[FairfieldLife] The Vedas differ...

2015-06-19 Thread he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]


 As the Mahabharata says, “The Vedas differ, and so do the Smṛtis. No one is a 
muni who has no independent opinion of his own (nāsau muniryasya mataṃ na 
bhinnam).” 

 

 From http://www.aghori.it/woodroffe_introduction_to_tantra_sastra.pdf 
http://www.aghori.it/woodroffe_introduction_to_tantra_sastra.pdf
  


[FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar coating 
is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the government 
expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received.  What do 
you think?
 

 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html

 
 
 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 
 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday 
for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...
 
 
 
 View on news.yahoo.com 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 



[FairfieldLife] Religion: a warning from history...

2015-06-19 Thread salyavin808


 So, what did we learn in the 20th century? Not much it seems...
 

 Jewish extremists suspected of torching Sea of Galilee 'loaves and fishes' 
church in Tabgha 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/jewish-extremists-suspected-of-torching-sea-of-galilee-loaves-and-fishes-church-in-tabgha-10329998.html

 
 
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/jewish-extremists-suspected-of-torching-sea-of-galilee-loaves-and-fishes-church-in-tabgha-10329998.html
 
 
 Jewish extremists suspected of torching Sea of Galilee &... 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/jewish-extremists-suspected-of-torching-sea-of-galilee-loaves-and-fishes-church-in-tabgha-10329998.html
 A fire believed to have been started by Jewish extremists has badly damaged a 
church on the Sea of Galilee built on the site where Christian tradition holds 
that...
 
 
 
 View on www.independent.co.uk 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/jewish-extremists-suspected-of-torching-sea-of-galilee-loaves-and-fishes-church-in-tabgha-10329998.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 



[FairfieldLife] Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.
- Forwarded Message -
  From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
   
It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 he explicitly said:
In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  -JaiGuruYou! 

Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and outright 
dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the possibility of me 
bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd ask you to do it 
for me. 

Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)

P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...



   

  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:

2015-06-19 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 Taking a grain of salt I still find this archive of spiritual talks impressive 
now. I should have liked to have heard him deliver some of these for context.
 

 
 Context often is everything. I been with Maharishi and heard him say things 
that then got retold by people later out in the field, even by folks who 
'heard' them, completely missing the context as things were said originally. I 
recall being there hearing Maharishi talking about kundalini awakening in the 
energy system and using a metaphor by example which people later reported 
taking literally. I was younger then and hearing things recycle like that 
became a good lesson about folks and their variability in comprehension at 
following things in context. Salt please.
 -JaiGuruYou 
 
 
 The Charlie Lutes lectures are compiled in the sidebar here for scrolling 
through and reading..
 http://www.maharishiphotos.com/ http://www.maharishiphotos.com/
 They are brief.   

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 What the heck was he talking about, Christ's space ship? Did he elaborate? I 
have heard he said a lot of wild stuff, but that takes the prize.
 

 

 

 From: Duveyoung 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:23 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:
 
 
   Just a reminder that I was about 20 feet away from Charlie when he told the 
audience that Christ's space ship would be found inside one of the great 
pyramidsin a few years.  After about 20 years I again saw him and asked him 
"what happened to the spaceship?"  He said, "I never said any such thing."  
This may be an indication that Transcendental Meditation, as understood and 
practiced by Charlie, did not, after what seems to have been a very dedicated 
and disciplined life of spirituality, make Charlie's integrity "better," OR, it 
may indicate that his lifestyle did not prevent a great memory loss.  Or?  I 
post this here where Charlie is being delightfully supported by Doug, and I 
wouldn't want any new visitors here at wonderful FairFieldLife to get off on 
the wrong start and not have at least a warning that Charlie's inexplicable 
actions could indicate that TM might even be injurious, and careful 
consideration of the years of discussion here at this forum clearly shows that 
the "jury is still out about TM" in many a regard -- especially when money is 
being required for one to learn what is typically given for free around the 
world.  Take care new visitors...if the science isn't hard, it's hardly science.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 These are great little chapters/lectures to sieve through now. Very straight 
ahead spirituality.
 Is a refreshing language from a time with a lot of heart different from some 
in-yur-head versions now.
 
 
 For instance, The Soul..
 Open it and then scroll around by title to others. They are brief. 
 

 http://www.maharishiphotos.com/lecture54.html 
http://www.maharishiphotos.com/lecture54.html
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Charles F. Lutes was the first person to enroll into the Transcendental 
Meditation program offered by His Holiness Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in the 
Continental United States in 1959. Impressed with the meditation technique he 
had received, Mr. Lutes teamed up with Maharishi and became a founding pillar 
of the Spiritual Regeneration Movement centers which later expanded into many 
branches of the Transcendental Meditation organization. He took four world 
tours with Maharishi to open hundreds of meditation centers around the world. 
In 1969 he became a teacher of the Transcendental Meditation program. 


 Mr. Lutes had gained God Consciousness enlightenment after two years of 
practicing the Transcendental Meditation technique. He was one of the most 
advanced of Maharishi’s teachers of Transcendental Meditation. Mr. Lutes was 
clairvoyant, a healer and a lecturer. He was also accomplished in many yogic 
siddhi powers.
 

 Helen Lutes In 1967, Helen studied in India with Maharishi at which time she 
became a teacher of the Transcendental Meditation program. Maharishi appointed 
Helen as the first President of his Spiritual Regeneration Movement. Helen also 
served as the Transcendental Meditation instructor for celebrities who 
preferred to keep their meditation practice confidential. 
 

 Helen Lutes was born with a high level of spiritual development. She was a 
child prodigy with an exceptionally keen understanding of human nature. She 
began the practice of the Transcendental Meditation technique with her husband, 
Charlie, in 1959. Since then Helen volunteered her time to help Maharishi 
Mahesh Yogi with his Transcendental Meditation Movement. She was an excellent 
administrator, organizing courses and managing finances. Helen also worked on 
special projects for Maharishi. It was through her efforts, working with her 
husband, that the foundation was established for the rapid expansion o

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Seems to me likely that it wasn't the disputed post so much as your reactions 
to his having told you he was moderating it that led him to delete your access, 
including claiming he was insane (more than once) and in particular your 
declaration that you would no longer read anything he posted nor reply to 
it--in other words, that you did not consider yourself subject to his 
moderation. Those posts of yours were made well after the "clean slate" point 
of June 9. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 
















[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread salyavin808

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 It really won't be the same without you old chap. Our new moderator is a 
dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron who has thrown out one of the most 
innovative and dynamic posters here in his all consuming quest for uniform 
blandness.
 

 Why Rick would leave the rights to who gets to post here down to him is beyond 
me, complete disinterest I suppose. But I guess that somehow we'll have to try 
and compensate for the inevitable gaping hole that your absence will leave 
behind.
 

 So cheers Barry for all the laughs, insights, wisdom, book recommendations, 
movie reviews and the ongoing travelogue of your life and times. If only the 
people who spent all day sitting in a dome with their eyes closed had so much 
to say!
 

 TTFN and all the very, very best.
 

 Salyavin
 







 PS Well done Doug for being a snivelling coward and not even daring to have a 
discussion about post content with Barry on here. Seems to me that every 
example you found to back up your decision was very poor indeed and stood up to 
about two seconds of scrutiny. But that's not the point is it? It's all about 
using the guidelines to further what YOU think this place should be about. 
Shame you never read the home page...
 

 

 









[FairfieldLife] Re: Consciousness and The Unified Field

2015-06-19 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 I found this to be a revealing post about how Doug and I differ concerning 
information and contrasting POV's here on FFL

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Dear 4U, I appreciate your taking the time to post this here. There are a 
number of contributors here who often cut off discussion of this but it is nice 
to have this point of view available to listen to.
 

 Me: Only moderators have the ability to "cut off discussion" here. What you 
are mislabeling 
as "cutting off" is when writers like myself point out that using physics terms 
as poetry outside their legitimate context is a transparent attempt to 
misappropriates the rigor of physics to a field of speculation.  You and I seem 
to go through a very different process when we see information that is contrary 
to the one we hold.
 

 I love articles like this one. It is a great writing prompt to see where my 
own intellectual edges lie. I welcome them and if I had the godlike powers you 
sought out and now possess, I would never want to interfere with anyone posting 
what I consider to be a cockamamie view of physics and consciousness.  When you 
see a person's opposing view you react as if they had "cut off" your 
conversation. I guess that is a lot easier than just making your case. 

 

 I asked Larry Domash if Maharishi meant to equate the vacuum state with 
consciousness or just use it as a metaphor? He giggled nervously and revealed 
that this area was one of disagreement   for him. What was the first thing 
Hagelin did when he took over the "I am a physicist AND play one on TV for my 
master" routine? He equated the Unified Field with consciousness following his 
masters lead on lack of intellectual integrity.
 

 Doug: I liked the video of Hagelin for the perspective it gives to the larger 
conversation. That was helpful for insight in to what has become the usual 
abbreviated put-down here when the subject of consciousness and physics 
generally comes up. Thanks, -JaiGuruYou  

 

 Me: I have written much about this topic and it is far from an "abbreviated 
put-down." Equating consciousness which is the product of a macro process with 
the mathematical formula dependent technical physics concept of a unified field 
at a completely different level of nature is intellectually dishonest (tip of 
the hat to Judy) from an actual physicist like Hegelin. He knows it is bogus 
but it that was the price for his movement position, his intellectual 
integrity. When movement types spout physics poetry as if they understand this 
level of physics I just have chalk it up to them never having the intellectual 
horsepower to actually go deep enough into a field to understand that there 
such a thing as expertise in a field like physics and we non physicists don't 
have it.
 

 Your post sounds suspiciously like something Buck would say. I wonder...

 

 

  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Consciousness and The Unified Field 
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/03/consciousness-and-the-unified-field-and-why-this-information-is-important.html

  
  
 
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/03/consciousness-and-the-unified-field-and-why-this-information-is-important.html
  
  
  
  
  
 Consciousness and The Unified Field 
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/03/consciousness-and-the-unified-field-and-why-this-information-is-important.html
 Consciousness – The Unified Field What follows is a theoretical explanation of 
how energies interact in our universe to create what we…


 
 View on themindunleashed.org 
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/03/consciousness-and-the-unified-field-and-why-this-information-is-important.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

 
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/03/consciousness-and-the-unified-field-and-why-this-information-is-important.html
 
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/03/consciousness-and-the-unified-field-and-why-this-information-is-important.html

 











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread feste37
For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
 Our new moderator is a dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moronDoug for being a 
snivelling coward
All insults that give grounds for your very own dismissal Sal! 
And here I thought I would be the first to go - I reckon Bucky wants to keep 
tabs on me so he will know where to direct the drones.
  From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:44 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum 
for me?
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.
 - Forwarded Message -
  From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 he explicitly said:
Inmoderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state ofevolution” and 
I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and notone is on moderation 
in any way from this point. I would only suggestin our going forward that folks 
take the time to actually read theYahoo-groups guidelines if they want to 
continue fluidly posting onFFL. We should appreciate your cooperative 
collaboration on this.  -JaiGuruYou! 

Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and outright 
dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the possibility of me 
bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd ask you to do it 
for me. 

Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)

P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...

It really won't be the same without you old chap. Our new moderator is a 
dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron who has thrown out one of the most 
innovative and dynamic posters here in his all consuming quest for uniform 
blandness.
Why Rick would leave the rights to who gets to post here down to him is beyond 
me, complete disinterest I suppose. But I guess that somehow we'll have to try 
and compensate for the inevitable gaping hole that your absence will leave 
behind.
So cheers Barry for all the laughs, insights, wisdom, book recommendations, 
movie reviews and the ongoing travelogue of your life and times. If only the 
people who spent all day sitting in a dome with their eyes closed had so much 
to say!
TTFN and all the very, very best.
Salyavin

PS Well done Doug for being a snivelling coward and not even daring to have a 
discussion about post content with Barry on here. Seems to me that every 
example you found to back up your decision was very poor indeed and stood up to 
about two seconds of scrutiny. But that's not the point is it? It's all about 
using the guidelines to further what YOU think this place should be about. 
Shame you never read the home page...


  #yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857 -- #yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2944085857 
#yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv2944085857 
#yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp #yiv2944085857hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp #yiv2944085857ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp .yiv2944085857ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp .yiv2944085857ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857ygrp-mkp .yiv2944085857ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv2944085857ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2944085857 
#yiv2944085857ygrp-sponsor #yiv2944085857ygrp-lc #yiv2944085857hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2944085857 
#yiv2944085857ygrp-sponsor #yiv2944085857ygrp-lc .yiv2944085857ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2944085857 
#yiv2944085857activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2944085857
 #yiv2944085857activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2944085857 
#yiv2944085857activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2944085857 #yiv2944085857activity span 
.yiv2944085857underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2944085857 
.yiv2944085857attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;

[FairfieldLife] Dark Medieval Consciousness

2015-06-19 Thread Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
It would appear a dark, medieval consciousness is beginning to take over 
Fairfield Life, in the likeness of the Transcendental Meditation Organisation's 
tyrannical manner.
Medieval
1. of or relating to the Middle Ages.

2. Informal, very old-fashioned or primitive.
Synonyms:  antique  archaic  feudal  Gothic  primitive  antediluvian  
antiquated  old  old-fashioned  unenlightened  antiquated  out of date  
outdated  outmoded  anachronistic  passé  obsolete  horse-and-buggy
Tyranny
3. cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control.

Synonyms:  authoritarianism  autocracy   coercion   cruelty   despotism   
domination   oligarchy   oppression   terrorism   totalitarianism   absolutism  
 fascism   high-handedness   imperiousness   monocracy   severity   totality   
peremptoriness   reign   of   terror   unreasonableness
 #yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988 -- #yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp #yiv3597600988hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp #yiv3597600988ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp .yiv3597600988ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp .yiv3597600988ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-mkp .yiv3597600988ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3597600988ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988ygrp-sponsor #yiv3597600988ygrp-lc #yiv3597600988hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988ygrp-sponsor #yiv3597600988ygrp-lc .yiv3597600988ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3597600988
 #yiv3597600988activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988activity span 
.yiv3597600988underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3597600988 
.yiv3597600988attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv3597600988 
.yiv3597600988bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 dd.yiv3597600988last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3597600988 dd.yiv3597600988last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3597600988 
dd.yiv3597600988last p span.yiv3597600988yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv3597600988 div.yiv3597600988attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 div.yiv3597600988attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv3597600988 div.yiv3597600988file-title a, #yiv3597600988 
div.yiv3597600988file-title a:active, #yiv3597600988 
div.yiv3597600988file-title a:hover, #yiv3597600988 div.yiv3597600988file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 div.yiv3597600988photo-title a, 
#yiv3597600988 div.yiv3597600988photo-title a:active, #yiv3597600988 
div.yiv3597600988photo-title a:hover, #yiv3597600988 
div.yiv3597600988photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3597600988 
div#yiv3597600988ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3597600988ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv3597600988yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv3597600988 
.yiv3597600988green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv3597600988 o {font-size:0;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv3597600988
 #yiv3597600988reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv3597600988 .yiv3597600988replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3597600988 #yiv3597600988ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv3597600988 
#yiv3597600988ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv3597600988 
#yi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:

2015-06-19 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Thanks, Charlie was always one of my favorite personalities in the TM movement. 
He was so *far out there* and at the same time so down to earth.  I heard a 
story about the last time he saw M. He had been waiting a long time to speak to 
M and was told it would be another couple of hours. Charlie became outraged and 
yelled back, and I'm paraphrasing, Hell! I wouldn't wait two hours to meet 
Jesus Christ! Then he stormed out. I heard that is when he was *banned*from 
seeing M again. LOL!
 From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 10:44 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:
   
    These are great littlechapters/lectures to sieve through now. Very straight 
aheadspirituality.Is a refreshing language from a timewith a lot of heart 
different from some in-yur-head versions now.
For instance, The Soul..Open it and then scroll around by titleto others. They 
are brief. 
http://www.maharishiphotos.com/lecture54.html




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

CharlesF. Lutes wasthe first person to enroll into the Transcendental 
Meditation programoffered by His Holiness Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in the 
ContinentalUnited States in 1959. Impressed with the meditation technique he 
hadreceived, Mr. Lutes teamed up with Maharishi and became a foundingpillar of 
the Spiritual Regeneration Movement centers which laterexpanded into many 
branches of the Transcendental Meditationorganization. He took four world tours 
with Maharishi to openhundreds of meditation centers around the world. In 1969 
he became ateacher of the Transcendental Meditation program. 

Mr.Lutes had gained God Consciousness enlightenment after two years 
ofpracticing the Transcendental Meditation technique. He was one of themost 
advanced of Maharishi’s teachers of Transcendental Meditation.Mr. Lutes was 
clairvoyant, a healer and a lecturer. He was alsoaccomplished in many yogic 
siddhi powers.
HelenLutes In1967, Helen studied in India with Maharishi at which time she 
becamea teacher of the Transcendental Meditation program. Maharishiappointed 
Helen as the first President of his Spiritual RegenerationMovement. Helen also 
served as the Transcendental Meditationinstructor for celebrities who preferred 
to keep their meditationpractice confidential.
HelenLutes wasborn with a high level of spiritual development. She was a 
childprodigy with an exceptionally keen understanding of human nature. Shebegan 
the practice of the Transcendental Meditation technique withher husband, 
Charlie, in 1959. Since then Helen volunteered her timeto help Maharishi Mahesh 
Yogi with his Transcendental MeditationMovement. She was an excellent 
administrator, organizing courses andmanaging finances. Helen also worked on 
special projects forMaharishi. It was through her efforts, working with her 
husband, thatthe foundation was established for the rapid expansion of 
theTranscendental Meditation program throughout the world.


Charlie and Helen Lutes
|  |
|  | |  | Charlie and Helen Lutes Charlie and Helen Lutes Charlie and 
Helen Lutes Charlie and Helen Lutes by Vincent J. Daczynski |  |
|View on www.institutespiritual...  |   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Thanks for posting this to FFL. Incoincidence along with an interest in 
archival things someone just passed to me a recently a published copy of a 
limited edition of 108 CharlieLutes discourses. 
Charlie Lutes' was a side of the TM movement I was not broughtup in and I am 
finding his discourses now quite spiritually relevant.It seems his is where 
some lot of the movement went on to anyway insubtle practice. Certainly is the 
case in the meditating communityof Fairfield, Iowa now.  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

http://www.tinyurl.com/nubhtnp
   #yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322 -- #yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv0621746322 
#yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv0621746322 
#yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp #yiv0621746322hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp #yiv0621746322ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp .yiv0621746322ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp .yiv0621746322ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322ygrp-mkp .yiv0621746322ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv0621746322ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv0621746322 
#yiv0621746322ygrp-sponsor #yiv0621746322ygrp-lc #yiv0621746322hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv0621746322 
#yiv0621746322ygrp-sponsor #yiv0621746322ygrp-lc .yiv0621746322ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv0621746322 #yiv0621746322actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv06

[FairfieldLife] Re: Dark Medieval Consciousness

2015-06-19 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 Just added to my Dead Pool list for oppositional opinion:

4. Xeno

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It would appear a dark, medieval consciousness is beginning to take over 
Fairfield Life, in the likeness of the Transcendental Meditation Organisation's 
tyrannical manner.
 

 Medieval
 

 1. of or relating to the Middle Ages.

 

 2. Informal, very old-fashioned or primitive.
 

 Synonyms:  antique  archaic  feudal  Gothic  primitive  antediluvian  
antiquated  old  old-fashioned  unenlightened  antiquated  out of date  
outdated  outmoded  anachronistic  passé  obsolete  horse-and-buggy
 

 Tyranny
 

 3. cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control.

 

 Synonyms:  authoritarianism  autocracy   coercion   cruelty   despotism   
domination   oligarchy   oppression   terrorism   totalitarianism   absolutism  
 fascism   high-handedness   imperiousness   monocracy   severity   totality   
peremptoriness   reign   of   terror   unreasonableness

 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal Col Leed feels its excellent & especlly the expense reductions

2015-06-19 Thread William Leed wle...@aol.com [FairfieldLife]
excellent



-Original Message-
From: jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
To: FairfieldLife 
Sent: Fri, Jun 19, 2015 4:03 am
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal


  
 
  
It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar coating 
is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the government 
expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received.  What do 
you think?
 


 
Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code

 
   


  
   
 
 
 
  
   
 
  
   
 

 
  
   
 
  
   

Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow 
up&#...  
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday 
for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...

   
 
  
   
 
 

  
   
   View on news.yahoo.com  
 
  
   
 Preview by Yahoo
 
 
 
  
   
 
 

  
  
 


 


  
  
  
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Isn't that how you and I live? You can only spend what you earn.
 From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:03 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
   
    It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code
 
||
||||   Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow 
up&#...  WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called 
Thursday for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...| 
   |
|  View on news.yahoo.com  |Preview by Yahoo|
||

 

  #yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619 -- #yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp #yiv9311727619hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp #yiv9311727619ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp .yiv9311727619ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp .yiv9311727619ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-mkp .yiv9311727619ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv9311727619ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619ygrp-sponsor #yiv9311727619ygrp-lc #yiv9311727619hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619ygrp-sponsor #yiv9311727619ygrp-lc .yiv9311727619ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9311727619
 #yiv9311727619activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619activity span 
.yiv9311727619underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9311727619 
.yiv9311727619attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv9311727619 
.yiv9311727619bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 dd.yiv9311727619last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9311727619 dd.yiv9311727619last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9311727619 
dd.yiv9311727619last p span.yiv9311727619yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv9311727619 div.yiv9311727619attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 div.yiv9311727619attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv9311727619 div.yiv9311727619file-title a, #yiv9311727619 
div.yiv9311727619file-title a:active, #yiv9311727619 
div.yiv9311727619file-title a:hover, #yiv9311727619 div.yiv9311727619file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 div.yiv9311727619photo-title a, 
#yiv9311727619 div.yiv9311727619photo-title a:active, #yiv9311727619 
div.yiv9311727619photo-title a:hover, #yiv9311727619 
div.yiv9311727619photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9311727619 
div#yiv9311727619ygrp-mlmsg #yiv9311727619ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv9311727619yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv9311727619 
.yiv9311727619green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv9311727619 o {font-size:0;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv9311727619
 #yiv9311727619reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv9311727619 .yiv9311727619replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9311727619 #yiv9311727619ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv9311727619 
#yiv9311727619ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
FFL reflected Rick's open mindedness and respect for adults voicing their 
opinion in dramatic contrast to the group that most of us were involved with. I 
consider this latest change to be a version of FFL suicide by appointing 
Buck/Doug to kill off all opposing views. Once freedom of expression is gone it 
will die off as a useful place to post.

But your post makes you exempt from the FFL Dead Pool list, so there is that!

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  






Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal Col Leed feels its excellent & especlly the expense reductions

2015-06-19 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
The problems for politicians is that they won't be able to buy votes with 
promised spending on this special interest group or that one.
 From: "William Leed wle...@aol.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:44 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal Col Leed feels its 
excellent & especlly the expense reductions
   
    excellent




-Original Message-
From: jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
To: FairfieldLife 
Sent: Fri, Jun 19, 2015 4:03 am
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

 
 
 It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think? 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code
  
||
||||   Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow 
up&#...  WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called 
Thursday for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta... 
||
|  View on news.yahoo.com  |Preview by Yahoo|
||

  
 
 
 
 #yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891 -- #yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp #yiv9427806891hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp #yiv9427806891ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp .yiv9427806891ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp .yiv9427806891ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891ygrp-mkp .yiv9427806891ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv9427806891ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891ygrp-sponsor #yiv9427806891ygrp-lc #yiv9427806891hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891ygrp-sponsor #yiv9427806891ygrp-lc .yiv9427806891ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9427806891
 #yiv9427806891activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9427806891 #yiv9427806891activity span 
.yiv9427806891underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9427806891 
.yiv9427806891attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv9427806891 .yiv9427806891attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 .yiv9427806891attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9427806891 .yiv9427806891attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9427806891 .yiv9427806891attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv9427806891 .yiv9427806891bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv9427806891 
.yiv9427806891bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 dd.yiv9427806891last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9427806891 dd.yiv9427806891last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9427806891 
dd.yiv9427806891last p span.yiv9427806891yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv9427806891 div.yiv9427806891attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 div.yiv9427806891attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv9427806891 div.yiv9427806891file-title a, #yiv9427806891 
div.yiv9427806891file-title a:active, #yiv9427806891 
div.yiv9427806891file-title a:hover, #yiv9427806891 div.yiv9427806891file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 div.yiv9427806891photo-title a, 
#yiv9427806891 div.yiv9427806891photo-title a:active, #yiv9427806891 
div.yiv9427806891photo-title a:hover, #yiv9427806891 
div.yiv9427806891photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9427806891 
div#yiv9427806891ygrp-mlmsg #yiv9427806891ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv9427806891yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv9427806891 
.yiv9427806891green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv9427806891 .yiv9427806891MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv9427806891 o {font-size:0;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv9427806891 
#yiv9427806891photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv9427806891
 #yiv9427806891reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv9427806891

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Here's what perplexes me. ( and I agree with your assessment, btw). 

 Barry and Sal and others claim what they want, all they really want,  dear God 
in heaven what they want,  is unfettered conversation, dialog, and content.
 

 But, I guess it must be writtens somewhere, FFL BY DIVINE DECREE SHALL BE THE 
ONLY POSTING VENUE!
 

 Let's be honest.  What Barry does (by his own admission) is push people's 
buttons.
 

 Xeno is on record saying, to effect,
 

  "pushing buttons is noble endeavour, and the one pushing the buttons need not 
even be honest in the act of pushing.  Anyone taking offense to having their 
buttons pushed, even if they are blatantly misrepresented, is just revealing 
their own inadequacy and reactive mind."
 

 so, why not start their own venue, (as xeno himself suggested might be the 
solution)?
 

 and, of course, we know why this would be.  they'd have no satisfying targets.
 

 and as you point out Feste, there was a time when the participants practiced 
some modicum of discipline. But, really that went out the window many years 
ago, which is why the forum is down to only a few active participants.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  







[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread feste37
I would say that opposing views are welcome here. There is room for 
disagreement and argument but not an atmosphere in which insult and abuse 
becomes the norm. I find it astonishing that an effort to realign this group so 
that it conforms to the Yahoo! guidelines should be greeted by one recent 
poster as some kind of return to medieval tyranny. No, it's just a call for 
people to adopt a more civil tone with one another. The recently departed 
Turquoise was, in my opinion, the principal cause of the descent of FFL into 
the gutter, and now I hope it will become a more interesting and welcoming 
place, with more people from Fairfield posting. The group is, after all, called 
Fairfield Life. I hope you will go on posting, Curtis, because you are one of 
the most interesting and articulate people here. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FFL reflected Rick's open mindedness and respect for adults voicing their 
opinion in dramatic contrast to the group that most of us were involved with. I 
consider this latest change to be a version of FFL suicide by appointing 
Buck/Doug to kill off all opposing views. Once freedom of expression is gone it 
will die off as a useful place to post.

But your post makes you exempt from the FFL Dead Pool list, so there is that!

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FFL reflected Rick's open mindedness and respect for adults voicing their 
opinion in dramatic contrast to the group that most of us were involved with.
 

 I guess, Curtis, we all have a bar, above, or below which ,we consider 
respect, or disrespect..  
 

 If you consider the self described "pushing of people's buttons" solely to get 
a reaction, respect, then that is where you have set the bar.
 

 If you consider objecting to being misrepresented in a willful manner, 
respect, then that's where you've set the bar.
 

 We all get the value in discussing opposing ideas.  We all get the value in 
being challenged.
 

 What some of us object to, is when the challenging, or discussing, takes a 
malicious turn.
 

 

   I consider this latest change to be a version of FFL suicide by appointing 
Buck/Doug to kill off all opposing views. Once freedom of expression is gone it 
will die off as a useful place to post.
 

 And, again, Curtis, what is to prevent you, or others, from creating a 
discussion venue tailored to the tastes and predilections of a certain group of 
participants.  Isn't that how it is supposed to work?

But your post makes you exempt from the FFL Dead Pool list, so there is that!

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
It is an wonderful opportunity to see how the forum can proceed, absent the 
member considered to be the most abusive, at least according to some. 

 I would enjoy seeing some the participants who recently departed to the_peak, 
return.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I would say that opposing views are welcome here. There is room for 
disagreement and argument but not an atmosphere in which insult and abuse 
becomes the norm. I find it astonishing that an effort to realign this group so 
that it conforms to the Yahoo! guidelines should be greeted by one recent 
poster as some kind of return to medieval tyranny. No, it's just a call for 
people to adopt a more civil tone with one another. The recently departed 
Turquoise was, in my opinion, the principal cause of the descent of FFL into 
the gutter, and now I hope it will become a more interesting and welcoming 
place, with more people from Fairfield posting. The group is, after all, called 
Fairfield Life. I hope you will go on posting, Curtis, because you are one of 
the most interesting and articulate people here. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FFL reflected Rick's open mindedness and respect for adults voicing their 
opinion in dramatic contrast to the group that most of us were involved with. I 
consider this latest change to be a version of FFL suicide by appointing 
Buck/Doug to kill off all opposing views. Once freedom of expression is gone it 
will die off as a useful place to post.

But your post makes you exempt from the FFL Dead Pool list, so there is that!

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  











[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational
 

 rationale
 

 here so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.
 

 
I suspect it was this post of June 18 that did it, in particular the part I've 
highlighted in red:
 

 

 This has really become too sad to get involved with.
 

 Rick, please do something to help Doug -- like removing him from his position 
as moderator. The responsibility and the genuine impossibility of the task have 
clearly caused him to become mentally ill. 

 

 It was entertaining for a while when he was just embarrassing himself. But now 
he's embarrassing the whole forum.
 

 Moderator or not, Doug is now officially back on my Troll List. I will no 
longer bother to read anything he says or reply to anything he posts. Like our 
recently departed member, he no longer exists. By acting this crazy, he has 
effectively -- and ironically -- deleted himself. 

 

 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/417032 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/417032

 

 

 Turqb took the chance that Doug wouldn't have the guts to expel him
 

 In openly defying Doug's authority as moderator, Turqb was betting Doug 
wouldn't have the guts to expel him.
 

 Turqb lost.
 

 (I'm just guessing, but I wouldn't be surprised if Doug had consulted Rick and 
received his approval to oust Turqb on the basis of the quoted post.)
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I looked at the activity log, and Turq is still subscribed; all Doug did was 
kill his ability to post. Whereas, Rick booted *and* banned the one who shall 
not be mentioned (I think the banned list prevents a person from even sending a 
subscription request.) The only people I've given the boot are spammers, and I 
don't regard them as worthy of any kind of explanation. But, in the case of 
people who are actual participants, I think full disclosure is in order. In 
Turq's case, the reason is apparent, but it has not been disclosed if this is 
just a temporary time-out or permanent. The fact that Doug didn't actually 
unsubscribe him suggests the possibility that it isn't permanent.

What sayest thou, Doug? Is Turq gone for good?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 

 














  




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:

2015-06-19 Thread Duveyoung

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Taking a grain of salt I still find this archive of spiritual talks impressive 
now. I should have liked to have heard him deliver some of these for context.
 

 To those new visitors at FairFieldLife arriving, I would like to point out 
that Doug is giving Charlie Lutes an exulted status that the Transcendental 
Meditation Organization now completely disavows.  Mr. Lutes was made into a 
persona non grata DECADES AGO by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi.  

In supporting the writings and talks of Mr. Lutes, Doug is going AGAINST the 
decades long TMO policy of not mentioning Charlie or anything he had done for 
the movement that was NOT what the movement wished he'd done.  For instance he 
gave regular lectures to the public that included every sort of esoteric 
concept that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi almost NEVER chose to talk about and 
actively encouraged all his followers to not dwell with lest their minds become 
beclouded with dissonance.   Charlie would talk about demons, ghosts, space 
ships and the various alien species, the Great White Brotherhood, and on and on 
and on. 

I personally believe that it would take a deer lick's worth of salt to justify 
listening or reading ANYTHING BY CHARLIE.  Otherwise one's pristine beliefs and 
clarities about the TMO's techniques and practices would become as if IMPURE, 
and this would hasten its slow descent to obscurity.

I would call upon Richard Archer to see if Doug's possible impurity obviates 
Doug's ability to be a strong representative of the TMO's sacred intents.
 
 
 Context often is everything. I been with Maharishi and heard him say things 
that then got retold by people later out in the field, even by folks who 
'heard' them, completely missing the context as things were said originally. I 
recall being there hearing Maharishi talking about kundalini awakening in the 
energy system and using a metaphor by example which people later reported 
taking literally. I was younger then and hearing things recycle like that 
became a good lesson about folks and their variability in comprehension at 
following things in context. Salt please.
 -JaiGuruYou 

And here, new visitor to FairFieldLife, we see that Doug is suggesting that I, 
as a reporter, have somehow messed up with my recall due to the passage of 
time, or my brain's ineptitude, or, perhaps, I'm am actually lying -- "we'll 
never really know" seems to be Doug's suggestion.

To this assertion I  give the most strident denial.  There is zero evidence 
that my memory is faulty in this regard, and I have peppered my writings of the 
last 30 years with a repeating of this exact memory of Charlie and the Space 
Ship.  I have discussed it with those who were also there at the time.  

THERE IS NO MEMORY PROBLEM, dear new visitors to FairFieldLife.  Charlie said 
Christ had a space ship hidden inside a pyramid. Doug would be completely wrong 
to again assert or suggest that I am not remembering correctly, and instead, 
Doug should admit that Charlie said some of the most outrageous statements that 
often disagreed with movement values and got banned for the doing, and anyone 
who truly followed Charlie and also reported this to the movement  would then 
lose the ability to be in the dome.   
 

 The Charlie Lutes lectures are compiled in the sidebar here for scrolling 
through and reading..
 http://www.maharishiphotos.com/ http://www.maharishiphotos.com/
 They are brief.   

Again, dear new FairFieldLife visitor, TAKE EXTREME CARE,  if you even scroll 
through any of Charlie's works, please report this to a responsible movement 
leader who can begin to correct your wandering eye.  Also, while there, ask 
that leader about Doug.  I don't want to gossip, so get it straight from an 
official.  

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 What the heck was he talking about, Christ's space ship? Did he elaborate? I 
have heard he said a lot of wild stuff, but that takes the prize.
 

 

 

 From: Duveyoung 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:23 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:
 
 
   Just a reminder that I was about 20 feet away from Charlie when he told the 
audience that Christ's space ship would be found inside one of the great 
pyramidsin a few years.  After about 20 years I again saw him and asked him 
"what happened to the spaceship?"  He said, "I never said any such thing."  
This may be an indication that Transcendental Meditation, as understood and 
practiced by Charlie, did not, after what seems to have been a very dedicated 
and disciplined life of spirituality, make Charlie's integrity "better," OR, it 
may indicate that his lifestyle did not prevent a great memory loss.  Or?  I 
post this here where Charlie is being delightfully supported by Doug, and I 
wouldn't want any new visitors here at wonderful FairFieldLife to get off on 
the wrong start and not have at lea

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
should read, 

  If you consider objecting to being misrepresented, in a willful manner, some 
kind of weakness, then that's where you've set the bar, for adults voicing 
their opinions in a dramatic fashion.
 

 Just for the record, none of this type of interaction plays well in the real 
world.  It is what is commonly referred to as "trolling"
 

 Granted, this isn't the "real world", but, you have people participating, who, 
would appear, to have some degree of spiritual awareness, which many would 
equate with a (at least somewhat) higher standard of interaction.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FFL reflected Rick's open mindedness and respect for adults voicing their 
opinion in dramatic contrast to the group that most of us were involved with.
 

 I guess, Curtis, we all have a bar, above, or below which ,we consider 
respect, or disrespect..  
 

 If you consider the self described "pushing of people's buttons" solely to get 
a reaction, respect, then that is where you have set the bar.
 

 If you consider objecting to being misrepresented in a willful manner, 
respect, then that's where you've set the bar.
 

 We all get the value in discussing opposing ideas.  We all get the value in 
being challenged.
 

 What some of us object to, is when the challenging, or discussing, takes a 
malicious turn.
 

 

   I consider this latest change to be a version of FFL suicide by appointing 
Buck/Doug to kill off all opposing views. Once freedom of expression is gone it 
will die off as a useful place to post.
 

 And, again, Curtis, what is to prevent you, or others, from creating a 
discussion venue tailored to the tastes and predilections of a certain group of 
participants.  Isn't that how it is supposed to work?

But your post makes you exempt from the FFL Dead Pool list, so there is that!

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For years, FFL was like an unweeded garden. Noxious weeds were allowed to grow 
unchecked, poisoning the entire garden. Then a new gardener was appointed who 
decided to clean things up. Of course, the noxious weeds do not like it. As far 
as TurquoiseB's expulsion is concerned, he can have little cause for complaint, 
in my opinion.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational here 
so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never 
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.

In the spirit of Barry's sense of humor here I think the only appropriate thing 
to do now is to initiate a "dead pool" list of who is going to be next in the 
the current purge.

1. Salyavin808 for his last brilliant, scathing indictment of Buck/Doug

2. Michael for his consistent efforts to put his finger in the eye of the 
pompous powers that be in the movement.

3. Me for trying to focus my lens more and more precisely on what it is that I 
object to in Buck/Doug's misuse of moderator power here. (I am speaking about 
his threat to Barry for stating his opinion of David Lynch, not for getting 
banned. Until he reveals it I don't know what his reasons were for that.)

Game on! Who will be next?

 






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for

[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL by the Numbers. Hey Rick!

2015-06-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Clearly Buck/Doug is a maniac who should NOT be allowed to go through the 
files deleting posts that HE alone considers against the guidelines.
 

 As far as we know, Doug (not "Buck") hasn't deleted any posts.
 

 HE made the comments that started the conversations that he has removed.
 

 According to Doug, Rick removed those posts.
 

 If he is embarrassed about them now that's just tough. We all have to rake 
responsibility for what we say. If Doug is going to make clear allusions to the 
use of violence then we are going to comment on it. 
 

 Most of us make "allusions to the use of violence" at some point or other in 
remarking on an instance thereof in the big world out there. That's all Doug 
did.
 

 He can't be allowed deleting other people's posts because he's presented an 
image of himself that doesn't fit in with his professed love of peace.
 

 He didn't.
 

 We saw two days ago that he is incapable of discerning whether a post is 
offensive when he demanded that Turq delete a criticism of David Lynch. Lynch 
is a public figure and a member of the TMO and as such is a fair subject for 
discussion. You can't delete a post that calls him gullible for paying a 
million bucks for a course taught by the great man himself and then criticises 
Marshy for not even showing up in person. These are fair comments whether you 
like them or not.
 

 I agree. But that post hasn't been deleted.
 

 Buck wanted them deleted because he thought that they might put of people in 
the DLF from coming here to post! I think they should come here and get a 
different perspective rather than the "we are perfect" one that the TMO likes 
to award itself but anyway that's up to them, this censorship is NOT a fair use 
of the guidelines. 
 

 Doug (and presumably you) promised that he would be fair in his dealing with 
us but he is clearly behaving in a partisan manner and using the guidelines 
disingenuously to cover himself. Perhaps he thinks he's doing the right thing 
but you have to be able to tell the difference between fair comments and abuse.
 

 He made a mistake with that post, IMHO. He apparently didn't follow through, 
though, so it's not impossible he's realized he was wrong. I doubt any of us, 
taking on the job of moderator for the first time, would do so without making 
at least one mistake.
 

 I'm concerned about this because we could lose a lot of interesting and 
relevant stuff if he carries on with his jihad against us "apostates".
 

 So far the "jihad" exists only in the imagination of the "apostates."
 

 (PS isn't it funny seeing Judy accuse someone of bias about Barry!)
 

 Kinda like accusing someone of being partial to Rush Limbaugh (a virulently 
nasty and appallingly dishonest radio talk show host).
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] FF Strategic Planning

2015-06-19 Thread Duveyoung
Don't know what they have planned, but a sustainable golf course is possible. 
There's desert courses with no grass and only sand and pebbles, for instance.  
Just have the land smoothed and let the weeds grow and never water except for 
rain -- mowed weeds are pretty good golf surfaces.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "A sustainable Tom Doak designed golf course is also part of the vision."

 

 A sustainable golf course. What a concept. While there are some that claim to 
be including here in South Carolina, they can only be held to be eco friendly 
or sustainable in comparison to regular golf courses.
 

 Golf courses are notorious water hogs, some use hundreds of thousands of 
gallons a day for irrigation alone. How do you think the greens stay so green? 
And the levels of artificial fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides used are 
unbelievable. But they have to use them to make the greens green and keep the 
insects away from the golfers. 

 

 So that term sustainable golf course is a relative thing. 

 

 From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 9:21 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] FF Strategic Planning
 
 
   
 FW:
 

 You are receiving this e-mail to invite you to participate in a focus group on 
a planned Senior Living Community in Maharishi Vedic City because you are a 
member of our special community in Iowa. The sessions will be supervised by our 
consultant, from Health Planning and Management Resources, inc

 

 ..We are planning the development of an enlightened senior living community in 
Maharishi Vedic City with integrated medical care and organic food. This 
project is not to be located on the Pandit campus but in a several hundred acre 
site near to the MVC Peace Palace.  Eventually, we hope to provide all options 
for senior living at the newly constructed site including independent living 
housing, assisted living residences and enhanced care residences. We also 
anticipate that we will have land available for the development of single 
family residences, family/guest housing and/or duplexes. An organic farm to 
grow our food is also being planned in conjunction with the creation of our 
in-house farm to table dining service. A sustainable Tom Doak designed golf 
course is also part of the vision. A Village Center is planned for all persons 
living in the community.
 


 


 











[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL by the Numbers. Hey Rick!

2015-06-19 Thread j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL by the Numbers. Hey Rick!

2015-06-19 Thread j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 I looked at the log, and Doug has yet to delete one post. Rick deleted a bunch 
of posts, and a few folks have deleted their own posts. That's it.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Clearly Buck/Doug is a maniac who should NOT be allowed to go through the 
files deleting posts that HE alone considers against the guidelines.
 

 As far as we know, Doug (not "Buck") hasn't deleted any posts.
 

 HE made the comments that started the conversations that he has removed.
 

 According to Doug, Rick removed those posts.
 

 If he is embarrassed about them now that's just tough. We all have to rake 
responsibility for what we say. If Doug is going to make clear allusions to the 
use of violence then we are going to comment on it. 
 

 Most of us make "allusions to the use of violence" at some point or other in 
remarking on an instance thereof in the big world out there. That's all Doug 
did.
 

 He can't be allowed deleting other people's posts because he's presented an 
image of himself that doesn't fit in with his professed love of peace.
 

 He didn't.
 

 We saw two days ago that he is incapable of discerning whether a post is 
offensive when he demanded that Turq delete a criticism of David Lynch. Lynch 
is a public figure and a member of the TMO and as such is a fair subject for 
discussion. You can't delete a post that calls him gullible for paying a 
million bucks for a course taught by the great man himself and then criticises 
Marshy for not even showing up in person. These are fair comments whether you 
like them or not.
 

 I agree. But that post hasn't been deleted.
 

 Buck wanted them deleted because he thought that they might put of people in 
the DLF from coming here to post! I think they should come here and get a 
different perspective rather than the "we are perfect" one that the TMO likes 
to award itself but anyway that's up to them, this censorship is NOT a fair use 
of the guidelines. 
 

 Doug (and presumably you) promised that he would be fair in his dealing with 
us but he is clearly behaving in a partisan manner and using the guidelines 
disingenuously to cover himself. Perhaps he thinks he's doing the right thing 
but you have to be able to tell the difference between fair comments and abuse.
 

 He made a mistake with that post, IMHO. He apparently didn't follow through, 
though, so it's not impossible he's realized he was wrong. I doubt any of us, 
taking on the job of moderator for the first time, would do so without making 
at least one mistake.
 

 I'm concerned about this because we could lose a lot of interesting and 
relevant stuff if he carries on with his jihad against us "apostates".
 

 So far the "jihad" exists only in the imagination of the "apostates."
 

 (PS isn't it funny seeing Judy accuse someone of bias about Barry!)
 

 Kinda like accusing someone of being partial to Rush Limbaugh (a virulently 
nasty and appallingly dishonest radio talk show host).
 







Re: [FairfieldLife] FF Strategic Planning

2015-06-19 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
California has been through more droughts than the current one.  So 
perhaps they should look at golf courses here.  Someone on a political 
forum asked about water parks.  Those too have been through previous 
droughts and invested in water recycling.  Same with most all the car 
washes.  There are undoubtedly ways of using recycled non-potable water 
to keep the greens green.


On 06/19/2015 08:24 AM, Duveyoung wrote:


Don't know what they have planned, but a sustainable golf course is 
possible. There's desert courses with no grass and only sand and 
pebbles, for instance.  Just have the land smoothed and let the weeds 
grow and never water except for rain -- mowed weeds are pretty good 
golf surfaces.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

"A sustainable Tom Doak designed golf course is also part of the vision."

A sustainable golf course. What a concept. While there are some that 
claim to be including here in South Carolina, they can only be held to 
be eco friendly or sustainable in comparison to regular golf courses.


Golf courses are notorious water hogs, some use hundreds of thousands 
of gallons a day for irrigation alone. How do you think the greens 
stay so green? And the levels of artificial fertilizers, pesticides 
and herbicides used are unbelievable. But they have to use them to 
make the greens green and keep the insects away from the golfers.


So that term sustainable golf course is a relative thing.


*From:* "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" 


*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, June 18, 2015 9:21 PM
*Subj! ect:* [FairfieldLife] FF Strategic Planning

FW:

You are receiving this e-mail to invite you to participate in a focus 
group on a planned Senior Living Community in Maharishi Vedic City 
because you are a member of our special community in Iowa. The 
sessions will be supervised by our consultant, from Health Planning 
and Management Resources, inc


..We are planning the development of an enlightened senior living 
community in Maharishi Vedic City with integrated medical care and 
organic food. This project is not to be located on the Pandit campus 
but in a several hundred acre site near to the MVC Peace Palace. 
Eventually, we hope to provide all options for senior living at the 
newly constructed site including independent living housing, assisted 
living residences and enhanced care residences. We also anticipate 
that we will have land available for the development of single family 
residences, family/guest housing and/or duplexes. An organic farm to 
grow our food is also being planned in conjunction with the creation 
of our in-house farm to table dining service. A sustainable Tom Doak 
designed golf course is also part of the vision. ! A Village Center is 
planned for all persons living in the community.









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread salyavin808

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Our new moderator is a dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron
 Doug for being a snivelling coward
 

 All insults that give grounds for your very own dismissal Sal! 

 

 Kind of the idea. I'm just underlining that I won't be diluting myself at all. 
I'm happy as I am, I don't want to be assimilated into any group mind again.
 

 I will happily justify every word if our overlord decrees it though. But the 
funny thing is I'm most mild mannered usually but when some "authority" tells 
me I can't swear I instantly start swearing like trooper. Must be the anarchist 
in me. Most of me actually. We shall fight on the beaches etc...
 

 And here I thought I would be the first to go - I reckon Bucky wants to keep 
tabs on me so he will know where to direct the drones.
 

I just wrote a huge and brilliant [ahem] reply to this MJ, justifications, 
explanations about the dangers of censorship, an analysis of why people have a 
problem with us apostates, some cool quotes, some thoughts on what made FFL so 
good in the past, I spent best part of an hour on it and then I pressed the 
wrong key and deleted the whole thing myself. Doh! No moderator required
 

 And I'm out of time today. If I still have an account on Sunday I'll have 
another go. I've a feeling the topic won't go away!
 

 It's protest time in London town tomorrow. Another injustice that needs to be 
sorted out is our government of capitalist shitheads, so it's a good march and 
shout then a demo in Hyde park. Not that anyone listens and it won't even make 
the news but when you care about something you have to speak up or they assume 
you don't care. To the barricades!
 

 

 

 From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:44 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum 
for me?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 It really won't be the same without you old chap. Our new moderator is a 
dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron who has thrown out one of the most 
innovative and dynamic posters here in his all consuming quest for uniform 
blandness.
 

 Why Rick would leave the rights to who gets to post here down to him is beyond 
me, complete disinterest I suppose. But I guess that somehow we'll have to try 
and compensate for the inevitable gaping hole that your absence will leave 
behind.
 

 So cheers Barry for all the laughs, insights, wisdom, book recommendations, 
movie reviews and the ongoing travelogue of your life and times. If only the 
people who spent all day sitting in a dome with their eyes closed had so much 
to say!
 

 TTFN and all the very, very best.
 

 Salyavin
 







 PS Well done Doug for being a snivelling coward and not even daring to have a 
discussion about post content with Barry on here. Seems to me that every 
example you found to back up your decision was very poor indeed and stood up to 
about two seconds of scrutiny. But that's not the point is it? It's all about 
using the guidelines to further what YOU think this place should be about. 
Shame you never read the home page...
 

 

 








 


 











Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
That 14.5% figure is interesting because Donald Trump the last time he 
ran for President proposed a one-time 14.5% tax on all folks with an 
estate of $10M or more. He thought that would help reduce the deficit.  
Hence he was not to popular with Republicans.


Flat taxes have often been proposed because our current tax system has 
been corrupted by special interests.  It is no long a fair system nor 
can it even be interpreted properly even by IRS agents.  The $50,000 
exclusion for a family of four would help the proposal gain more 
traction as 14.5% for anyone with that low of income is quite a chunk.


Paul is more a populist than a Republican or even Libertarian. Same can 
be said for Bernie Sanders who is showing great popularity with the 
millennials.  It will be interesting to see what Sanders comes up with 
for a tax proposal as I'm sure too he feels the IRS codes corrupt.


On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The 
sugar coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer 
is that the government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new 
tax income received.  What do you think?



Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code 






image 
 




Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... 
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called 
Thursday for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...


View on news.yahoo.com 
 



Preview by Yahoo








Re: [FairfieldLife] Dark Medieval Consciousness

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Damn! Maybe your neck will be next for Buck Robespierre's guillotine!

  From: "Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:37 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Dark Medieval Consciousness
   
    It would appear a dark, medieval consciousness is beginning to take over 
Fairfield Life, in the likeness of the Transcendental Meditation Organisation's 
tyrannical manner.
Medieval
1. of or relating to the Middle Ages.

2. Informal, very old-fashioned or primitive.
Synonyms:  antique  archaic  feudal  Gothic  primitive  antediluvian  
antiquated  old  old-fashioned  unenlightened  antiquated  out of date  
outdated  outmoded  anachronistic  passé  obsolete  horse-and-buggy
Tyranny
3. cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control.

Synonyms:  authoritarianism  autocracy   coercion   cruelty   despotism   
domination   oligarchy   oppression   terrorism   totalitarianism   absolutism  
 fascism   high-handedness   imperiousness   monocracy   severity   totality   
peremptoriness   reign   of   terror   unreasonableness
   #yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908 -- #yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp #yiv0390409908hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp #yiv0390409908ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp .yiv0390409908ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp .yiv0390409908ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908ygrp-mkp .yiv0390409908ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv0390409908ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908ygrp-sponsor #yiv0390409908ygrp-lc #yiv0390409908hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908ygrp-sponsor #yiv0390409908ygrp-lc .yiv0390409908ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv0390409908
 #yiv0390409908activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv0390409908 #yiv0390409908activity span 
.yiv0390409908underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0390409908 
.yiv0390409908attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv0390409908 
.yiv0390409908bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 dd.yiv0390409908last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv0390409908 dd.yiv0390409908last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv0390409908 
dd.yiv0390409908last p span.yiv0390409908yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv0390409908 div.yiv0390409908attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 div.yiv0390409908attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv0390409908 div.yiv0390409908file-title a, #yiv0390409908 
div.yiv0390409908file-title a:active, #yiv0390409908 
div.yiv0390409908file-title a:hover, #yiv0390409908 div.yiv0390409908file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 div.yiv0390409908photo-title a, 
#yiv0390409908 div.yiv0390409908photo-title a:active, #yiv0390409908 
div.yiv0390409908photo-title a:hover, #yiv0390409908 
div.yiv0390409908photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0390409908 
div#yiv0390409908ygrp-mlmsg #yiv0390409908ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv0390409908yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv0390409908 
.yiv0390409908green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv0390409908 o {font-size:0;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv0390409908
 #yiv0390409908reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv0390409908 
#yiv0390409908reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv0390409908 .yiv0390409908replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv0390409

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I swear, Duveyoung, you are one of my favorite FFL posters. Kudos!

  From: Duveyoung 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 11:00 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


Taking a grain of salt I still findthis archive of spiritual talks impressive 
now. I should have likedto have heard him deliver some of these for context.
To those new visitors at FairFieldLife arriving, I would like to point out that 
Doug is giving Charlie Lutes an exulted status that the Transcendental 
Meditation Organization now completely disavows.  Mr. Lutes was made into a 
persona non grata DECADES AGO by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi.  

In supporting the writings and talks of Mr. Lutes, Doug is going AGAINST the 
decades long TMO policy of not mentioning Charlie or anything he had done for 
the movement that was NOT what the movement wished he'd done.  For instance he 
gave regular lectures to the public that included every sort of esoteric 
concept that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi almost NEVER chose to talk about and 
actively encouraged all his followers to not dwell with lest their minds become 
beclouded with dissonance.   Charlie would talk about demons, ghosts, space 
ships and the various alien species, the Great White Brotherhood, and on and on 
and on. 

I personally believe that it would take a deer lick's worth of salt to justify 
listening or reading ANYTHING BY CHARLIE.  Otherwise one's pristine beliefs and 
clarities about the TMO's techniques and practices would become as if IMPURE, 
and this would hasten its slow descent to obscurity.

I would call upon Richard Archer to see if Doug's possible impurity obviates 
Doug's ability to be a strong representative of the TMO's sacred intents.
  Context often is everything. I beenwith Maharishi and heard him say things 
that then got retold bypeople later out in the field, even by folks who 'heard' 
them,completely missing the context as things were said originally. Irecall 
being there hearing Maharishi talking about kundaliniawakening in the energy 
system and using a metaphor by example whichpeople later reported taking 
literally. I was younger then andhearing things recycle like that became a good 
lesson about folks andtheir variability in comprehension at following things in 
context.Salt please.-JaiGuruYou

And here, new visitor to FairFieldLife, we see that Doug is suggesting that I, 
as a reporter, have somehow messed up with my recall due to the passage of 
time, or my brain's ineptitude, or, perhaps, I'm am actually lying -- "we'll 
never really know" seems to be Doug's suggestion.

To this assertion I  give the most strident denial.  There is zero evidence 
that my memory is faulty in this regard, and I have peppered my writings of the 
last 30 years with a repeating of this exact memory of Charlie and the Space 
Ship.  I have discussed it with those who were also there at the time.  

THERE IS NO MEMORY PROBLEM, dear new visitors to FairFieldLife.  Charlie said 
Christ had a space ship hidden inside a pyramid. Doug would be completely wrong 
to again assert or suggest that I am not remembering correctly, and instead, 
Doug should admit that Charlie said some of the most outrageous statements that 
often disagreed with movement values and got banned for the doing, and anyone 
who truly followed Charlie and also reported this to the movement  would then 
lose the ability to be in the dome.   
The Charlie Lutes lectures are compiled in thesidebar here for scrolling 
through and reading..http://www.maharishiphotos.com/They are brief.   

Again, dear new FairFieldLife visitor, TAKE EXTREME CARE,  if you even scroll 
through any of Charlie's works, please report this to a responsible movement 
leader who can begin to correct your wandering eye.  Also, while there, ask 
that leader about Doug.  I don't want to gossip, so get it straight from an 
official.  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

What the heck was he talking about, Christ's space ship? Did he elaborate? I 
have heard he said a lot of wild stuff, but that takes the prize.


  From: Duveyoung 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:23 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A [TM] Bio of Charlie Lutes and Helen Lutes:
 
 Just a reminder that I was about 20 feet away from Charlie when he told the 
audience that Christ's space ship would be found inside one of the great 
pyramidsin a few years.  After about 20 years I again saw him and asked him 
"what happened to the spaceship?"  He said, "I never said any such thing."  
This may be an indication that Transcendental Meditation, as understood and 
practiced by Charlie, did not, after what seems to have been a very dedicated 
and disciplined life of spirituality, make Charlie's integrity "better," OR, it 
may indicate that his lifestyle did not prevent a great memory loss.  Or?  I 
post this here wher

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
So what do you think of the flat tax proposal Bhai?

  From: "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
   
 That 14.5% figure is interesting because Donald Trump the last time he ran 
for President proposed a one-time 14.5% tax on all folks with an estate of $10M 
or more.  He thought that would help reduce the deficit.  Hence he was not to 
popular with Republicans.
 
 Flat taxes have often been proposed because our current tax system has been 
corrupted by special interests.  It is no long a fair system nor can it even be 
interpreted properly even by IRS agents.  The $50,000 exclusion for a family of 
four would help the proposal gain more traction as 14.5% for anyone with that 
low of income is quite a chunk.
 
 Paul is more a populist than a Republican or even Libertarian.  Same can be 
said for Bernie Sanders who is showing great popularity with the millennials.  
It will be interesting to see what Sanders comes up with for a tax proposal as 
I'm sure too he feels the IRS codes corrupt.
 
 On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
  
    It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think? 
  Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code
   
|  
  |
|  
  ||  
  |   Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#...  WASHINGTON 
(AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday for a "fair 
and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...|  
  |
|  View on news.yahoo.com  |Preview by Yahoo|
|  
  |

  
  
   
 
  #yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651 -- #yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4710972651 
#yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4710972651 
#yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp #yiv4710972651hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp #yiv4710972651ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp .yiv4710972651ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp .yiv4710972651ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651ygrp-mkp .yiv4710972651ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4710972651ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4710972651 
#yiv4710972651ygrp-sponsor #yiv4710972651ygrp-lc #yiv4710972651hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4710972651 
#yiv4710972651ygrp-sponsor #yiv4710972651ygrp-lc .yiv4710972651ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4710972651 
#yiv4710972651activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4710972651
 #yiv4710972651activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4710972651 
#yiv4710972651activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4710972651 #yiv4710972651activity span 
.yiv4710972651underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4710972651 
.yiv4710972651attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4710972651 .yiv4710972651attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 .yiv4710972651attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4710972651 .yiv4710972651attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4710972651 .yiv4710972651attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4710972651 .yiv4710972651bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4710972651 
.yiv4710972651bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 dd.yiv4710972651last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4710972651 dd.yiv4710972651last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4710972651 
dd.yiv4710972651last p span.yiv4710972651yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv4710972651 div.yiv4710972651attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 div.yiv4710972651attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv4710972651 div.yiv4710972651file-title a, #yiv4710972651 
div.yiv4710972651file-title a:active, #yiv4710972651 
div.yiv4710972651file-title a:hover, #yiv4710972651 div.yiv4710972651file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 div.yiv4710972651photo-title a, 
#yiv4710972651 div.yiv4710972651photo-title a:active, #yiv4710972651 
div.yiv4710972651photo-title a:hover, #yiv4710972651 
div.yiv4710972651photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4710972651 
div#yiv4710972651ygrp-mlms

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
I like progressive taxes because they discourage money hoarding.  Done 
properly we would not have the huge gap we have today between the 
richest and the poorest.  And look how elitist are those with too much 
money.  Incentives are good but maybe cap the rich at 20 times of the 
wealth of the poorest.


Flat taxes appeal to people because it gets rid of the joke which are 
the IRS codes.  It means simplification.  You could also have a 
progressive flat tax too as there could be levels of taxation. Do we 
really need a "landed gentry?"


The real problem with the US is the standard of living is too high and 
was created by allowing too much debt especially among the public.  The 
last time the economy was real was in the mid 1970s. But a total 
economic collapse might solve that.  It should have happened in 2008 
when it would have damaged the public less than the rich.



On 06/19/2015 09:22 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

So what do you think of the flat tax proposal Bhai?


*From:* "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]" 


*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, June 19, 2015 12:10 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

That 14.5% figure is interesting because Donald Trump the last time he 
ran for President proposed a one-time 14.5% tax on all folks with an 
estate of $10M or more.  He thought that would help reduce the 
deficit.  Hence he was not to popular with Republicans.


Flat taxes have often been proposed because our current tax system has 
been corrupted by special interests.  It is no long a fair system nor 
can it even be interpreted properly even by IRS agents.  The $50,000 
exclusion for a family of four would help the proposal gain more 
traction as 14.5% for anyone with that low of income is quite a chunk.


Paul is more a populist than a Republican or even Libertarian.  Same 
can be said for Bernie Sanders who is showing great popularity with 
the millennials.  It will be interesting to see what Sanders comes up 
with for a tax proposal as I'm sure too he feels the IRS codes corrupt.


On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com  
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The 
sugar coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the 
hammer is that the government expenses will have to be reduced to fit 
the new tax income received.  What do you think?


Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code 





image 
 




Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... 
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called 
Thursday for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's 
ta...


View on news.yahoo.com 
 



Preview by Yahoo












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Woo Hooo!
End Austerity Now - National Demonstration Saturday 20th June
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| End Austerity Now - National Demonstration Saturday 2...Assemble 12pm, Bank 
of England (Queen Victoria St) City of London  March to Parliament Square 
Organised by The People's Assembly  |
|  |
| View on www.thepeoplesassem... | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |


  From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the 
forum for me?
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Our new moderator is a dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moronDoug for being a 
snivelling coward
All insults that give grounds for your very own dismissal Sal! 

Kind of the idea. I'm just underlining that I won't be diluting myself at all. 
I'm happy as I am, I don't want to be assimilated into any group mind again.
I will happily justify every word if our overlord decrees it though. But the 
funny thing is I'm most mild mannered usually but when some "authority" tells 
me I can't swear I instantly start swearing like trooper. Must be the anarchist 
in me. Most of me actually. We shall fight on the beaches etc...
And here I thought I would be the first to go - I reckon Bucky wants to keep 
tabs on me so he will know where to direct the drones.
I just wrote a huge and brilliant [ahem] reply to this MJ, justifications, 
explanations about the dangers of censorship, an analysis of why people have a 
problem with us apostates, some cool quotes, some thoughts on what made FFL so 
good in the past, I spent best part of an hour on it and then I pressed the 
wrong key and deleted the whole thing myself. Doh! No moderator required
And I'm out of time today. If I still have an account on Sunday I'll have 
another go. I've a feeling the topic won't go away!
It's protest time in London town tomorrow. Another injustice that needs to be 
sorted out is our government of capitalist shitheads, so it's a good march and 
shout then a demo in Hyde park. Not that anyone listens and it won't even make 
the news but when you care about something you have to speak up or they assume 
you don't care. To the barricades!


  From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:44 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum 
for me?
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.
 - Forwarded Message -
  From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 he explicitly said:
Inmoderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state ofevolution” and 
I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and notone is on moderation 
in any way from this point. I would only suggestin our going forward that folks 
take the time to actually read theYahoo-groups guidelines if they want to 
continue fluidly posting onFFL. We should appreciate your cooperative 
collaboration on this.  -JaiGuruYou! 

Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and outright 
dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the possibility of me 
bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd ask you to do it 
for me. 

Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)

P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...

It really won't be the same without you old chap. Our new moderator is a 
dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron who has thrown out one of the most 
innovative and dynamic posters here in his all consuming quest for uniform 
blandness.
Why Rick would leave the rights to who gets to post here down to him is beyond 
me, complete disinterest I suppose. But I guess that somehow we'll have to try 
and compensate for the inevitable gaping hole that your absence will leave 
behind.
So cheers Barry for all the laughs, insights, wisdom, book recommendations, 
movie reviews and the ongoing travelogue of your life and times. If only the 
people who spent all day sitting in a dome with their eyes closed had so much 
to say!
TTFN and all the very, very best.
Salyavin

PS Well done Doug for being a snivelling coward and not even daring to have a 
discussion about post content with Barry on here. Seems to me that every 
example you found to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Ya know, Sal, I think it's pretty simple: 

 Avoid gratuitous personal attacks and it works out pretty well.
 

 Avoid the temptation to push someone's buttons for the sole purpose, of 
declaring,  "Ha, I pushed your buttons"
 

 And then, if possible, try to avoid a commentary, or small essay, on the 
virtues of having your buttons pushed, and the tremendous opportunity it 
presents for personal growth, supplying statistics and definitions to buttress 
this position.
 

 That's my take.  (-:
 

 Otherwise, have at it!
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Our new moderator is a dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron
 Doug for being a snivelling coward
 

 All insults that give grounds for your very own dismissal Sal! 

 

 Kind of the idea. I'm just underlining that I won't be diluting myself at all. 
I'm happy as I am, I don't want to be assimilated into any group mind again.
 

 I will happily justify every word if our overlord decrees it though. But the 
funny thing is I'm most mild mannered usually but when some "authority" tells 
me I can't swear I instantly start swearing like trooper. Must be the anarchist 
in me. Most of me actually. We shall fight on the beaches etc...
 

 And here I thought I would be the first to go - I reckon Bucky wants to keep 
tabs on me so he will know where to direct the drones.
 

I just wrote a huge and brilliant [ahem] reply to this MJ, justifications, 
explanations about the dangers of censorship, an analysis of why people have a 
problem with us apostates, some cool quotes, some thoughts on what made FFL so 
good in the past, I spent best part of an hour on it and then I pressed the 
wrong key and deleted the whole thing myself. Doh! No moderator required
 

 And I'm out of time today. If I still have an account on Sunday I'll have 
another go. I've a feeling the topic won't go away!
 

 It's protest time in London town tomorrow. Another injustice that needs to be 
sorted out is our government of capitalist shitheads, so it's a good march and 
shout then a demo in Hyde park. Not that anyone listens and it won't even make 
the news but when you care about something you have to speak up or they assume 
you don't care. To the barricades!
 

 

 

 From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:44 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum 
for me?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and honesty was equally present 
in the newest moderator. 

 

 Barry...ooops, do I get in trouble for using my own real name?  :-)
 

 

 P.S. To everyone else, so long and thanks for all the fish...
 

 

 It really won't be the same without you old chap. Our new moderator is a 
dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron who has thrown out one of the most 
innovative and dynamic posters here in his all consuming quest for uniform 
blandness.
 

 Why Rick would leave the rights to who gets to post here down to him is beyond 
me, complete disinterest I suppose. But I guess that somehow we'll have to try 
and compensate for the inevitable gaping hole that your absence will leave 
behind.
 

 So cheers Barry for all the laughs, insights, wisdom, book recommendations, 
movie reviews and the ongoing travelogue of your life and times. If only the 
people who spent all day sitting in a dome with their eyes closed had so much 
to say!
 

 TTFN and all 

[FairfieldLife] Another state falls in line

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
U fool!
http://www.delawareonline.com/story/firststatepolitics/2015/06/18/senate-debate-marijuana/28927757/

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal Col Leed feels its excellent & especlly the expense reductions

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
WL, 

 This is easier said than done.  The Democrats for sure will have many 
arguments against it.  But it appears Rand Paul will increase military spending 
but cut the rest of the government spending.
 

 Personally, I think his proposal will cause an economic depression.  Why?  
Because the government typically is the one that stimulates economic activity.  
Without it, the economy will stagnate.
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 excellent
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] 
 To: FairfieldLife 
 Sent: Fri, Jun 19, 2015 4:03 am
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
 
 

 It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
 
 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 
 
 
 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday 
for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...


 
 View on news.yahoo.com 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 

 
 
 



 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
MD, 

 On a personal level, you're correct.  But the government has the 
responsibility to stimulate the economy.  IMO, a drastic measure like Rand 
Paul's proposal will cause an economic depression, both domestic and worldwide.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Isn't that how you and I live? You can only spend what you earn.

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:03 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
 
 
   
 It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
 

 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code

 
 
 
 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... WASHINGTON (AP) — 
Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday for a "fair and 
flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...


 
 View on news.yahoo.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 


 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Bhairitu, 

 IMO, Rand Paul is trying to attract votes by proposing and promising a tax 
reduction.  But I don't believe he can pass his proposal through Congress, if 
he were elected president.  He would have to raise other important issues and 
solutions that would convince the voters he's worthy of being the next 
president.
 

 In the past, Walter Mondale proposed a tax increase if elected.  That idea 
basically ended his quest for the presidency.  So, it's obvious that no 
aspiring candidate would propose this losing proposal in this coming election 
and in the future.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 That 14.5% figure is interesting because Donald Trump the last time he ran for 
President proposed a one-time 14.5% tax on all folks with an estate of $10M or 
more.  He thought that would help reduce the deficit.  Hence he was not to 
popular with Republicans.
 
 Flat taxes have often been proposed because our current tax system has been 
corrupted by special interests.  It is no long a fair system nor can it even be 
interpreted properly even by IRS agents.  The $50,000 exclusion for a family of 
four would help the proposal gain more traction as 14.5% for anyone with that 
low of income is quite a chunk.
 
 Paul is more a populist than a Republican or even Libertarian.  Same can be 
said for Bernie Sanders who is showing great popularity with the millennials.  
It will be interesting to see what Sanders comes up with for a tax proposal as 
I'm sure too he feels the IRS codes corrupt.
 
 On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
 
 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code
 
 
 
 
 
 Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... WASHINGTON (AP) — 
Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday for a "fair and 
flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...


 
 View on news.yahoo.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 


 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Bhairitu, 

 Don't speak too loudly about the 2008 incident.  An economic collapse may 
still come back and haunt us if the multi-trillion national debt is not 
reduced.  Murphy's Law may apply:  if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I like progressive taxes because they discourage money hoarding.  Done 
properly we would not have the huge gap we have today between the richest and 
the poorest.  And look how elitist are those with too much money.  Incentives 
are good but maybe cap the rich at 20 times of the wealth of the poorest.
 
 Flat taxes appeal to people because it gets rid of the joke which are the IRS 
codes.  It means simplification.  You could also have a progressive flat tax 
too as there could be levels of taxation.  Do we really need a "landed gentry?"
 
 The real problem with the US is the standard of living is too high and was 
created by allowing too much debt especially among the public.  The last time 
the economy was real was in the mid 1970s.  But a total economic collapse might 
solve that.  It should have happened in 2008 when it would have damaged the 
public less than the rich.
 
 
 On 06/19/2015 09:22 AM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   So what do you think of the flat tax proposal Bhai?
 
 
 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
 
 
   
 That 14.5% figure is interesting because Donald Trump the last time he ran for 
President proposed a one-time 14.5% tax on all folks with an estate of $10M or 
more.  He thought that would help reduce the deficit.  Hence he was not to 
popular with Republicans.
 
 Flat taxes have often been proposed because our current tax system has been 
corrupted by special interests.  It is no long a fair system nor can it even be 
interpreted properly even by IRS agents.  The $50,000 exclusion for a family of 
four would help the proposal gain more traction as 14.5% for anyone with that 
low of income is quite a chunk.
 
 Paul is more a populist than a Republican or even Libertarian.  Same can be 
said for Bernie Sanders who is showing great popularity with the millennials.  
It will be interesting to see what Sanders comes up with for a tax proposal as 
I'm sure too he feels the IRS codes corrupt.
 
 On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
 
 
 Presidentialcandidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code
 
 
 
 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 
 Presidentialcandidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... WASHINGTON (AP) — 
Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday for a "fair and 
flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...


 
 View on news.yahoo.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 


 




 
 






 
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
We'll have to agree to disagree. The government has the responsibility to 
defend the borders, deliver the mail and protect and promote commerce. The more 
it does beyond that, the more it begins to develop *mission creep*.
  The best thing the government can do to help the economy is to get out of the 
way. The nine most terrifying words are "I'm from the government and I'm here 
to help".  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 1:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
   
    MD,
On a personal level, you're correct.  But the government has the responsibility 
to stimulate the economy.  IMO, a drastic measure like Rand Paul's proposal 
will cause an economic depression, both domestic and worldwide.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Isn't that how you and I live? You can only spend what you earn.
  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:03 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
 
 It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code

|  |
|  | |  | Presidential candidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday 
for a "fair and flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta... |  |
| View on news.yahoo.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |





  #yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351 -- #yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2845112351 
#yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv2845112351 
#yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp #yiv2845112351hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp #yiv2845112351ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp .yiv2845112351ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp .yiv2845112351ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351ygrp-mkp .yiv2845112351ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv2845112351ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2845112351 
#yiv2845112351ygrp-sponsor #yiv2845112351ygrp-lc #yiv2845112351hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2845112351 
#yiv2845112351ygrp-sponsor #yiv2845112351ygrp-lc .yiv2845112351ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2845112351 
#yiv2845112351activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2845112351
 #yiv2845112351activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2845112351 
#yiv2845112351activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2845112351 #yiv2845112351activity span 
.yiv2845112351underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2845112351 
.yiv2845112351attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv2845112351 .yiv2845112351attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 .yiv2845112351attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv2845112351 .yiv2845112351attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv2845112351 .yiv2845112351attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv2845112351 .yiv2845112351bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv2845112351 
.yiv2845112351bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 dd.yiv2845112351last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2845112351 dd.yiv2845112351last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2845112351 
dd.yiv2845112351last p span.yiv2845112351yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv2845112351 div.yiv2845112351attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 div.yiv2845112351attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv2845112351 div.yiv2845112351file-title a, #yiv2845112351 
div.yiv2845112351file-title a:active, #yiv2845112351 
div.yiv2845112351file-title a:hover, #yiv2845112351 div.yiv2845112351file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 div.yiv2845112351photo-title a, 
#yiv2845112351 div.yiv2845112351photo-title a:active, #yiv2845112351 
div.yiv2845112351photo-title a:hover, #yiv2845112351 
div.yiv2845112351photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2845112351 
div#yiv2845112351ygrp-mlmsg #yiv2845112351ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv2845112351yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv2845112351 
.yiv2845112351green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv2845112351 .yiv284

Re: [FairfieldLife] Another state falls in line

2015-06-19 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
Yeah, they should have made it totally legal rather than amounts up to 1 
oz.  The only ones who want marijuana kept illegal are drug dealers and 
pot farmers.


On 06/19/2015 10:37 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

U fool!

http://www.delawareonline.com/story/firststatepolitics/2015/06/18/senate-debate-marijuana/28927757/





Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Duveyoung
14.5% flat tax reduces tax income for America by TWO TRILLION DOLLARS in the 
next ten years..all of which will come out of social programs instead of 
the military.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
So how does Murphy's law jibe with the idea of jyotish and yagya and all that 
jazz?
Shouldn't jyotish be considered the anti-Murphy's law?

  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
   
    Bhairitu,
Don't speak too loudly about the 2008 incident.  An economic collapse may still 
come back and haunt us if the multi-trillion national debt is not reduced.  
Murphy's Law may apply:  if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

I like progressive taxes because theydiscourage money hoarding.  Done properly 
we would not have thehuge gap we have today between the richest and the 
poorest.  Andlook how elitist are those with too much money.  Incentives 
aregood but maybe cap the rich at 20 times of the wealth of thepoorest.

Flat taxes appeal to people because it gets rid of the joke whichare the IRS 
codes.  It means simplification.  You could also havea progressive flat tax too 
as there could be levels of taxation. Do we really need a "landed gentry?"

The real problem with the US is the standard of living is too highand was 
created by allowing too much debt especially among thepublic.  The last time 
the economy was real was in the mid 1970s. But a total economic collapse might 
solve that.  It should havehappened in 2008 when it would have damaged the 
public less thanthe rich.


On 06/19/2015 09:22 AM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@...[FairfieldLife] wrote:

  So whatdo you think of the flat tax proposal Bhai?

  From:"Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
To:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent:Friday, June 19, 2015 12:10 PM
Subject:Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

 That14.5% figure is interesting becauseDonald Trump the last time he ran 
forPresident proposed a one-time 14.5% taxon all folks with an estate of $10M 
ormore.  He thought that would help reducethe deficit.  Hence he was not 
topopular with Republicans.

Flat taxes have often been proposedbecause our current tax system has 
beencorrupted by special interests.  It isno long a fair system nor can it even 
beinterpreted properly even by IRSagents.  The $50,000 exclusion for afamily of 
four would help the proposalgain more traction as 14.5% for anyonewith that low 
of income is quite achunk.

Paul is more a populist than aRepublican or even Libertarian.  Samecan be said 
for Bernie Sanders who isshowing great popularity with themillennials.  It will 
be interesting tosee what Sanders comes up with for a taxproposal as I'm sure 
too he feels theIRS codes corrupt.

On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_esq@...[FairfieldLife] wrote:

  It appears that there's ahidden agenda behind his proposal. The sugar coating 
is that taxesare reduced for everybody.  Butthe hammer is that the 
governmentexpenses will have to be reducedto fit the new tax incomereceived.  
What do you think?
Presidentialcandidate Rand Paul plans to'blow up' tax code

|  
 |
|  
 ||  
 | Presidentialcandidate Rand Paulplans to 'blowup&#... WASHINGTON(AP) — 
Republicanpresidential candidateRand Paul calledThursday for a "fairand flat 
tax" thatwould "blow up" thenation's ta... |  
 |
|   View on news.yahoo.com   | Preview by Yahoo  |
|  
 |








 
  #yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513 -- #yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3558704513 
#yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3558704513 
#yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp #yiv3558704513hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp #yiv3558704513ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp .yiv3558704513ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp .yiv3558704513ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513ygrp-mkp .yiv3558704513ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3558704513ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3558704513 
#yiv3558704513ygrp-sponsor #yiv3558704513ygrp-lc #yiv3558704513hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3558704513 
#yiv3558704513ygrp-sponsor #yiv3558704513ygrp-lc .yiv3558704513ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3558704513 
#yiv3558704513activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3558704513
 #yiv3558704513activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3558704513 
#yiv3558704513activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3558704513 #yiv3558704513activity span 
.yiv3558704513underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3558704513 
.yiv3558704513attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-famil

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread salyavin808

 Loth as I am to respond to any of your limp trolling posts..

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Ya know, Sal, I think it's pretty simple: 

 Avoid gratuitous personal attacks and it works out pretty well.
 

 Then you clearly haven't been paying attention. Buck used a post about David 
Lynch as an example that wasn't even a personal attack, in fact it was a fully 
justifiable comment about a public figure yet Buck twisted the guidelines round 
until it looked like he had a valid reason to demand Barry deletes it or gets 
removed.
 

 

 Avoid the temptation to push someone's buttons for the sole purpose, of 
declaring,  "Ha, I pushed your buttons"
 

 99% of your posts are banal trolling, attempts to sneer and criticise people 
who think about things and without doing any thinking of your own. You never 
contribute anything but whining and sneering.
 

 Yet you are still here! This is what partisan means, Look it up.
 

 Buck threw the baby out with the bath water and if we aren't careful we're 
going to be left solely with the devious likes of you. Trust me, that is worth 
getting upset about.
 

 

 And then, if possible, try to avoid a commentary, or small essay, on the 
virtues of having your buttons pushed, and the tremendous opportunity it 
presents for personal growth, supplying statistics and definitions to buttress 
this position.
 

 That's my take.  (-:
 

 Otherwise, have at it!
 

 I shall go back to ignoring you entirely.
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Our new moderator is a dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron
 Doug for being a snivelling coward
 

 All insults that give grounds for your very own dismissal Sal! 

 

 Kind of the idea. I'm just underlining that I won't be diluting myself at all. 
I'm happy as I am, I don't want to be assimilated into any group mind again.
 

 I will happily justify every word if our overlord decrees it though. But the 
funny thing is I'm most mild mannered usually but when some "authority" tells 
me I can't swear I instantly start swearing like trooper. Must be the anarchist 
in me. Most of me actually. We shall fight on the beaches etc...
 

 And here I thought I would be the first to go - I reckon Bucky wants to keep 
tabs on me so he will know where to direct the drones.
 

I just wrote a huge and brilliant [ahem] reply to this MJ, justifications, 
explanations about the dangers of censorship, an analysis of why people have a 
problem with us apostates, some cool quotes, some thoughts on what made FFL so 
good in the past, I spent best part of an hour on it and then I pressed the 
wrong key and deleted the whole thing myself. Doh! No moderator required
 

 And I'm out of time today. If I still have an account on Sunday I'll have 
another go. I've a feeling the topic won't go away!
 

 It's protest time in London town tomorrow. Another injustice that needs to be 
sorted out is our government of capitalist shitheads, so it's a good march and 
shout then a demo in Hyde park. Not that anyone listens and it won't even make 
the news but when you care about something you have to speak up or they assume 
you don't care. To the barricades!
 

 

 

 From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:44 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum 
for me?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I have zero idea what's going on, but I'll at least let him say goodbye.

 - Forwarded Message -
 From: TurquoiseBee 
 To: Alex Stanley  
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:46 AM
 Subject: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?
 
 
 It appears that Doug has gone ahead with his threats and has deleted my access 
to Fairfield Life. I'm just wondering how he justifies doing this based on 
supposedly "offending" posts of mine made back in May when on June 9th in post 
#416493 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416493?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 he explicitly said:
 

 In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of evolution” 
and I am going forward with a clean slate on everyone and not one is on 
moderation in any way from this point. I would only suggest in our going 
forward that folks take the time to actually read the Yahoo-groups guidelines 
if they want to continue fluidly posting on FFL. We should appreciate your 
cooperative collaboration on this.  
 -JaiGuruYou! 

 

 Seems to me there is more than a little hypocrisy, double-dealing, and 
outright dishonesty going on here, and since Doug has eliminated the 
possibility of me bringing this question up to the group myself, I figured I'd 
ask you to do it for me. 

 

 Thanks for everything. You have been more than fair in all of your dealings 
with Fairfield Life and with the odd group of characters who have posted there 
over the years. I wish that sense of fairness and

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Commenting as I go along
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Loth as I am to respond to any of your limp trolling posts..
 

 Big, bag troll that I am, I guess I should be honored.  (-:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Ya know, Sal, I think it's pretty simple: 

 Avoid gratuitous personal attacks and it works out pretty well.
 

 Then you clearly haven't been paying attention. 
 

 I was out of the loop for a few days.  The vitriol was too intense for my 
delicate sensibilities.
 

 Buck used a post about David Lynch as an example that wasn't even a personal 
attack, in fact it was a fully justifiable comment about a public figure yet 
Buck twisted the guidelines round until it looked like he had a valid reason to 
demand Barry deletes it or gets removed.
 

 Oh, okay, I missed all of that.  But I've picked up that others seem to be in 
agreement about this.
 

 

 Avoid the temptation to push someone's buttons for the sole purpose, of 
declaring,  "Ha, I pushed your buttons"
 

 99% of your posts are banal trolling, attempts to sneer and criticise people 
who think about things and without doing any thinking of your own. You never 
contribute anything but whining and sneering.
 

 You realize that you don't read my posts, so that realistically, that is not 
correct.  As you are scientifically inclined, I would say that 85% of my posts 
have been directed towards Barry, primarily (and to you and xeno to a lesser 
extent), and the content is of a critical nature.
 

 The rest of my posts have been along the lines of general interest.
 

 But here you are getting all excited about what you feel are inappropriate 
steps taken by Doug to stifle dissenting views from the party line.  And you 
are being quite vocal about it.
 

 There is only one thing I object to in Barry's posts, and that is when people 
are misrepresented.  I don't care about comments like M bf'n babies. That is 
standard fare for Barry, and has been that way for years, (decades really). 
 

 But, it is hard for me to fathom an interaction that consists, to the greater 
extent of (I'll say it again), pushing people's buttons, for a reaction.  Yes, 
I do object to that, and it is, in my opinion, what a troll does.
 

 Yet you are still here! This is what partisan means, Look it up.

 

 Buck threw the baby out with the bath water and if we aren't careful we're 
going to be left solely with the devious likes of you. Trust me, that is worth 
getting upset about.
 

 I'm afraid what you don't realize, Sal, is that you are wedded to your opinion 
as if it is the only justified opinion.  If you were able to step back, you 
might realize I feel justified in mixing it up to go after what I consider to 
be trolling from the other direction.
 

 At least I appear to have to ability to see this.
 

 

 And then, if possible, try to avoid a commentary, or small essay, on the 
virtues of having your buttons pushed, and the tremendous opportunity it 
presents for personal growth, supplying statistics and definitions to buttress 
this position.
 

 That's my take.  (-:
 

 Otherwise, have at it!
 

 I shall go back to ignoring you entirely.
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Our new moderator is a dipshit vedic nazi and a partisan moron
 Doug for being a snivelling coward
 

 All insults that give grounds for your very own dismissal Sal! 

 

 Kind of the idea. I'm just underlining that I won't be diluting myself at all. 
I'm happy as I am, I don't want to be assimilated into any group mind again.
 

 I will happily justify every word if our overlord decrees it though. But the 
funny thing is I'm most mild mannered usually but when some "authority" tells 
me I can't swear I instantly start swearing like trooper. Must be the anarchist 
in me. Most of me actually. We shall fight on the beaches etc...
 

 And here I thought I would be the first to go - I reckon Bucky wants to keep 
tabs on me so he will know where to direct the drones.
 

I just wrote a huge and brilliant [ahem] reply to this MJ, justifications, 
explanations about the dangers of censorship, an analysis of why people have a 
problem with us apostates, some cool quotes, some thoughts on what made FFL so 
good in the past, I spent best part of an hour on it and then I pressed the 
wrong key and deleted the whole thing myself. Doh! No moderator required
 

 And I'm out of time today. If I still have an account on Sunday I'll have 
another go. I've a feeling the topic won't go away!
 

 It's protest time in London town tomorrow. Another injustice that needs to be 
sorted out is our government of capitalist shitheads, so it's a good march and 
shout then a demo in Hyde park. Not that anyone listens and it won't even make 
the news but when you care about something you have to speak up or they assume 
you don't care. To the barricades!
 

 

 

 From: salyavin808 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Edg, 

 I don't believe that's good enough to erase the national debt which is about 
$17 trillion (the last time I looked, anyway).  So, his proposal is not enough 
to fix the national problem.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 14.5% flat tax reduces tax income for America by TWO TRILLION DOLLARS in the 
next ten years..all of which will come out of social programs instead of 
the military.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
MJ, 

 The US national chart will be undergoing a new major period (Rahu) in October 
2016.  At first glance, the period doesn't look good since Rahu is placed in 
the 8th house, the field of transformation.  However, using Nadi astrology 
rules, Rahu can be a prosperous period for the US economy.  Why?  Because Rahu 
is associated with Mercury, the 7th house and 10th house  lord.  In the US 
chart, these are the houses that make the country economically successful.
 

 As such, it is likely that one of the presidential candidates for the next 
election has the key to turning the national economy around.  So, stick around 
and find out how this karma unfolds itself before our eyes.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So how does Murphy's law jibe with the idea of jyotish and yagya and all that 
jazz?
 

 Shouldn't jyotish be considered the anti-Murphy's law?

 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
 
 
   Bhairitu,
 

 Don't speak too loudly about the 2008 incident.  An economic collapse may 
still come back and haunt us if the multi-trillion national debt is not 
reduced.  Murphy's Law may apply:  if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I like progressive taxes because they discourage money hoarding.  Done 
properly we would not have the huge gap we have today between the richest and 
the poorest.  And look how elitist are those with too much money.  Incentives 
are good but maybe cap the rich at 20 times of the wealth of the poorest.
 
 Flat taxes appeal to people because it gets rid of the joke which are the IRS 
codes.  It means simplification.  You could also have a progressive flat tax 
too as there could be levels of taxation.  Do we really need a "landed gentry?"
 
 The real problem with the US is the standard of living is too high and was 
created by allowing too much debt especially among the public.  The last time 
the economy was real was in the mid 1970s.  But a total economic collapse might 
solve that.  It should have happened in 2008 when it would have damaged the 
public less than the rich.
 
 
 On 06/19/2015 09:22 AM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   So what do you think of the flat tax proposal Bhai?
 
 
 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
 
 
   
 That 14.5% figure is interesting because Donald Trump the last time he ran for 
President proposed a one-time 14.5% tax on all folks with an estate of $10M or 
more.  He thought that would help reduce the deficit.  Hence he was not to 
popular with Republicans.
 
 Flat taxes have often been proposed because our current tax system has been 
corrupted by special interests.  It is no long a fair system nor can it even be 
interpreted properly even by IRS agents.  The $50,000 exclusion for a family of 
four would help the proposal gain more traction as 14.5% for anyone with that 
low of income is quite a chunk.
 
 Paul is more a populist than a Republican or even Libertarian.  Same can be 
said for Bernie Sanders who is showing great popularity with the millennials.  
It will be interesting to see what Sanders comes up with for a tax proposal as 
I'm sure too he feels the IRS codes corrupt.
 
 On 06/19/2015 01:03 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   It appears that there's a hidden agenda behind his proposal.  The sugar 
coating is that taxes are reduced for everybody.  But the hammer is that the 
government expenses will have to be reduced to fit the new tax income received. 
 What do you think?
 
 
 Presidentialcandidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up' tax code
 
 
 
 
http://news.yahoo.com/presidential-candidate-rand-paul-plans-blow-tax-code-205639493--election.html?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 
 Presidentialcandidate Rand Paul plans to 'blow up&#... WASHINGTON (AP) — 
Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul called Thursday for a "fair and 
flat tax" that would "blow up" the nation's ta...


 
 View on news.yahoo.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 


 




 
 






 
 



 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal

2015-06-19 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Well, it's a good start. More than 10% in 10 years.
   From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 4:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rand Paul's Tax Proposal
   
    Edg,
I don't believe that's good enough to erase the national debt which is about 
$17 trillion (the last time I looked, anyway).  So, his proposal is not enough 
to fix the national problem.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

14.5% flat tax reduces tax income for America by TWO TRILLION DOLLARS in the 
next ten years..all of which will come out of social programs instead of 
the military.  #yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951 -- #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp 
{border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 
10px;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp #yiv9849314951hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp #yiv9849314951ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp .yiv9849314951ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp .yiv9849314951ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mkp .yiv9849314951ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv9849314951ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951ygrp-sponsor #yiv9849314951ygrp-lc #yiv9849314951hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951ygrp-sponsor #yiv9849314951ygrp-lc .yiv9849314951ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9849314951
 #yiv9849314951activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951activity span 
.yiv9849314951underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9849314951 
.yiv9849314951attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv9849314951 
.yiv9849314951bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 dd.yiv9849314951last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9849314951 dd.yiv9849314951last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9849314951 
dd.yiv9849314951last p span.yiv9849314951yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv9849314951 div.yiv9849314951attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 div.yiv9849314951attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv9849314951 div.yiv9849314951file-title a, #yiv9849314951 
div.yiv9849314951file-title a:active, #yiv9849314951 
div.yiv9849314951file-title a:hover, #yiv9849314951 div.yiv9849314951file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 div.yiv9849314951photo-title a, 
#yiv9849314951 div.yiv9849314951photo-title a:active, #yiv9849314951 
div.yiv9849314951photo-title a:hover, #yiv9849314951 
div.yiv9849314951photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9849314951 
div#yiv9849314951ygrp-mlmsg #yiv9849314951ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv9849314951yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv9849314951 
.yiv9849314951green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv9849314951 o {font-size:0;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv9849314951
 #yiv9849314951reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv9849314951 .yiv9849314951replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9849314951 #yiv9849314951ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv9849314951 input, #yiv9849314951 textarea 
{font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv9849314951 
#yiv9849314951ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv9849314951 code {fo

[FairfieldLife] Win-win solution for Rachael Dolezal and Occupy.

2015-06-19 Thread Duveyoung
You want lemonade?
 Here:
 Occupy: "Hello, Rachael? I'm SoNSo over here at Occupy, and we've got an 
exciting offer for you."
 
 Rachel Dolezal: "Me? I'm in a fetal position on my floor soaked to the bone in 
a puddle of my tears."
 Occupy: "Today's your lucky day, bitch."
 Rachel Dolezal: "Huh? Who you callin' bitch?"
 Occupy: "You, you glorious hot mess. We need you exactly because you're a 
bitch in the eyes of the world that wants to hate on you."
 Rachel Dolezal: "Oh yeah, how the fuck so?"
 Occupy: "For the next few news cycles, every reporter out there is looking for 
another angle to shame on your ass, but this will all die down eventually, so 
we need to strike NOW. Girl, you are solid gold on the hoof, because there's no 
such thing as bad news."
 Rachel Dolezal: "You're losing me here. The world hates my fucking guts -- you 
can't change that."
 Occupy: "Wanna bet? Here's the deal: we want you to come on board and be our 
spokesperson."
 Rachel Dolezal: "Your whole movement will be ridiculed as opportunistic and 
cynical..not to mention no one wants to hear a single word from me now."
 Occupy: "You're not getting it. You're notorious. If you come over here and be 
our mouthpiece, the world will come to us, put attention on us, and THAT'S CASH 
FLOW, BABY. Attention is EVERYTHING."
 Rachel Dolezal: "But anything positive I'd say about you guys would be scoffed 
at simply because they'd know you'd hired me solely to get their cameras on ya. 
They'll crucify you for your crass hypocrisy since the Occupy movement is all 
about transparency, and here I have led a life of deceit in the last few years."
 Occupy: "Not if you give this opening speech we've written for you."
 Rachel Dolezal: "What? A single speech? Right."
 Occupy: "Here it is:
 Hi! I'm Rachel Dolezal. Yes, I'm a shitheel, but I've been given this 
opportunity to start to make up for my actions.
 I've been hired by Occupy to be a spokesperson for two reasons.
 1. Attention. You lousy rotten media fucks made me a household word, and now 
I've got you by the short hairs for the next few days, and everything I say 
will be "perfect soundbites" -- no fucking way you quote me out of context. You 
don't want to cover Occupy, but there's just too much buzz right now and you 
HAVE TO BE HERE.if only to try to get some footage of me saying something 
that can be twisted. But we're onto you shits and the game you play. Since 
you're addicted to outrageous headlines, you won't be able to help yourselves 
as you try to ruin Occupy for their associating with me so superficially. But 
no matter what, Occupy will be in the headlines...and that's pure 
profit.free advertising that would otherwise cost TENS OF MILLIONS OF 
DOLLARS.
 Occupy needs attention but the Mainstream Media won't cover its achievements 
and goals. If Occupy was but better known, lots of good hearted donors would 
become aware of how Occupy is getting it done and say, "Why didn't I hear about 
this great group before now? I'll send them some bucks."
 You BigMedia diseased mined psychos are TRAPPED by your own vile needs.
 2. Atonement. I must be punished for my misdeeds, and rather than send me to 
some psychiatric facility where it will take years to untangle my messed up 
psychology, I can be put to work now on the front lines of a movement with the 
same skills I was using at the NAACP. I won't have to be anyone I'm not, and 
the money that Occupy gets will be "a start" on "balancing" (not undoing) what 
I have done to so many others by my cheating ways.
 And every question you toss at me, guess what? I'm going to be a politician 
and just fucking ignore the question and come out with a pre-planned positive 
blurb about Occupy. I'll take my lesson here from any of the GOP nutjobs who 
are expert at not answering anything and just saying what they want as the 
cameras roll.
 So hate on me all that you possibly canOccupy fully and openly agrees 
they've hired me because I'm the wedge they need to get into the headlines, and 
the more I'm hated, the more millions of readers are triggered into thinking 
about Occupy."
 Rachel Dolezal: "Sold! I'll be on the next flight out."

 



[FairfieldLife] Saw Slumdog Millionaire for the 2nd time.

2015-06-19 Thread Duveyoung
The sheer mass of poverty hit me so much harder this time.

It sobers me majorly about philosophy and spirituality:  if India is like this, 
it is certain proof that more than talk, prayers and incense -- and more than 
Transcendental Meditation is needed.  India has the very best scriptures in the 
world, and it's a complete failure -- this is the TELL that intellect and great 
heartedness ARE NOT ENOUGH.

Dear new visitor to FairFieldLife -- be very careful if you are exposed to any 
romanticizing of India's present condition or any excusing it -- as is often 
done by true believers -- such as:  "India was so great in the past, it can 
afford to take a little time off." -- This concept was used by Maharishi Mahesh 
Yogi..I heard the actual words come out of his mouthalong with 1500 
hundred others.

What is needed is a hands-on tool-kit for human psychology:  do this and the 
person changes in such and such a manner.  We don't need sermons; we need 
BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES.

The rub:  not one person is willing to admit they need anything major in 
adjustments, and even a minor correction could take weeks of painful 
humiliation as ones past errors are brought to light.

The harder rub:  all of Fairfield's children raised from birth to be good 
meditators yet still are growing up with huge personality disorders -- like 
normal Americans!  

Here the video below is India, (I think it's India) or any 3rd world county 
today.
 An orphan 3yr old little girl was roaming around streets trying to sell Pens 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb33F0ZPJUA


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Getting your buttons hammered is a test of equanimity, which fails miserably 
with many, many meditators. Tuquoiseb was pretty intense this way, but also 
posted well reasoned posts and other interesting things. He was not a one note 
guy. I found authfriend just as annoying eventually as I did Turq in the 
beginning. Unlike the irrelevant posts of 'R' and the rather insanely abusive 
posts of another 'R' a few years ago. In fact those two 'Rs' were the only ones 
I would have removed from FFL myself were I in control. There was a third 'R' 
whom I found rather creepy, but he had reasoned if sometimes devious 
argumentation, so even though I did not care for him, I would not have removed 
him because I disagreed with him. Turq provided a strong pole for the 
non-theistic path of spirituality, and I miss the authfriend/turq battles of 
the past. Intellectually Turq is far more well rounded than our farmer turned 
tyrant, who I feel does not have the mental flexibility to deal with strong 
contrary views. His own posting has been spammy in mostly non-interactive, and 
until now, mostly a complaint. 

 We should note that personal attacks also do not necessarily involve profanity 
and can take on a much more subtle quality, and in this light everyone one here 
has engaged in that in my observation. It is very easy to slip from arguing 
against an idea and aiming at the person. Our moderator seems to have had a 
personal enmity against Turq and others opposed to his medieval religious 
persona. I for one vote for removing him as moderator.
 

 Also not all personal attacks here are gratuitous. What do you say if you are 
arguing against a point you regard as stupid? That implies the person holding 
that view is also stupid because they are holding it. And the converse is true, 
the person hold that stupid belief thinks it is true and holds the other in 
contempt for disagreeing, thinking it is stupid. Likes and dislikes have 
nothing to do with truth. Truth transcends even the gods, or however many you 
are pretending there are (the range is 0 or more).
 

 If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they 
do not want to hear.
 —George Orwell
 

 If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like 
sheep to the slaughter. 
 —George Washington
 

 Freedom of speech does not protect you from the consequences of saying stupid 
shit.
 —Jim C. Hines
 

 Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of 
opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of 
increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all 
its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.
 —Harry S. Truman
 

 My own opinion is enough for me, and I claim the right to have it defended 
against any consensus, any majority, anywhere, any place, any time. And anyone 
who disagrees with this can pick a number, get in line, and kiss my ass.
 —Christopher Hitchens
 

 I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the 
people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent 
and sudden usurpations.
 —James Madison
 

 Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to 
conscience, above all liberties.
 —John Milton
 

 Because if you don't stand up for the stuff you don't like, when they come for 
the stuff you do like, you've already lost.
 —Neil Gaiman
 

 If there's one American belief I hold above all others, it's that those who 
would set themselves up in judgment on matters of what is "right" and what is 
"best" should be given no rest; that they should have to defend their behavior 
most stringently. ... As a nation, we've been through too many fights to 
preserve our rights of free thought to let them go just because some prude with 
a highlighter doesn't approve of them.
 —Stephen King
 

 Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all 
subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us 
 The framers of the constitution knew human nature as well as we do. They too 
had lived in dangerous days; they too knew the suffocating influence of 
orthodoxy and standardized thought. They weighed the compulsions for restrained 
speech and thought against the abuses of liberty. They chose liberty.
 —William O. Douglas
 

 Most people do not really want others to have freedom of speech, they just 
want others to be given the freedom to say want they want to hear. 
 —Mokokoma Mokhonoana
 

 Religion grants its adherents malign, intoxicating and morally corrosive 
sensations. Destroying intellectual freedom is always evil, but only religion 
makes doing evil feel quite so good. 
 —Philip Pullman
 

 It is the rare fortune of these days that one may think what one likes and say 
what one thinks. 
 —Tacitus
 

 The moment you say that any idea system is sacred, whether it's a religious 
belief system or a secular

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sat 20-Jun-15 00:15:04 UTC

2015-06-19 Thread FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 06/13/15 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 06/20/15 00:00:00
457 messages as of (UTC) 06/19/15 22:49:16

 49 Michael Jackson mjackson74
 48 salyavin808 
 41 richard
 40 Bhairitu noozguru
 35 TurquoiseBee turquoiseb
 30 dhamiltony2k5
 30 anartaxius
 29 authfriend
 23 steve.sundur
 23 jr_esq
 22 curtisdeltablues
 18 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 14 Duveyoung 
  7 s3raphita
  6 yifuxero
  5 jason_green2
  5 j_alexander_stanley
  5 Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius
  4 hepa7
  4 emptybill
  4 email4you mikemail4you
  3 feste37 
  3 William Leed WLeed3
  2 wleed3 WLeed3
  2 ultrarishi 
  1 turquoiseb
  1 laughinggull108 
  1 Dick Mays dickmays
  1 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley
  1 'Rick Archer' rick
Posters: 30
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Yes, this "pushing of one's buttons" is certainly a useful tool. 

 But, at the risk of sounding too altruistic, why are here?
 

 I would say to discuss things, challenge one another, and yes, push one 
another's buttons.
 

 But, if it (this pushing of buttons) is done in a malicious manner, with no to 
other intent than to get a rise out of people, then I don't see any value in 
that.
 

 Correct me if I am wrong, but you have stated that the pushing of one's 
buttons is a useful exercise under any circumstances.
 

 You have also said, that  you have a hint of sociopath, so perhaps from that 
perspective it makes sense.
 

 For the sake of full disclosure, I've got plenty of my own issues, so I don't 
fault you for owning up to one of yours.
 

 And, I will agree that all personal attacks are not gratuitous.
 

 But in the case of the individual in question, we are talking about a decades 
long assault along these lines, and after a while it just becomes rather 
sickening.  At least as I see it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Getting your buttons hammered is a test of equanimity, which fails miserably 
with many, many meditators. Tuquoiseb was pretty intense this way, but also 
posted well reasoned posts and other interesting things. He was not a one note 
guy. I found authfriend just as annoying eventually as I did Turq in the 
beginning. Unlike the irrelevant posts of 'R' and the rather insanely abusive 
posts of another 'R' a few years ago. In fact those two 'Rs' were the only ones 
I would have removed from FFL myself were I in control. There was a third 'R' 
whom I found rather creepy, but he had reasoned if sometimes devious 
argumentation, so even though I did not care for him, I would not have removed 
him because I disagreed with him. Turq provided a strong pole for the 
non-theistic path of spirituality, and I miss the authfriend/turq battles of 
the past. Intellectually Turq is far more well rounded than our farmer turned 
tyrant, who I feel does not have the mental flexibility to deal with strong 
contrary views. His own posting has been spammy in mostly non-interactive, and 
until now, mostly a complaint. 

 We should note that personal attacks also do not necessarily involve profanity 
and can take on a much more subtle quality, and in this light everyone one here 
has engaged in that in my observation. It is very easy to slip from arguing 
against an idea and aiming at the person. Our moderator seems to have had a 
personal enmity against Turq and others opposed to his medieval religious 
persona. I for one vote for removing him as moderator.
 

 Also not all personal attacks here are gratuitous. What do you say if you are 
arguing against a point you regard as stupid? That implies the person holding 
that view is also stupid because they are holding it. And the converse is true, 
the person hold that stupid belief thinks it is true and holds the other in 
contempt for disagreeing, thinking it is stupid. Likes and dislikes have 
nothing to do with truth. Truth transcends even the gods, or however many you 
are pretending there are (the range is 0 or more).
 

 If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they 
do not want to hear.
 —George Orwell
 

 If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like 
sheep to the slaughter. 
 —George Washington
 

 Freedom of speech does not protect you from the consequences of saying stupid 
shit.
 —Jim C. Hines
 

 Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of 
opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of 
increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all 
its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.
 —Harry S. Truman
 

 My own opinion is enough for me, and I claim the right to have it defended 
against any consensus, any majority, anywhere, any place, any time. And anyone 
who disagrees with this can pick a number, get in line, and kiss my ass.
 —Christopher Hitchens
 

 I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the 
people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent 
and sudden usurpations.
 —James Madison
 

 Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to 
conscience, above all liberties.
 —John Milton
 

 Because if you don't stand up for the stuff you don't like, when they come for 
the stuff you do like, you've already lost.
 —Neil Gaiman
 

 If there's one American belief I hold above all others, it's that those who 
would set themselves up in judgment on matters of what is "right" and what is 
"best" should be given no rest; that they should have to defend their behavior 
most stringently. ... As a nation, we've been through too many fights to 
preserve our rights of free thought to let them go just because some prude with 
a highlighter doesn't approve of them.
 —Stephen King
 

 Restriction of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Saw Slumdog Millionaire for the 2nd time.

2015-06-19 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
It seems to me that M once blamed many of India's problems on the British. 
Seems that the British reduced the infant mortality rate with modern medicine.
  From: Duveyoung 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:49 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Saw Slumdog Millionaire for the 2nd time.
   
    The sheer mass of poverty hit me so much harder this time.

It sobers me majorly about philosophy and spirituality:  if India is like this, 
it is certain proof that more than talk, prayers and incense -- and more than 
Transcendental Meditation is needed.  India has the very best scriptures in the 
world, and it's a complete failure -- this is the TELL that intellect and great 
heartedness ARE NOT ENOUGH.

Dear new visitor to FairFieldLife -- be very careful if you are exposed to any 
romanticizing of India's present condition or any excusing it -- as is often 
done by true believers -- such as:  "India was so great in the past, it can 
afford to take a little time off." -- This concept was used by Maharishi Mahesh 
Yogi..I heard the actual words come out of his mouthalong with 1500 
hundred others.

What is needed is a hands-on tool-kit for human psychology:  do this and the 
person changes in such and such a manner.  We don't need sermons; we need 
BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES.

The rub:  not one person is willing to admit they need anything major in 
adjustments, and even a minor correction could take weeks of painful 
humiliation as ones past errors are brought to light.

The harder rub:  all of Fairfield's children raised from birth to be good 
meditators yet still are growing up with huge personality disorders -- like 
normal Americans!  

Here the video below is India, (I think it's India) or any 3rd world county 
today.An orphan 3yr old little girl was roaming around streets trying to sell 
Pens  #yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164 -- #yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv0664448164 
#yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv0664448164 
#yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp #yiv0664448164hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp #yiv0664448164ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp .yiv0664448164ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp .yiv0664448164ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164ygrp-mkp .yiv0664448164ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv0664448164ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv0664448164 
#yiv0664448164ygrp-sponsor #yiv0664448164ygrp-lc #yiv0664448164hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv0664448164 
#yiv0664448164ygrp-sponsor #yiv0664448164ygrp-lc .yiv0664448164ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv0664448164 
#yiv0664448164activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv0664448164
 #yiv0664448164activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv0664448164 
#yiv0664448164activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv0664448164 #yiv0664448164activity span 
.yiv0664448164underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0664448164 
.yiv0664448164attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv0664448164 .yiv0664448164attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 .yiv0664448164attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv0664448164 .yiv0664448164attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv0664448164 .yiv0664448164attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv0664448164 .yiv0664448164bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv0664448164 
.yiv0664448164bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 dd.yiv0664448164last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv0664448164 dd.yiv0664448164last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv0664448164 
dd.yiv0664448164last p span.yiv0664448164yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv0664448164 div.yiv0664448164attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 div.yiv0664448164attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv0664448164 div.yiv0664448164file-title a, #yiv0664448164 
div.yiv0664448164file-title a:active, #yiv0664448164 
div.yiv0664448164file-title a:hover, #yiv0664448164 div.yiv0664448164file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 div.yiv0664448164photo-title a, 
#yiv0664448164 div.yiv0664448164photo-title a:active, #yiv0664448164 
div.yiv0664448164photo-title a:hover, #yiv0664448164 
div.yiv0664448164photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0664448164 
div#yiv0664448164ygrp-mlmsg #yiv0664448164ygrp-msg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Saw Slumdog Millionaire for the 2nd time.

2015-06-19 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
I'm betting the little girl is not an orphan and also not 3 years old.  
The kids put on like this a bit in India. Pulling a con is basic 
education in India (MJ will like that).  The Kumba Mela video on Netflix 
I posted a link to a little while back has an "orphan kid" in it but it 
turned out that he had run away from his parents and is later reunited 
in the film.  Now Mira Nair's 1988 film "Salaam Bombay" deals with real 
homeless kids in Mumbai.  The cinematographer even adopted one and he 
grew up to be a rep for Panavision.


On 06/19/2015 03:49 PM, Duveyoung wrote:


The sheer mass of poverty hit me so much harder this time.

It sobers me majorly about philosophy and spirituality:  if India is 
like this, it is certain proof that more than talk, prayers and 
incense -- and more than Transcendental Meditation is needed.  India 
has the very best scriptures in the world, and it's a complete failure 
-- this is the TELL that intellect and great heartedness ARE NOT ENOUGH.


Dear new visitor to FairFieldLife -- be very careful if you are 
exposed to any romanticizing of India's present condition or any 
excusing it -- as is often done by true believers -- such as:  "India 
was so great in the past, it can afford to take a little time off." -- 
This concept was used by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi..I heard the actual 
words come out of his mouthalong with 1500 hundred others.


What is needed is a hands-on tool-kit for human psychology:  do this 
and the person changes in such and such a manner.  We don't need 
sermons; we need BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES.


The rub:  not one person is willing to admit they need anything major 
in adjustments, and even a minor correction could take weeks of 
painful humiliation as ones past errors are brought to light.


The harder rub:  all of Fairfield's children raised from birth to be 
good meditators yet still are growing up with huge personality 
disorders -- like normal Americans!


Here the video below is India, (I think it's India) or any 3rd world 
county today.


An orphan 3yr old little girl was roaming around streets trying to 
sell Pens <%20https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb33F0ZPJUA>







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
This post is almost entirely irrelevant to the current situation on FFL. 
Moreover, it has quite a few inaccuracies. 

 There is no reason that anyone's equanimity should be deliberately tested by 
trying to upset them. It may happen naturally in the course of a discussion or 
argument, but otherwise it's just an excuse to indulge one's aggression and 
treat them badly.
 

 Turq's posts were frequently poorly reasoned. He was a flashy writer, and this 
tended to be deceptive: one assumed he was saying something insightful because 
one was dazzled by the language. But if you looked more closely, you found that 
he was so focused on showing off his language skills that he didn't pay much 
attention to working out his ideas properly. Also, he often got his facts 
wrong, inadvertently or otherwise.
 

 I'm not sure anybody cares which "R's" you would or would not have removed.
 

 Doug has not yet demonstrated a tyrannical side. As Alex confirmed, he has not 
deleted any posts. He has "deleted" two posters, both for more than sufficient 
reason. He has not moderated any "contrary views" except for one slip with 
Turq's nasty post about David Lynch (which has not been deleted). Every new 
moderator, as far as I'm concerned, gets to make a couple of mistakes at first. 
That's how they learn what it's about.
 

 Doug has been under withering fire from Turq for *years*. It's no wonder he 
has "personal enmity"; he wouldn't be human if he didn't. He's stood up under 
it remarkably well. But Turq handed him a justification to expel him on a 
silver platter when he declared himself not subject to Doug's authority as 
moderator. What was he *thinking*?? How could there have been any question in 
his mind as to why he'd been denied access to the forum?
 

 Doug's "religious persona" is hardly medieval. Nineteenth century, maybe. I 
vote for giving him a chance and a bit of benefit of the doubt, maybe even 
helping him out rather than continually nastily criticizing him.
 

 Did anyone argue that personal attacks always involved profanity?
 

 Did anyone argue that personal attacks were always gratuitous?
 

 Did anyone argue that likes and dislikes have something to do with the truth?
 

 As for your quotes, at this point they're straw men. Nobody's freedom of 
speech has been taken away, nobody has tried to suppress others' opinions or 
ideas, nobody has censored anything.
 

 And your final paragraph is gratuitously insulting to Doug.
 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Getting your buttons hammered is a test of equanimity, which fails miserably 
with many, many meditators. Tuquoiseb was pretty intense this way, but also 
posted well reasoned posts and other interesting things. He was not a one note 
guy. I found authfriend just as annoying eventually as I did Turq in the 
beginning. Unlike the irrelevant posts of 'R' and the rather insanely abusive 
posts of another 'R' a few years ago. In fact those two 'Rs' were the only ones 
I would have removed from FFL myself were I in control. There was a third 'R' 
whom I found rather creepy, but he had reasoned if sometimes devious 
argumentation, so even though I did not care for him, I would not have removed 
him because I disagreed with him. Turq provided a strong pole for the 
non-theistic path of spirituality, and I miss the authfriend/turq battles of 
the past. Intellectually Turq is far more well rounded than our farmer turned 
tyrant, who I feel does not have the mental flexibility to deal with strong 
contrary views. His own posting has been spammy in mostly non-interactive, and 
until now, mostly a complaint. 

 We should note that personal attacks also do not necessarily involve profanity 
and can take on a much more subtle quality, and in this light everyone one here 
has engaged in that in my observation. It is very easy to slip from arguing 
against an idea and aiming at the person. Our moderator seems to have had a 
personal enmity against Turq and others opposed to his medieval religious 
persona. I for one vote for removing him as moderator.
 

 Also not all personal attacks here are gratuitous. What do you say if you are 
arguing against a point you regard as stupid? That implies the person holding 
that view is also stupid because they are holding it. And the converse is true, 
the person hold that stupid belief thinks it is true and holds the other in 
contempt for disagreeing, thinking it is stupid. Likes and dislikes have 
nothing to do with truth. Truth transcends even the gods, or however many you 
are pretending there are (the range is 0 or more).
 

 If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they 
do not want to hear.
 —George Orwell
 

 If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like 
sheep to the slaughter. 
 —George Washington
 

 Freedom of speech does not protect you from the consequences of saying stupid 
shit.
 —Jim C. Hines
 

 Once a government is committed

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
But, at the risk of sounding too altruistic, why are here?  This here is 
probably a better question than the one you probably intended to type. If you 
have the answer to the question 'why am I experiencing?' or 'Why is there 
experience at all?' in the largest sense, you will have the solution to many of 
life's problems.

 

 Well, at the moment, I am focused on this issue. I will have to ponder those 
larger questions at another time.  I also don't have the mental stamina at the 
moment.  Perhaps after a good night sleep, sleeping in a little, I might be up 
to it.
 

 But, if it (this pushing of buttons) is done in a malicious manner, with no to 
other intent than to get a rise out of people, then I don't see any value in 
that. Who determines whether content is malicious? Some thought Turq's content 
was malicious, some thought authfriend's content malicious, some thought 
Serious's content malicious, some thought fleetwood's content malicious. 
Sometimes I think a certain posters' content is malicious, but this is in 
disagreement with what others think about that same content and vice versa. 
When beliefs are challenged, a person often feels it is their person that is 
being attacked.

 

 Well, of course.  If loves makes the world go round, the above makes FFL go 
round.  There is no objective way to determine if content is "malicious", or 
just "too uncomfortable" for someone's tastes, or beliefs.  Perhaps the only 
guidance I can offer on this is that the primary poster in question, has been 
called out by most everyone on this forum for trolling tactics, and for going 
for the "reaction", for the purposes of getting a, well, "reaction"
 

 Again, you may endorse this "program", but I would say it is a poor way to 
communicate.
 

 Buttons may get pushed under any circumstances, but attempting to push buttons 
can at times be a disaster in certain circumstances. But on a spiritual forum, 
which may occasionally discuss spirituality, in which the individual level of 
life is supposedly being subsumed by a universal value, wanting to be protected 
from button pushing is tantamount to admitting you do not want your 
individuality to step aside in favour of that universality. I have always liked 
the Catholic priest Anthony de Mello's definition of enlightenment: 'absolute 
cooperation with the inevitable.' This expresses the relationship of 
individuality to universality. Another way to say this is take it as it comes, 
maybe you heard that somewhere. But it is more interesting when the idea is 
applied to one's entire life and the universe and not just in meditation. The 
'handling' of a mantra in meditation is just a small scale foreshadowing of 
what one must accommodate later on.

 

 Thank you for expanding on this theme, with an interesting aside.  I think my 
comments above pertain to some of this.
 

 Sociopathic tendencies make for a slightly less personal sense of self than a 
lot of people have, but small scale individuality is not absent, just less well 
defined. In some cases that is an advantage, and in some cases, not.

 

 Thanks for the clarification.  What I mean is that a relentless pushing of 
buttons, may be a recipe for progress according to some philosophies.  I must 
sound like a prude by insisting, or at least asking, that if one chooses this 
means of instruction, it would be desirable to have an intent for insight, as 
opposed to something more petty. But, as you say, who's to judge which is 
which.  I, of course have my own opinion about the intent of some posters here.
 

 

 And, I will agree that all personal attacks are not gratuitous. Not always 
gratuitous. But if a gratuitous attack comes, take it as it comes, you can 
respond more rationally if you can train your individuality to not take 
offence, and this helps wear down those buttons. And if you do not take 
offence, or get angry, you can formulate a more effective response. I am 
talking of verbal altercation on a group, not a knife attack in an alley by a 
pack of goons. On a group, the fight or flight response is not useful because 
there is usually no real danger to the person part of what we think we are, 
though there have been a few issues with identity and careers here, which is 
one of the few substantial reasons for getting kicked off of here as it affects 
a person's livelihood.

 

 Funny you use the example of a physical fight.  What I think is the feeling 
here, is that many of us come expecting a knife fight, only to find that others 
have come loaded for bear.  In other words, you think you are engaging in 
honest dialog, albeit with an edge, and then you find yourself being 
misrepresented.  But here we come back do our original conundrum: Are we really 
being misrepresented, or is just our ox being gored.
 

 Is it real, or is it Memorex.
 

  Maybe you need some stomach exercises. There are things on this Earth that 
are far, far more horrendous than anything that happens on FFL. I found Tur

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
This is interesting, because in arguing with authfriend, I would say something, 
and she would interpret it differently than I meant, and she would say 
something similar. I am not sure the misrepresentation is necessarily 
deliberate, but think that sometimes, maybe frequently, the world views of each 
prevent us from honing in on what the person is really thinking; we don't know 
what they are thinking, but interpret what they say through our own filter. The 
mismatch for me is greatest with authfriend. Some people deliberately seem to 
skew the argument that way, but I am not convinced it is always deliberate. We 
do not actually have more than one world view, and are probably not aware of 
its extent. A combination of hard wiring, software, and some soft wiring. When 
we encounter another world view, it seems strange and 'wrong', something askew 
— but our own, it always seem 'right'.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 

 Funny you use the example of a physical fight.  What I think is the feeling 
here, is that many of us come expecting a knife fight, only to find that others 
have come loaded for bear.  In other words, you think you are engaging in 
honest dialog, albeit with an edge, and then you find yourself being 
misrepresented.  But here we come back do our original conundrum: Are we really 
being misrepresented, or is just our ox being gored.
 

 Is it real, or is it Memorex.
 

 









[FairfieldLife] The birth of computer consciousness?

2015-06-19 Thread salyavin808
This is really fascinating:
 

 Inceptionism: Going Deeper into Neural Networks 
http://googleresearch.blogspot.fr/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html

 
 
 
http://googleresearch.blogspot.fr/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html
 
 
 Inceptionism: Going Deeper into Neural Networks 
http://googleresearch.blogspot.fr/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html
 Posted by Alexander Mordvintsev, Software Engineer, Christopher Olah, Software 
Engineering Intern and Mike Tyka, Software Engineer 
 
 
 
 View on googleresearch.blogsp... 
http://googleresearch.blogspot.fr/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Alex, can you post a question to the forum for me?

2015-06-19 Thread salyavin808

 LOL, looks like Judy hasn't been paying attention either.
 

 Unless I missed the post where Buck apologised to everyone for his blatant 
abuse of power and promised not to do it again because he wormed a post about 
David Lynch into his guidelines and tried to have it removed because he 
disliked the content and then deleted the poster anyway. Don't tell me you 
don't know what partisan means either!!!
 

 Don't worry Judy, we'll defend your right to post here with just as much 
vigour if you ever find you have something to say.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 This post is almost entirely irrelevant to the current situation on FFL. 
Moreover, it has quite a few inaccuracies. 

 There is no reason that anyone's equanimity should be deliberately tested by 
trying to upset them. It may happen naturally in the course of a discussion or 
argument, but otherwise it's just an excuse to indulge one's aggression and 
treat them badly.
 

 Turq's posts were frequently poorly reasoned. He was a flashy writer, and this 
tended to be deceptive: one assumed he was saying something insightful because 
one was dazzled by the language. But if you looked more closely, you found that 
he was so focused on showing off his language skills that he didn't pay much 
attention to working out his ideas properly. Also, he often got his facts 
wrong, inadvertently or otherwise.
 

 I'm not sure anybody cares which "R's" you would or would not have removed.
 

 Doug has not yet demonstrated a tyrannical side. As Alex confirmed, he has not 
deleted any posts. He has "deleted" two posters, both for more than sufficient 
reason. He has not moderated any "contrary views" except for one slip with 
Turq's nasty post about David Lynch (which has not been deleted). Every new 
moderator, as far as I'm concerned, gets to make a couple of mistakes at first. 
That's how they learn what it's about.
 

 Doug has been under withering fire from Turq for *years*. It's no wonder he 
has "personal enmity"; he wouldn't be human if he didn't. He's stood up under 
it remarkably well. But Turq handed him a justification to expel him on a 
silver platter when he declared himself not subject to Doug's authority as 
moderator. What was he *thinking*?? How could there have been any question in 
his mind as to why he'd been denied access to the forum?
 

 Doug's "religious persona" is hardly medieval. Nineteenth century, maybe. I 
vote for giving him a chance and a bit of benefit of the doubt, maybe even 
helping him out rather than continually nastily criticizing him.
 

 Did anyone argue that personal attacks always involved profanity?
 

 Did anyone argue that personal attacks were always gratuitous?
 

 Did anyone argue that likes and dislikes have something to do with the truth?
 

 As for your quotes, at this point they're straw men. Nobody's freedom of 
speech has been taken away, nobody has tried to suppress others' opinions or 
ideas, nobody has censored anything.
 

 And your final paragraph is gratuitously insulting to Doug.
 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Getting your buttons hammered is a test of equanimity, which fails miserably 
with many, many meditators. Tuquoiseb was pretty intense this way, but also 
posted well reasoned posts and other interesting things. He was not a one note 
guy. I found authfriend just as annoying eventually as I did Turq in the 
beginning. Unlike the irrelevant posts of 'R' and the rather insanely abusive 
posts of another 'R' a few years ago. In fact those two 'Rs' were the only ones 
I would have removed from FFL myself were I in control. There was a third 'R' 
whom I found rather creepy, but he had reasoned if sometimes devious 
argumentation, so even though I did not care for him, I would not have removed 
him because I disagreed with him. Turq provided a strong pole for the 
non-theistic path of spirituality, and I miss the authfriend/turq battles of 
the past. Intellectually Turq is far more well rounded than our farmer turned 
tyrant, who I feel does not have the mental flexibility to deal with strong 
contrary views. His own posting has been spammy in mostly non-interactive, and 
until now, mostly a complaint. 

 We should note that personal attacks also do not necessarily involve profanity 
and can take on a much more subtle quality, and in this light everyone one here 
has engaged in that in my observation. It is very easy to slip from arguing 
against an idea and aiming at the person. Our moderator seems to have had a 
personal enmity against Turq and others opposed to his medieval religious 
persona. I for one vote for removing him as moderator.
 

 Also not all personal attacks here are gratuitous. What do you say if you are 
arguing against a point you regard as stupid? That implies the person holding 
that view is also stupid because they are holding it. And the converse is true, 
the person hold that stupid belief thinks it is true and holds the other i