Re: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby

2003-02-20 Thread Dietmar Gaar


- Original Message - 
From: Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dietmar Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby


I do exactly this.

i copy hdparm from my redhat 80 workstation to /sbin/hdparm on my bering
and add a line in /etc/init.d/rmnologin that say /sbin/hdparm -y
/dev/hda

--cut--


 Hi,
 
 thanks for you answer.
 
 I´ve tried your solution with an new Bering 1.1 Disk - it works great ;-)
 
 My Problem is that my live-system is a Bering uClibc Disk and i was not
 able to find a compiled uClibc hdparm-binary nor have a clue how to do this
without creating a whole development environment ;-)
 
 regards,
 Dietmar 

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging  more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] [bug] Dachstein with IPSEC image

2003-02-20 Thread João Miguel Neves
Maybe it will help anyone else.

I've had problems with using the dachstein image with ipsec that's on
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/contrib_disk_images.htm

Problem

The situation where it failed was on creating a firewall that would
access the internet with NAT (aka masquerading) and another network
through IPsec (non masqueraded). I wanted to use the configuration
IPFILTER_SWITCH=firewall with the IPsec tunnel. It wouldn't work.
From the logs on both firewalls the tunnel was created but no traffic
went through.

Solution

I checked the rules and, after a lot of tweaking, I discovered that I
needed to add rules to ipchains to allow forwarding between the subnets
behind the firewalls. In my specific case the networks were:
192.168.0.0/16 and 192.168.31.0/24. So I created the file
/etc/ipchains.forward with the following content:

ipchains -I forward 2 -s 192.168.0.0/16 -d 192.168.31.0/24 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -I forward 3 -s 192.168.31.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT

Well, this is just in case it can be useful for anyone else. I have no
idea how to do it, but should this be integrated on the image
configuration ?

-- 
João Miguel Neves




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


RE: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby

2003-02-20 Thread S Mohan
Does this mean I can use any RH8.0 586 utility binary freely with Bering so
long as the modules are already loaded? I could figure out modules required
using depmod - can't I?

Mohan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dietmar Gaar
Sent: 20 February 2003 16:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby




- Original Message -
From: Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dietmar Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby


I do exactly this.

i copy hdparm from my redhat 80 workstation to /sbin/hdparm on my bering
and add a line in /etc/init.d/rmnologin that say /sbin/hdparm -y
/dev/hda

--cut--


 Hi,

 thanks for you answer.

 I´ve tried your solution with an new Bering 1.1 Disk - it works great ;-)

 My Problem is that my live-system is a Bering uClibc Disk and i was not
 able to find a compiled uClibc hdparm-binary nor have a clue how to do this
without creating a whole development environment ;-)

 regards,
 Dietmar

--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging  more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Changing /dev/root Size

2003-02-20 Thread Steve Bihari
Hi All,

I'm not too familiar with initrd or Bering (yet).

Does anyone know how to change the tmpfs from the default 6MB.  I am
running out of space on /dev/root and need to increase it.

TIASteve 




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] Cable modem ip change hangs system

2003-02-20 Thread Jim Hubbard
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Jonathan_Portwood
 Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:38 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Cable modem ip change hangs system


 Using pump - if my ip changed or I manually released it, I
 couldn't renew
 it.  Pump failed everytime.  It only worked on boot up and
 when it automatically
 renewed a lease after 12 hours.

 Then I realized I was using ipsec.  When I released my ip -
 eth0 would
 be released, but ipsec0 wouldn't.  That's because I cheated
 using ipsec
 with a dynamic ip - assigning it %defaultroute in the
 config files.

Good to at least hear someone else has had this problem.  However, I'm
not using ipsec.



 I also switched to dhclient at the same time.  So, I
 brought down ipsec
 and was able to renew/release with dhclient all day long.
 So, I cheat
 again - and if dhclient determines my ip has changed - I
 just restart
 ipsec.

 I haven't tested with pump, but I suspect that my ipsec0
 was really causing
 havoc when my eth0 lost its ip. I think I could go back to
 pump if I just
 don't use ipsec.

 You might try using dhclient - some people say that one or the other
 works better with certain dhcp servers.  In my case it
 seems to work ok
 for me.


I was thinking of trying dhclient too, since I'm booting Bering from a
hard disk and space is not a problem.  I've read somewhere that some
old versions of pump had trouble getting an ip from Roadrunner, but I
assumed those problems had been fixed.  Who knows - problems like this
are very hard to track down.

Jim



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



AW: [leaf-user] Changing /dev/root Size

2003-02-20 Thread Alex Rhomberg
 I'm not too familiar with initrd or Bering (yet).
 
 Does anyone know how to change the tmpfs from the default 6MB.  I am
 running out of space on /dev/root and need to increase it.

That's probably the most FAQ here :-)
Use the syst_size parameter, see
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/biaddrm.html#AEN632

- Alex


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] [bug] Dachstein with IPSEC image

2003-02-20 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
João Miguel Neves wrote:

Solution

I checked the rules and, after a lot of tweaking, I discovered that I
needed to add rules to ipchains to allow forwarding between the subnets
behind the firewalls. In my specific case the networks were:
192.168.0.0/16 and 192.168.31.0/24. So I created the file
/etc/ipchains.forward with the following content:

ipchains -I forward 2 -s 192.168.0.0/16 -d 192.168.31.0/24 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -I forward 3 -s 192.168.31.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT

Well, this is just in case it can be useful for anyone else. I have no
idea how to do it, but should this be integrated on the image
configuration ?


The default firewall scripts have hooks to call custom code if you need 
to do something not possible with just the /etc/network.conf variables.

With a default Dachstein system, you could simply put the rules above 
into /etc/ipchains.forward, and your custom rules will be added 
automatically when reloading the firewall rules.

Note you can also use the -b switch (bidirectional) to ipchains to 
reduce the above to a single rule, and in the /etc/ipchains.forward 
file, you should probably use the predefined IPCH environment variable, 
resulting in:

$IPCH -I forward -j ACCEPT -s 192.168.0.0/16 -d 192.168.31.0/24 -b

This is how I add the required forwarding rules to my firewall, but if 
the rule is simply for your VPN connection, you can specify the 
[left|right]firewall=yes setting in your ipsec connection definition, 
and the ipsec scripts will automatically add the required forwarding 
rules when the connection is brought up.  This might be required if (for 
example) you had public IP's on both sides of the VPN link, and didn't 
want traffic going across the 'net unencrypted until the VPN tunnel 
comes up.  With private IP's, this isn't as much of an issue (the 
default Dachstein firewall will prevent any private IP traffic from 
leaving the firewall unless it's tunneled through something like ipsec).

Also, if you use the [left|right]firewall setting in ipsec.conf, you 
have to stop ipsec if you want to modify your firewall rules, ie:

svi ipsec stop
net ipfilter reload
svi ipsec start

Which is one nice thing about using ipchains.forward to implement the 
forwarding rules, you can simply net ipfilter reload to change 
firewall rules, and your IPSec link will continue to work.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Changing /dev/root Size

2003-02-20 Thread Steve Bihari
Wow! That was easy.  Thanks !



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex
Rhomberg
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:45 AM
To: Steve Bihari; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [leaf-user] Changing /dev/root Size


 I'm not too familiar with initrd or Bering (yet).
 
 Does anyone know how to change the tmpfs from the default 6MB.  I am 
 running out of space on /dev/root and need to increase it.

That's probably the most FAQ here :-)
Use the syst_size parameter, see
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/biaddrm.html#AEN632

- Alex


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The
most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster.
C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] newbie question.

2003-02-20 Thread Troy Aden
Hello there. I have a quick newbie question here. I would just like to know
the 
CLI Command that I use to show the output below. I am assuming that it is
some variation of 
Ip addr . 

Thanks in advance.


What command will give me this output that I see in weblet?

1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue 
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast   
93612   0   0   0   0  
TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns 
93612   0   0   0   0  
2: dummy0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop 
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast   
0  00   0   0   0  
TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns 
0  00   0   0   0  
3: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:01:02:bf:93:54 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast   
56930223   943192   0   0   0   0  
TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns 
215592 1956 0   0   0   12 
4: eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:01:03:de:b2:25 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast   
907155 117560   0   0   0  
TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns 
21208576348 0   0   0   0   


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] newbie question.

2003-02-20 Thread Tom Eastep
Troy Aden wrote:



What command will give me this output that I see in weblet?

1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue 
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast   
93612   0   0   0   0  
TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns 
93612   0   0   0   0  

ip -s link show

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] newbie question.

2003-02-20 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello Troy 
 Hello there. I have a quick newbie question here. I would just like to know
 the 
 CLI Command that I use to show the output below. I am assuming that it is
 some variation of 
 Ip addr . 
almost correct ;)

#ip -s link show

the -s option includes the statistics


Eric Wolzak
member of the Bering Crew


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI

2003-02-20 Thread Bihari, Steve
I know this question has probably been posted many times before, but I can't
seem to find any solution out there.

Does anyone know if there is a publicly available Web-based GUI for
shorewall?  If so, what's a good one to use?

TIA...Steve


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals

2003-02-20 Thread Matt Schalit


Lynn Avants wrote:


I just didn't know how tunneling methods were integrated
into Java other than possibly a call built-into the source.



I think I'm back to my previous question, aren't these
tunnel programs run as seperate apps from the GUI?

What I mean is, there aren't any applications out there that
need to know or be configured to use an encrypted tunnel,
they just open a socket like they normally do.

The tunnel is created in advance of the GUI ever running,
isn't that the idea, and the GUI never knows about it.

I may be wrong, but unless there's a decision to use the
built-in java SSL or SSH calls as versus a seperate tunnel,
java doesn't have a role in the security aspect.

regards,
matthew



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI

2003-02-20 Thread Tom Eastep
Bihari, Steve wrote:

I know this question has probably been posted many times before, but I can't
seem to find any solution out there.


So you were looking for information about Shorewall and didn't consult 
the Shorewall FAQ?? (http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm) -- your question 
is FAQ #12.


Does anyone know if there is a publicly available Web-based GUI for
shorewall?  If so, what's a good one to use?



The latest Webmin version supports Shorewall (http://www.webmin.com) but 
Webmin under Bering is a tall order given the Perl requirement.

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby

2003-02-20 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi Dietmar,


 My Problem is that my live-system is a Bering uClibc Disk and i was not
 able to find a compiled uClibc hdparm-binary nor have a clue how to do this
without creating a whole development environment ;-)

I can give it a shot tomorrow evening (CET). I've made the hdsupp 
package (with fdisk and so on) for bering uClibc, and I guess hdparm 
would fit in there too (as I recall, we even discussed that among the 
uClibc developers, but decided against putting that in, since we didn't 
see much use for it (none of us is using real HDs, only CF discs, 
which is probably why we didn't see much use for it.))

I'll let you know when I have a binary (I'm afraid I won't be able to 
test it, since none of my uClibc boxes have a harddisk).

Martin



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Need advice on wireless LAN segment

2003-02-20 Thread John Desmond
Folks-

I am currently using Bering to protect a simple home
LAN:

Internet
 |
ADSL
 |
Bering
 |
Hub
 | |
PCs
(2: 1 Win  1 Lin)

I have to move my Linux machine into a room that has
no easy way to get Cat 5 to it. I'm thinking about
getting a couple of Linksys wireless ethernet bridges
and using their point-to-point capability to connect
the Linux box to the LAN and to disallow other (bad
boyz) to attach. [Or so the brochure would have me
believe.]
My first shot at it looks like this:

Internet
 |
ADSL
 |
Bering
 |
Hub --- WET11 . . . WET11 --- PC(Lin)
 |
PC
(Win)

Assuming this works, how can I encrypt all the traffic
across that link?

Is IPSec a reasonable solution here?

Does the LAN-attached WET11 need to be hung off the
Bering box instead of the hub? (The FreeS/WAN
documentation has about two sentences that apply to
this situation and it shows a gateway machine on the
LAN side.)

Would IPSec encrypt *all* the ethernet chatter on the
link (as, I guess, WEP does) or just that associated
with a particular session with another box on the LAN?

-John


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI

2003-02-20 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello Steve 


 I know this question has probably been posted many times before, but I can't
 seem to find any solution out there.
 
 Does anyone know if there is a publicly available Web-based GUI for
 shorewall?  If so, what's a good one to use?

I have an alpha weblet version that among others supports parts of 
shorewall  
rules, masq, zones and interfaces.
But take care this uses Get and the weblet has to run as root to 
change some of the settings 

As we are trying to update the configuration database, the weblet will 
be also changed  So no guarantee ;) 

http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw/bering/weblet.lrp
some information about the change of the setting in inetd you can 
find at my site
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw 

Regards
Eric Wolzak
member of the bering Crew



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] IDE HD only for booting and switch to standby

2003-02-20 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Martin Hejl wrote:

I can give it a shot tomorrow evening (CET). I've made the hdsupp 
package (with fdisk and so on) for bering uClibc, and I guess hdparm 
would fit in there too (as I recall, we even discussed that among the 
uClibc developers, but decided against putting that in, since we didn't 
see much use for it (none of us is using real HDs, only CF discs, 
which is probably why we didn't see much use for it.))

I'll let you know when I have a binary (I'm afraid I won't be able to 
test it, since none of my uClibc boxes have a harddisk).

You should be able to test it.  hdparm will dump a report on pretty much 
any IDE device.  While you won't be able to test spinning down your 
flash disk, you can run lots of other tests.

I personally find hdparm useful for any system running IDE devices, if 
for nothing else than to verify IDE modes, dma usage (or not), 
read-ahead, multi-sector operation, and the speed tests.  All of these 
should work on pretty much any IDE device, not just a mechanical hard-disk.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI

2003-02-20 Thread Bihari, Steve
I forgot to mention that, yes, I was aware of the Webmin version :)

-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Bihari, Steve
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI


Bihari, Steve wrote:
 I know this question has probably been posted many times before, but I
can't
 seem to find any solution out there.

So you were looking for information about Shorewall and didn't consult 
the Shorewall FAQ?? (http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm) -- your question 
is FAQ #12.

 
 Does anyone know if there is a publicly available Web-based GUI for
 shorewall?  If so, what's a good one to use?
 

The latest Webmin version supports Shorewall (http://www.webmin.com) but 
Webmin under Bering is a tall order given the Perl requirement.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI

2003-02-20 Thread Bihari, Steve
Thanks so much !

-Original Message-
From: Eric Wolzak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Bihari, Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall Web GUI


Hello Steve 


 I know this question has probably been posted many times before, but I
can't
 seem to find any solution out there.
 
 Does anyone know if there is a publicly available Web-based GUI for
 shorewall?  If so, what's a good one to use?

I have an alpha weblet version that among others supports parts of 
shorewall  
rules, masq, zones and interfaces.
But take care this uses Get and the weblet has to run as root to 
change some of the settings 

As we are trying to update the configuration database, the weblet will 
be also changed  So no guarantee ;) 

http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw/bering/weblet.lrp
some information about the change of the setting in inetd you can 
find at my site
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw 

Regards
Eric Wolzak
member of the bering Crew


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: Java and encrypted tunnels for LEAF configuration

2003-02-20 Thread Brad Fritz

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:28:29 PST Matt wrote:

 Lynn Avants wrote:
 
  I just didn't know how tunneling methods were integrated
  into Java other than possibly a call built-into the source.
 
 I think I'm back to my previous question, aren't these
 tunnel programs run as seperate apps from the GUI?

I suppose you could just use a native stunnel, lsh/ssh, putty/plink,
or zebedee binary to setup the tunnel and then send standard Java
socket communications over that tunnel.  A more platform independent,
and arguably more elegant, solution would be to use the Java TLS,
SSH2, or Zedebee libraries to do it all in Java.  Here are links
for the java libraries that support those protocols:

  SSL/TLS:
  Bundled with v1.4 and available as an add-on for earlier JREs.
  http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/

  SSH2:
  JCraft's JSch
  http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/

  Zedebee:
  jzbd
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/zebedee


These libraries should make it straightforward to create the
client-side portion of a platform-independent application or
(signed) applet for remotely configuring a LEAF server.

aside
  Personally, I am more interested in a platform-independent
  tool for pre-deployment configuration...if I ever find the
  time and motivation simultaneously, I hope to write one.
/aside

--Brad



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Telnet question

2003-02-20 Thread Jon Aubrey de Lavenu
Hi

I am trying to install telnet on my bering 1.0 box.

I have got the Telnet.lrp package installed, i have setup inetd.conf and
securetty.

When I try to telnet in I get a message saying error in loading shared
libraries and libncurses.s0.4: cannot open sgared object file: no such
file or directory

And then the client disconects.

Any thoughts/ideas?

Cheers

Jon


1395WU/2.12yrs



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Telnet question

2003-02-20 Thread Jeff Newmiller
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jon Aubrey de Lavenu wrote:

 Hi
 
 I am trying to install telnet on my bering 1.0 box.

Obligatory security warning:  Telnet (the client) is a useful tool for
poking at cleartext protocols.  Using it for anything else is pointless...
ssh is so much more flexible and secure that telnet is obsolete for
normal communication needs.

I don't think it is wise to equip a firewall to poke at cleartext
protocols, but some people might.

 I have got the Telnet.lrp package installed, 

Where did the package come from?  Was it
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/files/kwarchive/telnet.lrp?

 i have setup inetd.conf and securetty.

That is confusing.  Those need to be setup on the machine you are
connecting TO, not the machine you are connecting FROM.

 When I try to telnet in

I am assuming from Bering to something inside your network...

 I get a message saying error in loading shared
 libraries and libncurses.s0.4: cannot open sgared object file: no such
 file or directory

Well, it looks like you should find libncurses.  Have you looked at the
bottom of the page at
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/files/kwarchive/?

 And then the client disconects.

It is not clear that the client ever attempted to connect.

 Any thoughts/ideas?

I am confused, and am hoping you will just use ssh.

---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...2k
---




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Bering/Shorewall and alias interfaces

2003-02-20 Thread Thomas V. Fischer
Hello all,

I have managed to set a virtual/alias interface in the Bering distrib but
shorewall complains and tells me that I have an illegal character in the
interface and says no aliases.

IS there a way around this...

Cheers

---
Thomas Fischer, MCSE  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apple, WinNT, e-Mail, Groupware
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] Bering Kernel Source?

2003-02-20 Thread Nick Taylor
Thanks Peter,

Just one more question:

I've downloaded the source for kernel 2.4.20 from kernel.org.

I'm assuming that using the config file that you pointed me to,
adjusted so that the Math-Emulation flag is on, I should be able
to build the kernel that I need?

The patches that were in the 1.1 directory:

bridge-nf-0.0.7-against-2.4.19.diff.gz
grsecurity-1.9.9c-2.4.20.patch.gz
helpers-2.4.20.patch.gz
linux-2.4.19-openssl-0.9.6b-mppe.patch.gz

I assume that I apply all of these to the 2.4.20 source that I've
obtained? Is that correct? I guess I'm a little confused as some
of these patches appear to be for 2.4.19...

Once I've done all that, I'm also assuming that I can use the
precompiled modules for 2.4.20 without having to worry about
recompiling them too.

Could someone let me know if I'm way off track here?

Thanks

Nick 


 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 19 February 2003 00:59
 To: 'Nick Taylor'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Bering Kernel Source?
 
 
 Hi Nick,
  
  I'd like to try Bering, but only have a 486SX to try it out on,
  so I believe that I'll need to recompile the kernel.
 
 I think this is correct, Bering is compiled for 486DX by default..
 
  The only sources that I can find are for 2.4.18, which was for
  Bering 1.0-RC1. Will this work with 1.1, or will I need to get
  the source for 2.4.20?
 
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/
 
 specifically,
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/developm
 ent/kernel/Ber
 ing-2.4.20.config
 and the packages from the image file are what you'll need.
 
  Not having tried it, can a 2.4 kernel be recompiled to work on
  a 486SX, or am I going to slam into a brick-wall straight away
  on that front?
 
 I think you should be O.K. as long as you recompile your kernel.
 
 Hope that helps,
 
 Peter
 


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Bering/Shorewall and alias interfaces

2003-02-20 Thread Tom Eastep
Thomas V. Fischer wrote:

Hello all,

I have managed to set a virtual/alias interface in the Bering distrib but
shorewall complains and tells me that I have an illegal character in the
interface and says no aliases.

IS there a way around this...


Please see the Shorewall FAQ (http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq18

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] Bering Kernel Source?

2003-02-20 Thread Peter Mueller
Hi Nick,

 I've downloaded the source for kernel 2.4.20 from kernel.org.

great

 I'm assuming that using the config file that you pointed me to,
 adjusted so that the Math-Emulation flag is on, I should be able
 to build the kernel that I need?

mod it however you'd like, but be a little careful with the modules like
iptables (leave them the way they are unless you want to create a custom
modules.lrp).

 The patches that were in the 1.1 directory:
 
 bridge-nf-0.0.7-against-2.4.19.diff.gz
 grsecurity-1.9.9c-2.4.20.patch.gz
 helpers-2.4.20.patch.gz
 linux-2.4.19-openssl-0.9.6b-mppe.patch.gz

I didn't apply these to mine, but you might want them.  I know the
openssl-mppe patch is for PPTP functionality and the bridge-nf is some kind
of unusual bridging patch.  By looking at the source or using google you can
probably find out what the other two are fairly quickly.

 I assume that I apply all of these to the 2.4.20 source that I've
 obtained? Is that correct? I guess I'm a little confused as some
 of these patches appear to be for 2.4.19...

Usually when you see older versions in a CURRENT directory it means the
patches will apply cleanly to the current.  So in this case I would assume
the 2.4.19's will apply against 2.4.20.

 Once I've done all that, I'm also assuming that I can use the
 precompiled modules for 2.4.20 without having to worry about
 recompiling them too.

yes, AFAIK.  if you have problems you can always make modules and replace
the problem modules with ones from your specific build.

 Could someone let me know if I'm way off track here?

AFAIK you're ok.. you're pretty much doing what I did and it worked for me.
Hopefully we're not both off track. ;)

P


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html