[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
sparaig: > I might add that there are still people here who > apparently miss the irony of pointing fingers at > *everyone else* about the lack of maturity shown > here when they too are participants. > So, is there anyone posting here under the age of fifty? LoL! > > > This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and > > > if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what > > > shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here > > > under the age of 18? > > > > Alternatively, is there anyone here who has achieved > > an emotional or intellectual age *higher* than 18? :-) > > > > I've been kinda dismayed recently to realize that this > > forum seems to consist of people who believe things > > that most people on the planet would consider either > > retarded, or insane, or both. For example: > > > > * There are people here who still believe that using > > muscle power to bounce around on their butts on slabs > > of foam has the magical ability to end crime and strife > > and bring about world peace. > > > > * There are people here who, when someone tells them > > that they've been contacted in real time by aliens from > > the Pleiades, a star cluster so far away that it takes > > *light* 500 years to travel from there to here, believe > > every word that these supposed aliens supposedly said, > > and base important life decisions on their advice. > > > > * There are people here whose everyday behavior and > > ability to hold grudges and act out on them would make > > junior high school kids ashamed to be seen with them. > > > > * There are people who believe that hiring brown-skinned > > boys from India to chant to non-existent gods and goddesses > > for them is the way to achieve all their goals and desires > > in life. > > > > * There are people who believe that posting a tasteful > > photograph of a fully-clothed woman is pornography. > > > > My feeling is that this forum would *benefit* from having > > a few kids on it. Add four or five down-to-earth, feet-on- > > the-ground modern 15-year-olds to this forum, and both > > the emotional and intelligence quotient of the group would > > rise by 10 or more points. > > >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
> > This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and > > if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what > > shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here > > under the age of 18? > > turquoiseb: > Alternatively, is there anyone here who has achieved > an emotional or intellectual age *higher* than 18? :-) > > I've been kinda dismayed recently to realize that this > forum seems to consist of people who believe things > that most people on the planet would consider either > retarded, or insane, or both. For example: > The things TMers believe! Go figure. Who says Barry can change in seventeen years of posting? It's still all about Judy. LoL! "In the series I hope to dispel any misconceptions about TM and its adherents by removing the questions and the criticisms they might have been responding to, and focusing only on strong, long-term TMers and *their own words*, the things that they have come to believe after two to three decades of regular TM practice..." Subject: THINGS TMers BELIEVE, Volume I Author: TurquoiseB Newsgroup: Yahoo! FairfieldLife Date: Sunday Mar 4, 2007 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/133600 > * There are people here who still believe that using > muscle power to bounce around on their butts on slabs > of foam has the magical ability to end crime and strife > and bring about world peace. > > * There are people here who, when someone tells them > that they've been contacted in real time by aliens from > the Pleiades, a star cluster so far away that it takes > *light* 500 years to travel from there to here, believe > every word that these supposed aliens supposedly said, > and base important life decisions on their advice. > > * There are people here whose everyday behavior and > ability to hold grudges and act out on them would make > junior high school kids ashamed to be seen with them. > > * There are people who believe that hiring brown-skinned > boys from India to chant to non-existent gods and goddesses > for them is the way to achieve all their goals and desires > in life. > > * There are people who believe that posting a tasteful > photograph of a fully-clothed woman is pornography. > > My feeling is that this forum would *benefit* from having > a few kids on it. Add four or five down-to-earth, feet-on- > the-ground modern 15-year-olds to this forum, and both > the emotional and intelligence quotient of the group would > rise by 10 or more points. >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
Thanks...I should stop relying on my "recall" but my point, although not supported by statement, was that Barry had read to the end of your post. Glad that was an accurate statement. Tee Hee. Barry's World is perhaps a bit like Waldo's World - where is Barry? I'm still looking for him. Will the real Barry please stand up? I know he's in there somewhere (that's just me though exercising my unconditional right to love). Have a good day. From: authfriend To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:44 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: > > This post, in itself, contradicts your edict. Judy included her > explanation of how she hit 51 posts at the end of one of > her "return posts" I believe. (My recall could be wrong.) Close. You're thinking of a comment in a post I made earlier in the day that I posted out about Barry and iranitea having lost Vaj's support for the week because *he* had posted out: "Oh, and Vaj has just posted out, so you all will have to do without him next week." Barry misrepresented this comment as my having "taunted" Vaj "minutes before" I posted out. Not true on either count. But the point here is that nobody quoted that portion of my post, so for Barry to have seen it, he had to have read the post in its original form all the way to the very end, despite his claims that he never reads my posts. > Your behavior continues to belie your stated reality. But, > that's O.K. So it goes, in the world of Barry. Barry World is very similar to Disney World in its resemblance to reality. > From: turquoiseb > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:13 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only > photos of sattvic TMers > > > Â > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > > emotional maturity. > > I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with > a few people whose experiences and ability to discuss > them still interest me. This past couple of weeks has > been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of > people "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated > who and what they really were and what their intent was. > That was useful, because now I can simply avoid them > and focus on the folks whom I consider worth my time. > If you're wondering, no, you didn't make the cut. :-) >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: > > This post, in itself, contradicts your edict. Judy included her > explanation of how she hit 51 posts at the end of one of > her "return posts" I believe. (My recall could be wrong.) Close. You're thinking of a comment in a post I made earlier in the day that I posted out about Barry and iranitea having lost Vaj's support for the week because *he* had posted out: "Oh, and Vaj has just posted out, so you all will have to do without him next week." Barry misrepresented this comment as my having "taunted" Vaj "minutes before" I posted out. Not true on either count. But the point here is that nobody quoted that portion of my post, so for Barry to have seen it, he had to have read the post in its original form all the way to the very end, despite his claims that he never reads my posts. > Your behavior continues to belie your stated reality. But, > that's O.K. So it goes, in the world of Barry. Barry World is very similar to Disney World in its resemblance to reality. > From: turquoiseb > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:13 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only > photos of sattvic TMers > > > Â > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > > emotional maturity. > > I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with > a few people whose experiences and ability to discuss > them still interest me. This past couple of weeks has > been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of > people "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated > who and what they really were and what their intent was. > That was useful, because now I can simply avoid them > and focus on the folks whom I consider worth my time. > If you're wondering, no, you didn't make the cut. :-) >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
This post, in itself, contradicts your edict. Judy included her explanation of how she hit 51 posts at the end of one of her "return posts" I believe. (My recall could be wrong.) Your behavior continues to belie your stated reality. But, that's O.K. So it goes, in the world of Barry. From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:13 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > emotional maturity. I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with a few people whose experiences and ability to discuss them still interest me. This past couple of weeks has been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of people "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated who and what they really were and what their intent was. That was useful, because now I can simply avoid them and focus on the folks whom I consider worth my time. If you're wondering, no, you didn't make the cut. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > > > > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > > > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > > > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > > > emotional maturity. > > Barry: I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with my real feelings, my conscience, and the destiny of my martyrdom. A few people whose experiences and ability to discuss > this, still interest me, and since they do not see through me (or if they do, > they won't say Boo), I gotta keep doing my thing, folks. This past couple of > weeks has been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of fat earwigs and > tiny baby snails and sweet hummingbirds "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated how each of them was one of God's creatures. Who and what they really were and what their intent was I have no idea, but certainly it was enough to torment me into making a mockery of Mary's little lambkin. That was useful, because now I can simply put them inside the formaldehyde that I keep in a jar by my bed. And then I can focus on the folks who are willing to string the bitch up and then bury her in unconsecrated soil. I consider these fellow apparatchiks (who know the opiate of Fairfield) worth my singing to them the hymns of my still beating heart. If you're wondering, no, I still love my little scorpion (I envy his sting). Whoever you are, if you feel how perfectly this post does not touch me, you made the cut. :-) Robin: Are you trying for triple-irony here, Barry? The way I see it, you have re-written your original post to feste37this seems quite obvious to me. (If you check this version against the first one, you will see there are differences.) Were you ever ticklish as a baby?
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > > emotional maturity. I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with my real feelings, my conscience, and the destiny of my martyrdom. A few people whose experiences and ability to discuss this, still interest me, and since they do not see through me (or if they do, they won't say Boo), I gotta keep doing my thing, folks. This past couple of weeks has been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of fat earwigs and tiny baby snails and sweet hummingbirds "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated how each of them was one of God's creatures. Who and what they really were and what their intent was I have no idea, but certainly it was enough to torment me into making a mockery of Mary's little lambkin. That was useful, because now I can simply put them inside the formaldehyde that I keep in a jar by my bed. And then I can focus on the folks who are willing to string the bitch up and then bury her in unconsecrated soil. I consider these fellow apparatchiks (who know the opiate of Fairfield) worth my singing to them the hymns of my still beating heart. If you're wondering, no, I still love my little scorpion (I envy his sting). Whoever you are, if you feel how perfectly this post does not touch me, you made the cut. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
I might add that there are still people here who apparently miss the irony of pointing fingers at *everyone else* about the lack of maturity shown here when they too are participants. L --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > wrote: > > > > This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and > > if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what > > shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here > > under the age of 18? > > Alternatively, is there anyone here who has achieved > an emotional or intellectual age *higher* than 18? :-) > > I've been kinda dismayed recently to realize that this > forum seems to consist of people who believe things > that most people on the planet would consider either > retarded, or insane, or both. For example: > > * There are people here who still believe that using > muscle power to bounce around on their butts on slabs > of foam has the magical ability to end crime and strife > and bring about world peace. > > * There are people here who, when someone tells them > that they've been contacted in real time by aliens from > the Pleiades, a star cluster so far away that it takes > *light* 500 years to travel from there to here, believe > every word that these supposed aliens supposedly said, > and base important life decisions on their advice. > > * There are people here whose everyday behavior and > ability to hold grudges and act out on them would make > junior high school kids ashamed to be seen with them. > > * There are people who believe that hiring brown-skinned > boys from India to chant to non-existent gods and goddesses > for them is the way to achieve all their goals and desires > in life. > > * There are people who believe that posting a tasteful > photograph of a fully-clothed woman is pornography. > > My feeling is that this forum would *benefit* from having > a few kids on it. Add four or five down-to-earth, feet-on- > the-ground modern 15-year-olds to this forum, and both > the emotional and intelligence quotient of the group would > rise by 10 or more points. >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
LOL!! You expect us to believe this blatantly untruthful post? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > > emotional maturity. > > I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with > a few people whose experiences and ability to discuss > them still interest me. This past couple of weeks has > been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of > people "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated > who and what they really were and what their intent was. > That was useful, because now I can simply avoid them > and focus on the folks whom I consider worth my time. > If you're wondering, no, you didn't make the cut. :-) >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that > TurquoiseB would long ago have migrated to another forum > that was more of a match for his own intellectual and > emotional maturity. I have. :-) I remain here just to keep in touch with a few people whose experiences and ability to discuss them still interest me. This past couple of weeks has been instructive because as someone noted, a lot of people "came out of the woodwork" and kinda demonstrated who and what they really were and what their intent was. That was useful, because now I can simply avoid them and focus on the folks whom I consider worth my time. If you're wondering, no, you didn't make the cut. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
It's puzzling, isn't it? One would have thought that Turquoise B would long ago have migrated to another forum that was more of a match for his own intellectual and emotional maturity. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: > > I continue to ask you Turqb - why are you here? Â If I felt like you, there > is no way I would waste my time religiously posting to such a place day after > day after day after day as you do. Â Care to balance this out with what you > feel are the positive qualities of FFL that draw you to participate? Â After > all the years you've been here, seems like your "curiosity" about how the "TM > community" is faring would have waned. Â It seems like you would reserve your > opinions, articles, funnies, pics, and ramblings for an audience that you > respected. Â Â > > > > From: turquoiseb > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:21 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only > photos of sattvic TMers > > > Â > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > wrote: > > > > This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and > > if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what > > shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here > > under the age of 18? > > Alternatively, is there anyone here who has achieved > an emotional or intellectual age *higher* than 18? :-) > > I've been kinda dismayed recently to realize that this > forum seems to consist of people who believe things > that most people on the planet would consider either > retarded, or insane, or both. For example: > > * There are people here who still believe that using > muscle power to bounce around on their butts on slabs > of foam has the magical ability to end crime and strife > and bring about world peace. > > * There are people here who, when someone tells them > that they've been contacted in real time by aliens from > the Pleiades, a star cluster so far away that it takes > *light* 500 years to travel from there to here, believe > every word that these supposed aliens supposedly said, > and base important life decisions on their advice. > > * There are people here whose everyday behavior and > ability to hold grudges and act out on them would make > junior high school kids ashamed to be seen with them. > > * There are people who believe that hiring brown-skinned > boys from India to chant to non-existent gods and goddesses > for them is the way to achieve all their goals and desires > in life. > > * There are people who believe that posting a tasteful > photograph of a fully-clothed woman is pornography. > > My feeling is that this forum would *benefit* from having > a few kids on it. Add four or five down-to-earth, feet-on- > the-ground modern 15-year-olds to this forum, and both > the emotional and intelligence quotient of the group would > rise by 10 or more points. >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
I continue to ask you Turqb - why are you here? If I felt like you, there is no way I would waste my time religiously posting to such a place day after day after day after day as you do. Care to balance this out with what you feel are the positive qualities of FFL that draw you to participate? After all the years you've been here, seems like your "curiosity" about how the "TM community" is faring would have waned. It seems like you would reserve your opinions, articles, funnies, pics, and ramblings for an audience that you respected. From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:21 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote: > > This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and > if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what > shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here > under the age of 18? Alternatively, is there anyone here who has achieved an emotional or intellectual age *higher* than 18? :-) I've been kinda dismayed recently to realize that this forum seems to consist of people who believe things that most people on the planet would consider either retarded, or insane, or both. For example: * There are people here who still believe that using muscle power to bounce around on their butts on slabs of foam has the magical ability to end crime and strife and bring about world peace. * There are people here who, when someone tells them that they've been contacted in real time by aliens from the Pleiades, a star cluster so far away that it takes *light* 500 years to travel from there to here, believe every word that these supposed aliens supposedly said, and base important life decisions on their advice. * There are people here whose everyday behavior and ability to hold grudges and act out on them would make junior high school kids ashamed to be seen with them. * There are people who believe that hiring brown-skinned boys from India to chant to non-existent gods and goddesses for them is the way to achieve all their goals and desires in life. * There are people who believe that posting a tasteful photograph of a fully-clothed woman is pornography. My feeling is that this forum would *benefit* from having a few kids on it. Add four or five down-to-earth, feet-on- the-ground modern 15-year-olds to this forum, and both the emotional and intelligence quotient of the group would rise by 10 or more points.
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote: > > This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and > if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what > shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here > under the age of 18? Alternatively, is there anyone here who has achieved an emotional or intellectual age *higher* than 18? :-) I've been kinda dismayed recently to realize that this forum seems to consist of people who believe things that most people on the planet would consider either retarded, or insane, or both. For example: * There are people here who still believe that using muscle power to bounce around on their butts on slabs of foam has the magical ability to end crime and strife and bring about world peace. * There are people here who, when someone tells them that they've been contacted in real time by aliens from the Pleiades, a star cluster so far away that it takes *light* 500 years to travel from there to here, believe every word that these supposed aliens supposedly said, and base important life decisions on their advice. * There are people here whose everyday behavior and ability to hold grudges and act out on them would make junior high school kids ashamed to be seen with them. * There are people who believe that hiring brown-skinned boys from India to chant to non-existent gods and goddesses for them is the way to achieve all their goals and desires in life. * There are people who believe that posting a tasteful photograph of a fully-clothed woman is pornography. My feeling is that this forum would *benefit* from having a few kids on it. Add four or five down-to-earth, feet-on- the-ground modern 15-year-olds to this forum, and both the emotional and intelligence quotient of the group would rise by 10 or more points.
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > Friends; we should think of the children here, the MSAE children who may be > reading this site. These fellows who posts this stuff seem to have no > filters what so ever. Right now the adult decision needs to be taken by our > moderators to remove these guys for the spiritual safety of our children and > the well-being of a larger community here. > With the best of concern and regards for all, > -Buck in FF The MSAE children are going through the process of indoctrination in an ideology. We all go through this process in one way or another and then spend the rest of our life attempting to gain liberation from this prison of the mind, an undoing process which, if the ideology remains intact, we shall indeed fail to accomplish. Children have an uninhibited curiosity; that is how they learn. The social processes of indoctrination split the mind into categories of desirable and undesirable, and we end up with adults internally at war with themselves with shoulds and should nots vying for supremacy. That the MSAE kids are meditating may be enough to snake them out of this dark slumber eventually; particularly the tendency to rebel at certain ages may give them the opportunity to free themselves of the curse of ideological thinking. Meditation is like axle grease, it smooths the process, but the spark that keeps one's curiosity going probably will come in from the world somewhere, in all its brilliant and dark diversity. This forum was created for supposedly mature adults, and if children are prohibited, but are on the forum, what shall we say about their parents? Is there anyone here under the age of 18? There is a strange, fluid balance between anarchy, efficient but minimal government, and totalitarian oppression. You seem to have a sweet nature Buck, but I believe you are on the side of totalitarian tendencies. Taxes, censorship. Kind of like the British Crown and the American Colonies; and you know what happened there. Fairfield Life is the sacred plain of Kuruksetra. I hear the distant sound of trumpets...
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > I'm just fuckin' tired of Buck's act, when it swings > > prudish and Fundamentalist and nasty, as it just did. > > Buck has a tendency to dream up things that push *his* > > buttons, and then pretend that they push a lot of > > other people's buttons in Fairfield, the never-named, > > almost-certainly-imaginary people he "interviews." > > I'm calling bullshit. > > Well Buck got you going here too Barry, buttons and all. > I find it a little unlikely you are quite as offended as > you are making it sound however, all sound and fury and > all of that... Oh, but Ann, Barry's *very* sensitive. After all, he told Share he was "more than a little tired" of her "creative editing" observation when she made it for--wait for it-- the second time. So it doesn't take much to tire him out, you see. (He'll probably be very upset that you and I have ganged up on him here too. It's only he and his groupies who are allowed to "pile on.") > > Meanwhile human sexuality lives on, and refuses to hide > > its head in shame because people like Buck think it should. > > What does sexuality's head look like by the way? LOL.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
On 07/30/2012 02:49 PM, Seraphita wrote: > That's an impressive line-up of TM pinups. For a priceless glance from > Naomi Watts follow David Lynch down the rabbit hole here . . . > http://tinyurl.com/ch5xfww I see the copyright cops have been busy! :-D
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > FYI, the pictures Turq posted could probably be seen on > > billboards and city buses. > > More to the point, they're among the images of their > "TMer heroines" that they would find if they just > searched Google Images for their names. That's what > I did; that's where these photos came from. > > I'm just fuckin' tired of Buck's act, when it swings > prudish and Fundamentalist and nasty, as it just did. > Buck has a tendency to dream up things that push *his* > buttons, and then pretend that they push a lot of > other people's buttons in Fairfield, the never-named, > almost-certainly-imaginary people he "interviews." > I'm calling bullshit. Well Buck got you going here too Barry, buttons and all. I find it a little unlikely you are quite as offended as you are making it sound however, all sound and fury and all of that... > > I think -- whether or not he believes that his Buck > act is an act or not -- it reveals a great deal about > buck and *HIS* samskaras, *HIS* hangups. I don't think > that there are either "MSAE children" or children of > any other stripe reading this forum, and if there were > I give them far more credit than Buck does. They've > seen, dealt with, and handled (as Bhairitu says) images > of these TM heroines themselves, and almost certainly > *they weren't affronted by them*. I am sure you are correct Barry. But you know what, we all know and realize this, you can stop beating that dead horse now. Your outrage seems feigned. > > Unlike Buck, they probably grew up comfortable with > sexuality -- their own, and other people's -- and > don't feel threatened by it. Pretty big generalization here. > > > The link to "Boogie Nights" was for the trailer not the > > movie itself and could be shown on broadcast TV. Don't > > be such a prude. > > And don't be such a solipsist as to believe that you > have the RIGHT to enforce your prudery on others. We > get it -- you're not comfortable with this century. You > prefer to imagine "spiritual" as having to do with > communes full of women in granny dresses, among the > past cults you revere. Free Clue: all those people are > dead, and so are (with only a few exceptions) the so- > called spiritual lineages they hoped to found. Now you're on a roll. Fun isn't it? > > One of the reasons these movements died a much-deserved > death is that they took it upon themselves, as believers, > to tell their neighbors, the unbelievers, how they should > live their lives. And now they're all dead, and so are > the movements they thought were so holy, and so immortal. > Their neighbors forgot them, and so should we. What movements? Who as believers? What neighbors? When did they die? Who died? Who's on first? > > Meanwhile human sexuality lives on, and refuses to hide > its head in shame because people like Buck think it should. What does sexuality's head look like by the way? > > Protect the innocent "MSAE children" from images they > could see -- and should be able to see -- on their computers > or on TV or elsewhere any day of the week? Get real. Good point. > > The people who we should be concerned about protecting > these children from are people like Buck. They could > grow up to be like him. Oh nasty, Barry, low blow. That Buck, he may be a bit prudish but on the plus side he doesn't post pictures of true believers in granny dresses and Birkenstocks. > > > On 07/30/2012 11:30 AM, Buck wrote: > > > Friends; we should think of the children here, the > > > MSAE children who may be reading this site. These > > > fellows who posts this stuff seem to have no filters > > > what so ever. Right now the adult decision needs to > > > be taken by our moderators to remove these guys for > > > the spiritual safety of our children and the well- > > > being of a larger community here. > > > With the best of concern and regards for all, > > > -Buck in FF >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
That's an impressive line-up of TM pinups. For a priceless glance from Naomi Watts follow David Lynch down the rabbit hole here . . . http://tinyurl.com/ch5xfww
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > Friends; we should think of the children here, the MSAE children who may be > reading this site. These fellows who posts this stuff seem to have no > filters what so ever. Right now the adult decision needs to be taken by our > moderators to remove these guys for the spiritual safety of our children and > the well-being of a larger community here. > With the best of concern and regards for all, > -Buck in FF Oh dear, I must be missing something very juicy because I have yet to see anything in the last day or two that could possibly harm the innocents on this site. But indeed if there is something dubious in the form of pictures or videos for God's sake, tell me where they are. I'm dying to see them! > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > On 07/30/2012 09:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: > > > Laura Dern: > > > > > > > > > Ellen DeGeneris (with Portia de Rossi): > > > > > > > > > Sheryl Crow: > > > > > > > > > Heather Graham: > > > > > > > > > Naomi Watts: > > > > And those who would like to see more of Heather Graham can do so in the > > P.T. Anderson movie "Boogie Nights": > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLgDiBoKyqA > > > > Anderson has a new film coming out shortly called "The Master" and > > purportedly based on L Ron Hubbard. > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/27/the-master-release-date-paul-thomas-anderson-scientology_n_1711735.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment > > >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > FYI, the pictures Turq posted could probably be seen on > billboards and city buses. More to the point, they're among the images of their "TMer heroines" that they would find if they just searched Google Images for their names. That's what I did; that's where these photos came from. I'm just fuckin' tired of Buck's act, when it swings prudish and Fundamentalist and nasty, as it just did. Buck has a tendency to dream up things that push *his* buttons, and then pretend that they push a lot of other people's buttons in Fairfield, the never-named, almost-certainly-imaginary people he "interviews." I'm calling bullshit. I think -- whether or not he believes that his Buck act is an act or not -- it reveals a great deal about buck and *HIS* samskaras, *HIS* hangups. I don't think that there are either "MSAE children" or children of any other stripe reading this forum, and if there were I give them far more credit than Buck does. They've seen, dealt with, and handled (as Bhairitu says) images of these TM heroines themselves, and almost certainly *they weren't affronted by them*. Unlike Buck, they probably grew up comfortable with sexuality -- their own, and other people's -- and don't feel threatened by it. > The link to "Boogie Nights" was for the trailer not the > movie itself and could be shown on broadcast TV. Don't > be such a prude. And don't be such a solipsist as to believe that you have the RIGHT to enforce your prudery on others. We get it -- you're not comfortable with this century. You prefer to imagine "spiritual" as having to do with communes full of women in granny dresses, among the past cults you revere. Free Clue: all those people are dead, and so are (with only a few exceptions) the so- called spiritual lineages they hoped to found. One of the reasons these movements died a much-deserved death is that they took it upon themselves, as believers, to tell their neighbors, the unbelievers, how they should live their lives. And now they're all dead, and so are the movements they thought were so holy, and so immortal. Their neighbors forgot them, and so should we. Meanwhile human sexuality lives on, and refuses to hide its head in shame because people like Buck think it should. Protect the innocent "MSAE children" from images they could see -- and should be able to see -- on their computers or on TV or elsewhere any day of the week? Get real. The people who we should be concerned about protecting these children from are people like Buck. They could grow up to be like him. > On 07/30/2012 11:30 AM, Buck wrote: > > Friends; we should think of the children here, the > > MSAE children who may be reading this site. These > > fellows who posts this stuff seem to have no filters > > what so ever. Right now the adult decision needs to > > be taken by our moderators to remove these guys for > > the spiritual safety of our children and the well- > > being of a larger community here. > > With the best of concern and regards for all, > > -Buck in FF
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
FYI, the pictures Turq posted could probably be seen on billboards and city buses. The link to "Boogie Nights" was for the trailer not the movie itself and could be shown on broadcast TV. Don't be such a prude. :-D On 07/30/2012 11:30 AM, Buck wrote: > Friends; we should think of the children here, the MSAE children who may be > reading this site. These fellows who posts this stuff seem to have no > filters what so ever. Right now the adult decision needs to be taken by our > moderators to remove these guys for the spiritual safety of our children and > the well-being of a larger community here. > With the best of concern and regards for all, > -Buck in FF > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: >> On 07/30/2012 09:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: >>> Laura Dern: >>> >>> >>> Ellen DeGeneris (with Portia de Rossi): >>> >>> >>> Sheryl Crow: >>> >>> >>> Heather Graham: >>> >>> >>> Naomi Watts: >> And those who would like to see more of Heather Graham can do so in the >> P.T. Anderson movie "Boogie Nights": >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLgDiBoKyqA >> >> Anderson has a new film coming out shortly called "The Master" and >> purportedly based on L Ron Hubbard. >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/27/the-master-release-date-paul-thomas-anderson-scientology_n_1711735.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment >> > >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > Laura Dern: > > > Ellen DeGeneris (with Portia de Rossi): > > > Sheryl Crow: > > > Heather Graham: whoa! Phantastic, uh... eyes! :] > > > Naomi Watts: >
[FairfieldLife] Re: For Buck...mending my ways and posting only photos of sattvic TMers
Friends; we should think of the children here, the MSAE children who may be reading this site. These fellows who posts this stuff seem to have no filters what so ever. Right now the adult decision needs to be taken by our moderators to remove these guys for the spiritual safety of our children and the well-being of a larger community here. With the best of concern and regards for all, -Buck in FF --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > On 07/30/2012 09:38 AM, turquoiseb wrote: > > Laura Dern: > > > > > > Ellen DeGeneris (with Portia de Rossi): > > > > > > Sheryl Crow: > > > > > > Heather Graham: > > > > > > Naomi Watts: > > And those who would like to see more of Heather Graham can do so in the > P.T. Anderson movie "Boogie Nights": > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLgDiBoKyqA > > Anderson has a new film coming out shortly called "The Master" and > purportedly based on L Ron Hubbard. > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/27/the-master-release-date-paul-thomas-anderson-scientology_n_1711735.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment >
