[hugin-ptx] Re: New windows installer: 3652
As far the main problems with Hugin 1. finding out a compiled .exe to click and install mindlessy... 2. I could never ever stitch a circular fisheye image with it. So far command line original Dersch software was more intuitive to me. 3. As soon as I'm setting down in new offices I'll take more care of italian translation. Till now the new version has all the bad errors a software translation can have. Translating software is a delicate process, and takes time and some revisions. It can't be done in an hurry or in some days. Now is unconsistant and confusing, I far prefer using it in English. Logo. I can't find my originals any more. Other time will be dedicated in rebuilding an SVG version (thanx inkscape!!!) Another thing. A last build alpha repository for UBUNTU linux?!?! Gnome, KDE, WHAT After office moving and website building I can help hosting the files. Download page in hugin website for snapshots need UPDATING, explanations and things... I'm always lost. 2009/2/25 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch: allard wrote: I'm a newbie everybody was at some point. nothing wrong with that. to click on the .iss file in hugin_build/INSTALL to build the installer once the files in hugin_build/INSTALL/FILES are ready. the .iss file is not there, but in the hugin_build/platforms/windows/ installer most likely the INSTALL target in MSVC is deselected. It is by default and it is good so, because you want to build error free before installing/ proceeding to compile the installer. I guess you build the Release target (and not the Debug target). You can select to build the INSTALL project after the build completes successfully and then you'll be in the state to run the installer from its intended location. I start to see how much effort you did put into this and I have a lot of respect for people like you who try hard to make things work. Then test the installer. If you are not sure, ask a small circle of people to test it to avoid spreading confusion. I'm guilty of not doing that for sure. guilty? oh no. those who do not dare do not get nowhere. better a little confusion than no action at all. I never really meant to get caught up in the development process because I don't have the skills for it and no time at the moment to really learn them. you're quite advanced now, almost made it. I'll be happy to help you with the last few corners to be rounded. I'd expected one of the 'real' developers to come up with a working installer very soon after that, but that didn't happen. in open source users = developers. I've been waiting for a newbie to come forward and pick up the installer where I left it and take it further for a few steps. passage of the generations. there is no point in open source, if it is the usual suspects that do the work and everybody else just waits for it to be done. So I shared my half-baked installer with the world, figuring that if I preferred a semi-installed alpha of 0.8 over 0.7, others might as well. that's very good. it generated positive action/attention. If you feel this action of mine is causing too much confusion let me know and I'll take the installer down. not at all. your action is moving the project forward and I am thankful for that. I'm taking it down anyway once i reach the count of 1000 downloads because of the traffic limit. I'm at 450 now. I got about 100 clicks a day going from my blog to your site. don't know if they all downloaded, but this means that it won't stay up for much longer... Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Great Barrier Reef
2009/2/24 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch Want to see VR panoramas and vedute of the great barrier reef? Vote for me at: http://www.islandreefjob.com/#/applicants/watch/cjnIbMIgWjI Did that. Do you make underwater pano's? do you have already some of them? http://panospace.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/application-deadline/ and of course the Hugin community will be welcome visitors to sleep on the couch ;-) I wish I could say: yes, please. But I'm affraid I will only see the 1 m2 pond in my garden and it even doesn't have a reef. Succes with your strive for this opportunity. Hoi, Harry thanks Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: New windows installer: 3652
most likely the INSTALL target in MSVC is deselected. It is by default and it is good so, because you want to build error free before installing/ proceeding to compile the installer. I guess you build the Release target (and not the Debug target). You can select to build the INSTALL project after the build completes successfully and then you'll be in the state to run the installer from its intended location. Nope. It is deselected at first, but I built 'install' after the 'build solution', as Guido had prescribed. Neither that (nor package, which works with the nullsoft installer and builds a very broken installer) puts the iss files where they should be. When I do another build I will completely clear out everything, (backing up the cmakelists.txt and the iss file just in case), update and see if this still happens. But I'm pretty sure it will unless the SDK is adjusted. I start to see how much effort you did put into this and I have a lot of respect for people like you who try hard to make things work. Not that much effort really. It was just a matter of solving a lot of 'file not found' errors. Notepad++, Windows search and google were all I needed. The rest was using using the tools Guido and you provided as described in step-by-step recipes. I got about 100 clicks a day going from my blog to your site. don't know if they all downloaded, but this means that it won't stay up for much longer... I estimate it will be gone after the weekend. If someone is willing to host the file please contact me. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] What is the status of keypoint detection and keypoint matching: machpoint (gsoc2007) and feature_matching (gsoc2008)
All, I've been searching my archives but I'm a bit lost (or actually: completely lost). During gsoc 2007 Zoran Mesec created/worked on matchpoint: the patent free keypoint detector. As far as I'm aware matchpoint works fine, but still has problems dealing with transparency masks. True or wrong? Anyone who does know, please explain. Any relevant info that I didn't ask here is welcome too. During gsoc 2008 Onur Küçüktunç created/worked on feature_matching to be used in combination with matchpoint. Is this now (relatively) mature or not? Can we use it? As far as I know this still hasn't been integrated into the main Hugin trunk or has it? (and am I a complete moron for missing that?) Finally: Combination of matchpoint and match-n-shift: Is this now a working keypoint detection/matching combination as such or does match-n-shift just use autopano for the keypoint matching? (I'm almost sure about the latter, but maybe I also miss some details here). I know match-n-shift does much more, but I'm now only referring to keypoint detection/matching. hoi, Harry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini 0.62 released
On Feb 25, 1:56 am, Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com wrote: And if you have a design and need someone to create a PHP template from it, let me know :) If I knew what a PHP template was, I might know if I need one. Should I? Do I? :) That is, if you decide to use something like Drupal or Wordpress, you might want original design. When you have this design as PNG or XCF file, somebody has to create code in PHP so that your Drupal or Wordpress setup could use it for all pages. Alexandre --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Generalised stereographic projections
Hi Group, I have been playing with generalisations of the stereographic projection. Given a view sphere of a 360 panorama, the basic idea is the float around inside that sphere and then project on to either a plane or a cylinder. Conventional perspective comes from projecting from the centre of the sphere, and stereographic from the back, onto a plane. This projection allows projection from anywhere in the sphere in any (meaningful) direction. First tries at using this at http://www.flickr.com/photos/gawthrop/sets/72157614419442162/ At the moment, it's a mathmap implementation. But I would like to think about putting it in hugin and/or panini. Note that, unlike the Panini projection, the aim is to distort - albeit in a meaningful way. Commentssuggestions appreciated. Peter Peter Gawthrop pe...@gawthrop.net http://www.lightspacewater.net --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini 0.62 released
That is, if you decide to use something like Drupal or Wordpress, you might want original design. When you have this design as PNG or XCF file, somebody has to create code in PHP so that your Drupal or Wordpress setup could use it for all pages. Alexandre Hi Tom, I guess Alexandre is answering the a web designer to make a nice project web page part, Drupal and Wordpress being some Content Management System, ie basically a program (in PHP for example) that lets you easily create and update a website. Alexandre can help you customizing those CMS to have a nice looking interface. Cheers, RizThon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini 0.62 released
Tom Sharpless kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 24. helmikuuta 2009): Fedora Linux RPMs of Panini 0.62, thanks to Frantizek Hanzlik, are available at ftp://tksharpless.net/tksftp/Panini/FedoraLinux/. The site asks for username and password, it doesn't allow anonymous FTP. I'd be interested in trying the software on my Fedora system if I only could get it. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Simple lens calibration
sorry for waking up an old thread. I'd like to use this method to calibrate a UW camera set-up. That is, a camera in a housing with a wide angle lens attached on the housing. Obviously this set-up is very much different from the camera on land so I need to do it in the pool, so I need to plan the exercise in beforehand. The pool have a lot of natural lines to use in the tiles of the pool, the question is if these would be good enough, or if I must make my own lines using a little buoy with a weight and orange string to get enough accuracy? the purpose with the calibration foul be to be able to correct individual images using Fulla (and maybe directly in Lightroom eventually) but also to have a starting value when stitching linear panoramas of wreck sites. Cheers Oskar 2008/7/15 Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com: Right on, Rik Rotating the camera to take multiple images of one straight line target, then optimizing only the lens parameters, is a very clever idea. You can cover the whole field of a fisheye lens without having to build a circular target or worry about calibrated rotations. And it is perfectly OK if all the calibration lines are parallel, because what actually determines the calibration parameters is just the radial distances of the control points from the projection center = image center + (d,e). So the important thing is to cover the range of possible radii as fully as possible. For the same reason, the lines need not extend all the way across the image; a little past center on one side and all the way out on the other is fine. Cheers, Tom On Jul 14, 12:05 am, Rik Littlefield rj.littlefi...@computer.org wrote: Erik Krause wrote: The idea of using string lines is clever, but one must keep in mind that a string line is never exactly straight. It's own weight always bends it down more or less. The string tension must be very high in order to be almost straight... Try using a plumb line, hanging vertical so the line will be perfectly straight even if it is not very tight. Take several pictures, rotating the camera so that the line appears in a numerous places within the frames, different distances from the center. It is not necessary to rotate around the NPP. Then optimize a single set of lens parameters across all frames to make all the lines straight, leaving pitch/roll/yaw locked at zero for all frames. This method tested OK for me a couple of years ago, but I have not used it a lot so I don't know what all can go wrong with it. --Rik -- /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Simple lens calibration
2009/2/25 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: the purpose with the calibration foul be to be able to correct individual images using Fulla (and maybe directly in Lightroom eventually) but also to have a starting value when stitching linear panoramas of wreck sites. Why does it need to be underwater to calibrate ? regards mick --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Simple lens calibration
Put an empty drinking glass on your kitchen table. Fix a laser pointer so it aims from a higher point on one side of the glass to the table surface on the other side of the glass. Eventually mark the spot where the laser pointer hits the table. Fill your glass with tap water and watch the beam being refracted (I hope that's the right term) in a different angle when travelling from glass through water instead glass/air. The same water resistant lens has different values when used in standard or underwater conditions. Carl michael crane wrote: 2009/2/25 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: the purpose with the calibration foul be to be able to correct individual images using Fulla (and maybe directly in Lightroom eventually) but also to have a starting value when stitching linear panoramas of wreck sites. Why does it need to be underwater to calibrate ? regards mick --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Simple lens calibration
Yes, but a different medium (water instead of air) is used at one surface of the glass. That's where the angle of the light ray changes. Carl Mick Crane wrote: I assumed refraction was the issue but wondered why the calibration would be different underwater. It is light falling on the lens in both cases. Regards Mick On 25 Feb 2009, at 16:39, Carl von Einem ei...@gmx.de wrote: Put an empty drinking glass on your kitchen table. Fix a laser pointer so it aims from a higher point on one side of the glass to the table surface on the other side of the glass. Eventually mark the spot where the laser pointer hits the table. Fill your glass with tap water and watch the beam being refracted (I hope that's the right term) in a different angle when travelling from glass through water instead glass/air. The same water resistant lens has different values when used in standard or underwater conditions. Carl michael crane wrote: 2009/2/25 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com: the purpose with the calibration foul be to be able to correct individual images using Fulla (and maybe directly in Lightroom eventually) but also to have a starting value when stitching linear panoramas of wreck sites. Why does it need to be underwater to calibrate ? regards mick --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini 0.62 released
On Wed 25-Feb-2009 at 17:00 +0200, Markku Kolkka wrote: The site asks for username and password, it doesn't allow anonymous FTP. I'd be interested in trying the software on my Fedora system if I only could get it. Franta Hanzlik put fedora RPMS here, I think they are the same: http://hanzlici.cz/packages/fedora/panini/ I haven't tested them, but the SPEC file looks fine. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: New windows installer: 3652
On Wed 25-Feb-2009 at 10:17 +0100, luca vascon wrote: 2. I could never ever stitch a circular fisheye image with it. So far command line original Dersch software was more intuitive to me. I think this is because you are expecting it to work like ptgui, the hugin system is actually much easier to use and more versatile: 'circular fisheye' allows you to add a circular mask to the photo, the mask just controls the area you want to include in the stitch. This circle is simply a mask and doesn't effect the field of view or lens correction parameters - i.e. you can readjust the mask at any time without having to reoptimise the project. I can't find my originals any more. Other time will be dedicated in rebuilding an SVG version (thanx inkscape!!!) There is a small simplified SVG version here: http://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/hugin/hugin/trunk/src/hugin1/hugin/xrc/data/info.svg?revision=3628 Download page in hugin website for snapshots need UPDATING, explanations and things... I'm always lost. Yes, the website needs fixing, it should just point to Yuval's blog for info about binary snapshots. -- Bruno --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Moving between fields with the Tab key
Hello Is there an anomaly in the GUI when tabbing between fields in Hugin on Mac OSX, please? When I am editing values in, say, the Stitcher tab and moving between fields using Tab or Shift-Tab the focus moves to the new field but inserts a cursor, rather than highlighting the previous value. This means I have to either double click in the field or delete the previous entry before I can enter the new value. This is not a huge problem, but contrary to the way most programs handle tabbing between fields. Do other users experience this, or have I set something incorrectly, please? I have only recently tried Hugin (release 0.7.0) and I have to say it is absolutely superb! The auto estimate and auto fine tune functions make entering control points so much easier than with the other programs I have tried. Kind regards Andrew --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem compiling SVN 3665 on AMD 64b, Ubuntu 8.10
It seem to me that it's the same error ? On Feb 25, 2:43 am, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: Can you please post the enblend output? It may be different error. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini 0.62 released
Hi Othman There is no point in loading huge imagees into Panini 0.62, as it will reduce them to around 8 Mpixels anyhow before display. So in this case, yes, make a very reduced image. -- Tom On Feb 3, 8:38 am, Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad othm...@lycos.com wrote: Successfully installed on my system: Amd Athlon 64 X2 running on Vista Ultimate 64-bit RAM 4G When I tried to open the tiff file, 16712 x 8356 dimension, 333Mbyte size, output by Smartblend, it gave error messages: QImage Out of memory, returning null image. I used defaults for all settings. My instinctive reaction is to create a lower resolution file but I prefer to work at the highest resolution before scaling them down for web publication. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini 0.62 released
Sorry, the password is TKSpwd1. I keep forgetting that. On Feb 25, 10:00 am, Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi wrote: Tom Sharpless kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 24. helmikuuta 2009): Fedora Linux RPMs of Panini 0.62, thanks to Frantizek Hanzlik, are available at ftp://tksharpless.net/tksftp/Panini/FedoraLinux/. The site asks for username and password, it doesn't allow anonymous FTP. I'd be interested in trying the software on my Fedora system if I only could get it. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Problem compiling on Windows -- wxWidgets not found
With Guido's new SDK and the current Hugin svn, I get a basic cmakesetup configuration error: wxWidgets not found; plus a lot of consequential ones if I try to fix by hand -- and if I do that until cmakesetup says OK, the wxWidgets include directory is still not in the MSVC projects, so hugin1 etct won't build. I always use a separate build tree, so as to keep the source tree clean. Both are rooted in the same directory that contains the SDK. Does anybody know what is wrong? Thanks, -- Tom --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem compiling on Windows -- wxWidgets not found
Dear Tom, please use CMake 2.6.3 which has an updated script to find wxWidgets. The script in CMake 2.6.2 searched for only some of the libraries, but in the SDK the Unicode libs are only available. In the new CMake version the script will find all varaints of libs. Additionally the old script has problems to find the libs, if they are generated using the Visual Studio GUI, becuase some files are not created, which are build if you use the command line approach. Nevertheless, currently I prepare a detailed description to build the Hugin SDK with Visual C++ 2008. I hope that this information will be available on panotools wiki until this weekend. Guido With Guido's new SDK and the current Hugin svn, I get a basic cmakesetup configuration error: wxWidgets not found; plus a lot of consequential ones if I try to fix by hand -- and if I do that until cmakesetup says OK, the wxWidgets include directory is still not in the MSVC projects, so hugin1 etct won't build. I always use a separate build tree, so as to keep the source tree clean. Both are rooted in the same directory that contains the SDK. Does anybody know what is wrong? Thanks, -- Tom --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem compiling on Windows -- wxWidgets not found
Dear Tom,
I should be sufficient to copy the attached file to directory
CMakeInstallDir\share\cmake-2.6\Modules and to rename it to
FindwxWidgets.cmake
Guido
With Guido's new SDK and the current Hugin svn, I get a basic
cmakesetup configuration error: wxWidgets not found; plus a lot of
consequential ones if I try to fix by hand -- and if I do that until
cmakesetup says OK, the wxWidgets include directory is still not in
the MSVC projects, so hugin1 etct won't build.
I always use a separate build tree, so as to keep the source tree
clean. Both are rooted in the same directory that contains the SDK.
Does anybody know what is wrong?
Thanks, -- Tom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
# - Find a wxWidgets (a.k.a., wxWindows) installation.
# This module finds if wxWidgets is installed and selects a default
# configuration to use. wxWidgets is a modular library. To specify the
# modules that you will use, you need to name them as components to
# the package:
#
# FIND_PACKAGE(wxWidgets COMPONENTS base core ...)
#
# There are two search branches: a windows style and a unix style. For
# windows, the following variables are searched for and set to
# defaults in case of multiple choices. Change them if the defaults
# are not desired (i.e., these are the only variables you should
# change to select a configuration):
#
# wxWidgets_ROOT_DIR - Base wxWidgets directory
#(e.g., C:/wxWidgets-2.6.3).
# wxWidgets_LIB_DIR - Path to wxWidgets libraries
#(e.g., C:/wxWidgets-2.6.3/lib/vc_lib).
# wxWidgets_CONFIGURATION - Configuration to use
#(e.g., msw, mswd, mswu, mswunivud, etc.)
#
# For unix style it uses the wx-config utility. You can select between
# debug/release, unicode/ansi, universal/non-universal, and
# static/shared in the QtDialog or ccmake interfaces by turning ON/OFF
# the following variables:
#
# wxWidgets_USE_DEBUG
# wxWidgets_USE_UNICODE
# wxWidgets_USE_UNIVERSAL
# wxWidgets_USE_STATIC
#
# The following are set after the configuration is done for both
# windows and unix style:
#
# wxWidgets_FOUND- Set to TRUE if wxWidgets was found.
# wxWidgets_INCLUDE_DIRS - Include directories for WIN32
# i.e., where to find wx/wx.h and
# wx/setup.h; possibly empty for unices.
# wxWidgets_LIBRARIES- Path to the wxWidgets libraries.
# wxWidgets_LIBRARY_DIRS - compile time link dirs, useful for
# rpath on UNIX. Typically an empty string
# in WIN32 environment.
# wxWidgets_DEFINITIONS - Contains defines required to compile/link
# against WX, e.g. -DWXUSINGDLL
# wxWidgets_CXX_FLAGS- Include dirs and ompiler flags for
# unices, empty on WIN32. Esentially
# `wx-config --cxxflags`.
# wxWidgets_USE_FILE - Convenience include file.
#
# Sample usage:
# FIND_PACKAGE(wxWidgets COMPONENTS base core gl net)
# IF(wxWidgets_FOUND)
# INCLUDE(${wxWidgets_USE_FILE})
# # and for each of your dependant executable/library targets:
# TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(YourTarget ${wxWidgets_LIBRARIES})
# ENDIF(wxWidgets_FOUND)
#
# If wxWidgets is required (i.e., not an optional part):
# FIND_PACKAGE(wxWidgets REQUIRED base core gl net)
# INCLUDE(${wxWidgets_USE_FILE})
# # and for each of your dependant executable/library targets:
# TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(YourTarget ${wxWidgets_LIBRARIES})
#
# FIXME: check this and provide a correct sample usage...
#Remember to connect back to the upper text.
# Sample usage with monolithic wx build:
#
# FIND_PACKAGE(wxWidgets COMPONENTS mono)
# ...
# NOTES
#
# This module has been tested on the WIN32 platform with wxWidgets
# 2.6.2, 2.6.3, and 2.5.3. However, it has been designed to
# easily extend support to all possible builds, e.g., static/shared,
# debug/release, unicode, universal, multilib/monolithic, etc..
#
# If you want to use the module and your build type is not supported
# out-of-the-box, please contact me to exchange information on how
# your system is setup and I'll try to add support for it.
#
# AUTHOR
#
# Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva (miguelf at ieee dot org).
# Jan Woetzel (jw at mip.informatik.uni-kiel.de).
#
# Based on previous works of:
# Jan Woetzel (FindwxWindows.cmake),
#
