Re: Report for April mostly done

[Ian C]

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning  wrote:

> General section looks grand.
>
> We have a few projects unreported, DataFu,  ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
>


Hi,

I was just about to update the report for the ODF Toolkit , although not a
great deal to say.

We are quiet but not dead just yet... :-)

Apologies for missing the deadline.


> I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time.
>
> Who knows more about the others?
>
> Andrei, Konstantin, Suresh are the respective shepherds?  Any thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey 
> wrote:
>
> > Greets,
> >
> > Since this is Ted's first month as IPMC Chair, I promised "lots of
> > help" and deadlines are coming up, I've gone ahead and completed most
> > of the general section of the report.
> >
> > Ted, feel free to look things over and edit as you see fit.  Come
> > Monday, I'll send out the draft report to this list.  What will remain
> > after that is for you to file the report with the Board on Wednesday.
> >
> > Next month, we should have you use the report_runbook.py script and
> > collaborate more closely.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,

Ian C

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Steve Loughran]

> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning  wrote:
> 
> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in.  In
> particular, a glance to see whether there is any hygiene around licensing
> is an important question.  Many projects in the world at large have no good
> record of who write the code but still imagine that they can change the
> licensing.  Such projects are not suitable for Apache incubation since
> without a clean rewrite, they are not possible to Apache license.
> 
> Commercially developed code rarely has that sort of problem, but there may
> be other problems that a quick perusal would turn up or eliminate.

I believe one reason the openjdk GUI rendering is worse than the oracle one is, 
apparently, that there's a  chunk of OSF/Motif code in there whose provenance 
isn't clear, until it was released as LGPL, was closed source. That is: code 
sharing by cut-and-paste is always trouble

looking at the list of committers -it looks like a whole organisation is going 
to move to doing OSS dev. That's a pretty big move.

1. The withdrawal of support for Groovy shows that pivotal have been ruthless 
in the past about where to invest their OSS dev. It's a bit dangerous to list 
Groovy as a reference for pivotal's OSS experience. It shows they've done it, 
but it shows that the commitment is not indefinite funding (to be fair, no 
single org can guarantee that). Spring is the one to really emphasis.

2. It will make it more of a barrier to getting other developers in; it'll take 
active effort to bring them in, especially a transition to a process of 
decision making over the lists, rather than in meetings. Again, a perennial 
problem that we all encounter -not an argument against the proposal, just 
something that will take active effort.

I don't see it leaving incubation with more non-pivotal dev/contrib than the 
pivotal team, just because of the numbers. The mentors/vote will have to 
consider how many external developers constitutes "enough" to be an active, 
open dev community. Again, a permanent problem (*), it just means here that it 
will be very skewed towards pivotal. I think that open-source discussion and 
decision making should be a key metric here, rather than just looking at 
numbers.

otherwise: impressive proposal!

-Steve


(*) as a reminder, we in the slider-incubating project are hiring -along with 
every other incubated project.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Report for April mostly done

[Ted Dunning]

At this point, you should move to reporting in May.



On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C  wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning 
> wrote:
>
> > General section looks grand.
> >
> > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu,  ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
> >
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was just about to update the report for the ODF Toolkit , although not a
> great deal to say.
>
> We are quiet but not dead just yet... :-)
>
> Apologies for missing the deadline.
>
>
> > I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time.
> >
> > Who knows more about the others?
> >
> > Andrei, Konstantin, Suresh are the respective shepherds?  Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Greets,
> > >
> > > Since this is Ted's first month as IPMC Chair, I promised "lots of
> > > help" and deadlines are coming up, I've gone ahead and completed most
> > > of the general section of the report.
> > >
> > > Ted, feel free to look things over and edit as you see fit.  Come
> > > Monday, I'll send out the draft report to this list.  What will remain
> > > after that is for you to file the report with the Board on Wednesday.
> > >
> > > Next month, we should have you use the report_runbook.py script and
> > > collaborate more closely.
> > >
> > > Marvin Humphrey
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Ian C
>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.2.0-incubating

[Alan Gates]

+1.  Checked out the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked to 
make sure there were no jars or class files in the source distribution, 
ran the tests (and quickly found the east of GMT issues :) ).


Alan.


Julian Hyde 
April 13, 2015 at 6:05
Hi all,

The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Calcite 1.2.0-incubating.

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. This is a 
short release,
less than a month after 1.1, but there are 42 fixed issues 
nevertheless. In

particular, Avatica has better coverage of the JDBC API and is much more
robust. You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/blob/branch-1.2/doc/HISTORY.md

During the vote we noted issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-677: one test fails if you
run in a time zone east of Greenwich. The bug is minor, but affects the
build process as documented in the HOWTO. After a prolonged debate we
reached consensus that a note accompanying the release announcement was
sufficient.

Proposal:
http://s.apache.org/calcite-1.2-vote

Vote result:
3 binding +1 votes
2 non-binding +1 votes
No -1 votes
http://s.apache.org/calcite-1.2-result

The commit to be voted upon:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-calcite/commit/d60f2aa3aa9ce7cda7c4f6986af5729d50a28679

Its hash is d60f2aa3aa9ce7cda7c4f6986af5729d50a28679.

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/calcite/apache-calcite-1.2.0-incubating-rc1

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
src.tar.gz.md5 ead5878c92896668a51ab71a4108b070
src.tar.gz.sha1 9cd0b8c542dd8b1af50661543e6af3c67ad9da82
src.zip.md5 85a547882c800677f46f59444c8a1539
src.zip.sha1 cefa18ab2243814ef8a2cde352d4059c2da3dc28

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1007

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/jhyde.asc

Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now
like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the 
release.
The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes 
(3 +1)

is reached.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.2.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Julian Hyde, on behalf of Apache Calcite PPMC

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Justin Erenkrantz]

>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning  wrote:
>>
>> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in.  In

To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to
this submission.  The ASF wouldn't accept the software grant until the
Incubator approved the proposal.  Pivotal wouldn't release it as ALv2
until the ASF accepted the grant.

It's a chicken-and-egg problem - seeing the code through the
click-through evaluation license is the least bad scenario that drives
this proposal forward.

As a mentor unaffiliated with Pivotal, I'm not worried about the
provenance checks - Pivotal is ready to execute the software grant and
release it as ALv2.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Steve Loughran  wrote:
> looking at the list of committers -it looks like a whole organisation is 
> going to move to doing OSS dev. That's a pretty big move.

Yes, it is.  I'm confident in my conversations with the Pivotal team
that they fully understand what will be asked of them.  However, as a
mentor, the proof will be in the pudding and will be demonstrated
through the Incubation process...or not.

> 1. The withdrawal of support for Groovy shows that pivotal have been ruthless 
> in the past about where to invest their OSS dev. It's a bit dangerous to list 
> Groovy as a reference for pivotal's OSS experience. It shows they've done it, 
> but it shows that the commitment is not indefinite funding (to be fair, no 
> single org can guarantee that). Spring is the one to really emphasis.

Companies are always free to re-evaluate where they spend their time
and resources.  I actually view the experience with Groovy as a
positive thing in the macro sense.  The point of submitting Geode to
the ASF is to ensure the longevity of the project and community - the
lesson from Groovy is to ensure it is in appropriate foundation that
will care for it.

> 2. It will make it more of a barrier to getting other developers in; it'll 
> take active effort to bring them in, especially a transition to a process of 
> decision making over the lists, rather than in meetings. Again, a perennial 
> problem that we all encounter -not an argument against the proposal, just 
> something that will take active effort.

This is why we have an Incubator.  =)

> I don't see it leaving incubation with more non-pivotal dev/contrib than the 
> pivotal team, just because of the numbers. The mentors/vote will have to 
> consider how many external developers constitutes "enough" to be an active, 
> open dev community. Again, a permanent problem (*), it just means here that 
> it will be very skewed towards pivotal. I think that open-source discussion 
> and decision making should be a key metric here, rather than just looking at 
> numbers.

Fully agreed for exit criteria, but let's get it in first!  -- justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[jan i]

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Justin Erenkrantz  wrote:

> >> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning  > wrote:
> >>
> >> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in.  In
>
> To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to
> this submission.  The ASF wouldn't accept the software grant until the
> Incubator approved the proposal.  Pivotal wouldn't release it as ALv2
> until the ASF accepted the grant.
>
> It's a chicken-and-egg problem - seeing the code through the
> click-through evaluation license is the least bad scenario that drives
> this proposal forward.
>
> As a mentor unaffiliated with Pivotal, I'm not worried about the
> provenance checks - Pivotal is ready to execute the software grant and
> release it as ALv2.

i second the opinion of justin, as Mentor I was one of those that suggested
this way.

The concerns raised below are very similar to my concerns, but they have to
with graduation,
and not entering Incubator. Most importantly both Mentors and the team are
aware of
the potential problems.

rgds
jan i

>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Steve Loughran  > wrote:
> > looking at the list of committers -it looks like a whole organisation is
> going to move to doing OSS dev. That's a pretty big move.
>
> Yes, it is.  I'm confident in my conversations with the Pivotal team
> that they fully understand what will be asked of them.  However, as a
> mentor, the proof will be in the pudding and will be demonstrated
> through the Incubation process...or not.
>
> > 1. The withdrawal of support for Groovy shows that pivotal have been
> ruthless in the past about where to invest their OSS dev. It's a bit
> dangerous to list Groovy as a reference for pivotal's OSS experience. It
> shows they've done it, but it shows that the commitment is not indefinite
> funding (to be fair, no single org can guarantee that). Spring is the one
> to really emphasis.
>
> Companies are always free to re-evaluate where they spend their time
> and resources.  I actually view the experience with Groovy as a
> positive thing in the macro sense.  The point of submitting Geode to
> the ASF is to ensure the longevity of the project and community - the
> lesson from Groovy is to ensure it is in appropriate foundation that
> will care for it.
>
> > 2. It will make it more of a barrier to getting other developers in;
> it'll take active effort to bring them in, especially a transition to a
> process of decision making over the lists, rather than in meetings. Again,
> a perennial problem that we all encounter -not an argument against the
> proposal, just something that will take active effort.
>
> This is why we have an Incubator.  =)
>
> > I don't see it leaving incubation with more non-pivotal dev/contrib than
> the pivotal team, just because of the numbers. The mentors/vote will have
> to consider how many external developers constitutes "enough" to be an
> active, open dev community. Again, a permanent problem (*), it just means
> here that it will be very skewed towards pivotal. I think that open-source
> discussion and decision making should be a key metric here, rather than
> just looking at numbers.
>
> Fully agreed for exit criteria, but let's get it in first!  -- justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
>
>

-- 
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.

Re: Report for April mostly done

[Ian C]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Ted Dunning  wrote:

> At this point, you should move to reporting in May.
>
>
Thanks, will do when it opens up.

>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C  wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > General section looks grand.
> > >
> > > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu,  ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was just about to update the report for the ODF Toolkit , although not
> a
> > great deal to say.
> >
> > We are quiet but not dead just yet... :-)
> >
> > Apologies for missing the deadline.
> >
> >
> > > I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time.
> > >
> > > Who knows more about the others?
> > >
> > > Andrei, Konstantin, Suresh are the respective shepherds?  Any thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey <
> mar...@rectangular.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Greets,
> > > >
> > > > Since this is Ted's first month as IPMC Chair, I promised "lots of
> > > > help" and deadlines are coming up, I've gone ahead and completed most
> > > > of the general section of the report.
> > > >
> > > > Ted, feel free to look things over and edit as you see fit.  Come
> > > > Monday, I'll send out the draft report to this list.  What will
> remain
> > > > after that is for you to file the report with the Board on Wednesday.
> > > >
> > > > Next month, we should have you use the report_runbook.py script and
> > > > collaborate more closely.
> > > >
> > > > Marvin Humphrey
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian C
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,

Ian C

[Pre - IP Clearance] ec2stack and gstack donation to CloudStack

[Sebastien Goasguen]

Hi,

This is a heads up and request for help to prepare for a IP clearance request 
for two code base to be donated to Apache CloudStack:

ec2stack: https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack

and,

gstack: https://github.com/NOPping/gstack

Its two software there were developed on github by myself and two other folks 
(mostly them :) ). One of them is on the cloudstack PMC and the other one has 
an ICLA on file.
The code is already ASF licensed.

I am a member and will do the work for the IP clearance forms and requests but 
I have never done it, so I want to make sure I do this properly.

I am following instructions in [1].
I submitted a software grant for each code base to secretary@ today.
I committed a draft of the forms [2] and [3]
I edited [4] but do not know how to generate the html.

Do I need to drop a tarball somewhere or is pointing to the github releases 
enough ?

Having a second pair of eyes to check everything would be nice,

Once everything is in order I will call a vote.

thanks for your time,

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
[2] 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.xml
[3] 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.xml
[4] 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/index.xml

-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Jake Farrell]

This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)

Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7

Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
time has

* Had successful IPMC approved releases
* Expanded the PPMC with new members
* Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
support
* A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes

I would like to get the voting started with my own +1

Please vote

[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…

Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12

-Jake



=== Board Resolution ==

Establish the Apache Parquet Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of
responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Parquet Project:

   * Chris Aniszczyk 
   * Ryan Blue 
   * Jonathan Coveney 
   * Tianshuo Deng 
   * Jake Farrell 
   * Marcel Kornacker 
   * Mickael Lacour 
   * Julien Le Dem 
   * Alex Levenson 
   * Nong Li 
   * Todd Lipcon 
   * Chris Mattmann 
   * Aniket Mokashi 
   * Lukas Nalezenec 
   * Brock Noland 
   * Wesley Graham Peck 
   * Remy Pecqueur 
   * Dmitriy Ryaboy 
   * Roman Shaposhnik 
   * Daniel Weeks 
   * Tom White 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Apache Parquet Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
Project are hereafter discharged.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[jan i]

+1 (binding)
jan i.


On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell  wrote:

> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
>
> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> time has
>
> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> support
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
>
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
>
> Please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
>
> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
>
> -Jake
>
>
>
> === Board Resolution ==
>
> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Parquet Project:
>
>* Chris Aniszczyk 
>* Ryan Blue 
>* Jonathan Coveney 
>* Tianshuo Deng 
>* Jake Farrell 
>* Marcel Kornacker 
>* Mickael Lacour 
>* Julien Le Dem 
>* Alex Levenson 
>* Nong Li 
>* Todd Lipcon 
>* Chris Mattmann 
>* Aniket Mokashi 
>* Lukas Nalezenec 
>* Brock Noland 
>* Wesley Graham Peck 
>* Remy Pecqueur 
>* Dmitriy Ryaboy 
>* Roman Shaposhnik 
>* Daniel Weeks 
>* Tom White 
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Ryan Blue]

+1 (non-binding)

rb

On 04/13/2015 09:02 AM, jan i wrote:

+1 (binding)
jan i.


On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell  wrote:


This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)

Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7

Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
time has

* Had successful IPMC approved releases
* Expanded the PPMC with new members
* Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
support
* A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes

I would like to get the voting started with my own +1

Please vote

[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…

Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12

-Jake



=== Board Resolution ==

Establish the Apache Parquet Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of
responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Parquet Project:

* Chris Aniszczyk 
* Ryan Blue 
* Jonathan Coveney 
* Tianshuo Deng 
* Jake Farrell 
* Marcel Kornacker 
* Mickael Lacour 
* Julien Le Dem 
* Alex Levenson 
* Nong Li 
* Todd Lipcon 
* Chris Mattmann 
* Aniket Mokashi 
* Lukas Nalezenec 
* Brock Noland 
* Wesley Graham Peck 
* Remy Pecqueur 
* Dmitriy Ryaboy 
* Roman Shaposhnik 
* Daniel Weeks 
* Tom White 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Apache Parquet Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
Project are hereafter discharged.






--
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Cloudera, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Henry Saputra]

+1

Awesome job guys

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell  wrote:

> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
>
> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> time has
>
> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> support
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
>
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
>
> Please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
>
> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
>
> -Jake
>
>
>
> === Board Resolution ==
>
> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Parquet Project:
>
>* Chris Aniszczyk >
>* Ryan Blue >
>* Jonathan Coveney >
>* Tianshuo Deng >
>* Jake Farrell >
>* Marcel Kornacker >
>* Mickael Lacour >
>* Julien Le Dem >
>* Alex Levenson >
>* Nong Li >
>* Todd Lipcon >
>* Chris Mattmann >
>* Aniket Mokashi >
>* Lukas Nalezenec >
>* Brock Noland >
>* Wesley Graham Peck >
>* Remy Pecqueur >
>* Dmitriy Ryaboy >
>* Roman Shaposhnik >
>* Daniel Weeks >
>* Tom White >
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Timothy Chen]

+1 as well

Tim

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Henry Saputra  wrote:
> +1
>
> Awesome job guys
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell  wrote:
>
>> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
>> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
>> members), 3 community)
>>
>> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
>> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
>> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
>>
>> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
>> time has
>>
>> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
>> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
>> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
>> support
>> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
>>
>> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
>>
>> Please vote
>>
>> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
>>
>> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
>>
>> -Jake
>>
>>
>>
>> === Board Resolution ==
>>
>> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
>>
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
>> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>> Foundation; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
>> for management of the projects within the scope of
>> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> Apache Parquet Project:
>>
>>* Chris Aniszczyk >
>>* Ryan Blue >
>>* Jonathan Coveney >
>>* Tianshuo Deng >
>>* Jake Farrell >
>>* Marcel Kornacker >
>>* Mickael Lacour >
>>* Julien Le Dem >
>>* Alex Levenson >
>>* Nong Li >
>>* Todd Lipcon >
>>* Chris Mattmann >
>>* Aniket Mokashi >
>>* Lukas Nalezenec >
>>* Brock Noland >
>>* Wesley Graham Peck >
>>* Remy Pecqueur >
>>* Dmitriy Ryaboy >
>>* Roman Shaposhnik >
>>* Daniel Weeks >
>>* Tom White >
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>> encourage open development and increased participation in the
>> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
>> Project are hereafter discharged.
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Tom White]

+1

Tom

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jake Farrell  wrote:
> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
>
> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> time has
>
> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> support
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
>
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
>
> Please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
>
> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
>
> -Jake
>
>
>
> === Board Resolution ==
>
> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Parquet Project:
>
>* Chris Aniszczyk 
>* Ryan Blue 
>* Jonathan Coveney 
>* Tianshuo Deng 
>* Jake Farrell 
>* Marcel Kornacker 
>* Mickael Lacour 
>* Julien Le Dem 
>* Alex Levenson 
>* Nong Li 
>* Todd Lipcon 
>* Chris Mattmann 
>* Aniket Mokashi 
>* Lukas Nalezenec 
>* Brock Noland 
>* Wesley Graham Peck 
>* Remy Pecqueur 
>* Dmitriy Ryaboy 
>* Roman Shaposhnik 
>* Daniel Weeks 
>* Tom White 
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[John D. Ament]

+1
On Apr 13, 2015 11:46 AM, "Jake Farrell"  wrote:

> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
>
> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> time has
>
> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> support
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
>
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
>
> Please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
>
> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
>
> -Jake
>
>
>
> === Board Resolution ==
>
> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Parquet Project:
>
>* Chris Aniszczyk 
>* Ryan Blue 
>* Jonathan Coveney 
>* Tianshuo Deng 
>* Jake Farrell 
>* Marcel Kornacker 
>* Mickael Lacour 
>* Julien Le Dem 
>* Alex Levenson 
>* Nong Li 
>* Todd Lipcon 
>* Chris Mattmann 
>* Aniket Mokashi 
>* Lukas Nalezenec 
>* Brock Noland 
>* Wesley Graham Peck 
>* Remy Pecqueur 
>* Dmitriy Ryaboy 
>* Roman Shaposhnik 
>* Daniel Weeks 
>* Tom White 
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Chris Aniszczyk]

+1

On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell  wrote:

> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
>
> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> time has
>
> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> support
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
>
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
>
> Please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
>
> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
>
> -Jake
>
>
>
> === Board Resolution ==
>
> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Parquet Project:
>
>* Chris Aniszczyk >
>* Ryan Blue >
>* Jonathan Coveney >
>* Tianshuo Deng >
>* Jake Farrell >
>* Marcel Kornacker >
>* Mickael Lacour >
>* Julien Le Dem >
>* Alex Levenson >
>* Nong Li >
>* Todd Lipcon >
>* Chris Mattmann >
>* Aniket Mokashi >
>* Lukas Nalezenec >
>* Brock Noland >
>* Wesley Graham Peck >
>* Remy Pecqueur >
>* Dmitriy Ryaboy >
>* Roman Shaposhnik >
>* Daniel Weeks >
>* Tom White >
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>


-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Greg Chase]

jan i  apache.org> writes:

> 
> On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh  gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
> 
> Good catch, we need to hear the opinion of trademark   because it depend 
> on
> it is in an overlapping field (as I understood it). F.x. Corinthia is
> registered as a print font and hotel chain, but that was not a problem.
> 
> I think it is a good proposal and the project seems to have good chances of
> growing under the wings of apache.
> 
> rgds
> jan i
> 


The name "Geode" was thought up by the Geode contributors at Pivotal.  

Pivotal legal did a pretty extensive trademark search to ensure there would 
be no infringement.  It was their opinion that there  is low risk of trademark 
infringement with the AMD product.

However, its fully understandable that Apache legal needs to vet the name 
of the project should it be accepted for incubation.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Julien Le Dem]

+1 (non-binding)

Julien

> On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell  wrote:
> 
> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> members), 3 community)
> 
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
> 
> Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> time has
> 
> * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> support
> * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
> 
> I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
> 
> Please vote
> 
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
> 
> Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
> 
> -Jake
> 
> 
> 
> === Board Resolution ==
> 
> Establish the Apache Parquet Project
> 
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Parquet Project:
> 
>   * Chris Aniszczyk 
>   * Ryan Blue 
>   * Jonathan Coveney 
>   * Tianshuo Deng 
>   * Jake Farrell 
>   * Marcel Kornacker 
>   * Mickael Lacour 
>   * Julien Le Dem 
>   * Alex Levenson 
>   * Nong Li 
>   * Todd Lipcon 
>   * Chris Mattmann 
>   * Aniket Mokashi 
>   * Lukas Nalezenec 
>   * Brock Noland 
>   * Wesley Graham Peck 
>   * Remy Pecqueur 
>   * Dmitriy Ryaboy 
>   * Roman Shaposhnik 
>   * Daniel Weeks 
>   * Tom White 
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[jan i]

On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase  wrote:

> jan i  apache.org> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh  gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
> >
> > Good catch, we need to hear the opinion of trademark   because it
> depend on
> > it is in an overlapping field (as I understood it). F.x. Corinthia is
> > registered as a print font and hotel chain, but that was not a problem.
> >
> > I think it is a good proposal and the project seems to have good chances
> of
> > growing under the wings of apache.
> >
> > rgds
> > jan i
> >
>
>
> The name "Geode" was thought up by the Geode contributors at Pivotal.
>
> Pivotal legal did a pretty extensive trademark search to ensure there would
> be no infringement.  It was their opinion that there  is low risk of
> trademark
> infringement with the AMD product.
>
> However, its fully understandable that Apache legal needs to vet the name
> of the project should it be accepted for incubation.
>

Thanks for the explanation, that was what I expected, but since a slight
concern has
been raised, I have the following proposal.

Get a statement from Pivotal legal, what they have done, and add it to the
proposal.

That will also give ASF trademark (not legal) a stepping stone.

rgds
jan I.


>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

RE: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)]

I believe we evaluate the community, not the code. 

However, in this case I would like to look at the code to get a feel for 
whether I would be interested in contributing to the project.

Ross

-Original Message-
From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] 
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:33 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

Ross,

do we evaluate source code at the incubation-entry level, or do we evaluate 
proposed development goals and development community propositions? I'm curious 
about your thoughts.

Yours,

Bill
On Apr 13, 2015 12:16 AM, "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" < 
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Pivotal are asking me to agree to an "evaluation license" which I 
> cannot view before I sign up. So I have to review the privacy policy first.
>
> Pivotal's privacy policy goes a *long* way beyond the point I am 
> comfortable with when getting open source software (or deciding 
> whether I want to agree with an evaluation license I can't read). I 
> guess your defense could be that it's not open source yet, that's 
> fine, but you are asking me, as an IPMC Member, to make a judgement on 
> the validity of the proposal but I can't evaluate the code since I 
> can't access it or the license under which I am allowed to view it.
>
> Most importantly, the "export and license obligations" you mention are 
> something that have to go away before we can accept the project (or 
> more accurately before it can graduate). Since I can't evaluate the 
> code or the license I have no way of evaluating whether this is 
> possible. There is no mention of such an item under "known risks" or 
> the "crypotography" section of the proposal so what's this "export" 
> stuff about (assuming the license thing is the evaluation license)?
>
> Given the points above I do not see how I can evaluate this proposal 
> in its current form.
>
> Ross
>
> -Original Message-
> From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
> Roman Shaposhnik
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 11:56 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal
>
> Since I'm getting a few off-list questions, I just want to make one 
> point
> clear:
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik 
> 
> wrote:
> >> I'd also like to be able to review the source referred to in the 
> >> proposal without having to sign up to  "the Pivotal network" - how 
> >> can
> I do that?
> >
> > The issue here is export and license compliance. Unfortunately, 
> > singing up is the only way to go right now. Why is it problematic 
> > for
> you?
>
> The software currently is NOT under ALv2. It is available under the 
> evaluation license. The whole point of the proposal is to make it 
> available under ALv2 as an Incubating project.
>
> Our apologies for making folks click through the evaluation license.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

RE: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)]

It's nothing to do with my browser. If I click the download link I get asked to 
join the "Pivotal Network" before I can download it.

If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there 
were "export" issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction, it's 
actually about the licensing issue. If that's the case then the proposal is 
correct in not highlighting these issues - thanks for clarifying that.

I replied to the third part in response to Bill's question. However, to be sure 
my point gets across. Now that you have confirmed there are in fact no export 
restrictions then I have no problem with the proposal. However, I'd still like 
to be able to evaluate the code and to do so I would need to know what I'm 
agreeing to under the evaluation license.

-Original Message-
From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman 
Shaposhnik
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:38 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) 
 wrote:
> Pivotal are asking me to agree to an "evaluation license" which I cannot view 
> before I sign up.
> So I have to review the privacy policy first.

This must be a bug in your browser. What OS/Browser are you using?

The text of the license is also available in a separate file under the name 
"Evaluation License":
https://network.pivotal.io/products/project-geode

> Most importantly, the "export and license obligations" you mention are 
> something that have to go away before we can accept the project (or more 
> accurately before it can graduate).
> Since I can't evaluate the code or the license I have no way of evaluating 
> whether this is possible.
>
> There is no mention of such an item under "known risks" or the 
> "crypotography" section of the proposal so what's this "export" stuff about 
> (assuming the license thing is the evaluation license)?

Sorry for not being more explicit: this is just how Pivotal distribution 
network works.
And we have to use it in this particular case in order to guarantee that the 
evaluation license has been explicitly acknowledged (as opposed to just being 
there in a tarball). All these constraints has nothing to do with the source 
code itself.

> Given the points above I do not see how I can evaluate this proposal in its 
> current form.

I see that Bill has asked the question that I wanted to ask here, so I'll let 
you reply in that part of the thread.

Thanks,
Roman.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Justin Erenkrantz]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
 wrote:
> If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there 
> were "export" issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction, 
> it's actually about the licensing issue. If that's the case then the proposal 
> is correct in not highlighting these issues - thanks for clarifying that.
>
> I replied to the third part in response to Bill's question. However, to be 
> sure my point gets across. Now that you have confirmed there are in fact no 
> export restrictions then I have no problem with the proposal. However, I'd 
> still like to be able to evaluate the code and to do so I would need to know 
> what I'm agreeing to under the evaluation license.

FWIW, the clickthrough license et al worked for me on my Mac with Chrome.

Inspecting the code will be a lot easier once the proposal is accepted
and we can import the code under ALv2 into our repositories.

*grin*  -- justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Roman Shaposhnik]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:42 AM, jan i  wrote:
> On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase  wrote:
>
>> jan i  apache.org> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh  gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
>> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
>> >
>> > Good catch, we need to hear the opinion of trademark   because it
>> depend on
>> > it is in an overlapping field (as I understood it). F.x. Corinthia is
>> > registered as a print font and hotel chain, but that was not a problem.
>> >
>> > I think it is a good proposal and the project seems to have good chances
>> of
>> > growing under the wings of apache.
>> >
>> > rgds
>> > jan i
>> >
>>
>>
>> The name "Geode" was thought up by the Geode contributors at Pivotal.
>>
>> Pivotal legal did a pretty extensive trademark search to ensure there would
>> be no infringement.  It was their opinion that there  is low risk of
>> trademark
>> infringement with the AMD product.
>>
>> However, its fully understandable that Apache legal needs to vet the name
>> of the project should it be accepted for incubation.
>>
>
> Thanks for the explanation, that was what I expected, but since a slight
> concern has
> been raised, I have the following proposal.
>
> Get a statement from Pivotal legal, what they have done, and add it to the
> proposal.
>
> That will also give ASF trademark (not legal) a stepping stone.

I guess at this point I'm not sure what level of specific details
would be required.
Like I said: Pivotal has done a trademark clearance search to determine whether
the Geode name was available for use. The determination was that it is ok to
use it.

Of course, ASF always has to do a PODLINGNAMESEARCH before blessing
the name and we fully expect this to be the case here. I am not saying that
we somehow replaced that step. All I am saying is that chances of Geode
passing PODLINGNAMESEARCH are high. But that's just one company's
opinion.

Not sure what other level of details needs to be communicated. If somebody
can jump in and tell me specifics -- that would be appreciated.


Thanks,
Roman.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams Project version 0.2-incubating (rc2)

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
>> I'll prepare a new release with all test resources with unclear
>> licensing removed and the tests that require them deactivated for now.
>
> That could be an easy short term solution, but I wouldn't remove the tests
> just yet as it may be that they could be downloaded not bundled and/or
> hosted elsewhere if that is required.
>
> It may also be OK to release this release candidate if the incubator knows
> the issues raised are being looked into and will be fixed in a future
> release. I'd hold off on cancelling the vote until other people state their
> opinion .

I think Steve's plan to cancel this vote and spin up a new release candidate
with certain tests disabled is sensible and appropriate.  The podling can go
about finding the best long term solution at its leisure, which may involve
new test data, downloading, etc as they see fit.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.2.0-incubating

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 binding

I checked:
- artefact contains "incubating"
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- has DISCLAIMER
- All source files have correct headers
- No binaries (expect one used in testing which is gzipped text)
- Can compile from source but as noted a test fail

Thanks,
Justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

[Niclas Hedhman]

+1 for Geode accepted into Incubator.

It shouldn't be a big issue whether the codebase is available or not at the
moment. It is part of incubation to shape it up to an open source project,
that doesn't have to happen a priori (can't recall that Google Wave was
available as OSS before coming to ASF, but I could remember wrongly)

Anyway, looking forward to see this being accepted.

// Niclas

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik 
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:42 AM, jan i  wrote:
> > On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase  wrote:
> >
> >> jan i  apache.org> writes:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh  gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
> >> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
> >> >
> >> > Good catch, we need to hear the opinion of trademark   because it
> >> depend on
> >> > it is in an overlapping field (as I understood it). F.x. Corinthia is
> >> > registered as a print font and hotel chain, but that was not a
> problem.
> >> >
> >> > I think it is a good proposal and the project seems to have good
> chances
> >> of
> >> > growing under the wings of apache.
> >> >
> >> > rgds
> >> > jan i
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> The name "Geode" was thought up by the Geode contributors at Pivotal.
> >>
> >> Pivotal legal did a pretty extensive trademark search to ensure there
> would
> >> be no infringement.  It was their opinion that there  is low risk of
> >> trademark
> >> infringement with the AMD product.
> >>
> >> However, its fully understandable that Apache legal needs to vet the
> name
> >> of the project should it be accepted for incubation.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation, that was what I expected, but since a slight
> > concern has
> > been raised, I have the following proposal.
> >
> > Get a statement from Pivotal legal, what they have done, and add it to
> the
> > proposal.
> >
> > That will also give ASF trademark (not legal) a stepping stone.
>
> I guess at this point I'm not sure what level of specific details
> would be required.
> Like I said: Pivotal has done a trademark clearance search to determine
> whether
> the Geode name was available for use. The determination was that it is ok
> to
> use it.
>
> Of course, ASF always has to do a PODLINGNAMESEARCH before blessing
> the name and we fully expect this to be the case here. I am not saying that
> we somehow replaced that step. All I am saying is that chances of Geode
> passing PODLINGNAMESEARCH are high. But that's just one company's
> opinion.
>
> Not sure what other level of details needs to be communicated. If somebody
> can jump in and tell me specifics -- that would be appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Dave Lester]

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Julien
> 
> > On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell  wrote:
> > 
> > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
> > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
> > members), 3 community)
> > 
> > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> > Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> > Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
> > 
> > Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in that
> > time has
> > 
> > * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> > * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> > * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve Parquet
> > support
> > * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
> > 
> > I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
> > 
> > Please vote
> > 
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
> > 
> > Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> > http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
> > 
> > -Jake
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > === Board Resolution ==
> > 
> > Establish the Apache Parquet Project
> > 
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
> > 
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > Foundation; and be it further
> > 
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
> > 
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
> > 
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache Parquet Project:
> > 
> >   * Chris Aniszczyk 
> >   * Ryan Blue 
> >   * Jonathan Coveney 
> >   * Tianshuo Deng 
> >   * Jake Farrell 
> >   * Marcel Kornacker 
> >   * Mickael Lacour 
> >   * Julien Le Dem 
> >   * Alex Levenson 
> >   * Nong Li 
> >   * Todd Lipcon 
> >   * Chris Mattmann 
> >   * Aniket Mokashi 
> >   * Lukas Nalezenec 
> >   * Brock Noland 
> >   * Wesley Graham Peck 
> >   * Remy Pecqueur 
> >   * Dmitriy Ryaboy 
> >   * Roman Shaposhnik 
> >   * Daniel Weeks 
> >   * Tom White 
> > 
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > 
> > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
> > 
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
> > 
> > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > Project are hereafter discharged.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

[Sergio Fernández]

+1 (binding)
congrats!

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Dave Lester  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > > On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell  wrote:
> > >
> > > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache
> Parquet
> > > has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from
> IPMC
> > > members), 3 community)
> > >
> > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
> > > Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
> > > Graduation resolution: http://s.apache.org/w7
> > >
> > > Apache Parquet has been apart of the Incubator since May 2014 and in
> that
> > > time has
> > >
> > > * Had successful IPMC approved releases
> > > * Expanded the PPMC with new members
> > > * Worked and submitted fixes in other Apache projects to improve
> Parquet
> > > support
> > > * A successful community vote to graduate with 14 positive votes
> > >
> > > I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
> > >
> > > Please vote
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Parquet as a TLP because…
> > >
> > > Voting will end in 72 hours, i.e. 12:00 UTC on 2015-04-16
> > > http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20150416T12
> > >
> > > -Jake
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > === Board Resolution ==
> > >
> > > Establish the Apache Parquet Project
> > >
> > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > > public, related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop.
> > >
> > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Parquet Project",
> > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > > Foundation; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby is
> > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> > > related to a columnar storage format for Hadoop; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Parquet" be
> > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > > of the Apache Parquet Project, and to have primary responsibility
> > > for management of the projects within the scope of
> > > responsibility of the Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > > Apache Parquet Project:
> > >
> > >   * Chris Aniszczyk 
> > >   * Ryan Blue 
> > >   * Jonathan Coveney 
> > >   * Tianshuo Deng 
> > >   * Jake Farrell 
> > >   * Marcel Kornacker 
> > >   * Mickael Lacour 
> > >   * Julien Le Dem 
> > >   * Alex Levenson 
> > >   * Nong Li 
> > >   * Todd Lipcon 
> > >   * Chris Mattmann 
> > >   * Aniket Mokashi 
> > >   * Lukas Nalezenec 
> > >   * Brock Noland 
> > >   * Wesley Graham Peck 
> > >   * Remy Pecqueur 
> > >   * Dmitriy Ryaboy 
> > >   * Roman Shaposhnik 
> > >   * Daniel Weeks 
> > >   * Tom White 
> > >
> > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem
> > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Parquet, to
> > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Parquet PMC be and hereby is
> > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> > > encourage open development and increased participation in the
> > > Apache Parquet Project; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Parquet Project be and hereby
> > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > > Incubator Parquet podling; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > > Incubator Parquet podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > > Project are hereafter discharged.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co