Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC > (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. Thanks for voting Roman. Arun
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
2 1 3 4 5 My vote is non-binding, fwiw. -Shaneal On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> We've discussed several options: >>> >>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>> hole. >>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >>> >>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >>> >>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or >> PMC >> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: > > As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. > > Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. > > Thanks for voting Roman. > > Arun
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
2 1 3 4 5 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek wrote: > 2 > 1 > 3 > 4 > 5 > > My vote is non-binding, fwiw. > > -Shaneal > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >>> >>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or >>> PMC >>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: >> >> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. >> >> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. >> >> Thanks for voting Roman. >> >> Arun -- Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3,2,1,4,5, in order of preference. (binding) -Todd On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Brock Noland wrote: > 2 > 1 > 3 > 4 > 5 > > (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek wrote: >> 2 >> 1 >> 3 >> 4 >> 5 >> >> My vote is non-binding, fwiw. >> >> -Shaneal >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: >>> >>> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. >>> >>> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. >>> >>> Thanks for voting Roman. >>> >>> Arun > > > > -- > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 4, 1, 5 In order of preference (binding) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > My vote: 3,2,1,4,5, in order of preference. (binding) > > -Todd > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Brock Noland wrote: >> 2 >> 1 >> 3 >> 4 >> 5 >> >> (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek wrote: >>> 2 >>> 1 >>> 3 >>> 4 >>> 5 >>> >>> My vote is non-binding, fwiw. >>> >>> -Shaneal >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >> hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers > or PMC > (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. Thanks for voting Roman. Arun >> >> >> >> -- >> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. instead of > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. Let me restart the vote. Arun On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote remains the same: (binding) (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3-2-1-4-5 non-binding -kihwal On Mar 19, 2012, at 7:57 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > 3, 2, 4, 1, 5 In order of preference (binding) > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> My vote: 3,2,1,4,5, in order of preference. (binding) >> >> -Todd >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Brock Noland wrote: >>> 2 >>> 1 >>> 3 >>> 4 >>> 5 >>> >>> (non-binding) >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek wrote: 2 1 3 4 5 My vote is non-binding, fwiw. -Shaneal On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy >> wrote: >>> We've discussed several options: >>> >>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>> hole. >>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. >>> 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively >>> postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >>> >>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >>> >>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers >> or PMC >> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: > > As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. > > Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. > > Thanks for voting Roman. > > Arun >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My binding vote is: 3, 2, 1, 5. -- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
Preference in descending order: 4, 3, 2, 1, 5 On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 4, 2 On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is 3, 4, 2. > Let's do a STV [1] ... Since STV for single-winner elections is equivalent to instant-runoff voting. You may want to read [2] instead of [1]. In particular, the flowchart [3] in [2] is very easy to understand. Regards, Tsz-Wo [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:06 PM Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
A little random but, for future consideration, approval voting generally leads to saner results than IRV. It's very counter-intuitive to me, but I've been told by people smarter than myself that it's a pretty well accepted result. It's not perfect, but nothing is as proved by Arrow's Impossibility Theorem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem) Some references: http://scorevoting.net/CompleteIdioticIRV.html http://www.electology.org/approval-voting-vs-irv -Shaneal On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > My vote is 3, 4, 2. > >> Let's do a STV [1] ... > > Since STV for single-winner elections is equivalent to instant-runoff > voting. You may want to read [2] instead of [1]. In particular, the > flowchart [3] in [2] is very easy to understand. > > > Regards, > > Tsz-Wo > > > [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting > > > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png > > > > > > From: Arun C Murthy > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:06 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x > > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My binding vote: (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3, 2, 4, 1, 5 In order of preference (binding) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, sanjay Radia wrote: > My binding vote: > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > > > > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). >> >> The vote will run the normal 7 days. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >> >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3, 2, 4, 1, 5 (binding). Thanks Mahadev Konar Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > My vote is 3, 4, 2. > > > Let's do a STV [1] ... > > Since STV for single-winner elections is equivalent to instant-runoff > voting. You may want to read [2] instead of [1]. In particular, the > flowchart [3] in [2] is very easy to understand. > > > Regards, > > Tsz-Wo > > > [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting > > > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png > > > > > > From: Arun C Murthy > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:06 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x > > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 1, 5, 4, 2 no binding. I don't like a "hole" there as it means a lack of foresight sometimes. Thanks, Junping - Original Message - From: "Arun C Murthy" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:06:41 AM Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,4,2,1 non-binding On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: > >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > instead of > >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > > Let me restart the vote. > > Arun > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >> > > -- > Arun C. Murthy > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,4,2,1 - non binding Thanks, Todd On Mar 20, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > 3,4,2,1 non-binding > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: >> >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> >> instead of >> >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> >> >> Let me restart the vote. >> >> Arun >> >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> We've discussed several options: >>> >>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>> hole. >>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >>> >>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >>> >>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Arun >>> >>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >>> >> >> -- >> Arun C. Murthy >> Hortonworks Inc. >> http://hortonworks.com/ >> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
Arun, how do you plan to count the vote on this? Could you please publish the formula. Thanks, --Konst On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3 4 1 (binding). On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > --
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
Konst, Please links Nic sent out - essentially STV with a single winner becomes IRV: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting A helpful flowchart: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png Btw, thanks for the links Nic! Arun On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Arun, > how do you plan to count the vote on this? > Could you please publish the formula. > Thanks, > --Konst > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). >> >> The vote will run the normal 7 days. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >> -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding) Mark On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: >We've discussed several options: > >(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >hole. >(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > >The vote will run the normal 7 days. > >thanks, >Arun > >[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding) John George -Original Message- From: Arun C Murthy Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:06:41 -0500 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x >We've discussed several options: > >(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >hole. >(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > >The vote will run the normal 7 days. > >thanks, >Arun > >[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 4, 5, 2, 1 (non-binding) On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding) Tom On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,4,2,1,5 --Bobby Evans On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1,3,4,2,5 (non-binding)
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 4, 2, 1 -- Hitesh On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,2,1,4,5 (non-binding) Nathan On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding) Jason On 03/19/2012 08:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,2,1,4,5 (non-binding) Dave On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3 1 4 2 5 (non-binding) Daryn On Mar 19, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is: 3 2 1 5 4. (binding) Thanks, Enis On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Daryn Sharp wrote: > 3 1 4 2 5 (non-binding) > > Daryn > > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > We've discussed several options: > > > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is: 3 4 2 1 5 (non-binding) Regards, -James On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3,2,1,4,5 (non-binding). On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > -- Ahmed
RE: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My non-binding vote is 3, 2, 1, 5 Amol. -Original Message- From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:07 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote : 3 4 1 -Giri On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
4,2,3 Patrick On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Doug On 03/19/2012 06:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My binding vote is: 4, 3, 2, 1, 5 On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. On 03/19/2012 06:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My (non-binding) vote is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 - milind >On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. >>2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively >>postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). >> >> The vote will run the normal 7 days. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >> > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is (3). -dhruba On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM, wrote: > My (non-binding) vote is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 > > - milind > > >On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > >> We've discussed several options: > >> > >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > >>hole. > >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. > >>2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively > >>postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >> > >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >> > >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >> > >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > >> > >> The vote will run the normal 7 days. > >> > >> thanks, > >> Arun > >> > >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >> > > > > > > -- Subscribe to my posts at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,4,2,1,5 (non-binding) Kumar
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1,2,3,4,5 (non binding) Thanks, Mayank On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Palaniappan, Kumar < kumar.palaniap...@netapp.com> wrote: > 3,4,2,1,5 (non-binding) > > > Kumar > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1,2,3,4,5 (non binding) Promoting 21 and 23 as major releases is great, but what's the point of leaving no space for 22 as a possible major release? Joep On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote 2 3 1 4 5 Thanks Amareshwari On 3/20/12 6:36 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
my binding vote: 3 1 2 4 5 sharad On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
Recasting to the revised one. 3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding) Kihwal On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
RE: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3, 1, 2 Regards, Uma From: Arun C Murthy [a...@hortonworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:36 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is 3, 2 Thanks. Alejandro On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G wrote: > My vote: > 3, 1, 2 > > Regards, > Uma > > > From: Arun C Murthy [a...@hortonworks.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:36 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x > > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My preference: 3, 4, 2, 1. (binding) Thanks +Vinod On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 4, 2, 1, 5 (non binding) -- Arpit Gupta Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1, 2, 5 Thanks, --Konst On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re:[VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
(5) At 2012-03-20 08:13:01,"Arun C Murthy" wrote: >We've discussed several options: > >(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >thanks, >Arun > >[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > > We've discussed several options: > > > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1,4, 2,3,5 (non-binding) Thanks, Benoy Antony On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1, 2, 5 Items 3, 4 are unreasonable, IMO, and not beneficial to the community at large. Cos On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:03PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > instead of > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > > Let me restart the vote. > > Arun > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > We've discussed several options: > > > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > > hole. > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > > > -- > Arun C. Murthy > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1, 2, 5 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
RE: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1,2,4,3,5 Jagane On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:03PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > instead of > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > > Let me restart the vote. > > Arun > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > We've discussed several options: > > > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > > hole. > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > > > -- > Arun C. Murthy > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote: 3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (binding) -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My votes: 1, 2, 5 where (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3 (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Anatoli
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3,5 (non-binding) Making three official version announces to community that these versions are maintained in high priority. It leades to human resource is distributed, which makes the evlution of Hadoop slower. For a while, branch-0.23 might be unstaible. But, in longer timescale, the fewer commitment line, the more human resource is concentrated on major release and sooner or lator all the patches for branch-0.22 would be merged into branch-0.23(major release), I hope. Regards, --HAL On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:49:58 -0700 Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > 1, 2, 5 > > Items 3, 4 are unreasonable, IMO, and not beneficial to the community at > large. > > Cos > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:03PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: > > > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > > > instead of > > > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > > > > > Let me restart the vote. > > > > Arun > > > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > > > We've discussed several options: > > > > > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > > > hole. > > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > > > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > > > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > > > > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > > > > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > > > > > thanks, > > > Arun > > > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > > > > > > -- > > Arun C. Murthy > > Hortonworks Inc. > > http://hortonworks.com/ > > > > Haruyasu Ueda, Research Manager Research Center for Cloud Computing FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD. E-mail: hal_u...@jp.fujitsu.com Tel: +81 44 754 2575 Ken-S602, 4-1-1, Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, 211-8588 Japan
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 Tom On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
4, 3, 2, 1, 5 (binding) --Matt
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
1,2, 5 Best wishes On 03/22/2012 03:56 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote -- Marcos Luis Ortíz Valmaseda (@marcosluis2186) Data Engineer at UCI http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com 10mo. ANIVERSARIO DE LA CREACION DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS CIENCIAS INFORMATICAS... CONECTADOS AL FUTURO, CONECTADOS A LA REVOLUCION http://www.uci.cu http://www.facebook.com/universidad.uci http://www.flickr.com/photos/universidad_uci
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
3, 4, 2 (binding) regards, Eric On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > 1,2, 5 > Best wishes > > > On 03/22/2012 03:56 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy >> wrote: >>> >>> We've discussed several options: >>> >>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>> hole. >>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >>> >>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >>> >>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >>> >>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). >>> >>> The vote will run the normal 7 days. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Arun >>> >>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >>> > > -- > Marcos Luis Ortíz Valmaseda (@marcosluis2186) > Data Engineer at UCI > http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com > > > > 10mo. ANIVERSARIO DE LA CREACION DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS CIENCIAS > INFORMATICAS... > CONECTADOS AL FUTURO, CONECTADOS A LA REVOLUCION > > http://www.uci.cu > http://www.facebook.com/universidad.uci > http://www.flickr.com/photos/universidad_uci
