[FairfieldLife] >>> The TRUTH About Eating Organic…

[email4you mikemail4...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

https://biotrust.com/blog/truth-eating-organic/?SID=contentfb1184-170729&CID=content1184&utm_source=contentfb1184-170729&utm_medium=email&sub=y

The benefits of eating organic—particularly produce—are that produce grown 
under organic standards have been shown to provide significantly greater 
amounts of powerful compounds called phytochemicals (i.e., plant 
chemicals)—which have potent fat-fighting, age-defying, antioxidant 
properties—while reducing exposure to potentially harmful pesticide residues, 
heavy metals, 
and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[doctordumbass]

As it relates to the earlier discussion about radiating unconditional love, 
such a saint would be fully aware of both the bliss, and the great physical 
pain, and the source of each. Maybe it is then like stubbing your toe, while 
your child is running towards you, for a hug. The hug still happens, fully and 
deeply, while you think, "ouch, that toe hurts".  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Doc, I agree that all this stuff resides in the physiology and arises from 
there. But then I remember reading about saints who were in bliss but also 
great physical pain. Any thoughts about that? 
 

 
 
 On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:02 PM, "doctordumbass@..."  
wrote:
 
   Beliefs in limitations don't arise, unless the limitation is evident within 
oneself. Similarly, a belief in one's unlimited ability doesn't arise, unless 
the ability within oneself is present - latent, perhaps, but present.
So, although we all enjoy 'owning' our beliefs, even arguing for them, and 
thinking of them as choices we each make, they are really much more of a 
rationalized expression, of the state of our physiology.
However, as humans, we have this unique ability to set a conflict within 
ourselves, to believe in something, that in terms of everyday life, we cannot 
support. It is simply not possible - Not impossible, in terms of future 
achievement, but in terms of simply thinking it so, it is not possible for a 
belief to instantaneously override the physiology. 
That means, if, as this guy says, we believe in giving unconditional love, but 
we do not have the capacity, all we can offer is inner conflict, and why would 
you want to pass that on? Once the ability to offer unconditional love is 
there, it doesn't matter what our belief is, at all - we can only spread, and 
share it.
I find that humans are not as smart as we *think* we are - life, itself, serves 
as much better mirror, and teacher. :-)



 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 But Doc, is it conditioning that is preventing unconditional love. Or is it 
the belief that conditioning is preventing unconditional love that is the real 
culprit?!
PS I find David Deida to be a very profound thinker so I take to heart what he 
says.
 

 
 
 On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:20 AM, "doctordumbass@..."  
wrote:
 
   Who, then, is doing the unconditional loving, in those cases? It is a very 
strange thing to assert, since it is conditioning which prevents unconditional 
love, in the first place. Perhaps he is merely mentioning the old saw, to not 
wait for full enlightenment, to begin living a full life, and that is always 
good advice.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Thanks, Ann. I tend to come from a perspective of psychological health is 
good. But I know one spritual teacher, David Deida, who though he thinks it's 
good too, also thinks that people can love unconditionally even if they're 
totally screwed up!
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:02 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.
 

 I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.
 
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."  wrote:
 
   A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 


 



 














 














 














 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[Share Long]

Doc, I agree that all this stuff resides in the physiology and arises from 
there. But then I remember reading about saints who were in bliss but also 
great physical pain. Any thoughts about that? 





On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:02 PM, "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Beliefs in limitations don't arise, unless the limitation is evident within 
oneself. Similarly, a belief in one's unlimited ability doesn't arise, unless 
the ability within oneself is present - latent, perhaps, but present.
So, although we all enjoy 'owning' our beliefs, even arguing for them, and 
thinking of them as choices we each make, they are really much more of a 
rationalized expression, of the state of our physiology.
However, as humans, we have this unique ability to set a conflict within 
ourselves, to believe in something, that in terms of everyday life, we cannot 
support. It is simply not possible - Not impossible, in terms of future 
achievement, but in terms of simply thinking it so, it is not possible for a 
belief to instantaneously override the physiology. 
That means, if, as this guy says, we believe in giving unconditional love, but 
we do not have the capacity, all we can offer is inner conflict, and why would 
you want to pass that on? Once the ability to offer unconditional love is 
there, it doesn't matter what our belief is, at all - we can only spread, and 
share it.
I find that humans are not as smart as we *think* we are - life, itself, serves 
as much better mirror, and teacher. :-)




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


But Doc, is it conditioning that is preventing unconditional love. Or is it the 
belief that conditioning is preventing unconditional love that is the real 
culprit?!
PS I find David Deida to be a very profound thinker so I take to heart what he 
says.





On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:20 AM, "doctordumbass@..."  
wrote:

 
Who, then, is doing the unconditional loving, in those cases? It is a very 
strange thing to assert, since it is conditioning which prevents unconditional 
love, in the first place. Perhaps he is merely mentioning the old saw, to not 
wait for full enlightenment, to begin living a full life, and that is always 
good advice.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Thanks, Ann. I tend to come from a perspective of psychological health is good. 
But I know one spritual teacher, David Deida, who though he thinks it's good 
too, also thinks that people can love unconditionally even if they're totally 
screwed
up!





On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:02 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:

 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.

I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.






On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."
 wrote:

 
A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[doctordumbass]

Beliefs in limitations don't arise, unless the limitation is evident within 
oneself. Similarly, a belief in one's unlimited ability doesn't arise, unless 
the ability within oneself is present - latent, perhaps, but present.
So, although we all enjoy 'owning' our beliefs, even arguing for them, and 
thinking of them as choices we each make, they are really much more of a 
rationalized expression, of the state of our physiology.
However, as humans, we have this unique ability to set a conflict within 
ourselves, to believe in something, that in terms of everyday life, we cannot 
support. It is simply not possible - Not impossible, in terms of future 
achievement, but in terms of simply thinking it so, it is not possible for a 
belief to instantaneously override the physiology. 
That means, if, as this guy says, we believe in giving unconditional love, but 
we do not have the capacity, all we can offer is inner conflict, and why would 
you want to pass that on? Once the ability to offer unconditional love is 
there, it doesn't matter what our belief is, at all - we can only spread, and 
share it.
I find that humans are not as smart as we *think* we are - life, itself, serves 
as much better mirror, and teacher. :-)


 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 But Doc, is it conditioning that is preventing unconditional love. Or is it 
the belief that conditioning is preventing unconditional love that is the real 
culprit?!
PS I find David Deida to be a very profound thinker so I take to heart what he 
says.
 

 
 
 On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:20 AM, "doctordumbass@..."  
wrote:
 
   Who, then, is doing the unconditional loving, in those cases? It is a very 
strange thing to assert, since it is conditioning which prevents unconditional 
love, in the first place. Perhaps he is merely mentioning the old saw, to not 
wait for full enlightenment, to begin living a full life, and that is always 
good advice.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Thanks, Ann. I tend to come from a perspective of psychological health is 
good. But I know one spritual teacher, David Deida, who though he thinks it's 
good too, also thinks that people can love unconditionally even if they're 
totally screwed up!
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:02 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.
 

 I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.
 
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."  wrote:
 
   A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 


 



 














 














 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[Share Long]

But Doc, is it conditioning that is preventing unconditional love. Or is it the 
belief that conditioning is preventing unconditional love that is the real 
culprit?!
PS I find David Deida to be a very profound thinker so I take to heart what he 
says.





On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:20 AM, "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Who, then, is doing the unconditional loving, in those cases? It is a very 
strange thing to assert, since it is conditioning which prevents unconditional 
love, in the first place. Perhaps he is merely mentioning the old saw, to not 
wait for full enlightenment, to begin living a full life, and that is always 
good advice.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Thanks, Ann. I tend to come from a perspective of psychological health is good. 
But I know one spritual teacher, David Deida, who though he thinks it's good 
too, also thinks that people can love unconditionally even if they're totally 
screwed up!





On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:02 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:

 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.

I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.






On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."
 wrote:

 
A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[doctordumbass]

Who, then, is doing the unconditional loving, in those cases? It is a very 
strange thing to assert, since it is conditioning which prevents unconditional 
love, in the first place. Perhaps he is merely mentioning the old saw, to not 
wait for full enlightenment, to begin living a full life, and that is always 
good advice.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Thanks, Ann. I tend to come from a perspective of psychological health is 
good. But I know one spritual teacher, David Deida, who though he thinks it's 
good too, also thinks that people can love unconditionally even if they're 
totally screwed up!
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:02 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.
 

 I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.
 
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."  wrote:
 
   A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 


 



 














 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[Share Long]

Thanks, Ann. I tend to come from a perspective of psychological health is good. 
But I know one spritual teacher, David Deida, who though he thinks it's good 
too, also thinks that people can love unconditionally even if they're totally 
screwed up!





On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:02 PM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.

I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.






On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."
 wrote:

 
A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[awoelflebater]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.
 

 I like this post, Share. I believe much of what you say here is true.
 
 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoiseb@..."  wrote:
 
   A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 


 



 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[Richard J. Williams]

On 2/23/2014 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote:
> what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
> for others, indeed for all life.
 >
"Man is the measure of all things." - Protagoras

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth

[Share Long]

turq, I very much enjoy these statistics and understand what you are saying. 
However, I think the conclusions need to be a bit more nuanced. Because if a 
person thinks he or she is insignificant, then they will think other humans are 
insignificant too. And that often leads to all kinds of problematic behavior. I 
think what's better is a healthy self regard which promotes growth in regard 
for others, indeed for all life.





On Sunday, February 23, 2014 1:55 AM, "turquoi...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 

[FairfieldLife] The Truth

[turquoiseb]

A post for those who claim to value the Truth. Here it is. Now get over your 
puny self. 

 

[FairfieldLife] The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

[turquoiseb]

Lawson's passing comment about "context" earlier got me thinking about
truth. Or Truth, if you prefer. Or, if you're even stronger in your
preferences, The Truth.

In my travels along the somewhat twisty spiritual path, I have noticed
that a LOT of people are fond of this word "truth." They speak of
seeking it, of valuing it above all else, of its importance to those on
a spiritual path. Some speak of "knowing" it, and speak as if they
reveal it in every word.

And yet, many of these *same* people seem to have No Problem holding two
completely contradictory truths in their heads at the same time, and
considering *each* of them Truth.

Maharishi was both a householder and a monk. Depending on "context."
Both of them are "truth," seen from that context. Depending on how much
you consider Maharishi enlightened -- and we've all been told that the
enlightened cannot *help* but speak the truth -- both could be seen as
Truth from that context.

It makes me wonder whether what all these seekers are seeking as
"truth," and often speaking about as if it were The Truth is in reality
relative truth. Things are "true" or the "truth" only in context, as
*they* see them -- or claim to see them -- in that moment. Truth
*changes*, depending on context.

How is that so different from the way those of us who do not even
believe in the *concept* of truth live our lives?

[FairfieldLife] The Truth About Hair

[Rick Archer]

http://www.manataka.org/page2423.html

[FairfieldLife] The Truth About Justice Sotomayor

[do.rflex]

The Truth About Justice Sotomayor


Lary Coppola
Editor and Publisher
Kitsap Peninsula Business Journal

Dear Mr. Coppola  ,

There are many business-oriented newspapers in this state, but yours is
the only one I know of that is discerning enough to carry Adele
Ferguson's column. That's a shame, because those other papers' readers
are missing out on some of the most insightful political commentary
available anywhere.

Few columnists have the guts to defend the institution of slavery and
bemoan the sorry plight of "top shelf blacks" who were forced into
freedom, but Mrs Ferguson does.
  She is also the only columnist who fully comprehends the
threat Somali pirates pose
  to the Washington State Ferry System.

Sure, sometimes she's wrong, but even then, she rebounds with a column
that is invariably a work of pure genius. Such was the case when she
admitted that she was wrong when she predicted that Obama would nominate
"a black" for his first Supreme Court appointment.


Here's
  what Mrs. Ferguson had to say
after he picked Sonia Sotomayor instead:

I was wrong there. I still don't understand who President Obama was
pleasing when he picked a white Jewish woman instead. He didn't know
her. Somebody had to press her case. I'd give anything to know who
and the identities of his inner circle.There's that genius I was writing
about. While everyone else slavishly repeated Obama's spin that
Sotomayor is an Hispanic Catholic, only Mrs. Ferguson had the guts to
inform us that the newest justice is actually a white Jew who was forced
onto us by the secret cabal of Jews who control Obama.

As the editor and publisher of a newspaper that carries her column, that
kind of reporting must make you very proud.

Heterosexually yours,

Gen. JC Christian, patriot

http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2010/04/truth-about-justice-sotamayor.htm\
l

[FairfieldLife] The truth about Republicans ... by George Carlin

[do.rflex]

George Carlin was a favorite comedian of mine for his direct, right on ripping 
humor. 

He did this particular routine quite a few years back and it seems the 
Republicans haven't changed much at all since then.

I didn't know however that that many Reagan administration officials faced 
criminal charges.

Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsBfqrNoFXQ   

[FairfieldLife] The Truth in Labeling Coalition: May 9 event in Fairfield [2 Attachments]

[Rick Archer]

We warmly invite you to a public awareness event hosted by the M.U.M.
Department of Sustainable Living Saturday, May 9 at 8:00 PM in Dalby Hall.
Please see the attached ad for details, and forward this email. Thank you!!

Citizens to Label GE Foods is helping to organize the "The Truth in Labeling
Coalition." (TLC). TLC is a group consisting of medical doctors, farmers,
whole food manufacturers and distributors, whole food retailers and coops,
NGO's, and concerned citizens. This group is coming together for the purpose
of passing a law requiring mandatory labeling of laboratory- based genetic
manipulation of our food. We believe members of the public are unwitting
participants in a far-reaching, unregulated human health experiment. Both
government and media funded surveys indicate that 90% of Americans, when
clearly informed, insist on labeling of such substances in their food. In
discussions of this issue, most people are dumfounded to hear that our
Governement is not already requiring such labeling and human health testing,
as well as testing for environmental impact.

The Coalition is utilizing the talent and knowledge of an experienced
lobbying firm in Washington, D.C. comprised of former four-term Congressman
Jim Bates and his partner, Christopher "Kip" Byrne, former FDIC legal
director.  Both Mr. Bates and Mr. Byrne understand the importance of keeping
genetically engineered contamination out of the organic production chain.
More importantly, they they are experienced professionals who offer a
realistic chance of passing a bill requiring mandatory labeling of
genetically engineered food through Congress.  (see attached bio for more
information)

We are working to expand the coalition and generate the financial support
needed to navigate new labeling legislation through Congress.  Early
supporters include: Derek and Nancy Casady, Ocean Beach People's Organic
Food Coop (with over 10,000 members); Chris Wege, Citizens to Label GE Food,
Andrew Kimbrell, Center for Food Safety; Michael Funk, United Natural Foods
International;  Kathy Larson, Frontier Natural Products Coop;  New Pioneer
Food Coop, Iowa City (over 20,000 active members); Mike Potter, Eden Foods;
and Ronnie Cummins, Organic Consumers Association.

Please come out and show these great leaders how enthusiastic we are about
this critical issue!

Yours truly,
Chris Wege
Anne Dietrich

Citizens to Label Genetically Engineered Food
P.O. Box 1208
Fairfield, Iowa 52556
Web:  www.gmofoodlabel.org  
 
Phone:  (641) 472-0411
Fax:  (641) 469-5779
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth about Osama bin Laden and Iraq from Wesley Clark

[Bhairitu]

Rick Archer wrote:
> from WesleyClark  
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8aOiMmekGk
So YouTube moves into the 21st century.  They now show videos in 
widescreen aspect ratio 16:9.  No more having to create a letterbox 
version of a video for YouTube but not for Vimeo.  :-D

http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=0i22UDAOfj8

[FairfieldLife] The Truth about Osama bin Laden and Iraq from Wesley Clark

[Rick Archer]

from WesleyClark  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8aOiMmekGk

[FairfieldLife] The Truth According to Puppetji

[Ben Gilberti]

The Truth According to Puppetji:

http://www.puppetji.blogspot.com/ 

  [:x]

RE: [FairfieldLife] The truth about flying, CC in 5-8, etc.

[Rick Archer]

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:55 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] The truth about flying, CC in 5-8, etc.

 

Since I began writing, my shoveling has all been erased under another
four inches of snow.

You lucky bastard. All we’re getting is ice here. I’d LOVE to have all that
snow. Get yourself some cross-country or back country skis if you don’t have
any and get out there and work up a sweat. Burn off some of that rage.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.0/1180 - Release Date: 12/10/2007
2:51 PM
 

[FairfieldLife] The truth about flying, CC in 5-8, etc.

[Duveyoung]

This guy got up to the mike, 1972 Majorca, and asked Maharishi if this
"five to eight years was something he'd said," and Maharishi said: 
"NO, NO, NO, NO NOnot for you.  For teachers of TM we should be
thinking only two years."

Not an exact quote, but I was there, and that's exactly what he MEANT.

I sold TM to EVERYONE on the basis of that five to eight year claim.

It took me FIFTEEN two-year-hunks before I gave up hope of getting to
CC in this lifetime, and finally faced that I'd been sold a bill of
goods and was just another cultish true believer.  Talk about being in
denial.

To me, one of the most telling facts that EVERY TRUE BELIEVER KNOWS IS
TRUE is that no one is hovering -- and that those who are most
dedicated to TM, those on Purusha and Mother Divine, have not
perfected this siddhi yet.  Given how much TM has used flimsy
quasi-scientific evidence to the hilt, there can be no doubt that the
TMO would be running banner ads in every media if there was a TMer
hovering -- it would easily get the TMO BILLIONS OF DOLLARS almost
overnight.  NO ONE IS HOVERING.

The Purusha and Mother Divine folks were/are required to be much much
more pure in their relative lives.  If those fuckers can't fly, why
would anyone in the householder lifestyle even begin to think they'll
be lucky enough to perfect that siddhi?  I feel so fucking stupid to
have ever even tried to evolve when I see so many who have left
Purusha, entered business life, and been just as assholish as me.  I
just don't see any superiority in them, moral or otherwise, nor did I
sense anything "much" in the vibes of those who were still on the
program.  

But I was plainly LIED to by true believers who came back from the
first six-month courses and said the most outlandish assertions ever
about it.  "This is it guys...you have to get to this course."  Like that.

And now the poor pundits are in a slave camp and freezing and low on
food.  The TMO took my ATR credits and never even bothered to tell me
until I applied for the siddhi course -- IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY.

It's snowing here in Wisconsin for the sixth time in a month. My arms
and wrists are killing me after another two hours of shoveling my
corner house's walk and drive; ibuprofen will mostly cure my physical
woes, but my psychic arms and wrists still are sore from all the shit
I shoveled for the TMO.

To me THE LACK OF FLYING AFTER 30 YEARS OF FOLKS TRYING IS FUCKING
PROOF THAT ANYONE WOULD BE A FOOL TO BELIEVE IN IT ENOUGH TO DEDICATE
THEIR LIFE TO IT.  I did more than that:  I sold out my family, my
career, and my precious integrity based on a bill of goods that never
had any more value than a pig in a poke.  

29 years, four hours a day.  But, hey, I got off "lite," cuz I didn't
pay a million buckazoids for a crown and an empty title.

If I ever see Bevan or John in person again, I'm going to spit out the
above words with as much rage as I can muster.   Neither would finish
a meal in any restaurant I would find them in.  They'd have to call
the cops to drag my ass out of there.

This is about predation.  

I was one of the suckers born every minute.

Judy, do you think, in the next 20 years that anyone will fly?

If not, then why bother?  Be born in the family of yogis in your next
lifetime and enjoy what you have left of this one.

If Maharishi had handled the money correctly, I might still be in the
fold -- so, bottom line, THANKS FOR ROBBING US ALL BLIND, MAHARISHI,
it was one of the major components of my REALIZATION that I was duped
to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost opportunities,
and tens of thousands in actual out of pocket money -- and this loss
was as if nothing compared to the burden that my past memories have on
me even now.  Mirrors are hard to have around.

But thanks, TMO, thanks Maharishi, at least after such a "divine
screwing" as I've received from this, I can avoid suchlike for the
rest of my life and enjoy what I have now without the onus of making a
spiritual case for its value.

After such a religious rape, THANKS, I get it now.  I can have a beer,
a steak, and a fuck -- daily for the rest of my life -- without even
one idea passing through my mind about "sin," and if anyone, ANYONE,
looks cross-eyed at me for it, they'll get my fullest energetic blast
back at them if they emit the slightest judgmental peep about it.

It's about the money, and here's the good news:  MAHARISHI IS GOING TO
DIE ANY DAY NOWand the shit is going to hit a very big fan.  I
hope I get to see it, but at the rate that the snow is falling here, I
may freeze to death by tomorrow.

Since I began writing, my shoveling has all been erased under another
four inches of snow.

FUCK FUCK FUCK!  

Edg











--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steven klayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Would you not agree that the TMO teaches a flying
> technique and no one is flying.
> If so I believe science would invalidate the TMO
> claims that they can teach people to fly.
> P

[FairfieldLife] The truth must be told. India is a big pile of shit - by Sid Harth

[off_world_beings]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >  
> > Hari Om,
> >   Of Harappa and Hindu Haramjadeh 
> > by Sid Harth 
> 
> > <<<...The truth must be told. India is a big pile of shit, take it 
> or leave it.>>>


 Hilarious stuff Sid Harth. 
Thanks for the lol.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth About Britain

[Robert Gimbel]

Sad that the average time is so small. Men really need to practice more, I would say...
Funny, how deeply programed we are to be so obsessed for five minutes of pleasure?
Or, maybe not so funny...L B Shriver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Message: 2    Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:26:59 -0700   From: NHNE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Study: Length Of Time People Spend Having SexNHNE News ListCurrent Members: 1337Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.---WATCH THE CLOCK, DARLING ­ BRITS LAST LONGEST AT SEXBy Ben DowellThe Sunday Times - BritainMay 22, 2005http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1622297,00.htmlA scientific study to be published this week will suggest that British menare world leaders at sex, at least when they are measured against the clock.But that is not saying much considering that most men in other countrieswere at
 best five-minute wonders.After equipping hundreds of couples in various countries with stopwatches,researchers have for the first time amassed accurate data on the length oftime that people spend having sex.Across all the countries studied, the average time for actual lovemaking was5.4 minutes. Around that figure, however, the researchers found considerablevariations related to age and nationality.While British men took on average 7.6 minutes, the typical American took 7minutes, while the Spanish lasted 5.8 minutes and the Dutch 5.1 minutes.The Turks produced the biggest surprise: on average they spend just 3.7minutes at it.In all the countries studied there was no significant difference in thetimings whether the men were using condoms or not.In the research, to be published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, Britishand Dutch scientists studied 500 couples aged over 18 in the
 five countries."Sexual events were stopwatch-timed over a four-week period and recorded,"says Dr Marcel Waldinger, a leading neuro-psychiatrist based at UtrechtUniversity who led the research.The findings also revealed how the time from start to finish of sexdecreased with age, from an average of 6.5 minutes for men aged 18-30 to 4.3minutes for those over 51.The researchers say the findings indicate that male sexual functioningvaries significantly between healthy individuals, and there is no easydefinition of what should be classified as average sexual performance orpremature ejaculation."The wide range among normal men points to a physical rather than apsychological cause for premature ejaculation," said Waldinger."The results will help to lift the taboo over premature ejaculation becausethey show that men are indeed different from one another."Just why there are significant
 national differences is not clear and theresearchers plan bigger studies and yet more research to find anexplanation.NHNE News List:To subscribe, send a message to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe, send a message to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/and click 'Join This Group!' 
		Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online & more.  Check it out!


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[FairfieldLife] The Truth About Britain

[L B Shriver]

Message: 2 
   Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:26:59 -0700
   From: NHNE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Study: Length Of Time People Spend Having Sex


NHNE News List
Current Members: 1337
Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.

---

WATCH THE CLOCK, DARLING ­ BRITS LAST LONGEST AT SEX
By Ben Dowell
The Sunday Times - Britain
May 22, 2005

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1622297,00.html

A scientific study to be published this week will suggest that British 
men
are world leaders at sex, at least when they are measured against the 
clock.
But that is not saying much considering that most men in other 
countries
were at best five-minute wonders.

After equipping hundreds of couples in various countries with 
stopwatches,
researchers have for the first time amassed accurate data on the length 
of
time that people spend having sex.

Across all the countries studied, the average time for actual 
lovemaking was
5.4 minutes. Around that figure, however, the researchers found 
considerable
variations related to age and nationality.

While British men took on average 7.6 minutes, the typical American 
took 7
minutes, while the Spanish lasted 5.8 minutes and the Dutch 5.1 
minutes.

The Turks produced the biggest surprise: on average they spend just 3.7
minutes at it.

In all the countries studied there was no significant difference in the
timings whether the men were using condoms or not.

In the research, to be published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, 
British
and Dutch scientists studied 500 couples aged over 18 in the five 
countries.

"Sexual events were stopwatch-timed over a four-week period and 
recorded,"
says Dr Marcel Waldinger, a leading neuro-psychiatrist based at Utrecht
University who led the research.

The findings also revealed how the time from start to finish of sex
decreased with age, from an average of 6.5 minutes for men aged 18-30 
to 4.3
minutes for those over 51.

The researchers say the findings indicate that male sexual functioning
varies significantly between healthy individuals, and there is no easy
definition of what should be classified as average sexual performance 
or
premature ejaculation.

"The wide range among normal men points to a physical rather than a
psychological cause for premature ejaculation," said Waldinger.

"The results will help to lift the taboo over premature ejaculation 
because
they show that men are indeed different from one another."

Just why there are significant national differences is not clear and 
the
researchers plan bigger studies and yet more research to find an
explanation.



NHNE News List:

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth Is!

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 4/6/05 3:26:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's 
  amazing to see people pay $5800.00 plus room and board so they can BE what 
  they already are! :-) ROFLOLActually, it's all about getting money to 
  pay for the completion of the pundit project. They ran out of money 
  because there are no pundits. People have stopped their donations because 
  it was contingent on pundits. And the bank won't give them anymore money, 
  because the bank money was contingent on the donations of the people 
  who thought there would be pundits this time.So what to do? What 
  to do? Let's un-governorize all the governors and then hold a course 
  and charge them thousands of dollars to make them governors again. The 
  course fees will give us the money to complete the pundit project. MUM 
  staff and faculty will be task forced to do all the work for essentially 
  no additional expense. We'll tell everyone that this "special" wave of 
  "new" knowledge will bring in Sat Yuga by July 21. This will make everyone 
  guilty if they don't drop everything and come right away. Then we'll tell 
  everyone that this is a "once in a lifetime" opportunity, they don't want 
  to miss it. It may never come again. They will all rush here.After 
  the course everyone will be all blissed and happy that they got in on it 
  and are governors again. Oh wait excuse me--"CERTIFIED GOVERNORS" with the 
  certificate to prove it. And some will be Raja Designates that  were 
  able to sit in the front row, near the "real" Rajas, during the course. 
  Like that, like that.And even though we said the pundit project was 
  completed months ago, when we put out that fake brochure with the doctored 
  photos. NOW we will actually have a completed pundit project -- WELL, 
  except for the pundit part. We'll have some extra cash on hand, and a 
  completed housing facility ready for Purusha and/or Mother Divine when 
  they are evicted from North Carolina. It will all work out very 
  beautifully, and very beautifully, and very beautifully! No one will be 
  the wiser, he he he! A little lighter in the wallet perhaps, but OBVIOUSLY 
  no one has gotten any WISER!Creative Intelligence in action! 
  Infinite Organizing Power! It's all s beautiful!ENGAGING TOTAL 
  NATURAL LAW --    TO FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE, ALL OF THE 
  TIME!

Oh my God, you are just so 
negative!


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth Is!

[rudra_joe]

ENGAGING TOTAL NATURAL LAW --    TO FOOL ALL OF THE 
PEOPLE, ALL OF THE TIME!
 
 
---What? It can't 
be!


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Truth Is!

[Peter Sutphen]

Say it ain't so Joe! If this is what is "really"
happening the TMO is in very big trouble. Maybe my
dream of 25 years ago is true--the TMO is run by
rakshasas.
-Peter

--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> It's amazing to see people pay $5800.00 plus room
> and board so they 
> can BE what they already are! :-) ROFLOL
> 
> Actually, it's all about getting money to pay for
> the completion of 
> the pundit project. They ran out of money because
> there are no 
> pundits. People have stopped their donations because
> it was 
> contingent on pundits. And the bank won't give them
> anymore money, 
> because the bank money was contingent on the
> donations of the people 
> who thought there would be pundits this time.
> 
> So what to do? What to do? Let's un-governorize
> all the governors 
> and then hold a course and charge them thousands of
> dollars to make 
> them governors again. The course fees will give us
> the money to 
> complete the pundit project. MUM staff and faculty
> will be task 
> forced to do all the work for essentially no
> additional expense. 
> We'll tell everyone that this "special" wave of
> "new" knowledge will 
> bring in Sat Yuga by July 21. This will make
> everyone guilty if they 
> don't drop everything and come right away. Then
> we'll tell everyone 
> that this is a "once in a lifetime" opportunity,
> they don't want to 
> miss it. It may never come again. They will all rush
> here.
> 
> After the course everyone will be all blissed and
> happy that they got 
> in on it and are governors again. Oh wait excuse
> me--"CERTIFIED 
> GOVERNORS" with the certificate to prove it. And
> some will be Raja 
> Designates that  were able to sit in the front row,
> near the "real" 
> Rajas, during the course. Like that, like that.
> 
> And even though we said the pundit project was
> completed months ago, 
> when we put out that fake brochure with the doctored
> photos. NOW we 
> will actually have a completed pundit project --
> WELL, except for the 
> pundit part. We'll have some extra cash on hand, and
> a completed 
> housing facility ready for Purusha and/or Mother
> Divine when they are 
> evicted from North Carolina. It will all work out
> very beautifully, 
> and very beautifully, and very beautifully! No one
> will be the wiser, 
> he he he! A little lighter in the wallet perhaps,
> but OBVIOUSLY no 
> one has gotten any WISER!
> 
> Creative Intelligence in action! Infinite Organizing
> Power! It's all 
> s beautiful!
> 
> ENGAGING TOTAL NATURAL LAW -- 
>TO FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE, ALL OF THE TIME!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[FairfieldLife] The Truth Is!

[anonymousff]

It's amazing to see people pay $5800.00 plus room and board so they 
can BE what they already are! :-) ROFLOL

Actually, it's all about getting money to pay for the completion of 
the pundit project. They ran out of money because there are no 
pundits. People have stopped their donations because it was 
contingent on pundits. And the bank won't give them anymore money, 
because the bank money was contingent on the donations of the people 
who thought there would be pundits this time.

So what to do? What to do? Let's un-governorize all the governors 
and then hold a course and charge them thousands of dollars to make 
them governors again. The course fees will give us the money to 
complete the pundit project. MUM staff and faculty will be task 
forced to do all the work for essentially no additional expense. 
We'll tell everyone that this "special" wave of "new" knowledge will 
bring in Sat Yuga by July 21. This will make everyone guilty if they 
don't drop everything and come right away. Then we'll tell everyone 
that this is a "once in a lifetime" opportunity, they don't want to 
miss it. It may never come again. They will all rush here.

After the course everyone will be all blissed and happy that they got 
in on it and are governors again. Oh wait excuse me--"CERTIFIED 
GOVERNORS" with the certificate to prove it. And some will be Raja 
Designates that  were able to sit in the front row, near the "real" 
Rajas, during the course. Like that, like that.

And even though we said the pundit project was completed months ago, 
when we put out that fake brochure with the doctored photos. NOW we 
will actually have a completed pundit project -- WELL, except for the 
pundit part. We'll have some extra cash on hand, and a completed 
housing facility ready for Purusha and/or Mother Divine when they are 
evicted from North Carolina. It will all work out very beautifully, 
and very beautifully, and very beautifully! No one will be the wiser, 
he he he! A little lighter in the wallet perhaps, but OBVIOUSLY no 
one has gotten any WISER!

Creative Intelligence in action! Infinite Organizing Power! It's all 
s beautiful!

ENGAGING TOTAL NATURAL LAW -- 
   TO FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE, ALL OF THE TIME!






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/