Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yes, I found that out yesterday, I have tracked down the header I was missing (if_var.h) I just need to brush up on how to get the fink build-system to place a file into the source tree after un- compressing it, as opposed to just patching existing files. I am glad to report that I have net-snmp 5.3 working on Mac OS X 10.4. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 2 Jan 2006, at 22:57, Martin Costabel wrote: Cian Hughes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so I'm currently trying to do two things with regard to net_snmp: I need to figure out exactly what apple keeps in /System/Library/ Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders (which is referenced from http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.3/net_snmp-18/Makefile There are a couple hundred files in there, almost 20% of what is in /usr/include. Some of them are the same as in /usr/include, some are different, of interest for net_snmp mainly those in netinet and netinet6. You get them if you install and run darwinbuild http:// opendarwin.org/projects/darwinbuild/ Most of them are in the kernel tarball which you can download from http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/Roots/8F46/xnu.root.tar.gz a few come from other projects, but these are probably not needed by net_snmp. -- Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDupDRaVVfOlCF0TQRAu3OAJ91LNDIghKN837gaDtZTan0AdZ7rACfXC9G /8kpYizPDh4G95mLdxyriug= =P/HJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so I'm currently trying to do two things with regard to net_snmp: I need to figure out exactly what apple keeps in /System/Library/ Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders (which is referenced from http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.3/net_snmp-18/Makefile and secondly I need to adapt the current patches for net-snmp 5.3 the latest version. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24 Dec 2005, at 08:47, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Dec 24, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: On June 23, 2005 11:08, Cian Hughes wrote: I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they will reply shortly. Hmm. http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.3/net_snmp-18/ What's the problem? Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDuU53aVVfOlCF0TQRAlUXAKCASJ/p6WpfESBnTmmCHD3AKDPdfgCfU1GS O41mfnVbC+xMSJ5ZRWWMjKA= =uAGg -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
Cian Hughes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so I'm currently trying to do two things with regard to net_snmp: I need to figure out exactly what apple keeps in /System/Library/Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders (which is referenced from http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.3/net_snmp-18/Makefile There are a couple hundred files in there, almost 20% of what is in /usr/include. Some of them are the same as in /usr/include, some are different, of interest for net_snmp mainly those in netinet and netinet6. You get them if you install and run darwinbuild http://opendarwin.org/projects/darwinbuild/ Most of them are in the kernel tarball which you can download from http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/Roots/8F46/xnu.root.tar.gz a few come from other projects, but these are probably not needed by net_snmp. -- Martin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
On June 23, 2005 11:08, Cian Hughes wrote: I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they will reply shortly. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Six months after this discussion, we still have the same mess with the net-snmp packages for Tiger: The 5.2.1 version in main does not build, and the outdated 5.0.7 version in crypto does not build now either, because it depends on autoconf which conflicts with autoconf2.5, and the latter is depended on by a couple of other packages. Cian, we are on 10.4.3 now and have been for quite a while; what is the situation with the darwin sources of net-snmp now? Is the system net-snmp still broken? And what about the new release 5.2.2? If there is no working net-snmp package for Tiger soon, I think we will have to revive the idea of scrapping this package altogether. -- Martin On 23 Meith 2005, at 09:12, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Thanks, Cian! I was looking around the other day, and I got the impression that the patches for 5.2 were available with the Darwin source. Assuming not much has changed between 5.2 and 5.2.1, they'll probably be quite useful. I guess it also depends on when 10.4.2 is out! Jeremy. On 23/06/2005, at 18:00, Cian Hughes wrote: Yes, I'll take care of maintaining net-snmp, as soon as apple release their patches for 5.2.1 (which they should do at the same time as 10.4.2) I'll work on adapting it to compile without the private headers. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 23 Meith 2005, at 01:03, Jeremy Higgs wrote: OK, I guess we keep the package, then! Would anyone be prepared to take over the maintainership (?) for net-snmp, in that case? As evidenced by my lack of activity in Fink, I haven't (and still don't have) a great deal of spare time. If there's someone who could maintain net-snmp a better better than I have, then I'm sure Fink and the users of the package will benefit. Otherwise, I'll have a go at getting 5.2.1 to work in the near future. Thanks, Jeremy. On 22/06/2005, at 22:46, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for this either. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote: Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards, Cian Hughes On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc= =lCHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
On Dec 24, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: On June 23, 2005 11:08, Cian Hughes wrote: I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they will reply shortly. Hmm. http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.3/net_snmp-18/ What's the problem? Peter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
Ok the problem was basically due to school, I was back at it and working rather hard by the time apple released the patch set, hopefully at some stage today i'll fix up the patchset from apple so that it will work for fink and we should be good to go again. Sorry about the delay guys. Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This is my signature, often imitated, never beaten. On 22 Dec 2005, at 22:51, Brad Schwie wrote: What's the current status with net-snmp? I'm not having much luck turning up a patch for Tiger... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
Thanks, Cian! I was looking around the other day, and I got the impression that the patches for 5.2 were available with the Darwin source. Assuming not much has changed between 5.2 and 5.2.1, they'll probably be quite useful. I guess it also depends on when 10.4.2 is out! Jeremy. On 23/06/2005, at 18:00, Cian Hughes wrote: Yes, I'll take care of maintaining net-snmp, as soon as apple release their patches for 5.2.1 (which they should do at the same time as 10.4.2) I'll work on adapting it to compile without the private headers. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 23 Meith 2005, at 01:03, Jeremy Higgs wrote: OK, I guess we keep the package, then! Would anyone be prepared to take over the maintainership (?) for net-snmp, in that case? As evidenced by my lack of activity in Fink, I haven't (and still don't have) a great deal of spare time. If there's someone who could maintain net-snmp a better better than I have, then I'm sure Fink and the users of the package will benefit. Otherwise, I'll have a go at getting 5.2.1 to work in the near future. Thanks, Jeremy. On 22/06/2005, at 22:46, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for this either. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote: Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards, Cian Hughes On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http:// www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc= =lCHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/? ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuV2a6wPs8J05MxMRAqpVAJ9064NEmeSAJn8ev47BuNGUAFnpLgCdFw7P 7rco/kFCd5N7iGvb4KDHJVg= =4RJz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they will reply shortly. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 23 Meith 2005, at 09:12, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Thanks, Cian! I was looking around the other day, and I got the impression that the patches for 5.2 were available with the Darwin source. Assuming not much has changed between 5.2 and 5.2.1, they'll probably be quite useful. I guess it also depends on when 10.4.2 is out! Jeremy. On 23/06/2005, at 18:00, Cian Hughes wrote: Yes, I'll take care of maintaining net-snmp, as soon as apple release their patches for 5.2.1 (which they should do at the same time as 10.4.2) I'll work on adapting it to compile without the private headers. Regards, Cian Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 23 Meith 2005, at 01:03, Jeremy Higgs wrote: OK, I guess we keep the package, then! Would anyone be prepared to take over the maintainership (?) for net-snmp, in that case? As evidenced by my lack of activity in Fink, I haven't (and still don't have) a great deal of spare time. If there's someone who could maintain net-snmp a better better than I have, then I'm sure Fink and the users of the package will benefit. Otherwise, I'll have a go at getting 5.2.1 to work in the near future. Thanks, Jeremy. On 22/06/2005, at 22:46, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for this either. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote: Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards, Cian Hughes On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http:// www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc= =lCHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/? ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuV2a6wPs8J05MxMRAqpVAJ9064NEmeSAJn8ev47BuNGUAFnpLgCdFw7P 7rco/kFCd5N7iGvb4KDHJVg= =4RJz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards, Cian Hughes On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path.- ---TShttp://southofheaven.org/Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone,I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version...On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too.OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package.If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future...Thanks,Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3oicA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc==lCHz-END PGP SIGNATURESF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategiesfrom IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up tospeed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click___Fink-devel mailing listFink-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for this either. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote: Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards, Cian Hughes On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net- snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http:// www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc= =lCHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuV2a6wPs8J05MxMRAqpVAJ9064NEmeSAJn8ev47BuNGUAFnpLgCdFw7P 7rco/kFCd5N7iGvb4KDHJVg= =4RJz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
OK, I guess we keep the package, then! Would anyone be prepared to take over the maintainership (?) for net- snmp, in that case? As evidenced by my lack of activity in Fink, I haven't (and still don't have) a great deal of spare time. If there's someone who could maintain net-snmp a better better than I have, then I'm sure Fink and the users of the package will benefit. Otherwise, I'll have a go at getting 5.2.1 to work in the near future. Thanks, Jeremy. On 22/06/2005, at 22:46, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for this either. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote: Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards, Cian Hughes On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http:// www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc= =lCHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuV2a6wPs8J05MxMRAqpVAJ9064NEmeSAJn8ev47BuNGUAFnpLgCdFw7P 7rco/kFCd5N7iGvb4KDHJVg= =4RJz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
If I remember correctly, the Nessus security scanner uses net-snmp libs to check and scan for snmp vulnerabilities. While it should be able to work with the version that comes preinstalled on Tiger (even Panther, but at v5.0.8), still having the SSL-enabled option would be welcome. Of course, I should also mention that the nessus Fink package is a bit outdated from the current official version (2.2.0 vs. 2.2.4). John Courcoul On Jun 21, 2005, at 2:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. ... Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone,I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version...On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too.OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one.Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package.If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future...Thanks,Jeremy.
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one.Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package.If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future...Assuming that nothing depends on this, eliminating the package is OK with me. However, the "fink way" to bring a package to the end of its life -- when the package involves a shared library -- is to restructure the package so that it *only* builds the -shlibs splitoff. This way, net-snmp-shlibs and net-snmp-ssl-shlibs can continue to exist for the benefit of anyone who may have compiled something which links to this, but since net-snmp-dev won't exist, nobody in the future can compile anything which will link to it. -- Dave
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
I tried today to compile net-snmp 5.2.1 on Tiger, an it has not worked properly, I succeeded in patching the new source but it seems from apples patches that it must include some headers from: /System/Library/Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders , which I for one don't have, I have been unable to compile it, falling into undefined symbols problems, since there are many problems with apples net-snmp, for example no hrProcessor tables, I think net-snmp-ssl should remain in fink. If anyone has successfully patched either CVS or 5.2.1 snmp and got it to compile please let me know (I am aware this is off topic from fink-devel).Just my two (euro) cents. Regards,Cian Hughes[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 21 Meith 2005, at 08:31, David R. Morrison wrote:On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one.Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package.If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future...Assuming that nothing depends on this, eliminating the package is OK with me. However, the "fink way" to bring a package to the end of its life -- when the package involves a shared library -- is to restructure the package so that it *only* builds the -shlibs splitoff. This way, net-snmp-shlibs and net-snmp-ssl-shlibs can continue to exist for the benefit of anyone who may have compiled something which links to this, but since net-snmp-dev won't exist, nobody in the future can compile anything which will link to it. -- Dave
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net- snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http:// www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/ net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't a terribly important package. If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future... Thanks, Jeremy. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc= =lCHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... Thanks! Jeremy. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger
Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version... On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source. (http:// darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to use these for the Fink package... According to the license file on the server http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/net_snmp.txt, the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers the patches, too. OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
