Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

I have updated the Apache ResilientDB (incubating) website to host the
Inter font stylesheet on our domain instead of using Google APIs. It is now
served from https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/ to comply with ASF
policies.

Please let me know if there are any more issues or if further updates are
required.

Best regards,
Apratim
apra...@apache.org
Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team

On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:29 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:

> There is a problem with the web site. It loads static content from:
>
>
> https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@100;200;300;400;500;600;700;800;900=swap
>
> The ASF does not allow ASF projects to have web sites contact
> googleapis or similar external sites that will try to track our users.
>
> Ideally, you should change your web site to fetch this file from
> apache.org - i.e. you can deploy a copy of this file to
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/ and use that instead.
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 at 02:02, Apratim Shukla
>  wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I hope this message finds you well. As a member of the Apache ResilientDB
> > (incubating) team, I am writing to inform you that we have addressed the
> > feedback concerning the downloads section of our website.
> >
> >1. We have removed the signature badge from the downloads section to
> >eliminate any confusion regarding the verification of our downloadable
> >files as requested.
> >2. The SHA256 badges have been updated to ensure they align with the
> >standard format expected by automated checkers.
> >3. We have renamed the "GitHub" text to "ResilientDB" to correctly
> >reflect our project's identity and maintain consistency across our
> >documentation.
> >
> > These updates have been implemented and are live on our website at
> > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/.
> >
> > Please let me know if any further updates or modifications need to be
> made.
> >
> > Thank you for your guidance and support.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Apratim
> > apra...@apache.org
> > Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:53 PM sebb  wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 00:22, Apratim Shukla
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your guidance regarding the management of the Downloads
> > > > section on our website.
> > > >
> > > > I am writing to inform you that the Apache ResilientDB (Incubating)
> team
> > > > has updated the Downloads section of our website -
> > > > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/. We have clearly labeled
> the
> > > > available download artifacts to specify that they are non-ASF
> releases.
> > > > Moreover, we've added a badge to the Downloads section to further
> > > highlight
> > > > that these are non-ASF.
> > > >
> > > > Please feel free to review these modifications at your convenience.
> If
> > > > there are any further changes or additional clarifications needed,
> do not
> > > > hesitate to let me know.
> > >
> > > The contents of the SHA256 link are not in the standard format
> > > expected by automated checkers.
> > >
> > > The  'Sign' link downloads a file in UTF-16 format, and are actually a
> > > SHA256 hash for a different file entirely.
> > > The word 'Sign' is not applicable; it should probably be 'Signature'.
> > > Also a signature file requires a KEYS file for verification.
> > > In this case, the Sign link should probably be dropped.
> > >
> > > It's also confusing that the download box is headed "GitHub
> v1.9.0"
> > >
> > > > Warm regards,
> > > > Apratim
> > > > apra...@apache.org
> > > > Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:35 PM Craig Russell  >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering
> > > incubation,
> > > > > it's fine to disable the download section.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly
> identify
> > > the
> > > > > download artifacts as non-ASF releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > Warm regards,
> > > > > Craig
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim Shukla
> > > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Greetings,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache
> > > > > ResilientDB
> > > > > > (Incubating) project website -
> > > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
> > > > > .
> > > > > > Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are
> considering
> > > > > > temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our
> first
> > > > > > official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly
> > > > > appreciated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for your support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Apratim
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:
> > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[PJ Fanning]

There is a problem with the web site. It loads static content from:

https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@100;200;300;400;500;600;700;800;900=swap

The ASF does not allow ASF projects to have web sites contact
googleapis or similar external sites that will try to track our users.

Ideally, you should change your web site to fetch this file from
apache.org - i.e. you can deploy a copy of this file to
https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/ and use that instead.


On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 at 02:02, Apratim Shukla
 wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I hope this message finds you well. As a member of the Apache ResilientDB
> (incubating) team, I am writing to inform you that we have addressed the
> feedback concerning the downloads section of our website.
>
>1. We have removed the signature badge from the downloads section to
>eliminate any confusion regarding the verification of our downloadable
>files as requested.
>2. The SHA256 badges have been updated to ensure they align with the
>standard format expected by automated checkers.
>3. We have renamed the "GitHub" text to "ResilientDB" to correctly
>reflect our project's identity and maintain consistency across our
>documentation.
>
> These updates have been implemented and are live on our website at
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/.
>
> Please let me know if any further updates or modifications need to be made.
>
> Thank you for your guidance and support.
>
> Best regards,
> Apratim
> apra...@apache.org
> Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:53 PM sebb  wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 00:22, Apratim Shukla
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your guidance regarding the management of the Downloads
> > > section on our website.
> > >
> > > I am writing to inform you that the Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) team
> > > has updated the Downloads section of our website -
> > > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/. We have clearly labeled the
> > > available download artifacts to specify that they are non-ASF releases.
> > > Moreover, we've added a badge to the Downloads section to further
> > highlight
> > > that these are non-ASF.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to review these modifications at your convenience. If
> > > there are any further changes or additional clarifications needed, do not
> > > hesitate to let me know.
> >
> > The contents of the SHA256 link are not in the standard format
> > expected by automated checkers.
> >
> > The  'Sign' link downloads a file in UTF-16 format, and are actually a
> > SHA256 hash for a different file entirely.
> > The word 'Sign' is not applicable; it should probably be 'Signature'.
> > Also a signature file requires a KEYS file for verification.
> > In this case, the Sign link should probably be dropped.
> >
> > It's also confusing that the download box is headed "GitHubv1.9.0"
> >
> > > Warm regards,
> > > Apratim
> > > apra...@apache.org
> > > Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:35 PM Craig Russell 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering
> > incubation,
> > > > it's fine to disable the download section.
> > > >
> > > > Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly identify
> > the
> > > > download artifacts as non-ASF releases.
> > > >
> > > > Warm regards,
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim Shukla
> > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Greetings,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache
> > > > ResilientDB
> > > > > (Incubating) project website -
> > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
> > > > .
> > > > > Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are considering
> > > > > temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our first
> > > > > official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly
> > > > appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for your support.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Apratim
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen
> >  > > > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any
> > > > formal
> > > > >>> released code.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
> > > > >> There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
> > > > >> the Incubator.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> For the download links, should it be the link of the
> > > > >>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
> > > > >>> ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Yes, for KEYS, hashes and 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

I hope this message finds you well. As a member of the Apache ResilientDB
(incubating) team, I am writing to inform you that we have addressed the
feedback concerning the downloads section of our website.

   1. We have removed the signature badge from the downloads section to
   eliminate any confusion regarding the verification of our downloadable
   files as requested.
   2. The SHA256 badges have been updated to ensure they align with the
   standard format expected by automated checkers.
   3. We have renamed the "GitHub" text to "ResilientDB" to correctly
   reflect our project's identity and maintain consistency across our
   documentation.

These updates have been implemented and are live on our website at
https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/.

Please let me know if any further updates or modifications need to be made.

Thank you for your guidance and support.

Best regards,
Apratim
apra...@apache.org
Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:53 PM sebb  wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 00:22, Apratim Shukla
>  wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Thank you for your guidance regarding the management of the Downloads
> > section on our website.
> >
> > I am writing to inform you that the Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) team
> > has updated the Downloads section of our website -
> > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/. We have clearly labeled the
> > available download artifacts to specify that they are non-ASF releases.
> > Moreover, we've added a badge to the Downloads section to further
> highlight
> > that these are non-ASF.
> >
> > Please feel free to review these modifications at your convenience. If
> > there are any further changes or additional clarifications needed, do not
> > hesitate to let me know.
>
> The contents of the SHA256 link are not in the standard format
> expected by automated checkers.
>
> The  'Sign' link downloads a file in UTF-16 format, and are actually a
> SHA256 hash for a different file entirely.
> The word 'Sign' is not applicable; it should probably be 'Signature'.
> Also a signature file requires a KEYS file for verification.
> In this case, the Sign link should probably be dropped.
>
> It's also confusing that the download box is headed "GitHubv1.9.0"
>
> > Warm regards,
> > Apratim
> > apra...@apache.org
> > Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:35 PM Craig Russell 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering
> incubation,
> > > it's fine to disable the download section.
> > >
> > > Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly identify
> the
> > > download artifacts as non-ASF releases.
> > >
> > > Warm regards,
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
> > > > On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim Shukla
> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache
> > > ResilientDB
> > > > (Incubating) project website -
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
> > > .
> > > > Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are considering
> > > > temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.
> > > >
> > > > Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our first
> > > > official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly
> > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your support.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Apratim
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen
>  > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any
> > > formal
> > > >>> released code.
> > > >>
> > > >> That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
> > > >> There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
> > > >> the Incubator.
> > > >>
> > > >>> For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For the download links, should it be the link of the
> > > >>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
> > > >>> ?
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, for KEYS, hashes and sigs.
> > > >> Source artifacts must use closer.lua.
> > > >> Your mentors should be able to help with this.
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Junchao
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:
> > > >>>
> > >  The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
> > >  (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
> > > 
> > >  Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not
> been
> > >  formally released.
> > >  The quick setup instructions should only reference released code,
> i.e.
> > >  code that has passed a formal vote.
> > > 
> > >  On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
> > >   wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > I'm pleased to announce 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[sebb]

On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 00:22, Apratim Shukla
 wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Thank you for your guidance regarding the management of the Downloads
> section on our website.
>
> I am writing to inform you that the Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) team
> has updated the Downloads section of our website -
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/. We have clearly labeled the
> available download artifacts to specify that they are non-ASF releases.
> Moreover, we've added a badge to the Downloads section to further highlight
> that these are non-ASF.
>
> Please feel free to review these modifications at your convenience. If
> there are any further changes or additional clarifications needed, do not
> hesitate to let me know.

The contents of the SHA256 link are not in the standard format
expected by automated checkers.

The  'Sign' link downloads a file in UTF-16 format, and are actually a
SHA256 hash for a different file entirely.
The word 'Sign' is not applicable; it should probably be 'Signature'.
Also a signature file requires a KEYS file for verification.
In this case, the Sign link should probably be dropped.

It's also confusing that the download box is headed "GitHubv1.9.0"

> Warm regards,
> Apratim
> apra...@apache.org
> Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:35 PM Craig Russell  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering incubation,
> > it's fine to disable the download section.
> >
> > Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly identify the
> > download artifacts as non-ASF releases.
> >
> > Warm regards,
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > > On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim Shukla 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache
> > ResilientDB
> > > (Incubating) project website - https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
> > .
> > > Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are considering
> > > temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.
> > >
> > > Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our first
> > > official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly
> > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your support.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Apratim
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen  > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any
> > formal
> > >>> released code.
> > >>
> > >> That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
> > >> There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
> > >> the Incubator.
> > >>
> > >>> For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
> > >>>
> > >>> For the download links, should it be the link of the
> > >>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
> > >>> ?
> > >>
> > >> Yes, for KEYS, hashes and sigs.
> > >> Source artifacts must use closer.lua.
> > >> Your mentors should be able to help with this.
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Junchao
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:
> > >>>
> >  The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
> >  (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
> > 
> >  Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
> >  formally released.
> >  The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
> >  code that has passed a formal vote.
> > 
> >  On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
> >   wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache
> > >> ResilientDB
> > > (Incubating) website, now live at
> >  https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
> > >
> > > The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for
> > >> improved
> > > user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for
> > >> continuous
> > > deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community
> > >> and
> > > showcase the project’s capabilities.
> > >
> > > Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your support.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Apratim
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi <
> > >> msado...@expolab.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear Justin
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand
> > >> version
> >  of the
> > >> website to address all your comments.
> > >>
> > >> Here is a quick response to your feedback.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the
> > >> project?*These
> > >> companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC
> >  Davis; no
> > >> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

Thank you for your guidance regarding the management of the Downloads
section on our website.

I am writing to inform you that the Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) team
has updated the Downloads section of our website -
https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/. We have clearly labeled the
available download artifacts to specify that they are non-ASF releases.
Moreover, we've added a badge to the Downloads section to further highlight
that these are non-ASF.

Please feel free to review these modifications at your convenience. If
there are any further changes or additional clarifications needed, do not
hesitate to let me know.

Warm regards,
Apratim
apra...@apache.org
Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) Team

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:35 PM Craig Russell  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering incubation,
> it's fine to disable the download section.
>
> Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly identify the
> download artifacts as non-ASF releases.
>
> Warm regards,
> Craig
>
>
> > On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim Shukla 
> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache
> ResilientDB
> > (Incubating) project website - https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
> .
> > Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are considering
> > temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.
> >
> > Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our first
> > official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly
> appreciated.
> >
> > Thank you for your support.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Apratim
> >
> > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen  >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any
> formal
> >>> released code.
> >>
> >> That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
> >> There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
> >> the Incubator.
> >>
> >>> For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
> >>>
> >>> For the download links, should it be the link of the
> >>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
> >>> ?
> >>
> >> Yes, for KEYS, hashes and sigs.
> >> Source artifacts must use closer.lua.
> >> Your mentors should be able to help with this.
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Junchao
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:
> >>>
>  The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
>  (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
> 
>  Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
>  formally released.
>  The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
>  code that has passed a formal vote.
> 
>  On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
>   wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache
> >> ResilientDB
> > (Incubating) website, now live at
>  https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
> >
> > The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for
> >> improved
> > user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for
> >> continuous
> > deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community
> >> and
> > showcase the project’s capabilities.
> >
> > Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
> >
> > Thank you for your support.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Apratim
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi <
> >> msado...@expolab.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Justin
> >>
> >> Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand
> >> version
>  of the
> >> website to address all your comments.
> >>
> >> Here is a quick response to your feedback.
> >>
> >>
> >> *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the
> >> project?*These
> >> companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC
>  Davis; no
> >> commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
> >>
> >> *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS
> >> files*
> >> We will fix it.
> >>
> >> *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This
> >> is
> >> problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't
> >> have a
> >> leader.*
> >> I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC
>  Davis. We
> >> will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will
> >> use the
> >> following template.
> >>
> >> https://spark.apache.org/
> >> https://flink.apache.org/
> >> https://hadoop.apache.org/
> >> https://sedona.apache.org/
> >>
> >> *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Craig Russell]

Hi,

Yes, if there are no releases from the project since entering incubation, it's 
fine to disable the download section.

Or if you want to expend the extra effort, you could clearly identify the 
download artifacts as non-ASF releases.

Warm regards,
Craig


> On May 30, 2024, at 21:51, Apratim Shukla  
> wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache ResilientDB
> (Incubating) project website - https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/.
> Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are considering
> temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.
> 
> Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our first
> official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thank you for your support.
> 
> Best regards,
> Apratim
> 
> On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any formal
>>> released code.
>> 
>> That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
>> There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
>> the Incubator.
>> 
>>> For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
>>> 
>>> For the download links, should it be the link of the
>>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
>>> ?
>> 
>> Yes, for KEYS, hashes and sigs.
>> Source artifacts must use closer.lua.
>> Your mentors should be able to help with this.
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Junchao
>>> 
>>> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:
>>> 
 The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
 (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
 
 Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
 formally released.
 The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
 code that has passed a formal vote.
 
 On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
  wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache
>> ResilientDB
> (Incubating) website, now live at
 https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
> 
> The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for
>> improved
> user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for
>> continuous
> deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community
>> and
> showcase the project’s capabilities.
> 
> Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
> 
> Thank you for your support.
> 
> Best regards,
> Apratim
> 
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi <
>> msado...@expolab.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Justin
>> 
>> Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand
>> version
 of the
>> website to address all your comments.
>> 
>> Here is a quick response to your feedback.
>> 
>> 
>> *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the
>> project?*These
>> companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC
 Davis; no
>> commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
>> 
>> *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS
>> files*
>> We will fix it.
>> 
>> *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This
>> is
>> problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't
>> have a
>> leader.*
>> I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC
 Davis. We
>> will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will
>> use the
>> following template.
>> 
>> https://spark.apache.org/
>> https://flink.apache.org/
>> https://hadoop.apache.org/
>> https://sedona.apache.org/
>> 
>> *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the
>> PMC*
>> Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.
>> 
>> *- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is
>> problematic.
 You
>> can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the
>> community.*
>> Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.
>> 
>> *- you use resilientdb.com  email
>> address for
>> contact and support.*
>> We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.
>> 
>> *- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF
 project
>> is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be
 commercial
>> offerings?*
>> We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is
>> based
>> mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development
>> and
>> community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
>> open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and
>> development,
 and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

I am reaching out to discuss the download section on the Apache ResilientDB
(Incubating) project website - https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/.
Since we do not have any approved releases yet, we are considering
temporarily hiding this section to avoid any potential confusion.

Could we proceed with disabling the download section until our first
official release? Your advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Apratim

On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 1:11 AM sebb  wrote:

> On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any formal
> > released code.
>
> That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
> There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
> the Incubator.
>
> > For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
> >
> > For the download links, should it be the link of the
> > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
> > ?
>
> Yes, for KEYS, hashes and sigs.
> Source artifacts must use closer.lua.
> Your mentors should be able to help with this.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Junchao
> >
> > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:
> >
> > > The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
> > > (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
> > >
> > > Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
> > > formally released.
> > > The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
> > > code that has passed a formal vote.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache
> ResilientDB
> > > > (Incubating) website, now live at
> > > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
> > > >
> > > > The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for
> improved
> > > > user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for
> continuous
> > > > deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community
> and
> > > > showcase the project’s capabilities.
> > > >
> > > > Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your support.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Apratim
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi <
> msado...@expolab.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Justin
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand
> version
> > > of the
> > > > > website to address all your comments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is a quick response to your feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the
> project?*These
> > > > > companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC
> > > Davis; no
> > > > > commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
> > > > >
> > > > > *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS
> files*
> > > > > We will fix it.
> > > > >
> > > > > *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This
> is
> > > > > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't
> have a
> > > > > leader.*
> > > > > I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC
> > > Davis. We
> > > > > will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will
> use the
> > > > > following template.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://spark.apache.org/
> > > > > https://flink.apache.org/
> > > > > https://hadoop.apache.org/
> > > > > https://sedona.apache.org/
> > > > >
> > > > > *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the
> PMC*
> > > > > Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.
> > > > >
> > > > > *- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is
> problematic.
> > > You
> > > > > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the
> community.*
> > > > > Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.
> > > > >
> > > > > *- you use resilientdb.com  email
> address for
> > > > > contact and support.*
> > > > > We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.
> > > > >
> > > > > *- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF
> > > project
> > > > > is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be
> > > commercial
> > > > > offerings?*
> > > > > We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is
> based
> > > > > mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development
> and
> > > > > community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
> > > > > open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and
> development,
> > > and
> > > > > we do not have any commercialization plan.
> > > > >
> > > > > *- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.*
> > > > > This is our application stack built on top of ResilientDB.
> Essentially
> > > it
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[sebb]

On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 08:10, Junchao Chen  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any formal
> released code.

That is not the impression given by the website or GitHub.
There is no indication that any of the downloads are not approved by
the Incubator.

> For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.
>
> For the download links, should it be the link of the
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
> ?

Yes, for KEYS, hashes and sigs.
Source artifacts must use closer.lua.
Your mentors should be able to help with this.

> Thanks,
> Junchao
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:
>
> > The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
> > (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
> >
> > Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
> > formally released.
> > The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
> > code that has passed a formal vote.
> >
> > On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache ResilientDB
> > > (Incubating) website, now live at
> > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
> > >
> > > The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for improved
> > > user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for continuous
> > > deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community and
> > > showcase the project’s capabilities.
> > >
> > > Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your support.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Apratim
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Justin
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand version
> > of the
> > > > website to address all your comments.
> > > >
> > > > Here is a quick response to your feedback.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?*These
> > > > companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC
> > Davis; no
> > > > commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
> > > >
> > > > *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files*
> > > > We will fix it.
> > > >
> > > > *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This is
> > > > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> > > > leader.*
> > > > I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC
> > Davis. We
> > > > will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will use the
> > > > following template.
> > > >
> > > > https://spark.apache.org/
> > > > https://flink.apache.org/
> > > > https://hadoop.apache.org/
> > > > https://sedona.apache.org/
> > > >
> > > > *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC*
> > > > Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.
> > > >
> > > > *- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic.
> > You
> > > > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.*
> > > > Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.
> > > >
> > > > *- you use resilientdb.com  email address for
> > > > contact and support.*
> > > > We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.
> > > >
> > > > *- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF
> > project
> > > > is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be
> > commercial
> > > > offerings?*
> > > > We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is based
> > > > mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development and
> > > > community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
> > > > open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and development,
> > and
> > > > we do not have any commercialization plan.
> > > >
> > > > *- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.*
> > > > This is our application stack built on top of ResilientDB. Essentially
> > it
> > > > is toolsets. The main tools have already been transferred into the
> > Apache
> > > > incubator repo as well.
> > > >
> > > > *- The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation,
> > events,
> > > > license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]*
> > > > We will add the missing elseents.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > > > Associate Professor
> > > > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > > > Department of Computer Science
> > > > University of California, Davis
> > > >
> > > > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > > > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > > > Phone: 914-319-7937
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:20 AM Justin Mclean <
> > jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > A few questions 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

Hi,

Currently, we are working on our first release, we don't have any formal
released code.
For this channel, we are aiming to obtain votes for our release.

For the download links, should it be the link of the
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/
?

Thanks,
Junchao

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:01 AM sebb  wrote:

> The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
> (and the signature button does not link to the signature)
>
> Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
> formally released.
> The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
> code that has passed a formal vote.
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
>  wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache ResilientDB
> > (Incubating) website, now live at
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
> >
> > The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for improved
> > user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for continuous
> > deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community and
> > showcase the project’s capabilities.
> >
> > Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
> >
> > Thank you for your support.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Apratim
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Justin
> > >
> > > Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand version
> of the
> > > website to address all your comments.
> > >
> > > Here is a quick response to your feedback.
> > >
> > >
> > > *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?*These
> > > companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC
> Davis; no
> > > commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
> > >
> > > *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files*
> > > We will fix it.
> > >
> > > *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This is
> > > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> > > leader.*
> > > I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC
> Davis. We
> > > will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will use the
> > > following template.
> > >
> > > https://spark.apache.org/
> > > https://flink.apache.org/
> > > https://hadoop.apache.org/
> > > https://sedona.apache.org/
> > >
> > > *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC*
> > > Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.
> > >
> > > *- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic.
> You
> > > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.*
> > > Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.
> > >
> > > *- you use resilientdb.com  email address for
> > > contact and support.*
> > > We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.
> > >
> > > *- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF
> project
> > > is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be
> commercial
> > > offerings?*
> > > We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is based
> > > mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development and
> > > community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
> > > open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and development,
> and
> > > we do not have any commercialization plan.
> > >
> > > *- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.*
> > > This is our application stack built on top of ResilientDB. Essentially
> it
> > > is toolsets. The main tools have already been transferred into the
> Apache
> > > incubator repo as well.
> > >
> > > *- The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation,
> events,
> > > license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]*
> > > We will add the missing elseents.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > > Associate Professor
> > > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > > Department of Computer Science
> > > University of California, Davis
> > >
> > > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > > Phone: 914-319-7937
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:20 AM Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > A few questions occurred to me when looking at the website:
> > > > - You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?
> > > > - You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files
> > > > - You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator” This is
> > > > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have
> a
> > > > leader.
> > > > - There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC
> > > > - You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic.
> You
> > > > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[sebb]

The download links are not in compliance with ASF policy.
(and the signature button does not link to the signature)

Also the quick setup section links directly to code that has not been
formally released.
The quick setup instructions should only reference released code, i.e.
code that has passed a formal vote.

On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 02:40, Apratim Shukla
 wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache ResilientDB
> (Incubating) website, now live at https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.
>
> The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for improved
> user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for continuous
> deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community and
> showcase the project’s capabilities.
>
> Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.
>
> Thank you for your support.
>
> Best regards,
> Apratim
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi 
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Justin
> >
> > Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand version of the
> > website to address all your comments.
> >
> > Here is a quick response to your feedback.
> >
> >
> > *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?*These
> > companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC Davis; no
> > commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
> >
> > *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files*
> > We will fix it.
> >
> > *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This is
> > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> > leader.*
> > I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC Davis. We
> > will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will use the
> > following template.
> >
> > https://spark.apache.org/
> > https://flink.apache.org/
> > https://hadoop.apache.org/
> > https://sedona.apache.org/
> >
> > *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC*
> > Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.
> >
> > *- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You
> > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.*
> > Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.
> >
> > *- you use resilientdb.com  email address for
> > contact and support.*
> > We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.
> >
> > *- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project
> > is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be commercial
> > offerings?*
> > We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is based
> > mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development and
> > community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
> > open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and development, and
> > we do not have any commercialization plan.
> >
> > *- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.*
> > This is our application stack built on top of ResilientDB. Essentially it
> > is toolsets. The main tools have already been transferred into the Apache
> > incubator repo as well.
> >
> > *- The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation, events,
> > license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]*
> > We will add the missing elseents.
> >
> > ---
> > Best Regards,
> > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > Associate Professor
> > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > Department of Computer Science
> > University of California, Davis
> >
> > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > Phone: 914-319-7937
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:20 AM Justin Mclean 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A few questions occurred to me when looking at the website:
> > > - You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?
> > > - You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files
> > > - You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator” This is
> > > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> > > leader.
> > > - There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC
> > > - You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You
> > > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.
> > > - you use resilientdb.com email address for contact and support.
> > > - The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project
> > > is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be
> > commercial
> > > offerings?
> > > - Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.
> > > - The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation,
> > events,
> > > license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]
> > >
> > > I suggest you engage with your mentors and get them to provide advice
> > here.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

I'm pleased to announce the launch of the redesigned Apache ResilientDB
(Incubating) website, now live at https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org.

The website has been rebuilt using Next.js and Tailwind CSS for improved
user experience and scalability, with CircleCI integrated for continuous
deployment. We believe these updates will better serve our community and
showcase the project’s capabilities.

Please visit the new site and share any feedback or required changes.

Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Apratim

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:08 PM Mohammad Sadoghi 
wrote:

> Dear Justin
>
> Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand version of the
> website to address all your comments.
>
> Here is a quick response to your feedback.
>
>
> *- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?*These
> companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC Davis; no
> commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.
>
> *- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files*
> We will fix it.
>
> *- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This is
> problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> leader.*
> I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC Davis. We
> will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will use the
> following template.
>
> https://spark.apache.org/
> https://flink.apache.org/
> https://hadoop.apache.org/
> https://sedona.apache.org/
>
> *- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC*
> Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.
>
> *- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You
> can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.*
> Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.
>
> *- you use resilientdb.com  email address for
> contact and support.*
> We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.
>
> *- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project
> is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be commercial
> offerings?*
> We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is based
> mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development and
> community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
> open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and development, and
> we do not have any commercialization plan.
>
> *- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.*
> This is our application stack built on top of ResilientDB. Essentially it
> is toolsets. The main tools have already been transferred into the Apache
> incubator repo as well.
>
> *- The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation, events,
> license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]*
> We will add the missing elseents.
>
> ---
> Best Regards,
> Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> Associate Professor
> Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> Department of Computer Science
> University of California, Davis
>
> ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> Phone: 914-319-7937
>
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:20 AM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > A few questions occurred to me when looking at the website:
> > - You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?
> > - You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files
> > - You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator” This is
> > problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> > leader.
> > - There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC
> > - You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You
> > can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.
> > - you use resilientdb.com email address for contact and support.
> > - The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project
> > is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be
> commercial
> > offerings?
> > - Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.
> > - The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation,
> events,
> > license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]
> >
> > I suggest you engage with your mentors and get them to provide advice
> here.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Mohammad Sadoghi]

Dear Justin

Thank you for your detailed feedback. We will create a brand version of the
website to address all your comments.

Here is a quick response to your feedback.


*- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?*These
companies funded basic research and development at ExpoLab at UC Davis; no
commercial interests. So we will keep it separate.

*- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files*
We will fix it.

*- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator.” This is
problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
leader.*
I serve as the principal investigator in my research group at UC Davis. We
will remove this from the website that we are creating. We will use the
following template.

https://spark.apache.org/
https://flink.apache.org/
https://hadoop.apache.org/
https://sedona.apache.org/

*- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC*
Members will be removed from the new website for Apache.

*- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You
can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.*
Same as above. We will mark them as initial committers.

*- you use resilientdb.com  email address for
contact and support.*
We will use d...@resilientdb.apache.org instead.

*- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project
is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be commercial
offerings?*
We have a testnet live for public use since last October. It is based
mostly on cost-effective small cloud installations for development and
community purposes. Our project has been active since 2018 (and
open-sourced since 2019). Our focus has been research and development, and
we do not have any commercialization plan.

*- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.*
This is our application stack built on top of ResilientDB. Essentially it
is toolsets. The main tools have already been transferred into the Apache
incubator repo as well.

*- The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation, events,
license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]*
We will add the missing elseents.

---
Best Regards,
Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
Associate Professor
Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
Department of Computer Science
University of California, Davis

ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
Phone: 914-319-7937


On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:20 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A few questions occurred to me when looking at the website:
> - You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?
> - You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files
> - You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator” This is
> problematic from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a
> leader.
> - There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC
> - You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You
> can’t claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.
> - you use resilientdb.com email address for contact and support.
> - The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project
> is unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be commercial
> offerings?
> - Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.
> - The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation, events,
> license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1]
>
> I suggest you engage with your mentors and get them to provide advice here.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

A few questions occurred to me when looking at the website:
- You list sponsors, how do these companies sponsor the project?
- You list 1.9.0 for download, but there is no link to the KEYS files
- You list Mohammad Sadoghi as the “Principle Investigator” This is problematic 
from an ASF point of view. An ASF community doesn't have a leader.
- There are people listed on the page that are not part of the PMC 
- You list members of a “founding team”, again this is problematic. You can’t 
claim this as it is now an ASF project and run by the community.
- you use resilientdb.com email address for contact and support.
- The relationship between cloud offering and rsview and the ASF project is 
unclear. Are these also open source, or do they intend to be commercial 
offerings?
- Again the connection with ResillientApp is unlear.
- The website is misisng the required ASF links to the foundation, events, 
license, thanks, security, and privacy. [1] 

I suggest you engage with your mentors and get them to provide advice here.

Kind Regards,
Justin

1. https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

I'm pleased to update you on our latest improvements to Apache ResilientDB
(Incubating). We've implemented systemd services to tackle previous
downtime issues and introduced a new status page for real-time monitoring
at https://status.resilientdb.com/.

Our website now features updated images, the "incubating" keyword, and a
new download section. You can see these changes live at
https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/.

Additionally, our full software stack has been active on our live testnet
since October 2023, and some of our main services are accessible at:

   - GraphQL Cloud Interface: cloud.resilientdb.com/graphql
   - Explorer: explorer.resilientdb.com
   - Resview: resview.resilientdb.com

Please let me know if further modifications are needed.

Best regards,
Apratim

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:17 PM sebb  wrote:

> On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 21:11, Apratim Shukla
>  wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The website has been updated with the required Incubator disclaimer as
> > requested. The changes are now live at
> > https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
>
> Thanks, however I could not find a download page.
>
> Also, the menu links mostly don't work.
>
> > Best regards,
> > Apratim
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:23 AM sebb  wrote:
> >
> > > The website does not appear to have the required Incubator disclaimer.
> > >
> > > Also I could not find a download page for the source code (which
> > > should also have the disclaimer).
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:33, Mohammad Sadoghi 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before
> advancing
> > > to
> > > > the voting phase? Thank you kindly.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > > > Associate Professor
> > > > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > > > Department of Computer Science
> > > > University of California, Davis
> > > >
> > > > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > > > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > > > Phone: 914-319-7937
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen
>  > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Fanning,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the help.
> > > > >
> > > > > I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to
> spell
> > > out
> > > > > what
> > > > > > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have
> work
> > > to do
> > > > > to
> > > > > > get the license corrected. You could list that in the
> DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen
> > > 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > > > > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > > > > > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > > > > > >  is
> outdated
> > > > > and I
> > > > > > > have removed it from our source code.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > also fixed the typo.
> > > > > > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > > > > > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the LICENSE,
> > > > > > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > > > > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > > > > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Junchao
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament <
> > > johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament <
> > > johndam...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > > > > > >  > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> I have 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[sebb]

On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 21:11, Apratim Shukla
 wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The website has been updated with the required Incubator disclaimer as
> requested. The changes are now live at
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/

Thanks, however I could not find a download page.

Also, the menu links mostly don't work.

> Best regards,
> Apratim
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:23 AM sebb  wrote:
>
> > The website does not appear to have the required Incubator disclaimer.
> >
> > Also I could not find a download page for the source code (which
> > should also have the disclaimer).
> >
> > On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:33, Mohammad Sadoghi 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before advancing
> > to
> > > the voting phase? Thank you kindly.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > > Associate Professor
> > > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > > Department of Computer Science
> > > University of California, Davis
> > >
> > > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > > Phone: 914-319-7937
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Fanning,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the help.
> > > >
> > > > I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> > > > >
> > > > > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell
> > out
> > > > what
> > > > > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work
> > to do
> > > > to
> > > > > get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen
> > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > > > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > > > > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > > > > >  is outdated
> > > > and I
> > > > > > have removed it from our source code.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > also fixed the typo.
> > > > > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > > > > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the LICENSE,
> > > > > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > > > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > > > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Junchao
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > > > > >  > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and
> > > > there
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > >> no
> > > > > > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > > > > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > > > > >> necessary.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for
> > RocksDB
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache
> > > > > License
> > > > > > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.
> > So I
> > > > > > > suspect
> > > > > > > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you
> > actually
> > > > > > wanted
> > > > > > > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> > > > > > contents
> > > > > > > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when
> > > > building,
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > should reference those separately, likely under a binary
> > release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just wondering, 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[PJ Fanning]

Hi Apratim,

I think you should change the text in the home page where it says 'Apache
ResilientDB' to say 'Apache ResilientDB (Incubating)'.

The first instance should be changed at least.

Apache ResilientDB (Incubating) offers a high-throughput yielding
distributed ledger built upon scale-centric design principles to
democratize and decentralize computation.

Having the Apache Incubator logo above the button for 'Visit the API
Playground' also seems like a mistake that was made. Shouldn't that have a
different logo - something ResilientDB specific?



On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 21:11, Apratim Shukla 
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> The website has been updated with the required Incubator disclaimer as
> requested. The changes are now live at
> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
>
> Best regards,
> Apratim
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:23 AM sebb  wrote:
>
> > The website does not appear to have the required Incubator disclaimer.
> >
> > Also I could not find a download page for the source code (which
> > should also have the disclaimer).
> >
> > On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:33, Mohammad Sadoghi 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before advancing
> > to
> > > the voting phase? Thank you kindly.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > > Associate Professor
> > > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > > Department of Computer Science
> > > University of California, Davis
> > >
> > > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > > Phone: 914-319-7937
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen
>  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Fanning,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the help.
> > > >
> > > > I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> > > > >
> > > > > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell
> > out
> > > > what
> > > > > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work
> > to do
> > > > to
> > > > > get the license corrected. You could list that in the
> DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen
> > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > > > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > > > > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > > > > >  is
> outdated
> > > > and I
> > > > > > have removed it from our source code.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > also fixed the typo.
> > > > > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > > > > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the LICENSE,
> > > > > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > > > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > > > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Junchao
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > > > > >  > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files,
> and
> > > > there
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > >> no
> > > > > > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > > > > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project,
> it
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > > > > >> necessary.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for
> > RocksDB
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 +
> Apache
> > > > > License
> > > > > > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.
> > So I
> > > > > > > suspect
> > > > > > > > the real issue is that you 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Apratim Shukla]

Greetings,

The website has been updated with the required Incubator disclaimer as
requested. The changes are now live at
https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/

Best regards,
Apratim

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:23 AM sebb  wrote:

> The website does not appear to have the required Incubator disclaimer.
>
> Also I could not find a download page for the source code (which
> should also have the disclaimer).
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:33, Mohammad Sadoghi 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before advancing
> to
> > the voting phase? Thank you kindly.
> >
> > ---
> > Best Regards,
> > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > Associate Professor
> > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > Department of Computer Science
> > University of California, Davis
> >
> > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > Phone: 914-319-7937
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Fanning,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the help.
> > >
> > > I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > >
> > > > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> > > >
> > > > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell
> out
> > > what
> > > > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work
> to do
> > > to
> > > > get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > >
> > > > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen
> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > > > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > > > >  is outdated
> > > and I
> > > > > have removed it from our source code.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > >
> > > > > and
> > > > > also fixed the typo.
> > > > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > > > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For the LICENSE,
> > > > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Junchao
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > > > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and
> > > there
> > > > > are
> > > > > > >> no
> > > > > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > > > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it
> is
> > > not
> > > > > > >> necessary.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for
> RocksDB
> > > is
> > > > > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache
> > > > License
> > > > > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.
> So I
> > > > > > suspect
> > > > > > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you
> actually
> > > > > wanted
> > > > > > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> > > > > contents
> > > > > > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when
> > > building,
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > should reference those separately, likely under a binary
> release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their
> feedback
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a
> mentor
> > > > vote
> > > > > -1
> > > > > > at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since
> > > there
> > > > > was
> > > > > > no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing
> that
> > > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

Hi,

We have switched to DISCLAIMER-WIP since this is our first release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP

We are still in the voting phase and waiting for the review from the IPMCs,
the source code is only in:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1/

The download page is here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/resilientdb/


W e also have included
it here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/README.md#downloads



On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:23 AM sebb  wrote:

> The website does not appear to have the required Incubator disclaimer.
>
> Also I could not find a download page for the source code (which
> should also have the disclaimer).
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:33, Mohammad Sadoghi 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before advancing
> to
> > the voting phase? Thank you kindly.
> >
> > ---
> > Best Regards,
> > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> > Associate Professor
> > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> > Department of Computer Science
> > University of California, Davis
> >
> > ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> > ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> > Phone: 914-319-7937
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Fanning,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the help.
> > >
> > > I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > >
> > > > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> > > >
> > > > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell
> out
> > > what
> > > > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work
> to do
> > > to
> > > > get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > >
> > > > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen
> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > > > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > > > >  is outdated
> > > and I
> > > > > have removed it from our source code.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > > >
> > > > > and
> > > > > also fixed the typo.
> > > > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > > > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For the LICENSE,
> > > > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Junchao
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > > > >  > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and
> > > there
> > > > > are
> > > > > > >> no
> > > > > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > > > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it
> is
> > > not
> > > > > > >> necessary.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for
> RocksDB
> > > is
> > > > > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache
> > > > License
> > > > > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.
> So I
> > > > > > suspect
> > > > > > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you
> actually
> > > > > wanted
> > > > > > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> > > > > contents
> > > > > > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when
> > > building,
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > should reference those separately, likely 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[sebb]

The website does not appear to have the required Incubator disclaimer.

Also I could not find a download page for the source code (which
should also have the disclaimer).

On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:33, Mohammad Sadoghi  wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before advancing to
> the voting phase? Thank you kindly.
>
> ---
> Best Regards,
> Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
> Associate Professor
> Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
> Department of Computer Science
> University of California, Davis
>
> ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
> ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
> Phone: 914-319-7937
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Fanning,
> >
> > Thanks for the help.
> >
> > I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:
> >
> > > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > >
> > > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> > >
> > > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell out
> > what
> > > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work to do
> > to
> > > get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > >
> > > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > >
> > > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > > >  is outdated
> > and I
> > > > have removed it from our source code.
> > > >
> > > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > > >
> > > > and
> > > > also fixed the typo.
> > > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For the LICENSE,
> > > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any other suggestions?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Junchao
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament  > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > > >  > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and
> > there
> > > > are
> > > > > >> no
> > > > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is
> > not
> > > > > >> necessary.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB
> > is
> > > > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache
> > > License
> > > > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I
> > > > > suspect
> > > > > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually
> > > > wanted
> > > > > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> > > > contents
> > > > > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when
> > building,
> > > > you
> > > > > > should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a mentor
> > > vote
> > > > -1
> > > > > at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since
> > there
> > > > was
> > > > > no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing that
> > > you
> > > > > forwarded your dev@ vote thread to general@ so there was likely some
> > > > > context missing on what the ask is.  Apologies for any confusion from
> > > me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking at your release, I think you just appended
> > > > > "resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubating" to all of your folders and root
> > files.
> > > > > This isn't required, we just ask that the source release be named
> > with
> > > > > "-incubating" somewhere in it.  It would be better if the source
> > > release
> > > > > said "apache-resilientdb-incubating" or similar though.  The result
> > of
> > > > > appending the name though 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Mohammad Sadoghi]

Dear all,

Are there any other concerns that need to be addressed before advancing to
the voting phase? Thank you kindly.

---
Best Regards,
Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
Associate Professor
Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
Department of Computer Science
University of California, Davis

ExpoLab: https://expolab.org/
ResilientDB: https://resilientdb.com/
Phone: 914-319-7937


On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 6:00 PM Junchao Chen 
wrote:

> Hi Fanning,
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:
>
> > That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> >
> > Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
> >
> > It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell out
> what
> > your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work to do
> to
> > get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> >
> > Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> >
> > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > hi John,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> > INSTALL_MAC.sh
> > >  is outdated
> and I
> > > have removed it from our source code.
> > >
> > > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > >
> > > and
> > > also fixed the typo.
> > > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> > "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> > >
> > >
> > > For the LICENSE,
> > > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > > I also added the version for each dependency.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any other suggestions?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Junchao
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> > >  > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> hi Justin,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and
> there
> > > are
> > > > >> no
> > > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is
> not
> > > > >> necessary.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB
> is
> > > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache
> > License
> > > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I
> > > > suspect
> > > > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually
> > > wanted
> > > > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > > > >
> > > > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> > > contents
> > > > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when
> building,
> > > you
> > > > > should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback
> on
> > > the
> > > > > release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a mentor
> > vote
> > > -1
> > > > at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since
> there
> > > was
> > > > no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing that
> > you
> > > > forwarded your dev@ vote thread to general@ so there was likely some
> > > > context missing on what the ask is.  Apologies for any confusion from
> > me.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at your release, I think you just appended
> > > > "resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubating" to all of your folders and root
> files.
> > > > This isn't required, we just ask that the source release be named
> with
> > > > "-incubating" somewhere in it.  It would be better if the source
> > release
> > > > said "apache-resilientdb-incubating" or similar though.  The result
> of
> > > > appending the name though is your DISCLAIMER goes missing.  The one
> > > > distributed talks about Apache Answer, are you in fact using Answer?
> If
> > > not
> > > > maybe there was a copy/paste issue.  You may want to switch to
> > > > DISCLAIMER-WIP since this is your first release.
> > > >
> > > > I attempted to run resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubatingINSTALL_MAC.sh on
> my
> > > > machine, it failed.
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/d9krfb42262xbbdb75jnz2tsbs367mst
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

Hi Fanning,

Thanks for the help.

I updated DISCLAIMER-WIP and placed the licenses there.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP


On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:46 PM PJ Fanning  wrote:

> That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.
>
> Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
>
> It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell out what
> your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work to do to
> get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.
>
> Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
>
> On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen 
> wrote:
>
> > hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> > We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file
> INSTALL_MAC.sh
> >  is outdated and I
> > have removed it from our source code.
> >
> > I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > >
> > and
> > also fixed the typo.
> > Also renamed the release source prefix to
> "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> >
> >
> > For the LICENSE,
> > RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> > So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> > I also added the version for each dependency.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Junchao
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> >  > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> hi Justin,
> > > >>
> > > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there
> > are
> > > >> no
> > > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
> > > >> necessary.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB is
> > > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache
> License
> > > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I
> > > suspect
> > > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually
> > wanted
> > > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > > >
> > > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> > contents
> > > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when building,
> > you
> > > > should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.
> > > >
> > > > Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback on
> > the
> > > > release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a mentor
> vote
> > -1
> > > at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since there
> > was
> > > no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing that
> you
> > > forwarded your dev@ vote thread to general@ so there was likely some
> > > context missing on what the ask is.  Apologies for any confusion from
> me.
> > >
> > > Looking at your release, I think you just appended
> > > "resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubating" to all of your folders and root files.
> > > This isn't required, we just ask that the source release be named with
> > > "-incubating" somewhere in it.  It would be better if the source
> release
> > > said "apache-resilientdb-incubating" or similar though.  The result of
> > > appending the name though is your DISCLAIMER goes missing.  The one
> > > distributed talks about Apache Answer, are you in fact using Answer? If
> > not
> > > maybe there was a copy/paste issue.  You may want to switch to
> > > DISCLAIMER-WIP since this is your first release.
> > >
> > > I attempted to run resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubatingINSTALL_MAC.sh on my
> > > machine, it failed.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d9krfb42262xbbdb75jnz2tsbs367mst
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> junchao
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean <
> > jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > HI,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Thanks for letting me know.
> > > >> > > I have removed those dependencies.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are
> > > >> included
> > > >> > in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless
> > it
> > > is
> > > >> > optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Kind Regards,
> > > >> > Justin
> > > >> >
> > -
> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[PJ Fanning]

That is not a valid DISCLAIMER-WIP.

Please read https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html

It has the correct text for a DISCLAIMER-WIP and you need to spell out what
your issues are. For instance, it appears that you still have work to do to
get the license corrected. You could list that in the DISCLAIMER-WIP.

Apache Liminal has a DISCLAIMER-WIP.

https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP

On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 22:35, Junchao Chen 
wrote:

> hi John,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
> We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file INSTALL_MAC.sh
>  is outdated and I
> have removed it from our source code.
>
> I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/DISCLAIMER-WIP
> >
> and
> also fixed the typo.
> Also renamed the release source prefix to "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
>
>
> For the LICENSE,
> RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
> So we don't rely on any GPL code.
> I also added the version for each dependency.
>
>
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Junchao
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
>  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> hi Justin,
> > >>
> > >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there
> are
> > >> no
> > >> GPL dependencies there.
> > >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
> > >> necessary.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB is
> > > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache License
> > > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I
> > suspect
> > > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually
> wanted
> > > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> > >
> > > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the
> contents
> > > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when building,
> you
> > > should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.
> > >
> > > Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback on
> the
> > > release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a mentor vote
> -1
> > at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since there
> was
> > no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing that you
> > forwarded your dev@ vote thread to general@ so there was likely some
> > context missing on what the ask is.  Apologies for any confusion from me.
> >
> > Looking at your release, I think you just appended
> > "resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubating" to all of your folders and root files.
> > This isn't required, we just ask that the source release be named with
> > "-incubating" somewhere in it.  It would be better if the source release
> > said "apache-resilientdb-incubating" or similar though.  The result of
> > appending the name though is your DISCLAIMER goes missing.  The one
> > distributed talks about Apache Answer, are you in fact using Answer? If
> not
> > maybe there was a copy/paste issue.  You may want to switch to
> > DISCLAIMER-WIP since this is your first release.
> >
> > I attempted to run resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubatingINSTALL_MAC.sh on my
> > machine, it failed.
> >
> > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d9krfb42262xbbdb75jnz2tsbs367mst
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> junchao
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > HI,
> > >> >
> > >> > > Thanks for letting me know.
> > >> > > I have removed those dependencies.
> > >> >
> > >> > What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are
> > >> included
> > >> > in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless
> it
> > is
> > >> > optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
> > >> >
> > >> > Kind Regards,
> > >> > Justin
> > >> >
> -
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

hi John,

Thanks for the suggestions and sorry for the confusion.
We don't support MAC in the current state, the install file INSTALL_MAC.sh
 is outdated and I
have removed it from our source code.

I have renamed DISCLAIMER to DISCLAIMER-WIP

and
also fixed the typo.
Also renamed the release source prefix to "apache-resilientdb-incubating":
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1


For the LICENSE,
RocksDB and zstd have been removed from our project.
So we don't rely on any GPL code.
I also added the version for each dependency.



Any other suggestions?

Thanks,
Junchao



On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 4:44 AM John D. Ament  wrote:

> On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> hi Justin,
> >>
> >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are
> >> no
> >> GPL dependencies there.
> >> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
> >> necessary.
> >>
> >
> > Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB is
> > wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache License
> > V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I
> suspect
> > the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually wanted
> > to label them under the permissive license we can use.
> >
> > And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the contents
> > of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when building, you
> > should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.
> >
> > Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback on the
> > release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
> >
>
> Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a mentor vote -1
> at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since there was
> no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing that you
> forwarded your dev@ vote thread to general@ so there was likely some
> context missing on what the ask is.  Apologies for any confusion from me.
>
> Looking at your release, I think you just appended
> "resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubating" to all of your folders and root files.
> This isn't required, we just ask that the source release be named with
> "-incubating" somewhere in it.  It would be better if the source release
> said "apache-resilientdb-incubating" or similar though.  The result of
> appending the name though is your DISCLAIMER goes missing.  The one
> distributed talks about Apache Answer, are you in fact using Answer? If not
> maybe there was a copy/paste issue.  You may want to switch to
> DISCLAIMER-WIP since this is your first release.
>
> I attempted to run resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubatingINSTALL_MAC.sh on my
> machine, it failed.
>
> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d9krfb42262xbbdb75jnz2tsbs367mst
>
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> junchao
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > HI,
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks for letting me know.
> >> > > I have removed those dependencies.
> >> >
> >> > What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are
> >> included
> >> > in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless it
> is
> >> > optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
> >> >
> >> > Kind Regards,
> >> > Justin
> >> > -
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[John D. Ament]

On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament  wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen 
> wrote:
>
>> hi Justin,
>>
>> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are
>> no
>> GPL dependencies there.
>> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
>> necessary.
>>
>
> Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB is
> wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache License
> V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I suspect
> the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually wanted
> to label them under the permissive license we can use.
>
> And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the contents
> of your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when building, you
> should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.
>
> Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback on the
> release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
>

Sorry, I think I understand what's happening now.  You had a mentor vote -1
at [1] and were looking for other IPMC members to review it since there was
no additional feedback on the release.  It's a little confusing that you
forwarded your dev@ vote thread to general@ so there was likely some
context missing on what the ask is.  Apologies for any confusion from me.

Looking at your release, I think you just appended
"resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubating" to all of your folders and root files.
This isn't required, we just ask that the source release be named with
"-incubating" somewhere in it.  It would be better if the source release
said "apache-resilientdb-incubating" or similar though.  The result of
appending the name though is your DISCLAIMER goes missing.  The one
distributed talks about Apache Answer, are you in fact using Answer? If not
maybe there was a copy/paste issue.  You may want to switch to
DISCLAIMER-WIP since this is your first release.

I attempted to run resilientdb-v1.10.0-incubatingINSTALL_MAC.sh on my
machine, it failed.

[1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d9krfb42262xbbdb75jnz2tsbs367mst


>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> junchao
>>
>> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > HI,
>> >
>> > > Thanks for letting me know.
>> > > I have removed those dependencies.
>> >
>> > What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are
>> included
>> > in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless it is
>> > optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > Justin
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[sebb]

On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 05:13, John D. Ament  wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen 
> wrote:
>
> > hi Justin,
> >
> > I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are no
> > GPL dependencies there.
> > Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
> > necessary.
> >
>
> Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB is
> wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache License
> V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I suspect
> the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually wanted
> to label them under the permissive license we can use.
>
> And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the contents of
> your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when building, you
> should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.

Product licenses may change, so ideally the LICENSE file should state
the version of each dependency to which it applies.
When a dependency is updated, its license should be re-checked, and
the LICENSE file updated.

> Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback on the
> release? They should be able to help you sort this out.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > junchao
> >
> > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > HI,
> > >
> > > > Thanks for letting me know.
> > > > I have removed those dependencies.
> > >
> > > What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are included
> > > in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless it is
> > > optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Justin
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[John D. Ament]

On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen 
wrote:

> hi Justin,
>
> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are no
> GPL dependencies there.
> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
> necessary.
>

Just to put it out there - I think the license listing for RocksDB is
wrong.  It's a dual licensed piece of software (GPLv2 + Apache License
V2).  Similar for zstd, it's a dual license BSD-3 and GPLv2.  So I suspect
the real issue is that you mislabeled it as GPLv2 but you actually wanted
to label them under the permissive license we can use.

And keep in mind, your source license file should represent the contents of
your source release.  If you bring in dependencies when building, you
should reference those separately, likely under a binary release.

Just wondering, but who are your mentors?  What was their feedback on the
release? They should be able to help you sort this out.


>
> Thanks,
> junchao
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > > Thanks for letting me know.
> > > I have removed those dependencies.
> >
> > What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are included
> > in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless it is
> > optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

hi Justin,

I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are no
GPL dependencies there.
Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
necessary.

Thanks,
junchao

On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 5:36 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> HI,
>
> > Thanks for letting me know.
> > I have removed those dependencies.
>
> What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are included
> in the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless it is
> optional, you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> Thanks for letting me know.
> I have removed those dependencies.

What goes in the license file is any 3rd party licenses that are included in 
the source release, not those that are dependencies. But unless it is optional, 
you also can’t have any GPL dependencies.

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[PJ Fanning]

The list of 'public domain' software in the resilientdb LICENSE [1] seems
incorrect.

* protobuf is not public domain - see its license [2]
* snappy is not public domain - see its license [3]
* zlib has a customised license that we should reproduce [4]
* this is just some of the issues, I haven't looked at every link


[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/LICENSE
[2] https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/LICENSE
[3] https://github.com/google/snappy?tab=License-1-ov-file#readme
[4] https://github.com/madler/zlib


On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 00:41, Justin Mclean  wrote:

> HI,
>
> I assume you mean [1] I’ve not looked at it in detail, but I note you
> include GPL licensed code. GPL-licensed code is Category X and can’t be
> used in an ASF project.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

Hi Justin,

Thanks for letting me know.
I have removed those dependencies.

https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/v1.10.0-rc01/LICENSE


Thanks,
Junchao

On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:41 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> HI,
>
> I assume you mean [1] I’ve not looked at it in detail, but I note you
> include GPL licensed code. GPL-licensed code is Category X and can’t be
> used in an ASF project.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

I assume you mean [1] I’ve not looked at it in detail, but I note you include 
GPL licensed code. GPL-licensed code is Category X and can’t be used in an ASF 
project.

Kind Regards,
Justin


1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

Hi Justin,

It is very grateful for your help with the review and the suggestions.

I have addressed the license issues, added the URL in the NOTICE file, and
mentioned the 3rd code in LICENSE.

Could you please take a look again?

Thanks,
Junchao


On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 5:51 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It’s -1 (binding) from me. I think you should use Apache Rat to check the
> release.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in artifact name
> - signatures and hashes are correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE is missing mention of 3rd party code included in the release
> - NOTICE doesn't include correct text (missing URL)
> - Files are missing ASF headers
> - no unexpected binary files
> - I did not try to compile from the source
>
> Files missing headers - you need to work out if these are 3rd party files
> or not.
> ./INSTALL.sh
>
> ./INSTALL_MAC.sh./entrypoint.sh./script.js./platform/consensus/ordering/common/algorithm/protocol_base.cpp./platform/consensus/ordering/common/algorithm/protocol_base.h./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/algorithm/poe.cpp./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/algorithm/poe.h./platform/statistic/test_server.sh./scripts/format.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/performance/pbft_performance.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/performance/poe_performance.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/performance/run_performance.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/script/deploy.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/script/env.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/script/generate_config.sh
> ./scripts/deploy/script/generate_key.sh
>
> ./scripts/deploy/script/load_config.sh./service/tools/contract/api_tools/example_contract/compile.sh./service/tools/contract/service_tools/start_contract_service.sh
>
> ./service/tools/kv/server_tools/start_kv_service.sh./service/tools/kv/server_tools/start_kv_service_monitoring.sh./service/tools/utxo/service_tools/start_utxo_service.sh./service/utxo/start_contract_server.sh
> ./tools/generate_certificate.sh
> ./tools/generate_client.sh
> ./tools/generate_cluster.sh
> ./tools/generate_key.sh
>
> 3rd party files that need to be mentioned in LICENSE:
> ./benchmark/protocols/poe/kv_server_performance.cpp
> ./common/crypto/hash.cpp
> ./common/crypto/hash.h
> ./common/crypto/hash_test.cpp
> ./common/crypto/key_generator.cpp
> ./common/crypto/key_generator.h
> ./common/crypto/mock_signature_verifier.h
> ./common/crypto/signature_utils.cpp
> ./common/crypto/signature_utils.h
> ./common/crypto/signature_verifier.cpp
> ./common/crypto/signature_verifier.h
> ./common/crypto/signature_verifier_interface.cpp
> ./common/crypto/signature_verifier_interface.h
> ./common/crypto/signature_verifier_test.cpp
> ./common/test/json_test.cpp
> ./common/test/test_macros.h
> ./common/utils/utils.cpp
> ./common/utils/utils.h
> ./node_modules/fs.realpath/old.js
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/consensus.cpp
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/consensus.h
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/performance_manager.cpp
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/performance_manager.h
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/response_manager.cpp
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/response_manager.h
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/transaction_utils.cpp
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/transaction_utils.h
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/framework/consensus.cpp
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/framework/consensus.h
> ./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/framework/consensus_test.cpp
> ./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/addr_utils.cpp
> ./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/addr_utils.h
> ./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/key_utils.cpp
> ./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/key_utils.h
>
> ./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/pybind/wallet_tools_py.cpp./node_modules/lodash.union/index.js./node_modules/lodash.difference/index.js./node_modules/brace-expansion/index.js./node_modules/ignore/index.js./node_modules/once/once.js./node_modules/inherits/inherits.js
> ...and many other files in node_modules
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

It’s -1 (binding) from me. I think you should use Apache Rat to check the 
release.

I checked:
- incubating in artifact name
- signatures and hashes are correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing mention of 3rd party code included in the release
- NOTICE doesn't include correct text (missing URL)
- Files are missing ASF headers 
- no unexpected binary files
- I did not try to compile from the source

Files missing headers - you need to work out if these are 3rd party files or 
not.
./INSTALL.sh
./INSTALL_MAC.sh./entrypoint.sh./script.js./platform/consensus/ordering/common/algorithm/protocol_base.cpp./platform/consensus/ordering/common/algorithm/protocol_base.h./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/algorithm/poe.cpp./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/algorithm/poe.h./platform/statistic/test_server.sh./scripts/format.sh
./scripts/deploy/performance/pbft_performance.sh
./scripts/deploy/performance/poe_performance.sh
./scripts/deploy/performance/run_performance.sh
./scripts/deploy/script/deploy.sh
./scripts/deploy/script/env.sh
./scripts/deploy/script/generate_config.sh
./scripts/deploy/script/generate_key.sh
./scripts/deploy/script/load_config.sh./service/tools/contract/api_tools/example_contract/compile.sh./service/tools/contract/service_tools/start_contract_service.sh
./service/tools/kv/server_tools/start_kv_service.sh./service/tools/kv/server_tools/start_kv_service_monitoring.sh./service/tools/utxo/service_tools/start_utxo_service.sh./service/utxo/start_contract_server.sh
./tools/generate_certificate.sh
./tools/generate_client.sh
./tools/generate_cluster.sh
./tools/generate_key.sh

3rd party files that need to be mentioned in LICENSE:
./benchmark/protocols/poe/kv_server_performance.cpp
./common/crypto/hash.cpp
./common/crypto/hash.h
./common/crypto/hash_test.cpp
./common/crypto/key_generator.cpp
./common/crypto/key_generator.h
./common/crypto/mock_signature_verifier.h
./common/crypto/signature_utils.cpp
./common/crypto/signature_utils.h
./common/crypto/signature_verifier.cpp
./common/crypto/signature_verifier.h
./common/crypto/signature_verifier_interface.cpp
./common/crypto/signature_verifier_interface.h
./common/crypto/signature_verifier_test.cpp
./common/test/json_test.cpp
./common/test/test_macros.h
./common/utils/utils.cpp
./common/utils/utils.h
./node_modules/fs.realpath/old.js
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/consensus.cpp
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/consensus.h
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/performance_manager.cpp
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/performance_manager.h
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/response_manager.cpp
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/response_manager.h
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/transaction_utils.cpp
./platform/consensus/ordering/common/framework/transaction_utils.h
./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/framework/consensus.cpp
./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/framework/consensus.h
./platform/consensus/ordering/poe/framework/consensus_test.cpp
./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/addr_utils.cpp
./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/addr_utils.h
./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/key_utils.cpp
./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/cpp/key_utils.h
./service/tools/utxo/wallet_tool/pybind/wallet_tools_py.cpp./node_modules/lodash.union/index.js./node_modules/lodash.difference/index.js./node_modules/brace-expansion/index.js./node_modules/ignore/index.js./node_modules/once/once.js./node_modules/inherits/inherits.js
...and many other files in node_modules

Kind Regards,
Justin







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

Hi PMCs

This is our first release and we are looking for help.
It would be very grateful if any PMC help to take a look.


Thanks,
Junchao

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:49 AM Junchao Chen  wrote:

> Update:
>
> - KEYS files:
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/resilientdb/KEYS
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:02 AM Junchao Chen  wrote:
>
>> Hi Calvin,
>>
>> I have updated the release:
>> - added disclaimer
>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/v1.10.0-rc01/DISCLAIMER>
>> file
>> - included "incubating" in the filenames
>>
>> The release candidates:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev//incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#resielientdb-v1100-2024-4-16
>>
>> Git tag for the release:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/tree/v1.10.0-rc01
>>
>>
>> For the keys, could you give guidelines on how to upload the keys to the
>> download pages? https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/resilientdb/KEYS
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Junchao
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:46 PM Calvin Kirs  wrote:
>>
>>> -1 binding
>>>
>>> I checked:
>>> - signatures and hashes are fine
>>> - license and notice files look good
>>> - file have correct ASF headers if necessary
>>>
>>>  - disclaimer does not exist
>>> -  the release file name does not contain the word "incubating"
>>> - KEYS files should use
>>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/resilientdb/KEYS
>>> When casting your vote, please provide your checklist. Simply adding "+1"
>>> without providing context often lacks meaningful impact.
>>>
>>> podlings should undergo a community vote before initiating a formal vote
>>> on
>>> the general@incubator.a.o mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:01 PM Kaustubh Shete
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 [ APPROVE  ]
>>> >
>>> > *Kaustubh Shete*
>>> >
>>> > (He/Him/His)
>>> >
>>> > Graduate Student Researcher
>>> > Medical AI @ UC Davis Health - IT
>>> >
>>> > ksh...@ucdavis.edu | Personal Mobile : 201.551.2685
>>> > *“Mastery in Servitude” - Merwan Sheriar Irani*
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *University of California Davis Health - Innovation Technology*
>>> >
>>> > Health Services Administration (HAS) Building
>>> >
>>> > 10850 White Rock Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
>>> >
>>> > Learn about VALID AI: Collective for Gen AI <http://validai.health/>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/2b1ce67fc08045df88ed4134ef6bd...@ucdavis.edu?anonymous=signature>
>>> Book
>>> > time to meet with me
>>> > <
>>> https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/2b1ce67fc08045df88ed4134ef6bd...@ucdavis.edu?anonymous=signature
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > *From:* Mohammad Sadoghi 
>>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2024 9:51 AM
>>> > *To:* d...@resilientdb.apache.org 
>>> > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating,
>>> v1.10.0-RC1
>>> >
>>> > +1 approve
>>> > ---
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> > Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD
>>> > Associate Professor
>>> > Exploratory Systems Lab (ExpoLab)
>>> > Department of Computer Science
>>> > University of California, Davis
>>> >
>>> > ExpoLab:
>>> > https://expolab.org/
>>> > <https://expolab.org/>
>>> > ResilientDB:
>>> > https://resilientdb.com/
>>> > <https://resilientdb.com/>
>>> > Phone: 914-319-7937
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:55 AM Junchao Chen 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hello,
>>> > >
>>> > > This is a call for vote to release Apache ResilientDB(Incubating)
>>> version
>>> > > v1.10.0-RC1.
>>> > >
>>> > > The release candidates:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev//incubator/re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

[Junchao Chen]

+ general channel.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:03 AM Thamir Qadah 
wrote:

> Dear Junchao,
>
> I just checked the release notes for this RC. If I remember correctly, PoE
> was published in EDBT 2021, not 2011, as mentioned in the change log.
>
> Best
>
> Thamir
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 3:38 PM Junchao Chen  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a call for vote to release Apache ResilientDB(Incubating) version
> > v1.10.0-RC1.
> >
> > The release candidates:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev//incubator/resilientdb/resilientdb/v1.10.0-rc1
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#resielientdb-v1100-2024-4-16
> >
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/tree/v1.10.0-rc01
> >
> > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev//incubator/resilientdb/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Checklist for reference:
> >
> > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each repo.
> > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> > [ ] No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
> >
> > To compile from the source, please refer to:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/tree/v1.10.0-rc01?tab=readme-ov-file#build-and-deploy-resilientdb
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Junchao
> >
>