Re: [gentoo-user] Install with Netgear FA311?

2005-03-04 Thread Jonathan Nichols
A. Khattri wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Alex Stagg wrote:

Here is a follow up. I could not get any tulip-based driver to recognize the
FA311. I did a web search and found that the tulip driver supported FA310
cards, but the chipset was changed on the FA311 and the natsemi driver is
required instead.

This is classic Netgear - changing chipsets without changing model number!
They *did* change the model number.. to the FA311. the FA310 used to 
have the Tulip driver.
I have a collection of both the FA311 and FA310 cards and have never had 
a problem with either of them. :)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: howto tune SpamAssassin

2005-03-02 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:13 -0500, Thomas Kirchner wrote:
* On Mar  2 21:50, Matthias F. Brandstetter (gentoo-user@gentoo.org) wrote:
after upgrading SA to version 3 I now do get lots of false negative. I 
trained my filter via sa-learn, and many of these FP do have BAYES_99, 
but they do not reach 5.0 points.
In your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file, add some lines like the
following, for whatever tests you want to modify:
score BAYES_50 1.0
score BAYES_60 1.5
score BAYES_80 2.5
score BAYES_95 4.0
score BAYES_99 4.5

How can this be implemented to be done system wide??

/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Also make sure that you're using the new surbl features of SpamAssassin 
3.x - they catch a LOT of spam.
It's a network check, though. Keep that in mind.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Trying to patch mrtg..

2005-02-04 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hi all!
I'm trying to add the 95th percentile patch to MRTG 
(http://www.seanadams.com/95/) and I'm trying to edit the ebuild to 
include the patch.

I added the following to the mrtg-2.10.15.ebuild
src_unpack() {
unpack ${A} ; cd ${S}
epatch /tmp/95.patch
}
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2chap=1 
tells me that epatch is a valid function, but when I try to run the 
ebuild, I get this:

 Unpacking mrtg-2.10.15.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/mrtg-2.10.15/work
/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh: line 21: epatch: command not found
 Source unpacked.
... and it continues on its merry way, unpatched.
I'm most definately *not* a programmer/coder/developer, but I at least 
took a stab at the documentation and gave it a try.

Anyone else ever try this? I've been trying a few different things.. no 
luck yet. Seems that epatch is a function, but I can't really find it 
anywhere in /var/lib/portage/bin...

yes, I Googled. Yes, I searched the forums. Yes, I asked on IRC.. that's 
where I got the link to the devrel/handbook.

Help? :) I'd like to get MRTG patched to use this very handy add-on..
Thanks!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


[gentoo-user] cachefs: anyone use it?

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Nichols
I believe that it's part of the kernel now, right?
Is anyone using cachefs at all?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: hosting plan? [OT]

2005-01-31 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Owen Ford wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 20:26 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Don't many ISP's also offer the babysitting service for your computer?  That
is, take your box to the ISP's actual building and leave it there (plugged
in).  Administer the box remotely.  Only time you need the ISP people is
when you want someone to hit the power switch for you.

That's called Colo where I come from and it's hella expensive.  You
could lease your own server for less.
Depends on what you need, really. I offer colocation space  managed 
services (firewall, bandwidth, etc) at a decent price. Fortunately, I 
have enough room in the colo facility to put odd sized machines. :)

If you lease a server, you generally don't own the hardware. That might 
not matter to some, but to those that like to upgrade every now  then 
it could be an issue.

There isn't a one size fits all solution for many cases. :)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


[gentoo-user] Uh oh.. automake?

2005-01-27 Thread Jonathan Nichols
This looks like a total disaster waiting to happen...
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] dev-lang/perl-5.8.5-r3 [5.8.5-r2]
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.13
[ebuild  N] sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper-2
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r6 [2.59-r5]
[ebuild UD] sys-devel/automake-1.5 [1.8.5-r1]
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r2
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-devel/automake-1.6.3
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-devel/automake-1.7.9
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-devel/automake-1.4_p6
[ebuild  N] sys-devel/automake-wrapper-1
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-devel/automake-1.9.4
*snip*
Anyone else seen this, and if so, what happened? heh.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] MegaRAID

2005-01-27 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Daniel Corbe wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying rather unsucessfully to find monitoring tools for
the MegaRAID-based RAID cards that will run on Gentoo.  Does anyone
out there have one of these cards?  If so, what are you using to
monitor the status of the array.
I just want some basic information out of it: Whether or not the
drives are on line, rebuilding, failed, etc.

Is this on a Dell box? In the archives, you migth find me asking the 
same questions.. I ended up just cobbling together some scripts to 
monitor stuff in /proc/{i.forgot.what.directory} instead. I found that 
the MegaRAID stuff was pretty good about letting you know if the array 
changed states.

Unfortunately I don't have the box (or the scripts) any longer. We have 
some Dell boxes around here, but I checked them all and none of them 
have megaraid.. all aacraid. :-(


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo as a domain member on a Win NT network

2004-02-10 Thread Jonathan Nichols
gabriel wrote:

On February 10, 2004 06:32 pm, Brock Campbell wrote:

Well, in the real world

NT while a bit of a Pain In The Ass, does the job for a lot of
businesses. It's really easy to suggest ripping out all the NT and throw
Linux in it's place. It's also really easy to get fired for doing
something like that if you're not fairly skilled with Linux. Most
businesses have the attitude of If it ain't broke, don't fix it. And NT
in a lot of places fits that bill to a T

A Windows Server can provide a great resource to any small office -

Symantec Antivirus, Corporate Edition.

Install it, use it as a parent server. Keep those antivirus defs up to 
date. :)

That's what I use my Windows Server for, mainly

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] highmem K7S5A

2004-02-01 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hey all,
	I have an ECS K7S5A board and tried putting 2x512 DDR2100 DIMMS into 
the thing. It boots up, but I get an error in dmesg about only 896MB 
being available. So, following some instructions I found on 
forums.gentoo.org, I enabled highmem support (4gb) in the kernel and 
recompiled. From that moment on, I got nothing but kernel panic errors 
on start!
	The RAM tests just fine. I tossed in the memtest86 CD and let it run 
for 24 hours - not one single error. The same RAM works perfect in 
another box with the same board running Windows XP (I have 5 of these 
boards and haven't had a single problem so far - 1 board is in a linux 
box, but it only has 512mb RAM)
	I got the kernel panics to go away by removing highmem support, and 
putting 1x512 module and 1x256 module in the box instead. 768MB RAM 
isn't too bad, but I can't figure out why it was crashing. =/

I'm using gentoo-sources-2.4.22-r5 on all of the machines.
Has anybody ever used one of these boards with 1gb RAM? =/
Thanks!

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] So, glibc....

2004-01-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
.. this glibc problem is only affecting Intel boxes right now?

Is there a fix coming soon? :) I only have 1 Intel box, but it's many 
miles away .. and I updated glibc on it. :P

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Critical warning: Do not update GLIBC!

2004-01-19 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:

Hello

This is just to stop others sharing the misfortune that occurred to me.  I
updated glibc to 2.3.2-r9 on stable x86 tree and it broke python, portage
and also most applications.
Do NOT perform this update until bug 38619 [1] has been worked out.

Dhruba.

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38619
Uh oh. Mine just finished a few minutes ago.

But, everything seems normal...

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Buying a new NIC

2004-01-14 Thread Jonathan Nichols

Tomorrow I'll buy a new NIC (I'm tired of USB-ADSL).

My question is can I buy whatever NIC I want or some NICs will not in
Linux?
I have several Netgear FA-310TX 10/100bT ethernet cards and they've 
worked great. :)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] warning problem emerge sync this morning.

2004-01-13 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Philippe Van Hecke wrote:

It seem that an emerge sync 
remove all the /usr/portage/profile dir.
after that you are unable to do any emerge. I will full fill a new bug.

Philippe
Don't. Just look at www.gentoo.org :P



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] am i the only person with genkernel gentoo problems?

2004-01-12 Thread Jonathan Nichols



No, I would like to know somebody to whom it works :-(.

After I decided to try it, I like to start with RTFM,
but didn't find any usable doc (not a good sign).
genkernel not working? I had the same problems. I gave up on the 
automated stuff and did everything by hand. Wasn't too difficult, I 
could see what was going on, and it was fun to learn a few new things. :)



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] gripe about the other docs on gentoo.org

2004-01-08 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hrm.. the virtual mailhosting system guide says that it was updated on 
January 7th, 2004.

But there's no changelog that I can see!

It would be nice to know *what* was updated, don't y'all agree? :)
I think that a brief ChangeLog for the documentation that hits the 
public site would be a *very* useful resource.

Does anybody know what was added/removed/changed?

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] I killed my xp boot sector with grub

2004-01-08 Thread Jonathan Nichols

Is there a way to restore the winXP boot sector without reinstalling xp? 


I have very good universal solution for all micro$hit systems,
which will prevent such troubles forever:
dd if=/dev/zero  of=/dev/hdXX

hdXX is micro$hit partition

Yeah, that works, but it kind of makes stuff like Age of Empires II 
not work very well. ;)



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Virus's

2004-01-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Dennis Freise wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:14:47 -0500
Nicholas Hockey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

does anybody else on this mailing list get slammed by the Microsoft
Update virus going around, i'm trying to figure out why i get nailed by
it all the time, and i apologize for the apparent list spam. (  i
believe the virus is called swen or gibe ) 

Hrm, never seen it. OH, that one with the fake Windows patch?

Here's how to kill it 99% of the time:

/name=[^]*\.(ade|adp|asd|bas|bat|chm|cmd|com|cpl|crt|dbx|dll|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|lnk|js|jse|lnk|ocx|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ops|p
cd|pi|pif|prf|reg|scf|scr|sct|shb|shm|shs|swf|uue|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wab|wsc|wsf|wsh)/ 
REJECT Potentially dangerous file attachment. Please do
 not include any executable attachments in your email.

Add to header_checks in /etc/postfix

Run postmap /etc/postfix/header_checks

Add header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks to 
/etc/postfix/main.cf

You would be absolutely amazed at the amount of internet cruft that 
header_checks file keeps out. :) Even if you do see the email slip 
through, it won't have the virus payload.
SpamAssassin usually tags the virus email anyway.

Take a look at http://www.securitysage.com for more information. Note 
that this is for Postfix, if you're using qmail or sendmail, it'll be 
different. :D

-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Virus's

2004-01-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Chris Bare wrote:

Me too, but i'm using postfix to reject alle *.exe  attachments.



Oh, that sounds great. Could you post how you cofigured it to do that?
Here's how to kill it 99% of the time:

/name=[^]*\.(ade|adp|asd|bas|bat|chm|cmd|com|cpl|crt|dbx|dll|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|lnk|js|jse|lnk|ocx|mde|mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ops|p
cd|pi|pif|prf|reg|scf|scr|sct|shb|shm|shs|swf|uue|vb|vbe|vbs|vbx|vxd|wab|wsc|wsf|wsh)/ 
REJECT Potentially dangerous file attachment. Please do
 not include any executable attachments in your email.

Add to header_checks in /etc/postfix

Run postmap /etc/postfix/header_checks

Add header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks to 
/etc/postfix/main.cf

You would be absolutely amazed at the amount of internet cruft that 
header_checks file keeps out. Even if you do see the email slip through, 
it won't have the virus payload.
SpamAssassin usually tags the virus email anyway.

Take a look at http://www.securitysage.com for more information. Note 
that this is for Postfix, if you're using qmail or sendmail, it'll be 
different. :D

-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.4.22-r3

2004-01-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Marius Mauch wrote:

On 01/07/04  Alberto Garcia Hierro wrote:


Differences are _trivial_.


I wasn't talking about the differences but the vulnerability.



So, does gentoo-sources-2.4.22r3 address this recent vulnerability or 
not? :-)

I just finished upgrading everything to 2.4.22r2, so if I'm going to 
reboot stuff, now is a good time. ;)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] bazillion portage updates?

2004-01-06 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Every time I run 'emerge sync' it tells me that a new version of portage 
is available.
Did something get mucked up or have there been a few minor releases 
recently?



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Shell scripting question

2004-01-06 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Evening, all!

Got a quick shell scripting question, if anyone wants to take a stab at 
it. :) I'm writing a script to creat a DNS zonefile and so far, 
everything is working great except for the $ORIGIN (and $TTL) statement.
The phrase $ORIGIN is the problem. The script thinks it's a variable, 
obviously.

How can I tell the script to just ignore $ORIGIN and print the text 
$ORIGIN in the output instead?

The incorrect output:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jnichols $ less db.blah.org
 .
 86400  ; 1 day
blah.orgIN SOA  ns1.pbp.net.blah.org hostmaster.pbp.net. (
*snip*
The *CORRECT* output: (what I want)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jnichols $ less db.blah.org
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 86400  ; 1 day
blah.orgIN SOA  ns1.pbp.net.blah.org hostmaster.pbp.net. (
Notice the difference between the two? ;) I just want the script to 
completely ignore the text $ORIGIN and $TTL - is there a way to do 
this?

Thanks!

-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] hello

2004-01-05 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Redeeman wrote:

On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 22:16, Jonas Widarsson wrote:

Eric Paynter wrote:


Aaron Stout said:



hello
  

Hi!

-Eric



Tjena!
- Jonas
hej!

waaap?

;)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] New kernel exploit/patch/etc?

2004-01-05 Thread Jonathan Nichols
So, rumor has it that there's a small kernel problem today...

Any word on patching gentoo-source-2.4.22r2? ;)

And I *just* finished compiling it on all of the machines. Drat.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] couriertls problem

2004-01-02 Thread Jonathan Nichols
(also posted to courier-users)

Greetings!
This just started today..
Jan  2 15:59:27 [imapd-ssl] Connection, ip=[192.168.10.78]
Jan  2 15:59:27 [imapd-ssl] LOGIN: DEBUG: ip=[192.168.10.78], 
command=AUTHENTICATE
Jan  2 15:59:30 [imapd-ssl] LOGIN, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
ip=[192.168.10.78], protocol=IMAP
Jan  2 15:59:34 [imapd-ssl] couriertls: read: error:140943FC:SSL 
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert bad record mac
Jan  2 15:59:34 [imapd-ssl] DISCONNECTED, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
ip=[192.168.10.78], headers=938, body=0

Only when using Pine, too - I see the message numbers, but that's it. 
When I try to actually read a message, I get [MAIL FOLDER INBOX 
CLOSED DUE TO ACCESS ERROR]

I've seen a few newsgroup postings quoting a similar error, but SSL is 
working fine with Mozilla. It's only Pine that seems to be having the 
problem (so far)

Any ideas? Thanks!

-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Daemon Status

2003-12-10 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Jeff Smelser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,

I just realized spamassassins deamon was not running. Doing a rc-status, of 
course, said it was started..  

Has someone created a nifty script to run through the default runlevel, like 
rc-status, but actually make sure the daemon is running.. Maybe a check 
pid.

If not, I am going to write one.. Dunno how I am gonna pull it off. If anyone 
has some ideas on how I find the pid files dynamically. I know they are in 
the /var/run. I am talking programatically..
I have this in crontab:

#Check for spamd and restart it if it croaked
0,15,30,45 * * * *   if [ `ps -ef | grep spamd | grep -v grep` = 
 ]; then (cd /usr/bin; ./spamd -q -x -m 15 -u spam -d); fi

:)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge problem

2003-11-03 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Belinus wrote:
Is anyone having resolve errors for emerge tonight? I'm trying to emerge
sync and I am getting 'Temproary failure in name resolution' errors but
when I ping the IP from my Windows workstation it resolves just fine.
/etc/resolve.conf is correct as well

Any suggestions?

It's working fine here. Maybe you have an rsync mirror in 
/etc/make.conf? If so, remove it - then try again. :-)

-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge problem

2003-11-03 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Belinus wrote:

I commented out the GENTOO_MIRRORS line and up'd the retries to 25 in
make.conf but I still get the same error.
Jon

Does mirrorselect give you back anything?

That's odd. I haven't had trouble with emerge...

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] spam problem

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols

thanks
just emerged it
apparently it's even trickier: dev-perl/Mail-Spam*A*ssassin :)

Uh oh.. expect an update any day now. 2.60 has been released. The 
current ebuild shows 2.55 :)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] spamassassin hates gentoo-user

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Cal Evans wrote:

IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM

Did these guys come back up? I turned them off after  the rule started 
flagging ALL messages as SPAM when they went down.

What version of SpamAssassin?

No, they didn't...
Might be an issue with Verisign's stupidity - remember, anything .com 
was actually resolving to an IP instead of failing (timing out in 
osirusoft.com's case)

I have the stuff below in local.cf - works great! (Don't forget to 
donate $ to spamcop if you use their RBL!)

#Adjusted a few scores because of dead RBL
score SUBJECT_MONTH 0.00
score RCVD_IN_ORBS 0.00
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH 0
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC 0
# Some new RBLs to go check
header RCVD_IN_RFCW eval:check_rbl('rfcw', 
'whois.rfc-ignorant.org.')
describe RCVD_IN_RFCW   Received via a relay in 
whois.rfc-ignorant.org

header RCVD_IN_RFCP eval:check_rbl('rfcp', 
'postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org.')
describe RCVD_IN_RFCP   Received via a relay in 
postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org

header RCVD_IN_RFCA eval:check_rbl('rfca', 
'abuse.rfc-ignorant.org.')
describe RCVD_IN_RFCA   Received via a relay in 
abuse.rfc-ignorant.org

header RCVD_IN_RFCD eval:check_rbl('rfcd', 
'dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.')
describe RCVD_IN_RFCD   Received via a relay in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org

score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET4.0
score RCVD_IN_RFCW  0.9
score RCVD_IN_RFCP  2.0
score RCVD_IN_RFCA  2.0
score RCVD_IN_RFCD  2.0




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] local.cf for spamassassin

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hey all,
Here's a freely available local.cf that you can grab once in a while:
http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current

-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] errr.... I meant blacklist, not local.cf

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
see my previous message about this:

http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current

I meant *blacklist* - not local.cf.
*goes to get coffee*
-Jonathan

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] spam problem

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Johan Van den Neste wrote:

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 17:38, Jonathan Nichols wrote:

thanks
just emerged it
apparently it's even trickier: dev-perl/Mail-Spam*A*ssassin :)

Uh oh.. expect an update any day now. 2.60 has been released. The 
current ebuild shows 2.55 :)


uh... new versions do not require major reconfiguration, do they?
(haven't started configuring anything yet)
nessie
With SpamAssassin, usually not - but beware of deprecated options in 
local.cf - it happens. :)

You may want to consider signing up for 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - very good list to be on. :)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] local.cf for spamassassin

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols

One question though.
Is it possible to get local.cf to include a second config file? I'd rather not 
start cat'ing files together everytime I update the blacklist.

Not entirely sure. I just download the blacklist and cat it onto the end 
of local.cf :)

Not one false-positive yet, I'm happy to say... :D

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Squirrelmail 1.4.2 ebuild?

2003-10-07 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Anyone seen an ebuild for 1.4.2 on the horizon? my 1.4.1 install has 
b0rked itself somehow. =/

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] mysql log files

2003-09-05 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hey all,
I just noticed that my mysql.log file has gotten way out of hand.
It's almost a gig right now. Doesn't metalog pick up logfiles from newly
emerged stuff?

Or, is there another advised way to rotate mysql logfiles?

Thanks!


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] pyzor spamassassin

2003-08-03 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Anybody managed to get the two working fine from the ebuilds? I'm having 
problems with pyzor right now..

spamd[20383]: [debug] Found Razor2 part: part=0 noresponse
spamd[20383]: [debug] leaving helper-app run mode
spamd[20383]: [debug] Razor2 results: spam? 0  highest cf score: 0
spamd[20383]: [debug] executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
spamd[20383]: [debug] Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
spamd[20383]: [debug] entering helper-app run mode
spamd[20383]: [debug] Pyzor: got response: Traceback (most recent call 
last):
spamd[20383]: [debug] leaving helper-app run mode
spamd[20383]: [debug] Pyzor: couldn't grok response Traceback (most 
recent call last):

Checked permissions/etc. Error still happening. Googled. Tried stuff 
that worked before (permissions, running pyzor discover etc).. still 
broken.
pyzor works ok from the command line.

Anybody seen this? :)
-jonathan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] I'm afraid. :P

2003-07-26 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hmm.. I've never seen the blocks thing pop up. What's that about?

Also, has anyone updated Perl to r12 yet? Experiences? :)

mail jnichols # emerge -up --deep world

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[blocks B] dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.05-r6 (from pkg 
dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12)
[blocks B] dev-perl/Test-Simple-0.47-r1 (from pkg 
dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12)
[blocks B] dev-perl/File-Spec-0.84-r1 (from pkg 
dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12)
[ebuildU ] dev-lang/perl-5.8.0-r12 [5.8.0-r10]
[ebuildU ] sys-apps/gawk-3.1.3 [3.1.2-r3]
[ebuildU ] dev-perl/File-Spec-0.84-r1 [0.82]
[ebuildU ] dev-perl/Test-Simple-0.47-r1 [0.47]
[ebuild  N   ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20030708
[ebuildU ] dev-php/mod_php-4.3.2-r4 [4.3.2-r3]
[ebuildU ] dev-db/phpmyadmin-2.5.2 [2.5.1]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-core-1.1-r3 [1.1-r2]
[ebuildU ] app-admin/ufed-0.33 [0.32]
[ebuild  N   ] dev-perl/Crypt-SSLeay-0.49
[ebuildU ] dev-perl/libwww-perl-5.69-r1 [5.69]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-plugins-1.3.0-r2 [1.3.0-r1]

mail jnichols #



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Failed to install socket filter?

2003-07-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
This error just started popping up, and it's kind of annoying..

[EMAIL PROTECTED] servers $ ping mail2
PING mail2.pbp.net (63.206.177.74) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 63.206.177.74: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=46.5 ms
WARNING: failed to install socket filter
: Protocol not available
64 bytes from 63.206.177.74: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=41.4 ms
? The ping still works, but where did that error come from? It's causing 
incorrect entries in my Nagios stuff. =/

Can't find anything useful on Google about the error, either.

The card in the machine is a Netgear FA310TX with the tulip driver..

Thanks! :)
-Jonathan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to install socket filter?

2003-07-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
A search for 'socket filter' on forums.gentoo.org brought this up as the first 
result:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=67576
Whoops. Forgot about the forums. =/

Interesting, because the kernel hasn't changed, and only recently has 
this error shown up. Guess I'll take a look at the kernel config.

Thanks!

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] [OFF-TOPIC] How can i test my Bandwidth ?

2003-07-15 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Andrew Farmer wrote:

At 15 July, 2003 Ricardo Nuno wrote:

Anyway the test's i make on the net the closes i get is 1773mb download
and 390 kbps upload, so or they are cheating me and making me pay for
something i dont got, and this is no dsl line this is a dedicated one it's
really alot of money, or the test's sux.

Put a 5mb file on your web server and let us all download it from 
various parts of the globe.

That'll certainly test your outbound connection. ;)

Those web-based bandwidth tests are notoriously unreliable.



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] how to prevent apacheto upgrade ?

2003-07-14 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Sylvain wrote:

Hello !

I'm affraid my question is a faq, but i have had a look at the
Portage Manual, and what i tried doesn't work :
i use axkit and apache, and i don't want to upgrade apache, since
axkit doesn't know how to work with apache2.
so i fixed the apache version in my /var/cache/edb/world file :
...
=net-www/apache-1.3.27-r3
...
but when i try 'emerge -up world', portage still want to upgrade apache :-(

I know apache1 and apache2 use different slots, so it won't uninstall my apache-1.3.27
but i really don't want this apache2 when upgrading world.
Add net-www/apache-2 to /usr/portage/profiles/default-x86-1.4/packages

:)

I had this exact same problem the other day, this fix worked for me. It 
will tell Gentoo to *not* upgrade to Apache 2...



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Silly question: Skipping stuff that emerge suggests

2003-07-13 Thread Jonathan Nichols

i think what you're looking for is /etc/make.profile/packages  read the 
comments in there and i *think* that's what you'll want to modify to get 
apache not to upgrade.

Yeah, I took a look there.. it's not in there. =/

if it works, remember to post what you did to the list eh?

Will do :D





--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Silly question: Skipping stuff that emerge suggests

2003-07-13 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Tom Wesley wrote:

On Sunday 13 July 2003 09:56, Jonathan Nichols wrote:

i think what you're looking for is /etc/make.profile/packages  read the
comments in there and i *think* that's what you'll want to modify to get
apache not to upgrade.
Yeah, I took a look there.. it's not in there. =/


If you create the file does that work?

Whoops, I meant that /etc/make.profile/packages is there, but there's no 
mention of Apache in the file. :)

I know there's a USE flag for apache2, so I tried USE=-apache2 emerge 
-up --deep world and the same stuff showed up.

Shoo, apache2!



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Silly question: Skipping stuff that emergesuggests

2003-07-13 Thread Jonathan Nichols

If you haven't installed apache yet or it is installed as dependency,
edit /usr/portage/profiles/default-x86-1.4/packages and add or modify
net-www/apache-2.
Or, I did install 1.3.27 from portage a while back...

This above approach worked. emerge -up --deep world stopped showing me 
Apache 2.0.x :-)

I also did the same for MySQL 4.x too, because I just don't need it 
quite yet. :D

Thanks! :D



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Silly question: Skipping stuff that emerge suggests

2003-07-12 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Greets, all..this is probably a *really* easy question, but I'm drawing 
blanks even after reading manpages  searching forums

mail jnichols%
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuildU ] sys-devel/gettext-0.11.5-r1 [0.11.5]
[ebuildU ] dev-libs/openssl-0.9.6j [0.9.6i-r2]
[ebuildU ] dev-db/mysql-4.0.13-r3 [3.23.56]
[ebuildU ] dev-libs/libpcre-4.2-r1 [3.9-r1]
[ebuildU ] net-www/apache-2.0.47 [1.3.27-r3]
[ebuildU ] app-arch/unzip-5.50-r2 [5.50-r1]
[ebuildU ] dev-libs/libxml2-2.5.8 [2.5.7]
[ebuildU ] dev-libs/libmcrypt-2.5.7 [2.5.5]
[ebuildU ] dev-php/mod_php-4.3.2-r3 [4.3.2]
[ebuildU ] dev-db/phpmyadmin-2.5.1 [2.5.0]
[ebuildU ] dev-util/dialog-0.9_beta20030308-r1 [0.9_beta20020814]
[ebuildU ] dev-lang/nasm-0.98.36 [0.98.34]
[ebuildU ] dev-util/intltool-0.26 [0.25]
mail jnichols%

Wow, Apache 2.x is now unmasked. Cool! But, I don't want it yet. I'm 
quite happy with 1.3.27 right now.

Is there an easy way to just skip Apache 2.x and emerge everything else?

Thanks! :)

-Jonathan



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Nagios?

2003-06-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Has anybody updated Nagios from portage yet? ;)

Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuildU ] sys-devel/patch-2.5.4-r5 [2.5.4-r4]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-core-1.1-r2 [1.0-r1]
[ebuild  N   ] net-misc/iputils-020927
[ebuildU ] net-misc/ntp-4.1.1b-r6 [4.1.1b-r5]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-plugins-1.3.0-r1 [1.3.0]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-nsca-2.3-r1 [2.3]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-nrpe-1.8-r1 [1.8]
[ebuildU ] net-analyzer/nagios-1.1 [1.0-r1]
. I'm thinking about it, but I don't want anything to blow up. ;)

-Jonathan



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] stolen:Re: [gentoo-user] new kernel

2003-06-13 Thread Jonathan Nichols


-- Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://arcterex.net

??

I'm still mad at you for stealing my Microsoft photo idea! ;)

-Dr_Stein (from #userfriendly..back in the day) :P



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] urgh.. mod_php blew up webmail

2003-06-10 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Cal Evans wrote:
Thanks,

Yes, I just found the message.

There has got to be a better way to notify users of these issues. I usually
start compiling and walk away. occasionally I do an emerge -U world if I
know what's getting updated and know it's going to take a while. These
messages fly by and never get seen.
Yup.. :) The only thing that blew up bad was Squirrelmail, because I was 
using the database based prefs and that DB.php file went missing. 
Someone on the squirrelmail list said PEAR! so I checked through the 
ebuild and saw that line about xml and xml2 - wish I had known about 
that ahead of time. ;)





--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] amavisd.conf?

2003-06-10 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hey all,
	I've got Postfix, f-prot, anomy mailtools, and amavis working quite 
well together but I noticed that the amavis ebuild doesn't seem to have 
an amavisd.conf file that I can find anywhere. Does it just not have 
one? Can I just create /etc/amavisd.conf and have it read it?

Thought I'd ask if anybody else has noticed this. :)

-Jonathan



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Advice for Blocking Attachments by File Extension

2003-06-09 Thread Jonathan Nichols

I'm quit new with mail on linux, i have already this working:
fetchmail - postfix - amavis - clamAV - spamassassin - procmail
now i want to bounce or quarantine mails with some 
extentions, like exe ,src and so on. But i don't know where 
to start, so any advice would be fine.

This is quite easy to do at the MTA (Postfix) level.

http://www.securitysage.com/files/mime_header_checks is a freely 
available header_checks file that you can use.
1)Download that file into /etc/postfix
2)Run postmap /etc/postfix/mime_header_checks
3)Add mime_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/maps/mime_header_checks 
into /etc/postfix/main.cf somewhere.
4)Restart Postfix.

That should be about all you need. Securitysage.com has quite a few 
really good articles on Postfix as well as other *_checks files, but 
beware that using broad filtering techniques can cause legitimate mail 
to be rejected. (I've had to relax some anti-spam stuff simply because 
of overzealous filtering)

Hope that helps!

-Jonathan



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: mbox vs maildir

2003-06-06 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Anthony Floyd wrote:
With all the discussion of mail handling recently, it's perked my
interest in trying to revive the mail system on my test machine,
which I've borked pretty royally.  One thing I've never had a good
handle on is mbox vs maildir.  I sort-of know the differences between
the two, but have no idea about the advantages/disadvantages of
either of them.
mbox = big fat flat file
Pro:Can be easy to administer  move mailboxes if needed
Con:Unfortunately easy to corrupt mail file
maildir = each message is an individual file
Pro:More efficient  less likely to hose big mail file
Con:Lots of files
I think that's a fairly rough list.. ;) We use Postfix/Courier-Imap here 
with maildir. It's been working a LOT better than the old 
Postfix/UW-Imap setup, that's for sure.

-Jonathan



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Postfix vs. Qmail

2003-06-05 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on 
these two.  I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at 
the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to go. 

 

What do you think? Pros and Cons for both.
This could end up a holy war, ya know. ;)

Personally, I choose Postfix. I'm using it on 2 production mail servers 
already, haven't had any problems.
Support for it is available, the author is on the postfix-users mailing 
list along with several other very sharp and helpful people. Once in a 
while, they're a little caustic, but you still get your answers. :)

Never used qmail, but I've heard the author/license/etc is a bit..odd..



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Ok, April 1st is over.. ;)

2003-04-02 Thread Jonathan Nichols
..perhaps it'd be a good idea to change the April 1st newsletter... I had
a co-worker (who I've convinced to try Gentoo because he hates RPM..heh)
come over and give me the WTF?? I just finished installing it and now
they're going to use RPM?? freak-out dance.

I explained that it was an April Fools Day joke. He relaxed quite a bit,
fortunately.
However, there could be other people glancing at the page that might not
quite remember that it's April 1st...

Just a thought. :-)

-Jonathan


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Ok, April 1st is over.. ;)

2003-04-02 Thread Jonathan Nichols
 However, there could be other people glancing at the page that might not
 quite remember that it's April 1st...


Whoops. I forgot to mention that I was only referring to the main page - I
made my co-worker read the actual newsletter and he understood that it was
a joke. :)


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] april fools?

2003-04-01 Thread Jonathan Nichols
 Quite honestly, I'm surprised that so many people believed it.  To me, the
 notion that Gentoo would dump ebuilds in favor of RPMs is so far from the
 realm of possibility as to be absurd.  Obviously, some folks didn't find it
 quite so impossible. :)


Oh, this wasn't too bad.. you should have seen the Userfriendly.org April
Fools Day joke blow up several years ago. ;)

I just imagined 5000 admins throwing up their arms and yelling D'OH!
after reading that article. ;)

-Jonathan


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how does one install all available categories/packages?

2003-04-01 Thread Jonathan Nichols

 Now a question. Why would you want to do that?

Sheer  utter insanity would be my guess. :-)



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] portage on Solaris?

2003-03-31 Thread Jonathan Nichols
 How far fetched is the idea getting portage onto Solaris?

 We need a system so the installed sources could be traced: who was
 compiling it, how he was doing it, what packeges are installed now and
 so on.  A package manager is perfect for this purpose.

Not too far fetched at all. Check out pkg-get on sunfreeware.com - it's
quite handy :)


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Who uses sudo?

2003-03-28 Thread Jonathan Nichols
 I'm just wondering how many other people use sudo instead of su, and whether
 it should be perhaps included in a 'standard' install (by which I mean
 mentioned in the install docs).

I do. Nobody ever gets the root passwords. ;) The root pw can be changed
via sudo if needed.

sudo is a pretty useful tool, especially because of its logging
capabilities. :)

-jonathan


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] bad ./configure Cant emerge mod_php

2003-03-27 Thread Jonathan Nichols
  !!! ERROR: dev-php/mod_php-4.3.1 failed.
  !!! ERROR: dev-php/mod_php-4.3.1 failed.
  !!! Function src_compile, Line 216, Exitcode 1
  !!! Function src_compile, Line 216, Exitcode 1
  !!! bad ./configure
  !!! bad ./configure


  Can someone tell me how to fix this?


Yup! I know how to fix that one ;)

USE=-java emerge mod_php

Or, add -java to your USE flags in /etc/make.conf

I had the exact same problem. :-)

-Jonathan


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] problem at bootup

2003-03-25 Thread Jonathan Nichols
 fsck.ext3: no such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hdb3
 /dev/hdb3:
  (superblock warning)
 *filesystem could not be fixed !!!
 give root password for maintenance (blah,Blah)

 System was running fine yesterday.

I had that happen when I forgot to do emerge reiserfstools - I never
installed the fsck tools. It's quite possible that you have the same
issue.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] bad uid -uid in virtual maps.

2003-03-21 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Hey all!
I posted this to the forums as
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=42722

I cannot find a resolution for this anywhere on the web, so I thought I'd
ask you guys.

Here's the text of the post:

After following every direction I could find in the document
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/virt-mail-howto.xml I'm getting the error
shown below.
I have the feeling that it's a problem with a UID somewhere, but for the
life of me I cannot find the actual problem.

Has anybody followed the virtual mail howto and encountered this error?
Anybody know a way to fix it or where I should start? I Googled for it and
didn't come up with any solutions. Oh, and yes, I checked the forums,
too..

Thanks!

Oh yeah, here's the error: (I made my DNS server authoritative for
domain2.com so DNS definately isn't the problem.)

Mar 20 20:27:32 [postfix/virtual] B346318FE4: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=virtual, delay=0, status=deferred (recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED]: bad
uid -uid in virtual_uid_maps)


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list