Re: Apply error WAS product

[Kurt Quackenbush]

On 2/14/2018 9:47 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:


That is correct. And there is no need to apply A or B if you plan
to apply C. But there should be no harm in specifying all three in
the apply. If it doesn't work, at least one of the PTFs must be
incorrectly constructed.


Does the check for whether a SUPerseding PTF correctly replaces all
elements operate if the putatively SUPerseded PTF is merely RECEIVED,
not necessarily APPLYed?
Nope, that checking only occurs if the superseded PTF is being, or has 
already been, applied.


Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Neubert, Kevin]

APAR/PTF table for WebSphere Application Server V8.5 for z/OS
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27036476

Confirming Fix Pack 8.5.5.9 is applied?

Fix Pack 8.5.5.13 is available.  Are you able to apply the related PTFs to 
eliminate need for PI87811/UI50772?

Regards,

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Peter
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Apply error WAS product

This time again it failed

BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0090, REASON CODE 0549010C.  A LINK FAILED FOR LINK 
NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository/HBBO850/IBM
/../bbodrmak.

*Reason Code : 0549010C*
BPXFSLNK 03/10/11

JRLnkAcrossFilesets: The service tried to link across file systems


Action: Reissue the request, specifying a new pathname that is within the same 
file system as the existing pathname.
***


Error log:
  GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SBBOIMR LIBRARY *FAILED FOR SHELLSCR 
BBODRMAK IN SYSMOD UI50772*. THE RETURN CODE
 (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE 18.043 - TIME 12:51:22
- SEQUENCE NUMBER 01.
GIM30227E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD HBBO850 BECAUSE PROCESSING 
FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI50772. SYSMOD UI50772
 CONTAINS HIGHER LEVELS OF COMMON ELEMENTS.

GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI50772. SYSTEM UTILITY
PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN UI50772.
GIM30201E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD HBBO800. ALL SYSMODS THAT WOULD 
HAVE DELETED HBBO800 HAVE FAILED.


++ PTF (UI50772)/*

//UI50772  JOB 5655-50772,I3500,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),CLASS=A */
.
++ VER (Z038)

   FMID(HBBO850)

   PRE  (UI35842,UI35825,UI35824,UI35823,UI35822,UI35821,

 UI35820,UI35819)

   REQ  (UI50780,UI50779,UI50778,UI50777,UI50776,UI50775,

 UI50774,UI50773)

   SUP  (UI48569,UI48568,UI48567,UI48566,UI48565,UI48564,



 UI48563,UI48562,UI48561,UI43211,UI43210,
UI43209,

 UI43208,UI43207,UI43206,UI43205,UI43204,
UI43203,

 UI39709,UI39708,UI39707,UI39706,UI39705,UI39704,


 UI39703,AI87811,AI83950,AI83947,AI83946,
AI83945,

 AI83944,AI83942,AI83939,AI83938,AI83936,
AI73286,

 AI73285,AI73284,AI73283,AI73282,AI73281,AI73280,


 AI73279,AI73278,AI65610,AI65609,AI65608,
AI65607,

 AI65606,AI65605,AI65603)


 /*


   PROBLEM DESCRIPTION(S):


 PI87811 -


   *
***

   * USERS AFFECTED: All users of WebSphere Application Server
*

   * V8.5 for z/OS, including
*

   *- DMZ Secure Proxy Server,
*

   *- Web server plugins,
*

   *- IBM HTTP Server V8.5 on z/OS
*

   *
***

   * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: A packaging issue with the previous
*

   *  WebSphere Application Server V8.5 for
*

   *  z/OS 8.5.5.12 PTFs prevented it from
*

   *  installing on top of WAS 8.5.5.9 and
*

   *  WAS 8.5.5.10.
*

   *
***

   * RECOMMENDATION:
*

   *
***

   Packaging errors in the original 8.5.5.12 PTFs caused SMP/E to

   fail to APPLY the Fix Pack repository with


Packaging errors in the original 8.5.5.12 PTFs caused SMP/E to

fail to APPLY the Fix Pack repository with



GIM32501E ** APPLY PROCESSING HAS FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI48569.

UI48569 SUPERSEDES UI39703 BUT DOES NOT CONTAIN SHELLSCR

  BBODRMAK.



For documentation of the APAR contents for Fix Pack 8.5.5.12

please refer to the following URL:



http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27036319

COMPONENT:  5655-I3500-HBBO850

*APARS FIXED: PI87811  *

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

  COPYRIGHT: 5655-I3500 COPYRIGHT IBM CORP. 2012

 LICENSED MATERIAL - PROGRAM PROPERTY OF IBM

  DOCUMENTATION:

*The PTFs for Fix Pack 8.5.5.9 MUST be applied BEFORE you apply*

*the PTFs for Fix Pack 8.5.5.10 or later. File corruption will *

*occur if you attempt to install Fix Pack 8.5.5.9 along with a *

*subsequent fix pack. See below for an explanation.*



The Fix Pack 8.5.5.12 PTFs update the Installation Manager

repository for WebSphere Application Server Version 8.5

to include the 8.5.5.12 Fix Pack level for the WebSphere

Application Server full (traditional) profile, IBM HTTP Server,

and the Web Server Plugins.



Fix Pack 8.5.5.9 of WebSphere Application Server for z/OS is

the last Fix Pack that updates both the full (traditional)

profile and the Liberty profile of WebSphere Application

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Paul Gilmartin]

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:50:46 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:

>On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 23:27:35 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
>>I thought that if PTF A was superseded by B, and B superseded 
>>by C, then SMPE would only install only C and mark A and B as 
>>SUP'D. That logic, if it obtains, always made sense to me. 
>
>That is correct. And there is no need to apply A or B if you plan 
>to apply C. But there should be no harm in specifying all three in 
>the apply. If it doesn't work, at least one of the PTFs must be 
>incorrectly constructed.
> 
Does the check for whether a SUPerseding PTF correctly replaces all
elements operate if the putatively SUPerseded PTF is merely RECEIVED,
not necessarily APPLYed?

--gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[John Eells]

Matthew Stitt wrote:

With WAS, I've encountered certain PTFs (fixpacks) which supersede other ones 
and create errors like this when both (or more) fixpacks are being applied at 
once.  The solution I've found is to apply each fixpack separately.



And indeed, there are some with HOLDs for ACTION for WebSphere PTFs for 
this very reason.  The reason to open a PMR is for the OP to determine 
whether (a) we screwed up the PTF packaging or (b) a HOLD was missed.


--
John Eells
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Tom Marchant]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 23:27:35 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:

>I thought that if PTF A was superseded by B, and B superseded 
>by C, then SMPE would only install only C and mark A and B as 
>SUP'D. That logic, if it obtains, always made sense to me. 

That is correct. And there is no need to apply A or B if you plan 
to apply C. But there should be no harm in specifying all three in 
the apply. If it doesn't work, at least one of the PTFs must be 
incorrectly constructed.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Jesse 1 Robinson]

I thought that if PTF A was superseded by B, and B superseded by C, then SMPE 
would only install only C and mark A and B as SUP'D. That logic, if it obtains, 
always made sense to me. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 3:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Apply error WAS product

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:52:06 -0600, Matthew Stitt wrote:

>With WAS, I've encountered certain PTFs (fixpacks) which supersede other ones 
>and create errors like this when both (or more) fixpacks are being applied at 
>once.  The solution I've found is to apply each fixpack separately.
>
That sounds PMR-worthy.  Are you doing what IBM recommended?

>On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:13:18 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>
>>Did you open a PMR?
>>
>>Please do, if not; and, please post the PMR number

-- gil


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Paul Gilmartin]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:52:06 -0600, Matthew Stitt wrote:

>With WAS, I've encountered certain PTFs (fixpacks) which supersede other ones 
>and create errors like this when both (or more) fixpacks are being applied at 
>once.  The solution I've found is to apply each fixpack separately.
>
That sounds PMR-worthy.  Are you doing what IBM recommended?

>On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:13:18 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>
>>Did you open a PMR?
>>
>>Please do, if not; and, please post the PMR number

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Matthew Stitt]

With WAS, I've encountered certain PTFs (fixpacks) which supersede other ones 
and create errors like this when both (or more) fixpacks are being applied at 
once.  The solution I've found is to apply each fixpack separately.

HTH

Matthew

On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:13:18 -0500, John Eells  wrote:

>Did you open a PMR?
>
>Please do, if not; and, please post the PMR number.
>
>Peter wrote:
>> This time again it failed
>>
>> BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0090, REASON CODE 0549010C.  A LINK FAILED FOR
>> LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository/HBBO850/IBM
>> /../bbodrmak.
>
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[John Eells]

Did you open a PMR?

Please do, if not; and, please post the PMR number.

Peter wrote:

This time again it failed

BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0090, REASON CODE 0549010C.  A LINK FAILED FOR
LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository/HBBO850/IBM
/../bbodrmak.



--
John Eells
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Peter]

>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 5:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Apply error WAS product
>
> Hi
>
> While applying an FMID for the WAS V10 I received the below error
>
>  Error Message: BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A
> LINK FAILED FOR LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository
> /HBBO850/IBM/..
> /WLP/fixpac. Pls find the attached log .
>
> I see a similar issue reported to IBM but for a different product
>
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21195928
>
> Has anyone faced this similar issue ?
>
> Peter
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Neubert, Kevin]

Confused.  You mention V10, link seems to indicate V8.5 and Liberty.

Hopefully some of this helps.

Liberty split from WebSphere maintenance V8.5.5.9.

My understanding, as of V9, SMPE no longer applies maintenance to the local 
repositories, etc. just to the samples jobs (A/SBBOJCL).

Take a look at the SBBOJCL(BBO1*) jobs for WebSphere or SBBOJCL(BBO5*) for 
Liberty.

Regards,

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Peter
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 5:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Apply error WAS product

Hi

While applying an FMID for the WAS V10 I received the below error

 Error Message: BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK 
FAILED FOR LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository /HBBO850/IBM/..
/WLP/fixpac. Pls find the attached log .

I see a similar issue reported to IBM but for a different product

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21195928

Has anyone faced this similar issue ?

Peter

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Lizette Koehler]

This was from a WAS 8.5 install

Upgrade WASAS850, Subset HBBO850

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1_WASAS850_HBBO850

I used Google and search terms   IBM HBBO850



If your existing copy of the WebSphere Application Server
 Liberty profile includes the extprogmodels install feature
 (included by default) or any Liberty features (such as
 zosConnect-1.0), and your z/OS system does not have access
 to the Web-based Liberty Repository (at ibm.com), you will
 need to edit the imcl.ini file in

/eclipse/tools

 and add the following text (on a single line):

 -Dwas.install.local.asset.location=/usr/lpp/
 InstallationManagerRepository/HBBO850/
 WLP/fixpacks/8.5.5.4

 If the WebSphere Application Server for z/OS SBBOIMR data
 set is mounted at a different location, modify the text in
 imcl.ini accordingly.

 For more information, see the following technote:

 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21692627



> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 8:01 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Apply error WAS product
> 
> This is a monoplex... The program directory of the product didn't mention
> about this mount points ... It sounded like a product bug...
> 
> 
> 
> On 10-Feb-2018 8:17 PM, "Lizette Koehler" <stars...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> 
> > Some Questions
> >
> > Is the LPAR this is running on, where the mount files reside?
> >
> > For example, you only have one LPAR this can run on?  Or is this a
> > SYSPLEX and it can run on more than one system?
> >
> > If this is a sysplex, make sure the file mounted where the job runs.
> > To do this, logon that that system and in ISPF using 3.17 (my
> > favorite) enter the mount point.  If it shows up, then enter FS next
> > to any file/dir in that file. Ensure names and locations for the run are
> correct.
> >
> > Or you can go to SDSF and issue  D OMVS,F,N=   and the N= would be the
> > actual MVS data set name.  Look for where the file is mounted
> >
> > Or you could go into report from the SMP APPLY and review the DDDEF
> > section.  Make sure the mount point used by SMPE is the right mount
> > point
> >
> >
> > Note:  This list typically will not allow attachments.  So if you
> > attached anything it may not go through.
> >
> >
> > Lizette
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> > > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 6:33 AM
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > > Subject: Apply error WAS product
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > While applying an FMID for the WAS V10 I received the below error
> > >
> > >  Error Message: BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D.
> > > A
> > LINK
> > > FAILED FOR LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository
> > /HBBO850/IBM/..
> > > /WLP/fixpac. Pls find the attached log .
> > >
> > > I see a similar issue reported to IBM but for a different product
> > >
> > > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21195928
> > >
> > > Has anyone faced this similar issue ?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Peter]

This is a monoplex... The program directory of the product didn't mention
about this mount points ... It sounded like a product bug...



On 10-Feb-2018 8:17 PM, "Lizette Koehler" <stars...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> Some Questions
>
> Is the LPAR this is running on, where the mount files reside?
>
> For example, you only have one LPAR this can run on?  Or is this a SYSPLEX
> and it can run on more than one system?
>
> If this is a sysplex, make sure the file mounted where the job runs.  To
> do this, logon that that system and in ISPF using 3.17 (my favorite) enter
> the mount point.  If it shows up, then enter FS next to any file/dir in
> that file. Ensure names and locations for the run are correct.
>
> Or you can go to SDSF and issue  D OMVS,F,N=   and the N= would be the
> actual MVS data set name.  Look for where the file is mounted
>
> Or you could go into report from the SMP APPLY and review the DDDEF
> section.  Make sure the mount point used by SMPE is the right mount point
>
>
> Note:  This list typically will not allow attachments.  So if you attached
> anything it may not go through.
>
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Peter
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 6:33 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Apply error WAS product
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > While applying an FMID for the WAS V10 I received the below error
> >
> >  Error Message: BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A
> LINK
> > FAILED FOR LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository
> /HBBO850/IBM/..
> > /WLP/fixpac. Pls find the attached log .
> >
> > I see a similar issue reported to IBM but for a different product
> >
> > http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21195928
> >
> > Has anyone faced this similar issue ?
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Apply error WAS product

[Lizette Koehler]

Some Questions

Is the LPAR this is running on, where the mount files reside?

For example, you only have one LPAR this can run on?  Or is this a SYSPLEX and 
it can run on more than one system?

If this is a sysplex, make sure the file mounted where the job runs.  To do 
this, logon that that system and in ISPF using 3.17 (my favorite) enter the 
mount point.  If it shows up, then enter FS next to any file/dir in that file. 
Ensure names and locations for the run are correct.

Or you can go to SDSF and issue  D OMVS,F,N=   and the N= would be the actual 
MVS data set name.  Look for where the file is mounted

Or you could go into report from the SMP APPLY and review the DDDEF section.  
Make sure the mount point used by SMPE is the right mount point


Note:  This list typically will not allow attachments.  So if you attached 
anything it may not go through.


Lizette


> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 6:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Apply error WAS product
> 
> Hi
> 
> While applying an FMID for the WAS V10 I received the below error
> 
>  Error Message: BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK
> FAILED FOR LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository /HBBO850/IBM/..
> /WLP/fixpac. Pls find the attached log .
> 
> I see a similar issue reported to IBM but for a different product
> 
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21195928
> 
> Has anyone faced this similar issue ?
> 
> Peter
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Apply error WAS product

[Peter]

Hi

While applying an FMID for the WAS V10 I received the below error

 Error Message: BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A LINK
FAILED FOR LINK NAME /usr/lpp/InstallationManagerRepository /HBBO850/IBM/..
/WLP/fixpac. Pls find the attached log .

I see a similar issue reported to IBM but for a different product

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21195928

Has anyone faced this similar issue ?

Peter

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN