[Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

[TheSin]

isn't = it's sorry

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:52 PM, Ben Hines wrote:

That sentence makes no sense

-Ben

On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:45 PM, TheSin wrote:

it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've already posted this to 
fink-devel...

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:17 PM, Ben Hines wrote:

Update of /cvsroot/fink/experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv8177
Added Files:
dia.info
Log Message:
Broken dia
--- NEW FILE: dia.info ---
Package: dia
Version: 0.92
Revision: 10
GCC: 3.3
Depends: libgnomeui2-shlibs, libgnome2-shlibs, libart2-shlibs, 
libunicode-gnome-shlibs, libxml-shlibs, gdk-pixbuf-shlibs, 
libpng3-shlibs, popt-shlibs
BuildDepends: libgnomeui2-dev, libgnome2, libart2, libunicode-gnome, 
libxml, libpng3, gdk-pixbuf, audiofile, esound, glib, gtk+, libjpeg, 
libtiff, netpbm, orbit-dev, readline (>= 4.3-15), imlib, giflib, 
gettext-dev, gettext-bin, libiconv-dev
Source: gnome
Source-MD5: 49a30a8a75bddfe59dc9f92f48afd2c8
#Patch: %n.patch
SetCFLAGS: -no-cpp-precomp
ConfigureParams: --infodir=%i/share/info --mandir=%i/share/man 
--enable-gnome
DocFiles: COPYING README AUTHORS NEWS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS TODO
Description: Diagram drawing program
DescDetail: <<
Dia is a tool for drawing diagrams, borrowing ideas from programs 
such
as visio. It can be used to draw specific types of diagrams such as
network and UML diagrams and flowcharts, while also providing some
more generic objects to draw with. Dia may be extended to use new
shape types by writing a simple XML description of the shape. The
diagrams can be exported to a number of formats including EPS, SVG,
CGM and PNG. Diagrams can also be printed (splitting the diagram to
multiple pages if appropriate).
<<
DescPort: Patch for the gcc3 install-name bug
License: GPL
Homepage: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/
Maintainer: Paul GABORIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-commits




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[Ben Hines]

it is good to work in CVS. But for major dep engine changes you might 
want to work in a 'branch' instead, not HEAD.

-Ben

On Dec 2, 2003, at 7:22 PM, TheSin wrote:

I'm just gonna do it steps, first I need BuildConflicts, which I just 
added, now I'm gonna add the transparent check before every build 
code, it'll remove and install as needed but won't ask since the first 
summary will cover it all anyhow.  And I've got that part almost 
working already, but I need to make small commits in between to not 
confuse myself, and so other can't help find any problems if there are 
any in little burst as so I don't get too far ahead, but this stuff 
has been put off too long, and been complained about too much.  So 
instead of my complaining about it again I just decided to do it.

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 4:23 PM, Max Horn wrote:

I think doing this properly is a very hard task. Are you sure you're 
up to it? For now, it might be *much* simpler to simply change "fink 
remove" to use "apt-get remove" instead of "dpkg --remove". That will 
give you almost exactly the functionality you want w/o having to 
study graph theory.


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

[Ben Hines]

That sentence makes no sense

-Ben

On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:45 PM, TheSin wrote:

it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've already posted this to 
fink-devel...

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:17 PM, Ben Hines wrote:

Update of /cvsroot/fink/experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv8177
Added Files:
dia.info
Log Message:
Broken dia
--- NEW FILE: dia.info ---
Package: dia
Version: 0.92
Revision: 10
GCC: 3.3
Depends: libgnomeui2-shlibs, libgnome2-shlibs, libart2-shlibs, 
libunicode-gnome-shlibs, libxml-shlibs, gdk-pixbuf-shlibs, 
libpng3-shlibs, popt-shlibs
BuildDepends: libgnomeui2-dev, libgnome2, libart2, libunicode-gnome, 
libxml, libpng3, gdk-pixbuf, audiofile, esound, glib, gtk+, libjpeg, 
libtiff, netpbm, orbit-dev, readline (>= 4.3-15), imlib, giflib, 
gettext-dev, gettext-bin, libiconv-dev
Source: gnome
Source-MD5: 49a30a8a75bddfe59dc9f92f48afd2c8
#Patch: %n.patch
SetCFLAGS: -no-cpp-precomp
ConfigureParams: --infodir=%i/share/info --mandir=%i/share/man 
--enable-gnome
DocFiles: COPYING README AUTHORS NEWS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS TODO
Description: Diagram drawing program
DescDetail: <<
Dia is a tool for drawing diagrams, borrowing ideas from programs such
as visio. It can be used to draw specific types of diagrams such as
network and UML diagrams and flowcharts, while also providing some
more generic objects to draw with. Dia may be extended to use new
shape types by writing a simple XML description of the shape. The
diagrams can be exported to a number of formats including EPS, SVG,
CGM and PNG. Diagrams can also be printed (splitting the diagram to
multiple pages if appropriate).
<<
DescPort: Patch for the gcc3 install-name bug
License: GPL
Homepage: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/
Maintainer: Paul GABORIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-commits


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[Ben Hines]

On Dec 2, 2003, at 3:29 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:

3. Calls the utility program rmorphans2 to remove all the packages 
that were only installed as a [Build]Depend, but that I don't want 
kept.

This would be a really nice feature to have implemented directly in 
fink.

-Ben



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.441,1.442 Engine.pm,1.113,1.114

[TheSin]

hmm good find...see this is working already :)  now if a fix was 
committed with it :)  jk I'll get it on my next commit, thanks pogma.

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin F. Hallett wrote:

| + foreach $pname (sort @selected) {
| + $package = Fink::Package->package_by_name($pname);
| +
| + # Can't purge or remove virtuals
| + next if $package->is_virtual();
| +
| + $lversion = &latest_version($package->list_versions());
| + $vo = $package->get_version($lversion);
| +
| + # Can only remove/purge installed pkgs
| + next unless $vo->is_installed();
| +
So now fink will only remove packages if they are at the latest 
version?

peter% fink list esound
Information about 1840 packages read in 4 seconds.
(i)  esound   0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
(i)  esound-bin   0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
(i)  esound-common0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
~ esound-data   [virtual package]
(i)  esound-shlibs0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
[pogma:~] peter% fink remove esound
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink  remove esound
Password:
Information about 1840 packages read in 4 seconds.
Failed: no package specified for command 'remove'!
Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBP81nJbiDAg3OZTLPAQL6/gQAwchTAizKXREuBcOx33ke5Zz4XBJaNtzU
z+5q60Au7z2iYbCz09MFNj8+emjtzBQecF5D98dIeqe+XFVyu4DPLdMZ/DqLfTCN
Dbkl5IYF6litbgJBG5PPddpI8L5EXi5B5uPXbUxIFoThfEpruLcpuhU40umG8i3X
6gc7LT8Ow9g=
=u9G/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Fink-devel] Re: experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test dia.info,NONE,1.1

[TheSin]

it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've already posted this to 
fink-devel...

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:17 PM, Ben Hines wrote:

Update of /cvsroot/fink/experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv8177
Added Files:
dia.info
Log Message:
Broken dia
--- NEW FILE: dia.info ---
Package: dia
Version: 0.92
Revision: 10
GCC: 3.3
Depends: libgnomeui2-shlibs, libgnome2-shlibs, libart2-shlibs, 
libunicode-gnome-shlibs, libxml-shlibs, gdk-pixbuf-shlibs, 
libpng3-shlibs, popt-shlibs
BuildDepends: libgnomeui2-dev, libgnome2, libart2, libunicode-gnome, 
libxml, libpng3, gdk-pixbuf, audiofile, esound, glib, gtk+, libjpeg, 
libtiff, netpbm, orbit-dev, readline (>= 4.3-15), imlib, giflib, 
gettext-dev, gettext-bin, libiconv-dev
Source: gnome
Source-MD5: 49a30a8a75bddfe59dc9f92f48afd2c8
#Patch: %n.patch
SetCFLAGS: -no-cpp-precomp
ConfigureParams: --infodir=%i/share/info --mandir=%i/share/man 
--enable-gnome
DocFiles: COPYING README AUTHORS NEWS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS TODO
Description: Diagram drawing program
DescDetail: <<
Dia is a tool for drawing diagrams, borrowing ideas from programs such
as visio. It can be used to draw specific types of diagrams such as
network and UML diagrams and flowcharts, while also providing some
more generic objects to draw with. Dia may be extended to use new
shape types by writing a simple XML description of the shape. The
diagrams can be exported to a number of formats including EPS, SVG,
CGM and PNG. Diagrams can also be printed (splitting the diagram to
multiple pages if appropriate).
<<
DescPort: Patch for the gcc3 install-name bug
License: GPL
Homepage: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/
Maintainer: Paul GABORIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-commits


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.441,1.442 Engine.pm,1.113,1.114

[Peter O'Gorman]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin F. Hallett wrote:

| + foreach $pname (sort @selected) {
| + $package = Fink::Package->package_by_name($pname);
| +
| + # Can't purge or remove virtuals
| + next if $package->is_virtual();
| +
| + $lversion = &latest_version($package->list_versions());
| + $vo = $package->get_version($lversion);
| +
| + # Can only remove/purge installed pkgs
| + next unless $vo->is_installed();
| +
So now fink will only remove packages if they are at the latest version?

peter% fink list esound
Information about 1840 packages read in 4 seconds.
(i)  esound   0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
(i)  esound-bin   0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
(i)  esound-common0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
~ esound-data   [virtual package]
(i)  esound-shlibs0.2.32-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon
[pogma:~] peter% fink remove esound
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink  remove esound
Password:
Information about 1840 packages read in 4 seconds.
Failed: no package specified for command 'remove'!
Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBP81nJbiDAg3OZTLPAQL6/gQAwchTAizKXREuBcOx33ke5Zz4XBJaNtzU
z+5q60Au7z2iYbCz09MFNj8+emjtzBQecF5D98dIeqe+XFVyu4DPLdMZ/DqLfTCN
Dbkl5IYF6litbgJBG5PPddpI8L5EXi5B5uPXbUxIFoThfEpruLcpuhU40umG8i3X
6gc7LT8Ow9g=
=u9G/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: libfinch (Was: Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field)

[TheSin]

I'd love to start in this but I only know perl, and even that, well you 
read Max's comment I'm sure he is trembling now that I decided to take 
this on, I just hope that you can just convert my perl additions for 
libfinch easily, that is the best I can do for help...sorry

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 5:30 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:

I have started a project to replace the Fink dep engine with a more 
generic one, called libfinch, and have already begun a perl interface 
to my library.  I am developing the project on SourceForge at 
.  I currently do not 
have much time for this project, but I am planning to work on it for a 
"Senior Technology Project" next year, and I will have much more time 
then.  There is a new set of packages on the package submission 
tracker, ID 843416, that provide generic version management, with 
interfaces in Obj-C, C, and Perl.  The libraries must be installed 
with libibrary first, libfinch second, and Finch (Perlmod) third.  All 
assistance is welcome, just email me privately if you want to help.  
At  is a patch to a 
(somewhat) recent CVS Services.pm which replaces the version 
comparison with my faster libfinch (C) library.  It isn't much, but I 
am working on adding "version ranges", "version sets", and 
"associative version sets" which allow the creation of arbitrary 
groups of versions.  The "associative" sets allowing the association 
of arbitrary Objective-C (and later Perl) objects to any subset of 
versions.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[TheSin]

I've already addressed this to a degree, see fink list -i -b and fink 
remove|purge -b

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 4:29 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:

Items two and three allow me to say 'bfink install xmms' and have fink 
install all the deps and builddeps, build xmms, and then remove all 
the builddeps. I can also do 'bfink remove xmms', and all the deps 
will be removed too. Saves lots of disk space, and time too, since an 
'update-all' no longer updates all kinds of packages which are lying 
around but I don't need.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[TheSin]

I'm just gonna do it steps, first I need BuildConflicts, which I just 
added, now I'm gonna add the transparent check before every build code, 
it'll remove and install as needed but won't ask since the first 
summary will cover it all anyhow.  And I've got that part almost 
working already, but I need to make small commits in between to not 
confuse myself, and so other can't help find any problems if there are 
any in little burst as so I don't get too far ahead, but this stuff has 
been put off too long, and been complained about too much.  So instead 
of my complaining about it again I just decided to do it.

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 4:23 PM, Max Horn wrote:

I think doing this properly is a very hard task. Are you sure you're 
up to it? For now, it might be *much* simpler to simply change "fink 
remove" to use "apt-get remove" instead of "dpkg --remove". That will 
give you almost exactly the functionality you want w/o having to study 
graph theory.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[TheSin]

yes to a degree but backwards, compile a list of pkgs that have build 
only deps and search for depends on em, but only if your checking the 
whole tree.

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 4:23 PM, Max Horn wrote:

How exactly could the validator do this? I.e. what exactly do you want 
to "validate", and how? Do you want to check the dependencies of all 
packages for "illegal" deps, or what?


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] Attn : Jeremy Higgs (maintainer of libnet)

[Jeremy Higgs]

Hi Mathieu,

I changed my email a couple of weeks ago, and that was updated in all 
of my fink packages... I also updated it on SourceForge, so I don't 
know what's happening there...

I'll take a look at the updated package tonight.

Thanks!

On 02/12/2003, at 8:12 PM, Mathieu Masseboeuf - NewSports wrote:

Hi,

Submitted an updated libnet package (1.1.1 which was released last 
week)
to the fink sourceforge - because your mail address is no more correct 
in
the package info file.
The update got rejected with the following message :
The maintainer had to change email. Contact fink-devel  ATTENTION
him in the subject.
So (if you are still here) please check that updated info file and if
possible update your mail address on the packages you maintain :)
The strange thing is that I sent an update for Bison, which got 
accepted
despite the maintainer being unreachable ...
Maybe the libnet one didn't went through cuz you are known here ? 
(sorry
if I'm not aware, i'm pretty new here)

--
Mathieu Masseboeuf


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

libfinch (Was: Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field)

[Kyle Moffett]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 02, 2003, at 17:45, TheSin wrote:
Also on a side note I'm working on fink remove -d pkg which will 
remove a pkg and all it's deps, this will need some what of a new dep 
engine, and I'll be able to make a fink deptree pkg using the same 
engine, are there any suggestions/requests before I start this?
I have started a project to replace the Fink dep engine with a more 
generic one, called libfinch, and have already begun a perl interface 
to my library.  I am developing the project on SourceForge at 
.  I currently do not 
have much time for this project, but I am planning to work on it for a 
"Senior Technology Project" next year, and I will have much more time 
then.  There is a new set of packages on the package submission 
tracker, ID 843416, that provide generic version management, with 
interfaces in Obj-C, C, and Perl.  The libraries must be installed with 
libibrary first, libfinch second, and Finch (Perlmod) third.  All 
assistance is welcome, just email me privately if you want to help.  At 
 is a patch to a 
(somewhat) recent CVS Services.pm which replaces the version comparison 
with my faster libfinch (C) library.  It isn't much, but I am working 
on adding "version ranges", "version sets", and "associative version 
sets" which allow the creation of arbitrary groups of versions.  The 
"associative" sets allowing the association of arbitrary Objective-C 
(and later Perl) objects to any subset of versions.

P.S.:
If somebody with CVS access could look at the packages for me, I'd 
really appreciate it, I posted updates several days ago but haven't had 
a response yet.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/zS7Dag7LSGnFq10RAjZXAJ9AgOE/sLmL2YXGslwxhgYcgjPL7ACghOup
FSCgNvqPQfGqiIHY7LIGcJg=
=dBdc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[Daniel Macks]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 03:45:54PM -0700, TheSin wrote:
> 
> Also on a side note I'm working on fink remove -d pkg which will remove 
> a pkg and all it's deps, this will need some what of a new dep engine, 
> and I'll be able to make a fink deptree pkg using the same engine, are 
> there any suggestions/requests before I start this?

A bunch of months ago there was a brief discussion about fink
maintaining a database of packages that were explicitly installed (cf.
those that were only installed due to dependencies of them), with
maybe an eye towards automatically removing those that were
automatically installed when they were no longer needed. It's probably
in the -devel archives...somewhere. Also related might be Feature
Requests tracker #496468.

dan
-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[Dave Vasilevsky]

I thought some of you might be interested in the wrapper I've been 
using for Fink lately. It requires Fink packages expect-pm and 
debfoster-2.5 . Here's what the wrapper `bfink` does to modify the 
build process:



bfink
Description: Binary data


rmorphans2
Description: Binary data


1. Becomes root with 'sudo -H', so that ccache doesn't ignore my 
max-disk-usage settings and dump root-owned files in ~/.ccache .

2. Adds any newly installed packages to my keepers, and removes any 
newly removed packages from my keepers.

3. Calls the utility program rmorphans2 to remove all the packages that 
were only installed as a [Build]Depend, but that I don't want kept.

Items two and three allow me to say 'bfink install xmms' and have fink 
install all the deps and builddeps, build xmms, and then remove all the 
builddeps. I can also do 'bfink remove xmms', and all the deps will be 
removed too. Saves lots of disk space, and time too, since an 
'update-all' no longer updates all kinds of packages which are lying 
around but I don't need.

Obviously the ugly techniques I use aren't the way Fink should do 
things. This is just a pointer to one of the good ways a knowledge of 
the dep tree could be used inside Fink. I'd within fink.

Toodles,
vasi

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[Max Horn]

Am Dienstag, 02.12.03 um 23:45 Uhr schrieb TheSin:

up until recently BuildDependsOnly was an accepted field but it didn't 
do anything.  Dave has added a warning if a pkgs depends on a 
BuildDependsOnly pkg now.  And I just added to fink cvs two more 
functions that now use BuildDependsOnly.  those being fink list -b or 
fink list -b -i to see which you have installed and fink remove|purge 
-b or -b list.

I'd just like to take this time to get all Maintainers to check there 
pkgs and make sure they have this field in proper pkgs, mostly -dev 
pkgs.  I might self know I have some pkgs missing it, ie 
test-simple-pm and test-hardness-pm and I'm sure many others.  I'm 
going to be adding proper checking the validator for this field 
shortly.
How exactly could the validator do this? I.e. what exactly do you want 
to "validate", and how? Do you want to check the dependencies of all 
packages for "illegal" deps, or what?

Also on a side note I'm working on fink remove -d pkg which will 
remove a pkg and all it's deps, this will need some what of a new dep 
engine, and I'll be able to make a fink deptree pkg using the same 
engine, are there any suggestions/requests before I start this?
I think doing this properly is a very hard task. Are you sure you're up 
to it? For now, it might be *much* simpler to simply change "fink 
remove" to use "apt-get remove" instead of "dpkg --remove". That will 
give you almost exactly the functionality you want w/o having to study 
graph theory.

Max



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly field

[TheSin]

up until recently BuildDependsOnly was an accepted field but it didn't 
do anything.  Dave has added a warning if a pkgs depends on a 
BuildDependsOnly pkg now.  And I just added to fink cvs two more 
functions that now use BuildDependsOnly.  those being fink list -b or 
fink list -b -i to see which you have installed and fink remove|purge 
-b or -b list.

I'd just like to take this time to get all Maintainers to check there 
pkgs and make sure they have this field in proper pkgs, mostly -dev 
pkgs.  I might self know I have some pkgs missing it, ie test-simple-pm 
and test-hardness-pm and I'm sure many others.  I'm going to be adding 
proper checking the validator for this field shortly.

Also on a side note I'm working on fink remove -d pkg which will remove 
a pkg and all it's deps, this will need some what of a new dep engine, 
and I'll be able to make a fink deptree pkg using the same engine, are 
there any suggestions/requests before I start this?

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Fink-devel] A fix for nedit on 10.3!

[Koen van der Drift]

Hi,

NEdit still hasn't been added to the 10.3 tree because there were 
problems building it. Today I ran into this on the blog of Ben Reed (of 
all places :), and the solution seems to work!

here's the link:  http://ranger.befunk.com/blog/archives/000246.html, 
and look for the reply by merle.

Please add this to the 10.3 tree,

thanks,

- Koen.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Package naming..(Max? )

[Max Horn]

Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Darian Lanx:

[...]

IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not "gnupg-alpha" 
or "gnupg-testing" etc.?
Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a 
development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant 
for production because it usual has many experimental features of the 
OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it 
went into the stable branch too quickly.

thus my dilemma
It's don't see the dilemma. This is *precisely* what "gnupg-testing" 
means.

Max



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Reinstall of tetex-base destroys texmf-local/ls-R

[Remi Mommsen]

Hi Dave,

I just updated the tetex-base package. That worked well. However, I 
noticed that in this process a new (virgin) ls-R was installed in 
/sw/etc/texmf.local. Therefore I needed to run mktexlsr to regain 
access to the installed packages in texmf.local. Could this be added to 
the post-install script to tetex-base?

Thanks a lot and best regards

Remi

-
If it's green, it's biology. If it stinks, it's chemistry. If it has
numbers, it's math. If it doesn't work, it's technology. (anonymous)
*
Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of California, Irvine   URL:http://cern.ch/mommsen
c/o SLAC voice:++1 (650) 926-3595
2575 Sand Hill Road #35fax:++1 (650) 926-3882
Menlo Park, CA 94025, US  home:++1 (650) 233-9041
*


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Package naming..(Max? )

[Max Horn]

Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Darian Lanx:

[...]

IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not "gnupg-alpha" 
or "gnupg-testing" etc.?
Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a 
development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant 
for production because it usual has many experimental features of the 
OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it 
went into the stable branch too quickly.

thus my dilemma
I still don't see a dilemma :-). For me the names "gnupg-testing" or 
"gnupg-unstable" still describe *exactly* what you say above in the 
Debian/Fink way of naming things.

Max



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] best of fink

[Darian Lanx]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Joe Corneli wrote:

Would it be possible to post use statistics and/or
let people vote on what their favorite packages are?
Joe

try
'fink desc popularity-contest'
- -d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/zKMRPMoaMn4kKR4RAwbTAKCSyWw2UVHSOzUAi5jQuHg+j0YGqwCfRdRH
xvdQlTCmEuJFa5gwBqftR+8=
=4KKx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] best of fink

[Joe Corneli]

Would it be possible to post use statistics and/or
let people vote on what their favorite packages are?

Joe


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Package naming..(Max? )

[TheSin]

sounds allot like testing to me or how about gnupg-unstable ?

---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 1-Dec-03, at 3:27 PM, Darian Lanx wrote:

Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a 
development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant 
for production because it usual has many experimental features of the 
OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it 
went into the stable branch too quickly.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-devel] Package naming..(Max? )

[Darian Lanx]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Max Horn wrote:
Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 11:31 Uhr schrieb D. Höhn:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello all

I know we have an excellent and working gnupg package. Yet, as I am a
frequent user and thus sometimes test GPG or use experimental features i
would like to include a package for the development tree (namels 1.3.4).
I have it installed and it works on my local box. Yes I cannot name this
package gnupg-dev since that would violate policies.
is gnupgdev a suitable name? Thanks

IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not "gnupg-alpha" or 
"gnupg-testing" etc.?

Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a 
development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant for 
production because it usual has many experimental features of the 
OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it went 
into the stable branch too quickly.

thus my dilemma

- -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/y8BtPMoaMn4kKR4RAxB3AJ4iSSgf5DYcw9H+MetTrwhUChGJlwCfROgl
xm2WyD2RXgOaOjL7FnYs4MY=
=z3ap
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Attn : Jeremy Higgs (maintainer of libnet)

[Darian Lanx]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Max Horn wrote:

Am Dienstag, 02.12.03 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Masseboeuf - NewSports:

[...]

The strange thing is that I sent an update for Bison, which got accepted
despite the maintainer being unreachable ...
The maintainer of bison (me) is unreachable? Interesting :-)


Because _I_ spoke to the "unreachable" Maintainer  :=)

- -d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/zJKGPMoaMn4kKR4RA5sNAJ9T1eSXkz5VI3G3yeQ+CxWv+L+VtQCfS08R
mtGgRBWuJwisfWADt1OAXtM=
=KprY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Package naming..(Max? )

[Darian Lanx]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
TheSin wrote:

an other major problem you might encounter is if it's a nightly tar file 
the MD5sum will change nightly.

I am not that daring ;)

It is development but it still has "scheduled" releases.

- -d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/y8CcPMoaMn4kKR4RA4/lAJ9vzKsTad7cuwGk/rMrF85aGE0LxgCcCom4
n2EQDWKvABl2+N0p/v5s2PE=
=HSae
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Attn : Jeremy Higgs (maintainer of libnet)

[Max Horn]

Am Dienstag, 02.12.03 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Masseboeuf - 
NewSports:

[...]

The strange thing is that I sent an update for Bison, which got 
accepted
despite the maintainer being unreachable ...

The maintainer of bison (me) is unreachable? Interesting :-)

Max



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Attn : Jeremy Higgs (maintainer of libnet)

[Mathieu Masseboeuf - NewSports]

Hi,

Submitted an updated libnet package (1.1.1 which was released last week)
to the fink sourceforge - because your mail address is no more correct in
the package info file.
The update got rejected with the following message :
>The maintainer had to change email. Contact fink-devel  ATTENTION 
>him in the subject.
So (if you are still here) please check that updated info file and if
possible update your mail address on the packages you maintain :)

The strange thing is that I sent an update for Bison, which got accepted
despite the maintainer being unreachable ...
Maybe the libnet one didn't went through cuz you are known here ? (sorry
if I'm not aware, i'm pretty new here)

-- 
Mathieu Masseboeuf



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel