I've got the best chiropractor in the world here - only problem is 
having to listen to the country music she pipes in.

I never even liked Randy Travis, tho my mother adores him, or used to before he 
started showing up naked and drunk in public - she liked him because he was 
close to one of my great uncles G.T. Little - Travis was a frequent visitor to 
my other uncle Buren who had the proverbial country store where Travis grew up. 
But no, no country music for me. Jethro Tull, yes, Jessie J., yes. No country.





 From: Ravi Chivukula 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
 


  
Come on MJ stop lying, no one cares if you listen to country music. I do 
realize that was not the best song to be recording, there were others I really 
liked like Hell on Heels. I wanted thanks for the Reno video, not the other one.

Anyway I know you don't really care for the Whole Foods video but
  I used to live very close to that Whole Foods on Rose &
  Lincoln and shopped there.

And here's another one from DJ Dave that I liked in the past -
  Yoga Girl which of course you won't really like but just putting
  it out there for whoever.

http://youtu.be/L-8IPDR4Khc

Is that you or someone you know at the end of the video - that Big
  Papa guy?

On 7/11/13 8:26 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:

  
>I promise you I would never spend 10 seconds listening to the Reno video - but 
>I loved the Whole Foods vid - downloaded it immediately - thanks Ravi!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ravi Chivukula 
>To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
>Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:16 PM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
> 
>
>
>  
>Here's a video from my Reno trip MJ, your kind of music - "Only Prettier"
>
>http://youtu.be/YGDXZ6cfTWE
>
>And here's my kind, "Whole foods Parking
lot"
>
>http://youtu.be/2UFc1pr2yUU
>
>
>
>

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Has Snowden gone Caracas?

[Michael Jackson]

of course this is nonsense, the other races are obviously interested in us, 
otherwise why would they be stomping on our crops?





 From: salyavin808 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 7:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Has Snowden gone Caracas?
 


  


Amid all the spying revelations about PRISM and the NSA released by Edward 
Snowden, the mainstream press seems to have missed this:



Venezuelan Asylum Achieved, Snowden reveals UFO Documents
BY KILGOAR, ON JULY 5TH, 2013
According to bombshell documents leaked by Snowden, the government has long 
known UFOs to be a species more advanced than mankind.
CARACAS, Venezuela  – Edward Snowden, the leaker of NSA surveillance documents, 
was granted asylum in Venezuela on Friday. With safe harbors in sight, Snowden 
was willing to share shocking and world-shattering exclusive secret government 
documents with The Internet Chronicle.
Snowden's testimony was as follows:
"The highest levels of government don't know what to do about UFOs, and the 
official story that they are all merely weather balloons or natural phenomena 
has been clearly dismissed. If anything, these documents speak about UFOs as if 
they are surely guided by an intelligence beyond our own. As it turns out, the 
most credible and inexplicable sightings are of vehicles that have been spotted 
leaving the sea floor at hydrothermal vents and directly entering solar orbit . 
. .
"Because ballistic missile tracking systems and deep-sea sonar are kept as 
state secrets, scientists don't have access to data about these objects. 
However, most of the contractors at DARPA are sure that there is a species more 
intelligent than homo sapiens living in the mantle of the Earth. It makes 
sense, if you think about it, because that is the only place where conditions 
have been more or less stable for billions of years. Extremophiles may live at 
different temperatures than us, but they have been able to thrive and develop 
intelligence at a seemingly accelerated rate. That's not true, because they've 
simply evolved at the same rate, but without many of the vicissitudes which set 
back surface life . . .
"The president receives daily briefings about their activities. Analysts 
believe their technology to be so far advanced that we stand little chance of 
survival in any potential war. The general sentiment is that we are but ants 
from their perspective, so there is little chance they would empathize or 
attempt to communicate with us, and the current contingency plan is to detonate 
nuclear weapons in deep caverns to `sting' the foe we have no hope of 
destroying in hopes it would discourage further attacks."
Critics may allege that what the 30-year-old former NSA and CIA contractor can 
state with authority about our ultraterrestrial neighbors is already 
well-known. But the Ground-Penetrating Radar, or GPR, scans, which The Internet 
Chronicle has shared and confirmed with sources within intelligence community, 
will only serve to underscore popular bitterness over strategically timed 
earthquakes and tsunamis.
Just as PRISM shined a new light on goings-on in NSA's ECHELON computer 
systems, revealed in the 1990s, the vast complexes of underground cities  – 
laser-etched from pure diamond – apparent in the GPR scans will transform 
public debate about the balance between liberty and security.

http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-reveals-ufo-documents-after-receiving-asylum-in-venezuela/
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

[Richard J. Williams]

mjackson74:
> No lies here Ravi - there are plenty of us from the 
> South who don't care for country... 
>
How many - three or four? Go figure.

Apparently you really like Michael Jackson. LoL!

[FairfieldLife] Re: For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

[Ann]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:
>
> No lies here Ravi - there are plenty of us from the South who don't care for 
> country - I've got the best chiropractor in the world here - only problem is 
> having to listen to the country music she pipes in.
> 
> I never even liked Randy Travis, tho my mother adores him, or used to before 
> he started showing up naked and drunk in public - she liked him because he 
> was close to one of my great uncles G.T. Little - Travis was a frequent 
> visitor to my other uncle Buren who had the proverbial country store where 
> Travis grew up. But no, no country music for me. Jethro Tull, yes, Jessie J., 
> yes. No country.

I too, surround myself with a country music- free zone. Sometimes I try and 
listen to it to see how strong my constitution is but within 15 seconds I have 
to turn it off. I have a visceral reaction to it and all of these young women 
here in Victoria, especially the horsey ones, love the crap. They had foolishly 
tried to put it on the radio station at the tack store and figured out pretty 
quickly that was a "no go". Then I would put on our Seattle-based NPR station 
with jazz and they hated that. So now we have compromised and listen to a more 
mainstream rock-type station but that can be insipid at times. If I got with 
the times and set up an iPod at work it would be best but it hasn't happened 
yet. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: Ravi Chivukula 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
>  
> 
> 
>   
> Come on MJ stop lying, no one cares if you listen to country music. I do 
> realize that was not the best song to be recording, there were others I 
> really liked like Hell on Heels. I wanted thanks for the Reno video, not the 
> other one.
> 
> Anyway I know you don't really care for the Whole Foods video but
>   I used to live very close to that Whole Foods on Rose &
>   Lincoln and shopped there.
> 
> And here's another one from DJ Dave that I liked in the past -
>   Yoga Girl which of course you won't really like but just putting
>   it out there for whoever.
> 
> http://youtu.be/L-8IPDR4Khc
> 
> Is that you or someone you know at the end of the video - that Big
>   Papa guy?
> 
> On 7/11/13 8:26 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
> 
>   
> >I promise you I would never spend 10 seconds listening to the Reno video - 
> >but I loved the Whole Foods vid - downloaded it immediately - thanks Ravi!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ravi Chivukula 
> >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> >Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:16 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
> > 
> >
> >
> >  
> >Here's a video from my Reno trip MJ, your kind of music - "Only Prettier"
> >
> >http://youtu.be/YGDXZ6cfTWE
> >
> >And here's my kind, "Whole foods Parking
> lot"
> >
> >http://youtu.be/2UFc1pr2yUU
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Here's a trend from Japan that may be true in Fairfield, too

[turquoiseb]

http://qz.com/103000/sales-of-adult-diapers-surpass-baby-diapers-in-aging-japan/

[FairfieldLife] Re: Global Warming

[Richard J. Williams]

Rick Archer:
> In case there are some climate change deniers here
>
Are there any 'climate change' deniers here? 

> who think that the slowing in the rise of atmospheric 
> temperatures means the planet is not warming.
>
So, I wonder why climate change seems to be taking a 
break and there is no more warming. Go figure.

'Sun Causes Climate Change Shock' 
http://tinyurl.com/3sahqkr

[FairfieldLife] Re: How to improve TM practice - a heretic's guide

[Xenophaneros Anartaxius]

--- Ravi Chivukula wrote: 
> Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote: 
>> Ravi Chivukula wrote: 

>>> On 7/11/13 12:19 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote: Getting someone to 
>>> learn a technique probably does not work. The person needs some sense of 
>>> purpose, internally on their own, to persist with a practice. Why are you 
>>> we doing this? What do you we want? Why do you we think this might work to 
>>> achieve that? I think a lot of people we learn TM as the behest of others 
>>> badgering them us, which probably partly accounts for the low rate of 
>>> long-term meditators, something in the range of 10% to 20% of people who 
>>> learn. Xeno baby - you are losing focus, veering off your persona here - 
>>> watch it !!! I corrected your post, corrections in Red

>> Yes, but what if I were color blind, had protanopia? This is found in about 
>> 8% of males. You cannot be certain I can see what you are talking about. 
>> Anyway, Yahoo managed to completely strip out what you wrote when I opened 
>> the reply window. So any reply will make little sense to anyone reading my 
>> reply. I am sure that suits you fine.

> Don't get clever with me Xeno baby, I don't have a whole lot of time 
> monitoring, correcting you. I have lot of responsibilities and my time is 
> better served elsewhere than baby sitting a stupid, senile, seventy year old 
> having trouble sticking to his sole trick. No more slip ups OK? Now focus and 
> reply to Emily, don't veer from the template we have identified.

I am like the little scrawny kid on the playground at elementary school, and 
you want to beat me up. Is that a sandwich in my lunchbox, or is that the 38 
snub nose revolver that my Dad left accidentally on the table?

I am thinking about Emily's post. In my good time. The longer I wait, the 
longer I can keep my fictional dignity. You cannot have it both ways Ravi, 
though with a mind like yours, I am sure you keep trying.

[FairfieldLife] Re: 10 Spiritually Transmitted Diseases

[Richard J. Williams]

> > > no comment.
> > >
> > On what?
> >
Ann:
> I think Doc's comment was his comment on Share's 
> musings below...
> 
Now this is even funnier - apparently some FFL
informants don't know how to 'snip' so after reading 
Card's suggestion to please snip, they re-posted over 
90 pages without snipping. ROTFLMAO!
  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Here's a trend from Japan that may be true in Fairfield, too

[doctordumbass]

Have you begun wearing them?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> http://qz.com/103000/sales-of-adult-diapers-surpass-baby-diapers-in-aging-japan/
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Zimmerman trial - So, it's all about race

[Richard J. Williams]

So, the Obama Administration needed to increase 
racial tension to boost black turnout in 2012? 
This is just outrageous!

"At every turn in the 40-minute interview with 
CNN's Howell, Lee doggedly defended his investigators, 
saying race never played a role in any decision 
and that his officers "conducted an unbiased review."

Zimmerman probe 'taken away from us'- Ex-Sanford 
police chief
CNN:
http://tinyurl.com/m3a8got
 
> "But whatever George Zimmerman's culpability in 
> Martin's shooting, he is not to blame for the 
> social order of pre-civil-rights America. He 
> has every right to mount a vigorous defense, 
> and the judge and jury have a duty, as in any 
> trial, to give the defendant the benefit of 
> any reasonable doubt.
> 
> The rightful term to describe a criminal trial 
> that serves as a 'referendum' is "show trial."
> 
> 'Cracking' the Case'
> http://tinyurl.com/ms7njhs
> 
> Mike Dixon wrote:
> > > It's been political from the get- go. This has been a lame attempt at 
> > > rehabilitating the unfortunate image of many young black males in America 
> > > today. "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon". The media has pushed 
> > > the image of a younger, more wholesome, clean-cut Trayvon being racially 
> > > profiled by a *white*, oops, *white Hispanic* vigilante. NBC was caught , 
> > > red-handed, editing 911 tapes in an attempt to make Zimmerman's motives 
> > > look racially charged. At the same time,the media only shows us photos of 
> > > Martin some 4 -5 years younger, less intimidating, no *grill*,no mention 
> > > of his reputation for fighting or drug use. The facts coming out in the 
> > > trial are showing why Zimmerman was not charged in the first place. As 
> > > far as I'm concerned, it's the media that is on trial and I find them 
> > > guilty of misuse of the facts to promote a political agenda.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >  From: Richard J. Williams 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 6:19 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Zimmerman trial - So, it's all about race
> >   
> >    
> >  
> > "We don't believe the focus was really race" - Martin 
> > Family Attorney
> > 
> > "That's a remarkable statement to come from the Martin 
> > legal team, since race is the only reason we're having 
> > this trial at all. 
> > 
> > Everyone from the Martin family's lawyers, to the 
> > professional grievance industry, to characters like the 
> > New Black Panther Party was busy whipping up riot 
> > conditions and treating Zimmerman as a fugitive from 
> > racial justice, which led to filmmaker Spike Lee 
> > endangering the lives of an innocent couple that just 
> > happened to be named 'Zimmerman.' 
> > 
> > And there's a good reason the media referred to 
> > Zimmerman as 'white' until photos of him finally leaked 
> > out, and they had to change it to 'white Hispanic,' a 
> > very special demographic of which George Zimmerman 
> > seems to remain the only high-profile member."
> > 
> > 'The focus most certainly is race at the Zimmerman trial'
> > http://tinyurl.com/qz7teg2
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[Xenophaneros Anartaxius]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:

> Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> people like you.

Wrong. I have no idea whether it impresses people or not, or will impress 
people or not. I just make it up. If I angle for trying to get some specific 
response from others, then that behaviour results in my being controlled by 
that desire. It is living in a prison.

For reasons not known to me, you appear to think that what you think represents 
reality and truth. The human mind is a fantasy manufacturing facility, and it 
churns out its stuff on a second by second basis.

 Our revels now are ended. These our actors,
 As I foretold you, were all spirits, and
 Are melted into air, into thin air:
 And like the baseless fabric of this vision,
 The cloud-capp'd tow'rs, the gorgeous palaces,
 The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
 Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
 And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
 Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff
 As dreams are made on; and our little life
 Is rounded with a sleep.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Has Snowden gone Caracas?

[Richard J. Williams]

salyavin:
> Amid all the spying revelations about PRISM and 
> the NSA released by Edward Snowden, the mainstream 
> press seems to have missed this:
> 
You may have missed this. LOL!

"As a general rule, so long as you have any choice 
at all, you should never route through or peer with 
the UK under any circumstances."

'NSA Ties Put German Intelligence in Tight Spot'
Spiegel Online:
http://tinyurl.com/k965s48

> 
> http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-reveals-ufo-documents-after-receivi\
> ng-asylum-in-venezuela/
>  ing-asylum-in-venezuela/>
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

[emilymae.reyn]

This one is pretty sweet.  Smile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOyPfJoGHe8



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@
wrote:
> >
> > No lies here Ravi - there are plenty of us from the South who don't
care for country - I've got the best chiropractor in the world here -
only problem is having to listen to the country music she pipes in.
> >
> > I never even liked Randy Travis, tho my mother adores him, or used
to before he started showing up naked and drunk in public - she liked
him because he was close to one of my great uncles G.T. Little - Travis
was a frequent visitor to my other uncle Buren who had the proverbial
country store where Travis grew up. But no, no country music for me.
Jethro Tull, yes, Jessie J., yes. No country.
>
> I too, surround myself with a country music- free zone. Sometimes I
try and listen to it to see how strong my constitution is but within 15
seconds I have to turn it off. I have a visceral reaction to it and all
of these young women here in Victoria, especially the horsey ones, love
the crap. They had foolishly tried to put it on the radio station at the
tack store and figured out pretty quickly that was a "no go". Then I
would put on our Seattle-based NPR station with jazz and they hated
that. So now we have compromised and listen to a more mainstream
rock-type station but that can be insipid at times. If I got with the
times and set up an iPod at work it would be best but it hasn't happened
yet.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
> >
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Come on MJ stop lying, no one cares if you listen to country music.
I do realize that was not the best song to be recording, there were
others I really liked like Hell on Heels. I wanted thanks for the Reno
video, not the other one.
> >
> > Anyway I know you don't really care for the Whole Foods video but
> >   I used to live very close to that Whole Foods on Rose &
> >   Lincoln and shopped there.
> >
> > And here's another one from DJ Dave that I liked in the past -
> >   Yoga Girl which of course you won't really like but just
putting
> >   it out there for whoever.
> >
> > http://youtu.be/L-8IPDR4Khc
> >
> > Is that you or someone you know at the end of the video - that Big
> >   Papa guy?
> >
> > On 7/11/13 8:26 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
> >
> > Â
> > >I promise you I would never spend 10 seconds listening to the Reno
video - but I loved the Whole Foods vid - downloaded it immediately -
thanks Ravi!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > >Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:16 PM
> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Â
> > >Here's a video from my Reno trip MJ, your kind of music - "Only
Prettier"
> > >
> > >http://youtu.be/YGDXZ6cfTWE
> > >
> > >And here's my kind, "Whole foods Parking
> > lot"
> > >
> > >http://youtu.be/2UFc1pr2yUU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susan.

Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
follow things closely.

> Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> matters.

You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.

Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
say something about it, he's welcome to do so.

Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
have missed it:

"There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."

> Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> health to do so.

I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.

> As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.

No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
back up every word of what I wrote below.

> As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> regards to Robin.

Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."

Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
Irony title if you aren't careful.



> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
>  
> 
> 
>   
> 349555
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> (snip)
> > OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> > apologizing.
> 
> Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> people like you.
> 
> > Robin didn't accept my apologies
> > before and I've had no indication from him that
> > he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> > many times so I agree with you that some posters
> > are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> > way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> > and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> > needs to apologize to whom and for what.
> 
> This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
> somewhere deep in your stunted heart and atrophied
> conscience, you know it.
> 
> > There was plenty of hurtful words on both sides.
> 
> There did not have to be *any* hurtful words on
> either side had you, Share, simply accepted Robin's
> initial explanation of what he had said to you that
> you had so absurdly misunderstood.
> 
> Instead, you mulishly resisted that explanation--as
> well as his gracious (and entirely undeserved) *apology*
> to you for having written something quite simple and
> straightforward that you somehow managed to get
> thoroughly garbled in your own mind. It was so
> ridiculously, hideously garbled that Robin didn't even
> understand what you were objecting to at first.
> 
> Robin was blameless in all this. What you call "hurtful
> words" on his side were no more than his trying to get
> you to deal with reality. This terrified you so badly
> that you made your inexcusable and utterly unjustified
> accusation that he had "psychologically raped" you--
> referring back to your *original* misunderstanding. I've
> documented how mild your initial complaint was and how
> you went on to inflate and embroider it, contradicting
> yourself time and again and refusing to address the
> contradictions when they were pointed out to you.
> 
> There is no way anybody but you needs to apologize. And
> your apology needs to be made in the same place as you
> made your false accusation, right here on FFL, in public
> where everyone can see it. That has not happened yet. Not
> only have you not apologized "many times," you have
> *never* apologized for that.
> 
> There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
> negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
> target does not have to give you any "indications" that
> an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
> you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
> the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
> making that apology. You owe it unconditionally.
> 
> Your refusal to apologize for what you know was a false
> accusation is the elephant in the room of your claims
> to be all about seeking healing and making amends for
> your bad behavior. You will never be 

[FairfieldLife] Re: For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

[mjackson74]

I am partial to Otis Spann

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cOGvdEHXe4



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:
> >
> > No lies here Ravi - there are plenty of us from the South who don't care 
> > for country - I've got the best chiropractor in the world here - only 
> > problem is having to listen to the country music she pipes in.
> > 
> > I never even liked Randy Travis, tho my mother adores him, or used to 
> > before he started showing up naked and drunk in public - she liked him 
> > because he was close to one of my great uncles G.T. Little - Travis was a 
> > frequent visitor to my other uncle Buren who had the proverbial country 
> > store where Travis grew up. But no, no country music for me. Jethro Tull, 
> > yes, Jessie J., yes. No country.
> 
> I too, surround myself with a country music- free zone. Sometimes I try and 
> listen to it to see how strong my constitution is but within 15 seconds I 
> have to turn it off. I have a visceral reaction to it and all of these young 
> women here in Victoria, especially the horsey ones, love the crap. They had 
> foolishly tried to put it on the radio station at the tack store and figured 
> out pretty quickly that was a "no go". Then I would put on our Seattle-based 
> NPR station with jazz and they hated that. So now we have compromised and 
> listen to a more mainstream rock-type station but that can be insipid at 
> times. If I got with the times and set up an iPod at work it would be best 
> but it hasn't happened yet. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: Ravi Chivukula 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > Come on MJ stop lying, no one cares if you listen to country music. I do 
> > realize that was not the best song to be recording, there were others I 
> > really liked like Hell on Heels. I wanted thanks for the Reno video, not 
> > the other one.
> > 
> > Anyway I know you don't really care for the Whole Foods video but
> >   I used to live very close to that Whole Foods on Rose &
> >   Lincoln and shopped there.
> > 
> > And here's another one from DJ Dave that I liked in the past -
> >   Yoga Girl which of course you won't really like but just putting
> >   it out there for whoever.
> > 
> > http://youtu.be/L-8IPDR4Khc
> > 
> > Is that you or someone you know at the end of the video - that Big
> >   Papa guy?
> > 
> > On 7/11/13 8:26 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
> > 
> >   
> > >I promise you I would never spend 10 seconds listening to the Reno video - 
> > >but I loved the Whole Foods vid - downloaded it immediately - thanks Ravi!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ravi Chivukula 
> > >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> > >Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:16 PM
> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >Here's a video from my Reno trip MJ, your kind of music - "Only Prettier"
> > >
> > >http://youtu.be/YGDXZ6cfTWE
> > >
> > >And here's my kind, "Whole foods Parking
> > lot"
> > >
> > >http://youtu.be/2UFc1pr2yUU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[John]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which 
> > > > coincides with the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is 
> > > > transitioning into.  In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now 
> > > > in the ascending mode of the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, 
> > > > according to Shri Yukteswar.  It means that the USA will benefit in the 
> > > > development of higher consciousness throughout the world.  It also 
> > > > suggests that the USA will be positioned to participate in the next 
> > > > evolution or revolution towards sophisticated high technology in 
> > > > science and space exploration.
> > > > 
> > > > In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> > > > economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> > > > transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the 
> > > > process.  Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, 
> > > > retirement age eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> > > > 
> > > > The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as 
> > > > long as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be 
> > > > economically healthy to pursue its quest for life, liberty and 
> > > > happiness.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Here's a brief lecture of Shri Yukteswar's Yuga Cycle.
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0xBUIJtfFE&list=PLr4btvSEPHazqNnOLIiTWseVUMPA2rZ1Y
> > >
> > 
> > Sadhguru explains his version of the Tide of Time.
> > 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAgd5KS-ULc
> >
> 
> He seems to be from Karnataka, and thus, Dravidian??
> 
>  My impression is that the people of the Southern, Dravidian parts of India 
> tend to be way "cooler", than the Northern Indo-Europeans, most
> of whom might be descendants of Siberian shamanic tribes??
> 
> I'm "afraid" the value of nimesha (16/75th of a second) is defined
> afterwards to get the correct speed of light, LoL. Go figure.
> 
> nimeSam. shutting the eye , twinkling , winking TS. Mn. Ya1jn5. MBh. 
> &c. (also as a measure of time i.e. a moment ; %{-SAd@iva} , in a mñmoment 
> MBh. R. &c. ; %{-SaM@nimeSam} , every mñmoment S3Br. ; as a disease Sus3r.)
>

Card,

Sadhguru's presentation was well done IMO.  It captured the aura of mystery and 
knowledge of ancient India.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[Share Long]

Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority to 
comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not have the 
emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you do not have the 
emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do not have the 
professional training to comment usefully or beneficially on them. IMO this is 
a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I don't think it is useful or appropriate 
for you to comment on these matters bt him and me.





 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
follow things closely.

> Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> matters.

You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.

Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
say something about it, he's welcome to do so.

Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
have missed it:

"There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."

> Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> health to do so.

I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.

> As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.

No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
back up every word of what I wrote below.

> As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> regards to Robin.

Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."

Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
Irony title if you aren't careful.

> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 349555
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> (snip)
> > OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> > apologizing.
> 
> Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> people like you.
> 
> > Robin didn't accept my apologies
> > before and I've had no indication from him that
> > he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> > many times so I agree with you that some posters
> > are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> > way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> > and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> > needs to apologize to whom and for what.
> 
> This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
> somewhere deep in your stunted heart and atrophied
> conscience, you know it.
> 
> > There was plenty of hurtful words on both sides.
> 
> There did not have to be *any* hurtful words on
> either side had you, Share, simply accepted Robin's
> initial explanation of what he had said to you that
> you had so absurdly misunderstood.
> 
> Instead, you mulishly resisted that explanation--as
> well as his gracious (and entirely undeserved) *apology*
> to you for having written something quite simple and
> straightforward that you somehow managed to get
> thoroughly garbled in your own mind. It was so
> ridiculously, hideously garbled that Robin didn't even
> understand what you were objecting to at first.
> 
> Robin was blameless in all this. What you call "hurtful
> words" on his side were no more than his trying to get
> you to deal with reality. This terrified you so badly
> that you made your inexcusable and utterly unjustified
> accusation that he had "psychologically raped" you--
> referring back to your *original* misunderstanding. I've
> documented how mild your initial complaint was and how
> you went on to inflate and embroider it, contradicting
> yourself time and again and refusing to address the
> contradictions when they were pointed out to you.
> 
> There is no way anybody but you needs to apologize. And
> your apology needs to be made in the same place as you
> made your false accusation, right here on FFL, in public
> where everyone can see it. That has not happened yet. Not
> only have you 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Has Snowden gone Caracas?

[Richard J. Williams]

> > Has Snowden gone Caracas?
> >
mjackson:
> ...the other races are obviously interested in us, 
> otherwise why would they be stomping on our crops?
> 
So, the Hispanics in Caracas are stomping on your
pot crop? LoL! 
  

> Amid all the spying revelations about PRISM and the NSA released by Edward 
> Snowden, the mainstream press seems to have missed this:
> 
> 
> 
> Venezuelan Asylum Achieved, Snowden reveals UFO Documents
> BY KILGOAR, ON JULY 5TH, 2013
> According to bombshell documents leaked by Snowden, the government has long 
> known UFOs to be a species more advanced than mankind.
> CARACAS, Venezuela  â€" Edward Snowden, the leaker of NSA surveillance 
> documents, was granted asylum in Venezuela on Friday. With safe harbors in 
> sight, Snowden was willing to share shocking and world-shattering exclusive 
> secret government documents with The Internet Chronicle.
> Snowden's testimony was as follows:
> "The highest levels of government don't know what to do about UFOs, and the 
> official story that they are all merely weather balloons or natural 
> phenomena has been clearly dismissed. If anything, these documents speak 
> about UFOs as if they are surely guided by an intelligence beyond our own. As 
> it turns out, the most credible and inexplicable sightings are of vehicles 
> that have been spotted leaving the sea floor at hydrothermal vents and 
> directly entering solar orbit . . .
> "Because ballistic missile tracking systems and deep-sea sonar are kept as 
> state secrets, scientists don't have access to data about these objects. 
> However, most of the contractors at DARPA are sure that there is a species 
> more intelligent than homo sapiens living in the mantle of the Earth. It 
> makes sense, if you think about it, because that is the only place where 
> conditions have been more or less stable for billions of years. Extremophiles 
> may live at different temperatures than us, but they have been able to thrive 
> and develop intelligence at a seemingly accelerated rate. That's not true, 
> because they've simply evolved at the same rate, but without many of the 
> vicissitudes which set back surface life . . .
> "The president receives daily briefings about their activities. Analysts 
> believe their technology to be so far advanced that we stand little chance of 
> survival in any potential war. The general sentiment is that we are but ants 
> from their perspective, so there is little chance they would empathize or 
> attempt to communicate with us, and the current contingency plan is to 
> detonate nuclear weapons in deep caverns to `sting' the foe we have no hope 
> of destroying in hopes it would discourage further attacks."
> Critics may allege that what the 30-year-old former NSA and CIA contractor 
> can state with authority about our ultraterrestrial neighbors is already 
> well-known. But the Ground-Penetrating Radar, or GPR, scans, which The 
> Internet Chronicle has shared and confirmed with sources within intelligence 
> community, will only serve to underscore popular bitterness over 
> strategically timed earthquakes and tsunamis.
> Just as PRISM shined a new light on goings-on in NSA's ECHELON computer 
> systems, revealed in the 1990s, the vast complexes of underground cities  
> â€" laser-etched from pure diamond â€" apparent in the GPR scans will 
> transform public debate about the balance between liberty and security.
> 
> http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-reveals-ufo-documents-after-receiving-asylum-in-venezuela/
>

[FairfieldLife] Lumia 1020: oversampled(?) video!

[card]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Q3bxo7vJI

Starting at ~~11:00...

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lumia 1020: oversampled(?) video!

[card]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
>
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Q3bxo7vJI
> 
> Starting at ~~11:00...
>

Ya gots to see this (needle in a haystack):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Q3bxo7vJI

 22:40 ->

Whoa!!

Re: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius

[Share Long]

Thanks, John, this is interesting. And I'm guessing that since it's the Moon in 
Aquarius, it will be women who will play a prominent role in this process.

Replying to post about Mars in 7th: USA has kuja dosha! Just like Ram!

Replying to post about war being waged via machines: reminds me of a Star Trek 
episode in which 2 planets waged war via computers. They had an agreement to 
honor kills estimates by sending their respective citizens into killing 
chambers thus, according to the elders, preserving their infrastructure and 
culture, etc. Kirk's opinion was that in doing this, they lost sight of the 
horrors of war vis a vis the loss of human life. I thought it was a profound 
episode.



 From: John 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius
 


  
In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides with 
the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is transitioning into.  In 
the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now in the ascending mode of the 
Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according to Shri Yukteswar.  It means that 
the USA will benefit in the development of higher consciousness throughout the 
world.  It also suggests that the USA will be positioned to participate in the 
next evolution or revolution towards sophisticated high technology in science 
and space exploration.

In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and economic 
cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the transformation will be 
evident.  There will be challenges in the process.  Undoubtedly, the changes 
will revolve around taxation, retirement age eligibility, Medicare, the deficit 
and the national debt.

The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as long as 
20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be economically healthy to 
pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QeDm2PrNV1I



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > Very spiritual, did you see this?
> > > > > Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> > > > > 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QeDm2PrNV1I
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
> > > > meditation movement for [complete] spiritual freedom too.   
> > > > -Buck
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Yes, 20 minutes twice a day minimum gets you in on spiritual revolution.
> > >
> > 
> > Yup, where two or more are gathered in transcendental deep meditation comes 
> > revolutionary change.  Join a meditation cell near you and be part of the 
> > ongoing spiritual Revival Movement for revolutionary change.
> >
> 
> Yes, be a soldier in the world-wide Spiritual Regeneration Movement and come 
> to meditation now.
> Yours in the Meissner,
> -Buck in the Dome
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Worried about the size of your butt?

[Seraphita]

Yes, we shipped over all the puritan types on the Mayflower and it's
been swinging London ever since :)
Richard Rose was serious about advocating celibacy - he wanted his
students to have no sex - solo or partnered - for 12 months, to clean
the slate as it were. Is that actually possible for a red-blooded young
man? It seems Rose had at least one affair judging by the review forThe
Direct Mind Experience on Amazon from his first wife which I copy
verbatim below:
I am truely amazed at the popularity of Mr. Rose's literary attempts.
How sad that he knows nothing of his success, though he is not yet
deceased. The person I read about is a stranger to me though I was wife
#1(there's a #2 as well) from 1950 thru 1974(a marriage that produced 3
children). I will grant that he was a brilliant & imaginative man,
though perhaps a bit psychotic. I caution to beware. You are reading the
rantings of a man that lost touch with reality years ago - long before
illness ravaged his oh so demented mind.
How's that for revenge?


In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
>
> Since you appear to be British I would imagine your fantasy might be
rather kinkified, or at least I would expect so. The British have this
interesting reputation of all starched shirt on the outside but inside
they would probably make even Ravi blush.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[emilymae.reyn]

Share, you are completely missing the point and changing the context up.  Judy 
is not commenting on the "upset between you and Robin" - what goes down 
privately between the two of you is private.

What she and I also were commenting on was your irresponsible behavior on this 
public forum with respect to how "stuck" you were in automatically and 
steadfastly repeating an accusation of major proportion about someone publicly 
that you refused to back up or explain or discuss and which had no basis in 
anything ever posted here by Robin to you.  Irresponsible.   


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority to 
> comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not have the 
> emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you do not have the 
> emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do not have the 
> professional training to comment usefully or beneficially on them. IMO this 
> is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I don't think it is useful or 
> appropriate for you to comment on these matters bt him and me.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
>  
> 
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> > been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
> Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
> following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
> primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
> follow things closely.
> 
> > Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> > he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> > think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> > matters.
> 
> You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
> on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.
> 
> Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
> weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
> topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
> say something about it, he's welcome to do so.
> 
> Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
> have missed it:
> 
> "There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
> negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
> target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
> an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
> you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
> the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
> making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."
> 
> > Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> > health to do so.
> 
> I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.
> 
> > As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.
> 
> No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
> back up every word of what I wrote below.
> 
> > As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> > regards to Robin.
> 
> Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."
> 
> Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
> Irony title if you aren't careful.
> 
> > 
> >  From: authfriend 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 349555
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > (snip)
> > > OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> > > apologizing.
> > 
> > Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> > it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> > people like you.
> > 
> > > Robin didn't accept my apologies
> > > before and I've had no indication from him that
> > > he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> > > many times so I agree with you that some posters
> > > are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> > > way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> > > and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> > > needs to apologize to whom and for what.
> > 
> > This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
> > somewhere deep in your stunted heart and atrophied
> > conscience, you know it.
> > 
> > > There was plenty of hurtful words on both sides.
> > 
> > There did not have to be *any* hurtful words on
> > either side had you, Share, simply accepted Robin's
> > initial explanation of what he had said to you that
> > you had so absurdly misunderstood.
> > 
> > Instead, you mulishly resisted that explanation--as
> > well as his gracious (and entirely undeserved) *apology*
> > to you for having written something quite simple and
> > straightforward that you somehow managed to get
> > thoroughly garbled in your own mind. It was so
> > ridiculously, hideously garbled that Robin didn't even

[FairfieldLife] Re: Here's a trend from Japan that may be true in Fairfield, too

[Ann]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@...  wrote:
>
> Have you begun wearing them?

Well of course he has Doc, where do you think he stores the poop he throws 
around here so often? He carries it with him in his pants!
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >
> > http://qz.com/103000/sales-of-adult-diapers-surpass-baby-diapers-in-aging-japan/
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[Ann]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Thanks, John, this is interesting. And I'm guessing that since it's the Moon 
> in Aquarius, it will be women who will play a prominent role in this process.
> 
> Replying to post about Mars in 7th: USA has kuja dosha! Just like Ram!
> 
> Replying to post about war being waged via machines: reminds me of a Star 
> Trek episode in which 2 planets waged war via computers. They had an 
> agreement to honor kills estimates by sending their respective citizens into 
> killing chambers thus, according to the elders, preserving their 
> infrastructure and culture, etc. Kirk's opinion was that in doing this, they 
> lost sight of the horrors of war vis a vis the loss of human life. I thought 
> it was a profound episode.

Yes, Star Trek is renown for its profound and deep messages to humanity. Thank 
you for making this widely known to those who may not have realized it yet.
> 
> 
> 
>  From: John 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:19 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius
>  
> 
> 
>   
> In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides with 
> the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is transitioning into.  
> In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now in the ascending mode of 
> the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according to Shri Yukteswar.  It means 
> that the USA will benefit in the development of higher consciousness 
> throughout the world.  It also suggests that the USA will be positioned to 
> participate in the next evolution or revolution towards sophisticated high 
> technology in science and space exploration.
> 
> In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process.  
> Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> 
> The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as long 
> as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be economically healthy 
> to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Future of the Air Force

[Bhairitu]

On 07/11/2013 07:58 PM, John wrote:
>Will the American experiment as conceived by the Founding Fathers survive?

It disappeared after the Civil War with the Supreme Court decision on 
Santa Clara County vs Southern Pacific Railroad.  Up until then 
corporations were limited in their power, size and lifespan.  This was 
the first time that the Supreme Court declared that corporation had the 
rights of individuals.  Remember the colonists were fighting the British 
East Indian Company whose principal stockholder was the King of 
England.  This left a bad taste in the mouths of many of the founding 
fathers who set up laws to keep corporations from being so powerful.  We 
are no longer a country "for the people, by the people" but "for the 
corporations and by the corporations." Anything else is an illusion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad

Perhaps the Supreme Court is a bad idea.  It probably should have been 
done away with and replaced by something more democratic.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[Share Long]

Emily, I suggest you look at your last posts before your left a while ago in 
order to ascertain who indeed keeps bringing it up. And in fact I did explain 
what I meant. To you actually, when you posted an online definition way back at 
the beginning of all this. Furthermore, I think you are not objective enough 
about me or Robin and so I don't find what you have to say about all that 
either beneficial or useful. 





 From: emilymae.reyn 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:48 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
 


  
Share, you are completely missing the point and changing the context up.  Judy 
is not commenting on the "upset between you and Robin" - what goes down 
privately between the two of you is private.

What she and I also were commenting on was your irresponsible behavior on this 
public forum with respect to how "stuck" you were in automatically and 
steadfastly repeating an accusation of major proportion about someone publicly 
that you refused to back up or explain or discuss and which had no basis in 
anything ever posted here by Robin to you.  Irresponsible. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority to 
> comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not have the 
> emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you do not have the 
> emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do not have the 
> professional training to comment usefully or beneficially on them. IMO this 
> is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I don't think it is useful or 
> appropriate for you to comment on these matters bt him and me.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
> 
> 
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> > been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
> Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
> following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
> primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
> follow things closely.
> 
> > Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> > he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> > think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> > matters.
> 
> You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
> on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.
> 
> Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
> weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
> topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
> say something about it, he's welcome to do so.
> 
> Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
> have missed it:
> 
> "There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
> negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
> target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
> an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
> you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
> the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
> making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."
> 
> > Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> > health to do so.
> 
> I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.
> 
> > As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.
> 
> No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
> back up every word of what I wrote below.
> 
> > As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> > regards to Robin.
> 
> Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."
> 
> Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
> Irony title if you aren't careful.
> 
> > 
> >  From: authfriend 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 349555
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > (snip)
> > > OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> > > apologizing.
> > 
> > Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> > it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> > people like you.
> > 
> > > Robin didn't accept my apologies
> > > before and I've had no indication from him that
> > > he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> > > many times so I agree with you that some posters
> > > are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> > > way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> > > and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> > > needs to apologize to whom and for what.
> > 
> > This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
> > somewhere deep in your stunted heart and atrophied
> > conscience, you know it.
> > 
> > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spotify's list of 10 misquoted songs

[Bhairitu]

Pays artists or publishers?  iTunes would be paying the record publisher 
in most cases unless the artist is a self-publisher.  Same should be 
true for Spotify. Artists were generally screwed by record companies 
anyway. Recordings have long been thought of as a way to get people to 
your concerts where you make the real money though back in the day one 
could make some good money on record and mechanical royalties.  As a 
musician I was amazed at how important people thought music was when 
Napster popped up.  You'd think they wouldn't have cut the arts from the 
school curriculum.

On 07/12/2013 12:34 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> Spotify pays artists 8/1000th's of a cent(!), as a royalty per song sale. 
> That compares to iTunes, which pays about 70 cents per song. Cheap bastards 
> masquerading as hipsters.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>> How many of these did you misquote?  In some cases the bands I was in
>> liked to misquote and often with even worse misquotes. :-D
>>
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2013/07/11/spotify-wrong-song-lyrics/2506899/
>>
>
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[emilymae.reyn]

Yes, yes, I brought it up.  I'm not attached to it though any longer - brought 
it up in the context of your post that I initially responded to, which upset 
you enough to "plonk" me, after not addressing any of the points I was making.  
I can be objective, my dear, and actually am, in this case.  It's you who keeps 
personalizing the whole issue - probably because you haven't dealt with it yet. 
 But, I don't pretend to know what's in your mind.  Why don't you think I'm 
objective about Robin?  Another opportunity for you to weigh in truthfully and 
objectively yourself Share.  Want to show me how its done?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Emily, I suggest you look at your last posts before your left a while ago in 
> order to ascertain who indeed keeps bringing it up. And in fact I did explain 
> what I meant. To you actually, when you posted an online definition way back 
> at the beginning of all this. Furthermore, I think you are not objective 
> enough about me or Robin and so I don't find what you have to say about all 
> that either beneficial or useful. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: emilymae.reyn 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:48 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
>  
> 
> 
>   
> Share, you are completely missing the point and changing the context up.  
> Judy is not commenting on the "upset between you and Robin" - what goes down 
> privately between the two of you is private.
> 
> What she and I also were commenting on was your irresponsible behavior on 
> this public forum with respect to how "stuck" you were in automatically and 
> steadfastly repeating an accusation of major proportion about someone 
> publicly that you refused to back up or explain or discuss and which had no 
> basis in anything ever posted here by Robin to you.  Irresponsible. 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority to 
> > comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not have the 
> > emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you do not have the 
> > emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do not have the 
> > professional training to comment usefully or beneficially on them. IMO this 
> > is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I don't think it is useful or 
> > appropriate for you to comment on these matters bt him and me.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: authfriend 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> > > been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
> > Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
> > following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
> > primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
> > follow things closely.
> > 
> > > Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> > > he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> > > think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> > > matters.
> > 
> > You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
> > on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.
> > 
> > Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
> > weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
> > topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
> > say something about it, he's welcome to do so.
> > 
> > Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
> > have missed it:
> > 
> > "There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
> > negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
> > target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
> > an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
> > you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
> > the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
> > making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."
> > 
> > > Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> > > health to do so.
> > 
> > I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.
> > 
> > > As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.
> > 
> > No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
> > back up every word of what I wrote below.
> > 
> > > As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> > > regards to Robin.
> > 
> > Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."
> > 
> > Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
> > Irony title if you aren't careful.
> > 
> > > 
> > >  From: authfriend 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Sh

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Mike Dixon]

Actually, this kid is trying to decide which is better, Sponge Bob Square Pants 
or Mickey Mouse.

 


 From: Buck 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 8:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All
  
   
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QeDm2PrNV1I

--- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > Very spiritual, did you see this?
> > > > > Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> > > > > 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QeDm2PrNV1I
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
> > > > meditation movement for [complete] spiritual freedom too. 
> > > > -Buck
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Yes, 20 minutes twice a day minimum gets you in on spiritual revolution.
> > >
> > 
> > Yup, where two or more are gathered in transcendental deep meditation comes 
> > revolutionary change.  Join a meditation cell near you and be part of the 
> > ongoing spiritual Revival Movement for revolutionary change.
> >
> 
> Yes, be a soldier in the world-wide Spiritual Regeneration Movement and come 
> to meditation now.
> Yours in the Meissner,
> -Buck in the Dome
>

   
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[John]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Thanks, John, this is interesting. And I'm guessing that since it's the Moon 
> in Aquarius, it will be women who will play a prominent role in this process.

Share,

Yes, you're correct that will be the case since the US culture has long ignored 
the rights of women, minorities and the LGBT population.  This can be seen in 
the US natal chart having the Moon, a significator for women, alone by itself 
without any support of any planets from the adjacent houses.  The Moon also 
disposits the conjunction of Mercury and Rahu in the 8th house which signifies 
minorities and the LGBT population.

Since Saturn is the dispositor of the Moon and is the significator of work, 
there is hope that the US will someday have equal opportunity for women and 
other minorities in the workplace.  Perhaps, in the future, there will be an 
American woman president.


> 
> Replying to post about Mars in 7th: USA has kuja dosha! Just like Ram!

This is why the USA as a country has been fairly aggressive in joining and 
initiating wars, such as the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars.  It has a history for 
spending a lot of money for these wars which have most recently caused havoc in 
the economy and which we are paying for most reluctantly.

> 
> Replying to post about war being waged via machines: reminds me of a Star 
> Trek episode in which 2 planets waged war via computers. They had an 
> agreement to honor kills estimates by sending their respective citizens into 
> killing chambers thus, according to the elders, preserving their 
> infrastructure and culture, etc. Kirk's opinion was that in doing this, they 
> lost sight of the horrors of war vis a vis the loss of human life. I thought 
> it was a profound episode.
>

I vaguely remember that episode but I'm sure I've seen all of the Star Trek 
episodes many years ago.  IMO, wars will be same in the future and will aimed 
to destroy the enemies wherever they may be.


 
> 
> 
>  From: John 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:19 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius
>  
> 
> 
>   
> In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides with 
> the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is transitioning into.  
> In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now in the ascending mode of 
> the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according to Shri Yukteswar.  It means 
> that the USA will benefit in the development of higher consciousness 
> throughout the world.  It also suggests that the USA will be positioned to 
> participate in the next evolution or revolution towards sophisticated high 
> technology in science and space exploration.
> 
> In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process.  
> Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> 
> The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as long 
> as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be economically healthy 
> to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Future of the Air Force

[John]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>
> On 07/11/2013 07:58 PM, John wrote:
> >Will the American experiment as conceived by the Founding Fathers 
> > survive?
> 
> It disappeared after the Civil War with the Supreme Court decision on 
> Santa Clara County vs Southern Pacific Railroad.  Up until then 
> corporations were limited in their power, size and lifespan.  This was 
> the first time that the Supreme Court declared that corporation had the 
> rights of individuals.  Remember the colonists were fighting the British 
> East Indian Company whose principal stockholder was the King of 
> England.  This left a bad taste in the mouths of many of the founding 
> fathers who set up laws to keep corporations from being so powerful.  We 
> are no longer a country "for the people, by the people" but "for the 
> corporations and by the corporations." Anything else is an illusion.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad
> 
> Perhaps the Supreme Court is a bad idea.  It probably should have been 
> done away with and replaced by something more democratic.
>

It will take an act of Congress to change the makeup of the Supreme Court.  For 
the time being, the judges have been adept at dodging major decisions as seen 
in its handling of the gay marriage issue.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Future of the Air Force

[Bhairitu]

On 07/12/2013 11:10 AM, John wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>> On 07/11/2013 07:58 PM, John wrote:
>>> Will the American experiment as conceived by the Founding Fathers 
>>> survive?
>> It disappeared after the Civil War with the Supreme Court decision on
>> Santa Clara County vs Southern Pacific Railroad.  Up until then
>> corporations were limited in their power, size and lifespan.  This was
>> the first time that the Supreme Court declared that corporation had the
>> rights of individuals.  Remember the colonists were fighting the British
>> East Indian Company whose principal stockholder was the King of
>> England.  This left a bad taste in the mouths of many of the founding
>> fathers who set up laws to keep corporations from being so powerful.  We
>> are no longer a country "for the people, by the people" but "for the
>> corporations and by the corporations." Anything else is an illusion.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad
>>
>> Perhaps the Supreme Court is a bad idea.  It probably should have been
>> done away with and replaced by something more democratic.
>>
> It will take an act of Congress to change the makeup of the Supreme Court.  
> For the time being, the judges have been adept at dodging major decisions as 
> seen in its handling of the gay marriage issue.

Sometime, probably soon, the dollar will collapse and with it the US.  
You'll be "on your own".  Some places may form "community" but other 
areas will be like a "Road Warrior" society.  People should be paying 
attention to things like the cost of food and what kind of food you are 
getting at your grocer.  Quality has gone done in the search for 
profit.   They will poison you to stay rich.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius

[Bhairitu]

On 07/11/2013 10:19 PM, John wrote:
> In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides with 
> the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is transitioning into.  
> In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now in the ascending mode of 
> the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according to Shri Yukteswar.  It means 
> that the USA will benefit in the development of higher consciousness 
> throughout the world.  It also suggests that the USA will be positioned to 
> participate in the next evolution or revolution towards sophisticated high 
> technology in science and space exploration.
>
> In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process.  
> Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
>
> The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as long 
> as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be economically healthy 
> to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.

John, what is the current ayanamsha degree?  It is no where near 
Aquarius.  It has almost 6 degrees to go which will take another 200 
years or more.

Yup, it sure doesn't look like Kali Yuga does it?  And the new span of 
the Bay Bridge is SO SAFE it will be safe to travel over after it opens 
on Labor Day. :-D

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[John]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>
> On 07/11/2013 10:19 PM, John wrote:
> > In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides 
> > with the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is transitioning 
> > into.  In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now in the ascending 
> > mode of the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according to Shri Yukteswar.  
> > It means that the USA will benefit in the development of higher 
> > consciousness throughout the world.  It also suggests that the USA will be 
> > positioned to participate in the next evolution or revolution towards 
> > sophisticated high technology in science and space exploration.
> >
> > In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> > economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> > transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process.  
> > Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> > eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> >
> > The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as 
> > long as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be economically 
> > healthy to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.
> 
> John, what is the current ayanamsha degree?  It is no where near 
> Aquarius.  It has almost 6 degrees to go which will take another 200 
> years or more.
> 
> Yup, it sure doesn't look like Kali Yuga does it?  And the new span of 
> the Bay Bridge is SO SAFE it will be safe to travel over after it opens 
> on Labor Day. :-D

Yes, that's correct.  The spring equinox still occurs at about 6 degrees in 
Pisces.  But everyone is saying we are at the cusp.  So, we're feeling the Age 
of Aquarius.  Well, 200 years is nothing compared to the total cycle of about 
25,000 years.

Sadhguru has an interesting take about the cause of the earth's precession.  He 
thinks the cause of it is an Invisible Star in which our Sun is revolving 
around.  

This is slightly different from Yukteswar's idea that our Sun is part of a 
binary star system in which the Sun is dancing with the star Sirius as they 
both journey around the Milky Way.  That's what one may call a cosmic polka 
dance. :)

I'll take my time crossing over the bridge.  I won't be there on opening day.  
You can cross it first and let us know about the experience.



>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Future of the Air Force

[John]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2013 11:10 AM, John wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> >> On 07/11/2013 07:58 PM, John wrote:
> >>> Will the American experiment as conceived by the Founding Fathers 
> >>> survive?
> >> It disappeared after the Civil War with the Supreme Court decision on
> >> Santa Clara County vs Southern Pacific Railroad.  Up until then
> >> corporations were limited in their power, size and lifespan.  This was
> >> the first time that the Supreme Court declared that corporation had the
> >> rights of individuals.  Remember the colonists were fighting the British
> >> East Indian Company whose principal stockholder was the King of
> >> England.  This left a bad taste in the mouths of many of the founding
> >> fathers who set up laws to keep corporations from being so powerful.  We
> >> are no longer a country "for the people, by the people" but "for the
> >> corporations and by the corporations." Anything else is an illusion.
> >>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad
> >>
> >> Perhaps the Supreme Court is a bad idea.  It probably should have been
> >> done away with and replaced by something more democratic.
> >>
> > It will take an act of Congress to change the makeup of the Supreme Court.  
> > For the time being, the judges have been adept at dodging major decisions 
> > as seen in its handling of the gay marriage issue.
> 
> Sometime, probably soon, the dollar will collapse and with it the US.  
> You'll be "on your own".  Some places may form "community" but other 
> areas will be like a "Road Warrior" society.  People should be paying 
> attention to things like the cost of food and what kind of food you are 
> getting at your grocer.  Quality has gone done in the search for 
> profit.   They will poison you to stay rich.
>

According to the criteria by Kalidasa, I'm well suited for living in San 
Francisco.  But using the criteria through astro-cartography, I am supposed to 
be living in the longitude going through Couer D'Alene to Tijuana, Mexico.  
That's quite a diversity of cities right there.

Anyway, the natal Moon of the USA in Aquarius is the same as mine.  So, we're 
buds or soul brothers.  If I don't make here, I won't make it anywhere (to 
paraphrase a song).

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[John]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, John, this is interesting. And I'm guessing that since it's the 
> > Moon in Aquarius, it will be women who will play a prominent role in this 
> > process.
> > 
> > Replying to post about Mars in 7th: USA has kuja dosha! Just like Ram!
> > 
> > Replying to post about war being waged via machines: reminds me of a Star 
> > Trek episode in which 2 planets waged war via computers. They had an 
> > agreement to honor kills estimates by sending their respective citizens 
> > into killing chambers thus, according to the elders, preserving their 
> > infrastructure and culture, etc. Kirk's opinion was that in doing this, 
> > they lost sight of the horrors of war vis a vis the loss of human life. I 
> > thought it was a profound episode.
> 
> Yes, Star Trek is renown for its profound and deep messages to humanity. 
> Thank you for making this widely known to those who may not have realized it 
> yet.

Ann,

Gene Roddenberry, the director of the show, was way ahead of his time.  His 
ideas were awe-inspiring.  According to some scientist, it is possible to 
travel at warp speed.  But no one knows how to build such a space ship, nor how 
to get the enormous power requirement to fly it--at least for now.  The hidden 
answers may lie in the potential discoveries of the LHC in Switzerland.  Stay 
tuned.




> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  From: John 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:19 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides 
> > with the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is transitioning 
> > into.  In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now in the ascending 
> > mode of the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according to Shri Yukteswar.  
> > It means that the USA will benefit in the development of higher 
> > consciousness throughout the world.  It also suggests that the USA will be 
> > positioned to participate in the next evolution or revolution towards 
> > sophisticated high technology in science and space exploration.
> > 
> > In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> > economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> > transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process.  
> > Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> > eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> > 
> > The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as 
> > long as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be economically 
> > healthy to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: How to improve TM practice - a heretic's guide

[sparaig]

Everyone is different. One thing I've noted about 40 years (as of yesterday) 
TM practice is that I still don't know "how" to do it.

I find it fascinating that anyone has discovered a way to "do" it (whatever 
"it" is) better.

L

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita"  wrote:
>
> Franklin Merrell-Wolff (younger readers will have to look him up on
> Wikipedia as he's fallen into obscurity in recent years) claimed that he
> never learned a single meditation practice that he didn't have to
> "tweak" before he could get the maximum benefits from the practice. I
> have to confess, I've had the same experience with TM. The effortless
> repetition (or favouring) of the mantra for sure elicited some dramatic
> changes in consciousness, including (on rounding courses) experiences of
> Richard Bucke-style "cosmic consciousness". But the TM technique always
> insisted one concentrate (if "concentrate" is the right word) on
> "hearing" the subtle sound of the syllable - with no reference given to
> where ones vision (perhaps a better expression is "inner vision") might
> be centred. I've since found that, for me, allowing my "inner vision"
> awareness to centre on the space immediately in front of my eyes greatly
> enhances the effects of TM and makes me more centred immediately after a
> mediation session. (I'm not actually crossed-eyed (!) during my
> sessions, but presumably the location does suggest the Ajna chakra.)
> I've heard that other spiritual groups recommend centring ones attention
> on the Ajna chakra if you're more the "thinking type" - that would
> describe me - but they also recommend centring attention on the heart
> chakra if you're more the touchy-feely type. By the way, dire warnings
> are given (especially by Theosophical-influenced groups) on allowing
> one's attention to centre on the lower - the root or genital chakras -
> unless you're sexually "pure" as that can increase one's libido and lead
> to sexual obsessions - or "sex addiction" as modern parlance has it.
> Now, only being myself your bog-standard meditator, I'm curious if other
> (more advanced) FFL posters have experienced a similar effect to me.
> That is, combining mantra favouring with relaxed, inner visual attention
> centred in front of the eyes has improved your results. And also I'm
> curious if those of you who took TM-sidha training, or trained as
> teachers, ever heard Maharishi mention chakras to your inner core of
> "true believers" . . .
> By the way, if what I'm saying sounds presumptuous why not give it a try
> yourself for a few days?
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[card]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which 
> > > > > coincides with the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world 
> > > > > is transitioning into.  In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world 
> > > > > is now in the ascending mode of the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, 
> > > > > according to Shri Yukteswar.  It means that the USA will benefit in 
> > > > > the development of higher consciousness throughout the world.  It 
> > > > > also suggests that the USA will be positioned to participate in the 
> > > > > next evolution or revolution towards sophisticated high technology in 
> > > > > science and space exploration.
> > > > > 
> > > > > In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business 
> > > > > and economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> > > > > transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the 
> > > > > process.  Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, 
> > > > > retirement age eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national 
> > > > > debt.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take 
> > > > > as long as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be 
> > > > > economically healthy to pursue its quest for life, liberty and 
> > > > > happiness.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Here's a brief lecture of Shri Yukteswar's Yuga Cycle.
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0xBUIJtfFE&list=PLr4btvSEPHazqNnOLIiTWseVUMPA2rZ1Y
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Sadhguru explains his version of the Tide of Time.
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAgd5KS-ULc
> > >
> > 
> > He seems to be from Karnataka, and thus, Dravidian??
> > 
> >  My impression is that the people of the Southern, Dravidian parts of India 
> > tend to be way "cooler", than the Northern Indo-Europeans, most
> > of whom might be descendants of Siberian shamanic tribes??
> > 
> > I'm "afraid" the value of nimesha (16/75th of a second) is defined
> > afterwards to get the correct speed of light, LoL. Go figure.
> > 
> > nimeSa  m. shutting the eye , twinkling , winking TS. Mn. Ya1jn5. MBh. 
> > &c. (also as a measure of time i.e. a moment ; %{-SAd@iva} , in a mñmoment 
> > MBh. R. &c. ; %{-SaM@nimeSam} , every mñmoment S3Br. ; as a disease Sus3r.)
> >
> 
> Card,
> 
> Sadhguru's presentation was well done IMO.  It captured the aura of mystery 
> and knowledge of ancient India.
>

It certainly was, but I doubt that the value of nimesha (16/75th of
a second) is (at least) some two thousand years old. I don't
claim that Sadhguru made it up, though. It might have been added to
the suurya-siddhaanta after the value was measured in the West??

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[card]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" jr_esq@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Card,
> >
> > Sadhguru's presentation was well done IMO.  It captured the aura of
mystery and knowledge of ancient India.
> >
>
> It certainly was, but I doubt that the value of nimesha (16/75th of
> a second) is (at least) some two thousand years old. I don't
> claim that Sadhguru made it up, though. It might have been added to
> the suurya-siddhaanta after the value was measured in the West??
>

Wiki:
The work referred to by the title Surya Siddhanta has been repeatedly
recast. There may have been an early work under that title dating back
to the Buddhist Age of India (3rd century BC). The work as preserved and
edited by Burgess (1860) dates to the Middle Ages. Utpala
 , a 10th-century commentator of
Varahamihira, quotes six shlokas of the Surya Siddhanta of his day, not
one of which is to be found in the text now known as the Surya
Siddhanta. The present version was modified byBhaskaracharya
  during the Middle
Ages.[citation needed
 ] The present
Surya Siddhanta may nevertheless be considered a direct descendant of
the text available to Varahamihira.[1]
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[card]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card"  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" jr_esq@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Card,
> > >
> > > Sadhguru's presentation was well done IMO.  It captured the aura of
> mystery and knowledge of ancient India.
> > >
> >
> > It certainly was, but I doubt that the value of nimesha (16/75th of
> > a second) is (at least) some two thousand years old. I don't
> > claim that Sadhguru made it up, though. It might have been added to
> > the suurya-siddhaanta after the value

...of the speed of light...

> was measured in the West??
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Spotify's list of 10 misquoted songs

[card]

"Misheard" English by Hullu-jussi (Mad-john):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g2mP7azLLY


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>
> Pays artists or publishers?  iTunes would be paying the record publisher 
> in most cases unless the artist is a self-publisher.  Same should be 
> true for Spotify. Artists were generally screwed by record companies 
> anyway. Recordings have long been thought of as a way to get people to 
> your concerts where you make the real money though back in the day one 
> could make some good money on record and mechanical royalties.  As a 
> musician I was amazed at how important people thought music was when 
> Napster popped up.  You'd think they wouldn't have cut the arts from the 
> school curriculum.
> 
> On 07/12/2013 12:34 AM, doctordumbass@... wrote:
> > Spotify pays artists 8/1000th's of a cent(!), as a royalty per song sale. 
> > That compares to iTunes, which pays about 70 cents per song. Cheap bastards 
> > masquerading as hipsters.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
> >> How many of these did you misquote?  In some cases the bands I was in
> >> liked to misquote and often with even worse misquotes. :-D
> >>
> >> http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2013/07/11/spotify-wrong-song-lyrics/2506899/
> >>
> >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Drummer showing "musicianship"??

[card]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvUKlIbwrF8

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How to improve TM practice - a heretic's guide

[Share Long]

Lawson, Happy Anniversary yesterday!




 From: sparaig 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2:34 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: How to improve TM practice - a heretic's guide
 


  
Everyone is different. One thing I've noted about 40 years (as of yesterday) TM 
practice is that I still don't know "how" to do it.

I find it fascinating that anyone has discovered a way to "do" it (whatever 
"it" is) better.

L

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita"  wrote:
>
> Franklin Merrell-Wolff (younger readers will have to look him up on
> Wikipedia as he's fallen into obscurity in recent years) claimed that he
> never learned a single meditation practice that he didn't have to
> "tweak" before he could get the maximum benefits from the practice. I
> have to confess, I've had the same experience with TM. The effortless
> repetition (or favouring) of the mantra for sure elicited some dramatic
> changes in consciousness, including (on rounding courses) experiences of
> Richard Bucke-style "cosmic consciousness". But the TM technique always
> insisted one concentrate (if "concentrate" is the right word) on
> "hearing" the subtle sound of the syllable - with no reference given to
> where ones vision (perhaps a better expression is "inner vision") might
> be centred. I've since found that, for me, allowing my "inner vision"
> awareness to centre on the space immediately in front of my eyes greatly
> enhances the effects of TM and makes me more centred immediately after a
> mediation session. (I'm not actually crossed-eyed (!) during my
> sessions, but presumably the location does suggest the Ajna chakra.)
> I've heard that other spiritual groups recommend centring ones attention
> on the Ajna chakra if you're more the "thinking type" - that would
> describe me - but they also recommend centring attention on the heart
> chakra if you're more the touchy-feely type. By the way, dire warnings
> are given (especially by Theosophical-influenced groups) on allowing
> one's attention to centre on the lower - the root or genital chakras -
> unless you're sexually "pure" as that can increase one's libido and lead
> to sexual obsessions - or "sex addiction" as modern parlance has it.
> Now, only being myself your bog-standard meditator, I'm curious if other
> (more advanced) FFL posters have experienced a similar effect to me.
> That is, combining mantra favouring with relaxed, inner visual attention
> centred in front of the eyes has improved your results. And also I'm
> curious if those of you who took TM-sidha training, or trained as
> teachers, ever heard Maharishi mention chakras to your inner core of
> "true believers" . . .
> By the way, if what I'm saying sounds presumptuous why not give it a try
> yourself for a few days?
>


 

[FairfieldLife] "Slight return" of 14,5 minutes!

[card]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvUKlIbwrF8

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hackers, was You are bought and sold by your masters every day...

[Share Long]

Hey Richard, relief may be headed your way! An old buddy of mine is here now 
and she has Texas plates on her car. Long term gov, I think she was on THMD and 
now she's a chiropractor. She's here for the build up to Guru Purnima. Maybe 
when she returns to Texas, she'll have all the FF news (-:





 From: Richard J. Williams 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2013 9:08 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hackers, was You are bought and sold by your 
masters every day...
 


  


> > > Of course paranoid FFLers will probably think they
> > > will be arrested just for watching it...
> > >
> > Hey, you're the guy posting under an assumed name!
> >
Bhairitu:
> Not like no-one else here does.
> 
Apparently there are no TM Teachers in good standing 
that post to FFL, which figures. But, that makes it 
difficult to find out what's happening up there inside
the TMO. 

So far, we know that Alex has a brother who is a Raja. 
Lawson visited Fairfield once, MJ said he was there in 
a pod in the eighties. Sometimes I hear things at the 
pool at Radiance, the TM Ideal Village in Austin. 

Go figure.

'The Maharishi Effect'
A Personal Journey Through the Movement That 
Transformed American Spirituality
by Geoff Gilpin 
Tarcher, 2006

> > Additional tip number 7:
> >
> > Do not join a social networking site like Yahoo! or
> > Google, or Facebook, Craig's List etc, and post your
> > real name and address. LoL!


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Equal Rights for All

[Buck]

Broad [evolutionary revolutionary] transformation of a whole area of the world, 
I'd like to see the Institute of Science, Technology and Public Policy find 
this kid and teach him transcending.  Wow what a combination.  http://istpp.org/



>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QeDm2PrNV1I
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Very spiritual, did you see this?
> > > > > > Social and political rights, out of the mouth of babes:
> > > > > > 
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QeDm2PrNV1I
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yep, that kid should learn how to meditate and join the world-wide TM 
> > > > > meditation movement for [complete] spiritual freedom too.   
> > > > > -Buck
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, 20 minutes twice a day minimum gets you in on spiritual revolution.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Yup, where two or more are gathered in transcendental deep meditation 
> > > comes revolutionary change.  Join a meditation cell near you and be part 
> > > of the ongoing spiritual Revival Movement for revolutionary change.
> > >
> > 
> > Yes, be a soldier in the world-wide Spiritual Regeneration Movement and 
> > come to meditation now.
> > Yours in the Meissner,
> > -Buck in the Dome
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] These Guys are Killin' Me!

[azgrey]

Vince Gilligan was recently quoted as saying he criedwhen writing the
last chapter. "I cried writing the end---"the end" on the last episode.
I haven't since then."
Aaron Paul gave parting words on the end of the series."You guys are
gonna s--- your pants."
And the poster. The poster!!!
"Remember My Name"
Killin me' I tell yas. I'd be seriously jonesin' right aboutnow if it
wasn't for the increased patience I experience in awareness due to
Mindfulness practice. Yeahhh!!! Science,bitch
I recently completed a complete re-watch of the series. Alpha to Zulu.
(What can I tell yas? Summer in the Sonoran desert.)Doonesbury from
early June showed me I'm not alone.
http://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/2013/06/09

[FairfieldLife] Re: Formatting, was Please learn to snip !

[azgrey]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. The absence of snipping keeps the original context. 
> > > But often a reply is only directed to a portion of 
> > > whatever was in a post, so it depends.
> > 
> > And besides, only the truly paranoid give a shit if
> > someone snips part of what they said. I mean, give
> > me a break...AS IF *anything* ever said on this
> > forum was worth preserving its "context."  :-)
> > 
> > > Judy and Barry format with newspaper sized columns. 
> > > This works pretty well for preserving the format 
> > > unless the material has been requoted in Yahoo 
> > > many times, or the viewing screen is very small, 
> > > then lines may break erratically.
> > 
> > I do it mainly out of habit, and because I'm a 
> > bit of a nitpicker when it comes to such things.
> > If you haven't noticed, I often reformat the 
> > original quoted text so that it *doesn't* get
> > messed up after multiple quotes. It's an OCD
> > thang, perhaps, but it amuses me. :-)
> > 
> > > Note, when he was here, Robin used to reformat all 
> > > his discussions with people's names and a number 
> > > to indicate how far back in the conversation or 
> > > diatribe that was going on. That also worked well.
> > 
> > For you, perhaps. I thought it was the dumbest
> > affectation I've ever seen on the Internet. I
> > mean, *really*, he did it so that all of *his*
> > precious words got reposted over and over and
> > over, AS IF someone was actually going to read
> > them this time. :-)
> 
> Been a while at the cafe now Barry? You seem to have crossed the threshold 
> and just consumed your "mean drink". That usually means about the third of 
> fourth of the night.
> >
>

Dear Turquoise B, 

You may have skipped over this post. I found it especially
creepy, even for Angry Arrogant Ann. She seems right on
the verge of calling you "daddy." Sooo sooo close it made my
skin crawl. Explains a lot, her being a serial cultist and so
disturbingly nasty to Share.  

(N.B. : Whenever Vajradhatu or Curtis would mangle spelling
or syntax---"the third of fourth of the night"--- the Junkyard
dog would attribute it to them either lying or experiencing extreme 
psychological distress rather than a simply mistyping. Go
figure.

http://bit.ly/15BynQY

10,3000,000 hits. At first I found that kinda amazing. Later, 
not so much. 


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Age of Aquarius

[Ann]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, John, this is interesting. And I'm guessing that since it's the 
> > > Moon in Aquarius, it will be women who will play a prominent role in this 
> > > process.
> > > 
> > > Replying to post about Mars in 7th: USA has kuja dosha! Just like Ram!
> > > 
> > > Replying to post about war being waged via machines: reminds me of a Star 
> > > Trek episode in which 2 planets waged war via computers. They had an 
> > > agreement to honor kills estimates by sending their respective citizens 
> > > into killing chambers thus, according to the elders, preserving their 
> > > infrastructure and culture, etc. Kirk's opinion was that in doing this, 
> > > they lost sight of the horrors of war vis a vis the loss of human life. I 
> > > thought it was a profound episode.
> > 
> > Yes, Star Trek is renown for its profound and deep messages to humanity. 
> > Thank you for making this widely known to those who may not have realized 
> > it yet.
> 
> Ann,
> 
> Gene Roddenberry, the director of the show, was way ahead of his time.  His 
> ideas were awe-inspiring.  According to some scientist, it is possible to 
> travel at warp speed.  But no one knows how to build such a space ship, nor 
> how to get the enormous power requirement to fly it--at least for now.  The 
> hidden answers may lie in the potential discoveries of the LHC in 
> Switzerland.  Stay tuned.

Yes, but this is not the same thing as spiritually profound or even 
particularly deep as far as enabling the development of thinking, feeling human 
beings. However, if Star Trek is on the cutting edge of scientific developments 
all the power to it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  From: John 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:19 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Age of Aquarius
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > In the US national chart, the Moon is placed in Aquarius which coincides 
> > > with the oft-mentioned Age of Aquarius in which the world is 
> > > transitioning into.  In the scheme of the Vedic Yugas, the world is now 
> > > in the ascending mode of the Copper Age or the Dwapara Period, according 
> > > to Shri Yukteswar.  It means that the USA will benefit in the development 
> > > of higher consciousness throughout the world.  It also suggests that the 
> > > USA will be positioned to participate in the next evolution or revolution 
> > > towards sophisticated high technology in science and space exploration.
> > > 
> > > In the short run, the US is undergoing a new phase of its business and 
> > > economic cycle.  After the tenure of President Barack Obama, the 
> > > transformation will be evident.  There will be challenges in the process. 
> > >  Undoubtedly, the changes will revolve around taxation, retirement age 
> > > eligibility, Medicare, the deficit and the national debt.
> > > 
> > > The transformation process will not be instantaneous.  It could take as 
> > > long as 20 years.  But once complete the US can once again be 
> > > economically healthy to pursue its quest for life, liberty and happiness.
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: How to improve TM practice - a heretic's guide

[sparaig]

Share, thanks. It's been an interesting journey, thus far.

L

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Lawson, Happy Anniversary yesterday!
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  From: sparaig 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2:34 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: How to improve TM practice - a heretic's guide
>  
> 
> 
>   
> Everyone is different. One thing I've noted about 40 years (as of yesterday) 
> TM practice is that I still don't know "how" to do it.
> 
> I find it fascinating that anyone has discovered a way to "do" it (whatever 
> "it" is) better.
> 
> L
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita"  wrote:
> >
> > Franklin Merrell-Wolff (younger readers will have to look him up on
> > Wikipedia as he's fallen into obscurity in recent years) claimed that he
> > never learned a single meditation practice that he didn't have to
> > "tweak" before he could get the maximum benefits from the practice. I
> > have to confess, I've had the same experience with TM. The effortless
> > repetition (or favouring) of the mantra for sure elicited some dramatic
> > changes in consciousness, including (on rounding courses) experiences of
> > Richard Bucke-style "cosmic consciousness". But the TM technique always
> > insisted one concentrate (if "concentrate" is the right word) on
> > "hearing" the subtle sound of the syllable - with no reference given to
> > where ones vision (perhaps a better expression is "inner vision") might
> > be centred. I've since found that, for me, allowing my "inner vision"
> > awareness to centre on the space immediately in front of my eyes greatly
> > enhances the effects of TM and makes me more centred immediately after a
> > mediation session. (I'm not actually crossed-eyed (!) during my
> > sessions, but presumably the location does suggest the Ajna chakra.)
> > I've heard that other spiritual groups recommend centring ones attention
> > on the Ajna chakra if you're more the "thinking type" - that would
> > describe me - but they also recommend centring attention on the heart
> > chakra if you're more the touchy-feely type. By the way, dire warnings
> > are given (especially by Theosophical-influenced groups) on allowing
> > one's attention to centre on the lower - the root or genital chakras -
> > unless you're sexually "pure" as that can increase one's libido and lead
> > to sexual obsessions - or "sex addiction" as modern parlance has it.
> > Now, only being myself your bog-standard meditator, I'm curious if other
> > (more advanced) FFL posters have experienced a similar effect to me.
> > That is, combining mantra favouring with relaxed, inner visual attention
> > centred in front of the eyes has improved your results. And also I'm
> > curious if those of you who took TM-sidha training, or trained as
> > teachers, ever heard Maharishi mention chakras to your inner core of
> > "true believers" . . .
> > By the way, if what I'm saying sounds presumptuous why not give it a try
> > yourself for a few days?
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hackers, was You are bought and sold by your masters every day...

[Bhairitu]

I think a lot of  us would like a report on how many of the "faithful" 
have return to Mecca for recert. ;-)

On 07/12/2013 02:41 PM, Share Long wrote:
> Hey Richard, relief may be headed your way! An old buddy of mine is here now 
> and she has Texas plates on her car. Long term gov, I think she was on THMD 
> and now she's a chiropractor. She's here for the build up to Guru Purnima. 
> Maybe when she returns to Texas, she'll have all the FF news (-:
>
>
>
>
> 
>   From: Richard J. Williams 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2013 9:08 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hackers, was You are bought and sold by your 
> masters every day...
>   
>
>
>
>
>
 Of course paranoid FFLers will probably think they
 will be arrested just for watching it...

>>> Hey, you're the guy posting under an assumed name!
>>>
> Bhairitu:
>> Not like no-one else here does.
>>
> Apparently there are no TM Teachers in good standing
> that post to FFL, which figures. But, that makes it
> difficult to find out what's happening up there inside
> the TMO.
>
> So far, we know that Alex has a brother who is a Raja.
> Lawson visited Fairfield once, MJ said he was there in
> a pod in the eighties. Sometimes I hear things at the
> pool at Radiance, the TM Ideal Village in Austin.
>
> Go figure.
>
> 'The Maharishi Effect'
> A Personal Journey Through the Movement That
> Transformed American Spirituality
> by Geoff Gilpin
> Tarcher, 2006
>
>>> Additional tip number 7:
>>>
>>> Do not join a social networking site like Yahoo! or
>>> Google, or Facebook, Craig's List etc, and post your
>>> real name and address. LoL!
>
>   

Re: [FairfieldLife] These Guys are Killin' Me!

[Bhairitu]

On 07/12/2013 02:49 PM, azgrey wrote:
> Vince Gilligan was recently quoted as saying he criedwhen writing the
> last chapter. "I cried writing the end---"the end" on the last episode.
> I haven't since then."
> Aaron Paul gave parting words on the end of the series."You guys are
> gonna s--- your pants."
> And the poster. The poster!!!
> "Remember My Name"
> Killin me' I tell yas. I'd be seriously jonesin' right aboutnow if it
> wasn't for the increased patience I experience in awareness due to
> Mindfulness practice. Yeahhh!!! Science,bitch
> I recently completed a complete re-watch of the series. Alpha to Zulu.
> (What can I tell yas? Summer in the Sonoran desert.)Doonesbury from
> early June showed me I'm not alone.
> http://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/2013/06/09

Looking forward to the final season.  These things go on to long anyway 
and it's mainly for  a paycheck for the crew not the TV addicts.

Thumbs up for "Orange is the New Black" on Netflix WI though the opening 
scenes are definitely rated "Not for Buck."  With Jason Biggs playing 
the main character's fiancee better hope she didn't leave any apple pies 
behind.

Big thumbs up on the "Starlet" indie film with Mariel Hemingway's 
daughter Dree playing lead (she's had some serious drama training). Sad 
to say the woman playing the elderly role passed away April 4th but she 
did a great job.  It was her first acting role too.  Her main career: 
astrologer though IMDB called her an "astrologist".  I wonder if they 
call people like Carl Sagan who were astronomers "astronomists?" :-D

Watched the second episode of HBOs "Ray Donovan" which might keep me 
watching. Folks were iffy on the first episode which probably had too 
much backstory setup.

[FairfieldLife] New Studies: Conspiracy theorists sane, government dupes crazy

[Bhairitu]

Well I knew this all along but now it's official: :-D

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK 
suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled 
“conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the 
official versions of contested events.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/




To subscribe, send a message to:
fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[FairfieldLife] The hazards of teleprompters

[Bhairitu]

As the local noon news anchor found out when someone obviously was 
fooling around with a report of 4 flight 214 pilots:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqjlhtKIToo

Hopefully it has not been taken down. Note the names.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The hazards of teleprompters

[Bhairitu]

On 07/12/2013 03:49 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> As the local noon news anchor found out when someone obviously was
> fooling around with a report of 4 flight 214 pilots:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqjlhtKIToo
>
> Hopefully it has not been taken down. Note the names.
>
>

More on the story:
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvspy/epic-ktvu-fail-anchor-reports-pilot-names-including-sum-ting-wong-and-wi-tu-lo_b97368

I now return you to your regularly scheduled teleprompter discussions of 
enlightenment.

Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

[Ravi Chivukula]

OK fine MJ - you have every right to deny it, I don't need to understand 
it - it's your choice.


Now what do you think of the food stamps issue - didn't even know that 
they call it Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP now.


Democrats say Republicans stripped food stamps for the poor from the 
farm bill and that it hasn’t happened since 1973.


And then I read this too - 
http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-farm-bill-doesnt-end-food-stamps-212350341.html


What do you say MJ - now that you have publicly disassociated yourself 
from country music?



On 7/12/13 4:58 AM, Michael Jackson wrote:
No lies here Ravi - there are plenty of us from the South who don't 
care for country - I've got the best chiropractor in the world here - 
only problem is having to listen to the country music she pipes in.


I never even liked Randy Travis, tho my mother adores him, or used to 
before he started showing up naked and drunk in public - she liked him 
because he was close to one of my great uncles G.T. Little - Travis 
was a frequent visitor to my other uncle Buren who had the proverbial 
country store where Travis grew up. But no, no country music for me. 
Jethro Tull, yes, Jessie J., yes. No country.




*From:* Ravi Chivukula 
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, July 12, 2013 1:23 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

Come on MJ stop lying, no one cares if you listen to country music. I 
do realize that was not the best song to be recording, there were 
others I really liked like Hell on Heels. I wanted thanks for the Reno 
video, not the other one.


Anyway I know you don't really care for the Whole Foods video but I 
used to live very close to that Whole Foods on Rose & Lincoln and 
shopped there.


And here's another one from DJ Dave that I liked in the past - Yoga 
Girl which of course you won't really like but just putting it out 
there for whoever.


http://youtu.be/L-8IPDR4Khc

Is that you or someone you know at the end of the video - that Big 
Papa guy?


On 7/11/13 8:26 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
I promise you I would never spend 10 seconds listening to the Reno 
video - but I loved the Whole Foods vid - downloaded it immediately - 
thanks Ravi!




*From:* Ravi Chivukula  

*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
 
 

*Sent:* Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:16 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] For MJ - Live Music from Downtown Reno

Here's a video from my Reno trip MJ, your kind of music - "Only Prettier"

http://youtu.be/YGDXZ6cfTWE

And here's my kind, "Whole foods Parking lot"

http://youtu.be/2UFc1pr2yUU

[FairfieldLife] The George Zimmerman case: Steyn nails it.

[Seraphita]

When conservative commentator Mark Steyn is on form he can pen some of
the best journalism on the web. I'm in awe at his piece about the George
Zimmerman stitch-up. Read it and weep.
http://tinyurl.com/qxadrqa

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Share - I think this is a brilliant move. This new strategy is the 
right way to avoid Judy's perverse, obsessive, pathological need to 
stick to facts, stick to truth. Clearly she lacks emotional 
intelligence, or why would she continually insist on presenting the 
gory, cruel, torturous facts with links to your posts over and over 
again. Why can't she just let you rest in peace, why does she trigger 
you and your attachment disorder?


Your new strategy is sure to perplex and thwart Judy. Yep - where is her 
moral authority, what are her credentials - is she a fucking therapist, 
does she like have a Ph. D? Or is she even a pastoral counsellor even? Ha.


This is a sickness dear Share. People like Judy who insist on truth, 
insist on facts should be fucking institutionalized, they need to be 
fucking medicated - yeah that's we need and your efforts are very 
admirable, brave and courageous my dear.


On 7/12/13 7:29 AM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority 
to comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not have 
the emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you do not 
have the emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do 
not have the professional training to comment usefully or beneficially 
on them. IMO this is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I don't think 
it is useful or appropriate for you to comment on these matters bt him 
and me.




*From:* authfriend 
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, Share Long  
wrote:

>
> Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
follow things closely.

> Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> matters.

You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.

Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
say something about it, he's welcome to do so.

Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
have missed it:

"There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."

> Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> health to do so.

I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.

> As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.

No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
back up every word of what I wrote below.

> As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> regards to Robin.

Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."

Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
Irony title if you aren't careful.

> 
> From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 


> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
>
>
>
> Â
> 349555
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, Share Long  wrote:

> (snip)
> > OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> > apologizing.
>
> Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> people like you.
>
> > Robin didn't accept my apologies
> > before and I've had no indication from him that
> > he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> > many times so I agree with you that some posters
> > are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> > way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> > and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> > needs to apologize to whom and for what.
>
> This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
> somewhere deep in your stunted heart and atrophied
> conscience, you know it.
>
> > There was plenty of hurtful words on both sides.
>
> There did not have to be *any* hurtful words on
> either side had you, Share, simply accepted Robin's
> initial explanation of what he had said to you that
> you had so absurdly misunderstood.
>
> Instead, you mulishly resisted that explanation--as
> well as his gracious

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[Ravi Chivukula]

On 7/12/13 4:08 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
Dear Share - I think this is a brilliant move. This new strategy is 
the right way to avoid Judy's perverse, obsessive, pathological need 
to stick to facts, stick to truth. Clearly she lacks emotional 
intelligence, or why would she continually insist on presenting the 
gory, cruel, torturous facts with links to your posts over and over 
again. Why can't she just let you rest in peace, why does she trigger 
you and your attachment disorder?


Your new strategy is sure to perplex and thwart Judy. Yep - where is 
her moral authority, what are her credentials - is she a fucking 
therapist, does she like have a Ph. D? Or is she even a pastoral 
counsellor even? Ha.


So - yes,  to reiterate dear Share, presenting facts is not good enough 
unless someone has moral or professional authority. Let her produce 
evidence of her training and/or authority.


The gall of this vengeful woman that we will just accept the truth in 
the absence of any credentials. She must think we are naive and gullible.





This is a sickness dear Share. People like Judy who insist on truth, 
insist on facts should be fucking institutionalized, they need to be 
fucking medicated - yeah that's we need and your efforts are very 
admirable, brave and courageous my dear.


On 7/12/13 7:29 AM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority 
to comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not 
have the emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you 
do not have the emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; 
you do not have the professional training to comment usefully or 
beneficially on them. IMO this is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, 
I don't think it is useful or appropriate for you to comment on these 
matters bt him and me.




*From:* authfriend 
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, Share Long 
 wrote:

>
> Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
follow things closely.

> Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> matters.

You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.

Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
say something about it, he's welcome to do so.

Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
have missed it:

"There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."

> Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> health to do so.

I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.

> As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.

No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
back up every word of what I wrote below.

> As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> regards to Robin.

Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."

Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
Irony title if you aren't careful.

> 
> From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 


> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:06 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Four for Share
>
>
>
> Â
> 349555
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, Share Long  
wrote:

> (snip)
> > OTOH, thank you so much for your insights about
> > apologizing.
>
> Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> people like you.
>
> > Robin didn't accept my apologies
> > before and I've had no indication from him that
> > he'd do so now. And actually I have apologized
> > many times so I agree with you that some posters
> > are using that issue, I'd say in an unhealthy
> > way. IMO they need to focus on their own lives
> > and let Robin and I, if we want, figure out who
> > needs to apologize to whom and for what.
>
> This is grossly offensive total bullshit, Share. And
> somewhere deep in your stu

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[Ravi Chivukula]

On 7/12/13 7:09 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, "authfriend" 
 wrote:


> Xeno has no insights about apologizing. He makes
> it up as he goes along because he knows it impresses
> people like you.

Wrong. I have no idea whether it impresses people or not, or will 
impress people or not. I just make it up. If I angle for trying to get 
some specific response from others, then that behaviour results in my 
being controlled by that desire. It is living in a prison.


For reasons not known to me, you appear to think that what you think 
represents reality and truth. The human mind is a fantasy 
manufacturing facility, and it churns out its stuff on a second by 
second basis.




Yes wow Xeno is back !!! Yep this nails it really - human mind is a 
fantasy manufacturing ability. Judy may have produced clear evidence of 
Share's words over and over again - but it is all fantasy, fiction. 
Really I can say Xenosociopath is a , something about Xeno makes me 
uncomfortable and his behavior is very similar to a sociopath. andI 
don't really need to take any accountability for it because that's what 
it is - my mind, conjuring up fantasies. Not to forget truth and facts 
don't matter in Unity - your original postulate Xeno, facts and truth 
don't exist at a universal, impersonal level, very powerful - very profound.


I wonder if arguments like yours can used in a court of law. I mean 
anything can be explained away with your postulates Xeno. Why is there 
any need for any honesty, any integrity? I don't think you even 
associate with these values - you don't even have any dignity 
apparently. How pathetic and retarded Xeno.





Our revels now are ended. These our actors,
As I foretold you, were all spirits, and
Are melted into air, into thin air:
And like the baseless fabric of this vision,
The cloud-capp'd tow'rs, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff
As dreams are made on; and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Come to Meditation

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
>
> 
> Very nice and thanks

Yup, reading these Guru Dev discourses are like administering a Rasāyana,  
 These discourses are indeed practical.  Everyday teachings that are 
cultivating to the subtle system.  I am liking very much reading them in bits. 
http://lbshriver.wordpress.com/guru-dev-lectures/ 

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > 71. 
> > 
> > By forgetting your nature, you get submerged in the sea of sorrow.
> > 
> > "Just once take a look and ask "who am I?"
> >  What ever you have experienced in samsara (human life), all that is 
> > different from you.  Body, mind, breath, and so on -all these things you 
> > see as your own.  It is said, "my body, my mind, my intellect, my breath."  
> > Clearly, you are master of these things you consider as your self, but your 
> > existence is different from them, like your house, or your temple.  The 
> > temple is yours; but you are not the temple.  Similarly, body, mind, 
> > intellect, breath, and so on- all these things belong to you, but they are 
> > not you.  You are different from them.  You are Sat, Chit, Ananda -being, 
> > consciousness, bliss- a ray of Paramatma.  But due to lack of 
> > discrimination, due to ignorance, you have built up such a strong 
> > association with the body-mind-intellect and so forth that you have started 
> > thinking these things to be your true form.  
> > Swami Brahmananda Saraswati,
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] One for the money, two for the show.....

[Bhairitu]

Saturday 12 AM watch FFL'ers go!

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sat 13-Jul-13 00:15:05 UTC

[FFL PostCount]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 07/06/13 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 07/13/13 00:00:00
503 messages as of (UTC) 07/12/13 23:51:28

50 authfriend 
48 Share Long 
48 Ann 
36 doctordumbass
36 Bhairitu 
31 Richard J. Williams 
28 card 
27 turquoiseb 
22 obbajeeba 
21 Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
20 Ravi Chivukula 
20 John 
19 emilymae.reyn 
16 Michael Jackson 
14 seventhray27 
11 nablusoss1008 
11 Buck 
 7 Rick Archer 
 6 Seraphita 
 6 Mike Dixon 
 4 salyavin808 
 3 emptybill 
 3 Susan 
 3 Dick Mays 
 2 sparaig 
 2 martyboi 
 2 azgrey 
 2 Duveyoung 
 2 Arhata Osho 
 1 mjackson74 
 1 martin.quickman 
 1 Alex Stanley 
Posters: 32
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
 wrote:
>
> Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral 
> authority to comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and
> Robin; you do not have the emotional good health to comment 
> beneficially on them; you do not have the emotional
> intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do not have
> the professional training to comment usefully or beneficially
> on them. IMO this is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I
> don't think it is useful or appropriate for you to comment on
> these matters bt him and me.

(cough cough) You'll excuse me, I seem to have swallowed
my spit.

You are of course free to conduct matters between yourself
and Robin as you see fit, just as I am free to comment on
whatever happens on FFL, including your public communications
with and about Robin, as I see fit.

I'm not at all sure why you imagine I would be interested in
your opinions of my "moral authority," etc., given what you
know of my opinions of you on those same scores.

Do you think anyone will notice that you can't seem to
muster up any reasoned rebuttal to what I've said?

BTW, indulge my curiosity, if you will. You write:

"Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
matters."

I seem to be missing the connection between his not
saying anything *specific* about your "upset" (how
specific? did he say anything *generally* about your
upset?) and the purported inappropriateness of my
comments on these matters.

After all, that was three weeks ago, and nobody was
discussing your "upset" at the time here, so why
*would* he have mentioned it?

It seems a bit dodgy for you to introduce this as if
it were evidence in your favor. And I wonder why, as
well, you failed to bring this up when you were making
this huge fuss about the possibility that he'd been
reading FFL.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" 
 wrote:
>
> Share, you are completely missing the point and
> changing the context up.  Judy is not commenting
> on the "upset between you and Robin" - what goes
> down privately between the two of you is private.

To be fair to Share, Emily, I *had* just got done
commenting on the *public* upset between the two
of them, what had happened on FFL in the month that
led up to Share's inexcusable accusation. This was
in response to her attempt to excuse herself for her
refusal to apologize (claiming to Xeno that I was
"using that issue...in an unhealthy way"). She had
characterized the issue in a manner that did not
reflect the reality, to say the least (speaking of
"unhealthy"), and I set the record straight about
what had actually gone on in public between them.

Of course Robin and Share's private contacts are
their business. What Share has never quite seemed to
grasp is that what a person posts to a public forum
becomes the business of everyone who reads that
forum.

> What she and I also were commenting on was your
> irresponsible behavior on this public forum with
> respect to how "stuck" you were in automatically
> and steadfastly repeating an accusation of major
> proportion about someone publicly that you refused
> to back up or explain or discuss and which had no
> basis in anything ever posted here by Robin to you.
> Irresponsible.

Well said.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Formatting, was Please learn to snip !

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey  
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  
wrote:
(snip)
> > Been a while at the cafe now Barry? You seem to have
> > crossed the threshold and just consumed your "mean
> > drink". That usually means about the third of fourth
> > of the night.
> 
> Dear Turquoise B, 
> 
> You may have skipped over this post. I found it especially
> creepy, even for Angry Arrogant Ann. She seems right on
> the verge of calling you "daddy." Sooo sooo close it made my
> skin crawl.

As in, she'd know the signs? I imagine she would readily
acknowledge that.

> Explains a lot, her being a serial cultist and so
> disturbingly nasty to Share.

Oh, az, don't tell me you're going to jump on the "enemy
of my enemy is my friend" too and get Share all confused.
Er, even more confused.

> (N.B. : Whenever Vajradhatu

You mean Vaj, right?

> or Curtis would mangle spelling
> or syntax---"the third of fourth of the night"--- the
> Junkyard dog would attribute it to them either lying or 
> experiencing extreme psychological distress rather than a 
> simply mistyping. Go figure.

Did you perhaps mean to say that mangled spelling and/or
syntax were found more frequently when they were lying and
thus presumably experiencing psychological stress?

> http://bit.ly/15BynQY
> 
> 10,3000,000 hits. At first I found that kinda amazing. Later, 
> not so much.

I guess you just looked at the number and didn't read
any of the hits, huh?

How many of those 10,3000,000 (extra zero in there, I
think, you might want to fix that) hits do you think
had to do with moi? How many do you figure were the
result of unfamiliarity with the syntax of search terms?
How many were the result of your incompetence in using
LMGTFY.com? How many of the hits that were left were a
function of "Judy Stein" being a fairly common name?

I love it. Just about every time you think you've
scored a really stinging putdown, it turns out you've
fucked up again and planted a nasty sting right on
your own butt.

Better luck next time. Maybe you'll land one eventually.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Come to Meditation

[Buck]

the Guru Dev Discourses, 
Cultivating to the subtle nervous system I like reading the discourses as an 
adjunct spiritual practice at those times as I sit with them.  It's a nice 
checking.  Of course their coming from the mid-20th Century there is that 
cultural overlay and application but they are quite true and practical even so. 
 Presently in the 21st Century I like mentally substituting Unified Field for 
the Indian jargon used around the spiritual instruction, Unified Field for 
Paramatma and the Bhagavan.  That works good as technique.  Same field with 
same vectors just a different cultural overlay of fluctuation or ray of the 
divine.  The Sanskrit modality though is quaint too.  The footnotes are 
interesting for context.  But overall great practical everyday spiritual 
teaching that is essential.

http://lbshriver.wordpress.com/guru-dev-lectures/


> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Very nice and thanks
> 
> Yup, reading these Guru Dev discourses are like administering a 
> Rasāyana,   These discourses are indeed practical.  Everyday teachings 
> that are cultivating to the subtle system.  I am liking very much reading 
> them in bits. 
> http://lbshriver.wordpress.com/guru-dev-lectures/ 
> 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > >
> > > 71. 
> > > 
> > > By forgetting your nature, you get submerged in the sea of sorrow.
> > > 
> > > "Just once take a look and ask "who am I?"
> > >  What ever you have experienced in samsara (human life), all that is 
> > > different from you.  Body, mind, breath, and so on -all these things you 
> > > see as your own.  It is said, "my body, my mind, my intellect, my 
> > > breath."  Clearly, you are master of these things you consider as your 
> > > self, but your existence is different from them, like your house, or your 
> > > temple.  The temple is yours; but you are not the temple.  Similarly, 
> > > body, mind, intellect, breath, and so on- all these things belong to you, 
> > > but they are not you.  You are different from them.  You are Sat, Chit, 
> > > Ananda -being, consciousness, bliss- a ray of Paramatma.  But due to lack 
> > > of discrimination, due to ignorance, you have built up such a strong 
> > > association with the body-mind-intellect and so forth that you have 
> > > started thinking these things to be your true form.  
> > > Swami Brahmananda Saraswati,
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Formatting, was Please learn to snip !

[Ann]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The absence of snipping keeps the original context. 
> > > > But often a reply is only directed to a portion of 
> > > > whatever was in a post, so it depends.
> > > 
> > > And besides, only the truly paranoid give a shit if
> > > someone snips part of what they said. I mean, give
> > > me a break...AS IF *anything* ever said on this
> > > forum was worth preserving its "context."  :-)
> > > 
> > > > Judy and Barry format with newspaper sized columns. 
> > > > This works pretty well for preserving the format 
> > > > unless the material has been requoted in Yahoo 
> > > > many times, or the viewing screen is very small, 
> > > > then lines may break erratically.
> > > 
> > > I do it mainly out of habit, and because I'm a 
> > > bit of a nitpicker when it comes to such things.
> > > If you haven't noticed, I often reformat the 
> > > original quoted text so that it *doesn't* get
> > > messed up after multiple quotes. It's an OCD
> > > thang, perhaps, but it amuses me. :-)
> > > 
> > > > Note, when he was here, Robin used to reformat all 
> > > > his discussions with people's names and a number 
> > > > to indicate how far back in the conversation or 
> > > > diatribe that was going on. That also worked well.
> > > 
> > > For you, perhaps. I thought it was the dumbest
> > > affectation I've ever seen on the Internet. I
> > > mean, *really*, he did it so that all of *his*
> > > precious words got reposted over and over and
> > > over, AS IF someone was actually going to read
> > > them this time. :-)
> > 
> > Been a while at the cafe now Barry? You seem to have crossed the threshold 
> > and just consumed your "mean drink". That usually means about the third of 
> > fourth of the night.
> > >
> >
> 
> Dear Turquoise B, 
> 
> You may have skipped over this post. I found it especially
> creepy, even for Angry Arrogant Ann.

Creepy yes. Because I have a lot of experience with mean drunks. But that is 
where the similarity between Barry and my father ends. My father was a winner, 
a lion, accomplished and he died a happy and fulfilled man - sober. 

 >She seems right on
> the verge of calling you "daddy." Sooo sooo close it made my
> skin crawl. Explains a lot, her being a serial cultist and so
> disturbingly nasty to Share. 

Serial cultist is so laughably inaccurate even you would blush to know how 
stupid you sound and, indeed, are. Share is the serial cultist. And you are 
simply angry. I don't know about arrogant; you don't seem self-confident enough 
to be so. I'm a fighter, there is a big difference between arrogance and 
gumption. One day you, and Share, might be able to figure out the difference. 
In the meantime just keep making a fool out of yourself while Share busies 
herself running after the next great teacher/healer all around that square in 
Fairfield. Just like the locals used to circle it every weekend night - round 
and round and round. 
> 
> (N.B. : Whenever Vajradhatu or Curtis would mangle spelling
> or syntax---"the third of fourth of the night"--- the Junkyard
> dog would attribute it to them either lying or experiencing extreme 
> psychological distress rather than a simply mistyping. Go
> figure.
> 
> http://bit.ly/15BynQY
> 
> 10,3000,000 hits. At first I found that kinda amazing. Later, 
> not so much.
>

[FairfieldLife] The Guru Dev [SBS] Discourses

[Buck]

Within the Guru Dev discourses there is direct plain advice pertinent to 
pricing spirituality and also policy recommendation throughout about seeing 
saints.  You know, Brahmananda Saraswati, Guru Dev .  It's also a lot of what 
we grew up with as the teaching and the spiritual regeneration movement.  

http://lbshriver.wordpress.com/guru-dev-lectures/


>
> 
> the Guru Dev Discourses, 
> Cultivating to the subtle nervous system I like reading the discourses as an 
> adjunct spiritual practice at those times as I sit with them.  It's a nice 
> checking.  Of course their coming from the mid-20th Century there is that 
> cultural overlay and application but they are quite true and practical even 
> so.  Presently in the 21st Century I like mentally substituting Unified Field 
> for the Indian jargon used around the spiritual instruction, Unified Field 
> for Paramatma and the Bhagavan.  That works good as technique.  Same field 
> with same vectors just a different cultural overlay of fluctuation or ray of 
> the divine.  The Sanskrit modality though is quaint too.  The footnotes are 
> interesting for context.  But overall great practical everyday spiritual 
> teaching that is essential.
> 
> http://lbshriver.wordpress.com/guru-dev-lectures/
> 
> 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Very nice and thanks
> > 
> > Yup, reading these Guru Dev discourses are like administering a 
> > Rasāyana,   These discourses are indeed practical.  Everyday teachings 
> > that are cultivating to the subtle system.  I am liking very much reading 
> > them in bits. 
> > http://lbshriver.wordpress.com/guru-dev-lectures/ 
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 71. 
> > > > 
> > > > By forgetting your nature, you get submerged in the sea of sorrow.
> > > > 
> > > > "Just once take a look and ask "who am I?"
> > > >  What ever you have experienced in samsara (human life), all that 
> > > > is different from you.  Body, mind, breath, and so on -all these things 
> > > > you see as your own.  It is said, "my body, my mind, my intellect, my 
> > > > breath."  Clearly, you are master of these things you consider as your 
> > > > self, but your existence is different from them, like your house, or 
> > > > your temple.  The temple is yours; but you are not the temple.  
> > > > Similarly, body, mind, intellect, breath, and so on- all these things 
> > > > belong to you, but they are not you.  You are different from them.  You 
> > > > are Sat, Chit, Ananda -being, consciousness, bliss- a ray of Paramatma. 
> > > >  But due to lack of discrimination, due to ignorance, you have built up 
> > > > such a strong association with the body-mind-intellect and so forth 
> > > > that you have started thinking these things to be your true form.  
> > > > Swami Brahmananda Saraswati,
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] The George Zimmerman case: Steyn nails it.

[Ravi Chivukula]

This guy nails it for me Seraphitarded baby

http://youtu.be/xTNtJoYSHa4


On 7/12/13 3:57 PM, Seraphita wrote:


When conservative commentator Mark Steyn is on form he can pen some of 
the best journalism on the web. I'm in awe at his piece about the 
George Zimmerman stitch-up. Read it and weep.


*http://tinyurl.com/qxadrqa*

[FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share

[raunchydog]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
>
> On 7/12/13 4:08 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > Dear Share - I think this is a brilliant move. This new strategy is 
> > the right way to avoid Judy's perverse, obsessive, pathological need 
> > to stick to facts, stick to truth. Clearly she lacks emotional 
> > intelligence, or why would she continually insist on presenting the 
> > gory, cruel, torturous facts with links to your posts over and over 
> > again. Why can't she just let you rest in peace, why does she trigger 
> > you and your attachment disorder?
> >
> > Your new strategy is sure to perplex and thwart Judy. Yep - where is 
> > her moral authority, what are her credentials - is she a fucking 
> > therapist, does she like have a Ph. D? Or is she even a pastoral 
> > counsellor even? Ha.
> 
> So - yes,  to reiterate dear Share, presenting facts is not good enough 
> unless someone has moral or professional authority. Let her produce 
> evidence of her training and/or authority.
> 
> The gall of this vengeful woman that we will just accept the truth in 
> the absence of any credentials. She must think we are naive and gullible.
> 

Don't confuse Share with the facts. Her mind is already made up. She sees 
things from her reality only. There in no room for reality in a discussion with 
her. Your point of view has no value despite the facts. It's a coping behavior 
that attempts to control the outcome of a dispute in relationships. Too bad she 
hasn't figured out that attacking the messenger and piling on more layers of 
bullshit to confuse the issue is a piss poor strategy on a public forum.  
http://youtu.be/amcDIPQ5z5E

> 
> >
> > This is a sickness dear Share. People like Judy who insist on truth, 
> > insist on facts should be fucking institutionalized, they need to be 
> > fucking medicated - yeah that's we need and your efforts are very 
> > admirable, brave and courageous my dear.
> >
> > On 7/12/13 7:29 AM, Share Long wrote:
> >> Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral authority 
> >> to comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and Robin; you do not 
> >> have the emotional good health to comment beneficially on them; you 
> >> do not have the emotional intelligence to comment usefully on them; 
> >> you do not have the professional training to comment usefully or 
> >> beneficially on them. IMO this is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, 
> >> I don't think it is useful or appropriate for you to comment on these 
> >> matters bt him and me.
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >> *From:* authfriend 
> >> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >> *Sent:* Friday, July 12, 2013 9:17 AM
> >> *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Four for Share
> >>
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> >> , Share Long 
> >>  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Judy, my own discernments re the upset bt me and Robin have
> >> > been validated by objective people like Xeno and Susa
> >> Not only are they obviously not objective, they weren't
> >> following what went on. Recently I had to give Susan a
> >> primer as to the facts. Xeno has acknowledged he didn't
> >> follow things closely.
> >>
> >> > Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> >> > he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> >> > think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> >> > matters.
> >>
> >> You don't seem to get it. This has to do with your behavior
> >> on FFL, in public, which gives me every right to comment.
> >>
> >> Whatever he may have said or not said to you in private
> >> weeks ago, your refusal to apologize hadn't even been a
> >> topic here for some time. If he wants to come on FFL and
> >> say something about it, he's welcome to do so.
> >>
> >> Let me repeat what I said below, because you appear to
> >> have missed it:
> >>
> >> "There is no basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes
> >> negotiations. With behavior as appalling as this, the
> >> target does not have to give you any 'indications' that
> >> an apology is in order, or that he would accept one if
> >> you made it. Difficult though it may be for you to face,
> >> the reality is that you don't get to put conditions on
> >> making that apology. You owe it unconditionally."
> >>
> >> > Nor do I think you have the moral authority or mental good
> >> > health to do so.
> >>
> >> I have to assume that is said without intentional irony.
> >>
> >> > As to the former, I've seen how you distort what I say.
> >>
> >> No, you haven't. I don't distort what you've said. I can
> >> back up every word of what I wrote below.
> >>
> >> > As to the latter, IMO I think you are out of balance with
> >> > regards to Robin.
> >>
> >> Says the person who called him a "psychological rapist."
> >>
> >> Barry, you're going to lose your Master of Inadvertent
> >> Irony title if you aren't careful.
> >>
> >> > 
> >> >

[FairfieldLife] The solution to Climate Change -- more sex!

[turquoiseb]

As presented by Reverend Billy, performance artist and
pastor of the Church Of Stop Shopping:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_63520&feature=iv&src_vid=JlpBKZPJHTE&v=vcT1vVtisNc

[FairfieldLife] test

[Ravi Chivukula]

test test