breeder's association

1999-05-18 Thread bcjdvm
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you can stand one more opinion on this subject, since Peg Knutson
asked for it (I think you meant me Peg?), I too am a firm believer that
adding more beauracracy just adds more problems.  We have the committees
in place within the NFHR which have been, in the past, and are currently
addressing these issues that are being discussed.  The real need is for
more of us to get involved and volunteer to help in these areas.

In this "Me" generation, service is not a popular topic.  We're all about
"what can I get", not "what can I give".  Do you realize, though, that
the future of the NFHR, and ultimately the Fjordhorses that we all love
so much, depends more on our willingness to help out and volunteer than
it does any other single factor.  Carol did not make a big point about
it, but she has voluntered recently.  The particular thing she voluntered
for was full, so I wonder if she'd be willing to volunteer for something
else.  Or, though all the seats were already taken on the committee she
voluntered for, would she be willing to volunteer to help with whatever
that committee needs?

And how about the rest of you?  Please keep in mind that experience is
not as important as eagerness.  Ability is not nearly as important as is
availability.  Please think about how you can help.

Sincerely,

Brian Jacobsen, DVM
Norwegian Fjordhest Ranch
Salisbury, North Carolina



Re: Fjord Breeder's "Association", "Group", "Whatever"

1999-05-17 Thread FJORDFUN
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Mary,
I liked your comments. We need to be inclusive, not exclusive.
Considering the Fjords' historic background as family farm horses,
we certainly need to honor the niche of small owner and not cater to 
the large breeders only. After all if they're so successful and so 
profitable, they are not the ones that need further support from the 
organization. I think Carol is to be commended for turning her farm
into a going concern in that fairly remote location. I'm sure a lot of her
return comes from the bed & breakfast and training and sales commissions
as well as from sales of the horses she actually bred or imported or stud fees
from Gjest and whomever else she is standing. The point is not to distance
the wealthy, successful breeders from the beginning or small breeders,
but to share information and help each other along. Is there not sufficient
Fjord interest to support us all? If the answer is no, could we not create 
this by working together, instead of against?
Thinking along these lines will bring a positive communication, which 
may
lead to a positive association.
Best wishes,
Alex Wind
Harmony Springs Farm (2 Fjords)
Shawsville VA



Re: Fjord Breeder's "Association", "Group", "Whatever"

1999-05-14 Thread MNoonan931
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mary,  Great posting,  I agree whole  heartedly,
>From one of the passionate little guys, you so mentioned
Michele Noonan (going to get my pregnant new mare tomorrow)
In windy Montana



Re: Fjord Breeder's "Association", "Group", "Whatever"

1999-05-14 Thread Mary Thurman
This message is from: Mary Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--- Arthur  Rivoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Arthur  Rivoire)
 > What I am talking about is an organization to
> address specific needs and
> interests of breeders. - As it's been pointed
> out many times by the
> NFHR, the interests and needs of the general
> membership are not always the
> same as breeders.  For instance, why should people
> who own only geldings,
> or those that have absolutely no interest in
> breeding be concerned with the
> things that vitally concern me as a breeder?  
>  So, what's wrong with breeders getting together in
> an organization to
> address their interests?  
  
Carol,

If breeders form their own organization to help each other and to
better the breed through their common interest, I see nothing wrong
with a Breeders Association.  In this vein, it would be virtually the
same as our "Promotional Groups" - a group of people getting together
to do what they can to promote the breed as a whole.  These are our
"using horse" groups.  They sponsor shows, clinics, etc., to help those
who use Fjords do that better.  A "breeders' group" formed for the
purpose of putting on seminars, clinics, etc., to be better informed
about the breeding issues of the Fjord could help ALL breeders do a
good job - if the membership is not limited in anyway, ie. no exclusive
"definition of a breeder".  This would allow access to the group for
small breeders - those who have only a mare or two, no stallion on
premises, produce only a few foals, BUT want to produce only very good
foals.  The small breeder is often the one with limited resources and
limited access to advice and information.  He is the one who needs the
shared knowledge of experienced breeders in order to produce good
(sometimes great) foals.  If the needs of the smaller breeders are not
addressed, they are the ones who will be unable, often, to produce good
horses - to the detriment of the breed.  Often these small breeders are
just as passionate about the breed as the bigger breeders - they own
one or two really good mares that they either bought or raised and want
to use them to produce good foals for the breed - but they do not have
the resources to "go bigtime".  I speak from experience here.  You
would not believe how incredibly hard it is to find out ANYTHING about
Fjords - let alone find a good stallion for your prize mare - if you
are small, out of the "main loop", live on the edge of nowhere, and
have little cash resources.  Hard, yes - but not impossible!  How much
easier it would have been for us to have had some organization we could
go to for basic information.  This should  be one of the goals of any
"breeders' group" - if you ignore the little guy, it is to the
detriment of the breed.   This said, I think the idea could be
workable.  Just be careful that it does not become an exclusive "rich
man's club".

Mary
===
Mary Thurman
Raintree Farms
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com



Re: Fjord Breeder's "Association", "Group", "Whatever"

1999-05-13 Thread Julia Will
This message is from: Julia Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The idea of a "Breeder's Committee" has been discussed by the Board a
couple of times, and there never seemed to be a great deal of interest,
possibly because there are so many things going on in all of our lives.  I
personally am generally over committed, and not anxious to have another
thing to become involved with.  If such a group were to form, I would hope
it would be under the "umbrella" of the NFHR, and not another entity to
"join".  My pennies worth.  Julie



Re: Fjord Breeder's "Association", "Group", "Whatever"

1999-05-13 Thread Arthur Rivoire
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur  Rivoire)



Hello All!  From Carol ar Beaver Dam Farm in Nova Scotia where it is now
snowing sligtly after 80 degree weather last week.  Nuts!

Thanks to everybody for giving your opinions on a Breeder's Association.
Almost all negative, but at least gives us food for thought.

It's vitally important you understand, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT ANOTHER
REGISTRY! 

 You're all correct. I couldn't agree more! There certainly are too many of
those, although it seems that situation is working itself out.  The NFHR is
the biggest by far, and will probably be the only registry in a short time.
 The original registry is called, I believe, THE FJORDHORSE ASSOCIATION,
started by Gene Bauer.  Although it was the original registry, "THE
ASSOCIATION" is now definitely #2.    By the way, the NFHR was formed
because of a problem and/or fight between two big breeders, Gene Bauer and
Harold Jacobsen, and  Jacobsen was instrumental in founding the NFHR.  ---
The FJORD BREEDERS OF AMERICA is the 3rd registry, but never amounted to
much. 

What I am talking about is an organization to address specific needs and
interests of breeders. - As it's been pointed out many times by the
NFHR, the interests and needs of the general membership are not always the
same as breeders.  For instance, why should people who own only geldings,
or those that have absolutely no interest in breeding be concerned with the
things that vitally concern me as a breeder?  
 So, what's wrong with breeders getting together in an organization to
address their interests?  

I may be wrong, but it seems to me that the general perception of "A
Breeder" is something akin to Ford Motor Co., . . . you know, in business
for the bottom line only. --- How about most of us are breeding Fjordhorses
because we have an all-consuming, passionate interest in the breed, and
therefore have dedicated our lives to maintaining the quality of this
extraordinary horse?  And feeling that way, we might benefit and enjoy the
company of like-minded people.  And through that association of like-minded
people even might be able to do a better job for the horses.  I think it's
possible.  I think it would be for the betterment of the breed.  I don't
think it would be harmful to the NFHR.  Why should it be?  

I've had a generally negative response to this idea, but have we heard from
breeders?   

As to there being too many organizations   I would agree that more than
one REGISTRY is too many. 

 But, do you think that the various Fjord Clubs that are springing up
across the country are detrimental?  I wouldn't think so.  I think it's
great!  The more the better.  They all have formed because of their special
itnerest  usually holding clinics or shows.  Anything wrong with that?
I don't think so.  

An association of breeders, in my opinion, would be a very good thing for
the breed.  Good Heavens, why not?  Why all this negative thinking?  Can't
anybody think of any positive aspects of the idea?  Why not explore the
idea with an open mind, and save all the negatives for later after we've
decided whether such an idea is something to pursue.

Regards,  Carol

 

 
Carol and Arthur Rivoire
Beaver Dam Farm Fjords II
R.R. 7 Pomquet
Antigonish County
Nova Scotia
B2G 2L4
902 386 2304
http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/beaverdf



Re: BREEDER'S ASSOCIATION

1999-05-13 Thread Jean Gayle
This message is from: "Jean Gayle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Interesting point Mike, I always thought it meant the stallion i.e. "bred"
the mare.  So a new way to look at it.

Jean Gayle
Aberdeen, WA
[Authoress of "The Colonel's Daughter" ]
http://www.techline.com/~jgayle
-Original Message-
From: Mike May, Registrar NFHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, May 13, 1999 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: BREEDER'S ASSOCIATION


>This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>make their SOLE income from Fjords either.  Not even Carol at Beaver Dam
>Farm does.  I guess I would like to hear the definition of a "Professional
>Breeder" too.  Or the definition of a "Non-Professional Breeder".  Actually
>I would like to know what others think the term "Breeder" means.  To me the
>"Breeder" is the owner of the mare at the time of service.  So anyone can
>be a breeder as long as you are a  owner of a mare.  Owning a stallion only
>makes you a stallion owner it doesn't make you a breeder (Professional or
>otherwise).
>
>Mike
>
>===
>
>Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry
>Mike May, Registrar
>Voice 716-872-4114
>FAX 716-787-0497
>
>http://www.nfhr.com
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



Re: BREEDER'S ASSOCIATION

1999-05-13 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR

This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 08:55 PM 5/12/99 -0400, you wrote:

What in the world is a non-professional breeder? Is this another " Back
Yard Breeder " catagory.or just implying that someone dosnt make their
SOLE income from breeding Norwegian Fjords? I for one, have met many
Fjord breeders in the last  10 years, and not one of them can claim that they
only breed these horses for a living.


And I have probably met and talked to many more.  I don't know of any that 
make their SOLE income from Fjords either.  Not even Carol at Beaver Dam 
Farm does.  I guess I would like to hear the definition of a "Professional 
Breeder" too.  Or the definition of a "Non-Professional Breeder".  Actually 
I would like to know what others think the term "Breeder" means.  To me the 
"Breeder" is the owner of the mare at the time of service.  So anyone can 
be a breeder as long as you are a  owner of a mare.  Owning a stallion only 
makes you a stallion owner it doesn't make you a breeder (Professional or 
otherwise).


Mike

===

Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry
Mike May, Registrar
Voice 716-872-4114
FAX 716-787-0497

http://www.nfhr.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-12 Thread FJORDFUN
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Carol,
Count me in! Sounds like a spiffy idea. I would think that all
breeders, even backyard breeders who only produce a foal once
every three years, or so, around competition schedules, could be 
involved. Anyone who is adding to the Fjord breed, needs to be
informed about the latest information, and breed standards and 
husbandry goals and methods.
With this e-mail, geography doesn't stand in the way so much,
as ongoing dialog is possible.
Fjording forever!
Alex Wind
Harmony Springs Farm
Shawsville VA 24162



re: Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-12 Thread Margaret Strachan
This message is from: "Margaret Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I can't see that a  Fjord Breeder's Association would serve any purpose that
the NFHR can't at the national level.   The breeder's associations that I am
familiar with are for race horse breeders at the local level.  They serve as
a local voice at the state and national level (politically) for the breeders
and offer incentive programs for California bred horses.  For example $50
paid in to the incentive program brings you an extra 20% of the purse if
your horse wins, and 15% of a place or show.  One important function of the
local breeder's association is they maintain a colostrum bank and a list of
available nurse mares.  Fjord Horse breeder's could choose to form local
organizations to help support each other, but that is already done
informally.  I don't see any reason to undermine the NFHR and possibly
confuse potential owners.  Just my 2 cents worth...
Margaret Strachan
Village Farm
Nuevo, CA
Where it is hot--90 degrees today--Summer is around the corner.



Re: BREEDER'S ASSOCIATION

1999-05-12 Thread Pedfjords
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 99-05-12 06:01:23 EDT, you write:

<< 
 Hello from Carol Rivoire at Beaver Dam Farm Fjords in Nova Scotia -
 
 For a long time now I've thought that the formation of a BREEDER'S
 ASSOCIATION would be beneficial to breeders and to the breed.  Such an
 organization would be able to address the needs specific to breeders (new
 breeders, established breeders, maybe even non-professional breeders.)  All
 that could be decided by the interested participants.  Such an organization
 could, for example, do co-operative advertising.  It could also speak with
 a united voice to the NFHR on issues of importance to breeders.  It could
 organize Evaluations . . . sponsor them even.  
  >>

**


  Hi List from warm So. Calif. ( 85 )  

 I wanted to comment on this idea, brought out by Carol. In my heart, Im 
NOT sure why this would be a BAD idea, but for the life of me, I cant figure 
out why another  and new group would be nessessary, or wanted.given the 
efforts of recent years to bring the seperate Norwegian Fjord groups 
TOGETHER. 

I have a couple of questions:

 What in the world is a non-professional breeder? Is this another " Back 
Yard Breeder " catagory.or just implying that someone dosnt make their 
SOLE income from breeding Norwegian Fjords? I for one, have met many 
Fjord breeders in the last  10 years, and not one of them can claim that they 
only breed these horses for a living. 

 So,  given that most ( if not all ) of us fall into the non-professional 
breeder catagory, what would a different and seperate group, do to help me? I 
already co-op advertising  here in So. Calif. with another breeder, and they 
also offer me WEB space for my Stallion and Fjords for sale on their 
site.This only takes communication, and friendship. No reason to compete 
here, this California market is starved for nice Fjords, and neither of us 
has ever advertised any of our stock, without selling rather quickly. 

 I also wonder if, " speaking to the NFHR in a United Voice " is not 
already occuring? With the access we all have to the BOD, and the Herald, and 
this list, not to mention the chat groups,  communication is better in 
the Fjord horse world than it has ever been. Sometimes I wonder if the 
INTERNET hasnt brought all of us together in a way, that 10 years ago, just 
didnt happen. I for one, have sure met alot of you here.

One last thought, ( promise ) I can only guess at the amount of work it 
takes to put on an Evaluation. I know that it took the Midwest Fjord club 
quite awhile and TONS of work to put a great one together. I would think that 
anyone undertaking this huge amount of responsibility would LOVE any kind of 
hand, taking care of millions of details. If someone was interested, Im sure 
you could help, and Im not sure of how, logistically, a group of professional 
( ?) and non-professional breeders would be able to pull off putting an 
Evaluation together, given that is is held locally SOMEWHERE.and where 
would the responsibility fall to delagate the tons of local details ?  

The idea of a Breeder group, sponsoring its own Evaluation is a 
dangerious one. One needs only to look at the implications of one breeder ( 
example ), active in sponsoring its own Evaluation, and having his own horses 
win..EVEN IF HE HAPPENS TO OWN WONDERFUL FJORDS.it could ( unfairly 
with the best of intentions ) turn into a situation similar to the Paint 
Horse world, where we spent years sucking up to just the right judges, 
trainers, and had to pay 200.00 for 10 min. time to have someone else lead 
our horse into a show ring, to have a chance at a big ribbon. No thanks, been 
there, done that. I am NOT implying that any of our fine Evaluators, or 
Breeders have done that, but to sponser your own game, is a little bit risky, 
given that the most active people prob. WOULD have the best Evaluated 
horsesas they are spending the most time and money to promote the breed, 
therefore have the best bred horses. ( Just a guess )

  
 * kind of like asking the fox to mind the chicken house. 

Just my .05 cents.flame away !   Lisa Pedersen   Pedersens 
Fjords 
 
Norco, Ca.  PAV FJORDS



Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-12 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR

This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 07:07 PM 5/11/99 -0800, you wrote:

Carol is talking about something very different from the Registries...The
Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry and the Norwegian fjord Horse Association in
the US, and the Canadian fjord Horse Association in Canada.  I think there
is also presently a Fjord Breeders Association, or there was at one
timeDid you know about that, Carol?  some of the Fjord Breeders got
disgruntled with the two US organizations and formed their own.


That is actually the third "Registry" in the US for Fjords.  The name is 
The "Fjord Breeders of America" or FBA.  So yes it is a pretty close name 
and would certainly make for confusion.  There has been talk of a "Breeders 
Committee" recently also.  That would be a part of the NFHR though and not 
a separate group.


Mike

===

Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry
Mike May, Registrar
Voice 716-872-4114
FAX 716-787-0497

http://www.nfhr.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re[2]: A Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-11 Thread Steve McIlree
This message is from: Steve McIlree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Carol--

Tuesday, May 11, 1999, you wrote:

> For a long time now I've thought that the formation of a BREEDER'S
> ASSOCIATION would be beneficial to breeders and to the breed. Such
> an organization would be able to address the needs specific to
> breeders ... Such an organization could, for example, do
> co-operative advertising. It could also speak with a united voice to
> the NFHR on issues of importance to breeders. It could organize
> Evaluations . . . sponsor them even.

  Just curious, what good would yet *another* organization do for the
  breed? What interests could be exclusive to breeders? Does your
  suggestion that the association speak with a united voice to the
  NFHR imply an adversarial position? If so why do you feel that is
  necessary? Are you suggesting that there be two sets of evaluations,
  or that the Registry get out of the evaluation process? Can you
  offer an example of any other horse breed that has a separate
  registry and breeders' association? Is there any reason that
  breeders could not do co-operative advertising without an
  association? Do you really believe that any horse organization which
  holds itself aloof from its end-users can be successful?

--
Steve McIlree & Cynthia Madden -- Pferd, Keyah, Skipper, Tank -- Omaha, 
Nebraska, USA
  The horse has so docile a nature, that he would always rather do right
  than wrong, if he can only be taught to distinguish one from the other.
 --George Melville(1821-1878)



Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-11 Thread Jean Ernest
This message is from: Jean Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bonnie,

Carol is talking about something very different from the Registries...The
Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry and the Norwegian fjord Horse Association in
the US, and the Canadian fjord Horse Association in Canada.  I think there
is also presently a Fjord Breeders Association, or there was at one
timeDid you know about that, Carol?  some of the Fjord Breeders got
disgruntled with the two US organizations and formed their own. 

 I personally think maybe it would be opening a can of worms to create A
"Fjord Breeders Association" and discriminate against those of us who have
just one or two mares and occasionally produce a foal.  So what will be the
criteria to be a member?  Owning and standing a Stallion?  Then Everybody
is going to want to keep a stud colt ungelded so they can qualify!  

Let's not create any exclusive clubs for the well-to-do who can afford to
buy and keep a large  number of breeding stock on an expensive farm with
lots of acreage, etc.and can hire a staff of trainers and helpers.  I would
dearly love to be able to have a herd of mares and a couple Stallions on a
large farm, with adequate help, not for personal agrandizemnt (sp?), but
because I dearly love the breed, but I must keep my herd down to a size
that I can handle myself with limited funds on my little ten acre lot.
Well, that is just some thoughts that bubbled up when I started to answer
Bonnie's post.surprized even me that I feel that strongly!  All four of
my Fjords are Canadian registered, with only Stella(II) also being
registered in the NFHR.  I haven't decided whether I'll register Adel with
NFHR yet. 

Jean in Fairbanks, Alaska Where It was BEAUTIFUL! 65 degrees and sunny
Today!   And I plalyed with my Fjords!

At 06:50 PM 5/11/99 -, you wrote:
>This message is from: "B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi:
>Wanted to ask... so the Fjords are all registered in Norway? I guess I
>didn't realize there wasn't an association in N.A.
>Bonnie
>Horse Portraits, Oil Paintings, Prints, Books
>http://www.hendricksgallery.com
>http://members.xoom.com/BHendricks/Gallery1.html
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Arthur Rivoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 7:32 PM
>Subject: Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association
>
>
>> This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur  Rivoire)
>>
>> Hello from Carol Rivoire at Beaver Dam Farm Fjords in Nova Scotia
>> For a long time now I've thought that the formation of a BREEDER'S
>> ASSOCIATION would be beneficial to breeders and to the breed.
>(snipped)
>
>
>
>

Jean Ernest
Fairbanks, Alaska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-11 Thread B. Hendricks
This message is from: "B. Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi:
Wanted to ask... so the Fjords are all registered in Norway? I guess I
didn't realize there wasn't an association in N.A.
Bonnie
Horse Portraits, Oil Paintings, Prints, Books
http://www.hendricksgallery.com
http://members.xoom.com/BHendricks/Gallery1.html


- Original Message -
From: Arthur Rivoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association


> This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur  Rivoire)
>
> Hello from Carol Rivoire at Beaver Dam Farm Fjords in Nova Scotia
> For a long time now I've thought that the formation of a BREEDER'S
> ASSOCIATION would be beneficial to breeders and to the breed.
(snipped)



Re: A Fjord Breeder's Association

1999-05-11 Thread Arthur Rivoire
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur  Rivoire)



Hello from Carol Rivoire at Beaver Dam Farm Fjords in Nova Scotia -

For a long time now I've thought that the formation of a BREEDER'S
ASSOCIATION would be beneficial to breeders and to the breed.  Such an
organization would be able to address the needs specific to breeders (new
breeders, established breeders, maybe even non-professional breeders.)  All
that could be decided by the interested participants.  Such an organization
could, for example, do co-operative advertising.  It could also speak with
a united voice to the NFHR on issues of importance to breeders.  It could
organize Evaluations . . . sponsor them even.  

I do not have the time, particularly in this season, to organize such a
group.  I think the first thing to do is determine if there's an interest,
which is why I'm putting out feelers now. 

I've had the formation of a Breeder's Association in the back of my mind
for several years, and from time to time have questioned other breeders
about it.  All have had a positive reaction and have seen the need, but
nothing has been done so far.  

Just today I spoke with a very experienced horsewoman who is getting into
Fjord breeding with some very high quality stock, and she also saw the need
and logic of forming such a group, and her reaction has prompted me to
broach the subject via the List.

So, any breeders out there who read this, I'd appreciate very much if you'd
 give me your opinions, pro or con.  

A Fjord Breeder's Association does not as yet exist.  Therefore, there are
no rules and no mandate as yet.  All that will be determined by the
members.  It can be as broad, or exclusionary, as members decide.
"Exclusionary?"  For example, what constitues a bona fide breeder?  To be
decided!

Best Regards,  Carol Rivoire 
Carol and Arthur Rivoire
Beaver Dam Farm Fjords II
R.R. 7 Pomquet
Antigonish County
Nova Scotia
B2G 2L4
902 386 2304
http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/beaverdf