Yan: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator
+1(binding) Gurkan Kimden: Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org Kime: general@incubator.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 5 Aralık 2011 0:11 Pazartesi Konu: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator Hello, Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included below for your convenience. Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept DeltaSpike for incubation [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't accept DeltaSpike for incubation because... The vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks, Gerhard [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltaSpikeProposal Apache DeltaSpike Proposal == Abstract Apache DeltaSpike is a collection of JSR-299 (CDI) Extensions for building applications on the Java SE and EE platforms. Proposal Apache DeltaSpike will consist of a number of portable CDI extensions that provide useful features for Java application developers. The goal of Apache DeltaSpike is to create a de-facto standard of extensions that is developed and maintained by the Java community, and to act as an incubator for features that may eventually become part of the various Java SE and EE-related specifications. Background One of the most exciting inclusions of the Java EE6 specification is JSR-299, Contexts and Dependency Injection (CDI) for Java. CDI builds on other Java EE specifications by defining a contextual component model and typesafe dependency injection framework for managed beans. It also defines a SPI that allows developers to write portable “extensions” that can be used to modify the behaviour of the Java EE platform, by offering additional features not provided by the platform by default. Apache DeltaSpike builds on this portable extensions SPI by providing baseline utilities and CDI Extensions which form the base of almost all CDI applications. Rationale There presently exists a number of open source projects that provide extensions for CDI, such as Apache MyFaces CODI, JBoss Seam3 and CDISource. Apache DeltaSpike seeks to unify these efforts by creating an “industry standard” set of extensions, combining the best core features of these projects. The project also aims to provide a rich, JBoss Arquillian based (license: ALv2), test environment to ensure that DeltaSpike portably runs in all important CDI environments. Initial Goals The initial goals of the Apache DeltaSpike project are to: * Setup the governance structure of the project * Receive code donations from contributing members * Ensure all donated code is appropriately licensed under the Apache License * Merge and rename code to reflect new project name * Merge code where feature overlap exists * Merge or produce documentation for all modules * Provide simple examples demonstrating feature usage * Produce release/s based on a schedule created by the PMC * Attract contributions from the greater Java EE community and other Java EE development groups Current Status The initial codebase for Apache DeltaSpike will be populated with mature code donations from project members, including JBoss Seam3, Apache MyFaces CODI and CDISource. Meritocracy All contributors have a well established history in the open source community and are well aware of the meritocracy principles of the Apache Software Foundation. Currently the Seam3 project is fortunate to receive the majority of its code contributions from its large community of users. Many of the modules that are contained in the Seam project are led by volunteers from the community, who have both direct commit access, and discretion over the direction of their modules. Apache MyFaces CODI is a subproject of Apache MyFaces and thus all contributors are already familiar with the meritocracy principles. The CDISource project has adopted the principles of meritocracy by the founding developers having control of different modules depending on their contribution to those modules. Community The JBoss Seam, Apache MyFaces CODI and CDISource projects already have well established communities, consisting of many active users and contributors. One of the primary goals of the Apache DeltaSpike project is to unify this community, and by creating a project that is a “single source of truth” for CDI Extensions. By doing this, we hope to make the whole greater than the sum of its parts, i.e. to attract a much stronger community than that which currently exists across the separate projects. To this end, it is a goal of this project to attract contributors from the Java EE community in addition to those from the three projects already mentioned. Core Developers * Shane Bryzak (Red Hat) * Jason Porter (Red Hat) * Stuart Douglas (Red Hat) * Jozef Hartinger (Red Hat) * Brian Leathem (Red Hat) *
Yan: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project
+1 (binding) Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 30 Kasım 2011 1:40 Çarşamba Konu: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project Hi! JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the Apache DeltaSpike project to the Incubator. We have added the initial proposal to the Wiki[1] and its content is also included below for convenience. There are already a few people who expressed interest in contributing additional CDI Extensions and would like to join this effort. Of course, we are thankful for every helping hand! We are looking forward to feedback and/or questions on the proposal. We already have five mentors, but would very much welcome additional volunteers to help steer Apache DeltaSpike through the incubation process. LieGrue, strub [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltaSpikeProposal Apache DeltaSpike Proposal == Abstract Apache DeltaSpike is a collection of JSR-299 (CDI) Extensions for building applications on the Java SE and EE platforms. Proposal Apache DeltaSpike will consist of a number of portable CDI extensions that provide useful features for Java application developers. The goal of Apache DeltaSpike is to create a de-facto standard of extensions that is developed and maintained by the Java community, and to act as an incubator for features that may eventually become part of the various Java SE and EE-related specifications. Background One of the most exciting inclusions of the Java EE6 specification is JSR-299, Contexts and Dependency Injection (CDI) for Java. CDI builds on other Java EE specifications by defining a contextual component model and typesafe dependency injection framework for managed beans. It also defines a SPI that allows developers to write portable “extensions” that can be used to modify the behaviour of the Java EE platform, by offering additional features not provided by the platform by default. Apache DeltaSpike builds on this portable extensions SPI by providing baseline utilities and CDI Extensions which form the base of almost all CDI applications. Rationale There presently exists a number of open source projects that provide extensions for CDI, such as Apache MyFaces CODI, JBoss Seam3 and CDISource. Apache DeltaSpike seeks to unify these efforts by creating an “industry standard” set of extensions, combining the best core features of these projects. The project also aims to provide a rich, JBoss Arquillian based (license: ALv2), test environment to ensure that DeltaSpike portably runs in all important CDI environments. Initial Goals The initial goals of the Apache DeltaSpike project are to: * Setup the governance structure of the project * Receive code donations from contributing members * Ensure all donated code is appropriately licensed under the Apache License * Merge and rename code to reflect new project name * Merge code where feature overlap exists * Merge or produce documentation for all modules * Provide simple examples demonstrating feature usage * Produce release/s based on a schedule created by the PMC * Attract contributions from the greater Java EE community and other Java EE development groups Current Status The initial codebase for Apache DeltaSpike will be populated with mature code donations from project members, including JBoss Seam3, Apache MyFaces CODI and CDISource. Meritocracy All contributors have a well established history in the open source community and are well aware of the meritocracy principles of the Apache Software Foundation. Currently the Seam3 project is fortunate to receive the majority of its code contributions from its large community of users. Many of the modules that are contained in the Seam project are led by volunteers from the community, who have both direct commit access, and discretion over the direction of their modules. Apache MyFaces CODI is a subproject of Apache MyFaces and thus all contributors are already familiar with the meritocracy principles. The CDISource project has adopted the principles of meritocracy by the founding developers having control of different modules depending on their contribution to those modules. Community The JBoss Seam, Apache MyFaces CODI and CDISource projects already have well established communities, consisting of many active users and contributors. One of the primary goals of the Apache DeltaSpike project is to unify this community, and by creating a project that is a “single source of truth” for CDI Extensions. By doing this, we hope to make the whole greater than the sum of its parts, i.e. to attract a much stronger
Re: [VOTE] Deltacloud Project
+1 (binding) --Gurkan From: David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 3:45:08 AM Subject: [VOTE] Deltacloud Project Hi all, after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2] I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest in being a mentor or initial committer to the proposal - if I have forgotten anybody, please holler. Please reply to this mail with your vote. David [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201005.mbox/%3c1273174879.7253.99.ca...@avon.watzmann.net%3e [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltacloudProposal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project
Hello Craig; Thanks for the solution. I have just sent an subscription email to private-subscr...@i.a.o waiting for confirmation :) -- Gurkan From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 10:46:10 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project Hi Gurkan, As a Member, just ask to be an IPMC member and you will become one. Craig On May 7, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: I would like to mentor but I am not a IPMC member. But if possible I would like to contribute and you could add me as an initial committer. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Fri, May 7, 2010 4:18:02 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project On 05/07/2010 02:33 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi; +1; I am happy to help during incubation process; Thanks; --Gurkan Gurkan, Is this an offer to help mentor the project, or just help out as needed. Reason for asking is if you would like to be represented onto the proposal or just voicing support which is greatly appreciated. regards, Carl. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project
Hi; +1; I am happy to help during incubation process; Thanks; --Gurkan From: David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 10:41:19 PM Subject: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project Hi, I would like to propose the Deltacloud API[1] for addition to the Apache incubator. I have added the initial proposal to the Wiki[2]; it is also included below for convenience. There are a few additional people that have expressed interest in becoming initial committers; I am waiting for their express consent to list them as committers, and will add them to the Wiki as I get that. We are looking forward to any and all feedback and/or questions on the proposal. We already have two mentors, but would very much welcome additional volunteers to help steer Deltacloud through the incubation process. David [1] http://deltacloud.org/ [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltacloudProposal Deltacloud, a cross-cloud web service API = Abstract Deltacloud defines a web service API for interacting with cloud service providers and resources in those clouds in a unified manner. In addition, it consists of a number of implementations of this API for the most popular clouds. Proposal * Define a REST-based API for managing and manipulating cloud resources in a manner that isolates the API client as much as possible from the particulars of specific cloud API's * Provide an open API definition for cloud providers for their IaaS clouds and a basis on which PaaS providers can layer their offering * Provide image management and directory capabilities as part of the API * The current implementation allows instance lifecycle management (create, start, stop, destroy, reboot), and querying of related resources like available images, instance sizes, and allowed instance actions for a number of public and private clouds * Currently supported are Amazon EC2, Eucalyptus, Rackspace, RimuHosting, GoGrid, OpenNebula, and RHEV-M * Future enhancements should broaden the scope of the API to include networking, firewalling, authentication, accounting, and image management Background -- An important issue for cloud users is that of avoiding lock-in to a specific cloud. By providing a cross-cloud API for infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) clouds, Deltacloud addresses this concern and strives to provide the best possible API for writing cloud-management applications that can target multiple clouds. There are also no efforts currently to define a truly open-source cloud API, one for which there is a proper upstream, independent of any specific cloud provider. Deltacloud API strives to create a community around building an open-source cloud API in a manner that fully allows for tried-and-true open source mechanisms such as user-driven innovation. By providing a web-service API, Deltacloud is language agnostic, and one of its subordinated goals is to provide a practical vocabulary for talking about IaaS cloud resources and operations on them. Rationale - IaaS clouds provide numerous advantages to their users, for example, making provisioning new servers more agile. If users directly use the 'native' cloud API's, they risk locking themselves in to the API of a specific cloud provider. There is therefore a strong need for an API that can be used across a wide range of public and private clouds, and that can serve as the basis for developing cloud management applications; in contrast to several existing language-specific efforts in this direction, Deltacloud is conceived as a web service. This will allow the project to attract a broad community of users of the API and cloud providers interested in offering a truly open-source API, with a proper upstream community. We strongly believe that the best way to drive such an API effort is by developing the API and open-source implementations of the API side-by-side. Initial Goals - Deltacloud is an existing open source project; initially started by Red Hat, it has attracted a number of outside contributors. We look at moving this project to the ASF as the next step to broaden the community, and put the project on solid footing since the ASF governance model is well suited for the Deltacloud project goals. The ASF is a great location for Deltacloud to build a community and will benefit from ASL licensing. Current Status -- Deltacloud API is licensed under the LGPL: * Deltacloud Website (http://deltacloud.org) There are two projects hosted there: the API under consideration here and the Aggregator (not part of this proposal, though also open source) * Deltacloud git repository (http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=deltacloud/core.git;a=summary) * Deltacloud mailing lists - users (https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/deltacloud-users) - developers
Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project
I would like to mentor but I am not a IPMC member. But if possible I would like to contribute and you could add me as an initial committer. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Fri, May 7, 2010 4:18:02 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project On 05/07/2010 02:33 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi; +1; I am happy to help during incubation process; Thanks; --Gurkan Gurkan, Is this an offer to help mentor the project, or just help out as needed. Reason for asking is if you would like to be represented onto the proposal or just voicing support which is greatly appreciated. regards, Carl. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator
+1 --Gurkan From: Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 1:48:46 AM Subject: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a new Amber podling. The goal is to build a community around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and implementation The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmberProposal [] +1 to accept Amber into the Incubator [] 0 don't care [] -1 object and reason why. Thanks, Simone Gianni --- Proposal text from the wiki --- = Amber = == Abstract == The following proposal is about Apache Amber, a Java development framework mainly aimed to build OAuth-aware applications. After a brief explanation of the OAuth protocol, the following proposal describes how Apache Amber solves issues related to the implementation of applications that adhere to such specification. == Proposal == Amber will have no or negligible dependencies and will provide both an API specification for, and an unconditionally compliant implementation of, the OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and v2.0 specifications. The API specification will be provided as a separate JAR file allowing re-use by other developers and permits configuration: * by XML * by the Java JAR Services ServiceLoader mechanism * programmatically The API component specifies that an implementation must provide default classes for Provider, Consumer and Token objects making Amber easy to integrate with existing infrastructure and OAuth client interactions possible with virtually no additional configuration. The API is flexible enough to allow programmatic customisation or replacement of much of the implementation, including the default HTTP transport. Amber will provide both client and server functionality, enabling developers to deploy robust OAuth services with minimal effort. == Background == Roughly, OAuth is a mechanism that allows users to share their private resources, like photo, videos or contacts, stored on a site with another site avoiding giving their username and password credentials. Hence, from the user point-of-view, OAuth could be the way to improve their experience across different applications with an enhanced privacy and security control in a simple and standard method from desktop and web applications. The protocol was initially developed by the oauth.net community and now is under IETF standardization process. The main idea behind OAuth is represented by the token concept. Each token grants access to a site, for a specific resource (or a group of resources), and for a precise time-interval. The user is only required to authenticate with the Provider of their original account, after which that entity provides a re-usable to token to the Consumer who can use it to access resources at the Provider, on the users behalf. Moreover, the total transparency to the user, that is completely unaware of using the protocol, represents one of the main valuable characteristics of the specification. Apache Amber community aims not just to create a simple low-level library, but rather to provide a complete OAuth framework easy to use with Java code, on top of which users can build new-generation killer applications. There are currently three implementation efforts going on in ASF for OAuth v1. A stable implementation of OAuth v1 is present in Apache Shindig, but it is not actively developed and not shared with other projects. A Lab having Simone Tripodi as its PI is working on an implementation for an OAuth library that could be used by other products. Zhihong Zhang wrote an OAuth plugin for JMeter. At the same time, on the IETF OAuth v2 mailing list, other people expressed interest for a Java API and implementation, among them two Apache committers and one active contributor. Outside the ASF there are three known Java OAuth 1.0/1.0a libraries * The oauth.net reference implementation by John Kristian, Praveen Alavilli and Dirk Balfanz. * OAuth SignPost - a simple OAuth message signing client for Java and Apache HttpComponents by Matthias Kaeppler. * OAuth Scribe - a simple OAuth client by Pablo Fernandez. * asmx-oauth (on google code) - a complete open source OAuth 1.0 Consumer and Service Provider implementation provided by Asemantics Srl (Simone Tripodi was involved). == Rationale == The key role played by the OAuth specification, within the overall Open Stack technologies, jointly with its high degree of adoption and maturity, strongly suggest having an Apache leaded incubator for suitable reference implementation. Furthermore, the OAuth specification is currently gaining value due to its involvement in a standardization process within the IETF, as the actual internet draft. Having the Apache Amber as an Apache Incubator could be an opportunity to enforce the actual Apache projects that already reference other
Third party Maven Repository Usage
Hi; Is there any rule/policy for using third-party maven repositories in our project poms? Recently, we have required to list some repositories in settings.xml (for example: jboss) to our codebase built correctly. But when Apache-Hudson runs to built daily, it throws errors because of not finding required repositories. Is it OK to list those repositories in our poms? I have just found http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.htmldocumentation FAQ and common mistakes section. Thanks; --Gurkan
Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
the U.S., Europe and Africa with no one company being associated with a majority of the developers. Many of these initial developers are experienced Apache committers already and all are experienced with working in distributed development communities. It is our hope that, through the incubator, further contributors with a broad background of experience but common interest will become involved with this project. Reliance on Salaried Developers To the best of our knowledge, none of the initial committers are being paid to develop code for this project. Relationships with Other Apache Products A number of existing ASF projects require an implementation of JSR303 including Geronimo, OpenJPA and MyFaces. It is hoped that members of those projects will be interested in contributing to and adopting this implementation. Apache Geronimo - Apache Geronimo is a server runtime framework and fully certified Java EE 5 application server runtime. It is interested in using this project, to provide the required JSR-303 implementation for the upcoming Geronimo 3.0 server, which will be a Java EE 6 certified release. Apache OpenJPA - Apache OpenJPA is a JPA provider, who needs to integrate and test with a JSR-303 provider as part of JSR-317 JPA2 specification. In the future, we may decide to include the Validation artifacts in our distribution for Java SE users. Apache MyFaces - Apache MyFaces is a JSF provider, who needs to integrate and test with a JSR-303 provider as part of the JSR-314 JSF2 specification. It is our hope, that the preferred Bean Validation provider will become Validation instead of the Hibernate RI, after the project exits the incubator. A Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand The Agimatec-Validation code is currently being hosted on Google Code. The developers (Agimatec Gmbh) did not approach Apache, but were instead approached by Donald Woods about moving the code to Apache in hopes to build a broader and more vibrant community around the code and as the eventual next generation Commons Validator codebase. Documentation JSR303 Bean Validation Specification: * http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 Agimatec Validation Project: * http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/ Initial Source The intiial source comprises code developed as as part of the agimatec-validation project on googlecode: * http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/source/browse/ Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan SGA has been submitted. Source tarball has not been uploaded to SVN yet. External Dependencies * Runtime o Apache Geronimo Bean Validation 1.0 Spec API o Apache Commons BeanUtils o Apache Commons Lang o Apache Commons Logging o Apache Commons Collections o XStream * Optional o org.freemarker - freemarker template to generate JSON output * Tests o JUnit o Log4J Required Resources * Mailing lists o validation-private (with moderated subscriptions) o validation-dev o validation-user o validation-commits * Subversion directory o https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/validation * Website o Confluence (VALIDATION) * Issue Tracking o JIRA (VALIDATION) Initial Committers Names of initial committers with affiliation and current ASF status: * Roman Stumm [roman.stumm at agimatec.de] - (Agimatec GmbH, CLA filed) * Donald Woods [dwoods] - (IBM, ASF committer) * Niall Pemberton [niallp] - (EMC, ASF committer) * Mohammad Nour El-Din [mnour] - (Thebe Technology, ASF committer) * Simone Tripodi [simone.tripodi at gmail.com] - (Asemantics S.r.l, CLA filed) * Jeremy Bauer [jrbauer] - (IBM, ASF committer) * Gerhard Petracek [gpetracek] - (IRIAN Solutions GmbH, ASF committer) * Mark Struberg [struberg] - (ASF committer) Sponsors Champion * Kevan Miller Nominated Mentors * Kevan Miller * Niall Pemberton * Luciano Resende Sponsoring Entity * Apache Incubator PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Apache Shindig graduated
Hi Vincent; Congratulations. Thanks; --Gurkan OpenWebBeans PMC Chair 2010/1/21 Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org Hi, We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache Shindig as a TLP. On behalf of the Shindig team, I would like to thank the Incubator PMC, and everybody that supported Shindig during its incubation. Special thanks to our mentors, especially Upayavira, for their guidance, effort and time. It is a pleasure to be part of the great Apache family! We will now begin the post graduation transition. Cheers, Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Apache OpenWebBeans Has Graduated
Hi; We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache OpenWebBeans as a project. I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and time. I am very proud to be part of the Apache family Thanks to all! Gurkan Erdogdu ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
[RESULT]Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP
Hi; The VOTE has passed with 6 +1 votes and no 0 or -1. Here are the votes; +1 Kevan Miller +1 Matthias Wessendorf +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 Niall Pemberton +1 Martijn Dashorst +1 Craig L Russell Thank you for all the support. As a next step, we will send the proposed resolution to the board for approval. Best Regards; --Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 10:32:04 PM Subject: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP Hi; After over one years in the incubator with providing three releases OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate OpenWebBeans to a Top Level Project. See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html To that end we have prepared the resolution for the Board below to be presented for consideration at the upcoming Board meeting. Please vote on recommending OpenWebBeans graduation to the ASF board. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only IPMC member votes are binding. [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because Unless they explicitly vote otherwise, I'm including the following IPMC member votes from the community vote also in the tally of this vote: +1 Kevan Miller +1 Matthias Wessendorf Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html Thanks; --Gurkan Erdogdu Board Resolution Report -- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the Java EE Platform; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC: * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com) * Kevan Miller (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com) * Mark Struberg (struberg at yahoo dot com) * Joe Bergmark (bergmark at gmail dot com) * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com) * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP
Hi; This is a reminder email that 72 hours have already passed. What other IPMC members think about graduation? So far we have three binding +1 votes from Kevan Miller, Matthias Wessendorf, Bertrand Delacretaz Thanks; --Gurkan 2009/12/7 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Hi; After over one years in the incubator with providing three releases OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate OpenWebBeans to a Top Level Project. See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html To that end we have prepared the resolution for the Board below to be presented for consideration at the upcoming Board meeting. Please vote on recommending OpenWebBeans graduation to the ASF board. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only IPMC member votes are binding. [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because Unless they explicitly vote otherwise, I'm including the following IPMC member votes from the community vote also in the tally of this vote: +1 Kevan Miller +1 Matthias Wessendorf Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html Thanks; --Gurkan Erdogdu Board Resolution Report -- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the Java EE Platform; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC: * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com) * Kevan Miller (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com) * Mark Struberg (struberg at yahoo dot com) * Joe Bergmark (bergmark at gmail dot com) * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com) * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
[VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP
Hi; After over one years in the incubator with providing three releases OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate OpenWebBeans to a Top Level Project. See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html To that end we have prepared the resolution for the Board below to be presented for consideration at the upcoming Board meeting. Please vote on recommending OpenWebBeans graduation to the ASF board. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only IPMC member votes are binding. [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because Unless they explicitly vote otherwise, I'm including the following IPMC member votes from the community vote also in the tally of this vote: +1 Kevan Miller +1 Matthias Wessendorf Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html Thanks; --Gurkan Erdogdu Board Resolution Report -- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the Java EE Platform; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC: * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com) * Kevan Miller (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com) * Mark Struberg (struberg at yahoo dot com) * Joe Bergmark (bergmark at gmail dot com) * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com) * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: [Reminder] use proper mirror system for downloads
Hi David; I learn new rules/things every day :) Thanks for poking. I am going to change it in the evening --Gurkan 2009/11/17 David Crossley cross...@apache.org The OpenWebBeans Status page links directly to apache.org /dist Please see the ASF mirror guidelines, which emphatically say to use the mirrors. So either set up your own mirrors script (preferred because then you can show Incubator notice), or use the default one, e.g. http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/openwebbeans/ -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Incubator Releases: mandatory or optional? Purpose?
the draconian release process. ;-) Actually it is quite true. Last time I released OpenWebBeans, it took nearly 1 month :) Besides, it is also very helpful to understand Apache way release procedures. --Gurkan 2009/11/16 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Hi, On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Ironically, when the Incubator first formed, podlings could NOT do a release and many yelled about it. Yes, the originally reason behind it, iirc, was so podlings had a reason to graduate, the thought being if they could do a release, then what incentive was there for them to ever leave? :) Nowadays it seems that one of the prime reasons for projects to leave the Incubator is to escape the draconian release process. ;-) BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [grammar] pure java syntax analyzer (this is not a compiler of compiler)
Hi: I think that writing some incubator proposal document related with your project is a good idea to start discussions. You could look at sample proposals here . http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ Thanks; --Gurkan 2009/11/15 Gaël Lalire gael.lal...@gmail.com Hello, Today if you want to do syntax analysis, you have to use a compiler of compiler (bison, yacc, javaCC ...) which generates source code. After generation, you need to compile your generated source code and then you can parse some input. I dislike this method because : - you need to learn a meta-language (the language which describe the grammar) - reusability of grammar is excluded - the grammar cannot be dynamic (self described) However I did not found any dynamical grammar analyzer so I decided to write it. I separate my project in 3 modules : - API : define Token, Terminal, Grammar, exceptions, ... ; A lexical analyzer have to depends on this module to send terminals to the syntax analyzer - Impl : The analyzers (LR, LL, SLR, ...) and some calculation utilities. - SPI : This module provide user friendly abstract classes. For example, if you create a grammar using this module there will be a type checking (generics) on non-terminals and its rules, so you will be sure that there will be no ClassCastException. It also provide a easy way to create arithmetic expression (you just need to provide terminals, the helper will create the rules). Why donate to apache ? I hope that I'm not the only one interested by having a runtime grammar tool, and I hope I could create a community on this project (because I'm alone). This isn't an easy domain, there is many things I do not know about compilation, so a community could bring speeder or new implementations. Also apache is well-known in university, which could be interested on this project for practical exercises. Future tasks : - LL(*) to create (abstract LL exists and is untested) - LR(1+) to create (I need documentations) - LALR(*) to create (need documentations too) - SLR(2+) to create (need documentations always) - Naming issue (bad english, bad words ...) - Comments - Tutorial - Find a way to serialize the grammar's states (actions on terminal input maps) and restore it with a simple bindings of terminals instead of grammar analyze. - Create bindings with a lexer (ORO ? JDK ?) - More reusable grammar part (boolean expression, sql parser, ...) - Parsing error management - Create a BNF to the SPI convertor - ... I join a source code to this mail. This is a maven2 / eclipse project [eclipse is not mandatory but the .project is provided] Now I need a champion (If I understand the mechanism : apache rule are not simple) to integrate the project. Best regards, Gael Lalire - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
Hi; For license issues, aforementioned libraries are included within samples/jms-sample-1.0.0-incubating-M3.war/WEB-INF/lib folder. For source distribution, we included everything under the svn/trunk that contains LICENSE, NOTICE, READMES, all sources etc. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:41:25 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2) The LICENSE.txt from the binary distribution mentions the following jars : jsf-facelet-1.1.14.jar, jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar, dom4j-1.6.1.jar, javassist-3.8.0.GA.jar But i can't find any of them in the binary distribution... [apache-openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-binary]$ find . -name \*.jar ./atinject-api-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-api-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-ejb-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-geronimo-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-impl-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-jms-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-jpa-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-jsf-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar ./openwebbeans-resource-1.0.0-incubating-M3.jar I'd say you should either add this to the distribution (as the README_ME.txt says they are required) or remove them from the LICENSe.txt. Similar thing with NOTICE.txt, where it mentions dom4j and javassist, but they are not really part of the distribution. These comments should also apply for source distribution, which from my quick scan is only distributing Apache Licensed source code. Also, a minor thing is that the source and binary distribution (zip files at least) are extracting to the same folder... On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: This is why I complained about a podling release procedure. We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are still not able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC members in our community list to get their binding votes. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:54:55 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2) +1 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Niall On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There is one *binding* +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. RC-2 Artifacts - Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving - Albert Einstein - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende http
[VOTE][RESULT]Release OpenWebBeans M3
Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding votes, not 0 or -1. +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller * Niall Pemberton * Luciano Resende. I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place. Thanks to everyone who helps us to pass this hard marathon :) ; Gurkan Erdogdu
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
This is why I complained about a podling release procedure. We started a voting process to release M3 at September 1 and are still not able to release. This maybe related with not enough IPMC members in our community list to get their binding votes. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:54:55 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2) +1 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Niall On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There is one *binding* +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. RC-2 Artifacts - Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving - Albert Einstein - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
Hi; 72 hours are over. We have not receiving any VOTE to release M3. Please have a look at the artifacts below, we require to get 2 more IPMC votes. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:14:21 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2) Hi; This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There is one *binding* +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. RC-2 Artifacts - Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan
[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3 (RC-2)
Hi; This is the RC-2 of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. OpenWebBeans is an Apache License, Version 2.0 implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There is one *binding* +1 VOTE from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get two more bindings IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. RC-2 Artifacts - Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *three* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01303.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan
[VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)
Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO impatience isn't a good enough reason. Yes, my fault. Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus. Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see if its possible. Yes agree also. Thanks for remindering; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:25:55 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO impatience isn't a good enough reason. Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus. Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see if its possible. Niall If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)
Hi Sebb, The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar. This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in NOTICE or LICENSE. IMO this is a blocker. I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facelet is licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0. You can look at https://facelets.dev.java.net/ for further information. The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address. Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate. I updated my KEY to include my apache account. http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index contains gerdo...@apache.org Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is. As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs) have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a blocker, but please consider for the next release). From the 2 points of above comments, we got advices our mentor while we were releasing the our first milestone (M1) about how we create distribution bundles and its name. Sure, I can remove all packages from the next release. Thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:52:31 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try) On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar. This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in NOTICE or LICENSE. IMO this is a blocker. Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar. This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in NOTICE or LICENSE. IMO this is a blocker. The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address. Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate. The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider removing for the next release) Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is. As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to review releases)? it might make getting votes easier next time if the all archive was dropped ...). Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs) have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a blocker, but please consider for the next release). SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products = This product The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)
IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO. Ok. I will create a second round VOTE on dev. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:37:51 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try) On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO. Niall Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3
Hey, We would like to get one more IPMC VOTE to release! Why I complained about Incubator Project Release Procedure last time! I started a release process at September 1 and still we are trying to release something! We have already learned those things and rules that how Apache works! We want to graduate but it requires some more community! Thanks; --Gurkan 2009/9/14 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Hi; OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3
There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key. Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server. (blocking) The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in to a Web of Trust (not blocking) I always published other releases with this public key. You can look at it at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using the phrase includes/uses. The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not required if the software is not physically included in the archive. The /uses part should be removed. Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution, so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file. (blocking) Alswhat they apply. Last time I corrected NOTICE /LICENCE file that you commented at M2 release. It does not changed since M2 release. --Gurkan 2009/9/17 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ The sigs are OK, however the public key says: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key. Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server. (blocking) The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in to a Web of Trust (not blocking) The NOTICE file refers to various items of 3rd party software using the phrase includes/uses. The file should only be used for required notices, and a notice is not required if the software is not physically included in the archive. The /uses part should be removed. Also, as far as I can tell, JUnit is not included in the distribution, so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file. (blocking) Also, the LICENSE file includes various licenses, but does not say to what they apply. (blocking) SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/ Some SVN property problems (not blocking): svn ps svn:eol-style native atinject-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/Provider.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ApplicationScoped.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ContextNotActiveException.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/ConversationScoped.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/context/Dependent.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Disposes.java The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
[VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans M3
Hi; I think it is more meaningful to cancel VOTE to apply Sebb concerns and create a new release! Thanks; --Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:01:50 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3
Hi; OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. There are two *binding* +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@.. We still require to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE to publish M3 release. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc1/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ This vote is open for 72 hours. Thanks; -- Gurkan
Re: About Podling Releases
Hi Bertrand; What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating? That's the best way of streamlining your release process. Actually this is ongoing discussion in the openwebbeans dev list. There are two solutions here, sub-project under Geronimo or TLP. But community are voted on being a TLP. The problem is that we have not a solid user base (not so much activity around u...@.. list). Otherwise, I think that we achieved activitites that are expected from podlings to graduate as a TLP. On a tangential note, I'm not sure what you mean by internal milestones - if those are just meant for OpenWebBeans developers, SVN tags might be good enough. I mean actual podling releases, not SVN tags. For example, we released M1 and M2. Now M3 is under VOTE. --Gurkan From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 10:42:35 AM Subject: Re: About Podling Releases Hi Gurkan, On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: ...As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating? That's the best way of streamlining your release process. I had a look at the latest report at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2009, but it doesn't mention the top 2 or 3 things to resolve prior to graduation, what are those? On a tangential note, I'm not sure what you mean by internal milestones - if those are just meant for OpenWebBeans developers, SVN tags might be good enough. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
About Podling Releases
Hi; I would like to specify some concerns about podling release procedure. As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project. I know that podling mentors/committers may delay to VOTE because of doing other business stuffs. But I think that podling releasing is also very important. With delayed releases, we are not able to attract and diverse our community. I wonder is that how can we improve podling release process to decrease this time duration? My proposal is to decrease positive IPMC and PPMC VOTE numbers to 1 instead of 3. Moreover, maybe it is reasonable to add silence consensus on podling releases. One can also think that getting positive votes from podling committers are enough to release without getting IPMC votes. Is there any other podlings that are suffering from release procedures? WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan
[VOTE][RESULT]Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M2 is successful. There are three +1 binding and one non-binding +0 votes, not -1. +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Ant Elder (binding) +0 Votes - *Sebastian Bazley (non-binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m2-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan
Re: [VOTE] CANCEL Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
/ConversationScoped.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/context/Dependent.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/BindingType.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-api/src/main/java/javax/inject/Disposes.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-geronimo/src/test/resources/log4j.properties svn pd svn:executable webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/WebBeansConstants.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/exception/WebBeansException.java svn pd svn:executable webbeans-impl/src/main/resources/log4j.properties svn pd svn:executable webbeans-tck/src/test/resources/log4j.properties The SVN problems are not blockers, but it would help if they were fixed before any new tags are made. On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Also this is the commit command Revision *780477* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revsortby=logsortdir=downrevision=780477 - Directory Listing http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?sortby=logsortdir=downpathrev=780477 Modified *Sun May 31 17:28:57 2009 UTC* (12 hours, 13 minutes ago) by * gerdogdu* Copied from: *incubator/openwebbeans/trunk* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/trunk?view=logsortby=logsortdir=downpathrev=780474 revision 780474 [maven-release-plugin] copy for tag openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2 2009/6/1 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Sorry I do not understand what you mean. I am also not a svn expert. I am looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?pathrev=780504 . When I opened URL, it shows the Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556) Sticky revision : 780504 I think this helps; But last M2 location is undertags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2. This is the last revision. Please VOTE on this. Thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 1:11:56 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Sorry I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on version At revision 780504 Neither of those agree with what I have just downloaded. What is the Last Changed Rev: ? That should be the same as revision in the SVN commit message. -- Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Thanks; From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN New Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ You appear to have re-used the same tag name. Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no means of knowing what files they relate
[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN Tag Last Changed Rev: 780720 Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; -- Gurkan
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
Now, Kevan Miller (+1 Binding) Matthias Wessendorf (+1 Binding) Sebastian Bazley (+ 0 Binding) Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still necessary ? -- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try) +0 Two files don't have AL headers: openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml I'm not sure what these files are for. The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose. The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed. On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN Tag Last Changed Rev: 780720 Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? Thanks; --- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans I've not checked these. Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which is not usual. Normally this is included in the parent, e.g. apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src rather than apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src This is not a release-blocker. SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. The NOTICE file must start with: Apache OpenWebBeans Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed. Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all the headers enclosed in == Some of the other entries include too much data. The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain all the required licenses. These are both release blockers. There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings: svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess Properties on 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess': svn: Inconsistent line ending style It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files. This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same EOL as the file happens to be. This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags cannot be fixed later. The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. My vote is -1, based on the problems with the N L files, and the incorrect version in the pom.xml [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org = == NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the Apache License, == == Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Geronimo distribution.== = Apache Geronimo Copyright 2003-2009 The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software
Re: [VOTE] CANCEL Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
I will re-tag the releases and artifacts after correcting the errors. --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content and http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the LICENSE file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses Thanks; --- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans I've not checked these. Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which is not usual. Normally this is included in the parent, e.g. apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src rather than apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src This is not a release-blocker. SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. The NOTICE file must start with: Apache OpenWebBeans Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed. Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all the headers enclosed in == Some of the other entries include too much data. The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain all the required licenses. These are both release blockers. There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings: svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess Properties on 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess': svn: Inconsistent line ending style It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files. This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same EOL as the file happens to be. This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags cannot be fixed later. The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. My vote is -1, based on the problems with the N L files, and the incorrect version in the pom.xml [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page]: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN New Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content and http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the LICENSE file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses Thanks; --- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans I've not checked these. Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which is not usual. Normally this is included in the parent, e.g. apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src rather than apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src This is not a release-blocker. SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. The NOTICE file must start with: Apache OpenWebBeans Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed. Also, the NOTICE file is much too long, it should be used for required elements only, so remove any references to other ASF projects and all the headers enclosed in == Some of the other entries include too much data. The LICENSES file only contains the Apache License. It must contain all the required licenses. These are both release blockers. There is at least one file in SVN with inconsistent line-endings: svn pl -v openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/samples/guess Properties on 'openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2\samples\guess': svn: Inconsistent line ending style It looks like the svn:eol-style properties are missing from a lot of files. This makes it difficult to use the code except on OSes with the same EOL as the file happens to be. This ought to be fixed before creating any new tags, because the tags cannot be fixed later. The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Thanks; From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN New Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ You appear to have re-used the same tag name. Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no means of knowing what files they relate to. Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable tag] thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content and http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the LICENSE file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses Thanks; --- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans I've not checked these. Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which is not usual. Normally this is included in the parent, e.g. apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src rather than apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2/src This is not a release-blocker. SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. The NOTICE file must start with: Apache OpenWebBeans Copyright 2008, 2009 The Apache Software Foundation The preceeding 4 lines need to be removed
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Sorry I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on version At revision 780504 -- Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Thanks; From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN New Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ You appear to have re-used the same tag name. Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no means of knowing what files they relate to. Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable tag] thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content and http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the LICENSE file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses Thanks; --- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans I've not checked these. Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. The source archives have an additional top-level src/ directory which is not usual. Normally this is included in the parent, e.g. apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating-M2-src rather than apache-openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-incubating
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
Sorry I do not understand what you mean. I am also not a svn expert. I am looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?pathrev=780504. When I opened URL, it shows the Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556) Sticky revision : 780504 I think this helps; But last M2 location is undertags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2. This is the last revision. Please VOTE on this. Thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 1:11:56 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Sorry I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on version At revision 780504 Neither of those agree with what I have just downloaded. What is the Last Changed Rev: ? That should be the same as revision in the SVN commit message. -- Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Thanks; From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN New Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ You appear to have re-used the same tag name. Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no means of knowing what files they relate to. Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable tag] thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content and http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice We have included *licenses* folder to hold third party license texts to ease reading of the third party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the LICENSE file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses Thanks; --- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
Also this is the commit command Revision *780477*http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revsortby=logsortdir=downrevision=780477- Directory Listinghttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?sortby=logsortdir=downpathrev=780477 Modified *Sun May 31 17:28:57 2009 UTC* (12 hours, 13 minutes ago) by * gerdogdu* Copied from: *incubator/openwebbeans/trunk*http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/trunk?view=logsortby=logsortdir=downpathrev=780474revision 780474 [maven-release-plugin] copy for tag openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2 2009/6/1 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Sorry I do not understand what you mean. I am also not a svn expert. I am looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/?pathrev=780504 . When I opened URL, it shows the Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556) Sticky revision : 780504 I think this helps; But last M2 location is undertags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2. This is the last revision. Please VOTE on this. Thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 1:11:56 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Sorry I have given wrong revision. Current M2 tag is created based on version At revision 780504 Neither of those agree with what I have just downloaded. What is the Last Changed Rev: ? That should be the same as revision in the SVN commit message. -- Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. Current Tag Revision is 780496 Thanks; From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:06:00 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN New Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ You appear to have re-used the same tag name. Tags are normally supposed to be immutable, otherwise there is no means of knowing what files they relate to. Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable tag] thanks; --Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:38:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2 On 31/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 hashes should be deleted as they serve no purpose. The POM files in the source archives have the wrong version; they are using 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT whereas they should have 1.0.0-incubating-M2 This is a release blocker. Looks like the artifacts were built from the wrong SVN checkout. OK, I will correct those. There are some major problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. When we created these file, we got help from our mentors. So we corrected those files in the M1 release repeatedly. If you look at the for example, Geronimo NOTICE file, it really like to OWB. I attached Geronimo NOTICE file for example. I'm afraid that NOTICE file is wrong as well. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
Hi folks; We require one more binding vote to publish release. Thanks; -- Gurkan 2009/5/26 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org +1 (binding) -Matthias On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeanshttp://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/http://people.apache.org/%7Egerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu
[RELEASE] OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1
Hi; Apache Incubator project OpenWebBeans has released first M1 version successfully. You could obtain the distribution artifacts from the URL, http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwebbeans/. Thanks to all for helping us in this first release process. Gurkan Erdogdu
[VOTE][RESULT]Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1
Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M1 is successful. There are three +1 binding votes, not 0 or -1. +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller * Matthias Wessendorf * Luciano Resende. I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place. Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1
Hi; Now we have three +1 binding votes for releasing the M1 artifacts. * Kevan Miller * Matthias Wessendorf * Luciano Resende. [VOTE] will be open for next 24 hours for reviewing by anybody else. Thanks; /Gurkan Erdogdu From: Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:53:20 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1 Looks good to me +1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. Just noting that the *four* +1 votes included two IPMC members (Matthias Wessendorf and myself). We'll require one more IPMC member vote, but, of course, all reviews/votes are much appreciated. --kevan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M1
Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M1/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M1/ SVN Tag (Revision: 740810) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M1/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *four* +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00555.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu
Re: [PROPOSAL] Pivot
want to see this project become successful, and we will continue to invest whatever time is necessary to help make it so. - Inexperience with Open Source Pivot has been conceived as an open-source project since day one. However, though we are longtime users of open source software and have some understanding of the process, we have no prior experience managing an open-source effort. We are hoping that the community experience within ASF can help bring our understanding to the next level. - Homogenous Developers While Pivot's primary developers work for VMware in Boston, Massachusetts, Pivot is not a VMware project. Most Pivot development takes place outside of work hours. Pivot is a highly-modularized framework that lends itself well to heterogenous development. We have already received code submissions from developers elsewhere in the U.S., Germany, Italy, Canada, and the U.K. We are hoping that, as the capabilities of the framework expand, it will lead to an increase in overall developer interest and an acceleration of the development process. - Reliance on Salaried Developers Pivot began as an off-hours side project. It was officially supported by VMware for a short time, but was dropped in June, 2008 when the company decided to pursue an off-the-shelf UI solution instead of a homegrown one. It has continued as an off-hours project since then. The *lack* of an ability to rely on salaried developers for development may actually be more of a risk to the project. Most work must be done in off-hours, which may occasionally limit our ability to make progress. Documentation Additional information is available from the project site: http://pivot-toolkit.org. Initial Source Source code for Pivot is currently hosted at Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/pivot. Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan VMware released Pivot as an open-source project under the Apache 2.0 license in June, 2008 but retains a copyright on the code. VMware has agreed to sign a software grant for the codebase; a signed copy of the agreement was faxed to the ASF on 12/22/2008. External Dependencies Pivot is a Java-based toolkit and relies on a JRE for execution. Pivot's charting library currently relies on JFreeChart (http://jfree.org) 1.0.9; however, charting is an optional package and JFreeChart is not integral to the implementation (i.e. it could be replaced with another charting package with no impact to the Pivot charting API). Required Resources - Subversion repository - Issue tracking - Dev., user, commits, and private mailing lists - Wiki space - Web hosting (for content currently hosted at pivot-toolkit.org) - SSL certificate (for code signing) Initial Committers Greg Brown, Todd Volkert - VMware (http://vmware.com) Eugene Ryzhikov - Florida Power and Light (http://www.fpl.com) Christopher Brind - unknown Sandro Martini - Technomind (http://www.technomind.it) Affiliations No relevant affiliations. Sponsors - Champion: Niclas Hedhman - Nominated Mentors: Niclas Hedhman - Sponsoring Entity: Incubator PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
January Incubator Report
Hi; I do not see any entry related with the January 2009 report for the incubator projects in the Wiki. What is the last date to send January report? Happy new year to all Apache folks :) Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu
Re: January Incubator Report
Hi Noel; I have added the 2009 Report Schedule into the Front Page, and also January 2009 Report with due date 12th. Gurkan Erdogdu From: Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 1, 2009 8:11:08 PM Subject: RE: January Incubator Report I do not see any entry related with the January 2009 report for the incubator projects in the Wiki. What is the last date to send January report? I'll have to check the board calendat, but if it runs true to form, we need everything the week of the 12th so that we can get the report into them on the 19th. Anyone volunteering to populate the Wiki for 2009? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Scrum
OpenEJB, OpenJPA, OpenWebBeans and OpenDeploy :) From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:21:38 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Scrum On Dec 18, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: I have think about new name. As AutoDeploy manages a lot of environments using agent (acting as arms), I propose : - Apache Shiva - Apache Calamar Apache Hydra :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: About Clutch Status
Ok. Then after the January report is done, I will change project reporting group in the ReportingSchedule to the appropriate group. Thanks; 2008/12/2 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: When I look at the OpenWebBeans in the clutch status table, column E: hasReportingGroup - did podling remember to choose a group is colored as a read flag. How will we change this color to yellow? By choosing a reporting group. Go to the ReportingSchedule wiki page as mentioned in the notes for column C i.e. to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule You will see that OpenWebBeans is only listed in the Monthly section. Add an entry for OpenWebBeans in one of the three reporting groups explained in the notes for column D. When Clutch is next run, it will pick up the edits to that Wiki page. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: About Clutch Status
Ok, it is done. Thanks Craig; Gurkan From: Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 6:47:23 PM Subject: Re: About Clutch Status Hi Gurkan, Considering that the March, June, September, December group only has 7 podlings (the others have a dozen or so), that might be a better group for OpenWebBeans. And you can update the page any time; no need to wait until the three month reporting is complete. Craig On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:36 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Ok. Then after the January report is done, I will change project reporting group in the ReportingSchedule to the appropriate group. Thanks; 2008/12/2 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: When I look at the OpenWebBeans in the clutch status table, column E: hasReportingGroup - did podling remember to choose a group is colored as a read flag. How will we change this color to yellow? By choosing a reporting group. Go to the ReportingSchedule wiki page as mentioned in the notes for column C i.e. to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule You will see that OpenWebBeans is only listed in the Monthly section. Add an entry for OpenWebBeans in one of the three reporting groups explained in the notes for column D. When Clutch is next run, it will pick up the edits to that Wiki page. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
About Clutch Status
Hi; When I look at the OpenWebBeans in the clutch status table,column E: hasReportingGroup - did podling remember to choose a group is colored as a read flag. How will we change this color to yellow? Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu
Re: Champion needed for Incubator proposal
Hey Pivot Team; I examined your project for getting more information, its great, screens look beautiful. Moreover, I asked some question to myself about the technology you are using, some of them are below; I admission that I just overpassed the document, so maybe I am wrong and question maybe meaningless. - Why you created own set of widgets using Java2D instead of using core Java Swing component set? - What is the difference between JavaFX usage on the client side and Pivot? Why the people uses Pivot? It is usage easier than JavaFX, or runtime performance? - Do you have any plan for creating Html/JavaScript/CSS rendering? Because there were lots of problems that the people avoided the use of applets in the browser. Thanks ; Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/11/19 Greg Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello all, The Pivot development team would like to submit the Pivot Toolkit for consideration as an Apache Incubator project. Pivot is an open-source platform for building rich internet applications in Java. The project is currently hosted at http://pivot-toolkit.org/ with development hosted at http://code.google.com/p/pivot/. We have recently released version 1.0 and are actively working on version 1.1. According to the proposal creation guide, the first step in submitting a project is to recruit a champion. If you would be willing to act as a champion on Pivot's behalf, please let us know. Thank you for your consideration. Greg Brown and Todd Volkert, Pivot Toolkit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation
Hi; Is it possible to do this thing? Could I get permission to edit the authorization files? Thanks; GE 2008/11/18 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevan Miller wrote: Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs to be done by someone on the incubator pmc. How will we going on? David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an earlier email. I only did the svn authorization part. The OpenWebBeans mentors should be able to handle the rest. i.e. I did the second part of: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository I know that that step is trivial, but i am directing people to the documentation. If it is obscure, then please help to fix it. -David Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly).. --kevan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: OpenWebBeans SVN Creation
Ok. Thanks a lot David for your great helping. GE 2008/11/21 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi; Is it possible to do this thing? Could I get permission to edit the authorization files? You don't need to edit anything. It is done. I was referring to the first step which was not done. Soon after that message someone did the 'svn mkdir ...' so your repository is ready at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/ You should now co-ordinate on your dev mail list and decide what directory structure and implement it with 'svn mkdir'. Look around at other projects for examples. -David David Crossley wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775for creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs to be done by someone on the incubator pmc. How will we going on? David Crossley already took care of that -- he mentioned this in an earlier email. I only did the svn authorization part. The OpenWebBeans mentors should be able to handle the rest. i.e. I did the second part of: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository I know that that step is trivial, but i am directing people to the documentation. If it is obscure, then please help to fix it. -David Remaining pieces are mailing lists creation (which is just now complete) and jira creation (which will be shortly).. --kevan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page)
Thanks, it works. Gurkan From: David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:14:55 AM Subject: OpenWebBeans svn authorization (Was: Update Incubator Status Page) Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml, and site-author/stylesheets/project.xml, also some updates in the site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml), but when I tried to commit it gives the error : svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/51fd909e-853a-4c12-83ff-c597a7a3379e': 403 Forbidden (https://svn.apache.org) I think, I have no permission to commit changes. Is it possible to get this permission? The accounts were already set up for you gerdogdu and for Conny Lundgren conny but not yet added to the Subversion authorisation. I just now did that, added the mentors matzew,kevan, and also added SVN configuration for the openwebbeans. Is that all correct? So now you should be okay to do that commit. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenWebBeans SVN Creation
Hi; I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs to be done by someone on the incubator pmc. How will we going on? Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu
Update Incubator Status Page
Hi; I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml, and site-author/stylesheets/project.xml, also some updates in the site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml), but when I tried to commit it gives the error : svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/51fd909e-853a-4c12-83ff-c597a7a3379e': 403 Forbidden (https://svn.apache.org) I think, I have no permission to commit changes. Is it possible to get this permission? Thanks;
Re: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
We really need for these stuffs to efficiently continue on the development. There are some great open source developers to work on the project, but I want that setting up all artifacts of the project in the Apache side, svn, jira, mailing lists etc is done before this. I think that discussions must be on the dev mailing lists, and assigning task to us using JIRA for good bookmarking. How long does it take that all these stuffs are done by the infra team? Thanks GE 2008/11/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN To: Infrastructure Apache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi infra@ team, I am a mentor of the OpenWebBeans podling ([1]). The project was accepted to go into incubation mode. To get this shindig started, we need some mailing lists: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Moderator (currently) will be me matzew AT apache DOT org. We also need a SVN repo (see [1]): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans and a JIRA would be great, too: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPEN-WEBBEANS Or, do you want me to file JIRA tickets for this ? Thanks, Matthias [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)
SVN is not setting now. But you can download all the sources from the sourceforge side [1] for the time being. [1] http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. GE 2008/11/13 Mohammad Nour El-Din [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I am interested to access the src code of OpenWenBeans. But the svn repo is not working yet. When it is going to be avail ? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or mentors of the project should do? Thanks; Gurkan 2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author: kevan Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008 New Revision: 711682 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev Log: Generate OpenWebBeans status page Added: incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with props) incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html (with props) Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving - Albert Einstein - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)
How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or mentors of the project should do? Thanks; Gurkan 2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author: kevan Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008 New Revision: 711682 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev Log: Generate OpenWebBeans status page Added: incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with props) incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html (with props) Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)
Hi; Yes, I have mailed signed copy of the CLA to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gurkan 2008/11/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] also... did we already ping infra for the mailing lists? If not, let me do that. @mail to request the accounts. We only have CLA from Conny, but not from Gurkan. Gurkan, did you already fax it? (Or is Sam just busy w/ ACon ;)) -M On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 PM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008 New Revision: 711682 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev Log: Generate OpenWebBeans status page Added: incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with props) incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html (with props) Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] OpenWebBeans Proposal
Hey Kevin, is there anything that I have to do for quick start. GE 2008/10/27 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Niclas Hedhman wrote: Gurkan Erdogdu This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal; * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding) * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding) * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding) * Kevan Miller+1 (binding-mentor) * Niall Pemberton +1 (binding) * Craig L Russell+1 (binding) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * Matthias Wessendorf +1 (non-binding-champion) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * James Carman +1 (non-binding) * Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (non-binding) What will be the next step for us? For your Mentor(s) to establish the podling's resources. Torsten mentioned; http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling You can also have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-83, where I have tried to list all the subtasks needed. Also Clutch tries to guide you with the next steps. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#steps which links directly to the Acceptance phase of the various incubation documents. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] OpenWebBeans Proposal
Sorry for my spelling error Kevan. 2008/10/27 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey Kevin, is there anything that I have to do for quick start. GE 2008/10/27 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Niclas Hedhman wrote: Gurkan Erdogdu This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal; * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding) * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding) * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding) * Kevan Miller+1 (binding-mentor) * Niall Pemberton +1 (binding) * Craig L Russell+1 (binding) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * Matthias Wessendorf +1 (non-binding-champion) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * James Carman +1 (non-binding) * Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (non-binding) What will be the next step for us? For your Mentor(s) to establish the podling's resources. Torsten mentioned; http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling You can also have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-83, where I have tried to list all the subtasks needed. Also Clutch tries to guide you with the next steps. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#steps which links directly to the Acceptance phase of the various incubation documents. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
[VOTE][RESULT] OpenWebBeans Proposal
Hi; This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal; * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding) * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding) * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding) * Kevan Miller+1 (binding-mentor) * Niall Pemberton +1 (binding) * Craig L Russell+1 (binding) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * Matthias Wessendorf +1 (non-binding-champion) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * James Carman +1 (non-binding) * Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (non-binding) Thanks to everyone, and I think VOTE is passed :) What will be the next step for us? Gurkan Erdogdu
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Hi Tim; That is great to hear, welcome :). Actually the spec is in the EDR-1 level now, and I am implementing this spec. As far as I know, the CR of the spec will be published in the near and lots of things may be change and help is really needed. The current implementation is in the sourceforge : http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/ If you have any question about the source code, I could try to answer. Thanks; GE 2008/10/20 Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I am interested in participating in this OpenWebBeans effort. Please let me know what if anything I need to do. Thanks much -- Thanks, Tim McConnell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
[VOTE] Accepting OpenWebBeans into the Incubator
Hi; Incubator PMC, this is the repetition for the [VOTE] process for the OpenWebBeans proposal. If acceptable, please vote on the proposal until 27 Oct. PS : The following fellows voted positively so far; * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding) * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding) * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding) Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu - Forwarded Message From: Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 5:50:15 PM Subject: [VOTE] Accepting OpenWebBeans into the Incubator Incubator PMC, Please vote on accepting the OpenWebBeans project for incubation. The full OpenWebBeans proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal. Here is my +1 = OpenWebBeans, Web Beans Container Implementation = === Abstract === Open Web Beans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. . === Proposal === Web Beans specification is an effort for defining stateful, contextual component models and its management for the enterprise applications that run on the Java EE 6 containers. It is a big step that it unifies the EJB (Enterprise Java Beans) and JSF (Java Server Faces) standart component models easily with simplifying the complex programming model from the developer perspective. Currently there is no standard based approach for integrating EJB session beans as a JSF based managed bean. Moreover, EJB does not define any contextual component model. Developer is responsible for managing all the lifecycle of the EJB components. Web Beans provides the management and lifecycle of the components within the container with a standart fashion. It uses the Java 5.0 annotation capability to further easing the configuration efforts. Altough Web Beans simplifies the EJB programming model within the enterprise projects, it could also be used outside of the Java EE containers, such as Apache Tomcat with its powerful component and context model. Open Web Beans Project is responsible for implementing the runtime container contract for the Web Beans specification. Besides the implementation, Open Web Beans Project will implement the core built-in components that further simplifies the developer complex interactions with other Java EE specific enterprise operations. For example, it defines the JMS (Java Messaging Service) Web Beans Component used for enterprise messaging, Logging Component for logging, Security Component for security etc. === Background === The development of this project is started by the individual developer as an open source project that is hosted on the sourceforge. Using the Open Web Beans project, enterprise developers unifies the EJB and JSF technlogies together easily. Neither of these standarts solves the all problems of the Java EE environment. While the EJB components solves the security, transactions, concurrency and scalability problems, JSF defines the web-tier presentation framework with its graphical component models, events and managed bean facility. Web Beans enables the developers to unify these component models easily within well defined semantics. Applications that uses the Open Web Beans Project may get more advanced context and component model provided by the project. === Rationale === Current Web Beans specificatin is in the EDR (Early Draft Review) level now, and no reference implementation is available yet. Introducing the early implementation of the specification to the enterprise community with using other Apache related projects, such as Open EJB, Open JPA and MyFaces, will attract a diverse community. Moreover, Open Web Beans will work closely with the other Apache projects such that it depends on the Open EJB, Open JPA and My Faces. Moreover, Geronimo may include it as a Web Beans Container when it implements Java EE 6 specification as a runtime environment in which Web Beans executes. Current Web Beans specification may be used in the Java EE 5 environment. Its very powerful type safe and EL component model injection mechanisms and other very useful stuffs could attracts the community that will use it in their current enterprise projects. === Initial Goals === The initial goals of the Open Web Beans Project are * Fully implement the JSR-299 specification. * Attracts a community around the current code base. * Active relationship with the other dependent projects to further develop some useful Web Beans Components. == Current Status == === Meritocracy === Initial developer of the project is familiar with the meritocracy principles of Apache. He knows that the open source gets power from its great developers and freedom. He also developed some other open source projects. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with other potential contributors. === Community === There is a great community within the Open
Re: [VOTE] Accepting OpenWebBeans into the Incubator
Hey James; Sorry for forgetting to add your vote sending before into the list Thanks for re-vote; Gurkan Erdogdu 2008/10/20 James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (non-binding) On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; Incubator PMC, this is the repetition for the [VOTE] process for the OpenWebBeans proposal. If acceptable, please vote on the proposal until 27 Oct. PS : The following fellows voted positively so far; * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding) * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding) * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding) Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu - Forwarded Message From: Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 5:50:15 PM Subject: [VOTE] Accepting OpenWebBeans into the Incubator Incubator PMC, Please vote on accepting the OpenWebBeans project for incubation. The full OpenWebBeans proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal. Here is my +1 = OpenWebBeans, Web Beans Container Implementation = === Abstract === Open Web Beans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. . === Proposal === Web Beans specification is an effort for defining stateful, contextual component models and its management for the enterprise applications that run on the Java EE 6 containers. It is a big step that it unifies the EJB (Enterprise Java Beans) and JSF (Java Server Faces) standart component models easily with simplifying the complex programming model from the developer perspective. Currently there is no standard based approach for integrating EJB session beans as a JSF based managed bean. Moreover, EJB does not define any contextual component model. Developer is responsible for managing all the lifecycle of the EJB components. Web Beans provides the management and lifecycle of the components within the container with a standart fashion. It uses the Java 5.0 annotation capability to further easing the configuration efforts. Altough Web Beans simplifies the EJB programming model within the enterprise projects, it could also be used outside of the Java EE containers, such as Apache Tomcat with its powerful component and context model. Open Web Beans Project is responsible for implementing the runtime container contract for the Web Beans specification. Besides the implementation, Open Web Beans Project will implement the core built-in components that further simplifies the developer complex interactions with other Java EE specific enterprise operations. For example, it defines the JMS (Java Messaging Service) Web Beans Component used for enterprise messaging, Logging Component for logging, Security Component for security etc. === Background === The development of this project is started by the individual developer as an open source project that is hosted on the sourceforge. Using the Open Web Beans project, enterprise developers unifies the EJB and JSF technlogies together easily. Neither of these standarts solves the all problems of the Java EE environment. While the EJB components solves the security, transactions, concurrency and scalability problems, JSF defines the web-tier presentation framework with its graphical component models, events and managed bean facility. Web Beans enables the developers to unify these component models easily within well defined semantics. Applications that uses the Open Web Beans Project may get more advanced context and component model provided by the project. === Rationale === Current Web Beans specificatin is in the EDR (Early Draft Review) level now, and no reference implementation is available yet. Introducing the early implementation of the specification to the enterprise community with using other Apache related projects, such as Open EJB, Open JPA and MyFaces, will attract a diverse community. Moreover, Open Web Beans will work closely with the other Apache projects such that it depends on the Open EJB, Open JPA and My Faces. Moreover, Geronimo may include it as a Web Beans Container when it implements Java EE 6 specification as a runtime environment in which Web Beans executes. Current Web Beans specification may be used in the Java EE 5 environment. Its very powerful type safe and EL component model injection mechanisms and other very useful stuffs could attracts the community that will use it in their current enterprise projects. === Initial Goals === The initial goals of the Open Web Beans Project are * Fully implement the JSR-299 specification. * Attracts a community around the current code base. * Active relationship with the other dependent projects to further develop some useful Web Beans Components. == Current Status == === Meritocracy
About OpenWebBeans Proposal
Hi; This is the last situation after struggled to achieve communicating the Web Beans Specification EG members. I tried to contact with Gavin King, Pete Muir (JBoss) and Guice Developer List and Crazy Bob (Google) for concerning about the OpenWebBeans proposal. As an action items I did the following: Mail to Gavin King : I kindly asked for adding me as an observer to the JSR-299 List. (No response.) Message to Seam List : I dropped a message to the Seam User List. (Pete Muir responded with advice joinining into the RI impl. group. . Message to Google Developer List : I dropped a message to the Google Developer List. (No response) Mail to Crazy Bob: I mailed to Crazy Bob about the WebBeansImpl and other concerns. (No response) It seems that Google folks does ignore me. Maybe their thinkings about the open source model is different. It must not be hard to response with simple message. Anyway , What does the IPMC thinks about this proposal to continue with or not? and whether or not it is applicable to vote this proposal? Sincerely; -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: About OpenWebBeans Proposal
Ok Matthias, I will send another message to the google guice user list and developer list and start a vote on next monday. Thanks; 2008/10/16 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, my suggestion is: -ask again on the list, on your proposal, if there are concerns; -if not, start the vote on Monday (always bad over a weekend) -M On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; This is the last situation after struggled to achieve communicating the Web Beans Specification EG members. I tried to contact with Gavin King, Pete Muir (JBoss) and Guice Developer List and Crazy Bob (Google) for concerning about the OpenWebBeans proposal. As an action items I did the following: Mail to Gavin King : I kindly asked for adding me as an observer to the JSR-299 List. (No response.) Message to Seam List : I dropped a message to the Seam User List. (Pete Muir responded with advice joinining into the RI impl. group. . Message to Google Developer List : I dropped a message to the Google Developer List. (No response) Mail to Crazy Bob: I mailed to Crazy Bob about the WebBeansImpl and other concerns. (No response) It seems that Google folks does ignore me. Maybe their thinkings about the open source model is different. It must not be hard to response with simple message. Anyway , What does the IPMC thinks about this proposal to continue with or not? and whether or not it is applicable to vote this proposal? Sincerely; -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Hi, First of all, there are lots of places that I could propose my project, but I think that open source development with the Apache Way conveys the real Free and Professional Open Source Project with meritrocracy in action. This code could be part of the Geronimo project as its Web Beans container, or could be the top level project its own. I only know that there is only one effort to create RI, this is the JBoss RI (Pete Muir is responsible for implementing, Gavin King for creating the spec) at the web side http://seamframework.org/WebBeans. And its implementation is in the early stage. Indeed, Apache way implementation makes different from the others, because and most importantly its developed based on the Apache Way and it also creates additions to the RI with creating add-on components that are based on the other Apache projects, such as, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, JSecurity, ActiveMQ etc, possible. Morevoer, It's always good to have multiple implementations of a spec so enterprise community benefits from the different imlpementations, and they choose the best (Like MyFaces and Sun JSF imeplemtnations.) I am ready for doing lots of work to this project progresses. Moreover, I get some great response from the below individuals to help this project succesfull, - Kevan Miller : As a mentor and partly committer - Conny Lundgren : JSR-299 EG member as a committer. And also, I think the committer number is increased by the time. As I said in the beginning, I believe that open source must be transparent, and the community appreciates the heavy working to implement this spec within the Apache Foundation. Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu - Original Message From: J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:13:05 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I have a number of questions before I can support the proposal: Where do you expect this code / community to end up after the incubator? Will it be part of Geronimo? Part of MySpaces? It's own TLP? I can say now that if the project is to stand on its own, then there's a lot of work to do. It seems as though there are 2 or 3 other Apache licensed efforts in creating a RI for JSR-299: Gavin King's work, JBoss's work and the rumored Guice work. What makes this RI effort any different? Why should the ASF support this project instead of one of the others? I'm concerned that there's only one listed committer. Getting to at least 3 committers is going to have to be the first order of business for this podling. -- J Aaron Farrjadetower.com[US] +1 724-964-4515 馮傑仁cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
- Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:52:25 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] 2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Matthias, I do not know the mail adress of the Crazy Bob. I dropped information into to the google-guice developer list about the OpenWebBeans proposal but I have got no response so far. I also dropped the message into the JBoss Seam framework mailing list. Pete Muir from the JBoss replied with kindly message that he said You could welcome to help into the WebBeans RI effort in the JBoss. But I said him, I think that different RI from the different foundations is great. I am subscribed on this list '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and I haven't seen a post from you there. Also I don't see that there was any other WebBeans announcement. Maybe it is worth to ask them, if they wanna join (or not). Today, I sent the mail to the Crazy Bob at adress, [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I got no response so far. A dropped message into the guice developer list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with title About WebBeans RI 3 days ago, no response. Matthias, if you wish I could sent same email again to the Bob with CC you ?. doing it here is fine, IMO. That's why I offered help in being a mentor / champion. I wonder the voting is stopped in this time or how will the process continue? Hrm, we always can revote. IMO no need to rush; Things should be cleared before continuing the *process* Ok. Just about my curious. _M Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:26:41 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] Gurkan- have you tried to ping the Guice folks ? I wonder if they a) would be interested in joining this effort, here at Apache (Crazy Bob is an apache committer) b) prefer to work on the RI, at JBoss (Crazy Bob is EG member) c) have no steaks into the WebBeans effort -Matthias 2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, First of all, there are lots of places that I could propose my project, but I think that open source development with the Apache Way conveys the real Free and Professional Open Source Project with meritrocracy in action. This code could be part of the Geronimo project as its Web Beans container, or could be the top level project its own. I only know that there is only one effort to create RI, this is the JBoss RI (Pete Muir is responsible for implementing, Gavin King for creating the spec) at the web side http://seamframework.org/WebBeans. And its implementation is in the early stage. Indeed, Apache way implementation makes different from the others, because and most importantly its developed based on the Apache Way and it also creates additions to the RI with creating add-on components that are based on the other Apache projects, such as, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, JSecurity, ActiveMQ etc, possible. Morevoer, It's always good to have multiple implementations of a spec so enterprise community benefits from the different imlpementations, and they choose the best (Like MyFaces and Sun JSF imeplemtnations.) I am ready for doing lots of work to this project progresses. Moreover, I get some great response from the below individuals to help this project succesfull, - Kevan Miller : As a mentor and partly committer - Conny Lundgren : JSR-299 EG member as a committer. And also, I think the committer number is increased by the time. As I said in the beginning, I believe that open source must be transparent, and the community appreciates the heavy working to implement this spec within the Apache Foundation. Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu - Original Message From: J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:13:05 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I have a number of questions before I can support the proposal: Where do you expect this code / community to end up after the incubator? Will it be part of Geronimo? Part of MySpaces? It's own TLP? I can say now that if the project is to stand on its own, then there's a lot of work to do. It seems as though there are 2 or 3 other Apache licensed efforts in creating a RI for JSR-299: Gavin King's work, JBoss's work and the rumored Guice work. What makes this RI effort any different? Why should the ASF support this project instead of one of the others? I'm concerned that there's only one listed committer. Getting to at least 3 committers is going to have to be the first order of business
[VOTE] Accepting OpenWebBeans into the Incubator
Incubator PMC, Please vote on accepting the OpenWebBeans project for incubation. The full OpenWebBeans proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal. Here is my +1 = OpenWebBeans, Web Beans Container Implementation = === Abstract === Open Web Beans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. . === Proposal === Web Beans specification is an effort for defining stateful, contextual component models and its management for the enterprise applications that run on the Java EE 6 containers. It is a big step that it unifies the EJB (Enterprise Java Beans) and JSF (Java Server Faces) standart component models easily with simplifying the complex programming model from the developer perspective. Currently there is no standard based approach for integrating EJB session beans as a JSF based managed bean. Moreover, EJB does not define any contextual component model. Developer is responsible for managing all the lifecycle of the EJB components. Web Beans provides the management and lifecycle of the components within the container with a standart fashion. It uses the Java 5.0 annotation capability to further easing the configuration efforts. Altough Web Beans simplifies the EJB programming model within the enterprise projects, it could also be used outside of the Java EE containers, such as Apache Tomcat with its powerful component and context model. Open Web Beans Project is responsible for implementing the runtime container contract for the Web Beans specification. Besides the implementation, Open Web Beans Project will implement the core built-in components that further simplifies the developer complex interactions with other Java EE specific enterprise operations. For example, it defines the JMS (Java Messaging Service) Web Beans Component used for enterprise messaging, Logging Component for logging, Security Component for security etc. === Background === The development of this project is started by the individual developer as an open source project that is hosted on the sourceforge. Using the Open Web Beans project, enterprise developers unifies the EJB and JSF technlogies together easily. Neither of these standarts solves the all problems of the Java EE environment. While the EJB components solves the security, transactions, concurrency and scalability problems, JSF defines the web-tier presentation framework with its graphical component models, events and managed bean facility. Web Beans enables the developers to unify these component models easily within well defined semantics. Applications that uses the Open Web Beans Project may get more advanced context and component model provided by the project. === Rationale === Current Web Beans specificatin is in the EDR (Early Draft Review) level now, and no reference implementation is available yet. Introducing the early implementation of the specification to the enterprise community with using other Apache related projects, such as Open EJB, Open JPA and MyFaces, will attract a diverse community. Moreover, Open Web Beans will work closely with the other Apache projects such that it depends on the Open EJB, Open JPA and My Faces. Moreover, Geronimo may include it as a Web Beans Container when it implements Java EE 6 specification as a runtime environment in which Web Beans executes. Current Web Beans specification may be used in the Java EE 5 environment. Its very powerful type safe and EL component model injection mechanisms and other very useful stuffs could attracts the community that will use it in their current enterprise projects. === Initial Goals === The initial goals of the Open Web Beans Project are * Fully implement the JSR-299 specification. * Attracts a community around the current code base. * Active relationship with the other dependent projects to further develop some useful Web Beans Components. == Current Status == === Meritocracy === Initial developer of the project is familiar with the meritocracy principles of Apache. He knows that the open source gets power from its great developers and freedom. He also developed some other open source projects. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with other potential contributors. === Community === There is a great community within the Open EJB, Open JPA, Geronimo and MyFaces Apache projects. Open Web Beans project is very related with these projects and in the some cases, it enhances these projects. We are thinking that Open Web Beans project gets strong community because it simplifies and unifies the using of these projects. It simplifies the developer effort for building complex enterprise applications. === Core Developers === Open Web Beans project has been developing by the open source developer Gurkan Erdogdu as a sole contributor. === Alignment === Open Web Beans project
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Hi Matthias, Yeap, no need to rush. Who is responsible for initiating the VOTE mail? It is ok for me to start a vote begining of the next week. Thanks for clearly explaining what is NDA and what is used for. Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 11:48:42 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be part of the EG? no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA. The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans... this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed. When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can work on the NDA. @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote beginning of next week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal etc. No need to rush, isn't it ? -M Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. You need a NDA for that. -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be part of the EG? Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. You need a NDA for that. -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: OpenWebBeans
Hi Conny, Its great, and thanks for interesting about the proposal. I have just sent the source code of the implementation sourceforge addresses to the this group (It is http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/). Lets discuss the things about the implementation and spec here. If you have any questions about the source code or any other, I would like to answer happily. Cheers; Gurkan - Forwarded Message From: Conny Lundgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 8:21:53 PM Subject: OpenWebBeans Hi My name is Conny, and I currently serve on the EG for JSR299. I think your proposal is interesting, and if needed I could possibly contribute to the development of the implementation. Regards, Conny
Re: OpenWebBeans
Hi Bill; Thanks for considering about the proposal. This is the seperate effort from the Gavin King. Actually, I have requested from the Gavin to add me as an observer to the working group, I haven't received any response. I changed the wrong term *JEE* from the proposal. Sincerely; Gurkan - Original Message From: Bill Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 9:57:15 PM Subject: OpenWebBeans Hi Gurkan. I saw your proposal at Apache: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal Are you working with Gavin King on this, or is this a completely separate effort? Also, please do me a favor and fix the JEE references. There is no JEE. *Never* use that name. JEE 6.0 should be Java EE 6, and JEE should be Java EE everywhere. http://www.java.com/en/about/brand/naming.jsp http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=35561 Thanks. Bill Shannon Java EE Spec Lead
[New Incubator Project Help - WebBeans Spec Implementation]
Hi to all; My name is Gurkan Erdogdu. I have been implementing the Web Beans Specification - JSR-299, EDR-1. 90% of the specification code is completed with its unit tests. I want to denote my working for the Apache Foundation, because I am the believer of the open source. As an open source developer, I developed open source JBoss Cache IDE for a while ago, as a committer of the JBoss IDE. After completing the EDR-1(in a couple of weeks), I will be synchronized with the next revision of the specification when it is available. I have read the pages and doumentation about the how incubator project is proposed and accepted by the foundation. I understand that, I have to find a Champion to further insist my project. Moreover, lots of documentation mixes my mind a little that how I will proceed. Help is very appreciated for taking a part of this great community; Thanks for helping; Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [New Incubator Project Help - WebBeans Spec Implementation]
Hi Matthias; Thanks for answering and becoming champion. I will create a proposal about the implementation and send it here. Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 3, 2008 5:51:03 PM Subject: Re: [New Incubator Project Help - WebBeans Spec Implementation] +1 sounds pretty interesting. why not posting a proposal like: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WicketProposal to our wiki. You can count me in for being a mentor/champion, since I am a member of the ASF -M On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all; My name is Gurkan Erdogdu. I have been implementing the Web Beans Specification - JSR-299, EDR-1. 90% of the specification code is completed with its unit tests. I want to denote my working for the Apache Foundation, because I am the believer of the open source. As an open source developer, I developed open source JBoss Cache IDE for a while ago, as a committer of the JBoss IDE. After completing the EDR-1(in a couple of weeks), I will be synchronized with the next revision of the specification when it is available. I have read the pages and doumentation about the how incubator project is proposed and accepted by the foundation. I understand that, I have to find a Champion to further insist my project. Moreover, lots of documentation mixes my mind a little that how I will proceed. Help is very appreciated for taking a part of this great community; Thanks for helping; Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal Thanks for advance; Gurkan Erdogdu - Original Message From: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 3, 2008 9:07:33 PM Subject: Re: [New Incubator Project Help - WebBeans Spec Implementation] On Oct 3, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: +1 sounds pretty interesting. why not posting a proposal like: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WicketProposal to our wiki. You can count me in for being a mentor/champion, since I am a member of the ASF Cool. You can count me in as a mentor. I'd also hope that I'd have a bit of time to help out with development... I'd expect that we'd see some interest in this project from the Geronimo community -- will pass it along... --kevan
