Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-04 Thread Philip Lawatsch
Nick Rout wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:27:59 +0100
Philip Lawatsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

This will for sure work but is definitely not what I intend. Simply 
overriding gcc by symlinking it to distcc is not what I want.

Thats exactly what distcc does, it puts a gcc wrapper in the PATH ahead of gcc. I was merely trying to establish if distcc was working. OTOH if it works, then it will solve your problem until we find the real answer.
Really?
I do have the impressions that distcc should be used instead of gcc and 
use kind of a patch attack against gcc :)
Anyway, it works if i make sure that the gcc in $PATH being used is a 
symlink to gcc.

Its just strange that emerge does not do this for me.
It looks to me like a problem with emerge not setting the PATH properly when compiling, so it gets to the real gcc before the wrapper. Take a look in /etc/env.d and see if it all looks fine.
-8
# This file is managed by distcc-config; use it to change these settings.
DISTCC_LOG=
DCCC_PATH=/usr/lib/distcc/bin
DISTCC_VERBOSE=0
8
Is in 02distcc.
Starting to wonder why its called DCCC_PATH and not DISTCC_PATH ...
I'd like 
to let emerge do this work for me. 

Look I don't have a magic answer, i am just trying to help work out the problem. Perhaps you should email Lisa Seelye direct - she is the gentoo distcc maintainer, or else the gentoo-dev list may be able to offer some help.
Will give it a try, and I do know that you're trying to help and I also 
do appreciate it!

As I said, if i manually use distcc 
it works.

Also I doubt that a package can disable distcc if it does not use 
something advanced to check for the real gcc. If you just disable 
parallel make you wont automagically stop distcc from being used afair.

Yes I guess that is true, but then how do you know distcc is being used with -j1, with the -j1 being set by the package (or perhaps the ebuild). An ebuild could also presumably over ride FEATURES
Yes, it could override it but none of the ones I tried did override it.

I'd like to know why emerge itself does not use distcc even though I 
tell it to by setting features to distcc.


me too. what versions of distcc and gcc?
gcc
 [  I] 3.3.5-r1 (3.3)
 sys-devel/distcc :
[  I] 2.16-r2 (0)
-ph-
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Philip Lawatsch wrote:
The other machines are in /etc/distcc/hosts and I cant ping / ssh to them.
tv1 / # distcc-config --get-hosts
localhost icebear icebird
Still emerge does not use distcc to compile for instance xine-lib or 
bison or perl.

I'm not sure what I missed to do, perhaps someone here has a hint for me.
And, another far worse problem I have is that in my case I'm having at 
least 8 parallel compile jobs running on my machine which really criples 
it. As far as I understood if the Makefile does support parallel 
building I should also be able to use distcc. But it looks like all the 
autoconf scripts try to use gcc / g++ instead of distcc for as the 
compiler.

Some packages can't be built in parallel, your best bet to not cripple 
the localhost is the put a limit on how many jobs it should allow
Example:
distcc-config --set-hosts localhost/2 icebear icebird

Will limit localhost to 2 active compile jobs at a time...
Take a look at the distcc manual and the nice document Lisa has put 
together on the Gentoo web

/Andreas
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Philip Lawatsch
Andreas Vinsander wrote:
Philip Lawatsch wrote:
The other machines are in /etc/distcc/hosts and I cant ping / ssh to 
them.
Sorry, this is a typo, of course i _can_ ping / ssh to them, otherwise 
this would not make much sense ...

tv1 / # distcc-config --get-hosts
localhost icebear icebird
Still emerge does not use distcc to compile for instance xine-lib or 
bison or perl.

I'm not sure what I missed to do, perhaps someone here has a hint for me.
And, another far worse problem I have is that in my case I'm having at 
least 8 parallel compile jobs running on my machine which really 
criples it. As far as I understood if the Makefile does support 
parallel building I should also be able to use distcc. But it looks 
like all the autoconf scripts try to use gcc / g++ instead of distcc 
for as the compiler.

Some packages can't be built in parallel, your best bet to not cripple 
the localhost is the put a limit on how many jobs it should allow
Example:
distcc-config --set-hosts localhost/2 icebear icebird

Will limit localhost to 2 active compile jobs at a time...
Take a look at the distcc manual and the nice document Lisa has put 
together on the Gentoo web
I know all of that and I've already set up the distccd on the local host 
in this way (not via distcc_hosts but by configuring distccd on 
localhost). BUT, for some reason portage does _not_ use distcc at all 
but the normal gcc and this will result in -jN jobs running on localhost.

kind regards Philip
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Philip Lawatsch wrote:
I know all of that and I've already set up the distccd on the local host 
in this way (not via distcc_hosts but by configuring distccd on 
localhost). BUT, for some reason portage does _not_ use distcc at all 
but the normal gcc and this will result in -jN jobs running on localhost.

Ok, then what do u have in /etc/conf.d/distccd on the different hosts
U need to configure it to listen to connections from your subnet or 
specific hosts

/Andreas
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


RE: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Dave Nebinger
 I know all of that and I've already set up the distccd on the local host
 in this way (not via distcc_hosts but by configuring distccd on
 localhost). BUT, for some reason portage does _not_ use distcc at all
 but the normal gcc and this will result in -jN jobs running on
 localhost.

Phil, I've noticed the same lack of distcc usage that you've encountered.  I
haven't isolated the cause (i.e. I think portage has been updated twice
since it started to fail for me), but I can assure you that it's not
necessarily anything you're doing...



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Philip Lawatsch
Andreas Vinsander wrote:
Philip Lawatsch wrote:
I know all of that and I've already set up the distccd on the local 
host in this way (not via distcc_hosts but by configuring distccd on 
localhost). BUT, for some reason portage does _not_ use distcc at all 
but the normal gcc and this will result in -jN jobs running on 
localhost.

Ok, then what do u have in /etc/conf.d/distccd on the different hosts
U need to configure it to listen to connections from your subnet or 
specific hosts
My distcc setup is verified to work (compiling something else on the 
machines right now).

My problem is that emerge simply does ignore FEATURES=distcc and 
instead uses gcc / g++ directly. Either emerge fails to tell the 
packages autoconf script to use distcc as a compiler or something else.

In case my distcc setup would be broken I'd get complaints from distcc 
about it, or get at least something in the distccd log on the local 
machine. But I get neither.

kind regards Philip
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Andreas Vinsander
Philip Lawatsch wrote:
My distcc setup is verified to work (compiling something else on the 
machines right now).

My problem is that emerge simply does ignore FEATURES=distcc and 
instead uses gcc / g++ directly. Either emerge fails to tell the 
packages autoconf script to use distcc as a compiler or something else.
Yep, that sounds strange...
What about environment variables? On my system the distcc ebuild has 
installed the file /etc/env.d/02distcc

Are the variables mentioned in there available in your actual environment?
env-update  source /etc/profile
might be helpful...
Looking at /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh there are some references to 
distcc, take look and try to find out if some of the tests found might 
cripple your portage's use of distcc

I have run out of ideas... sorry!
/Andreas
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Nick Rout
are you setting up distcc using distcc-config? 

what does the logfile say?

distcc-config --set-hosts host list
distcc-config set-verbose 1
distcc-config set-log /var/log/distcc
touch /var/log/distcc

emerge blah

tools to analyse:

tail -f /var/log/distcc (on the compiling machine)
DISTCC_DIR=/var/tmp/portage/.distcc distccmon-text 1 (ditto)
tcpdump port 3632 (on either machine)


On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:02:06 +0100
Philip Lawatsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to use distcc for building my system.
 
 I've yet encountered a rather strange problem, I've added
 
 CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer
 CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
 CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
 MAKEOPTS=-j8
 FEATURES=distcc
 
 to my make.conf.
 
 I've got the daemons running on the other machines (and also the local 
 host).
 
 The other machines are in /etc/distcc/hosts and I cant ping / ssh to them.
 
 tv1 / # distcc-config --get-hosts
 localhost icebear icebird
 
 Still emerge does not use distcc to compile for instance xine-lib or 
 bison or perl.
 
 I'm not sure what I missed to do, perhaps someone here has a hint for me.
 
 And, another far worse problem I have is that in my case I'm having at 
 least 8 parallel compile jobs running on my machine which really criples 
 it. As far as I understood if the Makefile does support parallel 
 building I should also be able to use distcc. But it looks like all the 
 autoconf scripts try to use gcc / g++ instead of distcc for as the compiler.
 
 Any help appreciated.
 
 kind regards Philip
 
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Philip Lawatsch
Nick Rout wrote:
are you setting up distcc using distcc-config? 

what does the logfile say?
distcc-config --set-hosts host list
distcc-config set-verbose 1
distcc-config set-log /var/log/distcc
touch /var/log/distcc
emerge blah
tools to analyse:
tail -f /var/log/distcc (on the compiling machine)
DISTCC_DIR=/var/tmp/portage/.distcc distccmon-text 1 (ditto)
tcpdump port 3632 (on either machine)
Nothing since distcc is not used by emerge but plain old gcc.
-ph-

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Nick Rout

On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:02:36 +0100
Philip Lawatsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nick Rout wrote:
  are you setting up distcc using distcc-config? 
  
  what does the logfile say?
  
  distcc-config --set-hosts host list
  distcc-config set-verbose 1
  distcc-config set-log /var/log/distcc
  touch /var/log/distcc
  
  emerge blah
  
  tools to analyse:
  
  tail -f /var/log/distcc (on the compiling machine)
  DISTCC_DIR=/var/tmp/portage/.distcc distccmon-text 1 (ditto)
  tcpdump port 3632 (on either machine)
 
 Nothing since distcc is not used by emerge but plain old gcc.

can i suggest you try setting PATH on the emerge command line and see what 
happens?

PATH=/usr/lib/distcc/bin;$PATH emerge blah

make sure blah is a package that does not disable distcc by disabling parallel 
makes, I know for sure mc will use distcc so i often test with that (if you 
don't want mc you can ctrl-c it before it finishes compiling). I also know 
Xorg-x11 disables parallel makes. with other packages YMMV

 
 -ph-
 
 
 
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Philip Lawatsch
Nick Rout wrote:
are you setting up distcc using distcc-config? 

what does the logfile say?

Nothing since distcc is not used by emerge but plain old gcc.

can i suggest you try setting PATH on the emerge command line and see what 
happens?
PATH=/usr/lib/distcc/bin;$PATH emerge blah
make sure blah is a package that does not disable distcc by disabling parallel makes, I know for sure mc will use distcc so i often test with that (if you don't want mc you can ctrl-c it before it finishes compiling). I also know Xorg-x11 disables parallel makes. with other packages YMMV
This will for sure work but is definitely not what I intend. Simply 
overriding gcc by symlinking it to distcc is not what I want. I'd like 
to let emerge do this work for me. As I said, if i manually use distcc 
it works.

Also I doubt that a package can disable distcc if it does not use 
something advanced to check for the real gcc. If you just disable 
parallel make you wont automagically stop distcc from being used afair.

I'd like to know why emerge itself does not use distcc even though I 
tell it to by setting features to distcc.

kind regards Philip
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread Nick Rout

On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:27:59 +0100
Philip Lawatsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This will for sure work but is definitely not what I intend. Simply 
 overriding gcc by symlinking it to distcc is not what I want.

Thats exactly what distcc does, it puts a gcc wrapper in the PATH ahead of gcc. 
I was merely trying to establish if distcc was working. OTOH if it works, then 
it will solve your problem until we find the real answer.

It looks to me like a problem with emerge not setting the PATH properly when 
compiling, so it gets to the real gcc before the wrapper. Take a look in 
/etc/env.d and see if it all looks fine.

 I'd like 
 to let emerge do this work for me. 

Look I don't have a magic answer, i am just trying to help work out the 
problem. Perhaps you should email Lisa Seelye direct - she is the gentoo distcc 
maintainer, or else the gentoo-dev list may be able to offer some help.

As I said, if i manually use distcc 
 it works.
 
 Also I doubt that a package can disable distcc if it does not use 
 something advanced to check for the real gcc. If you just disable 
 parallel make you wont automagically stop distcc from being used afair.

Yes I guess that is true, but then how do you know distcc is being used with 
-j1, with the -j1 being set by the package (or perhaps the ebuild). An ebuild 
could also presumably over ride FEATURES

 
 
 I'd like to know why emerge itself does not use distcc even though I 
 tell it to by setting features to distcc.
 

me too. what versions of distcc and gcc?

 kind regards Philip

-- 
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DistCC + Portage Questions

2005-02-03 Thread William Kenworthy
It actually doesnt stop distcc - just runs a single make job on the
other machine.  Very useful for low powered machines as you dont specify
localhost so all the makes are remote, even if just one machine
(should be, doesnt always happen tho!)

To stop distcc use FEATURES=-distcc

However, this thread is of use to me as I also have a laptop that plain
refuses to distcc anything.  Havent had time trace it yet, but the
symptoms are similar to what others are reporting.  Only difference with
my usual inastall method is that I tried to set up distcc according to
the gentoo guide so it would be used during bootstrap - it didnt work
there either.

Think were looking at some kind of configuration bug that some systems
trigger?

BillK


On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:55 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:27:59 +0100
 Philip Lawatsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

  Also I doubt that a package can disable distcc if it does not use 
  something advanced to check for the real gcc. If you just disable 
  parallel make you wont automagically stop distcc from being used afair.
 
 Yes I guess that is true, but then how do you know distcc is being used with 
 -j1, with the -j1 being set by the package (or perhaps the ebuild). An ebuild 
 could also presumably over ride FEATURES
 

-- 
William Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home!


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list