Re: SmartGWT 1.0 Released
Hi, I am wondering if the performance is due to too many items inside the demo or it is just slower than gwt-ext? In gwt-ext, the demo is much smaller. On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:27 AM, rakesh wagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: great job Sanjeev. Keep up the good work. Always love smart-client. Smart client is much better compared to ext-js as far as licensing is concerned. However the showcase looks little slow compared to the original js based smart-client as well as gwt-ext. Thanks! On Nov 22, 6:48 pm, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent Job! some things are rough around the edges but overall this release is impressive! Gotta fix those image downloads though. And adding a couple of the standard schemes wouldn't hurt. But you already mentioned these things in your release announcement post anyway. Can't wait. Cool stuff! On Nov 22, 8:32 am, ART [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This looks cool. Ann. On Nov 18, 9:50 am, Sanjiv Jivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,I have just released SmartGWT 1.0. Here is the release announcement : http://www.jroller.com/sjivan/entry/smartgwt_1_0_released Google Code Project Page :http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/ Showcase Demo :http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/ Javadocs :http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/javadoc/ SmartGWT uses the new GWT 1.6 event API's which is really neat and works great. Seehttp:// code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/wiki/ProposedEv... Thanks, Sanjiv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Why use GWT?
First a couple of rhetorical questions to you: a) why do you think JQuery and GWT are equivalent? b) why do you think the sites of the JQuery list are probably led by some smart, deep-thinking, open-minded individuals (IBM's web site might not necessarily be built by IBM)? c) why do you think the GWT list you pointed to is definitive? (try this as at least one update: http://www.gwtsite.com/whos-using-gwt/) You use the tools appropriate to the job and for which is the least cost to you. To me, JQuery is a simple library best suited to evolving aspects to a web site using the JavaScript language; GWT is more suited to building applications and is more than just using Java - you get, amongst other things: a) One base code that drives code for all browsers with the well managed approach called deferred binding when you hit across a situation where one browser (we know the now) does things differently - driving down you costs of development. b) The same code for browsers can quickly become widgets and gadgets, using different linkers - again driving down cost of development. c) You use modern development practices and tools - IDE with autocomplete, refactoring, JUnit, Maven, Ant etc - there's a real reason why we've enhanced software development over the years to invent and use these tools; they will drive down costs for (complicated) developments. d) You get generators that allow you to combine / generate new stuff from source stuff - ok that's vague, but this is a real example of where GWT is more than just a Java to JavaScript compiler. You get ImageBundles, meaning in source you manage your images separately and you let GWT pull those together into one image at compile time that can be accessed as sprites in run-time - you save wire-space, cut down on server requests meaning increased user experience, and there are more like this is on the way. Yes you can do all this by hand, but that all costs time and money, with GWT it comes for free when hitting the compile button. e) Same language client and sever side, but with flexibility to use whatever server side you want. f) Aggressive reduction in code size from libraries, both your own and/ or 3rd party libraries - all decreasing load size and increasing user experience g) Ability (soon) seemlessly defer loading of functionality until it's needed - i.e. if you have a 4 tab application load only the code for tabs as they are needed - again decreasing initial application load and increasing user experience h) I would argue in Java it is easier to see how to defer creation of objects in order to decrease initialisation time of applications - maybe that is just me, but the ability to use IDE and refactoring to support this greatly helps. Look at the sites on your JQuery list, and most are really web sites/ pages that are using JQuery to add some fancy effects or some manipulation of DOM - it doesn't identify, for example, how much of the site uses JQuery - whereas your GWT list is pure GWT applications on mostly the whole site; the lists are not really comparable in terms of functionality; I do though, get your point on why aren't IBM, Dell, BBC using GWT - the answer I suggest is three-fold a) These are (mostly) web sites not web applications and have lots of legacy content. They are going to possibly struggle to justify the benefit of GWT in comparison to cost already sunk, and a large number of them don't need to - why move to mechanised looms if your comfortable with your current cloth being produced? b) Look at the basic purpose of most of those sites, especially the featured ones; they are effectively brand advertising, and as such need to be indexed by search engines otherwise their return on investment is zero. JQuery is good at keeping that, as you generally load HTML which is then manipulated by JavaScript - this way, the search engine can index the HTML and the user sees a slightly flashier version. Sure, you can do a similar thing with GWT but not in such an elegant manner - but the point of GWT is to build applications not web sites. c) The teams behind it would probably need investement in retooling and training to use GWT and certainly given the first point above, this cost could outweigh any benefit. If you're building a new web application, then GWT is certainly a top candidate that should be investigated, why would you not want something that is promising to cut down your overall through life costs (apart from the cost of retooling your team)? I would also argue that with GWT you can build more complicated web applications simpler than you could with JQuery. For example, look at Chronoscope (http://timepedia.org/chronoscope/) and it's associated blog to see how it was developed and available in many many different forms from single GWT base. What would be fascinating to see is the results of an actual study on the comaprison of the development of a web application using several of the competing and complimentary
Re: How do I get browser autocomplete on a login form
I've already tried doing this and it doesn't solve the problem at
hand. IE(s) don't seem to ask you to save the username/password when
you do this. Here are the things I've tried with your idea:
Wrapping these inputs in a form in the HTML
Wrapping these inputs in a form in AJAX
Submitting the HTML/AJAX form when the login button is clicked.
Adding a submit button to the form in HTML
Clicking that submit button via js when the form is submitted
Lots of other things I can't really remember (I've been trying for a
few days) and all sorts of combination's of what's mentioned above.
IE(s) are very particular about when they allow autocomplete. The
only way I've been able to do it is when my form has no dom
manipulation whatsoever. If you've actually gotten this to work,
could you show a full example?
Thanks a lot,
Dan
On Nov 22, 1:07 am, Reinier Zwitserloot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can wrap existing elements in GWT 1.5:
new TextBox(DOM.getElementById(loginUsernameBox));
new PasswordTextBox(DOM.getElementById(loginPasswordBox));
then you can do the usual GWT shenanigans and add whatever listener
you like.
If you don't have GWT 1.5 Then, obviously, shame on you.
On Nov 21, 11:27 pm, tieTYT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw a faq that made the same recommendation. The problem is, I need
to capture the onKeyUp and onClick events of the input's inside the
form. I could only figure out how to bind to the form OR bind to
its children. I couldn't figure out how to bind to both. GWT threw a
variety of exceptions over the issue. Could you show me some sample
code that does this?
On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These features generally only work if the textbox and passwordbox are
in the initial HTML.
In GWT's normal modus operandi, the boxes are added dynamically by the
javascript.
The solution is to have the boxes in the static HTML file that
bootstraps GWT (normally auto-generated by the applicationCreator), in
a div that makes them hidden (use visibility and not display: none).
From GWT, re-visibilize them if you need em. That should work.
On Nov 21, 11:04 pm, tieTYT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to replicate browserautocompleteon a login form. For
example, every time you go to the login page, I'd like the username
and password field to be prepopulated with the username/password you
used last. Not only that, but if you clear the username and double
click the field, the list of previous usernames you've entered should
show up. If you select one, the password field gets populated with
that.
Fortunately, with normal HTML the browser handles all of this for
you. But I can't figure out how to get this to work on IE6/7 on an
GWT app. In these browsers, it doesn't offer to save the usernames.
I'll provide the code I have so far (this works in FF):
public class Sandbox implements EntryPoint, ClickListener,
KeyboardListener {
private Label label;
private FormPanel formPanel;
/**
* This is the entry point method.
*/
public void onModuleLoad() {
formPanel = new FormPanel();
final VerticalPanel basePanel = new VerticalPanel();
formPanel.add(basePanel);
TextBox loginTB = new TextBox();
//without this, FF doesn't know where to place the data
loginTB.setName(name);
basePanel.add(loginTB);
PasswordTextBox passTB = new PasswordTextBox();
//without this, FF doesn't know where to place the data
passTB.setName(password);
basePanel.add(passTB);
Button loginBT = new Button(Submit);
basePanel.add(loginBT);
RootPanel.get(slot1).add(formPanel);
loginTB.addKeyboardListener(this);
passTB.addKeyboardListener(this);
loginBT.addClickListener(this);
label = new Label();
RootPanel.get(slot2).add(label);
}
public void onClick(Widget sender) {
//Without this, FF doesn't offer to remember the data
formPanel.submit();
if (label.getText().equals()) {
SandboxService.App.getInstance().getMessage(Hello,
World!, new MyAsyncCallback(label));
} else
label.setText();
}
public void onKeyDown(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers)
{
}
public void onKeyPress(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers)
{
}
public void onKeyUp(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers) {
// If enter is pressed lets forward the request to onClick
method
if (keyCode == '\r') {
onClick(sender);
}
}
static class MyAsyncCallback implements AsyncCallback {
public void
Re: Exception handling in GWT Service
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:58 AM, satya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can i pass exceptions between client and server.
Can i have an RPC serice with method that throw an user defined
exception and handle that exception in the client side?
Yes as long as your exeption is declared in the Service Signature (to
be declared as GWT serialisable).
I created an userdefined exception:
--
public class IllegalDateRangeException extends SerializationException
implements IsSerializable
{
private String errorMessage = null;
public IllegalDateRangeException ( String error )
{
errorMessage = error;
}
public String toString()
{
return Exception occurred: + errorMessage;
}
public String getErrorMessage()
{
return errorMessage;
}
public void setErrorMessage( String errorMessage )
{
this.errorMessage = errorMessage;
}
}
and my RPC method throws this exception:
public String create(Rule rule) throws IllegalDateRangeException;
and i want to catch this exception in the client side and perform
actions.
But i get the following error from GWT:
[ERROR] Type
'com.cerner.cwx.ruleswizard.client.IllegalDateRangeException' was not
serializable and has no concrete serializable subtypes
Any suggestions?
Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Satya
--
Si l'ignorance peut servir de consolation, elle n'en est pas moins illusoire.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do I get browser autocomplete on a login form
I'm just going off of what I've heard elsewhere.
On Nov 23, 10:57 am, tieTYT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already tried doing this and it doesn't solve the problem at
hand. IE(s) don't seem to ask you to save the username/password when
you do this. Here are the things I've tried with your idea:
Wrapping these inputs in a form in the HTML
Wrapping these inputs in a form in AJAX
Submitting the HTML/AJAX form when the login button is clicked.
Adding a submit button to the form in HTML
Clicking that submit button via js when the form is submitted
Lots of other things I can't really remember (I've been trying for a
few days) and all sorts of combination's of what's mentioned above.
IE(s) are very particular about when they allow autocomplete. The
only way I've been able to do it is when my form has no dom
manipulation whatsoever. If you've actually gotten this to work,
could you show a full example?
Thanks a lot,
Dan
On Nov 22, 1:07 am, Reinier Zwitserloot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can wrap existing elements in GWT 1.5:
new TextBox(DOM.getElementById(loginUsernameBox));
new PasswordTextBox(DOM.getElementById(loginPasswordBox));
then you can do the usual GWT shenanigans and add whatever listener
you like.
If you don't have GWT 1.5 Then, obviously, shame on you.
On Nov 21, 11:27 pm, tieTYT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw a faq that made the same recommendation. The problem is, I need
to capture the onKeyUp and onClick events of the input's inside the
form. I could only figure out how to bind to the form OR bind to
its children. I couldn't figure out how to bind to both. GWT threw a
variety of exceptions over the issue. Could you show me some sample
code that does this?
On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These features generally only work if the textbox and passwordbox are
in the initial HTML.
In GWT's normal modus operandi, the boxes are added dynamically by the
javascript.
The solution is to have the boxes in the static HTML file that
bootstraps GWT (normally auto-generated by the applicationCreator), in
a div that makes them hidden (use visibility and not display: none).
From GWT, re-visibilize them if you need em. That should work.
On Nov 21, 11:04 pm, tieTYT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to replicate browserautocompleteon a login form. For
example, every time you go to the login page, I'd like the username
and password field to be prepopulated with the username/password you
used last. Not only that, but if you clear the username and double
click the field, the list of previous usernames you've entered should
show up. If you select one, the password field gets populated with
that.
Fortunately, with normal HTML the browser handles all of this for
you. But I can't figure out how to get this to work on IE6/7 on an
GWT app. In these browsers, it doesn't offer to save the usernames.
I'll provide the code I have so far (this works in FF):
public class Sandbox implements EntryPoint, ClickListener,
KeyboardListener {
private Label label;
private FormPanel formPanel;
/**
* This is the entry point method.
*/
public void onModuleLoad() {
formPanel = new FormPanel();
final VerticalPanel basePanel = new VerticalPanel();
formPanel.add(basePanel);
TextBox loginTB = new TextBox();
//without this, FF doesn't know where to place the data
loginTB.setName(name);
basePanel.add(loginTB);
PasswordTextBox passTB = new PasswordTextBox();
//without this, FF doesn't know where to place the data
passTB.setName(password);
basePanel.add(passTB);
Button loginBT = new Button(Submit);
basePanel.add(loginBT);
RootPanel.get(slot1).add(formPanel);
loginTB.addKeyboardListener(this);
passTB.addKeyboardListener(this);
loginBT.addClickListener(this);
label = new Label();
RootPanel.get(slot2).add(label);
}
public void onClick(Widget sender) {
//Without this, FF doesn't offer to remember the data
formPanel.submit();
if (label.getText().equals()) {
SandboxService.App.getInstance().getMessage(Hello,
World!, new MyAsyncCallback(label));
} else
label.setText();
}
public void onKeyDown(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers)
{
}
public void onKeyPress(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers)
{
}
public void onKeyUp(Widget sender, char keyCode, int modifiers) {
// If enter is pressed lets forward the request to onClick
Re: SmartGWT 1.0 Released
Hello, smartGwt looks very appealing and very rich in features, but it is very slow. This is due to the fact that it is a JSNI wrapper around the Smart Client framework. This means loosing all the benefits of having a pure GWT implementation (I will not go into details on this). I think a comparison with GXT (also known as GWT Ext, at this address http://extjs.com/products/gxt/) does not make any sense as GXT is a pure GWT feature implementation and it is lightining fast once compiled. The only appropriate comparison would be with gwt-ext (http:// code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/) which is JSNI wrapper around the ExtJS javascript framework (developed by the same company that developed GXT), much like smartGwt is a JSNI wrapper around the Smart Client framework. This forum is full of people complaining about how slow and cumbersome gwt-ext is, and I think exactly the same problems will be encountered with smartGwt.On the other hand GXT is not affected by any of these issues. True, GXT at the moment is not as rich in features at the moment, but they are getting there. I do not work for the ExtJS company, I only talk from experience. I used the JavaSciprt ExtJS framework for a big project for a full year and I understand exactly when people say the documentation is poor and performance slow. Having embranced GWT to progress and to make my life easier, I would never want to to have the same problems again with Js frameworks, even less with GWT frameworks with embed the same old Js issues, like gwt-ext or smartGWT. GXT is a completely different matter and I think it is a top framework. I have been using it for a few months now and never gave me any major issues. It is a pure GWT implementation, no javaScriptObject or JSNI. Period. Huge credit to Sanjiv for his work on smartGWT, but personally I think this is the wrong approach to any GWT framework. JSNI is very useful if used to integrate the odd js function here and there, not as a foundation to a framework itself. Regards, Francesco On Nov 23, 10:33 am, Juan Backson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the performance is due to too many items inside the demo or it is just slower than gwt-ext? In gwt-ext, the demo is much smaller. On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:27 AM, rakesh wagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: great job Sanjeev. Keep up the good work. Always love smart-client. Smart client is much better compared to ext-js as far as licensing is concerned. However the showcase looks little slow compared to the original js based smart-client as well as gwt-ext. Thanks! On Nov 22, 6:48 pm, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent Job! some things are rough around the edges but overall this release is impressive! Gotta fix those image downloads though. And adding a couple of the standard schemes wouldn't hurt. But you already mentioned these things in your release announcement post anyway. Can't wait. Cool stuff! On Nov 22, 8:32 am, ART [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This looks cool. Ann. On Nov 18, 9:50 am, Sanjiv Jivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,I have just released SmartGWT 1.0. Here is the release announcement : http://www.jroller.com/sjivan/entry/smartgwt_1_0_released Google Code Project Page :http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/ Showcase Demo :http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/ Javadocs :http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/javadoc/ SmartGWT uses the new GWT 1.6 event API's which is really neat and works great. Seehttp:// code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/wiki/ProposedEv... Thanks, Sanjiv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Why use GWT?
I think this is absolutely right: I do though, get your point on why aren't IBM, Dell, BBC using GWT - the answer I suggest is three-fold a) These are (mostly) web sites not web applications and have lots of legacy content. They are going to possibly struggle to justify the benefit of GWT in comparison to cost already sunk, and a large number of them don't need to - why move to mechanised looms if your comfortable with your current cloth being produced? b) Look at the basic purpose of most of those sites, especially the featured ones; they are effectively brand advertising, and as such need to be indexed by search engines otherwise their return on investment is zero. JQuery is good at keeping that, as you generally load HTML which is then manipulated by JavaScript - this way, the search engine can index the HTML and the user sees a slightly flashier version. Sure, you can do a similar thing with GWT but not in such an elegant manner - but the point of GWT is to build applications not web sites. Also big sites that are applications (the Amazons etc of this world) are not going to rewrite everything just like that. For building a new RIA, for building new business applications or for building replacement browser UI to existing back end business systems, GWT is a very strong candidate. regards gregor c) The teams behind it would probably need investement in retooling and training to use GWT and certainly given the first point above, this cost could outweigh any benefit. If you're building a new web application, then GWT is certainly a top candidate that should be investigated, why would you not want something that is promising to cut down your overall through life costs (apart from the cost of retooling your team)? I would also argue that with GWT you can build more complicated web applications simpler than you could with JQuery. For example, look at Chronoscope (http://timepedia.org/chronoscope/) and it's associated blog to see how it was developed and available in many many different forms from single GWT base. What would be fascinating to see is the results of an actual study on the comaprison of the development of a web application using several of the competing and complimentary libraries/toolkits/frameworks. So back to the first point, use the tool that is most appropriate for what has to be done, within the constraints you may have and the expectations users/client has. //Adam On 23 Nov, 07:42, adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure which people you're talking about, but I can't believe that the people who head large projects like the ones mentioned in the jQuery link don't update their knowledge of available tools and their development status on a regular basis. I think the answer must lie elsewhere. On Nov 22, 10:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I've seen is that a lot of people looked at GWT in it's really early stages and never really thought Hey, they're probably adding features and making everything work easier so they don't end up looking back at it. On Nov 22, 9:58 pm, adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see herehttp://docs.jquery.com/Sites_Using_jQuerythatlotsofbig projects, most of which are probably led by some smart, deep-thinking, open-minded individuals, are using jQuery and hand-written javascript. I notice that this list of projects using GWThttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/GWT.html#WhoIsUsingItdoesn't look as impressive. Why are leaders on big projects deciding to use tools other than GWT? Do they have any good reasons to not use GWT? Should they use GWT? If so, why? If this has already been covered in another post, please point me to it; no need to reinvent the wheel. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do I get browser autocomplete on a login form
On 23 nov, 10:57, tieTYT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've already tried doing this and it doesn't solve the problem at hand. IE(s) don't seem to ask you to save the username/password when you do this. Here are the things I've tried with your idea: Wrapping these inputs in a form in the HTML Wrapping these inputs in a form in AJAX Submitting the HTML/AJAX form when the login button is clicked. Adding a submit button to the form in HTML Clicking that submit button via js when the form is submitted Lots of other things I can't really remember (I've been trying for a few days) and all sorts of combination's of what's mentioned above. The form and the two inputs (username + password) have to exist in the HTML page, and you have to actually submit the form (i.e. do not return false in the onsubmit to make your own AJAX request). I'm not sure but I guess the form's submission might also have to be done by the user (i.e. not by any javascript code, be it form.submit() or submitBtn.click()). IE(s) are very particular about when they allow autocomplete. The only way I've been able to do it is when my form has no dom manipulation whatsoever. If you've actually gotten this to work, could you show a full example? Have you tried the app attached to http://groups.google.fr/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors/msg/9bcebfb17cf914ba It worked for me in IE. I'm also using this technique on a project at work, without a problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Why use GWT?
Thats one hell of a explanation from adam.. I think that content should be pointed at everybody who wants to know WHY GWT? Ajay --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Page navigation in GWT
On Nov 21, 1:02 pm, jonbutler88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I am new to GWT, though I have dabbled in C#/Java before so the language itself doesn't boggle me that much, but it seems some of the simpler concepts aren't sticking. Im pretty sure the answer to my question is so obvious, as I have not seen it answered in any of the tutorials on GWT on the web. What I wanted to know is, how do you do page navigation in GWT? For example I have my new class, with its onModuleLoad function, which is fine, but say I want to click a link and load a new page with a different onModuleLoad function? As others have pointed out, the Right(TM) way to do this is using the History mechanism. There are many strategies for working this into your application's internal syntax and structure. However, there are a few other basic concepts I think you might want some clarification on. First, you should think of your GWT app as a single HTML page, in which user and application events cause PORTIONS of the page (ie DOM elements) to change, be replaced, or loaded with content from the server or internal application logic. In general you will not be sending the user/browser to another real URL. Your initial HTML page is basically a canvas on which your GWT application spews up content in response to user or server events (the typical AJAX model). In the example of your login function, when your app has successfully received authentication credentials from the user, its next job will be to kick the login widgets off the page, and replace them with whatever is next. Second, you will probably find that the majority (if not all) of your user navigation paths are not coded in raw HTML. The GWT ui classes provide all the event handling and navigational connectivity that you would find in a typical desktop application. Although it is possible use raw HTML links to navigate your application, the GWT widgets are much easier to work with, test, and maintain than raw HTML files. So instead of following an a href=blah blahblah/a and going somewhere else, you will create event listeners that respond to mouse or key clicks which cause your app to change what is already there. Finally, you typically will only have one EntryPoint implementation with an onModuleLoad method in your application. That class will be responsible for initializing your application - probably by creating classes for the UI, classes for handling UI events, and classes for managing your applications internal state. In a lot of the samples, the class which implements EntryPoint also implements all of the UI, the event handlers, and the application logic, but that's only to reduce the amount of code you have to read. In any serious application you will want to factor those things out into different classes (as in MVC). It might be helpful to think of your EntryPoint.onModuleLoad() as if it were simply the main() method of a more traditional application. Hope that helps! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
SVG and GWT
Hi I am trying to call a GWT function from a hand written SVG script. I was just wondering if anyone has already managed this, and could provided an example? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Why use GWT?
Thanks for writing a very balanced and clear-headed response. code is, how much easier would it be for you to have done it in JQuery? Well, I'm about to find out empirically. I'm not sure -- it might end up being a draw for my particular application -- but it will at least be a learning experience. I'll try to remember to keep track of my impressions and post them for others to benefit. Adam On Nov 23, 10:57 am, Adam T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wouldn't say contradiction, I believe all aspects mentioned (inertia/retooling/SEO/experience/through life cost/future development cost/others) all combine to inform the decision of what technology to eventually use. In certain circumstances some aspects will weigh higher than others. Your example is a good case in point - did GWT naturally fit your design? How easy was it to do, how managed do you feel the resulting code is, how much easier would it be for you to have done it in JQuery? How much do you think your design was influenced by thinking of a GWT application as a multi-page app as opposed to a single page one? How much more complex is your application to some of those examples shown using JQuery? There are many questions that feed into stuff, which makes it hard to say why one is better than another. Though, if I'm going to build a complex application from scratch, then I would evaluate other technologies on a basis of why would I use it instead of GWT as I think GWT should be the starting point that others need to reach. Right now I would say the world is JavaScript focussed and there are many JavaScript coders out there, and hence the natural choice is JavaScript libraries. As we push the boundaries on complexity, so we need better and better tools/environments etc, and I believe GWT is well placed for when complexity catches up. Just for interest, there is a JQuery library for GWT:http://code.google.com/p/gwtquery/ //Adam On 23 Nov, 16:16, adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam T, Thank you for your thorough and thoughtful explanation. There appears to be a contradiction running through the thread of your explanation and I'm wondering if you or anyone else would like to comment on it. You write: version. Sure, you can do a similar thing with GWT but not in such an elegant manner - but the point of GWT is to build applications not web sites. This seems to imply that the awkwardness of using GWT with traditional web sites -- ones whose separate pages are requested from a server -- may be a good reason to choose non-GWT tools for them. This would mean that the creators of the sites listed on the jQuery site are not refraining from using GWT on account of inertia or the cost/benefit ratio of training and retooling, as you suggest elsewhere in your reply. Rather they would be using the result of a decision-making process that, given the necessity of SEO as a premise, concludes it's necessary to create a web site rather than a web application and chooses a non-GWT javascript solution on account of its relative elegance. I've actually created web sites (again, separate html pages generated on server) using GWT. My strategy has been to include a javascript variable in a script block on each page, the string value of which corresponds to an Enum defined in GWT-generated code. As a given page loads, that variable is read by a JSNI call in my EntryPoint and, in a long switch based on the value of the Enum, a PageView subclass is instantiated. The PageView -- which is coded in GWT, of course -- in turn widgetizes parts of the html or generates widgets to insert into html placeholders. It also instantiates a PageController subclass, again coded in GWT. The way I see it, I am a creating a web app, albeit one whose execution environment (i.e. html content) is constructed differently by my server-side JSP code on each page load. It's been a few years since I've created a hand-coded Javascript app, but I think I'm going to give it a shot. Although this doesn't really amount to a study, I would be very happy to thoughtfully analyze the results and post them here. Thanks again for your very complete response, Adam On Nov 23, 3:37 am, Adam T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First a couple of rhetorical questions to you: a) why do you think JQuery and GWT are equivalent? b) why do you think the sites of the JQuery list are probably led by some smart, deep-thinking, open-minded individuals (IBM's web site might not necessarily be built by IBM)? c) why do you think the GWT list you pointed to is definitive? (try this as at least one update:http://www.gwtsite.com/whos-using-gwt/) You use the tools appropriate to the job and for which is the least cost to you. To me, JQuery is a simple library best suited to evolving aspects to a web site using the JavaScript language; GWT is more suited to building applications
Re: Why use GWT?
gwt's pretty amazing, but I think it takes a good six months to really understand it all. If the implementors of those sites hate typing and hate java, they'll never get to the point where they appreciate gwt. Seems to be there's a strong anti-Java sentiment these days. Big, static typed languages aren't that cool now, and people are able to make nice apps in dynamic languages (Ruby, Javascript). Churning java into javascript is kind of weird (or at least novel) and it takes a while to really get it. jQuery is tight -- you can do a lot in one line of code. That sort of stuff wins developers over. To me, gwt realy comes down to turning java into really tight cross- browser javascript with clean abstractions for ajax'y apps. If that's not a sale for you (ie, you hate java), then jQuery is probably the next stop in the evaluation path. On Nov 22, 9:58 pm, adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see herehttp://docs.jquery.com/Sites_Using_jQuerythat lots of big projects, most of which are probably led by some smart, deep-thinking, open-minded individuals, are using jQuery and hand-written javascript. I notice that this list of projects using GWThttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/GWT.html#WhoIsUsingItdoesn't look as impressive. Why are leaders on big projects deciding to use tools other than GWT? Do they have any good reasons to not use GWT? Should they use GWT? If so, why? If this has already been covered in another post, please point me to it; no need to reinvent the wheel. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: SmartGWT 1.0 Released
Hi Fransceso, If you found a library that meets your needs, then good for you. Compile output size and runtime performance are two separate issues. A third party widget written in GWT Java, regardless of how small it compiles down to, doesn't magically make it run fast. Nor does it make it magically render perfectly on all browsers. As an example a TableGrid written in GWT Java could still perform really poorly, and not display consistently on all browsers. There are obviously several aspects to GWT that helps avoid leaks and such but this does not mean that any third party code written in GWT is 100% leak free. The GWT 1.6 event API is really neat and SmartGWT users it. Well written code is what will perform well and display consistently across various browser. On the issue of performance, there are numerous posts made by paying GXT users that the performance of GWT-Ext is still better than GXT. You can search their forums. This is not to suggest that performance improvements cannot be made in SmartGWT. If you can give specifics, it would certainly help in resolving them. But without specifics like whether it was the initial load time, performance of specific widgets etc it will be difficult to act on. Feel free to post on the SmartGWT forums or create an issue on the smartgwt google code project. On the issue of compile output size : The SmartClient library is extremely stable and developed over the past 8 years. If you peruse their forums, you will find that pretty much all questions are met with an answer explaining how the user can accomplish what they're trying to do. Their library is virtually bug free. I realize this is a strong statement, but its true. Only some 4-5 issues were patched post-release. Compare this to the bugs forum of any of your favorite libraries. SmartGWT will inherit these attributes once its past the few initial minor releases and issues are flushed out during this period. Due to the high level of stability of SmartClient, it can be viewed as the kernel of your web app which should be configured to be gzipped with an Expires Never header for a given version. This means that the browser will cache the kernel (SmartClient JS files) and the only code that gets downloaded is your application code, and not any code related to the widget / framework. Future releases of SmartGWT will provide a GWT linker that only pulls in the required files so this should cut down the total size of the application. The SmartGWT showcase has some 250 samples which is 6 times more than the GXT showcase so its not quite apples to apples when it comes to initial load time. Finally please read my blog entry http://www.jroller.com/sjivan/entry/smartgwt_1_0_released if you haven't already done so. I go over the SmartGWT fundamentals, the concept of a DataSource and how it will lead to a cleaner architecture and can cut application code significantly. I mention how a master detail page can be written in as little as 10 lines using a reusable DataSource definition that describes an entity / model class. Plus the reduced number of lines of code on the server as well. This is the first release of SmartGWT and while it is quite stable and has been tested and used by early adopters for the past four weeks, users can expect any rough edges / bugs / performance issues / better skins etc to be ironed out over the course of the next few minor releases. As mentioned earlier, if users have found a library that meets their needs, thats great and there's no need to look further. And for the others, feel free to evaluate SmartGWT to see if it helps meet your requirements. If you feel that there are things that can be improved please post on the SmartGWT forum or create an issue on the google code project page. Thanks, Sanjiv On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:49 AM, francescoNemesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, smartGwt looks very appealing and very rich in features, but it is very slow. This is due to the fact that it is a JSNI wrapper around the Smart Client framework. This means loosing all the benefits of having a pure GWT implementation (I will not go into details on this). I think a comparison with GXT (also known as GWT Ext, at this address http://extjs.com/products/gxt/) does not make any sense as GXT is a pure GWT feature implementation and it is lightining fast once compiled. The only appropriate comparison would be with gwt-ext (http:// code.google.com/p/gwt-ext/) which is JSNI wrapper around the ExtJS javascript framework (developed by the same company that developed GXT), much like smartGwt is a JSNI wrapper around the Smart Client framework. This forum is full of people complaining about how slow and cumbersome gwt-ext is, and I think exactly the same problems will be encountered with smartGwt.On the other hand GXT is not affected by any of these issues. True, GXT at the moment is not as rich in features at the moment, but they are getting there. I do not work for the ExtJS
Re: Animations
Hi, I did some basic animation at adligo.com, basically just a absolute panel with Timers that move the labels for the A and dligo and the panel for the tabs. The timers are set to run like the frames of a movie. I haven't checked out the GWT Animation kit, but I'm sure it's great It would be nice if someone wrote a sound API for gwt (or wrapper for the flash sound plugin), then people could write full blown video games in GWT! . Cheers, Scott On Nov 22, 5:12 am, tapan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can i create excellent animations with GWT. please help urgent. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Why use GWT?
I found this list VERY IMPRESSIVE! http://instantiations.com/mktg/customers_gwtd.html Cheers, Scott On Nov 22, 8:58 pm, adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see herehttp://docs.jquery.com/Sites_Using_jQuerythat lots of big projects, most of which are probably led by some smart, deep-thinking, open-minded individuals, are using jQuery and hand-written javascript. I notice that this list of projects using GWThttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/GWT.html#WhoIsUsingItdoesn't look as impressive. Why are leaders on big projects deciding to use tools other than GWT? Do they have any good reasons to not use GWT? Should they use GWT? If so, why? If this has already been covered in another post, please point me to it; no need to reinvent the wheel. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Animations
something like this? http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/ On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Adligo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I did some basic animation at adligo.com, basically just a absolute panel with Timers that move the labels for the A and dligo and the panel for the tabs. The timers are set to run like the frames of a movie. I haven't checked out the GWT Animation kit, but I'm sure it's great It would be nice if someone wrote a sound API for gwt (or wrapper for the flash sound plugin), then people could write full blown video games in GWT! . Cheers, Scott On Nov 22, 5:12 am, tapan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can i create excellent animations with GWT. please help urgent. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Aspect-Oriented Programming for GWT, GWTENT-0.5 now available for download
Oops, The format is not good for read, And looks like I can't modify
it. Sorry.
On Nov 24, 10:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, Guys,
Aspect-Oriented Programming for GWT, GWTENT-0.5 now available for
download.
Please see here or read through this post for more
information:http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ent/wiki/AOP
You can get all interceptors in sample project
athttp://gwt-ent.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gwtent-sample/src/com/gwtent/...
Please download the sample project
athttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-ent/downloads/list
If you get anything, any advises, issues, please let me know, let us
make it better. :D
1, Introduction
Now Aspect-Oriented Programming is available in GWT.
The following advice type supported by GWTENT(Compatible with
AspectJ annotation).
1. @Around
2. @Before
3. @After
4. @AfterReturning?
5. @AfterThrowing?
* Around advice: Advice that surrounds a join point such as a
method invocation. This is the most powerful kind of advice. Around
advice can perform custom behavior before and after the method
invocation. It is also responsible for choosing whether to proceed to
the join point or to shortcut the advised method execution by
returning its own return value or throwing an exception.
* Before advice: Advice that executes before a join point, but
which does not have the ability to prevent execution flow proceeding
to the join point (unless it throws an exception).
* After (finally) advice: Advice to be executed regardless of the
means by which a join point exits (normal or exceptional return).
* After returning advice: Advice to be executed after a join point
completes normally: for example, if a method returns without throwing
an exception.
* After throwing advice: Advice to be executed if a method exits
by throwing an exception.
And for pointcut, we support both Google Guice matcher classes and
AspectJ expression(a subset of AspectJ expression)
Please see here for all interceptors in sample project. Please
download the sample projecthere
2, Pointcut
2.1, Overview
Pointcut: A predicate that matches join points. Advice is associated
with a pointcut expression and runs at any join point matched by the
pointcut (for example, the execution of a method with a certain name).
The concept of join points as matched by pointcut expressions is
central to AOP: we support AspectJ pointcut language and Google Guice
matcher classes.
2.1.1, Client-side code?
Please note, All pointcut match code is runing at compile time,
it's mean you can write truely java code in your matcher class and
without any limit in GWT client-side code. In compile time and host-
mode, GWTENT require AspectJ jars to dealwith AspectJ expression, but
after your compile it, all are javascript.
2.2, AspectJ pointcut expression style
to be continue
2.2, Google Guice matcher style
We support matchclass(the class name which implement
com.gwtent.aop.matcher.ClassMethodMatcher?), for example:
@Aspect
public static class PhoneRedirectInterceptor {
@Around(matchclass
(com.gwtent.test.aspectj.TestMatcher))
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation)
throws Throwable {
invocation.proceed();
System.out.println(Do something in
PhoneRedirectInterceptor...);
return new Receiver(Alberto's Pizza
Place);
}
}
the matcher class will looks like this:
public class TestMatcher implements ClassMethodMatcher {
public Matcher? super Class? getClassMatcher() {
return Matchers.subclassesOf(Phone.class);
}
public Matcher? super Method getMethodMatcher() {
return Matchers.returns(Matchers.only
(Phone.Receiver.class));
//return Matchers.any();
}
}
3, Advice
3.1, Arguments Binding
1. if there is com.gwtent.client.aop.intercept.MethodInvocation?
in args list, then invocation will assign to args.
2. if source method and advice method have the same class type and
this type just have one, then we assign this one to args
3. Read settings in @AfterReturning?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](
pointcut=**,
returning=retVal
)
public void afterReturning(Object retVal)
4. Read settings in @AfterThrowing?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](
throwing=e
}
public void afterThrowing(Throwable e)
3.2, @Around
Advice that surrounds a join point such as a method invocation.
This is the most powerful kind of advice. Around advice can perform
custom behavior before and after the method invocation. It is also
responsible for choosing whether to proceed to the
The text of two TabBar Items Overlaps
Hi, I have the following problem: The text of two TabBar Items Overlaps, this is because the width property in the .css file doesn't works. I didn't have this problem with the gwt 1.4 version but when I change to the 1.5 version this problem appear. Some body know how to solve this problem. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Popup Stealing focus
Very cool thanks for the info Mark! On Nov 21, 8:03 am, markmccall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a know bug in FireFox that might be causing this: http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/threa...http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=891 Hope this helps. Mark On Nov 21, 12:24 am, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay so it seems that overriding show() actually is setting the focus on the textBox but the cursor is not showing up. On Nov 20, 10:51 pm, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey everyone, I have a pretty simple popup with a couple of text boxes in it. When it comes up, i'd like the focus to be on the first text box. Unfortunately, the focus is getting lost when the popup is shown and i'm not sure what is eating it. Does anyone have some insight into what might be going on? I've even tried overriding show() to set the focus after i make the call to super.show(). Thanks! bryan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Can Google Adsense be used with GWT
Hi Rick, AFAIK, Google AdSense won't work very well unless your site is Search Engine Optimized. If it is, you should be able to add Google AdSense to your site like you would with any other site built with Javascript and HTML. You can integrate it either with JSNI or put it into the HTML file that starts your GWT app. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have developed a web site using GWT1.5. I want to show Google Adsense on it. DO GWT have support for Google Adsense. Any comments/ updates in this regard will be highly appreciated. Regards Rick Smith --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Animations
That roadmap is pretty out of date (says Java 5 support is in-progress when it's already done). My understanding is that it will be updated soon. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:18 PM, hezjing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi A side note to this discussion, the roadmap of GWT (see http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#roadmap) mentioned that the Animation/effects support is still in planning? On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Jeremiah Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: something like this? http://code.google.com/p/gwt-voices/ On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Adligo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I did some basic animation at adligo.com, basically just a absolute panel with Timers that move the labels for the A and dligo and the panel for the tabs. The timers are set to run like the frames of a movie. I haven't checked out the GWT Animation kit, but I'm sure it's great It would be nice if someone wrote a sound API for gwt (or wrapper for the flash sound plugin), then people could write full blown video games in GWT! . Cheers, Scott On Nov 22, 5:12 am, tapan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can i create excellent animations with GWT. please help urgent. -- Hez --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Resource not found of Stock Watcher
I am trying Stock Watcher program, after I compiled the scripts in Eclipse, I encountered the warning:[WARN] Resource not found: com.google.gwt.sample.stockwatcher.StockWatcher.nocache.js; (could a file be missing from the public path or a servlet tag misconfigured in module com.google.gwt.sample.stockwatcher.stockwatcher.gwt.xml ?). I don't know why. who can help me ? Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
compile external project source file
Hi, How can I add another project source file into my GWT project. Actually I have divided our project into two project which is server project and GWT project. For the RPC we are making same DTO on both side. Now to prevent us from code duplicacy I want to add dto to another project and share between two. My gwt is not able to compile those DTO as this is outside of client package. I also tried source path= tag in gwt.xml file but how to add external project module path in that I don't know. Please help me in achiving this. Thanks WARM Regards, Vaibhav Saxena Srishti TechNet Pvt. Ltd. B1/168, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi - 110063 --- ( Tel: +91 9953058839 Skype: vaibhav_saxena1407 Any comments or statements made in this email are not necessarily those of Srishti TechNet Pvt. Ltd. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Srishti TechNet Pvt. Ltd. may be subject to our monitoring procedures --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How to do cross site implementation in GWT
Hi everybody, I has working for 2 months on GWT( 1.5.3 ). I have been successful in implementing various feature in GWT. Finally I am stuck at end for almost 20 days in including my GWT project to a set of HTML files with passing a set of values to GWT from HTML. Previously also I put this issue in this forum as i was trying with JSNI and xs linker.Now i am running out of time. Time has come for decision.Thanks for constant help and co-operation. Now can anybody please confirm my approach? Since still I suspect my approach. I have a set of HTML files. I have made and GWT project including some widgets , rpc and a external server( calling using request builder ). I have wriiten a JSNI method in GWT component which is called by a GWT method called inside onModuleLoad. I have wriiten a js method( on HTML side) which calls JSNI method. I compiled the GWT component using xs linker and added nocache.js in my HTML(in HEAD part). I am expecting that this will invoke GWT component as js method ( html side ) is called on click of a button displayed in HTML. A couple of months back I had got this but I don't understand why this is not working this time.There is a remarkable observation is that previously I had got xs-nocache.js and my JSNI method inside that.This I am not getting now. One more thing I would like to know that what is the role of cache.js? Can anybody provide me what is mistake/is this workable or not. Regards Manish --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Aspect-Oriented Programming for GWT, GWTENT-0.5 now available for download
Why doesn't this project get merged with GWT instead? On Nov 24, 10:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops, The format is not good for read, And looks like I can't modify it. Sorry. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Is they a way to create minimise buttons?
Hi Every one Greeting to everyone.. I want to create a popup like a screens in windows. More precisely I am require to create a popup having close , minimize, maximize buttons. Is there any way to create these? Can any give me a hint so that I can work on that? Regards Ananda --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: [ANN] GWT maven plugin released
I understand your point of view, I just want to notice Mojo project has been created to avoid such case of multiple plugins for same use-cases / technology. Anyone can get write acces to Mojo when donating a plugin, and this is the primary place where maven user will search for maven a maven plugin to support XX technology. It doesn't use the constraining Apache fundation release and licensing rules, so Mojo committer are free to create and promote nice plugins. I was not aware of googlecode gwt-maven plugin when I searched one, and found the one in Mojo sandbox that required some improvements. I later was pointed to google code, but hopefully I didn't plan same features. Same issue may occur with android or any other technology. I myself planned to study android and to support it as part of Mojo, but your comment let me thing there is allready plugins available *somewhere* for that ;) It would be better for such project to support own plugins, to avoid such ambiguous brother plugins. We (Mojo project) could also add links to such 3rd party plugins. Cheers, Nicolas On 23 nov, 08:25, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicolas, I hope you didn't take my comment the wrong way. I just wanted to point out that Charlie Collin's plugin has been out a lot longer and has many more people using it. It's great that the Mojo version has finally been brought up to a similar state, I just lament the fact that there are so few people maintaining gwt maven plugins that it might serve better to have a unified project. Charlie Collins recently did this with his Android Maven pluging, merging it with the Masa plugin which had a different featureset. I am not involved in either project, I'm just a heavy user of gwt-maven plugin from Charlie's project, and long term, I'd like to see a sort of defacto standard GWT maven plugin, defacto standard GWT repo, etc. Right now, everyone and their brother is putting GWT packages into repos, using various packaging schemes. -Ray On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:18 PM, nicolas.deloof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mojo.codehaus.org is the place where maven community starts plugins ideas or incubates third-party ones. They can get focus from many developpers and improve, until they get new releases. The gwt-maven mojo has been created as an experiment but failed due to GwtCompiler System.exit(). I then came to fix this and add support for no installation libs.zip, and other stuff like Asyn code generation. Charlie Collins as any other contributor is welcome to join the large Mojo community and donate code / help to improve the plugin with any new feature. I google guys want to maintain themselve a gwt plugin, they could either join Mojo, or Mojo could donate the plugin to GWT. Nicolas On 22 nov, 21:08, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to see this plugin and the one from Charlie Collins (total) unified, cause it seems like each have valuable nonoverlapping features and a real stable feature rich production quality plugin should be blessed by google in much the same way as ide plugins and ant tasks. Even though the gwt team doesn't use maven, a sizable market of people do and all major ides now integrate tightly with it. Just my two cents. On Nov 22, 2008, at 9:43 AM, nicolas.deloof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of the GWT Maven Plugin version 1.0. http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/ This is the first stable release after some month of real-life tests in sandbox. To get this update, simply specify the version in your project's plugin configuration: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdgwt-maven-plugin/artifactId version1.0/version /plugin Regards, Nicolas De loof --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: Don't forget CachedTableModel.clearCache()
If TableModel had an abstract clearCache method, I could make: myPagingGrid.getTableModel().clearCache(); myPagingGrid.gotoPage(0, true); That would be more clean imho. But it wouldn't, you see, because not all TableModels have caching. You're trying to move a method higher up the inheritance chain where it doesn't belong. The fact that your PST uses a caching TableModel is an implementation detail of your application. You should extend or encapsulate PST and your TableModel and provide/override a method in that new object that handles clearing the cache before refreshing the page. On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Geraldo Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm making a crud application that uses PagingScrollTable. It consists of a paging grid and a form that reflects the current selected row. I use the form to make query by example, so I start with a group of values and depending on the search I need to populate the grid with completely different set of values. After the user click the search button I was trying to reload the values with : myPagingGrid.gotoPage(0, true); // true to force reload. I was getting strange results, with values of the last search being mixed with the ones of the current search. My mistake was I'm using CachedTableModel, that encapsulate my real table mode and it was keeping values from the last search around. final CachedTableModelCliente cachedTableModel = new CachedTableModelCliente(tableModel); So cachedTableModel.clearCache() before myPagingGrid.gotoPage(0, true) solved the problem. Just wondering: CachedTableModel extends MutableTableModel which extends TableModel, and PagingScrollTable points to TableModel, so I can't invoke clear cache via PagingScrollTable. Instead I have to pass a instance to PagingScrollTable and CachedTableModel to be able to: cachedTableModel.clearCache(); myPagingGrid.gotoPage(0, true); If TableModel had an abstract clearCache method, I could make: myPagingGrid.getTableModel().clearCache(); myPagingGrid.gotoPage(0, true); That would be more clean imho. Thanks for the marvelous work you are doing. Geraldo Lopes --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
