Re: [VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project
+1 (binding) On Monday, September 30, 2013, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 (binding) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, 30 September 2013, 6:52 Subject: [VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project Since discussion about the BatchEE seems done, I'd like to call a vote for BatchEE to become an incubated project. The proposal is pasted below, and also available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BatchEEProposal Let's keep this vote open for three business days, closing the voting on Thursday 10/03. [ ] +1 Accept BatchEE into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't accept BatchEE because... = BatchEE, JBatch Implementation = === Abstract === BatchEE will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the JBatch Specification which is defined as JSR-352 (for version 1.0). === Proposal === BatchEE specification is an effort for defining a standard API and way to write batches in Java. It is integrated with JavaEE (JTA, CDI) but works out of the box in a standalone environment. BatchEE Project is responsible for implementing the runtime container contract for the JBatch specification. Besides the implementation, BatchEE Project will implement the core built-in components that further simplifies the developer complex interactions with other Java EE specific enterprise operations. For example, it will define default reader/processor/writer for jdbc, jpa, xml/json/flat files... === Background === Until today writing batches in java meant using a proprietary framework and link to JavaEE was quite limited (or missing). JBatch defines an API fixing this issue and now developpers need a fix. === Rationale === Current JBatch specificatin is released, and only the reference implementation is available but not really intended to be maintained. Moreover multiple Apache projects (geronimo, TomEE, ...) will need an Apache compatible Jbatch implementation to go ahread and implement JavaEE 7. === Initial Goals === The initial goals of the BatchEE Project are * Fully implement the JSR-352 specification. * Attracts a community around the current code base. * Active relationship with the other dependent projects to further develop some useful batch components. == Current Status == === Meritocracy === Initial developer of the project is familiar with the meritocracy principles of Apache. He knows that the open source gets power from its great developers and freedom. He also developed some other open source projects. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with other potential contributors. === Community === There is a great community within the OpenEJB, OpenWebBeans, Geronimo and TomEE Apache projects. BatchEE project is very related with these projects and in the some cases, it enhances these projects. We are thinking that BatchEE project gets strong community because it complete the needed frameworks of a java developper and unifies the using of these projects. It simplifies the developer effort for building complex enterprise applications batches. === Core Developers === BatchEE project has been developing by the IBM then forked by Romain Manni-Bucau as a sole contributor. === Alignment === BacthEE project will be a candidate for use in Geronimo AS and TomEE as a default JBatch implementation. Other projects could benefit from the BatchEE project as a general purpose component and context management. BatchEE project is closely aligned with the OpenEJB and OpenWebBeans projects perfectly. It depends on these projects to satisfy its requirements (mainly tests). == Known Risks == === Orphaned products === Even if the initial committer of the project has no plan to leave the active development, it must necessa- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache DeltaSpike for graduating out of the incubator
commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Sergio Fernández Salzburg Research +43 662 2288 318 Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II A-5020 Salzburg (Austria) http://www.salzburgresearch.at --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.orggeneral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)
+1 On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Matei Zaharia ma...@apache.org wrote: +1 Tested it on Mac OS X. Matei On Dec 11, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.10.0. This will be the second incubator release for Mesos in Apache. The candidate for Mesos 0.10.0-incubating release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.10.0-incubating-RC2/mesos-0.10.0-incubating.tar.gz The tag to be voted on: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/tags/release-0.10.0-incubating-RC2 The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.10.0-incubating-RC2/mesos-0.10.0-incubating.tar.gz.md5 The signature of the tarball can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.10.0-incubating-RC2/mesos-0.10.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc Mesos' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/dist/KEYS Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 0.10.0-incubating! The vote is open until Friday, December 14th at 5:00 pm (PST) and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.10.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... To learn more about Apache Mesos, please see http://www.mesosproject.org. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
'Apache Mobile First' ?
Hi, just ran into this one: https://twitter.com/smashingmag/status/253794604967669760 searching in my mail-account for 'apachemobilefilter' I do see it being mentioned with the DeviceMap proposal - but is that project _closely_ connected ? I think the following sentence is/was kinda confusing: Apache Mobile Filter is the easiest way to detect mobile devices. AMF is a suite of tools that allow access to a Device Repository (such as WURFL, DetectRight, 51Degrees or others) directly from Apache Thx, Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: 'Apache Mobile First' ?
Ha! two minutes later - the tweet has been deleted :-D But it was linking to this page = http://www.apachemobilefilter.org/ -Matthias On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi, just ran into this one: https://twitter.com/smashingmag/status/253794604967669760 searching in my mail-account for 'apachemobilefilter' I do see it being mentioned with the DeviceMap proposal - but is that project _closely_ connected ? I think the following sentence is/was kinda confusing: Apache Mobile Filter is the easiest way to detect mobile devices. AMF is a suite of tools that allow access to a Device Repository (such as WURFL, DetectRight, 51Degrees or others) directly from Apache Thx, Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache DeltaSpike 0.3-incubating
+1
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Folks!
The deltaspike-0.3-incubating vote has internally passed with lots of +1.
We have 2 IPMC +1 so far and like to ask for a tough review from fellow IPMCs.
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] I don't care but smells fine
[-1] stop it, this stuff contains a blocker ${insertreason}
The VOTE is open for 72h.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
- Forwarded Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org
deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache DeltaSpike 0.3-incubating
T ime to tally the vote.
+1: Mark Struberg (IPMC), Shane Bryzak, Gerhard Petracek (IPMC), Mehdi
Heidarzadeh (nonbinding), Lincoln Baxter, Romain Manni-Buccau, Thomas Herzog
(nonbinding), Cody Lerum, Arne Limburg, Charles Moulliard, Jason Porter, Ken
Finnigan, Christian Kaltepoth, Antoine Sabot-Durand
no -1 and no 0.
I'll forward the vote mail for a rewiew to general@incubator.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: deltaspike deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 11:56 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache DeltaSpike 0.3-incubating
Hi!
I like to call a VOTE on the Apache DeltaSpike 0.3-incubating release.
The Maven staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-010/
The source release package:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-010/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike-project/0.3-incubating/
I've pushed the GIT release branch to my github account:
https://github.com/struberg/incubator-deltaspike/tree/deltaspike-0.3-incubating
(The branch will be pushed and merged to master after the VOTE passed.)
The TAG can be found here:
https://github.com/struberg/incubator-deltaspike/tree/deltaspike-project-0.3-incubating
Please note:
This VOTE is majority approval with a minimum of three +1votes
of
PPMC members.
The VOTE is open for 72 hours.
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] I don't care but smells fine
[-1] stop it, this stuff contains a blocker ${insertreason}
LieGrue,
strub
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)
+1 (binding) On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote: +1 swept for licensing and general organization of everything :-) On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matei Zaharia ma...@eecs.berkeley.edu wrote: +1 Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine. Matei On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for Mesos in Apache, but the sixth release candidate. Changes since RC4: * Updated NOTICE to include project name and copyright date as well as to include third-party licences. * Changed one of our third-party components to be included as an archive of it's source rather than a binary bundle (Python egg). * Added DISCLAIMER. The candidate for Mesos 0.9.0-incubating release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz The tag to be voted on: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating-RC5 The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.md5 The signature of the tarball can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc Mesos' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/dist/KEYS Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating! The vote is open until Monday, April 23rd at 8 pm (a bit more than 72 hours since it's over the weekend) and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... To learn more about Apache Mesos, please see http://incubator.apache.org/mesos. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)
Hi, not that I want to (immediately) become a mentor here, but I am happy to oversee future release votes, and see if the community needs some other guidance etc. -M On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Benjamin Hindman benjamin.hind...@gmail.com wrote: Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean recruit active participants from the Mesos community into the IPMC? Or do you mean recruit people from the IPMC to be more active in Mesos? Ideally each podling should have at least three active mentors who can make sure that the required threshold of at least three PMC votes for a release is reached. If that's not the case (as it sounds like), there are a few options: * Ask help from other IPMC members to review the particular release candidate. If you're otherwise doing fine, this should be an OK workaround until you graduate. * Find one or more new mentors to replace inactive ones. Based on past experience this can be a bit difficult, but definitely worth a try. * If the above solutions fail, i.e. the Incubator PMC is unable to provide the help and oversight you deserve, we can also promote deserving PPMC members to the IPMC so that they have binding vote on things like releases. This works, but since that's more or less equivalent to saying that at least a part of the PPMC is already able to oversee itself, so one could well argue that a better solution would be to simply let the podling graduate. None of these solutions are really ideal, which is why I'm really hoping to find better ways for us to proactively identify and find solutions to cases where a podling no longer has enough active mentors. Unfortunately that won't help with the pressing matter of your release vote. Any IPMC members around who'd be willing to lend Mesos a hand and review this release candidate? Unless anyone beats me to it (please do! :-), I'll take care of it later in the weekend. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Fw: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi IPMC folks!
I'd like to call the 2nd round (IPMC review/vote) for our
DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating release!
See the attached thread for the release artifacts and the podling VOTE
results.
We have 14 +1 inclucing 2 IPMC +1 so far: gpetracek, struberg.
Here is a more readable form:
http://markmail.org/thread/orik7hucchqfbhzr
IPMC VOTE is open for 72h
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] puh, don't care
[-1] nah, because ${problem}
txs and LieGrue,
strub
- Forwarded Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org
deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating
Hi folks!
The internal DeltaSpike project VOTE passed with the following
binding +1: Mark Struberg, Gerhard Petracek, John Ament, Cody Lerum, Antoine
Sabot-Durand, Ken Finnigan, Jason Porter, Shane Bryzak,
non-binding +1: Łukasz Dywicki, Bruno Oliveira, Boleslaw Dawidowicz, Paul
Dijou,
Lincoln Baxter III, Mehdi Heidarzadeh
+0: none
-1: none
I'll move this now over to the Incubator PMC to approve our release.
txs 4 all who voted!
LieGrue,
strub
PS: for the record again, here is my gpg key
http://www.apache.org/dist/openwebbeans/KEYS
Will update our section asap.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: deltaspike deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 10:30 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating
Hi folks, I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache DeltaSpike
0.2-incubating. The Maven staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-051/
Source release:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-051/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike-project/0.2-incubating/deltaspike-project-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
Here are the md5 and sha1:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-051/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike-project/0.2-incubating/
I've pushed the GIT release branch to my github account:
https://github.com/struberg/incubator-deltaspike/tree/deltaspike-0.2-incubating
(The branch will be pushed and merged to master after the VOTE passed.)
The TAG can be found here:
https://github.com/struberg/incubator-deltaspike/zipball/deltaspike-project-0.2-incubating
Please note:
This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three +1 votes
of
PPMC members.
This vote is open for 72 hours.
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] I don't care but smells fine
[-1] stop it, this stuff contains a blocker ${insertname}
LieGrue,
strub
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release DeltaSpike 0.1-incubating
+1 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 (binding) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 8:20 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release DeltaSpike 0.1-incubating Hi, This is the first incubator release for Apache DeltaSpike, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1-incubating. We have received 16 binding +1 votes (including 4 votes of IPMC members) during the release voting on deltaspike-dev. Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/Ta2 Result: http://s.apache.org/8I3 Git release branch: http://s.apache.org/PbX (It will be pushed to our Apache Git repository after this vote passed.) Git release tag: http://s.apache.org/uC (It will be pushed to our Apache Git repository after this vote passed.) Release notes: http://s.apache.org/DeltaSpike_01incubating Release artifacts: http://s.apache.org/5hU PGP release file (key 2FDB81B1): http://s.apache.org/wW This vote is open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Thanks, Gerhard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP
+1 On Sunday, January 8, 2012, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: +1 regards, gerhard 2012/1/8 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Dear IPMC, dear Community! The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE on graduating as a TLP. The podling is in the incubator since 2010 and successfully shipped 3 releases and established an active community. The internal PPMC VOTE has decided with 11 +1 (see [1]) that we would like to propose graduation as a TLP. We also went through the graduation checklist and made sure that we fulfilled all requirements. We would like to thank our Mentors and the board for their continued support and also Roman Stumm and his team for contributing this project to the ASF! We are happy to finally start the VOTE about the recommendation to the board about graduating BVAL to a TLP with the Board Resolution Report attached below. For better readability, the Resolution text is also available in our WIKI [2] Please VOTE on recommending BVAL as a TLP [+1] graduate BVAL as a TLP [+0] don't care [-1] nope, because (fill in) The VOTE is open for 72h. Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/bval Status Page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beanvalidation.html thanks, the BVAL PPMC Board Resolution Report -- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to creating an implementation compliant with JSR-303 and a library of pre-developed validators and extensions for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Bean Validation Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Bean Validation Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to creating an implementation compliant with JSR-303 and a library of pre-developed validators and extensions; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Bean Validation be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Bean Validation Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Bean Validation Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Bean Validation Project: * Albert Lee allee8...@apache.org * Carlos Vara Callau carlosv...@apache.org * David Jencks djen...@apache.org * Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org * Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org * Jeremy Bauer jrba...@apache.org * Kevan Lee Miller ke...@apache.org * Luciano Resende lrese...@apache.org * Matthias Wessendorf -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions
Hi Arne, please add your name to the proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltaSpikeProposal If DeltaSpike is accepted at the Apache Incubator, you'll be a committer of the original podling. -M PS: Please make sure (if you haven't already) that your ICLA is on file. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote: Hi, I would be glad to be part of Apache DeltaSpike. I have already written some useful CDI-Extensions for my company open knowledge GmbH and I think we would contribute them to that project. Cheers, Arne -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions
actually the vote is already out, once the project is accepted you can contribute the code and become a committer via the regular Apache way (e.g. code contributions and mailing list interactivity) -M On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi Arne, please add your name to the proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltaSpikeProposal If DeltaSpike is accepted at the Apache Incubator, you'll be a committer of the original podling. -M PS: Please make sure (if you haven't already) that your ICLA is on file. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote: Hi, I would be glad to be part of Apache DeltaSpike. I have already written some useful CDI-Extensions for my company open knowledge GmbH and I think we would contribute them to that project. Cheers, Arne -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions
a few more references: http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html and http://apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html -M On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually the vote is already out, once the project is accepted you can contribute the code and become a committer via the regular Apache way (e.g. code contributions and mailing list interactivity) -M On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi Arne, please add your name to the proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltaSpikeProposal If DeltaSpike is accepted at the Apache Incubator, you'll be a committer of the original podling. -M PS: Please make sure (if you haven't already) that your ICLA is on file. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote: Hi, I would be glad to be part of Apache DeltaSpike. I have already written some useful CDI-Extensions for my company open knowledge GmbH and I think we would contribute them to that project. Cheers, Arne -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions
welcome :-) On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote: You can add me as a mentor to the project. Carl. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Arne is actually already Apache committer (on openwebbeans). He was also involved in creating the proposal - just missed to add himself to the proposal (and I missed his post on dec. 2nd). ah, ok :) I'd say our first task will be to formally vote him in, so we do this proper. +1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 1:25 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions a few more references: http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html and http://apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html -M On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: actually the vote is already out, once the project is accepted you can contribute the code and become a committer via the regular Apache way (e.g. code contributions and mailing list interactivity) -M On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi Arne, please add your name to the proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeltaSpikeProposal If DeltaSpike is accepted at the Apache Incubator, you'll be a committer of the original podling. -M PS: Please make sure (if you haven't already) that your ICLA is on file. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote: Hi, I would be glad to be part of Apache DeltaSpike. I have already written some useful CDI-Extensions for my company open knowledge GmbH and I think we would contribute them to that project. Cheers, Arne -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] DeltaSpike to join the Incubator
+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Bart Kummel b...@kummelweb.nl wrote: +1 (non-binding) -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project
+1 (binding) -Matthias On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: +1 (binding) PS: Updated the proposal to re-add myself as Mentor... On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the Apache DeltaSpike project to the Incubator. We have added the initial proposal to the Wiki[1] and its content is also included below for convenience. There are already a few people who expressed interest in contributing additional CDI Extensions and would like to join this effort. Of course, we are thankful for every helping hand! We are looking forward to feedback and/or questions on the proposal. We already have five mentors, but would very much welcome additional volunteers to help steer Apache DeltaSpike through the incubation process. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: yup the [VOTE] mail is currently planed for next monday. I will interpret any +1 as a frenetic 'wooohooo ye' until then ;) +1 :) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:28 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project Mmm, shouldn't voting be carried out in a separate [VOTE] Accept DeltaSpike... thread? Matt On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) -Matthias On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: +1 (binding) PS: Updated the proposal to re-add myself as Mentor... On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! JBoss, The Apache MyFaces CODI team and CDISource would like to propose the Apache DeltaSpike project to the Incubator. We have added the initial proposal to the Wiki[1] and its content is also included below for convenience. There are already a few people who expressed interest in contributing additional CDI Extensions and would like to join this effort. Of course, we are thankful for every helping hand! We are looking forward to feedback and/or questions on the proposal. We already have five mentors, but would very much welcome additional volunteers to help steer Apache DeltaSpike through the incubation process. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Callback for incubation
+1 On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote: +1 On 10/11/2011 11:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, As discussed, the PhoneGap project would like to enter the Incubator under the Apache Callback name (potential alternative names to be discussed during incubation). The initial proposal has been well received and there are no major open issues, so it's time to vote! Thus I'm now calling a formal VOTE on the Apache Callback proposal as included below. The proposal is also available at http://wiki.phonegap.com/w/page/46311152/apache-callback-proposal on the PhoneGap wiki, and I'll place a copy for our archives on the Incubator wiki as soon as it stops giving me internal server errors. Please VOTE: [ ] +1 Accept Apache Callback for incubation [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Callback for incubation because... This vote is open for the next 72 hours. Everyone is welcome to participate, but only votes from the Incubator PMC members are binding. Thanks! My vote is +1. Best regards, Jukka Zitting Apache Callback Proposal Abstract Apache Callback is a platform for building native mobile applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Proposal Apache Callback allows web developers to natively target Apple iOS, Google Android, RIM BlackBerry, Microsoft Windows Phone 7, HP webOS, Nokia Symbian and Samsung Bada with a single codebase. The Callback APIs are based on open web standards. The Callback bridge technology enables access to native device capabilities. Utilizing the Callback bridge native plugins allow for any type of native access from the embedded webview. Background -- Apache Callback is the free software evolution of the popular PhoneGap project. PhoneGap evolved from a hack that enabled a FFI (Foreign Function Interface) to an embedded WebView on iOS to a complete suite of tools for tackling parity across many mobile device and desktop platforms. PhoneGap has always focused on two complementary goals. Our first goal, is to see the web as a first class development platform. Not a sandbox without a filesystem but a real first class platform that includes access to the local system apis, sensors and data, in addition to first class tooling such as system debuggers. The second goal of PhoneGap is for the project to cease to exist. This is not a nihilistic sentiment, rather we at the PhoneGap project are providing a reference implementation for web browsers to assist and guide the standardization process of browser APIs. The name and trademark of PhoneGap will become the commercial entity for the project. The source, code, documentation and related assets will all be contributed to the Apache Foundation as Callback. The Callback name comes from the event of the same name that is fired when the FFI bridge is established. Rationale - The dominate window to the web is quickly becoming devices, mostly phones. The manufacturers of devices, creators of mobile operating systems, and authors of web browsers are consolidating. (In many cases these are all already the same company.) Those stakeholders may see a future for the web but their bottom line is not necessarily motivated to participate in an open web. It is especially clear that while many of these platforms have been seeing some level of strategic neglect in favor of enhanced experiences at the price locking developers into their respective platforms. The Callback project exists to bring the focus back to an open and accessible web. Initial Goals - * License all PhoneGap source code and documentation to the Apache Software Foundation. (We already name the Apache license in our CLA.) * Setup and standardize the open governance of the Callback project. * Rename all assets from PhoneGap to Callback in project src, docs, tests and related infrastructure. Current Status -- Callback is a mature software project recently shipping 1.0 on July 29, 2011. Meritocracy --- Callback has always been a project driven by merit and, in a sense, our solution is brute force requiring many collaborating developers to solve our goals. It would be far easier, and perhaps more correct, for the Callback project to port a single web browser codebase, and API bindings, across platforms but our executable size would be appreciably larger, unacceptably so for mobile, and our target abstraction would be only tertiary to m -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
LDAP groups for podlings?
Hi, I just tried to grant commit rights for someone on a podling First, I need to grant incubator, like: modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=committer But how to add him to the particular podling? Are there other perl scripts, that I am not aware of ? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Java package names
if you care to be able to run on a different JVM, than it needs to be fixed. Generally it's bad to rely on some private packages/APIs -M On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: River imported packages of code from the original Sun grant under the name 'com.sun.whatever'. How important is it to change that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Not receiving any email from *...@*.apache.org
ping :) On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:55 PM, George Aroush geo...@aroush.net wrote: Thanks to everyone who helped regarding this matter. I contacted my ISP and they told me they were blocking 148.211.11.3. They said it's unblocked now, so I'm testing to see if this was the case. Lets see if this email to general@incubator.apache.org will show up in my in-box. -- George On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:59 -0400, George Aroush wrote: Hi Everyone, Sorry about the spam. Since Sept 12, 2010, I have not received any email from all of my Apache subscriptions such as *...@lucene.apache.org, or �...@incubator.apache.org or *...@apache.org and I have several of them which I#146;m subscribed to (all of Solr#146;s mailing list, all of Lucene, all of Lucene.Net, private and general). Not only that, my post to them is not working either. My 2 email replies to Grant#146;s email on priv...@lucene.apache.org did not show up. My post to lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org did not show up!! If you do get this email, please reply to my email as well: geo...@aroush.net (since I may not see it in my in-box) and let me know if there is any issues with Apache#146;s email server or something is wrong on my end!! Thanks, -- George - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator)
+1 especially since incubation is about establishing a developers community -M On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 I barely see the users list used in OWB and even in MyFaces ;) I'd say an isis-...@incubator.a.o + isis-comm...@i.a.o list would do fine for now. LieGrue, strub --- On Wed, 9/8/10, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote: From: Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator) To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 7:16 AM Isis mentors: Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, should we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list for -dev and -user? Dan On 08/09/2010 08:10, Martijn Dashorst wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacksmatt...@matthewsacks.comwrote: ... *Mailing Lists* kitty-dev kitty-commits kitty-user Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the community across dev/user does not make sense. You want to keep the users and developers on the same mailing list until one starts to overwhelm the other. By partitioning the lists too early, you risk never reaching critical mass on *either* mailing list. This is actually great advice, and I wish we'd done this with a couple of podlings that are currently too small to graduate. In retrospect empire-db and etch really could have done without the user- list IMO. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Isis to enter the incubator
* Vincent Massol == Sponsor == Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: RAT can be dangerous
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Ross, while I understand the All it does part I don't get the dangerous part. I think noone has ever announced RAT as a solution. It is a helper tool. I think the recommendation to use RAT (for what it offers) is just plainly right. Nothing more - nothing less. I do agree. That's the reason for a lot of projects / podlings to use it -Matthias Jochen On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote: I'm really worried about the growing meme that RAT is solving the IP management problem. It is not a solution, it is merely a tool that is useful for a very specific use case. All it does is do a pattern match for an Apache licence header in a bunch of files. It's really useful for checking the proper licensing of our source files. It does nothing else. Thinking RAT is helping the Incubator teach codlings how to manage IP is just plain dangerous. Ross Sent from my mobile device. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Future of RAT
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@opensource.lk wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in Java land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to help check ASF policies. To me, that's a big scope and an important community, and just based on the telltale signs it seems like a TLP to me. RAT is a superb tool and its not only for ASF. In WSO2 we have now started to use RAT on releases .. still early stage (and RAT is finding lots of issues) but the plan is to incorporate it into the nightly build process so we catch issue early. I am certain RAT will keep growing to handle more complexity and scenarios and it makes sense for it to become its own thing. So totally +1 from me to going TLP. same here. +1 for TLP Sanjiva. -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder, Director Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ Founder, Chairman CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ Director; Sahana Software Foundation; http://www.sahanafoundation.org/ Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator
+1 (binding ) sent from my Android phone Am 06.05.2010 07:57 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com: +1 --Gurkan From: Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 1:48:46 AM Subject: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a ...
Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
, OpenJPA, OpenEJB, OpenWebBeans and MyFaces. Homogeneous Developers The list of initial committers are geographically distributed across the U.S., Europe and Africa with no one company being associated with a majority of the developers. Many of these initial developers are experienced Apache committers already and all are experienced with working in distributed development communities. It is our hope that, through the incubator, further contributors with a broad background of experience but common interest will become involved with this project. Reliance on Salaried Developers To the best of our knowledge, none of the initial committers are being paid to develop code for this project. Relationships with Other Apache Products A number of existing ASF projects require an implementation of JSR303 including Geronimo, OpenJPA and MyFaces. It is hoped that members of those projects will be interested in contributing to and adopting this implementation. Apache Geronimo - Apache Geronimo is a server runtime framework and fully certified Java EE 5 application server runtime. It is interested in using this project, to provide the required JSR-303 implementation for the upcoming Geronimo 3.0 server, which will be a Java EE 6 certified release. Apache OpenJPA - Apache OpenJPA is a JPA provider, who needs to integrate and test with a JSR-303 provider as part of JSR-317 JPA2 specification. In the future, we may decide to include the Validation artifacts in our distribution for Java SE users. Apache MyFaces - Apache MyFaces is a JSF provider, who needs to integrate and test with a JSR-303 provider as part of the JSR-314 JSF2 specification. It is our hope, that the preferred Bean Validation provider will become Validation instead of the Hibernate RI, after the project exits the incubator. A Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand The Agimatec-Validation code is currently being hosted on Google Code. The developers (Agimatec Gmbh) did not approach Apache, but were instead approached by Donald Woods about moving the code to Apache in hopes to build a broader and more vibrant community around the code and as the eventual next generation Commons Validator codebase. Documentation JSR303 Bean Validation Specification: * http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 Agimatec Validation Project: * http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/ Initial Source The intiial source comprises code developed as as part of the agimatec-validation project on googlecode: * http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/source/browse/ Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan SGA has been submitted. Source tarball has not been uploaded to SVN yet. External Dependencies * Runtime o Apache Geronimo Bean Validation 1.0 Spec API o Apache Commons BeanUtils o Apache Commons Lang o Apache Commons Logging o Apache Commons Collections o XStream * Optional o org.freemarker - freemarker template to generate JSON output * Tests o JUnit o Log4J Required Resources * Mailing lists o validation-private (with moderated subscriptions) o validation-dev o validation-user o validation-commits * Subversion directory o https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/validation * Website o Confluence (VALIDATION) * Issue Tracking o JIRA (VALIDATION) Initial Committers Names of initial committers with affiliation and current ASF status: * Roman Stumm [roman.stumm at agimatec.de] - (Agimatec GmbH, CLA filed) * Donald Woods [dwoods] - (IBM, ASF committer) * Niall Pemberton [niallp] - (EMC, ASF committer) * Mohammad Nour El-Din [mnour] - (Thebe Technology, ASF committer) * Simone Tripodi [simone.tripodi at gmail.com] - (Asemantics S.r.l, CLA filed) * Jeremy Bauer [jrbauer] - (IBM, ASF committer) * Gerhard Petracek [gpetracek] - (IRIAN Solutions GmbH, ASF committer) * Mark Struberg [struberg] - (ASF committer) Sponsors Champion * Kevan Miller Nominated Mentors * Kevan Miller * Niall Pemberton * Luciano Resende Sponsoring Entity * Apache Incubator PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
+1 to accept Validation into the Incubator afterwards we still can see where it actually ends up however I for sure want to see this at Apache. If you guys need a champion or mentor, count me in !! -M On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: We're leaving the TLP/sub-project decision till graduation... -Donald On 2/23/10 5:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote: As I understand it from the proposal, they intend to be Apache Commons Validation. On 24/02/2010, at 4:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote. I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new Validation podling. The goal is to build a community around delivering a JSR-303 Bean Validation implementation based on a new incoming codebase from Agimatec GmbH. The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal -1 to a project that could end up being called Apache Validation or just Validation. That's too big/general a word for a project name. No objection under a changed name. I'd suggest adding an adjective to indicate what is being validated. -- Nick Kew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Cassandra to an Apache TLP
[X] +1 to recommend Cassandra's graduation (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: Greetings, We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our active mentors to the proposed PMC, (for a total of 7 people), then ran that through a new community vote[2]. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/24427 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.user/2157 There didn't seem to be any other feedback, so I'd like to start an official vote to recommend graduation of Apache Cassandra to a top-level project. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 to recommend Cassandra's graduation [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, (because...) The vote will be open for 72 hours. Thanks, -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: avro in mapreduce
again the wrong list ? :) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Doug Cutting d...@cottrell-cutting.net wrote: I would like to call folks attention to MAPREDUCE-1126. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1126 This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating Avro in Mapreduce. Aaron proposed a design in early December, building on the design Tom developed last summer and committed in September in HADOOP-6165. Aaron's design was approved, and, after several rounds of reviews, I committed Aaron's patch on 11 January. On 15 January Owen reverted this commit without warning. It seems that Owen objects to the path initiated last July in HADOOP-6165. Aaron has also contributed MAPREDUCE-815, which permits one to use Avro for all phases of Mapreduce. When that issue is committed, the primary chain of Avro integration into Mapreduce will be complete. Can others please take the time to read this issue and express their opinions? Thank you, Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [contribution] Apache MyFaces Trinidad got a new skin (aka look-and-feel)
Hi, ok, as there was no concern, we will move forward and will integrate the new look-and-feel into the Trinidad library. Thanks! Matthias On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: Hi, for the Apache MyFaces subproject Trinidad we got a new contribution: == Adonis Raul Raduca (ICLA on file) contributed a new skin, which is basically a look-and-file (a bunch of CSS selectors and some new images). The code has been uploaded to TRINIDAD-1689. Question is: Do we need a software grant for that contribution ? I (personally) think no, we don't. Why? -The contribution is an improvement of the existing look-and-feel; -The contribution is not a standalone software / donation. In fact the contributions is pretty tied to the Trinidad subproject. It is actually useless without the Trinidad framework at all. Let me know if you guys agree that we do NOT need a software grant for this contribution. -Matthias (PMC Chair of Apache MyFaces) [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1689 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution looks good to me, but the proposed PMC is really small: * Jonathan Ellis jbel...@apache.org * Eric Evans eev...@apache.org * Jun Rao jun...@apache.org * Chris Goffinet goffi...@apache.org And all of its members are currently active in Cassandra only. Would it be possible for (some of) the mentors to stay onboard for a while? With only 4 PMC members to start with, the risk of being unable to get 3 votes on issues is real. that's a good point, Bertrand. Those that are involved in other communities are the mentors, like Torsten, Matthieu or Brian (according to [1]). Looks like the only exception is Johan Oskarsson, but I am not to familiar with the community itself and its activity. However I noted that Johan voted for the graduation... I am also not sure why the proposed PMC is that small. Some try to expand their PPMC during incubation with all the active folks (mailings and commits). So, I am not sure on the reason why there is this small (P)PMC. -Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[contribution] Apache MyFaces Trinidad got a new skin (aka look-and-feel)
Hi, for the Apache MyFaces subproject Trinidad we got a new contribution: == Adonis Raul Raduca (ICLA on file) contributed a new skin, which is basically a look-and-file (a bunch of CSS selectors and some new images). The code has been uploaded to TRINIDAD-1689. Question is: Do we need a software grant for that contribution ? I (personally) think no, we don't. Why? -The contribution is an improvement of the existing look-and-feel; -The contribution is not a standalone software / donation. In fact the contributions is pretty tied to the Trinidad subproject. It is actually useless without the Trinidad framework at all. Let me know if you guys agree that we do NOT need a software grant for this contribution. -Matthias (PMC Chair of Apache MyFaces) [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1689 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Shindig as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote: +1 - Original Message - From: vincent.sive...@gmail.com vincent.sive...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thu Jan 14 03:41:28 2010 Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Shindig as an Apache Top Level Project Hi, Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig as a TLP [1]. I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board. To that end I have prepared the resolution for the Board below to be presented for consideration at the upcoming Board meeting. Community graduation vote thread: http://shindig-dev.markmail.org/message/c47amdxjtntkjij5 Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 to recommend Shindig's graduation [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, because ... The vote will be open for 72 hours. Cheers, Vincent [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/qvpyymihv6gyh5a7 --- Begin Proposed Board Resolution --- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee, charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the implementation of an OpenSocial container and OpenSocial API specifications, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Shindig PMC, is hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Shindig Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to the OpenSocial API specifications, based on software licensed to the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Shindig be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of Apache Shindig, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Shindig PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Shindig PMC: * Ian Boston (ieb at apache dot org) * Kevin Brown (etnu at apache dot org) * Chris Chabot(chabotc at apache dot org) * Chico Charlesworth (chico at apache dot org) * Cassie Doll (doll at apache dot org) * Evan Gilbert (evan at apache dot org) * John Hjelmstad (johnh at apache dot org) * Paul Lindner (lindner at apache dot org) * Daniel Peterson (dpeterson at apache dot org) * Louis Ryan (lryan at apache dot org) * Henning Schmiedehausen (henning at apache dot org) * Vincent Siveton (vsiveton at apache dot org) * Upayavira (upayavira at apache dot org) * Adam Winer (awiner at apache dot org) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Paul Lindner be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Shindig, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that Apache Shindig be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Shindig podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Shindig podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. --- End Proposed Board Resolution --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Apache OpenWebBeans Has Graduated
BIT congrats!!! On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache OpenWebBeans as a project. I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and time. I am very proud to be part of the Apache family Thanks to all! Gurkan Erdogdu ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Apache OpenWebBeans Has Graduated
BIG!! congrats! -Matthias On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; We have just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache OpenWebBeans as a project. I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have supported OpenWebBeans during the incubation for their guidance, effort and time. I am very proud to be part of the Apache family Thanks to all! Gurkan Erdogdu ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP
+1 (again ;-) ) On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; After over one years in the incubator with providing three releases OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate OpenWebBeans to a Top Level Project. See the following community graduation vote thread in the archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01687.html To that end we have prepared the resolution for the Board below to be presented for consideration at the upcoming Board meeting. Please vote on recommending OpenWebBeans graduation to the ASF board. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and only IPMC member votes are binding. [] +1 Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation [] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because Unless they explicitly vote otherwise, I'm including the following IPMC member votes from the community vote also in the tally of this vote: +1 Kevan Miller +1 Matthias Wessendorf Incubator Page : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans Status Page : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html Thanks; --Gurkan Erdogdu Board Resolution Report -- WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project, to be known as Apache OpenWebBeans, related to the implementation of the JSR-299,i.e Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC) is hereby established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to JSR299, Context and Dependency Injection for the Java EE Platform; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC be and hereby is charged with the creation and maintenance of Apache OpenWebBeans; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of Apache OpenWebBeans, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC: * Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com) * Kevan Miller (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com) * Mark Struberg (struberg at yahoo dot com) * Joe Bergmark (bergmark at gmail dot com) * Eric Covener (covener at gmail dot com) * David Blevins (david dot blevins at visi dot com) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gurkan Erdogdu be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache OpenWebBeans, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that Apache OpenWebBeans be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator OpenWebBeans podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion
is at http://buildbot.subversion.org/buildbot/ Note that we request these resources to be at their final locations, not an intermediary while going through incubation. The cost of switching twice would otherwise be significant due to the size of the existing community. The Subversion team members are happy to work with and assist the ASF Infrastructure team to enable early deployments of its release candidates if possible. Initial Committers The list of initial committers is at http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/COMMITTERS. The initial PMC members are those listed as full committers in that file (lines 1-74). Sponsors * Champion: Greg Stein * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel Rall * Sponsor: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO impatience isn't a good enough reason. same here Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus. Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see if its possible. Niall If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! on goal of incubation is also to LEARN the Apache rules, not only to produce code. As the main focus is to attract this podling to new developers, there is no need to rush on providing a release for use-only users. We want committers. These should be able to get the svn TAG and work on that... Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) not sure what exactly he said, but please file a JIRA ticket for it, to not forget about it. -Matthias Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO impatience isn't a good enough reason. Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus. Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see if its possible. I totally agree, that rushing is not a good practice. Thanks Niall for jumping in. -Matthias Niall If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi; The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is successful. There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed. from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall +1 Votes - * Kevan Miller (binding) * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) * Niall Pemberton (binding) I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator dist/ place and upload to m3-incubator-repository Thanks to all; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation
draft of OSGi v4.2 core and compendium specifications - which includes the Blueprint container specification - is available at: http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf Initial Source * The Blueprint container impl from the Geronimo sandbox will be moved to the Aries project for further development: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/blueprint * IBM will also contribute code for: o container-managed JPA support in an OSGi environment. o making OSGi services visible to Java EE components through JNDI. o packaging web components as bundles and a URL handler for recognizing and converting non-bundled Web components * We will also be soliciting implementations of other OSGi enterprise application-centric specifications. External Dependencies * Apache Ant http://ant.apache.org Apache License * Apache Commons http://commons.apache.org Apache License * Junit (Java unit test framework) http://junit.sourceforge.net CPL v1.0 license: http://junit.sourceforge.net/cpl-v10.html * Apache Felix (implementation of the OSGi Core and Compendium specifications - compliance level unknown) http://felix.apache.org Apache License (hosted by ASF). * Eclipse Equinox (compliant implementation of the OSGi Core Specification and Compendium specifications) http://eclipse.org/equinox/ Eclipse Public License * OpenJPA http://openjpa.apache.org Apache License * Serp http://serp.sourceforge.net/ BSD * Apache Geronimo http://geronimo.apache.org Apache License Required Resources Mailing lists aries-private (with moderated subscriptions) aries-dev aries-commits aries-user Subversion Directory http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries Issue Tracking JIRA (ARIES) Web Site Confluence (Aries) Initial Committers Names of initial committers with affiliation and current ASF status: * Alan Cabrera (LinkedIn, ASF Member) * Alasdair Nottingham (IBM) * Andrew Osborne (IBM) * Bernd Kolb (SAP) * Carsten Ziegeler (Individual, ASF member) * Dan Kulp (Progress, ASF member) * David Bosschaert (Progress, ASF committer) * David Jencks (IBM, ASF member) * Dimo Stoilov (SAP) * Eoghan Glynn (Progress, ASF committer) * Graham Charters (IBM) * Guillaume Nodet (Progress, ASF member) * Hiram Chirino (Progress, ASF member) * Ian Robinson (IBM) * James Strachan (Progress, ASF member) * Jarek Gawor (IBM, ASF member) * Jean-Sebastien Delfino (IBM, ASF committer) * Jeremy Hughes (IBM, ASF committer) * Joe Bohn (IBM, ASF committer) * Lin Sun (IBM, ASF committer) * Kiril Mitov (SAP) * Mark Nuttall (IBM) * Niklas Gustavsson (individual, ASF committer) * Nikolai Tankov (SAP) * Oisin Hurley (Progress) * Peter Peshev (SAP) * Raymond Feng (IBM, ASF committer) * Rick McGuire (IBM, ASF committer) * Roman Roelofsen (ProSyst) * Sabine Heider (SAP) * Sergey Beryozkin (Progress, ASF committer) * Stuart McCulloch (individual, ASF committer) * Timothy Ward (IBM) * Todor Boev (ProSyst) * Valentin Mahrwald (IBM) * Violeta Georgieva (SAP) * Zoe Slattery (IBM) Affiliations The majority of the initial committers listed on the proposal initially are employed by IBM corp or Progress Software. One objective of the incubator is to attract a diverse community of contributors and we anticipate future contributors to have other affiliations. Indeed, since the proposal was initially posted, further initial committers have volunteered from SAP, ProSyst, LinkedIn and some individuals. Sponsors Champions Kevan Miller, Guillaume Nodet Nominated Mentors Guillaume Nodet, Davanum Srinivas (Dims), Kevan Miller Sponsoring Entity The incubator. Successful graduation from Incubator should result in Aries becoming a new TLP. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: About Podling Releases
hey Gurkan, don't worry that much about the user-base. It will grow. You guys are implementing a pretty new JSR. Once that is used more and more in the industry, the users will come to your project. -Matthias On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Gurkan Erdogdugurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Bertrand; What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating? That's the best way of streamlining your release process. Actually this is ongoing discussion in the openwebbeans dev list. There are two solutions here, sub-project under Geronimo or TLP. But community are voted on being a TLP. The problem is that we have not a solid user base (not so much activity around u...@.. list). Otherwise, I think that we achieved activitites that are expected from podlings to graduate as a TLP. On a tangential note, I'm not sure what you mean by internal milestones - if those are just meant for OpenWebBeans developers, SVN tags might be good enough. I mean actual podling releases, not SVN tags. For example, we released M1 and M2. Now M3 is under VOTE. --Gurkan From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 10:42:35 AM Subject: Re: About Podling Releases Hi Gurkan, On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: ...As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating? That's the best way of streamlining your release process. I had a look at the latest report at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2009, but it doesn't mention the top 2 or 3 things to resolve prior to graduation, what are those? On a tangential note, I'm not sure what you mean by internal milestones - if those are just meant for OpenWebBeans developers, SVN tags might be good enough. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc1
+1 on what Niall said On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Niall Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: What about commons javaflow - you're releasing a binary jar for that (its not been released by apache commons) and no source code from what I can see: http://incubator.markmail.org/message/wko4emwcwst5imto If you're going to release that code then you should include the source and IMO it would be good to tag the code in subversion and give it a version number other than 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Niall On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling vote thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00856.html 0.4.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-rc1 Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/ Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or longer if needed). There was quite a bit of discussion surrounding the last IPMC vote, so here is a list of some of the things that were brought up, and where we are are on those issues: * No zip archives We are still not generating zip archives. Hopefully that won't be an issue. * Missing SVN properties This was addressed in CASSANDRA-368 (i.e. the properties are now in place). * Licenses in lib/licenses instead of LICENSE.txt During the discussion, CASSANDRA-371 was created and a reference has since been added to the bottom of LICENSE.txt that directs people to lib/licenses for the third-party dependencies. The reason for putting third-party licenses in lib/licenses was to ease maintenance, which in turn should help guarantee that this information is up-to-date and accurate. That still seems like a valid reason so if possible, I'd like to wait for the resolution of LEGAL-31 * JUnit jar in binary archive I completely lost track of this after the discussion, and didn't notice it until after 0.4.0-rc1 was tagged and the artifacts created. I've submitted CASSANDRA-417 so that it won't be forgotten again. * Attributions in NOTICE.txt During the discussion, I explained the rationale[1] behind our NOTICE.txt, but I'm not sure that went anywhere. The example cited was Antlr, but by my understanding of the BSD license, there is no requirement that the attribution be in a top-level file let alone one named NOTICE.txt. Again, we're trying to keep things simple so that it is easier to maintain and as a result, more accurate and up-to-date. But, if this is a sore spot with IPMC voters, we'll put all attributions, required or not in NOTICE.txt. * NOTICE shouldn't have Developers and Contributors are listed in... This is another one I lost track of after the discussion, (CASSANDRA-415 submitted). [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg22190.html Regards, -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Jan Lehnardtj...@apache.org wrote: On 21 Aug 2009, at 08:58, ant elder wrote: What do people think about changing the poddling release voting process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the poddlings dev list instead of the dual voting we have now with a poddling dev list vote followed by an general@ vote? This would be similar to the changes done recently for committer and PPMC votes which removed the dual voting and help empower the poddlings. There would of course still be the minimum requirement of 3 +1s from IPMC members, and a notification process so the IPMC is fully aware of the vote. Can work out the details of that later in a formal doc change proposal but first I'd like to see if there's much support for or against such a change? Another -1 for many of the reasons stated already. I found the current procedure very helpful when incubating CouchDB. I don't think doing only the first release here is a good idea. - 1 as well. The current procedure help us (Apache MyFaces Trinidad) as well. We did several release here and we gained a lot out of that. -Matthias Cheers Jan -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: The vote is now closed with the following results: * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman) * 0 votes: 0 * -1 votes: 0 The vote passes. I was surprised to read this, as I noticed a discussion about the release on the gene...@i.a.o list And Sebb's mail pretty much indicates there are (still) some issues -matthias I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file. Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party libraries, apart from Groovy. Thanks everyone. On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote: The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling Vote thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans SVN Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1 Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/ Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
+1 (binding) I followed the thread and the provided stuff seems to be fine. -M On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Eric Evanseev...@rackspace.com wrote: The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling Vote thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans SVN Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1 Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/ Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html Regards, -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
+1 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote: I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension The full proposal can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal Vote will close in a little over 72 hours at mid day (BST, UTC + 1) Friday 17th July. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=7day=17year=2009hour=12min=0sec=0p1=136 Ross -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
+1 (IPMC binding) On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote: +1 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote: I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension The full proposal can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal Vote will close in a little over 72 hours at mid day (BST, UTC + 1) Friday 17th July. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=7day=17year=2009hour=12min=0sec=0p1=136 Ross -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
I think the vote is still up... @Incubator folks: please review the bit. Kevan and I already voted +1 ... -M On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Now, Kevan Miller (+1 Binding) Matthias Wessendorf (+1 Binding) Sebastian Bazley (+ 0 Binding) Is the above votes enough to create release ? Or one more +1 is still necessary ? -- Gurkan From: sebb seb...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try) +0 Two files don't have AL headers: openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml I'm not sure what these files are for. The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose. The licenses/ directory should be deleted from SVN as it is no longer needed. On 01/06/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; I have corrected the errors. New artifacts can be found at the below URLs. OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2-rc3/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN Tag Last Changed Rev: 780720 Last Changed Date: 2009-06-01 19:48:02 +0300 (Mon, 01 Jun 2009) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-RC3/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; -- Gurkan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
+1 (binding) -Matthias On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans Specification which is defined as JSR-299. Proposed released artifacts are: Plugins repository -- http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans Distribution content http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M2/ SVN Tag http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2/ The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in three +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members. [VOTES] Kevan Miller +1 Binding (PPMC) Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (PPMC) Mark Struberg +1 (PPMC) [VOTE Thread] : http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00944.html More information about the project can be found here: [Incubation Status Page ] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html [Project Page] : http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html [Wiki Page] : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/ [Blog] : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/ Thanks; Gurkan Erdogdu -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Graduate Apache Sling as Top Level Project
I'd support the graduation. -Matthias On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The Sling podling has voted on asking the Incubator PMC to support its graduation as a top level project. The vote passed with 23 +1 votes (8 of which from PPMC members), no 0 and no -1 votes. The vote thread can be found at [1], the result at [2]. Sling has been in the Incubator since September 5th, 2007. During its incubation, Sling has ... * produced two releases * added two committers/PPMC members * added a documentation committer * received numerous contributions Finally, let me quote our Champion Jukka Zitting: mentor hat on Day employees are still behind the majority of Sling commits, but the project has shown ability to welcome new ideas and contributors and to include them as equal members in the development and decision making processes. Also the other graduation criteria have been met and I don't think there's anything more that the Incubator can give to Sling. Thanks to everyone who's been participating so far, and good luck to Apache Sling as a standalone TLP! /mentor hat on We have prepared the board resolution on our wiki at [3]. Regards Felix [1] http://markmail.org/message/76yu7qatqfqnrdme [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/sling-...@incubator.apache.org/msg10305.html [3] http://cwiki.apache.org/SLING/graduation-resolution-draft.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite
+1 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Ropu rovagn...@gmail.com wrote: +1 We are working a lot around the project and we'd like to contribute to it. As a Shindig contributor, i'd love to see the same synergy applied to SocialSite. ropu On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote: Another +1 from me, too. SocialSite needs to live on and Apache could be a good home for it. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Jamey Wood jamey.w...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart pele...@sun.com; rovagn...@gmail.com; Robert Bissett robert.biss...@sun.com; leandro.milma...@globant.com; rodr...@globant.com; Tony Ng tony...@sun.com Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:47:00 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite I'm very much +1 on this. I appreciate Sun's willingness to contribute the existing SocialSite code, and I hope that we'll have the opportunity to evolve it under the Incubator's established governance model and level playing field. --Jamey On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Dave wrote: Greetings to all, It's my pleasure to present to you a proposal for a new project Apache SocialSite, a social networking service based on Apache Shindig (incubating) with an end-user interface composed entirely of OpenSocial gadgets and designed to add social networking features to existing web applications (e.g. Roller, JSPWiki, your favorite webapp, etc.). You can find the full proposal on the Incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SocialSiteProposal I look forward to your comments and suggestions on this proposal. Thanks, Dave -- .-. --- .--. ..- R o p u -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Are binding votes necessary for Committer - PPMC?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, binding votes are necessary for to The ASF legally binding issues: committers, PMC membership and releases. So when a podling has voted in a Committer, and the Incubator PMC has ack'd the Committer, are binding votes necessary for the podling's decision to make a Committer a member of their PPMC? Good point, Martijn. Since he was already ACK'd as a committer, an ACK for adding him to the PPMC should be (IMO) enough. -Matthias Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Are binding votes necessary for Committer - PPMC?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: No. The PPMC is an Incubator artifact, and has no standing within the ASF. Binding (PMC) votes are required for such things as Committer and Release. Great, thanks. -Matthias --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Accept Pivot into incubation.
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: The Pivot team would like to present the Pivot toolkit for incubation at the Apache Incubator. Please cast your votes; [ ] +1, bring Pivot into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way, [ ] -1, Don't bring Pivot into Incubator, because Non binding +1, I played with the demos and it seems to be veeery nice. Simone -- Simone GianniCEO Semeru s.r.l. Apache Committer http://www.simonegianni.it/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Access to nameprotect.com for podling
Hi Richard, see here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27 we faced the issue already in the past, but looks like no solution to that is actually (right now) available. -Matthias On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Hirsch, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to work on the podling status page for ESME and have reached a stumbling point with the first task regarding checking of the trademark on www.nameprotect.com for which a login is required I searched in the general incubator mailing lists and found references to the same problem as far back as 2005 but didn't find any answers describing how to deal with the problem. Is there a common apache login at http://www.cscprotectsbrands.com/ that we can use? Thanks. Dick Mag. Richard Hirsch Senior Consultant / Enterprise Portal Solutions Siemens AG Österreich Siemens IT Solutions and Services SIS PSE IND SG Werner-von-Siemens-Platz 1 A-5021 SALZBURG Phone +43 (0)5 1707 66794 Mobil: +43 (0) 676 3537770 Fax +43 (0)5 1707 53211 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Important Note: This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Company Name: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich Legal Form: Stock Corporation, Company Seat: Vienna, Register Number: FN 60562 m, registered at: Commercial Court Vienna, DVR-Number: 0001708 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)
you can produce them and upload them to a jira ticket. I doubt that you have write access on the page On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or mentors of the project should do? Thanks; Gurkan 2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author: kevan Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008 New Revision: 711682 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev Log: Generate OpenWebBeans status page Added: incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with props) incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html (with props) Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)
k, that should be fine. Just in case... any fax machine nearby ? -M On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; Yes, I have mailed signed copy of the CLA to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gurkan 2008/11/6 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] also... did we already ping infra for the mailing lists? If not, let me do that. @mail to request the accounts. We only have CLA from Conny, but not from Gurkan. Gurkan, did you already fax it? (Or is Sam just busy w/ ACon ;)) -M On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 PM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008 New Revision: 711682 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev Log: Generate OpenWebBeans status page Added: incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with props) incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html (with props) Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN
FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM Subject: [OpenWebBeans] request for mailing lists and SVN To: Infrastructure Apache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi infra@ team, I am a mentor of the OpenWebBeans podling ([1]). The project was accepted to go into incubation mode. To get this shindig started, we need some mailing lists: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Moderator (currently) will be me matzew AT apache DOT org. We also need a SVN repo (see [1]): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans and a JIRA would be great, too: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPEN-WEBBEANS Or, do you want me to file JIRA tickets for this ? Thanks, Matthias [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenWebBeans status page (Was: svn commit: r711682)
also... did we already ping infra for the mailing lists? If not, let me do that. @mail to request the accounts. We only have CLA from Conny, but not from Gurkan. Gurkan, did you already fax it? (Or is Sam just busy w/ ACon ;)) -M On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 PM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: kevan Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008 New Revision: 711682 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev Log: Generate OpenWebBeans status page Added: incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with props) incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/openwebbeans.html (with props) Great, but there is more needed. Please see the instructions: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Initialize+Podling+Status+Page http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report It needs to be added to the index page and right-hand panel. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accepting Kato into the Incubator
+1 On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:14 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Kato proposal has been out for discussion for a few weeks now, please vote on accepting the Kato project for incubation. +1 (non-binding). Always great to see JSRs working in the open. /niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] OpenWebBeans Proposal
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm. I had assumed that Matthias was an Incubator PMC member. I'll get started with project setup, but probably won't be able to start until Friday. In the meantime, you can submit an ICLA to Apache. Matthias needs to request to join the incubator pmc by sending a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ah, thx :-) will do, requested here on the list. -Matthias Would be really good to have a third mentor. Any volunteers? --kevan On Oct 27, 2008, at 5:25 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Sorry for my spelling error Kevan. 2008/10/27 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey Kevin, is there anything that I have to do for quick start. GE 2008/10/27 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Niclas Hedhman wrote: Gurkan Erdogdu This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal; * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding) * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding) * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding) * Kevan Miller+1 (binding-mentor) * Niall Pemberton +1 (binding) * Craig L Russell+1 (binding) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * Matthias Wessendorf +1 (non-binding-champion) * Niklas Gustavsson +1 (non-binding) * James Carman +1 (non-binding) * Gurkan Erdogdu +1 (non-binding) What will be the next step for us? For your Mentor(s) to establish the podling's resources. Torsten mentioned; http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling You can also have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-83, where I have tried to list all the subtasks needed. Also Clutch tries to guide you with the next steps. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#steps which links directly to the Acceptance phase of the various incubation documents. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Incubator PMC
Hello Incubator PMC, I am a member and I'd like to join this PMC in order to help out a new podling (OpenWebBeans) Thanks! Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenWebBeans - being a mentor / champion
Hi, I am a mentor / champion on the recently accepted OpenWebBeans effort. Is it possible to become part of the Incubator PMC (I am an asf member), in order to have some binding votes ? I think in the past we did the same in our Trinidad effort with Martin van den Bemt. Thanks! Matthias [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accepting OpenWebBeans into the Incubator
that the open source gets power from its great developers and freedom. He also developed some other open source projects. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with other potential contributors. === Community === There is a great community within the Open EJB, Open JPA, Geronimo and MyFaces Apache projects. Open Web Beans project is very related with these projects and in the some cases, it enhances these projects. We are thinking that Open Web Beans project gets strong community because it simplifies and unifies the using of these projects. It simplifies the developer effort for building complex enterprise applications. === Core Developers === Open Web Beans project has been developing by the open source developer Gurkan Erdogdu as a sole contributor. === Alignment === Open Web Beans project will be a candidate for use in Geronimo AS as a default Web Beans Container. Other projects could benefit from the Open Web Beans project as a general purpose component and context management. Open Web Beans project is closely aligned with the Open EJB, Open JPA and MyFaces projects perfectly. It depends on these projects to satisfy its requirements. == Known Risks == === Orphaned products === Even if the initial committer of the project has no plan to leave the active development, it must necessary to get other committers for the project. So that it less dependent on the single developer. The source code of the project is well documented and new committers could easily grasp the details. Initial committer continues to support actively this project. === Inexperience with Open Source === Initial developer have worked on open source project before, including the JBoss Cache IDE while committer as the JBoss IDE. === Homogeneous Developers === Altough the initial committer of the project is single, developer team may be increased within the active project lifecycle from the different locations. === Reliance on Salaried Developers === Project currently has no salaried developers. All the commitment is done by the volunteer developer. === Relationships with Other Apache Products === Open Web Beans will likely be used in the Geronimo and Apache Tomcat. It also requires Open JPA, Open EJB and MyFaces. === An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand === Open Web Beans project initial committer is the strong supporter of the open source projects. Initial committer of the project thinks that ASF has great place that provides wider colloboration and support of the open source project and it respects meritrocracy. Also, Open Web Beans project is embraced by the Geronimo and other Apache projects. Open Web Beans project is closely related with the some of the other Apache projects. == Documentation == Currently there is no documentation about the project. But the all the source code is well documented. == Initial Source == The source for Open Web Beans project that is to be imported is currently within the project at http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/ and is all ASL2.0 licensed. == External Dependencies == All dependencies have Apache compatible licenses. These include BSD and CDDL licensed dependencies. == Required Resources == Mailing lists * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subversion Directory * https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans Issue Tracking * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPEN-WEBBEANS Other Resources * Wiki == Initial Committers == || '''Name'''|| '''Email''' || '''CLA'''|| || Gurkan Erdogdu || gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com || no || || Conny Lundgren || conny dot lundgren at gmail dot com || no || == Sponsors == We kindly request the Apache Incubator PMC to be the sponsor for this project. Champion * Matthias Wessendorf (matzew at apache dot org) Nominated Mentors * Kevan Miller (kevan dot miller at gmail dot com) __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About OpenWebBeans Proposal
Hi, my suggestion is: -ask again on the list, on your proposal, if there are concerns; -if not, start the vote on Monday (always bad over a weekend) -M On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; This is the last situation after struggled to achieve communicating the Web Beans Specification EG members. I tried to contact with Gavin King, Pete Muir (JBoss) and Guice Developer List and Crazy Bob (Google) for concerning about the OpenWebBeans proposal. As an action items I did the following: Mail to Gavin King : I kindly asked for adding me as an observer to the JSR-299 List. (No response.) Message to Seam List : I dropped a message to the Seam User List. (Pete Muir responded with advice joinining into the RI impl. group. . Message to Google Developer List : I dropped a message to the Google Developer List. (No response) Mail to Crazy Bob: I mailed to Crazy Bob about the WebBeansImpl and other concerns. (No response) It seems that Google folks does ignore me. Maybe their thinkings about the open source model is different. It must not be hard to response with simple message. Anyway , What does the IPMC thinks about this proposal to continue with or not? and whether or not it is applicable to vote this proposal? Sincerely; -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About OpenWebBeans Proposal
I meant the incubator list. Like are there any concerns or is this topic ready for a vote -M On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok Matthias, I will send another message to the google guice user list and developer list and start a vote on next monday. Thanks; 2008/10/16 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, my suggestion is: -ask again on the list, on your proposal, if there are concerns; -if not, start the vote on Monday (always bad over a weekend) -M On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; This is the last situation after struggled to achieve communicating the Web Beans Specification EG members. I tried to contact with Gavin King, Pete Muir (JBoss) and Guice Developer List and Crazy Bob (Google) for concerning about the OpenWebBeans proposal. As an action items I did the following: Mail to Gavin King : I kindly asked for adding me as an observer to the JSR-299 List. (No response.) Message to Seam List : I dropped a message to the Seam User List. (Pete Muir responded with advice joinining into the RI impl. group. . Message to Google Developer List : I dropped a message to the Google Developer List. (No response) Mail to Crazy Bob: I mailed to Crazy Bob about the WebBeansImpl and other concerns. (No response) It seems that Google folks does ignore me. Maybe their thinkings about the open source model is different. It must not be hard to response with simple message. Anyway , What does the IPMC thinks about this proposal to continue with or not? and whether or not it is applicable to vote this proposal? Sincerely; -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Gurkan- have you tried to ping the Guice folks ? I wonder if they a) would be interested in joining this effort, here at Apache (Crazy Bob is an apache committer) b) prefer to work on the RI, at JBoss (Crazy Bob is EG member) c) have no steaks into the WebBeans effort -Matthias 2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, First of all, there are lots of places that I could propose my project, but I think that open source development with the Apache Way conveys the real Free and Professional Open Source Project with meritrocracy in action. This code could be part of the Geronimo project as its Web Beans container, or could be the top level project its own. I only know that there is only one effort to create RI, this is the JBoss RI (Pete Muir is responsible for implementing, Gavin King for creating the spec) at the web side http://seamframework.org/WebBeans. And its implementation is in the early stage. Indeed, Apache way implementation makes different from the others, because and most importantly its developed based on the Apache Way and it also creates additions to the RI with creating add-on components that are based on the other Apache projects, such as, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, JSecurity, ActiveMQ etc, possible. Morevoer, It's always good to have multiple implementations of a spec so enterprise community benefits from the different imlpementations, and they choose the best (Like MyFaces and Sun JSF imeplemtnations.) I am ready for doing lots of work to this project progresses. Moreover, I get some great response from the below individuals to help this project succesfull, - Kevan Miller : As a mentor and partly committer - Conny Lundgren : JSR-299 EG member as a committer. And also, I think the committer number is increased by the time. As I said in the beginning, I believe that open source must be transparent, and the community appreciates the heavy working to implement this spec within the Apache Foundation. Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu - Original Message From: J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:13:05 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I have a number of questions before I can support the proposal: Where do you expect this code / community to end up after the incubator? Will it be part of Geronimo? Part of MySpaces? It's own TLP? I can say now that if the project is to stand on its own, then there's a lot of work to do. It seems as though there are 2 or 3 other Apache licensed efforts in creating a RI for JSR-299: Gavin King's work, JBoss's work and the rumored Guice work. What makes this RI effort any different? Why should the ASF support this project instead of one of the others? I'm concerned that there's only one listed committer. Getting to at least 3 committers is going to have to be the first order of business for this podling. -- J Aaron Farrjadetower.com[US] +1 724-964-4515 馮傑仁cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Matthias, I do not know the mail adress of the Crazy Bob. I dropped information into to the google-guice developer list about the OpenWebBeans proposal but I have got no response so far. I also dropped the message into the JBoss Seam framework mailing list. Pete Muir from the JBoss replied with kindly message that he said You could welcome to help into the WebBeans RI effort in the JBoss. But I said him, I think that different RI from the different foundations is great. I am subscribed on this list '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and I haven't seen a post from you there. Also I don't see that there was any other WebBeans announcement. Maybe it is worth to ask them, if they wanna join (or not). doing it here is fine, IMO. That's why I offered help in being a mentor / champion. I wonder the voting is stopped in this time or how will the process continue? Hrm, we always can revote. IMO no need to rush; Things should be cleared before continuing the *process* _M Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:26:41 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] Gurkan- have you tried to ping the Guice folks ? I wonder if they a) would be interested in joining this effort, here at Apache (Crazy Bob is an apache committer) b) prefer to work on the RI, at JBoss (Crazy Bob is EG member) c) have no steaks into the WebBeans effort -Matthias 2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, First of all, there are lots of places that I could propose my project, but I think that open source development with the Apache Way conveys the real Free and Professional Open Source Project with meritrocracy in action. This code could be part of the Geronimo project as its Web Beans container, or could be the top level project its own. I only know that there is only one effort to create RI, this is the JBoss RI (Pete Muir is responsible for implementing, Gavin King for creating the spec) at the web side http://seamframework.org/WebBeans. And its implementation is in the early stage. Indeed, Apache way implementation makes different from the others, because and most importantly its developed based on the Apache Way and it also creates additions to the RI with creating add-on components that are based on the other Apache projects, such as, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, JSecurity, ActiveMQ etc, possible. Morevoer, It's always good to have multiple implementations of a spec so enterprise community benefits from the different imlpementations, and they choose the best (Like MyFaces and Sun JSF imeplemtnations.) I am ready for doing lots of work to this project progresses. Moreover, I get some great response from the below individuals to help this project succesfull, - Kevan Miller : As a mentor and partly committer - Conny Lundgren : JSR-299 EG member as a committer. And also, I think the committer number is increased by the time. As I said in the beginning, I believe that open source must be transparent, and the community appreciates the heavy working to implement this spec within the Apache Foundation. Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu - Original Message From: J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:13:05 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I have a number of questions before I can support the proposal: Where do you expect this code / community to end up after the incubator? Will it be part of Geronimo? Part of MySpaces? It's own TLP? I can say now that if the project is to stand on its own, then there's a lot of work to do. It seems as though there are 2 or 3 other Apache licensed efforts in creating a RI for JSR-299: Gavin King's work, JBoss's work and the rumored Guice work. What makes this RI effort any different? Why should the ASF support this project instead of one of the others? I'm concerned that there's only one listed committer. Getting to at least 3 committers is going to have to be the first order of business for this podling. -- J Aaron Farrjadetower.com[US] +1 724-964-4515 馮傑仁cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:51 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is required to be an apache committer? Since when? that is my understanding. The NDA to get access to the TCK for instance ? I always thought you need to be a committer. At least in MyFaces we were doing that (to get access to the TCK). I am only talking here about the TCKs, no other (more general) things. -M On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be part of the EG? no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA. The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans... this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed. When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can work on the NDA. @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote beginning of next week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal etc. No need to rush, isn't it ? -M Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. You need a NDA for that. -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be part of the EG? no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA. The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans... this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed. When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can work on the NDA. @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote beginning of next week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal etc. No need to rush, isn't it ? -M Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. You need a NDA for that. -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Matthias, Yeap, no need to rush. Who is responsible for initiating the VOTE mail? It is ok for me to start a vote begining of the next week. I'd expect it is you :-) Since you are the founder / father of OpenWebBeans :-) -M Thanks for clearly explaining what is NDA and what is used for. Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 11:48:42 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be part of the EG? no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA. The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans... this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed. When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can work on the NDA. @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote beginning of next week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal etc. No need to rush, isn't it ? -M Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. You need a NDA for that. -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs. You need a NDA for that. -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevan, Matthias; The project current code base is in the sourceforge -- http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/. I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously. About Implementation : So far, only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API. But now, I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences. There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder. Thanks; Gurkan - Original Message From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi to all; I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. It is in the WIKI, its address is http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording change Geronimo will include == Geronimo may include. Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge. Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their project? really ? Interesting. The JBoss WebBeans RI is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it looks like their TCK will be as well) See here: http://seamframework.org/WebBeans -Matthias --kevan -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenWebBeans
unfortunately the complete java *community* process isn't that open. So, the update of the proposal needs to wait a bit... until the spec draft is accessible for common people. IMO the update isn't really required at all. We just discuss here if such a project is interesting in Apache land or not. IMO that proposal doesn't need to match 100% of the latest (un-published) spec drafts :-) -M On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Bill Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: Hi Bill; Thanks for considering about the proposal. This is the seperate effort from the Gavin King. Actually, I have requested from the Gavin to add me as an observer to the working group, I haven't received any response. I changed the wrong term *JEE* from the proposal. Thanks! It's always good to have multiple implementations of a spec so I'll be interested to see how this progresses. Note that Gavin has been doing significant work on the Web Beans spec recently and a new draft should be available soon. You might want to update the text of your proposal to align with the new draft once it's available. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [New Incubator Project Help - WebBeans Spec Implementation]
+1 sounds pretty interesting. why not posting a proposal like: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WicketProposal to our wiki. You can count me in for being a mentor/champion, since I am a member of the ASF -M On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all; My name is Gurkan Erdogdu. I have been implementing the Web Beans Specification - JSR-299, EDR-1. 90% of the specification code is completed with its unit tests. I want to denote my working for the Apache Foundation, because I am the believer of the open source. As an open source developer, I developed open source JBoss Cache IDE for a while ago, as a committer of the JBoss IDE. After completing the EDR-1(in a couple of weeks), I will be synchronized with the next revision of the specification when it is available. I have read the pages and doumentation about the how incubator project is proposed and accepted by the foundation. I understand that, I have to find a Champion to further insist my project. Moreover, lots of documentation mixes my mind a little that how I will proceed. Help is very appreciated for taking a part of this great community; Thanks for helping; Sincerely; Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: legal questsion
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that a software grant should be fine, but the other question is whether the myfaces PMC wants to accept the contribution. yes, they will. Already kind of an agreement about that on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -M The process at http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html seems to fit the need here. There is a minimum of e-paperwork to do: just requires the myfaces PMC to request and the Incubator PMC to accept it. Craig On Jul 7, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I wouldn't call it legal issue. It's more a question what to do with the contribution, since it was developed offline. I personally think that a software grant for this offer should be fine. Main reason is, that the original author is already part of the myfaces community. -Matthias On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, since the discussion on the myfaces devs list has pointed me towards here a legal question. I developed in my working time which I can dedicate to opensource software a significant library, licensed under ASF 2.0 license. It is an extension library to the myfaces tomahawk library. Every single line of code of that lib is currently written by me. I have committer rights to myfaces. The main issue is, that the library itself probably will end up as separate myfaces subproject. The main issue is, is any incubation needed, or can the code just be merged in. Or does a ip clearance/software grant has to be performed upfront. The code was developed outside of the myfaces repo, but the coderights, and licensing issues are in the clear! Kind regards Werner Punz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BlueSky is clouded
+1 Sent from my iPod. Am 05.07.2008 um 20:43 schrieb Bernd Fondermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Hi, I just noticed that BlueSky did not report anything since being voted into incubation in January and is not linked from the incubator website. There is activity, on-list and in svn. I posted to their dev list to ping the people there. So, I guess they'd need to report for the next three months? Bernd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ping...
testing email address... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping...
...pong! (sorry for the noise) -M On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: testing email address... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [docs] Sitemap...?
nice +1 On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm currently working on some improvements to audit (yes i know - six months late). i'm plan to use texen to generate indexes for the audit pages. so, i finally got round to porting the sitemap code from the w.a.o site. take a look at http://incubator.apache.org/sitemap.html opinions? it's not yet included as part of the standard. if people think it's a good idea, i'll integrate it. otherwise, i'll probably just delete it. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Podling reporting schedule
Hi, it is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule -M On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Silly me, I can't find the official podling reporting schedule. Can anyone give me a pointer? Thanks, Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Champion sought for MyFaces Alchemy Proposal
I could act as mentor / champion as I am a member of the ASF. Currently I am limited to work... b/c of a broken arm... But generally I could help a bit in building a community around the bits... Is the goal doing a incubation or just a software grant ? -M On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Jihoon Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! My name is Jihoon Kim and I was hoping if I could have a volunteer in helping me for the proposal of MyFaces Alchemy project. It will be a subproject under MyFaces and as the name tips it off, MyFaces is the sponsor of the subproject. The exact details regarding the project has been written in a post titled [[PROPOSAL] FLEX and JSF integration [MyFaces Alchemy]] and the section titled 13.3 should be Sponsoring Entity. Thanks!!! -- Sincerely, Ji Hoon Kim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RCF Status?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Incubating since: May 2007. The project sources have not yet been committed to Apache svn. I've checked http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-rcf-dev/, as well, and there is hardly any traffic, although in December 2007 you mentioned that there was work happening to bring the code into the ASF. yes. we meet yesterday about our strategy to get the code finally out. Can you please elaborate on the status and issues? the current status is, that there is no code yet in the ASF svn repo. We all want to get is out as soon as possible! No doubt to that. We have some internal (oracle) discussion about migration for our existing customers, since the code-base is already used inside the company. We will have some more meetings before we can commit the initial code base. So, to sum it up, we must align our donation to open source with current oracle deliverable dates and branches to ensure existing products and customers are not affected. We don't want a through it over the wall donation. We want one that is used within the community and Oracle, so we currently are discussion the migration strategy. -Matthias --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Report reviews
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was away at ApacheCon (with fairly lousy 'net access, sadly)... I just updated Lucene.Net's April report. not my experience, i found the connection pretty good and fast (even upload) hrm, depends. once in a while it was very bad. but generally OK... during my talk I had no connection :-) -M johan -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Report reviews
I added a note on RCF -M On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if people are actively following the page or the diffs, so here's a summary of my review. OK: * CouchDB * PDFBox (I'm a mentor) * Tika (I'm a mentor) OK with comments: * CXF - Good luck for the TLP! * Imperius - Issues before graduation? * JSPWiki - Issues before graduation? * Qpid - Did you understand the IPMC concerns about diversity? The report seems to indicate otherwise. Also missing: Qpid is ...? Incubating since? * Sanselan - Issues before graduation? * Shindig - Issues before graduation? * UIMA - Too comfortable in the Incubator? Focus on growing the community and on graduating! Report missing: * Buildr * FtpServer * Ivy * RCF * JuiCE * Lucene.Net BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Oracle contribution to Apache MyFaces
It's been more than the 72 hours required, so I'll go ahead and close this thread and let the project know that the code has been cleared for import. regards, Matthias On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oracle has contributed some new translation message bundles to Apache MyFaces (for the Trinidad project): - The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant. - The code (+ checksums) was uploaded to Jira issue TRINIDAD-744.[1] - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site.[2] * - The vote to accept it passed. [3] Please let me know of any issues. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-744 [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/trinidad-translations.html * this is an outdated version. Yesterday Sam Ruby confirmed to me that the software grant is on file, so I updated the XML document and committed it to the SVN. [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27733.html -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[IP CLEARANCE] Oracle contribution to Apache MyFaces
Oracle has contributed some new translation message bundles to Apache MyFaces (for the Trinidad project): - The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant. - The code (+ checksums) was uploaded to Jira issue TRINIDAD-744.[1] - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site.[2] * - The vote to accept it passed. [3] Please let me know of any issues. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-744 [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/trinidad-translations.html * this is an outdated version. Yesterday Sam Ruby confirmed to me that the software grant is on file, so I updated the XML document and committed it to the SVN. [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27733.html -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation
=== Not applicable === Required Resources === * Mailing lists: * couchdb-pmc for private PMC discussions (with moderated subscriptions) * couchdb-dev * couchdb-commits * couchdb-user * Subversion Directory: * https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb * Issue Tracking: * JIRA couchdb === Initial Committers === * William Beh * Damien Katz * Jan Lehnardt * Christopher Lenz * Sam Ruby * Dirk Schalge * Noah Slater == Sponsors == === Champion === Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Nominated Mentors === * Jim Jagielski * Gianugo Rabellino * Ted Leung === Sponsoring Entity === The Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept PDFBox for incubation
+1 On Feb 1, 2008 3:48 PM, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 from me, obviously. On 01.02.2008 15:18:51 Jukka Zitting wrote: Incubator PMC, Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor the PDFBox podling, with myself, Jeremias Maerki, and Niall Pemberton as the mentors. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and only votes from the Incubator PMC are binding. [X] +1 Accept PDFBox as a new podling [ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please) Here's my +1 BR, Jukka Zitting snip/ Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package names (was Re: PLEASE READ: package names, trademarks and legal advice)
sorry for hijacking the thread. On Jan 23, 2008 11:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Legally, all we can do is ask them to change the package names and if they don't, there's nothing we can do so, does this mean: -during incubation the packages should be renamed to org.apache.* but not on the start? -is org.apache.* an exit criteria ? I think yes -M -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation
+1 (non-binding) for this cool podling -M On Dec 1, 2007 11:38 AM, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian McCallister wrote: This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. [X] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container
== The Apache Incubator. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] RAT to enter incubator
to check signatures. Required Resources Mailing lists: * rat-private * rat-dev * rat-commits Subversion Directory: [WWW] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat Issue Tracking: JIRA (RAT) Other Resources: Continuous integration may eventually required hardware Initial Committers --- * Stefan Bodewig bodewig AT apache.org * Robert Burrell Donkin rdonkin AT apache.org * Nodet Guillaume gnodet AT apache.org * Garrett Rooney rooneg AT apache.org * Matthieu Riou mriou AT apache.org * Jochen Wiedmann jochen AT apache.org * Henri Yandell bayard AT apache.org * Karl Pauls pauls AT apache.org Sponsors === Champion Robert Burrell Donkin Mentors * Yoav Shapira yoavs AT guess ;) * Ross Gardler rgardler AT apache.org * Matt Hogstrom hogstrom AT apache.org * Jim Jagielski jim AT apache.org The final destination is still uncertain. If RAT accumulates code then it is possible that a top level project would be appropriate. If RAT pushes code out to other projects then it might make more sense as a subproject of Maven or Gump. If RAT is finished before it creates a viable community then it may make sense as an Incubator subproject. So I would like to ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor RAT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache RAT
On 10/25/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RATify? that sounds cool(er) ;) Or rat as in the verb - to rat on something ;-) On 25/10/2007, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RAT is a good name and popular but i'm still a little concerned that there are existing open source projects named RAT as well as commercial software containing RAT in their name. aRATicate, known as RAT for short? ;-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Oracle contribution to Apache MyFaces
Please see also this mail: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200707.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] this group agreed on a straightforward software grant :-) -M On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oracle has contributed the JSF Portlet Bridge (JSR-301) code to Apache MyFaces: - The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant. - The code was uploaded to Jira issue MYFACES-1664.[1] - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site.[2] - The vote to accept it passed. [3] Please let me know of any issues. Regards, -Scott O'Bryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The meta-data problem, redux -- call for help
According to incubator-info.txt: March, June, September, December ADF Faces that's trinidad, and already part of the MyFaces project. Can you remove the entry ? -Matthias Kabuki UIMA Kabuki is long closed; log4php, River and TripleSoup aren't even listed, nor are Sanselan and Sling. In other words, this is a mess. Would it make sense to add a started/graduated/retired projects list to the report template? That might make it easier to follow the status transitions going on all the time. That is already part of the STATUS document. The problem is that we have all sorts of data stored in way too many places, constantly getting out of synch. This is an issue we really need to address, and I've asked for suggestions. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
