Re: Y2K and your PC

1999-12-31 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR

This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 06:42 PM 12/30/99 -0500, you wrote:

This message is from: "william poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi List,
I'm not sure if this will make a difference in your computer for Y2K, but I
checked mine and it failed the "short test".
I'm passing along this info that was sent to me.

Maybe someone on the list knows if this does make a difference. I did change
mine just in case!


That one is a HOAX Bill.  That short date is just what is being displayed 
by Windows.


Here is a link to the Symantec Web Site for further information on this Hoax.

http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/y2k.windows.hoax.html




May the New Year bring to pass all your hopes and dreams.


And a HAPPY NEW YEAR to you too!

Mike

===

Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry
Mike May, Registrar
Voice 716-872-4114
FAX 716-787-0497

http://www.nfhr.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Y2K and your PC

1999-12-31 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR

This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 04:08 PM 12/30/99 -0800, you wrote:

This message is from: "Jean Gayle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Should we make the correction before midnight or after?  Thanks for this
tip.  Jean


It won't matter Jean.  That is a Hoax.

Mike

===

Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry
Mike May, Registrar
Voice 716-872-4114
FAX 716-787-0497

http://www.nfhr.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Y2K and your PC

1999-12-30 Thread Jean Gayle
This message is from: "Jean Gayle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks Fred.   Jean




Jean Gayle
Aberdeen, WA
[Authoress of "The Colonel's Daughter"
Occupied Germany 1946 TO 1949 ]
http://www.techline.com/~jgayle
Barnes & Noble Book Stores



RE: Y2K and your PC

1999-12-30 Thread Frederick J. (Fred) Pack
This message is from: "Frederick J. (Fred) Pack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Dear friends, this "short test" is a hoax being spread around.  My son is a
VP for Microsoft and he put me in touch with some "gurus".

The "gurus" pointed me to a Microsoft web page that explained the "non
existent" problem.

Basically it said:
This change of short date to long date affects nothing more than the display
function and has nothing to do with how the computer will, or will not,
operate.  The internal functions of Windows are still rolling over to the
year 2000.  If you want it to say 2000, instead of 00then change the
display.  Either way, the computer is still functioning properly.

IT IS NOT REALLY NECESSARY TO CHANGE THE DIPLAY.

All the best, and Happy New Year from:

Fred and Lois Pack
Pack's Peak Stables
Wilkeson, WA USA

Sorry to re-send the entire forwarded message, but thought the above might
make better sense.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of william poe
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 3:43 PM
To: fjordhorse@angus.mystery.com
Subject: Y2K and your PC


This message is from: "william poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi List,
I'm not sure if this will make a difference in your computer for Y2K, but I
checked mine and it failed the "short test".
I'm passing along this info that was sent to me.

Maybe someone on the list knows if this does make a difference. I did change
mine just in case!

After running this quick little test, much to my  surprise, I
> >   learned that  my computer would have failed on  01-01-2000 due to a
> >   computer clock  glitch. Fortunately, a quick  fix is provided,
should
> >  your computer fail the test.
> >
> >   I  submit the following for your consideration:
> >
> >
> >TEST
> >   Double click on "My Computer".
> >   Double click on  "Control Panel".
> >   Double click on "Regional Settings"  icon.
> >   Click on the "Date" tab at the top of the page.
> >   Where it says, "Short Date Sample", look and see if it shows
> >   a  "two digit"   year. Of course it does.  That's the  default
> >   setting for Windows 95, Windows  98 and NT.  This date  RIGHT HERE
> >   is the date that feeds application software and WILL NOT  rollover
> >   in the year 2000.  It will roll over to 00.
> >
> >   Click on the button across from "Short Date Style"  and
> >   select the option that shows, mm/dd/.  (Be sure your  selection
> >   has four Y's showing, not two)  Then click on  "Apply" and then
click
> >   on "OK" at the  bottom.
> >
> >   Easy enough to fix.  However, every single  installation of Windows
> >   worldwide is defaulted to fail Y2K  rollover.
> >
> >   Please feel free to pass this on to your friends and  associates.
> >

May the New Year bring to pass all your hopes and dreams.


Bill and Kathy Poe
East Fork Fjords
Lynchburg, Ohio
Bill and Kathy Poe
East Fork Fjords
Lynchburg, Ohio



Re: Y2K and your PC

1999-12-30 Thread Jean Gayle
This message is from: "Jean Gayle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Should we make the correction before midnight or after?  Thanks for this
tip.  Jean



Jean Gayle
Aberdeen, WA
[Authoress of "The Colonel's Daughter"
Occupied Germany 1946 TO 1949 ]
http://www.techline.com/~jgayle
Barnes & Noble Book Stores



Re: Y2K

1998-11-13 Thread Mike May
This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 08:47 PM 11/12/98 -0700, you wrote:
>This message is from: Starfire Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>VERY funny Mike.  Thank you!

No problem.  ;-)



Re: Y2K

1998-11-13 Thread wcoli
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi everybody,
I've been away for a week at a meeting in Las Vegas (where veryone 
will be REALLY messed up if the power goes out given the acres of 
neon :o]) and am just catching up with 184 messages, so apologize if 
somene has commented already on my point here.
Not to Poo-poo concern over Y2, but one simple way to handle things 
for your personal computer is to set your clock to simulate the 
appoach of Jan.1,2000, and see what happens. Before you do, you may 
want to make a backup copy of the files that are your operating 
system to start your computer from a disk drive if it will not start 
from the hard drive (this is a good idea in general snce hard drives 
(mechanical devices after all) can, and do, fail).
As I understand it, there are several levels of computer operation 
and all can be affected. The first place to statrt a Y2K check is the 
BIOS (basic input/output system). This is found on a chip attaced to 
the mother board. To identify if you machine is in complaince, eithe 
id the manufacture and version of the BIOS you have and contact the 
manufacturer to see if it is compliance, OR purchase a Y2K software 
testing package such as Check2000 or YMARK2000.
The next thing to check on is the Operating System (unless you are 
using Windows 98 (Yes, there is a reason to upgrade OS, and its not 
just to make Bill Gates richer) or a Macintosh (which have had 
compliant BIOS and OS since 1984. For other OS, it is possible to 
download "a patch" from vendor webpages (for example, Windows 95 
requires a patch WIN95Y2.EXE available from microsoft.com)
The next level to check for compliance is any applications you are 
suing. Check200 will scan applications and generate a list of 
possible errors so that you can contact the vendor for help on how to 
patch them.
Other problems are possible at the Data Level (i.e., in 
spreadsheets, macros, and automated functions), although these will 
only cause bad data or reports, rather than systems failures.
The kinds of problems Brian and others were discussion are referred 
to as the Dependency Level, that is, place on which you rely, but 
over which you have no control (e.g., will your shipping company be 
up and running, etc.?). In these cases, it may be worth a call to 
them to see what they are doing to ensure compliance.
I am told that most computers will work correctly during the date 
change over if left powered-up during the change. If it fails, it 
will be at the next boot after 1/1/2000. 
I have also been told that one way to handle the change is to reset 
the clock to an earlier year. I remain hopeful that people in change 
of such things as nuke plants, missile silos, etc. will at least be 
able to do something such as that. 
Irrespective of what other preparations one might make, it seems to 
be a good idea to have a very current statement from your bank, 
credit card company, utility supplier, persons who owe you money, 
just prior to the changeover in the event that things really do get 
messed up.



Re: Y2K

1998-11-13 Thread Starfire Farm
This message is from: Starfire Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

VERY funny Mike.  Thank you!



Re: Y2k bug

1998-11-10 Thread Alison Barr
This message is from: "Alison Barr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I think the funniest thing about the Y2k problem is that the arts and
graphics industry will be the least affected, as allot of them use Macs
and macs (according to dad, who should know) never had the problem in
the first place.  Imagine, in the year 2000, everyone is in trouble, yet
we still get adds: )



RE: Y2K and Fjords

1998-11-10 Thread Larson
This message is from: Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>Of course, there's still a small possibility that this time the
>doomsayers could be right.  As the old saying goes, even a stopped
>clock is right twice a day
>
Marsha Jo, I really am impressed with yours and Pamela's preparedness!  And I 
have to agree with all the 
realists, alarmists and optomists.  Actually, if you review the list, we are 
all agreeing on one thing here:  
whether the domesday sayers are right or not, whether the computer experts are 
right or not, whether the 
financial wizards are right or not, the reaction of the populace just prior to 
01-01-2000 can cause a major 
disruption all by itself.  For this reason as well as normal issues such as 
blizzards, hurricanes, tornadoes, 
earthquakes, etc., we seem to all agree to some form and degree of preparedness 
for our families and our 
animals.



Re: Y2K

1998-11-10 Thread Northhorse
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 11/9/98 20:59:50 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

<< Like Steve, I suspect there will be a few Y2K glitches, which will be
 quickly ironed out or "worked around".  That's what us programmers do
 for a living! >>

I'm more with Brian on this one.  I've been reading, my husband (as said
before) has worked with computer chips/semiconductors/programming, etc. etc.
for years and has some expertise.  Me?  I just use the computer.  But enough
information has been seeping in that I think it is folly to NOT be prepared.
I hope you are right, and nothing major will happen, but I'm not convinced.
Nobody "really" knows what will happen, and we won't really know till 1-1-00.
And then either everybody will be laughing at those who were concerned, or it
will be too late to do anything about it.  To me, since we don't know what
will happen, it just makes good sense to be prepared.

And yes, I've heard "chicken little" from my mother.  But I had a lot more
time to spend talking with her than I have to discuss it on the fjord list
.   She now trusts that I have her best interests at heart, and will be
staying with us 1-1-00.  God, I hope she has a good laugh at my expense!  At
the least, she'll get to meet my new horses and see the property we just
bought.

Pamela



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Marsha Jo Hannah
This message is from: Marsha Jo Hannah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Steve McIlree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I've been in the computer business long enough to have created many
>  of the programs that are going to break. My opinion is that the
>  morning of January 1, 2000 will dawn without any major disruption.
>  Those who would have you believe otherwise are those who always have
>  fun scaring themselves with tales of the coming apocalypse or
>  economic collapse. Or they are folks who are cutting themselves a
>  fat hog by consulting. Yes there will be minor problems, but nothing
>  that will bring any kind of catastrophic collapse of our modern
>  social order.

I'd say that about sums it up!  Most of these media folks obviously
don't know the difference between computer hardware (which just counts
seconds from some initial date, and won't notice the Y2K rollover), vs
computer databases (which may save date info in human-readable form
that looks like MM/DD/YY), vs computer software (which may or may not
convert properly between the two formats).  But, yes, some of the
loudest of the doom-sayers have been finding reasons to warn folks to
head for the hills, buy silver, and lay in 6 months of food for at
least 2 decades (several different scenarios that never happened)---
i.e. they've been doing the "Chicken Little" (the sky is falling!)
routine for quite some time!  The biggest danger this time is that
enough people will believe them to cause "runs" on banks, grocery
stores, etc.  Sort of the ultimate "virus warning" hoax

Like Steve, I suspect there will be a few Y2K glitches, which will be
quickly ironed out or "worked around".  That's what us programmers do
for a living!

However, preparedness never hurts.  We're in earthquake country, with
The Big One predicted for sometime in the next 30 years.  We're also
in mudslide country---our "driveway" has been known to be impassible
for weeks or months.  And, the winter storms knock out our power for
several days at a time, almost every year.  Consequently, we've always
got at least one backup for just about everything in the pantry.  We
have a generator and a supply of gasoline.  The woodshed is always at
least half full.  The water tank always has at least 4000 gallons in
it.  I start every winter with enough hay to last the Fjords thru to
the next haying season.  Etc.

Of course, there's still a small possibility that this time the
doomsayers could be right.  As the old saying goes, even a stopped
clock is right twice a day

Marsha Jo HannahMurphy must have been a horseman--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   anything that can go wrong, will!
30 mi SSE of San Francisco, Calif.
---



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Kevin
This message is from: Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Steve McIlree wrote:
> 
> This message is from: Steve McIlree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>   I've been in the computer business long enough to have created many
>   of the programs that are going to break. My opinion is that the
>   morning of January 1, 2000 will dawn without any major disruption.
>   Those who would have you believe otherwise are those who always have
>   fun scaring themselves with tales of the coming apocalypse or
>   economic collapse. Or they are folks who are cutting themselves a
>   fat hog by consulting. Yes there will be minor problems, but nothing
>   that will bring any kind of catastrophic collapse of our modern
>   social order.
> 
>   I find it interesting, that at the cusp of the last millennium, the
>   doomsayers were predicting the second coming of Christ and the
>   destruction of the world. This time we're just expecting our
>   machines to break.
> 
> --
> Steve McIlree & Cynthia Madden -- Pferd, Keyah, Skipper, Tank -- Omaha, 
> Nebraska, USA
>   Then we began to ride.  My soul smoothed itself out, a long-cramped scroll
>   freshening and fluttering in the wind. --Robert Browning(1812-1889)

Steve, 

I agree.  I am the Y2k site coordinator at a major international
multimillion dollar corporation.  We expect, after all is said and done,
to spend about $113 million.  It's a big deal, but like the initial
message from Dr. Brian Jacobsen, he is putting in more scares and half
truths to the real problem.

Best Regards, 
Kevin A. Ryan
Network Administrator 
Dana Corporation
-- 
"My wife told me I should be more affectionate. So I got two
girlfriends." 

Kevin A. Ryan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Northhorse
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 11/9/98 11:10:32 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< I agree with Steve on the Y2K "problem". I'm a technical writer, and have
 worked in the software industry for over 10 years. I find that the
 majority of the people (like my mom) who are "scared" by the Y2K thing
 (which the media has blown out of proportion due to nothing else
 interesting to talk about) are people who do NOT make their living by
 computers--they are scared of computers, so they are also scared of
 problems with computers. >>

I don't know about that.  My husband is a highly sought computer expert and
he's nervous.  So are some of his friends that are even higher up the echelon
in the computer world.  Some of them are definitely city people, yet they have
gone out and bought acres and acres of land in the middle of Idaho in
preparation for New Years 2000.  I'm going to be on the safe side.  I hope
nothing much happens, but just in case, I'll be ready.  If nothing does
happen, well, I'll have enough candles to last the rest of my life, and enough
canned goods that I can happily donate to homeless shelters.

Pamela
Known for being cautious



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Lori Albrough
This message is from: Lori Albrough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Another computer person checking in to say the Y2K problem is being
overhyped in the media. This is not to say things will be perfect. There
will be problems, but a lot of them at the time of roll-over (when the
clock changes from Dec 31, 1999 11:59 pm to Jan 1, 2000). I'm planning
on not flying at that exact moment :-) Resist the urge to take all your
money out of the bank and cash in your investments. Everyone getting
panicky ahead of time could be worse than the actual Y2K problems.

BUT, everyone should be prepared for emergencies. Last year's ice storm
in Eastern Ontario and Quebec should have taught us that. People were
without electricity for weeks, some up to a month. This means no heat,
no lights, no WATER, no transportation as everything was coated in
treacherous ice. The army delivered water to people and farms, but I
heard if you didn't have somewhere to store the water, you were still in
trouble.

We have a 30 foot deep dug well lined with large boulders, it has a hand
pump and was used by the original people who lived here. Their house and
barn are long gone, although the foundations remain. This well has never
failed to produce water with just a few pumps of the handle. Last year
we had the water tested and although it does have some bacteria, it is
safe for livestock and OK for humans if boiled. Last winter we had
occasion to use it when our main well pumped fried itself. So water is
taken care of.

We also have a large supply of wood for the wood stove, hay in the hay
shed, and emergency rations in the cold cellar. The only thing I don't
have is much of an emergency medical supply kit (ie, drugs for the
horses). I've always relied on our vets quick response. Also, first aid
knowledge (for people) is something lacking. A first aid course has
always been something I've been planning to do Time to get on that. 

I bought this excellent book, basically it's "what to do if you can't
get the vet". It's called "Emergency" and is by Dr. Karen Hayes (who
also wrote the "Complete Book of Foaling", another good one).
"Emergency" covers step by step for Laminitis, Colic, Head Injuries,
Wounds, Eye Problems, etc. etc. Also gives a list of drugs you should
have on hand (although I haven't implemented that part). Anyway, a
really good book to keep in the barn.

Y2K aside, emergency preparedness and disaster planning is something
that everyone should be thinking of.

Lori Albrough
Bluebird Lane Fjords
Moorefield, Ontario, Canada



RE: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Poirier, Jeanne L
This message is from: "Poirier, Jeanne L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Jodie,

What you wrote is VERY true!  I work in the 'high tech' industry, and
knowing what we know about the computer world, we believe the sun will come
up 01-Jan-00 just like any other day.  My folks, (mid 60's), are terrified
about this day coming.  They've even started buying extra food, storing
water and... get this... even making plans to have all of their money in
cash, at home, when 01-Jan-00 hits!!  They even believe that at midnight on
December 31, 1999, all planes in the air will just drop from the sky 
Can you believe this ?!?!  I've tried to talk to them about this, but...
somewhere, somehow they are scared to death.  And, unlike your Mom, they
don't own a Fjord  :-(   Now, THATS sad.

Jeanne in Berthoud Colorado
- watching Hanne's coat grow thicker and thicker !!

> --
> From: Jodie Gilmore[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 12:10 PM
> To:   Fjord Horse List
> Subject:  Re: Y2K
> 
> This message is from: Jodie Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> I agree with Steve on the Y2K "problem". I'm a technical writer, and have
> worked in the software industry for over 10 years. I find that the
> majority of the people (like my mom) who are "scared" by the Y2K thing
> (which the media has blown out of proportion due to nothing else
> interesting to talk about) are people who do NOT make their living by
> computers--they are scared of computers, so they are also scared of
> problems with computers.
> 
> My take on it is this--it's not only the *consumers* who will be affected
> by Y2K glitches in programs. The business *owners* will be too, so it is
> beneficial to their bottom line to smooth out most problems beforehand,
> and they will do so. There will be places in the programs that didn't get
> fixed/caught, but I do not think any of the bank, satellite, financial
> guru, etc. type businesses want to lose money, and they will do what is
> necessary to keep from doing that.
> 
> Better off worrying about the polar ice caps melting (another of my Mom's
> favorite topics...) But she *does* own two Fjords, so she can't be all
> bad! :) :) :)
> 
> ---
> Jodie Gilmore
> Freelance Technical Writer
> Washougal, WA
> 
> 
> 



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Jodie Gilmore
This message is from: Jodie Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I agree with Steve on the Y2K "problem". I'm a technical writer, and have
worked in the software industry for over 10 years. I find that the
majority of the people (like my mom) who are "scared" by the Y2K thing
(which the media has blown out of proportion due to nothing else
interesting to talk about) are people who do NOT make their living by
computers--they are scared of computers, so they are also scared of
problems with computers.

My take on it is this--it's not only the *consumers* who will be affected
by Y2K glitches in programs. The business *owners* will be too, so it is
beneficial to their bottom line to smooth out most problems beforehand,
and they will do so. There will be places in the programs that didn't get
fixed/caught, but I do not think any of the bank, satellite, financial
guru, etc. type businesses want to lose money, and they will do what is
necessary to keep from doing that.

Better off worrying about the polar ice caps melting (another of my Mom's
favorite topics...) But she *does* own two Fjords, so she can't be all
bad! :) :) :)

---
Jodie Gilmore
Freelance Technical Writer
Washougal, WA



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Steve McIlree
This message is from: Steve McIlree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  I've been in the computer business long enough to have created many
  of the programs that are going to break. My opinion is that the
  morning of January 1, 2000 will dawn without any major disruption.
  Those who would have you believe otherwise are those who always have
  fun scaring themselves with tales of the coming apocalypse or
  economic collapse. Or they are folks who are cutting themselves a
  fat hog by consulting. Yes there will be minor problems, but nothing
  that will bring any kind of catastrophic collapse of our modern
  social order.

  I find it interesting, that at the cusp of the last millennium, the
  doomsayers were predicting the second coming of Christ and the
  destruction of the world. This time we're just expecting our
  machines to break.

--
Steve McIlree & Cynthia Madden -- Pferd, Keyah, Skipper, Tank -- Omaha, 
Nebraska, USA
  Then we began to ride.  My soul smoothed itself out, a long-cramped scroll
  freshening and fluttering in the wind. --Robert Browning(1812-1889)



Re: Y2K

1998-11-09 Thread Northhorse
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 11/8/98 20:35:21 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

<< What comments do others have to add?  Why or why not do you think Y2K
 will be a problem? >>

Brian, your timing is great.  I just told some friend on another list about
the book "The Millenium Bug -How To Avoid The Coming Chaos".  It's kind of
spooky to think about.  At first I thought it was a tempest in a teapot, but
my husband works in the computer industry, and has heard some rumours...

We've been getting ready.  We're going to be buying a hand pump for our well.
This way horses and humans will have water.  A generator will be nice, along
with a supply of propane for it.  Got the transportation thing down .
Fjords for the winter, and quarter horses on occasion.  Stocking up on food,
water, candles is also recommended in the book I read.  Buying silver, cause
your credit cards won't work if the banks are shut down.  Toilet paper,
ammunition and bic lighters will be good items to have stocked up to use for
barter, along with coffee, tea and sugar.

My mother who lives outside of Cleveland will be staying with us.  I finally
have her nervous enough to realize she'll be safer here.  I told her if
nothing happens she can laugh at me, and go home on January 7.  But if it gets
as scary as it could,  she'll be safe and protected.  

We bought our property 7 months ago, and so far only have 2 of the 5 acres of
pasture fenced off.  This next year I'll be planting a big garden, working
hard to give our horses the extra 3 acres of pasture by fencing.  And
preparing...just in case.  If nothing happens, I'll have a lot of canned
goods, and candles, etc.  And if we ever get snowed in here in temperate
Oregon, I'll be set.

Oh yes, the book recommends that we all get EMT training.  Learn how to deal
with broken bones, heart attacks, etc. etc.

Pamela
Who is a bit nervous about next year