Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine to Compute Engine communication via internal IP

2018-03-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Any news? I've spend a lot of time to find information on how to access 
Compute Engine vial URLFetch from App Engine standard using internal IP.
Is this simply not possible (yet)?

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 2:19:49 AM UTC+2, Lorne Kligerman wrote:
>
> Not just yet.  We'll let you know when we're ready for early tests.
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Robert Dyas  > wrote:
>
>> Now that GAE Std Java 8 is in beta, is there any update on when this 
>> might become available for testing?
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 1:25:40 PM UTC-5, Lorne Kligerman wrote:
>>
>>> As Adam mentioned, this is only possible right now with the flex.  
>>> However we do know this is a problem and are working towards a solution for 
>>> standard, nothing more to report at this time.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 1:53:53 PM UTC-8, Nick (Cloud Platform 
>>> Support) wrote:

 Hey Jitenda,

 The Flexible Environment can be used by any user, although of course 
 being a beta product, it isn't covered by the same SLA's as other 
 products. 
 You should check our documentation including the terms of service 
 , service level agreements 
 , and the explanation of launch 
 stages .

 Cheers,

 Nick
 Cloud Platform Community Support

 On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 9:14:50 AM UTC-5, JITENDRA GANGWAR 
 wrote:
>
> Thanks Adam for your answer , But  as per this documentation 
>  App Engine 
> flexible environment is still in beta release , can it be used in 
> production ?
>
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 2:38:46 AM UTC+5:30, Adam (Cloud 
> Platform Support) wrote:
>>
>> You should be able to do this if you use a Flexible Environment 
>> instance, and specify the same network name 
>> 
>>  
>> in the app.yaml that your Compute Engine instance running MySQL is on. 
>> It 
>> won't work for Standard Environment instances as they are on separate, 
>> physical networks.
>>
>> I say "should" as I haven't played around with this, and there's an 
>> additional layer of network routing from the Docker container the app 
>> lives 
>> in which also has its own local subnet.
>>
>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 10:43:29 AM UTC-4, Stephen Dunkley wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a Java Web application deployed on a Compute Engine instance 
>>> connecting to MySql running on another Compute Engine instance in the 
>>> same 
>>> project. I am able to connect to MySql using the internal IP address 
>>> (jdbc:mysql://10.240.0.4:3306/).
>>>
>>> If I deploy the same web application to an App Engine instance 
>>> within the same project, I can only connect to the MySql instance via 
>>> the 
>>> extermal IP address (jdbc:mysql://104.196.148.141:3306/>>
>>> If I try to use the internal IP address, I get a Communication Link 
>>> Failure, Permission Denied due to policy.
>>>
>>> My question is how do I open up communication between an App Engine 
>>> instance and a Compute Engine instance via an internal IP address? The 
>>> performance is about 5 x faster when using the internal IP address.
>>>
>>> Any help would be much appreciated
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/5RsoKIPWyTQ/unsubscribe
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> google-appengi...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/b21223f6-8d58-4522-b369-a17744453b53%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

[google-appengine] Re: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.ScriptObjectMirror is a restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.

2017-12-02 Thread Daniel Florey
We are using gwt 2.8.2 on the client side so the startup uses something 
like:

... -server com.google.appengine.tools.development.gwt.AppEngineLauncher
... -javaagent:appengine-java-sdk-1.9.59\lib\agent\appengine-agent.jar

My guess is that the tools in the new Java8 App Engine SDK are not yet 
ready for Java8?
Looks like the SecurityManager is still used when using the 
AppEngineLauncher / appengine-agent

On Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 10:06:57 PM UTC+1, George (Cloud Platform 
Support) wrote:
>
> Hello Daniel, 
>
> What is the output of the gcloud info command, and gcloud components list? 
>
> What version of Java is actually used by your local development server, 7 
> or 8? In case of Java 8, there is no longer a java.lang.SecurityManager 
> installed at startup, which means all Java standard classes are now 
> available and there is no longer a whitelist.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/db0ce0cf-de6b-4cbf-abe1-d357d8b17cd5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.ScriptObjectMirror is a restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.

2017-11-28 Thread Daniel Florey
We are using Java8 on GAE Standard.
It works really great.
When using Nashorn we get the error 

jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.ScriptObjectMirror is a restricted class. Please 
see the Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.

in the dev server. It works fine in prod though.
Is there a workaround to turn of the restricted class check completely so 
that we can test in dev mode?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/7ab19b2a-780f-4dbd-916c-88cfe350c669%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] URLFetchService getting timeouts

2016-08-29 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
since ~10 days we are getting a lot of "hanging" requests when using 
URLFetchService to upload files to our own servers.
It used to work just fine for the past years...
We can upload to our servers manually from our end without any issues, so 
it looks like an App Engine issue to me.
Anybody else affected?

Regards,
Daniel


10:07:11.294com.floreysoft.ultradox.server.adapter.TemplateAdapter 
transform: Template has been zipped 
10:07:11.294com.floreysoft.ultradox.server.adapter.TemplateAdapter convert: 
Starting upload of document (length=3534 bytes) to Ultradox engine with 
IP=85.214.114.14 
10:08:06.789com.floreysoft.ultradox.server.adapter.TemplateAdapter convert: 
Failed to retrieve document from Ultradox engine. Retry 1... 
com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$CancelledException: The API call 
urlfetch.Fetch() was cancelled because the overall HTTP request deadline 
was reached. at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl.doSyncCall(ApiProxyImpl.java:275) 
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl.access$000(ApiProxyImpl.java:73) 
at com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl$1.run(ApiProxyImpl.java:215) 
at com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl$1.run(ApiProxyImpl.java:212) 
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl.makeSyncCall(ApiProxyImpl.java:211) 
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.ApiProxyImpl.makeSyncCall(ApiProxyImpl.java:73) 
at com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy.makeSyncCall(ApiProxy.java:122) at 
com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.fetch(URLFetchServiceImpl.java:40)
 
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler$Connection.fetchResponse(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:543)
 
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler$Connection.getInputStream(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:422)
 
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler$Connection.getResponseCode(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:275)
 
at com.floreysoft.ultradox.server.adapter.TemplateAdapter.convert(
TemplateAdapter.java:1108 

)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/60443f00-252b-4dd0-a589-d1aca71cd618%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: Announcing SSL for GAE Custom Domains in the Developers Console

2015-11-20 Thread Daniel Florey
Is there still a way that companies can add app engine apps to their domain 
without the need to change the configuration of the app?
I've been using this feature for a long time, but I cannot find a way to 
enable companies to map their own domains to our app anymore without manual 
interaction from our side :-(

On Wednesday, 16 September 2015 02:10:30 UTC+2, Lorne Kligerman wrote:
>
> At long last, we are happy to announce that your App Engine custom domains 
> and SSL security can now be configured within the Google Developers 
> Console 
> .
>  
>  
>
> For many historical reasons, this functionality was split between the 
> Developers Console and the Google Apps Admin console.  With this change, 
> the Apps Admin console is no longer needed which will make your setup much 
> more simple and straightforward.
>
> Rest assured that all existing domains and certificates will continue to 
> serve as normal.
>
> If you have an existing App Engine application serving over a custom 
> domain and SSL certificate, you will have to verify ownership of your 
> domain in the Developers Console here 
> 
> .  Once verified, you will see all of your existing certificates and the 
> domain to which they belong.
>
> For those just getting started, simply follow the instructions on the Custom 
> Domains and SSL Certificates tabs.  For more details you can check out 
> the full documentation here 
> .
>
>
> This is just the beginning of a larger project that is under way to help 
> you quickly get your app online, brand it properly with your own domain, 
> make it as secure as possible, and manage the setup with ease among your 
> organization, however large or small.
>
> Cheers and thanks for your patience,
> The Cloud Custom Domains SSL Team.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/00b63d0a-3f9d-409e-99a8-ba54e83e8a52%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: GAE for Java picking wrong / old jars

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi Patrice,
thanks for the reply.
I've opened an issue on the issue tracker.
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=12035
If someone from Google want to dig into this I could provide access to one 
of my apps where I encounter this issue.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 7:53:49 PM UTC+2, Patrice (Cloud Platform 
Support) wrote:

 Hi Daniel!

 What do you mean by once in a while? How frequent is this? Do you have 
 any way to reliably reproduce that issue? We'd be happy to look into it, 
 but we'd need some clear reproduction steps. Once you have that, I would 
 suggest opening this on the issue tracker 
 https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list as a defect 
 report, with enough information to reliably reproduce. We do monitor that 
 site as well, so no worries for that :).

 Cheers!

 On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:59:28 AM UTC-4, Daniel Florey wrote:

 I am seing this issue once in a while:
 I'm uploading a new version of my app including updated jars, but GAE 
 still uses old versions of the jars.
 Anybody else?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/0e2b3cf3-fd38-41db-acfd-fe484456996a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] GAE for Java picking wrong / old jars

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel Florey
I am seing this issue once in a while:
I'm uploading a new version of my app including updated jars, but GAE still 
uses old versions of the jars.
Anybody else?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/3eeae185-da86-4ad0-8866-ce8a012f3ebb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] OAuth2 stopped working on all our apps

2015-03-05 Thread Daniel Florey
Since a few hours I'm getting weird responses when exchanging the OAuth2 
token.
Our apps are running on GAE/Java.
Anybody else?


htmlheadmeta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; 
charset=utf-8/titleSorry.../titlestyle body { font-family: verdana, 
arial, sans-serif; background-color: #fff; color: #000; 
}/style/headbodydivtabletrtdbfont face=times color=#0039b6 
size=10G/fontfont face=times color=#c41200 size=10o/fontfont face=times 
color=#f3c518 size=10o/fontfont face=times color=#0039b6 
size=10g/fontfont face=times color=#30a72f size=10l/fontfont face=times 
color=#c41200 size=10e/font/b/tdtd style=text-align: left; 
vertical-align: bottom; padding-bottom: 15px; width: 50%div 
style=border-bottom: 1px solid 
#dfdfdf;Sorry.../div/td/tr/table/divdiv style=margin-left: 
4em;h1We're sorry.../h1p... but your computer or network may be sending 
automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right 
now./p/divdiv style=margin-left: 4em;See a 
href=https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/86640;Google Help/a for 
more information.br/br//divdiv style=text-align: center; border-top: 
1px solid #dfdfdf;a href=https://www.google.com;Google 
Home/a/div/body/html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/2f11e5f1-825c-4e16-8e60-92a376596dd5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Re: OAuth2 stopped working on all our apps

2015-03-05 Thread Daniel Florey
What was that???
Now they are all working again.

On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 4:19:05 PM UTC, Daniel Florey wrote:

 Since a few hours I'm getting weird responses when exchanging the OAuth2 
 token.
 Our apps are running on GAE/Java.
 Anybody else?


 htmlheadmeta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; 
 charset=utf-8/titleSorry.../titlestyle body { font-family: verdana, 
 arial, sans-serif; background-color: #fff; color: #000; 
 }/style/headbodydivtabletrtdbfont face=times color=#0039b6 
 size=10G/fontfont face=times color=#c41200 size=10o/fontfont 
 face=times color=#f3c518 size=10o/fontfont face=times color=#0039b6 
 size=10g/fontfont face=times color=#30a72f size=10l/fontfont 
 face=times color=#c41200 size=10e/font/b/tdtd style=text-align: 
 left; vertical-align: bottom; padding-bottom: 15px; width: 50%div 
 style=border-bottom: 1px solid 
 #dfdfdf;Sorry.../div/td/tr/table/divdiv style=margin-left: 
 4em;h1We're sorry.../h1p... but your computer or network may be 
 sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your 
 request right now./p/divdiv style=margin-left: 4em;See a 
 href=https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/86640;Google Help/a for 
 more information.br/br//divdiv style=text-align: center; border-top: 
 1px solid #dfdfdf;a href=https://www.google.com;Google 
 Home/a/div/body/html



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/a7853ea0-ef20-4d71-ab4e-1122698caa52%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[google-appengine] Publishing Google App Engine applications using UserService rejected on Google Apps Marketplace

2014-02-26 Thread Daniel Florey
I want to publish my applications running on GAE on the Google Apps 
Marketplace.
I am using the UserService to send out mails on behalf of the user and to 
check if a user is logged in, admin by using isUserAdmin() etc.

My apps have been rejected as the Google Apps Marketplace allows only 
Oauth2 / OpenID connect for logging in.
How can I use the UserService with the new Google Apps Marketplace?

Is the UserService sill officially supported or is it somehow deprecated? 
The OpenID still is marked as experimental and OAuth2 is not supported at 
all.

If Google is retiring the UserService what is the recommended solution to 
send out emails from GAE on behalf of the current user?
I don't want to send out from GMail using socket API due to the daily 
quotas etc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[google-appengine] Application is down for several hours / days

2013-11-26 Thread Daniel Florey
Since a few days I am getting this error for almost every request. I 
reverted back to an old version that has been running fine for the last 
year, but this is what I get. Many users are asking for a refund, so please 
have a look at
floreysoftucm
Thanks


   1. /_ah/channel/disconnected/ 500 3338ms 0kb module=default version=5
   
   0.1.0.10 - - [26/Nov/2013:01:08:56 -0800] POST /_ah/channel/disconnected/ 
HTTP/1.1 500 0 - - floreysoftucm.appspot.com ms=3338 cpu_ms=692 
loading_request=1 pending_ms=1396 exit_code=121 app_engine_release=1.8.8 
instance=00c61b117c38da138127333d5b3a7f9d2e19b17c 
https://appengine.google.com/instances?app_id=s~floreysoftucmversion_id=5.367372894556961703key=00c61b117c38da138127333d5b3a7f9d2e19b17c#00c61b117c38da138127333d5b3a7f9d2e19b17c
   
   2. I2013-11-26 10:08:56.154
   
   This request caused a new process to be started for your application, and 
thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time. This request 
may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical request for your 
application.
   
   3. W2013-11-26 10:08:56.154
   
   A problem was encountered with the process that handled this request, 
causing it to exit. This is likely to cause a new process to be used for the 
next request to your application. (Error code 121)
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[google-appengine] Re: App engine is down on some apps

2013-10-16 Thread Daniel Florey
Upload is stuck here as well (Java).

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:34:18 PM UTC+2, Dennis wrote:

 I'm trying to upload a new version of my code, but the upload process has 
 been stuck for a 10 minutes now.
 Interestingly, however, the old version of my code (python) is still 
 running and is even quite responsive.



 On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:54:16 PM UTC+8, timh wrote:

 Though the dashboard is very slow at the moment.

 T

 On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:52:37 PM UTC+8, timh wrote:

 No..  I am on python and am finding it's running particularly well at 
 the moment. This morning memecache was being purged rapidly now it's 
 settled down and response times are good.

 T

 On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:24:50 PM UTC+8, ZeroCool wrote:

 Anyone else seeing the same problem?
 My app pe-server7 (java) is down, and others are experiencing lag 
 issues.

 Can any Googler look into the problem?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [google-appengine] Datastore down

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi Jeff,
thanks for your valuable reply. As a workaround I've slowed down my app. 
This seems to fix the issue.
It would be great to get more detailed info on this topic in the docs.

Thanks,
Daniel


Am Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013 18:54:40 UTC+2 schrieb Jeff Schnitzer:

 How many entities are you trying to write at once? There are rate limits 
 to what you can do from a single instance. A batch write will be broken up 
 into chunks internally, plus you can only have a certain number (10 I 
 think) of async requests in flight at once.

 In practice, writing large numbers of entities (1000+) takes substantial 
 amounts of time, and may be best shunted off to the task queue where it 
 will be spread out over a larger number of instances. If you have a 
 borderline case, there are a few tricks - you might try running an Executor 
 with multiple threads to get more parallelism.

 Jeff


 On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Daniel Florey 
 daniel...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 Hi,
 thanks for your reply. 
 I cannot believe that datastore is not able to handle many write requests 
 simultaneously. Where did you get this information?  Of course I'm not 
 writing to the same entity groups, just plain entities. 
 Any insight would be highly appreciated!
 My code is quite simpe, just writing to the datastore from concurrent 
 tasks using low-level api.



 2013/7/7 Vinny P vinn...@gmail.com javascript:

   On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Bert robertbcur...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 Is this happening all the time or just for some requests?
 Perhaps include the code that results in the exception being thrown.

  
 +1. DatastoreTimeoutExceptions generally occur when applications try to 
 put/delete large amounts of entities simultaneously. Did you change your 
 code, or get a large amount of new users recently?
  
  Perhaps your app can reduce its usage of the datastore. For example, 
 you could cache more into memcache, or consolidate entities.
  
 Can you post your code?
  
 -
 -Vinny P
 Technology  Media Advisor
 Chicago, IL

 App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com
   


 On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Daniel Florey 
 daniel...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 Our app is not working since 2 days due to datastore outage. This is very 
 bad as this is causing manual support/interaction for hundreds of clients.

 I'm getting tons of errors like this:


 Operation failed due to internal error, aborting
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreTimeoutException: 
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper.translateError(DatastoreApiHelper.java:43)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper$1.convertException(DatastoreApiHelper.java:70)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:94)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper$CumulativeAggregateFuture.get(FutureHelper.java:142)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.getInternal(FutureHelper.java:71)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.quietGet(FutureHelper.java:32)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$2.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:94)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$2.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:91)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.TransactionRunner.runInTransaction(TransactionRunner.java:29)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.put(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:91)
at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.put(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:80)


  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Google App Engine group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/Pgs-uSUMnv4/unsubscribe
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:.

 To post to this group, send email to 
 google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  


  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google App Engine group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 To post to this group, send email to 
 google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com

Re: [google-appengine] Datastore down

2013-07-07 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
I cannot believe that datastore is not able to handle many write requests
simultaneously. Where did you get this information?  Of course I'm not
writing to the same entity groups, just plain entities.
Any insight would be highly appreciated!
My code is quite simpe, just writing to the datastore from concurrent tasks
using low-level api.



2013/7/7 Vinny P vinny...@gmail.com

  On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Bert robertbcur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is this happening all the time or just for some requests?
 Perhaps include the code that results in the exception being thrown.


 +1. DatastoreTimeoutExceptions generally occur when applications try to
 put/delete large amounts of entities simultaneously. Did you change your
 code, or get a large amount of new users recently?

  Perhaps your app can reduce its usage of the datastore. For example, you
 could cache more into memcache, or consolidate entities.

 Can you post your code?

 -
 -Vinny P
 Technology  Media Advisor
 Chicago, IL

 App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com



 On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Daniel Florey daniel.flo...@gmail.comwrote:


 Our app is not working since 2 days due to datastore outage. This is very 
 bad as this is causing manual support/interaction for hundreds of clients.


 I'm getting tons of errors like this:



 Operation failed due to internal error, aborting
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreTimeoutException:
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper.translateError(DatastoreApiHelper.java:43)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper$1.convertException(DatastoreApiHelper.java:70)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:94)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper$CumulativeAggregateFuture.get(FutureHelper.java:142)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.getInternal(FutureHelper.java:71)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.quietGet(FutureHelper.java:32)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$2.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:94)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$2.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:91)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.TransactionRunner.runInTransaction(TransactionRunner.java:29)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.put(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:91)
  at 
 com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.put(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:80)


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
 Google Groups Google App Engine group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/Pgs-uSUMnv4/unsubscribe
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[google-appengine] Datastore down

2013-07-06 Thread Daniel Florey


Our app is not working since 2 days due to datastore outage. This is very bad 
as this is causing manual support/interaction for hundreds of clients.

I'm getting tons of errors like this:


Operation failed due to internal error, aborting
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreTimeoutException: 
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper.translateError(DatastoreApiHelper.java:43)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper$1.convertException(DatastoreApiHelper.java:70)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:94)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper$CumulativeAggregateFuture.get(FutureHelper.java:142)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:86)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.getInternal(FutureHelper.java:71)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.quietGet(FutureHelper.java:32)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$2.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:94)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$2.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:91)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.TransactionRunner.runInTransaction(TransactionRunner.java:29)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.put(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:91)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.put(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:80)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[google-appengine] Re: App Engine is down with 500 Internal Server Error

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Florey
Unfortunately my app is still broken. Since a few days I get this error for 
multiple apps:

Uncaught exception from servlet

java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Timeout while fetching URL: 
https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token


App-ID: floreysofteditey

(one of them)

Daniel

Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 13:00:38 UTC+2 schrieb Riccardo Carlesso:

 Hi,
 we are keeping an official thread at this address:


 https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/google-appengine-downtime-notify/2X9bpvuTby0

 Riccardo


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Issue

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Florey
I'm constantly getting this error. It is reproducible every time I try to 
login to our app to grant access.

app-id: floreysofteditey
http://www.editey.com

Uncaught exception from servlet
java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Timeout while fetching URL: 
https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token
at 
com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.convertApplicationException(URLFetchServiceImpl.java:142)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceImpl.fetch(URLFetchServiceImpl.java:43)
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler$Connection.fetchResponse(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:417)
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler$Connection.getInputStream(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:296)
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.security.urlfetch.URLFetchServiceStreamHandler$Connection.getResponseCode(URLFetchServiceStreamHandler.java:149)
at 
com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpResponse.init(NetHttpResponse.java:37)
at 
com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpRequest.execute(NetHttpRequest.java:94)
at com.google.api.client.http.HttpRequest.execute(HttpRequest.java:960)
at 
com.google.api.client.auth.oauth2.TokenRequest.executeUnparsed(TokenRequest.java:328)
at 
com.google.api.client.googleapis.auth.oauth2.GoogleAuthorizationCodeTokenRequest.execute(GoogleAuthorizationCodeTokenRequest.java:186)


Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 15:30:46 UTC+2 schrieb henn...@gmail.com:

 Yes, getting the same URL Fetch errors too:

 Deadline exceeded while waiting for HTTP response from URL: 
 https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/.well-known/host-meta?hd=https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/.well-known/host-meta?hd=sensecommerce.nl
 xxx

 I'm concerned that App Engine Downtime Notify group believes the problems 
 has been resolved, because issues still seem to be lingering:


 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-downtime-notify/2X9bpvuTby0/o1qa9-8uGA8J



 On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:21:14 AM UTC-5, Roberto wrote:

 Same here, it seems to be the same URL Fetch service timeout to Google 
 Accounts authentication endpoints that was affectig apps on June, 7.

 Roberto

 On Monday, June 10, 2013 11:14:17 AM UTC+2, vivpuri wrote:

 Our app is getting Deadline exceeded while waiting for HTTP response 
 from URL while making urlfetch calls. Please look into it asap.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[google-appengine] The conversion API is dead. Long live Ultradox

2012-10-24 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
as the conversion API is about to retire I wanted to let you know that we 
have created a new app (as part of the Google Apps Developer Challenge) 
running on App Engine that we now successfully use as a replacement for our 
invoice generation etc.
It is a full-feature document generation and automation service running in 
the cloud and leveraging many high-level Google services like Google Drive, 
Google Docs, Google Cloud Print etc.
You can create document from simple yet powerful templates (we support both 
Google Docs and LibreOffice documents as templates).
The document generation can be easily triggered from you app by using 
Ultradox as a REST service. You can pass simple variables to be replaced as 
URL parameters or you can pass complex objects in JSON format.
Our simple template language supports conditions, loops, different 
rendering options.
Check it out at 
http://www.ultradox.com
Documentation can be found here. Of course it's incomplete ;-)
http://ultradox-help.floreysoft.net
Feedback is very welcome+have fun!
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tWOfwF6cyHoJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Notice: Google App Engine Conversion API to be decommissioned in November 2012

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Florey
I suspect that the low adoption is the real reason behind it. I guess 
either the core developers left the App Engine team or they had some 
serious licensing trouble with the underlying products (PrinceXML etc.)
But this just a guess, it is fully understandable that Google will not 
communicate the real reasons behind this move.
But on the other hand I agree that claiming the low adoption is not a 
good excuse as there are too many services in experimental state and it 
will not scare developers to try them and invest time (and money).
So all I'm hoping for is to get some more time to find or implement an 
alternative and a little bit less of this marketing-driven 
email-communication.
If a service is switched off  I simply want to get an email that says We 
are sorry... instead of One of the great things about App Engine... 

Daniel

On Monday, August 27, 2012 3:54:45 PM UTC+2, Joshua Smith wrote:


 On Aug 27, 2012, at 5:20 AM, doright doug.s...@gmail.com javascript: 
 wrote:

 tell us how short you were from your required uptake


 Although I never actually tried the conversion API (too many people 
 complaining it didn't work well scared me off), I think that Google is 
 setting a bad precedent here.

 Killing projects because of low adoption makes people loath to adopt, 
 because all the work they spend getting a feature integrated may be 
 spontaneously wasted if it turns out the feature isn't widely adopted.

 So people reasonably avoid adopting features until they are popular.

 So features are killed because of low adoption.

 etc.

 I'm not sure exactly what the better way of doing things would be, but 
 there are plenty of options. This way is clearly a terrible way to do 
 business.

 -Joshua



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/CfJJ-M1DPTMJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Notice: Google App Engine Conversion API to be decommissioned in November 2012

2012-08-26 Thread Daniel Florey
Can you please give an exact date when the API will be switched off?
We are using it in some of our apps and rely on it heavily - as I've not 
expected that this great feature will not make it into production some day.
We need to implement a proper replacement, so it would be great to get some 
more time.
What about keeping it running until the end of the year?
We are planning to implement a replacement running on Google Compute 
Engine. Hopefully this is not the next service to be doomed ;-)
Stay tuned.

Daniel


On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:16:48 PM UTC+2, Christina Ilvento wrote:

 In November, 2012, we will be decommissioning the Experimental Conversion 
 API https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/conversion/. In 
 the 1.7.1 release, the API will be marked as “decommissioned” in our 
 documentation, and starting the first release after November 1, the 
 Conversion API will no longer be supported in the App Engine SDK or 
 runtimes.

 One of the great things about App Engine is our ability to quickly release 
 and iterate on new Experimental features. But sometimes a feature doesn’t 
 get the developer adoption and momentum needed to justify providing it as a 
 fully supported feature with a continued maintenance commitment. The 
 Conversion API is one of those features.

 We are committed to providing a well-maintained, fully-supported platform 
 and we will continue to focus on providing high value features for our 
 developers. If you have any concerns or questions, please don’t hesitate to 
 contact us at *google-app-engine-conversion-api-decommission-questions**@
 google.com*.

 Thank you for your continued support of App Engine.


 Regards,
 Christina Ilvento, Product Manager for the App Engine Conversion API





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/7yjwsKFETu4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Alternate to Conversion API

2012-08-22 Thread Daniel Florey
Same problem here. We have invested a lot of time (=money) into Conversion 
API.
So I am very frustrated and need to find a replacement.
From what I can tell App Engine has been using Princexml for the conversion.
Unfortunately this will not run on App Engine and costs a lot of €€€$$$.
So I'm basically lost right now.
Any suggestions?
The Conversion API worked perfectly fine for us :-(

Daniel


On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:00:57 PM UTC+2, aswath wrote:

 Hello,
 We were deeply involved in utilizing the conversion api for the HTML to 
 PDF conversion.  Suddenly, I got the email from Google about the plan for 
 decommissioning from Nov 2012.

 Does anyone has suggestions for doing the HTML to PDF conversion that is 
 compatible with Google Appengine for Java.  


 Regards
 -Aswath
 www.AccountingGuru.in


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/gqKJQqgouzAJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Please whitelist my app for sending mail with OAuth

2012-08-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I am using OpenID / OAuth and I get the Unauthorized Sender exception 
when sending out emails on behalf of the user.
Can someone please whitelist my app so that I am able to use the 
MailService with OpenID?
app-id: floreysoftultradox
Thanks!

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/xBnH7o9X4KQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Appengine down (M/S Datastore)

2012-06-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Same here. App Engine M/S seems to be down :-(

On Friday, June 8, 2012 5:15:51 PM UTC+2, Nikhil Jain wrote:

 At your end is it working, please update??

 Appengine team, Please resolved it asap.

 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Nikhil Jain nikhil.jaint...@gmail.comwrote:

 Appengine seems down,
 Any idea??




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/SUHgmD9UWNkJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Will full-text search index be limited in size?

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel Florey
? Yes/no

On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:50:38 PM UTC+2, Daniel Florey wrote:

 Are there any limitations in index size once the fts is out of 
 experimental state?

 Thanks,
 Daniel


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/jOBJSTvrwMUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Will full-text search index be limited in size?

2012-05-16 Thread Daniel Florey
Are there any limitations in index size once the fts is out of experimental 
state?

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/l0_tAdpeMaEJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Upgrading AuthSub single-use token to session token fails with new 1.6.5 backend

2012-04-26 Thread Daniel Florey
We are having issues upgrading the AuthSub single-use-tokens to 
session-tokens when an app is restricted to a Google Apps domain since a 
few hours/days (depending on the app-id).
I've already reported this issue to the enterprise support.
Anyone else?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/YZpsXDxSKvYJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Google checkout must die

2012-04-07 Thread Daniel Florey
I've also enabled billing for a lot of apps and it turns out that in many 
cases activating billing just redirects the user to the payment screen over 
and over again.
After a while billing may be activated, even though the success page is 
never displayed.
This is indeed annoying ... but on the other hand I'd be very happy to use 
checkout to pay my premier account instead of sending a checks with Fedex 
from Germany to the US ;-)

On Friday, April 6, 2012 9:10:20 PM UTC+2, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:

 Seriously, this is ridiculous.

 We've been trying to enable billing on our sandbox/demo appid for the
 last two hours.  We have a customer waiting for a demo and we can't
 give it.

 Please, PLEASE do something about this abomination.  I love appengine,
 but the billing system is retarded.  It makes the Phone Company look
 high tech.

 Every time we enable billing, it says ok and status goes to
 Activating Billing.  After some random amount of time it goes back to
 Free mode with no error messages.  Trying toenable it again emails
 a nastygram: Comments from Google Services: This inactive
 subscription has been canceled ...and goes back to Activating
 Billing.  Round and round we go.

 Appid is voosttest.  Yes we've filed a request at the billing form.

 Put this in context.  I can walk up to a janky ATM in Guatemala, put
 in a card, and get money out of it immediately.  I can whip out a
 credit card in nearly any store in the world, buy thousands of dollars
 of merchandise, and walk out with it.  And yet the most technically
 sophisticated corporation in the world needs 30+ minutes to process a
 simple sale - when it works at all?  I struggle to imagine what could
 make this so complicated.

 Jeff



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/GSJmgWyYYe4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel Florey
Too late

On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 11:02:21 PM UTC+2, j wrote:

 -1 for moving to stackoverflow. Why do we need another site? I have been 
 using Google groups for years, no issues so far. What do we get by moving 
 to stakoverflow? Does it work on Android tablet or something else that we 
 need to know that is so special about it?

 On Monday, February 13, 2012 3:49:47 PM UTC-5, Ikai Lan wrote:

 Supercobra,

 I share your concerns about streamlining the user experience. As it 
 stands, the user experience isn't great: you have groups, StackOverflow, 
 billing issues forms, abuse forms, the public issues tracker, Google 
 Groups, Reddit ... I could probably go on. The move to StackOverflow isn't 
 necessarily  making things more complicated, as our documentation will to 
 updated to reflect that it is the primary destination for code questions - 
 and in exchange, the Python/Java groups will be placed into read-only. 
 We've done this with other products at Google such as Android and 
 experienced overwhelming success - not only will App Engine Java questions 
 be exposed to developers following App Engine, they will also be exposed to 
 tens of thousands of Java developers on StackOverflow. And the tooling! The 
 tooling will allow us to identify where we need better learning resources, 
 or where the product needs improvements. We could certainly build this 
 ourselves, but that detracts from our ability to answer questions, launch 
 features, and improve the documentation. There are always tradeoffs in 
 those scenarios. 

 Hope this helps,

 --
 Ikai Lan 
 Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
 plus.ikailan.com



 On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Gregory D'alesandre 
 gr...@google.comwrote:

 Hi Mos,

 Google is absolutely committed to App Engine and part of the reason we 
 are moving the Java/Python groups to StackOverflow is to have better, more 
 consolidated answers to questions.  While it might be possible for Google 
 to build its own tool tailed to questions and answers, we really like 
 StackOverflow in part because it is where a lot of developers go in general 
 to get answers to questions.  As I've talked about on this group before, we 
 currently have essentially 2 support options: Premier Accounts (for 
 $500/month) or StackOverflow / Groups where the community can support it 
 and Googlers will sometimes answer questions.  The first has an SLA and the 
 second does not.  So, in response to Google investing in better enterprise 
 support, I hope that answers the question.  

 In terms of the concern that this means we are trying to deprecate App 
 Engine.  I can honestly and frankly say that there are no plans to do so, 
 quite the opposite, we are growing!  Right now we are trying to consolidate 
 a variety of places to get answers into 1 to improve how people get 
 questions answered.  We are keeping this group (google-appengine) because 
 it is a great place for discussions, but when it comes to asking a question 
 and getting an answer, we believe StackOverflow is a product more suited to 
 do this.

 Johan and Ikai both work on the App Engine team so their word is as 
 official as mine, but I figured hearing it from more people might help.

 Greg D'Alesandre
 Senior Product Manager, Google App Engine

 PS - Nice app Andrin, I'm already signed up! :)


 On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Mos mosa...@googlemail.com wrote:

 +111
 absolute agreement;   I would like to hear an official statement from 
 Google regarding long time commitment to GAE ( incl. plans regarding 
 adequate support options).

 Google, has the best developers in the world. It has so much money to 
 burn. It has the best internet-infrastructure on this planet.
 If Google would like, I'm sure a self implemented StackOverflow for 
 Google-Products would be ready in three month from now.
 And now they decide to outsource this one to the .NET based 
 StackOverflow, that just lost his founder and brain Jeff Atwood?

 That really doesn't look like Google has any plans to invest in better 
 enterprise support or make GAE a first class Google product.

 I hope I'm wrong


 On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Supercobra Thatbytes 
 superco...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think this is a terrible idea because it makes people check 2 places 
 and subscribe to 2 boards. Newcomers to this discussion will have a hard 
 time knowing about this.

 App Engine team does put enough resources for community and customer 
 support. I have a paid app and I cannot get my simple billing questions 
 answered. In the billing interface, there is no link or phone # to use. 
 Just a link to this forum... unless we pay become a Premier Account for 
 $500 / month but first we need to talk to the sales team. Really? So 
 desperate users in need of urgent help post questions on forums and if 
 they 
 make enough noise and show enough distress, others users help them and 
 sometimes, in with their immense goodwill and too little available 

[google-appengine] Premier account: No cost control

2012-02-13 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
our premier account has been activated on 12/6/11. 
Since then we totally lost control of the app engine costs. 
There is no amount/billing shown in the billing history of our premier apps 
and we have not yet received a single account statement.
So I'm a little bit worried that we already bankrupt ;-)
Is there a way to get at least the current balance of the total costs of 
all premier apps - or even better for each of them?

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tdTxq_ZpidAJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Premier account: No cost control

2012-02-13 Thread Daniel Florey
sharedgroups
floreysoftucm

Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/xEB9f2uJh84J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Request for best practice ideas for deployment of GWT JARs in AppEngine project

2012-02-12 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
our approach is to split up gwt modules into xxx-user.jar and 
xxx-server.jar. You can then copy the xxx-server.jar (containing only 
server/shared code) to WEB-INF/lib.
What 3rd party modules are you referring to?

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/dgQ6mFkWH0wJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-12 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I've been thinking about the decision to move to SO for some more time and 
I'd like to give a more general feedback.

We are developing apps for the Google ecosystem using the Google dev stack 
(gwt, gae, galgwt, gdata api, google apps marketplace, chrome webstore etc.)
See: http://www.floreysoft.net/download/SS377-1109_floreysoft_v1.pdf
Beside our premier account for the apps running on our own domain we also 
have ~2000 clients running dedicated installations of our tools on app 
engine, many of them with billing enabled. So most of our generated revenue 
goes directly to the GAE team ;-)

As we are using many tools from Google, not just GAE, my perspective on the 
decision to move to SO may be slightly different than the GAE team's point 
of view:
In my daily life I already have to use different channels to get support 
from Google:
- For GAE related issues I've to use the Enterprise Support Portal using 
Salesforce.com
- Using ~20 Google groups for the other api's/projects
- Issue trackers for the different projects
- Mail/Chat with Google Dev Advocates
- Blogs/Google+

In general the support is good as most developers are very responsive. My 
main concern is that the different teams / projects are working quite 
isolated.
Working in smaller teams of course is more efficient and more fun, but when 
it comes to support I would prefer a single point of contact.
It would be perfect to be able to address any issue to the Enterprise 
Portal (or any other channel) and to trigger some kind of internal dispatch 
to the proper team.
Let me give you an example:
We are using the Google Java Stack (Google Plugin/GWT/GAE) to create our 
apps for multiple locales/browsers, GWT generates dozens of permutations of 
our app. As GAE only supports 150mb project size, we are hitting this limit 
- as you have to divide this limit by the number of permutations to get the 
real max app size. It would be possible to e.g. serve gwt fragments from 
the blobstore, but this would involve all the different teams.
I've been totally lost to find the appropriate channel to communicate this 
issue as every tool itself is working fine, just the combination of them 
causes the pain.

I wonder if there is anybody responsible for taking care of the big picture 
of the google dev tools. There are some indicators that there may be 
someone with the big plan (e.g. new api console, streamlined 
documentation), but there are many overlapping developments and new 
projects not really linked into each other (e.g. gitkit/appengine user 
service) that I'm still confused.
In general decisions regarding how to provide support should be made on a 
higher level. If Google decides to use SO as the primary channel for 
answering questions of developers, at least all projects providing dev 
tools should use SO.
Don't get me wrong: I still believe that the most brilliant minds are 
working for Google, but as Google rapidly grows, I have the feeling that 
especially the enterprise support is not yet adequate...and deciding on a 
per-team basis which channels to establish is the wrong move IMO.

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/UpPZP2C20agJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-10 Thread Daniel Florey
Am I the only one using the new Groups interface??
Right now everything is perfect for me as I can see at first sight how many 
new topics have been discussed in all my ~20 Google related groups.
Is there a similar view in SO? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/0WT5S-4UzMQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I did not want to offend anyone. 
I just think it would make perfectly sense to improve Groups to allow users 
to rate posts and display the best answer on top etc. 
Especially if you take into account that Groups is also used as the Google 
Apps help system.
We are using almost all Google products actively including many of the dev 
tools and I had the impression that since introducing G+ Google recently 
tried to streamline the offerings. 
There are also many way I can think of to improve the Groups experience by 
adding some G+ stuff - which is very unlikely to happen in SO.

I know that the decision is made and I'll have to get used to SO, but I 
hope it will get reverted anytime soon - as it happend to the old new 
Google Help system ;-)

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VENxQMkpLJMJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Florey
I know that Google has grown to a large company and there may be many 
divisions not knowing each other well.
But from an outside view it is really sad that instead of fixing / 
improving existing Google products, teams are preferring an easy 
workaround like moving to Stack Overflow.
I've experienced this many times in different Google projects and this 
decision is by far not the worst example, but I don't think it is a good 
idea anyway.
It was great when Google worked on Wave using gwt, which lead to many 
improvements to gwt in a short time. Why not working closely with the guys 
working on groups to add the missing features?
I'd prefer to use all the services with my google account integrated into 
the navbar when working with the google stack.

So in short: Eat your own dog food ;-)

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Utn2Os0vHVYJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] No realtime account statement for premier accounts?

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
after moving our apps to the premier account I do not get any updated 
information about the costs of the apps.
Is there a plan to provide similar functionality to the billing history for 
premier apps that are available for classic apps?
Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/xNdR9swpC9gJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Channel API reconnect after token timeout

2012-01-06 Thread Daniel Florey
I've received a reasonable workaround from Google Enterprise Support:
You can use a timer on the client side to renew the token before it 
expires. This will work somehow...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/NivXiDrqW7QJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Conversion API: Best way to track down conversion issues?

2011-12-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I'm getting started with the new Conversion API. While it works like a 
charm for some documents (html-pdf) I end up with empty pdf's for others.
The pdf's seem to be generated with Prince (princexml.com), so I've 
downloaded the latest release to track down the issue.
Prince converts the documents just fine, so I'm wondering which version is 
used on GAE?
Or is there another way to get more debug info?

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/IP7Osc0iYK0J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Conversion API: Best way to track down conversion issues?

2011-12-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Everything works fine now! I've been just messing up the pdf document by 
streaming it to the client with the wrong encoding...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/QK_bZ9C6r6QJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] How to detect a Google Apps domain?

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I'd like to find a proper approach how to detect a Google Apps user/domain 
name.
I'm using OpenID and users are logging in with transitioned Google Apps 
accounts.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/BH_ypgMu0UUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Channel API reconnect after token timeout

2011-11-14 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I'm not able to re-open a channel after the token expired.
I'm using GWT on the client side.
I am creating a new channel after the onError() method is called when the 
token expires. 
Everything looks ok but I do not get any events after reopening the channel.
I've read in another thread that I had to delete the iframe manually, but 
this did not help either.
Any ideas?
Anybody managed to properly reconnect after timeout using GWT?

Thanks,
Daniel


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/CQxdbpTJw5wJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Channel API reconnect after token timeout

2011-11-14 Thread Daniel Florey
...finally figured out how to properly remove the iframe from a GWT app:

public static native void removeChannelApi() /*-{
  var child = $wnd.parent.document.getElementById(wcs-iframe);
  if ( child != null ) {
   child.parentNode.removeChild(child);
  }
}-*/;

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/sg_sPX024w8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Feedback on the new pricing

2011-11-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
we are running a tool on App Engine that allows users to sync GMail 
contacts between different Google / Google Apps accounts.
https://www.google.com/enterprise/marketplace/viewListing?productListingId=2083+12830481423215493060

We make a dedicated deploy to app engine for each customer (company) so 
that each client has full control over the datastore permissions etc.
Right now we have ~2000 instances running on GAE. A lot of these companies 
switched to Google Apps after evaluating our tool that gives them missing 
core functionality.

Each client pays between 50€ (small enterprises) and 200€ (large 
enterprises) for our tool and is also in charge for handling the app engine 
costs.

Most of the small businesses (non-profits or enterprises with very few 
people) have been able to run the app within the free quota. 
When exceeding the quota they have been charged a few cents per day on top 
for the resources consumed.

After the price change I received hundreds of support requests / complaints 
in the last two days because people where running out of quota as the apps 
have been shut down.
Our clients may be willing to pay the additional resources required, but 
most of them will not be able to pay $9 / month which by far exceeds the 
costs of our tool.
This would increase the total cost from 50€/year to at least 150€/year for 
even the smallest companies.

So what killing our business is not the new quota (we have spent a lot of 
effort to optimize the resources consumption with good results) it is the 
minimum fee of $9 / month.

Any ideas how to handle this?

Thanks,

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/thg1JWk6R7kJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?

2011-11-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Yes, please!
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3161
and
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1800


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/JIMJ5GNXUd8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Feedback on the new pricing

2011-11-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi Emlyn,
running as a multi-tenancy app is not doable for several reasons:
- Clients want to be able to protect the data by managing the permissions 
(=access to the datastore) by themselves
- The app can use a lot of resources depending on the settings of the 
customer. I don't see a simply way to charge them for the resources 
consumed when using a multi-tenancy app

You plugin concept sounds very interesting and is a good idea! In our case 
we are the only app running on app engine in 99% of the cases. Once GAE is 
more widely adopted this would be very interesting.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/UKr8tzjcJgEJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Feedback on the new pricing

2011-11-09 Thread Daniel Florey
Thanks for your input!
Well, the main reason why I came up with the approach to deploy 
applications to each customer mainly was because of the AuthSub restriction 
that each app could only be restricted to one Google Apps domain.
This was the only way to allow users to login with a Google Apps account 
and grant access to their contacts data.
A lot has changed since the initial version (OpenID/OAuth support etc.) and 
since the most recent versions of the SDK I'm confident that it the task 
queues will allow to handle thousands of concurrent tasks/users. 
This has been another showstopper for us as we have to run thousands of 
long living background tasks in parallel.

However I'd of course prefer to put all apps under a premium account but as 
far as I understand it will not be possible to add all applications that I 
own as a developer - only the once that are added to our own Google Apps 
domain as a service?
Or am I wrong?
This would be very good news indeed as this would resolve the 9$/month 
minimum fee.

Daniel

On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 3:49:56 PM UTC+1, Jon McAlister wrote:

 Are there other reasons holding you back? I ask because the two you
 have listed could both be overcome. The simplest design I could
 imagine would be for you to code your own authorization and accounting
 system within your app. It would take some work, but would presumably
 pay for itself in terms of keeping your customers and also gaining new
 customers. That is, the app would accept login from all Google
 accounts, but then your code checks the accounts against ACLs
 maintained by the app itself. You'd need to also write an admin page
 to allow the customer to add or remove folks from the ACL, but this is
 also somewhat better because now you could control the UI here. In
 terms of accounting, one simple solution would be for you to run a
 mapreduce each night to compute how much space/ops is used for each
 customer. Then, customers using lots of space would be billed. Given
 that, as you say, most customers use very little resources, you should
 only need to bill your top customers specially.

 The alternative would be for you to work out a special contract as a
 Premier Account, so that all of these apps were billed to your Premier
 Account instead of to the customer:
 http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/premier/index.html

 On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Daniel Florey daniel...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Emlyn,
  running as a multi-tenancy app is not doable for several reasons:
  - Clients want to be able to protect the data by managing the permissions
  (=access to the datastore) by themselves
  - The app can use a lot of resources depending on the settings of the
  customer. I don't see a simply way to charge them for the resources 
 consumed
  when using a multi-tenancy app
  You plugin concept sounds very interesting and is a good idea! In our 
 case
  we are the only app running on app engine in 99% of the cases. Once GAE 
 is
  more widely adopted this would be very interesting.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Google App Engine group.
  To view this discussion on the web visit
  https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/UKr8tzjcJgEJ.
  To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  google-appengi...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/PePR_FjRT3sJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Over quota exception even though plenty of quota is available?

2011-10-12 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
why do I get a lot of these exception:

...
Caused by: com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$OverQuotaException: The API 
call datastore_v3.Put() required more quota than is available.

even though I have a lot of quota left?
Will these exception be counted again the SLA uptime guarantee once the 
premium accounts are enabled?

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/k9vWIyYOly8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Turn off deduplication for multi-value property queries

2011-10-10 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
is there a way to sort by multi-value property and turn off the internal 
deduplication to get a sorted list of all values?

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/BP-IbTBZk68J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Parsing XML on GAE/Java

2011-10-05 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
just wanted to share my experience with parsing XML on App Engine/Java:
http://www.floreysoft.net/en/blog.html

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/n8TtHEgI6FUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Cannot delete index in ERROR state

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
I've been trying to delete an index that went into ERROR state.
It started to delete but after a while it switched back to ERROR. Now I'm 
not even able to start the deletion.
Can someone please help?
app-id: floreysoftucm

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/YexW2yFsJBQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Writing to google spreadsheet from GAE

2011-09-19 Thread Daniel Florey
I've been able to access spreadsheets from GAE without problems.
The only problem is the limited upload size for URLFetch that makes it 
impossible to upload large pre-populated sheets.
Other than that it worked without problmes...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/cI_21ja-m10J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: SocketTimeoutException when doing URLFetch between 2 apps

2011-09-16 Thread Daniel Florey
Any ideas anyone?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/oS6fYc8lgcsJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Are there any plans to increase the 150MB app size limit?

2011-09-14 Thread Daniel Florey
When using GWT the app can quickly exceed the 150MB app size limit. Are 
there any plans to increase this limit to let's say... unlimited?


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/NbCu7fZb5I8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Are there any plans to increase the 150MB app size limit?

2011-09-14 Thread Daniel Florey
No, my problem is the core concept of creating permutations for different 
locales, browsers etc.
So if I support different browsers and multiple locale I quickly end up with 
dozens of permutations.
If you have 100 permutations each permutation must not exceed 15MB in order 
to stay within the GAE limits.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Dg-Rrx1QmPMJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Are there any plans to increase the 150MB app size limit?

2011-09-14 Thread Daniel Florey
BTW: I already posted in the GWT group a while back, but no response yet:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/nJmgmT-36c0/discussion

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/pAR-zt-WMRAJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Min idle instances setting not working at all?

2011-09-13 Thread Daniel Florey
Where did you find the min idle instances setting?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/jfcSBnHMr5QJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: Please add MIN idle instances and MAX total instances

2011-09-12 Thread Daniel Florey
Johan,

thanks for your reply. I think I more or less got how the current settings 
influence the scheduler.
But I guess you agree that it would be much much simpler from a developers 
view to simply have two sliders:
- one specifying the min and max instances for the app
- another one for specifying how aggressively the app should scale (from 
slow to fast)

The number of questions regarding the scheduler indicates that the current 
approach is not very intuitive from a users point of view - even though it 
may reflect the internals of the current scheduler implementation best from 
your side

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Sx_5flfi8ycJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Java OAuth API, example

2011-09-11 Thread Daniel Florey
As it is not related to GAE you should check the GData docs. You'll
find all the good stuff there.

On Sep 11, 1:56 pm, de Witte jcreator.xi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to find any example for the OAuth API.

 The trunk forhttp://oauthexample.appspot.com/Welcomeseems to be empty.

 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2...

 Are there any other examples?

 Can google upload the code of oauthexample.

 -Wendel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Java OAuth API, example

2011-09-11 Thread Daniel Florey
...or are you interested in implementing an OAuth provider? Then of
course it is a different story.

On Sep 11, 11:12 pm, Daniel Florey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
 As it is not related to GAE you should check the GData docs. You'll
 find all the good stuff there.

 On Sep 11, 1:56 pm, de Witte jcreator.xi...@gmail.com wrote:







  Hello,

  I'm trying to find any example for the OAuth API.

  The trunk forhttp://oauthexample.appspot.com/Welcomeseemsto be empty.

 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2...

  Are there any other examples?

  Can google upload the code of oauthexample.

  -Wendel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: New pricing scheme and concerns about abuse

2011-09-11 Thread Daniel Florey
Please star 
thishttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5858issue.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/aUrt2tWUgD8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Please add MIN idle instances and MAX total instances

2011-09-11 Thread Daniel Florey
After thinking about this for a while I think I would prefer to just have a 
min and max instances slider.
I am running different apps on app engine and for the larger ones I'd like 
to have a min instances = 10 and max instances = unlimited to be able to 
scale up fast once heavy traffic occurs.
For the smaller apps I'd like to set max instances to a low value to limit 
scaling. For free apps I'd like to set max instances to 1.
I have no clue if this is technically doable but it's at least the easiest 
to understand for me...


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/gbrqNPQipOAJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Please add MIN idle instances and MAX total instances

2011-09-10 Thread Daniel Florey
I don't mind that there is a max idle instances slider, but I'd love to see 
a min idle instances (=always on) and a max total instances.
This would allow me to avoid crazy billing when the app is under heavy load 
and to keep free apps to run out of instance hours.
I'm happy to read that free instance hours have been increased to 28, but it 
would be great to be able to assure that the app is serving requests whole 
day.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/525WLu3pNtUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Automating deployment

2011-09-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
we are doing exactly the process you describe.
Have a look at our market, you can install our Shared Groups for free (30 
days trial) to see how the deployment works.

http://market.floreysoft.net

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/mEasuQDPE6wJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Aw: Re: How do I set maximum total instances to 1 ? OR How do I run my app for free for 24 hrs a day ?

2011-09-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Will this be possible before the new pricing model takes effect?
I've heard that other options will be provided before the new billing 
starts...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/O11NDkIlvoQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Automating deployment

2011-09-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Yes, I indeed was referring to the accept invitation problem.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/UJ35COXrSpYJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Aw: Re: How do I set maximum total instances to 1 ? OR How do I run my app for free for 24 hrs a day ?

2011-09-07 Thread Daniel Florey
But the question remains: is there a way to tell GAE not to use more than 
one active instance? 
I'd prefer for my free apps to be sure that one instance is up and running 
for 24hours. How can I prevent any additional instances to be started?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VfNe-bCIdKoJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Aw: Re: [google-appengine] Please include all consumed resources into logs

2011-09-06 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi Greg,
thanks a lot for considering this feature request!

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/EyNRlYcjs4MJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Strange datastore exception

2011-09-05 Thread Daniel Florey
Anybody seen this exception before?

Thanks for your help,
Daniel


Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: app s~floreysoftucm cannot 
access app floreysoftucm's data
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper.translateError(DatastoreApiHelper.java:36)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper$1.convertException(DatastoreApiHelper.java:98)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.utils.FutureWrapper.get(FutureWrapper.java:69)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper$CumulativeAggregateFuture.get(FutureHelper.java:144)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.getInternal(FutureHelper.java:72)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.FutureHelper.quietGet(FutureHelper.java:33)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$1.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:78)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl$1.runInternal(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:75)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.TransactionRunner.runInTransaction(TransactionRunner.java:31)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.get(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:75)
at 
com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreServiceImpl.get(DatastoreServiceImpl.java:62)
at com.floreysoft.ucm.server.DB.getContactMaster(DB.java:305)


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/oJsta5hCQYUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Aw: Re: Is billing usage reports running 3 days behind for everyone?

2011-09-03 Thread Daniel Florey
As I've written in another post it would be very helpful if all consumed 
resources would be displayed in each log statement.
Right now it still shows the info for the old billing like cpu usage.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/EQHb-2BMB3EJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] The whole instances pricing thing is too complicated for average brains like mine

2011-09-03 Thread Daniel Florey
Is there no way to create a simple pricing model that will not force me to 
learn everything about the internals of the app engine scheduler?
I'm fine with paying for consumed resources at a reasonable price but I'm 
not feeling comfortable with the instances/hours approach.
It makes me feel like the scheduler impl is responsible for my bill.
I'd prefer a simple approach (from a users perspective) where I would get 
charged for the cpu resources/memory consumed + be able to spend a budget on 
scalability/processing power and let app engine take care of whatever it 
needs to speed up / slow down my app according to my settings.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/QOyV18O5KfoJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Please include all consumed resources into logs

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Florey
It would be great if all the different resources that we'll have to pay for 
would be included into the request logs (different datastore operations 
etc.).
This would greatly help us to tweak the apps before the new pricing takes 
effect.
Thanks a lot.

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/lnNsBDL7LbIJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Aw: Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine is finished, here's why

2011-09-01 Thread Daniel Florey
If it is true that my app billing will increase from ~5$ per day to ~70$ per 
day as stated in the new billing preview, I'll go back 10 years in time and 
will host our apps on dedicated root servers.
For the same money that I'll have to spend on appengine I'll get 5 dedicated 
hexacore servers with 16 gig of memory and 4TB of storage each.
So this will be the route I'm forced to go unless Google is waking up and 
recalculates the new pricing scheme.
Of course this means to trash years of work and start from scatch regarding 
the datastore (moving from datastore - sql) and to deal with the hassle of 
apache load balancing etc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/11yQmu6YkDQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Quota debugger needed

2011-09-01 Thread Daniel Florey
As the new pricing modes is much more complicated and detailed than the old 
one it would be very helpful to have a quota debugger.
I'm thinking of a eclipse debugger view that will reflect how many GAE 
resources will be consumed (in the same way as shown in the billing history 
details) when stepping through the code when running on the local server.
This would greatly help us to find the expensive spots in the app.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ryL0-eSi-ZkJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Aw: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Small Datastore Operations = $50.00 per day??

2011-09-01 Thread Daniel Florey
Thanks for the link!
I've still confused what exactly will cause the small operations. If I do a 
keys only query will this lead to small operations = # of fetched keys?
It would be great to have an eclipse quota debug view showing the resources 
consumed when stepping through the code.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/sM99AUCexwMJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Aw: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Small Datastore Operations = $50.00 per day??

2011-09-01 Thread Daniel Florey
Some more info on how the Small Datastore Operations are counted would be 
appreciated!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/p8Kw_mkHOkwJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Aw: Re: [appengine-java] javax.mail.SendFailedException: Send failure:Unauthorized Sender: Unauthorized sender

2011-08-12 Thread Daniel Florey
Same problem here.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/V5KAFTzYUUsJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Upload blob never calls success path

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel Florey
As I expected in the first place I'm just dumb.
After running into a lot of issues (OutOfMemory and alike) I found out that 
I just forgot to attach the form to the site properly ;-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] List of supported content types in BlobStore?

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
is there a list of content types that BlobStore is be able to detect?

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Upload blob never calls success path

2011-05-23 Thread Daniel Florey
I guess I'm just dumb, but please help me anyway ;-)
I've just tried to upload a blob into the blobstore. When I upload the blobs 
I can see an entry for each upload in the __BlobUploadSession__ table.
I also can see in there that the success path is properly set, but my mapped 
servlet is never called. (I can call it from the browser though, so it seems 
to be mapped correctly).

Do I have to enable some option on the devserver so that the success path 
servlet will be called once the upload is complete?

Thanks for any hints,

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Upload blob never calls success path

2011-05-23 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
thanks a lot for the info.
I did not even upload to App Engine, just using the development server. So I 
guess there is just the default version?

My servlet is never called, so I cannot even send a redirect yet.
I just end up with an entry in the  __BlobUploadSession__ table and I assume 
that I may need to turn on some flags to call my success path after upload?

Is there a way to turn on debug logging for the core services?

Thanks!

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Deploy credentials with 3.6 beta plugin

2011-04-14 Thread Daniel Florey
Since upgrading to the 3.6 beta plugin I am unable to deploy apps with ant.
It will always complain that my credentials have expired, so I can only 
upload from the IDE.
This is annoying since it will always trigger full gwt compile...

Any ideas?

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: suggestions on template engine for GAE-java

2011-03-17 Thread Daniel Florey
You can check out 

http://code.google.com/p/jmte/


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: com.google.gdata.util.AuthenticationException: 403: OK

2011-03-10 Thread Daniel Florey
The problem can be fixed by registering the domain with Google.
In the past it was possible to use AuthSub without registering the domain, 
it just displayed a yellow warning box - since a few days it seems to be 
mandatory.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: com.google.gdata.util.AuthenticationException: 403: OK

2011-03-10 Thread Daniel Florey
www.google.com/accounts/ManageDomains

2011/3/10 Leo - אריאל leoce...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 How do I do this?

 Where do I have to type it?

 שלום יי
 Leo - אריאל


 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:51, Daniel Florey daniel.flo...@gmail.comwrote:

 The problem can be fixed by registering the domain with Google.
 In the past it was possible to use AuthSub without registering the domain,
 it just displayed a yellow warning box - since a few days it seems to be
 mandatory.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Datastore 100%, only 31 MB of data, no sessions

2011-02-18 Thread Daniel Florey
I'm running into the same problem once in a while on different applications:
The app is down because the datastore shows 100% of quota usage and throws 
OverQuotaExceptions, even though there are just a few instances in there.

You can have a look at this app as an example: jtpcontacts

Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Cloud2db for Cassandra and MongoDb

2010-12-28 Thread Daniel Florey
Hi,
this sounds very interesting.
Will the data stored in the db be human-readable in the datastore with
datastore viewer or will it just store a bunch of blobs?

Daniel

On Dec 28, 9:03 pm, Sandeep Sathaye sandeep.sath...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 Cloud2db http://www.cloud2db.com/ is pleased to announce the support for
 Cassandra and mongoDB cloud database platforms in addition to Google
 Bigtable platform which it already supports. With this new release you will
 be able to transparently choose between Google Bigtable, Cassandra and
 MongoDB as your cloud database platform.

 Please download the Cloud2db software from the following link.

 Download http://cloud2db-server.appspot.com/website/download.html(Google
 Bigtable, Cassandra, MongoDB)

 Cloud2db provides a standards-based abstraction layer over cloud databases.
 This product provides you with performance and scalability of cloud platform
 along with structure, standards and interoperability of RDBMS, SQL and JDBC.

 With Cloud2db, you will be able to manage your data on cloud platforms by
 using established concepts of RDBMS, SQL and JDBC, and thereby preserving
 your existing investments in tools, technologies, frameworks and skills.

 Here are Cloud2db features:

    - Manage data on Google Bigtable, Cassandra and MongoDB using familiar
    concepts of RDBMD, SQL
       - Referential integrity (Primary Keys, Foreign Keys)
       - Role Based Security
       - Joins (Inner Join, Left Outer Join, Theta Join, Cross Join)
       - Subqueries (Exists, Not Exists, In)
       - DDL  DML
       - Transactions (for the datastores supporting transactions)
       - ANSI SQL stored functions
       - Views
       - BLOB and CLOB support (for the datastores supporting BLOBs)

    - Use any JDBC compliant tools and frameworks in the market to interact
    with the Google Datastore. For example.
       - Squirrel SQL (database management)
       - Power Architect (data modeling)
       - Jasper Reports (reporting)
       - Hibernate (Object To Relational mapping)
       - All JDBC compliant tools

    - Port exiting RDBMS instances to cloud databases

 Please visit our websitehttp://www.cloud2db.comand try out the free trial
 version. Please visit google group
 Cloud2dbhttp://groups.google.com/group/cloud2db to
 share your feedback and thoughts.

 Sincerely,

 Sandeep Sathaye
 Founder and Chief Architect
 Cloud2db

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: FederatedLogin: Is logout supported?

2010-12-08 Thread Daniel Florey
Thanks, I've starred the issue.
I thought Google would have changed something as they removed the
logout note from the docs.

On Dec 8, 4:47 am, Julian Namaro namarojul...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can star the issue I filed a while ago about 
 this:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3301

 On Dec 8, 4:22 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:







  Thanks for the suggestion, but don't think this is a feasible solution
  for a real world application.
  Is it possible to redirect to the proposed Google logout links and
  pass something like a next url so that the user will end up on the
  login page of my app?

  Right now I'm using PAPE=0 in my own OpenID implementation, but I'd
  like to switch to the GAE implementation in order to be able to send
  emails on the behalf of the current user.

  What a mess :-(

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.